2024/08/13

Afterlife - Wikipedia 내세

Afterlife - Wikipedia

Afterlife

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A depiction of Idris visiting Heaven and Hell from an illuminated manuscript version of the Islamic text Stories of the Prophets (1577)

The afterlife or life after death is a purported existence in which the essential part of an individual's stream of consciousness or identity continues to exist after the death of their physical body.[1] The surviving essential aspect varies between belief systems; it may be some partial element, or the entire soul or spirit, which carries with it one's personal identity.

In some views, this continued existence takes place in a spiritual realm, while in others, the individual may be reborn into this world and begin the life cycle over again, known as reincarnation, likely with no memory of what they have done in the past. In this latter view, such rebirths and deaths may take place over and over again continuously until the individual gains entry to a spiritual realm or otherworld. Major views on the afterlife derive from religion, esotericism and metaphysics.

Some belief systems, such as those in the Abrahamic tradition, hold that the dead go to a specific place (e.g. paradise or hell) after death, as determined by their god, based on their actions and beliefs during life. In contrast, in systems of reincarnation, such as those in the Indian religions, the nature of the continued existence is determined directly by the actions of the individual in the ended life.

Different metaphysical models

[edit]

Theist immortalists generally believe some afterlife awaits people when they die. Members of some generally non-theistic religions believe in an afterlife without reference to a deity.

Many religions, whether they believe in the soul's existence in another world like Christianity, Islam, and many pagan belief systems, or reincarnation like many forms of Hinduism and Buddhism, believe that one's status in the afterlife is a consequence of one's conduct during life.[citation needed]

Reincarnation

[edit]

Reincarnation is the philosophical or religious concept that an aspect of a living being starts a new life in a different physical body or form after each death. This concept is also known as rebirth or transmigration and is part of the Saṃsāra/karma doctrine of cyclic existence. Samsara refers to the process in which souls (jivas) go through a sequence of human and animal forms. Traditional Hinduism teaches that each life helps the soul (jivas) learn until the soul becomes purified to the point of liberation.[2] All major Indian religions, namely BuddhismHinduismJainism, and Sikhism have their own interpretations of the idea of reincarnation.[3] The human idea of reincarnation is found in many diverse ancient cultures,[4][5] and a belief in rebirth/metempsychosis was held by historic Greek figures, such as Pythagoras and Plato.[6] It is also a common belief of various ancient and modern religions such as Spiritismtheosophy, and Eckankar. It is found as well in many tribal societies around the world, in places such as Australia, East Asia, Siberia, and South America.[7]

This Bhavachakra mural depicts the six realms of existence for reincarnation in Buddhism, with Yama holding the Wheel of Life.
The twelve nidanas in Buddhist artwork
Aztec wooden mask
Aztec mask depicting transformation and rebirth

Although the majority of denominations within the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam do not believe that individuals reincarnate, particular groups within these religions do refer to reincarnation; these groups include the mainstream historical and contemporary followers of Kabbalah, the CatharsAlawites, the Druze,[8] and the Rosicrucians.[9] The historical relations between these sects and the beliefs about reincarnation that were characteristic of neoplatonismOrphismHermeticismManicheanism, and Gnosticism of the Roman era as well as the Indian religions have been the subject of recent scholarly research.[10] Unity Church and its founder Charles Fillmore teach reincarnation.

Rosicrucians[9] speak of a life review period occurring immediately after death and before entering the afterlife's planes of existence (before the silver cord is broken), followed by a judgment, more akin to a final review or end report over one's life.[11]

Heaven and Hell

[edit]
Georgin François, The 3 Roads to Eternity, 1825

Heaven, the heavens, Seven Heavenspure landsTianJannahValhalla, or the Summerland, is a common religious, cosmological, or transcendent place where beings such as godsangelsjinnsaints, or venerated ancestors are said to originate, be enthroned, or live. According to the beliefs of some religions, heavenly beings can descend to earth or incarnate, and earthly beings can ascend to heaven in the afterlife, or in exceptional cases, enter heaven alive.

Heaven is often described as a "higher place", the holiest place, a paradise, in contrast to hell or the underworld or the "low places", and universally or conditionally accessible by earthly beings according to various standards of divinitygoodnesspietyfaith or other virtues or right beliefs or the will of God. Some believe in the possibility of a heaven on Earth in a world to come.

In Hinduism, heaven is considered as Svarga loka. There are seven positive regions the soul can go to after death and seven negative regions.[12] After completing its stay in the respective region, the soul is subjected to rebirth in different living forms according to its karma. This cycle can be broken after a soul achieves Moksha or Nirvana. Any place of existence, either of humans, souls or deities, outside the tangible world (heaven, hell, or other) is referred to as otherworld.

Hell, in many religious and folkloric traditions, is a place of torment and punishment in the afterlife. Religions with a linear divine history often depict hell as an eternal destination, while religions with a cyclic history often depict a hell as an intermediary period between incarnations. Typically, these traditions locate hell in another dimension or under the Earth's surface and often include entrances to hell from the land of the living. Other afterlife destinations include purgatory and limbo.

Traditions that do not conceive of the afterlife as a place of punishment or reward merely describe hell as an abode of the dead, the grave, a neutral place (for example, Sheol or Hades) located under the surface of Earth.[13]

Ancient religions

[edit]

Ancient Egyptian religion

[edit]
Judgment of the Dead in Duat
This detail scene from the Papyrus of Hunefer (c. 1375 BC) shows Hunefer's heart being weighed on the scale of Maat against the feather of truth, by the jackal-headed Anubis. The ibis-headed Thothscribe of the gods, records the result. If his heart is lighter than the feather, Hunefer is allowed to pass into the afterlife. If not, he is eaten by the waiting AmmitVignettes such as these were a common illustration in Egyptian books of the dead.

The afterlife played an important role in Ancient Egyptian religion, and its belief system is one of the earliest known in recorded history. When the body died, parts of its soul known as ka (body double) and the ba (personality) would go to the Kingdom of the Dead. While the soul dwelt in the Fields of AaruOsiris demanded work as restitution for the protection he provided. Statues were placed in the tombs to serve as substitutes for the deceased.[14]

Arriving at one's reward in afterlife was a demanding ordeal, requiring a sin-free heart and the ability to recite the spells, passwords, and formulae of the Book of the Dead. In the Hall of Two Truths, the deceased's heart was weighed against the Shu feather of truth and justice taken from the headdress of the goddess Ma'at.[15] If the heart was lighter than the feather, they could pass on, but if it were heavier they would be devoured by the demon Ammit.[16]

Egyptians also believed that being mummified and put in a sarcophagus (an ancient Egyptian "coffin" carved with complex symbols and designs, as well as pictures and hieroglyphs) was the only way to have an afterlife. What are referred to as the Coffin Texts, are inscribed on a coffin and serve as a guide for the challenges in the afterlife. The Coffin texts are more or less a duplication of the Pyramid Texts, which would serve as a guide for Egyptian pharaohs or queens in the afterlife.[17] Only if the corpse had been properly embalmed and entombed in a mastaba, could the dead live again in the Fields of Yalu and accompany the Sun on its daily ride. Due to the dangers the afterlife posed, the Book of the Dead was placed in the tomb with the body as well as food, jewelry, and 'curses'. They also used the "opening of the mouth".[18][19]

Ancient Egyptian civilization was based on religion. The belief in the rebirth after death became the driving force behind funeral practices; for them, death was a temporary interruption rather than complete cessation of life. Eternal life could be ensured by means like piety to the gods, preservation of the physical form through mummification, and the provision of statuary and other funerary equipment. Each human consisted of the physical body, the ka, the ba, and the akh. The Name and Shadow were also living entities. To enjoy the afterlife, all these elements had to be sustained and protected from harm.[20]

On 30 March 2010, a spokesman for the Egyptian Culture Ministry claimed it had unearthed a large red granite door in Luxor with inscriptions by User,[21] a powerful adviser to the 18th Dynasty Queen Hatshepsut who ruled between 1479 BC and 1458 BC, the longest of any woman. It believes the false door is a 'door to the Afterlife'. According to the archaeologists, the door was reused in a structure in Roman Egypt.

Ancient Greek and Roman religions

[edit]

The Greek god Hades is known in Greek mythology as the king of the underworld, a place where souls live after death.[22] The Greek god Hermes, the messenger of the gods, would take the dead soul of a person to the underworld (sometimes called Hades or the House of Hades). Hermes would leave the soul on the banks of the River Styx, the river between life and death.[23]

Charon, also known as the ferry-man, would take the soul across the river to Hades, if the soul had gold: Upon burial, the family of the dead soul would put coins under the deceased's tongue. Once crossed, the soul would be judged by AeacusRhadamanthus and King Minos. The soul would be sent to ElysiumTartarus, or Asphodel Fields. The Elysian Fields were for the ones that lived pure lives. It consisted of green fields, valleys and mountains, everyone there was peaceful and contented, and the Sun always shone there. Tartarus was for the people that blasphemed against the gods or were rebellious and consciously evil.[24] In Tartarus, the soul would be punished by being burned in lava or stretched on racks. The Asphodel Fields were for a varied selection of human souls including those whose sins equaled their goodness, those who were indecisive in their lives, and those who were not judged.

Some heroes of Greek legend are allowed to visit the underworld. The Romans had a similar belief system about the afterlife, with Hades becoming known as Pluto. In the ancient Greek myth about the Labours of Heracles, the hero Heracles had to travel to the underworld to capture Cerberus, the three-headed guard dog, as one of his tasks.

In Dream of ScipioCicero describes what seems to be an out of body experience, of the soul traveling high above the Earth, looking down at the small planet, from far away.[25]

In Book VI of Virgil's Aeneid, the hero, Aeneas, travels to the underworld to see his father. By the River Styx, he sees the souls of those not given a proper burial, forced to wait by the river until someone buries them. While down there, along with the dead, he is shown the place where the wrongly convicted reside, the fields of sorrow where those who committed suicide and now regret it reside, including Aeneas' former lover, the warriors and shades, Tartarus (where the titans and powerful non-mortal enemies of the Olympians reside) where he can hear the groans of the imprisoned, the palace of Pluto, and the fields of Elysium where the descendants of the divine and bravest heroes reside. He sees the river of forgetfulness, Lethe, which the dead must drink to forget their life and begin anew. Lastly, his father shows him all of the future heroes of Rome who will live if Aeneas fulfills his destiny in founding the city.

Other eschatological views populate the ancient-Greek worldview. For instance, Plato argued for reincarnation in several dialogues, including the Timaeus.[26]

Norse religion

[edit]

The Poetic and Prose Eddas, the oldest sources for information on the Norse concept of the afterlife, vary in their description of the several realms that are described as falling under this topic. The most well-known are:

  • Valhalla: (lit. "Hall of the Slain" i.e. "the Chosen Ones") Half the warriors who die in battle join the god Odin who rules over a majestic hall called Valhalla in Asgard.[27]
  • Fólkvangr: (lit. "Field of the Host") The other half join the goddess Freyja in a great meadow known as Fólkvangr.[28]
  • Niflhel: (lit. "The Dark" or "Misty Hel"). Niflhel is believed to be a place of punishment, where the oathbreakers and other wicked people go.
  • Hel: (lit. "The Covered Hall"). Hel was the daughter of god Loki and her kingdom was located in downward and northward. Snorri Sturluson's Gylfaginning tells of evil men going to Niflhel via Hel.

Abrahamic religions

[edit]

Judaism

[edit]

Sheol

[edit]

Sheol, in the Hebrew Bible, is a place of darkness (Job x. 21, 22) to which all the dead go, both the righteous and the unrighteous, regardless of the moral choices made in life (Gen. xxxvii. 36; Ezek. xxxii.; Isa. xiv.; Job xxx. 23), a place of stillness (Ps. lxxxviii. 13, xciv. 17; Eccl. ix. 10), at the longest possible distance from heaven (Job xi. 8; Amos ix. 2; Ps. cxxxix. 8).[29]

The inhabitants of Sheol were the "shades" (rephaim), entities without personality or strength. Under some circumstances they were thought to be able to be contacted by the living, as the Witch of Endor contacts the shade of Samuel for Saul, but such practices were forbidden (Deuteronomy 18:10).[30]

While the Hebrew Bible appears to describe Sheol as the permanent place of the dead, in the Second Temple period (roughly 500 BC – 70 AD) a more diverse set of ideas developed. In some texts, Sheol is considered to be the home of both the righteous and the wicked, separated into respective compartments; in others, it was considered a place of punishment, meant for the wicked dead alone.[31] When the Hebrew scriptures were translated into Greek in ancient Alexandria around 200 BC, the word "Hades" (the Greek underworld) was substituted for Sheol. This is reflected in the New Testament where Hades is both the underworld of the dead and the personification of the evil it represents.[31][32]

World to Come

[edit]

The Talmud offers several thoughts relating to the afterlife. After death, the soul is brought for judgment. Those who have led pristine lives enter immediately into the Olam Haba or world to come. Most do not enter the world to come immediately, but experience a period of reflection of their earthly actions and are made aware of what they have done wrong. Some view this period as being a "re-schooling", with the soul gaining wisdom as one's errors are reviewed. Others view this period to include spiritual discomfort for past wrongs. At the end of this period, not longer than one year, the soul then takes its place in the world to come. Although discomforts are made part of certain Jewish conceptions of the afterlife, the concept of eternal damnation is not a tenet of the Jewish afterlife. According to the Talmud, extinction of the soul is reserved for a far smaller group of malicious and evil leaders, either whose very evil deeds go way beyond norms, or who lead large groups of people to utmost evil.[33][34] This is also part of Maimonides' 13 principles of faith.[35]

Maimonides describes the Olam Haba in spiritual terms, relegating the prophesied physical resurrection to the status of a future miracle, unrelated to the afterlife or the Messianic era. According to Maimonides, an afterlife continues for the soul of every human being, a soul now separated from the body in which it was "housed" during its earthly existence.[36]

The Zohar describes Gehenna not as a place of punishment for the wicked but as a place of spiritual purification for souls.[37]

Reincarnation in Jewish tradition

[edit]

Although there is no reference to reincarnation in the Talmud or any prior writings,[38] according to rabbis such as Avraham Arieh Trugman, reincarnation is recognized as being part and parcel of Jewish tradition. Trugman explains that it is through oral tradition that the meanings of the Torah, its commandments and stories, are known and understood. The classic work of Jewish mysticism,[39] the Zohar, is quoted liberally in all Jewish learning; in the Zohar the idea of reincarnation is mentioned repeatedly. Trugman states that in the last five centuries the concept of reincarnation, which until then had been a much hidden tradition within Judaism, was given open exposure.[39]

Shraga Simmons commented that within the Bible itself, the idea [of reincarnation] is intimated in Deut. 25:5–10, Deut. 33:6 and Isaiah 22:14, 65:6.[40]

Yirmiyahu Ullman wrote that reincarnation is an "ancient, mainstream belief in Judaism". The Zohar makes frequent and lengthy references to reincarnation. Onkelos, a righteous convert and authoritative commentator of the same period, explained the verse, "Let Reuben live and not die ..." (Deuteronomy 33:6) to mean that Reuben should merit the World to Come directly, and not have to die again as a result of being reincarnated. Torah scholar, commentator and kabbalist, Nachmanides (Ramban 1195–1270), attributed Job's suffering to reincarnation, as hinted in Job's saying "God does all these things twice or three times with a man, to bring back his soul from the pit to... the light of the living' (Job 33:29, 30)."[41]

Reincarnation, called gilgul, became popular in folk belief, and is found in much Yiddish literature among Ashkenazi Jews. Among a few kabbalists, it was posited that some human souls could end up being reincarnated into non-human bodies. These ideas were found in a number of Kabbalistic works from the 13th century, and also among many mystics in the late 16th century. Martin Buber's early collection of stories of the Baal Shem Tov's life includes several that refer to people reincarnating in successive lives.[42]

Among well known (generally non-kabbalist or anti-kabbalist) rabbis who rejected the idea of reincarnation are Saadia GaonDavid KimhiHasdai Crescas, Yedayah Bedershi (early 14th century), Joseph AlboAbraham ibn Daud, the Rosh and Leon de Modena. Saadia Gaon, in Emunoth ve-Deoth (Hebrew: "beliefs and opinions") concludes Section VI with a refutation of the doctrine of metempsychosis (reincarnation). While rebutting reincarnation, Saadia Gaon further states that Jews who hold to reincarnation have adopted non-Jewish beliefs. By no means do all Jews today believe in reincarnation, but belief in reincarnation is not uncommon among many Jews, including Orthodox.

Other well-known rabbis who are reincarnationists include Yonassan GershomAbraham Isaac Kook, Talmud scholar Adin Steinsaltz, DovBer Pinson, David M. Wexelman, Zalman Schachter,[43] and many others. Reincarnation is cited by authoritative biblical commentators, including Ramban (Nachmanides), Menachem Recanti and Rabbenu Bachya.

Among the many volumes of Yitzchak Luria, most of which come down from the pen of his primary disciple, Chaim Vital, are insights explaining issues related to reincarnation. His Shaar HaGilgulim, "The Gates of Reincarnation", is a book devoted exclusively to the subject of reincarnation in Judaism.

Rabbi Naftali Silberberg of The Rohr Jewish Learning Institute notes that "Many ideas that originate in other religions and belief systems have been popularized in the media and are taken for granted by unassuming Jews."[44]

Christianity

[edit]

Mainstream Christianity professes belief in the Nicene Creed, and English versions of the Nicene Creed in current use include the phrase: "We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come."

When questioned by the Sadducees about the resurrection of the dead (in a context relating to who one's spouse would be if one had been married several times in life), Jesus said that marriage will be irrelevant after the resurrection as the resurrected will be like the angels in heaven.[45][46]

Jesus also maintained that the time would come when the dead would hear the voice of the Son of God, and all who were in the tombs would come out; those who have heard His "[commandments] and believes in the one who sent [Him]" to the resurrection of life, but those who do not to the resurrection of condemnation.[47]

The Book of Enoch describes Sheol as divided into four compartments for four types of the dead: the faithful saints who await resurrection in Paradise, the merely virtuous who await their reward, the wicked who await punishment, and the wicked who have already been punished and will not be resurrected on Judgment Day.[48] The Book of Enoch is considered apocryphal by most denominations of Christianity and Judaism.

The book of 2 Maccabees gives a clear account of the dead awaiting a future resurrection and judgment in addition to prayers and offerings for the dead to remove the burden of sin.

Domenico Beccafumi's Inferno: a Christian vision of hell

The author of Luke recounts the story of Lazarus and the rich man, which shows people in Hades awaiting the resurrection either in comfort or torment. The author of the Book of Revelation John, writes about God and the angels versus Satan and demons in an epic battle at the end of times when all souls are judged. There is mention of ghostly bodies of past prophets, and the transfiguration.

The non-canonical Acts of Paul and Thecla speak of the efficacy of prayer for the dead so that they might be "translated to a state of happiness".[49]

Hippolytus of Rome pictures the underworld (Hades) as a place where the righteous dead, awaiting in the bosom of Abraham their resurrection, rejoice at their future prospect, while the unrighteous are tormented at the sight of the "lake of unquenchable fire" into which they are destined to be cast.

Gregory of Nyssa discusses the long-before believed possibility of purification of souls after death.[50]

Pope Gregory I repeats the concept, articulated over a century earlier by Gregory of Nyssa that the saved suffer purification after death, in connection with which he wrote of "purgatorial flames".

The noun "purgatorium" (Latin: place of cleansing[51]) is used for the first time to describe a state of painful purification of the saved after life. The same word in adjectival form (purgatorius -a -um, cleansing), which appears also in non-religious writing,[52] was already used by Christians such as Augustine of Hippo and Pope Gregory I to refer to an after-death cleansing.

During the Age of Enlightenment, theologians and philosophers presented various philosophies and beliefs. A notable example is Emanuel Swedenborg who wrote some 18 theological works which describe in detail the nature of the afterlife according to his claimed spiritual experiences, the most famous of which is Heaven and Hell.[53] His report of life there covers a wide range of topics, such as marriage in heaven (where all angels are married), children in heaven (where they are raised by angel parents), time and space in heaven (there are none), the after-death awakening process in the World of Spirits (a place halfway between Heaven and Hell and where people first wake up after death), the allowance of a free will choice between Heaven or Hell (as opposed to being sent to either one by God), the eternity of Hell (one could leave but would never want to), and that all angels or devils were once people on earth.[53]

The Catholic Church

[edit]

The Catholic conception of the afterlife teaches that after the body dies, the soul is judged, the righteous and free of sin enter Heaven. However, those who die in unrepented mortal sin go to hell. In the 1990s, the Catechism of the Catholic Church defined hell not as punishment imposed on the sinner but rather as the sinner's self-exclusion from God. Unlike other Christian groups, the Catholic Church teaches that those who die in a state of grace, but still carry venial sin, go to a place called Purgatory where they undergo purification to enter Heaven.

Limbo

[edit]

Despite popular opinion, Limbo, which was elaborated upon by theologians beginning in the Middle Ages, was never recognized as a dogma of the Catholic Church, yet, at times, it has been a very popular theological theory within the Church. Limbo is a theory that unbaptized but innocent souls, such as those of infants, virtuous individuals who lived before Jesus Christ was born on earth, or those that die before baptism exist in neither Heaven nor Hell proper. Therefore, these souls neither merit the beatific vision, nor are subjected to any punishment, because they are not guilty of any personal sin although they have not received baptism, so still bear original sin. So they are generally seen as existing in a state of natural, but not supernatural, happiness, until the end of time.

In other Christian denominations it has been described as an intermediate place or state of confinement in oblivion and neglect.[54]

Purgatory

[edit]

The notion of purgatory is associated particularly with the Catholic Church. In the Catholic Church, all those who die in God's grace and friendship, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven or the final purification of the elect, which is entirely different from the punishment of the damned. The tradition of the church, by reference to certain texts of scripture, speaks of a "cleansing fire" although it is not always called purgatory.

Anglicans of the Anglo-Catholic tradition generally also hold to the belief. John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, believed in an intermediate state between death and the resurrection of the dead and in the possibility of "continuing to grow in holiness there", but Methodism does not officially affirm this belief and denies the possibility of helping by prayer any who may be in that state.[55]

Orthodox Christianity

[edit]

The Orthodox Church is intentionally reticent on the afterlife, as it acknowledges the mystery especially of things that have not yet occurred. Beyond the second coming of Jesus, bodily resurrection, and final judgment, all of which is affirmed in the Nicene Creed (325 AD), Orthodoxy does not teach much else in any definitive manner. Unlike Western forms of Christianity, however, Orthodoxy is traditionally non-dualist and does not teach that there are two separate literal locations of heaven and hell, but instead acknowledges that "the 'location' of one's final destiny—heaven or hell—as being figurative."[56]

Instead, Orthodoxy teaches that the final judgment is one's uniform encounter with divine love and mercy, but this encounter is experienced multifariously depending on the extent to which one has been transformed, partaken of divinity, and is therefore compatible or incompatible with God. "The monadic, immutable, and ceaseless object of eschatological encounter is therefore the love and mercy of God, his glory which infuses the heavenly temple, and it is the subjective human reaction which engenders multiplicity or any division of experience."[56] For instance, St. Isaac the Syrian observes in his Ascetical Homilies that "those who are punished in Gehenna, are scourged by the scourge of love. ... The power of love works in two ways: it torments sinners ... [as] bitter regret. But love inebriates the souls of the sons of Heaven by its delectability."[57] In this sense, the divine action is always, immutably, and uniformly love and if one experiences this love negatively, the experience is then one of self-condemnation because of free will rather than condemnation by God.

Orthodoxy therefore uses the description of Jesus' judgment in John 3:19–21 as their model: "19 And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. 20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. 21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God." As a characteristically Orthodox understanding, then, Fr. Thomas Hopko writes, "[I]t is precisely the presence of God's mercy and love which cause the torment of the wicked. God does not punish; he forgives... . In a word, God has mercy on all, whether all like it or not. If we like it, it is paradise; if we do not, it is hell. Every knee will bend before the Lord. Everything will be subject to Him. God in Christ will indeed be "all and in all," with boundless mercy and unconditional pardon. But not all will rejoice in God's gift of forgiveness, and that choice will be judgment, the self-inflicted source of their sorrow and pain."[58]

Moreover, Orthodoxy includes a prevalent tradition of apokatastasis, or the restoration of all things in the end. This has been taught most notably by Origen, but also many other Church fathers and Saints, including Gregory of Nyssa. The Second Council of Constantinople (553 AD) affirmed the orthodoxy of Gregory of Nyssa while simultaneously condemning Origen's brand of universalism because it taught the restoration back to our pre-existent state, which Orthodoxy does not teach. It is also a teaching of such eminent Orthodox theologians as Olivier Clément, Metropolitan Kallistos Ware, and Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev.[59] Although apokatastasis is not a dogma of the church but instead a theologoumenon, it is no less a teaching of the Orthodox Church than its rejection. As Met. Kallistos Ware explains, "It is heretical to say that all must be saved, for this is to deny free will; but, it is legitimate to hope that all may be saved,"[60] as insisting on torment without end also denies free will.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

[edit]
Plan of Salvation in LDS Religion

Joseph F. Smith of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints presents an elaborate vision of the afterlife. It is revealed as the scene of an extensive missionary effort by righteous spirits in paradise to redeem those still in darkness—a spirit prison or "hell" where the spirits of the dead remain until judgment. It is divided into two parts: Spirit Prison and Paradise. Together these are also known as the Spirit World (also Abraham's Bosom; see Luke 16:19–25). They believe that Christ visited spirit prison (1 Peter 3:18–20) and opened the gate for those who repent to cross over to Paradise. This is similar to the Harrowing of Hell doctrine of some mainstream Christian faiths.[61] Both Spirit Prison and Paradise are temporary according to Latter-day Saint beliefs. After the resurrection, spirits are assigned "permanently" to three degrees of heavenly glory, determined by how they lived – Celestial, Terrestrial, and Telestial. (1 Cor 15:44–42; Doctrine and Covenants, Section 76) Sons of Perdition, or those who have known and seen God and deny it, will be sent to the realm of Satan, which is called Outer Darkness, where they shall live in misery and agony forever.[62] However, according to the beliefs of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, most persons lack the amount of knowledge to commit the Eternal sin and are therefore incapable of becoming sons of perdition.[63]

The Celestial Kingdom is believed to be a place where the righteous can live eternally with their families. Progression does not end once one has entered the Celestial Kingdom, but extends eternally. According to "True to the Faith" (a handbook on doctrines in the LDS faith), "The celestial kingdom is the place prepared for those who have "received the testimony of Jesus" and been "made perfect through Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, who wrought out this perfect atonement through the shedding of his own blood" (Doctrine and Covenants, 76:51, 69). To inherit this gift, we must receive the ordinances of salvation, keep the commandments, and repent of our sins."[64]

Jehovah's Witnesses

[edit]

Jehovah's Witnesses occasionally use terms such as "afterlife"[65] to refer to any hope for the dead, but they understand Ecclesiastes 9:5 to preclude belief in an immortal soul.[66] Individuals judged by God to be wicked, such as in the Great Flood or at Armageddon, are given no hope of an afterlife. However, they believe that after Armageddon there will be a bodily resurrection of "both righteous and unrighteous" dead (but not the "wicked"). Survivors of Armageddon and those who are resurrected are then to gradually restore earth to a paradise.[67] After Armageddon, unrepentant sinners are punished with eternal death (non-existence).

Seventh-day Adventists

[edit]
Creation and Death Equation

The Seventh-day Adventist Church's beliefs regarding the afterlife differ from other Christian churches. Rather than ascend to Heaven or descend to Hell, Adventists believe the dead "remain unconscious until the return of Christ in judgement". The concept that the dead remain dead until resurrection is one of the fundamental beliefs of Seventh-day Adventism.[68] Adventists believe that death is an unconscious state (a "sleep"). This is based on Matt. 9:24; Mark 5:39; John 11:11–14; 1 Cor. 15:51, 52; 1 Thess. 4:13–17; 2 Peter 3:4; Eccl. 9:5, 6, 10. At death, all consciousness ends. The dead person does not know anything and does not do anything.[69] They believe that death is a decreation, or an undoing of what was created. This is described in Ecclesiastes 12:7: "When a person dies, the body turns to dust again, and the spirit goes back to God, who gave it." The spirit of every person who dies—whether saved or unsaved—returns to God at death. The spirit that returns to God at death is the breath of life.[70]

Islam

[edit]

The Quran (the holy book of Islam) emphasizes the insignificance of worldly life (ḥayāt ad-dunyā usually translated as "this world") vis-a-vis the hereafter.[Note 1] A central doctrine of Islamic faith is the Judgement Day (al-yawm al-ākhir, also known by other names),[Note 2] on which the world will come to an end and God will raise all mankind (as well as the jinn) from the dead and evaluate their worldly actions. The resurrected will be judged according to their deeds, records of which are kept on two books compiled for every human being—one for their good deeds and one for their evil ones.[72][46]

Having been judged, the resurrected will cross the bridge of As-Sirāt over the pit of hell; when the condemned attempt to they will be made to fall off into hellfire below, while the righteous will have no trouble and continue on to their eternal abode of heaven.[73]

Afterlife in Islam actually begins before the Last Day. After death, humans will be questioned about their faith by two angels, Munkar and Nakīr. Those who die as martyrs go immediately to paradise.[72] Others who have died and been buried will receive a taste of their eternal reward from the al-qabr or "the grave" (compare the Jewish concept of Sheol). Those bound for hell will suffer "Punishment of the Grave", while those bound for heaven will find the grave "peaceful and blessed".[74]

Islamic scripture—the Quran and hadith (reports of the words and deeds of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad who is believed to have visited heaven and hell during his Isra and Mi'raj journey) – give vivid descriptions of the pleasures of paradise (Jannah) and sufferings of hell (Jahannam). The gardens of jannah have cool shade [Quran 36:56–57] adorned couchs and cushions 18:31] rich carpets spread out, cups 88:10–16] full of wine 52:23] and every meat 52:22] and fruit 36:56–57]. Men will be provided with perpetually youthful, beautiful ḥūr, "untouched beforehand by man or jinn",[75]55:56] with large, beautiful eyes 37:48]. (In recent years some have argued that the term ḥūr refers both to pure men and pure women,[76] and/or that Quranic references to "immortal boys" (56:1776:19) or "young men" (52:24) (ghilmānwildān, and suqāh) who serve wine and meals to the blessed, are the male equivalents of hur.)[75]

In contrast, those in Jahannam will dwell in a land infested with thousands of serpents and scorpions;[77] be "burnt" by "scorching fire" 88:1-7] and when "their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins" to repeat the process forever 4:56]; they will have nothing to drink but "boiling water and running sores"78:21–30];[78] their cries of remorse and pleading for forgiveness will be in vain26:96–106].[79][80]

Traditionally Jannah and Jahannam are thought to have different levels. Eight gates and eight levels in Jannah, where the higher the level the better it is and the happier you are. Jahannam possess seven layers. Each layer more horrible than the one above.

The Quran teaches that the purpose of Man's creation is to worship God and God alone.[Note 3] Those it describes as being punished in hell are "most typically" unbelievers, including those who worship others besides Allah 10:24], those who deny the divine origin of the Quran 74:16–26], or the coming of Judgement Day 25:11–14].[81][82]: 404 

Straightforward crimes/sins against other people are also grounds for going to hell: the murder of a believer 4:93]3:21], usury (Q.2:275)2:275], devouring the property of an orphan 4:10], and slander [Quran 104], particularly of a chaste woman 24:23].[83] However, it is a common belief among Muslims that whatever crimes/sins Muslims may have committed, their punishment in hell will be temporary. Only unbelievers will reside in hell permanently.[84][Note 4] Thus Jahannam combines both the concept of an eternal hell (for unbelievers), and what is known in Christian Catholicism as purgatory (for believers eventually destined for heaven after punishment for their sins).[87]

The common belief holds that Jahannam coexists with the temporal world.[88] Mainstream Islam teaches the continued existence of the soul and a transformed physical existence after death. The resurrection that will take place on the Last Day is physical, and is explained by suggesting that God will re-create the decayed body ("Have they not realized that Allah, Who created the heavens and the earth, can ˹easily˺ re-create them?" 17:99]).

Ahmadiyya

[edit]

Ahmadi Muslims believe that the afterlife is not material but of a spiritual nature. According to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, founder of the Ahmadiyya, the soul will give birth to another rarer entity and will resemble the life on this earth in the sense that this entity will bear a similar relationship to the soul as the soul bears relationship with the human existence on earth. On earth, if a person leads a righteous life and submits to the will of God, his or her tastes become attuned to enjoying spiritual pleasures as opposed to carnal desires. With this, an "embryonic soul" begins to take shape. Different tastes are said to be born which a person given to carnal passions finds no enjoyment. For example, sacrifice of one's own rights over that of others becomes enjoyable, or that forgiveness becomes second nature. In such a state a person finds contentment and peace at heart and at this stage, according to Ahmadiyya beliefs, it can be said that a soul within the soul has begun to take shape.[89]

Sufism

[edit]

The Sufi Muslim scholar Ibn 'Arabi defined Barzakh as the intermediate realm or "isthmus". It is between the world of corporeal bodies and the world of spirits, and is a means of contact between the two worlds. Without it, there would be no contact between the two and both would cease to exist. He described it as simple and luminous, like the world of spirits, but also able to take on many different forms just like the world of corporeal bodies can. In broader terms Barzakh, "is anything that separates two things". It has been called the dream world in which the dreamer is in both life and death.[90]

Baháʼí Faith

[edit]

The teachings of the Baháʼí Faith state that the nature of the afterlife is beyond the understanding of those living, just as an unborn fetus cannot understand the nature of the world outside of the womb. The Baháʼí writings state that the soul is immortal and after death it will continue to progress until it finally attains God's presence.[91] In Baháʼí belief, souls in the afterlife will continue to retain their individuality and consciousness and will be able to recognize and communicate spiritually with other souls whom they have made deep profound friendships with, such as their spouses.[92]

The Baháʼí scriptures also state there are distinctions between souls in the afterlife, and that souls will recognize the worth of their own deeds and understand the consequences of their actions. It is explained that those souls that have turned toward God will experience gladness, while those who have lived in error will become aware of the opportunities they have lost. Also, in the Baháʼí view, souls will be able to recognize the accomplishments of the souls that have reached the same level as themselves, but not those that have achieved a rank higher than them.[92]

Indian religions

[edit]

Early Indian religions were characterized by the belief in an afterlife, Ancestor worship, and related rites. These concepts started to significantly change after the period of the Upanishads.[93]

Buddhism

[edit]

Afterlife in Buddhism consists of intermediated spirit realm that's beyond spatial means, which includes the six realms of existence, the 31 planes of existence, Naraka, Tengoku and the pure land after achieving enlightenmentAncestor worship, and links to one's ancestors, was once an important component of early Buddhism, but became less relevant already before the formation of the different Buddhist streams. The concepts and importance of afterlife vary among modern Buddhist teachings.[94][95]

Buddhists maintain that rebirth takes place without an unchanging self or soul passing from one form to another.[96] The type of rebirth will be conditioned by the moral tone of the person's actions (kamma or karma). For example, if a person has committed harmful actions by body, speech and mind based on greed, hate and delusion, would have his/her rebirth in a lower realm, i.e. an animal, a hungry ghost or a hell realm, is to be expected. On the other hand, where a person has performed skillful actions based on generosity, loving-kindness (metta), compassion and wisdom, rebirth in a happy realm, i.e. human or one of the many heavenly realms, can be expected.[97]

However, the mechanism of rebirth with Kamma is not deterministic. It depends on various levels of kamma. The most important moment that determines where a person is reborn into is the last thought moment. At that moment, heavy kamma would ripen if there were performed. If not, near death kamma would ripen, and if not death kamma, then habitual kamma would ripen. Finally if none of the above happened, then residual kamma from previous actions can ripen.[98] According to Theravada Buddhism, there are 31 realms of existence that one can be reborn into. According to these, 31 existences comprise 20 existences of supreme deities (Brahmas); 6 existences of deities (Devas); the human existence (Manussa); and, lastly, 4 existences of deprivation or unhappiness (Apaya).

Pure Land Buddhism of Mahayana believes in a special place apart from the 31 planes of existence called Pure Land. It is believed that each Buddha has their own pure land, created out of their merits for the sake of sentient beings who recall them mindfully to be able to be reborn in their pure land and train to become a Buddha there. Thus the main practice of pure land Buddhism is to chant a Buddha's name.

In Tibetan Buddhism the Tibetan Book of the Dead explains the intermediate state of humans between death and reincarnation. The deceased will find the bright light of wisdom, which shows a straightforward path to move upward and leave the cycle of reincarnation. There are various reasons why the deceased do not follow that light. Some had no briefing about the intermediate state in the former life. Others only used to follow their basic instincts like animals. And some have fear, which results from foul deeds in the former life or from insistent haughtiness. In the intermediate state the awareness is very flexible, so it is important to be virtuous, adopt a positive attitude, and avoid negative ideas. Ideas which are rising from subconsciousness can cause extreme tempers and cowing visions. In this situation they have to understand, that these manifestations are just reflections of the inner thoughts. No one can really hurt them, because they have no more material body. The deceased get help from different Buddhas who show them the path to the bright light. The ones who do not follow the path after all will get hints for a better reincarnation. They have to release the things and beings on which or whom they still hang from the life before. It is recommended to choose a family where the parents trust in the Dharma and to reincarnate with the will to care for the welfare of all beings.

Hinduism

[edit]

There are two major views of an afterlife in Hinduism: mythical and philosophical. The philosophies of Hinduism consider each individual consists of three bodies: physical body compose of water and bio-matter (sthūla śarīra), an energetic/psychic/mental/subtle body (sūkṣma-śarīra) and a causal body (kāraṇa śarīra) comprising subliminal stuff i.e. mental impressions etc.[99]

The individual is a stream of consciousness (Ātman), which flows through all the physical changes of the body and at the death of the physical body, flows on into another physical body. The two components that transmigrate are the subtle body and the causal body.

The thought that occupies the mind at the time of death determines the quality of our rebirth (antim smaraṇa)[1], hence Hinduism advises to be mindful of one's thoughts and cultivate positive wholesome thoughts – mantra chanting (japa) is commonly practiced for this.

The mythical includes the philosophical but adds heaven and hell myths.

When one leaves the physical body at death he appears in the court of Yama, the God of Death, for an exit interview. The panel consists of Yama and Chitragupta – the cosmic accountant, he has a book which consists the history of the dead persons according to his/her mistakes the Yama decides the punishment is and Varuna, the cosmic intelligence officer. He is counseled about his life, achievements and failures and is shown a mirror in which his entire life is reflected. Philosophically, these three men are projections of one's mind. Yama sends him to a heavenly realm (Svarga) if he has been exceptionally benevolent and beneficent for a period of rest and recreation. His period is limited in time by the weight of his good deeds. If he has been exceptionally malevolent and caused immense suffering to other beings, then he is sent to a hell realm (Naraka) for his sins. After one has exhausted his karma, he takes birth again to continue his spiritual evolution. However, the belief in rebirth was not a part of early Vedic religions and texts. It was later developed by rishis (sages) who challenged the idea of one's life as being simplistic.

Rebirth can take place as a god (deva), a human (manuṣya) an animal (tiryak)—but it is generally taught that the spiritual evolution takes place from lower to higher species. In certain cases of traumatic death a person can take the form of a preta or hungry ghost – and remains in an earth-bound state interminably – until certain ceremonies are done to liberate them. This mythological part is extensively elaborated in the Puranas, especially in the Garuda Purana.

The Upanishads are the first scriptures in Hinduism which explicitly mention the afterlife.[100] The Bhagavad Gita, a famous Hindu scripture, says that just as a man discards his old clothes and wears new ones; similarly the Atman discards the old body and takes on a new one. In Hinduism, the belief is that the body is nothing but a shell, the consciousness inside is immutable and indestructible and takes on different lives in a cycle of birth and death. The end of this cycle is called mukti (Sanskritमुक्ति) and staying finally with the ultimate reality forever is moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्ष) or liberation.

The (diverse) views of modern Hinduism in part differ significantly from the Historical Vedic religion.[94]

Jainism

[edit]

Jainism also believes in the afterlife. They believe that the soul takes on a body form based on previous karmas or actions performed by that soul through eternity. Jains believe the soul is eternal and that the freedom from the cycle of reincarnation is the means to attain eternal bliss.[101]

Sikhism

[edit]

The essential doctrine of Sikhism is to experience the divine through simple living, meditation, and contemplation while being alive. Sikhism also has the belief of being in union with God while living. Accounts of afterlife are considered to be aimed at the popular prevailing views of the time so as to provide a referential framework without necessarily establishing a belief in the afterlife. Thus while it is also acknowledged that living the life of a householder is above the metaphysical truth, Sikhism can be considered agnostic to the question of an afterlife. Some scholars also interpret the mention of reincarnation to be naturalistic akin to the biogeochemical cycles.[102]

But if one analyses the Sikh Scriptures carefully, one may find that on many occasions the afterlife and the existence of heaven and hell are mentioned and criticised in Guru Granth Sahib and in Dasam Granth as non-true man made ideas, so from that it can be concluded that Sikhism does not believe in the existence of heaven and hell; however, heaven and hell are created to temporarily reward and punish, and one will then take birth again until one merges in God. According to the Sikh scriptures, the human form is the closet form to God if the Guru is read and understood,[103][104] and the best opportunity for a human being to attain salvation and merge back with God and fully understand Him. Sikh Gurus said that nothing dies, nothing is born, everything is ever present, and it just changes forms. Like standing in front of a wardrobe, you pick up a dress and wear it and then you discard it. You wear another one. Thus, in the view of Sikhism, your soul is never born and never dies. Your soul is a part of God and hence lives forever.[105]

Others

[edit]

Confucianism

[edit]

Confucius did not directly discuss the afterlife. Nonetheless, Chinese folk religion has had a strong influence on Confucianism, so adherents believe that their ancestors become deified spirits after death.[106] Ancestor veneration in China is widespread.

Gnosticism

[edit]

In Gnostic teachings humans contain a divine spark within them said to have been trapped in their bodies by the creator of the material universe known as the Demiurge. It was believed that this spark could be released from the material world and enter into the heavenly spiritual world beyond it if special knowledge or gnosis was attained.[107] The Cathars, for example, viewed reincarnation as a trap made by Satan, who tricked angels from the heavenly realm into entering the physical bodies of humans. They viewed the purpose of life as a way to escape the constant cycle of spiritual incarnations by letting go of worldly attachments.[108]

Shinto

[edit]

It is common for families to participate in ceremonies for children at a shrine, yet have a Buddhist funeral at the time of death. In old Japanese legends, it is often claimed that the dead go to a place called yomi (黄泉), a gloomy underground realm with a river separating the living from the dead mentioned in the legend of Izanami and Izanagi. This yomi very closely resembles the Greek Hades; however, later myths include notions of resurrection and even Elysium-like descriptions such as in the legend of Ōkuninushi and Susanoo. Shinto tends to hold negative views on death and corpses as a source of pollution called kegare. However, death is also viewed as a path towards apotheosis in Shintoism as can be evidenced by how legendary individuals become enshrined after death. Perhaps the most famous would be Emperor Ōjin who was enshrined as Hachiman the God of War after his death.[109]

Spiritualism

[edit]

According to Edgar Cayce, the afterlife consisted of nine realms equated with the nine planets of astrology. The first, symbolized by Saturn, was a level for the purification of the souls. The second, Mercury's realm, gives us the ability to consider problems as a whole. The third of the nine soul realms is ruled by Earth and is associated with the Earthly pleasures. The fourth realm is where we find out about love and is ruled by Venus. The fifth realm is where we meet our limitations and is ruled by Mars. The sixth realm is ruled by Neptune, and is where we begin to use our creative powers and free ourselves from the material world. The seventh realm is symbolized by Jupiter, which strengthens the soul's ability to depict situations, to analyze people and places, things, and conditions. The eighth afterlife realm is ruled by Uranus and develops psychic ability. The ninth afterlife realm is symbolized by Pluto, the astrological realm of the unconscious. This afterlife realm is a transient place where souls can choose to travel to other realms or other solar systems, it is the soul's liberation into eternity, and is the realm that opens the doorway from our solar system into the cosmos point of view.[110]

Mainstream Spiritualists postulate a series of seven realms that are not unlike Edgar Cayce's nine realms ruled by the planets. As it evolves, the soul moves higher and higher until it reaches the ultimate realm of spiritual oneness. The first realm, equated with hell, is the place where troubled souls spend a long time before they are compelled to move up to the next level. The second realm, where most souls move directly, is thought of as an intermediate transition between the lower planes of life and hell and the higher perfect realms of the universe. The third level is for those who have worked with their karmic inheritance. The fourth level is that from which evolved souls teach and direct those on Earth. The fifth level is where the soul leaves human consciousness behind. At the sixth plane, the soul is finally aligned with the cosmic consciousness and has no sense of separateness or individuality. Finally, the seventh level, the goal of each soul, is where the soul transcends its own sense of "soulfulness" and reunites with the World Soul and the universe.[110]

Taoism

[edit]

Taoism views life as an illusion and death as a transformation into immortality. Taoists believe that immortality of the soul can be achieved by living a virtuous life in harmony with the Tao. They are taught not to fear death, as it is simply part of nature.[111]

Traditional African religions

[edit]

Traditional African religions are diverse in their beliefs in an afterlife. Hunter-gatherer societies such as the Hadza have no particular belief in an afterlife, and the death of an individual is a straightforward end to their existence.[112] Ancestor cults are found throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, including cultures like the Yombe,[113] Beng,[114] Yoruba and Ewe, "[T]he belief that the dead come back into life and are reborn into their families is given concrete expression in the personal names that are given to children....What is reincarnated are some of the dominant characteristics of the ancestor and not his soul. For each soul remains distinct and each birth represents a new soul."[115] The Yoruba, Dogon and LoDagoa have eschatological ideas similar to Abrahamic religions, "but in most African societies, there is a marked absence of such clear-cut notions of heaven and hell, although there are notions of God judging the soul after death."[115] In some societies like the Mende, multiple beliefs coexist. The Mende believe that people die twice: once during the process of joining the secret society, and again during biological death after which they become ancestors. However, some Mende also believe that after people are created by God they live ten consecutive lives, each in progressively descending worlds.[116] One cross-cultural theme is that the ancestors are part of the world of the living, interacting with it regularly.[117][118][119]

Unitarian Universalism

[edit]

Some Unitarian Universalists believe in universalism: that all souls will ultimately be saved and that there are no torments of hell.[120] Unitarian Universalists differ widely in their theology hence there is no exact same stance on the issue.[121] Although Unitarians historically believed in a literal hell, and Universalists historically believed that everyone goes to heaven, modern Unitarian Universalists can be categorized into those believing in a heaven, reincarnation and oblivion. Most Unitarian Universalists believe that heaven and hell are symbolic places of consciousness and the faith is largely focused on the worldly life rather than any possible afterlife.[122]

Wicca

[edit]

The Wiccan afterlife is most commonly described as The Summerland. Here, souls rest, recuperate from life, and reflect on the experiences they had during their lives. After a period of rest, the souls are reincarnated, and the memory of their previous lives is erased. Many Wiccans see The Summerland as a place to reflect on their life actions. It is not a place of reward, but rather the end of a life journey at an end point of incarnations.[123]

Zoroastrianism

[edit]

Zoroastrianism states that the urvan, the disembodied spirit, lingers on earth for three days before departing downward to the kingdom of the dead that is ruled by Yima. For the three days that it rests on Earth, righteous souls sit at the head of their body, chanting the Ustavaiti Gathas with joy, while a wicked person sits at the feet of the corpse, wails and recites the Yasna. Zoroastrianism states that for the righteous souls, a beautiful maiden, which is the personification of the soul's good thoughts, words and deeds, appears. For a wicked person, a very old, ugly, naked hag appears. After three nights, the soul of the wicked is taken by the demon Vizaresa (Vīzarəša), to Chinvat bridge, and is made to go to darkness (hell).

Yima is believed to have been the first king on earth to rule, as well as the first man to die. Inside of Yima's realm, the spirits live a shadowy existence, and are dependent on their own descendants which are still living on Earth. Their descendants are to satisfy their hunger and clothe them, through rituals done on earth.

Rituals which are done on the first three days are vital and important, as they protect the soul from evil powers and give it strength to reach the underworld. After three days, the soul crosses Chinvat bridge which is the Final Judgment of the soul. Rashnu and Sraosha are present at the final judgment. The list is expanded sometimes, and include Vahman and OrmazdRashnu is the yazata who holds the scales of justice. If the good deeds of the person outweigh the bad, the soul is worthy of paradise. If the bad deeds outweigh the good, the bridge narrows down to the width of a blade-edge, and a horrid hag pulls the soul in her arms, and takes it down to hell with her.

Misvan Gatu is the "place of the mixed ones" where the souls lead a gray existence, lacking both joy and sorrow. A soul goes here if his/her good deeds and bad deeds are equal, and Rashnu's scale is equal.

Parapsychology

[edit]

The Society for Psychical Research was founded in 1882 with the express intention of investigating phenomena relating to Spiritualism and the afterlife. Its members continue to conduct scientific research on the paranormal to this day. Some of the earliest attempts to apply scientific methods to the study of phenomena relating to an afterlife were conducted by this organization. Its earliest members included noted scientists like William Crookes, and philosophers such as Henry Sidgwick and William James.[citation needed]

Parapsychological investigation of the afterlife includes the study of hauntingapparitions of the deceased, instrumental trans-communication, electronic voice phenomena, and mediumship.[124]

study conducted in 1901 by physician Duncan MacDougall sought to measure the weight lost by a human when the soul "departed the body" upon death.[125] MacDougall weighed dying patients in an attempt to prove that the soul was material, tangible and thus measurable. Although MacDougall's results varied considerably from "21 grams", for some people this figure has become synonymous with the measure of a soul's mass.[126] The title of the 2003 movie 21 Grams is a reference to MacDougall's findings. His results have never been reproduced, and are generally regarded either as meaningless or considered to have had little if any scientific merit.[127]

Frank Tipler has argued that physics can explain immortality, although such arguments are not falsifiable and, in Karl Popper's views, they do not qualify as science.[128]

After 25 years of parapsychological research Susan Blackmore came to the conclusion that, according to her experiences, there is not enough empirical evidence for many of these cases.[129][130]

Mediumship

[edit]

Mediums purportedly act as a vessel for communications from spirits in other realms. Mediumship is not specific to one culture or religion; it can be identified in several belief systems, most notably Spiritualism. While the practice gained popularity in Europe and North America in the 19th century, evidence of mediumship dates back thousands of years in Asia.[131][132][133] Mediums who claim to have contact with deceased people include Tyler Henry and Pascal Voggenhuber.

Near death research

[edit]

Research also includes the study of the near death experience. Scientists who have worked in this area include Elisabeth Kübler-RossRaymond MoodySam ParniaMichael SabomBruce GreysonPeter FenwickJeffrey LongSusan BlackmoreCharles TartWilliam JamesIan StevensonMichael PersingerPim van LommelPenny SartoriWalter van Laack among others.[134][135]

Past life regression

[edit]

Past life regression is a method that uses hypnosis to recover what practitioners believe are memories of past lives or incarnations. The technique used during past-life regression involves the subject answering a series of questions while hypnotized to reveal identity and events of alleged past lives, a method similar to that used in recovered memory therapy and one that, similarly, often misrepresents memory as a faithful recording of previous events rather than a constructed set of recollections.

However, medical experts and practitioners do not agree that the past life memories gained from past life regressions are truly from past lives; experts generally regard claims of recovered memories of past lives as fantasies or delusions or a type of confabulation, because the use of hypnosis and suggestive questions can tend to leave the subject particularly likely to hold distorted or false memories.[136][137][138]

Philosophy

[edit]

Modern philosophy

[edit]

There is a view based on the philosophical question of personal identity, termed open individualism by Daniel Kolak, that concludes that individual conscious experience is illusory, and because consciousness continues after death in all conscious beings, you do not die. This position has allegedly been supported by physicists such as Erwin Schrödinger and Freeman Dyson.[139]

Certain problems arise with the idea of a particular person continuing after death. Peter van Inwagen, in his argument regarding resurrection, notes that the materialist must have some sort of physical continuity.[140] John Hick also raises questions regarding personal identity in his book, Death and Eternal Life, using an example of a person ceasing to exist in one place while an exact replica appears in another. If the replica had all the same experiences, traits, and physical appearances of the first person, we would all attribute the same identity to the second, according to Hick.[141]

Process philosophy

[edit]

In the panentheistic model of process philosophy and theology the writers Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne rejected the idea that the universe was made of substance, instead saying reality is composed of living experiences (occasions of experience). According to Hartshorne people do not experience subjective (or personal) immortality in the afterlife, but they do have objective immortality because their experiences live on forever in God, who contains all that was. However other process philosophers such as David Ray Griffin have written that people may have subjective experience after death.[142][143][144][145]

Science

[edit]

Psychological proposals for the origin of a belief in an afterlife include cognitive disposition, cultural learning, and as an intuitive religious idea.[146]

In 2008, a large-scale study conducted by the University of Southampton involving 2,060 patients from 15 hospitals in the United Kingdom, United States and Austria was launched. The AWARE (AWAreness during REsuscitation) study examined the broad range of mental experiences in relation to death. In a large study, researchers also tested the validity of conscious experiences for the first time using objective markers, to determine whether claims of awareness compatible with out-of-body experiences correspond with real or hallucinatory events.[147] The results revealed that 40% of those who survived a cardiac arrest were aware during the time that they were clinically dead and before their hearts were restarted. One patient also had a verified out-of-body experience (over 80% of patients did not survive their cardiac arrest or were too sick to be interviewed), but his cardiac arrest occurred in a room without markers. Dr. Parnia in the interview stated, "The evidence thus far suggests that in the first few minutes after death, consciousness is not annihilated."[148] The AWARE study drew the following primary conclusions:

  1. In some cases of cardiac arrest, memories of visual awareness compatible with so called out-of-body experiences may correspond with actual events.
  2. A number of NDErs may have vivid death experiences, but do not recall them due to the effects of brain injury or sedative drugs on memory circuits.
  3. The recalled experience surrounding death merits a genuine investigation without prejudice.[149]

Studies have also been done on the widely reported phenomenon of near death experiences (NDE). Experiencers commonly report being transported to a different "realm" or "plane of existence" and they have been shown to display a lasting positive aftereffect on most experiencers.[150]

Under the theoretical framework of extended cognition, an organism's cognitive processes may exist beyond the physical body and persist even after death.[151]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]
  1. ^ some of the verses are:
    • "... but compared with the Hereafter the life of this world is but a [trifling] enjoyment" [Quran 13:26]
    • " ...The life of this world is nothing but the wares of delusion." [Quran 3:185–186]
    • " ...Know that the life of this world is mere diversion and play, glamour and mutual vainglory among you and rivalry for wealth and children" (Q.57:20)[Quran 57:20]
    • " ...Seek the abode of the Hereafter by means of what Allah has given you, while not forgetting your share of this world. [Quran 28:77]
  2. ^ The Last Day has a number of other names. It is also called the Encompassing Day (al-yawm al-muḥīṭ), more commonly known as the "Day of Resurrection" (yawm al-qiyāma), "Day of Judgment" (yawm ad-dīn), and "Day of Reckoning" (yawm al-ḥisāb), as well as both the "Day of Separation" (yawm al-faṣl) and "Day of Gathering" (yawm al-jamʿ), and is also referred to as as-Sāʿah, meaning "the Hour" signaled by the blowing of the horn/trumpet.[71]
  3. ^ "I have created the jinn and humankind only for My worship."51:56]
  4. ^ "One should note there was a near consensus among Muslim theologians of the later periods that punishment for Muslim grave sinners would only be temporary; eventually after a purgatory sojourn in hell's top layer they would be admitted into paradise."[85] Prior to that, theologians of the Kharijite and Mu'tazilite schools insisted that the "sinful" and "unrepentant" should be punished even if they were believers, but this position has been "lastingly defeated and erased" by mainstream Islam.[86]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Microsoft NewsNear-death experience expert says he’s proven there is an afterlife ‘without a doubt’. Retrieved 1 Sept., 2023
  2. ^ Aiken, Lewis R. (2000). Dying, death, and bereavement (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-585-30171-9OCLC 45729833.
  3. ^ Rita M. Gross (1993). Buddhism After Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of Buddhism. State University of New York Press. p. 148ISBN 978-1-4384-0513-1.
  4. ^ Anakwue, Nicholas Chukwudike (22 February 2018). "The African Origins of Greek Philosophy: Ancient Egypt in Retrospect"Phronimon18: 167–180. doi:10.25159/2413-3086/2361ISSN 2413-3086.
  5. ^ McClelland, Norman (2018). Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma. McFarland. pp. 1–320. ISBN 978-0786456758.
  6. ^ see Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, Philip L. Quinn, A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. John Wiley and Sons, 2010, p. 640, Google Books For Plato, see Kamtekar 2016 and Campbell 2022. Kamtekar, Rachana. "The Soul's (After-) Life," Ancient Philosophy 36 (2016): 1–18. Campbell, Douglas R. "Plato's Theory of Reincarnation: Eschatology and Natural Philosophy," Review of Metaphysics 75 4 (2022): 643–665.
  7. ^ Gananath Obeyesekere, Imagining Karma: Ethical Transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek Rebirth. University of California Press, 2002, p. 15.
  8. ^ Hitti, Philip K (2007) [1924]. Origins of the Druze People and Religion, with Extracts from their Sacred Writings (New Edition). Columbia University Oriental Studies. 28. London: Saqi. pp. 13–14. ISBN 0-86356-690-1
  9. Jump up to:a b Heindel, Max (1985) [1939, 1908] The Rosicrucian Christianity Lectures (Collected Works)The Riddle of Life and Death Archived 29 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Oceanside, California. 4th edition. ISBN 0-911274-84-7
  10. ^ An important recent work discussing the mutual influence of ancient Greek and Indian philosophy regarding these matters is The Shape of Ancient Thought by Thomas McEvilley.
  11. ^ Max Heindel, Death and Life in Purgatory Archived 11 July 2006 at the Wayback MachineLife and Activity in Heaven Archived 11 July 2006 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ "Life After Death Revealed – What Really Happens in the Afterlife"Spiritual Science Research FoundationArchived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
  13. ^ Somov, Alexey (2018). "Afterlife". In Hunter, David G.; van Geest, Paul J. J.; Lietaert Peerbolte, Bert Jan (eds.). Brill Encyclopedia of Early Christianity OnlineLeiden and BostonBrill Publishersdoi:10.1163/2589-7993_EECO_SIM_00000067ISSN 2589-7993.
  14. ^ Richard P. Taylor, Death and the afterlife: A Cultural Encyclopedia, ABC-CLIO, 2000, ISBN 0-87436-939-8
  15. ^ Bard, Katheryn (1999). Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. Routledge.
  16. ^ Kathryn Demeritt, Ptah's Travels: Kingdoms of Ancient Egypt, 2005, p. 82
  17. ^ Shushan, Gregory (2011). Conceptions of the Afterlife in Early Civilizations: Universalism, Constructivism and Near-Death Experience. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. p. 53. ISBN 9781441130884.
  18. ^ Glennys Howarth, Oliver Leaman, Encyclopedia of death and dying, 2001, p. 238
  19. ^ Natalie Lunis, Tut's Deadly Tomb, 2010, p. 11
  20. ^ Fergus Fleming, Alan Lothian, Ancient Egypt's Myths and Beliefs, 2011, p. 96
  21. ^ "Door to Afterlife found in Egyptian tomb". meeja.com.au. 30 March 2010. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 30 September 2008.
  22. ^ F. P. Retief and L. Cilliers, "Burial customs, the afterlife and the pollution of death in ancient Greece", Acta Theologica 26(2), 2006, p. 45 (PDF Archived 6 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine).
  23. ^ Social Studies School Service, Ancient Greece, 2003, pp. 49–51
  24. ^ Perry L. Westmoreland, Ancient Greek Beliefs, 2007, pp. 68–70
  25. ^ N. Sabir, Heaven Hell Or, 2010, p. 147
  26. ^ See Timaeus 90–92. For a recent scholarly treatment, see Douglas R. Campbell, "Plato's Theory of Reincarnation: Eschatology and Natural Philosophy," Review of Metaphysics 75 (4): 643–665. 2022.
  27. ^ "Norse Mythology | The Nine Worlds"www.viking-mythology.com. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
  28. ^ "Fólkvangr, Freyja welcomes you to the Field of the Host"Spangenhelm. 20 May 2016. Archived from the original on 15 September 2017. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  29. ^ "SHEOL - JewishEncyclopedia.com"www.jewishencyclopedia.comArchived from the original on 18 September 2015. Retrieved 8 December 2019.
  30. ^ Berdichevsky 2016, p. 22.
  31. Jump up to:a b Pearson, Fred (1938). "Sheol and Hades in Old and New Testament". Review & Expositor35 (3): 304–314. doi:10.1177/003463733803500304S2CID 147690674 – via SAGE journals.
  32. ^ Berdichevsky, Norman (2016). Modern Hebrew: The Past and Future of a Revitalized Language. McFarland. p. 23. ISBN 978-1-4766-2629-1.
  33. ^ "Tractate Sanhedrin: Interpolated Section: Those Who have no Share in the World to Come". Sacred-texts.com. Archived from the original on 20 October 2019. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  34. ^ "Jehoiakim". Jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  35. ^ Maimonides' Introduction to Perek Helek, publ. and transl. by Maimonides Heritage Center, p. 22-23.
  36. ^ Paull Raphael, Simcha (2019). Jewish Views of the Afterlife. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 177–180. ISBN 9781538103463.
  37. ^ "soc.culture.jewish FAQ: Jewish Thought (6/12) Section – Question 12.8: What do Jews say happens when a person dies? Do Jews believe in reincarnation? In hell or heaven? Purgatory?". Faqs.org. 8 August 2012. Archived from the original on 12 February 2020. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  38. ^ Saadia Gaon in Emunoth ve-Deoth Section vi
  39. Jump up to:a b Reincarnation in the Jewish Tradition on YouTube
  40. ^ "Ask the Rabbi – Reincarnation". Judaism.about.com. 17 December 2009. Archived from the original on 9 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  41. ^ Yirmiyahu, Rabbi (12 July 2003). "Reincarnation " Ask! " Ohr Somayach". Ohr.edu. Archived from the original on 9 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  42. ^ Martin Buber, "Legende des Baalschem" in Die Chassidischen Bücher, Hellerau 1928, especially Die niedergestiegene Seele
  43. ^ "Reincarnation and the Holocaust FAQ". Archived from the original on 16 July 2011.
  44. ^ "Where does the soul go? New course explores spiritual existence". Middletown, CT. West Hartford News. 14 October 2015. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
  45. ^ "Matthew 22:23–33". Biblegateway.com. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  46. Jump up to:a b Boulaouali, Tijani (3 November 2022). "Biblical Eschatology and Qur'anic 'Ākhirāh: A Comparative Approach of the Concepts Afterlife, Death and the Day of Judgement"Khazanah Theologia4 (3): 147–158. doi:10.15575/kt.v4i3.19851ISSN 2715-9701S2CID 255287161Archived from the original on 8 January 2023. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
  47. ^ John 5:24"The New American Bible". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 2 August 2013. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  48. ^ Fosdick, Harry Emerson. A guide to understanding the Bible. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1956. p. 276.
  49. ^ Acts of Paul and Thecla Archived 6 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine 8:5
  50. ^ He wrote that a person "may afterward in a quite different manner be very much interested in what is better, when, after his departure out of the body, he gains knowledge of the difference between virtue and vice and finds that he is not able to partake of divinity until he has been purged of the filthy contagion in his soul by the purifying fire" (emphasis added)—Sermon on the Dead, AD 382, quoted in The Roots of Purgatory Archived 27 May 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  51. ^ "purgatory" Archived 17 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Columbia University Press., 2003. Answers.com 6 June 2007.
  52. ^ "Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, A Latin Dictionary". Perseus.tufts.edu. Archived from the original on 21 February 2008. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  53. Jump up to:a b Swedenborg, E. (2000). "Heaven and Hell". Swedenborg Foundation. Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
  54. ^ "limbo – definition of limbo by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia". Thefreedictionary.com. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  55. ^ Ted Campbell, Methodist Doctrine: The Essentials (Abingdon 1999), quoted in Feature article by United Methodist Reporter Managing Editor Robin Russell Archived 22 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine and in FAQ Belief: What happens immediately after a person dies? Archived 13 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  56. Jump up to:a b "Andrew P. Klager, "Orthodox Eschatology and St. Gregory of Nyssa's De vita Moysis: Transfiguration, Cosmic Unity, and Compassion," In Compassionate Eschatology: The Future as Friend, eds. Ted Grimsrud & Michael Hardin, 230–52 (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2011), 245" (PDF)Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
  57. ^ St. Isaac the Syrian, "Homily 28," In The Ascetical Homilies of Saint Isaac the Syrian, trans. Dana Miller (Brookline, MA: Holy Transfiguration Monastery Press, 1984), 141.
  58. ^ Fr. Thomas Hopko, "Foreword," in The Orthodox Church, Sergius Bulgakov (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1988), xiii.
  59. ^ "Andrew P. Klager, "Orthodox Eschatology and St. Gregory of Nyssa's De vita Moysis: Transfiguration, Cosmic Unity, and Compassion," In Compassionate Eschatology: The Future as Friend, eds. Ted Grimsrud & Michael Hardin, 230–52 (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2011), 251" (PDF)Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
  60. ^ Kallistos Ware, The Orthodox Church (New York: Penguin, 1997), 262.
  61. ^ Paulsen, David L.; Cook, Roger D.; Christensen, Kendel J. (2010). "The Harrowing of Hell: Salvation for the Dead in Early Christianity"Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture19 (1): 56–77. doi:10.5406/jbookmormotheres.19.1.0056ISSN 1948-7487JSTOR 10.5406/jbookmormotheres.19.1.0056S2CID 171733241Archived from the original on 28 November 2022. Retrieved 28 December 2022.
  62. ^ "Doctrine and Covenants, Section 76"Archived from the original on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  63. ^ Spencer W. Kimball: The Miracle of Forgiveness, p. 123.
  64. ^ "Kingdoms of Glory"Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  65. ^ "Is Gehenna a Place of Fiery Torment?"The Watchtower: 31. 1 April 2011. Archived from the original on 31 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  66. ^ Reasoning From the Scriptures. pp. 168–75.
  67. ^ Insight on the Scriptures. Vol. 2. pp. 574–76.
  68. ^ "The State of the Dead: From Death to Life"Seventh-day Adventist World Church Official Website. 30 March 2015. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
  69. ^ "From Life to Death: What Really Happens When You Die?"Seventh-day Adventist World Church Official Website. 30 March 2015. Archived from the original on 18 September 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
  70. ^ "Are the Dead Really Dead?"Amazing FactsArchived from the original on 28 September 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
  71. ^ Quran 39:68
  72. Jump up to:a b "Last Judgement"BritannicaArchived from the original on 31 January 2022. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
  73. ^ Esposito, John L., ed. (2004). The Oxford dictionary of Islam. Oxford paperback reference (1. issued as paperback ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512558-0.
  74. ^ J. A. C. Brown, Misquoting Muhammad, 2014: p. 46
  75. Jump up to:a b Rustomji, Nerina (2017). "Beauty in the Garden: Aesthetics and the WildānGhilmān, and Ḥūr". In Günther, Sebastian; Lawson, Todd (eds.). Roads to Paradise: Eschatology and Concepts of the Hereafter in Islam. Islamic History and Civilization. Vol. 136. Leiden and BostonBrill Publishers. pp. 297–307. doi:10.1163/9789004333154_014ISBN 978-90-04-33315-4ISSN 0929-2403LCCN 2016047258Archived from the original on 19 April 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2021.
  76. ^ "Are all 'houris' female?"Dawn.com. 9 June 2011. Archived from the original on 22 April 2019. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  77. ^ Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ, v.157, trans. Winter p.221-2; quoted in Lange, Christian (2016). "Introducing Hell in Islamic Studies". In Christian Lange (ed.). Locating Hell in Islamic Traditions. BRILL. p. 14. ISBN 978-90-04-30121-4JSTOR 10.1163/j.ctt1w8h1w3.7.
  78. ^ Hughes, Thomas Patrick (27 February 2020). "Project Gutenberg's A Dictionary of Islam. Hell"gutenberg.org/Archived from the original on 30 January 2022. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  79. ^ Kaltner, John, ed. (2011). Introducing the Qur'an: For Today's Reader. Fortress Press. p. 233. ISBN 9781451411386. Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  80. ^ Surah Ash-Shu'ara 26:96-102Surah Fussilat 41:24
  81. ^ Quran 17:10
  82. ^ Thomassen, Einar (2009). "Islamic Hell". Numen56 (2–3): 401–416. doi:10.1163/156852709X405062JSTOR 27793798.
  83. ^ Thomassen, "Islamic Hell", Numen, 56, 2009: p.405
  84. ^ A F Klein Religion Of Islam Routledge 2013 ISBN 978-1-136-09954-0 page 92
  85. ^ Lange, "Introducing Hell in Islamic Studies", 2016: p.7
  86. ^ Lange, "Introducing Hell in Islamic Studies", 2016: p.8
  87. ^ John Renard The Handy Islam Answer Book Visible Ink Press 2015 ISBN 978-1-578-59544-0
  88. ^ Lange, Christian (2016). "Introducing Hell in Islamic Studies". Locating Hell in Islamic Traditions. BRILL. p. 12. ISBN 978-90-04-30121-4JSTOR 10.1163/j.ctt1w8h1w3.7.
  89. ^ Mirza Tahir Ahmad (1997). An Elementary Study of Islam. Islam International Publications. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-85372-562-3Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
  90. ^ Ibn Al-Arabi, Muhyiddin (2006). Angela Jaffray (ed.). The Universal Tree and The Four Birds. Anqa Publishing. pp. 29n, 50n, 59, 64–68, 73, 75–78, 82, 102.
  91. ^ Baháʼu'lláhGleanings from the Writings of Baháʼu'lláh, ed. by US Baháʼí Publishing Trust, 1990, pp. 155–156.
  92. Jump up to:a b Smith, Peter (2000). "burial, "death and afterlife", evil, evil spirits, sin"A concise encyclopedia of the Baháʼí Faith. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. pp. 96–97, 118–19, 135–36, 322–23ISBN 978-1-85168-184-6.
  93. ^ Sayers, Matthew R. (12 September 2013). Feeding the Dead: Ancestor Worship in Ancient India. OUP USA. ISBN 978-0-19-989643-1Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 16 September 2022.
  94. Jump up to:a b Sayers, Matthew R. (May 2008). Feeding the ancestors: ancestor worship in ancient Hinduism and Buddhism (Thesis thesis). Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 16 September 2022.
  95. ^ Dying, Death and the Afterlife in Dharma Traditions and Western Religions (pp.29–44) Deepak Heritage Books, January 2006
  96. ^ Becker, Carl B. (1993). Breaking the circle: death and the afterlife in Buddhism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. p. viii. ISBN 978-0-585-03949-7Buddhists believe in karma and rebirth, and yet they deny the existence of permanent souls.
  97. ^ "The Buddhist Society: Kamma – Actions and Results"www.thebuddhistsociety.orgArchived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  98. ^ "ORDER OF EFFECT | Dhamma Earth 法域" (in Chinese (China)). 24 January 2011. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  99. ^ "The Hindu Concept of Three Bodies – Body, Mind and Existence"Sanskriti – Hinduism and Indian Culture Website. 6 April 2016. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  100. ^ "When the body becomes weak and goes into oblivion as it were, the Atman departs, and following it, the vital breath departs ... he becomes a pure consciousness, and with this consciousness, he proceeds. His past learning and deeds as well subtle memory accompany him. Just as a worm upon reaching the tip of a blade of grass, reaches out towards another blade of grass by way of support, so also does this Jiva end this body, becomes imperceptible, and then obtains another body by way of support, and pulls itself together." – Brhadaranyaka Upanishad 4.4
  101. ^ Jhaveri, Pujya Gurudevshri Rakeshbhai. "Death the Awakener"Shrimad Rajchandra Mission DharampurArchived from the original on 26 October 2019. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  102. ^ "Concept of reincarnation in Guru Nanak's philosophy" (PDF)Understanding Sikhism – the Research Journal13 (1–2). IUS Canada: 52–9. 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  103. ^ see God in Sikhism
  104. ^ Sentence By Sentence English Translation & Transliteration of Siri Guru Granth Sahib (PDF). Translated by Khalsa, Singh Sahib Sant Singh. p. 267. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2022. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  105. ^ "Sikhism: What happens after death?". Archived from the original on 7 January 2022. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
  106. ^ Lemmon, Cheyenne (12 February 2023). "Hachiman, Japanese God of War | History & Symbol"Study.comArchived from the original on 30 October 2023. Retrieved 30 October 2023.
  107. ^ Rossbach, Stefan (7 August 2019) [1999]. Gnostic WarsEdinburgh University Press. p. 49. ISBN 9781474472180.
  108. ^ J. Mark, Joshua (2 April 2019). "Cathars"World History EncyclopediaArchived from the original on 23 September 2022. Retrieved 23 September 2022.
  109. ^ says, Ōmiya Hachiman-Schrein| Ways to Japan (16 July 2015). "Ōmiya Hachiman-Shrine (大宮八幡宮) (Engl.)"Ways to JapanArchived from the original on 30 October 2023. Retrieved 30 October 2023.
  110. Jump up to:a b Bartlett, Sarah (2015). The Afterlife Bible: The Complete Guide to Otherworldly Experience. Octopus Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-84181-449-0Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2018.
  111. ^ Wong, Eva (1997). The Shambhala guide to Taoism (First ed.). Boston: Shambhala. ISBN 1570621691.
  112. ^ Bond, George C. (1992). "Living with Spirits: Death and Afterlife in African Religions". In Obayashi, Hiroshi (ed.). Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-313-27906-5The entire process of death and burial is simple, without elaborate rituals and beliefs in an afterlife. The social and spiritual existence of the person ends with the burial of the corpse.
  113. ^ Bond, George C. (1992). "Living with Spirits: Death and Afterlife in African Religions". In Obayashi, Hiroshi (ed.). Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-313-27906-5The belief in the ancestors remains a strong and active spiritual and moral force in the daily lives of the Yombe; the ancestors are thought to intervene in the affairs of the living.... The afterlife is this world.
  114. ^ Gottlieb, Alma; Graham, Philip; Gottlieb-Graham, Nathaniel (1998). "Infants, Ancestors, and the Afterlife: Fieldwork's Family Values in Rural West Africa" (PDF)Anthropology and Humanism23 (2): 121. doi:10.1525/ahu.1998.23.2.121S2CID 154032549. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 February 2020. But Kokora Kouassi, an old friend and respected Master of the Earth in the village of Asagbé, came to our compound early one morning to describe the dream he had just had: he had been visited by the revered and ancient founder of his matriclan, Denju, who confided that Nathaniel was his reincarnation and so should be given his name. The following morning a small ritual was held, and Nathaniel was officially announced to the world not only as Denju but as N'zri Denju—Grandfather Denju—an honorific that came to be used even by Nathaniel's closest playing companions.
  115. Jump up to:a b Opoku, Kofi Asare (1987). "Death and Immortality in the African Religious Heritage". In Badham, Paul; Badham, Linda (eds.). Death and Immortality in the Religions of the World. New York: Paragon House. pp. 9–23. ISBN 978-0-913757-54-3OL 25695134M.
  116. ^ Bond, George C. (1992). "Living with Spirits: Death and Afterlife in African Religions". In Obayashi, Hiroshi (ed.). Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-313-27906-5The process of being born, dying, and moving to a lower level of earth continues through ten lives.
  117. ^ Bond, George C. (1992). "Living with Spirits: Death and Afterlife in African Religions". In Obayashi, Hiroshi (ed.). Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-313-27906-5The ancestors are of people, whereas God is external to creation. They are of this world and close to the living. The Yombe believe that the afterlife of the ancestors lies in this world and that they are a spiritual and moral force within it.
  118. ^ Bond, George C. (1992). "Living with Spirits: Death and Afterlife in African Religions". In Obayashi, Hiroshi (ed.). Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-313-27906-5Death represents a transition from corporeal to incorporeal life in the religious heritage of Africa and the incorporeal life is taken to be as real as the corporeal.
  119. ^ Ephirim-Donkor, Anthony (2012). African Religion Defined a Systematic Study of Ancestor Worship among the Akan (2nd ed.). Lanham: University Press of America. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-7618-6058-7.
  120. ^ Bond, Jon (13 June 2004). "Unitarians: unitarian view of afterlife, unitarian universalist association uua, unitarian universalist association". En.allexperts.com. Archived from the original on 6 November 2015. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  121. ^ Mark W. Harris (2009). The A to Z of Unitarian Universalism. p. 147
  122. ^ Robyn E. Lebron (2012). Searching for Spiritual Unity ... Can There Be Common Ground? p. 582,
  123. ^ Solitary Wicca For Life: Complete Guide to Mastering the Craft on Your Own p. 162, Arin Murphy-Hiscock (2005)
  124. ^ David Fontana (2005): Is there an afterlife. A comprehensive overview of the evidence.
  125. ^ Roach, Mary (2005). Spook – Science Tackles the Afterlife. W. W. Norton & Co. ISBN 978-0-393-05962-5.
  126. ^ Urban Legends Archived 30 June 2014 at archive.today – Reference Page (Soul man).
  127. ^ Park, Robert Ezra (2010). Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-691-14597-6.
  128. ^ Tipler, Franl J. (1997). The Physics of Immortality – Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead. Anchor. ISBN 978-0-385-46799-5.
  129. ^ "Skeptical Odysseys: Personal Accounts by the World's Leading Paranormal Inquirers pp. 85–94". Susanblackmore.co.uk. 25 March 2002. Archived from the original on 6 April 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  130. ^ Kurtz, Paul (2001). Skeptical Odysseys: Personal Accounts by the World's Leading Paranormal Inquirers. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-57392-884-7.
  131. ^ David Marks. (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-57392-798-7
  132. ^ Nicola Holt, Christine Simmonds-Moore, David Luke, Christopher French. (2012). Anomalistic Psychology (Palgrave Insights in Psychology). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-30150-4
  133. ^ Millais Culpin. (1920). Spiritualism and the New Psychology, an Explanation of Spiritualist Phenomena and Beliefs in Terms of Modern Knowledge. Kennelly Press. ISBN 978-1-4460-5651-6
  134. ^ "Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective study in the Netherlands". Profezie3m.altervista.org. Archived from the original on 13 July 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  135. ^ "Nurse writes book on near-death"BBC News. 19 June 2008. Archived from the original on 31 March 2009. Retrieved 6 August 2008.
  136. ^ Carroll RT (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions. New York: Wiley. pp. 276–7ISBN 978-0-471-27242-7.
  137. ^ Cordón LA (2005). Popular Psychology: An Encyclopedia. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. pp. 183–5ISBN 978-0-313-32457-4.
  138. ^ Linse P, Shermer M (2002). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. pp. 206–7. ISBN 978-1-57607-653-8Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  139. ^ Kolak, Daniel (2005). I Am You: The Metaphysical Foundations for Global Ethics. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-2999-8.
  140. ^ Peter van Inwagen. "I Look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the Life of the World to Come". Archived from the original on 10 June 2007.
  141. ^ Hick, John (1994). Death and eternal life. Westminster/J. Knox Press. pp. 279–294. ISBN 978-0-664-25509-1OCLC 878755693.
  142. ^ Charles Hartshorne, Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (Albany: State University of New York, 1984) p. 32–36
  143. ^ David Griffin, "The Possibility of Subjective Immortality in Whitehead's Philosophy," in The Modern Schoolman, LIII, November. 1975, pp. 39–51.
  144. ^ What Is Process Theology? by Robert B. Mellert Archived 9 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  145. ^ A Whiteheadian Conception of Immortality by Forrest Wood, Jr. Archived 5 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  146. ^ Pereira, Vera; Faísca, Luís; de Sá-Saraiva, Rodrigo (1 January 2012). "Immortality of the Soul as an Intuitive Idea: Towards a Psychological Explanation of the Origins of Afterlife Beliefs" (PDF)Journal of Cognition and Culture12 (1): 121. doi:10.1163/156853712X633956hdl:10400.1/4894Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  147. ^ "Results of world's largest Near Death Experiences". 7 October 2014. Archived from the original on 16 January 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
  148. ^ "Consciousness after clinical death. The biggest ever scientific study published"Archived from the original on 16 January 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
  149. ^ AWARE STUDY INITIAL RESULTS ARE PUBLISHED! Archived 8 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Retrieved 8 July 2022
  150. ^ Greyson, Bruce (2003). "Near-Death Experiences in a Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic Population". Psychiatric Services54 (12): 1649–1651. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.54.12.1649PMID 14645808.
  151. ^ Spivey, Michael J (1 December 2023). "Extended cognition and life after death"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences54: 101325. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101325ISSN 2352-1546.

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]


===

내세

위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

내세(來世, 문화어: 래세, 영어afterlife)는 각 개인에게 개체성을 부여하는 그 자신의 일부 또는 에센스(이하, "에센스")가 이 세상에서의 육체의 죽음 이후에도, 초자연적인 존재에 의해서건 혹은 자연적인 법칙에 의해서건, 계속하여 살아남는다는 믿음 또는 견해에서, 그 에센스가 가게 되는 세상 또는 존재 상태를 가리키는 낱말이다. 또는 이러한 종류의 믿음을 지칭하는 용도로도 사용된다.

다음 세상(next world) · 뒷세상[後世] · 명도(冥途) · 명부(冥府) · 명토(冥土) · 사후 세계(死後世界, afterlife) · 유계(幽界) · 유명(幽冥) · 음부(陰府) · 저 세상(other world, otherworld) · 저승(other side) · 타계(他界) · 황천(黃泉) · 후생(後生) · 후세(後世, life after death)라고도 한다. 이 가운데 저승은 이승의 상대개념으로 이승은 '이 생[此生]'에서 유래했고 저승은 '저 생[彼生]'에서 유래했다.[1]

널리 알려진 대중적인 내세관으로는 크게 세 가지가 있다. 첫 번째는 이 세상에서 육체가 죽은 후에는 그 개인의 에센스가 '어떤' 영적인 세상 또는 영역(spiritual realm) 즉 영계에서 계속하여 삶을 이어간다는 내세관이다. 두 번째는 육체가 죽은 후에는 그 개인의 에센스는, 보통 일정 시간이 지난 후에, 다시 이 세상으로 태어나는데 이러한 재탄생은 그 개인이 영계에 들어갈 수 있는 자격을 얻을 때까지 또는 이 세상을 벗어날 수 있는 자격을 얻을 때까지 계속된다는 내세관이다. 마지막 세 번째는 이 세상에서의 육체의 죽음과 동시에 그 개인은 영원한 소멸(eternal oblivion)에 이르게 된다는 내세관이다.

기독교 · 유대교 · 이슬람교 등에서는 첫 번째 내세관을 가지고 있으며 불교 · 힌두교 · 고대 이집트 종교 · 피타고라스주의 · 영지주의 · 헤르메스주의 등에서는 두 번째 내세관을 가지고 있다. 유물론에서는 세 번째 내세관을 가지고 있다. 보통 두 번째 내세관에서는 육체가 죽은 후 그 개인의 에센스가 이 세상으로 다시 태어나기까지의 기간 동안에 그 에센스가 머무르는 특정한 장소가 있는데, 이 장소를 일반적으로 지칭할 때도 사후 세계 또는 저승 등이라고 하기도 한다. 내세관들은 주로 종교 · 신비주의 · 밀교 · 형이상학에서 유래한다.

내세

[편집]

고대 이집트

[편집]

고대 그리스

[편집]

기독교

[편집]

불교

[편집]

같이 보기

[편집]

각주

[편집]
  1.  한국학중앙연구원 (2010). 《한국민족문화대백과》 "저승", 네이버 지식백과. 2013년 4월 23일에 확인.
    "저승:
    정의: 이승의 상대개념으로 사람이 죽은 뒤에 그 영혼이 가서 산다고 믿는 세상.
    내용: 이승이 이생[此生]에 어원을 두고 있듯이 저승은 차생[彼生]에서 유래하였다. 저승은 후생(後生)·타계(他界)·명부(冥府)·음부(陰府)·명도(冥途)·명토(冥土)·황천(黃泉)·유계(幽界)·유명(幽冥) 등으로 부르기도 한다.
    이 가운데 명부와 음부는 이승의 관부(官府)와 같은 개념을 저승에 상정한 것이다. 저승에 극락과 지옥이 있다는 관념은 도교와 불교의 저승관이 한국에 도입된 이래 통용된 것이고, 극락과 지옥은 저승의 하위개념이 된다.
    종교마다 나름의 저승관을 갖고 있다. 한국종교는 다종교 공존의 특성을 지닌다. 여러 종교가 동시에 함께 사회에 존재하면서 신앙되기에 한국에는 여러 종류의 저승이 공존하는 셈이다.
    도교와 불교의 것 외에 조선 후기 이 땅에 들어온 기독교의 저승이 있고, 또 광복 이후에는 비록 소수의 신봉자에 불과하나 이슬람의 정착으로 그 저승 마저 우리 나라에 자리하게 되었다. 그밖에도 수많은 민족종교와 신흥종교가 조선 말 이래 생겨나고 유입된 바, 이들도 나름의 저승관을 갖고 있기에 실로 다양한 저승이 한국에서 관념·신앙되어 온다.
    이들 저승이 한국인의 관념 속에 기계적으로 공존하는 것은 아니다. 한국인 전체의 의식과 무의식에는 이들이 층위를 이루거나 혼재하여 있고, 각자의 종교에 따라 어느 저승관이 주로 신앙되기도 한다. 한편 여러 저승관은 한국 역사 속에서 서로 영향을 주고 받으면서 각기 나름의 독특한 한국적 저승관을 형성해 온다."

외부 링크

[편집]

===

来世

出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』
古代エジプトにおける死後の世界が描かれたパピルス

来世(らいせ、らいしょう)あるいは後世(ごせ、ごしょう)は、今世(今回の人生)を終えた後に、が経験する次に来る人生を指す概念。また、動物においては全体集合魂に帰一し、新たな個体が月の生理に従い生み出されるだけで来世は人間のようには存在しない。

神道においては常世(黄泉)のことを指す。仏教では「三世」のひとつ (「前世現世、来世」のこと。仏教以外においては人生に焦点を当てた「過去生、現在生、未来生」という表現もある)。

インドの宗教

[編集]
莫高窟(世界遺産)で発見された死後の世界の図

ヒンドゥー教

[編集]

ヒンドゥー教では、自我の本質としてアートマンの概念を持つ。ウパニシャッドの時代には梵我一如の考えが説かれた[1]。それは、宇宙の全てを司るブラフマンは不滅のものであり、それとアートマンが同一であるのなら、当然にアートマンも不滅のものであるという考えであった[1]

これに従うならば、個人の肉体が死を迎えても、自我意識は永遠に存続するということであり[1]、またアートマンが死後に新しい肉体を得るという輪廻の根拠でもあった[1]

仏教

[編集]

仏教インド哲学の思想を引き継ぎ、輪廻の立場に立つ。釈迦は「死んだら無になる」として来世を否定した唯物論(順世派)を、悪見六師外道として位置付け否定している[2]

下記は転生を前提とした考え方である。現世を中心に考える宗派では、六道を自分の心の状態として捉える。たとえば、心の状態が天道のような状態にあれば天道界に、地獄のような状態であれば地獄界に趣いていると解釈する。その場合の六道は来世の事象ではない。

浄土教では、一切の迷いが無くなる境地に達した魂は浄土に行き、そうでない魂は生前の行いにより六道にそれぞれ行くと説く宗派がある。

日蓮の教えでは、(転生があるにしても)今の自分(小我)に執着するあまり、いたずらにを恐れ、死後の世界ばかりを意識し期待するより、むしろ自分の小我を越えた正しい事(大我)のために今の自分の生命を精一杯活かし切ることで最高の幸福が得られるのだ、とされている(『一生成仏抄』)。

また真言宗などの密教でも、大我を重要視して即身成仏を説き、天台宗本覚思想から、「ここがこの世のお浄土」と捉え、来世について日蓮と同様の捉え方がなされる場合がある。

スピリチュアリズム

[編集]

人間の魂は人間にだけ生まれ変わっており、動物には生まれ変わることは無い、とされる。肉体の死後、魂は、一旦霊的な世界に戻り、数年~数百年後に、またこの世の肉体に宿る、とされる。この世は魂にとってのある種の"学校"のようなものであり、魂は転生を多数繰り返し、人間の肉体を通して様々な立場に伴う苦しみ・喜びなどを学び、次第に智慧を得て大きな慈愛にも目覚めると、この世で肉体を持つ必要はなくなり、霊的な階層世界の上層へと登ってゆく(言わば"卒業"する)とされる。

「行ったきり」の死後の世界

[編集]

「今の人生→死後の世界」という一方通行的な世界観。自分が今の自分のまま別の世界に行くという考え方(この考え方は、厳密に言えば「来世」という転生を前提とした項には属さないかも知れない。が、便宜上この項で扱う)。この意味では、「来世」の類義語として、あの世(あのよ)、死後の世界(しごのせかい)が挙げられる。

天国と地獄

[編集]
天国と地獄が描かれた、金持ちとラザロ

様々な宗教で「天国」と「地獄」((あるいは極楽と地獄)があるとする考え方も多い。 この場合、天国は生前に良い行いをして過ごした人が行き、地獄は生前に悪い事をしてきた人が行くとされることが多い。

キリスト教においては、ヨーロッパの中世期ころなどに、(元々のイエスの教えの意図から離れてしまい) 洗礼の有無等によって死後に魂の行く世界が異なる、などと強調されたことがあったが、現代のカトリック教会では、過去の反省も踏まえ、そのようなことに力点を置いた説明は控えられている。

古代日本における死後の世界

[編集]

日本では、古代において、死後に行く世界は、黄泉(よみ)と呼ばれていた。だが、発想の原点がそもそも現世利益重視や小我重視の視点であるため、あの世は「けがれ」の場 ( 否定されるもの、あるいはある種のタブー) としてとらえられる傾向があった。また同様の理由から、黄泉の概念は善悪とは結び付けられることもなく、人間の生き様を高めるためのきっかけとはならなかった。 後に、仏教が流入すると、日本古来の黄泉の観念と、仏教概念の中でも通俗化した"極楽・地獄"の観念とが混交することとなった。

日本での通俗

[編集]

「天国、地獄」という図式を前提とした上で、"地獄には閻魔がいて生前の罪を裁く"とする考え方も民衆の間にはある。これは、インドで生まれ、中国の民衆によって脚色され、後に日本の民衆にも広まった考え方であるが、あくまで通俗的なものであり、真面目な仏教の概念ではない。しかしながら例えば天台宗も閻魔などによる死後の裁きなどがあるという「通俗」は支持しており[3]輪廻転生的な世界観とも矛盾するものではない。

日本において支配的な宗教である神道及び仏教には本来「天国」という用語は無い。しかしながら日本人が故人について語る時、「天国の誰々」と呼ぶことはあっても「極楽の誰々」「黄泉の誰々」とは滅多に言わない。改まった語法として「泉下の誰々」があるが、これは黄泉から来た言い回しである。

来世への「旅」

[編集]

人の肉体が生死の境をさまよっているときに、魂(意識)は川岸にたどり着き(三途の川)、それを渡ることで魂は次の世界に行く、という話は、広く知られている。臨死体験をした者にこのような報告をする者も多いらしい。が、自ら転生をしていると認める者でも、その川は便宜的に視覚化されたある種の心象風景ともいうべきものであって、この世とあの世の間に川があるわけではない、と説明する者もおり、もとより物理的に検証できる性質のものでもなく、真偽のほどは定かではない。

関連項目

[編集]
近接
その他

脚注

[編集]

外部リンク

[編集]

===

내세

출처 : 무료 백과 사전 "Wikipedia (Wikipedia)"
고대 이집트의 사후 세계가 그려진 파피루스

내세 (라이세, 라이쇼) 혹은 후세 (고세, 오쇼)는, 금세(이번 인생)를 끝낸 후에, 영혼이 경험하는 다음에 오는 인생 을 가리키는 개념. 또한 동물 에서는 전체 집합혼으로 귀일하고 새로운 개체가 달의 생리에 따라 만들어지는 것만으로 내세는 인간처럼 존재하지 않는다.

신도 에서는 상세 (黄泉)를 가리킨다. 불교 에서는 「3세」의 하나(「전세 , 현세 , 내세」의 것. 불교 이외에 있어서는 인생에 초점을 맞춘 「과거생, 현재생, 미래생」이라고 하는 표현도 있다).

인도 종교

편집 ]
玫高窟(세계 유산)에서 발견 된 사후 세계의 그림

힌두교

편집 ]

힌두교 에서는 자아의 본질로 아트맨 의 개념을 가지고 있습니다. 우파니샤드 의 시대에는梵我一如의 생각이 전해졌다 [1] . 그것은 우주의 모든 것을 담당하는 브라프만 은 불멸의 것이고 그것과 아트맨이 동일하다면 당연히 아트맨도 불멸의 것이라는 생각이었다 [1] .

이에 따라 개인의 육체가 죽음을 맞이해도 자아의식은 영원히 존속한다는 것이고 [1] 또 아트맨이 사후에 새로운 육체를 얻는 윤회 의 근거이기도 했다 [1] .

불교

편집 ]

불교도 인도 철학 의 사상을 이어 윤회의 입장에 선다 석가 는 '죽으면 무해진다' 며 내세를 부정한 유물론( 순세파 )을 악견 , 육사 외도 로 자리매김 부정하고 있다 .

다음은 환생을 전제로 한 사고방식이다. 현세를 중심으로 생각하는 종파에서는 육도 를 자신의 마음의 상태로 파악한다. 예를 들어, 마음의 상태가 천도와 같은 상태에 있으면 천도계에, 지옥과 같은 상태라면 지옥계에 정취가 있다고 해석한다. 그 경우의 육도는 내세의 사건이 아니다.

정토교 에서는 일체의 망설임이 없어지는 경지에 도달한 영혼은 정토 에 가고, 그렇지 않은 영혼은 생전의 ​​행위에 의해 육도에 각각 가면 설교파가 있다.

니치렌 의 가르침에서는, (전생이 있어도) 지금의 자신(코가)에 집착하는 별로, 장난에 죽음 을 두려워해, 사후의 세계만을 의식해 기대하는 것보다, 오히려 자신의 오가를 넘었다 올바른 일(대아)을 위해 지금의 자신의 생명을 한껏 살리면 최고의 행복을 얻을 수 있다고 여겨지고 있다(『일생성불초』).

또 진언종 등의 밀교 에서도, 대가를 중요시하고 즉신성불 을 설해, 천대종도 본각 사상 으로부터, 「여기가 이 세상의 정토」라고 파악해, 내세에 대해 니치렌과 같은 포착 방법이 이루어지는 경우 있다.

영적 리듬

편집 ]

인간의 영혼은 인간에게만 다시 태어나고 있으며, 동물에게는 다시 태어나지 않는다고 여겨진다. 육체의 사후, 영혼은, 일단 영적인 세계로 돌아가, 수년~수백년 후에, 또 이 세상의 육체에 머무른다고 여겨진다. 이 세상은 영혼에 있어서의 어떤 종류의 "학교"와 같은 것이고, 영혼은 환생을 다수 반복해, 인간의 육체를 통해서 다양한 입장에 수반하는 고통·기쁨 등을 배워, 점차 지혜를 얻고 큰 자애에도 일어나면, 이 세상에서 육체를 가질 필요는 없어져, 영적인 계층 세계의 상층으로 올라간다(말하면 "졸업"한다)라고 된다.

"가는 키리"의 사후 세계

편집 ]

「지금의 인생→사후의 세계」라고 하는 일방통행적인 세계관. 자신이 지금 자신 그대로 다른 세계에 간다는 생각(이 생각은 엄밀히 말하면 '내세'라는 환생을 전제로 한 항에는 속하지 않을지도 모른다. 편의상 이 항에서 다룬다). 이 의미에서는 '내세'의 동의어로서 그 세상 (그것), 사후의 세계 (시고의 탓)를 들 수 있다.

천국과 지옥

편집 ]
천국과 지옥이 그려진 부자와 나사로

다양한 종교에서 「천국」과 「지옥」((혹은 극락 과 지옥)이 있다고 하는 생각도 많다.이 경우, 천국은 생전에 좋은 행위를 하고 보낸 사람이 가고, 지옥은 생전에 나쁜 일 를 해온 사람이 간다고 하는 경우가 많다.

기독교 에 있어서는, 유럽의 중세기 무렵 등에, (원래의 예수 의 가르침의 의도로부터 떨어져 버려) 세례의 유무등에 의해 사후에 영혼이 가는 세계가 다른, 등이라고 강조된 적이 있었지만 , 현대의 가톨릭 교회 에서는, 과거의 반성도 근거로 하고, 그러한 일에 역점을 둔 설명은 앞두고 있다.

고대 일본의 사후 세계

편집 ]

일본 에서는, 고대에 있어서, 사후에 가는 세계는, 황천 (요미)이라고 불리고 있었다. 하지만, 발상의 원점이 원래 현세이익 중시나 소가중시의 시점이기 때문에, 그 세상은 「상해」의 장(부정되는 것, 혹은 어떤 종류의 금기 ) 로서 파악되는 경향이 있었다. 또 같은 이유로 황천의 개념은 선악과 는 연관되지 않고 인간의 삶을 높이기 위한 계기가 되지 않았다. 후에 불교가 유입되면 일본 옛 황천의 관념과 불교 개념 속에서도 통속화된 '극락·지옥'의 관념이 혼교하게 되었다.

일본에서의 통속

편집 ]

‘천국, 지옥’이라는 도식을 전제로 한 뒤, “지옥에는 참마가 있어 생전의 죄를 심판한다”는 생각도 민중들 사이에는 있다. 이것은 인도에서 태어나 중국의 민중에 의해 각색되어 나중에 일본의 민중에게도 퍼진 사고방식이지만 어디까지나 통속적인 것이며 진지한 불교의 개념이 아니다. 그러나 예를 들어 천대종도 참마 등에 의한 사후 심판 등이 있다고 하는 「통속」은 지지하고 있고 [3] , 윤회전생적인 세계관과도 모순되는 것은 아니다.

일본에서 지배적인 종교인 신도 및 불교에는 본래 '천국'이라는 용어는 없다. 그러나 일본인이 고인 에 대해 말할 때 '천국의 누군가'라고 부르는 것은 있어도 '극락의 누군가', '황천의 누구들'이라고는 드물게 말하지 않는다. 개편된 어법으로서 「이즈미시타의 누군가」가 있는데, 이것은 황천에서 온 말투이다.

내세로의 「여행」

편집 ]

사람의 육체가 생사의 경계를 방황하고 있을 때에, 영혼(의식)은 강둑에 도착해( 삼도의 강 ), 그것을 건너는 것으로 영혼은 다음의 세계에 간다, 라는 이야기는, 널리 알려져 있다. 임사체험을 한 자에게 이런 보고를 하는 자도 많은 것 같다. 하지만, 스스로 환생을 하고 있다고 인정하는 사람이라도, 그 강은 편의적으로 시각화된 어떤 종류의 심상 풍경이라고도 말해야 할 것이고, 이 세상과 그 세상 사이에 강이 있는 것은 아니다, 설명하는 사람도 있어, 원래 보다 물리적으로 검증할 수 있는 성질의 것도 아니고, 진위의 정도는 확실하지 않다.

관련 항목

편집 ]
근접
기타

각주

편집 ]

외부 링크

편집 ]

===


2024/08/11

Innsæi meaning - Google 검색

Innsæi meaning - Google 검색

intuition
The ancient Icelandic word for intuition is “innsæi,” but in Iceland it has multiple meanings. 
It can mean “the sea within” which is the borderless nature of our inner world, a constantly moving world of vision, feelings and imagination beyond words.

===
Documentary

InnSaei: The Power in Intuition
A journey of soul searching, science, nature and creativity. 'Innsaei: The Power of Intuition' takes us on a global journey to uncover the art of connecting within in today's world of distraction and stress. The world is changing faster than ever before and new ways of thinking are required. How is this affecting the way we live our lives?

2024/08/10

박현정 | Facebook 모리스 블랑쇼

박현정 | Facebook


박현정
모리스 블랑쇼 
  · 
🖊 좋아하는 '모리스 블랑쇼'의 [기다림 망각]을 다시 읽으며 예전에 했던 정리를 매만져본다. 블랑쇼 작품들은 볼 때마다 새로운 부분이 보이는 신비로움을 안겨주니, 다음의 설렘도 기대하지 않을 수가 없다. 
.
<0>
말을 잘 주고받으려는 마음이 오히려 침묵으로 바뀌게 될 때가 있다. 해야 할 말과 할 수 있는 말이 자리 잡고 있지만 마음 속에서 끄집어낼 이야기로부터 나를 드러내지 않기 위해 침묵을 선택한다. 다치지 않으려는 의지일지도 모른다. 자신을 보호하기 위한 피난처와 같은 동굴. 그러나 상대방은 알고 있다. “무슨 말을 하고싶은 건지 우리 둘 다 이미 알고 있다.”는 그 사실 마저도 말이다. 
작품 속 남녀는 마음이 내킬 때 떠날 수 있다는 보장으로 지금 여기 머물 수 있음을 알고 있다. 그런 그들이 할 수 있는 일은 서로가 서로를 떠나는 일이다. 하지만 이는 실행될 수 없어 보인다. 당장에 떠날 수도 있지만 떠나지 않는 것, 그래서 결국 계속 머무를 것이라는 사실. 이것을 블랑쇼는 ‘기다림’으로 표현했다. 램프를 맴도는 나방처럼 서로의 주위에서 방황하는 주인공들의 기다림. 이번 다시 읽기에서는 망각과 같은 기다림과 함께 지난번 보다 주인공들의 침묵과 좀 더 가까워진 느낌이다. 
.
<1>
“당신이 저와 관계없는 것들을 말할 때조차, 당신의 모든 말은 제게 던져진 물음이에요.", “모든 것이 당신과 관계 있기 때문입니다.”, “저와 관계있는 게 아니에요. 저는 여기 있습니다. 그것만으로 당신에게는 충분하지요.”. “그렇습니다. 그것만으로 제게 충분하지요. 그러나 제게는 당신에 대한 확신이 있어야만 합니다.”, “저에 대한 확신이 없나요?”, “그게 당신이라면, 있지요.”
- 이 책은 '기다림과 망각'이라는 두 갈래의 이야기다. 그 깊은 곳에는 침묵의 고독이 자리를 잡고 있다. 기다림은 기다린다는 것을 파괴하는 행위이며, 역설적으로 어떤 것도 기다리는 것이 아니다. “기다림의 움직임은 언제나 그 대상을 무한히 앞질러 간다.” 블랑쇼의 말들은 희미하면서 동시에 선명하다. 사실을 말하지도 않고, 어떠한 주장을 펼치지도 않으며 가르치지도 않는, 자기 방식의 해석이 가능한 추상화를 보는 기분을 들게 한다. 그렇지만 곱씹어보면 너무나 그렇구나, 참으로 그렇구나 싶은 마음이 드는 것이다. 
- 망각의 사전 의미를 찾아보면. 어떤 사실에 대해 잊어버림으로 나온다. 작품에서의 망각은 이 의미를 넘어선다고나 할까. 무엇을 잊어야 하는지, 무엇을 어떻게 잊을 것인지, 잊을 수 있기는 한 건지, 많은 것들이 모호하기에 모든 망각을 포괄해 버리는 모습이다. 망각은 존재 자체를 말하며 그 존재는 망각을 가리키는 또 다른 이름의 하나다. 내 눈에 보이는 것과 그것을 보고 있는 나 사이의 관계의 사건 중 큰 한 가지인 '망각'. 블랑쇼는 이를 '현전'이라고 표현했다.    
.
<2>
“그것을 말하지 마십시오. 그것을 더 이상 생각하지 마십시오. 모든 것을 망각하십시오.” “저는 모든 것을 망각했어요. 당신도 망각했습니다.” “그래요. 당신은 저를 망각했습니다.” 그들 사이에 실제 대화는 없다. 기다림 속에서만 어떤 관계가, 기다리기 위해 한 말들이, 말들의 기다림이 그들이 말하는 것 가운데에서 이어진다. 아무것도 망각하지 않는 기억 속에서 서로가 서로의 망각에 동의하고 있는 모습이다.
- 이 작품은 모호하지만 특징이 있는 행위들로 이루어져 있다. 말로는 의미를 명확하게 파악할 수 없으니 행위로나마 알아 볼 수밖에 없다고 하면 될까. 그렇다고 연극이나 영화처럼 눈으로 볼 수 있는 것도 없다. 블랑쇼 식으로 말한다면 다만 현전하고 있다는 상상만으로 그 느낌을 받아들여야 하는데, 그것이 모순 가득한 주인공들의 말을 그대로 받아들이는 것보다 어쩌면 더 쉬울지도 모르겠다. 
- 블랑쇼는 소설가라면 누릴 수도 있을 권리 즉 소설의 허구를 스토리에 맞추어 구도를 잡아 꾸려나가는 행위를 아예 버렸다. 또한 교훈적이거나 도덕적인 메시지를 주는 자체도 취하지 않는다. '독자 위에 우뚝 서는' 저자의 모습은 어디서도 볼 수 없는데, 이야말로 블랑쇼가 그의 어느 작품에서든 충분히 보여주는 스스로 내려온 자의 모습이다. 그래서 역자는 “기다림과 망각이 하나의 행위라면, 그것은 바로 저자 스스로 행한 사라짐의 행위이다.”라고 말한다.  
.
<3>
“만일 제가 모든 것을 기억하고 당신에게 모든 것을 말한다면, 우리에게 단 하나의 기억만이 남아 있을 거예요.”, “공동의 기억?”, “아닙니다. 우린 한 번도 공동으로 기억 속에 들어가지 못할 것입니다.”, “그렇다면 망각 속으로 들어가겠군요.”,“아마도, 망각 속으로.”, “그래요. 제가 망각할 때, 이미 당신과 보다 더 가깝다고 느껴요.”, “가까움 가운데, 하지만 다가가지는 않은 채.”, “바로 그래요.”, “진실 없이, 비밀도 없이.” 
- 만남에서의 완전한 자유는 그 상대를 망각해야 얻을 수 있을지도 모르겠다. 주인공들을 끈덕지게 따라붙는 것이 있는데, 바로 ‘망각의 말’이다. 망각의 말이라는 게 성립이 되는 표현이긴 한 걸까. 이게 가능하다면, 이것들이 망각될 수 있는 것들이긴 한 걸까. 그게 또 가능하다면, 모든 것들이 망각되는 그 순간은 어떻게 망각이 되는 것일까. “망각이 망각 속에 묻힌다”는 블랑쇼의 이 말은 무엇을 말하고 싶었던 걸까. 
- 블랑쇼는 독자를 위해 어떤 것도 정의 내리지 않는다. 이는 그만의 침묵 방식이다. 명쾌한 말을 원하는 우리들은 보는 것과 말하는 것의 행위로 대상을 접하며 경험을 쌓는데, 이때의 망각은 우리를 지치게한다. 하지만 주인공들은 망각으로 들어가기를 요구받았고, 당연히 보고 말하는 것에서 멀어질 수밖에 없다. 기다림은 망각을 견디는 움직임이며 무한의 기다림이다. 끊임없는 기다림이 그들 ‘사이’에 놓여지고, 그 사이에서 그들은 ‘사랑’의 과정을 이어간다. 
.
.
.
.
.
다시 읽고 마저 정리할 이 멋진 [기다림 망각]의 뒷부분. 이미 아는 이야기임에도 설레고 또 좋다. 출판사 그린비와 옮긴이 박준상이 고맙지 않을 수가 없다. 물론 모리스 블랑쇼는 말할 수도 없이 너무나도! 
(정리 1 끝) 

Facebook
박현정
  · 
🖊 좋아하는 '모리스 블랑쇼'와 '밀란 쿤데라'로 페이스북 방을 꾸민 기념(!)으로 블랑쇼의 [기다림 망각] 예전 포스팅을 다시 들추어 보았다. 비록 부분 독서지만 새로움이 또 느껴지니 이어질 다음 설렘도 기대하지 않을 수 없다. 너무나 좋은...!
.
<1>
누군가와 말을 잘 주고받으려는 마음이 오히려 침묵으로 바뀌는 경험을 한 적이 있을 것이다. 내 안에 해야 할 말과 할 수 있는 말이 풍부하게 자리 잡고 있지만 마음속에서 이끌어 낼 이야기로부터 스스로를 감추기 위해 침묵을 선택한다. 다치지 않으려는 의지로부터 자신을 보호하기 위해 피난처와 같은 동굴을 만드는 것이다. 그러나 우리는 잘 안다. “그 말을 하지 않더라도 우리는 이미 그것을 잘 알고 있다”는 그 사실 마저도 말이다. 
작품 속 남녀는 언제든 떠날 수 있다는 안전한 보장 덕분에 지금 여기에 머물 수도 있음을 잘 알고 있다. 그런 그들이 쉽게 할 수 있는 일은 서로가 서로를 떠나는 일, 하지만 실행할 수 없는 상황으로 보인다. 당장에 떠날 수도 있지만 지금 바로 떠나지 않는 것, 그래서 결국 계속 머무를 거라는 것. 이것을 블랑쇼는 ‘기다림’으로 표현했나보다. 불 밝은 램프를 맴도는 나방처럼 서로의 주위에서 방황하는 주인공들이다. 작품을 다시 만날 때마다 그 전보다는 좀 더 주인공들을 이해할 수 있는 내 마음의 여유가 생긴다. 다행인건가. 
.
<2>
“당신이 저와 관계없는 것을 말할 때조차, 당신의 말은 제게 던져진 물음이에요.” “모든 것이 당신과 관계 있기 때문입니다.” “저와 관계있는 게 아니에요. 저는 여기 있습니다. 그것만으로 당신에게는 충분하지요.” “그러나 제게는 당신에 대한 확신이 있어야만 합니다.” “저에 대한 확신이 없나요?” “당신이라면, 있지요.” 이 책은 기다림과 망각이라는 두 갈래의 이야기다. 그 깊은 곳에는 침묵의 고독이 자리를 잡고 있다. 기다림은 기다린다는 것을 파괴하는 행위이며, 역설적으로 어떤 것도 기다리는 것이 아니다. “기다림의 움직임은 언제나 그 대상을 무한히 앞질러 간다.”
블랑쇼의 말들은 희미하면서 동시에 선명하다. 사실을 말하지도 않고, 어떠한 주장을 펼치지도 않는, 다시 말해 자기 방식의 해석이 가능한 추상화같다. 망각의 사전적 의미는 어떤 사실에 대한 잊어버림인데, 작품에서의 망각은 이 의미를 넘어선다고나 할까. 무엇을 잊을지, 무엇을 어떻게 잊을지, 잊을 수는 있는지, 많은 것들이 모호하기에 모든 망각을 포괄한다. 망각은 존재 자체를 말하며 그 존재는 망각을 가리키는 또 다른 이름이다. 내 눈에 보이는 것과 그것을 보고 있는 나 사이의 관계 중 큰 사건 한 가지는 바로 망각! 블랑쇼는 이를 '현전'이라고 한다.    
.
<3>
“그것을 말하지 마세요. 모든 것을 망각하세요.” “저는 모든 것을 망각했어요. 당신도 망각했습니다.” “그래요. 당신은 나를 망각했어요.” 그들 사이에 실제 대화는 없다. 기다리기 위해 한 말들이 그들의 말들 가운데 계속 이어진다. 아무것도 망각하지 않는 기억 속에서 서로가 서로의 망각에 동의한다. 말로는 의미를 명확하게 파악할 수 없으니 행위로 그 뜻을 알아 볼 수밖에 없다고 하면 될까. 그렇다고 연극이나 영화처럼 눈으로 볼 수 있는 것도 없다. 블랑쇼 식으로 말한다면 다만 현전한다는 상상만으로 그 느낌을 받아야 하는데, 그것이 모순 가득한 주인공들의 말을 그대로 받아들이는 것보다 어쩌면 더 쉬울지도 모르겠다. 
블랑쇼는 소설가이기에 누릴 수 있는 권리 즉 소설 속 허구를 스토리라인에 맞추어 짜임새 있게 꾸려나가는 행위 자체를 아예 버렸다. 또한 독자들에게 철학적이거나 도덕적인 메시지를 주는 자체도 결코 취하지 않는다. 그들의 머리 위에 우뚝 서는 저자로서의 그의 모습은 어디에서도 볼 수 없다. 이것이야말로 블랑쇼의 어느 책에서든 발견할 수 있는 블랑쇼가 지극히 추구했던 스스로 내려온 자의 모습이다. 그래서 역자는 말한다, “기다림과 망각이 하나의 행위로 이루어진 것이라면, 그것은 바로 저자 스스로 행한 사라짐의 행위이다.”
.
<4>
“내가 모든 것을 기억하고 당신에게 모든 것을 말한다면, 우리에게는 단 하나의 기억만이 남을 거예요.” “공동의 기억?” “아뇨. 우리는 공동의 기억 속으로 들어가지 못합니다.” “그렇다면 망각 속으로 들어가겠군요. 내가 망각할 때, 이미 당신과 보다 더 가깝다고 느껴요.” “가까움 가운데, 하지만 다가가지는 않은 채.” “그래요. 진실 없이, 비밀도 없이.” 만남에서의 완전한 자유는 그 상대를 망각해야 얻을 수 있는지도 모르겠다. 주인공들은 자신들에게 남은 공동의 것으로부터 갈라놓을 것이 있는데, 이는 바로 망각의 말이다. 
망각의 말이라는 게 성립이 되는 표현이긴 한 걸까. 그게 가능하다면 망각될 수 있기는 한 걸까. 그게 또 가능하다면 모든 것이 망각되는 그 순간은 어떻게 망각되는 것일까. “망각이 망각 속에 묻힐 것이다.”라는 블랑쇼의 말은 무엇을 말하고 싶던걸까. 앞서도 살짝 말했지만, 그는 작품을 대하는 독자들과는 정의도 교훈도 그 어떤 것도 주고받지 않음을 강조한다. 이는 수많은 것들 중 블랑쇼만의 침묵 방식 중 하나일 것이다. 명쾌한 말과 밝은 시선을 원하는 우리들은 보고 말하는 행위로 대상을 접하며 경험을 쌓아간다. 그 현실 속에서 마주치게 되는 망각은 큰 고통이 아닐 수 없다.
.
.
.
.
.
작품 속 주인공들은 망각 속으로 들어가기를 요구받았으며, 당연히 그들은 보고 말하는 것에서 멀어질 수밖에 없다. 기다림은 망각을 견디려는 움직임이며 무한으로 떠넘겨진 기다림들 속의 기다림들이다. 끊임없는 기다림들이 관계에서 ‘사이’로 놓여지고, 그 사이에서 주인공들은 그들 방식으로의 ‘사랑’이라고 부르는 '기다림'의 과정을 이어간다. 
기다림에 대한 새로운 정의를 세워본다. 상황이 흐르는대로 두어도 나쁘지 않을 것 같은 기다림 속 시간들, 그 속에서 우리들은 기다림의 시간을 맞이하고 그렇게 그 시간을 보낸다. 
누군가를 기다리는 그 기다림이 아니다. 나를 마주치기 위한 시간의 흐름, 그 사이에 그저 상대와 상황이 놓여 있을 뿐. 그래서 기다림은 충분히 가능하며, 그리하여 우리는 기다림의 연속선 상에서 자신의 삶을 이어갈 수 있다. 
블랑쇼가 작품에서 말하려던 기다림이 나의 기다림 정의와 다를 수는 있지만, 상관은 없겠다. 블랑쇼는 너와 나의 명쾌한 일치를 바라지는 않았으니까. 
(정리 1 끝)

박현정
  · 
🗝 뭉크(Edvard Munch)는 1902년에 그의 첫 카메라를 손에 쥐었다. 주변 환경부터 작품에까지, 나아가 찰나 속 자신의 모습까지 다양한 방식으로 찍었고 그것을 적극적으로 활용했다. 
셀카! 아래 사진들은 뭉크가 자신의 모습을 찍은 셀카일 것이다. 현재 남겨진 보통의 뭉크 사진은 누군가가 찍어준 갖추어진 모습이지만, 이 사진들은 셀카가 확실해 보인다. 각도가 그런... 
절규, 질투, 상처, 배신, 고뇌, 죽음 등의 키워드로 그와 그의 작품을 판단하지만, 의외라 생각될 만큼 밝은 면과 개구쟁이 면도 많았던 것 같다. 그 중 하나가 이 셀카들이라는 생각 ㅎ
셀카를 거의 찍지 않는 나에게 그의 이런 의외 모습은 흥미롭다. 한편으로는 안심도 되는 게, 깊은 우울의 그의 모습 속에 이런 셀카들이 존재했음에서 느끼는 다행스러움이라고나 할까. 
그의 삶과 그의 작품들은 알면 알수록 신기하고 오묘하다. 그래서 더 빠지게 되고 그래서 더 좋아진다. 혹시나 셀카가 아니더라도, 이 사진들 속 그의 다양한 멋스러움에 감탄을 하며. 
.
.
.
.
오늘은 나도 셀카를 찍어볼까 싶다. 뭉크만큼 멋지진 않더라도 나다운 자연스러운 모습으로, 딱 한 장의 셀카-

박현정
  · 
🖊 무력감을 느낄 때가 있다. 비밀스레 느끼는 무력감. 시는 무력감에서 탄생한다는 말을 건네는 '존 버거'를 다시 만났고, 그는 이번에도 ‘그럴 수 있다’며 [아픔의 기록: 시 소묘 사진 1956-1996]을 통해 고개를 끄덕여 주었다.   
.
<1>
“열두 살부터 시를 썼다. 시는 무력감에서 탄생한다. 그러므로 시의 힘은 무력감에서 나온다.” 사는 동안 사실들과 상황들에 타협을 할 수밖에 없다. 무언가가 나를 제어하면, 움직이지 못할까봐 염려를 한다. 달려야만 하는 경주마가 되었을 때는 다른 것은 생각할 수 없다. “시를 쓰는 동안 현재 일어나는 일을 제외한 모든 것에 귀를 기울인다.” 지금 이곳에 없는 것에 말을 건네는 것들이 있다면 그것이 바로 시가 아닐까.
모리스 블랑쇼의 다음 말에 위안을 얻으며 책 속 존 버거의 시들 중에서 기억에 남는 몇 편을 옮겨본다. “문학은(시는) 독자에게 자신을 완전하게 내비치지 않는다. 독자가 언어를 넘어 어떤 담론의 중심을 보았다고 생각하는 순간, 존재가 아닌 부재를 목도하게 된다.”
.
<2>
1. 시 1
한마디 한마디 나는 묘사합니다.
당신은 하나하나 사실을 받아들이고
이렇게 자신에게 묻습니다:
그의 말이 진실로 의미하는 바는 무엇인가.
연이어 펼쳐진 사절판 크기의 하늘,
소금기 배인 하늘,
별들로 구멍이 뚫린
다른 하늘에서 인쇄하듯 옮겨 온 잔잔한 눈물로 덮인 하늘,
말리기 위해 펼쳐 놓은 페이지들,
글자와도 같은 새들이 날아가고 있습니다.
아, 우리도 날아가게 해주오,
알 수 없는 글자 같은 새들의 보루 가까이
물 위에서 원을 그리다 그 위에 자리 잡게 해주오.
.
2. 르모리앙에서 (2)
나비 한 마리가 낱알 하나를 일깨우고
그 낱알이 또 하나의 낱알을 일깨우고 있어요
먼지 속에서 마찰이 일고
잉태한 돌 위에
하늘이 푸른 젖을 흘릴 때까지
하루가 탄생합니다
열린 눈들의 위태롭고 가파른 시선 아래로
나무들이 이끌립니다
.
3. 르모리앙에서 (3)
손끝이 닿는 곳 밤의 높이에서
풀들은 항상 자라겠지요
내 이파리의 이파리도
하지만 아주 이르게
그리고 꼿꼿이
나무들을 따라가노라면
내 팔목의 정맥을 간질이던
거미줄이 부서지는 것이 느껴지고
마침내 밤의 모든 연계선이 끊어집니다
그리고 나는 홀로 발걸음을 앞으로 옮깁니다
첫 손님의 눈 그 홍채 위에 비친
벌꿀빛 반점이 되기 위해
.
4. 르모리앙에서 (6)
내가 오르는 동안
산이 땀을 흘립니다
심장의 고동은 빨라지고
돌마다 방울져 맺힌 물기가
등뼈를 타고 소리내어 흐릅니다
계곡에서 
강어귀는 소문을 전하듯
들판의 귀에 속삭여 물을 흘립니다
어두워지기 전에
이 정상으로부터 나의 산이여
당신은 나를 내려놓아야 합니다
.
5. 죽은 이들의 세계에 관한 명제들
(1) 죽은 이들은 살아 있는 이들을 둘러싸고 있다. 살아 있는 이들이 죽은 이들의 핵심부를 이루고 있는 셈이다. 이 핵심에는 시간과 공간의 차원이 존재한다. 핵심부를 둘러싸고 있는 것에는 시간성이 존재하지 않는다.
(2) 핵심부와 그 주변부 사이에는 주고받기가 이루어지는데, 그것이 어떤 것인지는 명료하지 않다. 모든 종교는 그와 같은 주고받기가 어떤 것인지를 명료하게 밝히는 데 관심 가져왔다. 종교의 신비화는 그와 같은 주고받기를 체계적으로 생산하려는 노력의 결과다.
(3) 선명한 주고받기가 드문 것은 아무런 손상을 입지 않은 채 시간과 시간의 부재 사이의 경계를 건널 수 있는 것이 드물다는 데서 기인한다.
(4) 죽은 이들은 한때 개개인으로 존재했지만 여전히 개인으로 보게 되면 그들 본질이 모호해진다. 집합적으로 바라보라. 집합적은 공간뿐만 아니라 시간을 뛰어넘어 생성된다. 집합적인 것에는 일찍이 삶을 산 모든 이들이 포함된다. 그리하여 죽은 이들에 대해서도 생각할 수 있다. 
(5) 끊임없이 새롭게 시작되는 형성의 순간, 그것도 시간을 초월하여 존재하는 형성의 순간 속에 죽은 이들이 존재한다. 형성은 어느 순간에도 확인되는 우주의 상태다.
(6) 삶에 대한 그들의 기억에 의거해, 죽은 이는 형성의 순간이 또한 붕괴의 순간이기도 하다는 것을 안다. 살아 왔기에 죽은 이들은 무기력할 수 없다.
(7) 죽은 이들이 존재하는 순간 속에서 산다면, 어떻게 그들이 기억을 소유할 수 있겠는가. 단지 시간 속으로 던져졌다는 사실만을 기억한다. 존재했거나 존재하는 모든 것이 그러하듯.
(😎 죽은 이과 태어나지 않은 이 사이에 차이가 있다면, 그 차이는 죽은 이가 바로 이 기억을 소유하고 있다는 데 있다. 죽은 이들의 숫자가 늘어남에 따라 이 기억의 크기는 커진다.
(9) 시간을 초월하여 존재하는 죽은 이의 기억은 상상력의 한 형태로 생각할 수 있다. 이는 신과 가까우며 신 안에 거주한다. 하지만 어떻게 그런지는 모른다.
(10) 살아 있는 이들은 종종 시간의 부재를 체험한다. 잠에 취한 순간, 황홀경의 순간, 극도로 위험한 순간, 성적 오르가슴의 순간, 그리고 죽음을 체험하는 순간이 해당된다. 이 순간에 살아 있는 이들의 상상력은 개인적 삶이나 죽음의 경계를 넘는다.
(11) 미래라고 일컬어지는 모든 것은 그들의 상상력이 관여하여 만들어내는 구축물이다.
(12) 산 자들은 어떻게 죽은 자들과 함께 사는가. 살아 있는 것과 죽은 것은 상호의존적인데, 이를 깨뜨린 것은 어느 시대에도 존재하지 않던 현대 특유의 자기중심주의다. 그 결과 불행히도 산 자들은 죽은 자들을 제거된 자들로 생각한다.
.
.
.
.
.
.
이 책은 존의 시와 소묘 그리고 사진이 합체된 모음집이며 그의 다양한 매력을 느낄 수 있다. 아쉬운 점은 책 두께가 얇다는 것. 더 두꺼웠으면 좋았겠다는 건 물론 나의 욕심이다. 
'블랑쇼'의 말을 보탠다. “우리는 각각의 작품에 대해 말할 수 없다. 이 애매함은 작품을 읽는 경험에 내재적으로 들어 있다. 결국 매 순간의 감상 경험은 정의에서 빠져나간다.” 따라서, 존의 시와 소묘에 대해 분석하지 않는다. 아니, 분석해서는 안 된다. 
다만 마음이 가는대로 가 볼 것. 그래서 아픔을 또 다른 나만의 결로 느껴볼 것. 그때의 녹아내리는 응어리들에 안도할 것. 그리하여 또 다시 생길 필연적인 무력함에 (더 이상) 두려워 하지 않을 것. 
잘 읽었던 책, 이번에도 참으로 좋았다. 
(정리 끝)