2019/01/14

Biodynamic agriculture - Wikipedia



Biodynamic agriculture - Wikipedia



Biodynamic agriculture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

Part of a series on
Anthroposophy
General

Anthroposophy
Rudolf Steiner
Ita Wegman
Anthroposophical Society
Goetheanum
Anthroposophically inspired work

Waldorf education
Biodynamic agriculture
Anthroposophic medicine
Camphill Movement
Eurythmy
Philosophy

The Philosophy of Freedom
Social threefolding


Biodynamic agriculture is a form of alternative agriculture very similar to organic farming, but it includes various esotericconcepts drawn from the ideas of Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925).[1][2] Initially developed in 1924, it was the first of the organic agriculture movements.[3] It treats soil fertility, plant growth, and livestock care as ecologically interrelated tasks,[4][5][6]emphasizing spiritual and mystical perspectives.

Biodynamics has much in common with other organic approaches – it emphasizes the use of manures and composts and excludes the use of artificial chemicals on soil and plants


Methods unique to the biodynamic approach include its treatment of animals, crops, and soil as a single system, an emphasis from its beginnings on local production and distribution systems, its use of traditional and development of new local breeds and varieties. 

Some methods use an astrological sowing and planting calendar.[7] 

Biodynamic agriculture uses various herbal and mineral additives for compost additives and field sprays; these are prepared using methods that are more akin to sympathetic magic than agronomy, such as burying ground quartz stuffed into the horn of a cow, which are said to harvest "cosmic forces in the soil."[8]

As of 2016 biodynamic techniques were used on 161,074 hectares in 60 countries.[9]
Germany accounts for 45% of the global total;[10] the remainder average 1750 ha per country. Biodynamic methods of cultivating grapevines have been taken up by several notable vineyards.[11] There are certification agencies for biodynamic products, most of which are members of the international biodynamics standards group Demeter International.

No difference in beneficial outcomes has been scientifically established between certified biodynamic agricultural techniques and similar organic and integrated farming practices. 

Biodynamic agriculture lacks strong scientific evidence for its efficacy and has been labeled a pseudoscience because of its overreliance upon esoteric knowledge and mystical beliefs.[12]


Contents


History[edit]
Origin of a theory[edit]

Rudolf Steiner, occultist philosopher and founder of "anthroposophic agriculture", later known as "biodynamic".

Biodynamics was the first modern organic agriculture.[2][3][13] Its development began in 1924 with a series of eight lectures on agriculture given by philosopher Rudolf Steiner at Schloss Koberwitz in Silesia, Germany (now Kobierzyce in Poland).[14][15] These lectures, the first known presentation of organic agriculture,[2] were held in response to a request by farmers who noticed degraded soil conditions and a deterioration in the health and quality of crops and livestock resulting from the use of chemical fertilizers.[16] The 111 attendees, less than half of whom were farmers, came from six countries, primarily Germany and Poland.[2] The lectures were published in November 1924; the first English translation appeared in 1928 as The Agriculture Course.[17]

Steiner emphasized that the methods he proposed should be tested experimentally. For this purpose, Steiner established a research group, the "Agricultural Experimental Circle of Anthroposophical Farmers and Gardeners of the General Anthroposophical Society".[18] Between 1924 and 1939, this research group attracted about 800 members from around the world, including Europe, the Americas and Australasia.[18] Another group, the "Association for Research in Anthroposophical Agriculture" (Versuchsring anthroposophischer Landwirte), directed by the German agronomist Erhard Bartsch, was formed to test the effects of biodynamic methods on the life and health of soil, plants and animals; the group published a monthly journal, Demeter.[19] Bartsch was also instrumental in developing a sales organisation for biodynamic products, Demeter, which still exists today. The Research Association was renamed the Imperial Association for Biodynamic Agriculture (Reichsverband für biologisch-dynamische Wirtschaftsweise) in 1933. It was dissolved by the National Socialist regime in 1941. In 1931 the association had 250 members in Germany, 109 in Switzerland, 104 in other European countries and 24 outside Europe. The oldest biodynamic farms are the Wurzerhof in Austria and Marienhöhe in Germany.[20]

In 1938, Ehrenfried Pfeiffer's text, Bio-Dynamic Farming and Gardening, was published in five languages – English, Dutch, Italian, French, and German; this became the standard work in the field for several decades.[19] In July 1939, at the invitation of Walter James, 4th Baron Northbourne, Pfeiffer travelled to the UK and presented the Betteshanger Summer School and Conference on Biodynamic Farming at Northbourne's farm in Kent.[21] The conference has been described as the 'missing link' between biodynamic agriculture and organic farming because, in the year after Betteshanger, Northbourne published his manifesto of organic farming, Look to the Land, in which he coined the term 'organic farming' and praised the methods of Rudolf Steiner.[21] In the 1950s, Hans Mueller was encouraged by Steiner's work to create the organic-biological farming method in Switzerland; this later developed to become the largest certifier of organic products in Europe, Bioland.[4]:5
Geographic developments[edit]

Today biodynamics is practiced in more than 50 countries worldwide and in a variety of circumstances, ranging from temperate arable farming, viticulture in France, cotton production in Egypt, to silkworm breeding in China.[22]:141 Demeter International is the primary certification agency for farms and gardens using the methods.
In Australia, the first biodynamic farmer was Ernesto Genoni[23] who in 1928 joined the Experimental Circle of Anthroposophical Farmers and Gardeners, followed soon after by his brother Emilio Genoni.[24] Ileen Macpherson and Ernesto Genoni founded Demeter Biological Farm at Dandenong, Victoria, in 1934 and it was farmed using biodynamic principles for over two decades.[25] Bob Williams presented the first public lecture in Australia on biodynamic agriculture on 26 June 1938 at the home of the architects Walter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin at Castlecrag, Sydney.[26]Since the 1950s research work has continued at the Biodynamic Research Institute (BDRI)[27] in Powelltown, near Melbourne under the direction of Alex Podolinsky.[28] In 1989 Biodynamic Agriculture Australia was established, as a not for profit association.
In 1928 the Anthroposophical Agricultural Foundation was founded in England;[19] this is now called the Biodynamic Agriculture Association. In 1939, Britain's first biodynamic agriculture conference, the Betteshanger Summer School and Conference on Biodynamic Agriculture, was held at Lord Northbourne's farm in Kent; Ehrenfried Pfeiffer was the lead presenter.[21]
In the United States, the Biodynamic Farming & Gardening Association was founded in 1938 as a New York state corporation.
In France the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) was formed in 1972 with five founding members, one of which was the Swedish Biodynamic Association.[29]
The University of Kassel had a Department of Biodynamic Agriculture from 2006 to March 2011.[30]


Biodynamic method of farming[edit]

In common with other forms of organic agriculture, biodynamic agriculture uses management practices that are intended to "restore, maintain and enhance ecological harmony."[31] Central features include crop diversification, the avoidance of chemical soil treatments and off-farm inputs generally, decentralized production and distribution, and the consideration of celestial and terrestrial influences on biological organisms.[31][32] The Demeter Association recommends that "(a) minimum of ten percent of the total farm acreage be set aside as a biodiversity preserve. That may include but is not limited to forests, wetlands, riparian corridors, and intentionally planted insectaries. Diversity in crop rotation and perennial planting is required: no annual crop can be planted in the same field for more than two years in succession. Bare tillage year round is prohibited so land needs to maintain adequate green cover."[33]

The Demeter Association also recommends that the individual design of the land "by the farmer, as determined by site conditions, is one of the basic tenets of biodynamic agriculture. This principle emphasizes that humans have a responsibility for the development of their ecological and social environment which goes beyond economic aims and the principles of descriptive ecology."[22]:141–142 Crops, livestock, and farmer, and "the entire socioeconomic environment" form a unique interaction, which biodynamic farming tries to "actively shape ...through a variety of management practices. The prime objective is always to encourage healthy conditions for life": soil fertility, plant and animal health, and product quality.[22]:141–142 "The farmer seeks to enhance and support the forces of nature that lead to healthy crops, and rejects farm management practices that damage the environment, soil plant, animal or human health....the farm is conceived of as an organism, a self-contained entity with its own individuality,"[34]:148 holistically conceived and self-sustaining.[31] "Disease and insect control are addressed through botanical species diversity, predator habitat, balanced crop nutrition, and attention to light penetration and airflow. Weed control emphasizes prevention, including timing of planting, mulching, and identifying and avoiding the spread of invasive weed species."[33]

Biodynamic agriculture differs from many forms of organic agriculture in its spiritual, mystical, and astrological orientation. It shares a spiritual focus, as well as its view toward improving humanity, with the "nature farming" movement in Japan.[4]:5 Important features include the use of livestock manures to sustain plant growth (recycling of nutrients), maintenance and improvement of soil quality, and the health and well being of crops and animals.[16] Cover crops, green manures and crop rotations are used extensively and the farms to foster the diversity of plant and animal life, and to enhance the biological cycles and the biological activity of the soil.[31]

Biodynamic farms often have a cultural component and encourage local community, both through developing local sales and through on-farm community building activities. Some biodynamic farms use the Community Supported Agriculture model, which has connections with social threefolding.

Compared to non-organic agriculture, BD farming practices have been found to be more resilient to environmental challenges, to foster a diverse biosphere, and to be more energy efficient, factors Eric Lichtfouse describes being of increasing importance in the face of climate change, energy scarcity and population growth.[35]

Biodynamic preparations[edit]

In his "agricultural course" Steiner prescribed nine different preparations to aid fertilization, and described how these were to be prepared. Steiner believed that these preparations mediated terrestrial and cosmic forces into the soil.[36] The prepared substances are numbered 500 through 508, where the first two are used for preparing fields, and the other seven are used for making compost. A long term trial (DOK experiment) evaluating the biodynamic farming system in comparison with organic and conventional farming systems, found that both organic farming and biodynamic farming resulted in enhanced soil properties, but had lower yields than conventional farming.[citation needed] Regarding compost development beyond accelerating the initial phase of composting, some positive effects have been noted:[11]
The field sprays contain substances that stimulate plant growth including cytokinins.[citation needed][clarification needed]
Some improvement in nutrient content of compost is evident from the ingredients included, but not necessarily as a result of the practices and exact preparations as Steiner described them.[37]

Although the preparations have direct nutrient values, modern biodynamic practitioners believe their benefit is to support the self-regulating capacities of the biota already present in the soil and compost.[38] Critics of the practice have pointed out that no evidence or logic underlies the practices themselves, which instead are dependent on magical thinkingand debunked theories of Steiner himself. There is no evidence that biodynamic practices have any benefit beyond the direct nutrients they add as fertilizer,[37] which may itself be of smaller benefit than other traditionally organic or commercial fertilizers.[39]
Field preparations[edit]

Field preparations, for stimulating humus formation:
500: A humus mixture prepared by filling a cow's horn with cow manure and burying it in the ground (40–60 cm below the surface) in the autumn. It is left to decompose during the winter and recovered for use as fertilizer the following spring.[40]
501: Crushed powdered quartz stuffed into a cow's horn and buried in the ground in springtime and taken out in autumn. It can be mixed with 500 but is usually prepared on its own. The mixture is sprayed under very low pressure over the crop during the wet season, as a supposed antifungal.[41]
Compost preparations[edit]

The compost preparations Steiner recommended employ herbs which are frequently used in alternative medical remedies. Many of the same herbs Steiner referenced are used in organic practices to make foliar fertilizers, green manure, or in composting. The preparations Steiner discussed were:
502: Yarrow blossoms (Achillea millefolium) stuffed into the urinary bladders from red deer (Cervus elaphus), placed in the sun during summer, buried in the ground during winter, and retrieved in the spring.[42]
503: Chamomile blossoms (Matricaria recutita) stuffed into the small intestines of cattle, buried in humus-rich earth in the autumn, and retrieved in the spring.[43]
504: Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) plants in full bloom stuffed together underground surrounded on all sides by peat for a year.[44]
505: Oak bark (Quercus robur) chopped in small pieces, placed inside the skull of a domesticated animal, surrounded by peat, and buried in the ground in a place near rain runoff.[45]
506: Dandelion flowers (Taraxacum officinale) stuffed into the mesentery of a cow, buried in the ground during winter, and retrieved in the spring.[46]
507: Valerian flowers (Valeriana officinalis) extracted into water.[47]
508: Horsetail (Equisetum).[48]
Planting calendar[edit]

The approach considers that there are lunar and astrological influences on soil and plant development—for example, choosing to plant, cultivate or harvest various crops based on both the phase of the moon and the zodiacal constellation the moon is passing through, and also depending on whether the crop is the root, leaf, flower, or fruit of the plant.[49][50]This aspect of biodynamics has been termed "astrological" and "pseudoscientific" in nature.[51][52][53]
Seed production[edit]

Biodynamic agriculture has focused on the open pollination of seeds (with farmers thereby generally growing their own seed) and the development of locally adapted varieties.[54]

Biodynamic certification[edit]

The Demeter biodynamic certification system established in 1924 was the first certification and labelling system for organic production.[4]:5 As of 2018, to receive certification as biodynamic, the farm must meet the following standards: agronomic guidelines, greenhouse management, structural components, livestock guidelines, and post-harvest handling and processing procedures.[55]

The term Biodynamic is a trademark held by the Demeter association of biodynamic farmers for the purpose of maintaining production standards used both in farming and processing foodstuffs. The trademark is intended to protect both the consumer and the producers of biodynamic produce. Demeter International an organization of member countries; each country has its own Demeter organization which is required to meet international production standards (but can also exceed them). The original Demeter organization was founded in 1928; the U.S. Demeter Association was formed in the 1980s and certified its first farm in 1982. In France, Biodivin certifies biodynamic wine.[56] In Egypt, SEKEM has created the Egyptian Biodynamic Association (EBDA), an association that provides training for farmers to become certified.[57] As of 2006, more than 200 wineries worldwide were certified as biodynamic; numerous other wineries employ biodynamic methods to a greater or lesser extent.[58]

Effectiveness[edit]

Research into biodynamic farming has been complicated by the difficulty of isolating the distinctively biodynamic aspects when conducting comparative trials.[3] Consequently, there is no strong body of material that provides evidence of any specific effect.[3]

Since biodynamic farming is a form of organic farming, it can be generally assumed to share its characteristics, including "less stressed soils and thus diverse and highly interrelated soil communities".[59]

A 2009/2011 review found that biodynamically cultivated fields:[59]
had lower absolute yields than conventional farms, but achieved better efficiency of production relative to the amount of energy used;
had greater earthworm populations and biomass than conventional farms.

Both factors were similar to the result in organically cultivated fields.

Reception[edit]

In a 2002 newspaper editorial, Peter Treue, agricultural researcher at the University of Kiel, characterized biodynamics as pseudoscience and argued that similar or equal results can be obtained using standard organic farming principles. He wrote that some biodynamic preparations more resemble alchemy or magic akin to geomancy.[8]

In a 1994 analysis, Holger Kirchmann, a soil researcher with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, concluded that Steiner's instructions were occult and dogmatic, and cannot contribute to the development of alternative or sustainable agriculture. According to Kirchmann, many of Steiner's statements are not provable because scientifically clear hypotheses cannot be made from his descriptions. Kirchmann asserted that when methods of biodynamic agriculture were tested scientifically, the results were unconvincing.[60] 

Further, in a 2004 overview of biodynamic agriculture, Linda Chalker-Scott, a researcher at Washington State University, characterized biodynamics as pseudoscience, writing that Steiner did not use scientific methods to formulate his theory of biodynamics, and that the later addition of valid organic farming techniques has "muddled the discussion" of Steiner's original idea. Based on the scant scientific testing of biodynamics, Chalker-Scott concluded "no evidence exists" that homeopathic preparations improve the soil.[61]

In Michael Shermer's The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience, Dan Dugan says that the way biodynamic preparations are supposed to be implemented are formulated solely on the basis of Steiner's "own insight".[62] Skeptic Brian Dunning writes "the best way to think of 'biodynamic agriculture' would be as a magic spell cast over an entire farm. Biodynamics sees an entire farm as a single organism, with something that they call a life force."[63]

Florian Leiber, Nikolai Fuchs and Hartmut Spieß, researchers at the Goetheanum, have defended the principles of biodynamics and suggested that critiques of biodynamic agriculture which deny it scientific credibility are "not in keeping with the facts...as they take no notice of large areas of biodynamic management and research." Biodynamic farmers are "charged with developing a continuous dialogue between biodynamic science and the natural sciences sensu stricto," despite important differences in paradigms, world views, and value systems.[22]:147

Philosopher of science Michael Ruse has written that followers of biodynamic agriculture rather enjoy the scientific marginalisation that comes from its pseudoscientific basis, revelling both in its esoteric aspects and the impression that they were in the vanguard of the wider anti-science sentiment that has grown in opposition to modern methods such as genetic modification.[12]

Steiners theory was similar to those of the agricultural scientist Richard Krzymowski, who was teaching in Breslau since 1922.[64] The environmental scientist Frank M. Rauch mentioned in 1995, concerning the reprint of a book from Raoul Heinrich Francé, another source probably used by Steiner.[65]

The Real Dirt on Farmer John – documentary on a conventional farm which converted to biodynamic and community-supported agriculture
Wild farming

References[edit]

  1. ^ Lejano RP, Ingram M, Ingram HM (2013). "Chapter 6: Narratives of Nature and Science in Alternative Farming Networks". Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. MIT Press. p. 155. ISBN 9780262519571.
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Paull, John (2011). "Attending the First Organic Agriculture Course: Rudolf Steiner's Agriculture Course at Koberwitz, 1924". European Journal of Social Sciences. 21 (1): 64–70.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Vogt G (2007). Lockeretz W, ed. Chapter 1: The Origins of Organic Farming. Organic Farming: An International History. CABI Publishing. pp. 9–30. ISBN 9780851998336.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Paul Kristiansen and Charles Mansfield, "Overview of organic agriculture", in Paul Kristiansen, Acram Taji, and John Reganold (2006), Organic Agriculture: A global perspective, Collingwood, AU: CSIRO Publishing
  5. ^ Ikerd, John (2010). "Sustainability, Rural". In Leslie A. Duram. Encyclopedia of Organic, Sustainable, and Local Food. ABC-CLIO. pp. 347–49. ISBN 0313359636.
  6. ^ Abbott, L. K.; Murphy, Daniel V. (2007). Soil Biological Fertility: A Key to Sustainable Land Use in Agriculture. Springer. p. 233. ISBN 140206618X.
  7. ^ 2015 Biodynamic Lunar and Planetary Calendar[permanent dead link]; Desmond Ansel Jolly, Isabella Kenfield, California's New Green Revolution: Pioneers in Sustainable Agriculture, University of California Small Farm Program 2008, p. 114; Carl F. Jordan, An Ecosystem Approach to Sustainable Agriculture, Springer 2013, p. 126; Arnaldo Walter and Pedro Gerber Machado, "Socio-Economic Impacts of Bioethanol from Sugarcane in Brazil", in Socio-Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Production Dominik Rutz, Rainer Janssen (eds.), Springer 2014 ISBN 978-3-319-03828-5 pp. 193–215. p. 208; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Twenty-First Century Systems Agriculture, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council, Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century, National Academies Press 2010. ISBN 978-0-309-14896-2 p. 21
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Treue, Peter (13 March 2002). "Blut und Bohnen: Der Paradigmenwechsel im Künast-Ministerium ersetzt Wissenschaft durch Okkultismus". Die Gegenwart (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Archived from the original on 17 April 2003. Retrieved 15 November 2011. (Translation: "Blood and Beans: The paradigm shift in the Ministry of Renate Künast replaces science with occultism")
  9. ^ Paull, John (2016) Organics Olympiad 2016: Global Indices of Leadership in Organic Agriculture, Journal of Social and Development Sciences. 7(2):79–87
  10. ^ Paull, John (2011) "Organics Olympiad 2011: Global Indices of Leadership in Organic Agriculture" Archived July 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine., Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(4):144–50.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b Reeve, Jennifer R.; Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne; Reganold, John P.; York, Alan L.; McGourty, Glenn; McCloskey, Leo P. (December 1, 2005). "Soil and Winegrape Quality in Biodynamically and Organically Managed Vineyards". American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. Davis, CA: American Society for Enology and Viticulture. 56 (4): 367–76. ISSN 0002-9254. OCLC 60652537.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b Ruse M (2013). Pigliucci M, Boudry M, eds. Chapter 12: Evolution – From Pseudoscience to Popular Science, from Popular Science to Professional Science. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. p. 227. ISBN 978-0-226-05182-6.
  13. ^ Traditional agriculture employed organic practices in the absence of any alternative.
  14. ^ Paull, John (2013) "Koberwitz (Kobierzyce); In the footseps of Rudolf Steiner'", Journal of Bio-Dynamics Tasmania, 109 (Autumn), pp. 7–11.
  15. ^ Paull, John (2013) "Breslau (Wrocław): In the footsteps of Rudolf Steiner", Journal of Bio- Dynamics Tasmania, 110: 10–15.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b Diver (1999), "Introduction" Archived 2011-05-26 at the Wayback Machine..
  17. ^ Paull, John (2011). "The secrets of Koberwitz: the diffusion of Rudolf Steiner's agriculture course and the founding of biodynamic agriculture". Journal of Social Research & Policy. 2(1): 19–29.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Paull, John (2013) A history of the organic agriculture movement in Australia. In: Bruno Mascitelli, and Antonio Lobo (Eds.) Organics in the Global Food Chain. Connor Court Publishing, Ballarat, ch.3, pp. 37–61.
  19. ^ Jump up to:a b c Paull, John (2011). "Biodynamic Agriculture: The Journey from Koberwitz to the World, 1924–1938". Journal of Organic Systems. 6 (1): 27–41.
  20. ^ Herbert Koepf and Bodo von Plato "Die biologisch-dynamische Wirtschaftsweise im 20.Jahrhundert", Dornach, 2001
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Paull, John (2011) "The Betteshanger Summer School: Missing link between biodynamic agriculture and organic farming", Journal of Organic Systems, 6(2):13–26.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Florian Leiber, Nikolai Fuchs and Hartmut Spieß, "Biodynamic agriculture today", in Paul Kristiansen, Acram Taji, and John Reganold (2006), Organic Agriculture: A global perspective, Collingwood, AU: CSIRO Publishing
  23. ^ Paull, John (2015) "Ernesto Genoni: Artist, Pacifist, Anthroposophist", Uriel Lecture, Christian Community, Hawthorn, pp. 1–67.
  24. ^ Paull, John (2014) "Ernesto Genoni: Australia’s pioneer of biodynamic agriculture", Journal of Organics, 1(1):57–81.
  25. ^ Paull, John (2017) Ileen Macpherson: Life and tragedy of a pioneer of biodynamic farming at Demeter Farm and a benefactor of Anthroposophy in Australia, Journal of Organics, 4(1):29–56.
  26. ^ Paull, John (2012) "Walter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin, Architects of Anthroposophy", Journal of Bio-Dynamics Tasmania, 106: 20–30.
  27. ^ Biodynamic Research Institute (BDRI)
  28. ^ "A Brief History of Bio-dynamics – an Australian Perspective" Biodynamic Growing No 1 Dec 2003 Archived February 17, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
  29. ^ Paull, John (2010) "From France to the World: The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM)", Journal of Social Research & Policy, 1(2):93–102.
  30. ^ Biodynamic Agriculture Dept. of the University of Kassel Archived October 13, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  31. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Lotter, Donald W. (2003). "Organic Agriculture". Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 21 (4): 59–128. doi:10.1300/J064v21n04_06. ISSN 1044-0046.
  32. ^ Harwood, Richard R. (1990). "A History of Sustainable Agriculture". In Clive A. Edwards, Rattan Lal, Patrick Madden, Robert H. Miller and Gar House (Eds.). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society. pp. 3–19. ISBN 0-935734-21-X. p. 7
  33. ^ Jump up to:a b Demeter, USA, Farm Standard
  34. ^ Alsos, G. A., Carter, S., and Ljunggren, E. (2011), The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development Cheltenham, GB:Edward Elgar Publishing
  35. ^ K. Padmavathy; G. Poyyamoli (2011). Lichtfouse, Eric, ed. Genetics, biofuels and local farming system. Berlin: Springer. p. 387. ISBN 978-94-007-1520-2.
  36. ^ Kirchmann, H.; Thorvaldsson, G.; Bergstrom, L.; Gerzabek, M.; Andren, O.; Eriksson, L.O.; Winninge, M. (2008). "Fundamentals of organic agriculture" (PDF). Organic Crop Production--Ambitions and Limitations. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-12. Retrieved 2009-07-01.
  37. ^ Jump up to:a b Chhabra, Esha (5 March 2017). "Biodynamic farming is on the rise – but how effective is this alternative agricultural practice?". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  38. ^ Raupp, J. and U.J. König. (1996). "Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels." Biol. Agric. & Hort. 13, pp. 175–88.
  39. ^ Chalker-Scott, Linda (December 2013). "The Science Behind Biodynamic Preparations: A Literature Review". HortTechnology. 23 (6): 814–819. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  40. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 33–37
  41. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 47–48
  42. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 67–69
  43. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 70–73
  44. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 73–74
  45. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 74–76
  46. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 77–78
  47. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 79–80
  48. ^ Proctor (1997), pp. 81–82
  49. ^ Desai, B K (2007). Sustainable agriculture: a vision for the future. New Delhi: B T Pujari/New India Pub. Agency. pp. 228–29. ISBN 978-81-89422-63-9.
  50. ^ Biodynamic Tea (2007), "Beyond Organic Biodynamic Tea".
  51. ^ Diver (1999), "Planetary Influences" Archived 2011-05-26 at the Wayback Machine..
  52. ^ Novella, Steven (19 June 2017). "Biodynamic Farming and Other Nonsense". NeuroLogica Blog. The New England Skeptical Society. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  53. ^ Stableford, Brian M. (1 July 2015). Science fact and science fiction : an encyclopedia. Routledge. p. 42. ISBN 978-1138868823. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  54. ^ Nemoto, K.; Nishikawa, Y. (2007). "Seed supply system for alternative agriculture: Case study of biodynamic agriculture in Germany". Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. Shinshu University, Japan. 43 (1–2): 73–81.
  55. ^ Magali Delmas, Vered Doctori-Blass, Kara Shuster, "Ceago Vinegarden: How green is your wine?: Environmental differentiation strategy through Eco-labels". Case Study, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, p.9
  56. ^ Paul Gregutt, "Not Woo-Woo Anymore: More and more wineries are tasting the benefits of saving the soil", The Seattle Times, November 20, 2005. Reprint copy Archived May 25, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.. Accessed 2008-01-26.
  57. ^ Egyptian Biodynamic Association (EBDA). Accessed 2008-01-26. Archived May 15, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  58. ^ Monty Waldin, Biodynamic Wines, ISBN 1-84000-964-0
  59. ^ Jump up to:a b Turinek, M.; Grobelnik-Mlakar, S.; Bavec, M.; Bavec, F. (2009). "Biodynamic agriculture research progress and priorities". Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 24 (2): 146–54. doi:10.1017/S174217050900252X.
  60. ^ Kirchmann, Holger (1994). "Biological dynamic farming – an occult form of alternative agriculture?". J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 7 (2): 173–87. doi:10.1007/BF02349036.
  61. ^ Chalker-Scott, Linda (2004). "The Myth of Biodynamic Agriculture" (PDF). Master Gardener Magazine. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 August 2017.
  62. ^ Dugan D (2002). Shermer M, ed. Anthroposophy and Anthroposophical Medicine. The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. 2. ABC-CLIO. p. 32. ISBN 1-57607-653-9.
  63. ^ Dunning, Brian. "Skeptoid #26: Biodynamic Agriculture". Skeptoid. Retrieved 2011-12-12.
  64. ^ Helmut Zander (2011). Rudolf Steiner. Die Biographie. Piper, Munich. p. 458. ISBN 978-3-492-05448-5.
  65. ^ Frank M. Rauch (1995). "Lebendige Erde". Zur Neuauflage: Francé Das Leben im Bodenund Das Edaphon, Report about the new edition. Edition Siebeneicher.

Further reading[edit]
Biodynamic Agricultural Association (n.d.). "How does the Calendar work?". Biodynamic Frequently Asked Questions. The Biodynamic Agricultural Association (UK). Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2007-10-05.

Burkitt, L.L.; D R. Small; J.W. McDonald; W.J. Wales; M.L. Jenkin (2007a). "Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 1. Soil and pasture properties". Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. Melbourne, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Publishing. 47 (5): 479–88. doi:10.1071/EA05196. OCLC 12490171.

Burkitt, L.L.; W.J. Wales; J.W. McDonald; D R. Small; M.L. Jenkin (2007b). "Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 2. Milk production and composition and animal health". Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. Melbourne, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Publishing. 47 (5): 489–94. doi:10.1071/EA06085. OCLC 12490171.Diver, Steve (1999). "Biodynamic Farming & Compost Preparation (ATTRA Publication #IP137)". ATTRA - National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. Archived from the originalon 2011-05-26. Retrieved 2007-10-05.Harwood, Richard R. (1990). "A History of Sustainable Agriculture". In Clive A. Edwards; Rattan Lal; Patrick Madden; Robert H. Miller; Gar House. Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society. pp. 3–19. ISBN 0-935734-21-X. OCLC 20933949.

Koepf, Herbert (2009). Research in Biodynamic Agriculture: Methods and Results. Biodynamic Farm and Gardening Association. ISBN 0-938250-34-5.Kristiansen, Paul (2006). "Overview of organic agriculture" (PDF). In Paul Kristiansen; Acram Taji; John Reganold. Organic Agriculture: A Global Perspective (online sample reprint ed.). Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing. pp. 1–23. ISBN 978-0-643-09090-3. OCLC 71801183.

Mäder, Paul; Andreas Fließbach; David Dubois; Lucie Gunst; Padruot Fried; Urs Niggli (2002). "Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming". Science. New York, NY: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 296 (5573): 1694–97. doi:10.1126/science.1071148. OCLC 1644869. PMID 12040197. Archived from the original (Summary) on October 25, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-11.

Martinez, A.W. (1952-05-31). "The City With Golden Garbage" (Reprint). Collier's Weekly. Springfield, OH: Crowell-Collier. OCLC 8755061. Retrieved 2007-10-05.McKanan, Dan (2017). Eco-Alchemy: Anthroposophy and the History and Future of Environmentalism. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520290051. JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctt1vjqqzd. IntroductionNastati, Enzo (2010). "Commentary on Dr Rudolf Steiner's Agriculture Course"

MM Publications.Eskenazi, Joe (2010). "Voodoo on the Vine". SF Weekly.Pfeiffer, Ehrenfried (2006) [1938]. Soil Fertility, Renewal and Preservation: Bio-Dynamic Farming and Gardening. Delhi, India: Asiatic Publishing House. ISBN 81-87067-73-X.Schilthuis, Willy (2003). Biodynamic Agriculture. Floris Books. ISBN 0-86315-397-6.


Bibliography[edit]

Proctor, Peter (1997). Grasp the Nettle: Making Biodynamic Farming & Gardening Work. With Gillian Cole. Random House.
External links[edit]
Biodynamics Section at the Rudolf Steiner Archive, An Online Library

show

v
t
e
Anthroposophy


show

v
t
e
Horticulture and gardening


show

v
t
e
Pseudoscience


Authority control

GND: 4006856-0

2019/01/13

Restoration Agriculture by Mark Shepard | Goodreads



Restoration Agriculture by Mark Shepard | Goodreads



Want to Read

Rate this book
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Preview

Restoration Agriculture

by
Mark Shepard
4.32 · Rating details · 361 ratings · 36 reviews
Around the globe most people get their calories from annual agriculture - plants that grow fast for one season, produce lots of seeds, then die. Every single human society that has relied on annual crops for staple foods has collapsed. Restoration Agriculture explains how we can have all of the benefits of natural, perennial ecosystems and create agricultural systems that imitate nature in form and function while still providing for our food, building, fuel and many other needs - in your own backyard, farm or ranch. This book, based on real-world practices, presents an alternative to the agriculture system of eradication and offers exciting hope for our future. (less)

GET A COPY
Kobo
Online Stores ▾
Book Links ▾

Paperback, 313 pages
Published August 16th 2013 by Acres USA (first published January 1st 2013)
ISBN
1601730357 (ISBN13: 9781601730350)
Edition Language
English

Other Editions (4)





All Editions | Add a New Edition | Combine...Less Detailedit details





FRIEND REVIEWS
Recommend This Book None of your friends have reviewed this book yet.



READER Q&A
Ask the Goodreads community a question about Restoration Agriculture



Be the first to ask a question about Restoration Agriculture



LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
100+ Best Permaculture & Homesteading Books: The Ultimate Reading List for Sustainable Living

166 books — 120 voters
The Best Permaculture Books Ever

113 books — 95 voters

More lists with this book...



COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
Rating details


Sort: Default
|
Filter

Jan 02, 2013Adam rated it liked it
Shelves: environmental-history, botany, food, inspirational, non-fiction, sustainable-agriculture, the-problem-of-civilization, permaculture, restoration-ecology
Mark Shepard's presentation at 2013's MOSES organic farming conference was among the most influential, rousing, and revelatory moments of the past few years of my life. He said nothing I didn't already know, but he put all the pieces together in a way that seemed new and showed me that the oft-discussed but rarely practiced ideal of a perennial polyculture could feed people really, really well, and restore ecosystem functions, and be a phenomenally successful restoration ecology project. A farm could heal the land and create nutritious diets in a totally ethical way at the same time, with little compromise.

It was everything I had ever wanted, and it was finally a real option on the table. I am presently about to graduate, I have no debt, and I benefit from an unusually strong support network. I have the opportunity to make Mark's dream my reality. It was also clear that every goal I planned to attend graduate school to accomplish would be simple to do on the farm: fulfilling curiosity by reading academic papers and books, but also by looking and watching and taking pictures: learning to understand ecology by doing it, trying to put the complex system back together and tune it up.

Mark's book, in consequence, was a rather large disappointment. I'd imagined that the presentation was sort of a teaser for the book, but having read it, it's clear Mark is a much better speaker than a writer, and more importantly that his book is nothing like the practical how-to manual he made it out to be. It's essentially an extended explanation of the system and an advertisement for it, with only the most cursory advice for an aspiring practitioner (though of course there were plenty of interesting ideas I took away - I'll get to that in a bit).

Restoration Agriculture is sorely in need of an editor, or a flock of them (in leader-follower mob grazing rotation, perhaps!). It is rife with typos, embarrassing things like "it's" instead of "its" or "compliment" instead of "complement." The prose is invariably clumsy and unpleasant to read. You can see Mark typing it out in Word or something - it doesn't feel polished from that point at all.

Worst of all, he just butchers native bee taxonomy. He implies that all N. American natives are Megachilids, while all Eurasian natives are Apids - ignoring the other families entirely. He goes on to speculate that there is "something about North America" that discourages sociality in bees - dismissing the achievements of all bumblebees and a few Halictids who have been doing just fine at social living here for millions of years.

Mark's treatment of scholarship is upsetting. He constantly throws out claims (most of which I'm sure are true and backed by at least a fair amount of research, since most of it is stuff I'm familiar with from more responsible sources) with clauses like "scientists claim" or "there is reason to believe." He essentially doesn't cite anyone but Paul Martin, and that case feels more like a recommendation than a citation. This betrays not only a lack of respect for the scientists whose work he is taking advantage of, but also a relatively ideological and thin understanding of the material in general.

This is symptomatic of Mark's conflicted relationship with science and research overall. His claims are based in a complex and rich body of work. At many points throughout the book he bemoans the lack of research and development on restoration agriculture systems. This is right - part of the reason perennial polyculture systems are perceived as financially unfeasible is because none of the efficiency-increasing equipment for them has been designed yet. But often he seems to scorn "science" and "scientific theories" and in his presentation he actively encouraged the audience to go plant trees instead of going into research.

This hits close to home for me, of course, because right now I'm essentially trying to decide between going into doing restoration agriculture or being paid to research it (and of course practicing it on the side). Mark makes two things clear that definitely support the latter option: farmers, even those with low input costs, diverse crops, and high-value products, don't make enough money to support themselves, so there's no shame or failure in seeking off-farm work to support yourself; and research is desperately needed, and is still so rare that any new entries would be extremely helpful in guiding new practitioners. Yet in his presentation and speaking to him in person, he constantly heckled (it seemed like) me to not wait, to plant the trees now! Very stressful, confusing, annoying.

While it's clear that literally anything is better than an industrial cornfield (even parking lots are accompanied by drainage ponds, and have lower pesticide loads) and Mark's system is substantially better than any other agricultural system I know of, I'm interested in doing him one better. He has a cavalier disregard for invasives, going so far as encouraging people to plant the Siberian Peashrub because of its vigor. His system probably reproduces many of the ecosystem services we might expect from such a plot. But it doesn't go as far as it could in actually monetizing restoration of modified native ecosystems. The system is advocated for its benefits to the farmer and to society, and the "restoration" aspect is only vaguely referred to with some handwaving about bird species and tree frogs. Mark seems to be implying that if you put together something that resembles an ecosystem, the self-repairing aspects of ecology will take care of the rest.

Thus Restoration Agriculture lacks the flavor of deep ecology, bioregionalism, of love of place, that, for instance, Richard Manning communicates so beautifully in Grassland: The History, Biology, Politics and Promise of the American Prairie. There's a little too much of the engineer. Members of each canopy layer are interchangeable parts, altering the hydrology is a water harvesting strategy, not a return to free meandering rivers and the “story the land calls forth.” In some ways it's still an organic machine. This isn't just a sentimentalist complaint tied to a misled vision of wilderness – it's pragmatic: it influences the choices you make and the results you get.

On the flip side, this pragmatic lens is a clear advantage. Mark is far more interested in monetizing good practices and achieving financial sustainability than in remaking the pre-Columbian Exchange oak savannah. This is a really, really important line of thinking because it unlocks a wonderfully appealing transition path. With restoration ag, we can restore cornfields to functioning ecosystems resilient to climate change, produce enough food to not only feed urban populations, but feed them in a way that solves serious nutritional issues, and at the same time engage in a restoration agriculture project that pays for itself in cold, hard dollars. Mark makes a number of suggestions that make this track seem feasible, but most of them boil down to putting in every niche an organism that yields marketable products. Large animals in the system are completely replaced with livestock; trees are chosen for their growth rate, timber quality, and edible bits; trees are laid out in patterns that facilitate mechanical harvesting and soil management. Even most of the ecosystem services are meant to reduce work and investment by bootstrapping themselves into perpetuity.


I've been ragging on the book quite a bit, so I want to emphasize the quiet enormity of Mark's idea. He doesn't express it very well (hopefully I can write a better book a few years down the road ;) but it really is totally revolutionary.

Mark does what sustainable agriculture practitioners have been saying they want to do for ages but have never thought they could really get away with. He uses ecological means to manage weeds, pests, diseases, and fertility. He makes food production compatible with wildlife – theoretically all of it. Mainstream organic farmers, on the advice of the Xerces Society, install hedgerows and insectary plantings and windbreaks that provide marginal habitat for insects on the borders of fields. The fields themselves are still essentially “sacrifice zones.” Mark builds the solutions into the system. It's organic farming that finally makes sense, that finally fulfills its promises.

It's the same in nutrition. Organic farmers play up the lack of poison and the nutritional density of fresh vegetables. They're marketing a product that is easy for them to produce, and they're right about those claims, but they aren't actually putting themselves in a position to solve global nutrition issues. Mark instead looks at what people eat and want to eat, and asks how he can supply that in a restoration agriculture system. Unlike most organic growers, he is attempting to create a nutritionally complete diet. Of course, this is the only way the movement can ever fulfill its goals. We can only end the devastating reign of industrial agriculture by replacing it completely.

So Mark's brilliant, incomparable, and endlessly worthwhile contribution is simply the explication and proof of concept of a great idea – perennial polyculture food ecosystems – but there were a few other great ideas in the book as well. His concept of on-farm plant breeding is empowering and exciting, and likely a necessity in dealing with the vicissitudes of catastrophic climate change. It takes the long view of diverse outcomes in succession, acknowledging that if we are going to shape artificial but permanent food-producing ecosystems, we will need to shape the genetics of each component as well, mimicking the locally specific and therefore regionally diverse gene pools found in nature.

While he wasn't particularly good at focusing on deep ecology and his particular place, he did make great strides in integrating environmental history into his design. He brings it back to pre-Clovis North America, to the Pleistocene megafauna, and uses that lens to translate functioning ecosystem traits (like what I saw in Tanzania) into lessons for the farm. I think a lot of the problems organic farmers have when implementing solutions stem from the fact that few people have a grasp of what truly rich and healthy ecosystems are actually like. This insight made me appreciate my lessons in Tanzania much more. It really puts the lie to the zero-sum thinking that encourages specialization and simplification of agroecosystems, showing that many different plant and animal species can coexist productively together. It is the norm in natural ecosystems. (less)
flag14 likes · Like · 2 comments · see review



Sep 25, 2013Anna rated it liked it
Shelves: gardening-homesteading
I hate to be the nay-sayer to this book. Mark Shepard has a fascinating story to tell about his 106-acre food forest. Unfortunately, he doesn't tell it! Instead, he titillates us with tidbits of hands-on information (which might cover about 20 pages), then rants and regurgitates for the rest of the book.

Luckily for you, I've written a lunchtime series with those useful tidbits in it, so you don't have to go gold-mining in this book.
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



Jan 14, 2015-Me rated it it was amazing
This is a fabulous book about permaculture principals and why a perennial, polyculture farm is more productive and healthier than an annual, monoculture counterpart. The descriptions are clear and concise.
I would highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the subject.
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Jan 14, 2018Danni rated it it was amazing
Every year there are more and more books published about Permaculture. Some of these new books show lovely example sites and explain a hundred inspiring techniques for using Permaculture. It's getting harder to tell which books are worth your time to read, though. Restoration Agriculture stands out in this ever increasingly crowded topic area. I've yet to read such a easy and exciting treatise that really addresses the "Why" of Permaculture like Restoration Agriculture.

Readers are treated to chapters that clearly outline what brought the author to Permaculture and how he uses it on his farm and in consulting practice. In every chapter he shows respect and admiration for his conventional neighbors and the dying agricultural communities throughout the country. This book is really meant for those folks. It is meant for the countless farmers looking for real ways to feed the world and survive in the communities they love. I adored reading his chapters laying out how conventional agriculture "feeds" the world and how restoration agriculture can nourish the wold.

If you are looking for a Permaculture book to really kick you into high gear for the new year, this is it! I don't think I've read a nonfiction book so fast and loved so much of it before! (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Jul 16, 2018Warren rated it it was amazing
It is an inspirational book - not only does Mark explain restoration agriculture but only offers methods to practically set up such a system.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Sep 09, 2014Zach rated it it was amazing
This is, so far, the best collection of permaculture philosophy that points toward a specific system of planting that yields food and replenishes the soil. Most of the permaculture books I've read are either broadly preaching to a set of sparkly principles or a reference book lacking a compelling narrative, but this manages to do both. It doesn't get into the daily details of maintaining such a system, but the point is also to develop plants that survive neglect, which is cool for this lazy, lazy gardener.

Some of his points could use some explanation (i.e. how has everycivilization reliant upon annual plants failed?), and I lost momentum toward the end, but it's still a fantastic book that gets me excited to plant a bunch of trees on land I don't yet own. (less)
flag1 like · Like · 1 comment · see review



Dec 22, 2012Chuck rated it it was amazing
This is a permaculture resource book that is up-to-date, inspirational, informative and transformational. Mark makes the case for a new vision of perennial agriculture as a way for humans to live sustainably on the planet. And it's full of practical discussions of the reality of annual/tillage farming as compared to his own data from his demonstration perennial-based farm.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Oct 26, 2018Боби rated it it was amazing
Ако си мислите, че текущото земеделие, което унищожава всичко по пътя си в името на мимолетен триумф и после хайде пак отначало следващата година е единствения начин хората да се прехранват, значи 1) не познавате добре дълбоката история от преди 10-12К години и 2) не сте чели тази книга.

Марк не си поплюва и ми харесва, че е готов на всичко, за да постигне своето - природата да процъфтява, докато той си получава заслуженото. Вдъхновителят на нашия кестенов експеримент, който започва през есен 20 ...more
flagLike · comment · see review



May 04, 2018Alex rated it really liked it
Great introduction to agroforestry with a permaculture flavor. Shepard makes a great case for the necessity of nothing short of an agriculture revolution. I was hoping for more practical details about how to actually do my part on my property. But he does point the reader in the right direction and mentions where to find more info. The writing is crisp and personal.
flagLike · comment · see review



Dec 20, 2017Blanche rated it it was amazing
An incredible call to arms, and a hopeful vision for a future we could build.
flagLike · comment · see review



Jan 04, 2015John rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites, to-reread
This book is a big deal. There has always been the question: is permaculture actually physically and economically feasible as an agricultural practice on a large-scale, in a way competitive with conventional farming, while not compromising on ecological measures? This book makes a broad case that the answer is yes, both by qualitative and quantitative measures, and explains how this agriculture is done in an accessible way. In short, these practices takes both techniques from permaculture, such careful perennial plant combinations and keyline-style water management and plowing, with a natural farming approach to variety selection and pest control (namely, if a plant is going to die without constant tending, a working polyculture farmer doesn't have time to deal with it).

This book includes a great overview of the polycultures Mark uses, including silviopasture (integrated herd management), bee-keeping (the history-driven explanation of how bee colony collapses are caused by modern bee-keeping technology, and the alternative historical practice, was eye-opening), and fungi harvesting, but also points to other systems appropriate to other regions, and gives credit to further resources, such as the Center for Agroforestry. It describes the transition to these practices from annual agriculture. The book also provides a numerical comparisons of the yields seen today by conventionally-raised corn in terms of nutrition, useable caloric output, and input costs.

The book does repeat itself, but not in a way that I found off-putting to my reading, but more in the sense of "here is yet another example of X", continually marshaling evidence and pointing back to points made before, in a way I found kept a certain rhythm with my particular pace of reading.

Finally, besides explaining and defending, this book is also a call to action, urging farmers, ranchers, and land-owners to undertake these practices, others to support their efforts, and "doing-based" non-profits to build these efforts. I cannot help but be excited about the

Let's talk about what the book isn't. The purpose of this book is not to provide a complete agricultural-design practice or to be a step-by-step guide of what to do when. Others have found "The Resilient Farm and Homestead" to be better for this purpose, and so far I'm enjoying that too. I suggest it can't hurt to read both. It's also not written for conventional farmers to enjoy, though I can't tell exactly how inflammatory it is.

What readers may find astonishing is that this book does not exhaust all that Mark has to say. I've initially heard Mark speaking on a variety of podcasts, and I recommend maybe listening to a few of those first, so that you can hear the voice of the book.
(less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Mar 09, 2015Mark rated it liked it · review of another edition
There are more and more books on the market concerning permaculture and for good reason. The recent upsurge in interest regarding organic foods and humanely raised animals for food will eventually lead to the concept of permaculture. Mark Shepard's book, Restoration Agriculture, is a good example of this. Shepard's farm, located in Wisconsin, is the living example of what permaculture is.

The book offers solid suggestions on how to get started and what it takes (time) to begin the journey towards food revolution. However,I would suggest that this particular book on permaculture is not limited to real-world solutions. Rather, Shepard spends the first third of the book explaining the evils of agribusiness and the inevitable consequences of mixing cash profit with long-term realistic goals. Make no mistake, Shepard is correct in his doomsday scenarios.

However, I think the book should explore in more detail the suggestions that he makes regarding permaculuture practices rather than giving an expose upon the agribusiness that is causing so much of the environmental degradation that we see today.

I would recommend Shepard's book to those "just getting started" in the business of growing their own food. While I am one of those beginners, I have read several other books on permaculture including Sepp Holzer's book concerning the topic. Shepard is certainly a cheerleader for the permaculture movement, but I think that the title is a bit misleading. Restoration Agriculture is not just about restoring the tortured land that surrounds us, but is about uncovering uncomfortable facts about the real cost of how many of us live today. (less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Jan 04, 2013Karen Mahtin rated it liked it
Shelves: ag-how-to, ag-reference, gardening, permaculture
I read Acres U.S.A. magazine, and I have to say that the quality of editing (lack of proofreading) of this book is entirely consistent with the magazine's. I have to wonder if anyone at Acres read the book, or why they seem to have a policy against editing. It can actually interfere with the reader's comprehension of the text. For instance, there's the use of the word "decent" instead of "descent." Can you imagine being a non-native English speaker (aka "English learner") and trying to understand this kind of thing? There are also issues such as agreement of subject and verb, misuse of commas and hyphens, etc. Here's another example- I'm watching a video interview with him and he misquotes the same kids' song as in the book: "and the green grass grew all around, all around..." Uh, it's "grows." A quick Google search verified this for me.

These typos take away from the credibility of the entire work. They also make the reader ask oneself over and over, "Did the editors ACTUALLY READ THIS BOOK?!"

The book is slow to start, with a lot of background about ecology and stuff like that. Like many Acres U.S.A. publications, it doesn't have a lot of recommendations for plants to use in Californian (although Shepard does cover the oak savannah). The chapters in the middle of the book cover different things that you can have on your farm, like livestock and bees. I actually learned a lot from the bee chapter. (less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Sep 02, 2013Grant rated it liked it
Mark Shepard is a talented public speaker, with a body of work growing in the soil that may be unmatched. Given his tremendous accomplishments, I would hope a much better editorial staff had been utilized before publishing this book.

The core idea of this book - that a perennial polyculture agricultural system is both an attainable and realistic ideal - is grand. This concept is best conveyed in a one hour keynote presentation, this book falls short as both a how-to manual and a clear explanation of the end goal.

Alas, the content is only better presented in Ben Falk's The Resilient Farm and Homestead.The Resilient Homestead: Innovative Permaculture Systems for the Home and Farm--Based on Research and Development in Earthworks, Perennial Crops, Cold-Climate Rice Production, and Nutrient-Dense Food/Medicine from the Whole Systems Research Farm

If you're open to the idea of changing agriculture as we know it, give it a read, but don't judge the message upon editorial skill. (less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Mar 20, 2014Antonius De veyra rated it really liked it
There were definitely a few chapters that I skimmed over before because I'd heard it all before (a lot of the ecological/ethical arguments in favor of changing our cropping systems...) but the main meat of his writings, on perennial cropping systems, still contained some new content. This was the first book I've seen that had a full description of silvopasture, and I really appreciate an introduction to that idea. Shephard's system of restoration agriculture is basically a hybridization of agroforestry with Salatin and Savory's works on rotational grazing. He goes into detail describing the system he's setup at his ranch in Wisconsin (Zone 4) which is also really cool; his polyculture food forest is based on chestnuts, apples, rubus berries, grapes, asparagus and others grown together with a pasture component that rotates cattle hogs and fowl. Overall a good book that could be a very good layman's introduction to perennial agricultural systems. However, the small typos, (sometimes) overbearing prose and preachy tone detracted from the book's overall polish. (less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Mar 16, 2015Andrea rated it it was amazing
Shelves: farming
This book recommends the strategic planting of edible trees and shrubs in the pasture and farm to increase the overall yield. It is all about biome-appropriate agriculture where the yield of a polyculture (field of multiple crops) is greater than a traditional monoculture (field of one crop). "Overyeilding polycultures are intentionally designed plan and animal systems that may produce lower yields per item, but the total per acre yield exceeds that which any one crop would have produced." (p.173) I was interested to read about how planting trees in a pasture actually increased the pasture's yield. As an example of his ideas he says that a 90 acre farm was able to support 12 Holstein cows, 24 hogs, 24 sheep, 250 chickens, 7,488 chestnut trees, 37,440 raspberry bushes, 22,464 hazelnut (small) trees, 7,488 grape vines, 29,952 currant bushes and 3,744 apple trees (some acting as grape arbors). If that sounds unbelievable to you, read the book! (less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Jun 30, 2014Melissa rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
What a fantastic, and inspiring book! I have been a student of permaculture for years, and have put several of the principals into effect in my semi-suburban backyard. However, my plans to purchase some rural property/homestead and expand upon what I have learned, just got MUCH bigger - I really wish I was younger!!! This book has my wheels turning and the bookmark is loaded with notes to pursue. This is clearly a book that motivates, and the ending analogy about the demise of the dinosaurs and survival of the mice was quite inspiring.
(less)
flagLike · comment · see review



Mar 26, 2015Brett Anderson rated it really liked it
"Over 440 million acres of farmland each year are the scene of advanced chemical warfare unheard of in human combat, but taken for granted in agriculture." - Page 20

"Why is there agriculture? Isn't it so that people can eat and be healthy and nourished?" Wouldn't it make sense to design systems that actually do that? - Page 183

"If a plant wants to die, let it!" - Page 249



flagLike · comment · see review



Jan 20, 2017Daniel rated it really liked it
I really enjoyed the discussion of what crops could be used for perennial agriculture in temperate regions. The author, however, fails to address the problem of the huge amounts of physical labor necessary to harvest the diverse fruit, nut, and root crops that would replace the fields of corn, wheat, and beans that commercial farmers are now producing.
flagLike · comment · see review



May 29, 2014Anna rated it really liked it
Shelves: ag-food
I skimmed through the "preaching-to-the-choir" parts and really enjoyed the practical information, although it is a bit light on this. I have visited Mark Shepard's farm; he is really doing it, but I didn't get to see the rotating livestock in action because they don't yet have facilities for overwintering the large animals.
flagLike · comment · see review



Jan 29, 2013Mwalkes rated it really liked it
I planned to slug through this book to learn from it. It was written in such a delightful way that it was an easy, pleasant read. It is just chock full of common sense. I found myself asking, "Why are we not doing this? Does organic farming have to be so difficult?" Mark Shepard says a resounding, "NO! It does not!" My favorite part of the book, "STUN." Read it. It will be yours too!
flagLike · comment · see review



Aug 04, 2015Alexis rated it really liked it
Lots of good information, the only thing I didn't like was that it seemed to be more negative in the middle of the book than I would've liked. I think its extremely important to recognize the facts and the negative things that are happening in our world, but having done that move on and focus almost entirely on positivity and what you can do to make things better.
flagLike · comment · see review



May 19, 2014Jeneenw rated it it was amazing
Permaculture meets agricultural production. I found this particularly valuable because of the geographical location (essentially local for me), for alley cropping, guilds that work in Wisconsin, and ideas related to daffodils and irises of all things.
flagLike · comment · see review



Jun 24, 2013Mike Murray rated it really liked it
Shelves: nature, plant-care
80 - American Chestnut: zone 2
- Chinese Chestnut: zone 4, 30-50', less acidic soil
flagLike · see review



Nov 30, 2015Ann rated it liked it · review of another edition
Shelves: at-the-farm
Interesting ideas, although the author has a little bit of a tendency to rant.
flagLike · comment · see review



Dec 24, 2014Pieter rated it liked it
Goed als je nog weinig weet over permacultuur. Beschrijft vooral de nadelen van de huidige landbouw en geeft in vogelvlucht een idee van hoe de auteur het oplost. Geen praktisch handboek!
flagLike · comment · see review



Sep 21, 2016Mark Gostkiewicz rated it it was amazing
Mind blowing!
flagLike · comment · see review



Jun 25, 2013David rated it really liked it
Sensible, sustainable agriculture...hoping to join in the fun!
flagLike · comment · see review



May 13, 2014Sheri Bauer rated it really liked it
Excellent information. Did not add to my library shelf because it is more geared to large acreage farms.
flagLike · comment · see review



Aug 05, 2016Mills College Library added it
631.58 S5474 2013
flagLike · see review

Shopping Cart / Cheap-Library.com




  1. Pichon: Race and Revolution in Castro's Cuba: A Memoir by Carlos Moore $5.24

    Cuba: Between Reform and Revolution (Latin American Histories) by Louis A. Pérez Jr. $4.56

    Countdown: Our Last, Best Hope for a Future on Earth? by Alan Weisman $4.72

    Restoration Agriculture - Real-World Permaculture for Farmers by Mark Shepard $5.95

    Dark green religion : nature spirituality and the planetary future by Taylor, Bron Raymond $4.59