2022/11/28

How to Read the Bible as Literature: 12

How to Read the Bible as Literature: . . . and Get More Out of It: Chapter Twelve  The Literary Unity of the Bible    A Book for All Seasons and Temperaments 

Chapter Twelve 
The Literary Unity of the Bible 
 
A Book for All Seasons and Temperaments 
THE LITERARY RANGE AND DIVERSITY OF THE BIBLE are truly impressive. Written by 
a variety of writers over a span of many centuries, the Bible is an anthology of liter- 
ature, as the very name Bible suggests (biblia, “books”). Previous chapters have 
demonstrated how the list of biblical genres keeps expanding. Every aspect of life 
is covered in this comprehensive book. Because the Bible is both comprehensive 
and written by a variety of writers, it preserves the complexities and polarities of 
human experience to an unusual degree. The paradoxes of life are held in tension 
in what can be called the most balanced book ever written. The Bible is truly a 
book for all seasons and every human temperament. 
 
The Literary Unity of the Bible 
 
But if we stress only the variety of the Bible, we distort the kind of book it is. For 
although the Bible does justice to the breadth and fullness of human experience in 
a marvelous way, it is also an amazingly unified book. The purpose of this con- 
cluding chapter is to suggest some important ways in which the Bible is one book. 
In keeping with the literary focus of my book, I will be concerned mainly with the 
literary unity of the Bible rather than its theological unity. 
 
THE BIBLE AS A STORY 
Narrative Unity in the Bible 
 
The most obvious element of literary unity in the Bible is that it tells a story. It is a 
series of events having a beginning, a middle, and an end. Even the external 
shapeliness of the Bible is remarkable. It begins with the creation of all things. The 
story of the Fall quickly takes the action down to the level of fallen history. But the 
story slowly and painfully winds its way to the consummation of history with the 
eternal defeat of evil and the triumph of good. 
 
The Unifying Plot Conflict 
 
The overall story of the Bible has a unifying plot conflict. It is the great spiritual 
and moral battle between good and evil. A host of details makes up this conflict: 
God and Satan, God and his rebellious creatures, good and evil people, inner 
human impulses toward obedience to God and disobedience to God. Almost 
every story, poem, and proverb in the Bible contributes to this ongoing plot con- 
flict between good and evil. Every act and mental attitude shows God’s creatures 
engaged in some movement, whether slight or momentous, toward God or away 
from him. 
 
The Prevalence of Human Choice 
 
The presence of the great spiritual conflict makes choice on the part of biblical 
characters necessary. Every area of human experience is claimed by God and 
counterclaimed by the forces of evil. There is no neutral ground. Every human 
event shows an allegiance to God or rebellion against him. The Bible concentrates 
on the person at the crossroads. Life is momentous for the actors in this drama of 
the soul’s choice. Viewed as a story, the Bible is a series of great moral and spir- 
itual dilemmas and choices, underscoring the biblical view of people as morally 
responsible. 
 
Human Choice, Not External Environment, Is Crucial 
 
In the episodes that make up the overriding story of the Bible, the decisive action 
does not reside in external reality itself but consists of a person’s response to what 
happens in the world. People’s problems do not stem from outward events or the 
material world. Their moral and spiritual choices in history are the crucial action 
in the ongoing story of the Bible. Its plot is thus a moral/spiritual action in which 
external events provide the occasion for significant action, whether good or bad. 
 
God as Protagonist 
 
Every story has a central protagonist, and in the Bible that protagonist is God. He 
is the central character, the actor whose presence unifies the story of universal 
history with its myriads of changing human characters. Roland Frye comments: 
 
The characterization of God may indeed be said to be the central literary con- 
cern of the Bible, and it is pursued from beginning to end, for the principal 
character, or actor, or protagonist of the Bible is God. Not even the most 
seemingly insignificant action in the Bible can be understood apart from the 
emerging characterization of the deity. With this great protagonist and his de- 
signs, all other characters and events interact, as history becomes the great 
arena for Goďs characteristic and characterizing actions.¹ 
 
The Story of God 
 
It is obvious, then, that the chief element of progression in the overall story of the 
Bible is the unfolding purposes of God throughout history. Biblical scholars have 
taught us to call this “salvation history”—God’s great plan to save people from 
their sin and its eternal consequences. The story of the Bible is the record of 
God’s acts—in history, in nature, in the lives of people. Because it is God’s pur- 
poses that comprise the essential action, the overriding story of the Bible can be 
called the history of the human race within a providential framework of God’s acts 
of redemption from, and judgment against, the evil in the universe. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
If we stand back from the Bible and take it in at a single view, it is above all a story, 
with many interspersed passages that interpret the meaning of the events. Like 
other stories, the Bible has a beginning-middle-end pattern, a unifying plot con- 
flict between good and evil, a focus on people in the act of choosing, and a central 
protagonist who is God. 
 
THE RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION OF THE BIBLE 
The Bible as a Religious Book 
 
The Bible is also unified by its religious orientation. It is pervaded by a 
consciousness of God. Human experience is constantly viewed in a religious or 
moral light. No matter how artistic and entertaining the Bible is, its writers have a 
didactic view of literature. Their purpose is to reveal truth to people so they can 
order their lives aright. Two oft-quoted descriptions of this aspect of the Bible are 
these: 
 
It is . . . not merely a sacred book but a book so remorselessly and contin- 
uously sacred that it does not invite, it excludes or repels, the merely aesthetic 
approach.² 
 
The Bible’s claim to truth is not only far more urgent than Homer’s, it is tyran- 
nical—it excludes all other claims. The world of the Scripture stories is not 
satisfied with claiming to be a historically true reality—it insists that it is the 
only real world.³ 
 
The Theme of the Two Worlds 
 
Part of the religious orientation of the Bible is the assumption of its writers that 
reality consists of two spheres. I call this the theme of the two worlds. Biblical 
writers take it for granted that there are two planes of reality—the physical world, 
perceived through the senses, and the supernatural world, invisible to ordinary 
human view. Both worlds are objectively real, but whereas earthly reality can be 
demonstrated empirically, the spiritual world must be accepted on faith. The con- 
stant appeal of biblical writers is for people to order their lives by the unseen spir- 
itual realities, even though doing so usually contradicts earthly or human stan- 
dards. 
 
The Sense of Ultimacy 
 
This transcendental stance of the Bible helps to produce two of its most constant 
and distinctive literary qualities. One is the sense of ultimacy with which the Bible 
invests human experience. What in most literature would be portrayed as a purely 
natural occurrence—the birth of a baby, a shower of rain, the daily course of the 
sun—is portrayed in the Bible as being rooted in a divine reality that lends spir- 
itual significance to human and natural events. There is a continual penetration of 
the supernatural into the earthly order. God is a continual actor in human affairs. 
The result is that life becomes filled with meaning, since every event takes on spir- 
itual significance. 
 
The Mystery of the Supernatural 
 
The supernatural slant of the Bible also produces a sense of mystery and wonder. 
By refusing to allow reality to be conceived solely in terms of known, observable 
reality, biblical literature continually transforms the mundane into something with 
sacred significance. As readers we are repeatedly confronted with a sense of the 
mystery of the divine beyond total human understanding. The Bible is a literature 
of mystery and wonder not because it conceals the spiritual but for precisely the 
opposite reason: it reveals the spiritual and thereby challenges the natural human 
tendency to explain life solely in earthly and natural terms. 
 
Preoccupation With History 
 
The theme of the two worlds does not mean that biblical writers take historical 
reality any less seriously. On the contrary, they take it more seriously than is true 
of most of the world’s literature. Biblical literature is firmly embedded in historical 
reality. It constantly claims to be history and has repeatedly been authenticated as 
history by modem archaeology. Compared with the fictional stories of modern 
writers, the storytellers of the Bible seem always to be eager to bring in historical 
facts. Snatches of historical chronicles, diaries, or genealogies are always creeping 
into the stories and poems of the Bible. Of course, the history of the Bible is not 
straightforward factual history. The historical facts are always presented within the 
interpretive framework of God’s dealings with the human race. 
 
Vivid Consciousness of Values 
 
The religious orientation of the Bible also includes the vivid consciousness of val- 
ues that pervades it. Some conception of right and wrong underlies most liter- 
ature, but in the Bible this conception is more sharply defined and more strongly 
held than elsewhere. For biblical writers the issue of what is good and evil is more 
important than anything else. Biblical authors are constantly saying, “This, not 
that.” Biblical literature is similarly pervaded by a conviction that some things 
matter more than others. Ultimate value does not reside in anything or anyone 
apart from its relationship to God, nor can human endeavor be regarded as ulti- 
mately valuable apart from obedience to God. In the Bible, good and evil are 
supreme realities and are the most important issues in people’s lives. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
One of the unifying elements in the Bible is its general sense of life. The prevailing 
attitude or perspective toward life throughout the Bible can only be called reli- 
gious. It manifests itself most markedly in its awareness of supernatural reality 
and divine mystery, its conviction that human life in history is ultimately signif- 
icant, and its vivid consciousness of values. These attitudes become the “air” 
within which biblical literature lives and moves and has its being. 
 
UNIFYING THEMES 
Unity of Subject Matter 
 
Any body of literature can achieve unity on the basis of its topics and themes. If 
individual writers and works share a common subject matter, the literature in- 
evitably begins to create a unified impression in a reader’s mind. This is exactly 
what happens in the Bible. Individual biblical writers tend overwhelmingly to be 
preoccupied with a core of shared concerns. 
 
The Character of God 
 
Dominating everything is the character of God. The question of what God is like 
underlies more biblical passages than does any other concern. The most cus- 
tomary way of answering the question in the Bible is by narrating what God has 
done, but the Psalms, Prophets, Gospels, and New Testament Epistles also 
contain many direct statements about who God is in his inner being. This theme 
of God’s self-revelation is so pervasive in the Bible that nearly every passage will 
provide an answer to the overriding question, What is God like? 
 
The View of People 
 
Balancing this preoccupation with God is a constant concern with people. This is 
not surprising, because the subject of literature is human experience. Most works 
of biblical literature are an implied assertion about human nature and destiny. Re- 
peated themes include the significance of the individual, the importance of the 
individual’s relationship to God and society, the simultaneous physical and 
moral/spiritual make-up of people, moral responsibility, and the capacity to make 
moral and spiritual choices. 
The corresponding questions to ask of the stories, poems, proverbs, and vi- 
sions of the Bible include these: according to this passage, what are people like? 
What are their longings and fears? What values (for example, home, wealth, nature, 
God) are most worthy and least worthy of human pursuit? How can a person achieve 
meaning and happiness in life? 
 
The Divine-Human Relationship 
 
Usually the twin topics of God and people appear together in biblical passages, 
making the theme of the divine-human relationship one of the big ideas of the 
Bible. Roland Frye theorizes that 
 
the pervasive theme of the Bible is the interaction between individuals, soci- 
eties, and God, and one of the pervasive purposes of the Bible is to derive out 
of these interactions a clarification of each of the constituent elements. 
Throughout it is assumed that man cannot understand himself apart from 
God. . . .⁴ 
 
The theme of the divine-human relationship means that the Bible is a continuous 
exploration of people’s inescapable connections with deity and God’s unrelenting 
interest in what people do. The most customary biblical way of portraying this 
relationship is the idea of covenant. 
 
Human Evil and Suffering 
 
Biblical authors write in a painful awareness that the divine-human relationship 
has been disrupted. A literary scholar writes, “From the quantitative point of view, 
three central subjects emerge. . . . This threefold theme is the interest of God in 
man, the wrath of God, and the weakness or rather the wickedness of humanity.’’⁵ 
This is similar to T. R. Henn’s belief that “overriding all else” is “the problem, re- 
stated constantly and from many angles of experience, of evil and suffering.”⁶ 
 
The Acts of God 
 
Another topic that pervades the pages of the Bible is the history of God’s acts—his 
dealings with individual people, with Old Testament Israel, with the New Testa- 
ment church. G. Ernest Wright has popularized the concept of the acts of God as 
the unifying center of the Bible.⁷ These acts fall mainly into the categories of cre- 
ation, redemption or salvation, and judgment. The concept of salvation history 
(discussed above) is virtually synonymous with the theme of the acts of God. 
Whatever designation we use, the theme remains the purposes of God as they 
occur in history. The corresponding question to ask of a given biblical passage is, 
What is the nature of God’s acts? What does or did God do, and for what purpose? 
 
The Acts of People 
 
The concern with what God does is almost always accompanied in the Bible by 
the theme of what people do or ought to do. Human behavior is a constant sub- 
ject of biblical literature. It tends to fall into the dual pattern of virtuous behavior 
and sinful behavior. The Bible moves between the poles of human waywardness 
and human virtue. Using the twin techniques of portraying negative examples of 
vice to avoid and positive examples of virtue to imitate, the Bible presents a uni- 
fied moral vision. This ethical unity of the Bible pervades both the expository parts 
and the literary sections, where it is incarnated in human characters, whether they 
be people actually doing things or the speaker in a lyric poem expressing the inner 
weather of his feelings (which also have moral implications in the Bible). The uni- 
fying moral preoccupation in biblical literature makes these questions relevant to 
most biblical texts: What is typical or characteristic of human behavior? How should 
people behave? In the Bible, description of human behavior is combined with an 
evaluative bias in such a way as to leave the reader with a sense of moral duty—of 
how people ought to live. Ethical duty, moreover, is not pictured as selfexertion 
toward moral perfection but as submission to Goďs law or conformity to his char- 
acter. 
 
Law and Grace 
 
Luther and the Reformers interpreted the Bible through a thematic grid of law and 
gospel that is still useful as a way of seeing the unity of the Bible. In this view, the 
message of a biblical passage is either law or gospel (or both). “Law” is anything 
that exposes human ruin through sin. “Gospel” refers to everything that displays 
people’s restoration through faith in God’s grace. To use Melanchthon’s formula, 
“The law indicates the sickness, the gospel the remedy.” When flexibly applied, 
this framework of human sinfulness and divine grace yields much. Of most bib- 
lical passages we can ask, What does this text say about human sinfulness and/or 
God's grace? 
 
Promise and Fulfillment 
 
The theme of Goďs promises and their fulfillment is also a controlling theme of the 
Bible. T. R. Henn speaks of the Bible’s “two major symphonic movements of 
promise and fulfillment.”⁸ This pattern appears in many forms, small and big, but 
the most important example is the relationship between the Old Testament and 
the New. This relationship has been well summarized by H. H. Rowley: “The Old 
Testament continually looks forward to something beyond itself; the New Testa- 
ment continually looks back to the Old. Neither is complete without something 
beyond itself.”⁹ 
 
Old and New Testaments 
 
The New Testament builds upon the Old, bringing anticipations to fruition. 
Northrop Frye describes this overarching pattern of promise and fulfillment: 
 
There is a very large number of these references to the Old Testament in the 
New: they extend over every book—not impossibly every passage—in the New 
Testament. . . .The general principle of interpretation is traditionally given as 
“In the Old Testament the New Testament is concealed; in the New Testament 
the Old Testament is revealed.” Everything that happens in the Old Testament 
is a “type” or adumbration of something that happens in the New Testament, 
and the whole subject is therefore called typology.¹⁰ 
 
The result is a book in which no part is wholly self-contained but instead carries 
echoes from many other parts. 
 
Unity of Reference 
 
The vast system of interlocking references and allusions is not confined to New Testa- 
ment fulfillments of Old Testament foreshadowings. Biblical writers share a com- 
mon framework of reference. They keep referring to the same core of faith events. 
These events make up the underlying story of the Bible and are arranged into the 
following sequence: Creation, Fall, Covenant (promises of God to the patriarchs 
and Israelite nation), Exodus (including Revelation at Mount Sinai and Conquest 
of Canaan), Israelite Monarchy, Exile and Return, Life and Teaching of Jesus, 
Salvation (accomplished by the Death and Resurrection of Jesus), the Beginnings 
of the Christian Church, Consummation of History. This outline can be either ex- 
panded or telescoped. Northrop Frye divides the biblical story into seven “phases 
of revelation”: Creation, Revolution, Law, Wisdom, Prophecy, Gospel, 
Apocalypse.¹¹ 
This outline by itself imposes a loose unity on the Bible, but a much greater 
degree of cohesion results from the way in which biblical writers so consistently 
refer to this overriding story and its accompanying doctrines. No other long book 
in the world contains the interlocking system of references that have been codified 
in modern Bibles with cross references in the margins. 
 
Unity of Faith 
 
There is, finally, a unity of faith that welds the Bible into an organic whole. The 
Bible is not a theological outline, but the ideas that are stated and embodied in the 
Bible add up to a coherent system of doctrine. This doctrinal framework is a uni- 
fying context within which we should read individual parts. Everywhere we turn in 
the Bible, it is the same God and the same view of people that we encounter. The 
physical world is not considered good in one biblical book and evil in another. Of 
course, no single passage by itself “covers the whole territory” on a given topic. 
Individual parts of the Bible are interdependent. When we put the parts together, 
we find a coherent set of doctrines whose main tenets include consistently held 
views about God, the nature of people, creation (nature, the physical world), 
providence, God’s revelation as the source of truth, good and evil, salvation, and 
eschatology. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
As we read the Bible, we continually encounter a core of topics and themes. They 
include the character and acts of God, human nature and activity, moral good and 
evil, law and grace, promise and fulfillment. Biblical writers frequently refer to the 
same events that make up biblical history, and they share a common set of reli- 
gious beliefs. 
 
LITERARY ARCHETYPES IN THE BIBLE 
A Definition of Archetypes 
 
Literature is a great interlocking system in which we are continuously reminded of 
characters, situations, and symbols that we have encountered in other works of 
literature. These recurrent units are called archetypes. They fall into three cate- 
gories: images (such as light, mountaintop, or prison), character types (such as the 
hero, villain, or tempter), and plot motifs (such as the quest, fall from innocence, 
or rescue). Archetypes are the basic building blocks of the literary imagination. 
When we read literature we are constantly in touch with them. Of course they 
recur in literature because they are pervasive in life. In both literature and life, 
archetypes elicit powerful universal responses from the human psyche. 
 
A Pattern of Opposites 
 
Archetypes tend overwhelmingly to fall into a pattern of opposites. We can label 
the two categories wish and nightmare, or the ideal and unideal, or the good and 
the evil. Together they are a vision of the kind of world that people want and do 
not want. The following table lists the most important archetypal images and char- 
acter types in the Bible, arranged according to the dialectical pattern of opposites. 
 
The Archetypes of Ideal Experience 
The supernatural: God; angels; the heavenly society. 
Human characters: the hero or heroine; the virtuous wife / husband / mother / fa- 
ther; the bride / groom; the innocent child; the benevolent king or ruler; the 
priest; the wiseman; the shepherd; the pilgrim. 
Human relationships: the community, city, or tribe; images of communion, order, 
unity, friendship, love; the wedding or marriage; the feast, meal, or supper; the 
harmonious family; freedom; covenant, contract, or treaty. 
Clothing: any stately garment symbolizing legitimate position or success; festal 
garments such as wedding clothes; fine clothing given as gifts of hospitality; 
white or light colored clothing; clothing of adornment (such as jewels); protec- 
tive clothing such as a warrior’s armor. 
The human body: images of health, strength, vitality, potency, sexual fertility (in- 
cluding womb and seed); feats of strength and dexterity; images of sleep and 
rest; happy dreams; birth. 
Food: staples such as bread, milk, and meat; luxuries such as wine and honey; the 
harvest of grain. 
Animals: a community of domesticated animals, usually a flock of sheep or herd 
of cattle; the lamb; a gentle bird, often a dove; a faithful domesticated animal 
or pet; any animal friendly to people; singing birds; animals or birds noted for 
their strength, such as the lion or eagle; fish. 
Landscape: a garden, grove, or park; the mountaintop or hill; the fertile and secure 
valley; pastoral settings or farms; the safe pathway or easily traveled highway. 
Plants: green grass; the rose; the vineyard; the tree of life; any productive tree; the 
lily; evergreen plants (symbolic of immortality); herbs or plants of healing. 
Buildings: the city; the palace or castle; the military stronghold; the tabernacle, 
temple, or church; the house or home; the tower of contemplation; the capital 
city, symbol of the nation. 
The inorganic world: images of jewels and precious stones, often glowing and fiery; 
fire and brilliant light; burning that purifies and refines; rocks of refuge. 
Water: a river or stream; a spring or fountain; showers of rain; dew; flowing water 
of any type; tranquil pools; water used for cleansing. 
Forces of nature: the breeze or wind; the spring and summer seasons; calm after 
storm; the sun or the lesser light of the moon and stars; light, sunrise, day. 
Sounds: musical harmony; singing; laughter. 
Direction and motion: images of ascent, rising, height (especially the mountaintop 
and tower), motion (as opposed to stagnation). 
 
The Archetypes of Unideal Experience 
The supernatural: Satan; demons or evil spirits; evil beasts and monsters such as 
those in the Book of Revelation; pagan idols. 
Human characters: the villain; the tempter or temptress; the harlot/prostitute; the 
taskmaster, tyrant, or oppressor (usually a foreign oppressor); the wanderer, 
outcast, or exile; the traitor; the sluggard or lazy person; the hypocrite; the false 
religious leader or priest; the fool; the drunkard; the thief. 
Human relationships: tyranny or anarchy; isolation among people; images of tor- 
ture (the cross, stake, scaffold, gallows, stocks, etc.), slavery, or bondage; im- 
ages of war, riot, feud, or family discord. 
Clothing: ill-fitting garments (often symbolic of a position that is usurped and not 
held legitimately); garments symbolizing mourning (such as sackcloth, rent 
garments, dark mourning garments); dark clothes; tattered, dirty, or coarse 
clothing; any clothing that suggests poverty or bondage; a conspicuous excess 
of clothing. 
The human body: images of disease, deformity, barrenness, injury, or mutilation; 
sleeplessness or nightmare, often related to guilt of conscience; death. 
Food: hunger, drought, starvation, cannibalism; poison; drunkenness. 
Animals: monsters or beasts of prey; the wolf (enemy of sheep), tiger, dragon, vul- 
ture, owl (associated with darkness/ignorance), or hawk; the cold and earth- 
bound snake; any wild animal harmful to people; the goat; the unclean animals 
of Old Testament ceremonial law. 
Landscape: the dark forest; the wilderness or wasteland (which is either too hot or 
too cold); the dark and dangerous valley; the underground cave or tomb; the 
labyrinth; the dangerous or evil pathway. 
Plants: the thorn or thistle; weeds; dead or dying plants; unproductive plants; the 
willow tree (symbolic of mourning). 
Buildings: the prison or dungeon; the wicked city of violence, sexual perversion, or 
crime; the tower of imprisonment or wicked aspiration (the tower of Babel); 
pagan temples. 
The inorganic world: the inorganic world in its unworked form of deserts, rocks, 
and wilderness; dry dust or ashes; fire that destroys and tortures instead of 
purifying; rust and decay. 
Water: the sea and all that it contains (sea beasts and water monsters); stagnant 
pools (including the Dead Sea). 
Forces of nature: the storm or tempest; the autumn and winter seasons; sunset, 
darkness, night. 
Sounds: discordant sounds, cacophony, weeping, wailing. 
Direction and motion: images of descent, lowness, stagnation or immobility, suffo- 
cation, confinement. 
 
The Organizing Function of Archetypes 
 
This chart of archetypes outlines the basic “language” of the literary imagination 
throughout the Bible. The list of images and character types is an organizing 
framework for the entire Bible. The unity of the Bible is partly a unity of master im- 
ages. 
 
The One Story of Literature 
 
Archetypes can also consist of plot motifs. In fact, all of literature adds up to a 
single composite story known in literary circles as “the monomyth” (the “one 
story” of literature). The monomyth, which should not be confused with “mythol- 
ogy,” is shaped like a circle and has four separate phases. As such, it corresponds 
to some familiar cycles of human experience. The cycle of the year, for example, 
consists of the sequence summer-fall-winter-spring. A day moves through a cycle 
consisting of sunrise-zenith-sunset-darkness. A person’s life passes from birth to 
adulthood to old age to death. The monomyth, too, is a cycle having four phases. 
We can picture the “one story” of literature like this: 
 
Romance portrays idealized human experience—life as we wish it to be. Its oppo- 
site, anti-romance, pictures a world of bondage and misery. Tragedy narrates a fall 
downward from bliss to catastrophe, while comedy narrates a rise from bondage 
to happiness and freedom. These are the four kinds of literary material, and to- 
gether they make up the composite story of literature. It is easy to see how the two 
categories of archetypal images and character types noted above make up the 
upper and lower halves of the monomyth. 
 
Archetypal Plot Motifs 
 
The monomyth is the most general or universal A pattern to be found in literature. 
The circular Motifs pattern of the monomyth takes a number of specific forms, in- 
cluding the following: 
1. The quest, in which a hero struggles to reach a goal, undergoing obstacles 
and temporary defeat before achieving success (Abraham’s quest for a son and 
Ruth’s quest for a home). 
2. The death-rebirth motif¦ in which a hero endures death or danger and returns 
to life or security (the stories of Hezekiah and Jesus). 
3. The initiation, in which a character is thrust out of an existing, usually ideal, 
situation and undergoes a series of ordeals as he or she encounters various forms 
of evil or hardship for the first time (the stories of Jacob and Joseph). 
4. The journey, in which characters encounter danger and experience growth as 
they move from one place to another (the stories of Abraham and the Exodus). 
5. Tragedy, or its more specific form of the fall from innocence, (the stories of 
Adam/Eve and David/Bathsheba). 
6. Comedy, a U-shaped story that begins in prosperity, descends into tragedy, 
but rises to a happy ending as obstacles to success are overcome (the stories of 
Esther and Job). 
7. Crime and punishment (the stories of Cain and King Saul). 
8. The temptation, in which someone becomes the victim of an evil tempter or 
temptress (the stories of Eve and Samson/Delilah). 
9. The rescue (the stories of Esther and of Elisha at Dothan). 
10. The suffering servant or scapegoat pattern, in which a character undergoes 
unmerited suffering in order to secure the welfare of others (the stories of Joseph 
and Jesus). 
 
Type Scenes 
 
In addition to archetypal plot motifs, there are type scenes (not to be confused 
with types or typology) in the Bible. A type scene is a story pattern or situation that 
recurs often enough in the Bible that we can identify a set of conventions and 
expectations for each one. Each type scene has its constituent ingredients in an 
established order. An awareness of such type scenes can become a significant 
organizing pattern for either individual books of the Bible or the Bible as a whole. 
 
Type Scenes in the Book of Acts 
 
In the Book of Acts, for example, the following cycle of events keeps getting re- 
peated: God raises up leaders who preach the Gospel; they perform mighty works; 
crowds are drawn and many hearers are converted; opposition and persecution 
arise against the leaders; God intervenes to rescue them; and on to a new reen- 
actment of the cycle.¹² Other type scenes also unify the Book of Acts—preaching 
the gospel, conversion stories, and trial/defense scenes. 
 
Type Scenes Throughout the Bible 
 
Such type scenes occur throughout the Bible. Robert Alter cites the Old Testament 
examples of “the annunciation . . . of the birth of the hero to his barcen mother; 
the encounter with the future betrothed at a well; the epiphany in the field; the ini- 
tiatory trial; danger in the desert and the discovery of a well or other source of 
sustenance; the testament of the dying hero.”¹³ The type scene that dominates the 
story of the Exodus is the situation that unfolds according to this sequence: cri- 
sis—com-plaint by the people—call to God by Moses—divine rescue/provision— 
reve-tion or rebuke by God. The Gospels have their distinctive type scenes: heal- 
ing stories, pronouncement stories, preaching to the crowds, encounter stories, 
Passion stories. Each biblical type scene consists of a set of conventional ele- 
ments, usually in a set order. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
The Bible is not a collection of isolated fragments. It is a vast system of recurring 
images, character types, plot motifs, and type scenes. As we read a given biblical 
passage, we are reminded of other similar material elsewhere in the Bible. In this 
process, the Bible assumes a remarkable unity in our thinking. 
 
UNIFYING STYLISTIC TRAITS 
The Bible is written in a rich variety of styles. In the midst of all the variety, 
however, certain stylistic tendencies help to give the Bible a discernible literary 
unity. There are, of course, numerous passages that do not fit the generalizations I 
am about to note, but the very fact that we think of these as exceptions proves the 
validity of the general rules that scholars have attributed to the Bible’s style. 
 
Concrete Rather Than Abstract 
 
The biblical tendency toward the concrete is well known. There are many great ab- 
stractions in the Bible (including the Psalms), but in general the biblical writers 
show a concern for things rather than ideas. God is portrayed as light and rock 
and thunder. Wealth is visible and tangible. So are human emotions. Even the 
prose sections of the Bible resemble poetry in their reliance on concrete images. 
 
Realism 
 
The Bible is a realistic book. Its characters and settings are predominantly 
nonaristocratic (unlike other ancient literature). The Bible, writes Erich Auerbach, 
“engenders a new elevated style, which does not scorn everyday life and which is 
ready to absorb the sensorily realistic, even the ugly, the undignified, the physi- 
cally base.’’¹⁴ The Bible also portrays the flaws of even its best characters. 
 
Simplicity 
 
The style of the Bible is marked by simplicity. Its characteristic imagery comes 
from daily life. Its narrative style is plain and unembellished, with only the essen- 
tial details included. Shakespeare has a vocabulary of more than fifteen thousand 
words and Milton thirteen thousand, while the King James Bible has a vocabulary 
of about six thousand different words.¹⁵ The biblical imagination also operates 
with simplified dichotomies, such as light and darkness, good and evil, heroes 
and villains, the tiny nation against its overpowering enemies. “The simplicity of 
the Bible,’’ writes Northrop Frye, “is the simplicity of majesty. . . ; its simplicity ex- 
presses the voice of authority.’’¹⁶ 
 
Elemental Quality 
 
The Bible is par excellence the book of elemental human experience. It depicts what 
is true for all people in all times and places. In the words of John Livingston 
Lowes, “the Biblical vocabulary is compact of the primal stuff of our common 
humanity—of its universal emotional, sensory experiences.”¹⁷ Someone else has 
expressed it thus: 
 
The themes of the Bible are simple and primary. Life is reduced to a few basic 
activities—fighting, farming, a strong sexual urge, and intermittent worship. . . 
.We confront basic virtues and primitive vices. . . .The world these persons in- 
habit is stripped and elemental—sea, desert, the stars, the wind, storm, sun, 
clouds, and moon, seedtime and harvest. . . . Occupation has this elementary 
quality also.¹⁸ 
 
Brevity 
 
The Bible displays a preference for brevity over length. Biblical writers overwhelm- 
ingly work with brief units that are relatively self-contained. Individual episodes in 
stories from Genesis through the Gospels are almost never elaborated at length. 
The characters in these stories are illuminated by momentary flashes of heroism 
or evil or courage and so forth. When we move from the stories of the Bible to 
other genres, the forms are consistently brief ones: lyric, song, parable, proverb, 
prophetic vision, letter. The aphoristic, or proverbial, style of the Bible is a further 
evidence of this preference for conciseness and economy. The Bible is therefore a 
vast collection of concentrated moments of epiphany, “a series of ecstatic mo- 
ments or points of expanding apprehension,” as Northrop Frye calls it.¹⁹ 
 
Repetition 
 
All of literature relies on various forms of repetition, but the Bible has even more 
of it than most literature, probably because so much of the Bible was originally 
oral literature. In poetry this urge for repetition takes the form of parallelism and 
rhetorical patterns. There is an equal abundance of repetition in the stories of the 
Bible, Jesus’ parables and discourses, and the Epistles.²⁰ 
 
The Spoken Word 
 
The style of the Bible is an oral style. The prevalence of dialogue in biblical narra- 
tive is unique in ancient literature.²¹ But the Bible is everywhere filled with voices 
speaking and replying. To read the Bible well is to become a listener, either literally 
or in one’s imagination. 
 
Affective Power 
 
The style of the Bible is predominantly affective. It moves us as well as appealing 
to our reason. It convinces us by evoking a response from us. The characteristic 
(though not exclusive) biblical way of conducting an argument is to repeat the 
main point so often that we feel or experience the truth of the assertion. The sto- 
ries and parables of the Bible force us to respond to characters and events. The 
poems and oratory and Epistles are impassioned. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
The style of the Bible is uniquely powerful and beautiful. It can be parodied but 
never duplicated. The elements that make the Bible the most expressive book in 
the world include concreteness, realism, simplicity, an elemental quality, brevity, 
repetition, emphasis on the spoken word, and affective power. 
 
Further Reading 
The strength of Northrop Frye’s The Great Code is the way in which it leaves a 
reader with a unified impression of the whole Bible. The best short introduction to 
the literary unity of the Bible is Roland M. Frye, “Introduction” to The Bible: Selec- 
tions from the King James Version for Study as Literature (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 
1965; reprint, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977), pp. ix-xxxix. Volume 5 
(1951) of Interpretation contains numerous still-useful articles on the unity of the 
Bible. The sources cited in the footnotes to chapter 12 also have good additional 
comments on the topic. 
A wealth of good generalizations about the style of the Bible has been gathered 
by D. G. Kehl, ed., Literary Style of the Old Bible and the New (Indianapolis: Bobbs- 
Merrill, 1970). 
 
 
¹Introduction to The Bible: Selections from the King James Version for Study as 
Literature (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965), xvi. 
²C. S. Lewis, The Literary Impact of the Authorized Version (Philadelphia: 
Fortress 1963), 32-33. 
³Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, 
trans. Willard R. Trask (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953, 1968), 14-15. 
⁴Roland Frye, Introduction, xvi. 
⁵Howard Mumford Jones, “The Bible from a Literary Point of View,” in Five Es- 
says on the Bible (New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1960), 52. 
⁶The Bible as Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970), 257. 
⁷See especially God Who Acts: Biblical Theology as Recital (Chicago: Henry Reg- 
nery, 1952). 
⁸Henn, Bible as Literature, 21. Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Toward an Old Testament 
Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978), 20–40, elaborates the same theme. 
⁹The Unity of the Bible (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1953), 99. 
¹⁰The Great Code: The Bible and Literature (New York: Harcourt Brace Jo- 
vanovich, 1982), 79. 
¹¹Ibid., 105–38. 
¹²M. D. Goulder, Type and History in Acts (London: S.P.C.K., 1964), organizes 
the entire Book of Acts around this type scene. 
¹³The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 51. 
¹⁴Mimesỉs, 12. 
¹⁵Cỉeỉand B. McAfee, The Greatest English Classic (New York: Harper and 
Brothers, 1912), 105. 
¹⁶The Great Code, 211. 
¹⁷“The Noblest Monument of English Prose,” in Literary Style of the Old Bible 
and the New, ed. D. G. Kehl (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970), 9. 
¹⁸Jones, “The Bible,” 52–53. 
¹⁹Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), 326. 
²⁰Good sources to consult as a starting point on repetition include James 
Muilenburg, “A Study in Hebrew Rhetoric: Repetition and Style,” Vet us Testa- 
mentum Supplements 1 (1953): 97–111; Robert C. Tannehill, The Sword of His Mouth 
(Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975); Jacob Licht, Storytelling in the Bible (Jerusalem: 
Magnes, 1978), 51–95; and Alter, Art of Biblical Narrative, 88–113. 
²¹See Auerbach, Mimesis, 46; Alter, Art of Biblical Narrative, 63–87; and Amos 
N. Wilder, Early Christian Rhetoric (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), 
40–54.