How to Read the Bible as Literature: 13

How to Read the Bible as Literature: . . . and Get More Out of It: Appendix:  The Allegorical Nature of the Parables   

Appendix: 

The Allegorical Nature of the Parables 

 

The part of this book that will be most objectionable to biblical scholars is my 

discussion of the parables as allegories. It seems advisable, therefore, to explore 

the matter in more detail in this appendix. 

The approach of biblical scholars is based from start to finish on their aversion 

(which I share) to the arbitrary allegorizing of the Bible that the medieval Fathers 

championed and that has been around ever since. For some people, moreover, 

the very concept of allegory has connotations of being simplistic or superficial (a 

bias that I do not share). Convinced that allegory is a bad thing, biblical scholars 

proceed to multiply the reasons why the parables cannot be considered alle- 

gorical. For the most part, these reasons betray an understanding of allegory that 

simply does not hold up when applied to literature in general. 

I have outlined my own proposed solution in my chapter on the parables. I be- 

lieve that it will only create confusion if we deny the name allegory to stories that 

fit the definition of allegory as applied elsewhere in literature. It is far preferable to 

treat the parables as allegorical texts and then to insist on accurate as opposed to 

arbitrary interpretation of the details. Allegorizing a biblical text is illegitimate, but 

interpreting an allegorical text is not. 

I propose that we take a critical look at the reasons that are commonly offered 

for denying that the parables are allegorical. The list of such arguments includes 

the following. 

The parables are not allegorical because in an allegory every detail has a corre- 

sponding “other” meaning. This is untrue of allegory in literature generally, where 

the same range exists as we find in the parables, as Northrop Frye suggests with 

his allegorical continuum. On the opening page of Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, for 

example, we attach allegorical meaning to such details as Christian, the book in 

his hand, and the burden on his back, but not to his house, wife, and children. 

When Aslan is killed near the end of C. S. Lewis’s The Lion, the Witch, and the 

Wardrobe, we ascribe symbolic meaning to Aslan’s death and resurrection, but not 

to such narrative details as the stone table, the shaving of Aslan, and the mice 

who gnaw through the ropes binding Aslan. It is a very rare exception, not the rule, 

to find allegories in which every detail has a corresponding meaning. 

The parables are not allegories because “the details are not intended to have inde- 

pendent significance” (Charles Dodd). Modern scholarship has championed the 

view that we should ignore the individual details in the parables and stand back at 

such a distance from them that only one general point emerges. But this is some- 

thing we cannot do even if we try because with most of the parables at least some 

of the details automatically remind us of a corresponding reality. Jesus himself 

provided the model for such interpretation. When Jesus interpreted the parable of 

the sower for his disciples (Matt. 13:18–23), he gave a corresponding meaning to 

every major detail in the story except the sower. When Jesus explained the parable 

of the wheat and the tares (Matt. 13:36–43), he gave eight of the narrative details a 

meaning. 

Even Milton Terry, who denies that the parables are allegorical, admits that 

“most of the details in a parable have a meaning, and those which have no special 

significance in the interpretation serve, nevertheless, to enhance the force and 

beauty of the rest” (Biblical Hermeneutics [1883; reprint ed., Grand Rapids: Zon- 

dervan, 1964], 286). In my chapter on the parables I cited the conclusions of M. 

D. Goulder, who found that 82 percent of the details in the parables in Matthew’s 

Gospel have a corresponding meaning, 75 percent in Mark, and 60 percent in 

Luke. Of course some parables (such as the parable of the good Samaritan) have 

no allegorical details. What we need, therefore, is a sliding scale that allows us to 

be flexible in describing the unique contours of each parable; Frye’s allegorical 

continuum provides exactly this flexibility. 

“The point of the parable is not in the points of reference as it would be in a true 

allegory” (Fee/Stuart). The mere identification of correspondences is never syn- 

onymous with the main theme or purpose of an allegory. Once we have identified 

Bunyan’s City of Destruction as the lost state and the Slough of Despond as de- 

spair over one’s sin, we must still translate those details into a statement of lit- 

erary theme and purpose. If, on the other hand, the quoted statement means that 

the allegorical details in a parable are somehow extraneous to the theme of a para- 

ble, this, too, is untrue. In the parable of the prodigal son, for example, the whole 

point of the parable depends on our identifying the father as God, the prodigal as 

a repentant sinner, and the elder brother as the scribes and Pharisees. 

“The parable uses words in their literal sense, and its narrative never transgresses 

the limits of what might have been actual fact. The allegory is continually using words 

in a metaphorical sense, and its narrative, however supposable in itself is manifestly 

fictitious” (Terry, p. 302). Here, too, the neat dichotomy between allegory and para- 

ble breaks down. The parables, for example, have struck most readers through the 

centuries as being “manifestly fictitious,” a quality that Terry reserves for allegory. 

Allegory, says Terry, uses words “in a metaphorical sense.” So do the parables; in 

fact, recent parable interpretation has stressed their metaphorical qualities. Many 

of the details in Jesus’ parables already had metaphoric meanings before Jesus 

told them: God as father, judge, and vineyard owner; God’s word as seed that is 

planted; divine judgment as a harvest—the list goes on and on. 

It is true that the parables are noteworthy for the realism of their surface de- 

tails, whereas most allegories have employed the techniques of fantasy part of the 

time (though rarely all of the time). But the narrative details of a work like The Pil- 

grim’s Progress are often taken straight from Bunyan’s local Bedfordshire. In any 

case, allegory need not be fantastic, as Jesus’ allegory of the Good Shepherd (John 

10:1—18) illustrates. Besides, the parables of Jesus, for all their realism, are satu- 

rated with elements of the preposterous or exaggerated, such as a grain of wheat 

that when planted produces a hundred grains, a mustard plant treated as though it 

were a gigantic tree, an employer who completely disregards how long his employ- 

ees have worked when he pays them, and a housewife who bakes a bushel of 

bread dough. 

The parables are not allegories because in allegory the surface details of the story 

are unimportant in themselves and exist only to point to a truth beyond themselves. 

This may be true of transparent or unsophisticated allegory, but not of genuinely 

literary allegory. Allegories like Edmund Spenser’s Faerie Queene or Bunyan’s 

Pilgrim’s Progress are literary masterpieces that elicit the reader’s full imaginative 

response at the realistic or surface level of the narrative. Great literary allegory is 

bifocal, engaging a reader’s interest at two levels (literal and allegorical) simulta- 

neously. Literary allegory does not give us a simple one-for-one correspondence 

because surface details such as Bunyan’s slough, journey, burden, and river are 

too connotative and multifaceted to be reduced to a single conceptual parallel. 

(For more on this subject, see E. Beatrice Batson’s John Bunyan: Allegory and 

Imagination [London: Croom Helm, 1984].) 

“A parable is aesthetic in a way that an allegory is not” (Dan Via, Jr.). For many 

scholars, this is really the heart of the matter: the parables are just too good to be 

allegorical! But literary classification should be descriptive, not honorific. Besides, 

modern criticism on such literary masterpieces as The Divine Comedy, The Faerie 

Queene, and The Pilgrim’s Progress has long since exploded old myths about the 

supposed artistic anemia of literary allegory. (Here, too, Batson’s book is the best 

source.) 

When we look closely at what biblical scholars say, it is apparent to me that 

their comments misconstrue the nature of allegory as a literary form. If we apply 

the scholar’s composite definition of allegory to literature as a whole, there is 

virtually no piece of literature to which we could apply the title. 

The result of denying that the parables are allegorical has been to confuse peo- 

ple about how to deal with the parables. We are told that the parables are not alle- 

gories, and then we find Jesus allegorizing the parables of the sower and the 

wheat and tares. Nor does it inspire confidence in our ability to handle parables to 

be told that “the parables are not allegories—even if at times they have what ap- 

pear to be allegorical features” (Fee/Stuart). 

The most obvious feature of the parables is that they are realistic stories, sim- 

ple in construction and didactic (“aiming to teach”) in purpose, that convey reli- 

gious truth and in which the details often have a significance beyond their literal 

narrative meaning. In any other context we would call such works allegorical. My 

proposal is simple and commonsensical: we should begin with what is obvious 

(that the parables tend to be allegorical) and then note those things that distin- 

guish these particular allegories: their profound realism, their brevity, their ab- 

sence of allegorical names for people and places, their persuasive strategy de- 

signed to force a response, their ingenious way of subtly undermining ordinary 

patterns of thinking, their variability in regard to how many details call for a corre- 

sponding meaning, and their artistic excellence. 

Of course we need to insist on curbs to the interpretive process in order to 

eliminate arbitrary allegorizing of the medieval type. These curbs include the inter- 

pretive clues contained in the narrative links before or after a parable as it appears 

in the Gospel narratives; the traditional symbolic meanings of a given detail (espe- 

cially if those meanings appear within the Bible itself); compatibility with the in- 

ferred purpose or main teaching of a parable; and compatibility with biblical/ 

Christian doctrine. There must be a good reason drawn from the biblical text be- 

fore we attach a given meaning to a detail in a parable. In keeping with the oral na- 

ture of the parables, a general or obvious meaning is truer to the spirit of a parable 

than a specific or obscure meaning. In a parable that teaches about stewardship 

(Matt. 25:14-30), for example, the money that is entrusted to the three stewards 

should be interpreted in general terms as a person’s abilities, time, and opportu- 

nities, not specifically as the Holy Spirit. We must, in short, insist on interpretation 

of allegorical details rather than arbitrary allegorizing, but in the meantime we must 

not try to deny the obvious symbolic meanings in parables. 

The academic world has surrounded the parables with so many intricate rules 

for interpreting them that ordinary people have become convinced that they had 

best leave the parables to the specialist. It is time to give the parables back to the 

group to which Jesus originally told them—ordinary people. Viewing the parables 

as allegorical would be a step in the right direction, since simple allegory has usu- 

ally struck ordinary people as being accessible.

==

Index of Persons 

 

Aesop, 148 

Allott, Miriam, 59n. 17 

Alter, Robert, 32, 39-40, 73, 193, 196nn.20, 21 

Aristotle, 40n.6, 44, 45, 47, 49, 52, 57, 83-84, 135 

Auerbach, Erich, 39, 180n.3, 194, 196n.21 

Bacon, Roger, 9 

Bailey, Kenneth Ewing, 140n.2 

Batson, E. Beatrice, 201 

Baudelaire, Charles-Pierre, 58 

Beardslee, William A., 32, 175 

Bilezikian, Gilbert G., 85n. 11 

Boonstra, Harry, 163 

Breech, James, 32 

Brown, Raymond E., l47n 

Buechner, Frederick, 82n 

Bullinger, Ethelbert W., 107 

Bunyan,John,199, 200, 201 

Cadoux, A. T., 150, 151 

Caird,G. B., 107, 148n.13 

Cary, Joyce, 68 

Coleridge, Samuel T., 125, 169 

Collins, John J., 175 

Connolly, Terence L., 121n 

Cox, Roger L., 85n.11 

Crossan, John Dominic, 61n.18, 151n.21 

Culler, Jonathan, 25n, 58n.15 

Dodd, Charles, 200 

Doty, William G., 3ln. 13, 158 

Drury, John, 138 

Eastman, Arthur M., 92n 

Enslin, Morton Scott, 156n.2 

Farrar, Austin, 29-30 

Fee, Gordon D., 26n, 156n.1, 200, 202 

Fischer, James A., 32 

Fitzgerald, Robert, 44n 

Fitzgerald, Sally, 44n 

Fokkelman, J. P., 32 

Forster, E. M., 42, 47 

Fowler, Robert M., 31n.14, 132n.2 

Frost, Robert, 92 

Frye, Northrop, 32, 79, 83n, 85, 146, 185, 194, 195, 196, 199, 200 

Frye, Roland, 32, 179, 183, 196 

Funk, Robert W., l42n, 151n.21 

Gardiner, J. H., 174n 

Gerleman, Gillis, 107n, 108 

Good, Edwin M., 56n, 84n.9, 163 

Gottcent, J. H., 31 

Goulder, M. D., 148n.14, 193n.12, 200 

Grawe, Paul H., 82n 

Guelich, Robert A., l33n 

Gunkel, Hermann, 199-20 

Hagner, Donald A., 134n.5 

Hals, Ronald, 61 

Henn,T. R., 183, 185n.8 

Houghton, Walter, 76n 

Huffman, Norman A., 144 

Hunter, Archibald M., 148, 150 

Jones, Geraint V., 140n.3, l43n, 145, 147, 152 

Jones, Howard Mumford, 183n.5, 195n.18 

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr., 185n.8 

Kehl,D. G., 195n.17, 197 

Kermode, Frank, 78n 

Kugel, James L., 108 

Lewis, C. S., 12, 52, 90n, 106, 111, 116, 120, 169, 180n.2, 199 

Licht, Jacob, 73, 196n.20 

Lindblom, J., 175 

Lodge, David, 67n 

Long, Burke O., 85 

Louis, Kenneth R. R. Gros, 32, 73, 138 

Lowes, John Livingston, 194-95 

Luce, Henry R., 33 

Luther, Martin, 185 

McAfee, Cleỉand B., 194n.15 

Melancthon, Philip, 185 

Mencken, H. L., 24n 

Michie, Donald, 32, 138 

Milton, John, 52n.11 

Moulton, Richard C., 29, 168 

Muilenburg, James, 105n, 195n.20 

Murry, J. Middleton, 58n.14 

Niebuhr, H. Richard, 21n 

O’Connor, Flannery, 43-44, 58-59, 77n 

Perrin, Norman, 34, 125 

Peterson, Norman R., 32 

Prince, Gerald, 52n.10 

Rauber, D. F., 73 

Resseguie, James L., 136n.7 

Rhoads, David, 32, 138 

Richardson, Donald W., 173n 

Richmond, Hugh M., 79n.5 

Ricoeur, Paul, 94 

Index of Subjects 

 

Allegory in biblical parables, 145-48, 199-203 

Allusion, 97 

Apocalypse as a literary form, 165-75 

Anthropomorphism, 102-3 

Apostrophe as poetic figure of speech, 98 

Archetypes, 143, 187-92 

Artistry in.the Bible, 9, 23-24 

 

Biblical scholarship, 11, 30-31 

 

Character portrayal: in parables, 142–43; in stories, 37-40, 43-44, 53–54, 60, 63-64, 

71-72 

Choice in stories, 51-52 

Comedy as a narrative form, 81-83 

 

Dialogue in the Bible, 20, 196 

Discourses of Jesus, 101, 137, 160, 162 

Dramatic irony, 55-56 

 

Encomium, 119 

Epic, 78-81 

Epistle, 20, 27-28, 155-58 

 

Foils, 54-55, 69-70, 141 

 

Genres in the Bible, 25-26 

Gospel, 131-38 

Grammatico-historical criticism, 9, 12-13 

 

Hermeneutics. See Interpretation 

Hero: in heroic narrative, 75–78; in tragedy, 83-84 

Hyperbole, 25, 99-100 

 

Interpretation: of characters in stories, 39-40; of narrative, 57-68; need for, 22-23; 

of parables, 148-52; of poetry, 94-95, 101-2; of visionary literature, 171-74 

 

Lament psalms, 114-15 

Language, used distinctively in literature, 26-28 

Literature, definition of, 12-31 

Love poetry, 118-19 

Lyric poetry, 109-14 

 

Metaphor, 23, 28, 91-97 

Metonymy, 101 

 

Narrative: the Bible as a whole, 177—79; as a biblical form, 33-73; Gospels as, 

132-37; parables as, 139-52; types of, 53-54, 75-86 

 

Parable, 139-53, 199-203 

How to Read the Bible as Literature: 12

How to Read the Bible as Literature: . . . and Get More Out of It: Chapter Twelve  The Literary Unity of the Bible    A Book for All Seasons and Temperaments 

Chapter Twelve 

The Literary Unity of the Bible 

 

A Book for All Seasons and Temperaments 

THE LITERARY RANGE AND DIVERSITY OF THE BIBLE are truly impressive. Written by 

a variety of writers over a span of many centuries, the Bible is an anthology of liter- 

ature, as the very name Bible suggests (biblia, “books”). Previous chapters have 

demonstrated how the list of biblical genres keeps expanding. Every aspect of life 

is covered in this comprehensive book. Because the Bible is both comprehensive 

and written by a variety of writers, it preserves the complexities and polarities of 

human experience to an unusual degree. The paradoxes of life are held in tension 

in what can be called the most balanced book ever written. The Bible is truly a 

book for all seasons and every human temperament. 

 

The Literary Unity of the Bible 

 

But if we stress only the variety of the Bible, we distort the kind of book it is. For 

although the Bible does justice to the breadth and fullness of human experience in 

a marvelous way, it is also an amazingly unified book. The purpose of this con- 

cluding chapter is to suggest some important ways in which the Bible is one book. 

In keeping with the literary focus of my book, I will be concerned mainly with the 

literary unity of the Bible rather than its theological unity. 

 

THE BIBLE AS A STORY 

Narrative Unity in the Bible 

 

The most obvious element of literary unity in the Bible is that it tells a story. It is a 

series of events having a beginning, a middle, and an end. Even the external 

shapeliness of the Bible is remarkable. It begins with the creation of all things. The 

story of the Fall quickly takes the action down to the level of fallen history. But the 

story slowly and painfully winds its way to the consummation of history with the 

eternal defeat of evil and the triumph of good. 

 

The Unifying Plot Conflict 

 

The overall story of the Bible has a unifying plot conflict. It is the great spiritual 

and moral battle between good and evil. A host of details makes up this conflict: 

God and Satan, God and his rebellious creatures, good and evil people, inner 

human impulses toward obedience to God and disobedience to God. Almost 

every story, poem, and proverb in the Bible contributes to this ongoing plot con- 

flict between good and evil. Every act and mental attitude shows God’s creatures 

engaged in some movement, whether slight or momentous, toward God or away 

from him. 

 

The Prevalence of Human Choice 

 

The presence of the great spiritual conflict makes choice on the part of biblical 

characters necessary. Every area of human experience is claimed by God and 

counterclaimed by the forces of evil. There is no neutral ground. Every human 

event shows an allegiance to God or rebellion against him. The Bible concentrates 

on the person at the crossroads. Life is momentous for the actors in this drama of 

the soul’s choice. Viewed as a story, the Bible is a series of great moral and spir- 

itual dilemmas and choices, underscoring the biblical view of people as morally 

responsible. 

 

Human Choice, Not External Environment, Is Crucial 

 

In the episodes that make up the overriding story of the Bible, the decisive action 

does not reside in external reality itself but consists of a person’s response to what 

happens in the world. People’s problems do not stem from outward events or the 

material world. Their moral and spiritual choices in history are the crucial action 

in the ongoing story of the Bible. Its plot is thus a moral/spiritual action in which 

external events provide the occasion for significant action, whether good or bad. 

 

God as Protagonist 

 

Every story has a central protagonist, and in the Bible that protagonist is God. He 

is the central character, the actor whose presence unifies the story of universal 

history with its myriads of changing human characters. Roland Frye comments: 

 

The characterization of God may indeed be said to be the central literary con- 

cern of the Bible, and it is pursued from beginning to end, for the principal 

character, or actor, or protagonist of the Bible is God. Not even the most 

seemingly insignificant action in the Bible can be understood apart from the 

emerging characterization of the deity. With this great protagonist and his de- 

signs, all other characters and events interact, as history becomes the great 

arena for Goďs characteristic and characterizing actions.¹ 

 

The Story of God 

 

It is obvious, then, that the chief element of progression in the overall story of the 

Bible is the unfolding purposes of God throughout history. Biblical scholars have 

taught us to call this “salvation history”—God’s great plan to save people from 

their sin and its eternal consequences. The story of the Bible is the record of 

God’s acts—in history, in nature, in the lives of people. Because it is God’s pur- 

poses that comprise the essential action, the overriding story of the Bible can be 

called the history of the human race within a providential framework of God’s acts 

of redemption from, and judgment against, the evil in the universe. 

 

SUMMARY 

 

If we stand back from the Bible and take it in at a single view, it is above all a story, 

with many interspersed passages that interpret the meaning of the events. Like 

other stories, the Bible has a beginning-middle-end pattern, a unifying plot con- 

flict between good and evil, a focus on people in the act of choosing, and a central 

protagonist who is God. 

 

THE RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION OF THE BIBLE 

The Bible as a Religious Book 

 

The Bible is also unified by its religious orientation. It is pervaded by a 

consciousness of God. Human experience is constantly viewed in a religious or 

moral light. No matter how artistic and entertaining the Bible is, its writers have a 

didactic view of literature. Their purpose is to reveal truth to people so they can 

order their lives aright. Two oft-quoted descriptions of this aspect of the Bible are 

these: 

 

It is . . . not merely a sacred book but a book so remorselessly and contin- 

uously sacred that it does not invite, it excludes or repels, the merely aesthetic 

approach.² 

 

The Bible’s claim to truth is not only far more urgent than Homer’s, it is tyran- 

nical—it excludes all other claims. The world of the Scripture stories is not 

satisfied with claiming to be a historically true reality—it insists that it is the 

only real world.³ 

 

The Theme of the Two Worlds 

 

Part of the religious orientation of the Bible is the assumption of its writers that 

reality consists of two spheres. I call this the theme of the two worlds. Biblical 

writers take it for granted that there are two planes of reality—the physical world, 

perceived through the senses, and the supernatural world, invisible to ordinary 

human view. Both worlds are objectively real, but whereas earthly reality can be 

demonstrated empirically, the spiritual world must be accepted on faith. The con- 

stant appeal of biblical writers is for people to order their lives by the unseen spir- 

itual realities, even though doing so usually contradicts earthly or human stan- 

dards. 

 

The Sense of Ultimacy 

 

This transcendental stance of the Bible helps to produce two of its most constant 

and distinctive literary qualities. One is the sense of ultimacy with which the Bible 

invests human experience. What in most literature would be portrayed as a purely 

natural occurrence—the birth of a baby, a shower of rain, the daily course of the 

sun—is portrayed in the Bible as being rooted in a divine reality that lends spir- 

itual significance to human and natural events. There is a continual penetration of 

the supernatural into the earthly order. God is a continual actor in human affairs. 

The result is that life becomes filled with meaning, since every event takes on spir- 

itual significance. 

 

The Mystery of the Supernatural 

 

The supernatural slant of the Bible also produces a sense of mystery and wonder. 

By refusing to allow reality to be conceived solely in terms of known, observable 

reality, biblical literature continually transforms the mundane into something with 

sacred significance. As readers we are repeatedly confronted with a sense of the 

mystery of the divine beyond total human understanding. The Bible is a literature 

of mystery and wonder not because it conceals the spiritual but for precisely the 

opposite reason: it reveals the spiritual and thereby challenges the natural human 

tendency to explain life solely in earthly and natural terms. 

 

Preoccupation With History 

 

The theme of the two worlds does not mean that biblical writers take historical 

reality any less seriously. On the contrary, they take it more seriously than is true 

of most of the world’s literature. Biblical literature is firmly embedded in historical 

reality. It constantly claims to be history and has repeatedly been authenticated as 

history by modem archaeology. Compared with the fictional stories of modern 

writers, the storytellers of the Bible seem always to be eager to bring in historical 

facts. Snatches of historical chronicles, diaries, or genealogies are always creeping 

into the stories and poems of the Bible. Of course, the history of the Bible is not 

straightforward factual history. The historical facts are always presented within the 

interpretive framework of God’s dealings with the human race. 

 

Vivid Consciousness of Values 

 

The religious orientation of the Bible also includes the vivid consciousness of val- 

ues that pervades it. Some conception of right and wrong underlies most liter- 

ature, but in the Bible this conception is more sharply defined and more strongly 

held than elsewhere. For biblical writers the issue of what is good and evil is more 

important than anything else. Biblical authors are constantly saying, “This, not 

that.” Biblical literature is similarly pervaded by a conviction that some things 

matter more than others. Ultimate value does not reside in anything or anyone 

apart from its relationship to God, nor can human endeavor be regarded as ulti- 

mately valuable apart from obedience to God. In the Bible, good and evil are 

supreme realities and are the most important issues in people’s lives. 

 

SUMMARY 

 

One of the unifying elements in the Bible is its general sense of life. The prevailing 

attitude or perspective toward life throughout the Bible can only be called reli- 

gious. It manifests itself most markedly in its awareness of supernatural reality 

and divine mystery, its conviction that human life in history is ultimately signif- 

icant, and its vivid consciousness of values. These attitudes become the “air” 

within which biblical literature lives and moves and has its being. 

 

UNIFYING THEMES 

Unity of Subject Matter 

 

Any body of literature can achieve unity on the basis of its topics and themes. If 

individual writers and works share a common subject matter, the literature in- 

evitably begins to create a unified impression in a reader’s mind. This is exactly 

what happens in the Bible. Individual biblical writers tend overwhelmingly to be 

preoccupied with a core of shared concerns. 

 

The Character of God 

 

Dominating everything is the character of God. The question of what God is like 

underlies more biblical passages than does any other concern. The most cus- 

tomary way of answering the question in the Bible is by narrating what God has 

done, but the Psalms, Prophets, Gospels, and New Testament Epistles also 

contain many direct statements about who God is in his inner being. This theme 

of God’s self-revelation is so pervasive in the Bible that nearly every passage will 

provide an answer to the overriding question, What is God like? 

 

The View of People 

 

Balancing this preoccupation with God is a constant concern with people. This is 

not surprising, because the subject of literature is human experience. Most works 

of biblical literature are an implied assertion about human nature and destiny. Re- 

peated themes include the significance of the individual, the importance of the 

individual’s relationship to God and society, the simultaneous physical and 

moral/spiritual make-up of people, moral responsibility, and the capacity to make 

moral and spiritual choices. 

The corresponding questions to ask of the stories, poems, proverbs, and vi- 

sions of the Bible include these: according to this passage, what are people like? 

What are their longings and fears? What values (for example, home, wealth, nature, 

God) are most worthy and least worthy of human pursuit? How can a person achieve 

meaning and happiness in life? 

 

The Divine-Human Relationship 

 

Usually the twin topics of God and people appear together in biblical passages, 

making the theme of the divine-human relationship one of the big ideas of the 

Bible. Roland Frye theorizes that 

 

the pervasive theme of the Bible is the interaction between individuals, soci- 

eties, and God, and one of the pervasive purposes of the Bible is to derive out 

of these interactions a clarification of each of the constituent elements. 

Throughout it is assumed that man cannot understand himself apart from 

God. . . .⁴ 

 

The theme of the divine-human relationship means that the Bible is a continuous 

exploration of people’s inescapable connections with deity and God’s unrelenting 

interest in what people do. The most customary biblical way of portraying this 

relationship is the idea of covenant. 

 

Human Evil and Suffering 

 

Biblical authors write in a painful awareness that the divine-human relationship 

has been disrupted. A literary scholar writes, “From the quantitative point of view, 

three central subjects emerge. . . . This threefold theme is the interest of God in 

man, the wrath of God, and the weakness or rather the wickedness of humanity.’’⁵ 

This is similar to T. R. Henn’s belief that “overriding all else” is “the problem, re- 

stated constantly and from many angles of experience, of evil and suffering.”⁶ 

 

The Acts of God 

 

Another topic that pervades the pages of the Bible is the history of God’s acts—his 

dealings with individual people, with Old Testament Israel, with the New Testa- 

ment church. G. Ernest Wright has popularized the concept of the acts of God as 

the unifying center of the Bible.⁷ These acts fall mainly into the categories of cre- 

ation, redemption or salvation, and judgment. The concept of salvation history 

(discussed above) is virtually synonymous with the theme of the acts of God. 

Whatever designation we use, the theme remains the purposes of God as they 

occur in history. The corresponding question to ask of a given biblical passage is, 

What is the nature of God’s acts? What does or did God do, and for what purpose? 

 

The Acts of People 

 

The concern with what God does is almost always accompanied in the Bible by 

the theme of what people do or ought to do. Human behavior is a constant sub- 

ject of biblical literature. It tends to fall into the dual pattern of virtuous behavior 

and sinful behavior. The Bible moves between the poles of human waywardness 

and human virtue. Using the twin techniques of portraying negative examples of 

vice to avoid and positive examples of virtue to imitate, the Bible presents a uni- 

fied moral vision. This ethical unity of the Bible pervades both the expository parts 

and the literary sections, where it is incarnated in human characters, whether they 

be people actually doing things or the speaker in a lyric poem expressing the inner 

weather of his feelings (which also have moral implications in the Bible). The uni- 

fying moral preoccupation in biblical literature makes these questions relevant to 

most biblical texts: What is typical or characteristic of human behavior? How should 

people behave? In the Bible, description of human behavior is combined with an 

evaluative bias in such a way as to leave the reader with a sense of moral duty—of 

how people ought to live. Ethical duty, moreover, is not pictured as selfexertion 

toward moral perfection but as submission to Goďs law or conformity to his char- 

acter. 

 

Law and Grace 

 

Luther and the Reformers interpreted the Bible through a thematic grid of law and 

gospel that is still useful as a way of seeing the unity of the Bible. In this view, the 

message of a biblical passage is either law or gospel (or both). “Law” is anything 

that exposes human ruin through sin. “Gospel” refers to everything that displays 

people’s restoration through faith in God’s grace. To use Melanchthon’s formula, 

“The law indicates the sickness, the gospel the remedy.” When flexibly applied, 

this framework of human sinfulness and divine grace yields much. Of most bib- 

lical passages we can ask, What does this text say about human sinfulness and/or 

God's grace? 

 

Promise and Fulfillment 

 

The theme of Goďs promises and their fulfillment is also a controlling theme of the 

Bible. T. R. Henn speaks of the Bible’s “two major symphonic movements of 

promise and fulfillment.”⁸ This pattern appears in many forms, small and big, but 

the most important example is the relationship between the Old Testament and 

the New. This relationship has been well summarized by H. H. Rowley: “The Old 

Testament continually looks forward to something beyond itself; the New Testa- 

ment continually looks back to the Old. Neither is complete without something 

beyond itself.”⁹ 

 

Old and New Testaments 

 

The New Testament builds upon the Old, bringing anticipations to fruition. 

Northrop Frye describes this overarching pattern of promise and fulfillment: 

 

There is a very large number of these references to the Old Testament in the 

New: they extend over every book—not impossibly every passage—in the New 

Testament. . . .The general principle of interpretation is traditionally given as 

“In the Old Testament the New Testament is concealed; in the New Testament 

the Old Testament is revealed.” Everything that happens in the Old Testament 

is a “type” or adumbration of something that happens in the New Testament, 

and the whole subject is therefore called typology.¹⁰ 

 

The result is a book in which no part is wholly self-contained but instead carries 

echoes from many other parts. 

 

Unity of Reference 

 

The vast system of interlocking references and allusions is not confined to New Testa- 

ment fulfillments of Old Testament foreshadowings. Biblical writers share a com- 

mon framework of reference. They keep referring to the same core of faith events. 

These events make up the underlying story of the Bible and are arranged into the 

following sequence: Creation, Fall, Covenant (promises of God to the patriarchs 

and Israelite nation), Exodus (including Revelation at Mount Sinai and Conquest 

of Canaan), Israelite Monarchy, Exile and Return, Life and Teaching of Jesus, 

Salvation (accomplished by the Death and Resurrection of Jesus), the Beginnings 

of the Christian Church, Consummation of History. This outline can be either ex- 

panded or telescoped. Northrop Frye divides the biblical story into seven “phases 

of revelation”: Creation, Revolution, Law, Wisdom, Prophecy, Gospel, 

Apocalypse.¹¹ 

This outline by itself imposes a loose unity on the Bible, but a much greater 

degree of cohesion results from the way in which biblical writers so consistently 

refer to this overriding story and its accompanying doctrines. No other long book 

in the world contains the interlocking system of references that have been codified 

in modern Bibles with cross references in the margins. 

 

Unity of Faith 

 

There is, finally, a unity of faith that welds the Bible into an organic whole. The 

Bible is not a theological outline, but the ideas that are stated and embodied in the 

Bible add up to a coherent system of doctrine. This doctrinal framework is a uni- 

fying context within which we should read individual parts. Everywhere we turn in 

the Bible, it is the same God and the same view of people that we encounter. The 

physical world is not considered good in one biblical book and evil in another. Of 

course, no single passage by itself “covers the whole territory” on a given topic. 

Individual parts of the Bible are interdependent. When we put the parts together, 

we find a coherent set of doctrines whose main tenets include consistently held 

views about God, the nature of people, creation (nature, the physical world), 

providence, God’s revelation as the source of truth, good and evil, salvation, and 

eschatology. 

 

SUMMARY 

 

As we read the Bible, we continually encounter a core of topics and themes. They 

include the character and acts of God, human nature and activity, moral good and 

evil, law and grace, promise and fulfillment. Biblical writers frequently refer to the 

same events that make up biblical history, and they share a common set of reli- 

gious beliefs. 

 

LITERARY ARCHETYPES IN THE BIBLE 

A Definition of Archetypes 

 

Literature is a great interlocking system in which we are continuously reminded of 

characters, situations, and symbols that we have encountered in other works of 

literature. These recurrent units are called archetypes. They fall into three cate- 

gories: images (such as light, mountaintop, or prison), character types (such as the 

hero, villain, or tempter), and plot motifs (such as the quest, fall from innocence, 

or rescue). Archetypes are the basic building blocks of the literary imagination. 

When we read literature we are constantly in touch with them. Of course they 

recur in literature because they are pervasive in life. In both literature and life, 

archetypes elicit powerful universal responses from the human psyche. 

 

A Pattern of Opposites 

 

Archetypes tend overwhelmingly to fall into a pattern of opposites. We can label 

the two categories wish and nightmare, or the ideal and unideal, or the good and 

the evil. Together they are a vision of the kind of world that people want and do 

not want. The following table lists the most important archetypal images and char- 

acter types in the Bible, arranged according to the dialectical pattern of opposites. 

 

The Archetypes of Ideal Experience 

The supernatural: God; angels; the heavenly society. 

Human characters: the hero or heroine; the virtuous wife / husband / mother / fa- 

ther; the bride / groom; the innocent child; the benevolent king or ruler; the 

priest; the wiseman; the shepherd; the pilgrim. 

Human relationships: the community, city, or tribe; images of communion, order, 

unity, friendship, love; the wedding or marriage; the feast, meal, or supper; the 

harmonious family; freedom; covenant, contract, or treaty. 

Clothing: any stately garment symbolizing legitimate position or success; festal 

garments such as wedding clothes; fine clothing given as gifts of hospitality; 

white or light colored clothing; clothing of adornment (such as jewels); protec- 

tive clothing such as a warrior’s armor. 

The human body: images of health, strength, vitality, potency, sexual fertility (in- 

cluding womb and seed); feats of strength and dexterity; images of sleep and 

rest; happy dreams; birth. 

Food: staples such as bread, milk, and meat; luxuries such as wine and honey; the 

harvest of grain. 

Animals: a community of domesticated animals, usually a flock of sheep or herd 

of cattle; the lamb; a gentle bird, often a dove; a faithful domesticated animal 

or pet; any animal friendly to people; singing birds; animals or birds noted for 

their strength, such as the lion or eagle; fish. 

Landscape: a garden, grove, or park; the mountaintop or hill; the fertile and secure 

valley; pastoral settings or farms; the safe pathway or easily traveled highway. 

Plants: green grass; the rose; the vineyard; the tree of life; any productive tree; the 

lily; evergreen plants (symbolic of immortality); herbs or plants of healing. 

Buildings: the city; the palace or castle; the military stronghold; the tabernacle, 

temple, or church; the house or home; the tower of contemplation; the capital 

city, symbol of the nation. 

The inorganic world: images of jewels and precious stones, often glowing and fiery; 

fire and brilliant light; burning that purifies and refines; rocks of refuge. 

Water: a river or stream; a spring or fountain; showers of rain; dew; flowing water 

of any type; tranquil pools; water used for cleansing. 

Forces of nature: the breeze or wind; the spring and summer seasons; calm after 

storm; the sun or the lesser light of the moon and stars; light, sunrise, day. 

Sounds: musical harmony; singing; laughter. 

Direction and motion: images of ascent, rising, height (especially the mountaintop 

and tower), motion (as opposed to stagnation). 

 

The Archetypes of Unideal Experience 

The supernatural: Satan; demons or evil spirits; evil beasts and monsters such as 

those in the Book of Revelation; pagan idols. 

Human characters: the villain; the tempter or temptress; the harlot/prostitute; the 

taskmaster, tyrant, or oppressor (usually a foreign oppressor); the wanderer, 

outcast, or exile; the traitor; the sluggard or lazy person; the hypocrite; the false 

religious leader or priest; the fool; the drunkard; the thief. 

Human relationships: tyranny or anarchy; isolation among people; images of tor- 

ture (the cross, stake, scaffold, gallows, stocks, etc.), slavery, or bondage; im- 

ages of war, riot, feud, or family discord. 

Clothing: ill-fitting garments (often symbolic of a position that is usurped and not 

held legitimately); garments symbolizing mourning (such as sackcloth, rent 

garments, dark mourning garments); dark clothes; tattered, dirty, or coarse 

clothing; any clothing that suggests poverty or bondage; a conspicuous excess 

of clothing. 

The human body: images of disease, deformity, barrenness, injury, or mutilation; 

sleeplessness or nightmare, often related to guilt of conscience; death. 

Food: hunger, drought, starvation, cannibalism; poison; drunkenness. 

Animals: monsters or beasts of prey; the wolf (enemy of sheep), tiger, dragon, vul- 

ture, owl (associated with darkness/ignorance), or hawk; the cold and earth- 

bound snake; any wild animal harmful to people; the goat; the unclean animals 

of Old Testament ceremonial law. 

Landscape: the dark forest; the wilderness or wasteland (which is either too hot or 

too cold); the dark and dangerous valley; the underground cave or tomb; the 

labyrinth; the dangerous or evil pathway. 

Plants: the thorn or thistle; weeds; dead or dying plants; unproductive plants; the 

willow tree (symbolic of mourning). 

Buildings: the prison or dungeon; the wicked city of violence, sexual perversion, or 

crime; the tower of imprisonment or wicked aspiration (the tower of Babel); 

pagan temples. 

The inorganic world: the inorganic world in its unworked form of deserts, rocks, 

and wilderness; dry dust or ashes; fire that destroys and tortures instead of 

purifying; rust and decay. 

Water: the sea and all that it contains (sea beasts and water monsters); stagnant 

pools (including the Dead Sea). 

Forces of nature: the storm or tempest; the autumn and winter seasons; sunset, 

darkness, night. 

Sounds: discordant sounds, cacophony, weeping, wailing. 

Direction and motion: images of descent, lowness, stagnation or immobility, suffo- 

cation, confinement. 

 

The Organizing Function of Archetypes 

 

This chart of archetypes outlines the basic “language” of the literary imagination 

throughout the Bible. The list of images and character types is an organizing 

framework for the entire Bible. The unity of the Bible is partly a unity of master im- 

ages. 

 

The One Story of Literature 

 

Archetypes can also consist of plot motifs. In fact, all of literature adds up to a 

single composite story known in literary circles as “the monomyth” (the “one 

story” of literature). The monomyth, which should not be confused with “mythol- 

ogy,” is shaped like a circle and has four separate phases. As such, it corresponds 

to some familiar cycles of human experience. The cycle of the year, for example, 

consists of the sequence summer-fall-winter-spring. A day moves through a cycle 

consisting of sunrise-zenith-sunset-darkness. A person’s life passes from birth to 

adulthood to old age to death. The monomyth, too, is a cycle having four phases. 

We can picture the “one story” of literature like this: 

 

Romance portrays idealized human experience—life as we wish it to be. Its oppo- 

site, anti-romance, pictures a world of bondage and misery. Tragedy narrates a fall 

downward from bliss to catastrophe, while comedy narrates a rise from bondage 

to happiness and freedom. These are the four kinds of literary material, and to- 

gether they make up the composite story of literature. It is easy to see how the two 

categories of archetypal images and character types noted above make up the 

upper and lower halves of the monomyth. 

 

Archetypal Plot Motifs 

 

The monomyth is the most general or universal A pattern to be found in literature. 

The circular Motifs pattern of the monomyth takes a number of specific forms, in- 

cluding the following: 

1. The quest, in which a hero struggles to reach a goal, undergoing obstacles 

and temporary defeat before achieving success (Abraham’s quest for a son and 

Ruth’s quest for a home). 

2. The death-rebirth motif¦ in which a hero endures death or danger and returns 

to life or security (the stories of Hezekiah and Jesus). 

3. The initiation, in which a character is thrust out of an existing, usually ideal, 

situation and undergoes a series of ordeals as he or she encounters various forms 

of evil or hardship for the first time (the stories of Jacob and Joseph). 

4. The journey, in which characters encounter danger and experience growth as 

they move from one place to another (the stories of Abraham and the Exodus). 

5. Tragedy, or its more specific form of the fall from innocence, (the stories of 

Adam/Eve and David/Bathsheba). 

6. Comedy, a U-shaped story that begins in prosperity, descends into tragedy, 

but rises to a happy ending as obstacles to success are overcome (the stories of 

Esther and Job). 

7. Crime and punishment (the stories of Cain and King Saul). 

8. The temptation, in which someone becomes the victim of an evil tempter or 

temptress (the stories of Eve and Samson/Delilah). 

9. The rescue (the stories of Esther and of Elisha at Dothan). 

10. The suffering servant or scapegoat pattern, in which a character undergoes 

unmerited suffering in order to secure the welfare of others (the stories of Joseph 

and Jesus). 

 

Type Scenes 

 

In addition to archetypal plot motifs, there are type scenes (not to be confused 

with types or typology) in the Bible. A type scene is a story pattern or situation that 

recurs often enough in the Bible that we can identify a set of conventions and 

expectations for each one. Each type scene has its constituent ingredients in an 

established order. An awareness of such type scenes can become a significant 

organizing pattern for either individual books of the Bible or the Bible as a whole. 

 

Type Scenes in the Book of Acts 

 

In the Book of Acts, for example, the following cycle of events keeps getting re- 

peated: God raises up leaders who preach the Gospel; they perform mighty works; 

crowds are drawn and many hearers are converted; opposition and persecution 

arise against the leaders; God intervenes to rescue them; and on to a new reen- 

actment of the cycle.¹² Other type scenes also unify the Book of Acts—preaching 

the gospel, conversion stories, and trial/defense scenes. 

 

Type Scenes Throughout the Bible 

 

Such type scenes occur throughout the Bible. Robert Alter cites the Old Testament 

examples of “the annunciation . . . of the birth of the hero to his barcen mother; 

the encounter with the future betrothed at a well; the epiphany in the field; the ini- 

tiatory trial; danger in the desert and the discovery of a well or other source of 

sustenance; the testament of the dying hero.”¹³ The type scene that dominates the 

story of the Exodus is the situation that unfolds according to this sequence: cri- 

sis—com-plaint by the people—call to God by Moses—divine rescue/provision— 

reve-tion or rebuke by God. The Gospels have their distinctive type scenes: heal- 

ing stories, pronouncement stories, preaching to the crowds, encounter stories, 

Passion stories. Each biblical type scene consists of a set of conventional ele- 

ments, usually in a set order. 

 

SUMMARY 

 

The Bible is not a collection of isolated fragments. It is a vast system of recurring 

images, character types, plot motifs, and type scenes. As we read a given biblical 

passage, we are reminded of other similar material elsewhere in the Bible. In this 

process, the Bible assumes a remarkable unity in our thinking. 

 

UNIFYING STYLISTIC TRAITS 

The Bible is written in a rich variety of styles. In the midst of all the variety, 

however, certain stylistic tendencies help to give the Bible a discernible literary 

unity. There are, of course, numerous passages that do not fit the generalizations I 

am about to note, but the very fact that we think of these as exceptions proves the 

validity of the general rules that scholars have attributed to the Bible’s style. 

 

Concrete Rather Than Abstract 

 

The biblical tendency toward the concrete is well known. There are many great ab- 

stractions in the Bible (including the Psalms), but in general the biblical writers 

show a concern for things rather than ideas. God is portrayed as light and rock 

and thunder. Wealth is visible and tangible. So are human emotions. Even the 

prose sections of the Bible resemble poetry in their reliance on concrete images. 

 

Realism 

 

The Bible is a realistic book. Its characters and settings are predominantly 

nonaristocratic (unlike other ancient literature). The Bible, writes Erich Auerbach, 

“engenders a new elevated style, which does not scorn everyday life and which is 

ready to absorb the sensorily realistic, even the ugly, the undignified, the physi- 

cally base.’’¹⁴ The Bible also portrays the flaws of even its best characters. 

 

Simplicity 

 

The style of the Bible is marked by simplicity. Its characteristic imagery comes 

from daily life. Its narrative style is plain and unembellished, with only the essen- 

tial details included. Shakespeare has a vocabulary of more than fifteen thousand 

words and Milton thirteen thousand, while the King James Bible has a vocabulary 

of about six thousand different words.¹⁵ The biblical imagination also operates 

with simplified dichotomies, such as light and darkness, good and evil, heroes 

and villains, the tiny nation against its overpowering enemies. “The simplicity of 

the Bible,’’ writes Northrop Frye, “is the simplicity of majesty. . . ; its simplicity ex- 

presses the voice of authority.’’¹⁶ 

 

Elemental Quality 

 

The Bible is par excellence the book of elemental human experience. It depicts what 

is true for all people in all times and places. In the words of John Livingston 

Lowes, “the Biblical vocabulary is compact of the primal stuff of our common 

humanity—of its universal emotional, sensory experiences.”¹⁷ Someone else has 

expressed it thus: 

 

The themes of the Bible are simple and primary. Life is reduced to a few basic 

activities—fighting, farming, a strong sexual urge, and intermittent worship. . . 

.We confront basic virtues and primitive vices. . . .The world these persons in- 

habit is stripped and elemental—sea, desert, the stars, the wind, storm, sun, 

clouds, and moon, seedtime and harvest. . . . Occupation has this elementary 

quality also.¹⁸ 

 

Brevity 

 

The Bible displays a preference for brevity over length. Biblical writers overwhelm- 

ingly work with brief units that are relatively self-contained. Individual episodes in 

stories from Genesis through the Gospels are almost never elaborated at length. 

The characters in these stories are illuminated by momentary flashes of heroism 

or evil or courage and so forth. When we move from the stories of the Bible to 

other genres, the forms are consistently brief ones: lyric, song, parable, proverb, 

prophetic vision, letter. The aphoristic, or proverbial, style of the Bible is a further 

evidence of this preference for conciseness and economy. The Bible is therefore a 

vast collection of concentrated moments of epiphany, “a series of ecstatic mo- 

ments or points of expanding apprehension,” as Northrop Frye calls it.¹⁹ 

 

Repetition 

 

All of literature relies on various forms of repetition, but the Bible has even more 

of it than most literature, probably because so much of the Bible was originally 

oral literature. In poetry this urge for repetition takes the form of parallelism and 

rhetorical patterns. There is an equal abundance of repetition in the stories of the 

Bible, Jesus’ parables and discourses, and the Epistles.²⁰ 

 

The Spoken Word 

 

The style of the Bible is an oral style. The prevalence of dialogue in biblical narra- 

tive is unique in ancient literature.²¹ But the Bible is everywhere filled with voices 

speaking and replying. To read the Bible well is to become a listener, either literally 

or in one’s imagination. 

 

Affective Power 

 

The style of the Bible is predominantly affective. It moves us as well as appealing 

to our reason. It convinces us by evoking a response from us. The characteristic 

(though not exclusive) biblical way of conducting an argument is to repeat the 

main point so often that we feel or experience the truth of the assertion. The sto- 

ries and parables of the Bible force us to respond to characters and events. The 

poems and oratory and Epistles are impassioned. 

 

SUMMARY 

 

The style of the Bible is uniquely powerful and beautiful. It can be parodied but 

never duplicated. The elements that make the Bible the most expressive book in 

the world include concreteness, realism, simplicity, an elemental quality, brevity, 

repetition, emphasis on the spoken word, and affective power. 

 

Further Reading 

The strength of Northrop Frye’s The Great Code is the way in which it leaves a 

reader with a unified impression of the whole Bible. The best short introduction to 

the literary unity of the Bible is Roland M. Frye, “Introduction” to The Bible: Selec- 

tions from the King James Version for Study as Literature (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 

1965; reprint, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977), pp. ix-xxxix. Volume 5 

(1951) of Interpretation contains numerous still-useful articles on the unity of the 

Bible. The sources cited in the footnotes to chapter 12 also have good additional 

comments on the topic. 

A wealth of good generalizations about the style of the Bible has been gathered 

by D. G. Kehl, ed., Literary Style of the Old Bible and the New (Indianapolis: Bobbs- 

Merrill, 1970). 

 

 

¹Introduction to The Bible: Selections from the King James Version for Study as 

Literature (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965), xvi. 

²C. S. Lewis, The Literary Impact of the Authorized Version (Philadelphia: 

Fortress 1963), 32-33. 

³Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, 

trans. Willard R. Trask (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953, 1968), 14-15. 

⁴Roland Frye, Introduction, xvi. 

⁵Howard Mumford Jones, “The Bible from a Literary Point of View,” in Five Es- 

says on the Bible (New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1960), 52. 

⁶The Bible as Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970), 257. 

⁷See especially God Who Acts: Biblical Theology as Recital (Chicago: Henry Reg- 

nery, 1952). 

⁸Henn, Bible as Literature, 21. Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Toward an Old Testament 

Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978), 20–40, elaborates the same theme. 

⁹The Unity of the Bible (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1953), 99. 

¹⁰The Great Code: The Bible and Literature (New York: Harcourt Brace Jo- 

vanovich, 1982), 79. 

¹¹Ibid., 105–38. 

¹²M. D. Goulder, Type and History in Acts (London: S.P.C.K., 1964), organizes 

the entire Book of Acts around this type scene. 

¹³The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 51. 

¹⁴Mimesỉs, 12. 

¹⁵Cỉeỉand B. McAfee, The Greatest English Classic (New York: Harper and 

Brothers, 1912), 105. 

¹⁶The Great Code, 211. 

¹⁷“The Noblest Monument of English Prose,” in Literary Style of the Old Bible 

and the New, ed. D. G. Kehl (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970), 9. 

¹⁸Jones, “The Bible,” 52–53. 

¹⁹Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), 326. 

²⁰Good sources to consult as a starting point on repetition include James 

Muilenburg, “A Study in Hebrew Rhetoric: Repetition and Style,” Vet us Testa- 

mentum Supplements 1 (1953): 97–111; Robert C. Tannehill, The Sword of His Mouth 

(Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975); Jacob Licht, Storytelling in the Bible (Jerusalem: 

Magnes, 1978), 51–95; and Alter, Art of Biblical Narrative, 88–113. 

²¹See Auerbach, Mimesis, 46; Alter, Art of Biblical Narrative, 63–87; and Amos 

N. Wilder, Early Christian Rhetoric (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), 

40–54.

How to Read the Bible as Literature: 11

How to Read the Bible as Literature: . . . and Get More Out of It: Chapter Eleven  Visionary Literature    The Two Types of Literature 

Chapter Eleven 

Visionary Literature 

 

The Two Types of Literature 

THE CONTENT OF LITERATURE AS A WHOLE falls into two large categories. Some 

literature presents a replica of existing reality; the usual term for such literature is 

realism. Other literature presents an alternative to known reality. It does not imi- 

tate empirical reality but creates or imagines an alternate reality. The standard 

term for such literature is fantasy. 

The Bible’s tendency toward realism is a commonplace. Its staple is historical 

narrative and biography. Even the fictional parables of Jesus stay close to the way 

things are in everyday reality. 

 

Visionary Literature Defined 

 

But the other type of literature is also well-represented, chiefly in the related gen- 

res of prophecy and apocalypse. I have decided to discuss this amorphous body 

of literature under the single heading of visionary literature. Visionary literature 

pictures settings, characters, and events that differ from ordinary reality. This is 

not to say that the things described in visionary literature did not happen in past 

history or will not happen in future history. But it does mean that the things as 

pictured by the writer at the time of writing exist in the imagination, not in empir- 

ical reality. 

 

Prophecy and Apocalypse Are Partly Visionary 

 

In discussing prophecy and apocalypse together I do not mean to imply that these 

biblical forms do not have distinguishing traits that make them different from 

each other. Nor am I saying that they are wholly visionary. Prophecy, especially, 

contains much that is straightforward preaching and prediction, and many of its 

judgments can best be approached under the literary category of satire. 

Still, the visionary element is strong in both genres, and my purpose is to 

delineate the rhetoric and literary forms that will allow a reader to make literary 

sense of these writings. They are among the most literary parts of the Bible but are 

so different from familiar types of literature that they often get bypassed in literary 

discussions. By discussing them under this visionary aspect, I am obviously omit- 

ting much that could be said about both genres. I should also note that the vision- 

ary element in such literature should by no means be regarded as necessarily 

futuristic in orientation. 

 

The Element of Otherness 

 

I have already hinted at the first thing we should notice about visionary literature: 

the element of otherness. Visionary literature transforms the known world or the 

present state of things into a situation that at the time of writing is as yet only 

imagined. In one way or another, visionary literature takes us to a strange world 

where ordinary rules of reality no longer prevail. 

 

Reversal and Transformation as Visionary Themes 

 

The simplest form of such transformation is a futuristic picture of the changed 

fortunes of a person or group or nation. In the prophetic oracle of judgment, for 

example, the currently powerful individual or group is pictured as defeated, con- 

trary to all that is apparent at the time of writing: 

You women who are so complacent, 

rise up and listen to me; 

you daughters who feel secure, 

hear what I have to say! 

In little more than a year 

you who feel secure will tremble; 

the grape harvest will fail, 

and the harvest of fruit will not come. . . . 

The fortress will be abandoned, 

the noisy city deserted; 

citadel and watchtower will become a 

wasteland forever, 

the delight of donkeys, a pasture for flocks 

(Isa. 32:9-10, 14). 

In the oracle of redemption, this pattern is reversed. Instead of a coming woe 

more terrible than anything that presently exists, those to whom the oracle is ad- 

dressed will receive a blessing that is the opposite of anything they currently expe- 

rience: 

“The days are coming,’’ declares the LORD, 

“when the reaper will be overtaken by the 

plowman 

and the planter by the one treading grapes. 

New wine will drip from the mountains 

and flow from all the hills’’ 

(Amos 9:13). 

The motifs of transformation and reversal are prominent in visionary literature, 

and they lead to this principle of interpretation: in visionary literature, be ready for 

the reversal of ordinary reality. 

 

Transcendental Realms as a Visionary Theme 

 

The otherness of visionary writing is often more radical than the temporal rever- 

sals and changing fortunes just noted. A leading element of visionary literature is 

the portrayal of a transcendental or supernatural world. In the Bible this other 

world is usually heaven, but there are also visions of hell. Visions of either type do 

not primarily take the reader forward in time but rather beyond the visible spatial 

world. One thinks at once of such passages as Isaiah’s vision of God sitting on 

his heavenly throne (6:1-5), or Ezekiel’s vision of the divine chariot (Ezek. 1), or 

scenes of heavenly worship in the Book of Revelation (e.g., ch. 4), or the descrip- 

tion of the New Jerusalem in the last two chapters of Revelation. The element of 

transcendence is pervasive in visionary literature, and it, too, can be formulated as 

a principle: when reading visionary literature, be prepared to use your imagination to 

picture a world that transcends earthly reality. Visionary literature assaults a purely 

mundane mindset; in fact, this is one of its main purposes. 

 

The Cosmic Scope of Visionary Literature 

 

The strangeness in visionary literature extends to both scenes and actors. The 

scene is cosmic, not localized. In Old Testament prophecy it extends to whole na- 

tions. In apocalyptic works it encompasses the entire earth and reaches beyond it 

to heaven and hell. In the Book of Revelation, for example, we move in a regular 

rhythm between heaven and earth, and the scenes set on earth involve the entire 

planet. The action, moreover, eventually reaches out to include the whole human 

race throughout all of history. Old Testament prophecy is similar; Richard Moul- 

ton writes: 

 

These prophetic dramas are such as no theatre could compass. For their state 

they need all space; and the time of their action extends to the end of all 

things. The speakers include God and the Celestial Hosts; Israel appears, Is- 

rael Suffering and Israel Repentant; Sinners in Zion, the Godly in Zion; the 

Saved and the Doomed, the East and West, answer one another.¹ 

 

Supernatural Agents and Strange Creatures 

 

Filling this cosmic stage are actors that do not fit ordinary expectations. God and 

angels and glorified saints in heaven seem appropriate enough in the heavenly 

scenes, and they are leading actors in the visionary literature of the Bible. But 

other creatures are more startling to earthly eyes: a great red dragon (Rev. 12:3-4), 

“living creatures” with “six wings and. . .covered with eyes all around” (Rev. 4:8), a 

warrior riding a red horse (Rev. 6:4), two flying women with wings like those of a 

stork (Zech. 5:9), or a beast that “was like a lion, and it had the wings of an eagle,” 

which had its wings plucked off and then stood “on two feet like a man” (Dan. 

7:4). 

 

Inanimate Forces as Actors 

 

Such mingling of the familiar and unfamiliar, a hallmark of visionary literature, 

takes an even stranger form when inanimate objects and forces of nature suddenly 

become actors, as in this vision of imminent military invasion in Isaiah 13:10: 

The stars of heaven and their constellations 

will not show their light. 

The rising sun will be darkened 

and the moon will not give its light. 

Such breaking down of ordinary distinctions between the human and the natural 

realms is equally pervasive in the Book of Revelation: 

 

The woman was given the wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly to the 

place prepared for her in the desert. . . .Then from his mouth the serpent 

spewed forth water like a river, to overtake the woman and sweep her away 

with the torrent. But the earth helped the woman by opening its mouth and 

swallowing the river that the dragon had spewed out of his mouth (Rev. 12:14- 

16). . 

 

Anything Can Happen 

 

In the strange and frequently surrealistic world of visionary literature, virtually any 

aspect of creation can become a participant in the ongoing drama of God’s judg- 

ments and redemption. It is a world where a river can overflow a nation (Isa. 8:5— 

8), where a branch can build a temple (Zech. 6:12) and a ram’s horn can grow to 

the sky and knock stars to the ground (Dan. 8:9-10). Sea, clouds, earthquake, 

storm, whirlwind, and assorted animals are constant actors in visionary literature. 

This is obviously a type of fantasy literature, not because the events symbolically 

portrayed are unreal or untrue, but because the form in which they are pictured as 

happening is purely imaginary. 

The visionary strangeness of such writing leads to a related rule for reading it: 

visionary literature is a form of fantasy literature in which readers must be willing to 

exercise their imaginations in picturing unfamiliar scenes and agents. It requires what 

the poet Coleridge called “the willing suspension of disbelief.” We know that peo- 

ple do not fly through the air on wings, but when reading such visions we sus- 

pend our disbelief and enter the realm of make-believe in order to appropriate the 

truth it conveys about reality. The best introduction to such visionary literature in 

the Bible is other fantasy literature, such as the Narnia stories of C. S. Lewis. 

 

Visionary Literature as a Subversive Form 

 

What is the point of such writing? Why would a biblical writer resort to fantasy in- 

stead of staying with realism? Visionary literature, with its arresting strangeness, 

breaks through our normal way of thinking and shocks us into seeing that things 

are not as they appear. Visionary writing attacks our ingrained patterns of deep- 

level thought in an effort to convince us of such things as that the world will not 

always continue as it now is, that there is something drastically wrong with the 

status quo, or that reality cannot be confined to the physical world that we per- 

ceive with our senses. Visionary literature is not cozy fireside reading. It gives us 

the shock treatment. 

 

Kaleidoscopic Structure 

 

The element of the unexpected extends even to the structure of visionary liter- 

ature. I will call it a kaleidoscopic structure. It consists of brief units, always shift- 

ing and never in focus for very long. Its effects are similar to those of some mod- 

ern films. The individual units not only keep shifting, but they consist of a range 

of diverse material, including visual descriptions, speeches that the visionary 

hears and records, dialogues, monologues, brief snatches of narrative, direct dis- 

courses by the writer to an audience, letters, prayers, hymns, parables. Visionary 

elements, moreover, may be mingled with realistic scenes and events. 

This disjointed method of proceeding places tremendous demands on the 

reader and is the thing that makes such literature initially resistant to a literary ap- 

proach. The antidote to this frustration is a basic principle of interpretation: in- 

stead of looking for the smooth flow of narrative, be prepared for a disjointed series of 

diverse, self-contained units. 

 

Dream Structure 

 

Dream, and not narrative, is the model that visionary literature in the Bible fol- 

lows. Of what do dreams consist? Momentary pictures, fleeting impressions, 

characters and scenes that play their brief part and then drop out of sight, abrupt 

jumps from one action to another. This is exactly what we find in visionary liter- 

ature. 

 

Pageant Structure 

 

Sometimes, it is true, the units form a more discernible sequence than this, as in 

the visions of the four horsemen of Revelation (6:1-8). The model we should have 

in mind for such passages is the pageant—a succession of visual images that 

suggest in symbolic fashion an event or situation. In no case, however, does vi- 

sionary literature in the Bible follow the typical structure of a story. 

 

Narrative Elements 

 

Even though visionary literature is not structured as a story, some of the standard 

narrative questions are exactly the right ones to ask. Individual units normally con- 

sist of the usual narrative elements of scene, agent, action, and outcome. The 

corresponding questions to ask of individual passages are: 

1.Where does the action occur? 

2.Who are the actors? 

3.What do they do? 

4.What is the result? 

Not just the individual units but usually the books as a whole will yield some type 

of unity and organization if we ask these narrative questions: 

1.What overall plot conflicts govern the work? 

2.Who are the main actors in the work? 

3.What changes occur as the book unfolds? 

4.What final resolution is reached in regard to the overriding conflicts? 

Symbolism as the Basic Mode 

 

Visionary literature not only has story-like qualities; it makes even more use of the 

resources of poetry. And above all, visionary literature uses the technique of sym- 

bolism. In fact, it is symbolic through and through, a point that cannot be over- 

stated. To insist that the Old Testament prophetic books and the Book of Reve- 

lation use symbolism as their basic mode is not to deny that they describe super- 

natural and historical events that really happen. The crucial question, however, is 

how the writers go about describing history. 

 

The Reality of What Is Portrayed 

 

It can be easily documented by ordinary historical means that the events de- 

scribed in visionary literature are historical in nature. For example, Israel and 

Judah were carried into captivity (as predicted in Old Testament prophecy), and 

the Roman Empire did fall (as predicted in Revelation). The literary question is, 

How are these historical realities portrayed in visionary literature? The answer 

usually is, By means of symbolism. 

 

Symbolism in Old Testament Prophecy 

 

Consider some typical specimens. The youthful Joseph dreamed that the sun, 

moon, and eleven stars bowed down to him. This symbolic picture was fulfilled 

later in his life, but the fulfillment was not literal. Isaiah described a river that over- 

flowed the land of Judah. This symbolic picture was fulfilled historically (but not 

literally) when Assyria invaded and conquered Judah. The dream, interpreted by 

Daniel, of a statue composed of various minerals (Dan. 2:31–45) pictured histor- 

ical realities, but it is not a literal description of those realities. 

 

Symbolism in the Book of Revelation 

 

The same type of symbolism prevails in the Book of Revelation. It is already 

present in the letters to the seven churches, the most realistic part of the whole 

book. We read, for example, about people “who have not soiled their clothes” 

(3:4) and who are destined to become “a pillar in the temple of my God” (3:12). 

Surely no one will interpret such statements literally. When the Christians at 

Laodicea are said to be lukewarm (3:16), we are obviously not talking about body 

temperature, and when they are described as being “poor, blind, and naked” (3:17) 

it is not a literal picture of their physical state but a symbolic picture of their spir- 

itual condition. Nor does Christ literally stand at a physical door and knock (3:20). 

If there is this much symbolism already in the letters to the churches, how much 

more can we not expect in the futuristic sections of Revelation? 

The action that unfolds in the opening verses of Revelation 12 is also a good 

index of the symbolic mode of the book. This passage narrates how a woman of 

cosmic dimensions (symbolic of Old Testament Israel) gives birth to a child “who 

will rule all the nations” (Christ), and it tells of the futile attempt of a great red 

dragon (Satan) to destroy the child, who is caught up into heaven. The most plau- 

sible interpretation of the passage is that it is a symbolic account of the incar- 

nation and ascension of Jesus as narrated in the Gospels. 

The corresponding question we need to ask of visionary literature in the Bible 

is a further principle of interpretation: of what historical event or theological reality 

or event in salvation history does this passage seem to be a symbolic version? 

An example of a theological reality in symbolic form would be God’s forgive- 

ness of sins as seen in Zechariah’s vision of the replacement of the high priest’s 

filthy garments with clean ones (Zech. 3:3–5). Similarly, the sealing of believers in 

Revelation (7:2–3) is a symbolic picture of redemption. By “events in salvation his- 

tory” I mean such events as the moral degeneration of the end times and the final 

judgment that are repeatedly pictured in the Book of Revelation. 

 

Visionary Literature Is Symbolic Rather Than Pictorial 

 

We need to make a distinction between symbolic and pictorial effects. Visionary 

literature in the Bible is heavily symbolic but rarely pictorial. Many of the scenes in 

Revelation become grotesque the moment we visualize them as pictures. The por- 

trait of Christ in Revelation 1:12-16, replete with a hand holding seven stars and a 

mouth with a sword issuing from it, is a series of symbols representing various 

aspects of Christ’s character, not a composite picture of him. Someone has 

expressed the distinction thus: 

 

Symbolic writing. . .does not paint pictures. It is not pictographic but ideo- 

graphic. . . .The skull and crossbones on the bottle of medicine is a symbol of 

poison, not a picture. . . .The fish, the lamb, and the lion are all symbols of 

Christ, but never to be taken as pictures of him. In other words, the symbol is 

a code word and does not paint a picture.² 

 

Interpreting the Symbols 

 

How can we know what a given symbol means? It is relatively easy. In Old Testa- 

ment prophecy the immediate context usually provides an interpretive framework 

for a given symbol or scene. Similarly, whenever a symbolic vision has been ful- 

filled in subsequent history, we can use that fulfillment to interpret the prophecy 

in which it was portrayed. This includes New Testament fulfillments of Old Testa- 

ment prophetic and messianic visions. 

 

Symbols Are a Universal Language, Easily Grasped 

 

A wide acquaintance with visionary literature both in the Bible and in literature 

generally is a great asset because literary symbolism tends to be a universal lan- 

guage that recurs throughout literature. Such common symbols as thunder, earth- 

quake, dragon, lion, or harvest occur often enough in visionary literature for us 

generally to know what they mean. 

 

A Keen Eye for the Obvious 

 

Above all, we should never minimize the usefulness of contact with everyday expe- 

rience and a keen eye for the obvious. The purpose of symbols is not to conceal 

but to reveal. A few of the symbols in the visionary literature of the Bible no doubt 

had a contemporary meaning that has been lost, but for the most part all we need 

is a sensitivity to the obvious associations of literary symbols. We do not need a 

commentary to tell us that a sword symbolizes judgment or a throne power or a 

vineyard prosperity. 

 

Grasping the Total Meaning 

 

Nor should we allegorize every detail in a passage unless there is a hint that we 

are intended to do so. Often it is the total impact of a scene or action that conveys 

the meaning. 

 

The Mystery of the Supernatural 

 

Then, too, some of the images portraying supernatural reality are meant to convey 

a sense of more-than-earthly mystery. Naturally, much remains elusive in Ezekiel’s 

vision of the divine chariot (Ezek. 1). The images remain mysterious because their 

purpose is to convey the mystery of supernatural reality. Someone has contrasted 

the clarity of outline in Greek statues of the gods and the blurred edges of vision- 

ary writing in the Bible: 

 

The very clarity and definiteness of outline in those wonderful marbles stand 

out as a limitation: in comparison with these vague and mystical imaginings of 

the Christian seers the representations of Greek art are impotent. In the end 

the Greek statue of a god, for all its gracious beauty, is only a glorified and 

idealized man. The visions of the apocalypse, on the other hand, transcend 

once for all the limitations of human nature.³ 

 

SUMMARY 

 

Visionary literature is what its name implies—an imagined picture, frequently 

symbolic rather than literal, of events that have not yet happened at the time of 

writing, or of realities such as heaven that transcend ordinary reality. Such writing 

requires that readers be ready to use their imagination—to let it fly beyond the 

stars. Visionary literature liberates us from the mundane and familiar and literal. It 

is an assault on our patterns of deep-level thought in an effort to shake us out of 

complacency with the normal flow of things. Visionary literature is a revolutionary 

genre. It announces an end to the way things are and opens up alternate possi- 

bilities. 

 

Further Reading 

The characteristic rhetoric, imagery, and generic features of apocalyptic writing 

are discussed in these sources: William A. Beardslee, Literary Criticism of the New 

Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1970), pp. 53–63; Amos N. Wilder, “Apocalyptic 

Rhetorics,” in Jesus’ Parables and the War of Myths, ed. James Breech (Philadelphia: 

Fortress, 1982), pp. 153–68; and vol. 14 of Semeia (1979), especially the intro- 

duction by John J. Collins (pp. 1–20). 

For Old Testament prophecy, J. Lindblom, Prophecy in Ancient Israel (Phila- 

delphia: Muhlenberg, 1962), is good on the visionary element (see especially pp. 

122–82). 

For literary commentary on the New Testament Book of Revelation, see the ex- 

cerpts collected under that heading in The New Testament in Literary Criticism, ed. 

Leland Ryken (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1984); and my book The Literature of 

the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1974), pp. 335–56. 

 

 

¹The Modern Reader's Bible (New York: Macmillan, 1895,1935), 1392. 

²Donald W. Richardson, The Revelation of Jesus Christ: An Interpretation (Rich- 

mond: John Knox, 1939), 16. For convincing statements of the same viewpoint, 

see the excerpts under “Revelation, Book of, Symbolism,” in The New Testament 

in Literary Criticism, ed. Leland Ryken (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1984). 

³J. H. Gardiner, The Bible as English Literature (New York: Charles Scribner’s 

Sons, 1906), 272.