Showing posts with label Carl Jung unconscious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carl Jung unconscious. Show all posts

2022/06/30

The Spectrum of Consciousness — Personality Type in Depth

The Spectrum of Consciousness — Personality Type in Depth


ABOUT US
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
AUTHORS
TERMS & THEORY
SUBMISSION AND STYLE GUIDE
DEPTH TYPOLOGY CENTER

Bridging psychological type and depth psychology
Editors: Carol Shumate, Mark Hunziker, Jenny Soper, Lori Green, Olivia Ireland (Art Editor), and Erin Temple

Next Issue: July
=======

The Spectrum of Consciousness


25 / Culture and Cultural Typology / Research, Theory, and History

Tags: alchemy, Buddhism, cauda pavonis, color symbolism, individuation, Intuition, Kiley Laughlin, mandala, psychoid, quaternity, Secret of the Golden Flower, Wolfgang Pauli, yoga
October 20156


Color Symbolism in the Typology of C. G. Jung

Jung viewed color as a primary component of human experience and symbolic of psychic processes. Because of their qualitative properties—a type of qualia—colors can say a great deal about the modes of consciousness. By the end of the 1920s, Jung had begun to correlate four primary colors with the four psychic functions—thinking, feeling, sensation, and intuition—described in his theory of types. In Jung’s view, the colors—blue, red, green, and yellow—aptly symbolized the four functions (Figure 1) and comprised a color quaternity. Jung suggested that this color quaternity, alternatively called a rainbow tetrad, was not an arbitrary assertion but rather a formulation founded on the empirical observations derived from alchemical studies, mythology, literature, folklore, religion, and individual case studies (i.e., Mann and Pauli). What did Jung intend to convey with this scheme? It seems that he believed that colors symbolize dynamic psychic factors that evolve in lockstep with consciousness. An analysis of his color studies suggests that the psyche uses color as a way to distinguish different kinds (i.e., functions) of consciousness. Furthermore, the appearance of the four rainbow colors suggests that consciousness aims at a purposeful goal and evokes the alchemical symbol of the cauda pavonis, which announces the completion of the alchemical work. Jung explained the relationship of the cauda pavonis or peacock’s tail with its multitude of colors to individuation as follows:


Psychologically it means that during the assimilation of the unconscious the personality passes through many transformations which show it in different lights and are followed by ever-changing moods. These stages precede the coming birth. (1956/1963, CW 14, para. 430)

Jung’s thinking regarding the color quaternity was mainly predicated on two empirical sources. The first source was the array of dreams and visions that Jung initially observed in himself and later in his analysands. The second source was the archive of cross-cultural studies, which included his exploration of Eastern traditions. Jung does not seem to have arrived at a mature understanding of the color quaternity until late 1929, which coincided with the publication of his commentary on The Secret of the Golden Flower, wherein he indirectly suggested a color quaternity. Yet, in this commentary the colors Jung (1929) alluded to are not red, yellow, green, and blue, but black, white, yellow (or gold), and red, which parallel the colors of the four alchemical stages—nigredo, albedo, citrinitas, and rubedo (CW13, para. 220, n. 108) (Figure 2).

In Jung’s commentary on The Secret of the Golden Flower he included one of his own mandalas, which came from Liber Novus, image 105. Jung (1929) provided the following description of the image:


In the centre, the white light, shining in the firmament; in the first circle, protoplasmic life-seeds; in the second, rotating cosmic principles which contain the four primary colours [italics added]; in the third and fourth, creative forces working inward and outward. At the cardinal points, the masculine and feminine souls, both again divided into light and dark. (CW 13, p. A6)

Over 20 years later, Jung (1950) provided additional commentary on the same image in his essay “Concerning Mandala Symbolism,” wherein he wrote:


In the center is a star. The blue sky contains golden clouds. … The circle enclosing the sky contains structures or organisms that look like protozoa. The sixteen globes painted in four colors [italics added] just outside the circle derived originally from an eye motif and therefore stand for the observing and discriminating consciousness. (CW 9i, para. 682)

In his second commentary Jung refrained from calling them primary colors. Author John Irwin (1994) has suggested that at some point in Jung’s career his understanding of the color quaternity evolved.


As we noted earlier, one form that the quaternity symbol takes in alchemy is the four colors linked to the stages of alchemical work—black, white, yellow, and red. But Jung points out that there is another quaternity of colors associated with the marriage of the king and queen of heaven—yellow, red, green, and blue. (p. 68)

Irwin’s observations are further elucidated by Jung’s 1933 commentary:


The quaternity in alchemy, incidentally, was usually expressed by the four colours of the old painters, mentioned in a fragment of Heraclitus: red, black, yellow, and white; or in diagrams as the four points of the compass. In modern times the unconscious usually chooses red, blue (instead of black), yellow or gold, and green (instead of white). The quaternity is merely another expression of the totality. These colors embrace the whole of the rainbow. The alchemists said that the appearance of the cauda pavonis, the peacock’s tail, was a sign that the process was coming to a successful conclusion. (1940, p. 48)

The Missing Fourth

Jung suggested that sometime within the last 500 years, between the end of the Middle Ages (500 C.E.–1500 C.E.) and the beginning of the Modern Era (1600 C.E.–2000 C.E.), the color symbolism corresponding to the four functions underwent a transformation within the western psyche, which implies a major restructuring of collective psychic contents. Regarding the alchemical quaternity, Jung (1956/1963) further noted that:


Four stages are distinguished, characterized by the original colours mentioned in Heraclitus: melanosis (blackening), leukosis (whitening), xanthosis (yellowing), and iosis (reddening). This division of the process into four was called the quartering of the philosophy. Later, about the fifteenth or sixteenth century, the colours were reduced to three, and the xanthosis, otherwise called the citrinitas, gradually fell into disuse or was but seldom mentioned. … Whereas the original tetrameria corresponded exactly to the quaternity of elements, it was now frequently stressed that although there were four elements (earth, water, fire, and air) and four qualities (hot, cold, dry, and moist), there were only three colours: black, white, and red. (CW 12, para. 333)

In this way, Jung suggested that not only did the color symbolism change but also the corresponding number symbolism. An analysis of the foregoing passage indicates that the reduction of the colors from four to three corresponds to an omission of the fourth typological function, intuition—perception through the unconscious—which the alchemists rendered as citrinitas or xanthosis—the inner light of the soul. The gradual disappearance of citrinitas in the alchemical system suggests a undervaluing of intuition. Thus, Jung’s (1952) color quaternity, as opposed to a color trinity, highlights the problem of the three and the four, or what is also called the Axiom of Maria—“Out of the third, comes the One as the Fourth” (CW 8, para. 962). One of the central aims of Jung’s psychology was to compensate for the number four’s state of neglect during the Christian Era. The number four is a symbol of wholeness, as suggested by Socrates’ original question: “One, two, three—but where, my dear Timaeus, is the fourth?” (Cornford, 1937, p. 9). Although in Psychological Types Jung (1921/1971) does not mention a color quaternity—a tetrad of rainbow colors—that corresponds to the four functions, he does correlate three of the psychic functions to a Gnostic typology consisting of pneumatikoi (thinking), psychikoi (feeling), and hylikoi (sensation), but the Gnostic’s tripartite system omitted the fourth function or intuition. So the problem of the missing fourth is also present in Gnosticism.

Thus, between 1929 and 1950—when he published “Concerning Mandala Symbolism”—Jung’s thinking on the color quaternity changed. As previously suggested, his re-visioning of the color scheme seems predicated on the symbolism expressed in the dreams and fantasies of individuals on the one hand and Jung’s intense study of Eastern philosophy and religion on the other. Jung’s propensity to connect things together was bolstered by his syncretistic impulse.

Dreams and Visions

Throughout his long career, Jung gathered a plethora of analytic and clinical material which he used to support his theories. He incorporated a good deal of case material into his papers, including “A Study in the Process of Individuation.” Jung originally presented this paper at the 1933 Eranos Conference in Ascona, Switzerland. Therein he first alluded to a color quaternity comprised of red, yellow, green, and blue. The paper dealt with a middle-aged female analysand, Miss X, who had reached an impasse in her life and found herself stuck. Her unconscious compensated for the inadequacies of her conscious attitude by producing elaborate archetypal dreams and fantasies. In addition to this imagery, she had a collection of 24 paintings that Jung viewed as charting the course of her individuation journey. It should be noted that Jung included one picture (i.e., Picture 9) from her collection in his commentary for The Secret of the Golden Flower. Jung encouraged Miss X to document her fantasies in an imagistic and aesthetic way, not unlike what he had done with his own Red Book material. During the span of their analytic sessions, Jung understood that colors could help activate the unconscious and encouraged her to creatively express them in pictures: “I also advised her not to be afraid of bright colours, for I knew from experience that vivid colours seem to attract the unconscious. Thereupon, a new picture arose” (CW 9i, para. 530). Miss X was later identified as one of Jung’s close colleagues, an American woman named Kristine Mann (1873-1945) (Kirsch, 2000, p. 65). Although we cannot say for certain, it seems that Mann began her analysis with Jung around 1928, which turned out to be a pivotal year in the development of Jung’s ideas. Her analysis with Jung apparently concluded in May 1938. Regarding the mandala pictures rendered by Mann, Jung (1934/1959) noted the same color quaternity:


This takes place in stages: a combination first of blue and red, then of yellow and green [italics added]. These four colours symbolize four qualities, as we have seen, which can be interpreted in various ways. Psychologically this quaternity points to the orienting functions of consciousness, of which at least one is unconscious and therefore not available for conscious use. (CW 9i, para. 582)

Jung observed that Mann herself correlated her colors with the four functions:


The inner, undifferentiated quaternity is balanced by an outer, differentiated one, which Miss X equated with the four functions of consciousness. To these she assigned the following colours: yellow = intuition, light blue = thinking, flesh pink = feeling, brown = sensation. (CW 9i, para. 588)

Elsewhere, Jung provided the following correlation in regards to the symbolism contained in Mann’s pictures: “Red means blood and affectivity, the physiological reaction that joins spirit to body, and blue means the spiritual process (mind or nous)” (CW9i, para. 555), and gold “expresses sunlight, value, divinity even” (CW 9i, para. 543). In a footnote on the same page, Jung (1934/1959) observed that, “The colour correlated with sensation in the mandalas of other persons is usually green” (CW 9i, p. 335, n. 134). Jung’s descriptions suggest that the color scheme was not universally applicable and could vary from person to person depending on a range of factors—culture, context, etc. In this way, Jung was not unequivocal about his color scheme, but he did say that, “It happens with some regularity that these colours are correlated with the four orienting functions of consciousness” (1942/1948, CW 11, para. 281). Furthermore, he was prone to insert conditional statements like “usually” when he encountering an exceptional case that deviated from the general scheme.

Another individual case study that played a major role in shaping Jung’s understanding of the color quaternity is found in the dreams, visions, and waking fantasies of the physicist Wolfgang Pauli (1900 -1958), who underwent analysis between February 1932 and October 1934 (Gieser, 2005, p. 147). In 1931, Pauli was suffering from depression and frequently had disturbing dreams (Gieser, 2005, p. 142). Besides drinking heavily and embracing a roguish lifestyle, Pauli’s mother had died abruptly in 1927. In December 1929, he married Käthe Margarethe Deppner. The marriage quickly disintegrated resulting in a divorce less than a year later. One could say then that the late 1920s marked a period of personal upheaval and crisis for Pauli, who finally sought out Jung’s help through correspondence in late 1931. Jung, aware of Pauli’s reputation as a brilliant scientist, wished to avoid inadvertently influencing his analytical material or interfering with what would otherwise be an objective process. Jung initially assigned the task of analysis to one of his pupils, a female doctor named Erna Rosenbaum. Pauli worked with Rosenbaum for about five months until Jung took over his analysis. Jung and Pauli’s relationship eventually evolved into a highly creative intellectual partnership which yielded a number of original ideas, including that of synchronicity.

Jung included Pauli’s fantasy material in two major essays: “Psychology and Religion” and “Dream Symbols of the Process of Individuation,” which was later revised and renamed “Individual Dream Symbols in Relation to Alchemy” and published in Psychology and Alchemy. Jung presented this paper at the 1934 Eranos Conference. Pauli’s fantasy material was comprised of over one thousand dreams and visual impressions, although Jung only included a sampling consisting of 355 for his study (Gieser, 2005, p. 144). Jung selected only the dreams that dealt with what he considered mandala symbolism, which paralleled the Eastern motifs and ideas Jung had earlier encountered in The Secret of the Golden Flower. Jung (1940) added:


I have chosen the term “mandala” because this word denotes the ritualistic or magical circle employed in Lamaism and also in the Tantric yoga as a yantra or aid to contemplation. The Eastern mandalas used in ceremonial are formations fixed by tradition, and are not only drawn or painted, but are even represented bodily in certain ritualistic celebrations. I refer the reader to Zimmer’s exposition in Kunstform und Yoga im indischen Kultbild [Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India], as well as to Wilhelm and Jung, The Secret of the Golden Flower. (p. 127)

That Jung felt it necessary to name Heinrich Zimmer’s work—Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India—alongside The Secret of the Golden Flower underscores its importance to Jung’s study of Eastern Philosophy and religion.

Pauli’s dreams and visions were strewn with number and color symbolism, which Jung found to roughly accord with his typological color quaternity. For instance, the following dream describes the same combination of the four colors:


23. Dream: In the square space. The dreamer is sitting opposite the unknown woman whose portrait he is supposed to be drawing. What he draws, however, is not a face but three-leaved clovers or distorted crosses in four different colours: red, yellow, green, and blue. (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 212)

Another one of Pauli’s fantasies presents the same color sequence:


39. Visual Impression: The dreamer is falling into the abyss. At the bottom there is a bear whose eyes gleam alternately in four colours: red, yellow, green, and blue. Actually it has four eyes that change into four lights. The bear disappears and the dreamer goes through a long dark tunnel. Light is shimmering at the far end. A treasure is there, and on top of it the ring with the diamond. It is said that this ring will lead him on a long journey to the east. (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 262)

Jung’s commentary on the foregoing dream is notable for his reliance on Eastern and alchemical amplifications:


This waking dream shows that the dreamer is still preoccupied with the dark centre. The bear stands for the chthonic element that might seize him. But then it becomes clear that the animal is only leading up to the four colours (cf. dream 23, par. 212), which in their turn lead to the lapis, i.e., the diamond whose prism contains all the hues of the rainbow. The way to the east probably points to the unconscious as an antipode. According to the legend the Grail-stone comes from the east and must return there again. In alchemy the bear corresponds to the nigredo of the prima materia, whence comes the colourful cauda pavonis. (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 263)

Thus, one could say that the appearance of the four colors in Pauli’s dreams symbolized the cauda pavonis (i.e., peacock’s tail), which suggests a completion of the alchemical opus and viewed in depth psychological terms is tantamount to knowledge of the self—the archetype of wholeness. Jung subsequently turns to another dream that alludes to the four colors:


51. Dream: There is a feeling of great tension. Many people are circulating around a large central oblong with four smaller oblongs on its sides. The circulation in the larger oblong goes to the left and in the smaller oblongs to the right. In the middle there is an eight-rayed star. A Bowl is placed in the centre of each of the smaller oblongs, containing red, yellow, green, and the colourless water. The water rotates to the left. The disquieting question arises: is there enough water? (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 286)

In Jung’s extended commentary on the dream material, he correlated the four colors to the four functions of consciousness (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 287).

Pauli’s fantasy material culminates in the appearance of what he described as a “great vision,” which principally consisted of a “world clock” (Figure 3). The world clock is comprised of a vertical and a horizontal circle carried on the back of a black bird. The horizontal circle is divided by four sections and four colors, which Jung associated with his typological quaternity. It also merits mention that on the same circle stand four little men who hold pendulums (CW 11, para. 307). According to Jung (1938/1969), “The four little men of our vision are dwarfs or Cabiri. They represent the four cardinal points and the four seasons, as well as the four colours [italics added] and the four elements” (CW 11, para. 120). Given the relative regularity of the appearance of such number and color symbols in dreams of people like Kristine Mann and Wolfgang Pauli, Jung felt that the motifs could be best understood as spontaneous products of the objective psyche, which in his mind lent empirical support to his theories.

Parallels in Eastern Culture

As previously indicated, prior to 1933, there is no explicit mention of Jung’s rainbow color quaternity. The first reference of it ostensibly appeared in the 1933 Eranos conference which was followed by Jung’s 1934 presentation of Pauli’s dreams. Jung published both papers in the 1940 book The Integration of Personality. During the late 1920s, Jung’s interests began to shift to areas where he could find broader cross-cultural and archetypal consensus for his psychological theories.

By 1928, Jung’s preoccupation with The Red Book and Black Books was winding down and around the same time he received Wilhelm’s manuscript of The Secret of the Golden Flower, which Jung found profoundly meaningful, even synchronistic. In his autobiography, Jung (1961/1989) indicated that he received Wilhelm’s Taoist-alchemical manuscript in 1928 (p. 204). Jung described this serendipitous encounter in a margin note in The Red Book, Jung (2009) wrote:


1928. When I painted this image, which showed the golden well-fortified castle, Richard Wilhelm sent me from Frankfurt the Chinese, thousand-year-old text of the golden castle, the embryo of the immortal body. Ecclesia catholic et protestantes et seclusi in secreto. Aeon finitus. [The Catholic Church and the Protestants and those secluded in secret. The end of an aeon.]. (p. 163)

According to E.A. Bennet (1985), after Jung wrote “The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious” in 1928 his interest in Chinese thought intensified, which coincided with his reading of Wilhelm’s manuscript on The Secret of the Golden Flower, for which he would later write a commentary. Jung viewed his typology as a western parallel to the Chinese notion of Tao (p. 71).

Around the same time Jung started his dream analysis seminar, which took place between November 7, 1928 and June 25, 1930. During this time period, Jung was still working through a stack of fantasy material that originated both from analytic encounters and cross-cultural studies. In the seminar, Jung indicated that he had already read Zimmer’s Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India, which was instrumental to Jung’s psychological understanding of Eastern traditions and likely informed his reading of the Shri-chakra-sambhara Tantra.

In the foreword of Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India, Joseph Campbell (1984) wrote that, “The crucial moment was of Jung’s reading of Indologist Heinrich Zimmer’s Kunstform und Yoga” (p. xvi). Thus, the importance of this work in regards to Jung’s understanding of mandala symbolism should not be understated. Jung indicated that he first read the book after writing his commentary for Richard Wilhelm’s translation of The Secret of the Golden Flower (1929) and before he met Zimmer: “I first met Heinrich Zimmer at the beginning of the thirties. I had read his fascinating book Kunstform und Yoga and long wished to meet him in person” (Jung as cited in Campbell, 1984, p. xix). Jung actually met Zimmer in May 1932. The fact that Jung (1984) mentioned Zimmer in his dream analysis seminar on February 26, 1930 (p. 492) suggests that he read it around January 1930. Based on the contents of Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India, one can infer that the material informed his dream analysis seminar in regards to Jung’s understanding of Eastern philosophy and symbolism.

In a lecture dated February 12, 1930, Jung discussed the parallels between his typology and Tantric Buddhist symbolism, with reference to the architecture of a Buddhist monastery:


Extraversion means going out through the gates of the courtyard. The inside square is divided like this: and each of the triangles is characterized by a different colour and represents particular philosophical conceptions. Red is the north below, the cardinal points of the horizon being all reversed: A most interesting book, the Bardo Thodol, or the Tibetan Book of the Dead, has been translated recently by an American named Evans-Wentz. There the coloured triangles are explained, and one can identify them with the four functions as we know them in our Western Psychology, the basis of our consciousness, the four qualities of our orientation in space, and therefore identical with cardinal points of the horizon. One leaves the gates through the different functions or habitual attitudes. The man who leaves through the south gate will live in the southern world, and the man who goes out through the gate of thinking will live in the thought world. But when they return, the functions do not matter; only as long as they are outside are the functions important. When he enters the courtyard of the monastery, he approaches the place where all the functions meet; in the very centre he goes into the void where there is nothing. We cannot say that it is unconsciousness, it is a consciousness that is not. (1984, p 467)

The foregoing passage is prescient on three points: 1) Jung (1935/1953) would eventually write a commentary for Evans-Wentz’ (1927/2000) translation of the said work which he apparently read between the date it was published and 1930 (1984, p. 467); 2) the color quaternity—red, yellow, green, and blue—would eventually be imported into his typology; and 3) in 1938 and 1939 Jung gave three lectures on the symbolism of Tantric Buddhism that closely paralleled his abovementioned commentary.

In another lecture in the same month as the previous one, on February 19, 1930, Jung discussed a Tibetan mandala, which he described at length, and he further elaborated on the comparisons between his typological system and the four functions:


I have brought you today the picture of which I spoke last week, the reproduction of the Tibetan mandala. It is a yantra, used for the purpose of concentration upon the most philosophical thought of the Tibetan Lamas. It shows in the innermost circle the diamond wedge or thunderbolt, that symbol of potential energy, and the white light symbolizing absolute truth. And here are the four functions, the four fields of colour, and then the four gates to the world. Then comes the gazelle garden, and finally the ring of fire of desirousness outside. (1984, p. 479)

The passage above demonstrates not only Jung’s interest in the East, but that as early as 1930 he recognized definite parallels between the structure of Western and Eastern mandalas such as the Tibetan yantra. At this time, Jung had already written his commentary for Wilhelm’s The Secret of the Golden Flower, and his attention began to drift to other fields and disciplines (i.e., alchemy, Kundalini yoga, Tantric Buddhism, etc.).

In Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India Zimmer provided extensive commentary on an obscure tantric text called the Shri-chakra-Sambhara Tantra. Zimmer (1926/1984) described this work as a “product of an era in Buddhism’s development in which the main stream of the Buddha doctrine in its course through time acquired an influx from the tributaries of Hinduism [such] that its content became virtually indistinguishable from Hinduism” (p. 81). The Shri-Chakra-Sambhara Tantra has its roots in the diamond vehicle (Vajrayana) doctrine of Tantric Buddhism and consists of a series of instructional mantras—meditational techniques—informed by Tantric doctrine and teachings. Shri Chakra translates to the “Circle of Bliss” (Zimmer, p. 90) and is visualized as a circular mandala consisting of four gates, which evoke Jung’s four functions. The adept or Yogin focuses on the mandala and visualizes a god. The god (Devata) represents the “guru-essence” which could be interpreted psychologically as emanations or projections originating from the background activity of the psyche. Zimmer suggested that the culminating point of the ritual is the attainment of the vajrasattva (diamond essence), which would be analogous to the alchemical lapis. Zimmer added:


Then the adept develops internally the feeling proper to his awareness of the undifferentiated sameness of all phenomena. In the Emptiness that constitutes their essence … he sends out rays in every direction, colored according to the cardinal points–blue, green, red, and yellow [italics added]. Their colors are a surety that his feeling of Total Compassion (karuna) permeates the entire cosmos. (p. 93)

Understandably, the color symbolism would have garnered Jung’s attention when he read the book early in 1930. Around the same time (1930-1931), Jung prepared a two-page manuscript headed “Tantric Texts” which he evidently used in preparation for his lectures at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (Shamdasani, 1996, p. xxxiv, n. 66). Shamdasani further indicated that the source material for these manuscripts was Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India (pp. 2-87), wherein can be found Zimmer’s exposition of the Shri-Chakra-Sambhara Tantra.

Jung’s study of the Tantric texts culminated in his 1938 and 1939 lectures at ETH, where he presented psychological commentary on the material in its most lucid form. In these ETH lectures, Jung (1958) provided a historical and etymological overview in accordance with his own hermeneutic understanding. In his commentary, Jung (1958) cited the following passage: “From the Mantra ‘Hum’ rays of blue, green, red and yellow light shoot forth through the four heads of the Devata and gradually fill the whole universe” (p. 48). Jung added:


The Yogin is in the centre, saying “Hum,” the first quality of consciousness, the world principle. The four colours emanate from the centre, the four qualities of consciousness, that is the four functions of consciousness, the four possibilities of consciousness. (p. 48)

Thus, Jung tried to correlate the four colors with his four functions of consciousness, and in a syncretistic turn, proceeded to associate the principal skandhas—the basic building blocks of the phenomenal world in Buddhist tradition—mentioned in the text with his four functions: Rupa skandha (thinking), Vedana skandha (sensation), Samjna skandha (feeling), and Sangskara skandha (intuition). The skandhas are reminiscent of the four classical elements—earth, air, fire, and water—found in ancient philosophy. The text also identifies a fifth skandha or function, Vijnana which Jung equated with a kind of centralized knowledge which united all four functions. Jung (1958) wrote: “The aggregate of cognition (knowledge) is the Buddha, the enlightened diamond essence. The highest essence proceeds out of the four functions as the final result” (p. 51). What seems to emerge from the combination of all functions is the quintessence of Buddha consciousness, made available to us through the mediating service of the Buddhist master, or yogi: “The quaternity is dissolved in the essence of the Yogin, and the fourfold image of consciousness disappears” (p. 51). In his analysis, Jung interpreted the phenomenon as follows:


Then he assimilates all beings into the mandala. One could say that the Yogin hangs like a spider in its web, and draws all beings through the rays of light into the mandala of his personality. He establishes himself as the centre of the world. The light, which emanated from the “Hum,” is withdrawn and absorbed by the Self. (1958, p. 55)

Just as the Yogin may achieve the diamond body through the fifth skandha, the western adept may realize the self by integrating the four functions into a fifth. Thus, one could say that in vijnana (i.e., wisdom) one reconciles the opposites and the self. Vijnana is the path to the center or the self. As mentioned, one could also compare the idea of the vajrasattva to the alchemical lapis, which Jung also viewed as a symbol of the self. Jung’s commentary in the ETH Lectures demonstrates his most mature understanding of the color quaternity. The breadth of his commentary suggests that it took him nearly a decade to work through his analytic material and cross-cultural studies before he was able to synthesize a symbolic understanding of the four functions which he represented by color (Figure 4). In the same lecture, Jung attributed the discovery of the functions to the Chinese “centuries ago” (1958, p. 105). Elsewhere in the ETH Lectures, Jung provided a primer for his color code:


The four colours attributed to the functions are based on certain feeling values. Feeling is red, this is connected with blood and fire, with passion and love which is supposed to be warm and glowing. Sensation is green, this is connected with the earth and perceiving reality. Thinking is white, or blue, cold like snow and Intuition is gold or yellow because it is felt to shine and radiate. (1958, p. 78)

The fact that Jung uses white interchangeably with blue warrants some explanation. In his book Secret Doctrines of the Tibetan Book of the Dead, author and Buddhist scholar Detlef Ingo Lauf (1977) points out that in Buddhism, blue and white are frequently used interchangeably (p. 129). Furthermore, in his commentary for the Tibetan Book of the Dead, Jung (1935/1953) correlated the color white with thinking:


It gradually becomes clearer that all these deities are organized into mandalas, or circles, containing a cross of the four colours. The colours are co-ordinated with the four aspects of wisdom: (1) White = the light-path of the mirror-like wisdom; (2) Yellow = the light-path of the wisdom of equality; (3) Red = the light-path of the discriminative wisdom; (4) Green = the light-path of the all-performing wisdom. (CW 11, para. 850)

Thus, one could say that what was most essential for Jung was not establishing a universally valid psychological schema predicated on color symbolism but empirically demonstrating a semi-regular chromatic pattern which more or less indicated the same psychological meaning. Jung accepted that there would always be some variation in the way the psyche expressed color symbolism.

The Psychoid Factor

Why in modern times does the unconscious select the colors red, yellow, blue, and green? Although addressing such a question presents a difficult task, Jung left behind a few conceptual clues that may provide at least a partial answer. In On the Nature of the Psyche Jung (1947/1954) introduced the concept of the psychoid factor, which one may define as the part of the psyche that is incapable of consciousness and thus only quasi-psychic in nature. In the same work, he employed the analogy of a color spectrum as an analogy to describe his psychoid concept.


Using the analogy of the spectrum, we could compare the lowering of unconscious contents to a displacement towards the red end of the colour band, a comparison which is especially edifying in that red, the blood colour, has always signified emotion and instinct. (CW 8, para. 384)

With his introduction of the psychoid concept, Jung seems to have expanded his original color scheme into the deep unconscious. Just as the electromagnetic spectrum extends far beyond the limited range of visible light, a psychophysical continuum would comprise a broader range of psychic and physiological phenomena than does consciousness and its four functions (Figure 5). Jung extended this metaphor as follows: “The dynamism of instinct is lodged as it were in the infra-red part of the spectrum, whereas the instinctual image lies in the ultra-violet part” (CW 8, para. 414). Thus, if we were to read the color symbolism in the appropriate context, we could suppose that the psychoid concept is a natural progression of Jung’s typological system. Accordingly, typology comprises the four functions of consciousness whereas the psychoid concept subsumes the totality of unconscious psychic states. Jung’s psychoid concept is understandably difficult to grasp and merits some further explanation. Jung viewed psychic processes as analogous to the concept of an electromagnetic spectrum (Figure 5) on which consciousness slides to the left and to the right. To the left one finds the instincts grounded in somatic processes whereas to the right one encounters the archetypes found in images and ideas. However, either side of the spectrum eventually reaches a threshold that is inaccessible to both image and instincts. On both ends of the spectrum, instinct and archetype gradually fade into the psychoid domain. In Jung’s later work he opined that the archetypes originated from this psychoid domain, which rests on a transcendental substrate. Jung believed however that although psychoid processes are inaccessible to consciousness, through the image-making faculty of the human mind we could expand our reach into those heretofore untrodden regions of the psychoid domain just as through the advent of the telescope our ancestors learned to extend the reach of the eye.

The color symbolism also seems to parallel the alchemical idea of the cauda pavonis, for Jung (1934/1959) suggested that “we may expect the miracle of the cauda pavonis, the appearance of “all Colours,” the unfolding and realization of wholeness, once the dark dividing wall has broken down” (CW 9i, para. 685). Thus, one could associate the color symbolism of Jung’s typology with the appearance of the cauda pavonis—a symbol of wholeness. The cauda pavonis seems to herald the gradual broadening of the total representable bandwidth accessible to the human species. Because Western consciousness occupies but a narrow sliver of this bandwidth of psychic energy, Jung’s assertion that, “Psychic processes therefore behave like a scale along which consciousness ‘slides’” (CW 8, para. 408), suggests that the ego could be viewed as a pointer that can move freely, left and right, on a sliding scale of consciousness and thus could eventually access all the colors of the spectrum analogy alluded to earlier. Viewed in this way, the colors symbolize different modes of consciousness, which probably exceed a mere number of four.

Jung’s typology then, with its emphasis on four functions and four colors should not be viewed as a complete system for it seems possible, even probable, that the human species has the potential to extend the boundaries of consciousness into the psychoid domain and thereby develop heretofore latent functions within the psyche, whose distinct features can only be imagined. Toward the end of his long life, Jung (1956/1963) intimated that more colors, up to seven, could be included into his color scheme: “Consequently the synthesis of the four or seven colours would mean nothing less than the integration of the personality, the union of the four basic functions, which are customarily represented by the colour quaternio blue-red-yellow-green” (CW 14, para. 390).

References


Bennet, E.A. (1985). Meetings with Jung. Zurich, CH: Daimon.

Campbell, J. (1984). Preface. In H. Zimmer, Artistic form and yoga in the sacred images of India (pp. xvii-xxvii). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1926).

Cornford, F. (1937). Plato’s cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato translated with a running commentary. London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul, Ltd.

Evans-Wentz, W.Y. & Karma-Glin-Pa. (2000). The Tibetan Book of the Dead. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1927).

Gieser, S. (2005). The innermost kernel: Depth psychology and quantum mechanics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.

Irwin, J. (1994). The mystery to a solution: Poe, Borges, and the analytic detective story. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1929). Commentary on The secret of the golden flower. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 13). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1940). The integration of personality. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., LTD.

Jung, C. G. (1948). A psychological approach to the dogma of trinity. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 106-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1942)

Jung, C. G. (1950). Concerning Mandala Symbolism. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 9i, pp. 355-384). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1952). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1953). Commentary on the Tibetan book of the dead. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 11). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1935)

Jung, C. G. (1954). On the nature of the psyche. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1947)

Jung, C. G. (1958). Modern psychology: The ETH lectures. Barbara Hannah (Ed.). Unpublished.

Jung, C. G. (1959). A study in the process of individuation. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 9i). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1934)

Jung, C. G. (1963). Mysterium coniunctionis. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C .G. Jung. (Vol. 14). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1956)

Jung, C. G. (1969). Psychology and religion. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 5-105). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1938)

Jung, C. G. (1970). Psychology and alchemy. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 12). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1944)

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 6). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)

Jung, C. G. (1984). Dream analysis: Notes on the seminar given in 1928-1930 by C. G. Jung (W. McGuire, Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1938)

Jung, C. G. (1989). Memories, dreams, reflections. Aniela Jaffé (Ed.) (Richard and Clara Winston, Trans.). New York: NY: Vintage Book. (Original work published 1962)

Jung, C. G. (1996). The psychology of Kundalini Yoga: Notes of the seminar given in 1932 by C. G. Jung. Sonu Shamdasani (Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (2009). The Red Book: Liber novus. Sonu Shamdasani (Ed.). Philemon Series. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.

Kirsch, T. (2000). The Jungians. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.

Lauf, D. I. (1977). Secret doctrines of the Tibetan Book of the Dead. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

Zimmer, H. (1984). Artistic form and yoga in the sacred images of India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1926)

Images:

Hee Choung Yi, “In the Mountains,” (2010), Courtesy: Korean Art Museum Assoc.

Pietro Longhi, “The Alchemist,” (c. 1757). Courtesy: The Yorck Project.

Figure 3: W. Byers-Brown, “World Clock,” (1887). Appeared originally in Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Matter and Mind, (London, 1987), p. 19.

Figure 4: Reconstruction of Jung’s drawing, p. 104, ETH Lectures (1958).

Share with friends and colleagues:
Share


1Save
Email




6 Comments

Erik Meyer
Oct 9, 2015, 5:25




Might Jung being alive today arrive to an even more evolved conclusion as to the comparison of heightened energy states of atoms emitting of photons at defined wave-lengths may also correlate to heighten states of consciousness in the “psychoid domain”? With differing photon wavelengths equaling the spectrum of visible color, might the mind’s energy level also equate to different levels of consciousness?



Kiley Laughlin
Oct 30, 2015, 7:45




Erik, thank you for the comment. Jung was very interested in atomic theory and quantum physics. He really didn’t get the mathematics but had a solid grasp of the philosophical implications. I think your thinking is headed in the right direction and thus, is on the mark. In Jung’s essay “On the Nature of the Psyche,” Jung uses the EM spectrum as an analogy to consciousness, which descends, as it were, into the psychoid domain. Jung recognized that what we view as unconscious may, from a different vantage point, actually be conscious. Consciousness after all suggests that somebody or something is conscious “of something.” Your question is highly relevant to the importance of models (and metaphors) in constructing our picture of reality. It’s always changing. Jung viewed analytical psychology as tantamount to a bridge from one weltanschauung to another. Again, thanks for taking the time to read the article. – Kiley



Ian
Feb 8, 2016, 0:57




I absolutely love this! So much information and patterns to trace. Thank you for providing such an article.

I was wondering if the image of the color spectrum with the functions labeled has an error. Is the red band “feeling” or sensation?

https://typeindepth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/typological-spectrum-Redux-250x.jpg

There is the image link for you.
And here is a nice resource that I am conferring as I read this:

http://www.terrapsych.com/jungdefs.html

Best, IAN!



Nader Khaghani
Aug 2, 2017, 9:02




As a painter/writer, I do appreciate your insightful scholarly article. Thank you for sharing.
As you know the color qualities are flexible things–not written in stone; we choose them to represent our feelings, thoughts, intuitions, and perceptions.
My preferred way of looking at intuition is the fire that cooks all the previous functions. I must admit my bias. I am an introvert intuitive type with the inferior function as a sensate.

Here is how I see it: Green: sensation/manifestation, Blue: feeling/formation, Yellow/creation, and finally Red of our being as emanation–the numinous–Spirit. The ultimate lightning that hits us from the blue yonder of consciousness

is Red of spirit and not yellow of thinking.

I am curious as to your informed thoughts.
Thanks again for sharing, that is what life is all about. We stand on each other’s shoulder and take a peek into the darkness of unconscious just like the trail blazer wise Jung that we all love.



Nader Khaghani
Aug 2, 2017, 9:05




Oh, by the way, I will be in Pacifica for the alchemy seminar coming up the end of August. Love to say hello and shake hands.

Nader



Carl Andrews
Sep 4, 2021, 23:56




I have only skimmed over a bit of this essay and already it helped me with what I was looking for and gave me insight on something profound in my life which I have wondered about for years. Thank you!


2022/06/29

Carl Gustav Jung: Theories of Personality | PDF | Carl Jung | Unconscious Mind

Carl Gustav Jung: Theories of Personality | PDF | Carl Jung | Unconscious Mind

Carl Gustav Jung: Theories of Personality
Uploaded byMarhaeni Sekar FP Date uploadedon Jun 30, 2010
Full description

Download
===
You are on page 1of 84
===

Colin Wilson - C.G. Jung: Lord of The Underworld | PDF | Carl Jung | Synchronicity

Colin Wilson - C.G. Jung: Lord of The Underworld | PDF | Carl Jung | Synchronicity



Colin Wilson - C.G. Jung: Lord of The Underworld


Original Title:
Colin Wilson - C.G. Jung: Lord of the Underworld

==================
C.G.Jung: Lord of the Underworld Paperback – 15 December 2005
by Colin Wilson (Author)

4.8 out of 5 stars 5 ratings

Carl Gustav Jung is one of the seminal figures in the history of depth psychology. An enormously influential and original thinker, Jung was for some time Freud's principal disciple, but he became more and more critical of the Freudian emphasis on repressed sexual tendencies and after the publication of 'Symbols of Transformation' in 1912, Jung broke away from Freud to develop his own technique of 'analytical psychology'.
Print length
160 pages


Review
Carl Gustav Jung is one of the seminal figures in the history of depth psychology. An enormously influential and original thinker, Jung was for some time Freud's principal disciple, but he became more and more critical of the Freudian emphasis on repressed sexual tendencies and after the publication of Symbols of Transformation in 1912, Jung broke away from Freud to develop his own technique of 'analytical psychology'. Jungs clinical work and, perhaps more importantly, his own experience of so-called occult phenomena led him to formulate and describe a number of key concepts, which have now passed into general currency, including the theory of archetypes; the collective unconscious; synchronicity; and the idea of 'active imagination, a technique of conscious dreaming. With characteristic fluency, Colin Wilson weaves a fascinating biographical narrative with a penetrating analysis of Jung's ideas, providing a clear, readable introduction to his life and work.
About the Author
Colin Wilson was born in the East Midlands city of Leicester in 1931. After the phenomenal success of his first book The Outsider in 1956, he moved to Cornwall where he pursued a successful career as a writer, producing over 150 titles in fifty-five years. Essentially an existential philosopher, he has also written on crime, psychology, sex, the occult, literature, music, unexplained phenomena, history, pre-history, and over twenty novels in various genres. He died in December 2013.
Start reading C.G.Jung: Lord of the Underworld on your Kindle in under a minute.

Colin Wilson
4.7 out of 5 stars 9
Paperback
$35.11
Get it 8 - 13 Jul
FREE Shipping
Only 2 left in stock.

About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.


Follow
Colin Wilson
Colin Henry Wilson (26 June 1931 – 5 December 2013) was an English writer, philosopher and novelist. He also wrote widely on true crime, mysticism and the paranormal. Wilson called his philosophy "new existentialism" or "phenomenological existentialism", and maintained his life work was "that of a philosopher, and (his) purpose to create a new and optimistic existentialism".


4.8 out of 5 stars

chris brown
4.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 April 2018
Verified Purchase
Good book, looking forward to reading it. Service excellent.
Report abuse
James
5.0 out of 5 stars Synchronicity
Reviewed in the United States on 27 August 2018
Verified Purchase
Excellent intro into the life and work of Carl Young and a well worth the read.
Report abuse

===
Eugene Pustoshkin
Mar 24, 2015Eugene Pustoshkin rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 1my-library, wilson-colin, carl-jung, jungian-psychology, active-imagination

This is a critical biography by Colin Wilson on Carl Gustav Jung. It is critical in the sense that Wilson tries to appreciate Jung, while growing increasingly impatient about his flaws and especially about what Wilson sees as his incongruence in terms of trying to project outwards an image of a scientific man, while inwardly being an artist-visionary, a sort of a mystic. The book starts in an inspiring fashion, but the inspiration grows tired (perhaps, Wilson grew tired as well: his numerous remarks about the obscurity and annoyance of Jung’s writings are telling—I guess, he tried to encompass Jung’s works in a concentrated effort, which is a very Wilsonian way to do things, but Jung had proven to be a bit too much [and, perhaps, a bit too illogical and self-contradictory] to digest; perhaps, Wilson also projected something of his own on Jung, as we all do). In any case, there is a sense of boredom that arises towards the end of the book (I guess Wilson’s attitude towards Jung is somewhat similar to that of Ken Wilber, who has always been a bit reluctant to build upon Jung’s work). Then at the very end of it suddenly there is a metamorphosis, and the same ol’ optimistic Colin Wilson returns, as especially is evidenced by the concluding remarks and the appendix essay on active imagination. In fact, this essay is very valuable in itself, can be read and re-read, for it offers some crucial understandings of this method, one of the primary Jung’s discoveries. I find “C. G. Jung: Lord of the Underworld” to have been remarkably useful, though it is not a book for someone who is seeking to become inspired by Jung’s work; rather, it is the author’s attempt to follow Jung’s work in an impartial and just way, at times suppressing his obvious frustrations as regards to Jung. My own hypothesis here is that Jung’s figure—as figures of such magnitude—is much to digest (and authentically identify with), and any commenter is bound to start facing their own psychoactive material or at least get in sync with the demons that obviously both tortured and guided C. G. Jung, this lord of the psychic underworld. (less)
flag8 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Hakim Mokeddem
Jan 11, 2020Hakim Mokeddem rated it it was amazing
The book is a biography narrating the life of the Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung and his rising from early childhood to the paroxysms of his career, passing by his father’s failure to achieve success and how that influenced young Jung’s vision of the world, he developed a thirst to accomplish his goals and passion, guided by his grandfather’s reputation as a famous doctor, the early self-realization and discovery of his uniqueness which led him later to the exploration of his vivid imagination to the spiritual experiences he went through, the artistic aspect Jung had and his admiration of science left him so little choices for choosing a career, though finally following his grandfather’s footsteps, Collin Wilson’s (the author) attempt to highlight the most life changing points in Jung’s life, such as the realism of duality of the self, his early alienation with his peers, what being an outsider meant for him, his acquaintance with Freud and how that shaped his first views into psychological field and with much effort his breaking with him, and the consequences that followed, Collin tried to decipher Jung’s views and psychological path, the why of the things, subjectively between commenting and criticizing his methods and admitting the genius man he was, from synchronicity to individuation, his plunging into Chinese culture and his longing for mythology and the construction of his theory of the psyche the unconscious and symbols as an attempt to escape the prison of Freud’s sexual theory he meant it to be its replacement for it with a wider perspective on human self, thus the book discusses a new type of analytical psychology to grasp a better understanding of the unexplored realms of the human mind and try to explain what it is already explored and how to take good hold of it, doing this allows us to fathom human troubles and reduce them in a healthy way, to make the world a better place by, this process certainly will start with the individual’s power to start exploring dark edges of his self , because the most fatale dangers reigns in the human since the existence of the world. Thus we should regard this work as a step forward to reach a more clear vision of our nature and how to react to it. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Donald Scott
Aug 02, 2014Donald Scott rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The author provides many novel insights into the character and personal history of Jung. Many of the stories he provides I hadn't come across elsewhere. For those interested in finding out more about one of the key thinkers in psychotherapy, I can recommend this thin paperback which can fit easily into your back pocket or can be read in the bath if you spray it with silicon beforehand. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Hoang
Dec 11, 2018Hoang rated it liked it
The writer is a bit pushy with his own ideology. As I read the book, I sometimes got confused between Jung’s and Wilson’s own thinking.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
- Andrew
Apr 30, 2021- Andrew rated it it was amazing

In this small biographical book, which is one volume of a series he wrote, about such frank individuals, whom Wilson found them quite interesting for him to understand their psychic and their thoughts, and clearly, Carl Jung is one of those folks.

During those 8 chapters, the book guides us to the early years of Carl Jung, he, being a misfit teen, raised by a doubtful father, to Carl's obsession to prove himself through hard work, to the development of Carl's psychic, and his spiritual development, and his mental breakdowns, and insights, and some of the personal glimpses of his life with the women in his life, Freud, and his possessed colleagues and patients.

For the fact that I've read Jung before, especially his latest works, the archetypes, this book, seems like a revision philosophy course, that gave me a historical content of how Jung had come up with his archetypes, inspired by a psychologist before, which hos ideas about passive and active types, really shapes Jung's thoughts about introvert and extrovert functions.

One thing that had really fascinated me, is Jung's reach vivid inner world, and him being an outstanding outsider, really hits home. His own individuality and attitude, I've found that the artistic, poetic, mystical nature of his, and his concepts such as the anima/animus, and his fascination with mythology, astrology, and alchemist are quite very admirable to me too.

I've always found Wilson quite knowledgeable, if not an encyclopedia hydra, just like a mercury Gemini. who makes every confusing topic, very entertaining, engaging, witty, and really easy to grasp, although it might lose some of its juicy technical details, in order to be will preserve from the masses number of audience, but that never makes him less interesting, highly recommended for whom who wants to know about Jung, yet they haven't read his memoirs yet.

(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Larry
May 01, 2022Larry rated it really liked it
This is a pretty short and easy book. Wilson summarizes Jung's life and ideas and then offers his own critique in the final chapter.

I was glad to hear that someone else found Jung's Symbols of Transformation to be rather opaque and difficult.

As a believer in psychic powers, the supernatural, and what some of us might call the occult, Wilson is frustrated at what he perceives as Jung dancing all around these mysteries without ever taking a firm stand. Commenting on Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle, Wilson says "At last, then, he is willing to admit that synchronicity and magic are much the same thing." But then Jung disappoints him once more with a bunch of hand-waving that ultimately still leaves the reader guessing about Jung's true beliefs.

I found the comments about split-brain research and modern Jungian practice interesting. The right side is the unconscious? After all, the world hasn't held still since Jung's death 60 years ago. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Laura
Jan 01, 2022Laura rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Ihan hyvä kirja. Tätä ei voinut lukea objektiivisuuteen pyrkivänä tietokirjana, vaan Colin Wilsonin hyvin subjektiivisena välienselvittelynä Jungin kanssa. Kirja käsittelee niitä asioita Jungin ajattelussa, jotka vetoavat Wilsoniin, ärsyttävät häntä, tai joissa hänen mielestään Jung on väärässä. Aina ei ole selvää, kenen väite esitetään.

Viihdyttävä, koska pidän siitä että jollain on jotain sanottavaa. Wilsonilla on paljonkin.

Toisaalta Wilson revittelee liikaa turhanpäiväisillä, hieman pahantahtoisilla yksityiskohdilla - Jungin ajatukset jäävät toissijaisiksi, kun mielenkiintoisempaa on tutkia esim. Jungin ja Freudin välienselvittelyä ja kummankin puutteita.
Silti opin tästä paljon, ja onhan se hyvä lukea monenlaisia näkökulmia. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Fernando
Jun 21, 2020Fernando rated it really liked it
Is the first time I read Collin Wilson. And I am not disappointed. I heard his name mentioned by the Spanish Mexican singer Alaska on YouTube. Carl Jung lord of the underworld is kind of biography mixed with Wilson’s personal bias. Everypage did give me the impression of transfering occult knowledge. I'm going to read more books by this writer. (less)
flagLike  · see review
Zach Copley
Oct 28, 2021Zach Copley rated it really liked it
Good-faith critical biography. Especially good insights into active imagination.
flagLike  · comment · see review
Niamh
Dec 09, 2015Niamh rated it it was ok
Shelves: craniosacral-therapy-related, psychotherapy
The author is no fan of Jung and in a way, judging from his description of Jung's early inner life, he doesn't really get him. I learned more about Jung the man from the first paragraph alone of his wonderful autobiography. That said I was happy to read a critical analysis of Jungs writings and also to learn about those aspects of his private life that didn'tmake it in to his autobiography, namely his extramarital affairs and at times cantankerous nature! So, glad to have read it but wouldn't recommend highly. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review

Knowledge in a Nutshell: Carl Jung: The Complete Guide to the Great Psychoanalyst, Including the Unconscious, Archetypes and the Self: 5 : Bobroff, Gary: Amazon.com.au: Books

Knowledge in a Nutshell: Carl Jung: The Complete Guide to the Great Psychoanalyst, Including the Unconscious, Archetypes and the Self: 5 : Bobroff, Gary: Amazon.com.au: Books





Knowledge in a Nutshell: Carl Jung: The Complete Guide to the Great Psychoanalyst, Including the Unconscious, Archetypes and the Self: 5 Paperback – Illustrated, 15 May 2020
by Gary Bobroff (Author)
4.8 out of 5 stars 254 ratings
Book 4 of 6: Knowledge in a Nutshell



Kindle
$6.15
Read with Our Free App
Paperback
$25.09
5 New from $25.09


An excellent primer on Jungian concepts. Highly recommended - Jung Utah review by A. Butler

One of the best introductions to Jung's psychology! - André De Koning, past President Australian and New Zealand Society for Jungian Analysts

Carl Jung was the founder of analytical psychology who revolutionized the way we approached the human psyche. Drawing on Eastern mysticism, mythology and dream analysis to develop his theories, Jung proposed many ideas which are still influential today, including introversion, extroversion and the collective unconscious.

Knowledge in a Nutshell: Carl Jung introduces psychologist Jung's ideas in an engaging and easy-to-understand format. Jungian psychology expert Gary Bobroff breaks down the concepts of the psyche, collective unconscious, archetypes, personality types and more in this concise book. He also explores the influence on Eastern philosophy and religion on Jung's ideas, and how spiritualism enriched his theories.

With useful diagrams and bullet-point summaries at the end of each chapter, this book provides an essential introduction to this influential figure and explains the relevance of Jung's ideas to the modern world.

ABOUT THE SERIES: The critically-acclaimed Knowledge in a Nutshell series provides accessible and engaging introductions to wide-ranging topics, written by experts in their fields.




240 pages
Language

Review
A stunning writer.--Andrew Harvey

Accessible to everybody, through your insightful writing and the illustrations, it gives us the possibility of understanding Jungian concepts very well.--Jungian Analyst Elisabeth Pomès

An excellent primer on Jungian concepts. Highly recommended .... contains good descriptions of Jungian terms in simple language. The writing is clear and engaging, easily understandable even for those with no background in psychology. This would be an excellent book to recommend to clients or others who are interested in learning about Jung's basic ideas.--Amanda Butler

One of the best introductions to Jung's psychology! . . . He illustrates and elaborates and thus gives the reader the overall view of the framework within which we can understand Jung's psychology at a clear, yet deep level.--André De Koning, past President Australian and New Zealand Society for Jungian Analysts
About the Author
Gary S. Bobroff grew up in Saskatoon and took his first personality type test at twelve and has been hooked on Jung ever since. He has a bachelor's degree from the University of British Columbia, and a master's degree in Jungian-oriented counselling psychology from Pacifica Graduate Institute. He is a certified administrator of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator(TM). An international speaker and workshop leader, Gary presents new ideas in engaging and accessible ways. He is the author of Jung, Crop Circles and the Reemergence of the Archetypal Feminine (North Atlantic, 2014).

Start reading Knowledge in a Nutshell on your Kindle in under a minute.


Product details
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Arcturus Editions; Illustrated edition (15 May 2020)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 240 pages
4.8 out of 5 stars 254 ratings



Gary Bobroff



Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs, and more



Products related to this item
Sponsored

Top review from Australia


André de Koning

5.0 out of 5 stars IN A NUTSHELLReviewed in Australia on 19 May 2020
Verified Purchase
IN A NUTSHELL

This new introduction is a most welcome work helping those interested to understand more about Carl Jung and the genius nature of his work on the soul. Modern psychology started its history at the time of the discovery of the knee jerk reflex (1874) and it was almost as if the little hammer of the neurologist knocked out the soul of the human subject. Jung restored much of the exploration of the lost psyche, but to access his work is not always easy.
The author of this book manages to introduce basic concepts in a didactical way. He illustrates and elaborates and thus gives the reader the overall view of the framework within which we can understand Jung’s psychology at a clear, yet deep level.
Apart from historical detail and concepts there are also references to such meaningful work as “Answer to Job” and the important phenomenon of synchronicity.
The author is a psychologist and is founder of JungianOnline.
IN A NUTSHELL: A GREAT NEW CONTRIBUTION TO JUNGIAN PSYCHOLOGY

André de Koning
Jungian Psychoanalyst

2 people found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse

See all reviews


Top reviews from other countries

Elljay
5.0 out of 5 stars A fun, well-researched entry to the wonderful (but complex!) world of Carl Jung's theory.Reviewed in Canada on 10 June 2020
Verified Purchase

A treasure. Wish I'd had it when I first tackled reading Jung. What I love about this book: so READABLE! Intelligent pop culture references make it fun to read without trivializing. Makes the key concepts crystal clear with plain language explanations. Jung In A Nutshell will really help people who want to understand why Jung is important and to read more challenging books on this subject. A useful, enriching book that entertains as well as informs!

4 people found this helpfulReport abuse

John Simmons
5.0 out of 5 stars Clarity & ease of readingReviewed in Canada on 10 June 2020
Verified Purchase

I wish this had been available when first I came to Jungian thought. If I had my way this would be required first basic reading to anyone with a new interest in Jung. Actually come to think of it anyone who is not actually a Jungian Scholar already. It puts so much into context, a foundation from which to adventure forth into deeper studies. It is also a great resource & refresher for stuff you have forgotten
Most enjoyable

2 people found this helpfulReport abuse

FS
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting read - rusty EnglishReviewed in Germany on 28 March 2022
Verified Purchase

Concise introduction (life and work of C.G. Jung). The English translation is a bit rusty. Sometimes strange interpretations. Key points at end of each chapter.
Report abuse

Leah Taylor
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent! ThanksReviewed in Canada on 17 August 2020
Verified Purchase

Excellent thanks!

One person found this helpfulReport abuse

Dr. Jean B. Raffa
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent, clear, and concise.Reviewed in the United States on 9 June 2020
Verified Purchase

What a marvelous introduction to, and summary of, Jungian psychology this is! I've been telling my almost-18-year-old twin grandsons about Jungian psychology for many years. They're very curious, but sometimes they find my explanations a bit too difficult to absorb. This book is exactly what I've been looking for. As soon as I read it (in only two sittings) I ordered two more copies for them. I've been studying Jungian psychology for 30 years and have the complete works. This book beautifully summarizes the salient points of his work without being too complex or wordy. And the photographs add a depth of meaning that words alone don't always do. Gary Bobroff has made Jung understandable to the average layperson. My favorite chapters were the last two: Anima and Animus, and Synchronicity, both difficult topics to explain. He's done a superb job. Highly recommended..

33 people found this helpfulReport abuse
See all reviews

Jung: A Biography - Bair, Deirdre | Amazon.com.au | Books

Jung: A Biography - Bair, Deirdre | 9780316159388 | Amazon.com.au | Books




Jung: A Biography Paperback – 9 November 2004
by Deirdre Bair (작가)
4.4 out of 5 stars 43 ratings

This authoritative biography reveals the untold truth about Jung's secret work for the Allies during World War II, his controversial affair with one of his patients, and the contents of his private papers, as well as never before published photos.

928 페이지
Language


Jung: His Life and Work, a Biographical Memoir
Barbara Hannah
4.8 out of 5 stars 18
Paperback

$40.70$ 40.70 _ _
Prime FREE Delivery
Usually dispatched within 3 to 5 days.

The Portable Jung
Carl Jung
4.6 out of 5 stars 221
Paperback



Product description

검토
"A remarkable biography of a remarkable French woman--the high priestess of existentialism and modern feminism. Deirdre Bair writes with an intimacy and vividness unique in modern American biography."

"Deirdre Bair's portrait of Simone de Beauvoir is at once intima entertainingly readable and densely researched. She has amassed a vast amount of information without being tyrannized by it."




Top reviews from other countries

a23
5.0 out of 5 stars Fair picture of the manReviewed in the United Kingdom on 13 June 2011
Verified Purchase

Jung is a challenging subject to write about - an individual that splits public and professional opinion and no shortage of acolytes or assassins wanting to whet their own particular angles, plus ongoing and fierce protection of many of his notebooks/archives etc by his family. 've read several other biographies, including Jung's Memories, Dreams, Recollections and found this work immensely engaging and thorough. I felt I was presentad with a vivd picture of Jung with good explanations of the origins and development of encountered (or created) with his professional peers and his personal life. It's not always an attractive picture that emerges, but it does seem fair and balanced. I'd say this is probably the one book you should read if you have a that knowledge about the man (i'd recommend Anthony Stevens "On Jung" if it's his professional theories that interest you)

6 people found this helpfulReport abuse

Amazon Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars Poor quality copyReviewed in the United Kingdom on 4 January 2021
Verified Purchase

Poor quality paper therefore not a pleasant book to touch or look at.... Content great so far.
Report abuse

Erkki-Pekka Kinnunen
5.0 out of 5 stars Magnum opusReviewed in the United Kingdom on 7 February 2014
Verified Purchase

An excellent biography, very accurately documented, yet enjoyable to read - great! A rare reading enjoyment, an opus written with expertise and great style

One person found this helpfulReport abuse

Sam the Man
2.0 out of 5 stars Print on demand!Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 May 2015
Verified Purchase

This is a fine book as regards the actual text; however I want to warn anyone who might order the paperback new from Amazon that what they are selling here is nothing but a crappy print-on-demand copy; the cover and pages are accordingly produced - for instance the photo section contains lines from the computer printer, etc.

9 people found this helpfulReport abuse

Gerard P_Mtl CA
5.0 out of 5 stars fantastic jjob by Deirdre BairReviewed in Canada on 30 October 2019
Verified Purchase

Wow!
Report abuse
See all reviews
===

Jung: A Biography
by Deirdre Bair
 4.05  ·   Rating details ·  268 ratings  ·  29 reviews
This authoritative biography reveals the untold truth about Jung's secret work for the Allies during World War II, his controversial affair with one of his patients, and the contents of his private papers, as well as never before published photos. ...more
GET A COPY
KoboOnline Stores ▾Book Links ▾
Paperback, 928 pages
Published November 9th 2004 by Back Bay Books (first published 2003)
Original TitleJung: A Biography
ISBN0316159387  (ISBN13: 9780316159388)
Edition LanguageEnglish
CharactersCarl Jung
Other Editions (12)
Jung: A Biography 
Jung: biografija 
Jung 
Jung: A Biography 
111x148
All Editions
...Less DetailEdit Details
FRIEND REVIEWS
Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.
READER Q&A
Ask the Goodreads community a question about Jung
54355902. uy100 cr1,0,100,100 
Ask anything about the book
Be the first to ask a question about Jung

LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
You Never Forget Your First by Alexis CoeThomas Cromwell by Tracy BormanBarracoon by Zora Neale HurstonElvis and Ginger by Ginger AldenA Man Called Destruction by Holly George-Warren
Biographies About Men, Written by Women
112 books — 6 voters
Psychology and Alchemy by C.G. JungC.G. Jung Speaking by C.G. JungThe Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious by C.G. JungThe Book of Symbols by Ami RonnbergJung by Anthony Stevens
A Carl Jung Reading List
100 books — 3 voters


More lists with this book...
COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
 Average rating4.05  ·  Rating details ·  268 ratings  ·  29 reviews

Search review text


All Languages
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of Jung: A Biography

Write a review
Kressel Housman
Aug 19, 2018Kressel Housman rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: biography, non-fiction, psychology
Normally, I don’t write book reviews until after I’ve finished the book, but when a book is over 500 pages long and dense with information, I do status updates as mini-reviews. The things that impress me at the beginning of a book may not be the same at the end, but I don’t want to forget anything. This is a biography of Jung, and I was drawn to it because it addresses Jung’s Nazi past, claiming that he was not a really a Nazi sympathizer, but an American spy. But I’m not up to that part yet. I’m just up to his early life and career.

The first thing that impressed me, aside from the coldness and isolation of Jung’s childhood, is that he had a cousin who claimed to be a medium, and he and other members of his family had seances with her at the helm regularly. The author of the book claims that Helly (the cousin) had a crush on Carl, which I find easy to believe. I was a teenage girl once; that’s what we’re like. But the thought that struck me was one I’d heard in another book I’d heard about recently: namely, that in an era when women weren’t taken seriously when they spoke for themselves, being “possessed” or “speaking in tongues” was an effective way to get heard. (That book is called Radical Spirits: Spiritualism and Women's Rights in Nineteenth-Century America.) To be clear, I don’t mean that Helly was being deliberately manipulative. She may well have fallen for her own act. Presumably, her older cousin Carl did, too.

Next, I learned about Eugen Bleuler, who ran the most well-reputed psychiatric hospital in Switzerland, the Burgholzi and gave Jung his first medical job. His reputation was far eclipsed by Freud’s and Jung’s, but the book makes him out like a hero. Like R.D. Laing a century later, he lived alongside his patients, he involved them directly in their own care, and also in the running of the facility. It sounded so much like what I’ve read about Kingsley Hall, I wondered if Bleuler was an influence, at least in his democratic or egalitarian approach to treatment, but Bleuler is the one who coined the phrase “schizophrenia,” which Laing said was a myth. I’m going to have to ask Laing’s biographer. I’ve emailed him once before. In any case, to Bleuler’s credit, the reason he didn’t write as voluminously as Freud and Jung is that he was too busy caring for his patients.

The final figure that interested me was Sabina Spielrein. Now, I’d heard of her before – Keira Knightley stars in a biopic about her – but this book gave me more detail. She was Jewish, which of course interested me, and she sounded like Mary Barnes in many ways. In parallel to Helly finding her voice indirectly as a medium, the highly intelligent Sabina got as far as medical school, which made her a pioneer, but she broke down in the process. Well, breaking barriers is taxing. It was her against the world. That’s a hard place to be in. No wonder she fell back into the passive position of patient, but she was willful enough to be a really difficult one at times. I want to read more of her story. There are multiple accounts of it, though. As of now, I have no way of knowing whose opinion to trust.

Well, that’s all for now. I guess I’ll post again in a few days. Be well! (less)
flag19 likes · Like  · 3 comments · see review
Erik Graff
Apr 08, 2018Erik Graff rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: Jung fans
Recommended to Erik by: Heirloom Books
Shelves: biography
This is a detailed biography of Carl Gustav Jung, founder of analytical psychology, not an exposition of his theoretical development. There's a lot of name dropping, particularly of his colleagues, professional acquaintances and analysands, not much insight into his central beliefs. The one notable exception, however, is as regards his attitudes about race, the Jewish 'race' especially, given the allegations that he was anti-Semitic or pro-Nazi.

On the matter of race, and on the equally controversial matter of Jung's adulteries, the author appears to fairly present the evidence behind the arguments without herself adopting a stance except in such cases which are amply documented. Thus while Jung certainly did say and write about such things as a 'racial' unconscious before the war, while emphasizing a 'collective' species-wide unconscious after it, matters he might well have been more careful about with benefit of hindsight, he was certainly not pro-Nazi. Indeed, he was never much interested in or informed about politics beyond the politics within his various psychological/medical associations.

As regards his sex life, the author mentions some of the gossip within the Jungian community but only certifies one affair, that being with his long-term mistress Toni Wolff. In terms of his marriage to Emma, this--including, of course, the rumors--was quite enough, she, the source of his material fortune, being represented as a long-suffering and neglected (as their children appear to have been neglected) wife and, ultimately, colleague.

Not enough treated, in my view, is how important the wealth Emma brought into their marriage was to Jung's life. Although brought up himself in meagre, but respectable, circumstances--his father being a parson and some notable figures appearing in his family tree--Jung entered into the reaches of cosmopolitan elites as he entered into his professional maturity during his thirties. This wealth and those associations allowed him the freedom to go his own way both in his personal and in his professional life, the freedom to represent himself as a very private introvert, on the one hand, while being an extremely public person on the other. This sudden attainment of wealth has likely relevance to his relations with Freud as well as to his personal development and the particular orientation of his psychological practice, implications barely explicated by the author.

This is not the book for anyone interested in analytical psychology. For persons already familiar with it, and with, it may be noted, his pseudo-autobiography 'Memories, Dreams, Reflections', 'Jung' serves as a substantial contribution. (less)
flag12 likes · Like  · 1 comment · see review
Aaron Wolfson
Jan 10, 2016Aaron Wolfson rated it really liked it
Recommended to Aaron by: Tim Swisher
A wonderfully thorough and balanced portrait of an immensely complex man. Walt Whitman, with your contradictions and multitudes: Jung is the proof in your pudding. And Deirdre Bair serves that pudding up as a scrumptious and filling dish.

My one major concern with the book is that it doesn't delve as deeply into Jung's psychology as I'd have liked. Perhaps I've been spoiled by recently reading James Gleick's meticulous scientific treatment of Richard Feynman's life (Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman). This book, in contrast, is heavier on the purely biographical details than on the ideas, and there are portions that focus overly on names, dates, and other minutiae.

That said, there are plenty of references in the appropriate places, along with the background behind the theories as Bair mines it. She accomplishes well the primary task of the biographer: to retract the curtain of mystery so we can glimpse the human behind.

For a man with such a thick curtain, Bair presents a breathtaking view. It's important to understand the mortality of great thinkers, especially those with a seemingly immortal aura. For those looking to achieve such an understanding of Jung, this is a place to begin. (less)
flag5 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Ladiibbug
Oct 20, 2015Ladiibbug rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: biography
Biography

What a big disappointment. I spent lots of time researching to find the best book about Jung, by the most qualified biographer/writer. Despite the author's sterling credentials, and a wasted week of reading the 640 pages (the rest being notes and an index), for the most part, I still don't have a clue about:

1. Jung's thought processes about "the collective unconscious", how he arrived at his conclusions about introvert/extrovert types, what he thought about an individual's unconscious mind, and so much more of many tidbits I've read about over the years attributed to Jung. It was never made clear in what order Jung arrived at the above major ideas of his, and which theories led him to the next possible theory.

The book made clear Jung was wildly jumbled with his ideas, notes, theories, research into complex topics (alchemy, archetypes, religion, psychic phenomenon), and would, at the drop of a hat, abandon a theory or area of research and take off investigating a different area. Sometimes years or decades would pass before he got back into working on the original theory.

Still, for a book about Jung with no definition of "the collective unconscious", or many of the other major theories attributed to him, is ridiculous.

What the book does provide is a brain-numbingly detailed record of various meetings, none of which gave me one iota of information about Jung.

It was clear that Jung was usually not a very nice person. He was routinely arrogant, proud, lived only for his career and what he wanted to do, with no regard for others. Toward the end of his career, if everyone in a psychological society that he was a member of offered new ideas, Jung would force them out of the group. People had to base their entire idea of psychology using only his own ideas -- nothing more, nothing less.

For decades he was married but carried on an affair with another woman, who came to the house many times per week, while his wife and children were home, to enjoy dinner, or meet with him privately in his office in the home.

Repeated mentions of Jung's lifelong interest in "alleged mystical, mythological and religious underpinnings of his theories" (page 433), along with a lifelong fascination and investigations into alchemy, make me wonder if Jung is the brilliant father of many psychological theories, or just a nut.

Jung claimed to have "visions" and dreams that he would explore to the degree that, to me, made him seem to be unstable at times.

After slogging thru this book, I am no longer interested in reading more about this man or his supposed theories. (less)
flag4 likes · Like  · 4 comments · see review
Clif
Dec 06, 2015Clif rated it it was ok
Shelves: biography
I got through it.

A good biography offers insight into the times as well as the subject. This account leaves the man isolated from events. World War 1 passes almost without notice and World War 2 comes and goes without much disturbance beyond problems with the mail and rationing while living a life in isolation in Switzerland. All the while this association or that is being formed around Jung, the leadership of each bickering about the purpose of the group and all hoping to find favor with Jung.

In short, Jung becomes famous, analyzes a great many people only a few of whose cases are described, using a method only touched upon, is adored by the rich and famous who flit back and forth across continents to see him and even pay for him to do the same for them. He then loses interest in individuals, passes analysis on to apt patients, who then sanction their patients to analyze others. The master then wants only to be left to his work on such very questionable things like alchemy, astrology, and UFO's all the while seeking a grand scheme to tie things together. Like Freud he constructs an edifice of his own design that claims to explain how our minds work. Unlike Freud he isn't fixated on sex and childhood mentality. Like Freud he is awed by his own creation. Unlike Freud he is willing to admit modifications to his thoughts, but only if these are framed in a way to make it appear he had the modification in mind first.

You will get chapters of details about who thought what about whom, who was thought to be closest to Jung, how the minutiae of daily life was handled at the homestead. I got excited upon beginning a chapter titled "The Solar Phallus Man" but it went nowhere. A Jung family member would love this book about a famous relative, but I kept wondering why I was reading.

You'll get little about Jung's concepts on psychology. His differences with Freud are mildly interesting but not examined more than briefly. Jung's school of thought, called Analytical Psychology, hangs in the background. We get a vague idea about what a "complex" is, we find out that he pioneered the division of personalities into introverts and extroverts and there is mention of archetypes with no definition of the term. The "collective unconscious" is mentioned many times with no explanation of what it is.

When I finished I felt I had read an account of what I would call The Jung Society - those who fluttered around him, dedicated their lives to him like his wife and Toni Wolff, and a host of eminently forgettable others. Just as when I started, I remain unenlightened on his school of psychology. There are other biographies of Jung. I recommend giving one a try. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
D.S. West
Mar 18, 2012D.S. West rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Budding Jungians and New Agers with an abundance of free time on their hands
Recommended to D.S. by: Jesus
I didn't finish Bair's biography of Jung. My surrender should say nothing about the quality of Bair's research; it's a doozy. I got as far as 300-ish pages before the breadth of names, concepts, and aside biographies (context to help the reader understand Jung's environment) convinced me I'd have to devote more time to finish the book. I'm eager to move on to other texts, so Bair and I will have to part company prematurely.

I "did" get far enough in to see Jung through middle-age. (I would have liked to have moved into his alchemical studies...maybe some other time.) I tracked this award-winning biography down in the hopes that it could reinforce what I read in Jung's own Dreams, Memories, Reflections and provide some measure of the man's shortcomings. Dreams, Memories, Reflections was, even by Jung's admission, a story of his inner-life. It was purposely and admirably one-sided. Bair provides a comprehensive reiteration of Jung's autobiography in modern, untranslated parlance, as well as an outside perspective of who he was, the significance of what he did, and how his (many) contemporaries regarded him. Take Toni Wolff for example. She doesn't figure into Dreams, Memories, Reflections at all; however, Wolff was perhaps closer to Jung than his wife Emma, personally and professionally. She was his mistress and his intellectual partner. Sabina Speilrein too--Bair gives us information Jung was too proud or ashamed to include in his life story.

It's probably a sin to write more than one paragraph about a book you haven't and likely won't finish, so I'm now exiting stage left. Jung is a tremendous biography--I can't imagine organizing a book like this. Bair must be a robot or something. Props, kudos, etc. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
max
Dec 02, 2019max rated it it was ok
Deidre Bair claims in her introduction that her biography will be different because of her unique access to materials via Jung's heirs, who approved of her project. She also claims that as a professional biographer and not a psychologist she has less bias.

While it's true Bair does rather well exposing her materials, her desire to present them objectively overwhelms the project of their interpretation. Jung's thoughts and ideas recede behind clashes of personalities and petty squabbles. Too much attention is given to wartime Zurich, a playground for spies and largely irrelevant intrigue. Bair attempts to defend Jung from the worst accusations of antisemitism and Nazi collaboration, but the facts as she presents them are too ambiguous to make the case decisive. Instead, despite her ministrations, Jung appears to be swept up by his own Germanic pride and unable to publicly apologize for his ugly moments as an early Nazi apologist.

Only those with a scholarly interest in Jung's life need read this book, as anyone looking to better understand his intellectual development would be better served elsewhere. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Sandy
Aug 30, 2020Sandy rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is a detailed and thorough writing of Jung’s outer life. I was hoping for some more information into his inner world, but his own writings do that. Jung has been the biggest influence in my life from the therapeutic and personal standpoint. His own life was unfortunately chaotic and complicated but he has provided the world with a clear understanding of the inner workings of the mind, for which I am most grateful. I felt sad to learn of all the conflicts in his own life. He seemed to be most happy when in solitude and I nature. I highly recommend Bair’s book if you have an interest in this great man’s life. If you want to understand his inner life and your own, Jung’s own books are the best choice. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
John
Aug 25, 2017John rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A thoroughly researched and for the most part well written biography. Bair did tend to go too heavily into the machination of the Psychoanalytical Clubs. Her in-depth delving into the politics of the writing and publications of Jung's "so called autobiography" did veer off into the realm of the mind-numbing. Otherwise a very worthwhile read. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Raul Popescu
Jul 03, 2019Raul Popescu rated it it was amazing
http://www.litero-mania.com/c-g-jung-... (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Elizabeth
Sep 05, 2012Elizabeth rated it really liked it
This is a fascinating look at a complicated man. Deidre Bair has managed to show him as a flawed man whose curiosity helped him create psychology as we know it. His relationships are fraught with difficulty. He is inconsistent and hates criticism. He is constantly searching for the connection between our interior world and the exterior world of both mythology and dreams.

The description of getting "Memories, Dreams, Reflections" published will resonate with anyone who has worked in publishing. The author's wishes, the editors' wishes, the translators...the family. It is a publishing nightmare, yet somehow the book got published. It is certainly the one with which I first became familiar with Jung. Time to read it again. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Jamie
Mar 12, 2011Jamie rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, bio
Bair gives a great exhaustive history of Jung's life, but as a psych-minded person, I wish she would have done more on going into the theories which Jung created and how his personal life lead to the development of the collective unconscious, archetypes, etc. She goes into more detail on Jung's interest in alchemy but mainly as it created and destroyed some of his close relationships. Learning more about Jung and all of his nuances as a very private man who couldn't help but self-promote relentlessly was pretty a great read, but I now want to follow it up with a refresher on his theory and view of humanity in the world. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Jann
May 12, 2008Jann rated it really liked it
Shelves: biography
It was wonderful to read a comprehensive, objective biography of this amazing man, who was a pioneer in connecting man's pursuit of self-actualization with the spiritual (even though he was afraid of being criticized as "non-scientific" and disguised his beliefs in somewhat ambiguous terminology). I now want to re-read "Memories, Dreams, & Reflections", his autobiography, with more information about his personality.


(less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Erin
May 22, 2007Erin rated it it was amazing
If you want to study Jung, I highly recommend this book. It's written by a biographer (not a Jungian) so it's accessible to any reader. I also found it an aid to helping me understand Jung's own writing since it contextualizes and grounds him in world history. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Bookmarks Magazine
Feb 05, 2009Bookmarks Magazine added it  ·  review of another edition
Bair, award-winning author of books on Samuel Beckett, Simone de Beauvoir, and Ana_

flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Lewis
Feb 26, 2015Lewis rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book is fraught with numerous errors in scholarship.

Many of these error have been noted in Chapter IV of "Jung Stripped Bare-By His Biographers Even" by Sonu Shamdasani.

A few of the errors cited in Footnotes by Shamdasani are:

22. Bair noted that Jung asked Cary Baynes to write his biography in the 1930s, without citing a source (Bair, 2003, p. 585) There is no mention in their correspondence of this.

51. This copy of the protocols was donated by Helen Wolff to Princeton University Press, who in turn donated them to the Library of Congress in 1983, placing a ten year restriction on them. I studied these in 1991, and they have been on open access since 1993. Bair stated that the copy in the Library of Congress, which is in the Bollingen collection, is restricted (2003, p. 657, n. 7). This is actually unrestricted and was moved to a separate collection. The copy at the ETH in Zürich is restricted.

86. Countway ms., CLM; Hull draft translation, LC; Draft translation, BL. During the editing, there was some discussion about one passage in the manuscript. In Hull’s draft translation of Jung’s boyhood fantasy concerning Basle Cathedral, the manuscript reads: “God sits on his golden throne, high above the world, and shits on the cathedral; from under the throne falls an enormous turd falls” (p. 32, LC). In the Countway manuscript, the same passage reads: “God sits on his golden throne, high above the world, and shits on the cathedral [in hand: shits on his church]” (CLM, p. 32). Bair commented that neither Jaffé nor Marianne Niehus would permit Jung to use the word “shit” in this context,
suggesting that it was censored (2003, p. 635). However, the original German typescript reads: “unter dem Thron fällt ein ungeheures Excrement” (“an enormous excrement falls under the throne”) (JA, p. 19). This manuscript is on open access. This correctly reproduces Jung’s handwritten manuscript (Jung family archives, personal communication, Ulrich Hoerni).

93. Adler, 1975, p. 550, tr. mod. Bair described this letter as ‘curious’ and claimed that it indicated power which Marianne and Walther Niehus had (2003, p. 606–607). However, as the documents cited here show, this letter is in consonance with a number of other critical statements by Jung.

101. In the late 1980s, research on the composition of the text was concurrently and independently undertaken by Alan Elms and myself (see Elms 1994 and Shamdasani 1995). Prior to this, the status of the text was unquestioned in the public domain. Bair claimed that the divergences between the English and German editions caused led to speculation concerning censorship between scholars from the moment that the work was published (2003, p. 638). This was simply not the case, as there was no public debate concerning censorship until our research was published. In her footnote, she wrote: “most prominent among them Shamdasani and Elms, who base many of their charges on incomplete evidence and non-objective speculation” (p. 847, n. 69). No evidence is given of this, and Bair does not even provide the reference for anything that I have written on the subject.

102. Jung discussed his relationship with Toni Wolff in the protocols, LC, p. 98, pp. 171–174; see Shamdasani, 1995, pp. 124–125. Bair stated that in the protocols she read, there was no discussion of this (2003, p. 838, n. 61).

122. In 1933, Fordham had gone to Zurich to meet Jung for training, and was turned down, due to the difficulty of foreigners finding work. (Fordham 1993, pp. 67–69). The date of this trip is confirmed by Fordham’s diary (private possession, Max Fordham). Bair misdated this meeting to the early years of the Second World War and claimed that by this time Fordham was angry that Baynes had published an account of his analysis which was too easily recognizable (2003, p. 472). Baynes’ Mythology of the Soul only appeared in 1940. Bair also claimed that until his death, Fordham insisted that he did not resent Jung, and alleged that his “grudge” towards him was as great as that towards Baynes
(ibid.). Over the course of many conversations I held with Fordham between 1988 and 1995, I did not notice any resentment expressed towards Baynes or Jung: his attitude towards them was one of admiration and gratitude.

129. Jung to Read, 17 July 1946, RA. Bair claimed that most of Jung’s correspondence during the Collected Works project was with Hull (2003, p. 582). This is not the case, as Jung had extensive correspondences with Gerhard Adler, Michael Fordham and Herbert Read.

136. 11 May 1955, CMAC, orig. in English. Bair claimed that Jung praised Hull’s translations in all extant statements, and that there is no evidence that he had any reservations about them (2003, p. 583). The citations here indicate that this was not the case. In Hannah’s view, as a “thinking type”, Hull’s translations left out feeling and the irrational. (1976, p. 334). Von Franz noted that Jung’s writings had a double aspect, a logically understandable argument on the one hand, and on the other, the “unconscious” was allowed its say: “the reader . . .finds himself at the same time exposed to the impact of that ‘other voice’, the unconscious, which may either grip or frighten him off. That ‘other voice’ can, among other factors, be heard in Jung’s special way of reviving the original etymological meanings of words and allowing both feeling and imaginative elements to enter into his scientific exposition.” She noted that “unfortunately, this double aspect of Jung’s writings has not been preserved in the monumental English edition of his Collected Works, translated by R. F. C. Hull” (Von Franz, 1972, p. 4). Franz Jung recalled heated discussions between Jung and Hull on issues of translation. He noted that Hull would come to see Jung with a completed translation, and would be unwilling to correct what he had done (personal communication).

159. Jung, CW 5, (1952), pp. 13–14. Bair misdated this episode to 1915 (2003, p. 255).

192. Bair described Barbara Hannah as a lesbian (Bair, 2003, p. 364). Emmanuel Kennedy, Hannah’s literary executor, who has her diaries, stated that this is not true. He also noted that many of Bair’s descriptions of Hannah are derogatory (personal communication).

216. The first to posit that Jung had a “death-wish” against Freud was Freud himself when they met at Bremen in 1909, as an interpretation of Jung’s interest in the corpses recently found there (Jones, 1955, p. 166). Jung commented to Bennet, “I had branded myself, in becoming identified with Freud. Why should I want him to die? I had come to learn. He was not standing in my way: he was in Vienna, I was in Zürich. Freud identified himself with his theory—in this case, his theory of the old man of the tribe whose death every young man must want; the son must want to displace the father. But Freud wasn’t my father!” (Bennet 1961, p. 44). According to Jones, it was at Bremen that Jung was persuaded to have his first alcoholic drink since leaving the Burghölzli, with its teetotal regime (1955, pp. 61, 165). This point is repeated by Paul Roazen (1974, p. 246), McLynn (1996, p. 135), and Bair (2003, p. 161). However, in commenting on Jones’ biography, Jung pointed out to Bennet that this was mistaken, and that he had celebrated leaving the Burghölzli by drinking (Bennet, diary, 18 September, 1959, Bennet papers, ETH).

257. Oeri, 1935, p. 526. A few pages earlier, Bair had actually referred to Oeri’s article, (p. 44). In the protocols of the Zofingia society, the student debating organization which Jung attended, his name is generally given as “Jung vulgo Walze” (Staatsarchiv, Basel).

262. Bair claimed that Jung did not practice hypnosis or believe in its powers (p. 738, n. 84). This is not the case. Volumes 1 to 4 of Jung’s Collected Works present numerous cases of hypnosis and discussions of it. For an account of Jung’s involvement with hypnosis, see Shamdasasni, 2001. In 1913, Jung recalled that he resolved to abandon the use of hypnotic suggestion not because it was inefficacious, but because he did not understand how it cured: “I was resolved to abandon suggestion altogether rather than allow myself to be passively transformed into a miracle-worker” (CW 4, § 582).

263. When Jung visited Freud in March 1909, a loud noise occurred at a critical point in the conversation, which he interpreted parapsychologically as a “catalytic exteriorisation phenonemena”. For Freud’s understanding of this event, see Freud to Jung, 16 April 1909, (McGuire, 1974, p. 218). Bair mistakenly stated that this occurred on their first meeting (p. 117).

269. The Honegger papers are in the archives of the ETH in Zurich. A number of years ago, a copy was given to William McGuire for his personal study. McGuire subsequently deposited them in the Library of Congress. The ETH requested the return of their materials. Bair stated that the Jung estate claimed ownership of the papers (2003, p. 642), which is false (personal communication, Ulrich Hoerni).

272. On this question, see Jung’s discussion of this issue in his 1912 lectures at Fordham University, “Attempt at a portrayal of psychoanalytic theory”, CW 4, §§ 407–457. While Jung was in America on this trip, Bair claimed that Emma Jung wrote to him usually every day (2003, p. 229) and noted that the letters are in the Jung family archive (ibid., p. 723, n. 60). However, there are no letters from Emma Jung to C. G. Jung in 1912 there (personal communication, Andreas Jung).

280. [Bair 2003], p. 246. Bair added that Jung did not respond to Freud’s citation of the letter because of his distress and confusion. The letter cited to Bjerre cited above suggests otherwise.

281. In August 1913, Jung presented a paper in London at the International Medical Congress. Bair erroneously stated that he gave a series of lectures (2003, p. 239). Jung actually gave one lecture, “General aspects of psychoanalysis” (CW 4).

282. Bair argued that Jung’s work began as an attempt to show how myths could be used to explain psychological concepts, which is mistaken (2003, p. 201).The work applied the libido theory to the interpretation of mythological symbols.

283. Bair erroneously claimed that Flournoy gave Jung his translation of Frank Miller’s fantasies with what he had gleaned from her in conversation and correspondence (2003, p. 213). Frank Miller wrote an article in French, to which Flournoy wrote an introduction. Bair also claimed that Frank Miller actually invented her fantasies (p. 214). There is no evidence to support this. On Frank Miller, see Shamdasani, 1990.

284. Bair claimed that in the second part of the work, Jung argued that the sex drive did not have primacy, as other factors were present, such as the archetypes of the collective unconscious (2003, p. 201). This is to confound Jung’s subsequent theories with his arguments in 1912.

289. 27 October 1913, McGuire, 1974, p. 550. Bair noted that Freud informed Maeder that Jung was an anti-Semite, but the reference given is to the Jung’s letter to Freud concerning ‘bona fides’ (p. 240). Freud’s letter to Maeder of 21 September 1913 (LC) contains no reference to anti-semitism. This may be a confusion with Maeder’s statement in his interview with Nameche that he received a letter from Freud in which he wrote, “Maeder, you are an anti-Semite” (CLM, p. 4).

293. Bair claimed that in the protocols, Jung identified this figure as Maria Moltzer (p. 291). Such an explicit identification is not found in the protocols in the Library of Congress. The argument for Moltzer as the woman in question was made by myself (Shamdasani, 1995, p. 129, 1998a, p. 16). If there exists documentation where Jung explicitly made this identification, it should be produced. In the early 1920s, Riklin painted frescos on the ceilings of Amsthaus 1 in Zürich, together with Augusto Giacometti. Bair misdated this to 1912 (p. 223). On Moltzer, see also Shamdasani, 1998b.

296. Protocols, LC, p. 98. In the protocols, there then follows an excerpt of Jung’s discussion of this dream in the 1925 seminar (protocols, pp. 99–100; Jung 1925, pp. 56–57). What Bair cited as Jung’s discussion of this dream in the protocols on p. 727, n. 13 is actually a quotation from this excerpt.

299. Bair claimed that Emma Jung was forbidden to read the Black Books, and that in early 1914, Toni Wolff was the only person to read them. (pp. 249–250). Material in the Jung family archives suggests otherwise, as will be clear when the Red Book is published. Bair also reported that Jung “drew” in the Black Books, which was generally not the case.

300. Information from Andreas Jung. Bair erroneously claimed that he was away more than he was at home that year (p. 248).

301. Bair erroneously noted that these dreams contain “yellow flood” and “dark red blood” (2003, p. 243). Neither in Memories, nor in the Black Books are these motifs to be found.

309. [Bair 2002] Ibid., p. 292. Bair also stated that the figure of Philemon led Jung to study Gnosticism (p. 396). However, Jung’s reading notes (JA) and references in
Transformations and Symbols of the Libido indicate that he started studying Gnosticism in 1910. Bair reproduced a photograph of Jung’s mural of Philemon together with his a mural of a mandala and stated that they are on the wall of his “private room” in his tower at Bollingen (facing p. 370). Actually, they are in separate bedrooms.

316. Bair, 2003, p. 297. Bair claimed that the Sermones followed the style and subject matter of the works of G. R. S Mead, and that Jung was studying sixteen or eighteen volumes of Mead’s work at this time (p. 296). The first statement is mistaken. No source is given for the second, and no evidence exists to support it.

331. Bair claimed that the only member of the Club who declined was Fanny Bowditch Katz. In actuality, between half and two-thirds of the membership responded.

335. I wrote: “these points strongly suggest that ‘Analytical collectivity’ was actually written by Moltzer. Whilst this is not definitively proved, the balance of the evidence clearly points in this direction” (Shamdasani, 1998a, p. 72). “We have seen that no positive corroborative evidence has arisen to indicate that ‘Analytical collectivity’ was by Jung, and that sufficient evidence exists to refute the claim that Jung was the author, beyond all reasonable doubt” (p. 84).

338. Archives, Psychological Club, Zürich. Riklin made no reference to Harold McCormick’s letter.

339. Moltzer resigned from the Club in 1918. Bair claimed that she subsequently returned to Holland for the rest of her life (p. 259). She actually remained in Switzerland, and lived at 198 Zollikerstrasse, Zollikerberg. She was buried in Zollikon cemetery.

345. Bair stated that the account in Memories was evidently pieced together from what Jung said about Taos in various passages in the Collected Works (p. 762, n. 40). Actually, it was excerpted from the manuscript, “African Voyage”. It is explicitly stated in Memories that the section is an “extract from an unpublished manuscript” (1962, p. 274). On this ms., see Shamdasani, 2003, pp. 323–328.

350. Jung/Jaffé 1962, p. 303. The sentence in German actually reads: “That the air had become too thick for me in Europe.”

352. Bair claimed that the Psychological Club wanted a further seminar based on Jung’s experiences (2003, p. 357). Such a request was not noted in the Club minutes. Bair also claimed that Jung received requests for new writings and translations “every day” (ibid.). I have made a comprehensive study of Jung’s correspondences in the 1920s, and this is simply not the case.

356. After his Africa trip, Bair referred to Jung’s annual month of military service (pp. 361–362). However, after the First World War, Jung was only on military service twice—for five days in 1923 and 1927 (personal communication, Andreas Jung).

357. Bair, 2003, p. 395. Concerning Jung’s religious attitudes, Bair stated that Jung once described himself as a “Christian-minded agnostic” (p. 127). The phrase comes from a letter Jung which wrote to Eugene Rolfe on 19 November 1960, in response to Rolfe’s book, The Intelligent Agnostic’s Introduction to Christianity. Jung wrote: “you have fulfilled your task of demonstrating the approach to Christianity to a Christian-minded agnostic” (Adler, 1975, p. 610). The phrase is not a self-description, but refers to the intended reader of Rolfe’s book. On Rolfe’s correspondence with Jung concerning his book, see Rolfe, 1989, p. 130f.

359. Bair claimed that the first results of Jung’s research into alchemy was The Psychology of the Transference in 1946 (p. 526). This was actually preceded by “Dream symbols of the individuation process” (1936), “The process of redemption in alchemy” (1937), “Some remarks on the visions of Zosimos” (1938), “The spirit Mercurius” (1943), Psychology and Alchemy (1944), “The enigma of Bologna” (1945) and “The philosophical tree” (1945).

360. “Ueber Alchemie”, Library of the Psychological Club, Zürich. Reichstein later won the Nobel prize for Chemistry.

361. Toni Wolff, (1946). A similar point is made by Hayman, who cites this article (1999, p. 288). We may also note that Toni Wolff’s paper, “Christianity within,” took its point of departure from Jung’s Psychology and Alchemy (in Wolff, 1959).

362. Bair, 2003, p. 434. On Jung’s collaboration with Hauer, see my introduction to Jung, 1932.

366. Bair, 2003, p. 469. This is an example of what Richard Ellmann referred to in his review of Bair’s Beckett biography as the way in which Bair “hangs on to wrong views even while amassing information that discredits them” (Ellmann, 1978, p. 236).

367. Bair, 2003, p 750, n. 36. Bair noted that Jung abandoned this term and referred to his work as “analytical psychology”. The reverse is actually the case.

372. There has been a great deal of mythology written concerning Sabina Spielrien and Jung’s relation with her. For correctives, see Angela Graf-Nold (2001), Zvi Lothane (1999), and Fernando Vidal (2001).

373. Jung, 1930–1934, p. 3. Bair suggested that the reason why Jung may have chosen to discuss Morgan’s work was because it would offer an opportunity for triangular relations between the participants to be worked out on a neutral terrain, which is quite implausible. She claimed that the lectures paralleled Jung’s “strong attraction” towards Morgan, but does not provide sufficient evidence for this (Bair, 2003, p. 391).

374. Douglas 1993, p. 167. There is no indication of an affair between Jung and Morgan in Forrest Robinson’s biography of Henry Murray (1992), which is based on extensive interviews with Murray.

379. Bair erroneously stated that there was no such gossip during the course of the seminars, while also claiming that Jung betrayed Morgan’s privacy, as she could be recognized (2003, p. 391).

386. On Bair’s errors in her treatment of Jung’s relationship to Victor White, see Ann Lammers, 2004.

Reader of this book: Proceed with Caution.
(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Lewis
Oct 01, 2014Lewis rated it did not like it
This book is fraught with numerous errors in scholarship.

Many of these error have been noted in Chapter IV of "Jung Stripped Bare-By His Biographers Even" by Sonu Shamdasani.

A few of the errors cited in Footnotes by Shamdasani are:

22. Bair noted that Jung asked Cary Baynes to write his biography in the 1930s, without citing a source (Bair, 2003, p. 585) There is no mention in their correspondence of this.

51. This copy of the protocols was donated by Helen Wolff to Princeton University Press, who in turn donated them to the Library of Congress in 1983, placing a ten year restriction on them. I studied these in 1991, and they have been on open access since 1993. Bair stated that the copy in the Library of Congress, which is in the Bollingen collection, is restricted (2003, p. 657, n. 7). This is actually unrestricted and was moved to a separate collection. The copy at the ETH in Zürich is restricted.

86. Countway ms., CLM; Hull draft translation, LC; Draft translation, BL. During the editing, there was some discussion about one passage in the manuscript. In Hull’s draft translation of Jung’s boyhood fantasy concerning Basle Cathedral, the manuscript reads: “God sits on his golden throne, high above the world, and shits on the cathedral; from under the throne falls an enormous turd falls” (p. 32, LC). In the Countway manuscript, the same passage reads: “God sits on his golden throne, high above the world, and shits on the cathedral [in hand: shits on his church]” (CLM, p. 32). Bair commented that neither Jaffé nor Marianne Niehus would permit Jung to use the word “shit” in this context,
suggesting that it was censored (2003, p. 635). However, the original German typescript reads: “unter dem Thron fällt ein ungeheures Excrement” (“an enormous excrement falls under the throne”) (JA, p. 19). This manuscript is on open access. This correctly reproduces Jung’s handwritten manuscript (Jung family archives, personal communication, Ulrich Hoerni).

93. Adler, 1975, p. 550, tr. mod. Bair described this letter as ‘curious’ and claimed that it indicated power which Marianne and Walther Niehus had (2003, p. 606–607). However, as the documents cited here show, this letter is in consonance with a number of other critical statements by Jung.

101. In the late 1980s, research on the composition of the text was concurrently and independently undertaken by Alan Elms and myself (see Elms 1994 and Shamdasani 1995). Prior to this, the status of the text was unquestioned in the public domain. Bair claimed that the divergences between the English and German editions caused led to speculation concerning censorship between scholars from the moment that the work was published (2003, p. 638). This was simply not the case, as there was no public debate concerning censorship until our research was published. In her footnote, she wrote: “most prominent among them Shamdasani and Elms, who base many of their charges on incomplete evidence and non-objective speculation” (p. 847, n. 69). No evidence is given of this, and Bair does not even provide the reference for anything that I have written on the subject.

102. Jung discussed his relationship with Toni Wolff in the protocols, LC, p. 98, pp. 171–174; see Shamdasani, 1995, pp. 124–125. Bair stated that in the protocols she read, there was no discussion of this (2003, p. 838, n. 61).

122. In 1933, Fordham had gone to Zurich to meet Jung for training, and was turned down, due to the difficulty of foreigners finding work. (Fordham 1993, pp. 67–69). The date of this trip is confirmed by Fordham’s diary (private possession, Max Fordham). Bair misdated this meeting to the early years of the Second World War and claimed that by this time Fordham was angry that Baynes had published an account of his analysis which was too easily recognizable (2003, p. 472). Baynes’ Mythology of the Soul only appeared in 1940. Bair also claimed that until his death, Fordham insisted that he did not resent Jung, and alleged that his “grudge” towards him was as great as that towards Baynes
(ibid.). Over the course of many conversations I held with Fordham between 1988 and 1995, I did not notice any resentment expressed towards Baynes or Jung: his attitude towards them was one of admiration and gratitude.

129. Jung to Read, 17 July 1946, RA. Bair claimed that most of Jung’s correspondence during the Collected Works project was with Hull (2003, p. 582). This is not the case, as Jung had extensive correspondences with Gerhard Adler, Michael Fordham and Herbert Read.

136. 11 May 1955, CMAC, orig. in English. Bair claimed that Jung praised Hull’s translations in all extant statements, and that there is no evidence that he had any reservations about them (2003, p. 583). The citations here indicate that this was not the case. In Hannah’s view, as a “thinking type”, Hull’s translations left out feeling and the irrational. (1976, p. 334). Von Franz noted that Jung’s writings had a double aspect, a logically understandable argument on the one hand, and on the other, the “unconscious” was allowed its say: “the reader . . .finds himself at the same time exposed to the impact of that ‘other voice’, the unconscious, which may either grip or frighten him off. That ‘other voice’ can, among other factors, be heard in Jung’s special way of reviving the original etymological meanings of words and allowing both feeling and imaginative elements to enter into his scientific exposition.” She noted that “unfortunately, this double aspect of Jung’s writings has not been preserved in the monumental English edition of his Collected Works, translated by R. F. C. Hull” (Von Franz, 1972, p. 4). Franz Jung recalled heated discussions between Jung and Hull on issues of translation. He noted that Hull would come to see Jung with a completed translation, and would be unwilling to correct what he had done (personal communication).

159. Jung, CW 5, (1952), pp. 13–14. Bair misdated this episode to 1915 (2003, p. 255).

192. Bair described Barbara Hannah as a lesbian (Bair, 2003, p. 364). Emmanuel Kennedy, Hannah’s literary executor, who has her diaries, stated that this is not true. He also noted that many of Bair’s descriptions of Hannah are derogatory (personal communication).

216. The first to posit that Jung had a “death-wish” against Freud was Freud himself when they met at Bremen in 1909, as an interpretation of Jung’s interest in the corpses recently found there (Jones, 1955, p. 166). Jung commented to Bennet, “I had branded myself, in becoming identified with Freud. Why should I want him to die? I had come to learn. He was not standing in my way: he was in Vienna, I was in Zürich. Freud identified himself with his theory—in this case, his theory of the old man of the tribe whose death every young man must want; the son must want to displace the father. But Freud wasn’t my father!” (Bennet 1961, p. 44). According to Jones, it was at Bremen that Jung was persuaded to have his first alcoholic drink since leaving the Burghölzli, with its teetotal regime (1955, pp. 61, 165). This point is repeated by Paul Roazen (1974, p. 246), McLynn (1996, p. 135), and Bair (2003, p. 161). However, in commenting on Jones’ biography, Jung pointed out to Bennet that this was mistaken, and that he had celebrated leaving the Burghölzli by drinking (Bennet, diary, 18 September, 1959, Bennet papers, ETH).

257. Oeri, 1935, p. 526. A few pages earlier, Bair had actually referred to Oeri’s article, (p. 44). In the protocols of the Zofingia society, the student debating organization which Jung attended, his name is generally given as “Jung vulgo Walze” (Staatsarchiv, Basel).

262. Bair claimed that Jung did not practice hypnosis or believe in its powers (p. 738, n. 84). This is not the case. Volumes 1 to 4 of Jung’s Collected Works present numerous cases of hypnosis and discussions of it. For an account of Jung’s involvement with hypnosis, see Shamdasasni, 2001. In 1913, Jung recalled that he resolved to abandon the use of hypnotic suggestion not because it was inefficacious, but because he did not understand how it cured: “I was resolved to abandon suggestion altogether rather than allow myself to be passively transformed into a miracle-worker” (CW 4, § 582).

263. When Jung visited Freud in March 1909, a loud noise occurred at a critical point in the conversation, which he interpreted parapsychologically as a “catalytic exteriorisation phenonemena”. For Freud’s understanding of this event, see Freud to Jung, 16 April 1909, (McGuire, 1974, p. 218). Bair mistakenly stated that this occurred on their first meeting (p. 117).

269. The Honegger papers are in the archives of the ETH in Zurich. A number of years ago, a copy was given to William McGuire for his personal study. McGuire subsequently deposited them in the Library of Congress. The ETH requested the return of their materials. Bair stated that the Jung estate claimed ownership of the papers (2003, p. 642), which is false (personal communication, Ulrich Hoerni).

272. On this question, see Jung’s discussion of this issue in his 1912 lectures at Fordham University, “Attempt at a portrayal of psychoanalytic theory”, CW 4, §§ 407–457. While Jung was in America on this trip, Bair claimed that Emma Jung wrote to him usually every day (2003, p. 229) and noted that the letters are in the Jung family archive (ibid., p. 723, n. 60). However, there are no letters from Emma Jung to C. G. Jung in 1912 there (personal communication, Andreas Jung).

280. [Bair 2003], p. 246. Bair added that Jung did not respond to Freud’s citation of the letter because of his distress and confusion. The letter cited to Bjerre cited above suggests otherwise.

281. In August 1913, Jung presented a paper in London at the International Medical Congress. Bair erroneously stated that he gave a series of lectures (2003, p. 239). Jung actually gave one lecture, “General aspects of psychoanalysis” (CW 4).

282. Bair argued that Jung’s work began as an attempt to show how myths could be used to explain psychological concepts, which is mistaken (2003, p. 201).The work applied the libido theory to the interpretation of mythological symbols.

283. Bair erroneously claimed that Flournoy gave Jung his translation of Frank Miller’s fantasies with what he had gleaned from her in conversation and correspondence (2003, p. 213). Frank Miller wrote an article in French, to which Flournoy wrote an introduction. Bair also claimed that Frank Miller actually invented her fantasies (p. 214). There is no evidence to support this. On Frank Miller, see Shamdasani, 1990.

284. Bair claimed that in the second part of the work, Jung argued that the sex drive did not have primacy, as other factors were present, such as the archetypes of the collective unconscious (2003, p. 201). This is to confound Jung’s subsequent theories with his arguments in 1912.

289. 27 October 1913, McGuire, 1974, p. 550. Bair noted that Freud informed Maeder that Jung was an anti-Semite, but the reference given is to the Jung’s letter to Freud concerning ‘bona fides’ (p. 240). Freud’s letter to Maeder of 21 September 1913 (LC) contains no reference to anti-semitism. This may be a confusion with Maeder’s statement in his interview with Nameche that he received a letter from Freud in which he wrote, “Maeder, you are an anti-Semite” (CLM, p. 4).

293. Bair claimed that in the protocols, Jung identified this figure as Maria Moltzer (p. 291). Such an explicit identification is not found in the protocols in the Library of Congress. The argument for Moltzer as the woman in question was made by myself (Shamdasani, 1995, p. 129, 1998a, p. 16). If there exists documentation where Jung explicitly made this identification, it should be produced. In the early 1920s, Riklin painted frescos on the ceilings of Amsthaus 1 in Zürich, together with Augusto Giacometti. Bair misdated this to 1912 (p. 223). On Moltzer, see also Shamdasani, 1998b.

296. Protocols, LC, p. 98. In the protocols, there then follows an excerpt of Jung’s discussion of this dream in the 1925 seminar (protocols, pp. 99–100; Jung 1925, pp. 56–57). What Bair cited as Jung’s discussion of this dream in the protocols on p. 727, n. 13 is actually a quotation from this excerpt.

299. Bair claimed that Emma Jung was forbidden to read the Black Books, and that in early 1914, Toni Wolff was the only person to read them. (pp. 249–250). Material in the Jung family archives suggests otherwise, as will be clear when the Red Book is published. Bair also reported that Jung “drew” in the Black Books, which was generally not the case.

300. Information from Andreas Jung. Bair erroneously claimed that he was away more than he was at home that year (p. 248).

301. Bair erroneously noted that these dreams contain “yellow flood” and “dark red blood” (2003, p. 243). Neither in Memories, nor in the Black Books are these motifs to be found.

309. [Bair 2002] Ibid., p. 292. Bair also stated that the figure of Philemon led Jung to study Gnosticism (p. 396). However, Jung’s reading notes (JA) and references in
Transformations and Symbols of the Libido indicate that he started studying Gnosticism in 1910. Bair reproduced a photograph of Jung’s mural of Philemon together with his a mural of a mandala and stated that they are on the wall of his “private room” in his tower at Bollingen (facing p. 370). Actually, they are in separate bedrooms.

316. Bair, 2003, p. 297. Bair claimed that the Sermones followed the style and subject matter of the works of G. R. S Mead, and that Jung was studying sixteen or eighteen volumes of Mead’s work at this time (p. 296). The first statement is mistaken. No source is given for the second, and no evidence exists to support it.

331. Bair claimed that the only member of the Club who declined was Fanny Bowditch Katz. In actuality, between half and two-thirds of the membership responded.

335. I wrote: “these points strongly suggest that ‘Analytical collectivity’ was actually written by Moltzer. Whilst this is not definitively proved, the balance of the evidence clearly points in this direction” (Shamdasani, 1998a, p. 72). “We have seen that no positive corroborative evidence has arisen to indicate that ‘Analytical collectivity’ was by Jung, and that sufficient evidence exists to refute the claim that Jung was the author, beyond all reasonable doubt” (p. 84).

338. Archives, Psychological Club, Zürich. Riklin made no reference to Harold McCormick’s letter.

339. Moltzer resigned from the Club in 1918. Bair claimed that she subsequently returned to Holland for the rest of her life (p. 259). She actually remained in Switzerland, and lived at 198 Zollikerstrasse, Zollikerberg. She was buried in Zollikon cemetery.

345. Bair stated that the account in Memories was evidently pieced together from what Jung said about Taos in various passages in the Collected Works (p. 762, n. 40). Actually, it was excerpted from the manuscript, “African Voyage”. It is explicitly stated in Memories that the section is an “extract from an unpublished manuscript” (1962, p. 274). On this ms., see Shamdasani, 2003, pp. 323–328.

350. Jung/Jaffé 1962, p. 303. The sentence in German actually reads: “That the air had become too thick for me in Europe.”

352. Bair claimed that the Psychological Club wanted a further seminar based on Jung’s experiences (2003, p. 357). Such a request was not noted in the Club minutes. Bair also claimed that Jung received requests for new writings and translations “every day” (ibid.). I have made a comprehensive study of Jung’s correspondences in the 1920s, and this is simply not the case.

356. After his Africa trip, Bair referred to Jung’s annual month of military service (pp. 361–362). However, after the First World War, Jung was only on military service twice—for five days in 1923 and 1927 (personal communication, Andreas Jung).

357. Bair, 2003, p. 395. Concerning Jung’s religious attitudes, Bair stated that Jung once described himself as a “Christian-minded agnostic” (p. 127). The phrase comes from a letter Jung which wrote to Eugene Rolfe on 19 November 1960, in response to Rolfe’s book, The Intelligent Agnostic’s Introduction to Christianity. Jung wrote: “you have fulfilled your task of demonstrating the approach to Christianity to a Christian-minded agnostic” (Adler, 1975, p. 610). The phrase is not a self-description, but refers to the intended reader of Rolfe’s book. On Rolfe’s correspondence with Jung concerning his book, see Rolfe, 1989, p. 130f.

359. Bair claimed that the first results of Jung’s research into alchemy was The Psychology of the Transference in 1946 (p. 526). This was actually preceded by “Dream symbols of the individuation process” (1936), “The process of redemption in alchemy” (1937), “Some remarks on the visions of Zosimos” (1938), “The spirit Mercurius” (1943), Psychology and Alchemy (1944), “The enigma of Bologna” (1945) and “The philosophical tree” (1945).

360. “Ueber Alchemie”, Library of the Psychological Club, Zürich. Reichstein later won the Nobel prize for Chemistry.

361. Toni Wolff, (1946). A similar point is made by Hayman, who cites this article (1999, p. 288). We may also note that Toni Wolff’s paper, “Christianity within,” took its point of departure from Jung’s Psychology and Alchemy (in Wolff, 1959).

362. Bair, 2003, p. 434. On Jung’s collaboration with Hauer, see my introduction to Jung, 1932.

366. Bair, 2003, p. 469. This is an example of what Richard Ellmann referred to in his review of Bair’s Beckett biography as the way in which Bair “hangs on to wrong views even while amassing information that discredits them” (Ellmann, 1978, p. 236).

367. Bair, 2003, p 750, n. 36. Bair noted that Jung abandoned this term and referred to his work as “analytical psychology”. The reverse is actually the case.

372. There has been a great deal of mythology written concerning Sabina Spielrien and Jung’s relation with her. For correctives, see Angela Graf-Nold (2001), Zvi Lothane (1999), and Fernando Vidal (2001).

373. Jung, 1930–1934, p. 3. Bair suggested that the reason why Jung may have chosen to discuss Morgan’s work was because it would offer an opportunity for triangular relations between the participants to be worked out on a neutral terrain, which is quite implausible. She claimed that the lectures paralleled Jung’s “strong attraction” towards Morgan, but does not provide sufficient evidence for this (Bair, 2003, p. 391).

374. Douglas 1993, p. 167. There is no indication of an affair between Jung and Morgan in Forrest Robinson’s biography of Henry Murray (1992), which is based on extensive interviews with Murray.

379. Bair erroneously stated that there was no such gossip during the course of the seminars, while also claiming that Jung betrayed Morgan’s privacy, as she could be recognized (2003, p. 391).

386. On Bair’s errors in her treatment of Jung’s relationship to Victor White, see Ann Lammers, 2004.

Reader of this book: Proceed with Caution.

(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Susan
May 09, 2020Susan rated it it was amazing
An in depth biography of Carl Jung ; though access to Jung’s material are closely protected by his family, the author Deidre Bair was granted access by a committee of his heirs. Reluctance of the heirs to grant access was a result of the supercilious and condescending tone of previous books of his life but Bair conducted a thorough research of Jung’s archives and research in Zurich, even though access is tightly controlled, the family gave permission. This biography is well researched and very interesting. It covers all of Jung’s life from his haphazard upbringing through his parting of the ways with Freud, to the end of his life and the lasting impact he had on psychoanalysis. Highly readable and enlightening. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Slim Khezri
Sep 19, 2019Slim Khezri rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This book extensively covers every aspect of Jung's life. I could hardly put it down. My favorite section was about the Solar Phallus Man. This was the schizophrenic patient whose peculiar hallucinations convinced Jung that there was a collective unconscious. I highly recommend this book to anyone who would like to know more about the man and his life. This biography is probably the detailed one of Jung, although its occasional 'softball' approach can well be supplemented by other biographies such as Carl Gustav Jung: A Biography and Jung: A Biography. It will be "must reading" by anyone seriously studying Jung's life and ideas. I enjoyed it very much. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Gintas
Jun 14, 2021Gintas rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Pamatęs, kad ši Jungo biografija išlesta dar 2003 metais, kažkiek nusivyliau, manydamas, kad ji jau senstelėjusi. „Raudonosios knygos: Liber Novus“ (pirmą kartą išleista 2009 metais) įžangoje Sonu Shamdasani rašo „Neišstudijavus „Liber Novus“ tiesiog neįmanoma suvokti vėlesnių Jungo darbų genezės ir aiškiai suprasti, ką jis stengėsi pasiekti“. Vis tik beskaitydamas šią knygą susidariau įspūdį, kad autorė, atrodo, buvo pakankamai susipažinusi su „Raudonosios knygos“ turiniu ir šią Jungo biografiją parašė labai išsamiai, kuo kiekvienas gali pats įsitikinti. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Lee Kofman
Dec 05, 2018Lee Kofman rated it it was ok
This book was a serious disappointment! I loved Bair’s biography of Anais Nin so much that I couldn’t possibly expect her to write a mediocre let alone a completely tedious book, and yet this is what Jung ended up being – just the latter. Or perhaps my expectations were unrealistic? I don’t know… I anticipated, with excitement, that I’ll find in the book an intellectually astute discussion of Jung’s ideas and some delicious, psychologically insightful gossip/narrative of his personal life which was very unconventional since he informally had two wives for some decades. Instead I ended up dragging myself through 650 pages of mostly utterly dull accounts of internal politics of psychoanalytic society/ies in its early years. Their squabbles and petty intrigues held very little interest to me, and by the end of the book I was not much clearer on Jung’s fascinating theories than I was when I started the book (luckily I did have some pre-existing knowledge). As to Jung’s intriguing family life, including his complex relationships with his children, it remained mostly clouded… I don’t even really understand why he and Toni, his de-facto wife, separated eventually. She in particular, such a significant person in Jung’s personal and professional lives, remained a cardboard character. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Zeb
Oct 20, 2013Zeb rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: the-human-condition
Between the Smith person in here and me we have read the whole book, as I skipped some chapters in the first half, and then again at the very end ... as I got too tired of the exhaustive telling of the Zangengeburt/breach birth of the "so called Autobiography", thus labelled by Jung, of " Dreams, ... reflections" I can only admire Deidre Blair for wading through all this material and the endless on-goings between all parties concerned. And then rendering it all into a quite readable biography! Considering the depth in which she covered many inside politics, the book remains fluent enough with the odd humorous remark and breezy telling. She kept in some unique German phrases, offering translations next to them, but as a bilingual person I much appreciate how wonderfully discriptive "Trotzkoepchen's Zeitvertreib" is to label a meddeling and tiresome "helping" party.
She does not glorify Jung, nor run him down badly. All the stars there are for the enormous work done. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Klaus Metzger
Apr 09, 2015Klaus Metzger rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: klaus
Deidre Bair hat über einen Zeitraum von 8 Jahren das Leben des Psychologen C.G. Jung erforscht, der sich mit Sigmund Freud zerstritten hat und mit seiner Lehre nicht nur Freunde fand. Über Jahre hat mich das Phänomen der "Synchronizität" fasziniert, das C.G. Jung erstmals beschrieben hat. F. David Peat hat darüber ein erstklassiges Buch verfasst.
Synchronizität Die Verborgene Ordnung ; Das Sinnvolle Zusammentreffen Kausal Nicht Verbundener Geschehnisse ; Die Moderne Wissenschaft Auf Der Suche Nach Dem Zeitlosen Ordnungsprinzip Jenseits Von Zufall Und Notwendigkeit by F. David Peat ...more
flagLike  · comment · see review


===