Showing posts with label Peace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peace. Show all posts

2016/05/02

전쟁권 - 위키백과

전쟁권 - 위키백과


전쟁권(Jus ad bellum)이란 한 국가의 국왕대통령총리 등 군통수권자가 국제법상 합법적으로 전쟁을 일으킬 권리이다.

"국제법의 아버지"인 17세기 네덜란드 휴고 그로티우스는 1625년 전쟁과 평화의 법을 저술, "대부분의 사람들은 방어, 자국 소유물의 탈환, 처벌 등 세가지의 경우에 전쟁권(Jus ad bellum)을 인정한다."고 주장했다.
정의로운 전쟁론의 윤리 원칙은 ‘전쟁결정시 충분조건(Jus ad bellum)’과 ‘전쟁수행조건(Jus in bello)’의 두 가지로 구분된다. '정당한 명분(jus ad bellum)', '정당한 수단(jus in bello)', '교전규칙(jus in bello)', '전쟁법(jus in bello)'이라고도 번역한다.
현재 국제법은 침략전쟁을 금지하고, 개인까지도 국제형사재판소에서 처벌하기 때문에, 자위권에 근거한 전쟁만을 합법적이라고 인정한다. 즉, 현재의 국제법상 전쟁권은 자위권을 의미한다고 볼 수 있다. 
그러나 자위권에 근거한 전쟁이 반드시 소극적인 방어전쟁만을 말하는 것은 아니고, 적극적인 침략전쟁, 보복전쟁의 경우도 모두 자위권의 조건을 만족하면, 국제법상 합법적으로 인정한다.

정의로운 전쟁론 - 위키백과

정의로운 전쟁론 - 위키백과

정의로운 전쟁론(라틴어: bellum iustum, 영어: Just War Theory)은 어떤 전쟁이 과연 정당한가에 대한 논란이다. 군사 윤리학으로, 신학자와 윤리학자, 국제 정세와 관여한 입안자들의 연구 대상이며, 논란의 대상이다. 물론 이에 대한 윤리적, 철학적, 정치적으로 공정한 답변을 꼭 찾아야만 할 것이다.

정의로운 전쟁론은 아우구스티누스의 신의 도시(Civitas Dei)의, 로마제국을 침공한 "미개한" 족속들의 반응에서 시작되었다고 보고, "평화주의와 정의로운 전쟁"간의 논쟁으로 이해할 수 있다. 이에 대한 의견은 기독교인과 윤리학자들 사이에서도 분분하다. 정치에서의 현실주의에서도 논의되고 있다.

유엔[편집]

유엔헌장 제42조에 의한 유엔 안보리의 무력사용승인에 의한 전쟁, 제51조에 의한 자위권에 의한 전쟁은 정당한 전쟁으로 국제법상 인정되고 있다. 자위권의 경우에는, 유엔 회원국이 아니더라도, 국제관습법상 자위권이 인정된다. 그 이외의 전쟁은 침략범죄가 되어 국제법 위반이며, 이에 대한 국가책임 이외에, 로마규정에 의해 개인까지 전범으로 형사처벌한다.

같이 보기[편집]

2016/05/01

예수의 정치학, 요더

예수의 정치학,
존 하워드 요더 (지은이) | 신원하 | 권연경 (옮긴이) | 2007-10-08 |
원제 The Politics of Jesus

---
신약 윤리학 분야에서 중요한 책으로 평가받는 저작으로서, 정치와 관련된 문제들 그리고 이와 관련된 권력, 신분, 올바른 관계 등의 이슈들에 깊은 관심을 갖고 있었던 한 구세주에게로 우리를 인도한다. 지은이는 누가복음을 개관하면서, 예수의 삶과 사역이 제자들의 사회적 행동에 미친 본질적인 영향을 다룬다.

지은이 존 하워드 요더는 예수의 삶과 사역이 특정한 종류의 기독교 평화주의를 드러내고 있다는 사실, 그리고 ';그리스도의 십자가가 기독교가 추구하는 사회적 효율성의 모범'이 된다는 사실을 설득력 있게 논증하고 있다.

이 번역본은 1994년에 나온 개정판인데, 초판에서 제기했던 주제와 연관된 좀더 최근의 연구들에 대한 논의를 접할 수 있다. 거의 모든 장의 말미에는 지난 20여 년 간 등장한 연구를 요약하는 새로운 ‘후기’가 첨가되어 있는데, 이 글은 지은이가 초판에서 개진했던 통찰들이 여전히 유효함을 말해 주고 있다.
---

약어
초판 서문
2판 서문


1장 메시아적 윤리의 가능성

2장 도래하는 하나님 나라

3장 희년의 의미

4장 하나님이 우리를 위해 싸우시리라

5장 비폭력적 저항의 가능성

6장 시산표

7장 그리스도의 제자와 예수의 길

8장 그리스도와 권세

9장 혁명적 복종

10장 모든 영혼은 복종하라: 로마서 13장과 국가의 권위

11장 믿음으로 말미암은 은혜의 칭의

12장 어린 양의 전쟁

-----
해설

인명 색인

성구 색인

저자 연보

--

김두식 (경북대학교 법학전문대학원 교수)

: 한 기독교 평화주의자가 사는 법

김두식 (경북대학교 법학전문대학원 교수)

: 예수님은 더 높은 자리로 올라가 세상 권세를 획득함으로써 하나님 나라를 이루려 하지 않으셨다. 십자가, 제자도, 비폭력, 교회의 교회됨 등 존 요더가 제시하는 예수님의 방법은 욕심에 눈이 멀어 길을 잃은 한국 교회에 분명한 출구를 제시해 줄 것이다. [예수의 정치학]은 위험한 책이다. 이 책을 읽는 여러분의 인생이 결코 어제와 똑같을 리 없는 까닭이다. 단순한 진리의 회복을 통해 나의 인생을 바꾼 이 위험한 책이 여러분의 인생도 바꾸게 되리라 믿는다. - 김두식 교수, 경북대 법학과

----
저자 : 존 하워드 요더 (John Howard Yoder)

 최근작 : <그럼에도 불구하고, 평화>,<급진적 제자도>,<비폭력 평화주의의 역사> … 총 53종 (모두보기)

 소개 : 기독교 평화주의에 대한 논의의 시각을 정립하는데 크게 기여한 메노나이트 신학자이며 기독교 윤리학계의 거장이다.

미국 메노나이트 직영신학교인 고센대학을 졸업하고 스위스 바젤대학교에서 칼 바르트의 상당한 영향 아래 박사학위를 받았다.

고센대학과 메노나이트연합성서신학교AMBS와 미국 인디애나주의 노트르담 대학교에서 교수로 재직했으며, 미국 기독교 윤리학회의 회장을 역임했다.
----

역자 : 신원하
 최근작 : <죽음에 이르는 7가지 죄>,<교회가 꼭 대답해야 할 윤리 문제들>,<시대의 분별과 윤리적 선택> … 총 10종 (모두보기)

 소개 :
연세대학교 사회학과 고신대 신학대학원에서 공부하고 미국 칼빈신학교에서 기독교 윤리학과 보스톤 대학에서 사회 윤리학을 전공하여 박사학위(Ph. D.)를 받았다. 저서로는 가 있으며, <기독교 윤리와 사회정의>를 편저하였고, J. 다우마의 <개혁주의 윤리학>, 스탠리 그렌츠의 <기독교윤리의 토대와 흐름>을 번역하였다. 2009년 현재 천안에 있는 고려신학 대학원(고신대 ...
---

역자 : 권연경
 최근작 : <한국교회 설교, 무엇이 문제인가?>,<세월호와 역사의 고통에 신학이 답하다>,<한국교회, 개혁의 길을 묻다> … 총 17종 (모두보기)

 소개 : 미국 풀러신학대학원 (M.Div.)
미국 예일대학교 (S.T.M.)
영국 킹스칼리지 런던 (Ph.D.)
현)숭실대학교 기독교학 교수

----

기독교 사회 윤리의 이정표를 제시한 기독교 평화주의의 고전!

신약 윤리학의 분수령이 된 이 책은, 정치와 관련된 문제들 그리고 이와 관련된 권력, 신분, 올바른 관계 등의 이슈들에 깊은 관심을 갖고 있었던 한 구세주에게로 우리를 인도한다. 요더는 누가복음을 개관하면서 예수의 삶과 사역이 그의 제자들의 사회적 행동에 미친 본질적인 영향을 다루고 있는데, 그것이 특정한 종류의 기독교 평화주의를 드러내고 있다는 사실, 그리고 “그리스도의 십자가가 기독교가 추구하는 사회적 효율성의 모범”이 된다는 사실을 설득력 있게 논증하고 있다. 거의 모든 장의 말미에는 지난 20여 년 간 등장한 연구를 요약하는 새로운 ‘후기’가 첨가되어 있는데, 이들은 요더가 초판에서 개진했던 탁월한 통찰들이 여전히 옳다는 사실을 말해 준다.

[특징]

- 기독교 평화주의 윤리학의 대표작
- 성경에 근거하여 예수의 생애를 정치적으로 이해한 작품
- 2000년 “크리스채너티투데이” 20세기 가장 큰 영향을 끼친 책 10선 중 하나로 선정!

[독자대상]
- 신학생, 목회자, 신학 교수, 평화주의 운동에 관심 있는 이들
- 기독교와 정치의 관계에 관심 있는 이들


Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way (Facets): Walter Wink: 9780800636098: Amazon.com: Books

Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way (Facets): Walter Wink: 9780800636098: Amazon.com: Books

More than ever, Walter Wink believes, the Christian tradition of nonviolence is needed as an alternative to the dominant and death-dealing "powers" of our consumerist culture and fractured world. In this small book Wink offers a precis of his whole thinking about this issue, including the relation of Jesus and his message to politics and nonviolence, the history of nonviolent efforts, and how nonviolence can win the day when others don't hesitate to resort to violence or terror to achieve their aims.
---
Top Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
A radical Jesus
By Martin Smedjeback on February 9, 2004

We have all been fooled! That was the feeling I had when I put down Jesus and Nonviolence. Jesus is not the weak, nonpolitical, do not rock the boat-kind of guy that they talk about in church. The Bible researcher Walter Wink shows with clarity how Jesus both gave examples and himself acted very politically to change the society he was living in. He challenged the rules and the laws of his day's powers. He acted powerfully against the hypocrisy of the religious leaders and he questioned the unlawful occupation of his land. There were others that did this before him. The difference was that they used violence to protest against the occupation. Jesus acted with loving nonviolence. He challenged the injustices but always with respect for the other. Wink goes on to show us that the ideas and methods of nonviolence are very alive also today, actually more than any time before. Only in 1989-90 there were fourteen nations that underwent nonviolent revolutions, all of them successful except China. In this thin book Wink has given me a whole new view of Christianity, has strengthened my belief in nonviolence and has given me hope for a nonviolent future. Quite an accomplishment for a 117-pages book!
---

5.0 out of 5 starsnonviolent action is not passivism!
By C.J.A. on September 1, 2004

I carry a copy of this little book with me wherever I go, and I've reread it many times with great enjoyment. This is an essential introduction to the nonviolent way of Jesus for all Christians, including great commentary on relevant biblical passages and invaluable guidance for respecting the dignity of one's "opponents." It makes a super gift.
----
5.0 out of 5 stars
Wink Does It Again
By Dr. Thomas H. Martin on June 11, 2003

If you are considering or committed to the way of nonviolence and searching for firm footing in the actual practice of peace and reconciliation, read this book. As always, Wink is challenging, creative, convincing, and compelling. The many stories he tells to illustrate his points are quite interesting and practical.

This is vintage Wink at his best. I will refer to this little book often. It would be a steal at twice the price.
----
5.0 out of 5 stars
A good interpretation of the Christian basis for nonviolence.
By James G. Williams on September 2, 2005

Walter Wink here gives a fine overview and simplification of his thinking on the topic of nonviolence as presented in his various scholarly studies of the New Testament topics of the principalities and powers and the Son of Man. It gives new life to turning the other cheek, going the extra mile, and love of enemies. It is especially appropriate for classes and small groups of laypeople who have only an elementary background in biblical studies.

For heartier fare on this issue that is at the heart of Christian faith and life one may turn to Wink's trilogy on The Powers. For comparable or related works I highly recommend John Howard Yoder, The Politics of Jesus and William T. Cavanaugh, Torture and the Eucharist. One lack in this little monograph is that Wink doesn't mention the work of René Girard on desire and violence, although he has taken note of it in The Powers.
---

5.0 out of 5 starsA new look at Jesus
By Highlanderthal on October 12, 2005

This is a small book that you can carry with you as a reminder in your hectic life.This introduction to a non-violent Jesus will empower you to make changes in your life.It has many biblical passages that teach you to respect the dignity of people who disagree with your beliefs. The only lasting way to eliminate an enemy is to make him your friend.
---

5.0 out of 5 stars
A Classic of Nonviolence Written with Passion and from Personal Experience
By Amos Smith on May 24, 2014

This is a classic of Nonviolence in Christian tradition. Whereas some books on Nonviolence from a Christian perspective often stray from the mark, Walter Wink brings us back over and over again to the Nonviolent core of Jesus' message. He also shows us how that message has been watered-down and misunderstood. Wink writes with conviction, passion, and personal experience as an international proponent of Nonviolent resistance. Highly recommended!!
-Amos Smith (author of Healing The Divide: Recovering Christianity's Mystic Roots)
---

5.0 out of 5 stars
Awsome little book!
By R. Ross on January 13, 2008

This book was first introduced to me through a Wilmington College (Ohio) class on Quakerism and the Peace Testimony. It affirmed my beliefs that we have no right to kill other people, no matter what. Jesus was a radical, and understanding the context of his teachings help to make them clearer to our culture today. As a Christian (and now following the Quaker testimonies), I don't understand how someone who believes Jesus is Christ can kill another human being, when he states that we are to "love (respect) our enemies." This little book shows how nonviolent revolutions solve political problems in the long run, much more often than violent ones do, yet people still believe that nonviolence in passive and cowardly. This is a book that every Christian should read.
---

5.0 out of 5 stars
Thoughtful and can be provocative
By Frank Coats on December 30, 2015

This is a thoughtful, can be provocative look at Jesus'teaching on non-violence. It helps answer a question that shoukd bother everyone: if Jesus was so nice and sweet why did anyone want o kill him? Walter Wink was a sharp theologian and this kindle version is excellent.

2016/04/30

*Episode 8: Just War Theory and The Americanization of Armistice Day | Oklatopia

*Episode 8: Just War Theory and The Americanization of Armistice Day | Oklatopia
November 10 by oklatopia




“We perpetuate war by exalting its sacrifices.” 


Lukus and Hunter observe Veterans Day by recalling its origins as Armistice Day, 
intended as “a day to be dedicated to the cause of world peace,” 
and by outlining the essentials of Just War Theory with the help 
of the Catholic Catechism. 

Emphasizing the importance of just means as well as just ends, 
the guys discuss the legal, moral, and social consequences of war, 
and the sticky implications for Christians in the military. 
They consider the ramifications of only remembering war’s military victims 
while neglecting the goal of peace.
--





2016/04/28

The Politics of Jesus: John Howard Yoder: 9780802807342: Amazon.com: Books

The Politics of Jesus: John Howard Yoder

Top Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
The most valued work of theology I own
By Hugo Schwyzer on December 14, 2001

If I had only one work of twentieth-century theology to read, this would be it (with apologies to everyone from Barth to Brueggemann to Bonhoeffer). In the aftermath of September 11, pacifism has been reviled in the public secular discourse like never before. Most Christian leaders from across the theological spectrum have endorsed one form or another of the "Just War Theory" of Augustine, Aquinas, and Calvin.

No one makes the case for the radical, total non-violence of the Christian message better than John Howard Yoder. Though he wrote many books after this one, this is by far the best place to start. Yoder's familiarity with Scripture is magisterial, and the gentle yet firm way he responds to his Catholic and Reformed critics is convincing and exciting. Most timely of all, he devotes an entire chapter to deconstructing traditional Christian interpretations of Romans 13:1-7, the passages most often cited by just war theorists to defend the use of violence by the state. Anyone who believes it is possible for a Christian to bear arms and follow Christ must respond to Yoder's analysis.

Though Yoder was a Mennonite (and though I am an Episcopalian by affiliation, I am an anabaptist in my heart), his work is catholic, orthodox, and accessible to all Christians. Yoder's death in 1997 marked the passing of the man whom I believe may well be regarded as the most important theologian of our time. As even good Christians "rally round the flag" and join in the cries for "just war" and "retributive justice", Yoder's work has never been more important as a vital theological corrective.
---
5.0 out of 5 stars
Jesus as the Way for the 21st century church!
By Sarah R Seaver on April 17, 2001

In an age where the Western Christian church is stuggling for a relevant witness to our rapidly changing culture, John Howard Yoder makes a solid and challenging claim that Jesus is not only relevant, but normative for social Christian ethics. Yoder convincingly illustrates that Jesus was in fact confrontive socially and politically to the powers that be in that age. Throughout the text he demonstrates that the Gospel of Lukes bears witness not to just a divine Jesus, who redeemed humanity, but also a human Jesus who incarnated the nature of God through the way of the cross. By focusing his study on the cross of Christ, he develops a challenging ethic that examplifies the love of neighbor and witness that the faithful church and disciple is called to be. I recommend this text to anyone interested in a new, fresh and challenging look to the Jesus as known in 1st century Jewish culture. This book is a must read that should be on the shelf of anyone interested in honest, Christian scholarship.
----
4.0 out of 5 stars
Was Jesus a Dove?
By Amazon Customer VINE VOICE on March 7, 2004

I am borrowing a term from my youth and the Viet Nam conflct when people were labeled Hawks or Doves by their reaction to war.

Yoder makes a case that Jesus was VERY political. He was not uninterested in world events around him. He was involved, but not in the way that much of the religious right is today. More likely, he made the footsteps that Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Mother Theresa later walked in. This is a book on politics, power, and pacifism. At least that is the way that Yoder sees it.

Many Christians do not agree with Yoder, but he is not easily dismissed. This book is well written and each chapter of this revised edition contains an epilogue that helps to update it with new information since the days of the first edition.

---
5.0 out of 5 stars
THE POLITICS OF JESUS by John Howard Yoder
By MOTU Review on February 16, 2008

The Politics of Jesus is John Howard Yoder's treatise on Jesus' political inclinations, based on and in response to twentieth century biblical scholarship. Yoder was a Mennonite biblical scholar, theologian, and professor of theology. The 1994 version of this book is a revision and expansion of his original version, published in 1972.

Yoder points out early that this book is an ethical methodology, not an exegesis. Indeed, he spends the majority of the work building on and responding to the thought of innumerable other twentieth century scholars. His primary target is twentieth century Christian systematic theology that argues for various reasons that Jesus is not a valid source of personal ethics. Yoder does a thorough job of demonstrating that Jesus was indeed politically-minded, and one of the consequences of this is the discovery that Jesus has intended us to follow his pacifist lifestyle.

Contrary to what at least one reviewer has complained, Yoder does address the Old Testament as it relates to a modern Christian pacifism, albeit briefly. Yoder's treatment of Romans 13, however, is thorough.

Most of the criticism of this book seems to be from people who are inherently opposed to Christian pacifism as many arguments are from that ground rather than on anything Yoder has done incorrectly. That is, people tend to reject his arguments based on their personal beliefs and traditions. Many arguments say "Yoder didn't address such and such"; but a book can only be so long.

The book does contain a lot of the vocabulary and jargon of Christian scholarship, and people unfamiliar with such may have a little trouble with it.

The Politics of Jesus is the finest book on Christianity I have read in a long time. Yoder does an excellent job highlighting parallels and themes running through Jesus' life, and of making the case for Christian pacifism. I recommend this book to everyone.
---

Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way (Facets): Walter Wink: 9780800636098: Amazon.com: Books

Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way (Facets): Walter Wink:


Top Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars

A radical Jesus

By Martin Smedjeback on February 9, 2004

We have all been fooled! That was the feeling I had when I put down Jesus and Nonviolence. Jesus is not the weak, nonpolitical, do not rock the boat-kind of guy that they talk about in church. The Bible researcher Walter Wink shows with clarity how Jesus both gave examples and himself acted very politically to change the society he was living in. He challenged the rules and the laws of his day's powers. He acted powerfully against the hypocrisy of the religious leaders and he questioned the unlawful occupation of his land. There were others that did this before him. The difference was that they used violence to protest against the occupation. Jesus acted with loving nonviolence. He challenged the injustices but always with respect for the other. Wink goes on to show us that the ideas and methods of nonviolence are very alive also today, actually more than any time before. Only in 1989-90 there were fourteen nations that underwent nonviolent revolutions, all of them successful except China. In this thin book Wink has given me a whole new view of Christianity, has strengthened my belief in nonviolence and has given me hope for a nonviolent future. Quite an accomplishment for a 117-pages book!

--

5.0 out of 5 stars

nonviolent action is not passivism!

By C.J.A. on September 1, 2004

I carry a copy of this little book with me wherever I go, and I've reread it many times with great enjoyment. This is an essential introduction to the nonviolent way of Jesus for all Christians, including great commentary on relevant biblical passages and invaluable guidance for respecting the dignity of one's "opponents." It makes a super gift.

The only lasting way to eliminate an enemy is to make him your friend.

--

5.0 out of 5 stars

Wink Does It Again

By Dr. Thomas H. Martin on June 11, 2003

If you are considering or committed to the way of nonviolence and searching for firm footing in the actual practice of peace and reconciliation, read this book. As always, Wink is challenging, creative, convincing, and compelling. The many stories he tells to illustrate his points are quite interesting and practical.

This is vintage Wink at his best. I will refer to this little book often. It would be a steal at twice the price.

--

5.0 out of 5 stars

A good interpretation of the Christian basis for nonviolence.

By James G. Williams on September 2, 2005

Walter Wink here gives a fine overview and simplification of his thinking on the topic of nonviolence as presented in his various scholarly studies of the New Testament topics of the principalities and powers and the Son of Man. It gives new life to turning the other cheek, going the extra mile, and love of enemies. It is especially appropriate for classes and small groups of laypeople who have only an elementary background in biblical studies.

For heartier fare on this issue that is at the heart of Christian faith and life one may turn to Wink's trilogy on The Powers. For comparable or related works I highly recommend John Howard Yoder, The Politics of Jesus and William T. Cavanaugh, Torture and the Eucharist. One lack in this little monograph is that Wink doesn't mention the work of René Girard on desire and violence, although he has taken note of it in The Powers.

---

5.0 out of 5 starsA new look at Jesus

By Highlanderthal on October 12, 2005

Format: Paperback

This is a small book that you can carry with you as a reminder in your hectic life.This introduction to a non-violent Jesus will empower you to make changes in your life.It has many biblical passages that teach you to respect the dignity of people who disagree with your beliefs. The only lasting way to eliminate an enemy is to make him your friend.

--

5.0 out of 5 starsA Classic of Nonviolence Written with Passion and from Personal Experience

By Amos Smith on May 24, 2014

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase

This is a classic of Nonviolence in Christian tradition. Whereas some books on Nonviolence from a Christian perspective often stray from the mark, Walter Wink brings us back over and over again to the Nonviolent core of Jesus' message. He also shows us how that message has been watered-down and misunderstood. Wink writes with conviction, passion, and personal experience as an international proponent of Nonviolent resistance. Highly recommended!! -Amos Smith (author of Healing The Divide: Recovering Christianity's Mystic Roots)

--

5.0 out of 5 starsAwsome little book!

By R. Ross on January 13, 2008

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase

This book was first introduced to me through a Wilmington College (Ohio) class on Quakerism and the Peace Testimony. It affirmed my beliefs that we have no right to kill other people, no matter what. Jesus was a radical, and understanding the context of his teachings help to make them clearer to our culture today. As a Christian (and now following the Quaker testimonies), I don't understand how someone who believes Jesus is Christ can kill another human being, when he states that we are to "love (respect) our enemies." This little book shows how nonviolent revolutions solve political problems in the long run, much more often than violent ones do, yet people still believe that nonviolence in passive and cowardly. This is a book that every Christian should read.

--

5.0 out of 5 starsThoughtful and can be provocative

By Frank Coats on December 30, 2015

Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase

This is a thoughtful, can be provocative look at Jesus'teaching on non-violence. It helps answer a question that shoukd bother everyone: if Jesus was so nice and sweet why did anyone want o kill him? Walter Wink was a sharp theologian and this kindle version is excellent.

--

See all 30 customer reviews (newest first)

Write a customer review


T

Jesus and the Lies of War | Sojourners

Jesus and the Lies of War | Sojourners

Jesus and the Lies of War

Killing from the Inside Out: Moral Injury and Just War
by Robert Emmet Meagher. 
Cascade Books. 
Borderline: Reflections on War, Sex, and Church, 
by Stan Goff. 
Cascade Books.



Killing from the Inside Out / Amazon
Killing from the Inside Out / Amazon

DAYS AFTER 9/11, a just war philosopher and I were interviewed on Christian radio. I’m a pacifist who served on peace teams in Nicaragua and Iraq. My co-interviewee called for waging war on “terrorists” because we must kill our enemies while loving them. My plea to listen to Jesus and victims of war was scorned.
Two compelling recent challenges to Christian justifications for war are Robert Emmet Meagher’s Killing from the Inside Out: Moral Injury and Just War and Stan Goff’s Borderline: Reflections on War, Sex, and Church.
Meagher, a humanities scholar, incorporates listening to veterans of war into his work. Goff writes as someone who was a soldier before being transformed by Jesus.
Three issues in both books—just war, masculine sexual violence, and moral injury—resonate with my peace team encounters with war. Through very different approaches, Meagher and Goff offer the best reflection on these concerns that I’ve seen; both rightly implicate the church.
First, just war has a sordid rather than sanctifying history. Meagher’s survey of ancient literature, scripture, and Christian history reveals its legacy as antithetical to Jesus’ teaching: “Since the time of Constantine ... just war doctrine has served to license and legitimize state and ecclesiastical violence and to draw a convenient, if imaginary, line between killing and murder.”
- See more at: https://sojo.net/magazine/january-2016/jesus-and-lies-war#sthash.V4ymdrBv.dpuf

Christian pacifism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christian pacifism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christian pacifism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigationsearch

Blessed are the Peacemakers (1917) byGeorge Bellows
Christian pacifism is the theological and ethical position that any form of violence is incompatible with the Christian faith. Christian pacifists state that Jesus himself was a pacifist who taught and practicedpacifism, and that his followers must do likewise.

Notable Christian pacifists include Martin Luther King, Jr.Leo Tolstoy,[1] and Ammon Hennacy. Hennacy believed that adherence to Christianity required not just pacifism but, because governments inevitably threatened or used force to resolve conflicts, anarchism. However, most Christian pacifists, including thepeace churchesChristian Peacemaker Teams and individuals such as John Howard Yoder, make no claim to be anarchists.





Origins[edit]

Old Testament[edit]

Whilst pacifism is only a minority practice in modern Christianity, the concept has scriptural and historical support. For example, in the Old Testament, although there are many recounts of war and retaliation, Christian pacifists argue that violence was a mark against someone and never God's ideal. For example,David was forbidden to build God's house because he was a man of war and had shed so much blood:[2]

But this word of the Lord came to me: 'You have shed much blood and have fought many wars. You are not to build a house for my Name, because you have shed much blood on the earth in my sight. (1 Chronicles 22:8)
God’s ideal is further explained by Isaiah, who prophesies a future Messianic Age where there will be peace amongst all humankind:[3]

They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore. (Isaiah 2:4)
The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the hole of the cobra, and the young child put his hand into the viper's nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea. (Isaiah 11:6-9)
Also the commandment You shall not murder (Exodus 20:13) has been viewed as an instruction for pacifism.[4]

Ministry of Jesus[edit]

Jesus appeared to teach pacifism during his ministry when he told his disciples:[5]

You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.' But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. (Matt. 5:38-39)
Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. (Matt. 5:43-48, Luke 6:27-28)
Put your sword back in its place...for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. (Matt. 26:52)
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. (Matt. 5:9)

Early Church[edit]

Several Church Fathers interpreted Jesus' teachings as advocating nonviolence.[6] For example:

I do not wish to be a king; I am not anxious to be rich; I decline military command... Die to the world, repudiating the madness that is in it.

— Tatian's Address to the Greeks 11[7]
Whatever Christians would not wish others to do to them, they do not to others. And they comfort their oppressors and make them their friends; they do good to their enemies…. Through love towards their oppressors, they persuade them to become Christians.

— The Apology of Aristides 15[8]
A soldier of the civil authority must be taught not to kill men and to refuse to do so if he is commanded, and to refuse to take an oath. If he is unwilling to comply, he must be rejected for baptism. A military commander or civic magistrate must resign or be rejected. If a believer seeks to become a soldier, he must be rejected, for he has despised God.

One soul cannot be due to two masters—God and Cæsar. And yet Moses carried a rod, and Aaron wore a buckle, and John (Baptist) is girt with leather and Joshua the son of Nun leads a line of march; and the People warred: if it pleases you to sport with the subject. But how will a Christian man war, nay, how will he serve even in peace, without a sword, which the Lord has taken away? For albeit soldiers had come unto John, and had received the formula of their rule; albeit, likewise, a centurion had believed; still the Lord afterward, in disarming Peter, unbelted every soldier. No dress is lawful among us, if assigned to any unlawful action.

— Tertullian, On Idolatry Chapter 19: Concerning Military Service
For since we, a numerous band of men as we are, have learned from His teaching and His laws that evil ought not to be requited with evil, that it is better to suffer wrong than to inflict it, that we should rather shed our own blood than stain our hands and our conscience with that of another, an ungrateful world is now for a long period enjoying a benefit from Christ, inasmuch as by His means the rage of savage ferocity has been softened, and has begun to withhold hostile hands from the blood of a fellow-creature.

— ArnobiusAdversus Gentes I:VI[10]
Consider the roads blocked up by robbers, the seas beset with pirates, wars scattered all over the earth with the bloody horror of camps. The whole world is wet with mutual blood; and murder, which in the case of an individual is admitted to be a crime, is called a virtue when it is committed wholesale.

Those soldiers were filled with wonder and admiration at the grandeur of the man's piety and generosity and were struck with amazement. They felt the force of this example of pity. As a result, many of them were added to the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ and threw off the belt of military service.

— Disputation of Archelaus and Manes[12]
How can a man be master of another's life, if he is not even master of his own? Hence he ought to be poor in spirit, and look at Him who for our sake became poor of His own will; let him consider that we are all equal by nature, and not exalt himself impertinently against his own race[...]

— Gregory of Nyssa, Homilies on the Beatitudes[13]
However, many early Christians also served in the army,[14][15] and the presence of large numbers of Christians in his army may have been a factor in the conversion of Constantine to Christianity.[16]

Conversion of the Roman Empire[edit]

After the Roman Emperor Constantine converted in A.D. 312 and began to conquer "in Christ's name," Christianity became entangled with the state, and warfare and violence were increasingly justified by influential Christians. Some scholars believe that "the accession of Constantine terminated the pacifist period in church history."[17] Nevertheless, the tradition of Christian pacifism was carried on by a few dedicated Christians throughout the ages, such as Martin of Tours. Martin, who was serving as a soldier, declared in 336 "I am a soldier of Christ. I cannot fight."[18] He was jailed for this action, but later released.[18]

Since then, many other Christians have made similar stands for pacifism as the following quotes show:

The Scriptures teach that there are two opposing princes and two opposing kingdoms : the one is the Prince of peace ; the other the prince of strife. Each of these princes has his particular kingdom and as the prince is so is also the kingdom. The Prince of peace is Christ Jesus ; His kingdom is the kingdom of peace, which is His church; His messengers are the messengers of peace; His Word is the word of peace; His body is the body of peace; His children are the seed of peace.

— Menno Simons (1494-1561), Reply to False Accusations, III[19]
To our most bitter opponents we say: ‘We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you.’

— Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968), "Loving your Enemies" in Strength to Love[20]
Love without courage and wisdom is sentimentality, as with the ordinary church member. Courage without love and wisdom is foolhardiness, as with the ordinary soldier. Wisdom without love and courage is cowardice, as with the ordinary intellectual. Therefore one who has love, courage, and wisdom is the one in a million who moves the world, as with Jesus, Buddha, and Gandhi.

— Ammon Hennacy (1893 - 1970)[21]
Charles Spurgeon did not explicitly identify as a pacifist but expressed very strongly worded anti-war sentiment.[22]

Christian pacifist denominations[edit]

The first conscientious objector in the modern sense was a Quaker in 1815.[23] The Quakers had originally served in Cromwell's New Model Army but from the 1800s increasingly became pacifists. A number of Christian denominations have taken pacifist positions institutionally, including the Quakers andMennonites.[24]

Peace churches[edit]

Main article: Peace churches

The Deserter (1916) byBoardman Robinson.
The term "historical peace churches" refers to three churches—the Church of the Brethren, the Mennonitesand the Quakers—who took part in the first peace church conference, in Kansas in 1935, and who have worked together to represent the view of Christian pacifism.

Christadelphians[edit]

Main article: Christadelphians
Although the group had already separated from the Campbellites, a part of the Restoration Movement, after 1848 for theological reasons as the "Royal Assembly of Believers", among other names, the "Christadelphians" formed as a church formally in 1863 in response to conscription in the American Civil War. They are one of the few churches to have been legally formed over the issue of Christian pacifism.[25] The British and Canadian arms of the group adopted the name "Christadelphian" in the following year, 1864, and also maintained objection to military service during the First and Second World Wars. Unlike Quakers, Christadelphians generally refused all forms of military service, including stretcher bearers and medics, preferring non-uniformed civil hospital service.[26]

Churches of God (7th day)[edit]

The different groups evolving under the name Church of God (7th day) stand opposed to carnal warfare, based on Matthew 26:52; Revelation 13:10; Romans 12:19-21. They believe the weapons of their warfare to not be carnal but spiritual (II Corinthians 10:3-5; Ephesians 6:11-18).[27][28]

Seventh-day Adventists[edit]

During the American Civil War in 1864, shortly after the formation of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, the Seventh-day Adventists declared, "The denomination of Christians calling themselves Seventh-day Adventists, taking the Bible as their rule of faith and practice, are unanimous in their views that its teaching are contrary to the spirit and practice of war; hence, they have ever been conscientiously opposed to bearing arms."[29]

The general Adventist movement from 1867 followed a policy of conscientious objection. This was confirmed by the Seventh-day Adventist Church in 1914. The official policy allows for military service innon-combative roles such as medical corps[30] much like Seventh-day Adventist Desmond Doss who was the first conscientious objector to receive the Medal of Honor and one of only three so honored, and other supportive roles which do not require to kill or carry a weapon.[31]

Christian pacifism in action[edit]

From the beginning of the First World War, Christian pacifist organizations emerged to support Christians in denominations other than the historic peace churches. The first was the interdenominational Fellowship of Reconciliation ("FoR"), founded in Britain in 1915 but soon joined by sister organizations in the U.S. and other countries. Today pacifist organizations serving specific denominations are more or less closely allied with the FoR: they include


The Network of Christian Peace Organisations (NCPO) is a UK-based ecumenical peace network of 28 organizations.[32] Some of these organizations do not take strictly pacifist positions, describing themselves instead as advocating nonviolence, and some either have members who would not consider themselves Christians or are explicitly interfaith. However, they share historical and philosophical roots in Christian pacifism.

In some cases Christian churches, even if not necessarily committed to Christian pacifism, have supported particular campaigns of nonviolent resistance, also often called civil resistance. Examples include theSouthern Christian Leadership Conference (a grouping of churches in the southern United States) in supporting the US civil rights struggle in the 1960s; the Chilean Catholic Church's support for the civic action against authoritarian rule in Pinochet's Chile in the 1980s; and the Polish Catholic Church's support for the Solidarity movement in Poland in the 1980s.[33]

Walter Wink writes that "There are three general responses to evil:
(1) passivity, (2) violent opposition, and (3) the third way of militant nonviolence articulated by Jesus.

Human evolution has conditioned us for only the first two of these responses: fight or flight."[34] This understanding typifies Walter Wink's book,Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way.[35]

World War I[edit]

Ben Salmon was an American Catholic pacifist and outspoken critic of just war theory, as he believed all war to be unjust.[36] During World War I, Salmon was arrested for refusing to complete a Selective Service and report for induction. He was court-martialed at Camp Dodge, Iowa on July 24, 1918, and sentenced to death. This was later revised to 25 years hard labor.[37] Salmon's steadfast pacifism has since been cited as an inspiration for other Catholics, such as Fathers Daniel Berrigan and John Dear.[38][39]

Episcopalian bishop Paul Jones, who had associated himself with the Fellowship of Reconciliation and had been quite outspoken in his opposition to the war, was forced to resign his Utah see in April 1918.

World War II[edit]

The French Christian pacifists André and Magda Trocmé helped conceal hundreds of Jews fleeing the Nazis in the village of Le Chambon-sur-Lignon.[40][41] After the war, the Trocmés were declared Righteous Among the Nations.[40]

The radical Christian pacifist[42] John Middleton Murry, changed his opinions on Christian pacifism in light of the Holocaust. In his early years as a writer of The Necessity of Pacifism (1937) and as editor of the weekly London newspaper, Peace News, he argued that Nazi Germany, should be allowed retain control of mainland Europe, arguing Nazism was a lesser evil compared to the horrors of a total war.[43][44] Later, he recanted his pacifism in 1948 and promoted a preventative war against the Soviet Union.[45]

Vera Brittain was another British Christian pacifist. She worked as a fire warden and by travelling around the country raising funds for the Peace Pledge Union's food relief campaign. She was vilified for speaking out against the saturation bombing of German cities through her 1944 booklet Massacre by Bombing. Her principled pacifist position was vindicated somewhat when, in 1945, the Nazi's Black Book of 2000 people to be immediately arrested in Britain after a German invasion was shown to include her name.[46] After the war, Brittain worked for Peace News magazine, "writing articles against apartheid and colonialism and in favour of nuclear disarmament" from a Christian perspective.[47]

Anti-war movement[edit]

Having been inspired by the Sermon on the MountThomas launched the White House Peace Vigil in 1981; the longest running peace vigil in US history.[48] Over the years, he was joined by numerous anti-waractivists including those from the Catholic Worker Movement and Plowshares Movement.[49]

War tax resistance[edit]

Opposition to war has led some, like Ammon Hennacy, to a form of tax resistance in which they reduce their income below the tax threshold by taking up a simple living lifestyle.[50][51] These individuals believe that their government is engaged in immoral, unethical or destructive activities such as war, and paying taxes inevitably funds these activities.[52]

See also[edit]

Christianity portal
Anglican Pacifist Fellowship
Catholic peace traditions
Christian anarchism
Christian realism
Christian martyrs
Christians in the military
Christian vegetarianism
Christianity and violence
Civil resistance
Love your enemies
Lutheran Peace Fellowship
Nonviolence
Nonviolent resistance
Onward, Christian Pilgrims
Pax Christi
Religion and peacebuilding
References[edit]

^ Colm McKeogh, Tolstoy's Pacifism, Cambria Press, 2009, ISBN 1-60497-634-9.
^ Greg Boyd. "Does the bible teach total non-violence?".
^ Rev Dr Gordon Wong. "Pacifism Or Peace? War, Peace and Justice in the Old Testament"(PDF).
^ Bailey, Wilma A. (2005). "You shall not kill" or "You shall not murder"?: the assault on a biblical text. Liturgical Press. pp. 72, 73 and 74.
^ Orr, Edgar W. (1958). Christian pacifism. C.W. Daniel Co. p. 33.
^ Justo L. González, Essential Theological Terms, Westminster John Knox Press, 2005,ISBN 0-664-22810-0, p. 125: "There is no doubt that the early church was pacifist, teaching that Christians could not be soldiers."
^ "Tatian's Address to the Greeks". Retrieved25 April 2015.
^ "The Apology of Aristides the Philosopher". Retrieved 25 April 2015.
^ "The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus of Rome". Retrieved 25 April 2015.
^ Arnobius, Adversus Gentes, Book I, Chapter VI.
^ Cyprian of Carthage, Epistle I, to Donatus, 6.
^ Ante-Nicene Fathers, volume 6, p. 179: Disputation of Archelaus and Manes
^ Gregory of Nyssa on the Beatitudes, in Ancient Christian Writers, Gregory of Nyssa, The Lord's Prayer & The Beatitudes, tr. Hilda C. Graef, (The Newman Press, London, 1954), pp. 94-95
^ J. Daryl Charles, Between Pacifism and Jihad: Just war and Christian tradition, InterVarsity Press, 2005, ISBN 0-8308-2772-2, p. 35.
^ Gregory M. Reichberg, Henrik Syse, and Endre Begby, The Ethics of War: Classic and contemporary readings, Wiley-Blackwell, 2006,ISBN 1-4051-2377-X, p 62.
^ John Helgeland, Christians and the Roman Army from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine, in Hildegard Temporini and Wolfgang Haase,Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung, Walter de Gruyter, 1979,ISBN 3-11-007822-8, pp. 724 ff.
^ Roland Bainton, quoted in Robin Gill, A Textbook of Christian Ethics, 3rd ed, Continuum, 2006, ISBN 0-567-03112-8, p. 194.
^ a b Kurlansky, Mark (2006). Nonviolence: Twenty-five lessons from the history of a dangerous idea, pp. 26-27.
^ The Complete writings of Menno Simons: c.1496-1561, tr. Leonard Verduin, ed. John Christian Wenger, Herald Press, 1966, p. 554.
^ Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968), Strength to Love, quoted in Martin Luther King, Jr: Civil rights leader, theologian, orator, Volume 1, David J. Garrow, Carlson Pub., 1989, ISBN 0-926019-01-5, p. 41.
^ Ammon Hennacy, The Book of Ammon, p. 149
^ Long have I held that war is an enormous crime; long have I regarded all battles as but murder on a large scale. India's Ills and England's Sorrows," September 6, 1857
^ The New conscientious objection: from sacred to secular resistance Charles C. Moskos, John Whiteclay Chambers - 1993 "The first conscientious objector in the modern sense appeared in 1815. Like all other objectors from then until the 1880s, he was a Quaker.4 The government suggested exempting the pacifist Quakers, but the Storting, the Norwegian "
^ Speicher, Sara and Durnbaugh, Donald F. (2003), Ecumenical Dictionary: Historic Peace Churches
^ Lippey C. The Christadelphians in North America
^ Bryan R. Wilson Sects and Society 1961
^ Doctrinal Points of the Church of God (7th Day)
^ http://www.cog7day.org/about/index.asp?pgID=11
^ F.M. Wilcox, Seventh-day Adventists in Time of War, p. 58.
^ "Seventh-day Adventists and Project Whitecoat". Retrieved April 16, 2016.
^ "Adventist Review: BETWEEN PACIFISM AND PATRIOTISM". Retrieved April 16, 2016.
^ "Network of Christian Peace Organisations".
^ Adam Roberts and Timothy Garton Ash(eds.), Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-violent Action from Gandhi to the Present, Oxford University Press, 2009,ISBN 978-0-19-955201-6, pp. 58-74, 127-143 and 197-212.
^ Walter Wink, writing in Roger S. Gottlieb,Liberating Faith: Religious voices for justice, peace, and ecological wisdom, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, ISBN 0-7425-2535-X, p. 442.
^ Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way, Augsburg Fortress, 2003. ISBN 0-8006-3609-0
^ Robert Ellsberg (1997). All Saints: Daily Reflections on Saints, Prophets, and Witnesses for Our Time. p. 77.
^ "WW1 Conscientious Objectors Database". Swarthmore College Peace Collection. RetrievedFebruary 24, 2010.
^ John Dear (February 23, 2010). "Ben Salmon and the Army of Peace". National Catholic Reporter.
^ Berrigan, Daniel. "The Life and Witness of Benjamin Joseph Salmon". Jonah House. Retrieved February 24, 2010. He brings to mind the buried treasure of the Gospel story, this unlikely hero
^ a b Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed: The Story of Le Chambon and How Goodness Happened There Philip P. Hallie, (1979) New York: Harper & Row, ISBN 0-06-011701-X
^ Brock and Young, p. 220.
^ "Quotation by John Middleton Murry". London: Dictionary.com. 1944, Peace News.Check date values in: |date= (help);[verification needed]
^ Richard A. Rempel, "The Dilemmas of British Pacifists During World War II", The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 50, No. 4, On Demand Supplement (Dec. 1978), pp. D1213-D1229.
^ Lea, pp. 310-12.
^ David Goodway,Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow (2006), Liverpool University Press, 2006. ,ISBN 1846310261, p. 208.
^ Berry, Paul and Bostridge,Mark, Vera Brittain: A Life, 1995, ISBN 0-7011-2679-5 (p. 445).
^ Loretta Stec, "Pacifism, Vera Brittain, and India". Peace Review , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 237-244, 2001
^ Lloyd Grove (December 14, 1984). "Birth of a street person". The Washington Post.
^ "Significant Peace Park Vigilers from the Past". Prop1.org.
^ "Anarchists and War Tax Resistance".National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee (NWTRCC).
^ "Low Income/Simple Living as War Tax Resistance". NWTRCC.
^ "What is War Tax Resistance?". NWTRCC.

External links[edit]