The World's Religions (Plus) Paperback – May 12, 2009
by Huston Smith (Author)
4.5 out of 5 stars 1,091 ratings
#1 Best Seller in History of Islam
See all formats and editions
Paperback
AUD 14.29
101 Used from AUD 3.89
36 New from AUD 16.14
448 pages
May 12, 2009
===
====
Editorial Reviews
From the Back Cover
Huston Smith's masterpiece explores the essential elements and teachings of the world's predominant faiths, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and the native traditions of Australia, Africa, Oceania, and the Americas.
Emphasizing the inner—rather than the institutional—dimension of these religions, Smith devotes special attention to Zen and Tibetan Buddhism, Sufism, and the teachings of Jesus. He convincingly conveys the unique appeal and gifts of each of the traditions and reveals their hold on the human heart and imagination.
About the Author
Huston Smith is internationally known and revered as the premier teacher of world religions. He is the focus of a five-part PBS television series with Bill Moyers and has taught at Washington University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Syracuse University, and the University of California at Berkeley. The recipient of twelve honorary degrees, Smith's fifteen books include his bestselling The World's Religions, Why Religion Matters, and his autobiography, Tales of Wonder.
--------------------
Publisher : HarperOne; 2nd edition (May 12, 2009)
Language : English
Paperback : 448 pages
------------
Customer Reviews: 4.5 out of 5 stars 1,091 ratings
Huston Smith
Follow
Biography
Huston Cummings Smith (born May 31, 1919) is among the preeminent religious studies scholars in the United States. His work, The Religions of Man (later revised and retitled The World's Religions), is a classic in the field, with over two million copies sold, and it remains a common introduction to comparative religion.
Smith was born in Soochow, China, to Methodist missionaries and spent his first 17 years there. He taught at the Universities of Colorado and Denver from 1944 to 1947, moved to Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, for the next 10 years, and then served as professor of Philosophy at MIT from 1958 to 1973. While at MIT, he participated in some of the experiments with entheogens that professor Timothy Leary conducted at Harvard University. Smith then moved to Syracuse University, where he was Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Philosophy until his retirement in 1983 and current emeritus status. He now lives in the Berkeley, California, area where he is Visiting Professor of Religious Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
During his career, Smith not only studied but also practiced Vedanta Hinduism, Zen Buddhism (under Goto Zuigan), and Sufism for over 10 years each. He is a notable autodidact.
As a young man, of his own volition after suddenly turning to mysticism, Smith set out to meet with then-famous author Gerald Heard. Heard responded to Smith's letter, invited him to Trabuco College (later donated as the Ramakrishna Monastery) in Southern California, and then sent him off to meet the legendary Aldous Huxley. So began Smith's experimentation with meditation and his association with the Vedanta Society in Saint Louis under the auspices of Swami Satprakashananda of the Ramakrishna order.
Via the connection with Heard and Huxley, Smith eventually experimented with Timothy Leary and others at the Center for Personality Research, of which Leary was research professor. The experience and history of that era are captured somewhat in Smith's book Cleansing the Doors of Perception. In this period, Smith joined in on the Harvard Project as well, in an attempt to raise spiritual awareness through entheogenic plants.
He has been a friend of the XIVth Dalai Lama for more than 40 years, and has met and talked to some of the great figures of the century, from Eleanor Roosevelt to Thomas Merton.
Smith developed an interest in the Traditionalist School formulated by Rene Guenon and Ananda Coomaraswamy. This interest has become a continuing thread in all his writings.
In 1996 Bill Moyers devoted a five-part PBS special to Smith's life and work: The Wisdom of Faith with Huston Smith. Smith has also produced three series for public television:
- The Religions of Man,
- The Search for America, and (with Arthur Compton)
- Science and Human Responsibility.
His films on Hinduism, Tibetan Buddhism, and Sufism have all won awards at international film festivals. His latest DVD release is The Roots of Fundamentalism—A Conversation with Huston Smith and Phil Cousineau.
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
---------------
Top reviews from the United States
Mark Canter
5.0 out of 5 stars Unsurpassed. A classic that well-deserves its high status.
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2015
in 2009 I wrote a letter to Huston Smith telling him that in my teens I had taken a course on world religions at Boston University and the professor had used as textbook Smith’s “The Religions of Man” (now titled “The World’s Religions”). I told Smith that I had recently become an adjunct professor of world religions at FSU and that after examining a dozen textbooks I could not find one that came even close to the beauty and understanding Smith conveys in clear and eloquent prose in “The World’s Religions.” Therefore, I chose to use his book as the textbook for all my comparative religion classes. Smith wrote back that my letter had arrived on his 90th birthday and he said, "I couldn’t have asked for a better birthday present!”
389 people found this helpful
--
Jeremy David Stevens
5.0 out of 5 stars I don’t see how you could pass on this book
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2018
Verified Purchase
“Six aspects of religion surface so regularly as to suggest that their seeds are in the human makeup.” (Chapter III, p. 92 50th Anniversary Edition)
I actually found that sentence buried in the chapter on Buddhism, as a short setup for a line of reasoning much less important than I thought such a statement merited. There’s so much to unpack in such a short sentence like that one that it’s hard to move past it and keep reading. An assertion like that really needs its own chapter.
So there are two elements to this statement. The first is the six aspects, and that is fairly straight forward (although the author goes on to assert that Buddhism is a rarity in that it doesn’t initially embrace such concepts).
These are the six aspects of religion that surface regularly, according to Huston Smith:
Authority
Ritual
Speculation
Tradition
Grace
Mystery
I’ll accept the six aspects as they are so we can move to the second element of the assertion. These six key aspects “surface so regularly as to suggest that their seeds are in the human makeup.” This second element is where it really gets interesting for me. In other words, the implication is that we come right out of the package psychologically pre-programmed with these archetypal ideas. This a concept that I’ve been looking into for a number of months now while reading Carl Jung and Jordan B. Peterson and I’ve come to accept it as the truth. In fact, Huston Smith cites Jung several times throughout the book, so it’s not surprising that he’d been reading some of Jung’s work to come to a conclusion like that.
Look for other flashes of brilliance like that throughout the book.
Just in case you read this in hopes of an actual book review, I guess I can do that, too:
The World’s Religions by Huston Smith is considered a classic in the genre by many. It’s such a respected book that it’s often used as a university textbook in World Religion classes. But this book does more than present the history and spirit of the major religions as you might expect from the title and some of the reviews. There are some very sophisticated and thoughtful parts of the book, too.
I want to quickly address a criticism I’ve seen while looking through reviews: If you have a version that contains pictures and only a couple hundred pages, you have the abridged, illustrated version instead of the full book. I haven’t seen inside of that one but no wonder you have complaints about the sections being too brief. Do yourself a favor and go buy the genuine article. It’s over four-hundred pages and it’s quite thorough.
Final say: Overall, I don’t see how you could pass on this book if you’re the least bit interested in religion or philosophy.
RIP Huston Smith
Born: May 31, 1919
Died: December 30, 2016
39 people found this helpful
Chris
3.0 out of 5 stars Beware of possible fakes?
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2019
Verified Purchase
I received a copy from Amazon directly with really poor print quality. Strange issue. The cover was blurry, and the inside text was as well. I also realized once I grabbed another copy locally and looked at lots of copys, the cover's words "The World's Religions" is supposed to be raised / embossed. Mine was totally flat.
The book itself (I returned the Amazon copy) is fantastic though, so not sure if to give 1 or 5 stars.
Customer imageCustomer imageCustomer image
15 people found this helpful
---
Ana Muñoz
1.0 out of 5 stars An Altered Perspective on Religion
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2020
Verified Purchase
This man like to hear the sound of his own voice. But I would not be writing to say DO NOT BUY THIS BOOK if you want a HISTORICALLY ACCURATE view on religion. Smith says it right in the beginning of the book that this is HIS TAKE ON RELIGION.
Basically, he strips any accuracy and preciseness of the history of all the religions in this book and gives you a flowery, mind-numbing version of him waxing poetic about how great they are. He skims over any details and conflicts that may have helped to shape this religion, if not neglecting them at all.
Again, DO NOT BUY THIS BOOK IF YOU WANT AN UNADULTERATED, UNFILTERED, AND ACCURATE BOOK ON RELIGION.
11 people found this helpful
---
MSD
5.0 out of 5 stars Moving and insightful
Reviewed in the United States on October 25, 2019
Verified Purchase
I bought this as a textbook (I'm a professor) but reread it throughout the semester to refresh my memory and get excited to teach each new chapter. It's not a traditional textbook, so students get frustrated with not being able to find a tidy list of facts. However, Smith tries to convey what is truly meaningful and beautiful about each religion, and I think he does a good job of it. And I think that's more important than memorizing history or doctrinal details.
12 people found this helpful
John
4.0 out of 5 stars Great book but why no audiobook
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2019
Verified Purchase
I love the book, but I struggle why this has not even been turned into an audio book. There is an audiobook that is similar in nature, but it does not do the justice that is found in this book. With having a 2 hour drive to work each day, this would be a blessing to have for this book. I have found myself coming back to this book over and over again as it has so much in it. Just wish it would be offered in an audio book format.
10 people found this helpful
NavyMom
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazingly detailed explanation of many world religions
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2018
Verified Purchase
This book was exactly what I was looking for. Mr. Smith doesn't just cover the basics and move on. He goes into great depth about each religion discussed. I am leading a study group on world religions, and this book is so full of information I don't have time to use it all. Well written and very readable.
8 people found this helpful
Amazon Customer
2.0 out of 5 stars Informative but....
Reviewed in the United States on July 4, 2020
Verified Purchase
This book is very informative but wordy as hell. I swear I've never disliked a person by just reading a book. It's like Smith decided to find the most complicated words in the world and combine them with unnecessary long dry passages about things that could have been said in a simple sentence. I love religious studies, yet this book make me want to jump off a cliff and meet my maker for real. This book tops the list of the worst college textbooks I've ever had the displeasure of meeting. This book should have its own SparkNotes page!!... Save yourself the headache and read Van Voorst instead.
One person found this helpful
Kindle Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Perfect For My Philospher Hubby
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 30, 2020
Verified Purchase
My deep thinking husband loves philosophy and is self-taught on all the greats. Slogging through Nietzsche and Socrates is his idea of fun. He recently shifted into religions and has really been enjoying studying Asian and Indian religions. I bought him this book as a surprise present to give him more material to chew on. As I hoped, he LOVES it and has barely been able to put it down since I gave it to him a couple of days ago. Instead of giving a history lesson on how the major world religions came to be, this author focuses on the ways various religions attempt to satisfy the longings and concerns of the human soul. I chose this book because I like the author's focus on spiritual principles. I also like the fact that, like my husband, this author seems capable of recognizing and appreciating the kernels of Divine wisdom that all religions have to offer. Once you know who God is, you are able to see Him at work everywhere instead of getting stuck in the idea that there is only one "right" religion. My husband and I have come to the conclusion that there is no perfect religion--instead, they each have their strengths and shortcomings. I really enjoy hearing my husband's summaries of what he's gleaning from this book and would highly recommend for any serious thinkers who are open to seeing God working in a "big picture" kind of way. I also really like how this author discusses some of the less common religions in the final chapter of this book--that was a very nice bonus.
Read less
4 people found this helpful
ujidweller
5.0 out of 5 stars This book contains essential knowledge for anyone involved in intercultural relations.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 18, 2019
Verified Purchase
This book has been not just informative but very useful for negotiating past potential misunderstandings between people of different backgrounds.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Zazoo
1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of money and time.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 9, 2020
Verified Purchase
Not interesting, biased opinion and not appealing to read.
Report abuse
Ruud Wagenaar
5.0 out of 5 stars extended but a lttle bit complex
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 3, 2013
Verified Purchase
As technical non-native english reader I faced many new words in English and it increased my vocabulary. I like the perspective in how this book is written, it has sometimes a narrativestyle, but is also gives a thorough background on the roots of our word religions. I find it impressive how many different religions we have on our planet and on theit own they describe their own path to enlightment. A must have for your collection if you are interested in belief systems and consciousness developments of humans.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Richard Dryden
5.0 out of 5 stars A memorable book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 19, 2015
Verified Purchase
This is a superb book - beautifully written and informative. It is a distillation of a lifetime's exploration of the major world religions.
Report abuse
====
Grace
Aug 08, 2012Grace rated it really liked it
Shelves: books-to-read-again
I picked up this book thinking that this would be a good refresher, after all I'm a worldly woman who knows so much about other religions! Right? Yeah, I'm embarrassed about how smug that sounds, too. After perusing (in the truly correct use of that word) its pages, I honestly cannot believe how little I knew. And to be completely honest, I am still struggling to grasp all of the information presented by Smith.
This book is amazing. Smith readily admits that his work is not comprehensive (and really, how could it be?), but what I really appreciated was how effectively he ties in the history of each religion with its spirit. He delves into the core beliefs of each major religion, beginning with Hinduism and ending with Christianity, with a chapter at the end on the primal religions.
His parting advice to us is simply to listen. That in listening we are communicating, and in communicating we are loving. It doesn't get more beautiful than that.
It took me much longer to read than I initially assumed it would, so give yourself some time. But it was totally worth it, and I will read it again. (less)
flag31 likes · Like · 3 comments · see review
Tim
Jul 08, 2015Tim rated it it was amazing
Shelves: religion-comparative
I hope to have time to reflect more on this one in writing. For now, a quote:
"But we also listen to the faith of others, including the secularists. We listen first because, as this book opened by noting, our times require it. The community today can be no single tradition; it is the planet. Daily the world grows smaller, leaving understanding the only place where peace can find a home. We are not prepared for the annihilation of distance that science has effected. Who today stands ready to accept the solemn equality of peoples? Who does not have to fight an unconscious tendency to equate foreign with inferior? ...Those who listen work for peace, a peace built not on ecclesiastical or political hegemonies but on understanding and mutual concern...Understanding, then, can lead to love. But the reverse is also true. Love brings understanding; the two are reciprocal. So we must listen to understand, but we must also listen to put into play the compassion that the wisdom traditions all enjoin, for it is impossible to love another without hearing that other." (390) (less)
flag14 likes · Like · comment · see review
Paul
Dec 19, 2009Paul rated it it was ok · review of another edition
Shelves: comparative-religions
No doubt a popular book in terms of numbers of copies sold. The author is a highly respected scholar on world religions who has taught at some of the most prestigious universities in America. He also grew up in China and has imbibed the rituals of most of the religions he's studied. So why the two stars:
* Smith is a pluralist. I find this position doesn't allow for the most rigorous and critical analysis of the religious positions presented.
Indeed, I find this position ironically gives the least respect to other religions. When everyone become special and unique, no one is special and unique.
* Smith barely delves into the doctrines of the world's religions, and this is what I'm interested in leaning and knowing.
This, of course, helps out with the pluralism. If we mainly look at the moral aspects of religions, well, they seem quite similar. Confucius say nice things and Jesus does nice things too. After all, WWJD, baby!
* Smith was raised a Christian (well, a moralist), but ironically he seems to know the least about Christianity.
He reads the OT prophets as proto advocates of a social gospel, and he reads the NT like a liberal protestant.
But if that weren't enough, he tries to "defend" the trinity by comparing the triune God of the Bible water's three stages. But the good doctor fails to see that this is simply the modalist heresy.
And if that weren't enough, he misquotes the Bible more than once.
* The book is depressing, but upon reflection, uplifting. One is sad for the adherents of the other religions and the constant working they do so as to "get saved" (however that is cashed out in their particular religion). How tiring. How impossible a task.
But then the Christian reflects. Christianity is based on something it claims actually happened in history. This is Jesus, the God-man, who fulfilled the demands of the law, and then took the punishment due lawbreakers, and then rose from the dead. By faith the Christian believes that these things were done for him and he simply rests and trusts in the work of another. How utterly beautiful is the gospel of Christianity to the ears of weary sinners tired of doing what Confucius say, or bending and contorting their bodies in hopes that the yogic rituals will make them ready to enter nirvana.
I would not recommend this book for anyone who wants to take a serious looks at the beliefs of the world's religions and wants to know why the adherents of those religions find those beliefs compelling and true.
(less)
flag12 likes · Like · 23 comments · see review
Jamie
Jan 06, 2010Jamie rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Huston provides a powerful punch of wonderous delight for the world's historical religions. I was left in awestuck wonder at how beautiful, pragmatic, and well thought out information that he articluates in this excellent book. This is an unbias fact base book that adhears to the positive side that religion provides (aside from the negativity that is obviously present within every religion, he bypasses that notion and delves into the heart and soul of each practice.)
I sat on my comfy sofa feeling the flecks of Eurika moments when my Westernized lacking of the Eastern religious became known to my clear concious. For example I erronously never knew that Hinduism was in actually embodiments of God (Brahmin), and never claimed to be attached to the polytheistic concept of gods. I never knew Buddhism claimed a 'non-soul' formation rather than obtaining a diety or type of heaven. Buddhism is self expansion. However my lacking of the Eastern practices which I found finally enlightened thorough Huston, the most embarassing Western religion that I found myself quite ignorant on was Islam. I thought of Islam from what I was known from the bias media, other religion's adgendas, and through a lack of educational enlightenment. Islam was the most enlightening and inspiring for me that I had to tell the world about how 'surrendering' Islam really is. Violence towards Islam coupled with Islam's faith is quite misunderstood, and completey wrong. Of course no one is discounting that there is domestic violence in Arab countries, but on the same coin there is also domestic violence towards women in America. The secret is that American's tend to 'shovel it under the rug'.
This book will provide a strong foundational backbone for anyone interested in learning about the world's religions. There is also a special chapter towards the end that talks about early man's 'primitive' or 'tribal' religions, before man became established on this earth (during prelithic and neolithic periods). This chapter alone is worth reading this book. Also on a side note, this book goes real well with Robert Van Voorst Anthology of World's Scriptures. For Huston skims over religion's doctrines and cultural rituals, where Voorst delves more into these aspects. (less)
flag7 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review
Nathaniel
Jun 17, 2011Nathaniel rated it it was ok · review of another edition
The seminal inaccurate "world religions" volume for the ages. While Smith's coverage of the Judeo-Christian tradition is excellent and his treatment of Islam is adequate, he has a hard time getting away from the Middle Eastern/monotheistic perspective and allows it to color his writing. Consequently this book becomes less and less accurate the farther East he gets and the more different from the Judeo-Christian tradition the religions become. His handling of Buddhism and Taoism is particularly slipshod, coming at the traditions empirically without having truly experienced them. It's possible that he's finally remedied this in the newer editions, but the 1985 printing that I read had the same glaring holes that were in the 1960's original. This book dominated Western religious studies classes for decades, but in this globalized world its time is long past. Maybe look at the chapters on Western/Middle Eastern religions, especially if you're doing research in Judeo-Christian studies and want to build on Smith's widely-recognized work. However, any other chapters in this volume are so misleading that they are worse than useless. (less)
flag7 likes · Like · 3 comments · see review
Paul
May 18, 2012Paul rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Huston Smith's "The World's Religions" is one of the most significant books I've ever read. Smith digs underneath the rituals, theology, and cold historical facts to capture why some of these major religious traditions, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity, are so deeply and meaningfully profound to billions and billions of people. One may disagree about whether any of these religious faiths speak the the absolute or partial truth regarding the meaning of our existence or reality, but each faith does speak directly to our human condition and try to sustain meaning in a world that often feels cold or hostile to us. This book is not an attempt to convert, but to appreciate the richness of traditions and thought found in religions to answer the fundamental questions posed from the very depths of our lives. Using an analogy popularized by John Hick, we are all simply people blindfolded and feeling this great elephant in the room and just trying to figure out what it is. (less)
flag6 likes · Like · comment · see review
Jennifer Olson
Dec 28, 2014Jennifer Olson rated it it was ok · review of another edition
Read this for a graduate class on Religion in Education. I think a lot of professors assign this book because it's a well-known one that covers many religions. The book works great if you want to hear Huston Smith's narrative interpretation of what the world's religions are about, however it's not so great if you actually want a good overview of world religions in order to gain some basic knowledge about them.
He makes lots of awkward comparisons with Christianity and Western culture that don't make the reading more accessible, nor really do justice to the traditions he's discussing. Half the time I can't figure out what he is talking about. In the chapter on Confucianism I find the line "Someone has ventured that in a woman's certitude that she is wearing precisely the right thing for the occasion, there is a peace that religion can neither give nor take away." Huh? In the middle of a chapter on Hinduism he starts going on for several paragraphs about C.S. Lewis. Rather than actually teaching about different traditions he gets caught up in making awkward comparisons and sweeping characterizations about each one that don't do justice to their complexity.
I left this book feeling like I could have learned so much more about world religions. (less)
flag5 likes · Like · 2 comments · see review
Kitap
Dec 17, 2009Kitap rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Shelves: religion, islam, judaism, philosophy, hinduism, daoism, christianity, confucianism, favorites, buddhism
I've always found Huston Smith insightful, lucid, and fun to read, and so I chose this as one of my course textbooks (when the previous textbook came out in a new edition—for $110!). In spite of its lack of much primary source material (which Philip Novak's collection of scriptures supplements), this is an excellent introduction to the major religions of the world, "our wisdom traditions." Smith's concise chapters describe the big religions—Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Daoism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity—as well as discussing the role of religion in the 21st century and providing tips on how to approach religions and religious diversity. The illustrations are the weakest part of the book. Some are excellent, others (like the image of Mahavira in the chapter on Buddhism) are out of place, and the heavy reliance on the paintings of Marc Chagall didn't make much sense when the religions of the world afford so much imagery. (less)
flag5 likes · Like · see review
Cappy
Jul 28, 2009Cappy rated it liked it
Shelves: theology
The book is thoroughly uneven - strong at some points (Hinduism, Buddhism, articulating the merits of the world's wisdom tradtions) and weak at others (Judaism, Tribal religions, covering the nuts and bolts of the world's religions).
"As it was, the first 'draft' of my book was delivered to a television audience, and the director of the series never let me forget that audience. This is not a classroom where you have a captive audience, he kept reminding me. If you lose their attention for thirty seconds they will switch stations and you won't get them back. So make your points if you must...But illustrate them immediately, with an example, an anecdote, a fragment of poetry, something that will connect your point to things your audience can relate to." (pg. xi-xii)
"What a strange fellowship this is, the God-seekers in every land, lifting their voices in the most disparate ways imaginable to the God of all life. How does it sound from above? Like bedlam, or do the strains blend in strange, ethereal harmony? Does one faith carry the lead, or do the parts share in counterpoint and antiphony where not in full-throated chorus?" (pg. 2)
"The empowering theological and metaphysical truths of the world's religions are...inspired. Institutions - religious institutions emphatically included - are another story. Constituted as they are of people with their inbuilt frailties, institutions are built of vices as well as virtues." (pg. 5)
"Science makes major contributions to minor needs, [Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:] was fond of saying, adding that religion, however small its successes, is at least at work on the things that matter the most." (pg. 9)
"Religion is not primarily a matter of facts; it is a matter of meanings." (pg. 10)
"If we were to take Hinduism as a whole - its vast literature, its complicated rituals, its sprawling folkways, its opulent art - and compress it into a single affirmation, we would find it saying: You can have what you want." (pg. 13)
"Though in some watered-down sense there may be a religion of self-worship, true religion begins with the quest for meaning and value beyond self-centeredness. It renounces the ego's claim to finality." (pg. 19)
"A distinctive feature of human nature is its capacity to think of something that has no limits: the infinite." (pg. 21)
"Life is so filled with disappointments that we are likely to assume they are built into the human condition." (pg. 23)
"By and large, life is powered less by reason than by emotion, and of the many emotions that crowd the human heart, the strongest is love." (pg. 32)
"Work is the staple of human life. The point is not simply that all but a few people must work to survive. Ultimately, the drive to work is psychological rather than economic. Forced to be idle, most people become irritable; forced to retire, they decline." (pg. 37)
"How long can the average mind think of one thing - one thing only, without slipping first into thinking about thinking about that thing and taking off from ther on a senseless chain of irrelavencies? About three and a half seconds, psychologists tell us." (pg. 48)
Consider Shankara's invocation of "Oh Thou, before whom all words recoil." (pg. 60)
"Most people have little idea how much they secretly bank on luck - hard luck to justify past failures, good luck to bring future successes. How many people drift through life simply waiting for the breaks." (pg. 65)
"It is no accident that the only art form India failed to produce was tragedy." (pg. 72)
Consider "[Hinduism's:] conviction that the various major religions are alternate paths to the same goal. To claim salvation as the monopoly of any one religion is like claiming that God can be found in this room but not the next, in this attire but not another." (pg. 73)
"[Buddha:] was undoubtedly one of the greatest rationalists of all times, resembling in this respect no one as much as Socrates. Every problem that came his way was subjected to cool, dispassionate analysis." (pg. 88)
"Dukkha, then, names the pain that to some degree colors all finite existence...it was used in Pali to refer to wheels whose axles were off-center...A modern metaphor might be a shopping cart that we try to steer from the wrong end." (pg. 101)
"Reason's most vociferous detractors must admit that it plays at least this much of a role in human life: Whether or not it has the power to lure, it clearly holds power of veto." (pg. 106)
"Metaphysics is unavoidable. Everyone harbors some notions about ultimate questions, and these notions affect interpretations of subsidiary issues." (pg. 113)
"Some problems are posed so clumsily by our language as to preclude solution by their very formulation." (pg. 118)
"Religions invariably split." (pg. 120)
"What is the best part of the human self, its head or its heart? A popular parlor game used to revolve around the question, 'If you had to choose, would you rather be loved or respected?'" (pg. 121)
"Though Confucius did not author Chinese culture, he was its supreme editor." (pg. 154)
"There is plenty of violence in nature, but on the whole it is between species, not within them." (pg. 161)
"Individualism and self-consciousness are contagious. Once they appear, they spread like epidemic and wildfire. Unreflective solidarity is a thing of the past." (pg. 163)
"To harp exclusively on love is to preach ends without means." (pg. 167)
"Altruism is not much engendered by exhortation." (pg. 168)
"Genius does not depend upon full, self-conscious understanding of its creations...Probably all exceptional creativity proceeds more by intuitive feel than by explicit discernment." (pg. 170)
Consider that the name Muhammad "has been born by more male children than any other in the world." (pg. 224)
"From without, the Koran is all but impenetrable. No one has ever curled up on a rainy weekend to read the Koran." (pg. 233)
"God's compassion and mercy are cited 192 times in the Koran, as against 17 references to his wrath and vengeance." (pg. 237)
"Heroism is never a mass option." (pg. 253)
"Spain and Anatolia changed hands at about the same time - Christians expelled the Moors from Spain, while Muslims conquered what is now Turkey. every Muslim was driven from Spain, put to the sword, or forced to convert, whereas the seat of the Eastern Orthodox church remains in Instanbul to this day." (pg. 256)
"Every religion at some stages in its career has been used by its professed adherents to mask aggression." (pg. 257)
"Mysticism breaks through the boundaries that protect the faith of the typical believer." (pg. 264)
"Compared with the histories of Assyria, Babylon, Egypt, and Syria, Jewish history is strictly minor league." (pg. 272)
"The word sin comes from a root meaning 'to miss the mark.'" (pg. 281)
"Nobody likes moral rules anymore than they like stop lights or 'no left turn' signs." (pg. 286)
"The Prophetic Principle can be put as follows: The prerequisite of political stability is social justice." (pg. 292)
"The idea of progress - belief that the conditions of life can improve, and that history can in this sense get somewhere - originated in the West." (pg. 296)
"The idea that a universal God decided that divine nature should be uniquely and incoparably disclosed to a single people is among the most difficult notions to take seriously in the entire study of religion." (pg. 307)
"We have heard Jesus' teachings so often that their edges have been worn smooth, dulling their subversiveness." (pg. 326)
"Doctrins...seem tedious if not incredible and at times annoying." (pg. 339)
"Every people, oursleves not excepted, needs to think well of its origins; it is part of having a healthy self-image." (pg. 381)
"The worthful aspects of reality - its values, meaning and purpose - slip through the devices of science in the way that the sea slips through the nets of fishermen." (pg. 386) (less)
flag4 likes
Ming Wei
Dec 05, 2018Ming Wei rated it really liked it · review of another edition
Shelves: read-religion-related-books
A very interesting book, from this book I learnt many things about some religions that I did not know, worth a read if you like religion related theme books. Would be an excellent choice for students at College or University for study reasons.
flag3 likes · Like · see review
Joseph Schrock
May 24, 2018Joseph Schrock rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
I have found “The World’s Religions” by Huston Smith to be a worthwhile read. The book is highly informative about the greatly diverse religious beliefs, values, and traditions among the world’s great and not-so-great religions. I found it to be a highly engaging experience to read about the diverse ways in which human civilizations have, throughout the centuries and millennia of human history, expressed their desires to commune with the Spiritual Realm – a Realm often referred to as God. I learned a lot from reading this book, but I believe that the greatest benefit for me was the stark realization of how very different cultures can arrive at spiritual and moral values and philosophies. Not only are there awesomely great diversities within respective religions, but even more pronounced are some of the utterly different ways that the world’s religions can instruct their adherents to worship or serve the Divine.
Huston Smith has performed a valuable service in his in-depth treatments of the numerous diverse religions on our planet. Jews differ from Christians, Hindus greatly differ from both Jews and Christians, Muslims have their convictions that extend beyond the boundaries of the other Abrahamic religions, and the Buddhists, Taoists, and those of the Shinto faith subscribe to vastly different concepts of the Divine than do the Western religions.
My reading of Smith’s book has encouraged me to be very disinclined to denounce those of religions that contrast with my own traditions. Rather, an attitude of openness can be fostered and encouraged by reading such an unbiased and objectively written work. I would recommend “The World’s Religions” to anyone who believes that religion speaks powerfully to the human spirit and can help guide us toward harmony with Ultimate Reality.
(less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
James
Dec 30, 2011James rated it liked it · review of another edition
My rating should really be split into two: 5/5 for the art and 2/5 for the written content. The photographs and artworks in The Illustrated World's Religions are gorgeous, and highly illustrative of the various faiths in question. But the text is riddled with sweeping generalities. Peoples with highly different faiths and worldviews are lumped together: the final chapter, "The Primal Religions", includes Australian Aborigines, Native Americans, and various peoples of Africa and New Guinea as all constituting some amorphous religious blob, and even Jainism, a completely distinct religion, is added without clarity to the Hinduism section. The diversity present within numerous religious groups is entirely glossed over. While many of the examples are true, they do not have strong subtlety in dealing with each faith. Yet, the text does do a good job in situating the art within an appropriate religious and historical context.
All in all, a good coffee table book, if the reader considers the text as a complimentary addition to the art and not vice-versa. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
Qt
Nov 15, 2007Qt rated it really liked it · review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
A very nicely-put-together book, this consists of chapters written by various authors on different facets of religion: pilgrimages, prayers, modern directions of the church, etc. My favorite part was the photos, which were of National Geographic-type quality and showed people performing various religious activities, as well as some beautiful shots of temples, churches, and scenery.
While not really something I would ordinarily just pick up to read, it was a very easy-reading book--very interesting, beautifully put together, and quite informative. I'd recommend it to anyone interested in an introduction to different religions (the chart outlining the different facets of Christianity is particularly useful!), or anyone wanting to read some religious-topic essays illustrated by beautiful photographs. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · 14 comments · see review
Brandon
Jun 20, 2011Brandon rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Shelves: owned-books, philosophy
The World's Religions is one of the most insightful introductory texts to the distinct religions in the world one will discover. It was through this book that allows me to give a one-word definition for each of the definitions; for without them I will perhaps will not remember the words, the brilliance, and social implications Smith brought into an extremely well-written eulogy of the world's religions. Whilst I continue to remain an agnostic atheist, I will have had the opportunity to qualify my own existence further just by learning more about the populations that populate the planet.
Primal Religions = First
Hinduism = Unison
Buddhism = Enlightenment
Confucianism = Living
Taoism = Flow
Islam = Surrender
Judaism = Meaning
Christianity = Rest
(less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
Eric
Jul 01, 2009Eric rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Shelves: sprituality
I read this book for a World Religions class which was actually the intro class, but I took it at the end :) I didn't expect much from a 101 class, but this book really grabbed me. As Smith says in the beginning, 'There are plenty of sources dealing with the negative aspects of religions and religious strife over the years. This book focuses on the positive aspects, the ideal each religion is striving for.'
It really opened up new worlds to me, and it was a breath of fresh air to have Christianity at the end; it allowed you to see it from a broader perspective. And the photos speak as much as the words, giving you a sense of the people who practice, if only a condensed view. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
Drew
Dec 26, 2016Drew rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Brilliant! Huston Smith, a Christian, is a child of missionaries who has lived in many parts of the world. He has taught comparative religion courses for many years. He dedicates a chapter in this book to each of the world's major religions. He deals with each religion sensitively, in depth, with generosity and with impressive insight. He points out, quoting Justice Holmes, that science makes major contributions to minor needs and that religion, however small its successes, is at least at work on the things that matter most. My world view has been broadened as a result of reading this book. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
Madhuri
Apr 23, 2020Madhuri rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
Shelves: religion, non-fiction
Reading this book was an education of the most wonderful kind. I have been trying to make sense of religion and overcoming my perception of it as merely an elaborate system of rituals. In this book I have encountered much wisdom, even the ability to see the value in the rituals and the myths. It is easier for me to recognise that my temperament was not suitable to the tradition of devotion which I assumed to be the only form of religion. It is important for me to reflect and to experiment, and it is heartening to know that there is a path to religion through that too.
I am sure I will keep coming back to this book as a guide. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
Megan
Feb 21, 2009Megan rated it really liked it · review of another edition
Uh, well, I kinda read this one. :) It was more dense than I am used to, it took me a long time to read and I couldn't renew it anymore at the library so I had to take it back before I finished it. I got about a 1/3 to 1/2 through it and I thought it was excellent. As one critic said, it really captures the "spirit" of major religions instead of focusing on dogma or traditions. I am considering purchasing so I can finish it and have it as a reference book. ...more
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review
Patrick
Sep 19, 2011Patrick rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. I love this book b/c it shows religious tradition at its essence.
Judaism - The first revolutionary monotheistic religion that centers on one monotheistic God in which the whole life of a people as well as of an individual focuses on that God. I like how morality is seen as away to keep social cohesion. There are a lot of modern building blocks of society that springs from its creation:
1)Guilt - If the world created by God is good and everything in it is good, then the bad is purely a human creation.
2)individual self-empowerment = if things are bad b/c of human deeds, then man can change his work so things can be good for himself and his people
3)Private property and Capitalism = if God created things that are good and charged men as having dominion over it, then it is only natural that man would want the good stuff that God created
4)Individual choice in creation of ones life - man is a demigod
5)social justice and the rule of law = prophets were ordinary men who told the kings that they were not being loyal to YHWH and thus would be punished; thereby giving credence that no one was above God's law. Also, because Jews can change their circumstances then they have the responsibility to make society better.
6)YHWH was the first God who cares for his people and since it is one God, their loyalties are not divided
7)Moses/Exodus/10 commandments is important to the Jewish faith because it is when God gave laws to the Jewish people and its creation as a state of Israel. The is the reason it is so hard for orthodox Jews to give up the idea of Israel because the founding of its state in exile was also the founding of its people as well as its religion. Apparently before this point, there was no Israel. Jewish people believed that God's grace was shown to them by "giving" them the land of Israel and thus are God's chosen people. But in order for them to keep God's grace, they have to remain faithful to God's commandments\
8)Incidentally, the fact that Jews were not allowed to own land combined with the study and debate of Rabbinic tradition made the Jews uniquely situated through 2000 years of natural selection to take advantage of today's knowledge economy. Also, the idea of the Kibbutzim in which people toil with their hands is a direct response to Jews being forbid to own lands in Europe as well as the utopian ideal of socialism in which everyone is one in the community.
9) Another reason that it is hard for orthodox Jewish settlers to sacrifice all of Israel is the idea that the Messiah coming that will not only restore the state of Israel in its entirety but also will bring law and order to the whole world through a unified Israel. Thus, Zionism is the outgrowth of belief in the Messianic age in which the political and the spiritual mold together in creating the perfect Israel.
10) Ritual: Catholics get this from the Jews are idea the ritual is important in our religious ceremonies. Ritual molds the profane with the mundane together that is the spirit of God is suffused in our daily lives. Unlike Catholicism, Judaism's rituals the suffuses itself in holiness in their daily lives is so linked to their history thus making historical Israel basically indistinguishable from the holiness of Israel as a people. Further making it difficult for orthodox settlers to give up the land that God has given them by Divine right.
Islam - all fundamentalist from every religion should convert to Islam if they want to live according to the literal word of God. Islam itself means one's life surrender to God. Muslim believe that the Koran is the direct word of God just as Christian's believe that Jesus is God's word made flesh. Thus, fundamentalist's usually do not have room for any interpretation because the Koran is very doctrinary to enforce how Muslim should behave toward God and historical context is only incidental to the main purpose of the Koran which is to organize Muslims toward God. In the context of a chaotic world in which there was no morality and no laws, one understands how Muhammed was able to convince Arabian people that the Koran which organized the world around God's supreme word. Also Islamic fundamentalist also have a hard time separating church from state because their prophet brought order politically in a time of chaos by marrying the church with the state in Medina. What was once a strength of Islam its immutability during a time of chaos is now its greatest weakness b/c it cannot adapt to a world that is constantly changing. Apparently, the Koran is meant to be spoken in Arabic because in its spoken form it is so melodious that is it though the greatest poet have come down to speak it. It is like my preference for melody over the lyrical importance of a song.
Knowing this, how does one ask Muslim to focus on the Koranic introspective version (Sufism) instead of its socio-political bent. Obviously, there are countries (Turkey and perhaps Indonesia) that has married modernity and Islam. Perhaps this is because they are not Arab. I think this is the reason m.c. democracy in the middle east is a top priority b/c it is only through this means that we can see of our civilizations can coexist.
Muhammed to me seems to be an enlightened ruler who was needed during an age of lawlessness but that age is not this age. Also, Muhammed seems to be a person who goes into trances like other mystics of the middle age. The problem with Muhammad and Islam is not what Muhammad did during his age but the persistent belief of what his social prescription for his age works today. In fact, I think Muhammad was an enlightened ruler for his age, but does the way he did things which was enlightened by 7th century standards the way Muslim should do things now a 1,500 years later?
The good thing about Islam is that they are concerned with social justice issues too, just like Christians. But like Judaism, I am afraid their social justice issues are highly tribal and linked to their own respective religions.
Basic beliefs of Muslims:
God is not a God of love but a God of fear in his awesome being. Since Muslims are continuously conscious of the Judgement Day, they have to act righteously continuously in accordance to the Koran. There way of thinking goes like this the Fear in God leads one to surrender to his will and thus do the right thing constantly which leads to peace in oneself by knowing you are doing God's will which leads to joy. Thus, I believe Islam is the institutionalization of Christian fundamentalist conversion experience via explicit laws laid out in the Koran.
The one thing that I agree and I like about Islamic religion is its total surrender to God and the fact that it challenges its adherents towards charity. The main thing that I disagree with Islam is the seeming compulsion of these acts in the form of Islamic law.
Islamic law
1) Economics - it does not forbid capitalism but it states that people with money should give to people who do not have anything thereby having a redistribution of wealth
2)Issue of women - In Islam, marriage is the most sacred thing and philanderers are to be stoned. I guess for the time, the innovative thing is men had to take care of the women they slept with and raise their children
3)Islam is adamant on its desire for racial equality as seen in its enforcement of Mecca in which social status disappears in the eyes of God and people from all over the world commune together in Mecca regardless of nationality
4)Use of Force - jihad (the lesser) is only to be used in self-defense or to right a wrong. The problem of course is since there is a loop-hole in the Koran for war, people with political motives have used a Koranic defensive posture for terrorist bombings. This inicidentally goes against the Islamic notion that God created human beings an He sees them as good.
5) Muhammad promoted religious tolerance in his kingdom so Islamic countries should likewise respect other religions.
In the study of Islam vs. Judaism one sees why there is such a battle for Israel. Whereas Islam marries religion and the state and sees itself as God's word that should be followed on earth and thus supreme to other religions, Judaism sees Israel as part of historical Israel which was promised by God through eternity to his chosen people, the Jews. Religion should really be left out of politics when one deals with the middle east because faith in any religion is uncompromising. The reason why Islam has a hard time adapting to the world is that the Koran is an all encompassing book that institutionalize how people should behave and have faith.
I am convinced if we could get most Muslim to practice Sufism, there would be know Islam/Christian aggression. This is why the Sufi mosque close to 9/11 is a welcome one being that it is the unifying force of Islam. But seeing that Sufism seeks to unify with God and thus is esoteric and take the laws in the Koran as allegorical whereas most Muslims believe that what the Koran writes is the law that God wants Muslims to follow, I do not see mass conversion to Sufism. Maybe a better strategy is west to play up the focus of Islam to the Greater Jihad in each individual as oppose to enforcing it to general society.
CHRISTIANITY:
Like Judaism, the historical Jesus seems insignificant. After all, he came from a Jewish tribe which is one of thousands other principalities under Rome and his ministry itself only lasted 1 to 3 years. How did one man from a boonies tribe with a short ministry so effect the world that a third of the worlds population worships him now. The answer of course is that he was a social prophet who was sent to heal humanity.
Apparently Jesus and the Pharisees were closest to one another in terms of how they saw God with the difference being that Jesus emphasized total compassion toward other people whereas the Pharisees emphasized following the letter of the law above all else. Whereas Orthodox Jews and Islam emphasize written laws as a path to God, Jesus emphasized principles that can be expressed in many different ways.
I think the main reason that the Western world took to democracy and individual liberty as well as it has is because of its Christian outlook. Jesus himself questioned the utility of following the Mosiac laws and the prevailing social convention of his day when it did not impact people and make them closer to God. From his example, we get the fact that men through grass roots democracy can change his social order as well as critical thinking skills that question systems that may have worked ones but no longer work now. Unlike Islam in which its adherent has to conform to it, Christianity does mold into peoples lives because it seeks to change a person from the inside out and leaves his cultural outlook in tact.
The reason Christians think Jesus is God b/c:
1) He did good work without seeking fame for them or monetary compensation
2)His wisdom through what he says is legendary and by speaking in parables he used metaphor and peoples imagination to convey his message with central theme being God loves us unconditionally and that love in turn will naturally be shared to all. The use of engaging in imagination favors innovators and creative types which is in stark contrast to main stream Islam and Orthodox Jews with their countless laws they have to adhere to.
3)He lived with total integrity and thus hated hypocrisy as the chief sin
Gospel: What separates Christianity from other religions is the fact that its members experience the fire of the Holy Spirit that brought with it Christian Love that God gives to us and the fact that we want to share this Love with others. It was this value of feeling God's presence in our lives through his Divine Love that displaced the feelings of fear, guilt for not living up to ones potential, and disregard for the self in favor for the all-encompassing Love that made mass conversion possible and attracted people to the early church. Through the principle of Christian Love, a feeling of common discipleship that disregard status and feeling of inner peace that found expression in exuberant joy.
Also unlike Islam, the conversion experience is highly individualized instead of institutionalized. Thus, this individualization and the sense of the mystical body of Christ that needs to be expressed differently in order to come into the same goal is in direct contradiction of the Islamic way of top-down submission to the will of Allah via the Islamic law explicitly stated in the Koran.
Christian theology sprung from from religious experience and tried to explain the what people were experiencing. The three cornerstones of this theology is: 1) Incarnation - Jesus is a full man and full God 2) Atonement - Jesus died for our sins (separation away from God) so that we can be reconciled with him 3) Trinity - God's love extends to three beings and by extension us the mystical body of God. So what this all means is that God is a continuum that can extend to us if we fervently have faith in him and do his will on earth
Christian Denomination
1) Roman Catholicism - teaches that the Church concentrated on the Pope is the final authority in matters of faith and morality and that the sacraments are the way for us to live the Christian life by infusing the Divines presence in our daily lives. The most pressing of this example is the Mass and the communing of God's presence on earth in the form of the Holy Eucharist
2) Eastern Orthodox - is similar to Catholicism in its sacrament but teaches that corporate body of the Church is the final authority of faith and morality as present in the ecclesiastical councils of Bishops. It teaches that all its members has direct responsibility to the Church which includes electing its clergy and thus everyone needs to keep the other in line. Thus, unlike Catholicism, everyone is responsible for the Churches well-being and unlike Protestantism everyone is solidly behind the Orthodox faith. Also, the orthodox church encourages everyone to be a mystic in that they want their congregation to be united with Christ
3) Protestantism
a) Justification by Faith - The starting point for all Christians is faith to Jesus Christ and Christian Love and through this faith meaning is infused into the Sacraments, Creeds, and good works. Without this faith and belief the sacraments, creeds, and good works are meaningless.
b)Protestant principle- against idolatry that is nothing on earth is infallible since it is touched by human hands thus people should always question earthly power ---> gives rise to critical thinking skills---> diversity of thought---> diversity of action---> societal checks and balances via rejection of absolutes ---> rise of Western Power
i) protestant can succumb to biblotry - they think that the Bible is the unerring Word of God when it is supposed to be only His medium in communicating his will on Earth----so the Bible is should not be seen as Dogmatic rather it should be used as a medium.... Incidentally, I think it is protestantism insistence on reading the Bible for oneself that gave rise to global literacy
ii) inerrant works of the Holy Spirit through man
BUDDHISM:
I see the Buddhist philosophy as pre-christian addendum to Christianity. I think the Buddha himself was the first famous pre-Christian mystic saint in that he preached and practice Christian Love.
The reason I think Buddhist philosophy is compatible with Christianity is the way the Buddha lived out his life with Christian Love and total integrity just like Jesus. Imagine trying to explain Christian Love suffused with the power of the Holy Spirit 500 years before Christ using language of the pervading concept of religion (Hinduism) so people who want to follow enlightenment can understand what you are teaching. I think this is the reason he was so circumvect in his teaching because He was trying to explain an phenomenon in which the words have not been created yet. To Buddha, Nirvana is dissolving of self into the Oneness of the Divine (Christian concept of heaven on earth) and thus cease to exist as an individual but instead he started to do God's will and thus became an extension of God himself (Pauline Christian mystical body of God).
Like Jesus, Buddha hated social conventions that separated people from each other and he rejected religious authorities of his day for preaching spirituality that is devoid of meaning. After leading a life of pleasure in the world, the Buddha sought to experience enlightenment apart from the world. Buddhism rose as a rejection of the meaningless religion of his day and preached the enlightenment (Christian Love) can be attained by anyone who seeks it without any preconditions. Like him, enlightenment must be experienced by the seeker.
BUDDHIST TEACHINGS:
1) Once a person focuses solely on material things of this world outside his basic comforts (middle way or Christian simplicity), he is doomed to disappointment and suffering
2) Suffering is caused by selfish desire that attaches us to the material world
3) The only way out of this suffering is to focus on being selfless and to think of how our actions will effect the universe
4) The way out of selfishness into universal thinking is through the 8th fold path which is to live with total integrity to being good in ones mind, heart, soul, and actions.
a)One needs to know why one is seeking enlightenment
b)One needs to know that he wants to seek enlightenment in his heart---> so one can have persistence towards it
c) right speech - since speech shows one's character so one has to be aware of what one is speaking and gradually focus on saying the right thing
d) right conduct - one's actions need to be good and pure
e) right livelihood - one needs to do something that is consistent with one's good character
f) right effort - one has to have the will to live the Buddhist way
g) right mindfulness - self-awareness in what one is thinking good and bad and gradually change it to focus on the good
h) right concentration - meditation toward enlightenment is the only way to bring it
Buddhist sects: Theravada vs Mahayana
Theravada rightly believes that Buddha was a saint who taught how one can achieve enlightenment (heaven on earth) and only those who become compenlative monks can achieve similar enlightenment
Mahayana sect focus on Buddha's being not his teaching in that Buddhist should be compassionate since the Buddha himself was compassionate. Since this sect is awed by the Buddha's compassion (Christian Love) they mistakenly assume that he was the messiah.
Mahayana sect:
1) Pure Land sect believes that only through faith alone of the Divine does one reach Nirvana
2) Zen Buddhism - the use of words that expresses scripture or creeds are imperfect so they prefer to silently meditate, answer difficult illogical questions in order to banish the logical mind and thus achieve Satori. One they achieve Satori they must live their lives as though the infinite has come down to the finite plain. A person is said to achieve Satori when he sees that absolute beauty of life, have a dispassionate view of the world so compassion flows out from his very being b/c everything and himself are unified, and they do everything with meaning as though the infinite is present in every mundane task (Therese of Lisieux).
Tibetan Buddhism focuses on Tantra interconnectedness through movt via Mantras(words), Mudras(movt.), Mandalas(symbolism) in order to attain Nirvana now. Dalai Lama is the bodhavista is the being that shows it is possible to attain enlightenment now.
(less)
flag1 like · Like · 5 comments · see review
Jared Woods
Jul 20, 2020Jared Woods rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
I don't know what happened over the last five years but my interest in religion has unceasingly grown until it sprouted legs. It then proceeded to trip me up and stomp on my skull causing my obsession gland to explode onto my carpet and now it's all I think about. When I read another sacred text or grasp the innards of a new belief system, I feel myself level-up, earning a badge of historical understanding within long developed paths of spiritual access. My enthusiasm has sunk so far inward that I've already founded my own religion, Janthopoyism, which I consider to be the central point where the collective holy worship can function in unity with the universal sciences. Look us up!
But just because I've located solace in my personal conclusions, this does not mean that my hunger has been muffled. Hence why I recently determined that I needed a book akin to a fat religious cake with hefty slices representing multiple faiths, allowing me to digest various divine outlooks in the shortest timeframe possible. Moments later, this publication came roaring down the pipeline, winning first place in my attention race, two-million sold, lathered in accolades, ordering me to order it immediately. Ok! I ordered it! I read it! I'm here!
The World's Religions focuses primarily on seven of the biggest names: Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Islam, Judaism, and Christianity (with a small section devoted to primal religions too). Why Sikhism was hardly discussed and why Jainism was excluded (to mention only a few) baffles me but never mind. Because what was covered was done so thoroughly, churned out from a uniquely rich perspective, leaning into the spiritual enlightenment of these beliefs rather than wasting time analysing the oft-misguided organisations that were built around them. I eagerly learned something new on every page and was embarrassed at how incorrect I was about certain previous judgments, ideas that once appeared absurd to me now making total sense. On the other side of this, however, were those powerful concepts I comprehended from my solar plexus outwards but never had the vocabulary to connect them to my head. This book poured the cement of knowledge into my brain and smoothed out the crevices, reinforcing what it is that I love so dear about religion and what it is that so many fail to see.
Religion is heartbreakingly misunderstood. It's not as much of a blind faith as people often assume it is, but rather, complex theories set forth by some of the greatest philosophers that ever existed then debated for thousands of years by millions of reflective thoughts further. Every religion is essentially good if you concentrate on the words of their prophets and/or earliest teachings, promoting love and unity, moral progression and a quest to encounter perfection. What's more, plenty of souls have pursued these doctrines and, no matter the denomination, have achieved profound spiritual breakthroughs. They have deconstructed the universe often using logical measurements then uniting their vibrations with the inner-workings of this infinite divinity, an achievement which would be difficult to attain without these guidances. And I can't think of anything more beautiful or more important than this. Sadly, the bigger a doctrine becomes and the longer it exists for, the easier it splits and the greater the temptation is for a select few individuals to exploit the name for a disguised ulterior chase of power. It's such a shame that these ugly yet rare practices have turned so many minds away from core messages that could soothe their lives with an aura of peace. To write religion off is nothing but a disservice to yourself but, whatever, moving on.
When considering such a celebrated topic, well-researched content is imperative but this alone would be useless if the voice did not know how to handle the message. And it is here that you learn why this specific publication is as revered as it is. Huston Smith harnesses an undeniable adoration for the subject matter which he sets forth with poetic flair, utilising descriptive language which (truth be told) may have benefited from simpler deliveries and shorter sentences. However, it is this vibrancy that moulds an otherwise intricate and testing topic into a bright and exciting experience. His intellect and expertise ooze through his impassioned words as if the paper had pores and, what's more, he really gets it. Each religion is articulated with respect, treating their designated slots as if this belief is the correct one, always rational and fair, never succumbing to bias, leaving me with no idea which faith this man even subscribed to (if any). He did an impressively meticulous job here and I was in awe every step of the way, grateful for the miniature dollop of enlightenment that inevitably comes with examining material like this. Without fail, my mood forever elated during these reading sessions, at times curiously so. Simply put, this was the right book. I don’t know what I was expecting but I got everything.
I closed this cover more confident than ever that I am on the correct path of discovery. I think specialising in one religion is where the danger lies but by dedicating yourself to all of them, you start to piece together a monumental picture of collaborated thought. My mind and spirit have been fed, enriched from these seven important timelines of metaphysical hypothesis and I feel blessed by a soft underlying sensation of wellbeing. It's strange but I truly believe that studying religious principles reveals to you more about yourself than anything else, and the deeper I explore these ideas the calmer my state of person becomes. I am thankful for this book's significant role on my exciting journey and I simply couldn't score it any less than perfect for what it is. I genuinely cannot fault Huston's work and would recommend it immediately to anybody with similar pursuits. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review
Kate Nos
Apr 14, 2021Kate Nos rated it did not like it · review of another edition
I stopped on the first chapter because of inaccurate informations about Hinduism. Coming from European deeply catholic country I wanted to learn about other religions, yet I am also lucky to have a husband raised in a Hindu Brahmin house that can check the accuracy of what the author is saying.
Even when the book is trying to go to the source of the information talking about sanskrit word artha, the translation is wrong. The author is referring to it as a "things, objects, worldly success", when it simply stands for "meaning". This changes a lot in what he is trying to say.
From other reviews I can see that book is ok if you want to learn more about western religions, but from perspective of a person reading this book while sitting at my Indian in laws' couch I can say that the Hinduism chapter has very little to do with the reality. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review
Debra Leigh
Jun 18, 2018Debra Leigh rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
One of the earlier editions of this book was my first introduction into the subject of world religions -- that was many decades ago now, and the book remains on my shelf. I am a huge fan of the scholarship and work of Huston Smith -- both as an academic and as a public intellectual. He brought this topic into the public awareness of Americans by popularizing the topic, offering lectures beyond the college campus, providing shows on PBS. His was a very open-minded and open-hearted approach to the study and the understanding of the world's wisdom traditions -- a term he prefers because it encompasses more than the word "religion" -- and I would say that every one should have a copy of this book of their shelves, as a primer to understand the spiritual practices of the world's people. (less)
flag1 like · Like · see review
