Showing posts with label Rodney Stark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rodney Stark. Show all posts

2021/07/26

The Rise of Christianity -Rodney Stark, Wikipedia

The Rise of Christianity - Wikipedia

The Rise of Christianity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from The Rise of Christianity (book))
Jump to navigationJump to search
The Rise of Christianity
The Rise of Christianity.jpg
AuthorRodney Stark
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Harper San Francisco
Publication date
13 May 1996[1]
9 May 1997
Media typeprint hard-cover (and 1997 paperback[2])
Pages256
272
ISBN978-0691027494

The Rise of Christianity (subtitled either A Sociologist Reconsiders History or How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries, depending on the edition), is a book by the sociologist Rodney Stark, which examines the rise of Christianity, from a small movement in Galilee and Judea at the time of Jesus to the majority religion of the Roman Empire a few centuries later.

Summary[edit source]

Stark argues that contrary to popular belief, Christianity was not a movement of the lower classes and the oppressed but instead of the upper and middle classes in the cities and of Hellenized Jews. Stark also discusses the exponential nature of the growth of religion.

Stark points to a number of advantages that Christianity had over paganism to explain its growth:

  • While others fled cities, Christians stayed in urban areas during plague, ministering and caring for the sick.
  • Christian populations grew faster because of the prohibition of birth controlabortion and infanticide. Since infanticide tended to affect female newborn more frequently, early Christians had a more even sex ratio and therefore a higher percentage of childbearing women than pagans.
  • To the same effect: Women were valued higher and allowed to participate in worship leading to a high rate of female converts.
  • In a time of two epidemics (165 CE and 251 CE) which killed up to a third of the whole population of the Roman Empire each time, the Christian message of redemption through sacrifice offered a more satisfactory explanation of why bad things happen to innocent people. Further, the tighter social cohesion and mutual help made them able to better cope with the disasters, leaving them with fewer casualties than the general population. This would also be attractive to outsiders, who would want to convert. Lastly, the epidemics left many non-Christians with a reduced number of interpersonal bonds, making the forming of new ones both necessary and easier.
  • Christians did not fight against their persecutors by open violence or guerrilla warfare but willingly went to their martyrdom while praying for their captors, which added credibility to their evangelism.

Stark's basic thesis is that, ultimately, Christianity triumphed over paganism because it improved the quality of life of its adherents at that time.

Reception[edit source]

"Stark has produced a provocative, insightful, challenging account of the rise of Christianity. The thesis—that Christianity was a success because it provided those who joined it with a more appealing, more assuring, happier, and perhaps longer life—may anger many readers and force all readers to stop and think. It is a marvelous exercise in the sociological imagination and a warning to those who like simple explanations--such as that Constantine was ultimately responsible for the success of Christianity when he made it the official religion of the Roman Empire" (Andrew M. GreeleyNational Opinion Research CenterUniversity of Chicago).[3]

"For years, biblical scholars and church historians have used sociological jargon to promote ideological views. Now an established sociologist has entered the fray with devastating results. This brilliant and highly provocative book will revolutionize the way people think about both biblical studies and church history. Love it or hate it, Rodney Stark's The Rise of Christianity is a book nobody interested in the study of religion can ignore" (Irving HexhamUniversity of Calgary).[3]

In the media[edit source]

This book prominently featured within the storyline of Hidden Empire by Orson Scott Card, according to the book's afterword, and The Rise of Christianity even inspired the book's plot.[4]

See also[edit source]

References[edit source]

  1. ^ Rodney Stark. Rise of Christianity; Textbooks.com.
  2. ^ Rodney Stark. Rise of Christianity; Amazon.com.
  3. Jump up to:a b Rodney StarkThe Rise of Christianity. San Francisco: Princeton University Press & Harper. back cover. ISBN 978-0060677015.
  4. ^ Orson Scott CardHidden EmpireThe Empire Duet. St Martin's/Tor. ISBN 978-0-7653-2004-9.

Rodney Stark - Wikipedia On the growth of Christianity

Rodney Stark - Wikipedia

Rodney Stark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rodney Stark
Born
Rodney William Stark

July 8, 1934 (age 87)
Academic background
Alma mater
ThesisPolice Riots (1971)
Academic work
Discipline
Sub-discipline
Institutions
Notable works
Notable ideasStark–Bainbridge theory of religion
InfluencedDana Evan Kaplan
Websitewww.rodneystark.com Edit this at Wikidata

Rodney William Stark (born July 8, 1934) is an American sociologist of religion who was a longtime professor of sociology and of comparative religion at the University of Washington. He is presently the Distinguished Professor of the Social Sciences at Baylor University, co-director of the university's Institute for Studies of Religion, and founding editor of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion.[1]

Stark has written over 30 books, including The Rise of Christianity (1996), and more than 140 scholarly articles on subjects as diverse as prejudice, crime, suicide, and city life in ancient Rome.[2] He has twice won the Distinguished Book Award from the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, for The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival, and Cult Formation (1985, with William Sims Bainbridge), and for The Churching of America 1776–1990 (1992, with Roger Finke).[3]

Early life and education[edit source]

Stark was born on July 8, 1934,[3][4] and grew up in JamestownNorth Dakota, in a Lutheran family. He spent time in the United States Army, before graduating in journalism from the University of Denver in 1959. He worked as a journalist for the Oakland Tribune from 1959 until 1961, then pursued graduate work, obtaining his MA in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1965 and his PhD, also from Berkeley, in 1971.[1]

Career and research[edit source]

Positions held[edit source]

After completing his PhD, Stark held appointments as a research sociologist at the Survey Research Center and at the Center for the Study of Law and Society. After teaching as Professor of Sociology and of Comparative Religion at the University of Washington for 32 years, Stark moved to Baylor University in 2004, where he is co-director of the Institute for Studies of Religion.[2] He is an advocate of the application of the rational choice theory in the sociology of religion, which he calls the theory of religious economy.[3]

Stark–Bainbridge theory of religion[edit source]

During the late 1970s and 1980s, Stark worked with William Sims Bainbridge on the Stark–Bainbridge theory of religion,[3] and co-wrote the books The Future of Religion (1985) and A Theory of Religion (1987) with Bainbridge. Nowadays their theory, which aims to explain religious involvement in terms of rewards and compensators, is seen as a precursor of the more explicit recourse to economic principles in the study of religion as later developed by Laurence Iannaccone and others.[5][6]

Criticism of secularization theories[edit source]

Stark has been one of the most vocal critics of theories of secularization. In 1999, he published an article entitled “Secularization, R.I.P.”[7] that became both famous and controversial.[8] He expanded his theory in subsequent works, claiming that statistical data does not support the theory of a decline of religion in modern societies. Although it is true that the forms and practices of religion change, the idea of a decline called “secularization,” Stark argued, derives from faulty quantitative analysis and ideological preconceptions.[9]

On the growth of Christianity[edit source]

Stark has proposed in The Rise of Christianity that Christianity grew through gradual individual conversions via social networks of family, friends and colleagues. His main contribution, by comparing documented evidence of Christianity's spread in the Roman Empire with the history of the LDS church in the 19th and 20th centuries, was to illustrate that a sustained and continuous growth could lead to huge growth within 200 years. This use of exponential growth as a driver to explain the growth of the church without the need for mass conversions (deemed necessary by historians until then) is now widely accepted.

Stark has suggested that Christianity grew because it treated women better than pagan religions. He also suggested that making Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire weakened the faithfulness of the Christian community by bringing in people who did not really believe or had a weaker belief. This is consistent with Stark's published observations of contemporary religious movements, where once-successful faith movements gradually decline in fervor due to the free rider problem.

Criticism of anti-Catholicism[edit source]

While not a Roman Catholic himself, Stark believes that anti-Catholicism is still a dominant force in the American media and the academia. Particularly in his book Bearing False Witness (2016), he has argued that an anti-Catholic prejudice has poisoned the historical debate on the Crusades, the Inquisition and the relations of Pope Pius XII with Nazism, creating an "anti-Catholic history" that is at odds with contemporary academic research, yet is still taught in schools and promoted by mainline media.[10]

On the theory of evolution[edit source]

In 2004 The American Enterprise, an online publication of the American Enterprise Institute, published an article by Stark, "Facts, Fable and Darwin", critical of the stifling of debate on evolution. Stark criticized the "Darwinian Crusade" and their "tactic of claiming that the only choice is between Darwin and Bible literalism." Though not a creationist himself, he believes that though "the theory of evolution is regarded as the invincible challenge to all religious claims, it is taken for granted among the leading biological scientists that the origin of species has yet to be explained." He suggests that governments "lift the requirement that high school texts enshrine Darwin's failed attempt as an eternal truth."[11]

Personal religious faith[edit source]

In their 1987 book A Theory of Religion, Stark and Bainbridge describe themselves as "personally incapable of religious faith".[12] While reluctant to discuss his own religious views, he stated in a 2004 interview that he was not a man of faith, but also not an atheist.[13] In a 2007 interview, after accepting an appointment at Baylor University, Stark indicated that his self-understanding had changed and that he could now be described as an "independent Christian." In this interview Stark recollects that he has "always been a 'cultural' Christian" understood by him as having "been strongly committed to Western Civilization." Of his previous positions he wrote: "I was never an atheist, but I probably could have been best described as an agnostic."[14]

Selected works[edit source]

Books[edit source]

Articles[edit source]

See also[edit source]

Notes[edit source]

  1. Jump up to:a b Curriculum vitae, Baylor University.
  2. Jump up to:a b "Rodney Stark"Baylor University. 15 March 2013.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d André Nauta, "Stark, Rodney"Encyclopedia of Religion and Society, 1998.
  4. ^ "Stark, Rodney"Encyclopedia.
  5. ^ Alan E. Aldridge (2000). Religion in the contemporary world: A sociological introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 95–97. ISBN 9780745620831.
  6. ^ David Lehmann, "Rational Choice and the Sociology of Religion", in Bryan S. Turner (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 181–200.
  7. ^ Stark, Rodney, “Secularization, R.I.P.”, Sociology of Religion, vol. 60, 1999, pp. 249–273.
  8. ^ Gonçalves, Arnaldo M., “Why Is Stark Wrong on His Criticism of the Secularization Theory?”, SSRN, January 29, 2016.
  9. ^ Zielińska, Katarzyna, “Concepts of religion in debates on secularisation”Approaching Religion,vol. 3, no. 1, 2013, pp. 25–35.
  10. ^ CORKERY, Ann, “A Baptist Scholar Debunks Anti-Catholic Historical Hogwash”, ‘’National Review, July 25, 2016.
  11. ^ Rodney Stark, "Fact, Fable, and Darwin"The American Enterprise, September 2004.
  12. ^ Lehmann, p. 183.
  13. ^ Stark Archived 2013-10-29 at the Wayback Machine, JKNIRP, The National Institute for the Renewal of the Priesthood, 2004.
  14. ^ "A Christmas conversation with Rodney Stark". Center for Studies on New Religions. 25 December 2007.
  15. ^ James T. Richardson (1998). "New Religious Movements"Encyclopedia of Religion and Society.

Further reading[edit source]