The Life of Vivekananda: A Journey into the Inspiring Life of a Social Reformer by Swami Vivekanand: Inspiring Personality “All the powers in the universe are already our.” eBook : Swami Vivekanand: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store
Romain Rolland
+ Follow
More books from this author
Roll over image to zoom in
Read sample
The Life of Vivekananda: A Journey into the Inspiring Life of a Social Reformer by Swami Vivekanand: Inspiring Personality “All the powers in the universe are already our.” Kindle Edition
by Swami Vivekanand (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 36 ratings
See all formats and editions
The Life of Vivekananda: A Great Social Reformer and Inspiring Personality is a biographical work that sheds light on the life and teachings of Swami Vivekananda, a renowned spiritual leader, philosopher, and social reformer. This book explores the remarkable journey of Vivekananda, who played a significant role in revitalizing Hinduism and spreading the message of Vedanta across the world.
Key Aspects of The Life of Vivekananda:
Early Life and Spiritual Quest: The biography delves into Swami Vivekananda's early life, including his upbringing, education, and spiritual inclinations. It explores his quest for truth, his encounters with various spiritual teachers, and his transformative meeting with his guru, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. The book captures the essence of Vivekananda's spiritual journey and the profound impact it had on shaping his beliefs and mission.Advocacy of Vedanta and Social Reforms: The biography highlights Vivekananda's role as an advocate of Vedanta philosophy, which emphasizes the oneness of all religions and the spiritual unity of humanity. It explores his influential speeches at the Parliament of the World's Religions in Chicago in 1893, where he introduced Hinduism to the Western world. The book also delves into Vivekananda's efforts in social reforms, focusing on education, women's empowerment, and uplifting the marginalized sections of society.Legacy and Impact: The Life of Vivekananda examines the enduring legacy of Swami Vivekananda and his impact on spiritual seekers, social reformers, and individuals seeking personal transformation. The biography explores Vivekananda's teachings on self-realization, self-confidence, and harnessing one's inner potential. It reflects on his vision of a harmonious and inclusive society and his call for individuals to awaken their inherent divinity.
The Life of Vivekananda offers readers a deep insight into the life and teachings of Swami Vivekananda, showcasing his profound spiritual wisdom, social vision, and unwavering commitment to the upliftment of humanity. It celebrates Vivekananda as an inspiring personality who continues to inspire and guide generations with his timeless teachings and ideals.
Swami Vivekananda: Swami Vivekananda, an Indian spiritual leader and philosopher, played a pivotal role in introducing Indian philosophy and spirituality to the Western world. Born in 1863, Vivekananda was a disciple of the renowned saint Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. He represented Hinduism at the World's Parliament of Religions in 1893, delivering a groundbreaking speech that promoted the principles of universal tolerance and harmony among religions. Vivekananda's teachings, encompassing Vedanta philosophy and the practice of meditation, continue to inspire individuals in their pursuit of spiritual enlightenment and their quest for a more inclusive and compassionate world.
Read more
Language
English
Sticky notes
On Kindle Scribe
Publisher
Prabhat Prakashan
Publication date
25 February 2019
File size
1315 KB
Page Flip
Enabled
Word Wise
Enabled
Enhanced typesetting
Enabled
Next page
Top-rated books in Kindle Unlimited
Find your next great read. Browse this month's selection.
Report an issue with this product
Continue series you’ve started
Page 1 of 2Page 1 of 2
Previous page
The Greek World (Routledge Worlds)
Anton Powell
5.0 out of 5 stars 2
Kindle Edition
$68.79$68.79
Resisting Spirits: Drama Reform and Cultural Transformation in the People's Republic of China (China Understandings Today)
Maggie Greene
4.6 out of 5 stars 3
Kindle Edition
$25.56$25.56
Girt Nation: The Unauthorised History of Australia Volume 3
David Hunt
4.3 out of 5 stars 231
Kindle Edition
$16.99$16.99
Little One-Inch & Other Japanese Children's Favorite Stories (Favorite Children's Stories)
Florence Sakade
4.6 out of 5 stars 46
Kindle Edition
$14.07$14.07
Dividing Africa with Policy: The Influence of the Union for the Mediterranean on the Unity and Security of Africa (Library of Public Policy and Public Administration Book 14)
Lara Hierro
Kindle Edition
$79.93$79.93
The Cambridge Companion to Christian Doctrine (Cambridge Companions to Religion)
Colin E. Gunton
4.6 out of 5 stars 18
Kindle Edition
$47.92$47.92
The Great War in History: Debates and Controversies, 1914 to the Present (Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare Book 21)
Jay Winter
3.1 out of 5 stars 4
Kindle Edition
$45.95$45.95
Next page
Product details
ASIN : B07P55YQR5
Publisher : Prabhat Prakashan; The Life of Vivekananda: A Great Social Reformer and Inspiring Personality edition (25 February 2019)
Language : English
File size : 1315 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Sticky notes : On Kindle ScribeCustomer Reviews:
4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 36 ratings
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
+ Follow
Romain Rolland
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs, and more
How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today?
Very poor
Neutral
Great
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
36 global ratings
5 star 66%
4 star 20%
3 star 4%
2 star
0%
1 star 10%
How are ratings calculated?
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review
Sponsored
Top reviews
Top reviews from Australia
There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia
Top reviews from other countries
Navaneeta
5.0 out of 5 stars PriceReviewed in India on 11 October 2018
Verified Purchase
The MRP of the book is RS. 120
2 people found this helpfulReport
Kindle Customer
1.0 out of 5 stars A great work but extremely badly published e bookReviewed in India on 12 December 2022
Verified Purchase
The kindle edition is full of spelling mistakes. Most foot notes are wrongly tagged. Very disappointed with the production.
Report
Showing posts with label Swami Vivekananda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Swami Vivekananda. Show all posts
2024/02/17
2024/02/16
Vedanta Philosophy -- Vivekananda 1896 lecture
Vedanta Philosophy -- Vivekananda
The Vedanta Philosophy
From The Vivekanada Foundation
[NOTE: Swami Vivekananda, who was largely responsible for the introduction of Vedanta into the United States, presented this lecture, The Vedanta Philosophy, to the Graduate Philosophical Society of Harvard University on March 25, 1896. The following presents a summary of the lecture, the Q&A discussion which followed, and the footnotes relating to the text. The lecture presents Vedanta as it has evolved into modern times. Clicking on the link above will take you to the Vivekananda Foundation where you will find many interesting texts on-line, expecially in their "Archive" section. -- W. Weinstein]
====
What Vedanta Is
The Vedanta philosophy, as it is generally called at the present day, really comprises all the various sects that now exist in India. Thus there have been various interpretations, and to my mind they have been progressive, beginning with the dualistic or Dvaita and ending with the non-dualistic or Advaita. The word Vedanta literally means the end of the Vedas--the Vedas being the scriptures of the Hindus.{1} Sometimes in the West by the Vedas are meant only the hymns and rituals of the Vedas. But at the present time these parts have almost gone out of use, and usually by the word Vedas in India, the Vedanta is meant. All our commentators, when they want to quote a passage from the scriptures, as a rule, quote from the Vedanta, which has another technical name with the commentators--the Shrutis.{2} Now, all the books known by the name of the Vedanta were not entirely written after the ritualistic portions of the Vedas. For instance, one of them--the Isha Upanishad--forms the fortieth chapter of the Yajur-veda, that being one of the oldest parts of the Vedas. There are other Upanishads{3} which form portions of the Brahmanas or ritualistic writings; and the rest of the Upanishads are independent, not comprised in any of the Brahmanas or other parts of the Vedas; but there is no reason to suppose that they were entirely independent of other parts, for, as we well know, many of these have been lost entirely and many of the Brahmanas have become extinct. So it is quite possible that the independent Upanishads belonged to some Brahmanas, which in course of time fell into disuse, while the Upanishads remained. These Upanishads are also called Forest Books or Aranyakas.
The Vedanta, then, practically forms the scriptures of the Hindus, and all systems of philosophy that are orthodox have to take it as their foundation. Even the Buddhists and Jains, when it suits their purpose, will quote a passage from the Vedanta as authority. All schools of philosophy in India, although they claim to have been based upon the Vedas, took different names for their systems. The last one, the system of Vyasa, took its stand upon the doctrines of the Vedas more than the previous systems did, and made an attempt to harmonize the preceding philosophies, such as the Sankhya and the Nyaya, with the doctrines of the Vedanta. So it is especially called the Vedanta philosophy; and the Sutras or aphorisms of Vyasa are, in modern India, the basis of the Vedanta philosophy. Again, these Sutras of Vyasa have been variously explained by different commentators. In general there are three sorts of commentators{4} in India now; from their interpretations have arisen three systems of philosophy and sects. One is dualistic, or Dvaita; a second is the qualified non-dualistic, or Vishishtadvaita; and a third is the non-dualistic, or Advaita. Of these the dualistic and the qualified non-dualistic include the largest number of the Indian people. The non-dualists are comparatively few in number. Now I will try to lay before you the ideas that are contained in all these three sects; but before going on, I will make one remark--that these different Vedanta systems have one common psychology, and that is, the psychology of the Sankhya system. The Sankhya psychology is very much like the psychologies of the Nyaya and Vaisheshika systems, differing only in minor particulars.
All the Vedantists agree on three points. They believe in God, in the Vedas as revealed, and in cycles. We have already considered the Vedas. The belief about cycles is as follows: All matter throughout the universe is the outcome of one primal matter called Akasha; and all force, whether gravitation, attraction or repulsion, or life, is the outcome of one primal force called Prana. Prana acting on Akasha is creating or projecting{5} the universe. At the beginning of a cycle, Akasha is motionless, unmanifested. Then Prana begins to act, more and more, creating grosser and grosser forms out of Akasha--plants, animals, men, stars, and so on. After an incalculable time this evolution ceases and involution begins, everything being resolved back through finer and finer forms into the original Akasha and Prana, when a new cycle follows. Now there is something beyond Akasha and Prana. Both can be resolved into a third thing called Mahat--the Cosmic Mind. This Cosmic Mind does not create Akasha and Prana, but changes itself into them.
Mind, Soul, and God
We will now take up the beliefs about mind, soul, and God. According to the universally accepted Sankhya psychology, in perception--in the case of vision, for instance--there are, first of all, the instruments of vision, the eyes. Behind the instruments--the eyes--is the organ of vision or Indriya--the optic nerve and its centers--which is not the external instrument, but without which the eyes will not see. More still is needed for perception. The mind or Manas must come and attach itself to the organ. And besides this, the sensation must be carried to the intellect or Buddhi--the determinative, reactive state of the mind. When the reaction comes from Buddhi, along with it flashes the external world and egoism. Here then is the will; but everything is not complete. Just as every picture, being composed of successive impulses of light, must be united on something stationary to form a whole, so all the ideas in the mind must be gathered and projected on something that is stationary--relatively to the body and mind--that is, on what is called the Soul or Purusha or Atman.
Basic Psychology: the Sankhya Philosophy
According to the Sankhya philosophy, the reactive state of the mind called Buddhi or intellect is the outcome, the change, or a certain manifestation of the Mahat or Cosmic Mind. The Mahat becomes changed into vibrating thought; and that becomes in one part changed into the organs, and in the other part into the fine particles of matter. Out of the combination of all these, the whole of this universe is produced. Behind even Mahat, the Sankhya conceives of a certain state which is called Avyakta or unmanifested, where even the manifestation of mind is not present, but only the causes exists. It is also called Prakriti. Beyond this Prakriti, and eternally separate from it, is the Purusha, the soul of the Sankhya which is without attributes and omnipresent. The Purusha is not the doer but the witness. The illustration of the crystal is used to explain the Purusha. The latter is said to be like a crystal without any color, before which different colors are placed, and then it seems to be colored by the colors before it, but in reality it is not.
The Vedantic Point of View
Vedantists reject the Sankhya ideas of the soul and nature. They claim that between them there is a huge gulf to be bridged over. On the one hand the Sankhya system comes to nature, and then at once it has to jump over to the other side and come to the soul, which is entirely separate from nature. How can these different colors, as Sankhya called them, be able to act on that soul which by its nature is colorless? So the Vedantists, from the very first, affirm that this soul and this nature are one.{6} Even the dualistic Vedantists admit that the Atman or God is not only the efficient cause of this universe, but also the material cause. But they only say so in so many words. They do not really mean it, for they try to escape from their conclusions, in this way: They say there are three existences in this universe--God, soul, and nature. Nature and soul are, as it were, the body of God, and in this sense it may be said that God and the whole universe are one. But this nature and all these various souls remain different from each other through all eternity. Only at the beginning of a cycle do they become manifest; and when the cycle ends, they become fine, and remain in a fine state.
The Idea of the Advaitists Is to Generalize the Whole Universe into One
Advaita Vedantists--the non-dualists--reject this theory of the soul, and, having nearly the whole range of the Upanishads in their favor, build their philosophy entirely upon them. All the books contained in the Upanishads have one subject, one task before them--to prove the following theme: "Just as by the knowledge of one lump of clay we have the knowledge of all the clay in the universe, so what is that, knowing which we know everything in the universe?" The idea of the Advaitists is to generalize the whole universe into one--that something which is really the whole of this universe. And they claim that this whole universe is one, that it is one Being manifesting itself in all these various forms. They admit that what the Sankhya calls nature exists, but say that nature is God. It is this Being, the Sat, which has become converted into all this--the universe, man, soul, and everything that exists. Mind and Mahat are but the manifestations of that one Sat. But then the difficulty arises that this would be pantheism. How came that Sat which is unchangeable, as they admit (for that which is absolute is unchangeable), to become God? God is the material cause of this universe, but not really, only apparently. The celebrated illustration used is that of the rope and the snake, where the rope appeared to be the snake, but was not really so. The rope did not really change into the snake. Even so this whole universe as it exists is that Being. It is unchanged, and all the changes we see in it are only apparent. These changes are caused by Desha, Kala, and Nimitta (space, time, and causation), or, according to a higher psychological generalization, by Nama and Rupa (name and form). It is by name and form that one thing is differentiated from another. The name and form alone cause the difference. In reality they are one and the same. Again, it is not, the Vedantists say, that there is something as phenomenon and something as noumenon. The rope is changed into the snake apparently only; and when the delusion ceases, the snake vanishes. When one is in ignorance, he sees the phenomenon and does not see God. When he sees God, this universe vanishes entirely for him.
Defining Maya
Ignorance or Maya, as it is called, is the cause of all this phenomenon--the Absolute, the Unchangeable, being taken as this manifested universe. This Maya is not absolute zero, nor non- existence. It is defined as neither existence nor non-existence. It is not existence, because that can be said only of the Absolute, the Unchangeable, and in this sense, Maya is non- existence. Again, it cannot be said it is non-existence; for if it were, it could never produce the phenomenon. So it is something which is neither; and in the Vedanta philosophy it is called Anirvachaniya or inexpressible. Maya, then, is the real cause of this universe. Maya gives the name and form to what Brahman or God gives the material; and the latter seems to have been transformed into all this. The Advaitists, then have no place for the individual soul. They say individual souls are created by Maya. In reality they cannot exist. If there were only one existence throughout, how could it be that I am one, and you are one, and so forth? We are all one, and the cause of evil is the perception of duality. As soon as I begin to feel that I am separate from this universe, then first comes fear, and then comes misery. "Where one hears another, one sees another, that is small. Where one does not see another, where one does not hear another, that is the greatest, that is God. In that greatest is perfect happiness. In small things there is no happiness."
The High and the Low
According to the Advaita philosophy, then, this differentiation of matter, these phenomena, are, as it were, for a time, hiding the real nature of man; but the latter really has not been changed at all. In the lowest worm, as well as in the highest human being, the same divine nature is present. The worm form is the lower form in which the divinity has been more overshadowed by Maya; that is the highest form in which it has been least overshadowed. Behind everything the same divinity is existing, and out of this comes the basis of morality. Do not injure another. Love everyone as your own self, because the whole universe is one. In injuring another, I am injuring myself; in loving another, I am loving myself. From this also springs that principle of Advaita morality which has been summed up in one word--self-abnegation. The Advaitist says, this little personalized self is the cause of all my misery. This individualized self, which makes me different from all other beings brings hatred and jealousy and misery, struggle and all other evils. And when this idea has been got rid of, all struggle will cease, all misery vanish. So this is to be given up. We must always hold ourselves ready, even to give up our lives for the lowest beings. When a man has become ready even to give up his life for a little insect, he has reached the perfection which the Advaitist wants to attain; and at that moment when he has become thus ready, the veil of ignorance falls away from him, and he will feel his own nature. Even in this life, he will feel that he is one with the universe. For a time, as it were, the whole of this phenomenal world will disappear for him, and he will realize what he is. But so long as the Karma of this body remains, he will have to live.
When the Veil Has Vanished
This state, when the veil has vanished and yet the body remains for some time, is what the Vedantists call the Jivanmukti, the living freedom. If a man is deluded by a mirage for some time, and one day the mirage disappears--if it comes back again the next day, or at some future time, he will not be deluded. Before the mirage first broke, the man could not distinguish between the reality and the deception. But when it has once broken, as long as he has organs and eyes to work with, he will see the image, but will no more be deluded. That fine distinction between the actual world and the mirage he has caught, and the latter cannot delude him any more. So when the Vedantist has realized his own nature, the whole world has vanished for him. It will come back again, but no more the same world of misery. The prison of misery has become changed into Sat, Chit, Ananda--Existence Absolute, Knowledge Absolute, Bliss Absolute--and the attainment of this is the goal of the Advaita.
THE VEDANTA PHILOSOPHY: DISCUSSION
Q.--I should like to know something about the present activity of philosophic thought in India. To what extent are these questions discussed?
A.--As I have said, the majority of the Indian people are practically dualists, and the minority are monists. The main subject of discussion is Maya and Jiva. When I came to this country, I found that the laborers were informed of the present condition of politics; but when I asked them, "What is religion, and what are the doctrines of this and that particular sect?" they said, "We do not know; we go to church." In India if I go to a peasant and ask him, "Who governs you?" he says, "I do not know; I pay my taxes." But if I ask him what is his religion, he says, "I am a dualist", and is ready to give you the details about Maya and Jiva. He cannot read or write, but he has learned all this from the monks and is very fond of discussing it. After the day's work, the peasants sit under a tree and discuss these questions.
Q.--What does orthodoxy mean with the Hindus?
A.--In modern times it simply means obeying certain caste laws as to eating, drinking, and marriage. After that the Hindu can believe in any system he likes. There was never an organized church in India; so there was never a body of men to formulate doctrines of orthodoxy. In a general way, we say that those who believe in the Vedas are orthodox; but in reality we find that many of the dualistic sects believe more in the Puranas than in the Vedas alone.
Q.--What influence had your Hindu philosophy on the Stoic philosophy of the Greeks?
A.--It is very probable that it had some influence on it through the Alexandrians. There is some suspicion of Pythagoras' being influenced by the Sankhya thought. Anyway, we think the Sankhya philosophy is the first attempt to harmonize the philosophy of the Vedas through reason. We find Kapila mentioned even in the Vedas: "{Sanskrit}--He who (supports through knowledge) the first-born sage Kapila."
Q.--What is the antagonism of this thought with Western science?
A.--No antagonism at all. We are in harmony with it. Our theory of evolution and of Akasha and Prana is exactly what your modern philosophies have. Your belief in evolution is among our Yogis and in the Sankhya philosophy. For instance, Patanjali speaks of one species being changed into another by the infilling of nature-- "{Sanskrit}"; only he differs from you in the explanation. His explanation of this evolution is spiritual. He says that just as when a farmer wants to water his field from the canals that pass near, he has only to lift up his gate--"{Sanskrit}"--so each man is the Infinite already, only these bars and bolts and different circumstances shut him in; but as soon as they are removed, he rushes out and expresses himself. In the animal, the man was held in abeyance; but as soon as good circumstances came, he was manifested as man. And again, as soon as fitting circumstances came, the God in man manifested itself. So we have very little to quarrel with in the new theories. For instance, the theory of the Sankhya as to perception is very little different from modern physiology.
Q.--But your method is different?
A.--Yes. We claim that concentrating the powers of the mind is the only way to knowledge. In external science, concentration of mind is--putting it on something external; and in internal science, it is--drawing towards one's Self. We call this concentration of mind Yoga.
Q.--In the state of concentration does the truth of these principles become evident?
A.--The Yogis claim a good deal. They claim that by concentration of the mind every truth in the universe becomes evident to the mind, both external and internal truth.
Q.--What does the Advaitist think of cosmology?
A.--The Advaitist would say that all this cosmology and everything else are only in Maya, in the phenomenal world. In truth they do not exist. But as long as we are bound, we have to see these visions. Within these visions things come in a certain regular order. Beyond them there is no law and order, but freedom.
Q.--Is the Advaita antagonistic to dualism?
A.--The Upanishads not being in a systematized form, it was easy for philosophers to take up texts when they liked to form a system. The Upanishads had always to be taken, else there would be no basis. Yet we find all the different schools of thought in the Upanishads. Our solution is that the Advaita is not antagonistic to the Dvaita (dualism). We say the latter is only one of three steps. Religion always takes three steps. The first is dualism. Then man gets to a higher state, partial non-dualism. And at last he finds he is one with the universe. Therefore the three do not contradict but fulfil.
Q.--Why does Maya or ignorance exist?
A.--"Why" cannot be asked beyond the limit of causation. It can only be asked within Maya. We say we will answer the question when it is logically formulated. Before that we have no right to answer.
Q.--Does the Personal God belong to Maya?
A.--Yes; but the Personal God is the same Absolute seen through Maya. That Absolute under the control of nature is what is called the human soul; and that which is controlling nature is Ishvara, or the Personal God. If a man starts from here to see the sun, he will see at first a little sun; but as he proceeds he will see it bigger and bigger, until he reaches the real one. At each stage of his progress he was seeing apparently a different sun; yet we are sure it was the same sun he was seeing. So all these things are but visions of the Absolute, and as such they are true. Not one is a false vision, but we can only say they were lower stages.
Q.--What is the special process by which one will come to know the Absolute?
A.--We say there are two processes. One is the positive, and the other, the negative. The positive is that through which the whole universe is going--that of love. If this circle of love is increased indefinitely, we reach the one universal love. The other is the "Neti", "Neti"--"not this", "not this"--stopping every wave in the mind which tries to draw it out; and at last the mind dies, as it were, and the Real discloses Itself. We call that Samadhi, or superconsciousness.
Q.--That would be, then, merging the subject in the object!
A.--Merging the object in the subject, not merging the subject in the object. Really this world dies, and I remain. I am the only one that remains.
Q.--Some of our philosophers in Germany have thought that the whole doctrine of Bhakti (Love for the Divine) in India was very likely the result of occidental influence.
A.--I do not take any stock in that--the assumption was ephemeral. The Bhakti of India is not like the Western Bhakti. The central idea of ours is that there is no thought of fear. It is always, love God. There is no worship through fear, but always through love, from beginning to end. In the second place, the assumption is quite unnecessary. Bhakti is spoken of in the oldest of the Upanishads, which is much older than the Christian Bible. The germs of Bhakti are even in the Samhita (the Vedic hymns). The word Bhakti is not a Western word. It was suggested by the word Shraddha.
Q.--What is the Indian idea of the Christian faith?
A.--That is very good. The Vedanta will take in every one. We have a peculiar idea in India. Suppose I had a child. I should not teach him any religion; I should teach him breathings--the practice of concentrating the mind, and just one line of prayer-- not prayer in your sense, but simply something like this, "I meditate on Him who is the Creator of this universe: may He enlighten my mind!" That way he would be educated, and then go about hearing different philosophers and teachers. He would select one who, he thought, would suit him best; and this man would become his Guru or teacher, and he would become a Shishya or disciple. He would say to that man, "This form of philosophy which you preach is the best; so teach me." Our fundamental idea is that your doctrine cannot be mine, or mine yours. Each one must have his own way. My daughter may have one method, and my son another, and I again another. So each one has an Ishta or chosen way, and we keep it to ourselves. It is between me and my teacher, because we do not want to create a fight. It will not help any one to tell it to others, because each one will have to find his own way. So only general philosophy and general methods can be taught universally. For instance, giving a ludicrous example, it may help me to stand on one leg. It would be ludicrous to you if I said every one must do that, but it may suit me. It is quite possible for me to be a dualist and for my wife to be a monist, and so on. One of my sons may worship Christ or Buddha or Mohammed, so long as he obeys the caste laws. That is his own Ishta.
Q.--Do all Hindus believe in caste?
A.--They are forced to. They may not believe, but they have to obey.
Q.--Are these exercises in breathing and concentration universally practiced?
A.--Yes; only some practice only a little, just to satisfy the requirements of their religion. The temples in India are not like the churches here. They may all vanish tomorrow, and will not be missed. A temple is built by a man who wants to go to heaven, or to get a son, or something of that sort. So he builds a large temple and employs a few priests to hold services there. I need not go there at all, because all my worship is in the home. In every house is a special room set apart, which is called the chapel. The first duty of the child, after his initiation, is to take a bath, and then to worship; and his worship consists of this breathing and meditating and repeating of a certain name. And another thing is to hold the body straight. We believe that the mind has every power over the body to keep it healthy. After one has done this, then another comes and takes his seat, and each one does it in silence. Sometimes there are three or four in the same room, but each one may have a different method. This worship is repeated at least twice a day.
Q.--This state of oneness that you speak of, is it an ideal or something actually attained?
A.--We say it is within actuality; we say we realize that state. If it were only in talk, it would be nothing. The Vedas teach three things: this Self is first to be heard, then to be reasoned, and then to be meditated upon. When a man first hears it, he must reason on it, so that he does not believe it ignorantly, but knowingly; and after reasoning what it is, he must meditate upon it, and then realize it. And that is religion. Belief is no part of religion. We say religion is a superconscious state.
Q.--If you ever reach that state of superconsciousness, can you ever tell about it?
A.--No; but we know it by its fruits. An idiot, when he goes to sleep, comes out of sleep an idiot or even worse. But another man goes into the state of meditation, and when he comes out he is a philosopher, a sage, a great man. That shows the difference between these two states.
Q.--I should like to ask, in continuation of Professor __'s question, whether you know of any people who have made any study of the principles of self-hypnotism, which they undoubtedly practiced to a great extent in ancient India, and what has been recently stated and practiced in that thing. Of course you do not have it so much in modern India.
A.--What you call hypnotism in the West is only a part of the real thing. The Hindus call it self-hypnotisation. They say you are hypnotized already, and that you should get out of it and de- hypnotize yourself. "There the sun cannot illume, nor the moon, nor the stars; the flash of lightning cannot illume that; what to speak of this mortal fire! That shining, everything else shines" (Katha Upanishad, II.ii.15). That is not hypnotisation, but de- hypnotisation. We say that every other religion that preaches these things as real is practicing a form of hypnotism. It is the Advaitist alone that does not care to be hypnotized. His is the only system that more or less understands that hypnotism comes with every form of dualism. But the Advaitist says, throw away even the Vedas, throw away even the Personal God, throw away even the universe, throw away even your own body and mind, and let nothing remain, in order to get rid of hypnotism perfectly. "From where the mind comes back with speech, being unable to reach, knowing the Bliss of Brahman, no more is fear." That is de- hypnotisation. "I have neither vice nor virtue, nor misery nor happiness; I care neither for the Vedas nor sacrifices nor ceremonies; I am neither food nor eating nor eater, for I am Existence Absolute, Knowledge Absolute, Bliss Absolute; I am He, I am He." We know all about hypnotism. We have a psychology which the West is just beginning to know, but not yet adequately, I am sorry to say.
Q.--What do you call the astral body?
A.--The astral body is what we call the Linga Sharira. When this body dies, how can it come to take another body? Force cannot remain without matter. So a little part of the fine matter remains, through which the internal organs make another body--for each one is making his own body; it is the mind that makes the body. If I become a sage, my brain gets changed into a sage's brain; and the Yogis say that even in this life a Yogi can change his body into a god-body. The Yogis show many wonderful things. One ounce of practice is worth a thousand pounds of theory. So I have no right to say that because I have not seen this or that thing done, it is false. Their books say that with practice you can get all sorts of results that are most wonderful. Small results can be obtained in a short time by regular practice, so that one may know that there is no humbug about it, no charlatanism. And these Yogis explain the very wonderful things mentioned in all scriptures in a scientific way. The question is, how these records of miracles entered into every nation. The man, who says that they are all false and need no explanation, is not rational. You have no right to deny them until you can prove them false. You must prove that they are without any foundation, and only then have you the right to stand up and deny them. But you have not done that. On the other hand, the Yogis say they are not miracles, and they claim that they can do them even today. Many wonderful things are done in India today. But none of them are done by miracles. There are many books on the subject. Again, if nothing else has been done in that line except a scientific approach towards psychology, that credit must be given to the Yogis.
Q.--Can you say in the concrete what the manifestations are which the Yogi can show?
A.--The Yogi wants no faith or belief in his science but that which is given to any other science, just enough gentlemanly faith to come and make the experiment. The ideal of the Yogi is tremendous. I have seen the lower things that can be done by the power of the mind, and therefore, I have no right to disbelieve that the highest things can be done. The ideal of the Yogi is eternal peace and love through omniscience and omnipotence. I know a Yogi who was bitten by a cobra, and who fell down on the ground. In the evening he revived again, and when asked what happened, he said: "A messenger came from my Beloved." All hatred and anger and jealousy have been burnt out of this man. Nothing can make him react; he is infinite love all the time, and he is omnipotent in his power of love. That is the real Yogi. And this manifesting different things is accidental on the way. That is not what he wants to attain. The Yogi says, every man is a slave except the Yogi. He is a slave of food, to air, to his wife, to his children, to a dollar, slave to a nation, slave to name and fame, and to a thousand things in this world. The man who is not controlled by any one of these bondages is alone a real man, a real Yogi. "They have conquered relative existence in this life who are firm-fixed in sameness. God is pure and the same to all. Therefore such are said to be living in God" (Gita, V.19).
Q.--Do the Yogis attach any importance to caste?
A.--No; caste is only the training school for undeveloped minds.
Q.--Is there no connection between this idea of superconsciousness and the heat of India?
A.--I do not think so; because all this philosophy was thought out fifteen thousand feet above the level of the sea, among the Himalayas, in an almost Arctic temperature.
Q.--Is it practicable to attain success in a cold climate?
A.--It is practicable, and the only thing that is practicable in this world. We say you are a born Vedantist, each one of you. You are declaring your oneness with everything each moment you live. Every time that your heart goes out towards the world, you are a true Vedantist, only you do not know it. You are moral without knowing why; and the Vedanta is the philosophy which analyzed and taught man to be moral consciously. It is the essence of all religions.
Q.--Should you say that there is an unsocial principle in our Western people, which makes us so pluralistic, and that Eastern people are more sympathetic than we are?
A.--I think the Western people are more cruel, and the Eastern people have more mercy towards all beings. But that is simply because your civilization is very much more recent. It takes time to make a thing come under the influence of mercy. You have a great deal of power, and the power of control of the mind has especially been very little practiced. It will take time to make you gentle and good. This feeling tingles in every drop of blood in India. If I go to the villages to teach the people politics, they will not understand; but if I go to teach them Vedanta, they will say, "Now, Swami, you are all right". That Vairagya, non- attachment, is everywhere in India, even today. We are very much degenerated now; but kings will give up their thrones and go about the country without anything. In some places the common village- girl with her spinning-wheel says, "Do not talk to me of dualism; my spinning-wheel says 'Soham, Soham'--'I am He, I am He.'" Go and talk to these people, and ask them why it is that they speak so and yet kneel before that stone. They will say that with you religion means dogma, but with them realization. "I will be a Vedantist", one of them will say, "only when all this has vanished, and I have seen the reality. Until then there is no difference between me and the ignorant. So I am using these stones and am going to temples, and so on, to come to realization. I have heard, but I want to see and realize." "Different methods of speech, different manners of explaining the meaning of the scriptures--these are only for the enjoyment of the learned, not for freedom" (Shankara). It is realization which leads us to that freedom.
Q.--Is this spiritual freedom among the people consistent with attention to caste?
A.--Certainly not. They say there should be no caste. Even those who are in caste say it is not a very perfect institution. But they say, when you find us another and a better one, we will give it up. They say, what will you give us instead? Where is there no caste? In your nation you are struggling all the time to make a caste. As soon as a man gets a bag of dollars, he says, "I am one of the Four Hundred." We alone have succeeded in making a permanent caste. Other nations are struggling and do not succeed. We have superstitions and evils enough. Would taking the superstitions and evils from your country mend matters? It is owing to caste that three hundred millions of people can find a piece of bread to eat yet. It is an imperfect institution, no doubt. But if it had not been for caste, you would have had no Sanskrit books to study. This caste made walls, around which all sorts of invasions rolled and surged, but found it impossible to break through. That necessity has not gone yet; so caste remains. The caste we have now is not that of even hundred years ago. Every blow has riveted it. Do you realize that India is the only country that never went outside of itself to conquer? The great emperor Asoka insisted that none of his descendants should go to conquer. If people want to send us teachers, let them help, but not injure. Why should all these people come to conquer the Hindus? Did they do any injury to any nation? What little good they could do, they did for the world. They taught it science, philosophy, religion, and civilized the savage hordes of the earth. And this is the return--only murder and tyranny, and calling them heathen rascals. Look at the books written on India by Western people and at the stories of many travelers who go there; in retaliation for what injuries are these hurled at them?
Q.--What is the Vedantic idea of civilization?
A.--You are philosophers, and you do not think that a bag of gold makes the difference between man and man. What is the value of all these machines and sciences? They have only one result: they spread knowledge. You have not solved the problem of want, but only made it keener. Machines do not solve the poverty question; they simply make men struggle the more. Competition gets keener. What value has nature in itself? Why do you go and build a monument to a man who sends electricity through a wire? Does not nature do that millions of times over? Is not everything already existing in nature? What is the value of your getting it? It is already there. The only value is that it makes this development. This universe is simply a gymnasium in which the soul is taking exercise; and after these exercises we become gods. So the value of everything is to be decided by how far it is a manifestation of God. Civilization is the manifestation of that divinity in man.
Q.--Have the Buddhists any caste laws?
A.--The Buddhists never had much caste, and there are very few Buddhists in India. Buddha was a social reformer. Yet in Buddhistic countries I find that there have been strong attempts to manufacture caste, only they have failed. The Buddhists' caste is practically nothing, but they take pride in it in their own minds. Buddha was one of the Sannyasins of the Vedanta. He started a new sect, just as others are started even today. The ideas which now are called Buddhism were not his. They were much more ancient. He was a great man who gave the ideas power. The unique element in Buddhism was its social element. Brahmins and Kshatriyas have always been our teachers, and most of the Upanishads were written by Kshatriyas, while the ritualistic portions of the Vedas came from the Brahmins. Most of our great teachers throughout India have been Kshatriyas, and were always universal in their teachings; whilst the Brahmana prophets with two exceptions were very exclusive. Rama, Krishna, and Buddha--worshipped as Incarnations of God--were Kshatriyas.
Q.--Are sects, ceremonies, and scriptures helps to realization?
A.--When a man realizes, he gives up everything. The various sects and ceremonies and books, so far as they are the means of arriving at that point, are all right. But when they fail in that, we must change them. "The knowing one must not despise the condition of those who are ignorant, nor should the knowing one destroy the faith of the ignorant in their own particular method, but by proper action lead them and show them the path to come to where he stands" (Gita, III.26).
Q.--How does the Vedanta explain individuality and ethics?
A.--The real individual is the Absolute; this personalization is through Maya. It is only apparent; in reality it is always the Absolute. In reality there is one, but in Maya it is appearing as many. In Maya there is this variation. Yet even in this Maya there is always the tendency to get back to the One, as expressed in all ethics and all morality of every nation, because it is the constitutional necessity of the soul. It is finding its oneness; and this struggle to find this oneness is what we call ethics and morality. Therefore we must always practice them.
Q.--Is not the greater part of ethics taken up with the relation between individuals?
A.--That is all it is. The Absolute does not come within Maya.
Q.--You say the individual is the Absolute, and I was going to ask you whether the individual has knowledge.
A.--The state of manifestation is individuality, and the light in that state is what we call knowledge. To use, therefore, this term knowledge for the light of the Absolute is not precise, as the absolute state transcends relative knowledge.
Q.--Does it include it?
A.--Yes, in this sense. Just as a piece of gold can be changed into all sorts of coins, so with this. The state can be broken up into all sorts of knowledge. It is the state of superconsciousness, and includes both consciousness and unconsciousness. The man who attains that state has all that we call knowledge. When he wants to realize that consciousness of knowledge, he has to go a step lower. Knowledge is a lower state; it is only in Maya that we can have knowledge.
----
THE VEDANTA PHILOSOPHY: FOOTNOTES
{1}The Vedas are divided mainly into two portions: the Karma-kanda and the Jnana-kanda, the work-portion and the knowledge-portion. To the Karma-kanda belong the famous hymns and the rituals of Brahmanas. Those books which treat of spiritual matters apart from ceremonials are called Upanishads. The Upanishads belong to the Jnana-kanda, or knowledge-portion. It is not that all the Upanishads were composed as a separate portion of the Vedas. Some are interspersed among the rituals, and at least one is in the Samhita, or hymn-portion. Sometimes the term Upanishad is applied to books which are not included in the Vedas, e.g. the Gita; but as a rule it is applied to the philosophical treatises scattered through the Vedas. These treatises have been collected, and are called the Vedanta.
{2}The term Shruti meaning "that which is heard" though including the whole of the Vedic literature, is chiefly applied by the commentators to the Upanishads.
{3}The Upanishads are said to be one hundred and eight in number. Their dates cannot be fixed with certainty, only it is certain that they are older than the Buddhistic movement. Though some of the minor Upanishads contain allusions indicating a later date, yet that does not prove the later date of the treatise, as in very many cases in Sanskrit literature, the substance of a book, though of very ancient date, receives a coating, as it were, of later events in the hands of the sectarians, to exalt their particular sect.
{4}The commentaries are of various sorts such as the Bhashya, Tika, Tippani, Churni, etc., of which all except the Bhashya are explanations of the text or difficult words in the text. The Bhashya is not properly a commentary, but the elucidation of a system of philosophy out of texts, the object being not to explain the words, but to bring out a philosophy. So the writer of a Bhashya expands his own system, taking texts as authorities for his system.
There have been various commentaries on the Vedanta. Its doctrines found their final expression in the philosophical aphorisms of Vyasa. This treatise, called the Uttara Mimamsa, is the standard authority of Vedantism, nay, is the most authoritative exposition of the Hindu scriptures. The most antagonistic sects have been compelled, as it were, to take up the texts of Vyasa, and harmonize them with their own philosophy. Even in very ancient times the commentators on the Vedanta philosophy formed themselves into the three celebrated Hindu sects of dualists, qualified non- dualists, and non-dualists. The ancient commentaries are perhaps lost; but they have been revived in modern times by the post- Buddhistic commentators, Shankara, Ramanuja, and Madhva. Shankara revived the non-dualistic form; Ramanuja, the qualified non- dualistic form of the ancient commentator Bodhayana; and Madhva, the dualistic form. In India the sects differ mainly in their philosophy; the difference in rituals is slight, the basis of their philosophy and religion being the same.
{5}The word which is "creation" in the English language is in Sanskrit exactly "projection," because there is no sect in India which believes in creation as it is regarded in the West as something coming out of nothing. What we mean by creation is projection of that which already existed.
{6}The Vedanta and the Sankhya philosophy are very little opposed to each other. The Vedanta God developed out of the Sankhya's Purusha. All the systems take up the psychology of the Sankhya. Both the Vedanta and the Sankhya believe in the infinite soul; only the Sankhya believes there are many souls. According to the Sankhya, this universe does not require any explanation from outside. The Vedanta believes that there is the one Soul, which appears as many; and we build on the Sankhya's analysis.
Back to Top Back to Phil 307 Class Page
Vivekananda A Biography, 181-209, on religion and philosophy.
Post: Edit
APPENDIX
This appendix contains a number of Swami Vivekananda's important statements on religion and philosophy. T
hey have been selected from two volumes: Swami Vivekarianda on Religion and Philosophy, published by the Ramakrishna Mission Students' Home, Calcutta, and Teachings of Swami Vivekananda, published by the Advaita Mrama, Mayavati, Himalayas. We wish to express our indebtedness to the publishers.
Vivekananda A Biography, 71-79, VEDANTA IN AMERICA
Post: Edit 71-79
VEDANTA IN AMERICA
After the meetings of the Parliament of Religions were concluded, Swanii Vivekananda, as already noted, undertook a series of apostolic campaigns in order to sow the seed of the Vedãntic truths in the ready soil of America. Soon be discovered that the lecture bureau was exploiting him. Further, he did not like its method of advertisement. He was treated as if he were the chief attraction of a circus. The prospectus included his portrait, with the inscription, pro¬claiming his cardinal virtues: "An Orator by Divine Right; a Model Representative of his Race; a Perfect Master of the English Language; the Sensation of the 'World's Fair Parliament." It also described his physical bearing, his height, the colour of his skin, and his clothing. The Swami felt disgusted at being treated like a patent medicine or an elephant in a show. So be severed his relationship with the bureau and arranged his own lectures himself. He accepted invitations from churches, clubs, and private gatherings, and travelled extensively through the Eastern and Midwestern states of America, delivering twelve to fourteen or more lectures a week.
People came in hundreds and in thousands. And what an assorted audience he had to face! There came to his meetings professors from universities, ladies of fine breeding, seekers of truth, and devotees of God with childlike faith. But mixed with these were charlatans, curiosity-seekers, idlers, and vagabonds. It is not true that he met everywhere with favourable conditions. Leon Lands-berg, one of the Swami's American disciples, thus described Vivekananda's tribulations of those days:
The Americans are a receptive nation. That is why the country is a hotbed of all kinds of religious and irreligious monstrosities. There is no theory so absurd, no doctrine so irrational, no claim so extravagant, no fraud so transparent, but can find their numerous believers and a ready market. To satisfy this craving, to feed the credulity of the people, hundreds of societies and sects are born for the salvation of the world, and to enable the prophets to pocket $25 to $100 initiation fees. Hobgoblins, spooks, mahatmas, and ncw prophets were rising every day. In this bedlam of religious cranks, the Swami appeared to teach the lofty religion of the Vedas, the profound philosophy of Vedãnta, the sublime wisdom of the ancient rishis. The most unfavourable environment for such a task!
The Swami met with all kinds of obstacles. The opposition of fanatical Christian missionaries was, of course, one of these. They promised him help if he only would preach their brand of Christianity. When the Swami refused, they circulated all sorts of filthy stories about him, and even succeeded in persuading some of the Americans who had previously invited him to be their guest, to cancel the invitations. But Vivekananda continued to preach the religion of love, renunciation, and truth as taught by Christ, and to show him the highest veneration as a Saviour of mankind. How significant were his words:
"It is well to be born in a church, but it is terrible to die there!" Needless to say, he meant by the word church all organized religious institutions. How like a thunderbolt the words fell upon the ears of his audience when one day he exclaimed: "Christ, Buddha, and Krishna are but waves in the Ocean of Infinite Consciousness that I am!"
Then there were the leaders of the cranky, selfish, and fraudulent organizations, who tried to induce the Swami to embrace their cause, first by promises of support, and then by threats of injuring him if he refused to ally himself with them. But he could be neither bought nor frightened—"the sickle had hit on a stone," as the Polish proverb says.
To all these propositions his only answer was: "I stand for Truth. Truth will never ally itself with falsehood. Even if all the world should be against me, Truth must prevail in the end."
But the more powerful enemies he had to face were among the so-called free-thinkers, embracing the atheists, materialists, agnostics, rationalists, and others of similar breed who opposed anything associated with God or religion. Thinking that they would easily crush his ancient faith by arguments drawn from Western philosophy and science, they organized a meeting in New York and invited the Swami to present his views.
"I shall never forget that memorable evening," wrote an American disciple, "when the Swami appeared single-handed to face the forces of materialism, arrayed in the heaviest armour of law, and reason, and logic, and common sense, of matter, and force, and heredity, and all the stock phrases calculated to awe and terrify the ignorant. Imagine their surprise when they found that, far from being intimidated by these big words, he proved himself a master in wielding their own weapons, and as familiar with the arguments of materialism as with those of Advaita philosophy. He showed them that their much vaunted Western science could not answer the most vita' questions of life and being, that their immutable laws, so much talked of, had no outside existence apart from the human mind, that the very idea of matter was a metaphysical con¬ception, and that it was much despised metaphysics upon which ultimately rested the very basis of their materialism. With an irresistible logic he demon-strated that their knowledge proved itself incorrect, not by comparison with that which was true, but by the very laws upon which it depended for its basis; that pure reason could not help admitting its own limitations and pointed to something beyond reason; and that rationalism, when carried to its last conse-qucnces, must ultimately land us at something which is above matter, above force, above sense, above thought, and even consciousness, and of which all these are but manifestations."
As a result of his explaining the 'imitations of science, a number of people from the group of free-thinkers attended the Swami's meeting the next day and listened to his uplifting utterances on God and religion.
What an uphill work it was for Swami Vivckananda to remove the ignorance, superstition, and perverted ideas about religion in general and Hinduism in particular! No wonder he sometimes felt depressed. In one of these moods he wrote from Detroit, on March 15, 1894, to the Hale sisters in Chicago:
But I do not know—I have become very sad in my heart since I am here. I do not know why. I am wearied of lecturing and all that nonsense. This mixing with hundreds of human animals, male and female, has disturbed me. I will tell you what is to my taste. I cannot write—cannot speak—but I can think deep, and when I am heated can speak fire. But it should be to a select few—a very select few. And let them carry and sow my ideas broadcast if they wifl—not I. It is only a just division of labour. The same man never succeeded in thinking and in casting his thoughts all around. Such thoughts are not worth a penny. . . . I am really not "cyclonic" at all—far from it. What I want is not here—nor can I longer bear this cyclonic atmosphere. Calm, cool, nice, deep, pene-trating, independent, searching thought—a few noble, pure mirrors which will reflect it back, catch it until all of them sound in unison. Let others throw it to the outside world if they will. This is the way to perfcction—to be perfect, to make perfect a few men and women. My idea of doing good is this—to evolve a few giants, and not to strew pearls to the swine and lose time, breath, and energy. . . . Well, I do not care forlec-turing any more. It is too disgusting to bring me to suit anybody's or any audience's fad.Swami Vivekananda became sick of what he termed "the nonsense of public life and newspaper blazoning."
The Swami had sincere admirers and devotees among the Americans, who looked after his comforts, gave him money when he lacked it, and followed his instruction. He was particularly grateful to American women, and wrote many letters to his friends in India paying high praise to their virtues.
In one letter he wrote: "Nowhere in the world are women like those of this country. How pure, independent, self-relying, and kind-hearted! It is the women who are the life and soul of this country. All learning and culture are centred
in them."
In another letter: "[Americans] look with veneration upon women, who play
a most prominent part in their lives. Here this form of worship has attained its perfection—this is the long and short of it. I am almost at my wit's end to see the women of this country. They are Lakshmi, the Goddess of Fortune, in beauty, and Sarasvati, the Goddess of Learning, in virtues—they are the Divine Mother incarnate. If I can raise a thousand such Madonnas—incarna¬tions of the Divine Mother—in our country before I dic, I shall die in peace. Then only will our countrymen become worthy of their name."
Perhaps his admiration reached its highest pitch in a letter to the Mahrj of Khetri, which he wrote in 1894:
American women! A hundred lives would not be sufficient to pay my deep debt of gratitude to you! Last year I came to this country in summer, a wandering preacher of a far distant country, without name, fame, wealth, or learning to recommend me—friendless, helpless, almost in a state of destitution; and riiiirican women befriended me, gave me shelter and food, took me to their homes, and treated me as their own son, their own brother. They stood as my friends even when their own priests were trying to per¬suade them to give up the "dangerous heathen"—even when, day after day, their best friends had told them not to stand by this "unknown foreigner, maybe of dangcrous charactcr." But they are better judges of character and soul—for it is the pure mirror that catches the reflection.
And how many beautiful homes I have seen, how many mothers whose purity of character, whose unselfish love for their children, are beyond expression, how many daughters and pure maidens, "pure as thc icicle on Diana's temple"—and withal much culture, education, and spirituality in the highest sense! Is America, then, only full of wingless angels in the shape of women? There are good and bad everywhere, true—but a nation is not to be judged by its weaklings, called the wicked, for they are only the weeds which lag behind, but by the good, the noble, and the pure, who indicate the national life-current to be flowing clear and vigorous.
And how bitter the Swami felt when he remembered the sad plight of the women of India! He particularly recalled the tragic circumstances under which one of his own sisters had committed suicide. He often thought that the misery of India was largely due to the ill-treatment the Hindus meted out to their womenfolk. Part of the money earned by his lectures was sent to a foundation for Hindu widows at Baranagore. He also conceived the idea of sending to India women teachers from the West for the intellectual regeneration of Hindu women.
Swami Vivekananda showed great respect for the fundamentals of American culture. He studied the country's economic policy, industrial organizations, public instruction, and its museums and art galleries, and wrote to India en¬thusiastically about them. He praised highly the progress of science, hygiene, institutions, and social welfare work. He realized that such noble concepts as the divinity of the soul and the brotherhood of men were mere academic theories in present-day India, whereas America showed how to apply them in life. He fell indignant when he compared the generosity and liberality of the wealthy men of America in the cause of social service, with the apathy of the Indians as far as their own people were concerned.
"No religion on earth," he wrote angrily, "preaches the dignity of humanity in such a lofty strain as Hinduism, and no religion on earth treads upon the necks of the poor and the low in such a fashion as Hinduism. Religion is not at fault, but it is the Pharisees and Sadducees."
How poignant must have been his feelings when he remembered the iniquities of the caste-system! "India's doom was sealed," he wrote, "the very day they invented the word mlechcha8 and stopped from communion with others." When he saw in New York a millionaire woman sitting side by side in a tram-
8 The non-Hindu, with whom all social intercourse is forbidden.
Vivekananda 75
car with a negress with a wash-basket on her lap, he was impressed with the democratic spirit of the Americans. He wanted in India "an organization that will teach the Hindus mutual help and appreciation" after the pattern of Western democracies.
Incessantly he wrote to his Indian devotees about the regeneration of the masses. In a letter dated 1894 he said:
Let each one of us pray, day and night, for the downtrodden millions in India, who are held fast by poverty, priestcraft, and tyranny—pray day and night for them. I care more to preach religion to them than to the high and the rich. I am no metaphysician, no philosopher, nay, no saint. But I am poor, I love the poor. . . . Who feels in India for the three hundred millions of men and women sunken for ever in poverty and igno¬rance? Where is the way out? Who feels for them? Let these people be your God—think of them, work for them, pray for them incessantly—the Lord will show you the way. Him I call a mahätm, a noble soul, whose heart bleeds for the poor; otherwise he is a durãtmã, a wicked soul. . . . So long as the millions live in hunger and ignorance, I hold every man a traitor who, having been educated at their expense, pays not the least heed to them. . . . We are poor, my brothers, we are nobodies, but such have always been the instruments of the Most High.
Never did he forget, in the midst of the comforts and luxuries of America, even when he was borne on the wings of triumph from one city to another, the cause of the Indian masses, whose miseries he had witnessed while wander¬ing as an unknown monk from the Himalayas to Cape Comorin. The prosperity of the new continent only stirred up in his soul deeper commiseration for his own people. He saw with his own eyes what human efforts, intelligence, and earnestness could accomplish to banish from society poverty, superstition, squalor, disease, and other handicaps of human well-being. On August 20, 1893, he wrote to instil courage into the depressed hearts of his devotees in India:
Gird up your loins, my boys! I am called by the Lord for this. . . . The hope lies in you—in the meek, the lowly, but the faithful. Feel for the miserable and look up for help—it shall come. I have travelled twelve years with this load in my heart and this idea in my head. I have gone from door to door of the so-called "rich and great." With a bleeding heart I have crossed half the world to this strange land, seeking help. The Lord is great. I know He will help me. I may perish of cold and hunger in this land, but I bequeath to you young men this sympathy, this struggle for the poor, the ignorant, the oppressed. . . . Go down on your faces before Him and make a great sacrifice, the sacrifice of a whole life for them, for whom He comes from time to time, whom He loves above all—the poor, the lowly, the oppressed. Vow, then, to devote your whole lives to the cause of these three hundred millions, going down and down every day. Glory unto the Lord! We will succeed. Hundreds will fall in the struggle—hundreds will be ready to take it up. Faith—sympathy, fiery faith and fiery sympathy! Life is nothing, death is nothing—hunger nothing, cold nothing. Glory unto the Lord! March on, the Lord is our General. Do not look back to see who falls—forward—onward!
Swami Vivekananda was thoroughly convinced by his intimate knowledge of the Indian people that the life-current of the nation, far from being extinct, was only submerged under the dead weight of ignorance and poverty. India still produced great saints whose message of the Spirit was sorely needed by the Western world. But the precious jewels of spirituality discovered by them
76 Vivekananda
were hidden, in the absence of a jewel-box, in a heap of filth. The West had created the jewel-box, in the form of a healthy society, but it did not have the jewels. Further, it took him no long time to understand that a materialistic culture contained within it the seeds of its own destruction. Again and again he warned the West of its impending danger. The bright glow on the Western horizon might not be the harbinger of a new dawn; it might very well be the red flames of a huge funeral pyre. The Western world was caught in the maze of its incessant activity—in term inable movement without any goal. The hanker¬ing for material comforts, without a higher spiritual goal and a feeling of universal sympathy, might flare up among the nations of the West into jealousy and hatred, which in the end would bring about their own destruction.
Swami Vivekananda was a lover of humanity. Man is the highest manifesta¬tion of God, and this God was being crucified in different ways in the East and the West. Thus he had a double mission to perform in America. He wanted to obtain from the Americans money, scientific knowledge, and technical help for the regeneration of the Indian masses, and, in turn, to give to the Americans the knowledge of the Eternal Spirit to endow their material progress with significance. No false pride could prevent him from learning from America the many features of her social superiority; he also exhorted the Americans not to allow racial arrogance to prevent them from accepting the gift of spiritual¬ity from India. Through this policy of acceptance and mutual respect he dreamt of creating a healthy human society for the ultimate welfare of man's body and soul.
VARIOUS EXPERIENCES AS A TEACHER
The year following the Parliament of Religions the Swami devoted to address¬ing meetings in the vast area spreading from the Mississippi to the Atlantic. In Detroit he spent six wecks, first as a guest of Mrs. John Bagley, widow of the former Governor of Michigan, and then of Thomas W. Palmer, President of the World's Fair Commission, formerly a United States Senator and Amer¬ican Minister to Spain. Mrs. Bagilcy spoke of the Swami's presence at her house as a it continual bencdiction." It was in Detroit that Miss Greenstidel first heard him speak. She later became, under the name of Sister Christine, one of the most dcvoted disciples of the Swami and a collaborator of Sister Nivedita in her work in Calcutta for the educational advancement of Indian women.
After Detroit, he divided his time between Chicago, New York, and Boston, and during the summer of 1894 addressed, by invitation, several meetings of the "Humane Conference" held at Greenacre, Massachusetts. Christian Sci¬entists, spiritualists, faith-healers, and groups representing similar views partici¬pated in the Conference.
The Swami, in the course of a letter to the Hale sisters of Chicago, wrote on July 31, 1894, with his usual humour about the people who attended the meetings:
They have a lively time and sometimes all of them wear what you call your scientific dress the whole day. They have lectures almost every day. One Mr. Colville from Boston is here. He speaks every day, it is said, under spirit control. The editor of the Universal Truth from the top floor of Jimmy Mills has settled herself down here. She is conducting
Vivekananda 77
religious services and holding classes to heal all manner of diseases, and very soon I expect them to be giving eyes to the blind, etc., etc. After all, it is a queer gathering. They do not care much about social laws and are quite frce and happy.
There is a Mr. Wood of Boston here, who is one of the great lights of your scct. But he objects to belonging to the sect of Mrs. Vhir1pooL9 So he calls himself a mental healer of metaphysical, chemico, physicaLreligioso, what-not, etc.
Yesterday there was a tremendous cyclone which gave a good "treatment" to the tents. The big tent under which they held the lectures developed so much spirituality under the treatment that it entirety disappearcd from mortal gaze, and about two hundrcd chairs were dancing about the grounds under spiritual ecstasy. Mrs. Figs of Mills Company gives a class every morning, and Mrs. Mills is jumping all about the place. They are all in high spirits. I am especially glad for Cora, for she suffered a good deal last winter and a little hilarity would do her good. You would be astounded with the liberty they enjoy in the camps, but they are very good and pure peop'e—a little erratic, that is all.
Regarding his own work at Greenacre, the Swami wrote in the same letter:
The other night the camp people all went to steep under a pine tree under which I sit every morning i Ia India and talk to them. Of course I went with them and we had a nice night under the stars, steeping on the lap of Mother Earth, and I enjoyed every bit of it. I cannot describe to you that night's glories—after the year of brutal life that I have led, to steep on the ground, to meditate undcr the tree in the forest! The inn people are more or less well-to-do, and the camp people are healthy, young, sincere, and holy men and women. I teach them all ivoham, ivoharn—"I am Siva, I amSiva"—and they all repeat it, innocent and pure as they are, and brave beyond all bounds, and I am so happy and glorified.
Thank God for making me poor! Thank God for making these children in the tents poor! The dudes and dudines are in the hotel, but iron-bound ncrves, souls of triple steel, and spirits of fire are in the camp. If you had seen them yesterday, when the rain was falling in torrents and the cyclone was overturning everything—hanging on to their tent-strings to keep them from being blown off, and standing on the majesty of their souls, these brave ones—it would have done your hearts good. I would go a hundred miles to see the like of them. Lord bless them!
Never be anxious for me for a moment. I will be taken care of, and if not, I shall know my time has come—and pass out. . . . Now good dreams, good thoughts for you. You are good and noble. Instead of materializing the spirit, i.e. dragging the spiritual to the matcrial plane as these fellers do, convert matter into spirit—catch a glimpse at least, every day, of that world of infinite beauty and peace and purity, the spiritual, and try to live in it day and night. Seek not, touch not with your toes, anything which is uncanny. Let your souls ascend day and night like an unbroken string unto the feet of the Beloved, whose throne is in your own heart, and let the rest take care of them¬selves, i.e. the body and everything else. Life is an evanescent, floating dream; youth and beauty fade. Say day and night: "Thou art my fathcr, my mother, my husband, my love, my Lord, my God—I want nothing but Thee, nothing but Thee, nothing but Thee. Thou in me, I in Thee—I am Thee, Thou art me." Wealth gocs, beauty vanishes, life flies, powers fly—but the Lord abideth for ever, love abideth for ever. If there is glory in keeping the machine in good trim, it is more glorious to withhold the sou' from suffering with the body. That is the only demonstration of your being "not matter"—by 'etting matter atone.
Stick to God. Who cares what comes, in the body or anywhere? Through the terrors
"A reference to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of Christian Science.
78 Vivekananda
of evil, say, "My God, my Love!" Through the pangs of death, say, "My God, my Love!" Through all the evils under the sun, say: 'My God, my Love! Thou art here, I see Thee. Thou art with me, I feel Thee. I am Thine, take me. I am not the world's, but Thine—leave Thou not me." Do not go for glass beads, leaving the mine of dia¬monds. This life is a great chance. What! Scekest thou the pleasures of this world? He is the fountain of all bliss. Seek the highest, aim for the highest, and you shall reach the highest.
At Greenacre the Swami became a friend of Dr. Lewis G. Janes, Director of the School of Comparative Religions organized by the Greenacre Conference, and President of the Brooklyn Ethical Association. The following autumn he
lectured in Baltimore and Washington.
During the Swami's visit in New York he was the guest of friends, mostly rich ladies of the metropolitan city. He had not yet started any serious work there. Soon he began to feel a sort of restraint put upon his movements. Very few of his wealthy friends understood the true import of his message; they were interested in him as a novelty from India. Also to them he was the man of the hour. They wanted him to mix with only the exclusive society of "the right people." He chafed under their domination and one day cried: "iva! iva! Has it ever come to pass that a great work has been grown by the rich? It is brain and heart that create, and not purse." He wanted to break away from their power and devote himself to the training of some serious students in the spiritual life. He was fed up with public lectures; now he became eager to mould
silently the characters of individuals. He could no longer bear the yoke of money and all the botheration that came in its train. He would live simply and give freely, like the holy men of India. Soon an opportunity presented
itself.
Dr. Lewis Janes invited the Swami to give a series of lectures on the Hindu
religion before the Brooklyn Ethical Association. On the evening of December 311 1894, he gave his first lecture, and according to the report of the Brooklyn
Standard, the enthusiastic audience, consisting of doctors and lawyers and
judges and teachers, remained spellbound by his eloquent defence of the religion of India. They all acknowledged that Vivekananda was even greater than his
fame. At the end of the meeting they made an insistent demand for regular classes in Brooklyn, to which the Swami agreed. A series of class meetings was held and several public lectures were given at the Pouch Mansion, where the Ethical Association held its meetings. These lectures constituted the begin¬ning of the permanent work in America which the Swami secretly desired.
Soon after, several poor but earnest students rented for the Swami some unfurnished rooms in a poor section of New York City. He lived in one of them. An ordinary room on the second floor of the lodging-house was used for the lectures and classes. The Swami when conducting the meetings sat on the floor, while the ever more numerous auditors seated themselves as best they could, utilizing the marble-topped dresser, the arms of the sofa, and even the corner wash-stand. The door was left open and the overflow filled the hall and sat on the stairs. The Swami, like a typical religious teacher in India, felt himself in his own element. The students, forgetting all the inconveniences,
Vivekananda 79
hung upon every word uttered from the teacher's deep personal experiences or his wide range of knowledge.
The lectures, given every morning and several evenings a week, were free. The rent was paid by the voluntary subscriptions of the students, and the deficit was met by the Swami himself, through the money he earned by giving secular lectures on India. Soon the meeting-place had to be removed downstairs to occupy an entire parlour floor.
He began to instruct several chosen disciples in jnãna-yoga in order to clarify their intellects rcgarding the subtle truths of Vedinta, and also in rãja-yoga to teach them the science of self-control, concentration, and meditation. He was immensely happy with the result of his concentrated work. He enjoined upon these students to follow strict disciplines regarding food, choosing only the simplest. The necessity of chastity was emphasized, and they were warned against psychic and occultpowers. At the same time he broadened their intel¬lectual horizon through the teachings of Vedãntic universality. Daily he medi¬tated with the serious students. Often he would lose all bodily consciousness and, like ri Ramakrishna, have to be brought back to the knowledge of the world through the repctition of certain holy words that he had taught his disciples.
It was sometime about June 1895 when Swami Vivckananda finished writing his famous book Rja-Yoga, which attractcd the attention of the Harvard philosopher \Vifliarn James and was later to rouse the enthusiasm of To'stoy. The book is a translation of Patanjalli's Yoga aphorisms, the Swami adding his own explanations; the introductory chapters written by him are especially illuminating. Patanjab expounded, through these aphorisms, the philosophy of Yoga, the main purpose of which is to show the way of the soul's attaining freedom from the bondage of matter. Various methods of concentration are discussed. The book well served two purposes. First, the Swami demonstrated that religious experiences could stand on the same footing as scientific truths, being based on experimentation, observation, and verification. Therefore genu¬ine spiritual experiences must not be dogmatically discarded as tacking rational evidence. Secondly, the Swami explained lucidly various disciplines of concen¬tration, with the warning, however, that they should not be pursued without the help of a qualified teacher.
Miss S. Ellen Waldo of Brooklyn, a disciple of the Swami, was his amanu¬ensis. She thus described the manner in which he dictated the book:
"In delivering his commentaries on the aphorisms, he would leave me waiting while he entered into deep states of meditation or self-contemplation, to emerge therefrom with some luminous interpretation. I had always to keep the pen dipped in the ink. He might be absorbed for long periods of time, and then suddenly his silence would be broken by some eager expression or some long, deliberate teaching."
===
71
VEDANTA IN AMERICA
After the meetings of the Parliament of Religions were concluded, Swami
Vivekananda, as already noted, undertook a series of apostolic campaigns in order
to sow the seed of the Vedantic truths in the ready soil of America. Soon he
discovered that the lecture bureau was exploiting him. Further, he did not like
its method of advertisement. He was treated as if he were the chief attraction
of a circus. The prospectus included his portrait, with the inscription, pro¬
claiming his cardinal virtues: “An Orator by Divine Right; a Model Repre¬
sentative of his Race; a Perfect Master of the English Language; the Sensation
of the World’s Fair Parliament.” It also described his physical bearing, his
height, the colour of his skin, and his clothing. The Swami felt disgusted at
being treated like a patent medicine or an elephant in a show. So he severed
his relationship with the bureau and arranged his own lectures himself. He
accepted invitations from churches, clubs, and private gatherings, and travelled
extensively through the Eastern and Midwestern states of America, delivering
twelve to fourteen or more lectures a week.
People came in hundreds and in thousands. And what an assorted audience
he had to face! There came to his meetings professors from universities, ladies
of fine breeding, seekers of truth, and devotees of God with childlike faith.
But mixed with these were charlatans, curiosity-seekers, idlers, and vagabonds.
It is not true that he met everywhere with favourable conditions. Leon Lands-
berg, one of the Swami’s American disciples, thus described Vivekananda’s
tribulations of those days:
The Americans are a receptive nation. That is why the country is a hotbed of all kinds
of religious and irreligious monstrosities. There is no theory so absurd, no doctrine so
72
Vivekananda
irrational, no claim so extravagant, no fraud so transparent, but can find their numerous
believers and a ready market. To satisfy this craving, to feed the credulity of the people,
hundreds of societies and sects are born for the salvation of the world, and to enable the
prophets to pocket $25 to $100 initiation fees. Hobgoblins, spooks, mahatmas, and new
prophets were rising every day. In this bedlam of religious cranks, the Swami appeared
to teach the lofty religion of the Vedas, the profound philosophy of Vedanta, the sub¬
lime wisdom of the ancient rishis. The most unfavourable environment for such a task!
The Swami met with all kinds of obstacles. The opposition of fanatical
Christian missionaries was, of course, one of these. They promised him help if
he only would preach their brand of Christianity. When the Swami refused,
they circulated all sorts of filthy stories about him, and even succeeded in per¬
suading some of the Americans who had previously invited him to be their
guest, to cancel the invitations. But Vivekananda continued to preach the
religion of love, renunciation, and truth as taught by Christ, and to show him
the highest veneration as a Saviour of mankind. How significant were his words:
“It is well to be born in a church, but it is terrible to die there!” Needless to
say, he meant by the word church all organized religious institutions. How like
a thunderbolt the words fell upon the ears of his audience when one day he
exclaimed: “Christ, Buddha, and Krishna are but waves in the Ocean of Infinite
Consciousness that I am!”
Then there were the leaders of the cranky, selfish, and fraudulent organiza¬
tions, who tried to induce the Swami to embrace their cause, first by promises
of support, and then by threats of injuring him if he refused to ally himself
with them. But he could be neither bought nor frightened — “the sickle
had hit on a stone,” as the Polish proverb says. To all these propositions his
only answer was: “I stand for Truth. Truth will never ally itself with falsehood.
Even if all the world should be against me, Truth must prevail in the end.”
But the more powerful enemies he had to face were among the so-called
free-thinkers, embracing the atheists, materialists, agnostics, rationalists, and
others of similar breed who opposed anything associated with God or religion.
Thinking that they would easily crush his ancient faith by arguments drawn
from Western philosophy and science, they organized a meeting in New York
and invited the Swami to present his views.
“I shall never forget that memorable evening,” wrote an American disciple,
“when the Swami appeared single-handed to face the forces of materialism,
arrayed in the heaviest armour of law, and reason, and logic, and common
sense, of matter, and force, and heredity, and all the stock phrases calculated
to awe and terrify the ignorant. Imagine their surprise when they found that,
far from being intimidated by these big words, he proved himself a master in
wielding their own weapons, and as familiar with the arguments of materialism
as with those of Advaita philosophy. He showed them that their much vaunted
Western science could not answer the most vital questions of life and being,
that their immutable laws, so much talked of, had no outside existence apart
from the human mind, that the very idea of matter was a metaphysical con¬
ception, and that it was much despised metaphysics upon which ultimately
rested the very basis of their materialism. With an irresistible logic he demon¬
strated that their knowledge proved itself incorrect, not by comparison with
Vivekananda
73
that which was true, but by the very laws upon which it depended for its basis;
that pure reason could not help admitting its own limitations and pointed to
something beyond reason; and that rationalism, when carried to its last conse¬
quences, must ultimately land us at something which is above matter, above
force, above sense, above thought, and even consciousness, and of which all
these are but manifestations/'
As a result of his explaining the limitations of science, a number of people
from the group of free-thinkers attended the Swami’s meeting the next day and
listened to his uplifting utterances on God and religion.
What an uphill work it was for Swami Vivekananda to remove the ignorance,
superstition, and perverted ideas about religion in general and Hinduism in
particular! No wonder he sometimes felt depressed. In one of these moods he
wrote from Detroit, on March 15, 1894, to the Hale sisters in Chicago:
But I do not know — I have become very sad in my heart since I am here. I do not
know why. I am wearied of lecturing and all that nonsense. This mixing with hundreds
of human animals, male and female, has disturbed me. I will tell you what is to my
taste. I cannot write — cannot speak — but I can think deep, and when I am heated can
speak fire. But it should be to a select few — a very select few. And let them carry and
sow my ideas broadcast if they will — not I. It is only a just division of labour. The same
man never succeeded in thinking and in casting his thoughts all around. Such thoughts
are not worth a penny. ... I am really not “cyclonic’' at all — far from it. What I want is
not here — nor can I longer bear this cyclonic atmosphere. Calm, cool, nice, deep, pene¬
trating, independent, searching thought — a few noble, pure mirrors which will reflect it
back, catch it until all of them sound in unison. Let others throw it to the outside world
if they will. This is the way to perfection — to be perfect, to make perfect a few men
and women. My idea of doing good is this — to evolve a few giants, and not to strew
pearls to the swine and lose time, breath, and energy. . . . Well, I do not care for lec¬
turing any more. It is too disgusting to bring me to suit anybody’s or any audience's fad.
Swami Vivekananda became sick of what he termed “the nonsense of public
life and newspaper blazoning.”
The Swami had sincere admirers and devotees among the Americans, who
looked after his comforts, gave him money when he lacked it, and followed his
instruction. He was particularly grateful to American women, and wrote many
letters to his friends in India paying high praise to their virtues.
In one letter he wrote: “Nowhere in the world are women like those of this
country. How pure, independent, self-relying, and kind-hearted! It is the women
who are the life and soul of this country. All learning and culture are centred
in them.”
In another letter: “[Americans] look with veneration upon women, who play
a most prominent part in their lives. Here this form of worship has attained its
perfection — this is the long and short of it. I am almost at my wit’s end to
see the women of this country. They are Lakshmi, the Goddess of Fortune,
in beauty, and Sarasvati, the Goddess of Learning, in virtues — they are the
Divine Mother incarnate. If I can raise a thousand such Madonnas — incarna¬
tions of the Divine Mother — in our country before I die, I shall die in peace.
Then only will our countrymen become worthy of their name.”
74
Vivekananda
Perhaps his admiration reached its highest pitch in a letter to the Maharaja
of Khetri, which he wrote in 1894:
American women! A hundred lives would not be sufficient to pay my deep debt of
gratitude to you! Last year I came to this country in summer, a wandering preacher of
a far distant country, without name, fame, wealth, or learning to recommend me —
friendless, helpless, almost in a state of destitution; and zvmcrican women befriended me,
gave me shelter and food, took me to their homes, and treated me as their own son, their
own brother. They stood as my friends even when their own priests were trying to per¬
suade them to give up the “dangerous heathen” — even when, day after day, their best
friends had told them not to stand by this “unknown foreigner, maybe of dangerous
character.” But they are better judges of character and soul — for it is the pure mirror
that catches the reflection.
And how many beautiful homes I have seen, how many mothers whose purity of
character, whose unselfish love for their children, are beyond expression, how many
daughters and pure maidens, “pure as the icicle on Diana’s temple” — and withal much
culture, education, and spirituality in the highest sense! Is America, then, only full of
wingless angels in the shape of women? There are good and bad everywhere, true — but
a nation is not to be judged by its weaklings, called the wicked, for they are only the
weeds which lag behind, but by the good, the noble, and the pure, who indicate the
national life-current to be flowing clear and vigorous.
And how bitter the Swami felt when he remembered the sad plight of the
women of India! He particularly recalled the tragic circumstances under which
one of his own sisters had committed suicide. He often thought that the misery
of India was largely due to the ill-treatment the Hindus meted out to their
womenfolk. Part of the money earned by his lectures was sent to a foundation
for Hindu widows at Baranagore. He also conceived the idea of sending to
India women teachers from the West for the intellectual regeneration of Hindu
women.
Swami Vivekananda showed great respect for the fundamentals of American
culture. He studied the country’s economic policy, industrial organizations,
public instruction, and its museums and art galleries, and wrote to India en¬
thusiastically about them. He praised highly the progress of science, hygiene,
institutions, and social welfare work. He realized that such noble concepts as the
divinity of the soul and the brotherhood of men were mere academic theories in
present-day India, whereas America showed how to apply them in life. He felt
indignant when he compared the generosity and liberality of the wealthy men of
America in the cause of social service, with the apathy of the Indians as far as
their own people were concerned.
“No religion on earth,” he wrote angrily, “preaches the dignity of humanity
in such a lofty strain as Hinduism, and no religion on earth treads upon the
necks of the poor and the low in such a fashion as Hinduism. Religion is not
at fault, but it is the Pharisees and Sadducees.”
How poignant must have been his feelings when he remembered the iniqui¬
ties of the caste-system! “India’s doom was sealed,” he wrote, “the very day
they invented the word mlechcha 8 and stopped from communion with others.”
When he saw in New York a millionaire woman sitting side by side in a tram-
8 The non-Hindu, with whom all social intercourse is forbidden.
Vivekananda
75
car with a negress with a wash-basket on her lap, he was impressed with the
democratic spirit of the Americans. He wanted in India “an organization that
will teach the Hindus mutual help and appreciation” after the pattern of
Western democracies.
Incessantly he wrote to his Indian devotees about the regeneration of the
masses. In a letter dated 1894 he said:
Let each one of us pray, day and night, for the downtrodden millions in India, who
are held fast by poverty, priestcraft, and tyranny — pray day and night for them. I care
more to preach religion to them than to the high and the rich. I am no metaphysician,
no philosopher, nay, no saint. But I am poor, I love the poor. . . . Who feels in India
for the three hundred millions of men and women sunken for ever in poverty and igno¬
rance? Where is the way out? Who feels for them? Let these people be your God —
think of them, work for them, pray for them incessantly — the Lord will show you the
way. Him I call a mahatma, a noble soul, whose heart bleeds for the poor; otherwise he
is a duratma, a wicked soul. ... So long as the millions live in hunger and ignorance,
I hold every man a traitor who, having been educated at their expense, pays not the least
heed to them. . . . We are poor, my brothers, we are nobodies, but such have always
been the instruments of the Most High.
Never did he forget, in the midst of the comforts and luxuries of America,
even when he was borne on the wings of triumph from one city to another,
the cause of the Indian masses, whose miseries he had witnessed while wander¬
ing as an unknown monk from the Himalayas to Cape Comorin. The prosperity
of the new continent only stirred up in his soul deeper commiseration for his
own people. He saw with his own eyes what human efforts, intelligence, and
earnestness could accomplish to banish from society poverty, superstition,
squalor, disease, and other handicaps of human well-being. On August 20, 1893,
he wrote to instil courage into the depressed hearts of his devotees in India:
Gird up your loins, my boys! I am called by the Lord for this. . . . The hope lies in
you — in the meek, the lowly, but the faithful. Feel for the miserable and look up for
help — it shall come. I have travelled twelve years with this load in my heart and this
idea in my head. I have gone from door to door of the so-called “rich and great.” With
a bleeding heart I have crossed half the world to this strange land, seeking help. The
Lord is great. I know He will help me. I may perish of cold and hunger in this land, but
I bequeath to you young men this sympathy, this struggle for the poor, the ignorant,
the oppressed. . . . Go down on your faces before Him and make a great sacrifice, the
sacrifice of a whole life for them, for whom He comes from time to time, whom He
loves above all — the poor, the lowly, the oppressed. Vow, then, to devote your whole
lives to the cause of these three hundred millions, going down and down every day.
Glory unto the Lord! We will succeed. Hundreds will fall in the struggle — hundreds will
be ready to take it up. Faith — sympathy, fiery faith and fiery sympathy! Life is nothing,
death is nothing — hunger nothing, cold nothing. Glory unto the Lord! March on, the
Lord is our General. Do not look back to see who falls — forward — onward!
Swami Vivekananda was thoroughly convinced by his intimate knowledge of
the Indian people that the life-current of the nation, far from being extinct,
was only submerged under the dead weight of ignorance and poverty. India
still produced great saints whose message of the Spirit was sorely needed by
the Western world. But the precious jewels of spirituality discovered by them
76
Vivekananda
were hidden, in the absence of a jewel-box, in a heap of filth. The West had
created the jewel-box, in the form of a healthy society, but it did not have the
jewels. Further, it took him no long time to understand that a materialistic
culture contained within it the seeds of its own destruction. Again and again
he warned the West of its impending danger. The bright glow on the Western
horizon might not be the harbinger of a new dawn; it might very well be the
red flames of a huge funeral pyre. The Western world was caught in the maze
of its incessant activity — interminable movement without any goal. The hanker¬
ing for material comforts, without a higher spiritual goal and a feeling of
universal sympathy, might flare up among the nations of the West into
jealousy and hatred, which in the end would bring about their own destruction.
Swami Vivekananda was a lover of humanity. Man is the highest manifesta¬
tion of God, and this God was being crucified in different ways in the East
and the West. Thus he had a double mission to perform in America. He wanted
to obtain from the Americans money, scientific knowledge, and technical help
for the regeneration of the Indian masses, and, in turn, to give to the Americans
the knowledge of the Eternal Spirit to endow their material progress with
significance. No false pride could prevent him from learning from America
the many features of her social superiority; he also exhorted the Americans
not to allow racial arrogance to prevent them from accepting the gift of spiritual¬
ity from India. Through this policy of acceptance and mutual respect he dreamt
of creating a healthy human society for the ultimate welfare of man’s body
and soul.
VARIOUS EXPERIENCES AS A TEACHER
The year following the Parliament of Religions the Swami devoted to address¬
ing meetings in the vast area spreading from the Mississippi to the Atlantic.
In Detroit he spent six weeks, first as a guest of Mrs. John Bagley, widow of
the former Governor of Michigan, and then of Thomas W. Palmer, President
of the World’s Fair Commission, formerly a United States Senator and Amer¬
ican Minister to Spain. Mrs. Bagley spoke of the Swami’s presence at her house
as a “continual benediction.” It was in Detroit that Miss Greenstidel first heard
him speak. She later became, under the name of Sister Christine, one of the
most devoted disciples of the Swami and a collaborator of Sister Nivedita in
her work in Calcutta for the educational advancement of Indian women.
After Detroit, he divided his time between Chicago, New York, and Boston,
and during the summer of 1894 addressed, by invitation, several meetings of
the “Humane Conference” held at Greenacre, Massachusetts. Christian Sci¬
entists, spiritualists, faith-healers, and groups representing similar views partici¬
pated in the Conference.
The Swami, in the course of a letter to the Hale sisters of Chicago, wrote
on July 31, 1894, with his usual humour about the people who attended the
meetings:
They have a lively time and sometimes all of them wear what you call your scientific
dress the whole day. They have lectures almost every day. One Mr. Colville from Boston
is here. He speaks every day, it is said, under spirit control. The editor of the Universal
Truth from the top floor of Jimmy Mills has settled herself down here. She is conducting
Vivekananda
77
religious services and holding classes to heal all manner of diseases, and very soon I expect
them to be giving eyes to the blind, etc., etc. After all, it is a queer gathering. They do not
care much about social laws and are quite free and happy. . . .
There is a Mr. Wood of Boston here, who is one of the great lights of your sect. But
he objects to belonging to the sect of Mrs. Whirlpool.9 So he calls himself a mental
healer of metaphysical, chemico, physical-religioso, what-not, etc.
Yesterday there was a tremendous cyclone which gave a good “treatment” to the tents.
The big tent under which they held the lectures developed so much spirituality under
the treatment that it entirely disappeared from mortal gaze, and about two hundred
chairs were dancing about the grounds under spiritual ecstasy. Mrs. Figs of Mills
Company gives a class every morning, and Mrs. Mills is jumping all about the place.
They are all in high spirits. I am especially glad for Cora, for she suffered a good deal
last winter and a little hilarity would do her good. You would be astounded with the
liberty they enjoy in the camps, but they are very good and pure people — a little erratic,
that is all.
Regarding his own work at Greenacre, the Swami wrote in the same letter:
The other night the camp people all went to sleep under a pine tree under which I
sit every morning a la India and talk to them. Of course I went with them and we had
a nice night under the stars, sleeping on the lap of Mother Earth, and I enjoyed every
bit of it. I cannot describe to you that night’s glories — after the year of brutal life that
I have led, to sleep on the ground, to meditate under the tree in the forest! The inn
people are more or less well-to-do, and the camp people are healthy, young, sincere, and
holy men and women. I teach them all Sivoham, Sivoham — “I am Siva, I am Siva” —
and they all repeat it, innocent and pure as they are, and brave beyond all bounds, and
I am so happy and glorified.
Thank God for making me poor! Thank God for making these children in the tents
poor! The dudes and dudines are in the hotel, but iron-bound nerves, souls of triple
steel, and spirits of fire are in the camp. If you had seen them yesterday, when the rain
was falling in torrents and the cyclone was overturning everything — hanging on to their
tent-strings to keep them from being blown off, and standing on the majesty of their
souls, these brave ones — it would have done your hearts good. I would go a hundred
miles to see the like of them. Lord bless them! . . .
Never be anxious for me for a moment. I will be taken care of, and if not, I shall
know my time has come — and pass out. . . . Now good dreams, good thoughts for you.
You are good and noble. Instead of materializing the spirit, i.e. dragging the spiritual to
the material plane as these fellers do, convert matter into spirit — catch a glimpse at
least, every day, of that world of infinite beauty and peace and purity, the spiritual,
and try to live in it day and night. Seek not, touch not with your toes, anything which
is uncanny. Let your souls ascend day and night like an unbroken string unto the feet
of the Beloved, whose throne is in your own heart, and let the rest take care of them¬
selves, i.e. the body and everything else. Life is an evanescent, floating dream; youth
and beauty fade. Say day and night: “Thou art my father, my mother, my husband,
my love, my Lord, my God — I want nothing but Thee, nothing but Thee, nothing but
Thee. Thou in me, I in Thee — I am Thee, Thou art me.” Wealth goes, beauty vanishes,
life flies, powers fly — but the Lord abideth for ever, love abideth for ever. If there is glory
in keeping the machine in good trim, it is more glorious to withhold the soul from
suffering with the body. That is the only demonstration of your being “not matter” —
by letting matter alone.
Stick to God. Who cares what comes, in the body or anywhere? Through the terrors
9 A reference to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of Christian Science.
78
Vivekananda
of evil, say, "My God, my Love!” Through the pangs of death, say, "My God, my
Love!” Through all the evils under the sun, say: "My God, my Love! Thou art here,
I see Thee. Thou art with me, I feel Thee. I am Thine, take me. I am not the world s,
but Thine — leave Thou not me.” Do not go for glass beads, leaving the mine of dia¬
monds. This life is a great chance. What! Seekest thou the pleasures of this world? He
is the fountain of all bliss. Seek the highest, aim for the highest, and you shall reach
the highest.
At Greenacre the Swami became a friend of Dr. Lewis G. Janes, Director of
the School of Comparative Religions organized by the Greenacre Conference,
and President of the Brooklyn Ethical Association. The following autumn he
lectured in Baltimore and Washington.
During the Swami’s visit in New York he was the guest of friends, mostly rich
ladies of the metropolitan city. Lie had not yet started any serious work there.
Soon he began to feel a sort of restraint put upon his movements. Very few
of his wealthy friends understood the true import of his message; they were
interested in him as a novelty from India. Also to them he was the man of the
hour. They wanted him to mix with only the exclusive society of “the right
people.” He chafed under their domination and one day cried: “Siva! Siva!
Has it ever come to pass that a great work has been grown by the rich? It
is brain and heart that create, and not purse.” He wanted to break away from
their power and devote himself to the training of some serious students in the
spiritual life. He was fed up with public lectures; now he became eager to mould
silently the characters of individuals. He could no longer bear the yoke of
money and all the botheration that came in its train. He would live simply
and give freely, like the holy men of India. Soon an opportunity presented
itself.
Dr. Lewis Janes invited the Swami to give a series of lectures on the Hindu
religion before the Brooklyn Ethical Association. On the evening of December
31, 1894, he gave his first lecture, and according to the report of the Brooklyn
Standard , the enthusiastic audience, consisting of doctors and lawyers and
judges and teachers, remained spellbound by his eloquent defence of the religion
of India. They all acknowledged that Vivekananda was even greater than his
fame. At the end of the meeting they made an insistent demand for regular
classes in Brooklyn, to which the Swami agreed. A series of class meetings
was held and several public lectures were given at the Pouch Mansion, where
the Ethical Association held its meetings. These lectures constituted the begin¬
ning of the permanent work in America which the Swami secretly desired.
Soon after, several poor but earnest students rented for the Swami some
unfurnished rooms in a poor section of New York City. He lived in one of
them. An ordinary room on the second floor of the lodging-house was used
for the lectures and classes. The Swami when conducting the meetings sat
on the floor, while the ever more numerous auditors seated themselves as best
they could, utilizing the marble-topped dresser, the arms of the sofa, and even
the corner wash-stand. The door was left open and the overflow filled the hall
and sat on the stairs. The Swami, like a typical religious teacher in India, felt
himself in his own element. The students, forgetting all the inconveniences,
Vivekananda 79
hung upon every word uttered from the teacher’s deep personal experiences
or his wide range of knowledge.
The lectures, given every morning and several evenings a week, were free.
The rent was paid by the voluntary subscriptions of the students, and the
deficit was met by the Swami himself, through the money he earned by giving
secular lectures on India. Soon the meeting-place had to be removed downstairs
to occupy an entire parlour floor.
He began to instruct several chosen disciples in jnana-yoga in order to clarify
their intellects regarding the subtle truths of Vedanta, and also in raja-yoga to
teach them the science of self-control, concentration, and meditation. He was
immensely happy with the result of his concentrated work. He enjoined upon
these students to follow strict disciplines regarding food, choosing only the
simplest. The necessity of chastity was emphasized, and they were warned
against psychic and occult powers. At the same time he broadened their intel¬
lectual horizon through the teachings of Vedantic universality. Daily he medi¬
tated with the serious students. Often he would lose all bodily consciousness and,
like Sri Ramakrishna, have to be brought back to the knowledge of the world
through the repetition of certain holy words that he had taught his disciples.
It was sometime about June 1895 when Swami Vivekananda finished writing
his famous book Raj a-Yoga, which attracted the attention of the Harvard
philosopher William fames and was later to rouse the enthusiasm of Tolstoy.
The book is a translation of Patanjali’s Yoga aphorisms, the Swami adding
his own explanations; the introductory chapters written by him are especially
illuminating. Patanjali expounded, through these aphorisms, the philosophy
of Yoga, the main purpose of which is to show the way of the soul’s attaining
freedom from the bondage of matter. Various methods of concentration are
discussed. The book well served two purposes. First, the Swami demonstrated
that religious experiences could stand on the same footing as scientific truths,
being based on experimentation, observation, and verification. Therefore genu¬
ine spiritual experiences must not be dogmatically discarded as lacking rational
evidence. Secondly, the Swami explained lucidly various disciplines of concen¬
tration, with the warning, however, that they should not be pursued without
the help of a qualified teacher.
Miss S. Ellen Waldo of Brooklyn, a disciple of the Swami, was his amanu¬
ensis. She thus described the manner in which he dictated the book:
“In delivering his commentaries on the aphorisms, he would leave me waiting
while he entered into deep states of meditation or self-contemplation, to emerge
therefrom with some luminous interpretation. I had always to keep the pen
dipped in the ink. He might be absorbed for long periods of time, and then
suddenly his silence would be broken by some eager expression or some long,
deliberate teaching.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)