2021/09/08

Perennial Phil Ch 14 IMMORTALITY AND SURVIVAL [3,1512]

Perennial Phil Ch 14 IMMORTALITY AND SURVIVAL [3,1512]
불명 존속

IMMORTALITY is participation in the eternal now of the divine Ground;

survival is persistence in one of the forms of time. 

Immortality is the result of total deliverance. 
Sur­vival is the lot of those who are partially delivered into some heaven, 
or who are not delivered at all, but find themselves, by the law of their own untranscended nature, compelled to choose some purgatorial or embodied servitude even more painful than the one they have just left.

Goodness and virtue make men know and love, believe and delight in their immortality. When the soul is purged and en­lightened by true sanctity, it is more capable of those divine irradiations, whereby it feels itself in conjunction with God. It knows that almighty Love, by which it lives, is stronger than death. It knows that God will never forsake His own life, which He has quickened in the soul. Those breathings and gaspings after an eternal participation of Him are but the energy of His own breath within us.

John Smith, the Platonist

I have maintained ere this and I still maintain that I already pos­sess all that is granted to me in eternity. For God in the fullness of his Godhead dwells eternally in his image—the soul.

Eckhart

Troubled or still, water is always water. What difference can embodiment or disembodiment make to the Liberated? Whether calm or in tempest, the sameness of the Ocean suffers no change. 
Yogavasistha
242 243

To the question 'Where does the soul go, when the body dies?' Jacob Boehme answered: 'There is no necessity for it to go anywhere.'

The word Tathagata (one of the names of the Buddha) signifies one who does not go to anywhere and does not come from any­where; and therefore is he called Tathagata (Thus-gone), holy and fully enlightened.

Diamond Sutra

Seeing Him alone, one transcends death; there is no other way.
Svetasvatara Upanishad

God, in knowledge of whom standeth our eternal life....
Book of Common Prayer

I died a mineral and became a plant.
I died a plant and rose an animal.
I died an animal and I was man.
Why should I fear? When was I less by dying?
Yet once more I shall die as man, to soar
With the blessed angels; but even from angelhood
I must pass on. All except God perishes.
When I have sacrificed my angel soul,
I shall become that which no mind ever conceived.
O, let me not exist! for Non-Existence proclaims,
'To Him we shall return.'

Jalal-uddin Rumi
===
나는 광물로 죽어 식물이 되었다. 
나는 식물로 죽고 동물을 살아났다. 
나는 동물로 죽었고 나는 인간이 되었다.
내가 왜 두려워해야 할까? 내가 죽는다고 못했던 때가 언제 있었나? 
그러나 다시 한 번 나는 인간으로 죽어 축복받은 천사들과 함께 날아오르리라. 그러나 나는 천사의 신분에서 부터도 넘어야 한다. 하나님 외에는 다 멸망한다.
 내가 내 천사 영혼을 희생했을 때, 나는 아무 생각도 해본 적이 없는 사람이 될 것입니다. 
오, 내가 존재하지 않게 하소서! 
비존재(Non-Existence)는 '우리는 그에게로 돌아갈 것이다'라고 선언한다.
===
세진: 여기서 "하나님"은 보통 의미의 God이 아니다.

There is a general agreement, East and West, that life in a body provides uniquely good opportunities for achieving salvation or deliverance. Catholic and Mahayana Buddhist doctrine is alike in insisting that the soul in its disembodied state after death cannot acquire merit, but merely suffers in purgatory the consequences of its past acts. 
But whereas Catholic orthodoxy declares that there is no possibility of progress in the next world, and that the degree of the soul's beatitude is determined solely by what it has done and thought in its earthly life, the eschatologists of the Orient affirm that there are certain posthu­mous conditions in which meritorious souls are capable of advancing from a heaven of happy personal survival to genuine immortality in union with the timeless, eternal Godhead. 

And, of course, there is also the possibility (indeed, for most indi­viduals, the necessity) of returning to some form of embodied life, in which the advance towards complete beatification, or deliverance through enlightenment, can be continued. Mean­while, the fact that one has been born in a human body is one of the things for which, says Shankara, one should daily give thanks to God.244 

The spiritual creature which we are has need of a body, without which it could nowise attain that knowledge which it obtains as the only approach to those things, by knowledge of which it is made blessed.
St. Bernard

Having achieved human birth, a rare and blessed incarnation, the wise man, leaving all vanity to those who are vain, should strive to know God, and Him only, before life passes into death.
Srimad Bliagavatam

Good men spiritualize their bodies; had men incarnate their souls.
Benjamin Whickcote
245

More precisely, 
  • good men spiritualize their mind-bodies; 
  • bad men incarnate and mentalize their spirits. 

The completely spiritualized mind-body is a Tathagata, who doesn't go any­where when he dies, for the good reason that he is already, actually and consciously, where everyone has always poten­tially been without knowing. 

The person who has not, in this life, gone into Thusness, into the eternal principle of all states of being, goes at death into some particular state, either purga­torial or paradisal. 

In the Hindu scriptures and their commentaries several different kinds of posthumous salvation are distinguished. 
The 'thus-gone' soul is completely delivered into complete union with the divine Ground; but it is also possible to achieve other kinds of mulcti, or liberation, even while retaining a form of purified I-consciousness. 

The nature of any individual's deliverance after death depends upon three factors: 
  1. the degree of holiness achieved by him while in the body, 
  2. the particular aspect of the divine Reality to which he gave his primary allegiance, and 
  3. the particular path he chose to follow. 

Similarly, in the Divine Comedy, Paradise has its various circles; but whereas in the oriental eschatologies the saved soul can go out of even sublimated individuality, out of survival even in some kind of celestial time, to a complete deliverance into the eternal, Dante's souls remain for ever where (after passing through the unmeritorious sufferings of purgatory) they find themselves as the result of their single incarnation in a body. 

Orthodox Christian doctrine does not admit the possibility, either in the posthumous state or in some other embodiment, of any further growth towards the ultimate perfection of a total union with the Godhead. But in the Hindu and Buddhist versions of the Perennial Philosophy the divine mercy is matched by the divine patience: both are infinite. For oriental theologians there is no eternal damna­tion; there are only purgatories and then an indefinite series of second chances to go forward towards not only man's, but the whole creation's final end—total reunion with the Ground of all being.

----

Preoccupation with posthumous deliverance is not one of the means to such deliverance, and may easily, indeed, become an obstacle in the way of advance towards it. 
There is not the slightest reason to suppose that ardent spiritualists are more likely to be saved than those who have never attended a séance or familiarized themselves with the literature, speculative or evidential. My intention here is not to add to that literature, but rather to give the baldest summary of what has been written about the subject of survival within the various religious traditions.  246 

In oriental discussions of the subject, that which survives death is not the personality. Buddhism accepts the doctrine of reincarnation; but it is not a soul that passes on (Buddhism denies the existence of a soul); it is the character.

'What we choose to make of our mental and physical constitution in the course of our life on earth affects the psychic medium within which individual minds lead a part at least of their amphibious existence, and this modification of the medium results, after the body's death, in the initiation of a new existence either in a heaven, or a purgatory, or another body.

In the Vedanta cosmology there is, over and above the Atman or spiritual Self, identical with the divine Ground
something in the nature of a soul that reincarnates in a gross or subtle body, or manifests itself in some incorporeal state. 
This soul is not the personality of the defunct, but rather the particularized I-consciousness out of which a personality arises.

Either one of these conceptions of survival is logically self-consistent and can be made to 'save the appearances'—in other words, to fit the odd and obscure facts of psychical research. 
The only personalities with which we have any direct acquaint­ance are incarnate beings, compounds Of a body and some un­known x. But if x plus a body equals a personality, then, obviously, it is impossible for x minus a body to equal the same thing. The apparently personal entities which psychical research sometimes seems to discover can only be regarded as temporary pseudo-personalities compounded of x and the medium's body.

These two conceptions are not mutually exclusive, and sur­vival may be the joint product of a persistent consciousness and a modification of the psychic medium. 
If this is so, it is possible for a given human being to survive in more than one posthumous form. 
His 'soul'—the non-personal ground and principle of past and future personalities—may go marching on in one mode of being, while the traces left by his thoughts and volitions in the psychic medium may become the origin of new individualized existences, having quite other modes of being.