2022/03/28

치매 세계 랭킹  認知 症 世界 ランキング

 







livedoor
日本の認知症有病者数は世界の12% : 還暦からの出発















NHK
特集】動画でわかる認知症(1) 認知症のイロハ | NHK健康チャンネル
Visit
Images may be subject to copyright. Learn More



Related imagesSee more

動画でわかる認知症】喫煙、睡眠不足、運動不足などの生活習慣が認知症のリスクを高める | NHK健康チャンネル

動画でわかる認知症】喫煙、睡眠不足、運動不足などの生活習慣が認知症のリスクを高める | NHK健康チャンネル
nhk.or.jp


認知症を予防しよう:激しい運動は必要ない。ほどよい活動を仲間と楽しむ(1)- ライフリー - ユニ・チャーム

認知症を予防しよう:激しい運動は必要ない。ほどよい活動を仲間と楽しむ(1)- ライフリー - ユニ・チャーム
jp.lifree.com


運動不足とがん発症リスクの関係 日本人の調査結果と予防 | NHK健康チャンネル

運動不足とがん発症リスクの関係 日本人の調査結果と予防 | NHK健康チャンネル
nhk.or.jp


動画でわかる認知症】喫煙、睡眠不足、運動不足などの生活習慣が認知症のリスクを高める | NHK健康チャンネル

動画でわかる認知症】喫煙、睡眠不足、運動不足などの生活習慣が認知症のリスクを高める | NHK健康チャンネル
nhk.or.jp


〇 コグニサイズというものの人体実験 | 歌 と こころ と 心 の さんぽ - 楽天ブログ

〇 コグニサイズというものの人体実験 | 歌 と こころ と 心 の さんぽ - 楽天ブログ
plaza.rakuten.co.jp


血管・心臓を若々しく保つ運動 血管拡張効果や動脈硬化の予防効果 | NHK健康チャンネル

血管・心臓を若々しく保つ運動 血管拡張効果や動脈硬化の予防効果 | NHK健康チャンネル
nhk.or.jp


動画でわかる認知症】認知症予防運動プログラムとは | NHK健康チャンネル

動画でわかる認知症】認知症予防運動プログラムとは | NHK健康チャンネル
nhk.or.jp


健康俳句 ~脳鍛え 筋肉鍛え すこやかに~(座って、脳トレ・筋トレをしてみましょう) – らくわ健康教室 講演録

健康俳句 ~脳鍛え 筋肉鍛え すこやかに~(座って、脳トレ・筋トレをしてみましょう) – らくわ健康教室 講演録
blog.rakuwa.or.jp


認知症を予防するにはどうしたら良いの? | 西部桂子のupperブログ~美も健康も心color~

認知症を予防するにはどうしたら良いの? | 西部桂子のupperブログ~美も健康も心color~
ameblo.jp


甘いものを食べ続けると認知症に?糖尿病・高血圧と認知症の関係 | NHK健康チャンネル
甘いものを食べ続けると認知症に?糖尿病・高血圧と認知症の関係 | NHK健康チャンネル
nhk.or.jp


生活習慣の認知症リスク(1)|株式会社シクロケムバイオ

生活習慣の認知症リスク(1)|株式会社シクロケムバイオ
cyclochem.com


認知症と睡眠|不眠・眠りの情報サイト スイミンネット

認知症と睡眠|不眠・眠りの情報サイト スイミンネット
suimin.net







2022/03/27

Conscientious objection and Ukraine – Quakers and Religious Socialism

Conscientious objection and Ukraine – Quakers and Religious Socialism





Quakers and Religious Socialism

Intersection of Mutual Aid, Abolition and Socialism


Conscientious objection and Ukraine
 March 18, 2022 3 Minutes


Amid the horrifying situation of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, I was concerned every time I heard that Ukrainian men aged 18 – 60 were banned from leaving the country.

I studied war resistance and conscientious objection extensively while a student at Scattergood Friends School. All males in the US were required to register for the draft at the time of their eighteenth birthday. I was a Senior at Scattergood then (1969). I went through the process of applying for and was granted conscientious objector status while I tried to prepare my family for my decision to turn in my draft cards. Which I did.

This is a bit ironic because Iowa Yearly Meeting (Conservative)’s Peace and Social Concerns Committee discussed conscientious objector counseling at our recent meeting. That was brought up in part related to the war in Ukraine. Also, as an opportunity to engage our youth in discussions related to war and peace. And because of the writings of a member of the yearly meeting. John Griffith and Draft Resistance.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has ordered a general military mobilization.

In a declaration signed late Thursday, Zelensky said that “in order to ensure the defense of the state, maintaining combat and mobilization readiness of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations,” a broad-based mobilization was ordered, including in the capital, Kyiv and all Ukraine’s major cities.
It ordered the “conscription of conscripts, reservists for military service, their delivery to military units and institutions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine” and other state security services.

At the same time, Ukraine has banned all-male citizens 18-60 years old from leaving the country, according to the State Border Guard Service.

The statement said that following the introduction of martial law in Ukraine, a temporary restriction had been imposed.

“In particular, it is forbidden for men aged 18-60, Ukraine citizens, to leave the borders of Ukraine,” the statement said. “This regulation will remain in effect for the period of the legal regime of martial law. We ask the citizens to take this information into consideration.”

Ukrainian males aged 18-60 are banned from leaving the country, Zelensky says in new declaration From CNN’s Tamara Qiblawi and Caroll Alvardo, February 24, 2022




A New York Times podcast tells the story of an animator named Tyhran, who unsuccessfully tried to cross the border into Poland.


I can’t imagine myself doing military stuff […] I have no experience in it. I’m afraid of holding a gun […] I cannot imagine myself holding a gun.

Tyhran says he was shamed at the border by guards and others seeking to cross, but may try again to cross illegally.


They are bombing and people are dying. Everyone is running […] They are not going to stop. They just want to destroy.

In Ukraine, the Men Who Must Stay and Fight. As hundreds of thousands of citizens flee the Russian advance, the country’s government has ordered men ages 18 to 60 to remain. New York Times podcast, March 1, 2022




What international law says

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantees freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief. Although it does not specifically guarantee a right to conscientious objection to military service, the UN Human Rights Committee has confirmed this right derives from the protection under the convention.

This means that if a person’s conscience, religion or beliefs conflict with an obligation to use lethal force against other people, their right to conscientious objection to military service must be protected.

Some human rights can be suspended or limited during a public emergency. But the right to freedom of conscience is specifically excluded from this category.

Why banning men from leaving Ukraine violates their human rights by Amy Maguire, The Conversation, March 7, 2022



What should Ukraine do?

The government of Ukraine should cancel its ban on men leaving the country. To maintain it will violate the freedom of conscience of any man who wishes to flee due to a conscientious objection to killing others.

In relation to LGBTQI+ people, the ban could also be regarded as preventing people with a well founded fear of persecution from fleeing to seek refuge outside Ukraine.

More broadly, repealing the departure ban would protect Ukraine from allegations it is failing to protect civilians, as required by international humanitarian law. It is one thing to conscript men into military service, providing training and appropriate equipment (although, even in that case, a right to conscientious objection must be respected).

It is another thing entirely to prevent civilians from escaping a war zone.

Why banning men from leaving Ukraine violates their human rights by Amy Maguire, The Conversation, March 7, 2022






Share this:

Twitter
Facebook



Related


Working for peaceFebruary 23, 2022In "Faith"

Iowa Holocaust MemorialFebruary 28, 2022In "Quaker"

Thich Nhat Hanh Dies at 95January 23, 2022In "Faith"



Published by Jeff Kisling

View all posts by Jeff Kisling
PublishedMarch 18, 2022
Post navigation
Previous Post Spirituality over religion
Next PostEnd of free meals for all students

2 thoughts on “Conscientious objection and Ukraine”
Pingback: Thought for 2022 March 18 – Some View on the World

Christadelphians
March 18, 2022 at 11:44 am


Reblogged this on Some View on the World and commented:
Not wanting to go under arms does not mean that people of a certain age could not commit themselves to helping in a country at war.
As conscientious objectors, Christadelphians or Brothers in Christ are bound by the Laws of God whereby the killing of others is not an issue. War is to be avoided, but if it does occur, there are opportunities even for conscientious objectors to serve and show the love of God to others in trouble.

Fleeing a country because one is afraid is more likely to show a different reason than “conscientious objection” to the right cause. Of course, one must also take into account everyone’s state of mind, but not wanting to stand up to help others in difficulties does not really testify to love for one’s neighbour or love for a fatherland. (Not that the latter should be essential).

But where people are in need, one must dare to come to their aid. Even if a Christian will not and should not take up arms, he can in many ways come to the aid of his neighbour in a war zone.

Like
Reply

[[2203 The Peace Testimony and Ukraine - Friends Journal

The Peace Testimony and Ukraine - Friends Journal


The Peace Testimony and Ukraine
March 15, 2022
By Bryan Garman


Photo by Tetiana Shyshkina on Unsplash


The Russian invasion of Ukraine has shaken us all. Innocent civilians have been killed, suffering has worsened, negotiations have failed. Governments around the globe are condemning this depraved military maneuver and are collaborating to defuse it in ways that seemed impossible only a week ago. We hold the citizens of Ukraine and all victims of war in the Light.

For centuries, Friends have proclaimed their commitment to nonviolence. As early as 1654, George Fox insisted that nations “cannot engage in war as a method for settling international disputes, for war is a test of strength, not a search for truth and justice.” War, Quakers believed, proceeded from the “lusts of men.” And while the British persecuted Friends throughout the 1660s, Fox’s followers boldly affirmed their commitment to pacifism in their Declaration to Charles II. “Our principle is, and our Practice have always been, to seek peace and ensue it,” they insisted, “seeking the good and welfare and doing that which tends to the peace of all.”

In 1947, the Nobel Committee recognized Quakers’ long-standing dedication to nonviolence and service, and the American Friends Service Committee and the British Friends Service Council received the Peace Prize on behalf of Friends. In particular, Quaker peace-building activities had caught the committee’s attention during and after World War II. Friends established air raid shelters and centers for war victims in England, and adapted meeting houses and other facilities to create evacuation hostels for children and the elderly. Prominent Quakers continued to lead humanitarian causes in the wake of the Holocaust.

Quakers are clear on their obligation to wage peace, serve those in need, and pursue diplomatic channels, no matter how narrow they might be. But what happens when diplomacy fails, justice is breached, aggression persists, and lives are endangered? How do we justify waiting for diplomacy as tanks approach Kyiv and missiles flatten maternity hospitals? How can we avert our eyes from social media and news cycles that depict the gruesome toll of war? The ways of the world complicate the practice of the peace testimony, calling Friends to develop deep and nuanced knowledge about specific conflicts and compelling them to examine their consciences. To understand the situation in the Ukraine, we must not simply cling uncritically to the peace testimony. We must also understand the dynamic geopolitical and historical forces at play.

Quakers are short on dogma and long on discernment, a process that calls individuals to interrogate circumstances, seek truth, and act upon their conscience. 
Over the centuries individual Quakers have engaged in warfare provided they deemed the cause just. 
  • Somewhere between thirty and fifty percent of eligible U.S. and British Quakers fought in World War I, 
  • and approximately three-quarters chose to bear arms in World War II

Robert L. Smith, a devout Quaker who would become the headmaster of Sidwell Friends, was among those who served in the military in the latter conflict. 
By the time he earned admission to Harvard, Bob was reflecting on the role he should play in turning back the “ocean of darkness” that flooded Europe. 
“Is there that of God in every man?,” he asked. “Can you maintain that ideal in a world dominated by barbaric cruelty?”

There can be, and in the case of stopping fascism there were, multiple truths. The peace testimony provides a moral touchstone and calls us to act according to the leadings of our conscience. It enables us to recognize that faith must be tested in real time and on rugged terrain where change accelerates toward unforgiving and potentially irreversible circumstances. The testimony’s archaic language calls us to do our best to arrest time and wrestle with eternity, 
so that we might discern truth with discipline, so that we might act to save the best of humanity for the future. 
  • This way of being in the world is not infallible, but it may well offer us the best chance we know to seek peace, to pause 
  • so that we can see the divine even in our enemies, 
  • and to weigh competing truths.
Ukraine
Viewpoint



Bryan Garman

Bryan Garman has been working in Friends education for 25 years. He has previously served as head of Wilmington (Del.) Friends School and is the current head of Sidwell Friends in Washington, D.C.. He is a member of the Friends Council on Education board of trustees.
===
I must confess I have struggled with this and am gratified that this is an issue for others as well, since I cannot abide by seeing others suffer at the hands of madmen with power who are intent on bullying the world.

FRIENDSJOURNAL.ORG
The Peace Testimony and Ukraine
War is a test of strength, not a search for truth and justice.

Bryan Osborne

We need to stop isolating Ukraine as sort of priority and be supportive of the some eight power based conflicts around the globe incl Palestinian and Yemeni conflicts.
  • These two are supported by Britain and other NATO partners via proxy arms sales. 
  • In the Yemen today more than 80% of the population are dependent on foreign aid relief to just eat and drink every day. 
  • The way we have isolated Ukraine is just shameful.