2020/10/28

Quaker Theology Group | The mystical nature of Quakerism

Quaker Theology Group | Facebook

Jim Fussell
 shared a link.

badge icon
Admin
 taS1ptongs7orelhd 
“The mystical nature of Quakerism means that my experience may not be yours. But I believe that the roots of Quakerism are not in the steeplehouses and the hierarchies of Christianity. I believe that those roots are in the man who taught us to love one another. It’s that simple and that difficult, writes
Kate McNally
.
24
6 comments
Like
Comment

Comments

  • Excerpt: Our roots nourish us and hold us steady, but we are not our roots. Rather, we grow beyond them. In the same way that early Christians grew from their Jewish roots into something different, Quakers take their Christian roots and grow into something different.
    Me: And now, in the advent of meeting humanoids who live on other planets, we have outgrown our earth-centric roots and we expand to include the galaxy.
    2
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 17 h
    • Edited
  • True
    Our diversity should not divide us
    Jesus Christ is our source and like a tree with many root serving a common tree, let's use our gifts and talents well
    1
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 17 h
  • I’m not persuaded that Quakerism has a “mystical nature.” It is a diverse religious group that includes some mystics. I urge open-minded Friends to read & ponder the classic 1916 pamphlet, “The Appeal of Quakerism to the Non-Mystic,” for an explanation & testimony:
    The Appeal of Quakerism to The Non-Mystic
    AFRIENDLYLETTER.COM
    The Appeal of Quakerism to The Non-Mystic
    The Appeal of Quakerism to The Non-Mystic
    1
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 14 h
  • But that man never saw a steeplehouse or spoke of a hierarchy. His roots were in the instant of creation....and before the word. Mysticism helps us apprehend what we & he might have in common.
    2
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 14 h
    • Edited
  • badge icon
    Thank you so much for this, Jim. This description of the Quaker ‘version’ of Christianity articulates better than I could what I have come to believe.
    1
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 14 h
  • "A comprehended god is no god."
    - John Chrysostom (c. 347 – 14 September 407)
    John Chrysostom - Wikipedia
    EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
    John Chrysostom - Wikipedia
    John Chrysostom - Wikipedia
    2
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 13 h


---
Jim Fussell shared a link.
badge icon
Admin
  · taS1ptongs7orelhd  · 
“The mystical nature of Quakerism means that my experience may not be yours. But I believe that the roots of Quakerism are not in the steeplehouses and the hierarchies of Christianity. I believe that those roots are in the man who taught us to love one another. It’s that simple and that difficult, writes Kate McNally.
‘Our roots nourish us and hold us steady, but we are not our roots.’
THEFRIEND.ORG
‘Our roots nourish us and hold us steady, but we are not our roots.’
The Religious Society of Friends is rooted in Christianity and has always found inspiration in the life and teachings of Jesus. How do you interpret your faith...
Comments
Elliott Robertson
Excerpt: Our roots nourish us and hold us steady, but we are not our roots. Rather, we grow beyond them. In the same way that early Christians grew from their Jewish roots into something different, Quakers take their Christian roots and grow into something different.
Me: And now, in the advent of meeting humanoids who live on other planets, we have outgrown our earth-centric roots and we expand to include the galaxy.
 · Reply · 17 h · Edited
Pst Zadock Vidolo
True
Our diversity should not divide us
Jesus Christ is our source and like a tree with many root serving a common tree, let's use our gifts and talents well
 · Reply · 17 h
Chuck Fager
I’m not persuaded that Quakerism has a “mystical nature.” It is a diverse religious group that includes some mystics. I urge open-minded Friends to read & ponder the classic 1916 pamphlet, “The Appeal of Quakerism to the Non-Mystic,” for an explanation & testimony:
https://wp.me/p5FGIu-pX
The Appeal of Quakerism to The Non-Mystic
AFRIENDLYLETTER.COM
The Appeal of Quakerism to The Non-Mystic
The Appeal of Quakerism to The Non-Mystic
 · Reply · 14 h
Bill Powell
But that man never saw a steeplehouse or spoke of a hierarchy. His roots were in the instant of creation....and before the word. Mysticism helps us apprehend what we & he might have in common.
 · Reply · 14 h · Edited
Muriel Edgerton
badge icon
Thank you so much for this, Jim. This description of the Quaker ‘version’ of Christianity articulates better than I could what I have come to believe.
 · Reply · 14 h
David Tehr
"A comprehended god is no god."
- John Chrysostom (c. 347 – 14 September 407)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Chrysostom
John Chrysostom - Wikipedia
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
John Chrysostom - Wikipedia
John Chrysostom - Wikipedia
 · Reply · 13 h
---
‘Our roots nourish us and hold us steady, but we are not our roots.’
22 Oct 2020 | by Kate McNally

Thought for the week: Kate McNally comes to Jesus


'I often think about Jesus – the man, not the Christ.' | Photo: by Scott Rodgerson on Unsplash.
The Religious Society of Friends is rooted in Christianity and has always found inspiration in the life and teachings of Jesus. How do you interpret your faith in the light of this heritage? How does Jesus speak to you today? Are you following Jesus’ example of love in action? Are you learning from his life the reality and cost of obedience to God? How does his relationship with God challenge and inspire you? (Advices & queries 4)

We are taught that Quakerism is rooted in Christianity without much explanation of what that means. Just as early Christianity was rooted in Judaism, we are rooted in Christianity. It is our spiritual culture, our grounding, the language we use to describe our experiences with God.

Our roots nourish us and hold us steady, but we are not our roots. Rather, we grow beyond them. In the same way that early Christians grew from their Jewish roots into something different, Quakers take their Christian roots and grow into something different. Jesus was rooted in his family, in his culture and in his religion. They informed every aspect of his life. But he was not only that culture – he went beyond it. He even rejected large parts of it.

I can’t claim to be a student of the Bible, but I’m pretty sure that Jesus never said: ‘Pick up your cross and worship me’. I think what he said was ‘follow me’. Do what I do: tend the sick, feed the hungry, welcome the stranger. I believe that the Quaker form of worship helps us to connect to our roots and then go beyond them to ‘let our lives speak’; to work for the world we want to see.

Gandhi is often quoted as saying: ‘Your Christians are so unlike your Christ’. Quakerism began as a return to early Christianity, to the work of Jesus. At our best, Quakers continue to do this, to follow the one who said that we need to love one another.

I often think about Jesus – the man, not the Christ. I wonder, for example, what kind of accent did he have and what did that say about him? How did he part his hair? What did he call his mum? We hear he was a carpenter – was there one piece he created that he was particularly proud of? Did he like his work? What did he say when he smashed his thumb with a hammer? What was his favorite colour? His favourite meal? His favourite swear word? Could he swim? There is so much we do not know about this man and about the things that formed him to be the one we still talk about 2,000 years after his death.

One of the things that first attracted me to Quakers is the notion that revelation didn’t stop 2,000 years ago. It continues today, as Friends wait for divine inspiration and then share ministry with each other and with the world.

What does this mean, then? The mystical nature of Quakerism means that my experience may not be yours. But I believe that the roots of Quakerism are not in the steeplehouses and the hierarchies of Christianity. I believe that those roots are in the man who taught us to love one another. It’s that simple and that difficult.
---
The Appeal of Quakerism to the Non-Mystic
Can you be a Quaker in  the 21st century (especially a Liberal one), and not be a mystic?

Yes. And that’s been true for a LONG time. A century ago, in 1916, a noted British Friend made this case (but he was not the first or the last) in a striking pamphlet that unfortunately is little-known today.

To help relieve this work’s obscurity, we present it here; just click on the title below.

Take it away, William!

Littleboy-Appeal-of-Quakerism-to-the-Non-Mystic
---

John Chrysostom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Saint John Chrysostom
Johnchrysostom.jpg
Byzantine mosaic of John Chrysostom
from the Hagia Sophia
East: Great Hierarch and Ecumenical Teacher
West: Bishop and Doctor of the Church
Bornc. 347[1]
Antioch
Died14 September 407
(aged c. 58)[2]
Comana in Pontus[3]
Venerated inCatholic Church
Eastern Orthodox Church
Oriental Orthodoxy
Assyrian Church of the East
Ancient Church of the East
Anglican Communion
Lutheranism[4]
CanonizedPre-congregational
FeastByzantine Christianity

13 November (celebration transferred from 14 September)
27 January (Translation of Relics)
30 January (Three Holy Hierarchs)
Coptic Christianity
17 Hathor (Departure)
16 Thout (Translocation of Relics)
12 Pashons (Commemoration of Relocation of Relics from Comana to Constantinople AD 437)

Western Christianity
13 September; 27 January
AttributesVested as a Bishop, holding a Gospel Book or scroll, right hand raised in blessing. He is depicted as emaciated from fasting, with a high forehead, balding with dark hair and a small beard. Symbolsbeehive, a white dove, a pan,[5][unreliable source?] chalice on a biblepen and inkhorn[citation needed]
PatronageConstantinopleeducationepilepsylecturersoratorspreachers [5][unreliable source?]

John Chrysostom (/ˈkrɪsəstəm, krɪˈsɒstəm/GreekἸωάννης ὁ Χρυσόστομοςc. 347 – 14 September 407),[6] was an important Early Church Father who served as Archbishop of Constantinople. He is known for his preaching and public speaking, his denunciation of abuse of authority[7] by both ecclesiastical and political leaders, the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom, and his ascetic sensibilities. The epithet Χρυσόστομος (Chrysostomos, anglicized as Chrysostom) means "golden-mouthed" in Greek and denotes his celebrated eloquence.[2][8] Chrysostom was among the most prolific authors in the early Christian Church, exceeded only by Augustine of Hippo in the quantity of his surviving writings.[9]

He is honoured as a saint in the Oriental OrthodoxEastern OrthodoxCatholicAnglican, and Lutheran churches, as well as in some others. The Eastern Orthodox, together with the Byzantine Catholics, hold him in special regard as one of the Three Holy Hierarchs (alongside Basil the Great and Gregory of Nazianzus). The feast days of John Chrysostom in the Eastern Orthodox Church are 13 November and 27 January. In the Roman Catholic Church he is recognized as a Doctor of the Church. Because the date of his death is occupied by the feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross (14 September), the General Roman Calendar celebrates him since 1970 on the previous day, 13 September; from the 13th century to 1969 it did so on 27 January, the anniversary of the translation of his body to Constantinople.[10] Of other Western churches, including Anglican provinces and Lutheran churches, some commemorate him on 13 September, others on 27 January. The Coptic Church also recognizes him as a saint (with feast days on 16 Thout and 17 Hathor).[11]

Biography[edit]

Early life and education[edit]

John was born in Antioch in 347[12][13] to Greek parents from Syria.[citation needed] Different scholars describe his mother Anthusa as a pagan[14] or as a Christian, and his father was a high-ranking military officer.[15] John's father died soon after his birth and he was raised by his mother. He was baptised in 368 or 373 and tonsured as a reader (one of the minor orders of the Church). It is sometimes said that he was bitten by a snake when he was ten years old, leading to him getting an infection from the bite.[16]

As a result of his mother's influential connections in the city, John began his education under the pagan teacher Libanius.[17] From Libanius, John acquired the skills for a career in rhetoric, as well as a love of the Greek language and literature.[18]

As he grew older, however, John became more deeply committed to Christianity and went on to study theology under Diodore of Tarsus, founder of the re-constituted School of Antioch. According to the Christian historian Sozomen, Libanius was supposed to have said on his deathbed that John would have been his successor "if the Christians had not taken him from us".[19]

John lived in extreme asceticism and became a hermit in about 375; he spent the next two years continually standing, scarcely sleeping, and committing the Bible to memory. As a consequence of these practices, his stomach and kidneys were permanently damaged and poor health forced him to return to Antioch.[20]

Diaconate and service in Antioch[edit]

John was ordained as a deacon in 381 by Saint Meletius of Antioch who was not then in communion with Alexandria and Rome. After the death of Meletius, John separated himself from the followers of Meletius, without joining Paulinus, the rival of Meletius for the bishopric of Antioch. But after the death of Paulinus he was ordained a presbyter (priest) in 386 by Flavian, the successor of Paulinus.[21] He was destined later to bring about reconciliation between Flavian I of Antioch, Alexandria, and Rome, thus bringing those three sees into communion for the first time in nearly seventy years.[22]

In Antioch, over the course of twelve years (386–397), John gained popularity because of the eloquence of his public speaking at the Golden Church, Antioch's cathedral, especially his insightful expositions of Bible passages and moral teaching. The most valuable of his works from this period are his Homilies on various books of the Bible. He emphasised charitable giving and was concerned with the spiritual and temporal needs of the poor. He spoke against abuse of wealth and personal property:

Do you wish to honour the body of Christ? Do not ignore him when he is naked. Do not pay him homage in the temple clad in silk, only then to neglect him outside where he is cold and ill-clad. He who said: "This is my body" is the same who said: "You saw me hungry and you gave me no food", and "Whatever you did to the least of my brothers you did also to me"... What good is it if the Eucharistic table is overloaded with golden chalices when your brother is dying of hunger? Start by satisfying his hunger and then with what is left you may adorn the altar as well.[23]

His straightforward understanding of the Scriptures – in contrast to the Alexandrian tendency towards allegorical interpretation – meant that the themes of his talks were practical, explaining the Bible's application to everyday life. Such straightforward preaching helped Chrysostom to garner popular support.[2]

One incident that happened during his service in Antioch illustrates the influence of his homilies. When Chrysostom arrived in Antioch, Flavian, the bishop of the city, had to intervene with Emperor Theodosius I on behalf of citizens who had gone on a rampage mutilating statues of the Emperor and his family. During the weeks of Lent in 387, John preached more than twenty homilies in which he entreated the people to see the error of their ways. These made a lasting impression on the general population of the city: many pagans converted to Christianity as a result of the homilies. The city was ultimately spared from severe consequences.[7]

Archbishop of Constantinople[edit]

John Chrysostom confronting Aelia Eudoxia, in a 19th-century painting by Jean-Paul Laurens

In the autumn of 397, John was appointed Archbishop of Constantinople, after having been nominated without his knowledge by the eunuch Eutropius. He had to leave Antioch in secret due to fears that the departure of such a popular figure would cause civil unrest.[24]

During his time as Archbishop he adamantly refused to host lavish social gatherings, which made him popular with the common people, but unpopular with wealthy citizens and the clergy. His reforms of the clergy were also unpopular. He told visiting regional preachers to return to the churches they were meant to be serving—without any payout.[25]. Also he founded a number of hospitals in Constantinople.[26][27]

His time in Constantinople was more tumultuous than his time in Antioch. Theophilus, the Patriarch of Alexandria, wanted to bring Constantinople under his sway and opposed John's appointment to Constantinople. Theophilus had disciplined four Egyptian monks (known as "the Tall Brothers") over their support of Origen's teachings. They fled to John and were welcomed by him. Theophilus therefore accused John of being too partial to the teaching of Origen. He made another enemy in Aelia Eudoxia, wife of Emperor Arcadius, who assumed that John's denunciations of extravagance in feminine dress were aimed at herself.[7] Eudoxia, Theophilus and other of his enemies held a synod in 403 (the Synod of the Oak) to charge John, in which his connection to Origen was used against him. It resulted in his deposition and banishment. He was called back by Arcadius almost immediately, as the people became "tumultuous" over his departure, even threatening to burn the imperial palace.[28][unreliable source?] There was an earthquake the night of his arrest, which Eudoxia took for a sign of God's anger, prompting her to ask Arcadius for John's reinstatement.[29][unreliable source?]

Peace was short-lived. A silver statue of Eudoxia was erected in the Augustaion, near his cathedral. John denounced the dedication ceremonies as pagan and spoke against the Empress in harsh terms: "Again Herodias raves; again she is troubled; she dances again; and again desires to receive John's head in a charger",[30][unreliable source?] an allusion to the events surrounding the death of John the Baptist. Once again he was banished, this time to the Caucasus in Abkhazia.[31][page needed]

Around 405, John began to lend moral and financial support to Christian monks who were enforcing the emperors' anti-Pagan laws, by destroying temples and shrines in Phoenicia and nearby regions.[32][unreliable source?]

Exile and death[edit]

The causes of John's exile are not clear, though Jennifer Barry suggests that they have to do with his connections to Arianism. Other historians, including Wendy Mayer and Geoffrey Dunn, have argued that "the surplus of evidence reveals a struggle between Johannite and anti-Johannite camps in Constantinople soon after John's departure and for a few years after his death".[33] Faced with exile, John Chrysostom wrote an appeal for help to three churchmen: Pope Innocent IVenerius the Bishop of Milan, and the third to Chromatius, the Bishop of Aquileia.[34][35][36] In 1872, church historian William Stephens wrote:

The Patriarch of the Eastern Rome appeals to the great bishops of the West, as the champions of an ecclesiastical discipline which he confesses himself unable to enforce, or to see any prospect of establishing. No jealousy is entertained of the Patriarch of the Old Rome by the Patriarch of the New Rome. The interference of Innocent is courted, a certain primacy is accorded him, but at the same time he is not addressed as a supreme arbitrator; assistance and sympathy are solicited from him as from an elder brother, and two other prelates of Italy are joint recipients with him of the appeal.[37]

Pope Innocent I protested John's banishment from Constantinople to the town of Cucusus in Cappadocia, but to no avail. Innocent sent a delegation to intercede on behalf of John in 405. It was led by Gaudentius of Brescia; Gaudentius and his companions, two bishops, encountered many difficulties and never reached their goal of entering Constantinople.[38]

John wrote letters which still held great influence in Constantinople. As a result of this, he was further exiled from Cucusus (where he stayed from 404 to 407) to Pitiunt (Pityus) (in modern Georgia) where his tomb is a shrine for pilgrims. He never reached this destination, as he died at Comana Pontica on 14 September 407 during the journey. His last words are said to have been "δόξα τῷ θεῷ πάντων ἕνεκεν" (Glory be to God for all things).[29]

Veneration and canonization[edit]

Byzantine 11th-century soapstone relief of John Chrysostom, Louvre

John came to be venerated as a saint soon after his death. Almost immediately after, an anonymous supporter of John (known as pseudo-Martyrius) wrote a funeral oration to reclaim John as a symbol of Christian orthodoxy.[33] But three decades later, some of his adherents in Constantinople remained in schism.[39] Saint Proclus, Patriarch of Constantinople (434–446), hoping to bring about the reconciliation of the Johannites, preached a homily praising his predecessor in the Church of Hagia Sophia. He said, "O John, your life was filled with sorrow, but your death was glorious. Your grave is blessed and reward is great, by the grace and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ O graced one, having conquered the bounds of time and place! Love has conquered space, unforgetting memory has annihilated the limits, and place does not hinder the miracles of the saint."[40]

These homilies helped to mobilize public opinion, and the patriarch received permission from the emperor to return Chrysostom's relics to Constantinople, where they were enshrined in the Church of the Holy Apostles on 28 January 438. The Eastern Orthodox Church commemorates him as a "Great Ecumenical Teacher", with Basil the Great and Gregory the Theologian. These three saints, in addition to having their own individual commemorations throughout the year, are commemorated together on 30 January, a feast known as the Synaxis of the Three Hierarchs.[41]

In the Eastern Orthodox Church there are several feast days dedicated to him:

  • 27 January, Translation of the relics of Saint John Chrysostom from Comana to Constantinople
  • 30 January, Synaxis of the Three Great Hierarchs
  • 14 September, Repose of Saint John Chrysostom
  • 13 November, celebration was transferred from 14 September[42].

Writings[edit]

Homilies[edit]

Paschal Homily[edit]

The Byzantine emperor Nicephorus III receives a book of homilies from John Chrysostom; the Archangel Michael stands on his left (11th-century illuminated manuscript).

The best known of his many homilies is an extremely brief one, the Paschal Homily (Hieratikon), which is read at the first service of Pascha (Easter), the midnight Orthros (Matins), in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

General[edit]

Chrysostom's extant homiletical works are vast, including many hundreds of exegetical homilies on both the New Testament (especially the works of Saint Paul) and the Old Testament (particularly on Genesis). Among his extant exegetical works are sixty-seven homilies on Genesis, fifty-nine on the Psalms, ninety on the Gospel of Matthew, eighty-eight on the Gospel of John, and fifty-five on the Acts of the Apostles.[43]

The homilies were written down by stenographers and subsequently circulated, revealing a style that tended to be direct and greatly personal, but formed by the rhetorical conventions of his time and place.[44] In general, his homiletical theology displays much characteristic of the Antiochian school (i.e., somewhat more literal in interpreting Biblical events), but he also uses a good deal of the allegorical interpretation more associated with the Alexandrian school.[43]

John's social and religious world was formed by the continuing and pervasive presence of paganism in the life of the city. One of his regular topics was the paganism in the culture of Constantinople, and in his homilies he thunders against popular pagan amusements: the theatrehorseraces, and the revelry surrounding holidays.[45] In particular, he criticizes Christians for taking part in such activities:

If you ask [Christians] who is Amos or Obadiah, how many apostles there were or prophets, they stand mute; but if you ask them about the horses or drivers, they answer with more solemnity than sophists or rhetors.[46]

One of the recurring features of John's homilies is his emphasis on care for the needy.[47] Echoing themes found in the Gospel of Matthew, he calls upon the rich to lay aside materialism in favor of helping the poor, often employing all of his rhetorical skills to shame wealthy people to abandon conspicuous consumption:

Do you pay such honor to your excrements as to receive them into a silver chamber-pot when another man made in the image of God is perishing in the cold?[48]

Along these lines, he wrote often about the need for almsgiving and its importance alongside fasting and prayer, e.g. “Prayer without almsgiving is unfruitful.”[49]

Homilies against Jews and Judaizing Christians[edit]

During his first two years as a presbyter in Antioch (386–387), John denounced Jews and Judaizing Christians in a series of eight homilies delivered to Christians in his congregation who were taking part in Jewish festivals and other Jewish observances.[50] It is disputed whether the main target were specifically Judaizers or Jews in general. His homilies were expressed in the conventional manner, utilizing the uncompromising rhetorical form known as the psogos (Greek: blame, censure).[citation needed]

One of the purposes of these homilies was to prevent Christians from participating in Jewish customs, and thus prevent the perceived erosion of Chrysostom's flock. In his homilies, John criticized those "Judaizing Christians", who were participating in Jewish festivals and taking part in other Jewish observances, such as the shabbat, submitted to circumcision and made pilgrimage to Jewish holy places.[51] There had been a revival of Jewish faith and tolerance in Antioch in 361, so Chrysostom's followers and the greater Christian community were in contact with Jews frequently, and Chrysostom was concerned that this interaction would draw Christians away from their faith identity.[52]

John claimed that synagogues were full of Christians, especially Christian women, on the shabbats and Jewish festivals, because they loved the solemnity of the Jewish liturgy and enjoyed listening to the shofar on Rosh Hashanah, and applauded famous preachers in accordance with the contemporary custom.[53] A more recent theory is that he instead tried to persuade Jewish Christians, who for centuries had kept connections with Jews and Judaism, to choose between Judaism and Christianity.[54] He also refers to Jews as outsiders, illnesses, idolaters, lewd, and beast-like. [55]

Due to Chrysostom's stature in the Christian church, both locally and within the greater church hierarchy, his sermons were fairly successful in spreading anti-Jewish sentiment. This prompted the introduction of anti-Jewish legislation and social regulations, increasing the separation between the two communities. Despite being in a pluralistic world, Chrysostom and many other early Christians aimed to establish a community that was distinct from all others, and limited the presence of non-Christians.[citation needed]

Since there were only two other ordained individuals in Antioch who were legally recognized as able to preach Christianity, Chrysostom was able to reach a majority of the local population, especially with his skills in the art of orating. [56] He held great social and political power in Antioch, and was able to determine where one was or was not allowed to physically go; he frequently spoke about acts of violence taking place in Jewish spaces to dissuade Christians from going there. [57]

In Greek the homilies are called Kata Ioudaiōn (Κατὰ Ἰουδαίων), which is translated as Adversus Judaeos in Latin and Against the Jews in English.[58] The original Benedictine editor of the homilies, Bernard de Montfaucon, gives the following footnote to the title: "A discourse against the Jews; but it was delivered against those who were Judaizing and keeping the fasts with them [the Jews]."[58]

According to Patristics scholars, opposition to any particular view during the late 4th century was conventionally expressed in a manner, utilizing the rhetorical form known as the psogos, whose literary conventions were to vilify opponents in an uncompromising manner; thus, it has been argued that to call Chrysostom an "anti-Semite" is to employ anachronistic terminology in a way incongruous with historical context and record.[59] This does not preclude assertions that Chrysostom's theology was a form of Anti-Jewish supersessionism.[60]

Anglican priest James Parkes called Chrysostom's writing on Jews "the most horrible and violent denunciations of Judaism to be found in the writings of a Christian theologian".[61] According to historian William I. Brustein, his sermons against Jews gave further momentum to the idea that Jews are collectively responsible for the death of Jesus.[62] Steven Katz cites Chrysostom's homilies as “the decisive turn in the history of Christian anti-Judaism, a turn whose ultimate disfiguring consequence was enacted in the political antisemitism of Adolf Hitler.”[63]

Homily against homosexuality[edit]

According to Robert H. Allen, "Chrysostom's learning and eloquence spans and sums up a long age of ever-growing moral outrage, fear and loathing of homosexuality."[64] His most notable discourse in this regard is his fourth homily on Romans 1:26–27, where he argues as follows:

All these affections then were vile, but chiefly the mad lust after males; for the soul is more the sufferer in sins, and more dishonored, than the body in diseases. ... [The men] have done an insult to nature itself. And a yet more disgraceful thing than these is it, when even the women seek after these intercourses, who ought to have more sense of shame than men.[65]

He says the active male victimizes the passive male in a way that leaves him more enduringly dishonored than even a victim of murder, since the victim of this act must "live under" the shame of the "insolency".[65] The victim of a murder, by contrast, carries no dishonor. He asserts that punishment will be found in hell for such transgressors, and that women can be guilty of the sin as much as men. Chrysostom argues that the male passive partner has effectively renounced his manhood and become a woman – such an individual deserves to be "driven out and stoned". He attributes the cause to "luxury". "Do not, he means (Paul), because you have heard that they burned, suppose that the evil was only in desire. For the greater part of it came of their luxuriousness, which also kindled into flame their lust".[65]

According to scholar Michael Carden, Chrysostom was particularly influential in shaping early Christian thought that same-sex desire was an evil – altering the traditional interpretation of Sodom as a place of inhospitality, to one where the sexual transgressions of the Sodomites became paramount.[66] Allen describes the sermon as the "climax and consummation of homophobia in the late classical world".[67]

Treatises[edit]

Apart from his homilies, a number of John's other treatises have had a lasting influence. One such work is John's early treatise Against Those Who Oppose the Monastic Life, written while he was a deacon (sometime before 386), which was directed to parents, pagan as well as Christian, whose sons were contemplating a monastic vocation.[68] Chrysostom wrote that, already in his day, it was customary for Antiochenes to send their sons to be educated by monks.[69]

Another important treatise written by John is titled On the Priesthood (written 390/391, it contains in Book 1 an account of his early years and a defence of his flight from ordination by Bishop Meletios of Antioch, and then proceeds in later books to expound on his exalted understanding of the priesthood). Two other notable books by John are Instructions to Catechumens and On the Incomprehensibility of the Divine Nature.[70] In addition, he wrote a series of letters to the deaconess Olympias, of which seventeen are extant.[71]

Liturgy[edit]

Beyond his preaching, the other lasting legacy of John is his influence on Christian liturgy. Two of his writings are particularly notable. He harmonized the liturgical life of the Church by revising the prayers and rubrics of the Divine Liturgy, or celebration of the Holy Eucharist. To this day, Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholic Churches of the Byzantine Rite typically celebrate the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom as the normal Eucharistic liturgy, although his exact connection with it remains a matter of debate among experts.[72]

Legacy and influence[edit]

A sculpture of John Chrysostom in Saint Patrick's Cathedral, New York City

During a time when city clergy were subject to criticism for their high lifestyle, John was determined to reform his clergy in Constantinople. These efforts were met with resistance and limited success. He was an excellent preacher[72] whose homilies and writings are still studied and quoted. As a theologian, he has been and continues to be very important in Eastern Christianity, and is generally considered among the Three Holy Hierarchs of the Greek Church, but has been less important to Western Christianity. His writings have survived to the present day more so than any of the other Greek Fathers.[2]

Influence on the Catechism of the Catholic Church and clergy[edit]

John's influence on church teachings is interwoven throughout the current Catechism of the Catholic Church (revised 1992).[citation needed] The Catechism cites him in eighteen sections, particularly his reflections on the purpose of prayer and the meaning of the Lord's Prayer:[citation needed]

Consider how [Jesus Christ] teaches us to be humble, by making us see that our virtue does not depend on our work alone but on grace from on high. He commands each of the faithful who prays to do so universally, for the whole world. For he did not say "thy will be done in me or in us", but "on earth", the whole earth, so that error may be banished from it, truth take root in it, all vice be destroyed on it, virtue flourish on it, and earth no longer differ from heaven.[73]

Christian clerics, such as R. S. Storr, refer to him as "one of the most eloquent preachers who ever since apostolic times have brought to men the divine tidings of truth and love", and the 19th-century John Henry Newman described John as a "bright, cheerful, gentle soul; a sensitive heart".[74]

Music and literature[edit]

John's liturgical legacy has inspired several musical compositions. Particularly noteworthy[citation needed] are Sergei Rachmaninoff's Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, Op. 31, composed in 1910,[75] one of his two major unaccompanied choral works; Pyotr Tchaikovsky's Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, Op. 41; and Ukrainian composer Kyrylo Stetsenko's Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom. Arvo Pärt's Litany sets Chrysostom's twenty-four prayers, one for each hour of the day,[76] for soli, mixed choir and orchestra. And the compositions of Alexander Grechaninovs "Liturgy of Johannes Chrysostomos No. 1, Op. 13 (1897)", "Liturgy of Johannes Chrysostomos No. 2, Op.29 (1902)", "Liturgia Domestica (Liturgy Johannes Chrysostomos No. 3), Op. 79 (1917)" and "Liturgy of Johannes Chrysostomos No. 4, Op. 177 (1943)" are noteworthy.[citation needed]

James Joyce's novel Ulysses includes a character named Mulligan who brings 'Chrysostomos' into another character (Stephen Dedalus)'s mind because Mulligan's gold-stopped teeth and his gift of the gab earn him the title which St. John Chrysostom's preaching earned him, 'golden-mouthed':[77] "[Mulligan] peered sideways up and gave a long low whistle of call, then paused awhile in rapt attention, his even white teeth glistening here and there with gold points. Chrysostomos."[78]

The legend of the penance of Saint John Chrysostom[edit]

The Penance of St. John Chrysostom. Engraving by Lucas Cranach the Elder, 1509. The saint can be seen in the background on all fours, whilst the princess and their baby dominate the foreground.

A late medieval legend (not included in the Golden Legend) relates that, when John Chrysostom was a hermit in the desert, he was approached by a royal princess in distress.[citation needed][79] The Saint, thinking she was a demon, at first refused to help her, but the princess convinced him that she was a Christian and would be devoured by wild beasts if she were not allowed to enter his cave. He therefore admitted her, carefully dividing the cave in two parts, one for each of them. In spite of these precautions, the sin of fornication was committed, and in an attempt to hide it the distraught saint took the princess and threw her over a precipice. He then went to Rome to beg absolution, which was refused. Realising the appalling nature of his crimes, Chrysostom made a vow that he would never rise from the ground until his sins were expiated, and for years he lived like a beast, crawling on all fours and feeding on wild grasses and roots. Subsequently, the princess reappeared, alive, and suckling the saint's baby, who miraculously pronounced his sins forgiven. This last scene was very popular from the late 15th century onwards as a subject for engravers and artists.[citation needed] The theme was depicted by Albrecht Dürer around 1496,[80] Hans Sebald Beham and Lucas Cranach the Elder, among others. Martin Luther mocked this same legend in his Die Lügend von S. Johanne Chrysostomo (1537).[81][82] The legend was recorded in Croatia in the 16th century.[83][non-primary source needed]

Relics[edit]

The return of the relics of Saint John Chrysostom to the Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople

John Chrysostom died in the city of Comana in the year 407 on his way to his place of exile. There his relics remained until 438 when, thirty years after his death, they were transferred to Constantinople during the reign of the Empress Eudoxia's son, the Emperor Theodosius II (408–450), under the guidance of John's disciple, St. Proclus, who by that time had become Archbishop of Constantinople (434–447).[citation needed]

Most of John's relics were looted from Constantinople by Crusaders in 1204 and taken to Rome, but some of his bones were returned to the Orthodox Church on 27 November 2004 by Pope John Paul II.[84][85][86]. Since 2004 the relics have been enshrined in the Church of St. George, Istanbul.[87]

The skull, however, having been kept at the monastery at Vatopedi on Mount Athos in northern Greece, was not among the relics that were taken by the crusaders in the 13th century. In 1655, at the request of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, the skull was taken to Russia, for which the monastery was compensated in the sum of 2000 rubles. In 1693, having received a request from the Vatopedi Monastery for the return of Saint John's skull, Tsar Peter the Great ordered that the skull remain in Russia but that the monastery was to be paid 500 rubles every four years. The Russian state archives document these payments up until 1735. The skull was kept at the Moscow Kremlin, in the Cathedral of the Dormition of the Mother of God, until 1920, when it was confiscated by the Soviets and placed in the Museum of Silver Antiquities. In 1988, in connection with the 1000th Anniversary of the Baptism of Russia, the head, along with other important relics, was returned to the Russian Orthodox Church and kept at the Epiphany Cathedral, until being moved to the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour after its restoration.[citation needed]

Today, the monastery at Vatopedi posits a rival claim to possessing the skull of John Chrysostom, and there a skull is venerated by pilgrims to the monastery as that of Saint John. Two sites in Italy also claim to have the saint's skull: the Basilica di Santa Maria del Fiore in Florence and the Dal Pozzo chapel in Pisa. The right hand of Saint John[88][unreliable source?] is preserved on Mount Athos, and numerous smaller relics are scattered throughout the world.[89]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ The exact date of John's birth is in question, and dates between 344 and 349 are given. In the most recent general biography of Chrysostom, eminent patristics scholar JND Kelly, after a review of the evidence and literature, favours 349 as the date that best fits all available evidence, in agreement with Robert Carter. See Kelly, Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom: Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop, (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic 1998: originally published Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), p. 4 fn. 12; esp. Appendix B passim. For a discussion of alternatives presented in the literature, see Robert Carter, "The Chronology of St. John Chrysostom's Early Life", in Traditio 18:357–64 (1962); Jean Dumortier, "La valeur historique du dialogue de Palladius et la chronologie de saint Jean Chrysostome", in Mélanges de science religieuse, 8:51–56 (1951). Carter dates his birth to the year 349. See also Robert Louis Wilken, John Chrysostom and the Jews: Rhetoric and Reality in the Late Fourth Century, (Berkeley: University of California Press: 1983), p. 5.
  2. Jump up to:a b c d "St John Chrysostom" profile, Catholic Encyclopedia (see here); retrieved 20 March 2007.
  3. ^ "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: St. John Chrysostom"www.newadvent.org.
  4. ^ "Notable Lutheran Saints"Resurrectionpeople.org.
  5. Jump up to:a b "Catholic-forum.com". Archived from the original on 17 January 2008.
  6. ^ The exact date of John's birth is in question, and dates between 344 and 349 are often given, and limits set at 340 and 350 (Kelly 296). In the most recent general biography of Chrysostom, eminent patristics scholar JND Kelly, after a review of the evidence and literature, favours 349 as the date that best fits all available evidence, in agreement with Robert Carter. See Kelly, Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom: Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 1998: originally published Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), p. 4 fn. 12; esp. 296–298 passim. For a concurring analysis which is followed in most recent reconstructions of the early life of Chrysostomos, see Robert Carter, "The Chronology of St. John Chrysostom's Early Life", in Traditio 18:357–64 (1962). For a discussion of alternatives, often in older literature, see especially G. Ettlinger, Traditio 16 (1960), pp. 373–80, Jean Dumortier, "La valeur historique du dialogue de Palladius et la chronologie de saint Jean Chrysostome", Mélanges de science religieuse, 8:51–56 (1951)
  7. Jump up to:a b c Robert Wilken, "John Chrysostom" profile, Encyclopedia of Early Christianity (ed. Everett Ferguson), New York: Garland Publishing, 1997
  8. ^ Pope VigiliusConstitution of Pope Vigilius, pg. 553
  9. ^ Writings of Chrysostom in the Christian Classics Ethereal Libraryedition of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers:. Six full volumes by Chysostom, compared to eight full volumes for Augustine.
  10. ^ "Calendarium Romanum" (in Latin). Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis. 1969. pp. 102–103. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  11. ^ Coptic synaxarium Archived 27 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ Donald Attwater. "St. John Chrysostom – archbishop of Constantinople"Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
  13. ^ "Saint John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople"The Orthodox Faith – Lives of the Saints. The Orthodox Church in America. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
  14. ^ "John Chrysostom", Encyclopaedia Judaica
  15. ^ The Encyclopaedia Judaica describes Chrysostom's mother as a pagan. In Pauline Allen and Wendy Mayer, John Chrysostom (pg. 5), she is described as a Christian.
  16. ^ Wilken (p. 7) prefers 368 for the date of Chrysostom's baptism, the Encyclopaedia Judaica prefers the later date of 373.
  17. ^ Cameron, Averil (1998) "Education and literary culture" in Cameron, A. and Garnsey, P. (eds.) The Cambridge ancient history: Vol. XIII The late empire, A.D. 337–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pg. 668.
  18. ^ Wilken, pg. 5.
  19. ^ Sozomen (1995) [1890]. "Ecclesiastical History of Sozomen, Book VIII, Chapter II: Education, Training, Conduct, and Wisdom of the Great John Chrysostom". In Schaff, Philip; Wace, Henry (eds.). Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Volume II: Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories (reprint ed.). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers. p. 399. ISBN 1-56563-118-8. Retrieved 29 March 2007.
  20. ^ Allen, Pauline & Wendy Mayer, John Chrysostom, Routledge: 2000, pg. 6
  21. ^ Scholasticus, Socrates. Ecclesiastical History, VI, 3
  22. ^ Philip Hughes, History of the Church, Sheed and Ward, 1934, vol I, pp. 231–232.
  23. ^ Chrysostom, John. In Evangelium S. Matthaei, homily 50:3–4, pp 58, 508–509
  24. ^ Allen and Mayer, 2000, pg. 6
  25. ^ Farmer, David H. The Oxford Dictionary of the Saints (2nd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 1987, pg. 232
  26. ^ Andrew Todd Crislip. From Monastery to Hospital: Christian Monasticism & the Transformation of Health Care in Late Antiquity, University of Michigan Press, 2005, p. 103
  27. ^ Baluffi, Cajetan. The Charity of the Church (trans. Denis Gargan), Dublin: M H Gill and Son, 1885, p. 39
    Schmidt, Alvin J. Under the Influence: How Christianity Transformed Civilization, Grand Rapids, MI, Zondervan, 2001, p. 157
  28. ^ Socrates Scholasticus (1995) [1890]. "Book VI, Chapter XVI: Sedition on Account of John Chrysostom's Banishment". In Schaff, Philip; Wace, Henry (eds.). Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Volume II: Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories (reprint ed.). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers. p. 149. ISBN 1-56563-118-8. Retrieved 29 March 2007.
  29. Jump up to:a b "St John Chrysostom the Archbishop of Constantinople". Orthodox Church in America. Retrieved 29 March 2007.
  30. ^ Socrates Scholasticus, op cit "Chapter XVIII: Of Eudoxia's Silver Statue", p. 150.
  31. ^ "John Chrysostom" profile, The Oxford Dictionary of Church History(ed. Jerald C. Brauer), Philadelphia: Westminster Press (1971)
  32. ^ A chronicle of the last pagans, pg. 75
  33. Jump up to:a b Barry, Jennifer (2016). "Diagnosing Heresy: Ps.-Martyrius's Funerary Speech for John Chrysostom"Journal of Early Christian Studies24 (3). Retrieved 17 July 2017.
  34. ^ (Ep. CLV: PG LII, 702)
  35. ^ Vatican Library webpage; accessed 20 June 2015.
  36. ^ Appeal to the Pope, earlychurchtexts.com; accessed 20 June 2015.
  37. ^ Stephens, W.R.W., (2005) “Saint Chrysostom: His Life and Times”, Elibron Classics, pp. 349–50
  38. ^ St Gaudentius profile, newadvent.org; accessed 20 June 2015.
  39. ^ Holum, K.G., (1982) "Theodosian Empresses", (University of California Press), pg. 184
  40. ^ The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom. Primedia E-launch LLC. 1980. pp. 8–9. ISBN 978-1-61979-382-8.
  41. ^ "Three Holy Hierarchs: St Basil the Great, St Gregory the Theologian, and St John Chrysostom"Orthodox Christian Network. 27 January 2015. Retrieved 17 July 2017.
  42. ^ St. John Chrysostom. Orthodox Calendar.
  43. Jump up to:a b "John Chrysostom" profile, Catholic Encyclopaedia Online, newadvent.org; retrieved 20 March 2007.
  44. ^ Yohanan (Hans) Lewy, "John Chrysostom" in Encyclopaedia Judaica(ed. Cecil Roth), Keter Publishing House: 1997; ISBN 965-07-0665-8
  45. ^ Wilken, p. 30.
  46. ^ Chrysostom, John (quoted in Wilken, p. 30)
  47. ^ Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. Barbarians and Bishops: Army, Church, and State in the age of Arcadius and Chrysostom, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, pp. 175–176
  48. ^ Chrysostom, John (quoted in Liebeschuetz, p. 176)
  49. ^ Hopko, Thomas (1983). "32 - When You Give Alms". The Lenten Spring. St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press. pp. 128–29. ISBN 978-0-88141-014-3.
  50. ^ See Wilken, p. xv, and also "John Chrysostom" in Encyclopaedia Judaica
  51. ^ Wilken, p. xv.
  52. ^ John Chrysostom, Discourses Against Judaizing Christians, trans. Paul W Harkins, 2010, XXIX
  53. ^ "John Chrysostom" profile, Encyclopaedia Judaica.
  54. ^ Stark, Rodney. The Rise of Christianity. How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries, Princeton University Press: 1997, pp. 66–67
  55. ^ Chrysostom, 51
  56. ^ Christine C. Shepardson, Controlling Contested Places: Late Antique Antioch and the Spatial Politics of Religious Controversy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014), 93)
  57. ^ Shepardson, 92
  58. Jump up to:a b Chrysostom, John. "Discourses Against Judaizing Christians", Fathers of the Church (vol. 68), Paul W. Harkins (trans.), Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1979, pp. x, xxxi
  59. ^ Wilken, Robert Louis. John Chrysostom and the Jews: Rhetoric and Reality in the Late Fourth Century (1983), University of California, Berkeley Press; ISBN 978-0-520-04757-0, pp. 124–126.; retrieved 25 October 2011.
  60. ^ Fonrobert, Charlotte. "Jewish Christians, Judaizers, and Anti-Judaism"Late Ancient Christianity (2010), Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, pp. 234–254
  61. ^ Parkes, James (1969). Prelude to Dialogue. London. p. 153.
  62. ^ Brustein, William I. (2003). Roots of Hate: Anti-Semitism in Europe before the Holocaust. Cambridge University Press. p. 52. ISBN 0-521-77308-3.
  63. ^ Katz, Steven (1999). Ideology, State Power, and Mass Murder/Genocide", Lessons and Legacies: The Meaning of the Holocaust in a Changing World. Northwestern University Press.
  64. ^ Robert H. Allen, The Classical Origins of Modern Homophobia, (2006) p.187
  65. Jump up to:a b c "John Chrysostom: Homilies on Romans: Homily IV"en.wikisource.org.
  66. ^ Michael Carden, Sodomy: A history of a Christian Biblical Myth, Routledge, 2004, p32
  67. ^ Robert H. Allen, The Classical Origins of Modern Homophobia, (2006) p.187
  68. ^ Wilken, p. 26.
  69. ^ Woods, Thomas. How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization, Washington, D.C.: Regenery, 2005; ISBN 0-89526-038-7, pg. 44
  70. ^ On the Priesthood was well-known already during Chrysostom's lifetime, and is cited by Jerome in 392 in his De Viris Illustribus, chapter 129
  71. ^ Kirsch, Johann Peter (1911). "St. Olympias"Catholic Encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 17 November2009.
  72. Jump up to:a b Parry (2001), pp. 268–269
  73. ^ Chrysostom, John. Hom. in Mt. 19,5: pp. 57, 280.
  74. ^ Newman, John Cardinal, "St. Chrysostom" profile, The Newman Reader, Rambler: 1859 available online (see esp. chapter 2); retrieved 20 March 2007.
  75. ^ "The Divine Liturgy of St John Chrysostom, Op 31". Hyperion Records, Ltd.
  76. ^ "Litany"www.arvopart.org. Archived from the original on 19 May 2014. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  77. ^ Blaimes (1996, 3).
  78. ^ Joyce (1961, 3).
  79. ^ A variant relates that this was Genevieve of Brabant, wife of Count Siegfried of Treves, who was unjustly accused of infidelity and sentenced to death. She was led into the forest to be put to death, but her executioners relented and there abandoned her.[citation needed]
  80. ^ http://www.codexcoop.it, Codex, Pavia (IT) -. "La penitenza di San Giovanni Crisostomo, Dürer, Albrecht – Stampe e incisioni – Lombardia Beni Culturali"www.lombardiabeniculturali.it.
  81. ^ Available online
  82. ^ Fenelli, Laura. "From the Vita Pauli to the Legenda Breviarii: Real and imaginary animals as a Guide to the Hermit in the Desert"Animals and Otherness in the Middle Ages: Perspectives Across Disciplines, Oxford, Archaeopress (BAR International Series 2500), 2013, p. 41, fn. 40
  83. ^ "Legend of St John Chrysostom", Zgombic Miscellany. 16th-century Glagolitic manuscript [in Croatian Church Slavonic]. Zagreb, Archive of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. Shelf-mark VII 30. pp. 67–75.
  84. ^ Pope John Paul II. "Letter to the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, His Holiness Bartholomew I". Retrieved 30 March2007.
  85. ^http://www.christianunity.va/content/unitacristiani/en/dialoghi/sezione-orientale/chiese-ortodosse-di-tradizione-bizantina/relazioni-bilaterali/patriarcato-ecumenico/altri-documenti-ed-eventi/2004-celebrazione-ecumenica-reliquie-ss-gregorio-nazianzo-e-giov.html
  86. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Eztvp0CN4Q
  87. ^ Relics of St. John Chrysostom at the Church of St. George, Istanbul, cbc.ca; retrieved 13 September 2010.
  88. ^ "OrthodoxPhotos.com"www.orthodoxphotos.com. Archived from the original on 27 February 2008.
  89. ^ "Thousands queue outside Cyprus church after reports of miracle-working relic"International Herald Tribune. 13 November 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2015.

References[edit]

  • Allen, Pauline and Mayer, Wendy (2000). John Chrysostom. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-18252-2
  • Attwater, Donald (1960). St. John Chrysostom: Pastor and Preacher. London: Catholic Book Club.
  • Blamires, Harry (1996). The New Bloomsday Book: A Guide Through Ulysses. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-13858-2
  • Brändle, R., V. Jegher-Bucher, and Johannes Chrysostomus (1995). Acht Reden gegen Juden (Bibliothek der griechischen Literatur 41), Stuttgart: Hiersemann.
  • Brustein, William I. (2003). Roots of Hate: Anti-Semitism in Europe before the Holocaust. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-77308-3
  • Carter, Robert (1962). "The Chronology of St. John Chrysostom's Early Life." Traditio 18:357–64.
  • Chrysostom, John (1979). Discourses Against Judaizing Christians, trans. Paul W. Harkins. The Fathers of the Church; v. 68. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
  • Chuvin, Pierre (1990). "A chronicle of the last pagans". Harvard University Press
  • Dumortier, Jean (1951). "La valeur historique du dialogue de Palladius et la chronologie de saint Jean Chrysostome." Mélanges de science religieuse 8, 51–56.
  • Hartney, Aideen (2004). John Chrysostom and the Transformation of the City. London: Duckworth. ISBN 0-520-04757-5.
  • Joyce, James (1961). Ulysses. New York: The Modern Library.
  • Kelly, John Norman Davidson (1995). Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom-Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-3189-1.
  • Laqueur, Walter (2006). The Changing Face of Antisemitism: From Ancient Times To The Present Day. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-530429-2.
  • Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. (1990) Barbarians and Bishops: Army, Church and State in the Age of Arcadius and Chrysostom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-814886-0.
  • Lewy, Yohanan [Hans] (1997). "John Chrysostom". Encyclopaedia Judaica(CD-ROM Edition Version 1.0). Ed. Cecil Roth. Keter Publishing House. ISBN 965-07-0665-8.
  • Meeks, Wayne A., and Robert L. Wilken (1978). Jews and Christians in Antioch in the First Four Centuries of the Common Era (The Society of Biblical Literature, Number 13). Missoula: Scholars Press. ISBN 0-89130-229-8.
  • Morris, Stephen. "'Let Us Love One Another': Liturgy, Morality, and Political Theory in Chrysostom's Sermons on Rom. 12–13 and II Thess. 2," in: Speculum Sermonis: Interdisciplinary Reflections on the Medieval Sermon, ed. Georgiana Donavin, Cary J. Nederman, and Richard Utz. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004. pp. 89–112.
  • Palladius, Bishop of Aspuna. Palladius on the Life And Times of St. John Chrysostom, transl. and edited by Robert T. Meyer. New York: Newman Press, 1985. ISBN 0-8091-0358-3.
  • Parks, James (1969). Prelude to Dialogue. London.
  • Parry, David; David Melling, eds. (2001). The Blackwell Dictionary of Eastern Christianity. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-18966-1.
  • Pradels, W. (2002). "Lesbos Cod. Gr. 27 : The Tale of a Discovery", Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 6, pp. 81–89.
  • Pradels, W., R. Brändle, and M. Heimgartner (2001). "Das bisher vermisste Textstück in Johannes Chrysostomus, Adversus Judaeos, Oratio 2", Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 5, pp. 23–49.
  • Pradels, W., R. Brändle, and M. Heimgartner (2002). "The sequence and dating of the series of John Chrysostom's eight discourses Adversus Judaeos", Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 6, 90–116.
  • Schaff, Philip, and Henry Wace (eds.) (1890). Socrates, Sozomenus: Church Histories (A Select Library of Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, second series, vol. II). New York: The Christian Literature Company.
  • Stark, Rodney (1997). The Rise of Christianity. How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries. Princeton University Press.
  • Stephens, W.R.W. (1883). Saint John Chrysostom, His Life and Times. London: John Murray.
  • Stow, Kenneth (2006). Jewish Dogs, An Imagine and Its Interpreters: Continiuity in the Catholic-Jewish Encounter. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-5281-8.
  • Wilken, Robert Louis (1983). John Chrysostom and the Jews: Rhetoric and Reality in the Late Fourth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Willey, John H. (1906). Chrysostom: The Orator. Cincinnati: Jennings and Graham.
  • Woods, Thomas (2005). How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Washington, D.C.: Regenery. ISBN 0-89526-038-7

Collected works[edit]

Widely used editions of Chrysostom's works are available in Greek, Latin, English, and French. The Greek edition is edited by Sir Henry Savile (eight volumes, Eton, 1613); the most complete Greek and Latin edition is edited by Bernard de Montfaucon (thirteen volumes, Paris, 1718–38, republished in 1834–40, and reprinted in Migne's "Patrologia Graeca", volumes 47–64). There is an English translation in the first series of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (London and New York, 1889–90). A selection of his writings has been published more recently in the original with facing French translation in Sources Chrétiennes.[citation needed]

Further reading[edit]

Bibliography[edit]

Primary sources[edit]

  • Sermon on Alms Translated by Margaret M. Sherwood from the Parallel Greek and Latin Text of the Abbé Migne (New York: The New York School of Philanthropy, 1917)
  • The priesthood: a translation of the Peri hierosynes of St. John Chrysostom, by WA Jurgens, (New York: Macmillan, 1955)
  • Commentary on Saint John the apostle and evangelist: homilies 1–47, translated by Sister Thomas Aquinas Goggin, Fathers of the Church vol 33, (New York: Fathers of the Church, Inc, 1957)
  • Commentary on Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist, translated by Sister Thomas Aquinas Goggin. Homilies 48–88, Fathers of the Church vol 41, (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1959) [translation of Homiliae in Ioannem]
  • Baptismal instructions, translated and annotated by Paul W Harkins, (Westminster, MD: Newman Press, 1963)
  • Discourses against judaizing Christians, translated by Paul W Harkins., Fathers of the Church vol 68, (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1979)
  • On the incomprehensible nature of God, translated by Paul W Harkins. Fathers of the Church vol 72, (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1984)
  • On wealth and poverty, translated and introduced by Catharine P Roth, (Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1984)
  • Chrysostom, John (1985). Apologist. Margaret A. Schatkin and Paul W. Harkins, trans. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. ISBN 0-8132-0073-3. [translations of Discourse on blessed Babylas, and Against the Greeks: Demonstration against the pagans that Christ is God.]
  • Chrysostom, John (1986). Homilies on Genesis. Robert C. Hill, trans. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. ISBN 0-8132-0074-1. [translation of Homilies on Genesis 1–17]
  • Chrysostom, John (1986). On marriage and family life. Catherine P. Roth, trans. Crestwood, N.Y.: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 0-913836-86-9.
  • Samuel NC Lieu, ed, The Emperor Julian: panegyric and polemic. Claudius Mamertinus, John Chrysostom, Ephrem the Syrian, (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1986.) [contains translation of John Chrysostom, Homily on St. Babylas, against Julian and the pagans XIV-XIX]
  • Commentaries on the sages, translated with an introduction by Robert Charles Hill, 2 vols, (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2006) [Vol 1 is a translation of the Commentary on Job; vol 2 is a translation of the Commentary on Proverbs]

Secondary sources[edit]

External links[edit]

Works[edit]

Orthodox feast days[edit]

---