Perennial Phil Ch 11 GOOD AND EVIL [7, 3343] 자기 안의 자기를 죽이고 하나님을 따르는 것

Perenial Phil Ch 11 GOOD AND EVIL [7, 3343]

DESIRE is the first datum of our consciousness; we are born into sympathy and antipathy, wishing and willing. Unconsciously at first, then consciously, we evaluate: 'This is good, that is bad.' And a little later we discover obligation. 'This, being good, ought to be done; that, being bad, ought not to be done.'

All evaluations are not equally valid. We are called upon to pass judgment on what our desires and dislikes affirm to be good or bad. Very often we discover that the verdict of the higher court is at variance with the decision reached so quickly and light-heartedly in the court of first instance. In the light of what we know about ourselves, our fellow-beings and the world at large, we discover that what at first seemed good may, in the long run or in the larger context, be bad; and that what at first seemed bad may be a good which we feel our­selves under obligation to accomplish.

When we say that a man is possessed of penetrating moral insight we mean that his judgment of value-claims is sound; that he knows enough to be able to say what is good in the longest run and the largest context. When we say that a man has a strong moral character, we mean that he is ready to act upon the findings of his insight, even when these findings are unpleasantly or even excruciatingly at variance with his first, spontaneous valuations.

In actual practice moral insight is never a strictly personal matter. The judge administers a system of law and is guided by precedent. In other words, every individual is the member of a community, which has a moral code based upon past find­ings of what in fact is good in the longer run and the wider context. In most circumstances most of the members of any given society permit themselves to be guided by the generally accepted code of morals; a few reject the code, either in its entirety or in part; and a few choose to live by another, higher and more exacting code. 

===

In Christian phraseology, there are the few who stubbornly persist in living in a state of mortal sin and antisocial lawlessness; there are the many who obey the laws, make the Precepts of Morality their guide, repent of mortal sins when they commit them, but do not make much effort to avoid venial sins; and finally there are the few whose righteousness 'exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees,' who are guided by the Counsels of Perfection and have the insight to perceive and the character to avoid venial sins and even imperfections.

Philosophers and theologians have sought to establish a theoretical basis for the existing moral codes, by whose aid individual men and women pass judgment on their spon­taneous evaluations. From Moses to Bentham, from Epicurus to Calvin, from the Christian and Buddhist philosophies of universal love to the lunatic doctrines of nationalism and racial superiority—the list is long and the span of thought enormously wide. But fortunately there is no need for us to consider these various theories. Our concern is only with the Perennial Philosophy and with the system of ethical principles which those who believe in that philosophy have used, when passing judgment on their own and other people's evaluations. The questions that we have to ask in this section are simple enough, and simple too are the answers. As always, the difficulties begin only when we pass from theory to practice, from ethical principle to particular application.
====

Granted that the ground of the individual soul is akin to, or identical with, the divine Ground of all existence, and granted that this divine Ground is an ineffable Godhead that manifests itself as personal God or even as the incarnate Logos, what is the ultimate nature of good and evil, and what the true purpose and last end of human life?
===

The answers to these questions will be given to a great extent in the words of that most surprising product of the English eighteenth century, William Law. 

(How very odd our educational system is! Students of English literature are forced to read the graceful journalism of Steele and Addison, are expected to know all about the minor novels of Defoe and the tiny elegances of Matthew Prior. But they can pass all their examinations summa cum laude without having so much as looked into the writings of a man who was not only a master of English prose, but also one of the most interesting thinkers of his period and one of the most endearingly saintly figures in the whole history of Anglicanism.) 

Our current neglect of Law is yet another of the many indications that twentieth-century educators have ceased to be concerned with questions of ultimate truth or meaning and (apart from mere vocational training) are interested solely in the dissemination of a root­less and irrelevant culture, and the fostering of the solemn foolery of scholarship for scholarship's sake.

Nothing burns in hell but the self.

Theologia Germanica

The mind is on fire, thoughts are on fire. Mind-consciousness and the impressions received by the mind, and the sensations that arise from the impressions that the mind receives—these too are on fire.
And with what are they on fire? With the fire of greed, with the fire of resentment, with the fire of infatuation; with birth, old age and death, with sorrow and lamentation, with misery and grief and despair they are on fire.

From the Buddha's Fire Sermon

If thou hast not seen the devil, look at thine own self.

Jalal-uddin Rumi

Your own self is your own Cain that murders your own Abel.

For every action and motion of self has the spirit of Anti-Christ and murders the divine life within you.

William Law

The city of God is made by the love of God pushed to the contempt of self; the earthly city, by the love of self pushed to the contempt of God.

St. Augustine

The difference between a good and a bad man does not lie in this, that the one wills that which is good and the other does not, but solely in this, that the one concurs with the living inspiring spirit of God within him, and the other resists it, and can he chargeable with evil only because he resists it.

선한 사람과 악한 사람의 차이는 한 사람이 선한 것을 원하고 다른 사람이 원하지 않는다는 데 있지 않고 오직 여기에　있다．　한　사람은 자기 안에 있는 하나님의 살아 있는 영감을 주는 영과 일치하려고　한다는 것과, 다른 사람은 그것에 저항한다는　것．　그　하나님의　영에　저항한다는　것에　악이　있다고　볼　수　있다．　

William Law

People should think less about what they ought to do and more about what they ought to be. If only their being were good, their works would shine forth brightly. Do not imagine that you can ground your salvation upon actions; it must rest on what you are. The ground upon which good character rests is the very same ground from which man's work derives its value, namely a mind wholly turned to God. Verily, if you were so minded, you might tread on a stone and it would be a more pious work than if you, simply for your own profit, were to receive the Body of the Lord and were wanting in spiritual detachment.

Eckhart

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Bliagavad-Gita

It is mind which gives to things their quality, their foundation and their being. Whoever speaks or acts with impure mind, him sorrow follows, as the wheel follows the steps of the ox that draws the cart.

Dhammapada

The nature of a man's being determines the nature of his actions; and the nature of his being comes to manifestation first of all in the mind. What he craves and thinks, what he believes and feels—this is, so to speak, the Logos, by whose agency an individual's fundamental character performs its creative acts. 

These acts will be beautiful and morally good if the being is God-centred, 

bad and ugly if it is centred in the per­sonal self. 

'The stone,' says Eckhart, 'performs its work with­out ceasing, day and night.' For even when it is not actually falling the stone has weight.

 A man's being is his potential energy directed towards or away from God; 

and it is by this potential energy that he will be judged as good or evil—for it is possible, in the language of the Gospel, to commit adultery and murder in the heart, even while remaining blameless in action.

Covetousness, envy, pride and wrath are the four elements of self, or nature, or hell, all of them inseparable from it. And the reason why it must be thus, and cannot be otherwise, is because the natural life of the creature is brought forth for the participation of some high supernatural good in the Creator.

But it could have no fitness, no possible capacity to receive such good, unless it was in itself both an extremity of want and an extremity of desire for some high good.

When therefore this natural life is deprived of or fallen from God, it can be nothing else in itself but an extremity of want continually desiring, and an extremity of desire continually wanting.

And because it is that, its whole life can be nothing else but a plague and torment of covetousness, envy, pride and wrath, all which is precisely nature, self, or hell.

Now covetousness, pride and envy are not three different things, but only three different names for the restless workings of one and the same will or desire. Wrath, which is a fourth birth from these three, can have no existence till one or all of these three are contradicted, or have something done to them that is contrary to their will.

These four properties generate their own torment. They have no outward cause, nor any inward power of altering themselves. And therefore all self or nature must be in this state until some supernatural good comes into it, or gets a birth in it.

Whilst man indeed lives among the vanities of time, his covetous­ness, envy, pride and wrath may be in a tolerable state, may hold him to a mixture of peace and trouble; they may have at times their gratifications as well as their torments. But when death has put an end to the vanity of all earthly cheats, the soul that is not born again of the supernatural Word and Spirit of God, must find itself unavoidably devoured or shut up in its own insatiable, un­changeable, self-tormenting covetousness, envy, pride and wrath.

William Law

covetousness탐욕

covetous, greedy, acquisitive, grasping, avaricious mean having or showing a strong desire for especially material possessions. 

covetous implies inordinate desire often for another's possessions.

It is true that you cannot properly express the degree of your sinfulness; but that is because it is impossible, in this life, to represent sins in all their true ugliness; nor shall we ever know them as they really are except in the light of God. God gives to some souls an impression of the enormity of sin, by which He makes them feel that sin is incomparably greater than it seems. Such souls must conceive their sins as faith represents them (that is, as they are in themselves), but must be content to describe them in such human words as their mouth is able to utter.

Charles de Cona'ren

Lucifer, when he stood in his natural nobility, as God had created him, was a pure noble creature. But when he kept to self, when he possessed himself and his natural nobility as a property, he fell and became, instead of an angel, a devil. So it is with man. If he remains in himself and possesses himself of his natural nobility as a property, he falls and becomes, instead of a man, a devil.

The Following of Christ

If a delicious fragrant fruit had a power of separating itself from the rich spirit, fine taste, smell and colour, which it receives from the virtue of the air and the spirit of the sun, or if it could, in the beginning of its growth, turn away from the sun and receive no virtue from it, then it would stand in its own first birth of wrath, sourness, bitterness, astringency, just as the devils do, who have turned back into their own dark root and have rejected the Light and Spirit of God. So that the hellish nature of a devil is nothing but its own first forms of life withdrawn or separated from the heavenly Light and Love; just as the sourness, bitterness and astringency of a fruit are nothing else but the first form of its vege­table life, before it has reached the virtue of the sun and the spirit of the air.

And as a fruit, if it had a sensibility of itself, would be full of torment as soon as it was shut up in the first forms of its life, in its own astringency, sourness and stinging bitterness, so the angels, when they had turned back into these very same first forms of their own life, and broke off from the heavenly Light and Love of God, became their own hell.

No hell was made for them, no new qualities came into them, no vengeance or pains from the Lord of Love fell on them; they only stood in that state of division and separation from the Son and Holy Spirit of God, which by their own motion they had made for themselves. They had nothing in them but what they had from God, the first forms of a heavenly life; but they had them in a state of self-torment, because they had separated them from birth of Love and Light.

William Law

In all the possibility of things there is and can be but one happi­ness and one misery. The one misery is nature and creature left to itself, the one happiness is the Life, the Light, the Spirit of God, manifested in nature and creature. This is the true meaning of the words of Our Lord: There is but one that is good, and that is God.

William Law

Men are not in hell because God is angry with them;

they are in wrath and darkness because they have done to the light,

which infinitely flows forth from God,

as that man does to the light of the sun, who puts out his own eyes.

William Law

Though the light and comfort of the outward world keeps even the worst of men from any constant strong sensibility of that wrathful, fiery, dark and self-tormenting nature that is the very essence of every fallen unregenerate soul, yet every man in the world has more or less frequent and strong intimations given him that so it is with him in the inmost ground of his soul. How many inventions are some people forced to have recourse to in order to keep off a certain inward uneasiness, which they are afraid of and know not whence it comes? Alas, it is because there is a fallen spirit, a dark aching fire within them, which has never had its proper relief and is trying to discover itself and calling out for help at every cessation of worldly joy.

William Law

In the Hebrew-Christian tradition the Fall is subsequent to creation and is due exclusively to the egocentric use of a free will, which ought to have remained centred in the divine Ground and not in the separate selfhood. 

The myth of Genesis embodies a very important psychological truth, but falls short of being an entirely satisfactory symbol, because it fails to men­tion, much less to account for, the fact of evil and suffering in the non-human world. 

To be adequate to our experience the myth would have to be modified in two ways. 

In the first place, it would have to make clear that creation, the incompre­hensible passage from the unmanifested One into the manifest multiplicity of nature, from eternity into time, is not merely the prelude and necessary condition of the Fall; to some extent it is the Fall. 

And in the second place, it would have to indi­cate that something analogous to free will may exist below the human level.

That the passage from the unity of spiritual to the manifold-ness of temporal being is an essential part of the Fall is clearly stated in the Buddhist and Hindu renderings of the Perennial Philosophy. 

Pain and evil are inseparable from individual existence in a world of time; and, for human beings, there is an intensification of this inevitable pain and evil when the desire is turned towards the self and the many, rather than towards the divine Ground. 

To this we might speculatively add the opinion that perhaps even sub-human existences may be endowed (both individually and collectively, as kinds and species) with something resembling the power of choice. 

==== 

동물과 인간의 차이

There is the extraordinary fact that 'man stands alone'—that, so far as we can judge, every other species is a species of living fossils, capable only of degeneration and extinction, not of further evolutionary advance. 

In the phraseology of Scholastic Aristotelianism, matter possesses an appetite for form—not necessarily for the best form, but for form as such. Looking about us in the world of living things, we observe (with a delighted wonder, touched occasionally, it must be admitted, with a certain questioning dismay) the innumerable forms, always beautiful, often extravagantly odd and sometimes even sinister, in which the insatiable appetite of matter has found its satisfaction. 

Of all this living matter only that which is organized as human beings has succeeded in finding a form capable, at any rate on the mental side, of further develop­ment. 

All the rest is now locked up in forms that can only remain what they are or, if they change, only change for the worse. 

It looks as though, in the cosmic intelligence test, all living matter, except the human, had succumbed, at one time or another during its biological career, to the temptation of assuming, not the ultimately best, but the immediately most profitable form. 

By an act of something analogous to free will every species, except the human, has chosen the quick returns of specialization, the present rapture of being perfect, but per­fect on a low level of being. 

The result is that they all stand at the end of evolutionary blind alleys. To the initial cosmic Fall of creation, of multitudinous manifestation in time, they have added the obscurely biological equivalent of man's volun­tary Fall. 

As species, they have chosen the immediate satis­faction of the self rather than the capacity for reunion with the divine Ground. 

For this wrong choice, the non-human forms of life are punished negatively, by being debarred from real­izing the supreme good, to which only the unspecialized and therefore freer, more highly conscious human form is capable. 

But it must be remembered, of course, that the capacity for supreme good is achieved only at the price of becoming also capable of extreme evil. 

Animals do not suffer in so many ways, nor, we may feel pretty certain, to the same extent as do men and women. 

Further, they are quite innocent of that literally diabolic wickedness which, together with sanctity, is one of the distinguishing marks of the human species.

----

결론

We see then that, for the Perennial Philosophy, 

• good is the separate self's conformity to, and finally annihilation in, the divine Ground which gives it being; 
• evil, the intensification of separateness, the refusal to know that the Ground exists. 

This doctrine is, of course, perfectly compatible with 

the formulation of ethical principles as a series of negative and positive divine commandments, 

or even in terms of social utility. 

The crimes which are everywhere forbidden proceed from states of mind which are everywhere condemned as wrong; and these wrong states of mind are, as a matter of empirical fact, absolutely incompatible with that unitive know­ledge of the divine Ground, which, according to the Perennial Philosophy, is the supreme good.

Perennial Phil Ch 10 GRACE AND FREE WILL [7, 3815]

Perenial Phil Ch 10 GRACE AND FREE WILL [7, 3815]

DELIVERANCE is out of time into eternity, and 

is achieved by obedience and docility to the eternal Nature of Things. 

We have been given free will, in order that we may will our self-will out of existence and so come to live continuously in a 'state of grace.' 

All our actions must be directed, in the last analysis, to making ourselves passive [?] in relation to the activity and the being of divine Reality. 

We are, as it were, aeolian harps, endowed with the power either to expose themselves to the wind of the Spirit or to shut themselves away from it.

===

rescue, 

deliverance, 

extrication

in a state of grace : having asked God to forgive one's sins

He died in a state of grace.그는 은혜를 입고 죽었다.

===

Examples of 'state of grace' in a sentence

state of grace

--

• Just once, he achieved a state of grace, as if in a dream.
• The state of grace of these characters allows the manifestations of the uncanny.
• Sleep isn't a state of grace; it doesn't make you unimpeachable.
• Work your way towards a nun-like state of grace gently.
• Politicians want your love, grovelling if they say anything that suggests motherhood isn't a permanent state of grace and wisdom.
• It must somehow resume a state of grace that ended roughly half-way through the last century.

===

The Valley Spirit never dies.

It is called the Mysterious Female.
And the doorway of the Mysterious Female [현빈]
Is the base from which Heaven and Earth spring.
It is there within us all the time.
Draw upon it as you will, it never runs dry.

Lao Tu

In every exposition of the Perennial Philosophy the human soul is regarded as feminine in relation to the Godhead, the personal God and even the Order of Nature. 

Hubris, which is the original sin, consists in regarding the personal ego as self-sufficiently masculine in relation to the Spirit within and to Nature without, and in behaving accordingly.

hubris - excessive pride or self-confidence.

St. Paul drew a very useful and illuminating distinction between the psyche and the pneuma. 

But the latter word never achieved any degree of popularity, and the hopelessly ambigu­ous term, 

psyche, came to be used indifferently for either the personal consciousness or the spirit. And why, in the Western church, did devotional writers choose to speak of man's anima (which for the Romans signified the lower, animal soul) instead of using the word traditionally reserved for the rational soul, namely animus?190 

The answer, I suspect, is that they were anxious to stress by every means in their power the essential femininity [?] of the human spirit in its relations with God. 

Pneuma, being grammatically neuter, and animus, being mascu­line, were felt to be less suitable than anima and psyche. 

Con­sider this concrete example; given the structure of Greek and Latin, it would have been very difficult for the speakers of these languages to identify anything but a grammatically feminine soul with the heroine of the Song of Songs—an allegorical figure who, for long centuries, played the same part in Christian thought and sentiment as the Gopi Maidens played in the theology and devotion of the Hindus.

Take note of this fundamental truth. Everything that works in nature and creature, except sin, is the working of God in nature and creature.

The creature has nothing else in its power but the free use of its will, and its free will hath no other power but that of concurring with, or resisting, the working of God in nature. The creature with its free will can bring nothing into being, nor make any alteration in the working of nature; it can only change its own state or place in the working of nature, and so feel or find something in its state that it did not feel or find before.

William Law

====

Defined in psychological terms, grace is something other than our self-conscious personal self, by which we are helped. 

We have experience of three kinds of such helps—animal grace, human grace and spiritual grace. 

Animal grace 

• comes when we are living in full accord with our own nature on the bio­logical level—not abusing our bodies by excess, not interfering with the workings of our indwelling animal intelligence by conscious cravings and aversions, but living wholesomely and laying ourselves open to the 'virtue of the sun and the spirit of the air.' 
• The reward of being thus in harmony with Tao or the Logos in its physical and physiological aspects is a sense of well-being, 
• an awareness of life as good, not for any reason, but just because it is life. 192 
• There is no question, when we are in a condition of animal grace, of propter vitam vivendi perdere causas; for in this state there is no distinction between the reasons for living and life itself. 
• Life, like virtue, is then its own reward. 
• But, of course, the fullness of animal grace is reserved for animals. 
• Man's nature is such that he must live a self-conscious life in time, not in a blissful sub-rational eternity on the hither side of good and evil. 
• Consequently animal grace is something that he knows only spasmodically in an occasional holiday from self-consciousness, or as an accompaniment to other states, in which life is not its own reward but has to be lived for a reason outside itself.

Human grace comes to us either from persons, or from social groups, or from our own wishes, hopes and imaginings pro­jected outside ourselves and persisting somehow in the psychic medium in a state of what may be called second-hand objec­tivity. 

We have all had experience of the different types of human grace. 

1. There is, for example, te grace which, during childhood, comes from mother, father, nurse or beloved teacher. 
2. At a later stage we experience the grace of friends; the grace of men and women morally better and wiser than ourselves; the grace of the guru, or spiritual director. 
3. Then there is the grace which comes to us because of our attachment to country, party, church or other social organization—a grace which has helped even the feeblest and most timid individuals to achieve what, without it, would have been the impossible. 
4. And finally there is the grace which we derive from our ideals, whether low or high, whether conceived of in abstract terms or bodied forth in imaginary personifications. 
5. To this last type, it would seem, belong many of the graces experienced by the pious adherents of the various religions. 
6. The help received by those who devotedly adore or pray to some personal saint, deity or Avatar is often, we may guess, not a genuinely spiritual grace, but a human grace, coming back to the worshipper from the vortex of psychic power set up by repeated acts (his own and other people's) of faith, yearning and imagination.193

Spiritual grace cannot be received continuously or in its full ness, except by those who have willed away their self-will to the point of being able truthfully to say, 'Not I, but God in me.' 

There are, however, few people so irremediably self-condemned to imprisonment within their own personality as to be wholly incapable of receiving the graces which are from instant to instant being offered to every soul. 

By fits and starts most of us contrive to forget, if only partially, our pre­occupation with 'I,' 'me,' 'mine,' and so become capable of receiving, if only partially, the graces which, in that moment, are being offered us.

• Spiritual grace originates from the divine Ground of all being, and 
• it is given for the purpose of helping man to achieve his final end, 
• which is to return out of time and selfhood to that Ground. 
• It resembles animal grace in being derived from a source wholly other than our self-conscious, human selves; indeed, 
• it is the same thing as animal grace, but manifesting itself on a higher level of the ascending spiral that leads from matter to the Godhead. 

In any given instance, human grace may be wholly good, inasmuch as it helps the recipient in the task of achieving the unitive knowledge of God; but 

because of its source in the individualized self, it is always a little sus­pect and, in many cases, of course, the help it gives is help towards the achievement of ends very different from the true end of our existence.

All our goodness is a loan; God is the owner. God works and his work is God.

St. John of the Cross

---

Perpetual inspiration is as necessary to the life of goodness, holi­ness and happiness as perpetual respiration is necessary to animal life.

William Law

Conversely, of course, the life of goodness, holiness and beatitude is a necessary condition of perpetual inspiration. 

The relations between action and contemplation, ethics and spirituality are circular and reciprocal. 

Each is at once cause and effect.194

It was when the Great Way declined that human kindness and morality arose.

Lao Tu

Chinese verbs are tenseless. This statement as to a hypo­thetical event in history refers at the same time to the present and the future. 

It means simply this: that with the rise of self-consciousness, animal grace is no longer sufficient for the conduct of life, and must be supplemented by conscious and deliberate choices between right and wrong—choices which have to be made in the light of a clearly formulated ethical code. 

===

[Tao]

But, as the Taoist sages are never tired of repeating, codes of ethics and deliberate choices made by the surface will are only a second best. 

The individualized will and the superficial intel­ligence are to be used for the purpose of recapturing the old animal relation to Tao, but on a higher, spiritual level. 

• The goal is perpetual inspiration from sources beyond the personal self; and 
• the means are 'human kindness and morality,' lead­ing to the charity, 
• which is unitive knowledge of Tao, as at once the Ground and Logos.

Lord, Thou hast given me my being of such a nature that it can continually make itself more able to receive thy grace and good­ness. And this power, which I have of Thee, wherein I have a living image of Thine almighty power, is free will. By this I can either enlarge or restrict my capacity for Thy grace.

Nicholas of Cusa

Shun asked Ch'eng, saying, 'Can one get Tao so as to have it for oneself?'

'Your very body,' replied Ch'eng, 'is not your own. How should Tao be?'

'If my body,' said Shun, 'is not my own, pray whose is it?'

'It is the delegated image of God,' replied Ch'eng.

'Your life is not your own. It is the delegated harmony of God.

Your individuality is not your own. It is the delegated adaptability of God. Your posterity is not your own.

It is the delegated exuviae of God.

You move, but know not how.

You are at rest, but know not why.

You taste, but know not the cause.

These are the operations of God's laws.  

How then should you get Tao so as to have it for your own?'

Chuang Tsu

It is within my power either to serve God, or not to serve Him. Serving Him I add to my own good and the good of the whole world. Not serving Him, I forfeit my own good and deprive the world of that good, which was in my power to create.

Leo Tolstoy

God did not deprive thee of the operation of his love, but thou didst deprive Him of thy cooperation. God would never have rejected thee, if thou hadst not rejected his love. 0 all-good God, thou dost not forsake unless forsaken, thou never takest away thy gifts until we take away our hearts.

St. François de Sales

Ch'ing, the chief carpenter, was carving wood into a stand for musical instruments. When finished, the work appeared to those who saw it as though of supernatural execution; and the Prince of Lu asked him, saying, 'What mystery is there in your art?'

'No mystery, Your Highness,' replied Ch'ing. 'And yet there is something. When I am about to make such a stand, I guard against any diminution of my vital power. I first reduce my mind to absolute quiescence. Three days in this condition, and I become oblivious of any reward to be gained. Five days, and I become oblivious of any fame to be acquired. Seven days, and I become unconscious of my four limbs and my physical frame. Then, with no thought of the Court present in my mind, my skill becomes concentrated, and all disturbing elements from without are gone. I enter some mountain forest, I search for a suitable tree. It contains the form required, which is afterwards elaborated. I see the stand in my mind's eye, and then set to work. Beyond that there is nothing. I bring my own native capacity into relation with that of the wood. 'What was sus­pected to be of supernatural execution in my work was due solely to this.'

Chuang Tu

The artist's inspiration may be either a human or a spiritual grace, or a mixture of both. High artistic achievement is im­possible without at least those forms of intellectual, emotional and physical mortification appropriate to the kind of art which is being practised. Over and above this course of what may be called professional mortification, some artists have practised the kind of self-naughting which is the indispensable pre-condition of the unitive knowledge of the divine Ground. Fra Angelico, for example, prepared himself for his work by means of prayer and meditation; and from the foregoing extract from Chuang Tzu we see how essentially religious (and not merely profes­sional) was the Taoist craftsman's approach to his art.

Here we may remark in passing that mechanization is incom­patible with inspiration. The artisan could do and often did do a thoroughly bad job. But if, like Ch'ing, the chief carpenter, he cared for his art and were ready to do what was necessary to make himself docile to inspiration, he could and sometimes did do a job so good that it seemed 'as though of supernatural execution.' 

Among the many and enormous advantages of efficient automatic machinery is this: it is completely fool­proof. But every gain has to be paid for: The automatic machine is fool-proof; but just because it is fool-proof it is also grace-proof. 

The man who tends such a machine is impervious to every form of aesthetic inspiration, whether of human or of genuinely spiritual origin.

 'Industry without art is brutality.' But actually Ruskin maligns the brutes. The industrious bird or insect is inspired, when it works, by the infallible animal grace of instinct—'by Tao as it manifests itself on the level immediately above the physiological. The indus­trial worker at his fool-proof and grace-proof machine does his job in a man-made universe of punctual automata—a uni­verse that lies entirely beyond the pale of Tao on any level, brutal, human or spiritual.197

In this context we may mention those sudden theophanies which are sometimes vouchsafed to children and sometimes to adults, who may be poets or Philistines, learned or unsophisti­cated, but who have this in common, that they have done nothing at all to prepare for what has happened to them. 

These gratuitous graces, which have inspired much literary and pictorial art, some splendid and some (where inspiration was not seconded by native talent) pathetically inadequate, seem generally to belong to one or other of two main classes —sudden and profoundly impressive perception of ultimate Reality as Love, Light and Bliss, and a no less impressive per­ception of it as dark, awe-inspiring and inscrutable Power. 
==

theophany - a visible manifestation to humankind of God or a god.

vouchsafe - give or grant (something) to (someone) in a gracious or condescending manner.

"it is a blessing vouchsafed him by heaven"

==

In memorable forms, Wordsworth has recorded his own experi­ence of both these aspects of the divine Ground.

There was a time when meadow, grove and stream, The earth and every common sight,

To me did seem

Apparelled in celestial light.

And so on. But that was not the only vision.

Lustily

I dipped my oars into the silent lake,

And, as I rose upon the stroke, my boat

Went heaving through the water like a swan;

When, from behind that craggy steep, till then

The horizon's bound, a huge peak, black and huge,

As if with voluntary power instinct,

Upreared its head. I struck and struck again,

And growing still in stature, the grim shape

Towered up between me and the stars....

But after I had seen

That spectacle, for many days my brain

Worked with a dim and undetermined sense

Of unknown modes of being; o'er my thoughts There hung a darkness, call it solitude,

Or blank desertion.

Significantly enough, it is to this second aspect of Reality that primitive minds seem to have been most receptive. The for­midable God, to whom Job at last submits, is an 'unknown mode of Being,' whose most characteristic creations are Behemoth and Leviathan. He is the sort of God who calls, in Kierkegaard's phrase, for 'teleological suspensions of moral­ity,' chiefly in the form of blood sacrifices, even human sacri­fices. The Hindu goddess, Kali, in her more frightful aspects, is another manifestation of the same unknown mode of Being. And by many contemporary savages the underlying Ground is apprehended and theologically rationalized as sheer, unmiti­gated Power, which has to be propitiatively worshipped and, if possible, turned to profitable use by means of a compulsive magic.

To think of God as mere Power, and not also, at the same time as Power, Love and Wisdom, comes quite naturally to the ordinary, unregenerate human mind. 

Only the totally self­less are in a position to know experimentally that, in spite of everything, 'all will be well' and, in some way, already is well. 'The philosopher who denies divine providence,' says Rumi, 'is a stranger to the perception of the saints.' Only those who have the perception of the saints can know all the time and by immediate experience that divine Reality manifests itself as a Power that is loving, compassionate and wise. The rest of us are not yet in a spiritual position to do more than accept their findings on faith. If it were not for the records they have left behind, we should be more inclined to agree with Job and the primitives.

Inspirations prevent us, and even before they are thought of make themselves felt; but after we have felt them it is ours either to consent to them, so as to second and follow their attractions, or else to dissent and repulse them. They make themselves felt without us, but they do not make us consent without us.

St. François tie Sales

===

Our free will can hinder the course of inspiration, and when the favourable gale of God's grace swells the sails of our soul, it is in our power to refuse consent and thereby hinder the effect of the wind's favour; but when our spirit sails along and makes its voyage prosperously, it is not we who make the gale of inspira­tion blow for us, nor we who make our sails swell with it, nor we who give motion to the ship of our heart; but we simply receive the gale, consent to its motion and let our ship sail under it, not hindering it by our resistance.

St. François tie Sales

Grace is necessary to salvation, free will equally so—but grace in order to give salvation, free will in order to receive it. Therefore we should not attribute part of the good work to grace and part to free will; it is performed in its entirety by the common and inseparable action of both; entirely by grace, entirely by free will, but springing from the first in the second.

St. Bernard

====

St. Bernard distinguishes between voluntas communis and voluntaspropria. Voluntas communis is common in two senses; it is the will to share, and it is the will common to man and God. For practical purposes it is equivalent to charity. Vo-luntas propria is the will to get and hold for oneself, and is the root of all sin. In its cognitive aspect, voluntas propria is the same as sensum proprium, which is one's own opinion, cherished because it is one's own and therefore always morally wrong, even though it may be theoretically correct.

Two students from the University of Paris came to visit Ruys-broeck and asked him to furnish them with a short phrase or motto, which might serve them as a rule of life.

Vos estis tam sancti sicut vultis, Ruysbroeck answered. 'You are as holy as you will to be.'

God is bound to act, to pour Himself into thee as soon as He shall find thee ready.

Eckhart

The will is that which has all power; it makes heaven and it makes hell; for there is no hell but where the will of the creature is turned from God, nor any heaven but where the will of the creature worketh with God.

William Law

O man, consider thyself! Here thou standest in the earnest per­petual strife of good and evil; all nature is continually at work to bring forth the great redemption; the whole creation is travailing in pain and laborious working to he delivered from the vanity of time; and wilt thou he asleep? Everything thou hearest or seest says nothing, shows nothing to thee but what either eternal light or eternal darkness has brought forth; for as day and night divide the whole of our time, so heaven and hell divide all our thoughts, words and actions. Stir which way thou wilt, do or design what thou wilt, thou must be an agent with the one or the other. Thou canst not stand still, because thou livest in the perpetual workings of temporal and eternal nature; if thou workest not with the good, the evil that is in nature carries thee along with it. Thou hast the height and depth of eternity in thee and therefore, be doing what thou wilt, either in the closet, the field, the shop or the church, thou art sowing that which grows and must be reaped in eternity.

William Law

God expects but one thing of you, and that is that you should come out of yourself in so far as you are a created being and let God be God in you.

Eckhart

 201

For those who take pleasure in theological speculations based upon scriptural texts and dogmatic postulates, there are the thousands of pages of Catholic and Protestant controversy upon grace, works, faith and justification. And for students of comparative religion there are scholarly commentaries on the Bhagavad-Gita, on the works of Ramanuja and those later Vaishnavites, whose doctrine of grace bears a striking resem­blance to that of Luther; 

there are histories of Buddhism which duly trace the development of that religion from the Hinayanist doctrine that salvation is the fruit of strenuous self-help to the Mahayanist doctrine that it cannot be achieved without the grace of the Primordial Buddha, whose inner consciousness and 'great compassionate heart' constitute the eternal Suchness of things. 

For the rest of us, the foregoing quotations from writers within the Christian and early Taoist tradition provide, it seems to me, an adequate account of the observable facts of grace and inspiration and their relation to the observable facts of free will.

Perennial Phil Ch 9 SELF-KNOWLEDGE [4,1139] a very negative Ego.view of self.

Perenial Phil Ch 9 SELF-KNOWLEDGE [4,1139]

In other living creatures ignorance of self is nature; in man it is vice.

Boethius [a Roman senator]

VICE may be defined as a course of behaviour consented to by the will and having results which are bad, 

primarily because they are God-eclipsing and, 

secondarily, because they are physically or psychologically harmful to the agent or his fellows.

 Ignorance of self is something that answers to this description. In its origins it is voluntary; for by introspection and by listening to other people's judgments of our character we can all, if we so desire, come to a very shrewd understand­ing of our flaws and weaknesses and the real, as opposed to the avowed and advertised, motives of our actions. 

If most of us remain ignorant of ourselves, it is because self-knowledge is painful and we prefer the pleasures of illusion. 

As for the consequences of such ignorance, these are bad by every cri­terion, from the utilitarian to the transcendental. 

Bad because self-ignorance leads to unrealistic behaviour and so causes every kind of trouble for everyone concerned; 

and bad because, without self-knowledge, there can be no true humility, therefore no effective self-naughting 자책 , therefore no unitive knowledge of the divine Ground underlying the self and ordinarily eclipsed by it.

    
The importance, the indispensable necessity, of self-know­ledge has been stressed by the saints and doctors of every one of the great religious traditions. 

To us in the West, the most familiar voice is that of Socrates. More systematically than Socrates the Indian exponents of the Perennial Philosophy harped on the same theme. 185

There is, for example, the Buddha, whose discourse on 'The Setting-Up of Mindlness'expounds (with that positively inexorable exhaustiveness characteristic of the Pali scriptures) the whole art of self-knowledge in all its branches—knowledge of one's body, one's senses, one's feelings, one's thoughts. 

This art of self-knowledge is prac­tised with two aims in view. 

1] The proximate aim is that 'a brother, as to the body, continues so to look upon the body, that he remains ardent, self-possessed and mindful, having overcome both the hankering and dejection common in the world. 

2] And in the same way as to feelings, thoughts and ideas, he so looks upon each that he remains ardent, self-possessed and mindful, without hankering or dejection."  

Beyond and through this desirable psychological condition lies the final end of man, knowledge of that which underlies the individualised self. 

IN their own vovabulary, Christian writers expressthe same ideas.

A man has many skins in himself, coering the depths of his heart. Man knows so many things; he does not know himself. Why, thirty or forty skins or hides, just like an ox's or a bear's, so thick and hard, cover the soul. 

Go into your own ground and learn to know yourself there.

Eckhart

Fools regard themselves as awake now--so personal is their knowledge. It may be as a prince or it may he as a herdsman, but so cock-sure of themselves!

Chuang Tu

This metaphor of waking from dreams recurs again and again in the various expositions of the Perennial Philosophy. In this context liberation might be defined as the process of waking up out of the nonsense, nightmares and illusory plea­sures of what is ordinarily called real life into the awareness of eternity. 

The 'sober certainty of waking bliss'—that won­derful phrase in which Milton described the experience of the noblest kind of music—comes, I suppose, about as near as words can get to enlightenment and deliverance. 187

Thou (the human being) art that which is not. I am that I am. If thou perceivest this truth in thy soul, never shall the enemy deceive thee; thou shalt escape all his snares.

St. Catherine of Siena

Knowledge of ourselves teaches us whence we come, where we are and whither we are going. We come from God and we are in exile; and it is because our potency of affection tends towards God that we are aware of this state of exile.

Ruysbroeck

Spiritual progress is through the growing knowledge of the self as nothing and of the Godhead as all-embracing Reality. 

(Such knowledge, of course, is worthless if it is merely theo­retical; to be effective, it must be realized as an immediate, intuitive experience and appropriately acted upon.) 

Of one great master of the spiritual life Professor Etienne Gilson writes: 

'The displacement of fear by Charity by way of the practice of humility—in that consists the whole of St. Ber­nard's ascesis, its beginning, its development and its term.' 

Fear, worry, anxiety—these form the central core of indi­vidualized selfhood. 

Fear cannot be got rid of by personal effort, 

but only by the ego's absorption in a cause greater than its own interests.

 Absorption in any cause will rid the mind of some of its fears; 

but only absorption in the loving and know­ing of the divine Ground can rid it of all fear. 

For when the cause is less than the highest, the sense of fear and anxiety is transferred from the self to the cause —as when heroic self-sacrifice for a loved individual or institution is accompanied by anxiety in regard to that for which the sacrifice is made. 

Whereas if the sacrifice is made for God, and for others for God's sake, there can be no fear or abiding anxiety, since nothing can be a menace to the divine Ground and even fail­ure and disaster are to be accepted as being in accord with the divine will. 

In few men and women is the love of God intense enough to cast out this projected fear and anxiety for cherished persons and institutions. i88 

The reason is to be sought in the fact that few men and women are humble enough to be capable of loving as they should. And they lack the necessary humility because they are without the fully realized knowledge of their own personal nothingness.

Humility does not consist in hiding our talents and virtues, in thinking ourselves worse and more ordinary than we are, but in possessing a clear knowledge of all that is lacking in us and in not exalting ourselves for that which we have, seeing that God has freely given it us and that, with all His gifts, we are still of infinitely little importance.

Lacordaire

===

As the light grows, we see ourselves to be worse than we thought. We are amazed at our former blindness as we see issuing from our heart a whole swarm of shameful feelings, like filthy reptiles crawling from a hidden cave. But we must be neither amazed nor disturbed. We are not worse than we were; on the con­trary, we are better. But while our faults diminish, the light we see them by waxes brighter, and we are filled with horror.

So long as there is no sign of cure, we are unaware of the depth of our disease; we are in a state of blind presumption and hardness, the prey of self-delusion. While we go with the stream, we are unconscious of its rapid course; but when we begin to stem it ever so little, it makes itself felt.

Fénelon

===

My daughter, build yourself two cells.

First a real cell, so that you do not run about much and talk, unless it is needful, or you can do it out of love for your neighbour.

Next build yourself a spiritual cell, which you can always take with you, and that is the cell of true self-knowledge;

you will find there the knowledge of God's goodness to you.

Here there are really two cells in one, and if you live in one you must also live in the other; otherwise the soul will either despair or be presumptuous. If you dwelt in self-knowledge alone, you would despair; if you dwelt in the knowledge of God alone, you would be tempted to presump­tion. One must go with the other, and thus you will reach perfection.189

Sr. Catherine of Siena

Perennial Phil Ch 8 RELIGION AND TEMPERAMENT

Perennial Phil. Ch 8. RELIGION AND TEMPERAMENT  [11, 584]

IT seems best at this point to turn back for a moment from ethics to psychology, where a very important problem awaits us—a problem to which the exponents of the Perennial Philo­sophy have given a great deal of attention. 

What precisely is the relation between individual constitution and temperament on the one hand and the kind and degree of spiritual knowledge on the other? 

The materials for a comprehensively accurate answer to this question are not available—except, perhaps, in the form of that incommunicable science, based upon intuition and long practice, that exists in the minds of experienced 'spiritual directors.' But the answer that can be given, though incomplete, is highly significant.

All knowledge, as we have seen, is a function of being. Or, to phrase the same idea in scholastic terms, the thing known is in the knower according to the mode of the knower. In the Introduction reference was made to the effect upon knowledge of changes of being along what may be called its vertical axis, in the direction of sanctity or its opposite. But there is also variation in the horizontal plane.

 Congenitally by psycho-physical constitution, each one of us is born into a certain position on this horizontal plane. It is a vast territory, still imperfectly explored, a continent stretching all the way 

from imbecility to genius, 

from shrinking weakness to aggressive strength, 

from cruelty to Pickwickian kindliness, naive, generous

from self-revealing sociability to taciturn misanthropy and love of soli­tude, 

from an almost frantic lasciviousness to an almost Un-tempted continence. 

From any point on this huge expanse of possible human nature an individual can move almost indefi­nitely up or down, 

towards union with the divine Ground of his own and all other beings, 

or towards the last, the infernal extremes of separateness and selfhood. 

But where horizontal movement is concerned there is far less freedom. 

It is impos­sible for one kind of physical constitution to transform itself into another kind; and 

the particular temperament associated with a given physical constitution can be modified only within narrow limits. 

With the best will in the world and the best social environment, 

all that anyone can hope to do is to make the best of his congenital psycho-physical make-up; to change the fundamental patterns of constitution and temperament is beyond his power.

In the course of the last thirty centuries many attempts have been made to work out a classification system in terms of which human differences could be measured and described. 

For example, 

1. there is the ancient Hindu method of classifying people according to the psycho-physico-social categories of caste. 
2. There are the primarily medical classifications associ­ated with the name of Hippocrates, classifications in terms of two main 'habits'—the phthisic and the apoplectic—or of the four humours (blood, phlegm, black bile and yellow bile) and the four qualities (hot, cold, moist and dry). 
3. More recently there have been the various physiognomic systems of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries; the crude and merely psychological dichotomy of introversion and extra­version;
4. the more complete, but still inadequate, psycho-physical classifications proposed by Kretschmer, Stockard, Viola and others; and
5.  finally the system, more comprehensive, more flexibly adequate to the complex facts than all those which preceded it, worked out by Dr. William Sheldon and his collaborators.

In the present section our concern is with classifications of human differences in relation to the problems of the spiritual life. Traditional systems will be described and illustrated, and the findings of the Perennial Philosophy will be compared with the conclusions reached by the most recent scientific research.

===

In the West, the traditional Catholic classification of human beings is based upon the Gospel anecdote of Martha and Mary. 

The way of Martha is the way of salvation through action, 

the way of Mary is the way through contemplation. 

Following Aristotle, who in this as in many other matters was in accord with the Perennial Philosophy, 

Catholic thinkers have regarded contemplation (the highest term of which is the unitive know­ledge of the Godhead) as man's final end, and therefore have always held that Mary's was indeed the better way.

Significantly enough, it is in essentially similar terms that Dr. Radin classifies and (by implication) evaluates primitive human beings in so far as they are philosophers and religious devotees. 

For him there is no doubt that the higher mono­theistic forms of primitive religion are created (or should one rather say, with Plato, discovered) by people belonging to the first of the two great psycho-physical classes of human beings 

—the men of thought. To those belonging to the other class, the men of action, is due the creation or discovery of the lower, unphilosophical, polytheistic kinds of religion.

This simple dichotomy is a classification of human differ­ences that is valid so far as it goes. But like all such dichoto­mies, whether physical (like Hippocrates' division of humanity into those of phthisic and those of apoplectic habit) or psycho­logical (like Jung's classification in terms of introvert and extravert), 

this grouping of the religious 

into those who think and those who act, 

those who follow the way of Martha and those who follow the way of Mary, 

is inadequate to the facts. 

And of course no director of souls, no head of a religious organization, is ever, in actual practice, content with this all too simple system. 

Underlying the best Catholic writing on prayer and the best Catholic practice in the matter of recog­nizing vocations and assigning duties, 

we sense the existence of an implicit and unformulated classification of human differ­ences more complete and more realistic than the explicit dichotomy of action and contemplation.
==
In Hindu thought the outlines of this completer and more adequate classification are clearly indicated. The ways leading to the delivering union with God are not two, but three—

• the way of works, 
• the way of knowledge and 
• the way of devotion. 

In the Bhagavad-Gita Sri Krishna instructs Arjuna in all three paths—

• liberation through action without attachment; 
• liberation through knowledge of the Self and the Absolute Ground of all being with which it is identical; and 
• liberation through intense devotion to the personal God or the divine incarnation.

Do without attachment the work you have to do;

 for a man who does his work without attachment attains the Supreme Goal verily. By action alone men like Janaka attained perfection.

But there is also the way of Mary.

Freed from passion, fear and anger,

absorbed in Me, taking refuge in Me, and purified by the fires of Knowledge, many have become one with my Being.

And again:

Those who have completely controlled their senses and

are of even mind under all conditions

and thus contemplate the Im­perishable, the Ineffable, the Unmanifest, the Omnipresent, the Incomprehensible, the Eternal—they, devoted to the welfare of all beings, attain Me alone and none else.

But the path of contemplation is not easy.

The task of those whose minds are set on the Unmanifest is the more difficult;

for, to those who are in the body, the realization of the Unmanifest is hard. But those who consecrate all their actions to Me (as the personal God, or as the divine Incarnation), who regard Me as the supreme Goal, who worship Me and medi­tate upon Me with single-minded concentration—for those whose minds are thus absorbed in Me, I become ere long the Saviour from the world's ocean of mortality.

===

These three ways of deliverance are precisely correlated with the three categories, in terms of which Sheldon has worked out what is, without question, the best and most adequate classification of human differences. 

Human beings, he has shown, vary continuously between the viable extremes of a tri-polar system; and physical and psychological measure­ments can be devised, whereby any given individual may be accurately located in relation to the three co-ordinates. Or we can put the matter differently and say that any given individual is a mixture, in varying proportions, of three physical and three closely related psychological components. 

The strength of each component can be measured according to empirically determined procedures. To the three physical components Sheldon gives the names of endomorphy 내배엽 , mesomorphy 중형  and ectomorphy 외배엽 . 

The individual with a high degree of endo-morphy is predominantly soft and rounded and may easily become grossly fat. 

The high mesomorph is hard, big-boned and strong-muscled. 

The high ectomorph is slender and has small bones and stringy, weak, unemphatic muscles. 

The endomorph has a huge gut, a gut that may be more than twice as heavy and twice as long as that of the extreme ectomorph. In a real sense his or her body is built around the digestive tract. The centrally significant fact of mesomorphic physique, on the other hand, is the powerful musculature, while that of the ectomorph is the over-sensitive and (since the ratio of body surface to mass is higher in ectomorphs than in either of the other types) relatively unprotected nervous system.

With endomorphic constitution is closely correlated a tem­peramental pattern, which Sheldon calls viscerotonia. Signifi­cant among the viscerotonic traits are love of food and, characteristically, love of eating in common; love of comfort and luxury; love of ceremoniousness; indiscriminate amia­bility and love of people as such; fear of solitude and craving for company; uninhibited expression of emotion; love of childhood, in the form of nostalgia towards one's own past and in an intense enjoyment of family life; craving for affec­tion and social support, and need of people when in trouble. The temperament that is related to mesomorphy is called somatotonia. In this the dominating traits are love of muscular activity, aggressiveness and lust for power; indifference to pain; callousness in regard to other people's feelings; a love of combat and competitiveness; a high degree of physical courage; a nostalgic feeling, not for childhood, but for youth, the period of maximum muscular power; a need for activity when in trouble.

From the foregoing descriptions it will be seen how inade­quate is the Jungian conception of extraversion, as a simple antithesis to introversion. 

Extraversion is not simple; it is of two radically different kinds. 

---

There is the emotional, sociable extraversion of the viscerotonic endomorph—the person who is always seeking company and telling everybody just what he feels.

And there is the extraversion of the big-muscled soma-totonic—the person who looks outward on the world as a place where he can exercise power, where he can bend people to his will and shape things to his heart's desire. 

One is the genial extraversion of the salesman, the Rotarian good mixer, the liberal Protestant clergyman. 

The other is the extraversion 

• of the engineer who works off his lust for power on things, 
• of the sportsman and the professional blood-and-iron soldier, 
• of the ambitious business executive and politician, 
• of the dictator, whether in the home or at the head of a state.

With cerebrotonia, the temperament that is correlated with ectomorphic physique, we leave the genial world of Pickwick, the strenuously competitive world of Hotspur, and pass into an entirely different and somewhat disquieting kind of universe —that of Hamlet and Ivan Karamazov. 

The extreme cerebrotonic is the over-alert, over-sensitive introvert, 

who is more concerned with what goes on behind his eyes—with the con­structions of thought and imagination, with the variations of feeling and consciousness—than with that external world, to which, in their different ways, the viscerotonic and the soma-totonic pay their primary attention and allegiance. 

Cerebro-tonics have little or no desire to dominate, nor do they feel the viscerotonic's indiscriminate liking for people as people; 

on the contrary they want to live and let live, and their passion for privacy is intense. 

Solitary confinement, the most terrible punishment that can be inflicted on the soft, round, genial per­son, is, for the cerebrotonic, no punishment at all. 

For him the ultimate horror is the boarding school and the barracks. 

In company cerebrotonics are nervous and shy, .tensely inhibited and unpredictably moody. (It is a significant fact that no ex­treme cerebrotonic has ever been a good actor or actress.) 

Cerebrotonics hate to slam doors or raise their voices, and suffer acutely from the unrestrained bellowing and trampling of the somatotonic. 

Their manner is restrained, and when it comes to expressing their feelings they are extremely reserved. 

The emotional gush of the viscerotonic strikes them as offen­sively shallow and even insincere, nor have they any patience with viscerotonic ceremoniousness and love of luxury and magnificence. They do not easily form habits and find it hard to adapt their lives to the routines which come so naturally to somatotonics. 

Owing to their over-sensitiveness, cerebrotonics are often extremely, almost insanely sexual; but they are hardly ever tempted to take to drink—for alcohol, which heightens the natural aggressiveness of the somatotonic and increases the relaxed amiability of the viscerotonic, merely makes them feel ill and depressed. 

Each in his own way, the viscerotonic and the somatotonic are well adapted to the world they live in; but the introverted cerebrotonic is in some sort incommensurable with the things and people and insti­tutions that surround him.

 Consequently a remarkably high proportion of extreme cerebrotonics fail to make good as normal citizens and average pillars of society. But if many fail, many also become abnormal on the higher side of the average. In universities, monasteries and research laboratories —wherever sheltered conditions are provided for those whose small guts and feeble muscles do not permit them to eat or fight their way through the ordinary rough and tumble—the percentage of outstandingly gifted and accomplished cerebro-tonics will almost always be very high. Realizing the im­portance of this extreme, over-evolved and scarcely viable type of human being, all civilizations have provided in one way or another for its protection.

---

In the light of these descriptions we can understand more clearly the Bhagavad-Gita's classification of paths to salvation.

The path of devotion is the path naturally followed by the per­son in whom the viscerotonic component is high. 

His inborn tendency to externalize the emotions he spontaneously feels in regard to persons can be disciplined and canalized, so that a merely animal gregariousness and a merely human kindliness become transformed into charity—devotion to the personal God and universal goodwill and compassion towards all sentient beings.

The path of works is for those whose extraversion is of the somatotonic kind, those who in all circumstances feel the need to 'do something.' In the unregenerate somatotonic this craving for action is always associated with aggressiveness, self-assertion and the lust for power. 

For the born Kskatrya, or warrior-ruler, the task, as Krishna explains to Arjuna, is to get rid of those fatal accompaniments to the love of action and to work without regard to the fruits of work, in a state of complete non-attachment to self. Which is, of course, like everything else, a good deal easier said than done.

Finally, there is the way of knowledge, through the modi­fication of consciousness, until it ceases to be ego-centred and ]ecomes centred in and united with the divine Ground. 

This is the way to which the extreme cerebrotonic is naturally drawn. His special discipline consists in the mortification of his innate tendency towards introversion for its own sake, towards thought and imagination and self-analysis as ends in themselves rather than as means towards the ultimate tran­scendence of phantasy and discursive reasoning in the timeless act of pure intellectual intuition.

Within the general population, as we have seen, variation is continuous, and in most people the three components are fairly evenly mixed.

Those exhibiting extreme predominance of any one component are relatively rare. And yet, in spite of their rarity, it is by the thought-patterns characteristic of these ex­treme individuals that theology and ethics, at any rate on the theoretical side, have been mainly dominated. 

The reason for this is simple. Any extreme position is more uncompromis­ingly clear and therefore more easily recognized and understood than the intermediate positions, which are the natural thought-pattern of the person in whom the constituent components of personality are evenly balanced. 

These intermediate positions, it should be noted, do not in any sense contain or reconcile the extreme positions; they are merely other thought-patterns added to the list of possible systems. The construction of an all-embracing system of metaphysics, ethics and psychology is a task that can never be accomplished by any single individual, for the sufficient reason that he is an individual with one par­ticular kind of constitution and temperament and therefore capable of knowing only according to the mode of his own being. Hence the advantages inherent in what may be called the anthological approach to truth.

The Sanskrit dharma—one of the key words in Indian formulations of the Perennial Philosophy—has two principal meanings. 

The dharma of an individual is, first of all, 1] is essential nature, the intrinsic law of his being and develop­ment. 

But dharma also signifies 2] the law of righteousness and piety. 

--

In Hinduism, dharma is the religious and moral law governing individual conduct and is one of the four ends of life. ... In Buddhism, dharma is the doctrine, the universal truth common to all individuals at all times, proclaimed by the Buddha

---

The implications of this double meaning are clear: 

a man's duty, how he ought to live, what he ought to believe and what he ought to do about his beliefs—these things are 

conditioned by his essential nature, his constitution and tem­perament. 

Going a good deal further than do the Catholics, with their doctrine of vocations, the Indians admit the right of individuals with different dharmas 

to worship different aspects or conceptions of the divine. 

Hence the almost total absence, among Hindus and Buddhists, 

of bloody persecutions, religious wars and proselytizing imperialism.

It should, however, be remarked that, within its own ecclesi­astical fold, Catholicism has been almost as tolerant as Hindu­ism and Mahayana Buddhism. 

Nominally one, each of these religions consists, in fact, of a number of very different reli­gions, covering the whole gamut of thought and behaviour from fetishism, through polytheism, through legalistic mono­theism, through devotion to the sacred humanity of the Avatar, to the profession of the Perennial Philosophy and the practice of a purely spiritual religion that seeks the unitive knowledge of the Absolute Godhead. 

These tolerated religions-within-a-religion are not, of course, regarded as equally valuable or equally true. 

To worship polytheistically maybe one's dharma; nevertheless the fact remains that man's final end is the unitive knowledge of the Godhead, and 

all the historical formulations of the Perennial Philosophy are agreed that every human being ought, and perhaps in some way or other actually will, achieve that end. 

'All souls,' writes Father Garrigou-Lagrange, 'receive a general remote call to the mystical life; and if all were faithful in avoiding, as they should, not merely mortal but venial sin, if they were, each according to his condition, docile to the Holy Ghost, and if they lived long enough, a day would come when they would receive the proximate and efficacious vocation to a high perfection and to the mystical life properly so called.

' With this statement Hindu and Buddhist theologians would probably agree; 

but they would add that every soul will in fact eventually attain this 'high perfection.' 

All are called, but in any given generation few are chosen, because few choose themselves. 

But the series of conscious existences, corporeal or incorporeal, is indefinitely long; there is therefore time and opportunity for everyone to learn the necessary lessons. Moreover, there will always be helpers. 

For periodi­cally there are 'descents' of the Godhead into physical form; and at all times there are future Buddhas ready, on the threshold of reunion with the Intelligible Light, to renounce the bliss of immediate liberation in order to return as saviours and teachers again and again into the world of suffering and time and evil, until at last every sentient being shall have been delivered into eternity.

---

The practical consequences of this doctrine are clear enough. 

The lower forms of religion, whether emotional, active or intellectual, are never to be accepted as final. 

True, each of them comes naturally to persons of a certain kind of constitution and temperament; 

but the dharma or duty of any given individual is not to remain complacently fixed in the imperfect religion that happens to suit him; 

it is rather to transcend it, not by impossibly denying the modes of thought, behaviour and feeling that are natural to him, but by making use of them, so that by means of nature he may pass beyond nature. 

Thus the introvert uses "discrimination" (in the Indian phrase), and so learns to distinguish the mental activities of the ego from the principial Consciousness of the Self, which is akin to, or identical with, the divine Ground. 

The emotional extravert learns to 'hate his father and mother' (in other words, to give up his selfish attachment to the pleasures of indiscriminately loving and being loved), concentrates his devotion on the per­sonal or incarnate aspect of God, and comes at last to love the Absolute Godhead by an act, no longer of feeling, but of will illuminated by knowledge. 

And finally there is that other kind of extravert, whose concern is not with the pleasures of giving or receiving affection, but with the satisfaction of his lust for power over things, events and persons. 

Using his own nature to transcend his own nature, he must follow the path laid down in the Bhagavad-Gita for the bewildered Arjuna—the path of work without attachment to the fruits of work, the path of what St. François de Sales calls 'holy indifference,' the path that leads through the forgetting of self to the discovery of the Self.

---

In the course of history it has often happened that one or other of the imperfect religions has been taken too seriously and regarded as good and true in itself, instead of as a means to the ultimate end of all religion. 

The effects of such mistakes are often disastrous. For example, many Protestant sects have insisted on the necessity, or at least the extreme desirability, of a violent conversion. 

But violent conversion, as Sheldon has pointed out, is a phenomenon confined almost exclusively to persons with a high degree of somatotonia. 

These persons are so intensely extraverted as to be quite unaware of what is hap­pening in the lower levels of their minds. If for any reason their attention comes to be turned inwards, the resulting self-knowledge, because of its novelty and strangeness, presents itself with the force and quality of a revelation and their metwwia, or change of mind, is sudden and thrilling. 

This change may be to religion, or it may be to something else for example, to psycho-analysis. To insist upon the necessity of violent conversion as the only means to salvation is about as sensible as it would be to insist upon the necessity of having a large face, heavy bones and powerful muscles. To those natujally subject to this kind of emotional upheaval, the doctrine that makes salvation dependent on conversion gives a complacency that is quite fatal to spiritual growth, while those who are incapable of it are filled with a no less fatal despair.

 Other examples of inadequate theologies based upon psycho­logical ignorance could easily be cited. 

One remembers, for instance, the sad case of Calvin, the cerebrotonic who took his own intellectual constructions so seriously that he lost all sense of reality, both human and spiritual. 

And then there is our liberal Protestantism, that predominantly viscerotonic heresy, which seems to have forgotten the very existence of the Father, Spirit and Logos and equates Christianity with an emotional attachment to Christ's humanity or (to use the currently popular phrase) 'the personality of Jesus,' worshipped idola­trously as though there were no other God. 

Even within all-comprehensive Catholicism we constantly hear complaints of the ignorant and self-centred directors, who impose upon the souls under their charge a religious dharma wholly unsuited to their nature—with results which writers such as St. John of the Cross describe as wholly pernicious. 

We see, then, that it is natural for us to think of God as possessed of the qualities which our temperament tends to make us perceive in Him; but unless nature finds a way of transcending itself by means of itself, we are lost.

 In the last analysis Philo is quite right in saying that those who do not conceive God purely and simply as the One injure, not God of course, but themselves and, along with themselves, their fellows.

The way of knowledge comes most naturally to persons whose temperament is predominantly cerebrotonic. By this I do not mean that the following of this way is easy for the cere-brotonic. His specially besetting sins are just as difficult to overcome as are the sins which beset the power-loving soma-totonic and the extreme viscerotonic with his gluttony for food and comfort and social approval.

 Rather I mean that the idea that such a way exists and can be followed (either by discrimin­ation, or through non-attached work and one-pointed devo­tion) is one which spontaneously occurs to the cerebrotonic. 

At all levels of culture he is the natural monotheist; and this natural monotheist, as Dr. Radin's examples of primitive theo­logy clearly show, is often a monotheist of the tat tvam asi, inner-light school. Persons committed by their temperament to one or other of the two kinds of extraversion are natural polytheists. 

But natural polytheists can, without much diffi­culty, be convinced of the theoretical superiority of mono­theism. The nature of human reason is such that there is an intrinsic plausibility about any hypothesis which seeks to explain the manifold in terms of unity, to reduce apparent multiplicity to essential identity. 

And from this theoretical monotheism the half-converted polytheist can, if he chooses, go on (through practices suitable to his own particular tem­perament) to the actual realization of the divine Ground of his own and all other beings. 

He can, I repeat, and sometimes he actually does. But very often he does not. There are many theoretical monotheists whose whole life and every action prove that in reality they are still what their temperament inclines them to be—polytheists, worshippers not of the one God they sometimes talk about, but of the many gods, national­istic and technological, financial and familial, to whom in practice they pay all their allegiance.

---

In Christian art the Saviour has almost invariably been represented as slender, small-boned, unemphatically muscled. Large, powerful Christs are a rather shocking exception to a very ancient rule. Of Rubens' crucifixions William Blake contemptuously wrote:

I understood Christ was a carpenter

And not a brewer's servant, my good sir.

In a word, the traditional Jesus is thought of as a man of predominantly ectomorphic physique and therefore, by impli­cation, of predominantly cerebrotonic temperament. The central core of primitive Christian doctrine confirms the essen­tial correctness of the iconographic tradition.

 The religion of the Gospels is what we should expect from a cerebrotonic—not, of course, from any cerebrotonic, but from one who had used the psycho-physical peculiarities of his own nature to transcend nature, who had followed his particular dharma to its spiritual goal.

 The insistence that 

• the Kingdom of Heaven is within; 
• the ignoring of ritual; 
• the slightly contemptuous attitude towards legalism, 
• towards the ceremonial routines of organized religion, 
• towards hallowed days and places; 
• the general other-worldliness; 
• the emphasis laid upon restraint, not merely of overt action, 
• but even of desire and unexpressed intention; 
• the indifference to the splendours of material civil­ization and the love of poverty as one of the greatest of goods; 
• the doctrine that non-attachment must be carried even into the sphere of family relationships and that even devotion to the highest goals of merely human ideals, even the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, may be idolatrous distractions from the love of God

—all these are characteristically cerebrotonic ideas, such as would never have occurred spontaneously to the extraverted power lover or the equally extraverted viscerotonic.



Primitive Buddhism is no less predominantly cerebrotonic than primitive Christianity, and so is Vedanta, the metaphysi­cal discipline which lies at the heart of Hinduism. 

Confucian­ism, on the contrary, is a mainly viscerotonic system—familial, ceremonious and thoroughly this-worldly. And in Moham­medanism we find a system which incorporates strongly soma-totonic elements. Hence Islam's black record of holy wars and persecutions—a record comparable to that of later Christian­ity, after that religion had so far compromised with unregener­ate somatotonia as to call its ecclesiastical organization 'the Church Militant.'

So far as the achievement of man's final end is concerned, it is as much of a handicap to be an extreme cerebrotonic or an extreme viscerotonic as it is to be an extreme somatotonic. But whereas the cerebrotonic and the viscerotonic cannot do much harm except to themselves and those in immediate contact with them, the extreme somatotonic, with his native aggres­siveness, plays havoc with whole societies. 

From one point of view civilization may be defined as a complex of religious, legal and educational devices for preventing extreme somatotonics from doing too much mischief, and for directing their irre­pressible energies into socially desirable channels. 

Confucian­ism and Chinese culture have sought to achieve this end by inculcating filial piety, good manners and an amiably viscero-tonic epicureanism—the whole reinforced somewhat incon­gruously by the cerebrotonic spirituality and restraints of Buddhism and classical Taoism. 

In India the caste system represents an attempt to subordinate military, political and financial power to spiritual authority; and the education given to all classes still insists so strongly upon the fact that man's final end is unitive knowledge of God that even at the present time, even after nearly two hundred years of gradually acceler­ating Europeanization, successful somatotonics will, in middle life, give up wealth, position and power to end their days as humble seekers after enlightenment. 

In Catholic Europe, as in India, there was an effort to subordinate temporal power to spiritual authority; but since the Church itself exercised tem­poral power through the agency of political prelates and mitred business men, the effort was never more than partially success­ful. 

After the Reformation even the pious wish to limit temporal power by means of spiritual authority was com­pletely abandoned. Henry VIII made himself, in Stubbs's words, the Pope, the whole Pope, and something more than the Pope,' and his example has been followed by most heads of states ever since. Power has been limited only by other powers, not by an appeal to first principles as interpreted by those who are morally and spiritually qualified to know what they are talking about. 

Meanwhile, the interest in religion has everywhere declined and even among believing Christians the Perennial Philosophy has been to a great extent replaced by a metaphysic of inevitable progress and an evolving God, by a passionate concern, not with eternity, but with future time. And almost suddenly, within the last quarter of a century, there has been consummated what Sheldon calls a 'somatotonic revolution,' directed against all that is characteristically cerebro-tonic in the theory and practice of traditional Christian culture. Here are a few symptoms of this somatotonic revolution.

In traditional Christianity, as in all the great religious formu­lations of the Perennial Philosophy, it was axiomatic that contemplation is the end and purpose of action. Today the great majority even of professed Christians regard action (directed towards material and social progress) as the end, and analytic thought (there is no question any longer of integral thought, or contemplation) as the means to that end.

In traditional Christianity, as in the other formulations of the Perennial Philosophy, the secret of happiness and the way to salvation were to be sought, not in the external environment, but in the individual's state of mind with regard to the environ­ment. 

Today the all-important thing is not the state of the mind, but the state of the environment. Happiness and moral progress depend, it is thought, on bigger and better gadgets and a higher standard of living.

In traditional Christian education the stress was all on restraint; with the recent rise of the 'progressive school' it is all on activity and 'self-expression.'

Traditionally Christian good manners outlawed all expres­sions of pleasure in the satisfaction of physical appetites. 'You may love a screeching owl, but you must not love a roasted fowl'—such was the rhyme on which children were brought up in the nurseries of only fifty years ago. 

Today the young unceasingly proclaim how much they 'love' and 'adore' differ­ent kinds of food and drink; adolescents and adults talk about the 'thrills' they derive from the stimulation of their sexuality. 

The popular philosophy of life has ceased to be based on the classics of devotion and the rules of aristocratic good breeding, and is now moulded by the writers of advertising copy, whose one idea is to persuade everybody to be as extraverted and uninhibitedly greedy as possible, since of course it is only the possessive, the restless, the distracted, who spend money on the things that advertisers want to sell. 

Technological progress is in part the product of the somatotonic revolution, in part the producer and sustainer of that revolution. The extraverted attention results in technological discoveries. (Significantly enough, a high degree of material civilization has always been associated with the large-scale and officially sanctioned practice of polytheism.) 

In their turn, technological discoveries have resulted in mass-production; and mass-production, it is obvi­ous, cannot be kept going at full blast except by persuading the whole population to accept the somatotonic Weltanschauung and act accordingly.

Like technological progress, with which it is so closely associated in so many ways, modern war is at once a cause and a result of the somatotonic revolution. Nazi education, which was specifically education for war, had two principal aims: to encourage the manifestation of somatotonia in those most richly endowed with that component of personality, and to make the rest of the population feel ashamed of its relaxed amiability or its inward-looking sensitiveness and tendency towards self-restraint and tender-mindedness. 

During the war the enemies of Nazism have been compelled, of course, to borrow from the Nazis' educational philosophy. All over the world millions of young men and even of young women are being systematically educated to be 'tough' and to value 'toughness' beyond every other moral quality. 

With this system of somatotonic ethics is associated the idolatrous and polytheistic theology of nationalism—a pseudo-religion far stronger at the present time for evil and division than is Chris­tianity, or any other monotheistic religion, for unification and good. 

In the past most societies tried systematically to dis­courage somatotonia. This was a measure of self-defence; they did not want to be physically destroyed by the power-loving aggressiveness of their most active minority, and they did not want to be spiritually blinded by an excess of extra­version. 

During the last few years all this has been changed. What, we may apprehensively wonder, will be the result of the current world-wide reversal of an immemorial social policy? Time alone will show.

----

somatotonic

Designating a personality type characterised as aggressive and extroverted.