2018/09/18

Adaptation to Life by George E. Vaillant | Goodreads

Adaptation to Life by George E. Vaillant | Goodreads




4.12 · Rating details · 126 Ratings · 20 Reviews

Between 1939 and 1942, one of America's leading universities recruited 268 of its healthiest and most promising undergraduates to participate in a revolutionary new study of the human life cycle. The originators of the program, which came to be known as the Grant Study, felt that medical research was too heavily weighted in the direction of disease, and their intent was to chart the ways in which a group of promising individuals coped with their lives over the course of many years.



Nearly forty years later, George E. Vaillant, director of the Study, took the measure of the Grant Study men. The result was the compelling, provocative classic, Adaptation to Life, which poses fundamental questions about the individual differences in confronting life's stresses. Why do some of us cope so well with the portion life offers us, while others, who have had similar advantages (or disadvantages), cope badly or not at all? Are there ways we can effectively alter those patterns of behavior that make us unhappy, unhealthy, and unwise?



George Vaillant discusses these and other questions in terms of a clearly defined scheme of "adaptive mechanisms" that are rated mature, neurotic, immature, or psychotic, and illustrates, with case histories, each method of coping. (less)



GET A COPY

Kobo

Online Stores ▾

Book Links ▾



Paperback, 416 pages

Published August 11th 1998 by Harvard University Press (first published 1977)

Original Title

Adaptation to Life

ISBN

0674004140 (ISBN13: 9780674004146)

Edition Language

English



Other Editions (3)









All Editions | Add a New Edition | Combine...Less Detailedit details









EditMY ACTIVITY



Review of ISBN 9780674004146

Rating

1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars

Shelves to-read

edit

( 182nd )

Format Paperback edit

Status



September 18, 2018 – Shelved



September 18, 2018 – Shelved as: to-read

Review Add a review



comment











FRIEND REVIEWS

Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.









READER Q&A

Ask the Goodreads community a question about Adaptation to Life



Mark entire question as spoiler

Ask

Cancel







Be the first to ask a question about Adaptation to Life







LISTS WITH THIS BOOK

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »









COMMUNITY REVIEWS

(showing 1-30)

Rating details





Sort: Default

|

Filter



Oct 29, 2012Luke rated it really liked it

This book is a like a wide-lens biography. There are dozens of men we learn about and we see them live and change over decades. With the breadth of characters it was not hard to see myself in many of them and begin to wonder about the influences that were shaping me, right here, in real time. It was deeply confronting to stare this in the face. Without ever giving any direct life advice, this book was the best of self-help books because it lets you to take from it what particular wisdom you need and will teach different people in different ways.



The main lesson I found in the book is that character is not formed by large isolated events but the slow, steady effect of relationships. Freud’s idea of mental health as the ability to love and work is found to be true, but deeper than that. By loving and working we find it ever easier to love and work, or by falling out of this positive cycle, we become more isolated and selfish and ever more unable to join it. Life builds on momentum. Experiences in childhood and temperament may create the outline of a person but it is how the world acts upon that person that moulds them slowly, over decades. Friendships, relationships and worthwhile work are the benevolent winds that gently steer a happy course. Someone without them increasingly turns inwards to seek comfort and that source is shallow and will soon be propped up by fickle, destructive pleasures which can quickly slide into addictions.



There is much in this book which supports traditional values as the best way to live. A stable and faithful marriage, for example, is crucial to a good life; solid, honest friendships as well. The evidence illuminates why these ancient codes are the way they are. Honesty, for example, is a mysterious virtue which at first glance seems to have no clear benefit for the person who has it. Yet when we look closer we see that honesty is the gateway to close relationships. Without it, a person can never truly share and blend with another and so they remain cut off and alone, isolated from the engines of life which shape a good and happy character.



These are the main conclusions that leap from the pages to me, but someone else will draw something else from these men’s lives. In a curious aside, one of the men studied is JFK, so he must be hidden in the pages somewhere. I found myself looking for hints for him. He might be there with his name and details changed but character intact, or he may have faded into the statistics, just a number in a column somewhere. That thought however was enough to remind me that these were real men with real lives and I should certainly be able to learn something from them.

(less)

flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review







Feb 28, 2013Ariadna73 rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: brain-and-mind

Adaptation to life

Little Brown USA ISBN 031689520-2

Following 268 of the healthiest college students through all their lives.

Study conceived in 1937.

The author joined the staff in 1967.

Part I the study of mental health Introduction

1937 Philanthropist William T. Grant.

Previous study Frank Barron.

Conclusion -> problems exist always. The difference is how do we react to them.

The hypothesis was that health had a lot to do with success.

Ego mechanisms = keep affects, restore emotional balance, master changes in self-image, handle conflicts, survive major conflicts.

Author bias -> the experiment had too much candor.

Mental Health

How you adapt to life.

What do we do to make lite tolerable? -> Sublimation, altruism (Makes you warm).

Dissociation and Projection (make, you cold)

Thesis of the book: “A man's adaptative devices are as important in determining the course of his life as are his heredity, his upbringing, his social position, or his access to psychiatric help"

Five ideas:

1. Not the isolated traumas of childhood shape our future, but the quality of sustained relationships with important people.

2. Lives change and life is discontinuous

3. Key = understand adaptative mechanism. One defensive style can evolve into another.

4. Humans evolve. Truths are always relative.

5. Health exists and can be discussed.



Chapter 3 HTWS Six considerations on how small the sample was.

The men of the Grant study

This, book describes 95/268.

Many biases.

Did not pretend to be representative.

Kind of stoic. Kind of privileged.

How they were studied

We cannot be taught self-esteem. We absorb it

Sublimating the conflicts and wishes.

Forget or "Repress" passions.

Health redefined-sex-anger.

Questions about the mechanisms

How to identify them?

Defenses are a major means of Managing instinct and affect.

Do they exist?

They are unconscious.

How many are there?

Discrete from one another

Dynamic and reversible s.

They can be adaptative or pathologic.



The mechanisms 4 levels.

Level 1

Psychotic (childhood)

Denial

Distortion

Projection

Level II

Immature (Adolescents or people with personality disorders)

Fantasy

Projection

Hypochondriasis

Passive aggressive (masochism)

Acting out.

Level III

Neurotic

Intellectualization

Repression

Reaction formation

Displacement

Dissociation

Level IV Mature

Sublimation

Altruism

Suppression

Anticipation

Humor



What is the diff. between pathological defense Mech. and adaptive coping Mech?

Practical consequences?

Are they immutable through life?

What to do when seeing one?

Since these mechanisms are unconscious we can try to make the person shift to another one, but having the time and love to do it.

Part two Basic style, of adaptation

Adaptative ego mechanisms: A hierarchy

Sublimation

Makes instinct acceptable, makes ideas fun.

Every failure bring, something new and exciting.

Suppression, Anticipation, Altruism, and humor

Anticipation-Attenuates anxiety

Suppression-Always seeing the bright side.

Humor: elegant defense

Sup or Ant. = Positive

Sublim and Altruism = Poorly adapted

The neurotic defenses

Freud contribution.

Unusual human behavior could be Compensatory and adaptative. rather than immoral or derranged.

Repression = Prototype "Just forget it"

Suppression' Element of choice that differentiates it from repression

Intelectualization = Most clearly relates to the OCD

Displacement -> displace sexual arguments with money arguments.

Reaction formation Rigidity, change the perception. For example start hating the smell of cigarettes.

Dissociation = More dramatic Drugs, alcohol, Stanislavski method of acting

Important = The defense mechanism affect the interior of the user these neurotic mechanisms are the most widely used.

The immature defenses

Character disorders never learn

Projection -> Assign our own responsibilities to someone else.

Paranoia. Men who used it were terrified of intimacy.

Obsessive over involvement with the enemy.

Fantasy: Making events alight in our head

Acting out Giving in to impulses permits to express avoiding control drinking, killing, etc.

Hypochondria-Accuses and punishes others. Conversion of affect into a somatic equivalent.

Can't show hurt, so they sommatize it.

Masochism: Gandhi was a bad husband and a bad father

Guilty and paranoids are two ends of the same circle.

Part THREE Developmental consequence) of adaptation

The adult lifecycle: in one culture.

Caterpillars and butterflies

The passage of time renders truth itself relative.

Opinions change with aging.

Maturation makes liars of all of us.

There are patterns and rhythms in life. Not easy to discover, but they are the answer.

Adult development is still a mystery.

Adult life patterns outlined by Erik Erikson in "Childhood and society"

Basic trust

Autonomy + Initiative

Industry

Identity

Intimacy (40)

At 10 we pay attention to what our parents say. At 16 to what they do.

Adolescence- the first time around

Real responsibility -> after consolidation the career.

Parents are very important to achieve maturity.

By nature they are spontaneous, gregarious and idealistic

Intimacy and career consolidation

Marriage, before 30 (intimacy age) are more likely to fail.

Important change in Career consolidation> Acquisition, assimilation and finally casting aside of mentors.

Generativity-A second adolescence

At 40 extramarital affairs reach their peak.

Some fathers are more rigid.

At 55 one can only do 60% of watt could do at 40.

Implies responsibility for fellow creatures.

The keepers of the meanings

50 s are quieter than 40

50 sound terrifying for the younger readers.

However, don't forget that this is a limited study. .

Paths into health

Actors are masters al disociation

Hypocondriacs rarely connect their disease to emotions but theydo with maturity and dissociation from the parent-like figures.

Successful adjustment

"Occasionally, I would start thinking how such dull people could make money. I should have known that money making has more to do with emotional stability than intellect."

JP Marqland "Women and Thomas Harrow"

Blanche is sick. Stanley is healthy

It seems that people that don't self analize much, are happier.

Defense, of the best outcomes: Chanel rather than block inner life = suppression, anticipation, altruism, displacement

Poor outcomes = Defenses that remove, denies. Reaction formation, disociation, immature defenses.

P. 277 Photo Mental health is not predictable

The child is father to the man.

Selfishness occurs in people that got too little when children.

Children with less love grow into men that have 10 times prescription meds and spend 5 times more hours with the phyisichiatric.

Friends, wives and children.

Mental health and the capacity to love are linked.

In our era emotional attachments are overrated

Friends

Lives of friendly and lonely are very different.

Lonely are more frightened-more likely to feel nervous.

Friendly took full vacations.

Fatherhood

Family is a treasure for the successful.

Marriage

Less successful = Reaction formation = substitute happy myths to deny sadness.

More successful: supression

Fear of sex is linked with mistrust of the universe.

Love and the capacity to love is KEY

Part Four: Conclusions

The maturing Ego

Maturation of mind cannot be separated from maturation of body.

Criminals mysteriously reform between 25 and 40

The evolution of mature defenses is shockingly independent of social and genetic good fortune.

Evolution is independent of good fortune.

Biological maturity is necessary but not sufficient.

Maturity is accompanied with deeper relationships and love.

Environment influences

Suppression, anticipation and altruism are enhanced by apprenticeship

Defenses cannot be taught. They can be absorbed.

Adaptational maturity and ego are the agents of morality.

Belief in the species without generativity is impossible.

The ethical rule of adulthood is to do to others what will help them, even as it helps you to grow.

Association between maturation and external adjustment

Trust, autonomy and initiative are the most important tasks of childhood.

Pessimism, self-doubt and fear of sex are features of the worst lives.

What is mental health

Important = Internalize fathers as role models.

Master intimacy for good outcomes

Worst outputs gave less back.

Working and loving are still the goals of our society.

Health is success at living know when to stop.

Summary

Isolated traumatic events rarely mold individual lives.

Breaks of luck = interaction between our choice of adaptative mechanisms and our sustained relationships with other people.

Mental illness is more like the red tender swelling around a fracture that immobilizes so that it may heal.

Mental health exists.

Those who pay their internists the most visits are also most likely to visit psychiatrists.

Individual capable of homeostasis survive.

It is not stress what kills us. It is effective adaptation to stress that permits us to live.

(less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Jun 27, 2018Robert W. rated it really liked it

The chapter that really resonates with me is about Alan Poe. He breaks the study open and gives Valiant the most pause.

flagLike · comment · see review







Mar 18, 2018Jonathan rated it it was amazing

Re-read after 32 years. Did not duplicate the sense of revelation I had reading it at the age of 24, but that’s a measure of how deep the imprint was left.

flagLike · comment · see review







Apr 29, 2013Alex Ball rated it really liked it

Adaptation to Life provides an insightful look into the maturing ego defenses of a group of well-adjusted young men studied from the early 20th century through their later years ending in 1977. Vaillant, a psychologist, expands on Freud's (Anna's and Sigmund's) and Erikson's development theories, defining and illustrating such mechanisms as neurotic denial, suppression and altruism and how these mechanisms, or adaptive styles, impact the objective qualities of the men's adult lives.



Vaillant, writing in a clinically accurate but friendly style, makes some interesting points backed by extensive anecdotes and statistical data. For instance, a childhood characterized by stable but distant or immature parenting can in fact be more harmful in the long run than one traumatized by the death of a mother or father. Mental health, as defined by impartial professionals blind to particular variables, was not significantly correlated to socioeconomic stratum. Finally, a man's adaptive style (essentially, his ability and fashion of realistically (stoically?) facing and overcoming long-term personal challenges) predicts a vast number of variables, including career, social and marital success.



Adaptation to Life is really unique in that its longitudinal approach trumps all the snake oil and cross-sectional preaching you might hear from shrinks of one life-coaching camp or another. Great read if you're into psychology.(less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Jan 10, 2013Michaela rated it it was amazing

Shelves: nonfiction

A longitudinal study of adults, of what constitutes mental health. Fascinating, terrifying, freeing, what other adjectives can I throw at it? I am now slightly more apprehensive of middle age, when apparently both my children and I will be going through adolescence at the same time. But there is also incredible relief for a parent when he claims that single traumatic events are unlikely to result in poor development. As long as I am not subjecting them to ongoing trauma for decades, my children should turn out ok… Maybe I should classify this book as parenting… ;)



In all seriousness, this book was eye-opening and useful. The criticisms I could hurl at it the author has anticipated (showing great adaptive maturity?) and acknowledged. The biggest being that it is so very biased by the selection process of the study: privilege, college-educated white males born after WWI. There were paragraphs where I ached as he described a level of mental health based on criteria I can (still!) only imagine. In curiosity I longed to also know the mental health of the wives of some of the mentally healthy men, suspicious of what I would find. And yet. You won't be disappointed in Vaillant's treatment of that shortcoming. And the majority of his findings and conclusions I think do apply to humanity, not just a subset. So much in here to learn, even with the timeliness of some of the theories. (Those too, the author acknowledges) (less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Feb 16, 2016Alexei G rated it really liked it

When I first opened the book and read the first couple of chapters, I was initially stunned by the parochial narrow-mindedness of the notions and judgements the author passes upon his subjects. I was about to skim the rest of the book and was already gearing myself up to writing a scathing review.

And yet. As I read further and further on, I realised that the book is indeed very valuable. The simple access to a very unique and undervalued study gave the man insight and material to work with few o ...more

flagLike · comment · see review







Jun 05, 2011Ryan rated it it was amazing

Two quotes from the Conclusion sum up this book quite well:



"Neither a sextant nor a celestial map can predict where we should go; but both are invaluable in letting us identify where we are."



"Contrary to popular belief, lucky at work means lucky in love; lack of overt emotional distress does not lead to headache and high blood pressure but to robust physical health; and those who pay their internist the most visits are also most likely to visit psychiatrists. Inner happiness, external play, objective vocational success, mature inner defenses, good outward marriage, all correlate highly - not perfectly, but at least as powerfully as height correlates with weight." Though there is the occasional (1 in 1000) exception.



Fantastic insight into how we tick and where we, as individuals, are currently ticking. The book acknowledges its weaknesses (mostly in its cohort selection), but it provides some very useful broad swaths. The second to last chapter is also incredibly heartening. It should almost be read first, but acts as a sort of tension release valve for the rest of the book.



Highly recommended. (less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Aug 19, 2011Pepe rated it really liked it

Shelves: experiment-science

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

flagLike · comment · see review







Jul 11, 2007Ben rated it really liked it

Shelves: psychology

In this book George Vaillant analyzes adaptation techniques (aka coping strategies aka defense mechanisms) using the lives of men in the Grant Study (the Grant Study undertook the task of profiling 250+ male college graduates in the United States from 1940 to the end of their lives; this book was written in the 1970s, when the men were in their fifties). He covers 14 adaptation techniques, from altruism and sublimation to delusional projection and denial. The really fascinating aspect of this book is the author's ability to show how one defense can evolve into another one, for better or worse. He also gives a good picture of how different defenses work within the same person simultaneously. This book is an introduction to the defenses, so you don't need to know much about psychology to get into it. Vaillant cites Anna Freud and Sigmund Freud throughout the text, but also indicates that he is influenced by the writings of Harry Stack Sullivan, Erik Erikson, and Adolf Meyer. (less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Sep 11, 2013Jim Angstadt rated it liked it

Shelves: dnf

This is a topic that should be a some concern to all of us. How do we adapt to the curve-balls that life throws up? What are the important factors that point to successful adaptation? Or un-successful adaptation?



The author has a very organized approach to evaluation of a longitudinal study of some young men.



For me, the author's approach seems scientific and realistic. And yet, that was not my take-away learning.



My bottom-line was that we are all thrown curve-balls. The difference is our adaptability. Are we reasonable, or something else? Is our adaptability of a healthy kind or an unhealthy kind?



I bailed early, but this topic is still in my mind. (less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Jan 03, 2013Emma rated it it was ok

A book adhering to outdated Freudian analysis, where you can feel how the author manipulates /misrepresents characters in order to fit his overarching theme - positive coping mechanisms (defined rigidly) trump bad ones. Okay, after 50 pages we already get the idea, but the whole book repeats it over and over again, using caricatures, so one-dimensional it is like reading a horrible teen novel.

The idea is worth knowing, an excerpt/ review is all you need. With the advent of more scientific psychology theories, the ideas proposed here seem increasingly simplistic, sometimes laughable.



(less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Sep 20, 2010Michael rated it it was amazing

Shelves: brain-body-science, thought-religion

LIFE-CHANGING. I beg you to read it! Rarely has a book affected my view of the human condition so profoundly, and never so precisely. It approaches perfection; not for universality or omniscience, but because it shines within the acknowledged limits of the study. Erudition and grace transform what could have been a dull academic text into something approaching a novel. I felt both highly vulnerable and hopeful while reading it, and I doubt anyone could finish without becoming a more complete person. (less)

flagLike · comment · see review







Aug 15, 2014Rebecca rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Very interesting. I was more interested in immature and mature adaptation styles than neurotic so skimmed through a few sections. Reading about the men in the study, with the deft use of contrast and comparison, was enlightening. The conclusions resonated and are held up but what we have since learned about mental health, imho. Nothing mind-blowing here except for the depth and breadth of the study, which is remarkable.

flagLike · comment · see review







Apr 21, 2010Kristie Castellini rated it it was amazing

The detailed history behind my favorite article in years: What Makes Us Happy? It's a 72-year longitudinal study of Harvard grads and the long-term drivers for health & happiness.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/a...

This book is a skimmer but great detail behind the article if you get as interested in it as I did.

flagLike · comment · see review







Dec 26, 2009Andrew Pace rated it it was amazing

The best non fiction book I have ever read. Covers key events in the lives of dozens of intelligent, successful Harvard graduates. Describes the ways even the best of them manage to make themselves miserable, or how those who started with so little build rich, fulfilling lives.

flagLike · comment · see review







Apr 16, 2016Mugizi Rwebangira rated it liked it

This one talks a lot more about their quasiFreudian theories of how humans adapt than the follow up Triumphs of Experience.





flagLike · comment · see review







Sep 06, 2014Michele rated it it was amazing

Shelves: psychology, freud-is-alive, leadership

A genius longitudinal study that created a very effective way at viewing defenses. The taxonomy of defenses is fascinating. I have to go look at this again.

flagLike · comment · see review







Dec 23, 2013Adrian Herbez rated it really liked it

I found this to be fascinating- great take on what really matters in life, and what contributes to success and happiness.

flagLike · comment · see review







Jul 29, 2011Catherine Woodman rated it really liked it

Interim analysis of a very interesting longitudinal study

flagLike · comment · see review
===========






Top customer reviews

Long term customerTop Contributor: Star Trek

1.0 out of 5 starsOf historic interst onlyFebruary 17, 2015
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

Interesting premise that might have been an informative read, were it based on what we now know about mental health. Unfortunately, this analysis is just out-dated. We have all been struck, at one time or another, by the incongruities of existence. The high school valedictorian who fails at everything he or she tries. The mediocre student who attains great success in business. Such outcomes have traditionally defied explanation. The author takes the position that our ultimate success is largely due to the use of appropriate, healthy defense mechanisms. While there is a small nugget of truth in that, there is nothing here about the impact of one's vulnerability to such things as anxiety, depression or alcoholism and nothing about the luck factor when picking our careers or life's partner. In reading these life stories, it seemed to me that most of the "losers" were in fact depressed individuals. There is also no mention of sentinel spiritual events and life- changing epiphanies. In summary, while the Grant Study may offer some useful insights, I did not find it particularly enlightening, nor is it of any clinical utility for the mental health professional.

3 people found this helpful

Helpful
Comment Report abuse

Rich

5.0 out of 5 starsI liked this work (and found it personally insightful as I ...April 2, 2015
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase

As you read this, you need to review what the types of behavior are meant by the different "defense mechanisms" (there is an Appendix A that lists them, but often without sufficient examples). However, as the book essentially covers case studies, you come to see the different defense mechanisms used. People who use "immature" type defense mechanisms (denial, acting out, etc.). do less well than those who use more mature defense mechanisms (various ones are covered). There is an interplay of the individual and the environment, too. I liked this work (and found it personally insightful as I think about how I react and progressed through life's hardships and everyday events). If you're interested in this type of research and material you'll be enthralled. Mr. Vaillant's work, I believe, is considered seminal and he has additional (more recent) follow up books on living as an older adult. Many of the other higher rated reviews also summarize various aspects of his conclusions nicely (including avoid alcohol/drug abuse, etc.). However there is much more to this book than that and you can think about how you tend to react to life's events and get some insights from his work.

One person found this helpful

Helpful
Comment Report abuse

Dave Shumway

5.0 out of 5 starsExcellent book I hadn't read in yearsJuly 10, 2015
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

Excellent book I hadn't read in years. Important insights into "being able to live in your own skin type of success" in a narrow sector of the society. The study needs repeated (expensively) in a coed, broader population.
I love his book on spirituality. As a Buddhist/atheist/humanist I found myself slowing down and rereading in spite of the fact I'm 70 and feel I have much yet to read in a short time. He's a kind man, a good writer and someone I'd love to have lunch with.

One person found this helpful

Helpful
Comment Report abuse

Scott716

5.0 out of 5 starsThis book changed my lifeOctober 2, 2005
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

This book is amazing. It provides concrete examples based on a wonderful study of a group of Harvard graduates of how different psychological coping methods helped people succeed or fail during their lives.

Its most important finding, in my view, is that peoples circumstances in life play no role in their eventual success or failure. Instead, it is the coping methods that people develop, and the positive effort they put in, that decide their outcomes and happiness.

Most chapters contrast 2 real people from the Harvard study, identifying the opposing psychological methods each used (i.e. one is a procrastinator and another gets things done) and shows how their lives played out. Their behaviors correlated directly with their happiness and success in life. The procrastinator wandered from one job to the next, did not have satisfactory relationships, and did not build wealth. The person who got things done succeeded in business and in personal life.

This book identifies the key mental characteristics necessary to adapt to life, using concrete examples based on a long-term study. It provides a positive message that the circumstances of these subjects birth and background did not matter nearly as much as how much effort they put into life. It is well worth reading.

On the other hand, it is worth noting that these graduates were predominantly white, at least middle-class, often Protestant, and were part of the "greatest generation" that as WWII veterans worked during a time when the US economy was booming.
Read less

26 people found this helpful

Helpful
Comment Report abuse

James

5.0 out of 5 starsUseful framework to think about your lifeApril 3, 2011
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

I loved this book. I'm not a psychiatrist nor a psychologist but just a very introspective person who struggles with identity and liminality. Being a very skeptical person, I usually discredit a lot of these "prescriptive" books, and assure you that this is not one of them. I call this a self-help book not in the ordinary sense of the term, but b/c I read the book with "self-help" in mind - how can I use the experiences of these men in the Grant study to guide me to become the happy (which I define for myself, not necessarily as the study defines happiness). The book does well by laying out a framework of how to think of adaptive mechanisms and how they should evolve over time from the immature to the mature, but instead of trying to judge the reader and put the reader in this framework, the book tells the stories of the Grant men and how their adaptations made them or ruined them. This makes the book a far more enjoyable read and one whose lessons I am more willing to accept. Instead of preaching, it allows these men to lead by example. The longitudinal study gives the reader a unique opportunity to see it (read it) so as to believe it, which makes the lessons that much more effective. For anyone who knows something is wrong in their lives but can't put a finger on it, this book is a must read. While some of the cultural zeitgeists have moved dramatically from the date of its publication (and from the period in which these men grew), an intelligent reader will know how to apply their life lessons to the current struggles in our modern society. Even if everything seems right in your life, I would still urge a reading. I think you will definitely learn something about yourself.

8 people found this helpful

Helpful
Comment Report abuse

See all 33 reviews









2018/09/17

Korean-American finds home on Jeju in 'Stone House'



Korean-American finds home on Jeju in 'Stone House'



Korean-American finds home on Jeju in 'Stone House'
Posted : 2018-09-16 20:16
Updated : 2018-09-17 09:41



Brenda Paik Sunoo sits in front of her renovated stone house in the Jeju Island village of Aewol. / Courtesy of Brenda Paik Sunoo
-----------
By Jon Dunbar

For photojournalist Brenda Paik Sunoo, life has gone full circle. She now finds herself in her 70s, living with husband Jan in a stone house in the land of her ancestors.

Paik Sunoo is known for her deeply personal books, which explore the world around her while coming to terms with her grief over losing her 16-year-old son Tommy in 1994. In her 2006 book "Seaweed and Shamans: Inheriting the Gifts of Grief," she explores the continuance of life through 21 essays inspiring hope, comfort and renewal. Her 2011 book "Moon Tides: Jeju Island Grannies of the Sea" explores her growing affinity for Korea's southernmost island territory.

For her latest book, "Stone House on Jeju Island: Improvising Life Under a Healing Moon," she offers 25 essays on finding her new home on Jeju Island. Broken into three sections _ "Seduction of Jeju Island," "House Construction" and "Village Immersion" _ she walks readers through the process of her resettling.

"Coming to Jeju it kind of mirrored my inner landscape," Paik Sunoo, a third-generation Korean-American, told The Korea Times in an interview. "Certainly turning 70 and being in the last years, or last quarter or last third or last decade of life, one wants to renew, reinvent, create, and when you build a house, it's really about creating, reinventing, of course healing, and definitely touching base with the ancestral homeland, even though my personal family didn't come from Jeju."

First, she introduces what brought her to the island that she called home seasonally over 2007 to 2009, living in three villages over that time.

"I was always attracted to Jeju because the women and the shamanism and just the history have a confluence of all the things I feel passion about _ there's something that just brought it all together," she said.

Next she looks at the process of building her current house, a "unique and humble" renovated stone house, or "doljib."

"I thought if I'm going to build or renovate a house, I don't want to just build some Western-style house," she said. "I wanted to do something that perpetuated or promoted the notion of cultural preservation. I was dead set to find a stone house we could renovate."

After a painstaking search they located a dilapidated old house in the northern coastal village of Aewol in August 2015. Of the three structures on the property, almost everything had to go.

"We didn't replicate a traditional stone house, but it informed a kind of modern rustic version of a doljib," she said. "I see in building this house echoes from my own past."

One house, built out of cinder blocks, was completely torn down, giving them a nice open yard. The main house also had to be gutted, leaving only some authentic wall materials, as well as clay roof tiles, the hanji wallpaper, the maru (exterior deck) and the floor heating system.

But the third building, a cow stall, remained the most intact. Paik Sunoo had it made into a hwangtobang, a communal room for sitting. She estimates it's large enough for six to sit in a circle.

In her essays she recounts encounters with a giant spider and a snake. But when she asked workers to kill the snake, they refused, as it is a revered creature on Jeju. And in the case of the spider, she and her 24-year-old granddaughter took it outside rather than kill it.

"I'm not really a country girl by design, more of a city girl enamored by country living, and had to adapt to centipedes and snakes and bugs," she said. "I've made peace with all these critters, so if I see a snake I'm just going to say hello and let it slither around and do its thing."

She said her human neighbors were first skeptical of the renovation process, figuring she and her husband were wasting their money. One of their workers even asked them "Aren't you kind of old to be starting a house?"

But after the project was complete, the community welcomed the addition, with one neighbor even repainting his roof so it wouldn't clash with theirs.

"It's nice that it's not competitive and jealous, but collegial and people inspire each other," she said. "They want to see the community improve. After we moved in several others started to build and renovate to even greater dimensions than ours, so ours initially looked like it would stick out like a sore thumb but turned out to be more humble."

Paik Sunoo characterizes her life on Jeju as "simplicity and living with less," citing the low cost of living and good healthcare, as well as the strong community.

"I'd say overall it's living with less, smaller and cheaper," she said. "Those are not bad adjustments, but more of benefits."

For Paik Sunoo, living in Korea is a return to her origins. In 2013 she received an award from the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs on behalf of her grandfather, Reverend Yim Chung-koo, who moved to the U.S. in 1905. An independence activist, he first lived in Hawaii for a year working at a plantation, then resettled in California where he was a minister at a Methodist church founded in 1914.

Because she was his descendant, she was qualified to apply for Korean citizenship, which she did in 2016.

"When I took the oath it was very emotional for me," she recalled. "It reminded me of the Korean immigrants to the United States taking the oath. There were so many stories of how they were emotional and started to feel they wanted to contribute to the country because they were so grateful. It made me ponder more seriously what it means to be a global citizen."


The book is out in print and e-book on Seoul Selection next month. Visit brendasunoo.com for more information including the book's release.

2018/09/16

Jung: A Very Short Introduction by Anthony Stevens | Goodreads



Jung: A Very Short Introduction by Anthony Stevens | Goodreads

Want to Read

Rate this book
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Preview

Jung: A Very Short Introduction
(Very Short Introductions #40)
by
Anthony Stevens
4.05 · Rating details · 1,133 Ratings · 110 Reviews
This is the most lucid and timely introduction to the thought of Carl Gustav Jung available to date. Though he was a prolific writer and an original thinker of vast erudition, Jung lacked a gift for clear exposition, and his ideas are less widely appreciated than they deserve to be. Now, in this extremely accessible introduction, Anthony Stevens--one of Britain's foremost Jungian analysts--clearly explains the basic concepts of Jungian psychology: the collective unconscious, complex, archetype, shadow, persona, anima, animus, and the individualization of the Self. A small masterpiece of insight and concision, this volume offers a clear portrait of one of the twentieth century's most important and controversial thinkers.

About the Series: Combining authority with wit, accessibility, and style, Very Short Introductions offer an introduction to some of life's most interesting topics. Written by experts for the newcomer, they demonstrate the finest contemporary thinking about the central problems and issues in hundreds of key topics, from philosophy to Freud, quantum theory to Islam.
(less)

GET A COPY
Kobo
Online Stores ▾
Book Links ▾

Paperback, 192 pages
Published June 7th 2001 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published March 1994)
Original Title
Jung
ISBN
0192854585 (ISBN13: 9780192854582)
Series
Very Short Introductions #40

Other Editions (11)






All Editions | Add a New Edition | Combine...Less Detailedit details




EditMY ACTIVITY

Review of ISBN 9780192854582
Rating
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Shelves to-read
edit
( 112th )
Format Paperback edit
Status

September 15, 2018 – Shelved

September 15, 2018 – Shelved as: to-read
Review Add a review

comment





FRIEND REVIEWS (1) 4.00 average rating

Jul 20, 2014Alek rated it really liked it
Like · comment


Recommend this book…




READER Q&A
Ask the Goodreads community a question about Jung



Be the first to ask a question about Jung



LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
The Oxford Very Short Introductions Series

254 books — 50 voters
Jungian

81 books — 20 voters

More lists with this book...




COMMUNITY REVIEWS
(showing 1-30)
Rating details


Sort: Default
|
Filter

Dec 05, 2014Glenn Russell rated it it was amazing

I have enjoyed a dozen books in the ‘Very Short Introduction’ series but I must say this one on Jung is the best I’ve come across. You will not find a clearer presentation of the life and psychology of Carl Jung. Quite an accomplishment since Jung’s approach to the psyche and therapy is revolutionary and multifaceted. Since the subjects covered in this short introduction are so rich in content, for the purposes of this review, here are a few quotes along with my comments, starting with Jung’s break with his teacher and mentor in the world of psychoanalysis – Sigmund Freud.

“As time passed, Jung’s differences with Freud became harder to conceal. Two of Freud’s basic assumptions were unacceptable to him: (1) that human motivation is exclusively sexual and (2) that the unconscious mind is entirely personal and peculiar to the individual.” --------- Turns out, this is the difference for Jung that made all the difference. In Jung’s view, we humans have many reasons for doing what we do well beyond the boundaries of sexuality. And also, the human unconscious taps into the entire range of experiences we have developed as a species over millions of years

“Moreover, beneath the personal unconscious of repressed wishes and traumatic memories, posited by Freud, Jung believed there lay a deeper and more important layer that he was to call the collective unconscious, which contained in potenitia the entire psychic heritage of mankind. . . . The existence of this ancient basis of the mind had first been hinted to him as a child when he realized that there were things in his dreams that came from somewhere beyond himself. Its existence was confirmed when he studied the delusions and hallucinations of schizophrenic patients and found them to contain symbols and images which also occurred in myths and fairy-tales all over the world. --------- Again, Jung acknowledged there is a personal component to the unconscious realm we encounter in our dreams, but this is only the start: there is an ocean of unconscious energy deeper and wider than the personal – the collective unconscious. Thus, Jung’s lifelong fascination with symbols, such as mandalas, numbers, mythic animals, light-infused and shadowy superhuman presences.

“What distinguishes the Jungian approach to developmental psychology from virtually all others is the idea that even in old age we are growing toward realization of or full potential. . . . aging was not a process of inexorable decline but a time for the progressive refinement of what is essential. ‘The decisive question for a man is: is he related to something infinite or not?’ ---------- A critical difference from Freud: what happens in our psyche isn’t always about working out our relationship with our mother and father buried in our personal past; rather, every stage in the human cycle, childhood, adolescence, young adulthood, middle age, old age, has its own powerful psychic energies and challenges. It is our task to accept the challenges at each stage of our life to reach the full flowering of our humanity. Thus, for Jung, psychotherapy isn’t so much about curing illness as it is about personal growth.

“Jung held it to be the business of the psychologist to investigate the collective unconscious and the functional units of which it is composed – the archetypes, as he eventually called them. Archetypes are ‘identical psychic structures common to all’, which together constitute ‘the archaic heritage of humanity’. ---------- The author devotes two entire chapters to Jung’s archetypes: the Self, the ego, the shadow, the persona, the anima/amimus. And, what is an archetype? By way of example, we read: “One example which Jung frequently quoted was that of a schizophrenic patient who told him that if he stared at the sun with half-closed eyes he would see that the sun had a phallus and that this organ was the origin of the wind. Years later Jung came across a Greek text describing an almost identical vision.’ In other words, the archetype images we encounter in dreams belong to a common dream language we share will all humans, including our prehistoric ancestors and peoples of all world cultures and societies. And, according to Jung, these archetypical images can be understood as promptings to encourage our growth.

“In working on a dream the starting-point for Jung was not interpretation but ‘amplification’ – that is, to enter into the atmosphere of the dream to establish its mood as well as the detail of its images and symbols, in such a way as to amplify the experience of the dream itself. Then its impact on consciousness is enhanced. ---------- Dreams are central to Jungian analysis. And if you are interested in pursuing Jung’s vision of what it means to live a full human life, reading this small book would be a great place to start.

Coda: If you would like to start working with your own dreams in a Jungian way, there is short, clear, easy-to-follow instruction given by James A. Hall, available in booklet form at amazon.com or on audible --http://www.audible.com/pd/Science-Tec...

(less)
flag43 likes · Like · see review



May 20, 2015Riku Sayuj rated it it was ok
Shelves: jung, psychology, vsis
Does not succeed in representing Jung’s notoriously disorganized work in a coherent fashion. Instead this VSI is content with being a maximally shortened summary of Jung’s autobiography (Memories, Dreams, Reflections). The later chapters dedicated to the character types are cursory and, to be honest, wikipedia does a better job. Read Jung's Map of the Soul by Murray Stein instead for a better concise introduction.
flag16 likes · Like · 2 comments · see review



Jun 15, 2011Aral rated it liked it
made me wish he was my grandpa
flag5 likes · Like · comment · see review



Sep 09, 2018Rashid Saif rated it really liked it
Shelves: psychology
What got me interested in Jung and psychoanalysis was the whole Jordan Peterson craze; with the popularity of his book 12 Rules for Life I thought I would check him out. I saw a lecture he gave where he was describing the Disney movie Pinnochio through the lens of Jungian Archetypal Theory and I thought that was an interesting approach. I was apprehensive of Peterson because he wrote a self-help book (it's a personal prejudice) and I tend to mistrust popular intellectuals, but I thought it would be worthwhile to investigate the source of his psychoanalysis: Jung.

Now Jung is damn scary. How he could have devised his Archetype Theory and then apply it to psychoanalysis is beyond me. One would dismiss this theory as a literary exercise or coincidence if it didn't have strong support from archaeological, mythical/religious and psychological findings. I won't go into the details of this theory but you should definitely check it out.

Jung's psychoanalysis, for me, is more practical and on the whole more optimistic and holistic than Freud. Freud always reduced your mental states to childhood trauma and sexual frustration and more generally the past. He also interprets your dreams in that light too, and for him, you can only hope to cope and not to be cured. Jung however, takes into account your past but also equally, if not more, your present.

For Jung, you are not merely appendages of the past but rather an expectation of the future. He doesn't like the idea of interpreting dreams per se, he takes dreams as symbols formed by your 'Self' to tell to you something about your psychological state that your 'Ego' cannot perceive. Jung's main premise is that, psychologically, your goal is 'Individuation', this consists of fulfilling your archetypal potential he also claims that psychological problems arise from failure to fulfil one's archetypal destiny, this gives hope. What you need to do is not go back in time, but project yourself into the future and realise your archetypal potential.

I enjoyed this book greatly and have developed a new interest in psychology because of it. I think if Jordan Peterson is to be thanked for anything, then it should be for introducing more people to Jung. (less)
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Jun 16, 2013Harlan Vaughn rated it it was amazing
The sentences and phrases are so clear and easy to understand, which is a feat considering the density of the subject matter. The initial chapters about Jung's history were a little dry, but I was deeply curious about that part of his life, especially about his friendship slash "daddy complex" with Freud. It really gave a lot of insight to how his practice developed in his later life.

The "good stuff" here are the breakdowns of the complex psychological concepts. Anyone interested in psychology, mythology, or archetypes will be interested in these sections. They go on for a large chunk of the book and I was in heaven. As simple as the language is, I re-read a few sections to compare and contrast, as a lot of Jung's ideas are interwoven. The ideas about evolving archetypes as people age were particularly interesting.

All in all, a good read. Though it is "a very short introduction," it will still take some time to get through if you want to study it. I gave myself plenty of time for long pauses and reflection. Any book that warrants that is a good one.

Also, I just love Jung. (less)
flag3 likes · Like · comment · see review



Nov 17, 2017Maan Kawas rated it really liked it
A excellent book about the sophisticated and complex ideas and tenets of Carl Jung's 'Analytical Psychology'. I enjoyed it but I need to read more about the archetypes, the individuation process, and active imagination. I recommend as a good start for beginners.
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Apr 11, 2018David rated it really liked it
Shelves: read-2018
4 stars on the “simple intro” scale. But this is a nice overview for sure. Answers a lot of the lazy critiques of Jung and persuasively sketches why his thinking still matters.
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Jun 22, 2018Michael A. rated it it was ok
2/5

Scattered remarks:

Stevens says: "The specious idea that gender differences are due entirely to culture, and have nothing to do with biological or archetypal predispositions, still enjoys wide currency in our society, yet it rests on the discredited tabula rasa theory of human development and is at variance with the overwhelming mass of anthropological and scientific evidence." What evidence? He cites none. Also, does anti-essentialism necessarily entail tabula rasa?

Then he says: "Virtually everywhere, it appears that girls tend to be more nurturant and affiliative than boys ..... boys, on the other hand, are less interested in social interaction for its own sake and tend to prefer some form of physical activity..." I get that this is a 'very short introduction" but he doesnt give one example and makes the extremely broad, sweeping claim that virtually everywhere boys and girls conform to gender roles found within our culture today! strange. This is more a fault on Stevens than Jung, as Stevens doesn't really seem to make a distinction between sex or gender, thus leading to confused thinking.

Jung implicitly(?) reinforces the gender binary with his notions of "anima" (man) and "animus" (woman) and by extension endorses gender essentialism. What of this concept in intersexed people? Or hermaphrodites? Did Hercule Barbin primarily have anima or animus? He says both man and woman contains anima and animus. His idealist dimorphism to match the supposed clean-cut sexual dimorphism of humans is severely lacking.

Jung wrote “Individuation is an expression of that biological process …. by which every living thing becomes what it was destined to become from the beginning.” Stevens states that later Jung thought it took place in non-organic matter as well. On one hand Stevens writes as if individuation you have control over, and perhaps this Jung quote is taken out of context or he means something differently, but that quote to me heavily implies something you have little to no control over (“destined to become from the beginning”). Maybe there's some weird compatibilism going on here or he was just speaking ~*~enigmatically~*~ because he has a strong mysticism to his ideology.

Jung's psychological types are presented in this book like its some bad online personality test and Jung himself even admitted there's no “pure” type and we're all an amalgam. There's some justification given for it but it wasn't convincing. It's just a horoscope for smart people. To be fair Stevens says its oversimplified and Jung goes much more in depth, so perhaps its more convincing. But I don't find psychological typologies convincing in the first place.

There are some parts of Jung that do seem more likely to be true than others. I think the aspect of his concept of the collective unconscious that has the most merit is how certain myths from cultures seem very similar, and this is a result of humans have similar psychical structures. For example Stevens uses the “hero archetype” in myths is essentially symbolic for a coming-of-age....for men. Women are relegated to a passive role (he mentions Sleeping Beauty since heroes get “princesses” as rewards [symbolically a partner or spouse]....literally the most passive and dependent fictional princess I can think of) which continues the theme of Jung and Stevens on being awful with sex and gender.

The other parts of collective unconscious, like there's some shared unconscious that is passed down somehow (a two-million year old man is inside us) is too hard to accept unless you're spiritual and/or susceptible to deception, and it definitely seems Lemarckian-tinged and the “refutation” of this in the book is not convincing. His “archetype” idea is also really bad – apparently if people arrive at the same idea independently from across the world its part of the collective unconscious. Also synchronicity is bullshit. Boy there's a lot of dumb concepts to comment on here! He's essentially a mystico-idealist that touches way too close to being pure new age bullshit.

I agree with parts of Jungian dream analysis, I think he is more right than Freud about the meaning of dreams (i.e. they aren't predominantly sexual. They can be, but they are more broad than that). His idea of using dreams to help you now and in the future also seems more helpful than looking back in the past, but I feel like both Jungian and Freudian dream analysis has truth in it.

Jungian therapy seems more personable and human than Freudian therapy, which is nice. It's too bad a lot of the stuff grounding a Jungian paradigm seems incorrect to me. I guess I'm not surprised that a guy who spent 4 years in a psychotic state (with insight, so he was still cognizable) thought he was discovering some deep truth about the unconscious. Yeah, when I was psychotic I thought I was discovering deep truths too. Instead they're just delusions, and that's precisely what the bulk of Jungian imitates: that of a psychotic delusion. His bizarre interest in parapsychology doesn't help his credibility. Also his conception of mental illness being "a time for growth" and "creative" is really shitty and implies it'll just go away or something and you'll be all better. I'm pretty sure I'll have bipolar disorder for the rest of my life so how exactly am I growing and not suffering from this, unless you want to say "suffering is growth" but I would disagree and say suffering is a slow decaying of the mind.
Also he believed in alchemy. So....

The penultimate chapter is “Jung's Alleged Anti-Semitism”. Woo boy. However, I think what is revealing is a quote by Jung( quoted by Stevens): “Are we really to believe that a tribe which has wandered through history for several thousand years as “God's chosen people” was not put up to such an idea by some quite special psychological peculiarity? If no differences exist, how do we recognize Jews at all?” This was in the context of him saying, among other things, that his and Freud's approach deviated partly because Freud was Jewish and Jung was a Christian. This, to me, is open to the charges of an “inheritance of x-ness” where x is something contingent like religion or nation. It's probably related to his collective unconscious concept, but to me it seems like he's positing an psychological essentialist view. Also this is right after Stevens is talking about a paper he published in 1932 about how there were differences between Aryan and Jewish psychology. Ok, sure, maybe there were but he attributes it totally to an interior thing (its repeated often Jung is introspective....wow hes so deep) so he ignores the material conditions that lead to such differences in psychology. He uses the inner (psychological differences) to justify or explain the outer (conflict) (idealism) when its the other way around, the material conditions of a sociohistorical conjuncture (outer) explain and heavily influence the inner (psychology). This chapter is laughably bad and saying well Freud the same thing as Jung and sarcastically remarks “Well he can say it because he's a Jew”. Hmm, yeah probably? and Stevens concludes that people still call Jung a fascist/nazi/anti-semitic because they, deep down in their “shadow' (Jungian term) they have repressed fascism within them and project them onto Jung....so really it is you who are the racist if you think he had Nazi sympathies.

The last chapter is bad too and starts off with some offhand remark about “political correctness”. Wow. Whatever.

Overall, the book seemed good as an introduction to Jung because it's presented virtually uncritically (sometimes Stevens says Jung could have used a better term....I think thats as far as he goes in criticism) so you get an academic who is really into Jung so you get the most “positive' interpretation of him. However, it may have been better for me to get a critical introduction, if that exists.

As for his ideas, I feel like Jung has some interesting things to say but its grounded in esotericism and gnosticism. Perhaps the Post-Jungians (mentioned in the book by Stevens) strip this away or utilize it in a more satisfactory manner. Based off my limited knowledge of each I feel like Freud has more to offer as a theorist (though of course he was wrong, sometimes extremely, about things too) than Jung. But I feel he does express ideas that are very intriguing and could very well be true. I don't really like the writer too much though he exuded rightism. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Apr 27, 2016Kent rated it it was amazing
I love this. It has changed my life and worldview. I'm totally on board. I bought Memories, Dreams, Refelctions by Carl Jung and I look forward to the reading experience. Learning about Carl Jung and the theories of individuation and archetypes and spiritual wholeness has totally reawakened my spiritual life. It's a spirituality I can totally gel with. Jung was such a special guy. He kept popping up on my radar in other books and music and movies and I finally decided to find out why this man ke ...more
flag2 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review



Jul 07, 2014Joshua rated it it was amazing
This is an excellent introduction to Jung's work and makes his project as a whole much more clear. Before reading this text, I wasn't much interested in what he was doing and saw it as very much nonsense--as that was the impression I'd been given by my academic mentors and teachers; however, this couldn't be more incorrect. Not only does he make much sense out of the problems of Freud (e.g. everything cannot be reduced to sex; complexes are created out of societal notions/archetypes; the analyst needs to be on equal footing with the patient and help them to feel whole; analysts need to deal with their own b.s.; people aren't broken, just not working in their own best interest; etc.), but he explores territories that are dangerous for an academic to study (e.g. alchemy and the occult), which make his work have something not found within academic psychology, a discipline so fixated on being "scientific", that they ignore the thousands of years of heritage we have in psychological matters in the guise of "truth" through novelty and blindly theorizing. All-in-all, Jung makes way more sense than Freud does.(less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Jun 10, 2016Sherif Nagib rated it really liked it
مشكلة كارل يونج الكبرى (اللي هو نفسه كان معترف بيها) إن كتاباته ضخمة جداً وصعبة، وماينفعش الواحد يدخل عليها بنفسه مباشرة. ومن الأفضل إن الواحد يتقرب لها بالقراءة عنها وعنه من ناس درسته وفهمته. الكتاب جيد جداً في محاولة تلخيص حياة وعلم كارل يونج، بالطبع لا يمكن اتهام كتاب عنوانه "مقدمة قصيرة" بالاختزال أو الكروَتة. كان لازم يكروت ويجيب من الآخر. بس مشكلتي إنه ضيع فصل كامل في الدفاع عن اتهام كارل يونج بمعاداة السامية. وكان أفضل لو خصص الصفحات دي لحاجات تانية مهمة عدى عليها بسرعة قوي.

على صعيد آخر، ...more
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Jun 01, 2016Ahmad Sharabiani marked it as to-read
Shelves: 20th-century, psychology, non-fiction, philosophy, biography, historical,science, refrence
Jung: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions #40), Anthony Stevens

This is the most lucid and timely introduction to the thought of Carl Gustav Jung available to date. Though he was a prolific writer and an original thinker of vast erudition, Jung lacked a gift for clear exposition, and his ideas are less widely appreciated than they deserve to be. Now, in this extremely accessible introduction, Anthony Stevens--one of Britain's foremost Jungian analysts--clearly explains the basic concepts of Jungian psychology: the collective unconscious, complex, archetype, shadow, persona, anima, animus, and the individualization of the Self. A small masterpiece of insight and concision, this volume offers a clear portrait of one of the twentieth century's most important and controversial thinkers.(less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Nov 12, 2015Jessica rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
WOW!
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Nov 23, 2017M. Ashraf rated it really liked it
Shelves: vsi
This is a very good VSI, one of the best of the series so far, it conveyed Carl Jung his life, works, accomplishments and why he is shunned.
Though it started in a weird situations in his early life it progressed quit good with his first work with Eugen Bueler and later with Sigmund Freud and the rift between them. His relationship with his wife and mistress. His concepts of Individualism and the Self, ego, shadow which I find very interesting! the parts about alchemy were :/ and the anti-Semitism chapter was also interesting.
Again I liked the organization of the book, how it started and ended, of course further reading is required but I think it did its job well and it was a very good introduction to Jung and one of the best books in the series so far.


As time passed, Jung’s differences with Freud became harder to conceal. Two of Freud’s basic assumptions were unacceptable to him: that human motivation is exclusively sexual and that the unconscious mind is entirely personal and peculiar to the individual.

What distinguishes the Jungian approach to developmental psychology from virtually all others is the idea that even in old age we are growing toward realization of or full potential.
(less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



May 12, 2018William Schram rated it really liked it · review of another edition
Shelves: psychology
Jung by Anthony Stevens is an attempt to condense the writings of Carl Gustav Jung into a package compact enough to almost fit in your pocket. It seems to be some kind of series that I had not heard of called “Brief Insights.” The book is split into eight chapters. The first chapter discusses his life. The second chapter through the seventh chapter discusses his work, and the final chapter discusses the overarching theme and brings it all together.

It’s pretty good. Although they had to pare it down a great deal, it works to provide what the editors and publishers intended. With that said, it makes this book a fantastic introduction to C.G. Jung and his works. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Jun 04, 2018Ian Stewart rated it really liked it
Definitely worth reading if the title is what you’d like. I feel like Jung and the origins of analysis are less of a mystery now. I was surprised to find out that there is some scientific evidence now for some of Jung’s conjecture about consciousness, how much actually was conjecture, and how against the grain it was when he was developing it.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Sep 08, 2017Daniel Wright rated it it was ok
Shelves: biography, modern-history, vsi, psychology
Defensive and insufficiently critical.

Chapter 1: The man and his Psychology
Chapter 2: Archetypes and the collective unconscious
Chapter 3: The stages of life
Chapter 4: Psychological types
Chapter 5: Dreams
Chapter 6: Therapy
Chapter 7: Jung's alleged anti-Semitism
Chapter 8: The summing-up
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Apr 20, 2018Laurie Allee rated it it was amazing
This is a great, fairly detailed introduction to (or refresher of) Jung's life and work.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Oct 22, 2011Guy rated it it was amazing · review of another edition
A tightly written, comprehensive overview of Jung's ideas and biography. Stevens managed to connect how Jung's biography influenced the development of his ideas and how influential those ideas have been. Stevens' survey of Jung's relationship with Freud is interesting and balanced, as is his refutation of the anti-semitism charges that have floated around Jung since before the second world war.

Now after all that praise, I would suggest that Jung is a book without a really strong audience. The book is detailed enough and I suspect generally as accurate as a 3rd party biography can be. But that is its biggest problem. I suspect that many people completely unfamiliar with Jung's writings are likely to come away from this book with an exaggerated understanding of the power and range of Jung's ideas and influence and not read anything else. They will not understand that the reason people read Jung is to begin the journey of self-understanding, what Jung called individuation.

On the other hand, those who are significantly familiar with Jung will not find too much new here. It remains simply a summary and review, albeit a very good one. It does have some nice quotable bits for those interested in quips or sound bites.

But what moved this book from just a solid four to five stars was something Stevens observed I had until reading it here thought that I had uniquely observed. Thank god I am not the only one to have noticed a remarkable similarity between Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories and Jung's conceptualization of the collective unconscious and archetypes (p37). Now, it is possible that other Jungian commentators I have previously read made this reference too, but at a time in my life before I was familiar with Chomsky's linguistic ideas. But I do not remember even one reference. (For those curious about this, a good overview of Chomsky's linguistics is Justin Lieber's Noam Chomsky: A Philosophic Overview.) (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Nov 16, 2013Jean rated it it was amazing
Shelves: 2013-audio, biography
I have a friend who is a Jungian scholar who is writing a book on some aspect of Jung. When I saw this short book I jumped at it, thinking I could learn a bit about Jung so I would not feel so stupid when we get together. The only thing I knew about Jung was what I had read back in 1971 when I read Irving Stone’s “The Passions of the Mind” about the life of Sigmund Freud. Stone is the master of the biographical novel. The book on Freud was fascinating. The author of this book is Dr. Anthony Stevens a British psychiatrist and Jungian analyst. He has co-author several books on evolutionary psychiatry. Dr. Stevens’ book is a well written, comprehensive over view of Jung’s ideas and biography. He explains Jung’s relationship with Freud and refutes the anti-Semitism charges that floated around since before World War Two. It is obvious that Dr. Stevens did a great deal of research and has the magnificence ability to summarize a complex person and his ideas and system of psychology into understandable and interesting book for a lay person. I read this book in audio book format. Tim Piggott-Smith did a great job narrating the book.

(less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Dec 12, 2013Anthony rated it really liked it
This is the book I would recommend to anyone who wants a concise introduction to Jung's ideas. Informative and well written. It really helped to clarify some ideas about Jung that had long eluded me. Especially the stuff on the Archtypes and the Collective Unconscious.

(Looking at Archtypes as being comparable to the instinctual imprinting of say, a duck imprinting on the first thing it sees as its mother, and other principles of ethnobiology)

In a couple of places the author loses track of seeming impartial, and comes off as a little shrill—such as when he argues that Jung fits in perfectly with modern science.) (less)
flag1 like · Like · see review