2022/05/14

신비주의의 등 돌리기를 통한 독재적 기호로부터의 탈출

신비주의의 등 돌리기를 통한 독재적 기호로부터의 탈출
신비주의의 등 돌리기를 통한 독재적 기호로부터의 탈출
Exodus from the Despotic Signifier through Averting Face in Medieval Mysticism
종교연구

약어 : JKHR

2009, vol., no.57, pp. 95-118 (24 pages)

DOI : 10.21457/kars..57.200912.95

UCI : G704-000716.2009..57.006  

발행기관 : 한국종교학회

연구분야 : 인문학 > 종교학
이충범 /Choongbum Lee 1
1협성대학교

초록 
From the point of view of Jacques Derrida and poststructuralists, negative theology is no other than an onto-theology or a system of hermeneutics of the despotic Signifier. However, in this writing, the writer tried to demonstrate the poststructural characteristics of so-called negative theology or speculative mysticism by means of semiotic methodology of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari.
In short, the writer defines that mysticism of Meister Eckhart and Mechthild von Magdeburg is a type of the system of postsignifying regime of sign. The postsignifying regime of sign is a system of betrayal. The assembly of the power is manifested at the face. Thus, the faciality is a politics and the system of betrayal would be expressed at the face. Averting face is a start point of the line of flight. Cain, Moses, and Jesus have averted their faces against their own tradition, religion, and gods.
However, the point of averting face is the origin of subjectification. At that point, Cain began to draw a new subject which was independent upon God. Moses fled from the regime of Pharaoh at the moment of averting his own face. Jesus' betrayal to Judaism resulted in the creation of new religion. In the same sense, averting faces of Eckhart and Mechthild began to launch new type of religious experience and theology.


From the point of view of Jacques Derrida and poststructuralists, negative theology is no other than an onto-theology or a system of hermeneutics of the despotic Signifier. However, in this writing, the writer tried to demonstrate the poststructural characteristics of so-called negative theology or speculative mysticism by means of semiotic methodology of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari.
In short, the writer defines that mysticism of Meister Eckhart and Mechthild von Magdeburg is a type of the system of postsignifying regime of sign. The postsignifying regime of sign is a system of betrayal. The assembly of the power is manifested at the face. Thus, the faciality is a politics and the system of betrayal would be expressed at the face. Averting face is a start point of the line of flight. Cain, Moses, and Jesus have averted their faces against their own tradition, religion, and gods.
However, the point of averting face is the origin of subjectification. At that point, Cain began to draw a new subject which was independent upon God. Moses fled from the regime of Pharaoh at the moment of averting his own face. Jesus' betrayal to Judaism resulted in the creation of new religion. In the same sense, averting faces of Eckhart and Mechthild began to launch new type of religious experience and theology.



키워드
마이스터 에크하르트, 막덴부르크의 메칠드, 신비주의, 질 들뢰즈, 안면성, 기호체계, 돌파, 무(無), 탈기표적 기호체계
Meister Eckhart, Mechthild von Magdeburg, mysticism, Gilles Deleuze, faciality, regime of sign, breakthrough, nothingness, postsignifying regime of sign.