2019/09/28

Non-theist Friends Network | Website/log of the Non-theist Friends Network in Britain



Non-theist Friends Network | Website/log of the Non-theist Friends Network in Britain






Aims of the Nontheist Friends Network

The Network’s aim is to provide a forum and supportive framework for Friends who regard religion as a human creation. We want to ensure that our Religious Society of Friends is an inclusive rather than an exclusive Society. We seek to explore theological and spiritual diversity and their practical implications, in respectful acceptance of different views, experiences and journeys.

Quaker beliefs

“Quakers do not share a fixed set of beliefs.

Our unity is based on a shared practice of worship, not on our beliefs all being the same. There is no need to be in unity with Quakers on every issue in order to be part of our meetings.

Many people have a personal understanding of God; often this is based on Christian teachings, or on other religious traditions. Other people are aware of or seek a spiritual environment but would not define it further. Quakers are no different!

There is a great diversity within the Quakers on conceptions of God, and we use different kinds of language to describe religious experience. Some Quakers have a conception of God which is similar to that of orthodox Christians, and would use similar language. Others are happy to use God-centred language, but would conceive of God in very different terms to the traditional Christian trinity. Some describe themselves as agnostics, or nontheists, and describe their experiences in ways that avoid the use of the word God entirely.

Quaker faith is built on experience, and Quakers would generally hold that it is the spiritual experience which is central to Quaker worship, and not the use of a particular form of words (whether that be ‘God’ or anything else.”
----------------

The above statement was published on the website of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain www.quaker.org.uk during 2013 to describe a Quaker approach to belief, language, and experience. We are glad to reproduce it here, as it confirms that the perspectives of the Nontheist Friends Network has an accepted place in British Quakerism, as a Listed Informal Group of Britain Yearly Meeting.

Update 30 March 2018 (Good Friday).
Interestingly an almost identical text appears on the website of Baltimore Yearly Meeting and BYM Net today. It looks as if one BYM copied and pasted from the other BYM but we don’t know in which direction!

This Nontheist Quakers web site has been created to provide British Quakers who may consider themselves to be atheist, agnostic, or nontheist with a readily accessible source of information about this interesting and growing strand of liberal Quakerism.


22 THOUGHTS ON “ABOUT”

John Gaukroger
JULY 23, 2017 AT 7:43 AM


I am impressed rereading the above, and think I will find £20 to join. I shall be at Warwick for YMG/BYM and think I must do it then.
One phrase I find missing is “So-called” re word RELIGIOUS in the title of our organisatio. It is an obstacle for me.
I suspect it is so too for many others ut there for whom the word connects with a lot of negative baggage including conflict and hypocrisy.
For So many others however it is positive ín it’s multiple connections with other words suspect to me but profoundly meaningful to others, eg Spiritual and Faith

Like
REPLY

Trevor
JULY 26, 2017 AT 7:34 PM


Welcome John
I believe our treasurer Sarah Siddle, Clerk Gisela Creed, former Clerk Michael Wright and founder member David Boulton will all be at BYMG at some stage and (one of them) delighted to collect your £20! With only a few days to go, everyone please see the details of our upcoming events under EVENTS above.
PS. John. If you miss them at Warwick, see our Membership page under ‘About’ above.
Trevor

Like
REPLY

Trevor
JULY 27, 2017 AT 8:44 PM


As a further PS John, as shown on the membership page under ‘About’ our current annual membership fee appears to be just £10. (£20 for couples perhaps?)

Like

Sarah Siddle
SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 AT 6:39 PM


I do agree, John. When Paul Parker became Recording Clerk, he organised a conference called ‘Whoosh’ to consider the idea that the Society was ready to take off, to make a big stride, because there were many people for whom it could be an answer to their spiritual needs. I think many of these are people who identify as ‘Spiritual, not religious’, and it is these that the Society should be gathering in. ‘Religious’ implies to me the need to accept – or be bound to, ‘religio’ meaning ‘binding back’ – an orthodoxy of some kind, and many of us joined Friends partly because it did not require any such acceptance. We are, we get told, left free to find our own truth. I would prefer us to be the Spiritual Society of Friends, but I fear that to suggest this would cause outrage!
Sarah Siddle

Like
REPLY

Gerard Guiton
JUNE 30, 2019 AT 10:34 PM


The classical explanation of the relatively modern word ‘religion’ derives from the Latin ‘relego’—‘re’- (again) + ‘lego’ in the sense of ‘choose’, ‘go over again’ or ‘consider carefully’, rather than re-‘ligo’ (to combine etc.) which is ex-context and therefore a misinterpretation.

Like

Pamela Haymond
JULY 24, 2017 AT 8:52 PM


I would like to know if there is an online Meeting of non theist Quakers? Since we are few and far between, wouldn’t an online presence/meeting, via Skype, Google, Messenger or other platform be a wonderful thing to have?

Like
REPLY

Trevor
JULY 26, 2017 AT 7:40 PM


Welcome Pamela and I see you are now following the website.
I would be very interested to see what other members of our Steering Group and members of the Network make of this suggestion.
I am only familiar with Skype conference calling and not sure about the accessibility of other conferencing programs but the main difficulty would be (for someone) to organise a time for any such online meeting, at what frequency, how to manage it and with what purpose (eg. worship? discussion? Q&A? Readings? etc.).
More comments here please!

Like
REPLY

Deepa Parry-Gupta
AUGUST 23, 2017 AT 7:56 AM


I know that Woodbrooke have 2 online meetings each week, so they have the technology..I also find myself with permanent mixed feelings- I really value our network and our conference, needing the opportunity to meet like minded Friends. Having said this, I’m always aware that I wouldn’t want us to be seen as ” separate ” but as part of the wide spectrum of Quakers. My initial thought re online meetings was ” oh yes!!” but then I wondered if we are better to be present at , for example, the Woodbrooke online meetings where we would be part of the whole.. I still haven’t ‘got my head round’ what my thinking process is!!!!!

Like
REPLY

Trevor
AUGUST 23, 2017 AT 10:59 AM


Deepa, what is the purpose of and the procedure for joining those Woodbrooke online groups?
Trevor

Like

Deepa Parry-Gupta
AUGUST 23, 2017 AT 11:39 AM


They are online meeting for worship sessions so that if you can’t get to a meeting or even if you want to join in these additional meetings for worship you can.

Like

melclarkephotography
AUGUST 25, 2017 AT 8:13 AM


Glad to have heard about the Woodbrooke meetings, I am definitely going to join these to see how they work. It’s a great idea for people who can’t get there in person. If there were enough people here who would be interested and could make agreeable times I would love to join those too! I am familiar with join.me free meeting software online which could be an option.

Like
REPLY

Tom Duckham
SEPTEMBER 2, 2017 AT 10:20 PM


I am interested in Quakerism and would like to attend a local meeting, for spiritual and social reasons. However, I am not a Christian and probably never will be. This has made me hesitate in going to a local meeting. What should I expect and what kind of reception does a non-theist typically receive at a meeting?

Like
REPLY

Deepa Parry-Gupta
SEPTEMBER 2, 2017 AT 11:10 PM


I started at a meeting in which most Friends were from a Christian background. I felt welcomed and we had some evening groups where we talked about how we had got to where we were now. I could explain my nontheism and I could hear why God, Jesus and the Christian church is important to some Friends . It has been an opportunity to allow each other the space for our own beliefs along with a genuine interest in understand others positions

Like
REPLY

Martin
MAY 9, 2018 AT 8:11 AM


Hi Tom, I am in the same position as you and I wondered if you had taken the plunge and what your experience was?

Like
REPLY

Deepa
MAY 9, 2018 AT 10:31 AM


Hoping you have “taken the plunge” and had a positive experience! A dear Ffriend of mine advised me to visit a number of Quaker meetings as they are all so different.. another way may be to spend a night or two B&B at Woodbrooke and attend the daily morning for worship and evening epilogue; a very Friendly and gentle introduction.

Like

Trevor
MAY 9, 2018 AT 11:08 AM


Hi Martin
Thank-you for following the website. I hope you find it useful.
Whether Tom replies may depend on whether he checked the tick-box for receiving notices of replies to this comment thread. Comment/replies notification is not automatic as signing up to follow the website will only send notifications of new ‘posts’ and not comments (unless you sign up for them) or other changes (e.g. of pages) on the site.
As well as the tick box for individual comments, you can sign up for the RSS feed of new posts and/or any new comments in the very top left corner (black column) of the site. (Or at the very bottom – scroll down – of the mobile version). Perhaps I should make a post about this or update the How to? page?
With regard to ‘taking the plunge’ – see my reply to Tom in September below.
The week before our NFN conference at Woodbrooke, I myself ‘took the plunge’ of attending the local ‘Spiritualist church’ (there are two in Hounslow) by way of curiosity and ‘research’. I probably won’t go again! Perhaps one of the reasons we are still the ‘Religious Society of Friends’ and not the ‘Spiritual Society of Friends’ as has sometimes been suggested.
Whether you will encounter the ‘Spirit’, and in what form, amongst, for example, Christian Friends (http://friendsunitedmeeting.org/) or Evangelical Friends’ Churches (in America or Kenya (http://friendsunitedmeeting.org/africa.html)) or amongst non-theist Friends (Quakers) I am not able to say.

Like

Trevor Bending
SEPTEMBER 2, 2017 AT 11:07 PM


Welcome Tom
I almost wondered if I should send a private reply by email but your question is so direct I felt it was an opportunity to answer in this public space.
I think there would be no ‘typical reception’ of a non-theist, partly because at first no-one would know you were a non-theist (or Catholic, Jewish, Hindu, atheist etc.) unless you chose to say so.
Meetings vary considerably in their make-up, some being non-theist leaning, others more ‘Christocentric’ and most having individuals with a wide range of beliefs and backgrounds.
I hope that all would make you welcome but it is recommended that newcomers should try several meetings in their locality to form a broader picture of what Quaker meetings are like as they differ in size, age profile and other characteristics.
The main Quaker website in Britain, http://www.quaker.org.uk/ includes
http://www.quaker.org.uk/meetings where you can find your nearest meetings.
A lot of Quakers in Britain today would not describe themselves as Christian whilst others certainly would. (There is a book by a Quaker Universalist Tony Philpott called ‘From Christian to Quaker – a spiritual journey from evangelical Christian to universalist Quaker’ which you might find interesting).
Details of non-theist Quaker publications can be found on this website.
I hope you might get further answers to your question here but also that you might take the plunge and try a meeting one Sunday morning and perhaps another on another occasion.
Most meetings have tea (or coffee etc.) and biscuits (and sometimes cake) afterwards and an opportunity to chat about Quakerism, today’s news or last night’s telly. (My tongue slightly in cheek).
You could possibly even enjoy your first meeting tomorrow morning!
Trevor Bending (web-person who gets the comments before anyone else).

Like
REPLY

Opher
OCTOBER 4, 2018 AT 1:28 PM


Sounds good – just my cup of tea!

Like
REPLY

Trevor
OCTOBER 4, 2018 AT 7:26 PM


Welcome Opher!
Sorry to hear about your Quaker friend’s wife. I wonder if she had or will be having a Quaker funeral?
I wanted to draw your attention to articles about ‘awe and wonder’ (your words on your blog) by Michael Wright on our Articles page. (Michael was an Anglican vicar for 30 years but resigned because he no longer believed in God or the virgin birth).

Like
REPLY

Deepa
OCTOBER 5, 2018 AT 4:38 PM


I really like this. It is clear and certainly my position is encompassed here

Like
REPLY

Trevor
JANUARY 8, 2019 AT 11:58 AM


Sorry you didn’t get a reply earlier Deepa. Perhaps I’ve only just seen your comment. Sorry to hear too, if my understanding is correct, you won’t be able to attend NFN conference this year.
I haven’t booked yet but hope to do so soon.
Your contribution to our Steering Group is much appreciated!

Like

Trevor Bending
OCTOBER 5, 2018 AT 9:32 PM


The articles by Michael Wright I referred to in my reply to Opher above are to be found o the Articles page at Disagreeing about God (3 pages) https://nontheistquakers.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/disagreeing_about_god.pdf
and Prayer beyond belief (20 pages) https://nontheistquakers.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/prayer-beyond-belief.pdf

Like
REPLY

Life in the Light: the challenge of belief and language for 21st century Quakers | The Australian Friend

Life in the Light: the challenge of belief and language for 21st century Quakers | The Australian Friend

Life in the Light: the challenge of belief and language for 21st century Quakers

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Geoffrey Ballard, Canberra Regional Meeting

This article stems from the workshop looking at the non-traditional Quaker colours, that I co-facilitated with Peter Williams at the 2015 YM Summer School.
We attended a Share and Tell session on Non-Theism at the 2014 YM, our first Yearly Meeting. It was great to be among people who shared a range of views, were open to non-traditional beliefs, and wanted to have a conversation about Quaker beliefs. As a follow-up to that session, Peter volunteered to develop a proposal for a Quaker survey, to find out more about Australian Quakers and what they believe, the final results of which are now available. So now we have some data (that can be found on the Quaker website), none of it at all surprising perhaps, but interesting nonetheless.
I introduced the Summer School with these words:
Almost at the same time as the experience of George Fox and the founding of the Religious Society of Friends, Isaac Newton, in 1665, discovered that light is made up of many colours. Like light, 21st century Quakerism is made up of a spectrum of beliefs (colours).
In religion and science, views have changed since the 17th century. Since Fox and Newton’s views on religion, we have had the religious views of scientist Albert Einstein, and now Stephen Hawking; as well, religious thinkers, from the Christian tradition, like Selby Spong, Don Cupitt, Karen Armstrong, and non-theistic Quaker David Boulton, express various views on current religious thought. Their thinking has evolved.
No doubt there are Muslim, Jewish and Buddhist thinkers as well as Humanists who could add much to this arena.
What do you think and believe? The challenge of the Quaker survey was to think about the “god” word. Is Quakerism Christianity without beliefs? Is it Humanism within a Christian culture? Is Quakerism Humanistic Christianity? Does it matter what Quakers believe? I have heard some Quakers say “no” to the last question.
In essence, 62% of Australian Friends believe in “G/god”, 13% do not, and 25% are uncertain or unable to answer. Of those who believe in “G/god”, most describe this term as The Inward Light, A Life Force or Spirit, and not a being. Those who do not believe in “G/god” have developed a range of alternative words to substitute when traditional religious terms are used. Words are metaphors so it is important that when they are used we understand their common meaning so that we can communicate.
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth: And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord, Who was conceived by the holy Ghost, Born of the virgin Mary, Suffered under Pontius Pilate, Was crucified, dead and buried. He descended into Hell, The third day he rose again from the dead. He ascended into Heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost, The holy Catholick Churche, The Comunion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, The resurrection of the body, And the life everlasting. Amen.
From the 1662 Book of Common Prayer.
Is this the God that George Fox believed in?
Can I make a bold assertion and say that most 21st century Australian Quakers do not believe in this God, and that most people would see Quakers as non-theists if a conversation took place. David Boulton says,
Nontheism … is …the absence of any belief in a deity or deities, in the existence of God (where ‘existence’ is understood in a realist, objective sense), and especially belief in one God as creator and supreme ruler. (p.6, Godless for God’s Sake, edited by David Boulton)
Some Quaker nontheists have wholly abandoned ‘God language’ and hope for a progressive relinquishment of such language within the Society. Some choose not to use the word ‘God’ themselves but are happy to “translate” it when it is used by other Friends in written or spoken ministry or in conversation. Some have no problem using traditional Quaker Godspeak – “God”, “that of God”, “the Spirit”, “the divine”, ‘”the inner light” – understanding these hallowed and resonant terms metaphorically, symbolically, poetically, instrumentally, signifying the sum of our human values, the imagined embodiment of our human ideals, the focus of our ultimate concern: no more, but, gloriously, no less than all that makes up the wholly human spirit. (p.7-8, Godless for God’s Sake, edited by David Boulton)
Unfortunately experience is so hard to put into words. Yet we need to use words to communicate. As my husband pointed out to me: trying to describe beautiful music to another person is almost impossible. It has to be experienced. Yet everyone will experience something different. When I first heard Mimi and Rodolfo express their love for each other in La Boheme, tears came to my eyes. Someone else may be left without any emotional reaction, or a different reaction.
Quakers are experimental and experiential. They don’t accept being told, or behaving according to a formula. Quakers are bit like cats. Ever try herding cats?
So what is the problem? Quakers have meetings for “worship”. Some would call them just meetings, or meetings for silence and stillness, or meetings for contemplation and insight. And when you look on the Australian Quaker website, and start reading the material, a different picture is revealed about Quaker belief, at odds with the results of the Quaker survey. ‘God’ language is used that needs explanation for good communication. Making assumptions can lead to big misunderstandings.
For example, at the end of a press release by the YM Clerk, put out after the 2015 YM, it states:
About Quakers: ………Quakers believe everyone is endowed with something of the divine; and one can strengthen awareness of it and obedience to it by silent worship, mutual support and activity together, and by trying to live according to our testimonies……
I believe this statement is not a true reflection of all Quakers in Australia in 2015. If the statement had said: Most Quaker believe….. then it would have used inclusive language and been accurate.
This is the challenge for 21st century Quakerism. How to describe Quakerism that allows for the many colours of belief, at the same time not denying the historical Christian tradition, but using inclusive language that does not exclude those who are non-theist. Advices and Queries is a very useful tool for meditation and reflection, but for many non-theists it has many roadblocks because of the language used and the assumptions made about modern day Quakers.
It is often said that Quakers believe that there is something of God in everyone. They don’t, you know! Many do, but not all. And that is after a conversation to decide what is your experience or definition of God.
What would George Fox, with a 21st century mindset, say about Quakers now? Would he say, “Of course we believe in God – make it very clear to everyone”. (Which God would that be George?) Or would he be saying. “We are many years past the age of Enlightenment. We have scientific discoveries and understanding about the Universe. Update!” In the recent film The Theory of Everything, Stephen Hawking says in one of the opening scenes, to Jane, his future wife, that he is a cosmologist. “What’s cosmology?” she asks, and he responds, “Religion for intelligent atheists.”
How do Quakers now present themselves to the world as people of many colours (beliefs)? How do Quakers speak about themselves to each other? How can a theist and non-theist listen and accept each other, without the fear of change and a loss of historical tradition and heritage?
In particular, the current language, especially in written form, is not inclusive of all Quakers today. Diversity can bring strength, but Quakers must drag themselves into the 21st century, and truly represent the makeup of all members.
In 1656 the elders at Balby released Quakers from complete adherence to original writings, (the letter killeth”), as is seen in other religious traditions, and established the principle of continuing revelation”. The challenge is to make the principles and the practice of early Quakers meaningful to us by using language and practices that are relevant in the context of today’s culture.
I am not rejecting the use of religious language. I am asking for relevant and inclusive language.


Children of the Light
Come in all ages and sizes
One shape does not fit all.
Haiku by Margaret Woodward

Further reading
Books and articles
Bolton David (ed) 2009. Godless for God’s sake. Nontheism in contemporary Quakerism. Dales Historical Monographs; Hobsons Farm, Dent UK;
Epstein, Greg M. 2010 Good without God. What a billion nonreligious people do believe. HarperCollins: New York, NY.
Geering, Lloyd 2002  Christianity without God.  Polebridge Pess, California. 
Vosper, Greta 2012. Amen. What prayer can mean in a world beyond belief. HarperCollins: Toronto;
Maguire, Daniel C. 2014 Christianity without God. Moving beyond the dogmas and retrieving the epic moral narrative. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY.
Harris, Sam 2014. Waking Up. A guide to spirituality without religion. Simon & Schuster: New York, NY
Holloway, Richard 1999.  Godless morality.  Canongate Books, Edinburgh.
Cressin, Os 2014. Quaker and naturalist too. Morning Walk Press: Iowa City, IA.
Raymo, Chet 2008. When God is gone everything is holy. The making of a
religious naturalist. Sorin Books: Notre Dame IN.
Rush, David 2002. They Too are Quakers: A survey of 199 nontheist
Friends. Available at http://universalistfriends.org/pdf/rush.pdf
Wright, Michael (2014). Being Quaker now. A different way of being open
for transformation. Available at: http://www.nontheist-quakers.org.uk/documents/Being_Quaker_now.pdf
Websites
Nontheist Quakers. Nontheist Friends Network for British Quakers of an atheist, agnostic or nontheist persuasion interested in modern theology. http://www.nontheist-quakers.org.uk/index.php
Quaker Universalist Voice. A forum for exploring diverse spiritual paths.
http://universalistfriends.org/
Sea of faith network http://www.sofn.org.uk/ “Exploring and promoting religious faith as human creation”