Showing posts with label Great Courses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Great Courses. Show all posts

2021/06/26

[Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist by Michael Shermer | Goodreads

Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist by Michael Shermer | Goodreads

Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist
(The Great Courses)
by Michael Shermer
 4.11  ·   Rating details ·  469 ratings  ·  57 reviews


Despite our best efforts, we're all vulnerable to believing things without using logic or having proper evidence-and it doesn't matter how educated or well read we are.

But there is a method for avoiding such pitfalls of human nature, and it's called skepticism. By using rational inquiry and seeing subjects from a scientific perspective, we can approach even the most sensitive claims with clear eyes to ultimately arrive at the truth.

During 18 lectures that will surprise, challenge, and entertain you, you will learn how to think, not just what to think-and you'll come to understand why extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

You'll discover how skepticism can help differentiate between real science and pseudoscience, as well as between "scientific" history and pseudohistory-distinctions that have serious educational and political implications.

Fascinating case studies illustrate how you can apply the methods of skepticism to detect specious claims and faulty logic in any scenario you encounter such as:
•The methodology employed by Holocaust deniers
•Arguments made by proponents of creationism
•The biology of near-death experiences and the sensed-presence effect
•Psychic abilities and other "paranormal" phenomena.

As you learn how our brains work to form beliefs, you'll examine the classic fallacies of thought that lead us to experience mistakes in thinking and to form bad arguments in favor of our beliefs.

Is there a God? Is there life after death? Is there a basis for morality without God? Skepticism 101 doesn't shy away from controversial questions, nor does it give final answers. What it offers are methods and hard evidence for rationally evaluating various claims and positions, and an opportunity to understand why you believe what you believe.

Listening Length: 9 hours and 10 minutes (less)
GET A COPY
KoboOnline Stores ▾Book Links ▾
Audiobook, Unabridged
Published July 8th 2013 by The Teaching Company
ISBN139781682766132
Edition LanguageEnglish
SeriesThe Great Courses
Other Editions (4)
Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist (Great Courses) (Teaching Company) (Course Number 9388 Audio CD) 
Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist 
111x148 
Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist
All Editions | Add a New Edition | Combine
...Less DetailEdit Details
EditMY ACTIVITY
Review of ISBN 9781682766132
Rating
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Shelves to-read edit
( 831st )
Format Audiobook edit
Status
June 26, 2021 – Shelved as: to-read
June 26, 2021 – Shelved
Review Write a review
 
comment
FRIEND REVIEWS
Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.
READER Q&A
Ask the Goodreads community a question about Skepticism 101
54355902. uy100 cr1,0,100,100 
Ask anything about the book
Be the first to ask a question about Skepticism 101

LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale CarnegieHow to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas RockwellHow to Cook Everything by Mark BittmanHow to Be Alone by Jonathan FranzenHow to Be a Domestic Goddess by Nigella Lawson
How To...
528 books — 85 voters
Timefulness by Marcia BjornerudHow to Think Like a Roman Emperor by Donald J. RobertsonHow to Think Like a Neandertal by Thomas WynnHow to Think Like an Anthropologist by Matthew EngelkeMastermind by Maria Konnikova
"How to Think Like . . ."
85 books — 4 voters


More lists with this book...
COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
 Average rating4.11  ·  Rating details ·  469 ratings  ·  57 reviews

Search review text


English ‎(55)
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist

Write a review
Amirography
May 26, 2017Amirography rated it really liked it
Shelves: cognitive-science, philosophy
This book presents, for the most parts, why being skeptical is a necessary surviving skill. It utilizes many different real-life examples, to make abstract taught rather more tactile; while not using them as a proof at the same time.
I would argue that its greatest flaw is his lack of knowledge or preciseness when it comes to morality and animals. He explains normative ethics (Study of what people generally think they ought to do), as ethics in general (What we ought to do, regardless of our intuition), and calls it absolute truth, which was the problem with Sam Harris's book on ethics. He goes on about how animals have pre-ethical abilities while associating same abilities as "The absolute morality". Ironically, he immediately uses Frans Du Waal's works, as an anecdote to his perception, which is absolutely ridiculous, as Frans Du Waal has been utterly against calling other animals anything but parallel to us in historic terms.

Nevertheless, I enjoyed this book. It was an easy read and a fun and general introduction to what should be a scientific skepticism in the twenty-first century. (less)
flag24 likes · Like  · 3 comments · see review
Clif Hostetler
Mar 19, 2016Clif Hostetler rated it liked it
Shelves: current-events
These are eighteen lectures intended to teach listeners to be open-minded enough to accept new ideas without making fools of themselves by believing apparent truths that are actually false. As indicated by the title, these lectures encourage scientific and skeptical thinking.

Thinking skeptically doesn’t come naturally to the human brain which has been hardwired by evolution to be a belief engine. Our early ancestors while walking across the African Savanna had to quickly develop an image of possible causes for a sound behind a nearby bush; was it a predator or the wind? Those who waited around to collect more data in order to be certain about the cause ended up being victims who didn’t pass along their genes.

Thus today we have brains that naturally look for and find patterns of possible meanings from the flow of sensory data flowing into our brains. One process used by our brains is what the lecturer, Shermer, calls “patternicity” which is the tendency to find meaningful patterns in both meaningful and meaningless data. Another process of our brains is what he calls “agenticity” which is the tendency to infuse patterns with meaning, intention, and agency.

Our brains were evolved to connect the dots of our world into meaningful patterns that explain why things happen. We can’t help it, it’s just what our brains do. These meaningful patterns become beliefs, and these beliefs shape our understanding of reality. To keep these brain processes from leading to false conclusions Shermer quotes Rachard Feynman as saying, “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself--and you are the easiest person to fool.”

One interesting fact noted is that, “Students that scored well on these [science knowledge] tests were no more or less skeptical of pseudoscientific claims than students that scored very poorly.” The reason for this failing according to Shermer is that students are taught facts about science, but not how to do science.

The title “Skepticism 101: How to Think Like a Scientist” is actually the name of a freshman foundation course taught by Shermer at Chapman University. When I did an on-line search I found the syllabus for the class at the following link:
http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/Skep...

The following list of lecture titles and their descriptions give a pretty good idea of the topics covered by these lectures.

LIST OF LECTURE TITLES AND DESCRIPTIONS
(These descriptions are copied from The Great Courses)

1. The Virtues of Skepticism: As the professor introduces you to the definition of skepticism and the concept behind the larger skeptical movement, learn how myths like the Hundredth Monkey Phenomenon get started, why scientists aren’t able to effectively debate pseudoscientists, and why smart people believe in what skeptics call “weird things."

2. Skepticism and Science: What is the difference between a theory and a construct? How does skepticism relate to science? How do we know anything is true? Answer these and other questions as you explore how science works, what it means to think like a scientist, and the essential tension between skepticism and credulity.

3. Mistakes in Thinking: We All Make From coincidences and false reasoning to tautology and false analogies, there are a number of classic thinking fallacies and biases that interfere with our ability to reason clearly and rationally. This lecture provides an overview of the 12 most prevalent types of fallacies of thought that can lead us to make mistakes in our thinking.

4. Cognitive Biases and Their Effects: Once we form beliefs and commit to them, we reinforce them through powerful cognitive heuristics-otherwise known as rules of thumb or cognitive biases-that guarantee we are always correct. Explore the various types of biases we allow to influence us and learn how they can both help and hinder how we understand the world.

5. Wrong Thinking in Everyday Life: Has the status-quo effect ever led you to complacency? Have you ever held onto a stock too long because its value fell below what you paid for it? Explore the research on how people behave irrationally when it comes to money and which cognitive biases and fallacies of thought most interfere with our ability to make rational decisions about purchases and investments.

6. The Neuroscience of Belief: We all have a natural tendency to find meaningful patterns in both meaningful and meaningless noise. Learn why we’re hardwired to be superstitious and prone to making false positive errors through an investigation of the evolutionary origin of superstition and magical thinking. Discover how the brain’s neural networks drive the two central processes-patternicity and agenticity-that lead to the formation of beliefs.

7. The Paranonnal and the Supernatural: According to Professor Shermer, there is no such thing as the paranormal or the supernatural. There is just the normal, the natural, and the mysteries we have yet to explain. Discover how faulty neural activity and anomalous neural firing can lead to paranormal, supernatural, and extraordinary experiences, then consider scientific explanations for these natural phenomena.

8. Science versus Pseudoscience: Who has the burden of proof in science-the person making the claim or the person hearing about the claim? Delve into human psychology, the need to believe, and the age-old techniques psychics use to lure people into believing that paranormal powers are real. Then, see how the preconceived notions of scientists can skew research results.

9. Comparing SETI and UFOlogy: What is the difference between scientists engaged in SETI-the search for extraterrestrial intelligence-and proponents of the existence of UFOs? Make a distinction between science and pseudoscience through an analysis of the supposed alien crash-landing at Roswell, physiological explanations for the experience of alien abduction, and an exploration of the attempt to answer the question “are we alone?".

10. Comparing Evolution and Creationism: From the 1925 Scopes “Monkey” trial to the 2006 Dover trial over the theory of Intelligent Design, look at the history of the evolution and creationism debate, which has important political and cultural ramifications for science and education. Break down the “God of the Gaps" argument and consider why people shouldn’t fear evolution.

11. Science, History, and Pseudohistory: How can we tell the difference between scientific history and pseudohistory? What is the difference between historical revisionism and historical denial? Find out in this lecture that looks at the methodology of alternative historians and revisionists, specifically people who deny the Holocaust despite an overwhelming convergence of evidence. Conclude with an example of good historical science.

12. The Lure of Conspiracy Theories: Why do people believe conspiracy theories?Address the larger topic of conspiracies and conspiracy theories by contrasting erroneous claims surrounding Princess Diana’s death, the terrorist attacks of September 11, and the assassination of President Kennedy with the true conspiracy that led to the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Learn the characteristics that indicate a conspiracy theory is unlikely to be true.

13. Inside the Modern Cult: See how the power of belief and other strong psychological forces can override the rational mind and lead people to become members of cults. Learn the many characteristics that define a cult, from veneration of a leader to isolation from friends and family, then examine Heaven’s Gate as a case study for a modern cult.

14. The Psychology of Religious Belief: Investigate the issues of God, morality, and the afterlife through the eyes of a skeptic. Why do so many people across cultures believe in some form of God? What role do evolution and our cultural history play in the tendency to be religious? Look at dramatic parallels in the mythology of one religion to another as you consider the many cultural and historical factors that go into the world's religions and their varying beliefs about God.

15. The God Question: The question of God's existence has plagued humanity since ancient times, but it’s no less important a topic for skeptics to consider today. Using the Christian conception of God, examine the best arguments for and against his existence and judge the answer for yourself.

16. Without God, Does Anything Go?: If we hypothesize that God does not exist, is morality as we know it null and void? Consider why humans are and should be moral, independent from religion and an all-knowing God. Delve into the evolutionary theory of morality through a discussion of the Natural Law theory, the cross-cultural endorsement of the Golden Rule throughout history, and evidence of pre-moral sentiments in animals and how these gave rise to real moral emotions in humans.

17. Life, Death, and the Afterlife: Polls show that the vast majority of people believe in an afterlife. In this last lecture on science and religion, learn the primary psychological reasons why this may be the case, and consider the dualistic nature of most religions, where the soul is separate from the body. Explore biological explanations for near-death experiences-and why the events seem so real to people who report having them.

18. Your Skeptical Toolkit: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Explore this skeptic’s motto and assemble a “skeptical toolkit” of general principles that you can use for what the late great astronomer and skeptic Carl Sagan called “the fine art of baloney detection." Conclude with two broad observations about science and skepticism that illustrate just how important these modes of thinking are to our lives and to our society.
(less)
flag13 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Jim
Feb 19, 2020Jim rated it really liked it
Shelves: 3lecture, 1audio, 2non-fiction, science
I hadn't connected Shermer with Skeptic Magazine, but I should have. I had a subscription for a year some years back. It was good, but pricey & I didn't have time to read it properly. Anyway, he's the guy that started it. He's been knocking down all sorts of bunk for a long time. He mentions quite a bit of it in his lectures. I don't know how he manages to actually hang around with some of these nut jobs. Might be that he is one himself since he was in the first & several other runnings of the Race Across America, a 3000 mile bike race. My crotch hurts just thinking about it.

The lectures are well done. Nothing earth shattering, but just a very good overview of how to think properly & skeptically. He's a good speaker & makes his points well. The Table of Contents says the rest pretty much. It's from the PDF that accompanied the course. I didn't need to refer to it very often. I'll just put in a few notes, mostly further suggested reading. Highly recommended.

LECTURE 1
The Virtues of Skepticism ...................................................................4
LECTURE 2
Skepticism and Science ...................................................................11
He never mentions William Kingdon Clifford or The Ethics of Belief! Incredible since he's practically recreated the text in the first 2 lectures.
LECTURE 3
Mistakes in Thinking We All Make ....................................................20
LECTURE 4
Cognitive Biases and Their Effects ...................................................28
I recommend reading Brain Bugs: How the Brain's Flaws Shape Our Lives, too. It goes into more detail.
LECTURE 5
Wrong Thinking in Everyday Life ......................................................37
LECTURE 6
The Neuroscience of Belief ..............................................................45

Up to this point, he's shown just how flawed our thinking & memories are. He's also pointed out the correct methods for determining the facts or thinking like a scientist. From this point on, he starts taking on the major areas where people get fooled & showing how.

LECTURE 7
The Paranormal and the Supernatural .............................................53
LECTURE 8
Science versus Pseudoscience .......................................................62
LECTURE 9
Comparing SETI and UFOlogy .........................................................70
LECTURE 10
Comparing Evolution and Creationism .............................................79
LECTURE 11
Science, History, and Pseudohistory ................................................87
LECTURE 12
The Lure of Conspiracy Theories .....................................................95
LECTURE 13
Inside the Modern Cult ...................................................................102
LECTURE 14
The Psychology of Religious Belief ................................................111
LECTURE 15
The God Question ..........................................................................119
LECTURE 16
Without God, Does Anything Go?...................................................127
LECTURE 17
Life, Death, and the Afterlife ...........................................................135
LECTURE 18
Your Skeptical Toolkit......................................................................143

If this lecture is too long, the Debunking Handbook by John Cook is only 6 pages long & available for free from SkepticalScience.com. I read it a couple of years ago & gave it 5 stars. (less)
flag11 likes · Like  · 4 comments · see review
Ivonne Rovira
Mar 21, 2016Ivonne Rovira rated it really liked it
Michael Shermer, founder of the Skeptics Society and editor-in-chief of its magazine Skeptic, has written the book on skepticism — literally now, with Skepticism 101: How to Think Like a Scientist, a series of lectures on science, pseudoscience, and the in-between. He does the same service for history, pseudo-history, and historical revisionism. I was fortunate enough to listen to these lectures on the Audible edition released by The Teaching Company.

Skepticism 101: How to Think Like a Scientist doesn’t quite measure up to Shermer’s excellent The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense, with which it shares some material. However, readers will find the lectures a surprisingly entertaining read and definitely worth it.
(less)
flag6 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Bevan Lewis
May 31, 2017Bevan Lewis rated it really liked it
Excellent introduction to the skeptical way of viewing the world. Open minded people will enjoy this presentation which provides.a useful toolset for understanding the world. With ever greater numbers of charlatans and odd beliefs along with a deteriorating media (to mediate news, not that they're always perfect!) this kind of education is really important. Highly recommended (less)
flag3 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Gendou
Apr 25, 2015Gendou rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction, skepticism
These lectures are like an extended edition of Shermer's book Why People Believe Weird Things. I particularly liked the chapter on arguments for and against god. Spoiler alert, the against arguments are way more convincing. (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Xin
Dec 13, 2020Xin rated it did not like it
A lousy attempt to use the name of skepticism to stamp out any political or scientific skepticism. I couldn’t believe that the study of scientific methods, the science of the sciences, a philosophy to encourage ppl to think science more as a theory that needs periodic revolutionary restarts, has deteriorated into a pendantic tool that tells a student of science they can only think in one way but not in any another, a tool that the professor used favorably and constantly to “disprove” political rumors about Obama and Romney, degrading the “conspiracy theorists” who believe there might be an alternative truth to what’s presented by MSM or attacking religion in general. Also the teacher quotes “statistically speaking” all the time but fails to successfully display any grasp of knowledge of Bayesian thinking. The teacher’s “scientific standards” of thinking show his own lack of deep understanding of mathematics/statistics which is the foundation of all sciences.

Don’t listen to this. If you have time, read Kuhn’s original writings, or some introductory book on statistical or Bayesian thinking. Dude is a fake. Strong disrecommend. He is a true anti-skeptic, use the name of skepticism to stamp out and demean any one who dares to voice any skepticism against “well-accepted” scientific “truths”, and refuses to think inside the box laid out by their peers, the “experts” and society. Be aware. Don’t be fooled.

Enjoy your own unconventional thinking. Always seek out an angle or a perspective that no one has tried before. No matter how crazy it sounds. Riemann refused to think inside the box, challenged the core beliefs of Euclidean geometry and came up with a brand new form of mathematics, which was the mathematical foundation of Einstein's theories of relativity. Einstein was not a great mathematician who invented a whole new branch of mathematics to describe the world in the way he needed, but he had a mathematician friend who had heard of Riemann's work and didn't think he was crazy. This is why ppl always said that great mathematicians and physicists produce their best work before they are 35, when they're still at the peak of their creativity (or when they are too inexperienced to be boxed in by orthodox thinking or too rebellious to think only in the way they are told to).

Enjoy your creativity. Enjoy your independent individualistic thinking. That's what makes this world so beautiful! Don’t ever let other people’s skepticism stop you, no matter how “scientific” they claim themselves to be. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Xavier
Dec 13, 2019Xavier rated it really liked it
Shelves: audiobook, science, philosophy, non-fiction, library, fighting-false-info, great-courses
How important it is think critically and to question everything. It's okay to say, "I don't know. Let me do some research and get back to you." It's okay not to know everything and to ask questions. Look at both sides of the argument and come to your own conclusions but keep in mind that a new piece of information may arise and completely change your view. To pursue knowledge and understanding is to swim in a river with a gentle current -- it's always in flux and a new scene will present itself around every bend. To think like a scientist is to constantly ask and receive answers, to do research and experimentation to come to a conclusion, always learning something new. A static mind doesn't grow.

The teacher of this course Mr. Shermer seems to be a big fan of the poetic scientist Carl Sagan and so he will find a good friend in me! He mentions how some of those who are pious will make the claim that skeptics and scientists lack spirituality. I'll quote Mr. Sagan who can put it more eloquently than I ever could,

“Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light‐years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. So are our emotions in the presence of great art or music or literature, or acts of exemplary selfless courage such as those of Mohandas Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both.”

If that doesn't evoke some emotion in both the religious and the atheistic, I don't know what will. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Bremer
Oct 31, 2020Bremer added it
A skeptic will believe in an idea when there is sufficient evidence for that idea being true. Until then, depending on the quality of evidence and the probability of that idea’s truth, a skeptic will either suspend their judgement or lack a belief in such an idea.

Skeptics are open to many diverse—even seemingly paradoxical—ideas, but they will not accept those ideas as being true until there is empirical evidence and logic, which supports those ideas.

People who are intelligent and well-educated can still believe in strange, illogical ideas.

Just because a person is smart in one area doesn’t mean that they are smart in another. People are prone to believing in many superstitious ideas like ghosts and fortune telling, elusive fairies and demons and telepathy, knocking on wood for good luck, and peeing on a wart for its removal.

Smart people not only can believe in strange ideas, but they often argue for their beliefs much better than the average person, rationalizing for their side, while being resistant to any counter arguments.

Often someone will claim a supernatural event happened to them, such as one of their dreams predicting a future event, while ignoring all those times when their premonitions did not occur.

It is normal to remember a significant event while ignoring an insignificant event.

Such events, which may feel personally unique, may occur regularly in a probabilistic sense. All insignificant events, however, are often not accounted for, when considering the totality of such events. The hits are recorded but the misses are not.

Science is a method that leads to provisional conclusions. The scientific method aims at objectivity under external validation. Science is based on rational thought and logic and evidence.

There is a tension in science between skepticism and credulity. For paradigm shifts to occur in the field, scientists need to be willing to challenge established views. They need to criticize the cherished beliefs of civilization as well.

What distinguishes science from pseudoscience is the validity of each claim, the consistency of those claims with other theories, the quality of the evidence presented, the ability of each claim to be tested, and so on.

It is important to be rigorous when investigating claims because people are deeply flawed thinkers, prone to biases, misconceptions, and perceptual mistakes.

Many people are seduced by compelling anecdotes while never considering the evidence behind those anecdotes. Anecdotes are not data, no matter how many people believe in them, unless they are backed by sufficient evidence.

The burden of proof is on those who make claims rather than on those who do not agree with the claims presented. One doesn’t have to disprove every story invented.

When confronted with claims, a skeptical person should look for sound reasoning. It is all too common for proponents of a belief to argue on irrational, self-contradictory grounds, based on enthusiasm and tradition and appeals to emotion.

One fallacy that individuals use is the argument from ignorance. They may say that if they or anyone else cannot explain X, then their proposed explanation must be true. It is much more rational to say “I don’t know” than to assume a conclusion.

Another fallacy comes from equating correlation to causation. The human mind naturally seeks relationships and patterns. At the same time, many events may be coincidental, or probable, but not necessarily connected.

Often during heated arguments, people use ad hominem fallacies. They insult their opponents rather than addressing their arguments directly.

Even if such insults are true, that still doesn’t invalidate the other person’s argument. An ad hominem argument, rather than dealing with the substance of the argument, acts to distract.

Along with these fallacies, among others, people have cognitive biases.

Many biases aren’t conscious.

Individuals look for ideas that confirm their belief systems while filtering out, neglecting, and ignoring contrary evidence.

They may form conspiracies about past events once they’ve been given the benefit of hindsight.

They may justify poor choices with rationalizations while ignoring any opposing evidence.

It is common for individuals to consider their views to be rational. They will see their opponents, however, as emotional.

There are many cognitive biases such as trusting in authorities only because they are authorities, generalizing a trait of one person to all people of that same group, and focusing on negative ideas much more than positive ideas.

Scientists are as prone to wrong thinking and biases as everyone else. That is why there needs to be a rigorous standard for evidence.

People have evolved to find patterns, even when there are none, and look for threats, even when none exist.

Scientific thinkers must be able to distinguish what is real from what is an illusion, while not being seduced by the appearance of patterns.

It’s normal for people to ascribe agency to natural patterns (like the constellations) and find great significance in probability (like a pair of dice landing on the same number three times in a row).

When something that is unexplained, mysterious, or unknown gains validity through evidence, it will eventually be incorporated into science. Ideas that cannot be tested, or analyzed, under peer-reviewed standards, will still be considered unknown, meaningless, or unexplained, until there is reason and evidence in support of them.

Science is a method that filters good ideas from bad ideas. It is a long, self-correcting process.

Even the most obvious, ordinary, basic phenomena, which are assumed as true by most people, must still undergo the same amount of scrutiny as the wildest ideas. Even ideas that appear to have evidentiary support, overtime, may be falsified. Superior models may replace outdated models, new evidence may challenge an existing paradigm.

With so many claims about what reality is, it is important to be skeptical. As Carl Sagan, a famous scientist and public educator and author, once said, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

Scientists don’t have the burden of proof to disprove every idea. It is up to those who make positive assertions to prove themselves.

At the same time, scientific thinkers must be aware of the vast number of biases that interfere with how people determine what evidence is credible. Hindsight bias, confirmation bias, and other such biases, affect all people to a degree. Science is a method that cuts down on these biases overtime.

No scientific principles are absolute. All scientific principles must be tested and theories must lead to predictable results. It is important to question what is seen as acceptable and challenge the premises for any given conclusion.

Claims about reality should always be taken as false, meaningless, or unknown, until those claims gain enough evidence in support of them being true. Then they should be accepted tentatively. They may later be shown to be outdated, false, limited, full of errors, and so on.

Not all claims are created equal. Many claims are often misperceptions, misconceptions, hallucinations, lies, manipulations to serve ideological motives, speculations, opinions, untestable ideas, and so on, and so on.

Those who believe in irrational ideas can influence not only themselves, but those around them. They can form groups, which are destructive to the well-being of others. Their groups can create divisions in society, where the out-group is seen as less than human. Groups tend to conform to in-group values, while being hostile to outsiders.

They will listen to authorities that support their views, even when those authorities are wrong. Eloquent speakers can persuade uncritical people to follow them, even when their words are manipulations.

People can be convinced of outlandish ideas. Even smart people can fool themselves. There are no exceptions.

It is common for humans to believe in supernatural events because humans are hardwired to be social creatures, to feel good when they believe in transcendent ideas, following what those in their closest environments follow. There may even be a genetic predisposition toward believing in supernatural ideas, inherited from past ancestors. Culture then shapes what is passed down, providing a structure for what is already there.

People are natural-born believers. While it is crucial for individuals to be open to the unknown, to novelty and a future of what could be, they must not be so open that they neglect to critically think about issues that affect their well-being and the well-being of others.

To be duped into joining cults and stupid fads, into voting for politicians who promote disastrous policies for the environment, to be fooled into ordering sham products, donating life savings to charlatans, and wasting years on false solutions, while spreading misinformation to those who are nearest, is not only unwise.

It may ultimately be dangerous.
(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Tom
Feb 02, 2015Tom rated it it was ok
Fell short on the "how" part of the subtitle. Most of the time was on the author's view on specific topics. However much I might agree with the position he takes on the topics, it does not address the how... how does one overcome these natural human fallacies in logic. Identification of logic fallacies and how to overcome them are different learning objectives. I wanted the latter and was therefore disappointed (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
John
May 10, 2016John rated it liked it
This was kind of fun and definitely brought up some good points, but the author was very clearly heavily to the left, which shows several times throughout the book (who ever heard of a liberal professor!?). In itself that isn't bad, but when you're trying to promote critical thinking, it should be done so from a politically neutral stance.

3/5 (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Russ
Mar 29, 2016Russ rated it did not like it
I usually like the courses from the Great Courses. This one would be better titled as I Hate Religion and you're stupid for believing in God. Any relevant or useful information could have been provided in a much shorter format. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · see review
Dave
Apr 04, 2018Dave rated it it was ok
Shelves: gave-up-on, other-non-fiction, audio
Having listened to Your Deceptive Mind: A Scientific Guide to Critical Thinking (Great Courses by Steven Novella), I did not find this to be nearly as useful.

If you are considering this set of lectures, I suggest that you try Your Deceptive Mind.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Natalie
Nov 13, 2018Natalie rated it really liked it
Important skills to have in the world of fake news.
Also really interesting to learn how some of our natural assumptions evolved and why we have them.
flag1 like · Like  · see review
Laura
Mar 03, 2020Laura rated it it was ok
Useful information, but I found his monist, materialist assumptions had too much influence.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Budi Arsana
Jun 12, 2020Budi Arsana rated it did not like it
The quality is not what i expected from the great course series. And content have too much cites from other sources.
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Bart
Apr 12, 2021Bart rated it liked it
An interesting take on skepticism. However, this is more an addendum to “The Demon-Haunted World” by Ann Druyan and Carl Sagan rather than a separate position.
In many places, the author is oversimplifying things too much but on the other hand, provides discussion on the currently most popular disbelief in the world.

For instance, he presents the concepts of creationism and intelligent design in a sort of straw man fashion, by quickly summarizing it all as being a part of the supernatural, so unexplainable and therefore, unscientific.

Nevertheless, I do like his take on conspiracies vs. conspiracy theories and how easily manipulated people can be about those things. He also shares some wisdom re: the practical ways of being a skeptic at the end of the series. I do think that part should have been more emphasized with more time and detail. It felt a bit rushed. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Chris Boutté
Dec 24, 2020Chris Boutté rated it it was amazing
A while back, when I first became interested in the subjects of skepticism and critical thinking, I picked up a Michael Shermer book and didn't like it. That was about a year ago, and after reading numerous other books on the subjects, his name kept coming up, so I decided to give him another try, and he blew me away. I'm officially a fan after going through his Skepticism 101 course. He is extremely well-versed on why people believe in the supernatural and paranormal, and he has great strategies for scientific thinking. I'm super excited that I gave his work another chance because he has a ton of books that I can't wait to read. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Angie Boyter
Dec 30, 2020Angie Boyter rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
If you are new to this subject, you will probably enjoy this course more than my husband and I did. We listened to this course over lunches, one lecture per meal, and it was as entertaining as the radio would have been, although we were tempted to cut a couple of the lectures short. It was well presented, and there were some interesting examples and a few insights ,but for someone who has read a bit on the subject already, e.g., Dan Ariely, there is nothing new here.
In addition, there is not as much reference to scientific method as one might expect. There are a lot of references to scientific studies, however, like the Milgram study, which would be quite interesting if you do not already know them.
A minor but annoying flaw, surprising in someone like Shermer, who does a lot of public cpeaking, is his frequent (often multipl per lecture) mispronunciation of words. Admittedly, I am sometimes unsure how to pronounce a term I have only read, but if I were going to use the term in lectures, I would take the trouble to learn the proper pronunciation. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Graeme Roberts
Feb 06, 2018Graeme Roberts rated it it was amazing
This Great Courses audiobook is excellent. Michael Shermer is meticulously balanced and courteous in explaining scientific thinking and how to apply it to contentious issues. Ironically, no one who believes in conspiracy theories, attends seances, denies the existence of the Holocaust, or believes in UFOs will ever listen to it. It will help the rest of us, however. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review

2021/06/16

Amazon.com: Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth, and the Rise of Humanity (Audible Audio Edition): David Christian, David Christian, The Great Courses, The Great Courses: Books

Amazon.com: Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth, and the Rise of Humanity (Audible Audio Edition): David Christian, David Christian, The Great Courses, The Great Courses: Books

Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth, and the Rise of Humanity Audible Logo Audible Audiobook – Original recording
David Christian (Narrator, Author), The Great Courses (Author, Publisher)
4.2 out of 5 stars    11 ratings


How is it possible for the disciplines of cosmology, geology, anthropology, biology, and history to fit together? These 48 lectures answer that question by weaving a single story from accounts of the past developed by a variety of scholarly disciplines. The result is a story stretching from the origins of the universe to the present day and beyond, in which human history is seen as part of the history of our Earth and biosphere, and the Earth's history, in turn, is seen as part of the history of the universe.

Like traditional creation stories told by the world's great religions and mythologies, this lecture series provides a map of our place in space and time. But it does so using the insights and knowledge of modern science, as synthesized by a renowned historian. While you may have heard parts of this story before in courses on geology, history, anthropology, biology, cosmology, and other scholarly disciplines, Professor Christian provides more than just a recap of those disciplines. "Because of the scale on which we look at the past, you should not expect to find in it many of the familiar details, names, and personalities that you'll find in other types of historical teaching and writing," he explains. "For example, the French Revolution and the Renaissance will barely get a mention. They'll zoom past in a blur. You'll barely see them. Instead, what we're going to see are some less familiar aspects of the past. We'll be looking, above all, for the very large patterns, the shape of the past.

"Prepare yourself for a journey through time and across space, from the first moments of existence to the distant reaches of the far future."
Read less
©2008 The Teaching Company, LLC (P)2008 The Great Courses
Audible Logo Audiobook
AUD 0.00
with membership trial
Paperback
AUD 13.66
Audio CD
AUD 36.70
Other sellers & formats
Audible Logo
Special invitation from Audible!
Free with Audible TrialAUD 0.00
Continue for FREE
Monthly payment after 30 days:
$14.95(AUD 19.98 as of today) 
One credit a month to pick any title from our entire premium selection to keep (you’ll use your first credit now).
Unlimited listening on select audiobooks, Audible Originals, and podcasts.
You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
AUD 19.98 a month after 30 days. Cancel online anytime.
Learn more about Membership
Buy with 1-ClickAUD 67.60
Sold and delivered by Audible, an Amazon company
Add to List
Share    
Amazon book clubs early access
Add to book club
Not in a club? Learn more
People who viewed this also viewedPage 1 of 9Page 1 of 9
Previous page
The Origin and Evolution of Earth: From the Big Bang to the Future of Human Existence
The Origin and Evolution of Earth: From the Big Bang to the Future of Human ExistenceThe Origin and Evolution of Earth: From the Big Bang to the Future of…
Robert M. Hazen
5
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
The Joy of Science
The Joy of ScienceThe Joy of Science
Robert M. Hazen
6
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Mysteries of Modern Physics: Time
Mysteries of Modern Physics: TimeMysteries of Modern Physics: Time
Sean Carroll
2
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Particle Physics for Non-Physicists: A Tour of the Microcosmos
Particle Physics for Non-Physicists: A Tour of the MicrocosmosParticle Physics for Non-Physicists: A Tour of the Microcosmos
Steven Pollock
1
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Chemistry and Our Universe: How It All Works
Chemistry and Our Universe: How It All WorksChemistry and Our Universe: How It All Works
Ron B. Davis
6
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Biology: The Science of Life
Biology: The Science of Life
Stephen Nowicki
 13
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Next page
People who bought this also boughtPage 1 of 6Page 1 of 6
Previous page
Major Transitions in Evolution
Major Transitions in EvolutionMajor Transitions in Evolution
Anthony Martin
1
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
How the Earth Works
How the Earth WorksHow the Earth Works
Michael E. Wysession
7
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
What Darwin Didn’t Know: The Modern Science of Evolution
What Darwin Didn’t Know: The Modern Science of EvolutionWhat Darwin Didn’t Know: The Modern Science of Evolution
Scott Solomon
1
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Life in Our Universe
Life in Our UniverseLife in Our Universe
Laird Close
0
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
The History of the United States, 2nd Edition
The History of the United States, 2nd EditionThe History of the United States, 2nd Edition
The Great Courses
36
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
The Remarkable Science of Ancient Astronomy
The Remarkable Science of Ancient Astronomy
Bradley E. Schaefer
 0
Audible Audiobook
AUD 0.00 Free with Audible trial
Next page
Get more included with membership:
1 credit a month

The Plus Catalog

Podcasts

Product details
Listening Length 24 hours and 26 minutes
Author David Christian, The Great Courses
Narrator David Christian
Audible.com Release Date July 08, 2013
Publisher The Great Courses
Program Type Audiobook
Version Original recording
Language English
ASIN B00DTNW86O
Best Sellers Rank #11,788 in Audible Books & Originals (See Top 100 in Audible Books & Originals)
#136 in Biological Sciences (Audible Books & Originals)
#828 in Biological Sciences (Books)
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
11 global ratings
5 star
 59%
4 star
 28%
3 star 0% (0%)
 0%
2 star 0% (0%)
 0%
1 star
 13%
How are ratings calculated?
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Sponsored 

Top reviews
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
rikitikitavi
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Seller who gives a Complete and Accurate description of what he sells. I like that:)
Reviewed in the United States on February 17, 2021
Verified Purchase
I Love my “Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth”
the Complete Great Learning Compact Disc Set. Neatly packed and Quickly shipped. I’m a very Happy customer who’s always willing to spend a bit more for a complete and accurate description of the product sold:) Again, very Happy with my buy!
Helpful
Report abuse
S. Aldrich
5.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating and profound.
Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2016
Verified Purchase
Wonderful lectures.
Helpful
Report abuse
Becky
4.0 out of 5 stars Big History - Properly named Perfect for retirement folks to enjoy.
Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2014
Verified Purchase
Plan on listening to it throughout the winter months. We're looking forward to it. The set was in perfect condition. .
Helpful
Report abuse
Kristi R.
5.0 out of 5 stars "To understand ourselves," says Professor Christian, "we need to know the very large story, the largest story of all."
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2017
Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth and the Rise of Humanity
By Professor David Christian

"To understand ourselves," says Professor Christian, "we need to know the very large story, the largest story of all."

48 lectures | 30 minutes each
1 What Is Big History?
2 Moving across Multiple Scales
3 Simplicity and Complexity
4 Evidence and the Nature of Science
5 Threshold 1—Origins of Big Bang Cosmology
6 How Did Everything Begin?
7 Threshold 2—The First Stars and Galaxies
8 Threshold 3—Making Chemical Elements
9 Threshold 4—The Earth and the Solar System
10 The Early Earth—A Short History
11 Plate Tectonics and the Earth's Geography
12 Threshold 5—Life
13 Darwin and Natural Selection
14 The Evidence for Natural Selection
15 The Origins of Life
16 Life on Earth—Single-celled Organisms
17 Life on Earth—Multi-celled Organisms
18 Hominines
19 Evidence on Hominine Evolution
20 Threshold 6—What Makes Humans Different?
21 Homo sapiens—The First Humans
22 Paleolithic Lifeways
23 Change in the Paleolithic Era
24 Threshold 7—Agriculture
25 The Origins of Agriculture
26 The First Agrarian Societies
27 Power and Its Origins
28 Early Power Structures
29 From Villages to Cities
30 Sumer—The First Agrarian Civilization
31 Agrarian Civilizations in Other Regions
32 The World That Agrarian Civilizations Made
33 Long Trends—Expansion and State Power
34 Long Trends—Rates of Innovation
35 Long Trends—Disease and Malthusian Cycles
36 Comparing the World Zones
37 The Americas in the Later Agrarian Era
38 Threshold 8—The Modern Revolution
39 The Medieval Malthusian Cycle, 500–1350
40 The Early Modern Cycle, 1350–1700
41 Breakthrough—The Industrial Revolution
42 Spread of the Industrial Revolution to 1900
43 The 20th Century
44 The World That the Modern Revolution Made
45 Human History and the Biosphere
46 The Next 100 Years
47 The Next Millennium and the Remote Future
48 Big History—Humans in the Cosmos

This was such an all compassing history of the world combining history, science, physics, biology and statistics into a huge epic of how we got to where we are now and where are we going from here.

Professor Christian taught at San Diego State University and now in Sydney, Australia. He is clear and concise on his explanations and there is so much to cover in this course that I know I will have to listen to it repeatedly.

I thoroughly enjoyed the big picture of the science of the creation of the universe and the beginnings of man in such a short time. There were many questions that were answered and many questions that we need to study more. We have so much more to learn about where we came from and where we are going.

I highly recommend this lecture series, I certainly learned from it.
Read less
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Chris
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2015
This is the History of Everything from the beginning of the universe to the present day, organized around 8 threshold events-starting with the beginning of the universe, moving through the formation of the stars and galaxies, the formation of chemical elements, planets and solar systems (with special emphasis on our solar system and Earth), the beginning of life, the appearance of Homo sapiens, the development of agriculture (symbiosis between man and domesticates on a massive scale) and ending with The Modern Revolution. Each threshold event involves its own particular discipline from Cosmology, to Geology, Biology and Anthropology. Professor Christian provides background information from each discipline which he gathered from years coordinating Big History courses where lecturers from each of the disciplines taught segments of the class. The result is a cohesive narrative and foundation for understanding the past 13.6 billion years. I feel as if four years of inchoate 1980's undergrad education has been sorted and ordered in a few weeks.
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Camber
5.0 out of 5 stars This Course is Mandatory for All Adults
Reviewed in the United States on December 4, 2013
Christian was a pioneer of big history, and is still a leader in the field, if not THE leader. TTC and its customers are therefore incredibly fortunate to have gotten Christian to develop this course.

The scope of the course is very sweeping and comprehensive. Christian literally presents a history of the universe, both natural and human, from the big bang right up to present, and even ends with potential scenarios for the future. In the process, the student is exposed not only to history on the grandest possible scale (which is the scale at which everyone should first be exposed to history), but he also imparts basic knowledge in areas such as cosmology, physics, chemistry, biology, human evolution and anthropology, technology, etc.

As a lecturer, suffice it say that Christian is superb, and 48 lectures is perhaps a perfect length for this material - long enough to synthesize a vast amount of material, without tiring the student too much by the end of the course.

It would be a gross understatement to say that I highly recommend this course. Rather, this course is absolutely mandatory for anyone who aspires to consider themself an educated adult in the world today. The framework this course provides is essential for the putting the modern world in perspective and making wise decisions for the future.
Read less
9 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews

Big History - Wikipedia

Big History - Wikipedia

Big History

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
A diagram of the Big Bang expansion according to NASA
Notable events from the Big Bang to the present day depicted in a spiral layout. Every billion years (Ga) is represented in 90 degrees of rotation.

Big History is an academic discipline which examines history from the Big Bang to the present. Big History resists specialization, and searches for universal patterns or trends. It examines long time frames using a multidisciplinary approach based on combining numerous disciplines from science and the humanities,[1][2][3][4][5] and explores human existence in the context of this bigger picture.[6] It integrates studies of the cosmos, Earth, life, and humanity using empirical evidence to explore cause-and-effect relations,[7][8] and is taught at universities[9] and primary and secondary schools[10][11] often using web-based interactive presentations.[12][13][14]

Historian David Christian has been credited with coining the term "Big History" while teaching one of the first such courses at Macquarie University.[7][9][15] An all-encompassing study of humanity's relationship to cosmology[16] and natural history[17] has been pursued by scholars since the Renaissance, and the new field, Big History, continues such work.

Comparison with conventional history[edit source]

Conventional historyBig History
5000 BCE to presentBig Bang to present
7,000–10,000 years13.8 billion years
Compartmentalized fields of studyInterdisciplinary approach
Focus on human civilizationFocus on how humankind fits within the universe
Taught mostly with booksTaught on interactive platforms at: Coursera, Youtube's Crash CourseBig History ProjectMacquarie UniversityChronoZoom
MicrohistoryMacrohistory
Focus on trends, processesFocus on analogy, metaphor
Based on a variety of documents, including written records and material artifactsBased on current knowledge about phenomena such as fossils, ecological changes, genetic analysis, telescope data, in addition to conventional historical data

Big History examines the past using numerous time scales, from the Big Bang to modernity,[4] unlike conventional history courses which typically begin with the introduction of farming and civilization,[18] or with the beginning of written records. It explores common themes and patterns.[12] Courses generally do not focus on humans until one-third to halfway through,[7] and, unlike conventional history courses, there is not much focus on kingdoms or civilizations or wars or national borders.[7] If conventional history focuses on human civilization with humankind at the center, Big History focuses on the universe and shows how humankind fits within this framework[19] and places human history in the wider context of the universe's history.[20][21]

Conventional history often begins with the development of agriculture in civilizations such as Ancient Egypt.

Unlike conventional history, Big History tends to go rapidly through detailed historical eras such as the Renaissance or Ancient Egypt.[22] It draws on the latest findings from biology,[4] astronomy,[4] geoscience,[4] chemistryphysicsarchaeologyanthropologypsychologysociologyeconomics,[4] prehistoryancient history, and natural history, as well as standard history.[23] One teacher explained:

We're taking the best evidence from physics and the best evidence from chemistry and biology, and we're weaving it together into a story ... They're not going to learn how to balance [chemical] equations, but they're going to learn how the chemical elements came out of the death of stars, and that's really interesting.[12]

Big History arose from a desire to go beyond the specialized and self-contained fields that emerged in the 20th century. It tries to grasp history as a whole, looking for common themes across multiple time scales in history.[24][25] Conventional history typically begins with the invention of writing, and is limited to past events relating directly to the human race. Big Historians point out that this limits study to the past 5,000 years and neglects the much longer time when humans existed on Earth. Henry Kannberg sees Big History as being a product of the Information Age, a stage in history itself following speech, writing, and printing.[26] Big History covers the formation of the universe, stars, and galaxies, and includes the beginning of life as well as the period of several hundred thousand years when humans were hunter-gatherers. It sees the transition to civilization as a gradual one, with many causes and effects, rather than an abrupt transformation from uncivilized static cavemen to dynamic civilized farmers.[27] An account in The Boston Globe describes what it polemically asserts to be the conventional "history" view:

Early humans were slump-shouldered, slope-browed, hairy brutes. They hunkered over campfires and ate scorched meat. Sometimes they carried spears. Once in a while they scratched pictures of antelopes on the walls of their caves. That's what I learned during elementary school, anyway. History didn't start with the first humans—they were cavemen! The Stone Age wasn't history; the Stone Age was a preamble to history, a dystopian era of stasis before the happy onset of civilization, and the arrival of nifty developments like chariot wheels, gunpowder, and Google. History started with agriculture, nation-states, and written documents. History began in Mesopotamia's Fertile Crescent, somewhere around 4000 BC. It began when we finally overcame our savage legacy, and culture surpassed biology.[27]

Artist's depiction of the WMAP satellite gathering data to help scientists understand the Big Bang

Big History, in contrast to conventional history, has more of an interdisciplinary basis.[12] Advocates sometimes view conventional history as "microhistory" or "shallow history", and note that three-quarters of historians specialize in understanding the last 250 years while ignoring the "long march of human existence."[2] However, one historian disputed that the discipline of history has overlooked the big view, and described the "grand narrative" of Big History as a "cliché that gets thrown around a lot."[2] One account suggested that conventional history had the "sense of grinding the nuts into an ever finer powder."[23] It emphasizes long-term trends and processes rather than history-making individuals or events.[2] Historian Dipesh Chakrabarty of the University of Chicago suggested that Big History was less politicized than contemporary history because it enables people to "take a step back."[2] It uses more kinds of evidence than the standard historical written records, such as fossils, tools, household items, pictures, structures, ecological changes and genetic variations.[2]

Criticism of Big History[edit source]

Critics of Big History, including sociologist Frank Furedi, have deemed the discipline an "anti-humanist turn of history."[28] The Big History narrative has also been challenged for failing to engage with the methodology of the conventional history discipline. According to historian and educator Sam Wineburg of Stanford University, Big History eschews the interpretation of texts in favor of a purely scientific approach, thus becoming "less history and more of a kind of evolutionary biology or quantum physics."[29] Others have pointed out that such criticisms of Big History removing the human element or not following a historical methodology seem to derive from observers who have not sufficiently looked into what Big History actually does, with most courses having one-third or half devoted to humanity, with the concept of increasing complexity giving humanity an important place, and with methods in the natural sciences being innately historical since they also attempt to gather evidence in order to craft a narrative.[30]

Themes[edit source]

Radiocarbon dating helps scientists understand the age of rocks as well as the Earth and the Solar System.

Big History seeks to retell the "human story" in light of scientific advances by such methods as radiocarbon datinggenetic analysis, thermodynamic measurements of "free energy rate density", along with a host of methods employed in archaeologyanthropology, and world historyDavid Christian of Macquarie University has argued that the recent past is only understandable in terms of the "whole 14-billion-year span of time itself."[23] David Baker of Macquarie University has pointed out that not only do the physical principles of energy flows and complexity connect human history to the very start of the Universe, but the broadest view of human history many also supply the discipline of history with a "unifying theme" in the form of the concept of collective learning.[31] Big History also explores the mix of individual action and social and environmental forces, according to one view.[2] Big History seeks to discover repeating patterns during the 13.8 billion years since the Big Bang[1] and explore the core transdisciplinary theme of increasing complexity as described by Eric Chaisson of Harvard University.

Time scales and questions[edit source]

Big History makes comparisons based on different time scales and notes similarities and differences between the human, geological, and cosmological scales. David Christian believes such "radical shifts in perspective" will yield "new insights into familiar historical problems, from the nature/nurture debate to environmental history to the fundamental nature of change itself."[23] It shows how human existence has been changed by both human-made and natural factors: for example, according to natural processes which happened more than four billion years ago, iron emerged from the remains of an exploding star and, as a result, humans could use this hard metal to forge weapons for hunting and war.[7] The discipline addresses such questions as "How did we get here?," "How do we decide what to believe?," "How did Earth form?," and "What is life?"[4] According to Fred Spier it offers a "grand tour of all the major scientific paradigms" and helps students to become scientifically literate quickly.[20] One interesting perspective that arises from Big History is that despite the vast temporal and spatial scales of the history of the Universe, it is actually very small pockets of the cosmos where most of the "history" is happening, due to the nature of complexity.[32]

Cosmic evolution[edit source]

Cosmic evolution, the scientific study of universal change, is closely related to Big History (as are the allied subjects of the epic of evolution and astrobiology); some researchers regard cosmic evolution as broader than Big History since the latter mainly (and rightfully) examines the specific historical trek from Big Bang → Milky Way → Sun → Earth → humanity. Cosmic evolution, while fully addressing all complex systems (and not merely those that led to humans) has been taught and researched for decades, mostly by astronomers and astrophysicists. This Big-Bang-to-humankind scenario well preceded the subject that some historians began calling Big History in the 1990s. Cosmic evolution is an intellectual framework that offers a grand synthesis of the many varied changes in the assembly and composition of radiation, matter, and life throughout the history of the universe. While engaging the time-honored queries of who we are and whence we came, this interdisciplinary subject attempts to unify the sciences within the entirety of natural history—a single, inclusive scientific narrative of the origin and evolution of all material things over ~14 billion years, from the origin of the universe to the present day on Earth.

The roots of the idea of cosmic evolution extend back millennia. Ancient Greek philosophers of the fifth century BCE, most notably Heraclitus, are celebrated for their reasoned claims that all things change. Early modern speculation about cosmic evolution began more than a century ago, including the broad insights of Robert ChambersHerbert Spencer, and Lawrence Henderson. Only in the mid-20th century was the cosmic-evolutionary scenario articulated as a research paradigm to include empirical studies of galaxies, stars, planets, and life—in short, an expansive agenda that combines physical, biological, and cultural evolution. Harlow Shapley widely articulated the idea of cosmic evolution (often calling it "cosmography") in public venues at mid-century,[33] and NASA embraced it in the late 20th century as part of its more limited astrobiology program. Carl Sagan,[34] Eric Chaisson,[35] Hubert Reeves,[36] Erich Jantsch,[37] and Preston Cloud,[38] among others, extensively championed cosmic evolution at roughly the same time around 1980. This extremely broad subject now continues to be richly formulated as both a technical research program and a scientific worldview for the 21st century.[39][40][41]

One popular collection of scholarly materials on cosmic evolution is based on teaching and research that has been underway at Harvard University since the mid-1970s.[42]

Complexity, energy, thresholds[edit source]

Cosmic evolution is a quantitative subject, whereas big history typically is not; this is because cosmic evolution is practiced mostly by natural scientists, while big history by social scholars. These two subjects, closely allied and overlapping, benefit from each other; cosmic evolutionists tend to treat universal history linearly, thus humankind enters their story only at the most very recent times, whereas big historians tend to stress humanity and its many cultural achievements, granting human beings a larger part of their story. One can compare and contrast these different emphases by watching two short movies portraying the Big-Bang-to-humankind narrative, one animating time linearly, and the other capturing time (actually look-back time) logarithmically; in the former, humans enter this 14-minute movie in the last second, while in the latter we appear much earlier—yet both are correct.[43]

These different treatments of time over ~14 billion years, each with different emphases on historical content, are further clarified by noting that some cosmic evolutionists divide the whole narrative into three phases and seven epochs:

Phases: physical evolution → biological evolution → cultural evolution
Epochs: particulate → galactic → stellar → planetary → chemical → biological → cultural

This contrasts with the approach used by some big historians who divide the narrative into many more thresholds, as noted in the discussion at the end of this section below. Yet another telling of the Big-Bang-to-humankind story is one that emphasizes the earlier universe, particularly the growth of particles, galaxies, and large-scale cosmic structure, such as in physical cosmology.

Notable among quantitative efforts to describe cosmic evolution are Eric Chaisson's research efforts to describe the concept of energy flow through open, thermodynamic systems, including galaxies, stars, planets, life, and society.[44][45][46] The observed increase of energy rate density (energy/time/mass) among a whole host of complex systems is one useful way to explain the rise of complexity in an expanding universe that still obeys the cherished second law of thermodynamics and thus continues to accumulate net entropy. As such, ordered material systems—from buzzing bees and redwood trees to shining stars and thinking beings—are viewed as temporary, local islands of order in a vast, global sea of disorder. A recent review article, which is especially directed toward big historians, summarizes much of this empirical effort over the past decade.[47]

One striking finding of such complexity studies is the apparently ranked order among all known material systems in the universe. Although the absolute energy in astronomical systems greatly exceeds that of humans, and although the mass densities of stars, planets, bodies, and brains are all comparable, the energy rate density for humans and modern human society are approximately a million times greater than for stars and galaxies. For example, the Sun emits a vast luminosity, 4x1033 erg/s (equivalent to nearly a billion billion billion watt light bulb), but it also has a huge mass, 2x1033 g; thus each second an amount of energy equaling only 2 ergs passes through each gram of this star. In contrast to any star, more energy flows through each gram of a plant's leaf during photosynthesis, and much more (nearly a million times) rushes through each gram of a human brain while thinking (~20W/1350g).[48]

Cosmic evolution is more than a subjective, qualitative assertion of "one damn thing after another". This inclusive scientific worldview constitutes an objective, quantitative approach toward deciphering much of what comprises organized, material Nature. Its uniform, consistent philosophy of approach toward all complex systems demonstrates that the basic differences, both within and among many varied systems, are of degree, not of kind. And, in particular, it suggests that optimal ranges of energy rate density grant opportunities for the evolution of complexity; those systems able to adjust, adapt, or otherwise take advantage of such energy flows survive and prosper, while other systems adversely affected by too much or too little energy are non-randomly eliminated.[49]

Fred Spier is foremost among those big historians who have found the concept of energy flows useful, suggesting that Big History is the rise and demise of complexity on all scales, from sub-microscopic particles to vast galaxy clusters, and not least many biological and cultural systems in between.[50]

David Christian, in an 18-minute TED talk, described some of the basics of the Big History course.[51] Christian describes each stage in the progression towards greater complexity as a "threshold moment" when things become more complex, but they also become more fragile and mobile.[51] Some of Christian's threshold stages are:

In a supernova, a star which has exhausted most of its energy bursts in an incredible explosion, creating conditions for heavier elements such as iron and gold to form.
  1. The universe appears, incredibly hot, busting, expanding, within a second.[51]
  2. Stars are born.[51]
  3. Stars die, creating temperatures hot enough to make complex chemicals, as well as rocks, asteroids, planets, moons, and our solar system.[51]
  4. Earth is created.[51]
  5. Life appears on Earth, with molecules growing from the Goldilocks conditions, with neither too much nor too little energy.[51]
  6. Humans appear, language, collective learning.[51]

Christian elaborated that more complex systems are more fragile, and that while collective learning is a powerful force to advance humanity in general, it is not clear that humans are in charge of it, and it is possible in his view for humans to destroy the biosphere with the powerful weapons that have been invented.[51]

In the 2008 lecture series through The Teaching Company's Great Courses entitled Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth, and the Rise of Humanity, Christian explains Big History in terms of eight thresholds of increasing complexity:[52]

  1. The Big Bang and the creation of the Universe about roughly 14 billion years ago[52]
  2. The creation of the first complex objects, stars, about 12 billion years ago[52]
  3. The creation of chemical elements inside dying stars required for chemically-complex objects, including plants and animals[52]
  4. The formation of planets, such as our Earth, which are more chemically complex than the Sun[52]
  5. The origin and evolution of life from roughly about 4.2 billion years ago, including the evolution of our hominine ancestors[52]
  6. The development of our species, Homo sapiens, about 250,000 years ago, covering the Paleolithic era of human history[52]
  7. The appearance of agriculture about 11,000 years ago in the Neolithic era, allowing for larger, more complex societies[52]
  8. The "modern revolution", or the vast social, economic, and cultural transformations that brought the world into the modern era[52]
  9. What will happen in the future and predicting what will be the next threshold in our history[53][54]

Goldilocks conditions[edit source]

The Earth is ideally located in a Goldilocks condition—being neither too close nor too distant from the Sun.

A theme in Big History is what has been termed Goldilocks conditions or the Goldilocks principle, which describes how "circumstances must be right for any type of complexity to form or continue to exist," as emphasized by Spier in his recent book.[20] For humans, bodily temperatures can neither be too hot nor too cold; for life to form on a planet, it can neither have too much nor too little energy from sunlight. Stars require sufficient quantities of hydrogen, sufficiently packed together under tremendous gravity, to cause nuclear fusion.[20]

Christian suggests that complexity arises when these Goldilocks conditions are met, that is, when things are not too hot or cold, not too fast or slow. For example, life began not in solids (molecules are stuck together, preventing the right kinds of associations) or gases (molecules move too fast to enable favorable associations) but in liquids such as water that permitted the right kinds of interactions at the right speeds.[51]

Somewhat in contrast, Chaisson has maintained for well more than a decade that "organizational complexity is mostly governed by the optimum use of energy—not too little as to starve a system, yet not too much as to destroy it". Neither maximum energy principles nor minimum entropy states are likely relevant to appreciate the emergence of complexity in Nature writ large.[55]

Other themes[edit source]

Big Historians use information based on scientific techniques such as gene mapping to learn more about the origins of humanity.

Advances in particular sciences such as archaeologygene mapping, and evolutionary ecology have enabled historians to gain new insights into the early origins of humans, despite the lack of written sources.[2] One account suggested that proponents of Big History were trying to "upend" the conventional practice in historiography of relying on written records.[2]

Big History proponents suggest that humans have been affecting climate change throughout history, by such methods as slash-and-burn agriculture, although past modifications have been on a lesser scale than in recent years during the Industrial Revolution.[2]

A book by Daniel Lord Smail in 2008 suggested that history was a continuing process of humans learning to self-modify our mental states by using stimulants such as coffee and tobacco, as well as other means such as religious rites or romance novels.[18] His view is that culture and biology are highly intertwined, such that cultural practices may cause human brains to be wired differently from those in different societies.[18]

Another theme that has been actively discussed recently by the Big History community is the issue of the Big History Singularity[56] [57][58][59][60]

Presentation by web-based interactive video[edit source]

ChronoZoom is a free open source project that helps readers visualize time at all scales from the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago to the present.

Big History is more likely than conventional history to be taught with interactive "video-heavy" websites without textbooks, according to one account.[12] The discipline has benefited from having new ways of presenting themes and concepts in new formats, often supplemented by Internet and computer technology.[1] For example, the ChronoZoom project is a way to explore the 14 billion year history of the universe in an interactive website format.[9][61] It was described in one account:

ChronoZoom splays out the entirety of cosmic history in a web browser, where users can click into different epochs to learn about the events that have culminated to bring us to where we are today—in my case, sitting in an office chair writing about space. Eager to learn about the Stelliferous epoch? Click away, my fellow explorer. Curious about the formation of the earth? Jump into the "Earth and Solar System" section to see historian David Christian talk about the birth of our homeworld.

— TechCrunch, 2012[61]

In 2012, the History channel showed the film History of the World in Two Hours.[1][9] It showed how dinosaurs effectively dominated mammals for 160 million years until an asteroid impact wiped them out.[1] One report suggested the History channel had won a sponsorship from StanChart to develop a Big History program entitled Mankind.[62] In 2013 the History channel's new H2 network debuted the 10-part series Big History, narrated by Bryan Cranston and featuring David Christian and an assortment of historians, scientists and related experts.[63] Each episode centered on a major Big History topic such as salt, mountains, cold, flight, water, meteors and megastructures.

History of the field[edit source]

Early efforts[edit source]

Astronomer Carl Sagan

While the emerging field of Big History in its present state is generally seen as having emerged in the past two decades beginning around 1990, there have been numerous precedents going back almost 150 years. In the mid-19th century, Alexander von Humboldt's book Cosmos, and Robert Chambers' 1844 book Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation[20] were seen as early precursors to the field.[20] In a sense, Darwin's theory of evolution was, in itself, an attempt to explain a biological phenomenon by examining longer term cause-and-effect processes. In the first half of the 20th century, secular biologist Julian Huxley originated the term "evolutionary humanism",[1] while around the same time the French Jesuit paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin examined links between cosmic evolution and a tendency towards complexification (including human consciousness), while envisaging compatibility between cosmology, evolution, and theology. In the mid and later 20th century, The Ascent of Man by Jacob Bronowski examined history from a multidisciplinary perspective. Later, Eric Chaisson explored the subject of cosmic evolution quantitatively in terms of energy rate density, and the astronomer Carl Sagan wrote Cosmos.[1] Thomas Berry, a cultural historian, and the academic Brian Swimme explored meaning behind myths and encouraged academics to explore themes beyond organized religion.[1]

The famous 1968 Earthrise photo, taken by astronaut William Anders, may have stimulated, among other things, an interest in interdisciplinary studies.

The field continued to evolve from interdisciplinary studies during the mid-20th century, stimulated in part by the Cold War and the Space Race. Some early efforts were courses in Cosmic Evolution at Harvard University in the United States, and Universal History in the Soviet Union. One account suggested that the notable Earthrise photo, taken by William Anders during a lunar orbit by the Apollo 8, which showed Earth as a small blue and white ball behind a stark and desolate lunar landscape, not only stimulated the environmental movement but also caused an upsurge of interdisciplinary interest.[20] The French historian Fernand Braudel examined daily life with investigations of "large-scale historical forces like geology and climate".[23] Physiologist Jared Diamond in his book Guns, Germs, and Steel examined the interplay between geography and human evolution;[23] for example, he argued that the horizontal shape of the Eurasian continent enabled human civilizations to advance more quickly than the vertical north-south shape of the American continent, because an east-west continental axis and correspondingly similar climates facilitated the transfer and exchange of animals (as protein, for pulling carts, and other uses), ideas and information, as well as structures of human competition that honed and fine-tuned cultural and technological achievements.

In the 1970s, scholars in the United States including geologist Preston Cloud of the University of Minnesota, astronomer G. Siegfried Kutter at Evergreen State College in Washington state, and Harvard University astrophysicists George B. Field and Eric Chaisson started synthesizing knowledge to form a "science-based history of everything", although each of these scholars emphasized somewhat their own particular specializations in their courses and books.[20] In 1980, the Austrian philosopher Erich Jantsch wrote The Self-Organizing Universe which viewed history in terms of what he called "process structures".[20] There was an experimental course taught by John Mears at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, and more formal courses at the university level began to appear.

In 1991 Clive Ponting wrote A Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations. His analysis did not begin with the Big Bang, but his chapter "Foundations of History" explored the influences of large-scale geological and astronomical forces over a broad time period.

Sometimes the terms "Deep History" and "Big History" are interchangeable, but sometimes "Deep History" simply refers to history going back several hundred thousand years or more without the other senses of being a movement within history itself.[64][65]

David Christian[edit source]

One exponent is David Christian of Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.[66][67] He read widely in diverse fields in science, and believed that much was missing from the general study of history. His first university-level course was offered in 1989.[20] He developed a college course beginning with the Big Bang to the present[12] in which he collaborated with numerous colleagues from diverse fields in science and the humanities and the social sciences. This course eventually became a Teaching Company course entitled Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth, and the Rise of Humanity, with 24 hours of lectures,[1] which appeared in 2008.[9]

Since the 1990s, other universities began to offer similar courses. In 1994 at the University of Amsterdam and the Eindhoven University of Technology, college courses were offered.[20] In 1996, Fred Spier wrote The Structure of Big History.[20] Spier looked at structured processes which he termed "regimes":

I defined a regime in its most general sense as 'a more or less regular but ultimately unstable pattern that has a certain temporal permanence', a definition which can be applied to human cultures, human and non-human physiology, non-human nature, as well as to organic and inorganic phenomena at all levels of complexity. By defining 'regime' in this way, human cultural regimes thus became a subcategory of regimes in general, and the approach allowed me to look systematically at interactions among different regimes which together produce big history.

— Fred Spier, 2008[20]

Christian's course caught the attention of philanthropist Bill Gates, who discussed with him how to turn Big History into a high school-level course. Gates said about David Christian:

He really blew me away. Here's a guy who's read across the sciences, humanities, and social sciences and brought it together in a single framework. It made me wish that I could have taken big history when I was young, because it would have given me a way to think about all of the school work and reading that followed. In particular, it really put the sciences in an interesting historical context and explained how they apply to a lot of contemporary concerns.

— Bill Gates, in 2012[4]

Educational courses[edit source]

By 2002, a dozen college courses on Big History had sprung up around the world.[23] Cynthia Stokes Brown initiated Big History at the Dominican University of California, and she wrote Big History: From the Big Bang to the Present.[68] In 2010, Dominican University of California launched the world's first Big History program to be required of all first-year students, as part of the school's general education track. This program, directed by Mojgan Behmand, includes a one-semester survey of Big History, and an interdisciplinary second-semester course exploring the Big History metanarrative through the lens of a particular discipline or subject.[9][69] A course description reads:

Welcome to First Year Experience Big History at Dominican University of California. Our program invites you on an immense journey through time, to witness the first moments of our universe, the birth of stars and planets, the formation of life on Earth, the dawn of human consciousness, and the ever-unfolding story of humans as Earth's dominant species. Explore the inevitable question of what it means to be human and our momentous role in shaping possible futures for our planet.

— course description 2012[70]

The Dominican faculty's approach is to synthesize the disparate threads of Big History thought, in order to teach the content, develop critical thinking and writing skills, and prepare students to wrestle with the philosophical implications of the Big History metanarrative. In 2015, University of California Press published Teaching Big History, a comprehensive pedagogical guide for teaching Big History, edited by Richard B. Simon, Mojgan Behmand, and Thomas Burke, and written by the Dominican faculty.[71]

Big History is taught at the University of Southern Maine.

Barry Rodrigue, at the University of Southern Maine, established the first general education course and the first online version, which has drawn students from around the world.[19] The University of Queensland in Australia offers an undergraduate course entitled Global History, required for all history majors, which "surveys how powerful forces and factors at work on large time-scales have shaped human history". By 2011, 50 professors around the world have offered courses. In 2012, one report suggested that Big History was being practiced as a "coherent form of research and teaching" by hundreds of academics from different disciplines.[9]

Philanthropist Bill Gates is a major advocate of encouraging instruction in Big History.

There are efforts to bring Big History to younger students.[3] In 2008, Christian and his colleagues began developing a course for secondary school students.[20] In 2011, a pilot high school course was taught to 3,000 kids in 50 high schools worldwide.[12] In 2012, there were 87 schools, with 50 in the United States, teaching Big History, with the pilot program set to double in 2013 for students in the ninth and tenth grades,[4] and even in one middle school.[72] The subject is a STEM course at one high school.[73]

There are initiatives to make Big History a required standard course for university students throughout the world. An education project founded by philanthropist Bill Gates from his personal funds was launched in Australia and the United States, to offer a free online version of the course to high school students.[7]

International Big History Association[edit source]

Founding members of the International Big History Association gathered at Coldigioco, Italy in 2010

The International Big History Association (IBHA) was founded at the Coldigioco Geological Observatory in Coldigioco, Marche, Italy, on 20 August 2010.[74] Its headquarters is located at Grand Valley State University in Allendale, Michigan, United States. Its inaugural gathering in 2012 was described as "big news" in a report in The Huffington Post.[1]

People involved[edit source]

Some notable academics involved with the concept include:[9]

See also[edit source]

References[edit source]

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j Rev. Michael Dowd (May 8, 2012). "Big History Hits the Big Time"Huffington Post. Retrieved 2012-12-13"Big History" has entered the big leagues ...
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j Patricia Cohen (September 26, 2011). "History That's Written in Beads as Well as in Words"The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-12-13.
  3. Jump up to:a b Ursula Goodenough (February 10, 2011). "It's Time for a New Narrative; It's Time for 'Big History'"NPR. Retrieved 2012-12-13.
  4. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Tom Vander Ark (December 13, 2012). "Big History: An Organizing Principle for a Compelling Class, Block or School"Education Week. Retrieved 2012-12-13.
  5. ^ Christian, David (2004). Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. University of California Press.
  6. ^ Stearns, Peter N. Growing Up: The History of Childhood in a Global Context. p. 9.
  7. Jump up to:a b c d e f Vanessa Thorpe (27 October 2012). "Big History theories pose latest challenge to traditional curriculum: Maverick academic's 'Big History' – which is backed by Bill Gates – is subject of new documentary"The Guardian. Retrieved 2012-12-13Big History, a movement spearheaded by the Oxford-educated maverick historian David Christian,...
  8. ^ "International Big History Association". Retrieved September 17, 2012.
  9. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Craig Benjamin (July 2012). "Recent Developments in Big History"History of Science Society41(3). Archived from the original on 2013-01-09. Retrieved 2012-12-13.
  10. ^ "Big History School".
  11. ^ "Big History Project".
  12. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Stephanie M. McPherson (2012). "5 big ideas that just might transform the classroom: From longer days to history courses that span 13.7 billion years, these notions just might transform the classroom"Boston Globe Magazine. Retrieved 2012-12-131. Tale the Really Long View
  13. ^ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4e9AQVlcJTQdxGeeApugAEomCc02lchm
  14. ^ "Big History: Connecting Knowledge".
  15. ^ Connie Barlow and Michael Dowd (December 13, 2012). "Failing Our Youth: A Call to Religious Liberals"Huffington Post. Retrieved 2012-12-13Historian David Christian ... "big history."
  16. ^ Big History Project (16 December 2013). "Introduction to Cosmology" – via YouTube.
  17. ^ "Cosmic Evolution – More Than Big History by Another Name"www.sociostudies.org.
  18. Jump up to:a b c Alexander Star (book reviewer) Daniel Lord Smail (author of 'On Deep History and the Brain') (March 16, 2008). "I Feel Good"The New York Times Sunday Book Review. Retrieved 2012-12-13In "On Deep History and the Brain," Daniel Lord Smail suggests that human history can be understood as a long, unbroken sequence...
  19. Jump up to:a b "The Collaborative of Global and Big History"University of Southern Maine. 2012. Archived from the original on 2012-12-15. Retrieved 2012-12-13Big History is a history of the universe from its origins to the present and beyond....
  20. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Fred Spier (2008). "Big History: The Emergence of an Interdisciplinary Science?"World History Connected. Retrieved 2012-12-13'Big history' is a fresh approach to history that places human history within the wider framework of the history of the universe....
  21. ^ Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2008, Vol. 33, No. 2, Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining. Published by Maney
  22. ^ Joseph Manning (March 19, 2011). "Beyond the Pharaohs"The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2012-12-13Remarkable, then, that Egypt has been given short shrift in the current trend for "big history."
  23. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Emily Eakin (January 12, 2002). "For Big History, The Past Begins at the Beginning"The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-12-13... historical research has become more and more specialized. ...
  24. ^ Christian, David. Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. p. 441.
  25. ^ Stamhuis, Ida H. The Changing Image of the Sciences. p. 146.
  26. ^ Kannberg, Henry. "Optimism"Scribd. Retrieved 21 June2014.
  27. Jump up to:a b Doerr, Anthony (November 18, 2007). "Why the past isn't really past"Boston Globe. Retrieved 2012-12-13reviews of these books: On Deep History and the Brain – By Daniel Lord Smail...
  28. ^ "'Big History': the annihilation of human agency"www.spiked-online.com. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
  29. ^ Sorkin, Andrew Ross (2014-09-05). "So Bill Gates Has This Idea for a History Class ..." The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
  30. ^ Baker, D. (2012). "Big History". Times Literary Supplement, (5713), 6.
  31. ^ Baker, David. "Collective Learning: A Potential Unifying Theme of Human History" Journal of World History (2015) vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 77–104
  32. ^ John Green (David Baker, scriptwriter) Crash Course Big History: Exploring the Universe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi30zjQhtWY
  33. ^ Palmeri, J., "Bringing Cosmos to Culture: Harlow Shapley and the Uses of Cosmic Evolution," in Cosmos & Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context, Dick, S.J and Lupsella, M.L. (eds.), NASA SP4802, Washington, 2009. ISBN 978-0-16-083119-5
  34. ^ Sagan, C., Cosmos, Random House, 1980, ISBN 0-394-50294-9
  35. ^ Chaisson, E., Cosmic Dawn: The Origins of Matter and LifeAtlantic Monthly/Little, Brown, 1981, ISBN 0-316-13590-9
  36. ^ Reeves, H., Patience dans l'azur: L'evolution cosmiqueÉditions du Seuil, 1981
  37. ^ Jantsch, E., The Self-Organizing UniversePergamon, 1980
  38. ^ Cloud, P., Cosmos, Earth, and ManYale Univ. Press, 1980
  39. ^ Chaisson, E.J., Cosmic Evolution: Rise of Complexity in NatureHarvard Univ. Press, 2001. ISBN 0-674-00987-8
  40. ^ Dick, S.J., and Lupsella, M.L., Cosmos & Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context, NASA SP4802, Washington, 2009. ISBN 978-0-16-083119-5
  41. ^ Dick, S. and Strick, J., The Living UniverseRutgers University Press, 2004 ISBN 0-8135-3733-9
  42. ^ Chaisson, E.J.,"Researching and Teaching Cosmic Evolution," in From Big Bang to Global Civilization: A Big History Anthology, Rodriguez, Grinin, Korotayev, (eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley, 2013.
  43. ^ "Cosmic Evolution – Intro to Movies"www.cfa.harvard.edu.
  44. ^ Chaisson, E.J.,Cosmic Evolution: Rise of Complexity in Nature, Harvard Univ. Press, 2001. ISBN 0-674-00987-8
  45. ^ Chaisson, E.J.,"Energy Rate Density as a Complexity Metric and Evolutionary Driver," Complexity, Vol. 16, p. 27, 2011.
  46. ^ Chaisson, E.J.,"Energy Rate Density. II. Probing Further a New Complexity Metric," Complexity, Vol. 17, p. 44, 2011.
  47. ^ "The Natural Science Underlying Big History," The Scientific World Journal, v. 2014, 41 pp., 2014; doi:10.1155/2014/384912.
  48. ^ Chaisson, E.J., "A unifying concept for astrobiology,"International Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, p. 91, 2003.
  49. ^ Chaisson, E.J., "Using Complexity Science to Search for Unity in the Natural Sciences," in Complexity and the Arrow of Time: What is Complexity?, Lineweaver, Davies and Ruse (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013.
  50. ^ Spier, F., Big History and the Future of HumanityWiley-Blackwell, 2010
  51. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j David Christian (March 2011). "David Christian: The history of our world in 18 minutes"TED: Ideas worth spreading. Retrieved 2012-12-13(18 minute TED talk)
  52. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Christian, David (2008). Big History: The Big Bang, Life on Earth, and the Rise of Humanity. Chantilly, Virginia: The Teaching CompanyISBN 9781598034110.
  53. ^ "Big History Project: The Future"Big History Project. Retrieved 19 April 2016.
  54. ^ "The Future – Big History Project Course"Big History Project. Retrieved 19 April 2016.
  55. ^ Chaisson, E.J., "Complexity: An Energetics Agenda,"Complexity, v. 9, p. 14, 2004.
  56. ^ Nazaretyan A.P. 2017. Mega-History and the Twenty-First Century Singularity Puzzle.Social Evolution & History 16(1): 31–52.
  57. ^ Panov A.D. 2017. Singularity of Evolution and Post-Singular Development. From Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations. A Big History Anthology. Volume III. The Ways that Big History Works: Cosmos, Life, Society and our Future. Ed. by B. Rodrigue, L. Grinin, A. Korotayev. Delhi: Primus Books. pp. 370–402.
  58. ^ Korotayev, Andrey (2018). "The 21st Century Singularity and its Big History Implications: A re-analysis"Journal of Big History2 (3): 71–118. doi:10.22339/jbh.v2i3.2320.
  59. ^ LePoire D. Potential Economic and Energy Indicators of Inflection in Complexity. Evolution 3 (2013): 108–18.
  60. ^ The 21st Century Singularity and Global Futures. World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures. 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33730-8ISBN 978-3-030-33729-2.
  61. Jump up to:a b TechCrunch. "Explore 13.7 Billion Years of Cosmic History in Your Browser with ChronoZoom"Boston.com. Retrieved 2012-12-13For a bit of perspective, why not take a few minutes this fine Friday afternoon and explore the nearly 14 billion year history of the cosmos as we know it? ...
  62. ^ "History Channel Lands StanChart Sponsorship"Asia Media Journal. November 15, 2012. Retrieved 2012-12-13... Mankind's path is guided by events that stretch back, not hundreds, but thousands, even millions of years...
  63. ^ Genzlinger, Neil (1 November 2013). "'Big History,' a New Series, Debuts on H2"The New York Times – via NYTimes.com.
  64. ^ Benjamin Strauss and Robert Kopp (November 24, 2012). "Rising Seas, Vanishing Coastlines"The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-12-13.
  65. ^ Alan Wolfe (September 30, 2011). "The Origins of Religion, Beginning with the Big Bang"The New York Times Sunday Book Review. Retrieved 2012-12-13.
  66. ^ Christian was also affiliated with San Diego State Universityin California.
  67. ^ San Diego State University Archived December 9, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  68. ^ "Dominican Professor Examines Big History". Dominican University of California. Archived from the original on 2011-07-19. Retrieved 2011-04-12.
  69. ^ "General Education (GE) Requirements". Dominican University of California. 2011-04-12. Archived from the original on 2011-09-27. Retrieved 2011-03-03.
  70. ^ "Expanding Minds in an Expanding Universe"Dominican University of California. 2012. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-12-13Welcome to First Year Experience "Big History" at Dominican University of California. ...
  71. ^ Simon, Richard B., Mojgan Behmand, and Thomas Burke. Teaching Big HistoryUniversity of California Press, 2015.
  72. ^ David Axelson (November 30, 2012). "Coronado School District Explores Online Student Registration"Coronado Eagle & Journal. Retrieved 2012-12-13... Never before have science and history been so integrated and in depth. ...
  73. ^ Carol ladwig (December 3, 2012). "Snoqualmie school's freshman STEM exploratory scrapped for expanded math, science offerings"Snoqualmie Valley Record. Retrieved 2012-12-13... a full year of a STEM-based social studies class called "The Big History Project" ...
  74. ^ "OGC"www.geosc.psu.edu.
  75. ^ "Institute of Global Dynamic Systems"sites.google.com.

External links[edit source]