2021/09/08

Perennial Phil Ch 18 FAITH [4,1653] 믿음, 신앙 필요없다

Perenial Phil Ch 18 FAITH [4,1653]

THE word 'faith' has a variety of meanings, which it is important to distinguish.
 
1] In some contexts it is used as a synonym for 'trust,' as when we say that we have faith in Dr. X's diagnostic skill or in lawyer Y's integrity. 
Analogous to this is our 'faith' in authority—the belief that what certain persons say about certain subjects is likely, because of their special qualifications, to be true. 

2] On other occasions 'faith' stands for belief in propositions which we have not had occa­sion to verify for ourselves, but which we know that we could verify if we had the inclination, the opportunity and the neces­sary capacities. 
In this sense of the word we have 'faith,' even though we may never have been to Australia, that there is such a creature as a duck-billed platypus; we have 'faith' in the atomic theory, even though we may never have performed the experiments on which that theory rests, and be incapable of understanding the mathematics by which it is supported. 

3] And finally there is the 'faith,' which is a belief in propositions which we know we cannot verify, even if we should desire to do so---propositions such as those of the Athanasian Creed or those which constitute the doctrine of the Immaculate Concep­tion. This kind of 'faith' is defined by the Scholastics as an act of the intellect moved to assent by the will.

Faith in the first three senses of the word plays a very im­portant part, not only in the activities of everyday life, but even in those of pure and applied science. Credo ut itzteiigam —and also, we should add, at agam and at viivam. Faith is a pre-condition of all systematic knowing, all purposive doing and all decent living.

 Societies are held together, not primarily by the fear of the many for the coercive power of the few, but by a widespread faith in the other fellow's decency. Such a faith tends to create its own object, while the widespread mutual mistrust, due, for example, to war or domestic dissen­sion, creates the object of mistrust. 

269 Passing now from the moral to the intellectual sphere, we find faith lying at the root of all organized thinking. 
Science and technology could not exist unless we had faith in the reliability of the universe—unless, in Clerk Maxwell's words, we implicitly believed that the book of Nature is really a book and not a magazine, a coherent work of art and not a hodge-podge of mutually irrelevant snippets. 

To this general faith in the reasonableness and trustworthiness of the world 
the searcher after truth must add two kinds of special faith
  1. faith in the authority of quali­fied experts, sufficient to permit him to take their word for statements which he personally has not verified; and 
  2. faith in his own working hypotheses, sufficient to induce him to test his provisional beliefs by means of appropriate action. 
This action may confirm the belief which inspired it. Alternatively it may bring proof that the original working hypothesis was ill founded, in which case it will have to be modified until it becomes conformable to the facts and so passes from the realm of faith to that of knowledge

---

The fourth kind of faith is the thing which is commonly called 'religious faith.'

The usage is justifiable, not because the other kinds of faith are not fundamental in religion just as they are in secular affairs, but because this willed assent to propositions which are known to be unverifiable occurs in religion, and only in religion, as a characteristic addition to faith as trust, faith in authority and faith in unverified but veri­fiable propositions. 

This is the kind of faith which, according to Christian theologians, justifies and saves [?]. In its extreme and most uncompromising form, such a doctrine can be very dangerous. Here, for example, is a passage from one of Luther's letters. .

Esto peccator, et pecca fortiter sed fortius crede et gaua'e in Chrirto, qui victor est peccati, mortis et mundi. Peccandum est quam diu sic sumus; vita /iaec non est kabitatio justitiae. 
('Be a sinner and sin strongly; but yet more strongly believe and rejoice in Christ, who is the conqueror of sin, death and the world. So long as we are as we are, there must be sinning; this life is not the dwelling place of righteous­ness.')  270 

   To the danger that faith in the doctrine of justification by faith may serve as an excuse for and even an invitation to sin must be added another danger, namely, that the faith which is supposed to save may be faith in propositions not merely unverifiable, but repugnant to reason and the moral sense, and entirely at variance with the findings of those who have ful­filled the conditions of spiritual insight into the Nature of Things. 

'This is the acme of faith,' says Luther in his De Servo ..4rbitrio, to believe that God who saves so few and condemns so many, is merciful; 
that He is just who, at his own pleasure, has made us necessarily doomed to damnation, so that He seems to delight in the torture of the wretched and to be more deserving of hate than of love. 

If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, who shows so much anger and harshness, could be merciful and just, there would be no need of faith.'

 Revelation (which, when it is genuine, is simply the record of the immediate experience of those who are pure enough in heart and poor enough in spirit to be able to see God) says nothing at all of these hideous doctrines, to which the will forces the quite naturally and rightly reluctant intel­lect to give assent. 

Such notions rnare the product, not of the insight of saints, but of the busy phantasy of jurists, who were so far from having transcended selfness and the prejudices of education that they had the folly and presumption to interpret the universe in terms of the Jewish and Roman law with which they happened to be familiar. 'Woe unto you lawyers,' said Christ. The denunciation was prophetic and for all time.

The core and spiritual heart of all the higher religions is the Perennial Philosophy; and 
==
the Perennial Philosophy can be assented to and acted upon without resort to the kind of faith about which Luther was writing in the foregoing passages. 
==
There must, of course, be faith as trust—for confidence in one's fellows is the beginning of charity towards men, and confidence not only in the material, but also the moral and spiritual relia­bility of the universe, is the beginning of charity or love-knowledge in relation to God. 271  

There must also be faith in authority—the authority of those whose selflessness has quali­fied them to know the spiritual Ground of all being by direct acquaintance as well as by report. 

And finally there must be faith in such propositions about Reality as are enunciated by philosophers in the light of genuine revelation—propositions which the believer knows that he can, if he is prepared to fulfil the necessary conditions, verify for himself. 

But, so long as the Perennial Philosophy is accepted in its essential simplicity, there is no need of willed assent to propositions known in advance to be unverifiable. 
Here it is necessary to add that such unverifiable propositions may become verifiable to the extent that intense faith affects the psychic substratum and so creates an existence, whose derived objectivity can actually be discovered 'out there.' 

Let us, however, remember that an existence which derives its objectivity from the mental activity of those who intensely believe in it cannot possibly be the spiritual Ground of the world, and that 
a mind busily engaged in the voluntary and intellectual activity, which is 'religious faith,' cannot possibly be in the state of selflessness and alert passivity which is the necessary condition of the unitive know­ledge of the Ground. 

That is why the Buddhists affirm that 
  • 'loving faith leads to heaven; 
  • but obedience to the Dharma leads to Nirvana.' [?]
In Hinduism, dharma is the religious and moral law governing individual conduct and is one of the four ends of life.

Faith in the existence and power of any supernatural entity which is less than ultimate spiritual Reality, and 
in any form of worship that falls short of self-naughting, will certainly, if the object of faith is intrinsically good, result in improvement of character, and probably in posthumous sur­vival of the improved personality under 'heavenly' conditions. 

But this personal survival within what is still the temporal order is not the eternal life of timeless union with the Spirit

This eternal life 'stands in the knowledge' of the Godhead, [?]
not in faith in anything less than the Godhead.

The immortality attained through the acquisition of any objective condition (e.g., the condition—merited through good works, which have been inspired by love of and faith in, something less than the supreme Godhead—of being united in act to what is worshipped) is liable to end; for it is distinctly stated in the Scriptures that karma is never the cause of emancipation.[?]

Shankara272

Karma is the causal sequence in time, from which we are delivered solely by 'dying to, the temporal self and becoming united with the eternal, which is beyond time and cause. 

For 'as to the notion of a First Cause, or a Causa Sui' (to quote the words of an eminent theologian and philosopher, Dr. F. R. Tennant), 

'we have, on the one hand, to bear in mind that we refute ourselves in trying to establish it by extension of the application of the causal category, 
for causality when univer­salized contains a contradiction
and, on the other, to remem­ber that the ultimate Ground simply "is." 

Only when the individual also 'simply is,' by reason of his union through love-knowledge with the Ground, can there be any question of complete and eternal liberation.