Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts

2016/03/30

Wendy Fenton | Quaker Learning Australia

Wendy Fenton | Quaker Learning Australia


Wendy Fenton

Simply in the Spirit

When people approach Quakerism for the first time as adults, they are conditioned by their lives to apply some sort of method to their exploration of Quaker spirituality. Whether this approach is intellectual (scientific, psychological, philosophical, etc.), or mystical, there is usually a need for some sort of methodology. In their spiritual seeking, they go deeper and deeper into an individual spirituality, but in this exercise they may perhaps be missing a core element – the simplicity of spirituality and of worship.
Renowned Japanese violinist and teacher Dr Shinichi Suzuki, when studying the violin in Germany as a young man, and struggling with the German language, was struck by the fact that German children learnt to speak German fluently at their mother’s knee. This “mother tongue” learning was the basis for his method of teaching very young children to play a musical instrument.
In this same way, a child in a Quaker family approaches Quaker spirituality, and absorbs it in such a way as to become almost instinctive. During a secure, happy and loving early childhood she will learn to trust the Spirit. She becomes acquainted with “that which is of God in all men” as the Inner Light, and gradually comes to understand that she needs to follow the promptings of that Light, and to seek it in others.
I was such a Quaker child. I was told stories of the good deeds of Quakers in times gone by. Elizabeth Fry was my favourite story, and my Elizabeth Fry doll, lovingly dressed for me by a lady in my extended Quaker family, became my favourite possession. I was taught that I should make my life speak, without yet being aware of George Fox’s famous words. My Quaker spirituality adhered to the Testimony of Simplicity.
As time went on, this Quaker child realised that the Testimonies by which Friends endeavour to live are embodiments of the Spirit itself. Peace, Justice and above all Love are what my God is all about. I lived by the fact that the Inner Light is a reflection in me, and in everyone, and all around me, of the Spirit. With this, came the realisation that many people are unaware or in denial of their own Inner Light. As a young adult, I recognised this denial in the words of Francis Thompson, which was a significant lesson for me, as I hadn’t experienced this in myself:
I fled Him, down the nights and down the days;
I fled Him, down the arches of the years;
I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways
Of my own mind; and in the mist of tears
I hid from Him, and under running laughter.
Up vistaed hopes, I sped:
And shot, precipitated,
Adown Titanic glooms of chasmèd fears,
From those strong Feet that followed after.
But with unhurrying chase,
And unperturbed pace,
Deliberate speed, majestic instancy,
They beat – and a Voice beat
More instant than the Feet –
‘All things betray thee, who betrayest Me.’
[Francis Thompson, 1889, “The Hound of Heaven”]
My father had explained to me that if I can seek out the Light of God in those who live without Faith, there is the chance that the gleam of that Light might reflect back to them, so there is always a reason to seek it.
Times of contemplation inevitably become for me periods of conscious worship, as too do times of joy, thankfulness and contentment. At other times, when I find myself “incommunicado”, I pause for what my late husband called “station identification”. Solitary worship is a time for personal spiritual contact to discover what God requires of me. I do not feel a need to try to understand God.
Corporate worship, as in Meeting for Worship, is a different experience for me. It is as if my silence is blended with the silence of those around me, so that if the Spirit moves one, it may move all. Spoken ministry is one way of making that connection within the corporate silence. This “gathered stillness”, this linking in the Spirit can also happen quite spontaneously at quite unexpected times, and in quite unexpected places.
Recently, as I was standing on the pavement, an African family walked past. The two children were running ahead, laughing, and their parents followed behind them. When they saw my pleasure at the happiness of their children, they smiled back at me, and during that moment, there was a ‘gathered stillness’ and I felt wrapped in the warmth of it.
George Fox enjoined us to seek that which is of God in all men. In doing this, we are living our spirituality outside of ourselves. We are doing so in the course of our lives, not in personal isolation with God. It is significant for me to truly seek the Spirit, rather than spirituality.
There were times in my life when my circumstances took me away from Meeting for Worship for years on end, and, living amongst unbelievers, my conscious awareness of God was diminished. Now that I am, thankfully, back in Quaker Meeting, and perhaps growing wiser as I grow older, I find that I am reverting to my ‘simple spirituality’, and it has lost none of its validity for me.
Spirituality is now a constant part of my life – every day and all the time. The Spirit is with me, it is in me, in everyone, on every leaf and flower, in the sound of the sea, in art and music, and in every breath I take. To me, it is not necessary to “work out a suitable timetable” for contemplative practices, as the Quaker Basics course recommends. Spirituality can be spontaneous and constant. God does not require us to make an appointment; this divine Spirit is always available, if we just live in it and wait on it for Leading. Then we are led into the Quaker way of letting our lives speak, to “be patterns, be examples …………. answering that of God in every one”. We are then open to meeting in “a gathered stillness”, to share simply in worship, our corporate Quakerism. We learn to respond to Leadings and to hold back if we aren’t sure we are Spirit led, and we gain the joy, comfort and direction of life in the Spirit. In its essence it is spontaneous spirituality answering to our Testimony to Simplicity.
This entry was posted in Individuals' experience of Spirituality. Bookmark thepermalink.

2016/03/29

Kinship with Creation, Susannah Kay Brindle Alistair McIntosh - Shop Online for Books in Australia

Kinship with Creation, Susannah Kay Brindle Alistair McIntosh - Shop Online for Books in Australia



Kinship with Creation

Two Quakers Share Their Views

By Susannah Kay Brindle, Alistair McIntosh

---

Format: Paperback, 40 pages

Published In: United Kingdom, 03 May 2002

Contents & Introduction attached
Contents; Page; Introduction 1; The Questions: 1. How did you come to your beliefs? 2; 2. How do non-indigenes relate to the place inhabited by indigenous peoples? 6; 3. Are there Quaker insights on the right relationship between indigenous peoples and non-indigenes? 10; 4. Is there a conflict between nature religions and Christianity? 11; 5. Is it feasible for non-indigenes to develop a sense of belonging to the land? 14; 6. How can Quakers' understanding and discernment be applied to ecological relationships? 17; 7. Should or can the Quaker concept of ministry be extended to listening to the natural world? 20; 8. Is there too much emphasis on the supposed wisdom and lifestyle of indigenous peoples? 22; 9. Is there much cooperation in nature? Have we something to learn here? 24; 10. Is our rejection of Nature linked to our fear of death and of being recycled in the natural process? 26; 11. Is Genesis 1:28 to be blamed for Christianity's general exploitative attitude to the rest of creation? 29; 12. Is it possible to respect indigenous peoples when one holds a position of power and privilege over them by land-ownership? 30; 13. Does the land itself have a spirit through which God communicates with us? 32; 14. Is our first step towards knowing God knowing Nature? 34; Appendix from Susannah 37;

Introduction;

Having read Alastair's book 'Healing Nationhood' (the second one had not been published then) and Susannah's James Backhouse Lecture, 'To learn a New Song', it seemed that each had a similar theme, that of the relationships between people, the land and God. Alastair comes from a Scottish background, with ancestral memories of the clearances, and Susannah works with and feels a close empathy with the Aboriginal peoples of Australia. Both the Scottish crofters and the Australian indigenous peoples depend on the land and on a close knowledge of its productivity, seasonal changes, variations in weather, soil, and flows of water.

Alastair and Susannah are exceptional people, due to their experiences and their ability to reflect on these and to work out a theology for themselves. They bring a fresh new perspective which is not often heard now, especially as so many of us are urban dwellers, sometimes totally cut off from the natural world.

Therefore, in Quaker Green Action, we felt it important to give more publicity to both these writers and asked them to contribute their answers to a series of questions around the issues of people, their land and God. They are both Quakers, and they explain how they came to their beliefs in their answers to the first question Some of their views may be found to be challenging, and, as Alastair says, he can be a turbulent friend, as we suspect can Susannah.

So they are not necessarily the views of Quaker Green Action (if, indeed, it can be said to have collective views!), and not necessarily those of the Society of Friends (although again, our views on some matters are quite divergent).

However, both authors make one think, and they may in fact be ahead of their time. The ecological challenge is with us today as never before, and anything we can learn about right living on the land is important.

Indigenous people can provide valuable insights, both practically and spiritually. Not having access to resources from outside they have to live by their skills on the land as they find it. Their spirituality is bound up with the natural world so they can appreciate small changes, which the uninitiated would not notice, and find meaning in them.

Quakers are perhaps more open to the ideas expressed in this booklet than some other denominations of the Christian faith and QGA hopes that it will inspire and challenge readers to think more deeply about our relationships to the rest of creation.

Search Results : Roger Keyes

Search Australian Friend  : Roger Keyes

--
Fortieth Anniversary of The Aboriginal Tent Embassy, January 26, 2012

 1206 June 2012
 Roger Keyes, South Australia Regional Meeting.

The Aboriginal Tent Embassy, adjacent to Old Parliament House in Canberra, achieved the milestone of 40 years in the political landscape. Erected on 27 January 1972 by Michael Anderson, Billy Craigie, Bertie Williams (known as  Kevin Johnson) and Tony Koorie, the Tent Embassy has iconic political status and has inspired, educated and informed Aboriginal people and others from Australia and overseas. The first protest on the site was by Wiradjuri men, Jimmy Clements and John Noble, at the opening of Parliament House in 1927.

The Aboriginal Tent Embassy was re-established in 1992 and has been permanently occupied ever since. The sacred Fire for Peace and Justice in the centre of the site has been tended since being first made by Arabunna Elder Kevin Buzzacott and lit by Paul Coe Wiradjuri in 1998.

I went to Canberra not knowing what to expect. The website said there would be camping facilities, and we would self-cater. I purchased a one-person tent, self-inflating mattress and some cans of stew, and hoped there would be water and Porta-loos on site. I took the Greyhound coach overnight to Canberra and got breakfast after the cafe opened at 6:30 am. There were no showers in the National Capital’s Bus Station.

After 9:30 am I saw quite a number of Aboriginal people and supporters at the rendezvous not far away. I was glad to put my kit aboard a vehicle to be taken to the camp site. I was very tired, but glad to be asked to carry one of the Embassy banners. I spoke with Les Malezer (co-chair of National Congress of First Nations for QLD), and Congress members Brian Butler (SA) and Dennis Eggington (WA), who is the brother of Robert Eggington of Dumbartung Aboriginal Corporation who with his wife Selina spoke to us at YM in Perth of their work in the area of Youth suicide.

The March was non-violent and peaceful, which mainstream media neglected to report. Marchers expressed frustration and anger at 224 years of illegal and violent foreign occupation. The theme of the march was a call for the recognition of the dignity and sovereignty of the First Nations of this land. There was much anger expressed at the theft of resources and the alienation of the People from their Land.

As we approached Capital Hill it was decided by the marshals that we would divert our course to the Embassy opposite Old Parliament House then visit the present Parliament House. This was incident free and after a short stay we turned back to the Embassy. By this time I was feeling pretty worn, not having brought water, and after my less than perfect night’s sleep.

When we arrived at the Embassy hundreds of tents had been erected, some quite extensive. Most were small one- or two-person tents whose occupants relied on catering for at what might be called a ‘food hall under canvas’. The small number of volunteers were kept very busy with cooking, cleaning, dish washing, garbage and recycling tasks, watering the Porta-loos and so on. I had brought my own supplies. My ‘next-door-neighbour’ had had an Esky with bacon and eggs, so at her insistence, I fared a little better than I might have with only my tins.

I spent a good deal of time talking with Whitefella supporters, and trying to decide whether to attend the celebration. I felt that this might be something at which Whitefellas had no real place. Over the past 224 years we have so readily believed that we know what to do and how to do it. In the end I responded to the invitation that had been generously extended, but I was nevertheless reticent to do more than stand with the First Nations’ appeal for respect for their sovereignty. I had learnt this at Hindmarsh Island Bridge when Ngarrindjeri elders invited us to ‘stand with’ them. Problems arise when terms like ‘help’ or ‘advise’ gain currency. White supremacy is the underlying assumption but what was called for was respectful acknowledgement of First Nations’ Sovereignty.

There were numerous musical and rhetorical expressions of this aspiration from the main stage. I did not hear some of this as there was discussion in small groups and so much going on. There was much discussion on the second day, Friday 27 January, the actual birthday of the Tent Embassy, in the Big Tent. At one point a clear call was made by one, and agreed to by a number of the Nations’ elders, for a National Council of Elders without Federal or State Government involvement. Many among the First Nations see the newly created Congress, which is under the auspices of the government, as not sufficiently independent and self-determining. I felt increasingly uncomfortable sitting among the people in the tent, because I felt that Whitefellas presence might be frustrating or embarrassing to those who wanted to speak out strongly against our interference in Aboriginal life.

Other elders called for caution, patient waiting until they caught up with those who had been able to re-establish their cultures, their connection to Country, and their languages. There were many different aspirations. It was felt, I believe, that a Council of elders from around the Nations, away from the Federal Minister, might well address the problems being faced in the Big Tent.

At length there was a request that non-Aboriginal people should leave the gathering, so that First Nations people could feel freer to make their statements.

On the same day an incident at the Lobby Restaurant Cafe was portrayed by mainstream media as violent. I was not nearby, but I am assured that there was no violent protest; nobody was in any danger. Federal Police have laid no charges. Burning a flag by young people was not good public relations and regrettable. That is not the first time that the Australian flag has been maltreated, and it was symbolic, not causing actual harm.

I was frustrated that the mainstream media did not cover the celebration as a whole, with meaningful interviews with people attending the corroboree. This could have brought the basic soundness of the whole event into the light and informed Australian people of good things that happen in the Aboriginal community.

I was also disappointed (but not surprised) at media response to the frustration of some of the people at the now notorious cafe rendezvous between Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott. Why do we not understand that Aboriginal protesters become impatient when our leaders are insensitive to injustice? What a great opportunity they neglected when they failed to go down to the Embassy and sit down with the Elders.

The Tent Embassy has survived police brutality, politicians’ ridicule and general popular ignorance. My hope is that there will come a day when there is no need for the First Nations to have an Embassy in their own land.

For more information visit the Aboriginal Tent Embassy web site  and 40th Anniversary pages. For positive media stories visit New Matilda.



 Tagged with: Aboriginal, corroboree, flag, Lobby Restaurant Cafe, non-violent, tent embassy
-----
Seeing my whiteness: An appreciation
 1012 December 2010
Mar 16 2011

Letter from Roger Keyes, South Australia Regional Meeting

Duncan Frewin’s article, ‘Seeing my whiteness’ in the September 2010 Australian Friend (pp. 16-17) impressed me greatly in its depth and breadth of vision.

‘Would I ever really be able to transcend the “normalcy” of my own whiteness – the dominance of my own cultural group?’; ‘Would I ever be free of my part in oppression?’; ‘Is white ‘normal’?’ he asks.

These questions suggest a plethora of similar questions in my own mind. In principle … ‘Is Difference the same as Deviance?’; ‘Is the Other, ipso facto, Inferior?’ It’s the word ‘dominance’ which triggers questions for me. The dominance which we in the ‘developed world’ appear to have over the world in which we live seems to be born of a superiority complex founded on the heritage of the so-called Enlightenment. The Reformation of European Christendom, the turmoil out of which our own Religious Society was spawned, the birth of the Royal Society and the ‘scientific method’ are all undoubtedly important milestones in the long march of humanity.


They are the heritage that we in the ‘mainstream’ have been taught about from childhood, as though not much else was happening in those parts of the world which we had not yet ‘discovered’. Where it has been acknowledged that Arabs, Chinese and other ancient civilisations lived cultured and meaningful lives, we have been unable to escape the conclusion that our own is far superior.

Any person who bears testimony to Truth, Simplicity, Equity and Non-violence finds it difficult to abide by the theft of this continent and the establishment of what our news bulletins daily portray as a seriously dysfunctional society, in which competition, triumph, glamour and clever intrigue prevail over social cohesion, wealth-sharing and co-responsibility as our aspirations.

Acclaimed author and anthropologist Wade Davis in his 2009 Massey Lectures, The Wayfinders: Why Ancient Wisdom Matters in the Modern Age, drew my attention to the same phenomenon as that to which Duncan is alluding … the arrogance of what is sometimes celebrated as ‘modern western capitalist and democratic’ culture in its presumption that all mankind should emulate its insights.

For me, it is almost as though the colour ‘whiteness’ is beside the point. The point seems to be that the whole world should adopt this colonising, exploitative, extravagant and wasteful lifestyle, perhaps, by the way, because it is so good for business, but with the sanction that we can go to the ballot box to establish this tyranny of numbers, rather than doing so directly at the whim of a tyrant.

Yet, if a people can wisely gauge the capacity of their country to sustain a happy life; if they can learn a sustainable stewardship or husbandry; if they can educate their children in these ways, and deal with wayward and undisciplined members of their society by restorative justice; if they can live well in their physical bodies by implementing a health system free of the corruptions and profiteering of drug companies; if a people were able to achieve these things ‘before the coming of the white man’, it seems as though we are incapable of accepting the situation and must step in to improve it.

The assumption has been, right up until we come to the infamous ‘Intervention’ in the lives of Australian Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory, that we have the answer for all humanity.

Wade Davis points out …

Clearly, had humanity as a whole followed the ways of the Aborigines, the intellectual track laid down by these descendants of the first humans to walk out of Africa, we would not have put a man on the moon. But, on the other hand, had the Dreaming become a universal devotion, we would not be contemplating today the consequences of industrial processes that by any scientific definition threaten the very life supports of the planet. (ABC Books, p. 159).

And again …

The genius of culture is the ability to survive in impossible conditions … We cannot afford to lose any of that variety of skills, because we are not only impoverished without it, we are vulnerable without it. (Massey Lectures website).

Although it is probably true that as a race we cannot simply return to aboriginality and, as it were, start again, I believe that there is much to learn from the ways of aboriginality, and that the dysfunction of the ‘modern West’ might well be addressed, in part, for example, by an aversion to the dictates of the stock market and the pressures of a greedy profiteering culture, and by taking much more time to pursue a respectful relationship with all around us, human and non-human. Indeed, our Quaker Testimonies point us in that direction; they certainly do not sit lightly with the capitalist agenda.

Duncan’s question ‘Would I ever be free of my own part in oppression?’ calls to mind Mohandas Gandhi’s suggestion that we cease to look for victory, full resolution or perfection, but that we take whatever opportunities to do Good as are presented; ‘that little good you can do, you must do’. And there is always Karl Popper’s version of the ‘golden rule’ … treating others as they would wish to be treated.

Roger Keyes
----