2021/10/28

Medicine – Religion – Spirituality , Global Perspectives on Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Healing

Medicine – Religion – Spirituality bei transcript Verlag




Alle Titel der Reihe
Download Cover
Volltext (PDF)
Leseprobe (E-Paper)
Produktflyer
MARC-Record
Dorothea Lüddeckens / Monika Schrimpf (eds.)







Medicine – Religion – Spirituality

Global Perspectives on Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Healing



In modern societies the functional differentiation of medicine and religion is the predominant paradigm. Contemporary therapeutic practices and concepts in healing systems, such as Transpersonal Psychology, Ayurveda, as well as Buddhist and Anthroposophic medicine, however, are shaped by medical as well as religious or spiritual elements. This book investigates configurations of the entanglement between medicine, religion, and spirituality in Europe, Asia, North America, and Africa. How do political and legal conditions affect these healing systems? How do they relate to religious and scientific discourses? How do therapeutic practitioners position themselves between medicine and religion, and what is their appeal for patients?

KAPITEL-ÜBERSICHT

FrontmatterSeiten 1 - 4


ContentsSeiten 5 - 6


Preface and Acknowledgements  Seiten 7 - 8


IntroductionSeiten 9 - 22


Medicalized Healing in East Africa  Seiten 23 - 56


Medical Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Japanese Religions  Seiten 57 - 90


Self-fashioning of the Hereditary Siddha Practitioner  Seiten 91 - 132


Ayurveda and Discursive Formations between Religion, Medicine and Embodiment  Seiten 133 - 166


Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as a Toolkit for Secular Health-Care  Seiten 167 - 200


Crossing Fields  Seiten 201 - 240


Mapping the Boundaries between Science and Religion  Seiten 241 - 272


List of Authors  Seiten 273 - 274

Mehr
===

Medical Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Japanese Religions
Monika Schrimpf

Monika Schrimpf
Medical Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Japanese Religions
DOI: 10.14361/9783839445822-004
 
In this paper, Monika Schrimpf raises the question how in contemporary Japan religious actors offering therapeutic practices can legitimize their actions and position themselves in Japanese society. By choosing the example of a Nichiren-Buddhist priest and a new religion called Perfect Liberty Kyodan, two strategies of legitimizing and positioning therapeutic practices in the religious field are described: the scientification of religious practice, and code-switching between the semantic fields of medicine and religion.
 

ABSTRACT

In contemporary Japan, many religious actors engage in therapeutic practices with the intention of curing or  preventing  disease,  whether  in new  religious  movements  and the  Japanese  New  Age,  in  folk  religion or  in  “established  religions”  (kisei shūkyō). Notwithstanding  the  prominent  role  of  Buddhist  scriptures,  temples,  and  priests  in medical  practice  and  knowledge  in  premodern  Japan,  the  introduction  of  a  public healthcare system in the Meiji era (1868–1912)  based  on  German  medicine  resulted in a functional and institutional differentiation between medicine and religion. There-fore, the question arises how contemporary religious actors offering therapeutic prac-tices  can  legitimize  their  actions  and  position  themselves  in  Japanese  society.  

By choosing the example of a Nichiren-Buddhist priest’s concepts of Buddhist medicine and Buddhism as medicine, as well as healing practices in a new religion called Per-fect Liberty Kyōdan, two strategies of legitimizing and positioning therapeutic prac-tices in the religious field will be described: the scientification of religious practice, and code-switching between the semantic fields of medicine and religion.1  

INTRODUCTION

This article explores possible ways in which contemporary religious actors whose  religious  traditions  used  to  comprise  medical  or  therapeutical  tech-niques, react to a social and political environment in which religions are—at