Showing posts with label Anne Marie Schimmel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anne Marie Schimmel. Show all posts

2022/04/18

The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination: Chittick, William C.: 9780887068850: Amazon.com: Books

The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination: Chittick, William C.: 9780887068850: Amazon.com: Books


https://www.scribd.com/document/438156341/William-C-Chittick-The-Sufi-Path-of-Knowledge-1989


The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination Paperback – June 1, 1989
by William C. Chittick (Author)
4.6 out of 5 stars 48 ratings

See all formats and editions



Paperback
AUD 44.59
14 Used from AUD 32.8713 New from AUD 45.661 Collectible from AUD 45.03








"For the first time in the history of Orientalism, a thorough study of Ibn al-'Arabi's thought is now available. William Chittick has given us a translation of numerous passages from the work of the Magister Magnus and placed them in their theological context, thus removing many misunderstandings that have prevailed both among Muslims and in the West when interpreting Ibn al-'Arabi's mystical worldview. Chittick has done this with admirable clarity, and his book will always remain a most important milestone in the study of Islamic mystical theology." -- Annemarie Schimmel, Harvard University

Ibn al-'Arabi is still known as "the Great Sheik" among the surviving Sufi orders. Born in Muslim Spain, he has become famous in the West as the greatest mystical thinker of Islamic civilization. He was a great philosopher, theologian, and poet.

William Chittick takes a major step toward exposing the breadth and depth of Ibn al-'Arabi's vision. The book offers his view of spiritual perfection and explains his theology, ontology, epistemology, hermeneutics, and soteriology. The clear language, unencumbered by methodological jargon, makes it accessible to those familiar with other spiritual traditions, while its scholarly precision will appeal to specialists.

Beginning with a survey of Ibn al-'Arabi's major teachings, the book gradually introduces the most important facets of his thought, devoting attention to definitions of his basic terminology. His teachings are illustrated with many translated passages introducing readers to fascinating byways of spiritual life that would not ordinarily be encountered in an account of a thinker's ideas. Ibn al-'Arabi is allowed to describe in detail the visionary world from which his knowledge derives and to express his teachings in his own words.

More than 600 passages from his major work, al-Futuhat al-Makkivva, are translated here, practically for the first time. These alone provide twice the text of the Fusus al-hikam. The exhaustive indexes make the work an invaluable reference tool for research in Sufism and Islamic thought in general.
Read less

Report incorrect product information.

2022/04/14

Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet Chopra, Deepak: Scrbd

Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet (Enlightenment Collection Book 3) eBook : Chopra, Deepak: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet
Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet (Enlightenment Collection Book 3) by [Deepak Chopra]

“Compassionate and clear…a courageous undertaking.” —Greg Mortenson, New York Times bestselling author of Three Cups of Tea and Stones into Schools


“As a scholar and storyteller extraordinaire, Deepak Chopra portrays a morally courageous yet highly human messenger of God.” —Irshad Manji, Director, Moral Courage Project, New York University


From the New York Times bestselling author of Buddha and Jesus comes the page-turning and soul-stirring story of Muhammad. Deepak Chopra—easily one of the most influential spiritual leaders in the world today—delivers this stunning, sincere, and highly accessible portrait of the Prophet of Islam. Chopra’s Muhammad is an outstanding resource for everyone who thinks they should know more about the man who inspired the world's fastest-growing religion.


360 pages
8 September 2010

-----------------------------
Product description
From the Back Cover
In this riveting novel, beloved international bestselling author Deepak Chopra captures the spellbinding life story of the great and often misunderstood Prophet.


Islam was born in a cradle of tribal turmoil, and the arrival of one God who vanquished hundreds of ancient Arabian gods changed the world forever. God reached down into the life of Muhammad, a settled husband and father, and spoke through him. Muhammad's divine and dangerous task was to convince his people to renounce their ancestral idols and superstitious veneration of multiple gods. From the first encounter, God did not leave Muhammad alone, his life was no longer his own, and with each revelation the creation of a new way of life formed and a religion was born.


Muhammad didn't see himself as the son of God or as one who achieved cosmic enlightenment. His relatives and neighbors didn't part the way when he walked down the parched dirt streets of Mecca. There was no mark of divinity. Orphaned by age six, Muhammad grew up surrounded by dozens of cousins and extended family to become a trusted merchant. Muhammad saw himself as an ordinary man and that is why what happened to him is so extraordinary.


Rooted in historical detail, Muhammad brings the Prophet to life through the eyes of those around him. 
A Christian hermit mystic foretells a special destiny, 
a pugnacious Bedouin wet nurse raises him in the desert, and 
a religious rebel in Mecca secretly takes the young orphan under his spiritual wing.

 Each voice, each chapter brings Muhammad and the creation of Islam into a new light. 
The angel Gabriel demands Muhammad to recite, the first convert risks his life to protect his newfound faith, and Muhammad's life is not a myth but an incredible true and surprisingly unknown story of a man and a moment that sparked a worldwide transformation.
.
===

From the Inside Flap


Review

"Chopra shows that neither revering nor reviling Muhammad will unlock the meaning he embodied. So what will? Chopra's answer is bound to challenge Muslims and non-Muslims alike." -- Irshad Manji, Director, Moral Courage Project, New York University 

"Chopra takes us into the past through the Prophet Muhammad's journey, and brings wisdom and perspective to an often misunderstood figure. His compassionate and clear depiction is a courageous undertaking, and a valuable effort against the enemy of ignorance. An important and timely book, indeed." -- Greg Mortenson, New York Times bestselling author of Three Cups of Tea and Stones into Schools 

"I am grateful that Deepak Chopra, instead of adding to the often useless pile of [Muhammad] biographies, has instead crafted an absorbing novel based on Muhammad's life. Any reader will come away better informed both about the prophet himself and about Islam, the world's second largest religion." -- Harvey Cox, Hollis Research Professor of Divinity at Harvard University, and author of The Future of Faith 

"It's worth discovering Muhammad through Deepak Chopra." -- Ayaan Hirsi Ali, bestselling author of Infidel and Nomad 

"Compellingly told, this is not only good storytelling, it also helps readers, especially non-Muslims, better understand the complexities and contradictions surrounding Islam." -- Booklist 

"[O]ne of the most imaginative and touching biographies of Muhammad...Chopra's grasp of Muhammad's life and mission extends his range in a surprising direction; his popularization is welcome." -- Publishers Weekly 

"...an intricate, deeply considered depiction of the Prophet's life. At a time when Muhammad is largely misunderstood outside (and sometimes inside) of the Muslim world, the novel gives a vivid voice to his story." -- The Daily Beast 

"It is a positive portrait that nonetheless points to human flaws and complexities." -- The Arizona Republic 

"...profound summation of his life, teachings, and service of humanity..." -- Spirituality & Practice 

"His approach is as engaging as it is informative and deeply humanizing. The first-person narratives each paint a new layer onto the picture of the Beloved of God, in all his humanity and complexity and perfection." -- Dalia Mogahed, in a Huffington Post review 

"...the finest of his long shelf of books. ...Chopra returns in his own attractive voice with one of the more level, tough-love, discussions of Islamic religion available." -- The Daily Beast 

"[Chopra] produces an imaginative, evocative rendition of what it must have been like to be in the company of such an individual, making his way in an environment in many ways so alien to our own." -- The Historical Novels Review --This text refers to the hardcover edition.

====
About the Author
Deepak Chopra is the founder of The Chopra Center for Wellbeing in Carlsbad, California, and is acknowledged as one of the master teachers of Eastern philosophy in the Western world. He has written more than fifty-five books and has been a bestselling author for decades, with over a dozen titles on the New York Times bestseller lists, including Buddha and Jesus . --This text refers to the hardcover edition.
Read less

Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars

Top reviews from Australia
optima47
4.0 out of 5 stars Harsh times in a harsh land
Reviewed in Australia on 24 January 2016
Verified Purchase
If you would like to be able to see the circumstances that created the need for a Prophet and find some perspective for his messages, then read "Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet".
==
ellison
3.0 out of 5 stars A Novel Muhammad
Reviewed in Australia on 10 June 2017
Written as a novel this begins with one hundred pages of first-person encounters of people with the pre-prophet Muhammad, it shares the texture and culture of the era. Includes him getting married.

He is visited by an angel who shares god's word. 
When he tells other they run him out of town. 
Where he goes is at first welcoming but they tire of his message. 
He calls them traitors and asks a guy what to do because, after all he is a prophet. The guy says thumbs down and blades get wet. He eventually retakes his home town. The author concludes with some reasonable words.

====
Top reviews from other countries
j p mccarthy
4.0 out of 5 stars Facinating read.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 June 2015
Verified Purchase
Once again great stoty telling from Deepak Chopra. Have now read Jesus and Budda and all three seem to let you in on their unknown stories. Great stuff.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Praveen Sharma
2.0 out of 5 stars Old book delivered. Looked like a used one!!
Reviewed in India on 14 August 2020
Verified Purchase
As a product, it is an interesting book about a fascinating subject. However, this is a not typical biography. It is written in a novel style, and not an easy read.


Also, the book I received was an old one. The pages are yellow, rustic and the binding looks taped. Nevertheless, I didn’t return since it is not an easy find.
===
Karu Williams
4.0 out of 5 stars A deep view on the founding of Islam
Reviewed in Germany on 9 June 2015
Verified Purchase
A Novel breathing the wind, the sand and poetry of a life in the Arabian desert which lets the reader understand the historic circumstances of the Koran and it's author Muhammad.
It also shows us the deep spiritual dimension of Islam and that it needs a lot of empathy, will and thoughtfulness to enter into depths of this great religion.
Report abuse=




Kamal Jain
3.0 out of 5 stars IT IS OK.
Reviewed in India on 29 March 2016
Verified Purchase
IT IS OK.
Report abuse
Reader
1.0 out of 5 stars Muhammad:story of the last prophet
Reviewed in Canada on 7 April 2012
Verified Purchase
Chopra is no writer - contrary to the popular belief - for want of a better statement. He should stay with his first profession - MD. 

Unfortunately, the west tends to seek his opinions on any subject that is vaguely related with any culture or topic that is not western, thus giving most readers the impression that Chopra is knowledgeable about all that is not occidental. His book on Muhammad seemed to be well researched, but does not hold readers interest for long. I found it difficult to plough through - still have a couple of chapters to finish - it's been a few months since I started reading the book. I have read at least half a dozen books in between.


A book that has been researched should at least acknoweldge sources that were used. Writing style - again - does little to hold readers interest. There are numerous other authors who have written superior accounts of various prophets with greater depth - Annemarie Schimmel and Karen Armstrong being two. Anyone interested in religious backgrounds of other faiths should seek out works of the aforementioned authorities.

3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
Report an issue
===

Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet

by
Deepak Chopra (Goodreads Author)
3.65 · Rating details · 1,217 ratings · 159 reviews
Like
7 Years Ago
Add Your Answer

Ron Louis "Jesus: A Story of Enlightenment " which is book two in Deepak's Enlightenment series. This book on Muhammad is 3rd, 1st is Buddha. He also wrote "God: A Story of Revelation" after the Enlightenment series.(less)
flag
See 2 questions about Muhammad…



LISTS WITH THIS BOOK
Books on Prophet Muhammad s.a.w.

66 books — 68 voters

More lists with this book...



Oct 24, 2011PJ Swanwick rated it really liked it
Shelves: spiritual
Novel about Islam's founder proves surprisingly accessible and entertaining

4.5 stars: I had braced myself to slog through Deepak Chopra's biographical novel "Muhammad: A Story of the Last Prophet." Instead, I was delightfully surprised by the compelling story of Muhammad's journey from affluent trader to reluctant prophet, and the engagingly lyrical music of the suras (verses) he channeled from Allah.

Story: Although ostensibly a novel, Chopra bookends his story about the Muslim prophet with an author's note and an afterword, offering the reader a history lesson while reflecting on the current relationship between Islam and the rest of the world. The novel emphasizes that of all the founders of the great world religions, Muhammad is the most like us. Muhammad, a merchant who marries a rich widow and routinely travels in caravans as part of his trade, lives a regular life until the day the archangel Gabriel appears and orders the reluctant 40-year-old Muhammad to recite. (To recite, Chopra reminds, is the root word of Koran.) Using multiple first-person narrators--slaves and merchants, hermits, and scribes--he portrays life (including its brutality) on the streets of Mecca. Each chapter is self-contained. Muhammad's wife, Khadijah, laments there have been no warnings that this tumultuous, life-changing event is about to occur; Ali, the first convert, explains how the Prophet approached him. Compellingly told, this is not only good storytelling; it also helps readers, especially non-Muslims, better understand the complexities and contradictions surrounding Islam. (From Booklist)

Spiritual/metaphysical content: Medium. The book focused more on the man than his teachings, which I found to be less than satisfying. I had hoped to gain more insight into the teachings of Islam, although Chopra does describe the five pillars and six core beliefs of Islam, along with some of his other teachings. However, other aspects of the work delighted me. I expected to learn much about Islam, but what I didn't expect was the love of poetry that suffused Arab hearts and the attendant lyricism of Muhammad's suras. I enjoyed the poetry of each sura as much as the message.

Do you not see how he has lengthened the shadows?
the One is He who made the night a garment for you.
He gave you sleep so that you may rest
And the morning sky to be a resurrection.

And

Lo, I swear by the afterglow of sunset,
And by the night and all it enshrouds.
And by the moon when she is at the full,
You will journey to higher and higher worlds.

Another unexpected delight was the wealth of Arabic sayings that were both pithy and poetic: "Fate ... was like a wasp covered in honey. You cannot taste the sweetness without a sting."

My take: In addition to being a simple and easy introduction to the life and teachings of Muhammad and Islam, "Muhammad" proves to be entertaining, historically accurate, and relevant to our times. Chopra's stilted writing style made several of his non-historical novels less than enjoyable to me in the past. However, his short and direct prose works well in the context of this fictionalized biography. By writing each chapter from a different character's perspective, including Muhammad's enemies, Chopra offers fascinating perspective and varies what might otherwise be a monotonal story. The actual events of the Prophet's life provide a thrilling framework fraught with conflict that propels the story forward.

I learned a great deal about Muhammad's life and the rise of Islam. Although much blood was spilled in the evolution of Islam, violence was integral to Arabic life at that time. Muhammad struggled to project his message of peace, acceptance, and submission above the sometimes horrific reality of Arabic life in the 7th century. Chopra's author's note, afterward, timeline, and family tree helped clarify the complex history of the times and placed his life in a clearly defined context.

One of the most fascinating aspects of the story was the realization that Muhammad was a man like any other, not a son of God (such as Jesus) nor a transcendent human (such as Buddha). The angel Gabriel chose him as a medium to deliver Allah's message, and the reader clearly sees how Muhammad was forced into the role of reluctant prophet but also military commander, master politician, and sometimes brutal judge in order to ensure the survival of Allah's message. As Chopra notes, "I didn't write this book to make Muhammad more holy. I wrote it to show that holiness was just as confusing, terrifying, and exalting in the 7th century as it would be today."

For more reviews of spiritual/metaphysical novels, see Fiction For A New Age.
(less)
flag22 likes · Like · 3 comments · see review



Feb 05, 2012Heba rated it it was ok

I find this one a bit difficult to rate. It was well written, and despite the few little inaccuracies here and there, it stayed fairly faithful to the facts we know about the life of our Prophet Muhammad PBUH. On the other hand, as a Muslim myself, this kind of a book that sort of fictionalizes ( i.e. puts words and gives feelings to the people, whom we respect greatly, that they might have NOT felt or said, hence possibly altering our views on them) the stories I believe in as facts makes me a bit uneasy.

I would recommend reading this along with at least one or two other books that tell the stories of Islam and its Prophet. That way the picture you'll get will be more complete. (less)
flag19 likes · Like · 6 comments · see review



May 04, 2019Annette rated it it was amazing
Shelves: historical-fiction-0500s, novel-of-religious-leader, biographical-fiction
Islam, the world’s second-largest religion, is the most misunderstood religion. This journey of the Prophet Muhammad offers a clear depiction and a better understanding of his life and how it shaped his mission. It gives a reader a chance to be better informed.

Set in 6-7 AD, a time when “slaves were kept and cruelty abused. So were women and unwanted baby girls were routinely left to die on a mountainside after they were born.” Set mostly in Mecca, in a desert valley in western Saudi Arabia, (today, Islam’s holiest city). The seclusion provided by sands of desert gave Mecca a protection it needed from the invaders and a seclusion which gave birth to a new religion.

Muhammad is orphaned by age of six. He grows up surrounded by cousins and extended family.

At a young age, he makes a reputation for himself as a trusted merchant. He makes it through a desert leading safely a caravan for an older merchant, who was too weary to travel.

He marries a rich widow almost twice his age. She had many offers before. But they say, “She was waiting for a pure husband.”

Later, there is a shift in Muhammad’s behavior. Even his four daughters find him aloof. And others claim that he lost his mind. He likes to walk on the slopes of Mount Hira. One day, he finds a cave there, which he cleans and afterwards spends a lot of time there.

The angel Gabriel appears and tells him, he’s God’s chosen one. Now, he understands that “God is not someone you can seek. He is in all things, and always has been.”

He and his followers change one believer at a time. “To protect some of his followers, he sends them across the sea to Abyssinia, where the Christians recognize us as brothers under the same God. A bitter irony, this. Our own blood brothers, the Quraysh, persecute us without mercy.”

Hundreds of ancient Arabian gods have vanquished in favor of one God. “The God of Muhammad has cast down the gods of Arabia. They have crumbled to dust.”

Muhammad becomes the bringer of peace, settling feuds between Jews and Arabs.

The lives of Muhammad and his family are revealed through the lives of other people, for example Bedouin wet nurse, who takes him to the desert and nurses him for the first two years of his life as it was custom. The points of views through which the story is revealed are very interesting, making the story deeply engrossing.

Also, presented with great prose, “She had outlived most of Muhammad’s family with such steel in her spine that she threatened to outlive the rest of us too.”

P.S. The famous “five pillars of Islam” prescribe the duties of the faithful:

- The profession of faith, declaring that Allah is the one God and Muhammad his prophet.
- Prayer, which takes places five times a day facing Mecca, the most sacred place on earth.
- Charity, through the giving of alms to the poor.
- Fasting during the month of Ramadan.
- Pilgrimage, at least once in a lifetime, to Mecca.

There are six core beliefs (one God, prophets/messengers sent by God, angels, books sent by God, judgment day, fate) that would be agreed upon even by sects that otherwise divide along fierce lines like the Sunni and Shia. These beliefs overlap closely with those of both Judaism and Christianity. But no religion can escape the claim that it surmounts all others; often, leading to religious conflicts.


@FB/BestHistoricalFiction (less)
flag13 likes · Like · 6 comments · see review



Jun 13, 2011Maryam rated it did not like it · review of another edition
I gave this book one star not because the way it was written but about the content. As a muslim I felt that the writer was very disrespectful & had many hidden negative messages in the words spoken by his characters in the book, whether they were muslims or non-muslim.

I believe that you cannot judge past events and generations on today's standards. & yet they do. Picturing all Arabs as barbaric! Even nowadays condemning other cultures & traditions based on our own!

There are many facts in this book that are false. & many others that I don't know about.

If you want to know more about Islam, I do not recommend this book. But if you want to see how a spiritual scholar views Islam, then go ahead. I do believe that his writings was biased. He has other books about other religions, I didn't read them. Maybe this is how he writes! Condemning all religions as an oppression to humankind & suffocating their free will.

I wonder were the sources he used to write his book! (less)
flag10 likes · Like · 2 comments · see review



Sep 28, 2011Shaik rated it it was amazing
As a Muslim, I have read a number of books on the life of Muhammad, but this book stands out as a category of its ow
n.

Firstly the book does not claim to be a work of history, rather it is a work of fiction. The narrative is in the first person, with each of the characters telling their personal story.

The author would have had to have done thorough research before attempting a work of such creativity, while at the same time not contradicting known historical data.
flag7 likes · Like · comment · see review



Apr 13, 2011Ritu rated it it was ok
The first half of the book was better than the latter half. I found Mohammad's background, his early life interesting. I also understand the author's motivation in writing the book - exploring how an apparently common man had the revelation of God. I liked the format of the book - the way the story was narrated through the eyes of the different people in Mohammad's life - his wetnurse, hs wife, his daughter, a beggar, a cousin and so on. I liked the book upto the point when God reveals himself to Mohammad. After that the book went downhill. I am not sure if the author was convinced himself - but Mohammad's mission to spread Islam across the world, all the tribal wars, the justification to do the wars, becoming a strategist in warfare, convincing oneself that the actions done were the direct result of God's instructions, the slaughter and rape of woman and children....all that - I did not care for. Why is it neccesary for God to have his message spread everywhere? Shouldn't people who want to be enlightened about God go to the messenger? Why is there the need for force to convert people to a faith? (less)
flag6 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review



Jan 07, 2012Katrina rated it liked it
This is a quick read, and it was interesting to imagine how people would have reacted to Muhammad in the early days of his revelation, as well as how challenging the situation was for him. Each chapter is written from the perspective of a different character, which gives a nice sense of how different factions reacted as well as people closer to him. The afterword bothered me, as Chopra presents a very orthodox picture of islam as Islam itself. He goes on to talk about Sufism in very positive terms, but seems to make a distinction between Islam and Sufism, rather than seeing that the Sufi approach to Islam demonstrates that Islam is not monolithic nor does it have to be interpreted dogmatically. In short, the novel itself is worth reading, but the afterword only feeds into existing prejudices and stereotypes about Islam. (less)
flag5 likes · Like · comment · see review



Apr 12, 2011Lindsey rated it it was ok
I read this with my book club. I don't think I would have ever read it on my own, but I'm glad that I did. I know so little about Muhammad and Islam in general so it was good to learn the story of their prophet. However, the author is not Muslim and I think I would like to hear a Muslim's perspective on Muhammad. (less)
flag5 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review



Jan 17, 2012Ridzwan rated it really liked it
Muhammad - A Story of the Last Prophet was released in the US during a time of re-heightened tensions against Islam. Americans were protesting the building of an Islamic Centre in New York several blocks away from ground zero as it rekindled memories of the horrific attacks in 2011. The decision to launch the book at such a time could have been an opportune one by the publisher, harnessing the mass curiosity that people had with the most influential man ever in the history of mankind.

The novel takes on different vantage points of characters that have encountered Muhammad at various stages of his life. From his father Abdullah, his wet nurse the Bedouin Halimah, daughter Zaynab and several other colourful individuals like the prostitute Jasmine. But taken in its sum, these different vantage depicts very well the social, political and even economic climate in Mecca 1400 years ago when tribal loyalties rule, oppression against the weak were rampant and belief in the idols dictated every single aspect of life. Convincing people to abandon their traditional Gods and take on monotheism was indeed a monumental feat for a goat herder who could neither read nor write.

The author has made it very clear that the work is a novel. It is not meant to be a historical documentary nor is it an accurate depiction of actual events. But despite that, he has done fairly well in painting the context and environment upon which Islam was born. This goes a long way in helping the casual observer understand why Islam was revealed upon humankind.
(less)
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



Mar 04, 2012Saadia rated it really liked it
Well, it was interesting. 

The first third was interesting, about Muhammad growing up an orphan and snippets of his life and personality viewed through third parties. 

The second third was also interesting, with Muhammad being exposed to the intrigues of his time and eventually seeing the angel of prophecy. 

The third part was rather daunting, having to read about Muhammad's struggles with hostility and persecution and fighting his way. The last story about putting a group of Jews to death and reducing the families to slavery just turned my stomach.

I liked learning about the historical presence of the Kaaba and the Zamzam well in Mecca. But I was disturbed by the strife and intrigue among the arab tribes: it seems to me that very little has changed in centuries. Still so much hostility and affinity for intrigue and strife.

Sigh! (less)
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



May 07, 2015Dina Salaymeh rated it it was amazing
I always prefer to read about prophet Muhammad's life from non-Muslims because their point of view is always objective, transparent, bold and non political. Unfortunately we have grown so pathetic and desperate that we even disagree on the courses of the prophet's life and how he lived it.

This is the best book about the prophet I have read so far because it is presented as a novel where the main characters come in one at a time and tell you the story from their perspective. it is not a historic ...more
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



Feb 02, 2014Alabas0d rated it did not like it
I’m very interested in learning about the story behind each religion, and how it developed. Obviously, I didn't get the chance to study every religion; however, many of my readings and academic studies revolved around Abrahamic religions. This being said, this book lacks historical accuracy. After reading “Quran” (Muslims holy book) and many historical books about Islam, I noticed that a great deal of information provided is wrong or twisted.

Now I’m interested to read his book about Jesus and check its accuracy. Hopefully, it is not a trend for him to drop historical accuracy in the sake of story development.

This is a fiction book that revolves around a well-known historical character. The book is very well written. Deepak did a great job in making the reader involved, especially in the first third of the book. The only reason I'm giving this book 1 star is because of it historical inaccuracy.

I wouldn't recommend this book to someone who wants to learn about Muhammad; nonetheless, it is a good book if you have a background on Islam and looking for good fiction story about Islam that provides a different perspective.
(less)
flag3 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review



Mar 16, 2011Linda rated it really liked it
This is one of those books that jumped off the library shelf, right into my path. I am glad I read it because I learned so much - about the incredible rise of Islam and its appeal, and about the life of Muhammad. I know about the life of Christ and Buddha, but next to nothing about Muhammad. This is a novel, but the author did his research as far as dates, genealogy, and the chronology of events. It was very readable; each chapter using a different voice from Muhammad's life. It was kind of like Bible stories, but I didn't have to read the Koran to get the facts.
If you are interested in Muhammad and the growth of Islam, and don't want the history books, I recommend this little book that sheds a different light on Muhammad. As the author says "I didn't write this book to make Muhammad more holy. I wrote it to show that holiness was just as confusing, terrifying, and exalting in the seventh century as it would be today." (less)
flag3 likes · Like · 1 comment · see review





Jan 02, 2011Alan Jacobs rated it liked it
OK as historical fiction, not so good as fiction. I use historical fiction to fill myself in on areas where I'm weak without having to delve though dense, fact-filled tomes. This book did the trick for me on the life of Muhammad. It presented views of Muhammad and his forebears through the voices of various persons in Mecca and Medina who had personal contact with them. I assume that the major events depicted were actual events that are believed to have happened in the life of Muhammad. Novelistically, the book did not seem to go anywhere, to make any point.

The view of early Islam is somewhat scary. Allah is out for blood--it's not possible to subsume Islam into a non-Islamic state. Islamic is a total way of life, including personal life and governance. Allah and Muhammad are particularly hard on a group of Jews who seemed to have betrayed Muhammad by making a deal with Islam's foes, and then to try to come back into Islam's fold. Muhammad appoints a judge to decide those Jews' fates, and then carried out the judge's decision that all the men should be beheaded, and all their wives and daughters enslaved. Muhammad was a mean dude, and Allah is a mean god.

It's also clear why Islam became popular in Arab lands: Allah was already a big deal, but idols were a major part of everyday religion. The native religion was based on a caste system, where the rich were able to gain redemption, and the poor were left spiritually and materially bereft. Islam offered a spiritual equality accepting the Islam and practicing its five pillars. As Islam was able to build and conquer, those who succumbed to the religion became part of an inner group, a higher caste based on spirit rather than wealth, but which could lead to material comfort.

(less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Dec 25, 2013Khaleel Datay rated it liked it
I've read a number of biographies on the Arabian Prophet and found this book an interesting departure from the usual presentation. Deepak Chopra's novel is uniquely told through the eyes of friends, family members, and even enemies. This style brought an immediacy and vibrancy to the life of the Prophet, not to be found elsewhere. The author keeps the language simple and easy to understand, and it is this style that contributes to bringing the life of seventh century Arabia alive on the pages. 

We get a deep sense of the humanity of the extraordinary person that Muhammad was, his search for answers from a greater being and the profound impact on his life when he received the first revelation of the Quran via the angel, Gabriel. 
We see how the Prophet made enemies in his struggle to convince his community to worship one God as opposed to the hundreds of idols they followed. Not because they didn't agree with the message, but because they stood to lose tons of revenue from the visitors to Mecca who trekked to the holy city to visit the sacred house built by Prophet Abraham and his son. 

To write a story on the life of a man who brought a faith followed by almost 2 billion people is enough to send any writer for cover, but Chopra handles the subject matter with tact and diplomacy without pulling any punches where he felt he needed to. Chopra's characters are well drawn from what must have been a huge amount of research. The book never attempts to be a narration on the entire life story of the Prophet, yet the author was able to take you through his life with snippets as told through the eyes of his wife, his daughter, a Jewish holy man etc. It makes for a fascinating read and definitely worth a look at. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Feb 20, 2012Linda rated it really liked it
This is my second novel on Muhammad and I frankly find his story fascinating. What made this book special was the spirituality that was woven into the story complete with verse from the Koran and references to Christianity and Judaism. 

I remain perplexed by the images of such a gentle yet violent prophet; so unlike images we have of Jesus or Buddha. 
It is no wonder that we have such a diversity among Muslims. I read Chopra's novel on Jesus and plan on reading the one on Buddha. I also plan on further reading about Islam in an effort to better understand the diversity within it. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Sep 19, 2010Solady Batterjee is currently reading it
As Muslims we take somethings for granted.. For a human to receive the responsibility of spreading a new religion !! This is for sure out of the ordenrly .. Reading the story with a different eye gave me the ability to imagine how fearious it must have been.. Bering touched by an angle!!
Muslims,, listen to me, it's about time we don't take our Islam for granted, it's time to think more deeply about it and sense it's power and bueaty in our life.. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Oct 21, 2012أكرم Jaml-Allail rated it it was amazing
exceptional book. Made me know Muhammed, Fatimah, Ali, Waraqah, ABdullah and Amina Muhammad's parents in different way, yet a great one. (less)
flag2 likes · Like · comment · see review



Nov 13, 2021Rupert Wolfe-Murray rated it liked it
Not as good as Buddha, another book by this author, but worth reading. Last chapter is best as he summarizes Islam.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



May 21, 2020Huzaifa Irfan rated it liked it
This is an enchanting story of Prophet Muhammad (s) told by Deepak Chopra in the form of a novel where the narrator changes; this story is being told by Muhammad's companions, starting from Abdul Mutalib and ending on Abu Sufyan, Deepak Chopra through their lense understand and tell about Muhammad (s) and how he changed the their world: starting from NOBODY, humanist indifferent to different religions, tolerant towards all. Then a sudden transformation, becoming an unreluctant messenger of God, doing things he normally doesn't like, it was a hard, painful and most powerful aspect of his life.

Arousing from nothingness to domination of the Arab world ― from meek to unstoppable, from the submitter to Dominator, from being peaceful to clearance of Arabia from idolatry. Despite unwilling, he imposed what God asked him to. Muhammad (s) to Depak Chopra is the only human (unlike Jesus (a.s) and Budda) man that is successful beyond anyone imagination and still dominate the world ideologically; it has caused havoc and provide greatest civilizations and hope to millions ― you might hate or love Muhammed (s) but according to Depak Chopra, one thing you can't do is to ignore the more of human prophet Muhammad (s) ― now, past and the age(s) to come.

This is biographical novel narrated by Depak Chopra through nineteen different acquaintances of prophet Muhammad (s); these includes women, men of every caste: slaves, rich merchants, believers and skeptic, and rejectors alike, everyone of it tell their own tale and experiences about what they had experienced in their lives, in regards to Muhammad (s) ― before and after prophethood, it has three chapters; the life before prophethood, the angel embrace and God's warrior, the story goes through multiple people but remains consistent and everyone has to say something different.
.
Large chunk of this story is all about stories before prophethood and rest about new faith: it shows Muhammad (s) lineage, his wet nurse, his mother, his father, his childhood, then wondering and discussion about God, his marriage to rich merchant Khadija, daughters and after angel embrace, it is more of summary of activities recorded in hadith literature.
.
The most important aspect I loved about Depak is how well he gone inside characters to tell a story from their side, it doesn't even feel that the writing is naraating a story but the character he chose to tell, does it ― I was enthralled especially in the way he gone down to tell story from mouth of hypocrite ( who proclaimed to be muslim but was not ) against Muhammad (s) yet it was respectful, he made prophet Muhammad (s) the best he can.
.
However, I still found character narrating stories that don't concern them or they are oblivious to it in original, I found it more inspired from popular ahadith then actual history, you can say it is rather a novel form of history told in most of the papular hadith literature ― this makes it weak, and vulnerable, it is not the work of research to bring out truth, however, he also put some controversial issues, like age of Ayesha (r.a) to be 9 at marriage, killing off whole Jew tribe of Madina so on― I found no need for it, if he desired so, researched more, and presented unbiased independent of what muslims considers or believe normally, as I inclined to have Quran inclined history.
.
Moreover, a Good read! 🌸 (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Aug 08, 2011Sharon rated it really liked it
Deepak Chopra tells the life story of the prophet Mohammed and how Islam came to be created. Each chapter is the memory of someone who had close contact to the man--a wife or daughter or friend, even his lifelong enemy. One of them, Ali, the first convert, says, "Let me tell you how the Prophet opened the door of my soul, so that he may open yours." Mohammed was just an ordinary man who received a command from the Angel Gabriel to 'recite' even though that was the last thing he was used to doing or capable of doing. His 'divine task was to convince his people to denounce their ancestral idol worship and superstitious veneration of multiple gods'. Mohammed says of them,"They believe in no God and trust none of the gods they do believe in. My secret is that God is not someone you can seek. He is in all things, and always has been. He created this earth and then disappeared into it, like an ocean disappearing into a drop of water." The revelations that Mohammed received changed the world and this book is well worth the read. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Apr 08, 2012Sanjida Kamal rated it liked it
This is an important book to read for Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Religion in general is a touchy subject and no matter how an author discusses it, criticism is bound to appear. I didn't know much about Muhammad and the beginnings of Islam before but I think this book provided a good introduction to how Islam came about, not so much what Islam teaches. Having the story told from different perspectives in a fictionalized manner made the story easier to comprehend. The feelings of the individuals that were portrayed aren't accurate because it is fictionalized as the author mentions in the introduction. This is a great book to read for people that are merely curious and don't want an overload of information. I appreciated the author's writing style as it seemed respectful of Islam, though there could have been more of a distinction between how Islam should be practiced and how it it is perceived. This is especially true when the author speaks about Jihad. Despite the fact, it was still a great read. I might even read Chopra's other books on Buddha and Jesus. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Jan 29, 2017Aylin Alpustun rated it liked it · review of another edition
I cannot really put a label on my feelings after completing the book.

It touched the Prophet's life from the "surface". I had expected a "deeper" analysis of His life and teachings so this was not the book that catered to my expectations.

However, I must at the same time admit that the pleasure of easy reading was coupled with learning new facts and a fresh way of looking at events.

Each chapter is relayed from the viewpoint of a different character which was very clever. It gave the reader insight into Muhammad's life through the eyes of family, traitors, enemy, trades people, slaves...
If you are looking for an introduction to the life of Muhammad and the basic teachings of Islam, this is the book. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Nov 19, 2010Matt rated it really liked it
It was a great read. I am on a personal journey to learn as much as I can about religions across the world, and this I found was very enlightening. Chopra does an amazing job of weaving a tale of the up and downs of the life of Muhammad, and expressing the positives and negatives of this influential historical character. A must read for any one who has questions on Islam and their Prophet.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Jun 02, 2011Brian rated it did not like it
I am listening to the audiobook which is narrated by he author. While I enjoy his Indian accent, and I know that he is a successful author, I find his reading talent a bit limited. So far, his monotone has made quite a challenge for me to follow the story. I could not finish the book, it could not hold my interest.
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review



Feb 05, 2015Maryam Kd rated it did not like it
I wouldn't recommend this book to those who want to learn about Prophet Muhammad (Pbuh). As some had said, I also felt some resentment in the words written by the author. A much better alternative would be "Muhammad: His life based on the earliest sources" by Martin Lings or "Muhammad:Man of God" by Seyyed Hossein Nasr. (less)
flag4 likes · Like · comment · see review



Mar 24, 2015H rated it really liked it
Didn't enjoy this as much as 'Jesus' and 'God', perhaps it's because I'm a catholic. Well written as usual from Chopra, gave me a lot of new information about the origin and fundamentals of Islam, as well as always reminded me of the nature of human beings. I think the Prophet Mohammed PBUH would hang his head today. (less)
flag1 like · Like · comment · see review














==

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars


匿名
25-10-2020

A Nice Perspective

I was interested in this book because Audibles selection on Islam is super limited and mostly anti-islamic material. The novel jumps around a lot so you need to have some idea of the history of Islam to follow it. Also the production value is low and although I love when readers narrate, I felt it didnt fit this book and it was somewhat different to hear clearly.

6 people found this helpful


Overall
3 out of 5 stars


Victor
30-12-2010

Great story, poor naration


This is a great story told in an interesting way but the reader is not very good.

6 people found this helpful

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars


Ash
25-04-2021

Great Exercise for Story from Different Take

Listening to a novel taking on origin of Islam is interesting to say least. The imagination of the writer is appreciated. However, many of chronology of events & facts as were transmitted through Muslim scholars are not as accurate which was mentioned by writer in his introduction. It is still a novel that tales an interesting story to those who are interested to be introduced to Mohamed the Prophet. There are plethora of scholarly work that can be looked at for those who are interested. I would recommend the following as an example only; 
Sahih Bukhari, Sealed Nectar (Al Raheeq Al Makhtom ), & 
fikh Al Syrah by Imam Ghazali. 

Thanks for good work.

2 people found this helpful


Overall
1 out of 5 stars


Shahrad Milanfar
21-10-2010

Poorly written and poorly narrated

I was a bit surprised about how poorly written and narrated this book was. Dr. Chopra is capable of much better writing. He certainly should have let a professional narrator do the reading.

7 people found this helpful


Overall
3 out of 5 stars


susan
19-04-2011

Okay

trunkated story of the life of Muhammed, at times it was hard to hear the narrator

3 people found this helpful

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars


Davidgonzalezsr
28-03-2022

Bazinga

I'm spending some time in Saudi Arabi and wanted to learn about the customs, courtesies, and history. Jeddah is a beautiful city and I look forward to learning more about the country.

This was my third book on Muhammad in as many months. It was available via the Audible Plus catalog. It was not very informative or interesting. The narration by the author was fine.

If you have recommendations please comment below with title and author and I will look into them. Thank you in advance.

Disclaimer: My enjoyment of the narrator is based on my listening speed. I only leave 5 stars for books I've listened to or will listen to multiple times. I'll update my review if I listen again.

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars


pooneh
27-03-2022

Monotonous and boring

So hard to listen to. Confusing, scattered, and choppy. Stories have no references and not clear how someone illiterate can speak so eloquently and record their diaries (not Muhammad but others too). Didn’t enjoy at all despite being familiar with most of the characters and stories from other sources as I was growing up.. sorry. Expected much more.

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars


Carmen Lang
31-01-2022

Oversimplified with errors

I'm sure Deepak Chopra had the best of intentions with this book and for that I give him an A for effort. However as a Muslim and someone who's more familiar with the life of the prophet, his character his, his behavior, his way of thinking, his reverence for Allah and his overall temperament, through our Hadith , I found this book very erroneous and oversimplified. I wanted to do a review one quarter way through chapter one but since audible wouldn't let me I continue to listen and actually listen two parts of chapter 11. For what anyone interested in the history of Islam and the story of the prophet Muhammad I was suggest they read a book by a Muslim author that understands s e e r a h and Hadith and the importance of not over simplifying with made up character emotions and thoughts. However I do commend Deepak for his attempt.

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars


Kevin Hallock
03-01-2022

Provided a new perspective

I learned much about the context in which Islam developed during its formative years; it was a very different world with different values.

Would have been better with a professional narrator.

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars


Amazon Customer
01-10-2021

Worse than I thought

I found it sad and disrespectful in many ways. Deepak completely failed to touch the surface of something that could of been a beautiful story.

2022/04/12

Idries Shah - Wikipedia

Idries Shah - Wikipedia

Idries Shah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Idries Shah
इदरीस शाह, ادريس شاه
Idries Shah.gif
BornIdries Shah
16 June 1924
SimlaPunjabIndia
Died23 November 1996 (aged 72)
LondonEnglandUK
Pen nameArkon Daraul[1]
OccupationWriter, publisher
GenreEastern philosophy and culture
SubjectSufism, psychology
Notable works
  • The Sufis
  • The Commanding Self
  • The Subtleties of the Inimitable Mulla Nasrudin
  • The Exploits of the Incomparable Mulla Nasrudin
  • Thinkers of the East
  • Learning How to Learn
  • The Way of the Sufi
  • Reflections
  • Kara Kush
Notable awardsOutstanding Book of the Year (BBC "The Critics"), twice;
six first prizes at the UNESCO World Book Year in 1973
SpouseCynthia (Kashfi) Kabraji
ChildrenSaira ShahTahir ShahSafia Shah
Signature
Website
idriesshahfoundation.org

Idries Shah (/ˈɪdrɪs ˈʃɑː/Hindiइदरीस शाहPashtoادريس شاهUrduادریس شاه; 16 June 1924 – 23 November 1996), also known as Idris Shah, né Sayed Idries el-Hashimi (Arabic: سيد إدريس هاشمي) and by the pen name Arkon Daraul, was an Indian author and thinker, and a teacher in the Sufi tradition. Shah wrote over three dozen books on topics ranging from psychology and spirituality to travelogues and culture studies.

Born in India, the descendant of a family of Afghan nobles on his father's side and a Scottish mother, Shah grew up mainly in England. His early writings centred on magic and witchcraft. In 1960 he established a publishing house, Octagon Press, producing translations of Sufi classics as well as titles of his own. His seminal work was The Sufis, which appeared in 1964 and was well received internationally. In 1965, Shah founded the Institute for Cultural Research, a London-based educational charity devoted to the study of human behaviour and culture. A similar organisation, the Institute for the Study of Human Knowledge (ISHK), was established in the United States under the directorship of Stanford University psychology professor Robert Ornstein, whom Shah appointed as his deputy in the U.S.

In his writings, Shah presented Sufism as a universal form of wisdom that predated Islam. Emphasizing that Sufism was not static but always adapted itself to the current time, place and people, he framed his teaching in Western psychological terms. Shah made extensive use of traditional teaching stories and parables, texts that contained multiple layers of meaning designed to trigger insight and self-reflection in the reader. He is perhaps best known for his collections of humorous Mulla Nasrudin stories.

Shah was at times criticized by orientalists who questioned his credentials and background. His role in the controversy surrounding a new translation of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, published by his friend Robert Graves and his older brother Omar Ali-Shah, came in for particular scrutiny. However, he also had many notable defenders, chief among them the novelist Doris Lessing. Shah came to be recognized as a spokesman for Sufism in the West and lectured as a visiting professor at a number of Western universities. His works have played a significant part in presenting Sufism as a form of spiritual wisdom approachable by individuals and not necessarily attached to any specific religion.[2]

Life[edit]

Family and early life[edit]

Idries Shah was born in SimlaPunjab ProvinceBritish India, to an Afghan-Indian father of Pashtun descent; Sirdar Ikbal Ali Shah, a writer and diplomat, and a Scottish mother; Saira Elizabeth Luiza Shah. His family on the paternal side were Musavi Sayyids. Their ancestral home was near the Paghman Gardens of KabulAfghanistan.[3] His paternal grandfather, Sayed Amjad Ali Shah, was the nawab of Sardhana in the North-Indian state of Uttar Pradesh,[4] a hereditary title the family had gained thanks to the services an earlier ancestor, Jan-Fishan Khan, had rendered to the British.[5][6]

Shah mainly grew up in the vicinity of London.[7] According to L. F. Rushbrook Williams, Shah began accompanying his father in his travels from a very young age, and although they both travelled widely and often, they always returned to England, where the family made their home for many years. Through these travels, which were often part of Ikbal Ali Shah's Sufi work, Shah was able to meet and spend time with prominent statesmen and distinguished personalities in both East and West. Williams writes,

Such an upbringing presented to a young man of marked intelligence, such as Idries Shah soon proved himself to possess, many opportunities to acquire a truly international outlook, a broad vision, and an acquaintance with people and places that any professional diplomat of more advanced age and longer experience might well envy. But a career of diplomacy did not attract Idries Shah...[8]

Shah described his own unconventional upbringing in a 1971 BBC interview with Pat Williams. He described how his father and his extended family and friends always tried to expose the children to a "multiplicity of impacts" and a wide range of contacts and experiences with the intention of producing a well-rounded person. Shah described this as "the Sufi approach" to education.[9]

After his family moved from London to Oxford in 1940 to escape The Blitz (German bombing), he spent two or three years at the City of Oxford High School for Boys.[6] In 1945, he accompanied his father to Uruguay as secretary to his father's halal meat mission. He returned to England in October 1946, following allegations of improper business dealings.[6][7]

Personal life[edit]

Shah married the Parsi-Zoroastrian Cynthia (Kashfi) Kabraji, daughter of Indian poet Fredoon Kabraji, in 1958; they had a daughter, Saira Shah, in 1964, followed by twins – a son, Tahir Shah, and another daughter, Safia Shah – in 1966.[10]

Friendship with Gerald Gardner and Robert Graves, and publication of The Sufis[edit]

Towards the end of the 1950s, Shah established contact with Wiccan circles in London and then acted as a secretary and companion to Gerald Gardner, the founder of modern Wicca, for some time.[6][11] In those days, Shah used to hold court for anyone interested in Sufism at a table in the Cosmo restaurant in Swiss Cottage (North London) every Tuesday evening.[12]

In 1960, Shah founded his publishing house, Octagon Press; one of its first titles was Gardner's biography – Gerald Gardner, Witch. The book was attributed to one of Gardner's followers, Jack L. Bracelin, but had in fact been written by Shah.[11][13]

According to Wiccan Frederic Lamond, Bracelin's name was used because Shah "did not want to confuse his Sufi students by being seen to take an interest in another esoteric tradition."[12] Lamond said that Shah seemed to have become somewhat disillusioned with Gardner, and had told him one day, when he was visiting for tea:

When I was interviewing Gerald, I sometimes wished I was a News of the World reporter. What marvellous material for an exposé! And yet I have it on good authority that this group will be the cornerstone of the religion of the coming age. But rationally, rationally I can't see it![12]

In January 1961, while on a trip to Mallorca with Gardner, Shah met the English poet Robert Graves.[14] Shah wrote to Graves from his pension in Palma, requesting an opportunity of "saluting you one day before very long".[14] He added that he was currently researching ecstatic religions, and that he had been "attending... experiments conducted by the witches in Britain, into mushroom-eating and so on" – a topic that had been of interest to Graves for some time.[14][15]

Shah also told Graves that he was "intensely preoccupied at the moment with the carrying forward of ecstatic and intuitive knowledge."[15] Graves and Shah soon became close friends and confidants.[14] Graves took a supportive interest in Shah's writing career and encouraged him to publish an authoritative treatment of Sufism for a Western readership, along with the practical means for its study; this was to become The Sufis. Shah managed to obtain a substantial advance on the book, resolving temporary financial difficulties.[14]

In 1964, The Sufis appeared,[7] published by Doubleday, with a long introduction by Robert Graves.[16] The book chronicles the impact of Sufism on the development of Western civilisation and traditions from the seventh century onward through the work of such figures as Roger BaconJohn of the CrossRaymond LullyChaucer and others, and has become a classic.[17] Like Shah's other books on the topic, The Sufis was conspicuous for avoiding terminology that might have identified his interpretation of Sufism with traditional Islam.[18]

The book also employed a deliberately "scattered" style; Shah wrote to Graves that its aim was to "de-condition people, and prevent their reconditioning"; had it been otherwise, he might have used a more conventional form of exposition. The book sold poorly at first, and Shah invested a considerable amount of his own money in advertising it.[19] Graves told him not to worry; even though he had some misgivings about the writing, and was hurt that Shah had not allowed him to proofread it before publication, he said he was "so proud in having assisted in its publication", and assured Shah that it was "a marvellous book, and will be recognised as such before long. Leave it to find its own readers who will hear your voice spreading, not those envisaged by Doubleday."[20]

John G. Bennett and the Gurdjieff connection[edit]

In June 1962, a couple of years prior to the publication of The Sufis, Shah had also established contact with members of the movement that had formed around the mystical teachings of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky.[21][22] A press article had appeared,[nb 1] describing the author's visit to a secret monastery in Central Asia, where methods strikingly similar to Gurdjieff's methods were apparently being taught.[22] The otherwise unattested monastery had, it was implied, a representative in England.[6]

One of Ouspensky's earliest pupils, Reggie Hoare, who had been part of the Gurdjieff work since 1924, made contact with Shah through that article. Hoare "attached special significance to what Shah had told him about the enneagram symbol and said that Shah had revealed secrets about it that went far beyond what we had heard from Ouspensky."[23] Through Hoare, Shah was introduced to other Gurdjieffians, including John G. Bennett, a noted Gurdjieff student and founder of an "Institute for the Comparative Study of History, Philosophy and the Sciences" located at Coombe Springs, a 7-acre (2.8-hectare) estate in Kingston upon ThamesSurrey.[23]

At that time, Bennett had already investigated the Sufi origins of many of Gurdjieff's teachings, based on both Gurdjieff's own numerous statements, and on travels Bennett himself made in the East where he met various Sufi Sheikhs.[24] He was convinced that Gurdjieff had adopted many of the ideas and techniques of the Sufis and that, for those who heard Gurdjieff's lectures in the early 1920s, "the Sufi origin of his teaching was unmistakable to anyone who had studied both."[25]

Bennett wrote about his first meeting with Shah in his autobiography Witness (1974):

At first, I was wary. I had just decided to go forward on my own and now another 'teacher' had appeared. One or two conversations with Reggie convinced me that I ought at least to see for myself. Elizabeth and I went to dinner with the Hoares to meet Shah, who turned out to be a young man in his early 40s. He spoke impeccable English and but for his beard and some of his gestures might well have been taken for an English public school type. Our first impressions were unfavourable. He was restless, smoked incessantly and seemed too intent on making a good impression. Halfway through the evening, our attitude completely changed. We recognized that he was not only an unusually gifted man, but that he had the indefinable something that marks the man who has worked seriously upon himself... Knowing Reggie to be a very cautious man, trained moreover in assessing information by many years in the Intelligence Service, I accepted his assurances and also his belief that Shah had a very important mission in the West that we ought to help him to accomplish.[23]

Shah gave Bennett a "Declaration of the People of the Tradition"[26] and authorised him to share this with other Gurdjieffians.[22] The document announced that there was now an opportunity for the transmission of "a secret, hidden, special, superior form of knowledge"; combined with the personal impression Bennett formed of Shah, it convinced Bennett that Shah was a genuine emissary of the "Sarmoung Monastery" in Afghanistan, an inner circle of Sufis whose teachings had inspired Gurdjieff.[22][27]

Whose Beard?
Nasruddin dreamt that he had Satan's beard in his hand. Tugging the hair he cried: "The pain you feel is nothing compared to that which you inflict on the mortals you lead astray." And he gave the beard such a tug that he woke up yelling in agony. Only then did he realise that the beard he held in his hand was his own.

− Idries Shah[28]

For the next few years, Bennett and Shah had weekly private talks that lasted for hours. Later, Shah also gave talks to the students at Coombe Springs. Bennett says that Shah's plans included "reaching people who occupied positions of authority and power who were already half-consciously aware that the problems of mankind could no longer be solved by economic, political or social action. Such people were touched, he said, by the new forces moving in the world to help mankind to survive the coming crisis."[23]

Bennett agreed with these ideas and also agreed that "people attracted by overtly spiritual or esoteric movements seldom possessed the qualities needed to reach and occupy positions of authority" and that "there were sufficient grounds for believing that throughout the world there were already people occupying important positions, who were capable of looking beyond the limitations of nationality and cultures and who could see for themselves that the only hope for mankind lies in the intervention of a Higher Source."[23]

Bennett wrote, "I had seen enough of Shah to know that he was no charlatan or idle boaster and that he was intensely serious about the task he had been given."[23] Wishing to support Shah's work, Bennett decided in 1965, after agonising for a long time and discussing the matter with the council and members of his Institute, to give the Coombe Springs property to Shah, who had insisted that any such gift must be made with no strings attached.[6][22] Once the property was transferred to Shah, he banned Bennett's associates from visiting, and made Bennett himself feel unwelcome.[22]

Bennett says he did receive an invitation to the "Midsummer Revels", a party Shah held at Coombe Springs that lasted two days and two nights, primarily for the young people whom Shah was then attracting.[23] Anthony Blake, who worked with Bennett for 15 years, says, "When Idries Shah acquired Coombe Springs, his main activity was giving parties. I had only a few encounters with him but much enjoyed his irreverent attitude. Bennett once said to me, 'There are different styles in the work. Mine is like Gurdjieff's, around struggle with one's denial. But Shah's way is to treat the work as a joke.'"[29]

After a few months, Shah sold the plot – worth more than £100,000 – to a developer and used the proceeds to establish himself and his work activities at Langton House in Langton Green, near Tunbridge Wells, a 50-acre estate that once belonged to the family of Lord Baden-Powell, founder of the Boy Scouts.[6][30]

Along with the Coombe Springs property, Bennett also handed the care of his body of pupils to Shah, comprising some 300 people.[22] Shah promised he would integrate all those who were suitable; about half of their number found a place in Shah's work.[22] Some 20 years later, the Gurdjieffian author James Moore suggested that Bennett had been duped by Shah.[6] Bennett gave an account of the matter himself in his autobiography (1974); he said that Shah's behaviour after the transfer of the property was "hard to bear", but also insisted that Shah was a "man of exquisite manners and delicate sensibilities" and considered that Shah might have adopted his behaviour deliberately, "to make sure that all bonds with Coombe Springs were severed".[22] He added that Langton Green was a far more suitable place for Shah's work than Coombe Springs could have been and said he felt no sadness that Coombe Springs lost its identity; he concluded his account of the matter by stating that he had "gained freedom" through his contact with Shah, and had learned "to love people whom [he] could not understand".[31]

According to Bennett, Shah later also engaged in discussions with the heads of the Gurdjieff groups in New York. In a letter to Paul Anderson from 5 March 1968, Bennett wrote, "Madame de Salzmann and all the others... are aware of their own limitations and do no more than they are able to do. While I was in New York, Elizabeth and I visited the Foundation, and we saw most of the leading people in the New York group as well as Jeanne de Salzmann herself. Something is preparing, but whether it will come to fruition I cannot tell. I refer to their connection with Idries Shah and his capacity for turning everything upside down. It is useless with such people to be passive, and it is useless to avoid the issue. For the time being, we can only hope that some good will come, and meanwhile continue our own work..."[32]

The author and clinical psychologist Kathleen Speeth later wrote,

Witnessing the growing conservatism within the [Gurdjieff] Foundation, John Bennett hoped new blood and leadership would come from elsewhere... Although there may have been flirtation with Shah, nothing came of it. The prevailing sense [among the leaders of the Gurdjieff work] that nothing must change, that a treasure in their safekeeping must at all costs be preserved in its original form, was stronger than any wish for a new wave of inspiration."[32]

Sufi studies and institutes[edit]

In 1965, Shah founded the Society for Understanding Fundamental Ideas (SUFI), later renamed The Institute for Cultural Research (ICR) – an educational charity aimed at stimulating "study, debate, education and research into all aspects of human thought, behaviour and culture".[16][33][34][35] He also established the Society for Sufi Studies (SSS).[36]

Langton House at Langton Green became a place of gathering and discussion for poets, philosophers and statesmen from around the world, and an established part of the literary scene of the time.[37] The ICR held meetings and gave lectures there, awarding fellowships to international scholars including Sir John GlubbAquila Berlas KianiRichard Gregory and Robert Cecil, the head of European studies at the University of Reading who became chairman of the institute in the early 1970s.[37][38]

Shah was an early member and supporter of the Club of Rome.[nb 2] Fellow Club of Rome members, such as scientist Alexander King made presentations at the Institute.[39][40][41]

Other visitors, pupils, and would-be pupils included the poet Ted Hughes, novelists J. D. SalingerAlan Sillitoe and Doris Lessing, zoologist Desmond Morris, and psychologist Robert Ornstein. The interior of the house was decorated in a Middle-Eastern fashion, and buffet lunches were held every Sunday for guests in a large dining room that was once the estate stable, nicknamed "The Elephant" (a reference to the Eastern tale of the "Elephant in the Dark").[30]

Over the following years, Shah developed Octagon Press as a means of publishing and distributing reprints of translations of numerous Sufi classics.[42] In addition, he collected, translated and wrote thousands of Sufi tales, making these available to a Western audience through his books and lectures.[36] Several of Shah's books feature the Mullah Nasruddin character, sometimes with illustrations provided by Richard Williams. In Shah's interpretation, the Mulla Nasruddin stories, previously considered a folkloric part of Muslim cultures, were presented as Sufi parables.[43]

Nasruddin was featured in Shah's television documentary Dreamwalkers, which aired on the BBC in 1970. Segments included Richard Williams being interviewed about his unfinished animated film about Nasruddin, and scientist John Kermisch discussing the use of Nasruddin stories at the Rand Corporation Think Tank. Other guests included the British psychiatrist William Sargant discussing the hampering effects of brainwashing and social conditioning on creativity and problem-solving, and the comedian Marty Feldman talking with Shah about the role of humour and ritual in human life. The program ended with Shah asserting that humanity could further its own evolution by "breaking psychological limitations" but that there was a "constant accretion of pessimism which effectively prevents evolution in this form from going ahead... Man is asleep – must he die before he wakes up?"[44]

Shah also organised Sufi study groups in the United States. Claudio Naranjo, a Chilean psychiatrist who was teaching in California in the late 1960s, says that, after being "disappointed in the extent to which Gurdjieff's school entailed a living lineage", he had turned towards Sufism and had "become part of a group under the guidance of Idries Shah."[45] Naranjo co-wrote a book with Robert Ornstein, entitled On The Psychology of Meditation (1971). Both of them were associated with the University of California, where Ornstein was a research psychologist at the Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute.[46]

Ornstein was also president and founder of the Institute for the Study of Human Knowledge, established in 1969; seeing a need in the U.S. for books and collections on ancient and new ways of thinking, he formed the ISHK Book Service in 1972 as a central source for important contemporary and traditional literature, becoming the sole U.S. distributor of the works of Idries Shah published by Octagon Press.[47]

Another Shah associate, the scientist and professor Leonard Lewin, who was teaching telecommunications at the University of Colorado at the time, set up Sufi study groups and other enterprises for the promotion of Sufi ideas like the Institute for Research on the Dissemination of Human Knowledge (IRDHK), and also edited an anthology of writings by and about Shah entitled The Diffusion of Sufi Ideas in the West (1972).[48][49]

The planned animated feature film by Williams, provisionally titled The Amazing Nasruddin, never materialised, as the relationship between Williams and the Shah family soured in 1972 amid disputes about copyrights and funds; however, Williams later used some of the ideas for his film The Thief and the Cobbler.[50]

Later years[edit]

Shah wrote around two dozen more books over the following decades, many of them drawing on classical Sufi sources.[6] Achieving a huge worldwide circulation,[33] his writings appealed primarily to an intellectually oriented Western audience.[18] By translating Sufi teachings into contemporary psychological language, he presented them in vernacular and hence accessible terms.[51] His folktales, illustrating Sufi wisdom through anecdote and example, proved particularly popular.[18][33] Shah received and accepted invitations to lecture as a visiting professor at academic institutions including the University of California, the University of Geneva, the National University of La Plata and various English universities.[52] Besides his literary and educational work, he found time to design an air ioniser (forming a company together with Coppy Laws) and run a number of textile, ceramics and electronics companies.[30] He also undertook several journeys to his ancestral Afghanistan and involved himself in setting up relief efforts there; he drew on these experiences later on in his book Kara Kush, a novel about the Soviet–Afghan War.[16]

Illness[edit]

In late spring of 1987, about a year after his final visit to Afghanistan, Shah suffered two successive and massive heart attacks.[35][53] He was told that he had only eight per cent of his heart function left, and could not expect to survive.[35] Despite intermittent bouts of illness, he continued working and produced further books over the next nine years.[35][53]

Death[edit]

The grave of Idries Shah in Brookwood Cemetery

Idries Shah died in London on 23 November 1996, at the age of 72 and was buried in Brookwood Cemetery. According to his obituary in The Daily Telegraph, Idries Shah was a collaborator with Mujahideen in the Soviet–Afghan War, a Director of Studies for the Institute for Cultural Research and a Governor of the Royal Humane Society and the Royal Hospital and Home for Incurables.[35] He was also a member of the Athenaeum Club.[6] At the time of his death, Shah's books had sold over 15 million copies in a dozen languages worldwide,[7] and had been reviewed in numerous international journals and newspapers.[54][55]

Teachings[edit]

Books on magic and the occult[edit]

Shah's early books were studies of what he called "minority beliefs". His first book Oriental Magic, published in 1956, was originally intended to be titled Considerations in Eastern and African Minority Beliefs. He followed this in 1957 with The Secret Lore of Magic: Book of the Sorcerers, originally entitled Some Materials on European Minority-Belief Literature. The names of these books were, according to a contributor to a 1973 festschrift for Shah, changed before publication due to the "exigencies of commercial publishing practices."[56]

Before his death in 1969, Shah's father asserted that the reason why he and his son had published books on the subject of magic and the occult was "to forestall a probable popular revival or belief among a significant number of people in this nonsense. My son... eventually completed this task, when he researched for several years and published two important books on the subject."[57]

In an interview in Psychology Today from 1975, Shah elaborated:

The main purpose of my books on magic was to make this material available to the general reader. For too long people believed that there were secret books, hidden places, and amazing things. They held onto this information as something to frighten themselves with. So the first purpose was information. This is the magic of East and West. That's all. There is no more. The second purpose of those books was to show that there do seem to be forces, some of which are either rationalized by this magic or may be developed from it, which do not come within customary physics or within the experience of ordinary people. I think this should be studied, that we should gather the data and analyze the phenomena. We need to separate the chemistry of magic from the alchemy, as it were.[58]

Shah went on to say that his books on the subject were not written for the current devotees of magic and witchcraft, and that in fact he subsequently had to avoid them, as they would only be disappointed in what he had to say.[58]

These books were followed by the publication of the travelogue Destination Mecca (1957), which was featured on television by Sir David Attenborough.[59] Both Destination Mecca and Oriental Magic contain sections on the subject of Sufism.[60][61]

Sufism as a form of timeless wisdom[edit]

Shah presented Sufism as a form of timeless wisdom that predated Islam.[62] He emphasised that the nature of Sufism was alive, not static, and that it always adapted its visible manifestations to new times, places and people: "Sufi schools are like waves which break upon rocks: [they are] from the same sea, in different forms, for the same purpose," he wrote, quoting Ahmad al-Badawi.[36][62]

Shah was often dismissive of orientalists' descriptions of Sufism, holding that academic or personal study of its historical forms and methods was not a sufficient basis for gaining a correct understanding of it.[62] In fact, an obsession with its traditional forms might actually become an obstacle: "Show a man too many camels' bones, or show them to him too often, and he will not be able to recognise a camel when he comes across a live one," is how he expressed this idea in one of his books.[62][63]

Shah, like Inayat Khan, presented Sufism as a path that transcended individual religions, and adapted it to a Western audience.[42] Unlike Khan, however, he deemphasised religious or spiritual trappings and portrayed Sufism as a psychological technology, a method or science that could be used to achieve self-realisation.[42][64] In doing so, his approach seemed to be especially addressed to followers of Gurdjieff, students of the Human Potential Movement, and intellectuals acquainted with modern psychology.[42] For example, he wrote, "Sufism ... states that man may become objective, and that objectivity enables the individual to grasp 'higher' facts. Man is therefore invited to push his evolution ahead towards what is sometimes called in Sufism 'real intellect'."[42] Shah taught that the human being could acquire new subtle sense organs in response to need:[36]

Sufis believe that, expressed in one way, humanity is evolving towards a certain destiny. We are all taking part in that evolution. Organs come into being as a result of the need for specific organs (Rumi). The human being's organism is producing a new complex of organs in response to such a need. In this age of transcending of time and space, the complex of organs is concerned with the transcending of time and space. What ordinary people regard as sporadic and occasional outbursts of telepathic or prophetic power are seen by the Sufi as nothing less than the first stirrings of these same organs. The difference between all evolution up to date and the present need for evolution is that for the past ten thousand years or so we have been given the possibility of a conscious evolution. So essential is this more rarefied evolution that our future depends upon it.

— Idries Shah, The Sufis[65]

Shah dismissed other Eastern and Western projections of Sufism as "watered down, generalised or partial"; he included in this not only Khan's version, but also the overtly Muslim forms of Sufism found in most Islamic countries. On the other hand, the writings of Shah's associates implied that he was the "Grand Sheikh of the Sufis" – a position of authority undercut by the failure of any other Sufis to acknowledge its existence.[42] Shah felt the best way to introduce Sufi wisdom in the West, while at the same time overcoming the problems of gurus and cults, was to clarify the difference between a cult and an educational system, and to contribute to knowledge. In an interview, he explained, "You must work within an educational pattern – not in the mumbo-jumbo area."[66] As part of this approach, he acted as Director of Studies at the ICR.[66] He also lectured on the study of Sufism in the West at the University of Sussex in 1966. This was later published as a monograph entitled Special Problems in the Study of Sufi Ideas.[67]

Shah later explained that Sufi activities were divided into different components or departments: "studies in Sufism", "studies of Sufism", and "studies for Sufism".[68]

Studies for Sufism helped lead people towards Sufism and included the promotion of knowledge which might be lacking in the culture and needed to be restored and spread, such as an understanding of social conditioning and brainwashing, the difference between the rational and intuitive modes of thought, and other activities so that people's minds could become more free and wide-ranging. Studies of Sufism included institutions and activities, such as lectures and seminars, which provided information about Sufism and acted as a cultural liaison between the Sufis and the public. Finally, Studies in Sufism referred to being in a Sufi school, carrying out those activities prescribed by the teacher as part of a training, and this could take many forms which did not necessarily fit into the preconceived notion of a "mystical school".[68]

Shah's Sufi aims and methodologies were also delineated in the "Declaration of the People of the Tradition" given at Coombe Springs:

In addition to making this announcement, to feeding into certain fields of thought certain ideas, and pointing out some of the factors surrounding this work, the projectors of this declaration have a practical task. This task is to locate individuals who have the capacity for obtaining the special knowledge of man which is available; to group them in a special, not haphazard, manner, so that each such group forms a harmonious organism; to do this in the right place at the right time; to provide an external and interior format with which to work, as well as a formulation of 'ideas' suitable to local conditions; to balance theory with practice.[23]

In a BBC interview from 1971, Shah explained his contemporary, adaptive approach: "I am interested in making available in the West those aspects of Sufism which shall be of use to the West at this time. I don't want to turn good Europeans into poor Asiatics. People have asked me why I don't use traditional methods of spiritual training, for instance, in dealing with people who seek me out or hunt me down; and of course, the answer is, that it's for the same reason that you came to my house today in a motorcar and not on the back of a camel. Sufism is, in fact, not a mystical system, not a religion, but a body of knowledge."[69]

Shah frequently characterised some of his work as really only preliminary to actual Sufi study, in the same way that learning to read and write might be seen as preliminary to a study of literature: "Unless the psychology is correctly oriented, there is no spirituality, though there can be obsession and emotionality, often mistaken for it."[70][71] "Anyone trying to graft spiritual practices upon an unregenerate personality ... will end up with an aberration", he argued.[70] For this reason, most of the work he produced from The Sufis onwards was psychological in nature, focused on attacking the nafs-i-ammara, the false self: "I have nothing to give you except the way to understand how to seek – but you think you can already do that."[70]

Shah was frequently criticised for not mentioning God very much in his writings; his reply was that given man's present state, there would not be much point in talking about God. He illustrated the problem in a parable in his book Thinkers of the East: "Finding I could speak the language of ants, I approached one and inquired, 'What is God like? Does he resemble the ant?' He answered, 'God! No indeed – we have only a single sting but God, He has two!'"[70][72]

Teaching stories[edit]

Shah used teaching stories and humour to great effect in his work.[62][73] Shah emphasised the therapeutic function of surprising anecdotes, and the fresh perspectives these tales revealed.[74] The reading and discussion of such tales in a group setting became a significant part of the activities in which the members of Shah's study circles engaged.[43] The transformative way in which these puzzling or surprising tales could destabilise the student's normal (and unaware) mode of consciousness was studied by Stanford University psychology professor Robert Ornstein, who along with fellow psychologist Charles Tart[75] and eminent writers such as Poet Laureate Ted Hughes[76] and Nobel-Prize-winning novelist Doris Lessing[36][77] was one of several notable thinkers profoundly influenced by Shah.[74][78]

Shah and Ornstein met in the 1960s.[78] Realising that Ornstein could be an ideal partner in propagating his teachings, translating them into the idiom of psychotherapy, Shah made him his deputy (khalifa) in the United States.[74][78] Ornstein's The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) was enthusiastically received by the academic psychology community, as it coincided with new interests in the field, such as the study of biofeedback and other techniques designed to achieve shifts in mood and awareness. Ornstein has published more books in the field over the years.[78]

Philosopher of science and physicist Henri Bortoft used teaching tales from Shah's corpus as analogies of the habits of mind which prevented people from grasping the scientific method of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Bortoft's The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe's Way of Science includes tales from Tales of the DervishesThe Exploits of the Incomparable Mullah Nasruddin and A Perfumed Scorpion.[79]

In their original historical and cultural setting, Sufi teaching stories of the kind popularised by Shah – first told orally, and later written down for the purpose of transmitting Sufi faith and practice to successive generations – were considered suitable for people of all ages, including children, as they contained multiple layers of meaning.[36] Shah likened the Sufi story to a peach: "A person may be emotionally stirred by the exterior as if the peach were lent to you. You can eat the peach and taste a further delight ... You can throw away the stone – or crack it and find a delicious kernel within. This is the hidden depth."[36] It was in this manner that Shah invited his audience to receive the Sufi story.[36] By failing to uncover the kernel, and regarding the story as merely amusing or superficial, a person would accomplish nothing more than looking at the peach, while others internalised the tale and allowed themselves to be touched by it.[36]

Tahir Shah mentions his father's storytelling at several points throughout his 2008 book In Arabian Nights, first to discuss how Idries Shah made use of teaching stories: "My father never told us how the stories worked. He did not reveal the layers, the nuggets of information, the fragments of truth and fantasy. He didn't need to – because, given the right conditions, the stories activated, sowing themselves."[80] He then explains how his father used these stories to impart wisdom: "My father always had a tale at hand to divert our attention, or to use as a way of transmitting an idea or a thought. He used to say that the great collections of stories from the East were like encyclopedias, storehouses of wisdom and knowledge ready to be studied, to be appreciated and cherished. To him, stories represented much more than mere entertainment. He saw them as complex psychological documents, forming a body of knowledge that had been collected and refined since the dawn of humanity and, more often than not, passed down by word of mouth."[80]

Later on in the book, he continues his discussion of stories as teaching tools, quoting the following explanation his father gave him at the end of a story:

These stories are technical documents, they are like maps, or kind of blueprints. What I do is show people how to use the maps, because they have forgotten. You may think it's a strange way to teach – with stories – but long ago this was the way people passed on wisdom. Everyone knew how to take the wisdom from the story. They could see through the layers, in the same way you see a fish frozen in a block of ice. But the world where we are living has lost this skill, a skill they certainly once had. They hear the stories and they like them, because the stories amuse them, make them feel warm. But they can't see past the first layer, into the ice. The stories are like a lovely chessboard: we all know how to play chess and we can be drawn into a game so complicated that our faculties are drained. But imagine if the game was lost from a society for centuries and then the fine chessboard and its pieces were found. Everyone would cluster round to see them and praise them. They might never imagine that such a fine object ever had a purpose other than to entertain the eyes. The stories' inner value has been lost in the same way. At one time everyone knew how to play with them, how to decipher them. But now the rules have been forgotten. It is for us to show people again how the game is played.

— Tahir Shah, In Arabian Nights, [80]

Olav Hammer, in Sufism in Europe and North America (2004), cites an example of such a story.[7] It tells of a man who is looking for his key on the ground.[7] When a passing neighbour asks the man whether this is in fact the place where he lost the key, the man replies, "No, I lost it at home, but there is more light here than in my own house.".[7] Versions of this story have been known for many years in the West (see Streetlight effect). This is an example of the long-noted phenomenon of similar tales existing in many different cultures, which was a central idea in Shah's folktale collection World Tales.

Peter Wilson, writing in New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam (1998), quotes another such story, featuring a dervish who is asked to describe the qualities of his teacher, Alim.[81] The dervish explains that Alim wrote beautiful poetry, and inspired him with his self-sacrifice and his service to his fellow man.[81] His questioner readily approves of these qualities, only to find the dervish rebuking him: "Those are the qualities which would have recommended Alim to you."[81][82] Then he proceeds to list the qualities which actually enabled Alim to be an effective teacher: "Hazrat Alim Azimi made me irritated, which caused me to examine my irritation, to trace its source. Alim Azimi made me angry, so that I could feel and transform my anger."[82] He explains that Alim Azimi followed the path of blame, intentionally provoking vicious attacks upon himself, in order to bring the failings of both his students and critics to light, allowing them to be seen for what they really were: "He showed us the strange, so that the strange became commonplace and we could realise what it really is."[81][82]

Views on culture and practical life[edit]

Shah's concern was to reveal essentials underlying all cultures, and the hidden factors determining individual behaviour.[33] He discounted the Western focus on appearances and superficialities, which often reflected mere fashion and habit, and drew attention to the origins of culture and the unconscious and mixed motivations of people and the groups formed by them. He pointed out how both on the individual and group levels, short-term disasters often turn into blessings – and vice versa – and yet the knowledge of this has done little to affect the way people respond to events as they occur.[33]

Shah did not advocate the abandonment of worldly duties; instead, he argued that the treasure sought by the would-be disciple should derive from one's struggles in everyday living. He considered practical work the means through which a seeker could do self-work, in line with the traditional adoption by Sufis of ordinary professions, through which they earned their livelihoods and "worked" on themselves.[36]

Shah's status as a teacher remained indefinable; disclaiming both the guru identity and any desire to found a cult or sect, he also rejected the academic hat.[33] Michael Rubinstein, writing in Makers of Modern Culture, concluded that "he is perhaps best seen as an embodiment of the tradition in which the contemplative and intuitive aspects of the mind are regarded as being most productive when working together."[33]

Legacy[edit]

Idries Shah considered his books his legacy; in themselves, they would fulfil the function he had fulfilled when he could no longer be there.[83] Promoting and distributing their teacher's publications has been an important activity or "work" for Shah's students, both for fund-raising purposes and for transforming public awareness.[43] The ICR suspended its activities in 2013 following the formation of a new charity, The Idries Shah Foundation,[84] while the SSS had ceased its activities earlier. The ISHK (Institute for the Study of Human Knowledge), headed by Ornstein,[85] is active in the United States; after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, for example, it sent out a brochure advertising Afghanistan-related books authored by Shah and his circle to members of the Middle East Studies Association, thus linking these publications to the need for improved cross-cultural understanding.[43]

When Elizabeth Hall interviewed Shah for Psychology Today in July 1975, she asked him: "For the sake of humanity, what would you like to see happen?" Shah replied: "What I would really want, in case anybody is listening, is for the products of the last 50 years of psychological research to be studied by the public, by everybody, so that the findings become part of their way of thinking (...) they have this great body of psychological information and refuse to use it."[58]

Shah's brother, Omar Ali-Shah (1922–2005), was also a writer and teacher of Sufism; the brothers taught students together for a while in the 1960s, but in 1977 "agreed to disagree" and went their separate ways.[86] Following Idries Shah's death in 1996, a fair number of his students became affiliated with Omar Ali-Shah's movement.[87]

One of Shah's daughters, Saira Shah, became notable in 2001 for reporting on women's rights in Afghanistan in her documentary Beneath the Veil.[10] His son, Tahir Shah, is a noted travel writer, journalist and adventurer.

Translations[edit]

Idries Shah's works have been translated into many languages, such as French, German, Latvian, Persian, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish and others.

Idries Shah work was relatively late to reach the Polish reader. The pioneering translation into Polish was done by specialist in Iranian studies and translator Ivonna Nowicka who rendered the Tales of the Dervishes of her own initiative in 1999–2000. After a few unsuccessful attempts, she managed to find a publisher, the WAM Publishing House, and the book was finally published in 2002. The Wisdom of the Fools[88] and The Magic Monastery[89] in her translation followed in 2002 and 2003, respectively.

Reception[edit]

Shah's books on Sufism achieved considerable critical acclaim. He was the subject of a BBC documentary ("One Pair of Eyes") in 1969,[90] and two of his works (The Way of the Sufi and Reflections) were chosen as "Outstanding Book of the Year" by the BBC's "The Critics" programme.[91] Among other honours, Shah won six first prizes at the UNESCO World Book Year in 1973,[90] and the Islamic scholar James Kritzeck, commenting on Shah's Tales of the Dervishes, said that it was "beautifully translated".[91]

A collection of positive assessments of Shah's work entitled Sufi Studies: East and West was published in 1973 which included, among others, contributions from L. F. Rushbrook Williams, Rom LandauMohammad HidayatullahGyula GermanusSir John Glubb, Sir Razik FareedIshtiaq Hussain QureshiAhmet Emin Yalman, Mahmoud Youssef Shawarbi and Nasrollah S. Fatemi.[92]

Colin Wilson stated that "partly through Idries Shah, I have begun to see some rather new and interesting implications [about the subject of mysticism]"[93] and in his review of The Magic Monastery (1972) noted that Shah "is not primarily concerned with propagating some secret doctrine. He is concerned with the method by which mystical knowledge is transmitted... [The Sufis] transmit knowledge through direct intuition rather in the manner of the Zen masters, and one of the chief means of doing this is by means of brief stories and parables which work their way into the subconscious and activate its hidden forces."[94]

In Afghanistan, the Kabul Times said that Caravan of Dreams (1968) was "highly recommended" and "of especial interest to Afghans" because it is "basically an anthology of short stories, tales and proverbs, jokes and extracts, from the written and oral literature which forms a part of many an evening's talk and interchange – even in these modern times – in Afghanistan."[95] The Afghanistan News reported that The Sufis "covers important Afghan contributions to world philosophy and science" and was "the first fully-authoritative book on Sufism and the human development system of the dervishes."[96] As far as doubts about Shah's background and credentials are concerned, the Sardar Haji Faiz Muhammad Khan Zikeria, an Afghan scholar who had served as Afghan Minister of Education and later Ambassador and Foreign Minister of Afghanistan, issued a notarized Declaration for the scholars of the world about the Shah family in 1970: "The Musavi Saiyids of Afghanistan and Khans of Paghman are recognized as the descendants of the Prophet – may peace be upon him. They are recognized to be of the most noble descent of Islam and are respected as Sufi teachers and erudite scholars. Saiyid Idries Shah, son of the late Saiyid Ikbal Ali Shah, is personally known to me as an honourable man whose rank, titles and descent are attested and known by repute."[97]

In 1980, Professor Khalilullah Khalili, former Poet Laureate of Afghanistan, praised the work of his "compatriot and friend the Arif (Sufi Illuminate) The Sayed Idries Shah", saying "Especially to be appreciated are his brilliant and important services in revealing the celestial inspirations and inner thoughts of the great teachers of Islam and Sufis."[98]

The Hindustan Standard of India found that Caravan of Dreams, was a "fine anthology, dippable-into at any time for entertainment, refreshment, consolation, and inspiration... witty, engrossing, utterly and appealingly human."[99]

The Institute for Cross-cultural Exchange (ICE), a Canadian charity founded in 2004, decided to use Idries Shah's children's books to distribute to thousands of needy children in Canada, Mexico and Afghanistan, as part of their children's literacy programme and promotion of cross-cultural understanding. This series of books is published by Hoopoe Books, a non-profit initiative by the American psychologist Robert Ornstein's Institute for the Study of Human Knowledge (ISHK).[100][101] ISHK provides these books to needy children through their own Share Literacy initiative.[102]

"Shah-school" writings[edit]

A hostile critic was James Moore, a Gurdjieffian who disagreed with Shah's assertion that Gurdjieff's teaching was essentially Sufic in nature and took exception to the publication of a chronologically impossible, pseudonymous book on the matter (The Teachers of Gurdjieff by Rafael Lefort) that was linked to Shah.[6] In a 1986 article in Religion Today (now the Journal of Contemporary Religion), Moore covered the Bennett and Graves controversies and noted that Shah was surrounded by a "nimbus of exorbitant adulation: an adulation he himself has fanned".[6] He described Shah as supported by a "coterie of serviceable journalists, editors, critics, animators, broadcasters, and travel writers, which gamely choruses Shah's praise".[6] Moore questioned Shah's purported Sufi heritage and upbringing and deplored the body of pseudonymous "Shah-school" writings from such authors as "Omar Michael Burke PhD" and "Hadrat B. M. Dervish", who from 1960 heaped intemperate praise – ostensibly from disinterested parties – on Shah, referring to him as the "Tariqa Grand Sheikh Idries Shah Saheb", "Prince Idries Shah", "King Enoch", "The Presence", "The Studious King", the "Incarnation of Ali", and even the Qutb or "Axis" – all in support of Shah's incipient efforts to market Sufism to a Western audience.[6]

Peter Wilson similarly commented on the "very poor quality" of much that had been written in Shah's support, noting an "unfortunately fulsome style", claims that Shah possessed various paranormal abilities, "a tone of superiority; an attitude, sometimes smug, condescending, or pitying, towards those 'on the outside', and the apparent absence of any motivation to substantiate claims which might be thought to merit such treatment".[103] In his view, there was a "marked difference in quality between Shah's own writings" and the quality of this secondary literature.[103] Both Moore and Wilson, however, also noted similarities in style, and considered the possibility that much of this pseudonymous work, frequently published by Octagon Press, Shah's own publishing house, might have been written by Shah himself.[103]

Arguing for an alternative interpretation of this literature, the religious scholar Andrew Rawlinson proposed that rather than a "transparently self-serving [...] deception", it may have been a "masquerade – something that by definition has to be seen through".[104] Stating that "a critique of entrenched positions cannot itself be fixed and doctrinal", and noting that Shah's intent had always been to undermine false certainties, he argued that the "Shah myth" created by these writings may have been a teaching tool, rather than a tool of concealment; something "made to be deconstructed – that is supposed to dissolve when you touch it".[104] Rawlinson concluded that Shah "cannot be taken at face value. His own axioms preclude the very possibility."[104]

Assessment[edit]

Nobel-prize winner Doris Lessing was profoundly influenced by Shah.

Doris Lessing, one of Shah's greatest defenders,[6] stated in a 1981 interview: "I found Sufism as taught by Idries Shah, which claims to be the reintroduction of an ancient teaching, suitable for this time and this place. It is not some regurgitated stuff from the East or watered-down Islam or anything like that."[36] In 1996, commenting on Shah's death in The Daily Telegraph, she stated that she met Shah because of The Sufis, which was to her the most surprising book she had read, and a book that changed her life.[105] Describing Shah's œuvre as a "phenomenon like nothing else in our time", she characterised him as a many-sided man, the wittiest person she ever expected to meet, kind, generous, modest ("Don't look so much at my face, but take what is in my hand", she quotes him as saying), and her good friend and teacher for 30-odd years.[105]

Arthur J. Deikman, a professor of psychiatry and long-time researcher in the area of meditation and change of consciousness who began his study of Sufi teaching stories in the early seventies, expressed the view that Western psychotherapists could benefit from the perspective provided by Sufism and its universal essence, provided suitable materials were studied in the correct manner and sequence.[64] Given that Shah's writings and translations of Sufi teaching stories were designed with that purpose in mind, he recommended them to those interested in assessing the matter for themselves, and noted that many authorities had accepted Shah's position as a spokesman for contemporary Sufism.[64] The psychologist and consciousness researcher Charles Tart commented that Shah's writings had "produced a more profound appreciation in [him] of what psychology is about than anything else ever written".[106]

Asked to give an assessment of Shah in 1973, J.G. Bennett said that Shah was doing important work on a large scale, "stirring people up very effectively all over the place, making them think, showing them that modes of thought that appear to be free are really largely conditioned." He referred to Shah as the Krishnamurti of Sufism, breaking down people's fixed ideas in many directions as part of an awakening process that is "a very necessary preparation for the new world."[107]

The Indian philosopher and mystic Rajneesh, later known as Osho, commenting on Shah's work, described The Sufis as "just a diamond. The value of what he has done in The Sufis is immeasurable". He added that Shah was "the man who introduced Mulla Nasrudin to the West, and he has done an incredible service. He cannot be repaid. [...] Idries Shah has made just the small anecdotes of Nasrudin even more beautiful ... [he] not only has the capacity to exactly translate the parables, but even to beautify them, to make them more poignant, sharper."[108]

Richard Smoley and Jay Kinney, writing in Hidden Wisdom: A Guide to the Western Inner Traditions (2006), pronounced Shah's The Sufis an "extremely readable and wide-ranging introduction to Sufism", adding that "Shah's own slant is evident throughout, and some historical assertions are debatable (none are footnoted), but no other book is as successful as this one in provoking interest in Sufism for the general reader."[109] They described Learning How to Learn, a collection of interviews, talks and short writings, as one of Shah's best works, providing a solid orientation to his "psychological" approach to Sufi work, noting that at his best, "Shah provides insights that inoculate students against much of the nonsense in the spiritual marketplace."[109]

Ivan Tyrrell and social psychologist Joe Griffin, in their book about innate emotional needs, Human Givens: A new approach to emotional health and clear thinking, wrote that Shah "more than anyone else, understood and appreciated the real significance of the givens of human nature".[110] In another book, Godhead: The Brain's Big Bang – The explosive origin of creativity, mysticism and mental illness, they said that Shah's stories, "when told to young and old alike [...] lay down blueprints in the mind, not only for living and overcoming everyday difficulties but also for travelling the spiritual path. Their impact may not be recognized or felt for months or years after first hearing or reading them, but eventually the structural content they contain will exploit the pattern-matching nature of the brain and make it possible for students to observe the functioning of their own emotionally conditioned responses to changing life circumstances. It then makes it easier for them to take any action required by reality, and for their minds to connect to higher realms. Teaching stories should be read, told and reflected on, but not intellectually analysed, because that destroys the beneficial impact that they would otherwise have had on your mind." Shah, they added, was "a great collector and publisher of tales and writings that contain this 'long-term impact' quality. He understood the vital importance for humanity of the 'mental blueprint' aspect of them and his books are full of nourishing examples."[111]

Olav Hammer notes that during Shah's last years, when the generosity of admirers had made him truly wealthy, and he had become a respected figure among the higher echelons of British society, controversies arose due to discrepancies between autobiographical data – mentioning kinship with the prophet Muhammad, affiliations with a secret Sufi order in Central Asia, or the tradition in which Gurdjieff was taught – and recoverable historical facts.[7] While there may have been a link of kinship with the prophet Muhammad, the number of people sharing such a link today, 1300 years later, would be at least one million. Other elements of Shah's autobiography appeared to have been pure fiction. Even so, Hammer noted that Shah's books have remained in public demand, and that he has played "a significant role in representing the essence of Sufism as a non-confessional, individualistic and life-affirming distillation of spiritual wisdom."[7]

Peter Wilson wrote that if Shah had been a swindler, he had been an "extremely gifted one", because unlike merely commercial writers, he had taken the time to produce an elaborate and internally consistent system that attracted a "whole range of more or less eminent people", and had "provoked and stimulated thought in many diverse quarters".[106] Moore acknowledged that Shah had made a contribution of sorts in popularising a humanistic Sufism, and had "brought energy and resource to his self-aggrandisement", but ended with the damning conclusion that Shah's was "a 'Sufism' without self-sacrifice, without self-transcendence, without the aspiration of gnosis, without tradition, without the Prophet, without the Qur'an, without Islam, and without God. Merely that."[6][62]

Gore Vidal opined that Shah's "books are a great deal harder to read than they were to write."[112]

The Sufis reception[edit]

The reception of Shah's movement was also marked by controversy.[36] Some orientalists were hostile, in part because Shah presented classical Sufi writings as tools for self-development to be used by contemporary people, rather than as objects of historical study.[16] The internationally renowned German orientalist Annemarie Schimmel commented that The Sufis, along with Shah's other books, "should be avoided by serious students".[113]

Graves' introduction to The Sufis, written with Shah's help, described Shah as being "in the senior male line of descent from the prophet Mohammed" and as having inherited "secret mysteries from the Caliphs, his ancestors. He is, in fact, a Grand Sheikh of the Sufi Tariqa... "[114] Privately, however, writing to a friend, Graves confessed that this was "misleading: he is one of us, not a Moslem personage."[14] The introduction is not included in Octagon Press editions of the book after 1983 but has always been included in the Anchor/Doubleday editions.[115][116]

And Shah's fiercest critic, University of Edinburgh scholar L.P. Elwell-Sutton, in a 1975 article critical of what he called "pseudo-Sufis" like Gurdjieff and Shah, opined that Graves had been trying to "upgrade" Shah's "rather undistinguished lineage", and that the reference to Mohammed's senior male line of descent was a "rather unfortunate gaffe", as Mohammed's sons had all died in infancy. Although Elwell-Sutton accepted that the family were Sayyids descended from the seventh Imam Musa al-Kadhim, the great-greatgrandson of Hussein ibn Ali, who was the younger son of the marriage of Fatimah (the daughter of the Prophet) and Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib, he considered this an "undistinguished lineage" with no special sanctity because "Sayyids proliferate throughout the Islamic world, in all walks of society and on both sides of every religious and political fence."[21][117] He described Shah's books as "trivial", replete with errors of fact, slovenly and inaccurate translations and even misspellings of Oriental names and words – "a muddle of platitudes, irrelevancies and plain mumbo-jumbo", adding for good measure that Shah had "a remarkable opinion of his own importance".[118] He took a dim view of Rushbrook Williams' festschrift (collection written in honour of) Shah, saying he considered many of the claims made in the book on behalf of Shah and his father, concerning their representing the Sufi tradition, to be self-serving publicity marked by a "disarming disregard for facts".[119][120] Expressing amusement and amazement at the "sycophantic manner" of Shah's interlocutors in a BBC radio interview, Elwell-Sutton concluded that some Western intellectuals were "so desperate to find answers to the questions that baffle them, that, confronted with wisdom from 'the mysterious East,' they abandon their critical faculties and submit to brainwashing of the crudest kind".[91] To Elwell-Sutton, Shah's Sufism belonged to the realm of "Pseudo-Sufism", "centred not on God but on man."[36][121]

Omar Khayyam affair[edit]

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Shah came under attack over a controversy surrounding the 1967 publication of a new translation of Omar Khayyam's Rubaiyat, by Robert Graves and Shah's older brother, Omar Ali-Shah.[16][91] The translation, which presented the Rubaiyat as a Sufi poem, was based on an annotated "crib", supposedly derived from a manuscript that had been in the Shah family's possession for 800 years.[122] L. P. Elwell-Sutton, an orientalist at Edinburgh University, and others who reviewed the book expressed their conviction that the story of the ancient manuscript was false.[91][122]

Shah's father, the Sirdar Ikbal Ali Shah, was expected by Graves to present the original manuscript to clear the matter up, but he died in a car accident in Tangier in November 1969.[123] A year later, Graves asked Idries Shah to produce the manuscript. Shah replied in a letter that the manuscript was not in his possession, but even if it were, producing it would prove nothing, because it could not be accurately dated using the current methods and its authenticity would still be contested.[123] It was time, Shah wrote, "that we realised that the hyenas who are making so much noise are intent only on opposition, destructiveness and carrying on a campaign when, let's face it, nobody is really listening."[123] He added that his father had been so infuriated by those casting these aspersions that he refused to engage with them, and he felt his father's response had been correct.[123] Graves, noting that he was now widely perceived as having fallen prey to the Shah brothers' gross deception, and that this affected income from sales of his other historical writings, insisted that producing the manuscript had become "a matter of family honour".[123] He pressed Shah again, reminding him of previous promises to produce the manuscript if it were necessary.[123]

Neither of the brothers ever produced the manuscript, leading Graves' nephew and biographer to muse that it was hard to believe – bearing in mind the Shah brothers' many obligations to Graves – that they would have withheld the manuscript if it had ever existed in the first place.[123] According to his widow writing many years later, Graves had "complete faith" in the authenticity of the manuscript because of his friendship with Shah, even though he never had a chance to view the text in person.[124] The scholarly consensus today is that the "Jan-Fishan Khan" manuscript was a hoax, and that the Graves/Ali-Shah translation was in fact based on a Victorian amateur scholar's analysis of the sources used by previous Rubaiyat translator Edward FitzGerald.[6][91][125][126]

Works[edit]

Studies in minority beliefs[edit]

Sufism[edit]

Collections of Mulla Nasrudin stories[edit]

Studies of the English[edit]

Travel[edit]

Fiction[edit]

Folklore[edit]

For children[edit]

As Arkon Daraul[edit]

As Omar Michael Burke[edit]

  • Among the Dervishes (Octagon Press, 1973).

Audio interviews, seminars and lectures[edit]

  • Shah, Idries, and Pat Williams. A Framework for New Knowledge. London: Seminar Cassettes, 1973. Sound recording.
  • Shah, Idries. Questions and Answers. London: Seminar Cassettes, 1973. Sound recording.
  • King, Alexander, Idries Shah, and Aurelio Peccei. The World-and Men. Seminar Cassettes, 1972. Sound recording.
  • King, Alexander, et al. Technology: The Two-Edged Sword. London: Seminar Cassettes, 1972. Sound recording.
  • Learning From Stories (1976 Lecture) ISBN 1-883536-03-0 (1997)
  • On the Nature of Sufi Knowledge (1976 Lecture) ISBN 1-883536-04-9 (1997)
  • An Advanced Psychology of the East (1977 Lecture) ISBN 1-883536-02-2 (1997)
  • Overcoming Assumptions that Inhibit Spiritual Development; previously entitled A Psychology of the East (1976 Lecture) ISBN 1-883536-23-5 (2000)

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Augy Hayter, a student of both Idries and Omar Ali-Shah, asserts that the article, published in Blackwood's Magazine, was written by Idries Shah under a pseudonym. When Reggie Hoare, a Gurdjieffian and associate of Bennett's, wrote to the author care of the magazine, intrigued by the description of exercises known only to a very small number of Gurdjieff students, it was Shah who replied to Hoare, and Hoare who introduced Shah to Bennett. Shah himself according to Hayter later described the Blackwood's Magazine article as "trawling". (Hayter, Augy (2002). Fictions and Factions. Reno, NV/Paris, France: Tractus Books. p. 187. ISBN 2-909347-14-1.)
  2. ^ Some sources have described Shah as a "founding member" of the Club of Rome. Augy Hayter states, "To a certain extent, one can say that a good deal of the literature put out by Shah and friends under various pseudonyms was designed to act as a decoy. It occupied would-be students and opponents alike, and inflamed critics to quite amazing degree. A lot of it was fake: Shah knew perfectly well that he was not a founding member of the Club of Rome; he was a member for a short time and was politely asked to leave because he didn't turn up to meetings; but this mythology around Shah's public personage was necessary in order to provide the dream-lie without which no truth can exist, because a student must always have a choice."(Hayter, Augy (2002). Fictions and Factions. Reno, NV/Paris, France: Tractus Books. p. 262. ISBN 2-909347-14-1.)

Citations[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c Estate of Idries Shah, The (1 September 2012). "Idries Shah"Facebook. Retrieved 1 September 2012.
  2. ^ Shah, Idries (1977) [1964]. The Sufis. London, UK: Octagon Press. p. 54. ISBN 0-86304-020-9.: "Though commonly mistaken as a Moslem sect, the Sufis are at home in all religions"
  3. ^ Shah, Saira (2003). The Storyteller's Daughter. New York, NY: Anchor Books. pp. 19–26ISBN 1-4000-3147-8.
  4. ^ Dervish, Bashir M. (4 October 1976). "Idris Shah: a contemporary promoter of Islamic Ideas in the West". Islamic Culture – an English Quarterly. Islamic Culture Board, Hyderabad, India (Osmania University, Hyderabad). L (4).
  5. ^ Lethbridge, Sir Roper (1893). The Golden Book of India. A Genealogical and Biographical Dictionary of the Ruling Princes, Chiefs, Nobles, and Other Personages, Titled or Decorated, of the Indian Empire. London, UK/New York, NY: Macmillan and Co., p. 13; reprint by Elibron Classics (2001): ISBN 978-1-4021-9328-6
  6. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Moore, James (1986). "Neo-Sufism: The Case of Idries Shah"Religion Today3 (3): 4–8. doi:10.1080/13537908608580605. Archived from the original on 24 July 2013.
  7. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Westerlund, David, ed. (2004). Sufism in Europe and North America. New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon. pp. 136–138. ISBN 0-415-32591-9.
  8. ^ Williams, L.F. Rushbrook (1974). Sufi Studies: East and West. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton & Co. pp. 13–24.
  9. ^ 1970 BBC interview with Idries Shah on YouTube
  10. Jump up to:a b Groskop, Viv (16 June 2001). "Living dangerously"The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 16 December 2020. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
  11. Jump up to:a b Lamond, Frederic (2004). Fifty Years of Wicca. Green Magic. pp. 9, 37. ISBN 0-9547230-1-5.
  12. Jump up to:a b c Lamond, Frederic (2005). Fifty Years of Wicca. Green Magic. p. 19. ISBN 0-9547230-1-5.
  13. ^ Pearson, Joanne (2002). A Popular Dictionary of Paganism. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. p. 28. ISBN 0-7007-1591-6.
  14. Jump up to:a b c d e f O'Prey, Paul (1984). Between Moon and Moon – Selected Letters of Robert Graves 1946–1972Hutchinson. pp. 213–215. ISBN 0-09-155750-X.
  15. Jump up to:a b Graves, Richard P. (1998). Robert Graves and The White Goddess 1940–1985. London, UK: Phoenix Giant. p. 326ISBN 0-7538-0116-7.
  16. Jump up to:a b c d e Cecil, Robert (26 November 1996). "Obituary: Idries Shah"The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
  17. ^ "Editorial Reviews for Idries Shah's The Sufis". Retrieved 28 October 2008.
  18. Jump up to:a b c Smith, Jane I. (1999). Islam in America (Columbia Contemporary American Religion Series). New York, NY/Chichester, UK: Columbia University Press. p. 69. ISBN 0-231-10966-0.
  19. ^ O'Prey, Paul (1984). Between Moon and Moon – Selected Letters of Robert Graves 1946–1972. Hutchinson. pp. 236, 239, 240. ISBN 0-09-155750-X.
  20. ^ O'Prey, Paul (1984). Between Moon and Moon – Selected Letters of Robert Graves 1946–1972. Hutchinson. pp. 234, 240–241, 269. ISBN 0-09-155750-X.
  21. Jump up to:a b Elwell-Sutton, L. P. (May 1975). "Sufism & Pseudo-Sufism". EncounterXLIV (5): 14.
  22. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Bennett, John G. (1975). Witness: The autobiography of John G. Bennett. Turnstone Books. pp. 355–63. ISBN 0-85500-043-0.
  23. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Bennett, John G. (1974). Witness: The autobiography of John G. Bennett. Tucson: Omen Press. pp. 355–63. ISBN 0-912358-48-3.
  24. ^ Bennett, John G. (1973). Gurdjieff: Making a New World. Santa Fe, NM: Turnstone Books. p. 21. ISBN 0-9621901-6-0.
  25. ^ Bennett, John G. (1973). Gurdjieff: Making a New World. Santa Fe, NM: Turnstone Books. p. 104. ISBN 0-9621901-6-0.
  26. ^ Shah, Idries (13 April 2007). "Declaration of the People of the Tradition and Twenty-Two Principles" (PDF). Sher Point Publications, UK. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 October 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  27. ^ Hinnells, John R. (1992). Who's Who of World Religions. Simon & Schuster. p. 50ISBN 0-13-952946-2.
  28. ^ Shah, Idries (2003). The World of Nasruddin. London: Octagon Press. p. 438. ISBN 0-86304-086-1.
  29. ^ "Meetings"Anthonyblake.co.uk. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  30. Jump up to:a b c Hall, Elizabeth (July 1975). "At Home in East and West: A Sketch of Idries Shah". Psychology Today9 (2): 56.
  31. ^ Bennett, John G. (1975). Witness: The autobiography of John G. Bennett. Turnstone Books. pp. 362–63. ISBN 0-85500-043-0. Chapter 27, Service and Sacrifice: "The period from 1960 (...) to 1967 when I was once again entirely on my own was of the greatest value to me. I had learned to serve and to sacrifice and I knew that I was free from attachments. It happened about the end of the time that I went on business to America and met with Madame de Salzmann in New York. She was very curious about Idries Shah and asked what I had gained from my contact with him. I replied: "Freedom!"... Not only had I gained freedom, but I had come to love people whom I could not understand."
  32. Jump up to:a b Speeth, Kathleen (1989). The Gurdjieff Work. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam. p. 105. ISBN 0-87477-492-6.
  33. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Wintle, Justin (ed.) (2001). Makers of Modern Culture, Vol. 1. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge. p. 474. ISBN 0-415-26583-5. {{cite book}}|first= has generic name (help)
  34. ^ Staff. "About the Institute". Institute for Cultural Research. Archived from the original on 14 September 2008. Retrieved 29 October 2008.
  35. Jump up to:a b c d e Staff. "Idries Shah – Grand Sheikh of the Sufis whose inspirational books enlightened the West about the moderate face of Islam (obituary)"The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 25 May 2000. Retrieved 16 October 2008.
  36. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m Galin, Müge (1997). Between East and West: Sufism in the Novels of Doris Lessing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. xix, 5–8, 21, 40–41, 101, 115. ISBN 0-7914-3383-8.
  37. Jump up to:a b "Writers Meet". The Courier: 16. 15 October 1971.
  38. ^ "ICR Fellows"The Institute for Cultural Research. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2012.
  39. ^ Hall, Elizabeth (July 1975). "At Home in East and West: A Sketch of Idries Shah". Psychology Today9 (2): 56.
  40. ^ King, Dr. Alexander. "Monograph Series No. 10: Science, Technology and the Quality of Life"The Institute for Cultural Research. Archived from the original on 16 August 2018. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  41. ^ King, Dr. Alexander; et al. "Monograph Series No. 15: An Eye to the Future"The Institute for Cultural Research. Archived from the original on 16 August 2018. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  42. Jump up to:a b c d e f Smoley, Richard; Kinney, Jay (2006). Hidden Wisdom: A Guide to the Western Inner Traditions. Wheaton, IL/Chennai, India: Quest Books. p. 238. ISBN 0-8356-0844-1.
  43. Jump up to:a b c d Malik, Jamal; Hinnells, John R. (eds.) (2006). Sufism in the West. London, UK/New York/NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. p. 32. ISBN 0-415-27407-9. {{cite book}}|author2= has generic name (help)
  44. ^ Shah, Idries (Presenter) (19 December 1970). "One Pair of eyes: Dreamwalkers" (video)BBC Television. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  45. ^ Naranjo, Claudio (1994). Character and Neurosis. Nevada City, CA: Gateways. p. xxviii. ISBN 0-89556-066-6.
  46. ^ Naranjo, Claudio; Robert Ornstein (1972). On the Psychology of Meditation. New York, NY: Viking Press. ISBN 0-670-00364-6.
  47. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 15 February 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  48. ^ Lewin, Leonard (1972). Diffusion of Sufi Ideas in the West. Boulder, CO: Keysign Press.
  49. ^ "Dr Kate Fox : The Institute for Cultural Research"I-c-r.org.uk. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  50. ^ Dessem, Matthew (5 June 2014). "Animation's lost masterpiece"The DissolvePitchfork Media. Retrieved 9 August 2018.
  51. ^ Westerlund, David, ed. (2004). Sufism in Europe and North America. New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon. p. 54. ISBN 0-415-32591-9.
  52. ^ Campbell, Edward (29 August 1978). "Reluctant guru". Evening News.
  53. Jump up to:a b "Idries Shah, Sayed Idries el-Hashimi (official website)". The Estate of Idries Shah. Archived from the original on 23 January 2008. Retrieved 9 October 2008.
  54. ^ Archer, Nathaniel P. (1977). Idries Shah, Printed Word International Collection 8. London, UK: Octagon Press. ISBN 0-86304-000-4.
  55. ^ Ghali, Halima (1979). Shah, International Press Review Collection 9. London, UK: BM Sufi Studies.
  56. ^ Williams, L.F. Rushbrook (1974). Sufi Studies: East and West. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton & Co. pp. 230–31.
  57. ^ Shah, Sirdar Ikbal Ali (1992). Alone in Arabian Nights. London: Octagon Press Ltd. p. 136; ISBN 0-86304-063-2.
  58. Jump up to:a b c Hall, Elizabeth (July 1975). "The Sufi Tradition: A Conversation with Idries Shah" (PDF)Psychology Today9 (2): 61. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 16 March 2015.
  59. ^ Lessing, Doris (1970). "The Mysterious East"The New York Times Review of Books, 22 October
  60. ^ Shah, Sayed Idries (1956). Oriental Magic. London, UK: Octagon Press, Ltd. pp. 59–75. ISBN 0-86304-017-9.
  61. ^ Shah, Idries (1971) [1957]. Destination Mecca. London, UK: Octagon Press. pp. 169–78. ISBN 0-900860-13-8.
  62. Jump up to:a b c d e f Taji-Farouki, Suha; Nafi, Basheer M. (eds.) (2004). Islamic Thought in the Twentieth Century. London, UK/New York, NY: I.B.Tauris Publishers. p. 123. ISBN 1-85043-751-3. {{cite book}}|author2= has generic name (help)
  63. ^ Shah, Idries (1980) [1970]. The Dermis Probe. London, UK: Octagon Press. p. 18ISBN 0-86304-045-4.
  64. Jump up to:a b c Boorstein, Seymour, ed. (1996). Transpersonal PsychotherapyAmerican Journal of Psychotherapy. Vol. 54. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 408–23. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2000.54.3.408ISBN 0-7914-2835-4PMID 11008637.
  65. ^ Shah, Idries (1977) [1964]. The Sufis. London, UK: Octagon Press. p. 54. ISBN 0-86304-020-9.
  66. Jump up to:a b "New Psychology". The Courier. 23 June 1978.
  67. ^ Shah, Idries (1974). Special Problems in the Study of Sufi Ideas. London, UK: Octagon Press. ISBN 0-900860-21-9.
  68. Jump up to:a b Shah, Idries (1977). "An Advanced Psychology of the East" (audio)ISHKArchived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2012.
  69. ^ Lewin, Leonard (1972). Diffusion of Sufi Ideas in the West. Boulder, CO: Keysign Press. p. 17.
  70. Jump up to:a b c d Wilson, Peter (1998). "The Strange Fate of Sufism in the New Age". In Peter B. Clarke (ed.). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London, UK: Luzac Oriental. pp. 187–88. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  71. ^ Shah, Idries (1978). Learning How To Learn. New York, NY/London, UK/Ringwood, Victoria/Toronto, Canada/Auckland, NZ: Penguin Arkana. p. 80. ISBN 0-14-019513-0.
  72. ^ Shah, Idries (1972). Thinkers of the East. New York, NY, US; London, UK; Ringwood, Victoria, Australia; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Arkana. p. 101ISBN 0-14-019251-4.
  73. ^ Lewin, Leonard; Shah, Idries (1972). The Diffusion of Sufi Ideas in the West. Boulder, CO: Keysign Press. p. 72.
  74. Jump up to:a b c Malik, Jamal; Hinnells, John R., eds. (2006). Sufism in the West. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. p. 31. ISBN 0-415-27407-9.
  75. ^ Wilson, Peter (1998). "The Strange Fate of Sufism in the New Age". In Clarke, Peter B., ed. (1998). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London: Luzac Oriental. p. 195. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  76. ^ Hermansen, Marcia (1998). "In the Garden of American Sufi Movements: Hybrids and Perennials". In Clarke, Peter B., ed. (1998). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London: Luzac Oriental. p. 167. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  77. ^ Fahim, Shadia S. (1995). Doris Lessing: Sufi Equilibrium and the Form of the Novel. Basingstoke, UK/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan/St. Martins Press. pp. passim. ISBN 0-312-10293-3.
  78. Jump up to:a b c d Westerlund, David, ed. (2004). Sufism in Europe and North America. New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon. p. 53. ISBN 0-415-32591-9.
  79. ^ Henri Bortoft, The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe's Way of Science (1996). Floris Books; ISBN 0-86315-238-4
  80. Jump up to:a b c Shah, Tahir (2008). In Arabian Nights. London: Bantam Books. pp. 10, 15, 24, 262. ISBN 978-0-553-80523-9.
  81. Jump up to:a b c d Wilson, Peter (1998). "The Strange Fate of Sufism in the New Age". In Peter B. Clarke (ed.). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London, UK: Luzac Oriental. p. 185. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  82. Jump up to:a b c Shah, Idries (1980) [1970]. The Dermis Probe. London, UK: Octagon Press. p. 21ISBN 0-86304-045-4.
  83. ^ Shah, Tahir (2008). In Arabian Nights: A Caravan of Moroccan Dreams. New York, NY: Bantam. pp. 215–16. ISBN 978-0-553-80523-9.
  84. ^ "The Institute for Cultural Research". The Institute for Cultural Research. 2014. Archived from the original on 30 August 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  85. ^ "Directors, Advisors & Staff". Institute for the Study of Human Knowledge (ISHK). Archived from the original on 4 October 2008. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  86. ^ Hayter, Augy (2002). Fictions and Factions. Reno, NV/Paris, France: Tractus Books. pp. 177, 201. ISBN 2-909347-14-1.
  87. ^ Malik, Jamal; Hinnells, John R. (eds.) (2006). Sufism in the West. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. p. 30. ISBN 0-415-27407-9. {{cite book}}|author2= has generic name (help)
  88. ^ "Mądrość głupców". Retrieved 13 July 2019. (pol.)
  89. ^ "Zaczarowana świątynia". Retrieved 13 July 2019. (pol.)
  90. Jump up to:a b The Middle East and North Africa. Europa Publications Limited, Taylor & Francis Group, International Publications Service. 1988. p. 952ISBN 978-0-905118-50-5.
  91. Jump up to:a b c d e f Lessing, Doris; Elwell-Sutton, L. P. (22 October 1970). "Letter to the Editors by Doris Lessing, with a reply by L. P. Elwell-Sutton"The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
  92. ^ Sufi Studies: East and West, edited by Professor L.F. Rushbrook Williams, E.P.Dutton & Co., 1974.ISBN 978-0525211952
  93. ^ The Nature of Religious Man, edited by D.B. Fry, Octagon Press, London, 1982, p. 99.
  94. ^ "Worlds of Magic", in Books and Bookmen, June 1972, vol 17, no. 9, issue #201.
  95. ^ Kabul Times, 13 May 1973, p. 3.
  96. ^ The Afghanistan News, May 1964, vol 7, no. 81
  97. ^ "Spirituality, Science and Psychology in the Sufi Way" in Sufi Studies: East and West, edited by Professor L.F. Rushbrook Williams, E.P. Dutton & Co., 1974, p. 116
  98. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2 June 2015. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
  99. ^ "Oriental Wisdom" in Hindustan Standard, 4 January 1970.
  100. ^ Staff (2015). "Children's Literacy: About ICE: Who We Are". The Institute for Cross-cultural Exchange. Archived from the original on 17 December 2015. Retrieved 17 December 2015.
  101. ^ Zada, John (December 2012). "Helping to Close the Literacy Gap"Viewpoint. Vol. 38, no. 4. TorontoCanada: Canadian Pensioners Concerned, Inc. Archived from the original on 17 December 2015. Retrieved 17 December 2015.
  102. ^ Staff (2015). "About Share Literacy"Institute for the Study of Human Knowledge. Archived from the original on 19 December 2015. Retrieved 19 December 2015.
  103. Jump up to:a b c Wilson, Peter (1998). "The Strange Fate of Sufism in the New Age". In Peter B. Clarke (ed.). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London: Luzac Oriental. pp. 189–191. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  104. Jump up to:a b c Rawlinson, Andrew (1997). The Book of Enlightened Masters: Western Teachers in Eastern Traditions. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court. p. 525ISBN 0-8126-9310-8.
  105. Jump up to:a b Lessing, Doris"On the Death of Idries Shah"dorislessing.org. Retrieved 3 October 2008.
  106. Jump up to:a b Wilson, Peter (1998). "The Strange Fate of Sufism in the New Age". In Peter B. Clarke (ed.). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London, UK: Luzac Oriental. p. 195. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  107. ^ Bennett, J.G. (23 November 1973). "Gurdjieff: Making a New World". Bennett Books. Archived from the original (audio cd) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
  108. ^ Osho (2005). Books I Have Loved. Pune, India: Tao Publishing Pvt. Ltd. pp. 127–28. ISBN 81-7261-102-1.
  109. Jump up to:a b Smoley, Richard; Kinney, Jay (2006). Hidden Wisdom: A Guide to the Western Inner Traditions. Wheaton, IL/Chennai, India: Quest Books. pp. 250–51. ISBN 0-8356-0844-1.
  110. ^ Griffin, J; Tyrrell, I. (2004) Human Givens: A new approach to emotional health and clear thinking. HG Publishing.ISBN 1-899398-31-7
  111. ^ Griffin, J; Tyrrell, I. (2011) Godhead: The Brain's Big Bang – The explosive origin of creativity, mysticism and mental illness.; ISBN 978-1-899398-27-0
  112. ^ Christopher Hitchens (2011). Arguably. Atlantic Books. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-85789-257-7.
  113. ^ Annemarie Schimmel (2011). Mystical Dimensions of Islam. University of North Carolina Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-8078-9976-2.
  114. ^ O'Prey, Paul (1984). Between Moon and Moon – Selected Letters of Robert Graves 1946–1972. Hutchinson. pp. 214, 269. ISBN 0-09-155750-X.
  115. ^ "Idries Shah the Sufis Robert Graves"AbeBooks.com. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  116. ^ Idries Shah; Robert Graves (1964). The SufisAmazon.comISBN 978-0-385-07966-2.
  117. ^ O'Prey, Paul (1984). Between Moon and Moon – Selected Letters of Robert Graves 1946–1972. Hutchinson. pp. 311–312. ISBN 0-09-155750-X.
  118. ^ Elwell-Sutton, L. P. (2 July 1970). "Mystic-Making"The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
  119. ^ Elwell-Sutton, L. P. (1976). "Review of: Sufi Studies: East and West by L. F. Rushbrook Williams". FolkloreTaylor & Francis87 (1): 120–21.
  120. ^ Elwell-Sutton, L. P. (May 1975). "Sufism & Pseudo-Sufism". EncounterXLIV (5): 12–16.
  121. ^ Elwell-Sutton, L. P. (May 1975). "Sufism & Pseudo-Sufism". EncounterXLIV (5): 16.
  122. Jump up to:a b Robert Graves, Omar Ali-Shah (31 May 1968). "Stuffed Eagle at"time.com. Archived from the original on 21 January 2009. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
  123. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Graves, Richard Perceval (1995). Robert Graves and The White Goddess: The White Goddess, 1940–1985. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. pp. 446–447, 468–472. ISBN 0-231-10966-0.
  124. ^ Graves, Beryl (7 December 1996). "Letter to the Editor"The Independent. London. Retrieved 5 November 2008.
  125. ^ Aminrazavi, Mehdi (2005). The Wine of Wisdom. Oxford, UK: Oneworld. p. 155. ISBN 1-85168-355-0.
  126. ^ Irwin, Robert"Omar Khayyam's Bible for drunkards"The Times Literary Supplement. London. Archived from the original on 25 July 2009. Retrieved 5 October 2008.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Archer, Nathaniel P. (1977). Idries Shah, Printed Word International Collection 8. London, UK: Octagon Press. ISBN 0-86304-000-4.
  • Bennett, John G. (1975). Witness: The autobiography of John G. Bennett. Turnstone Books. ISBN 0-85500-043-0.
  • Boorstein, Seymour, ed. (1996). Transpersonal PsychotherapyAmerican Journal of Psychotherapy. Vol. 54. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 408–423. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2000.54.3.408ISBN 0-7914-2835-4PMID 11008637.
  • Galin, Müge (1997). Between East and West: Sufism in the Novels of Doris Lessing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-3383-8.
  • Ghali, Halima (1979). Shah, International Press Review Collection 9. London, UK: BM Sufi Studies.
  • Graves, Richard Perceval (1995). Robert Graves and The White Goddess: 1940–1985. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-81534-2.
  • Lewin, Leonard; Shah, Idries (1972). The Diffusion of Sufi Ideas in the West. Boulder, CO: Keysign Press.
  • Malik, Jamal; Hinnells, John R. (eds.) (2006). Sufism in the West. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 0-415-27407-9. {{cite book}}|author2= has generic name (help)
  • Moore, James (1986). "Neo-Sufism: The Case of Idries Shah". Religion Today3 (3): 4–8. doi:10.1080/13537908608580605.
  • O'Prey, Paul (1984). Between Moon and Moon – Selected Letters of Robert Graves 1946–1972. Hutchinson. ISBN 0-09-155750-X.
  • Rawlinson, Andrew (1997). The Book of Enlightened Masters: Western Teachers in Eastern Traditions. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court. ISBN 0-8126-9310-8.
  • Smith, Jane I. (1999). Islam in America (Columbia Contemporary American Religion Series). New York, NY/Chichester, UK: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-10966-0.
  • Smoley, Richard; Kinney, Jay (2006). Hidden Wisdom: A Guide to the Western Inner Traditions. Wheaton, IL/Chennai, India: Quest Books. ISBN 0-8356-0844-1.
  • Taji-Farouki, Suha; Nafi, Basheer M. (eds.) (2004). Islamic Thought in the Twentieth Century. London, UK/New York, NY: I.B.Tauris Publishers. ISBN 1-85043-751-3. {{cite book}}|author2= has generic name (help)
  • Westerlund, David, ed. (2004). Sufism in Europe and North America. New York, NY: RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 0-415-32591-9.
  • Wilson, Peter (1998). "The Strange Fate of Sufism in the New Age". In Peter B. Clarke (ed.). New Trends and Developments in the World of Islam. London: Luzac Oriental. ISBN 1-898942-17-X.
  • Wintle, Justin (ed.) (2001). Makers of Modern Culture, Vol. 1. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-26583-5. {{cite book}}|first= has generic name (help)

External links[edit]