2021/02/24

Einstein And Buddha: Convergence Between Science And Eastern Philosophy - Colombo Telegraph

Einstein And Buddha: Convergence Between Science And Eastern Philosophy - Colombo Telegraph

Einstein And Buddha: Convergence Between Science And Eastern Philosophy

By Mahendra De Silva –

“Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected in a cosmic religion for the future: It transcends a personal God avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the natural and spiritual; and it is based on a religious sense aspiring from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual, as a meaningful unity.

“If there is any religion that would cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.  . (Albert Einstein)

Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein is possibly the greatest scientist mankind has ever produced. His general theory of relatively created a revolutionary change on how scientists have viewed the world. He discovered that time and space is always related to the observer. His famous equation  E=MC2  revealed that matter and energy are interchangeable forms of same substance. Einstein being a genius did not confine his interest only on science. The views he has expressed on Religion, philosophy and politics indicates that he was a great thinker who tried to bridge the gap between science and philosophy or religion. Buddha gave us a great teaching which would lead to tap the maximum potential of the mind which will eventually lead to the understanding of everything happening around us and finally to liberate from the cycle of Sansara (Cycle of Birth and death). The difference between Einstein and Buddha is that while former was keen in finding answers to the phenomenon of outside world, Buddha used his own powers of observation within his mind (introspection), intellect and reasoning, grounded in reality, to guide him to his enlightenment. Both Buddha and Einstein did their research on a scientific basis. Buddha advised his followers NOT to accept what he was teaching them at face value or to take his beliefs “on faith.” Rather, he counseled them to test his theories for themselves, and if they didn’t prove true, then reject them.  Buddha found what he was looking for. Einstein after all his discoveries has to admit mankind does not have the wisdom to understand the all the mysteries of the nature. The purpose of this article is to examine the relevancy of some of Einstein’s statement to Buddhist teachings and also to present Einstein’s view about the religion.

Einstein upheld the need for morality and rightness of the mankind. But he believed that morality should not come from fear or punishment expected from ‘God” or any other force. He said – A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed- (Albert Einstein, “Religion and Science”, New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930

Einstein denied the existence of a personal God but he could not provide an answer behind the beauty and methodical way universe has been formed. This he expressed in following way.

I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. I believe in Spinoza’s God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.  (Albert Einstein, 1954)

Who is this Spinoza’s God Einstein is refereeing to?  Spinoza was a Dutch philosopher, who claimed that God is nothing but the NATURE According to Spinoza there is mass, energy, atoms, molecules, life, thought, people, societies, galaxies and perhaps even multiple universes but there is nothing outside nature, including spiritual visions and other phenomena we don’t yet understand. If they exist, they are part of nature.  According to Buddhism there are five natural laws at work in the cosmos that cause things to happen, called the Five Niyamas. . Karma is only one of these factors. Present circumstances are the result of countless factors that are always in flux. There is no single cause that makes everything to be the way it is

The following statement clearly indicates that although Einstein rejected God he is not an atheist.

I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being.

Buddha rejected the traditional Hindu view that world was a creation by God and also rejected materialism of atheists. He became the first philosopher to reject the belief ‘Soul’ is a permanent entity. It appears that Einstein accepted both these positions. In the above statement, Einstein was humble enough to admit the inadequacy or limitations of his knowledge to find the answer to the ‘mysteries’ of the world.

Just examine following statement of Einstein

A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space.  He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest – a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.  This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and affection for a few persons nearest us.  Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole nature in its beauty.  Nobody is able to achieve this completely but striving for such achievement is, in itself, a part of the liberation and a foundation for inner security.”

Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind, and are not, however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world. -Einstein

It is amazing to know that Buddha, 2500 years back, expressed almost the same view in different words   “All such notions as causation, succession, atoms, primary elements…are all figments of the imagination and manifestations of the mind. – -Buddha

According to Buddha, Self is not a rational concept. Self is only an emotional feeling- Therefore consciousness is an illusion and the feeling of ‘Self” is only an activity of brain. People live unconsciously in dream like state believing their existence. As a result they become attached to names and forms, not realising that they have no more basis than the activities of the mind itself. Buddha declared that due to this error in view, liberation of the mankind would be blocked. Buddha called it ignorance what Einstein described it as a delusion of consciousness. Buddha’s solution to free us from prison is by developing and purification of mind, following a clear path towards it (8 FP and 4NT). Buddha’s path also involves widening selfless compassion to all human beings. According to Buddha the attachment (Lust) brings suffering and would also prevent one from escaping the prison.  Einstein says that this prison restricts   our affection only to our loved ones (Becoming Selfish). He suggests that to free from the prison the compassion should embrace all living creatures. (It is interesting Einstein did not confine compassion only to human beings)

Einstein’s attempt to discover the mystery of the world can be seen from this statement.

The most beautiful and most profound experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead. To know that what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their primitive forms – this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of true religiousness.  (Albert Einstein – The Merging of Spirit and Science)

Here again Einstein admits that human mind cannot comprehend all the mysteries of the world. But he admired the beauty and methodical way nature operates it. He admitted the answer comes with more wisdom and he also termed it as true religiousness.  Buddha’s approach for what Einstein has been looking could be evident from following interesting Dialogue between Buddha and one of his disciples.

“Most respected one; can you please tell me what the size of the universe is?”

Buddha replied:

“Will the size of the universe help you end suffering?”

The disciple answered:

“No, most respected one”

Buddha then answered:

“So why are you asking questions of little importance and not ask questions on the ending of suffering?

Buddhism avoids speculative metaphysical questions as irrelevant distractions. According to Buddhism, nothing happens without a cause; therefore the universe is infinite with no real beginning. However, it does run in cycles, so there can be a beginning for each particular era.

This Parable of the arrow has often been used to illustrate the Buddha’s teachings that “practitioners who concern themselves with the origins of the universe and other topics are missing the point of religious practice.”

Suppose someone was hit by a poisoned arrow and his friends and relatives found a doctor able to remove the arrow. If this man were to say, ‘I will not have this arrow taken out until I know whether the person who had shot it was a priest, a prince or a merchant, his name and his family. I will not have it taken out until I know what kind of bow was used and whether the arrowhead was an ordinary one or an iron one.’ That person would die before all these things are ever known to

In short, work on being here (The Present moment) before you consider why or how you came to be here.

Once Bertrand Russell   explained why he accepts the Buddhist view on origin of the world. -” Among the founders of all religions in this world, I respect only one man — the Buddha. The main reason was that the Buddha did not make statements regarding the origin of the world. The Buddha was the only teacher who realised the true nature of the world.” (Bertrand Russell)

It is interesting to note that Modern scientists and psychologists pay great attention to research on brain and mind.  Buddhist mediation methods of loving kindness, breathing mediation and mindfulness are widely used in western medicine and psychology. It would be great if more scientists like Einstein come forward to bridge the gap between the science and eastern philosophy in future.


Latest Comments

  •  3
     0

    Very interesting facts.Thanks for sharing!

  •  8
     3

    This is a well presented piece having put together useful quotes from Einstein in particular and the Buddha. It deserves wide readership. I thought by responding with a comment I will be showing my respect to the writer’s effort.
    One must not take the comparison between the Buddha and Einstein too far as there are important aspects where the two world views clash. Einstein did believe in a pantheistic version of God as Spinoza did. God was to him some sort of force that “lived” in the universe. It wasn’t exactly an equation with nature. Buddha didn’t have such a vision. Besides this mystery that he experienced in nature Einstein was rigorously rational. I don’t think Buddha was rational to that extent. Despite Kalama Sutta, the Buddha did seem to borrow the prevailing world view of rebirth that the Vedas and Upanishads brought forth. He did give a twist to these beliefs but that was not a fundamental difference. Besides rebirth and samsara, where our lives are being recycled, the Buddha had been very rational.
    One has to realize that the Buddha lived in times when the human base of knowledge was very low-unlike the times of Einstein. One cannot understand reality by merely meditating under a bo tree. A fuller grasp of reality could be had only by advanced observation techniques that scientists have in possession today,

    •  3
       7

      “One cannot understand reality by merely meditating under a bo tree.”

      What is?? They can understand reality by owning Benz cars and can attain the highest order by owning Lamborghini with garage number plates for the 1 in 1000 only variety.

      Buddha was born at HumBugTota nede?

      He died Jain style therefore the Tri Murti,

    •  0
       0

      Einstein did believe in a pantheistic version of God as Spinoza did. God was to him some sort of force that “lived” in the universe is surely a mis-statement.

      Even spinoza did not believe in “some sort of force”. Einstein was explicit in his reply to Rabbi Goldstein who asked him if he believed in such a divine force. Einstein explained that it is the existence of physical laws that governed every aspect of the universe (and not some capricious god, or force) that he euphemistically called God. This does not mean that physical laws, although totally deterministic at one level, remain so at higher levels of complexity. But Einstein could not understand the failure of determinism at the utmost microscopic (quantum)level. In the end he was proven wrong regarding the quantum theory, as his “Einstein-Podlosky-Rosen” paradox was shown experimentally to definitely rule against Einstein.

      Similarly, the author’s quotes attributed to Einstein like “Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind, and are not, however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world. -Einstein” suggest that Einstein was some sort of idealist, supporting the “Mano-Pubbang” point of view of simplified Buddhism.

      This is completely misleading because it is out of context. What Einstein says here is that the brain adds a lot to what we think we conceive. In fact, even in Einstein’s time the physiology of vision was sufficiently advanced to show that about 80% of what we “see” is made up by brain circuitry, and only 20% comes in as inputs from the two optic nerves.

      Einstein had no doubts that the mind is a product of the brain, and here he agreed largely with Schrodinger In his book what is life?). In that sense Einstein was a materialist, except that Matter and Energy were proven to be the same thing since 1905 by Einstein !

  •  4
     7

    Dear Mahendra De Silva –

    Buddhism is a philosophy, not a religion.

    “If there is any religion that would cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism. . (Albert Einstein)

    Buddhism as a Philosophy was turned into a religion. If natural philosophy were turned into a religion, it would have come on top of Buddhism, without the Rebirth Dogma.

    Einstein, Newton, Galileo, Aristotle, Ptolemy and may others have made their mistakes. That includes Buddha too, and he tried two incorrect experiments before he settled on the final philosophy, but it still has the errors of rebirth.

    •  4
       1

      AMARASIRI and SHAYMAN JAYASINGHE:

      Lord Buddha had not talked anything about REBIRTH. It is you WHO understand a REBIRTH.

      FIRST UNDERSTAND THE WORD ANATHMA. Then try to talk Rebirth and see whether it matters.

      I like if you guys post an article on that in CT.

      •  2
         5

        JIM SOFTY,

        “Lord Buddha had not talked anything about REBIRTH. It is you WHO understand a REBIRTH. “
        “FIRST UNDERSTAND THE WORD ANATHMA. Then try to talk Rebirth and see whether it matters.”

        Very interesting thought, because it separates Buddhism as a Philosophy vs. Buddhism as a Religion. Most, if not almost all are brainwashed from early childhood and as adults. I did a quick survey and research to find out what those who spent their whole lifetime since childhood on Buddhism has to say about the subject. Given below is a quick summary and the citations. Make your own conclusions, with very good support and reason, not dogma.

        1. Buddhist View on Death and Rebirth by Ven. Thich Nguyen Tang

        http://www.urbandharma.org/udharma5/viewdeath.html

        To Buddhism, however, death is not the end of life, it is merely the end of the body we inhabit in this life, but our spirit will still remain and seek out through the need of attachment, attachment to a new body and new life. Where they will be born is a result of the past and the accumulation of positive and negative action, and the resultant karma (cause and effect) is a result of ones past actions.

        This would lead to the person to be reborn in one of 6 realms which are; heaven, human beings, Asura, hungry ghost, animal and hell. Realms, according to the severity of ones karmic actions, Buddhists believe however, none of these places are permanent and one does not remain in any place indefinitely. So we can say that in Buddhism, life does not end, merely goes on in other forms that are the result of accumulated karma. Buddhism is a belief that emphasizes the impermanence of lives, including all those beyond the present life. With this in mind we should not fear death as it will lead to rebirth.

        http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/reincarnation.htm

        What Reincarnation is Not

        Reincarnation is not a simple physical birth of a person; for instance, John being reborn as a cat in the next life. In this case John possesses an immortal soul which transforms to the form of a cat after his death. This cycle is repeated over and over again. Or if he is lucky, he will be reborn as a human being. This notion of the transmigration of the soul definitely does not exist in Buddhism.

        The World

        Traditionally, Buddhism teaches the existence of the ten realms of being. At the top is Buddha and the scale descends as follows: Bodhisattva (an enlightened being destined to be a Buddha, but purposely remaining on earth to teach others), Pratyeka Buddha (a Buddha for himself), Sravka (direct disciple of Buddha), heavenly beings (superhuman [angels?]), human beings, Asura (fighting spirits), beasts, Preta (hungry ghosts), and depraved men (hellish beings).

        Now, these ten realms may be viewed as unfixed, nonobjective worlds, as mental and spiritual states of mind. These states of mind are created by men’s thoughts, actions, and words. In other words, psychological states. These ten realms are “mutually immanent and mutually inclusive, each one having in it the remaining nine realms.” For example, the realm of human beings has all the other nine states (from hell to Buddhahood). Man is at the same time capable of real selfishness, creating his own hell, or is truly compassionate, reflecting the compassion of Amida Buddha. Buddhas too have the other nine realms in their minds, for how can a Buddha possibly save those in hell if he himself does not identify with their suffering and guide them to enlightenment.

  •  0
     8

    Is Creation or origin of the world so important to normal person and his spirituality? How many would have any sense of theory of Big Bang?
    Buddhism focus on selfish inner liberation, less emphasis on loving others, forgiving others, or selfless giving..
    Humans are imperfect. … Jesus believed loving others, forgiving others, selfless giving would liberate imperfect people, he didn’t talk much about direct inner development.
    Christianity –> Outer development –> unity –> materiel prosperity –>less violence… Buddhism –> Inner development –> separation –> poverty –> poverty leads to violence
    Just my thoughts …
    Anura

    •  2
       0

      “Big Bang” does not mean creation. That is a misunderstanding. There are many singularities in spacetime. Some are black-holes (where spacetime blows-up inwards, sucking everything in). Then there are “whhite-holes” where spacetime blows out. The big bang is the result of such a very rapid inflationary bubble in the fabric of space time. There are many such big-bangs going on, just like there are many bubbles forming at the bottom of a kettle. We happen to be in one of those bubbles that we identify from experiments as our “big-nag”.

      •  2
         3

        Can someone please tell me what happens if we take Mahendra De Silva to a black-hole and push him over the event horizon?

        I think he will attain instant Nirvana because there is no way he is going to be reborn in this universe!

        According to relativity, no event (his death) inside the horizon can influence an outside observer (a child birth).

        In the case he is reborn in another universe, I’m pretty curious how Buddha managed to see the causality between events even when they are not in the same universe.

        When Buddha was not aware that it was a simple but highly contagious virus that was causing “Smallpox”, how could he have understood physics that remain elusive for humans even today?

        •  1
           0

          Navin – “When Buddha was not aware that it was a simple but highly contagious virus that was causing “Smallpox”, how could he have understood physics that remain elusive for humans even today?”

          Navin if you have not already heard this quote from the Buddha’s Simsapa Sutta, I will reproduce it below. Maybe it will answer your question above.
          Please read the Sutta on Google for the full story.

          “In the same way, monks, those things that I have known with direct knowledge but have not taught are far more numerous [than what I have taught]. And why haven’t I taught them? Because they are not connected with the goal, do not relate to the rudiments of the holy life, and do not lead to disenchantment, to dispassion, to cessation, to calm, to direct knowledge, to self-awakening, to Unbinding. That is why I have not taught them.”

          •  2
             6

            This is all fine. A religion is something you take by faith. If you have enough faith to take that as a convincing explanation, well good for you.

            However, the moment you try to establish “truth” or investigate the veracity of claims or claim that Buddhism is not a religion but a philosophy or look down upon other religions (e.g. Buddhist rituals) you need to answer these questions and at that point this kind of Buddha is above everybody else in terms on knowing the truth doesn’t apply.

            Buddha will have to subject his discoveries to the same kind of peer reviews that any scientist has to go through.

            Any scientist providing a new solution/proof to any one of millennium price problems in mathematics for instance will have to break down his solution in such way that he addresses problems having more limited scope before he present his general solution.

            If you know the different between special and general theory of relativity you will appreciate that one is a special case of the other and you can solve many interesting problems without appealing to the general theory.

            Any reviewer reading your manuscript is going to run many sanity checks on your claims before he spends good amount of his time reading your 1000+ page paper.

            Your answer is good for the faithful. But we are not in the business of convincing faithful here right? Why do we need to compare what Buddha said with what Albert Einstein or some other famous scientist said for that? Why do we need to involve science at all?

            If you want to establish Buddhism as a doctrine or a philosophy you need to subject it to the same scrutiny like any other thesis.

            I’m afraid Buddhism in that respect doesn’t pass even the most rudimentary sanity checks!

    •  6
       0

      AVB – Have you not heard of the Buddha’s 4 Brahma Viharas?

      They are Meththa – Loving Kindness, Karuna – Compassion, Muditha – Joy in the Success of others, Upekkha – Equanimity.

      Buddhists should be made more aware of these qualities, rather than just giving Alms to Monks, which seems to be the most important aspect of Dana!