2023/06/19

Theology and Spirituality Thomas Merton

 A Course in Christian Mysticism 

 

 v 

Contents

Foreword vii 

 Michael N. McGregor 

Editor’s Prologue xi

Preface xix

Lecture 1: The Aim of This Course ......................1

Lecture 2: Mystical Theology in St. John’s Gospel ........12

Lecture 3: Martyrs and Gnostics (Ignatius, Irenaeus,Clement, and Origen) ....21

Lecture 4: Divinization and Mysticism(Te Cappadocian Fathers) ......40

Lecture 5: Evagrius Ponticus ..........................57

Lecture 6: Contemplation and the Cosmos(Maximus the Confessor) .......71

Lecture 7: The Dionysian Tradition ....................79

Lecture 8: Western Mysticism: The Influence ofSt. Augustine ..........88

Lecture 9: St. Bernard of Clairvaux .....................99

Lecture 10: St. Bernard’s Sermons on the Song of Songs .118

Lecture 11: Fourteenth Century Mysticism:The Béguines, Eckhart, Tauler......141

Lecture 12: Spanish Mysticism: St. Teresa of Avilaand Others .........161

Lecture 13: St. John of the Cross: Dark Nightsand Spiritual Crises .......184

===

Foreword by  Michael N. McGregor 


W hen the editor of this volume, Jon M. Sweeney,

asked me to write a foreword for it, my first

thought was that I’m not worthy to write about

Tomas Merton and mysticism. Tat feeling intensified as I

read the thirteen lessons collected here, filled as they are with

Merton’s intellectual vigor and supple application of sometimes

disparate theologies. What gave me hope was a hunch that the

 young monastics these lessons were originally intended for were as perplexed as me by some of Merton’s more esoteric concepts and conclusions—that and the glimmer of simplicity that lies at the heart of what Merton is saying. When stripped of the history

and tradition that Merton takes such pains to trace, mysticism, in

his mind, is simply union with God, and the path to it is opened

primarily by grace and prayer.

Judging by what Merton writes in

Te Seven Storey Mountain

,

his introduction to real mysticism came at twenty-two when

he read Aldous Huxley’s

 Ends and Means

, a book Robert Lax—whose concept of mysticism and most other spiritual ideas was

far less complicated—recommended he read. Until that time,

Merton and Lax and their college friends had distrusted even the

word

mysticism

, thinking it represented a kind of hocus pocus.

What impressed Merton about Huxley’s book was Huxley’s

erudition and sobriety, that “he had read widely and deeply and

intelligently in all kinds of Christian and Oriental mystical litera-

ture, and had come out with the astonishing truth that all this,

far from being a mixture of dreams and magic and charlatanism,

was very real and very serious

o become more truly right with God, Huxley insisted, we

need not only to avoid using evil means to achieve positive endsbut also to free our spirits from “a servitude to the flesh” through

prayer and asceticism—an idea, as Merton shows in these les-

sons, that runs throughout the history of Western Christian

mystical thought. But, according to Merton’s reading of Huxley,

release from the flesh was only the beginning: “Once the spirit

was freed, and returned to its own element, it was not alone

there: it could find the absolute and perfect Spirit, God. It could

enter into union with Him: and what is more, this union wasnot something vague and metaphorical, but it was a matter of

real experience.”

It is easy to see the seeds of the lessons contained in this

book in these lines about Huxley’s concepts from Merton’s early

autobiography, but Merton was never one to take the easy path

to anything or to let someone else’s investigation stand in the

stead of his own. In truth, he continued to distrust the concept

of mysticism—and even the word, often substituting

contemplation  for it in his writings, though he felt, as he suggests inmore than one place here, that contemplation and mysticism

weren’t really the same thing. In order to feel comfortable withthe term, he had to do a thorough survey of the available litera-ture on his own. One of the great blessings of working through

these lessons is learning from Merton’s research—viewing the

rich Christian mystical tradition through the eyes of a brilliant,spirit-filled man.

But of course this book is not meant to be just an interesting

study; it is intended to open us more completely to mystical

possibilities, to prepare us for a deepening of our own experi-

ence of God. As Merton himself warns, and Sweeney reiterates

in his introduction, if we are to undertake this journey, we must

be willing to accept deep and profound change.




pp 11-12


Theology and Spirituality—the Divorce

For some, theology is a penance and effort without value, except as a chore to be offered up, whereas spirituality is to be studied, developed, experienced. Hence there is an experience of spirituality but not an experience of theology—this is the death of contemplation. It promotes experience of experience and not experience of revelation and of God revealing. Perhaps in our modern world we are witnessing a kind of death agony of spirituality—a real crisis has been reached.

Fr. Georges Florovsky has said, 

“In this time of temptation and judgement theology becomes again a public matter, a universal and catholic mission. It is incumbent upon all to take up spiritual arms. Already we have reached a point where theological silence, embarrassment, incertitude, lack of articulation in our witness are equal to temptation, to flight before the enemy.

Silence can create disturbance as much as a hasty or indecisive answer. . . . It is precisely because we are thrown into theapocalyptic battle that we are called upon to do the job of theologians. . . . Theology is called not only to judge [scientific un-
belief] but to heal. We must penetrate into this world of doubt, of illusion and lies to reply to doubts as well as reproaches” (but not reply with complacent and ambiguous platitudes)! It mustbe the word of God lived in us. “A theological system must notbe a mere product of erudition. . . . It needs the experience of prayer, spiritual concentration, and pastoral concern. . . . The time has come when the refusal of theological knowledge has become a deadly sin, the mark of complacency and of lack of love, of pusillanimity and of malignity.”