2019/04/10

Chapter IV The North: Prize and Peril

Chapter IV The North: Prize and Peril



Chapter IV
THE NORTH: PRIZE AND PERIL


The history of the Three Kingdoms period is certainly one of failure. The cause of unification was shattered, hopes of cultural advances were dashed, what had to grow and mature was aborted. Failure in training to be a nation led to the path of pain, but this nation was not meant to plod, in silent despair, the path of ruin. If duty is enjoined by heaven, it does not stand to reason that an order was given but the opportunity for its execution was denied. History which poses a problem must offer opportunities to answer it.

The Koreans of the Three Kingdoms period had tried but failed to reach a summit. The road for the next five centuries of the succeeding Koryeo period was downhill. If the people of Koryeo had realized the meaning of history and advanced steadily toward an ideal which inspired them, they might have brought the aborted history of the Three Kingdoms back to life, much as the morning sun suffuses the tombstones of the fallen heroes in full glory. There have been several such opportunities. If Koryeo had seized any one of them the course of Korean history would have been quite different.

Opportunities for a leap forward came but each time Koryeo was cowed. Koryeo was afflicted with the same malaise that crippled the Three Kingdoms period: losing sight of self, not trying to recover self. The literati, who made Koryeo what it was, were not as they were in earlier times. The spirit was flagging and petty conformity to rigid rules was what now exercised their minds. Neither Confucianism nor Buddhism worked, simply because the Confucian with knotted hairdo took the place of the Buddhist monk with his head shaved. In the meantime, the soul of Korea, abandoned in some remote corner, kept wailing alone. The country was sold, the parents, even one's self-all for the privilege of playing servant to the Middle Kingdom of China. Koryeo was not learning to be Confucianist but to be a slave of China.

Once you lose your own self, even the wisdom of the sages is to no avail, for it turns into empty words. With empty words you cannot build a nation anywhere. The failure was not of Koryeo alone. The basic root of our history of suffering lies in the failure to probe deeply for selfhood, individual or national.
The era of Koryeo may be divided into three periods, each with its high point and low point. In the last days of Silla, political corruption reached its limits, popular sentiments went lax, and society was coming apart. It was a time, in oriental tradition, for a hero to emerge; there were stirrings in the popular mind and hopes rising for a new order. A few would-be heroes appeared and civil strife ensued. It was a repetition of the picture of the Three Kingdoms. Centuries had gone by since the three countries had supposedly come together as one, but real unity had yet to be achieved.

By now the scope of economic development had reached a stage which called for one Korea. It was a critical period in oriental history. In Manchuria, the Parhae period was on the way out, and in China proper, it was a troubled time known as the period of the Five Dynasties. Storm clouds were gathering over eastern Asia, and a chance came for Korea to settle her politics at home, and beyond her borders. The time was ripe for Korea to awake to its historic mission, to strike out in a daring new move. A tide of reawakening began welling up in Korean hearts. Calls for marching north were being heard again, and Kungye was in the midst of those who listened.
An illegitimate royal scion, Kungye grew up in adversity. He wandered from place to place, from one monastery to another. When he saw what was looming ahead, he quit the monastery. In time he became overly arrogant and uncontrollably fierce until he ended in failure. But he is too often dismissed with harsh strictures out of proportion to his faults. It must be said in fairness that he meant well, that he deserved sympathy. Although it was for lack of popular support that he bungled the job, he bore the historical burden of sin, nevertheless. The sin of Silla's decadence created a wave of protest against palace life, and his fierceness was a spray from this rolling wave. The merit we should look for in him, therefore, is not in his being a king but in that the national elan, which he forcefully embodied, soared high. Kungye chose for his country the name of Later Koguryoee to vindicate the fallen Koguryoe, while condemning Silla as the "doomed capital." It was all intended, no doubt, to whip up the patriotism of the descendants of Koguryoe. But that is not the whole story. In his plans for government reorganization he rejected all Silla institutions smacking of China in favor of older traditional institutions. In his choice of capital he contemplated Pyongyang. In his vision of the future he set up a facility for instruction of foreign languages. All this points to the fact that Manchuria, the old site of Koguryoe, was strongly in his mind. As the name adopted for his new country shows, his intention was to revive the spirit of Koguryoe. He was doomed by the judgment of a fate of his own making, a hero aborted.
Wang Kon inherited the aspirations of Kungye. Rising from military ranks, Wang Kon demonstrated talent and character that made him worthy of ascending a throne. He started as lieutenant to Kungye, and when he realized that Kungye had gone too far in his willful, intolerant ways, he saved himself by adroitness and earned popular support by his generous and accommodating attitude.

Wang Kon was not the man to think his work was done when he came to the throne of Korea. His vision reached north beyond the peninsula, once he had finished the work of containing a southern state, Chin Hwon, and taming Silla. Although he made Songdo (now Kaesong), his capital, he also established Pyongyang as a capital for the future. He kept the city wall in repair, set up schools, and returned there annually for a personal inspection. This, needless to say, was in anticipation of his northward push later.
He saw to it that people drifting in from the former country of Parhae across the Yalu were looked, after. When an emissary offering amity and trade arrived from the Khitan regime with gifts of camels, he sent the envoy into exile, while starving the camels to death by keeping them tethered under a bridge. Thus he showed his determination to his people to prepare them.
Commenting on Wang Kon's actions, certain so-called official historians in the later Yi period claimed that all he did was to antagonize Khitan and that Khitan's defeat of Parhae had nothing to do with Korea and so there was no need to avenge Parhae. These Yi officials say that Wang Kon was wrong simply because they were afraid that their own king might embrace the idea of keeping in step with popular sentiment and might think of reaching over into Manchuria. Such a move, they feared, would strain relations with China and place their own posts in peril. In order to perpetuate their posts they tried to nip any such thought that might be budding in the king's mind. Some may think that the people forget themselves; the fact is that they have never forgotten themselves nor will they ever. What happens is that privileged classes deceive the people and sell them to the oppressor and enjoy high office. In every age and among any people it is the privileged classes that sell out. One cannot gain power without selling out. The people are without power for they do not sell themselves.
Wang Kon's grand design was reflected in his policies. To do away with the habits of borrowing from China which had become pronounced from the middle of the Silla period onward, he sought to restore traditional Korean institutions. Item 4 of his Precepts reads: "From antiquity, ways of Tang (China) received great admiration in our Land of the East, and Chinese institutions have been copied in all matters of civic art, rites and music. But tempers differ in different lands. There is no reason, then, that one and the same way should prevail in two different lands! Again: "Since Khitan is a land of barbarians with different customs and language, none of their customs or institutions should ever be imitated! Again invoking the spirit of Korea in firm rejection of the cult of China, he unswervingly committed himself to the policy to go north. Going beyond his merely passive policy, he positively endeavored to invigorate the Korean spirit: control of Buddhism and institution of a Korean religious rite, p'algwanhoe.

Yi Korea historians were critical of the founder Wang Kon for tilting too far toward Buddhism. This was nothing but their way of discouraging their own king from embracing Buddhism so as to secure their own position as Confucianists. Even if these Yi officials had been honest in their criticism of Wang Kon, and not acting from any ulterior motives, their position would still have been inexcusable as recorders of history. If they really believed in what they said, they were very superficial in their views.

Wang Kon erected new temples and repaired existing ones. Item 1 of his Precepts says that the founding of Koryo was possible under the Buddha's tutelage; references to Buddhism recur in subsequent items. A closer investigation will show, however, that his position was one of restricting, not promoting, Buddhism. He banned further construction of temples. We have no reason to suppose that he was unaware of the overabundance of temples in Silla, which led to waste, tax evasion and downright exploitation and eventually to a ruined economy. So Wang Kon must have adopted a policy of checking Buddhism. Yet he claimed that he was favoring the promotion of Buddhism, and with good reason.

Choe Ung, a Confucian counselor, submitted a proposal for rejecting Buddhism. Wang Kon counseled caution on the grounds that drastic banning would bring about reactions from the people of Silla who were deeply steeped in Buddhism. But that was not all. Choe Ung's anti-Buddhist policy suggested the existence of a rivalry between Confucians and Buddhists. Wang Kon's intention was to curb the rise of the Confucian group in the name of keeping public sentiment calm and content.

As to the p'algwanhoe itself, the record is not clear except that the rite was performed, at the request of officials, in the first year of Wang Kon's reign, following the example of Silla, when it was held in the month of the winter solstice. The Precepts merely state that p'algwanhoe was for the purpose of worshipping "the spirit of heaven, the five mountain peaks, other noted hills and streams, and the god of rain and waters." Interpretations vary among historians; some guess that it was a Buddhist ceremony, while others believe it to be a Korean ritual preceding the arrival of Buddhism. From the deities to which the ceremony was addressed one may rightfully infer that p'algwanhoe had its origins in a cult of heaven going back to antiquity. The fact that it was practiced in the Silla court would lead one to surmise that something from Buddhism may have been incorporated; it may have been a compromise struck between the traditional cult and Buddhist rituals. Even today one finds in a Buddhist temple shrines dedicated to mountain spirits and other folk deities entirely unrelated to Buddhism. P'algwanhoe may perhaps have been something of this kind, a festivity held in the court from olden times, and, as it continued beyond the introduction of Buddhism, it may have adopted some Buddhist rituals, just as Christmas today incorporates folk customs.

In reinstituting the p'algwanhoe Wang Kon was circumspect far-seeing. Nothing definite is to be found about traditional thought or original cults native to Korea if you go by the histories penned by Confucian scholars, whose views were stultified by addiction to Chinese philosophy. There is circumstantial evidence enough from which the following may be deduced.
Although Buddhism as a state religion lost much of its life-enhancing efficacy in the closing years of Silla, its influence, ingrained if enfeebled, still endured. With the Tang culture of China gaining ever firmer g there emerged a class of Confucians to challenge the forces of Buddhism. As readiness for the revolution was gathering, interest was reawaken in traditional thought and institutions. This was in reaction to the heavy borrowings from foreign thought. In this new mood, those favoring reform and renovation, who were unhappy with the established order, naturally looked toward the revival of old Korean cults. In his Precepts enunciating the philosophy of the new state and providing guidelines, an aspiring as Wang Kon wrote: act with reverence. To probe his inner thoughts, you may gather that he proposed to bring stability to society by using Buddhism which was close to the people's heart, strengthen government organization by invoking the teachings of Confucianism which predominated as educational philosophy, and revitalize traditional sentiment in preparation for a heightened national spirit in a renewed dedication to his grand design on Manchuria. In this light, the founding of Koryo assumes special meaning in Korean history. For this reason, the task given to Koryo was of utmost importance. But again, the founder's policies somehow failed. Wang Kon nurtured what his predecessor Kungye had helped to sprout, but not to the point of bringing fruit.

The tide of history was ebbing out. By the reign of King Kwangjong the Confucians had gained ascendancy. The king was so enamored of Chinese institutions that be brought the scholar Shuang Chi all the way from China, and on his recommendation, introduced the civil service examination system. He went so far as to evict his retainers to provide room for naturalized Chinese. The adoption of the government recruiting system was significant, for it helped advance the position of the Confucian school. The next king, Seongjong, approving the idea of a principal minister, officially came out against Buddhism, in a move which gave a total victory to the Confucian literati. Confucianism was elevated to the status of state religion. Following practices in China, an ancestral temple and a shrine of the gods of land and grain were erected. A portrait of Confucius was imported, and a royal academy was opened for instruction in Confucianism. In bureaucracy, education and religion, a sustained effort got under way to become Chinese on the outside as well as on the inside. Reorientation toward China went apace, and subservience to China was set as a matter of policy. Maintenance of the status quo, above all else, was not the moving spirit, the status quo being the perpetuation of the status of the ruling classes: getting the full measure of power and perquisites indefinitely, leaving the populace to shift for themselves.
At this time, when the national spirit was at an ebb, and the ruling classes were drunk with a false sense of security, a blow was dealt right between the eyes. The Khitan invaded. It was they who had arisen from Manchuria about the time of KoryUs founding and succeeded in overthrowing Parhae, successor to Koguryoe. The founder of Koguryoe had spurned offers of friendship from the Khitan, condemning the country as the enemy of Parhae, as he nurtured his dreams of a northern expedition. If the successive kings of Koguryoe had launched a northward expedition in accordance with the founder's wishes, the Khitan would not have grown so strong. Preoccupied with the notion of playing the role of a land of Confucian gentlemen, Koguryoe pursued the easy line of preserving the status quo, rejecting all adventures. This was precisely the kind of opportunity the Khitan hoped for; they lost no time strengthening their position until they were firmly entrenched in the north. During the reign of King Seongjong, the ceremony of p'algwanhoe was abolished and the sword was beaten into a plow, all in the name of ushering in an "era of peace and tranquility under the sage-king Ironically, it was at this time that the Khitan increased raids into Koguryoe, building up every year until the time of King Hyeongjong when they attacked in force. Koguryoe, influenced by would-be Confucianists, panicked. Singlehanded and with nothing but eloquent tongue and indomitable courage, a Koguryoe official, Seo Heui, made bold to enter into the enemy's field headquarters; he managed to conclude an armistice and so saved the prestige of his country for a time.
It was a miserable expedient. There were other brave souls, who kept on battling, with only a handful of soldiers, against great odds until all their arrows were exhausted and they themselves fell. The founder's ambition had vanished in thin air.

The Khitan invasion was an alarm to rouse the people of Koguryoe. Losing all sense of self and wallowing in a false sense of safety and deceptive peace, they let a heaven-sent opportunity slip by, choosing the easy way of laziness and inaction. The alarm seemed to ask: How much longer can you continue in loyalty to China and go on living a life of ease? The Khitan now withdrew from the scene as if they had completed their role, and history began to prepare for a new period. Did Koguryoe people heed the warning? In the following decades peace prevailed; Koguryoe was able to heal her wounds and achieve some cultural advance and prosperity. This period saw so notable a Buddhist monk as Taegak-kuksa, and a Confucian scholar of virtue and erudition, Ch'oe Ch'ung, who achieved renown as a "Confucius of the East."
History now was at a high point again. It was an order to right what had gone wrong. While Koguryoe was gaining in strength, preparations were under way in Manchuria for a new period. The Khitan dynasty, past its heyday, was on the decline and with this, there were stirrings anew in Manchuria, awaiting a new master. It was a time for statesmen to bring out a map and hang it on the wall, for heroes to hear their swords rattle in their scabbards in the night. The Han Chinese, subdued by the Khitan, were lying low in the safety of the southern bank of the Yangtze. Two heroes were to appear on the stage of Manchuria with the promise of a lively drama to unfold - Koryo and Juchen. In prevailing conditions, Juchen appeared to be no match for Koguryoe. A branch of the Mo-ho tribes, Juchen submitted first to Koguryoe, then to Parhae, and then came under Khitan rule after Parhae was overthrown.
With Khitan now weakening, the Juchen regrouped themselves in the eastern part of Manchuria and came occasionally to violate the north-eastern frontier of Koguryoe. They were behind in culture and had held Koryoe in esteem as a "parental country" because the ancestors of their chieftain were Korean. It was plain to see that Koguryoe was by far the superior. The people of Koguryoe must have heard the call of history if they had ears to hear, Manchuria was where Koguryoe cavalrymen had earlier galloped their horses as they strove to realize unification, until they were laid low on the battlefield. Manchuria was calling again, as it did a century before, and sure enough, the soul of Korea responded.
Voices were raised in the time of King Sukchong calling for a northern expedition to put an end, once and for all, to the frequent raids of the Juchen tribes on the northeast. The king ordered General Yuri Kwan to repel the Juchen, but the attempts failed. The king thereupon offered prayers to the "gods that they may grant success to renewed efforts to stamp out the brigands" and contemplated a plan to raise an army with sustained food supplies, only to die the following year with his dream unfulfilled. His successor, Yejong, followed through with a force of one hundred and seventy thousand men under command of General Yun Kwan. The expedition, on which the destiny of the nation was staked, was crowned initially with illustrious success. General Yun advanced as far north as present-day Chientao (Kando), set up nine fortresses in Hamgy6ng province; sixty thousand households migrated from the south. It seemed as if history was pointing again to the north where a greater Korea loomed. That was not to be.
The court was filled with corrupt Confucian literati who were wracked by jealousy over enterprising minds, like General Yun Kwan, determined on a northern course. They argued for staying south of the Yalu, clinging to what they had at all cost and invoking the need for deference to China. Word arrived that the Juchen had again raided the northeastern frontier; they had little choice but to move south if only to survive. A Juchen emissary arrived to implore the return of the nine fortresses, with the pledge of tribute, and swearing that they would not even throw a piece of tile across the border. At this time General Yun Kwan was still away in the frontier camp. When the king sought counsel, the whole court of Confucians was of the opinion that surrendering the fortresses would be the proper thing to do. The courtiers went even further and vigorously pushed for the general's ouster. They claimed that the general had launched a campaign which was in no way justifiable. An embarrassed Yejong, whose design it was to attack the Juchen in the first place, tried to vindicate Yun Kwan's as well as his own position. He attempted to reason with his ministers, but they remained adamant. After the king retired to his private quarters, these courtiers followed, sat outside the door and pleaded with the king until sunset. Then they went on strike, absenting themselves from the court for days. One wonders how these fellows, so fearful and weak-kneed in the cause of a northern expedition, suddenly proved so daring and persistent in calling for the ouster of a worthy servant of the state. General Yun Kwan was recalled. He was not even allowed to report to the king in person, who was forced to relieve him of his duties and hand over the fortresses of the Juchen. So the moves for advancing northward were effectively dropped.
How would King Yejong have felt surrounded as he was with rotten elements, who temporized with the status quo? What would have stopped Koguryoe and what risks would have been involved if it had pressed ahead with the original plan for the north, and whom would it have antagonized? One of the royal decrees stated: "Civil and military arts should be pursued evenhandedly. It is noted that in the face of frequent invasions from across the border, commanders and ministers counseling the throne are alike engaged full-time in making armor and training soldiers. But would be ill-advised to devote himself exclusively to military affairs." Evidently this decree was forged by the Confucian ministers in order to discourage the ascendancy of the military officers.
A sense of crisis was in the air but it was played down by the Confucians in power. Soon thereafter, an official letter arrived from the Chin court (the Juchen named their country Chin and their ruler emperor): "The emperor of the great Chin-Juchen, as elder brother, sends a letter to his younger brother, king of Koguryoe. From times of our ancestors our country has been pushed off into a remote corner where we had to uphold Khitan as a greater country, and has deemed Koguryoe as our parental country, treating it with deference and reverence. Khitan wantonly trampled over our land, made our people their slaves, and repeatedly attacked us in unprovoked war. We were obliged to resist and with the help of heaven we overthrew them. The king of Koguryoe is hereby advised to enter into friendly relations so that we two countries will be brothers from generation to generation. Together with this letter, we send you a fine steed."
So ended the dream. Had Koguryoe had the resoluteness to push north, to scatter the roaming Juchen before they had the chance to realize unification, and to snuff out the Khitan who were on their last legs, possession of Manchuria and even Mongolia would have posed no serious difficulty. A similar letter could have been addressed to China. Amid vacillation and inaction, the dreams vaporized. The people of Koguryoe could not help being amazed as well as aggrieved at the sight of the Juchen rising to full height, realizing for themselves the dreams of Koryoe.
King Yejong spent his remaining days writing verse and reading books of the Chinese canon. Presumably he had no other way to beguile his empty feelings after he was disabused of his dreams. After his death, King Injong came to the throne at the tender age of fifteen. History's tide was receding. Just as Korean history reached a high tide earlier at the time of the Three Kingdoms, so the history of Koguryoe had been on the rise until the reign of Injong and then began heading down. Yet the situation was too provocative for Koguryoe to go down meekly to ruin, without uttering a sound.
A great drama of the age was being played out and the people of Koguryoe must have felt as if the world was leaving them behind. Were there no talents? Did their courage fail them altogether? Were the literi without a modicum of soul? Jealous of their power and privilege, they may well have been so, realist though they were, and yet how can they have been so spineless and so blind? There were a few who dared to take a last plunge across the dark chasm that threatened to engulf one and all; such was the Myoch'eong rebellion in the thirteenth year of Injong's reign.
The failure of the northern expedition, while highly welcome in the sight of the sinophile literati with conservative leanings, was a rankling wound for nationalists with a more enterprising outlook. It was only yesterday that the Juchen wanderers came foraying across the border. Today their leader pretended to be emperor. The very thought was revolting. Not just that the Juchen were beneath contempt, but that Koguryoe was just as capable of what these Juchen had done. Taking advantage of the young king, the Koguryoe officials kept the people quiet, hands tied, to use them and have them do their bidding, when the neighing of the northern horses bore down on them on north winds. There were a few persons who thought that affairs of state could no longer be safely left in the hands Of the literati who only knew how to presume upon their dignity. They proposed that the king of Koguryoe also declare himself emperor and the use of the name of the Chinese reign he discontinued. More important, they came out with a demand for resumption of the northern expedition. Popular response was immediate and keen; feelings ran high. It was evident that the people were quiet but not at all happy with the way things. The court Confucians naturally objected. In their judgment, what the Chin-Juchen were up to were so many barbarian follies; pretension to being emperor was an act of insolence, well deserving heavenly retribution, when the Son of Heaven of the Central Kingdom alone had the right to that title; the ruler of an outlying country like Koguryoe would not dare entertain such a presumption. These soldiers would never know any better, the literati complained. The two opposing schools soon came to a showdown. This development had been long in surfacing, and was not something that broke out suddenly under King Injong.
While the conservatives wanted to defend what they had and be content to stay within the peninsula, the dissidents argued for marching into Manchuria. The conservatives' argument was that as long as the Son of Heaven was created by heavenly mandate, serving him with deference was the proper thing to do, while the dissidents' contention was that, as descendants of the legendary Tan'gun, Koreans had a life of their own to live and that Manchuria was the land of their ancestors, after all. If the conservatives paraded the way of Confucius and Mencius9, the assidents matched them by invoking heaven and the traditional gods of the hills and streams. As a matter of fact, the Confucians found it satisfactory that they were well-off, well-educated and well-placed in the seat of power, whereas the nationalists felt a need for change, as they were left without power under pressures from Confucianism and Buddhism and as the were despised for being common and illiterate.
If the Confucians counted on the power of China, the nationalists trusted popular support. This rivalry, which had been hidden from view, was now brought out into the open. What precipitated it was a controversy over the moving of the capital to Pyongyang. In support of the move was the belief that Pyongyang was a highly auspicious site and establishing the capital there would entail thirty-six countries coming with tribute to the Koguryoe court, or, in modern parlance, Koryoe would gain so many new colonies. This theory harks back to the latter period of Silla; it was the dregs, as it were, of superstitions common during the period; it was an utter absurdity. Yet in historic perspective, there were conditions in society that gave rise to such superstition. Given the kind of science and religion known then, this belief was in the guise of the yin-yang theory of China.
What should be noted is that the popular mood was fully behind this belief. Dissatisfaction with corruption in the Silla government, a yearning for an ancestral home, a grievance over the withering away of national fortunes, vague hopes for a better future-all these and more came together to form the superstition. People's minds were in ferment. Rumors floated around like foam that rises from the fermenting brew-bubbles now appeared, now burst. What counts here is what is underneath the bubbling surface; popular sentiments are aroused, which may be carried to the point of revolution. Revolutionary it was indeed that Silla was overthrown and Koguryoe stood, but only to a point. It was not revolutionary enough to satisfy popular hearts.
One can imagine the scene. When a few villagers get together by the roadside or in a tavern, they talk in whispers: "D'you hear they're going to move the capital to Pyongyang?'' or "Say, there's going to be a war" or "Why, the spirits wouldn't just sit by" or "I don't know for sure but I hear a great man has been training to be an immortal" or "A dragon-steed turned up" or "A strange sound was heard coming from the tomb of the great king Tongmyeong" or "Our country is in for a really big thing. "
The advocates of northern expedition tried to turn these stirrings among the people to account. With the Buddhist priest Myoch'oeng leading, this group rallied the people by making use of the predictions going back to the time of Silla, and urged on the king the virtue of reestablishing Pyongyang as the capital-all in order to campaign for a northward push. King Injong was quite sympathetic to the cause and went as far as to build a palace near Pyongyang. But the whole endeavor met with stiff resistance from the Confucian ministers, who felt that not only their positions but even their lives were threatened. Led by Kim Pu-sik, author of the Samguk sagi, they fought desperately to block the moving of the capital. The Myoch'oeng group in turn persisted in prevailing upon the king to move to Pyongyang. Excessive resort to trickery, particularly of a superstitious nature, drew criticism from the Confucians, so that the king himself was hesitant.
At this time word came to the capital that Myoch'oeng had staged a rebellion. A new country under his leadership was proclaimed with the name of Taewi, which covered for a time nine provinces, including Hwanghae-do and P'yoengan-do. This attempt was ended when it was overthrown under the command of Kim Pu-sik. Choeng Chi-sang, Paek Su-han and other leaders were speedily executed in the capital upon receipt of the news of rebellion.
The Myochoeng rebellion was, according to historian Sin Ch'ae-ho, an event of foremost importance during the first ten centuries of history. Be that as it may, it was an event out of the ordinary. It is a perceptive observation to regard it as a confrontation between Confucians and Buddhists, between scholars of China-oriented outlook and Korean traditionalists. It is equally true to ascribe Kim Pu-sik's victory to the ascendancy of conservative thought favoring regimentation. Myoch'oeng's rebellion, be it noted , was too late, twenty years after the defeat of the Liao dynasty in China by Chin-Juchen. So even if the followers of Myoch'oeng had had their way and had shifted the capital to Pyongyang, it is highly doubtful that they could have carried through the cherished plan of invading Manchuria.
One could expect, nevertheless, that the Koreans would have saved themselves intellectual servitude or, at least, have had some relief from it, if Myoch'oeng had carried the day. Tradition has it that Kim Pu-sik, a stylist of undisputed reputation, was surprised one day by a verse written by Choeng Chi-sang and that Kim asked Choeng for the verse but was refused, and Kim held it against Choeng until he had him executed. There is no way to verify the story, nor can we learn what Cheong Chi-sang or Myoch'oeng had in mind. History has puzzles which remain puzzles forever. What we do know from the story, however, is what was the public judgment, and who the public thought was on its side. It is not at all clear whether Myoch'oeng acted from motives of seeking the good of the country and the people or was driven by personal ambitions. All we can do is to draw the historical significance of the event in its broader perspective.
From what we have seen, it is little wonder that history takes a turn for the worse at the landmark of Injong's reign. Living ideals make an individual or national life shine. So it was when the ideal of national growth yet lived in the hearts of the Koguryoe people. King Hyoenjong welcomed the triumphal return of General Kang Kam-ch'an with his verse:
In this year the barbarians warred
Advancing as far as the Han.
But for the valorous plan of General Kang
We might all have to wear foreign garb.
This, of course, refers to the invasion of Khitan and to the general's successful campaign which contained the advance. A grateful king went out to the field to meet him, decorated his hair with golden flowers, and personally poured wine into the general's cup. Such was the heightened ideal that stirred the entire nation as one spirit, and before it the Khitan were forced to retreat.
But what happens when a national ideal is lost? Ch'oe Ch'ung taught Confucian doctrine and it has been said: "The height of instruction in the teaching began with Ch'oe Ch'ung, and from that time on there appeared a brilliant succession of scholars who put affairs in proper order so that the Chinese themselves referred to ours as a country functioning according to the classics. None of this achievement could have been possible had it not been for him." But the fact is that Confucianism was a bramble that choked off the growth of the country.
What followed the loss of ideals was civil war that lasted off and on for the next century, a period that came in the wake of the ill-starred attempts at a northward push and the compromise of national interests at the hands of the Confucian courtiers. The Yi Cha-gyoem rebellion came in the fourteenth year of Injong's reign, the Myoch`oeng rebellion thirteen years thereafter, followed thirty-four years later by another revolt staged by Choeng Chung-bu, a military commander, to name a few. Yi Cha-gyoem protested against the corrupt ways at the court, which was modeled on the Chinese institution; Choeng Chung-bu came out against the policy of favoring the civil over military officialdom, another imitation of China. In former times, when the archer Chumong became King Tongmyoeng of Koguryoe, when Uelchi Mundoek and Kae So-mun administered the country, no such philosophy prevailed. It is since Korea began learning Chinese lore and customs and adopting the policy of "civil rule" that the habit of despising military officers took hold. Koguryoe, whose duty it was to rally the national destiny, had every reason to foster fortitude and unbending spirit, but chose an insubstantial formalism which pretended to apply the rule of the sages. An effete ineptness was all it earned.


The reigning king Uijong loved merry-making, preferred luxurious -living, and delighted in poetry. True, the superb ceramic art of Koguryoe celadon10 was perfected thanks to him, but the populace languished. People make such a great deal out of Koguryoe celadon that even a cracked dish or a misshapen jar fetches an enormous price, in the name of love of art. But how many can appreciate the true nature of Koguryoe ceramic art? Do you know what its lines and colors represent? The lines mean undernourished stomachs, souls in agony; its colors, the sad twilight of the declining fortune of a nation, the bluish tint history's shimmering horizon. Know this, before you call it the pride of Korean culture.

King Ueigong had a new house built for his pleasure. When he found a scenic spot, he would lead his civil ministers there, hold a drinking bout, punctuated with verse-making, and hardly notice the day far spent. While the party was in progress the military retinue had to look after the horses and wait around with empty stomachs. The upshot of it was the revolt of Choeng Chung-bu. The king's favorites were beheaded in front of the king, and those hiding nearby were not spared, even down to the lowliest clerk "so long as he wears the civilian headgear." The civilian wing of the court was deposed and even the king himself was sent away in exile where he died soon after.
There followed a series of military coups until Ch'oe Ch`ung-hoen seized power, which his descendants held for three more generations. Government was thrown into a state of disorganization; official positions were bought and sold, people's properties were seized at pleasure; ethical standards and all semblance of order collapsed. Former civil officials now had to beg for food at the doorways of the Ch'oe clan; the government operated out of the parlors of the Ch'oe households. If the civil official behaves like a viper, the military officer is wild and fierce like a beast. That is how it turns out once the guiding spirit is gone.
A gale raged from the Gobi Desert. Koguryoe was too busy with civil war within her own borders to heed the warnings of the age. But Koguryoe could no longer ignore the alarm when the victorious Mongol army mounted an attack in force. The Mongol invaders proved far more brutal and ruthless than the Khitan. One description will suffice. "Once Mongol soldiers passed through no more was the sound of a dog or a rooster to be heard' During the invasion in the forty-first year of Kojong alone, three hundred and six thousand were taken captive and carried away. Those encamped in the capital city, according to legend, made a meal of women's carved out breasts. As the writer of history dries his tears, he holds his pen, but this is a history he has to write.
No one can say that this trial imposed on Koguryoe was by accident. Be it remembered of provincial commander Kim Kyoeng-son that with only twelve men he resisted a swarm of enemy soldiers; until he managed to repulse the enemy, he refused to slacken the beating of his war drum even after an arrow lodged in his arm. In another battle he never flinched even as his soldiers behind him were felled by bullets. There was another hero, Pak Soe, who was defending a fortress in the mountain. The enemy dug an underground passage and he burned them by pouring in molten iron; when the enemy set a fire moving toward the fortress, he put it out; when the enemy opened up with artillery he matched it with his own. The enemy general was amazed: "In all the battles I have been in I have yet to see a man refuse to surrender against such fierce attacks and against such odds." Pak Soe turned a deaf ear to the urgings of an emissary from king who, he explained, had already made the decision to surrender. The emissary was so upset that he was about to commit suicide. Only then did Pak Soe obey the court order; he retired to the country.
There were a few like these two warriors but those in the government were cowardly and shiftless in everything they did. The capital had retreated to the safety of the island of Kanghwa leaving the populace to fend for itself. While there the court spent its time mostly holding parties every day, and there was civil disturbance into the bargain. The Mongols, not satisfied with military occupation alone, began to meddle in internal affairs. They went beyond inflicting physical pain by applying mental pressure. Each Koguryoe king was made to take a Mongol princess as awife and the crown prince was held in Mongolia as a hostage. Every decision at court was taken on the pleasure of the resident Mongol princess. All Koguryoe officials adopted the Mongol style in hair and dress. Many preferred to stay in Mongolia, without giving any thought to regaining of independence.
As I think it over, I lose all interest in the thirteen-tiered stone pagoda in Seoul or in admiring the printing blocks of the Tripitaka which are stored in the temple of Haein-sa. The stone pagoda was erected after the loss of independence. As for the printing blocks, they were made by royal order during the king's stay on Kanghwa Island to invoke the Buddha's intercession to save the country. At this writing, you will find in the Hain-sa the entire set of some eighty thousand blocks of meticulously inscribed characters without a single error, a work that took sixteen years to complete. While the court was given over to its daily party-giving and merry-making, safe from a suffering populace, orders went out requiring commoners to produce wood and money for the printing block project. Does it not vividly tell the story of government by rhetoric, of a lifeless faith? But then as I recall the fact that the pagoda and the blocks have survived these past seven centuries, I begin to wonder if they are not the crystallization of the strength of broad-based toils and sorrows of the populace, if the delicate workmanship may not reflect the spiritual force of the multitudes to which they were dedicated. May not even the solid square blocks, I wonder, embody the everlasting life of a nation? If that is the case, let the pagoda and the printing blocks stay for all time. As the deep ravine existed that sheltered the blocks from war and destruction through the ages, so there must be some spiritual haven that keeps religion for the nation. Just as the pagoda withstood the weather so long, so there must be divinity that will keep this history going.

Back to Queen of Suffering Table of Contents     On to Chapter V. The Broken Axle of History

Queen of Suffering - A Spiritual History of Korea by Ham Sok Hon

Queen of Suffering - A Spiritual History of Korea by Ham Sok Hon



Queen of Suffering

A Spiritual History of Korea

by

Ham Sok Hon


hangul.gif (5367 bytes)

Contents

Chapter I.Humanity, History and Religion
Chapter II.Korea: The Formative Elements
Chapter III.Early Promise and Failure
Chapter IV.The North: Prize and Peril
Chapter V.The Broken Axle of History
Chapter VI.The Just and the Unjust
Chapter VII.Disaster Upon Disaster
Chapter VIII.The Coming of Christianity
Chapter IX.Liberation
Chapter X.The Korean War
Chapter XI.The Meaning of Suffering

Also from this edition:

Foreward
Author's Preface to the English Edition
IntroductionKingdoms, Dynaties and Events

This document, originally scanned and edited by Tom Coyner of the Tokyo Monthly Meeting.
Copyright Information: © 1985 Friends World Committee for Consultation. Permission given by the FWCC for this reproduction.  All rights reserved by the FWCC.


Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943 - Appendix I

Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943 - Appendix I



APPENDIX I
A Japanese View of Quakers (abridged) by Dr. Inazo Nitobe

The starting point of Quaker teaching is the belief in the existence of the Inner Light. … Whatever the name, it means the presence of a Power not our own, the indwelling of a Personality, other than human, In each one of us. Such a doctrine is ... as old as the oldest form of mysticism. Buddhism is full of references to it. ... The Zen Sect of Buddhism makes it its aim to comprehend it. ...

Let it be far from me to turn Quakerism into Oriental mysticism. Quakerism stays within the family of Christianity. ... Unlike Orientals, George Fox and his followers conceived ... of light as a person, but by making their person eternal and existent before the world was, Quakerism came to much the same conclusion as the old mystics.

Were these mystics misguided, building their houses on the sands of fantasy and clothing themselves in garments woven of cobwebs? ... Modern psychologists do not seem to deny that there can be a gradual development in consciousness. ... [self-consciousness] is a state of development not very difficult for us to attain, in fact every normal being attains it. But is there not a stage still higher, where we can merge ourselves in the great universe? ... Curiously enough the Cosmic sense as described by those who attain it, is very much the same everywhere-whether it be by a Buddhist priest, a Shinto votary, or an American farmer.

The central doctrine of Quakerism is the belief in this Cosmic sense, which they call the Inner Light and all the doctrines and precepts of Quakerism are only corollaries drawn from this premise. ...

Is there then no superiority in the so-called revealed religion, by which is meant, I presume, the revelation of Godhead in the person and life of Jesus Christ? ... We read Lao-tze; we read Buddhist saints; I've study Oriental mystics, ... we are brought very near to the idea of redemption, atonement, salvation. ... but we feel that we have not reached our finality. ... Yes, we see light, but not the one thing essential-perfect, living Personality.



Return to our Page    Appendix II  Table of Contents

Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943 - Church Union and After



Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943 - Church Union and After







CHURCH UNION AND AFTER

In 1936 Japan Yearly Meeting celebrated the Fiftieth Anniversary of Quaker work in Japan. Fraternal delegates came from Philadelphia to share in the occasion, and it was a feast of good-will and hope. Whatever the subsequent developments, it was a bright spot in the memories of all concerned. But the international sky was already dark, and the storm broke the next year,--in north China. With war came a heightening of nationalistic feeling. What had begun as a struggle between China and Japan, soon became a whirlwind that drew the whole Pacific area into its vortex. To drive Western imperialism from the Orient was the Japanese slogan. There followed a time which was especially lacerating to the feelings of Japanese Christians, as well as to those of the West. Its connections with Western churches did Japanese Christianity no good in the eyes of the public. Missionaries found themselves in an embarrassing position, and by 1940 a large proportion of them had returned to their home countries. The year before that the Religious Organizations Bill passed the Diet, and became law. By it Christianity was recognized as one of the three religions of Japan, but it had to pay its price for recognition, which was, --union of all the denominations into one organization; severance of financial and other relations with missions from abroad; and an acceptance of a degree of government supervision. The union clause was not unpopular among many Japanese Christians. There bad been a more or less well-developed agitation for it before that time anyhow.

It was harder however for some churches than for others. The Episcopal Church held out against it until the fall of 1943, and then yielded because continued existence as a separate entity had practical difficulties that seemed insuperable. If that were true for such a strong organization, we may believe there would have been no hope for the little group of Friends. But it was a wrench to give up its independent existence. It meant, accepting the whole ecclesiastical program,--ordained ministers, sacraments, creeds, etc. At its last Yearly Meeting, in 1941 the decision was made, however, and the Japan Yearly Meetings of Friends ceased to exist soon thereafter.

It is not true that the government of Japan has adopted an attitude of persecution toward Christianity. It has recognized the service to Japanese society that Christianity has made, and it desires its help in the present crisis. But it wants the kind of Christianity that it can manipulate and make useful in its own way. In this sense it is a time of grave danger to the "Church of Christ in Japan."

What is left of Japanese Quakerism? Let us recognize first of all that spiritual values exist in the hearts of men, not in organizations. To the extent that members of Friends have been able to carry over into the new organization, the spiritual values received from their Quaker faith, let us give thanks. They will not die. There is a type of character which is of more importance than any organization, and it will go echoing down the ages., It needs no denominational tag.

But there is a "remnant", a stock from which fresh growth may sprout when a more favorable time comes. Let us attempt an inventory of the more tangible results from Friends' fifty years in Japan. To begin with material assets,-the meeting houses of course go with the meeting members to the union church. Besides them there is in Tokyo a furnished residence, a dormitory for young men, and the well-appointed buildings of the girls' school; in Mito some property on the main business street, and the buildings of an old peoples' home. These are all held by a Japanese Holding Company, and so are not subject to confiscation as enemy property. The girls' school and the old peoples' home are both carrying on outside the church, as far as organization is concerned. They have their own governing body of trustees. The men's dormitory in Tokyo was still functioning in September of 1943, but with the difficulties in provisioning, in getting help, and in the demands of the military on the young men, it may be necessary to close it down.

Last, but not least, there are two small group's left which may definitely be called Friends, both in Tokyo. The first of these is the Friends Center Committee. It was formed some years before the war began, to represent Friends to those of various countries who, come to Japan with an interest in Quakerism, and to serve the Jewish refugees who were coming in large numbers to Japan at that time. Gilbert Bowles was a member of the committee as long as he was in Japan. Now its members are Seiju Hirakawa, Iwao Ayusawa, and Yasukuni Suzuki. This committee has charge of the dormitory; it arranges for the Inazo Nitobe Memorial Lectures and it gathers other Friends, individual members who did not go with their meetings into the union movement, for meetings for wor ship, or for the consideration of some topic of common interest, as opportunity arises. To these people the tenet of inward faith without the aid of outward form seemed too precious to give up. They have an office in the dormitory, and a small Friends' library is also housed there. When communication with Japan becomes possible again, they will be instruments with whom Friends from outside can hope to make connections.

The other group of which we spoke is the group of Young Friends. They number perhaps ten or twelve. Many of them are second generation Christians, and quite a few have grown up with Friends. Four at least have had a year's study at

Pendle Hill, and all are trained to think. They are "convinced" Friends, whatever their forebears. They too felt that the Quaker heritage was too precious to be lost, and have continued to meet for worship and study and discussion. They and the Friends Center Committee plan to cooperate in holding meetings. The lives of these young Friends are before them, and perhaps we can not do better than leave the future of Quakerism in Japan with them, at this point, praying for them God's guidance and blessing.

Return to our Page Appendix I



Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943 - Quaker Service and Work for Peace



Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943 - Quaker Service and Work for Peace


QUAKER SERVICE AND WORK FOR PEACE

Quaker Service Friends have ever been mindful of suffering bodies as well as darkened souls, and have labored to bring relief to both. In Japan so many sudden catastrophes occur. A bit of thoughtlessness in the manipulation of the charcoal fire, and a high wind, may wipe out half a town in a few hours. And one never knows where the tremors of earthquakes that are of such frequent occurrence will end. Under such circumstances the habit of sharing is well developed. Bureau drawers are made to disgorge out-grown clothes; an accumulation of tea pots comes out of the corners of closets; a cup full of rice from the family supply, combined with those of the neighbors' makes a filling meal for people who have just lost everything. Already we have spoken of relief to flood sufferers. In some degree relief has been administered to victims of such natural catastrophes by all the Friends' groups, as occasion has demanded.

Friends have done yeoman's service too in the cause of temperance. From the very beginning Temperance Societies were formed in all the localities where Friends were working, and great earnestness for the cause was displayed. Friends co-operated too with the national Temperance Society and the W.C.T.L. One result was a village not far from Tsuchiura whose village organization absolutely banned the use of sake, and kept it up for years. Many personal efforts to help friends escape from the habit were also made.

One member of the Mito Meeting tells of walking to his home outside the city, after dark at night, when only a young boy, and soon after he had joined the Meeting. On the way he saw a man intoxicated, lying in the ditch by the side of the road. He trembled with what seemed to him the enormity of his responsibility' under these circumstances. At first he started to walk on and leave the man there, but he heard a voice say to him very clearly, "If your Christian faith has any meaning, you will go back and help him". He did, and the incident stays in his memory as one of the turning points in his spiritual life.

But some moments are too tremendous to be handled by any small group, and one of them was the noon hour on September lst, 1923, when the great Tokyo earthquake occurred. This is not the place to go into detail on the sufferings, or the activities to relieve them, in the days that followed. But Friends did rise to the emergency, and gave organized and effective relief. They began almost immediately giving personal help to their own members, but when money was cabled them from the American Friends Service Committee, they set to work in earnest on a larger scale. A Service Committee(11) was formed on September 10.

This committee weighed the possibilities carefully, and eventually received permission from the city to build 28 small dwelling houses and an assembly hall, in one corner of a city park. These houses were rented to families who had lost their homes, and a democratic organization was effected. Meetings for entertainment and uplift were held in the assembly hall. Two years later they were moved further out of the city, and set up again in a group that was called "Friends Village". Gradually the householders bought their homes and the group was liquidated.

Another project was for more distressed people in one of the slum sections of the city. Here barracks were erected and food and clothing distributed. A program of music, movies, talks on hygiene, a medical clinic, Christian talks and hymn singing, attempted to minister to the whole man. This was carried on for four years after the earthquake.

In addition to the assistance given at the time of the earthquake the A.F.S.C. sent Hugh and Elizabeth Borton to Japan for a three years' period, to work with the mission and to give especial attention to Japan-American relations.

Work for Peace
As early as the autumn of 1889 a Japan Peace Society had been formed, Akasaka Friends taking the initiative. Its purpose was to study the problems of war and peace. A little later the magazine "Peace" was issued, under the editorship of Manji Kato. But this beginning was cut short by government order, at the time of the Sino-Japanese War in 1894, as was also another beginning made in Yokohama, just at the eve of the war. Both of these attempts were made not by organized Friends Meetings, but by individual Friends. Non- Friends were admitted, and the activities of these societies, however short their duration, represent the beginning of the Christian Peace Movement in Japan. By the time of the Russo-Japan War in 1904, although there was no organization, the pacifist position was widely recognized, and many prominent people were associated with it. Among them was Kanzo Uchimura, with whom our story began. Friends seem to have lost their lead to some extent, during this time.

An interest in the movement had reached many public-spirited men, outside of the Christian church, and was fanned by Gilbert Bowles. He was assisted by a young man, named Setzuzo Sawada(12), who later became prominent in the diplomatic world. As a result of their efforts an organization called the Japan Peace Society was again formed in 1906. At first its leadership was prevailingly Christian, but later under the presidency of Count (later Marquis) Okuma, its scope and influence became broader. Anti-Japanese agitation on the Pacific coast made their work difficult, and after a quarter of a century of effective service, war, this time in Manchuria (1931), again nipped the promising bud. The two Christian organizations,--World Alliance for International Friendship through the Churches and the Fellowship of Reconciliation were hardier plants, with which Japanese Friends continued to cooperate. Seiju Hirakawa served as secretary of the latter for a long period of years.

The Yearly Meeting had from the beginning a Peace Committee and it was by its recommendation that representatives were appointed to the London All Friends Conference of 1920. They brought back a report that very much stirred up enthusiasm for peace in the Yearly Meeting, when it was made at its 1921 sessions. A minute was adopted, giving expression to their renewed sense of loyalty to the cause. In 1924 when feeling was very strong about the Immigration Law which the American government had enacted the Yearly Meeting Peace Committee issued a declaration, challenging the attention of the Home and Foreign Ministers of the government. Again in 1931 after the beginning of the Manchurian Incident, Friends cooperated with other Christian sects of peace principles, in the following declaration to the Prime Minister and other members of the Cabinet: "We deeply deplore the international strife with our neighbor, China. Desirous of attaining lasting peace, based on the broad way of love for humanity, not only between our two countries, but among all the nations of the world, we confidently look to you for efforts to that end."

On several occasions Peace Retreats were planned by the Standing Committee of the Yearly Meeting, when for two or three days, those especially interested, would withdraw to some place where they could be uninterrupted, and there discuss quietly the implications of peace and war. It was mental and spiritual gymnastics such as this that helped to produce the internationalism of such men as Seiju Hirakawa and Yasukuni Suzuki, head resident of the young men's dormitory in Tokyo. Opportunities for its expression come to them often in personal relations with Chinese and Korean students in the capital; in service rendered to European Jews who drifted to Japan without any economical support for the present, or hope for the future; and in propagating the spirit of internationalism among the students of the universities in Tokyo. A trip to Shanghai after 1932 helped Suzuki-san further to realize the true results of war and an imperialistic policy.

Friendly personal relationships between the nationals of the two countries may be of more significance than any number of declarations made by organizations. One example was the visit of S.H. Fong of West China Yearly Meeting, to Japan. He was on his way home after a year or two spent in England, and was urged to see Japan. He was very much averse to doing so, having received most unfavorable impressions of Japanese character. With the feeling of taking his life in his hands, he finally introduced himself to Japanese Friends. Some of their leading spirits spent two or three days with him in intimate and frank exchange of views, and in worship together, in a quiet hotel on the seashore of Ibaraki Province. He was entirely disarmed in the course of it, and the whole group entered into deep fellowship together. One Friend remarked that to see Mr. Fong wearing a Japanese kimono about the hotel, had given her quite a new feeling for China, and before he left, he bought Japanese trinkets to take home to his family, although he had previously advocated the boycott against Japanese goods. Later his home in Chengtu was destroyed in a Japanese air-raid. When the news of it came to Hijirizaka Meeting, a collection was made, and a gift of money was sent through safe hands, as a mark of penitential brotherhood.

Other visits back and forth have been made in the interests of mutual understanding. Gilbert Bowles, Mansaku.Nakamura and Seiju Hirakawa were such emissaries, at one time going as far as West China. Letters of Christian good will were exchanged between the two Yearly Meetings, even after feelings in both countries were running high.

One very good place to see the peace movement in Japan in its practical workings was at the Bowles' dinner table, at which Minnie P. Bowles presided with her inexhaustible spirit of hospitality. Gilbert Bowles at the other end of the table, would be directing the conversation into channels that made all the guests assembled there from many quarters, feel at home and enlightened.

Westerners often ask about the conscientious objector movement in Japan. If there is such a movement, it is not allowed to become public. It will not become a widespread movement, I think, because Japanese ways of thinking are different from those of the West in so many respects. In the first place they have been taught in the feudal days of the past, as well as in imperialistic times in the present, the duty of absolute obedience on the part of the subject to his overlord. Because the whole is, more important than any of its parts, there is nothing to do but to sacrifice the individual judgment, even at such times as it repudiates the demands made on it by that whole. In such cases they feel that this is not sin for them, because it has been taken out of their hands and is therefore no longer their moral responsibility.

Then again the family organization is so much stronger with them than with Anglo-Saxon people. A family conclave, including parents and uncles, is held to determine the young man's future steps in life. Of course he has a chance to express his own desires, but he certainly does not have the freedom to choose his own way that the young men of the West have. Besides, the consequences of his deeds come back not only to himself, but to his whole family. The conscientious objector stand comes out of a more individualistic society than obtains in Japan, I believe.

Quaker Strains from Other Sources
Lest it be thought that Japanese Quakerism is one of which the Philadelphia Mission was the sole purveyor, an account should be given without more delay, of the many contributions that have been made from other sources, and which have helped to preserve its cosmopolitan quality.

From the very beginning there was Dr. Whitney whose name has already been mentioned. He was the first American student at the medical school of the Tokyo University, and after he had taken his degree, he founded a hospital in Akasaka Ward of Tokyo, neighboring Shiba. That was in 1886. Dr. Henry Hartshorne was another who came to Japan on a professional medical errand, but who gave concerned counsel to the little group of Friends in its beginning days. His daughter, Anna C. Hartshorne, remained its friend through her long years of educational service in Tokyo. Meanwhile George Braithwaite had come from England, and Dr. Whitney had married his sister, Mary, and brought her to Japan. Thus a new center of Friends was formed. A little gathering of very zealous believers grew up around the hospital. At first they did not call themselves Friends, but as time went on the need for some connection with a Christian group was felt. And gradually its members and those at Hijirizaka came to know each other. Individuals from the older group took responsibilities from time to time for the Akasaka group, and finally in 1939, after much conference on the subject, the Akasaka Meeting was recognized as a Monthly Meeting of the Japan yearly Meeting, the ninth and last to be set up. Teiko Kudo a very earnest and consecrated woman, ministers to it.

The group of English Friends was represented in the Mission Committee by the son of George and Lettice Braithwaite, G. Burnham Braithwaite, and his wife, Edith Lamb Braithwaite. Burnham's knowledge of the language, learned as a child learns it, was of great value to the work. Canadian Friends have also served on the Fission Committee, and their Board has shared in the financial as well as the spiritual support of the work.

Among the Japanese Friends are some who have had broad international experience, and who have brought back to the little Quaker group in their own country some of the air of that bigger world. Foremost among these was Dr. Inazo Nitobe, a member of Baltimore Yearly Meeting, which he joined when a student at Johns Hopkins University. His marriage to a member of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting made the tie with America stronger. Later, seven years in the Secretariat of the League of Nations, taking an active and highly valued part in the solving of world problems, confirmed his international viewpoint. At such times as he could be in Japan, he was in demand on all sides and led an almost unbelievably busy life. Friends will therefore never forget the occasions when he took time for them, attending and addressing their Yearly Meetings, conducting a conference group one winter on Sunday mornings for the members of Hijirizaka Meeting, or occasionally dropping in unannounced to their meetings for worship. His weightiness, his simplicity, his lovable qualities, left a deep impress on all he met, Portions of his view of Quakerism are appended to this account.

Then there is Iwao Ayusawa, a one-time student of Haverford College, whose years in America were followed by a long residence in Geneva, and work in connection with the International Labour Office. His Quaker home in America, together with friendship with Dr. Nitobe, and connection with the Friends' group in Geneva, were the formative influences in his Quaker faith. He joined Japan Yearly Meeting on his return, and has been a most concerned member. His work as executive secretary of the World Economic Research Institute in Tokyo, still takes him into international fields. Like so many people in the West of late, he has been especially interested in encouraging the study of post war economic organization.

Takeo Iwahashi and his wife came to us from London Yearly Meeting, joined during years of study in Edinburgh. Pendle Hill, a school near Philadelphia, has done great service for Japanese students, who have come back to their country to share the catholicity of view, and the sense of responsibility for service, acquired there. Among these are Kikue Kurama, Ryumei Yamano, Masa Uraguchi, and Tane Takahashi.



Return to our Page Next Chapter

Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943



Quakerism in Japan: 1885-1943



Quakerism in Japan
A Brief Account of the Origins and Development
of the Religious Society of Friends

1885-1943by
Edith F. Sharpless
1944


Notes on this reproduction


Contents
Chapter I. Historical Background

Chapter II. Religious Background

Chapter III. Educational Period

Chapter IV. Quaker Service and Work for Peace

Chapter V. Church Union and After

Appendix I. A Japanese View of Quakerism

Appendix II. 50th Anniversary of Japanese Quakerism

Appendix III. Roster of Friends Foreign Mission
(1885-1941)

Foreward

Bibliography




Photographs


This document, originally scanned and edited by Tom Coyner, attendee of the Tokyo Monthly Meeting, April 1999.


Copyright Information. Originally published in 1944 by the Friends World Committee for Consultaton.

2019/04/05

THE QUAKER SHOP TURNS 50

THE QUAKER SHOP TURNS 50 

Kerry O’Regan 


The Quaker Shop is celebrating its fiftieth birthday
this year. I’ve just been reading a report written in 1982 by
Ngaire Thorp, the first Quaker Shop manager. In it she talks about the promptings which led to the shop’s establishment. This was 1967 and the Vietnam War and its human consequences were very much part of Quaker consciousness. She says, of reports from

Ngaire Thorp Vietnam:
As we listened to the letters from Quaker workers in that country … we knew that our normal methods of raising money had to change. So the Adelaide meeting resolved to find a way other than “our normal methods” to
raise money specifically for “the relief of Civilian War Victims in Vietnam”. Initially, they thought in terms of some kind of jumble sale of second-hand goods. There was a system at the time whereby various charities left donation tubs at the Adelaide Railway Station. The local Quakers gained permission to be part of this scheme and installed a collection tub of their own. They subsequently sold the donated goods at a stall they ran at a Baptist church, for three hours per week. The work involved in setting up and dismantling the stall was significant, with limited outcome in terms of money actually raised, so when Ngaire saw a To Rent sign in a shop on Kensington Road, Norwood, she jumped at the opportunity. Quaker ways are notoriously slow and ponderous, but this was an opportunity which required an immediate decision. Fortunately there was a business meeting scheduled for just about then, and at it a decision was made to go ahead and rent the property, I imagine, not without considerable misgivings and trepidation. But go ahead they did, at a rental of $10 per week. This rented property was not the current shop, but one a couple of doors down, but renting was just the beginning. Friends had to deal with the bureaucracy involved in obtaining a second hand dealer’s licence, and that took a while – finding out what needed to be done and then finding out how to do it. In the meantime, an optimistic sign was placed in the window: Opening soon – The Quaker Shop to aid civilians wounded in Vietnam

And the doors finally opened on 1st July, 1968.
It wasn’t until four years later, in 1972, that the current shop premises became available for purchase, and Adelaide Meeting managed to raise enough funds to buy the current site (including the shop and flat next door), the meeting presumably going through even more anxious discernment than they had with merely renting. But the proposal was agreed to and the purchase made. Over the fifty years there have been things that have changed and things that have
remained the same. While Adelaide Local Meeting still owns the shop premises, Regional Meeting has taken over the management of the shop and has entrusted that responsibility to the QSSANT (Quaker Service South Australia and Northern Territory) Committee who appoint the shop manager, oversee the general running of the shop, and make decisions about disbursement of funds.

These funds, of course, no longer go to the civilian wounded in Vietnam. There was a period when the shop sent clothing and books to several Aboriginal communities in Central Australia, and a large dot painting which takes pride of place in the shop is testament to the gratitude with which these donations were received, but the main recipient currently is QSA (Quaker Service Australia). 

Last year, the shop contributed $74 000 to the work of QSA. We also contribute regularly to the Australian Refugee Association, and on an ad hoc basis to the Refugee Advocacy Service of South Australia. The premises were “old” at the time of purchase in 1972 and have needed the care and
consideration associated with that fact. A major improvement was undertaken in 2015/16 with renovations and extensions undertaken under the able stewardship of the then manager Topsy Evans. These gave the place and its occupants a whole new lease of life. We are giving it another spruce-up in recognition of this fifty-year occasion. The front façade has been repainted and the large signs above the awning (which were there since 1972, and looked it) have been replaced with identical but bright shiny new ones. 

Despite the extensions, it would be impossible to fit all the fifty-year-celebration
participants into the shop itself, so the event will of necessity be, at least in part, out in the open. We thought that might not be very pleasant in July, so are planning to have the big event on 1st October, the Monday of the long weekend, when the weather should be much more conducive to outdoor activity. I had been working as a volunteer at the shop for seven years before I took over as
manager at the beginning of last year, but had no idea of the complexity of the operation before I assumed responsibility for managing it (which is maybe just as well). There are currently fifty-five volunteers on our books and they do so much more than sell stuff in the shop. Which brings me to a little commercial. People have a life outside the shop and are sometimes not available for their regular three-hour shifts. I do have a few people who fill in occasionally, but could really do with several more. (The more there are, the less any one individual is called upon). Of course, people who would like to volunteer on a regular basis are most welcome as well, but if your time and energy are limited… 

To quote again from Ngaire’s article:

One has really to work at the Quaker Shop to realise for oneself its vitality. 

Come check it out.

THE BACKHOUSE LECTURE BY CHO-NYON KIM

THE BACKHOUSE LECTURE BY CHO-NYON KIM

The Backhouse Lecture ‘An Encounter between Quaker Mysticism and Taoism in Everyday Life’ was delivered by Cho-Nyon Kim, professor of Sociology and of Daejon Meeting in South Korea. Cho-Nyon Kim explores his spiritual journey in the Korean religious environment, in which Confucianism, Buddhism. Taoism and Christianity have all influenced cultural practice and been integrated into daily life. He asks how we can live a simple life in a complex world. He focuses on how we can create a peaceful society in the face of nationalism and self-centredness. 

Quakerism has similarities to Taoism in its mysticism and its sense of waiting in a meditative way. He concludes that he must “lead my life in the manner of those who always seek truth with an open mind”. 

Cho-Nyon Kim visited Adelaide on July 16th. He was on his own as his wife did not come to Australia. Harald Ehmann was able to take him to all the places of interest with regard to The First Nations People during day, and translated into English from German with which language Kim was more confident. 

Olga Farnill writes: on Mon, 16th July, 2018, fifteen Friends met at the home of Inga and Michael Tolley, to hear South Korean Professor Cho Nyon Kim, who teaches Sociology at the University of Tae-Jeon. He is one of a very small number of Quakers in Korea. 

They follow their weekly meetings with an hour of study of topics such as Taoism, Quakerism, Eastern classics, and the Bible. There are 10 million Christians in South Korea, out of a total population of 45 million. Buddhists form a larger group. Cho Nyon explained that political tensions between the Left and Right have been entrenched even within S Korea, since World War Two. The boundary between North and South was drawn by Russia and the US, who both had agents operating throughout Korea to convert people to their side. Tensions remain in the South as many have kept a leftist allegiance, although the Communist Party is banned in South Korea. This has caused divisions within communities and families, which obstructs the peace process between North and South. 

President Mun has made continuing attempts to prevent war, including meeting with President Kim. South Koreans want a peace treaty, but are sceptical of the very slow process. People in either country still cannot communicate with friends in the other. The Quakers of South Korea are contributing to the peace process by planning strategy with Buddhists and other supporters. A meeting in September, 2017, decided on a pilgrimage to two major areas of strongest conflict, inviting discussion between Left and Right-wing sympathisers. This began on March 1st, 2018 (a day commemorating the 1919 movement for Independence from Japan. The pilgrimage covered the cities of Seoul, Tsung-Nam and Tae-Jeon. These peace -making efforts have received good publicity, and will be repeated in other areas in September, 2018. Then, next year, the group will share its experiences and publish a Peace Statement.

SILVER WATTLE QUAKER RETREAT

SILVER WATTLE QUAKER RETREAT
Upcoming Courses Please let all your friends (not just Quakers) know about these upcoming courses. 


  • Toward a Good Relationship with Earth (Rowe Morrow, 20-23 Sept) 
  • Quakers and Concerns (Sue Ennis & Catherine Heywood, 4-7 Oct) 
  • Art, Nature, & Spirit (Brenda Roy & others, 19-25 Oct) 
  • Indigenous Spirituality (David Carline & others, 2-4 Nov) 
  • Year-End Retreat (David & Trish Johnson, 28 Dec - 3 Jan) 


More details on the Silver Wattle website


WHY BECOME A FIR AT SILVER WATTLE?

 Why indeed? Well, let me try to answer your question. FIR stands for Friend in Residence. When you come to us as a FIR, you are invited to join in, what we call, our Rhythm of the Day. It is based on the ancient monastic traditions of both East and West. They, in turn, are linked to the rhythms of the Cosmos. This is perhaps our best kept secret. The Rhythm of the Day is a structured balanced lifestyle designed to nurture the Contemplative in you. And we regard this as the most important gift we can offer you during your stay with us. 

Why? Because when we act out of a contemplative perspective, we are more likely to respond to the promptings of the Spirit. This is called being a ‘contemplative in action’. For most of us, it doesn’t come naturally. It is the work of a lifetime. After all, it is God’s kingdom on Earth we are called to build, not our ego’s. How then does this Rhythm of the Day work? It consists of three elements. 

Firstly, there is the experience of living in community. This concerns our relationships with one another. It might appeal particularly to those who live alone, in an isolated location or in an impersonal suburb that fosters our need for companionship. 

Then there is our prayer life which nurtures our relationship with the Divine. It reminds us that we have been created and sustained by a loving Creator. 

Finally, there is the service you provide that helps to maintain Silver Wattle as a viable and vibrant Retreat Centre, available to both Quakers and others, who choose to avail of its opportunities and resources.

SPEAKING OF GOD Kerry O’Regan 1808

SPEAKING OF GOD 
Kerry O’Regan

 It was that Guardian article about God language and Britain Yearly Meeting that prompted me to think more deeply about my own position – in particular the statement in the article that some Friends were “offended” by such language. I thought no, that’s not it for me. I’m not offended by talk of God. Not re-traumatised by childhood or later tales of a vengeful and demanding God. No. It’s more a puzzlement. A non-comprehension. You know how George Fox said “and this I knew experimentally”? Well, I must confess I have
no “experimental” knowledge of God. I have had no experience, no encounter, that I can attach the label “God” to. I am like someone who has never experienced chocolate. They can hear others speak of chocolate – hear them describe its appearance, texture, smell, taste. They can accept the reality of that experience for another person, but ultimately, for them, the word has no real, experiential meaning. So it is for me and God. I hear people use God language and I think What? Nor does it help to use soft synonyms like Spirit or The Divine. It’s like saying to our non-chocolate person: What if we use other words for chocolate? That might help. It doesn’t. 

So what am I doing here among Quakers? Someone pretty much summed it up recently (at least from the belief perspective; there are other aspects). “Other religious groups tell you what to believe; Quakers ask you what you believe.” 

Experientially, I also relate to what the novelist AS Byatt says of her experience of Quakers: "Their religion is wonderful – you simply sat in silence and listened to the nature of things". I really value sitting in silence and listening to the nature of things. And then there’s the testimonies of course, and a sense of these are my people.

I do experience what Capital A Atheists, like Richard Dawkins, (and, ironically, the Lutheran theologian Rudolf Otto who actually invented the term) call the Numinous – a generalised sense of awe and reverence. But I have no sense of an I-Thou encounter with an Other. No sense of Spirit. No sense of being led or guided. When I was a child, I was told that that sense was all about God. I believed that. But only because that was what I was told; I had no other basis for such a belief. I’m totally accepting of others’ God experiences. In fact, I quite envy them. I would love to have a connection with an all-loving Spirit who would guide my path with infinite wisdom. I even have my Samuel Here I am response all ready. But so far, nothing from the chocolate corner. So that’s why I struggle, even among Quakers, with talk of God and The Will of God and Spirit
and so on. I just hear chocolate, chocolate, chocolate, and I think Huh? I did stop coming at one stage. For a few years, in fact. 

My sense of puzzlement (What are they talking about?) became too great, and I stayed away. I didn’t resign my membership, however. I retained my identity as “Quaker”. (And that raises the whole issue of what it means to be a Quaker – but that’s another story.) I’ve been back for quite a while now, though sometimes rather uneasily, with all the talk of God (or was that “chocolate”?) that swirls around me. I’ll wear it as long as I canst.  


REZA ASLAN. GOD. A HUMAN HISTORY. Reviewed by Reg Naulty.

REZA ASLAN. GOD. A HUMAN HISTORY. Reviewed by Reg Naulty.

Bantam Press. London. 2017. P. 298. $35. isbn. 9780593079836 [tpb] 

Here, according to Aslan, is the beginning of the religious impulse "It is the result of ... our ingrained, intuitive, and wholly experiential belief that
we are, whatever else we are, embodied souls. Our quest in the following chapters is neither to prove nor disprove the existence of the soul [there is no proof either way]. Rather it is to demonstrate how this universal belief in the existence of the soul led to the concept of an active, engaged, divine presence that underlies all of creation."[p. 47]
Somewhat surprisingly, numerous studies on the cognition of children have shown an instinctual propensity for "substance dualism" - the belief that the body and mind/soul are distinct in form and nature. One scientist, Paul Bloom, has argued that it is a natural by product of our possession of two distinct cognitive systems - one for dealing with material objects, the other for social entities [p.278] 

Aslan argues, persuasively, that humanity projected the soul onto nature, investing trees, winds, clouds and storms etc with spirits - hence animism, and religion was launched. 

Aslan started life as a Muslim, became a Christian, then a Muslim again. He is a Sufi, and an unorthodox one at that. He is a pantheist. He is quick to point out that some of the most influential Sufis were pantheists, as indeed they were, eg., Jalal ad - Din Rumi [d. 1273] and Ibn Arabi [d.1240] The thesis, championed by Feuerbach, that religion is a projection of human qualities on to external beings or being, is pursued so much in the book, that Aslan`s presentation and defence of pantheism towards the end is unexpected. 

He explains how pantheism arose in Islam:
"The issue is fairly straightforward: if God is indivisible, and God is Creator,
how could there be any division between Creator and Creation? Are they not necessarily the same? [p.158]"

To which the ready reply is "No. God creates a world distinct from himself. " Aslan`s re-phrasing provides no advance: "The only way to accept the proposition of a singular, eternal and indivisible God was to obliterate any distinction between Creator and Creation." The final sentence of the book is "You are God." 

Well, if the Pope and Richard Dawkins are also God, there are contradictions in God. Aslan writes "I pray to God not to ask for things but to become one with God." If he is God, there is no need to do that. 

Aslan`s final difficulties with pantheism do not negate the book as a whole. His account of the development of the idea of God from pre-historic times to Judaism is masterful. He turns up all kinds of interesting things. For example, the Sumerians, in, roughly, Iraq, around 50000 BC, drained marshes, built canals and irrigation systems, and invented the wheel and the sailboat. Sometime in the 4th century BC, they invented writing. One of their stories, about a great flood, is remarkably like the biblical story, which was written much later. The first monotheist in recorded history was Akhenaten, a young pharaoh from the Eighteenth Dynasty of the New Kingdom in Egypt, about 1353BC. He was followed, about 200 years later by Zarathustra in Persia, who called God Ahura Mazda, which means Wise Lord, although He had no name and was known through six "evocations" which God had brought forth from his own being: wisdom, truth, power, love, unity and immortality. 

Ahura Mazda made the heavens and earth, the night and the day, separated light from darkness, and determined the path of the sun and stars. Then there is, in Hinduism, the God Shiva, who made its way up from being a minor God in the Hindu pantheon, through the ranks of the superior Gods, absorbing their attributes on the way, until, at the top at last, Shiva became creator and destroyer, healer and afflicter, ascetic and hedonist, the god of storms, and the lord of the dance. The origins of Judaism and Christianity are done well. It is important to note that Muhammad`s God is the God of Judaism. He made no bones about it. When he first received his revelations [the Koran] he told his followers that if they doubted his words, the people of the book would corroborate them. 

At a different place in the Koran, it is written of the Jews "of your prophet they have made a jest and a pastime." What an endless tragedy that turned out to be. Aslan tells the story very well. Even someone who has read a lot about religion will enjoy and profit from this book. 

• Reg Naulty is a member of Canberra Regional Meeting and a former senior lecturer in philosophy and religion at Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga.

2019/04/03

How Kim Jong Il Starved North Korea - The Atlantic

How Kim Jong Il Starved North Korea - The Atlantic





How Kim Jong Il Starved North Korea
JORDAN WEISSMANNDEC 20, 2011


What kind of disastrous economic policy results in the death by starvation of up to 3 million people in a nation with the population of Texas?


Reuters

When North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il died of a coronary this weekend after 17 years in power, the homuncular tyrant left his country much as he found it -- poor and desperately hungry.



For the last two decades, North Korea has grappled with food crisis upon food crisis, the result of a dysfunctional government and its erratic leader. In 1994, the year Kim inherited North Korea's reins from his late father, the country was in the midst of a severe agricultural decline. The newly minted despot transformed it into a famine that would claim as many as three million lives. Food shortages have plagued the country ever since.


It begs the question: How did one man starve a nation of roughly 23 million people? The answer: By clinging to a broken economic system designed to do little but ensure his own survival.

Agriculture has always been a dicey proposition in North Korea, where the cold, mountainous terrain is short on high-quality farmland. A normal economy could cope by importing food. But during the 1980s, the North Korean government embarked on a policy of radical self-sufficiency known as juche. Farmers were expected to overcome mother nature and grow enough crops to feed the entire population. To do it, they relied on heaps of chemical fertilizer. But that crutch was yanked away in 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed.






The demise of the USSR threw North Korea's entire economy into chaos, and agriculture was among its most important casualties. Without imports of cheap fuel (self-sufficiency had its limits), the country's industrial base fractured, and production of fertilizer dwindled. Farm yields plummeted, and the government started a campaign urging citizens to consume less. Its cheery slogan: "Let's eat only two meals a day."



It was against this background that the Kim Jong Il took power. The country was at a crossroads, says Marcus Noland, a leading expert on North Korea at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. With the USSR gone, the prospects for a small, isolated, neo-Stalinist regime looked rather grim. The government could have opened up its economy, much like Vietnam did with great success. Instead, North Korea chose to stay frozen in time.

"The mystery is why the North Koreans did not understand the historical magnitude of the change around them," Noland says.

One Cold War relic in desperate need of reform was the country's food distribution system. Crops such as rice and corn were raised on collectivist farms, then doled out by the state. The process served a political purpose by funneling cheap food to the country's outsized military, as well as citizens in the capital of Pyongyang, which together made up the base of Kim's power. But it was also ready to collapse.


AFTER THE COLD WAR, THE FARMER WAR


In 1995, when the globe first learned about the North Korean famine, massive floods decimated as much as 15% of North Korea's farmable land. Local officials began hoarding food they were charged with distributing. And a fuel shortage made it impossible to move crops around the country. The government appealed to the United Nations World Food Program for humanitarian aid, blaming the floods for the disaster. Yet even as he sought help from abroad, Kim deepened the crisis at home by stumbling into a war with his country's farmers.



Without enough food to go around, the North Korean regime had turned to triage. Pyongyang and the military had to eat, so the government cut rations for farmers instead, slashing the portion of their harvest they could keep to feed their own families. Predictably, there were severe consequences. Faced with the unappealing prospect of going hungry, farmers began hiding their grain. In 1996, the World Food Program found that half the country's corn crop had gone missing. Reports spread of farmers' roofs collapsing under the weight of stashed food. Soldiers were sent to guard the fields at harvest time, but as a United States Institute for Peace report noted, they were easily bribed. After all, the soldiers were hungry, too.

From there, the situation only degenerated. Despite the international community's wariness toward the Kim regime, food aid did begin to flow. But much of it was stolen by well-connected elites, who re-sold the aid at marked-up prices. Farmers started doing the same thing with their own crops. As a result, food prices soared, and the poorest continued to starve.






Farmers stole their own crops. Elites stole the aid. Impoverished Koreans starved. Because the country's statistics are so unreliable, nobody knows the exact number of casualties caused by the famine. But common estimates peg the number of deaths between one million to three million.


THE GHOSTS OF 1994


The great famine finally began to subside in 1998. There were better harvests. The world continued delivering food aid. And North Koreans adjusted to the new private food markets. But history had a habit of repeating itself under Kim. The government set in motion a second, albeit milder, food crisis when it outlawed the private sale of grain in 2005, forcing the country to rely once again on the public food system. The situation worsened once foreign governments cut off aid following the military's first nuclear test.

Then just in October, Reuters published a report on the growing fears about yet another food shortage.

"The country's dysfunctional food-distribution system, rising global commodities prices and sanctions imposed over Pyongyang's nuclear and missile programs had contributed to what appears to be a hunger crisis in the North, even before devastating summer floods and typhoons compounded the emergency," the wire reported.



There are skeptics who believe that Pyongyang is exaggerating its food problems. The country is known to hold grain for its military, even as rural peasants starve, and according to Reuters, South Korean officials believe it may be stockpiling supplies in preparation of a new nuclear test.

And yet, the echoes of 1994 are haunting. Like his father before him, Kim Jong Il has left the country in the hands of a politically inexperienced son, who has yet to consolidate his own power. Once again, the transition has happened at a moment when the government may not be able to feed its own people. Hopefully, the parallels end there.

>

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.




JORDAN WEISSMANN is a former senior associate editor at The Atlantic.
Twitter

Ben Habib @ IPC India 2017: Permaculture as an International Social Move...

Ben Habib's discussant remarks at the Living Politics Conference + Q&A