2024/03/19

Hinduism for Beginners: The 330 Million Gods of Hinduism





20:58 / 46:19


Hinduism for Beginners: The 330 Million Gods of Hinduism

Patrick Goodness
14.7K subscribers

Subscribe

1.3K


Share

Download

47,378 views  Dec 31, 2022
Learn the basics of Hinduism. Discover the origins of the world's oldest extant religion. Learn about the main gods and the defining principles of Hindu religion and philosophy. Uncover the basic principles of karma, moksha and samsara. See the origins of the Hindu caste system and how this system is still in practice today. 

In a past lecture, I offered the number of 33 Million Gods of Hinduism. I realized (with the guidance of many Hindu friends) that my math was wrong. I have corrected this lecture to correctly reflect 330 Million Gods. This number however, is not meant to reflect an accurate number of Hindu gods. Indeed, no such count of 330 Millions Gods has ever been made. This number of 330 Million is symbolic and is meant to reflect an abstract understanding that the followers of Hinduism see gods in all things. Gods and divinity are inextricably intertwined in every facet of life. 

One of the great elements of Hinduism is the almost complete lack of dogma and doctrine. Believers of Hinduism may agree on one element of their faith and disagree on everything else. This lack of consistency of belief and variation in beliefs and principles makes Hinduism one of the most dynamic and interesting faith traditions in human history.



======
Transcript


0:02
[Music]
0:11
[Music] thank you
0:17
[Music]
0:25
so let's get started talking about the 330 million gods of Hinduism
0:31
number one it warms my heart thank you
0:39
Hinduism is the world's oldest religion according to many scholars with roots and Customs dating back more than 4 000
0:47
years and many accounts Hinduism is even older than the Greek myths the Roman myths and
0:55
Judaism itself so what you're going to see when I tell some of these stories today are the
1:01
comparisons to your faiths as well roughly 95 percent of the Hindus in the
1:07
world live in India because Hinduism has no specific founder it's difficult to
1:13
trace its Origins and its history Hinduism is unique in that it's not a
1:19
single religion but a compilation of many traditions and philosophies
1:25
so how did Hinduism begin Hinduism developed from the from the religion
1:32
that the Aryans brought to India with them at about 1500 BCE so about 3 500
1:37
years ago its beliefs and practices are based on The Vedas a collection of hymns that
1:43
refer to actual historical events that Aryan Scholars completed by about 800
1:49
BCE Hinduism encourages living a good life with the hope of being rewarded in this
1:57
life and the next what I hope that you gather from today is a new understanding
2:02
of karma that Karma isn't something that necessarily happens in the next life
2:08
Karma happens immediately and it's quickly as your next breath
2:15
Hinduism is the world's third largest religion after Christianity and Islam its followers known as Hindus number
2:23
1.15 billion or about 15 to 16 percent of the total world population Hindus can
2:29
be found all over the world most big populations are in India Nepal and Mauritius but you can find Hindus all
2:35
over the world the actual term Hindu is a Persian term that comes to recognize people who lived
2:42
beyond the river Indus Hinduism includes a diversity of ideas of spirituality and traditions and is
2:50
fundamentally different from other world religions there is no ecclesiastical order there's
2:57
no Pope there's no leader at the top there's no unquestionable religious
3:02
authorities so there isn't any one person who can say that this is the truth or that this isn't the truth
3:09
there's no governing body there's no prophets and there's no binding holy book
3:15
so as we would call this in the religious terms this is the religious Wild Wild West
3:21
basic Hindu Concepts Hinduism Embraces Many religious ideas
3:27
but it's mostly and generally referred to as a way of life
3:32
less a religion many forms of of Hinduism are henotheistic meaning that they believe
3:39
in one God as supreme or they believe in one God above all other gods and this is
3:46
important to recognize when we consider uh how Hinduism uh in its heenotheism
3:51
impacted other world faiths Hindus believe in the diraq and the doctrines of samsara the Cycles The Continuous
3:58
cycles of Life Death and reincarnation and Karma the universal law of cause and
4:06
effect one of the key thoughts of Hinduism is Atman the belief in a soul a personal
4:13
soul this philosophy holds that all living creatures have an Atman or a soul
4:20
which is part of the Supreme Universal Soul brahmana
4:25
so each one of us is an Atman and we belong to the Universal Soul of
4:33
Brahman the goal is to achieve Moksha
4:38
or salvation which ends the cycle of birth death and rebirth
4:47
the fundament one of the fundamental principles of the religion is the idea that people's actions and
4:53
thoughts directly impact their life now and their next life
4:59
Hindus strive to achieve Dharma which is a code of living that emphasizes Good
5:04
Conduct and morality Hindus Revere all living creatures and consider the cow a sacred animal
5:11
all of us in the world should be thankful that Hindus do not eat beef
5:17
imagine the condition of our uh of our climate today if even 1.15 billion more
5:26
people were eating beef food is an important part of life for Hindus most don't eat beef or pork and
5:33
many are vegetarians did you know that the swastika is actually a symbol of
5:39
Hinduism and many other ancient faiths the swastika which comes from the base
5:45
suasti means well-being or good it later became associated with evil which is
5:50
what we remember today under the Nazi party but here are some samples of swastikas from around the world that
5:56
came and originated with Hinduism
6:02
if you remember nothing more about today's talk I hope that you will
6:08
remember this and I'm going to read it because I don't want to make a mistake Hinduism is a way of life
6:15
according to the Supreme Court of India unlike other religions in the world the Hindu religion does not claim any one
6:21
Prophet it does not worship any one God it does not believe in any one philosophic concept it does not follow
6:28
any one set of religious rights or performances in fact it does not satisfy
6:34
the traditional features of a religion or Creed it is a way of life and nothing
6:39
more from a western standpoint we see it as a religion in India the term Dharma or way
6:46
of life is broader than the Western term of religion for us we think of religion somehow as
6:53
something that we do and something that we believe in for Hindus this is the way that they
7:01
live their belief impacts every moment from waking till sleeping
7:08
in their way of life in fact so broad is the range of theists
7:14
that belong to the Hindu faith that Hindus can be polytheistic belief in many gods pantheistic which is
7:21
a belief that God is imminent in all things he no theistic the worship of one
7:26
God while recognizing other gods monotheistic the belief in one and only God and monistic the belief that all
7:34
things come from a source that is distinct from us Transcendent from us agnostic the belief that God is
7:42
unknowable and the doubt in God atheistic disbelief in God you can be an atheist and be a Hindu you can be a
7:49
non-theist not really caring about whether or not there is a God or not and then a
7:55
humanist which is where many fall believe that the potential value and goodness of human beings should be our
8:02
sole concern humanists emphasize common human needs and seek rational ways of solving human
8:08
problems Hinduism has been called the oldest religion in the world and is often
8:14
referred to as the sanatana Dharma the Eternal Wayne meaning that its faith is beyond history we'll see these claims
8:21
reverberated through many religions that this truth is older than time itself
8:27
Scholars regard Hinduism as a synthesis of various Indian cultures and traditions with diverse roots and no
8:33
founder this Hindu synthesis started to develop in modern day India and Pakistan
8:38
around 500 BCE so 500 years before Christ
8:43
the Hindu Faith was well developed although Hinduism contains a broad range
8:49
of philosophies it is linked by shared Concepts rituals cosmology shared
8:54
scriptures and sacred texts major scriptures include the upanishads the bhagavad-gita The Vedas and the
9:01
agamas sources of authority and eternal truths play an important role but there's also
9:07
a strong role of Hindu tradition and this tradition questions the
9:13
authority of these tasks questions whether or not the people who are saying these things are right and it allows
9:20
them to continue to develop truth as an ongoing part of their tradition
9:25
it's an admirable part of this faith the doctrine of Atman Brahman is an
9:30
interesting one most Hindus believe in Brahman in uncreated Eternal infinite Transcendent and
9:37
all-embracing principle Brahman contains itself in itself both
9:42
being and non-being and it is the sole reality the ultimate
9:48
cause the foundation source and goal of all existence
9:54
and we with our Atman are a part of that
9:59
each one of us in Hindu belief has an Atman a piece of Brahman the Eternal Soul
10:08
as the all Brahman either causes the universe and all beings to emanate from itself
10:15
transforms itself into the universe or assumes the appearance of the universe
10:24
you can't expect to understand this in this lecture this is a lifetime of
10:30
learning Brahman is in all things and is the self the Atman of all living beings
10:37
Brahman is the creator the preserver or Transformer and the reabsorber of everything it is the
10:45
beginning the middle and the end it is all things
10:51
karma is the universal law that drives Hindu principles by which good or bad
10:57
actions determine the future modes of an individual's existence Indian theories
11:04
of salvation believe that births future births and life situations will
11:10
result from your actions in this life but make no mistake karma is not
11:16
something that just happens in the next life it's something that happens now your actions accumulate and they impact
11:22
you in this life and in the next the common goal for all Hindus is Moksha
11:29
release from the cycle of birth and death and rebirth
11:34
Karma thus serves two main functions within Indian moral philosophy number one it provides motivation to live a
11:42
moral life and number two more importantly and so different from all of the other faiths
11:48
it explains the existence of evil I'm going to chat briefly about that
11:55
because I think it Bears discussion
12:00
Judaism and Christianity and Islam the abrahamic faiths believe
12:06
that original sin happened
12:12
in the Garden of Eden that at that moment when eve took a bite
12:17
that she revealed and that original sin this was the stain of humankind the stain of mankind we would look back to
12:24
the Greek myths we see that again
12:29
Pandora opened the box and released all of the evils on the world
12:35
here there is a source of evil and you lead look no further than the
12:42
mirror to find it the source of all evil is you it's me it's us
12:50
we are the reason that bad things happen in the world there's no God that is causing these things and Judaism
12:57
Christianity and Islam there's a God that punishes or rewards us for our actions however in the classical
13:03
traditions of India Hinduism Buddhism and jaundism they believe that no Divine
13:08
or external agent intervenes in the relationship of the Moral Moral act to an its inevitable result I love this
13:15
graphic whatever you do comes right back to hit you again whether it's good or
13:21
bad and this is the foundational principle of karma whatever you do comes
13:26
back to you and it's not so much that comes back to you in the next life we carry it with us
13:31
because we know intrinsically when we've done right or wrong we know and we carry
13:37
it with us and there's a wonderful quote from uh from Buddhism which is you will
13:43
not be punished by your anger you will not be part I'm sorry you will
13:48
not be punished for your anger you will be punished by your anger and in the same way you will not be rewarded for
13:56
your goodness and your kindness you will be rewarded by your goodness and your
14:01
kindness the law of karma represents a non-theistic explanation of why there is
14:07
evil in the world samsara is a wonderful concept to understand this is reincarnation
14:12
transmigration in Hinduism samsada is a journey of the soul the body dies but
14:19
not the soul which is the Eternal reality indestructible and blissful
14:24
everything is connected cyclical and composed of two things the soul and
14:29
matter the Eternal Soul called Atman your Eternal Soul called Atman never
14:36
reincarnates it is the same from body to body from life to life it cannot change
14:43
in contrast the body and the personality does change and it's constantly changing being born dying and being reborn again
14:50
Karma impacts your future circumstances in this life as well as the future in your
14:57
next life good intentions and actions lead to a good future bad intentions and
15:03
bad actions lead to a bad future we tell our children the same thing
15:08
right the range of samsara stretches from insects all the way to the god Brahma
15:14
the range of rank birth in the hierarchy of life depends on
15:19
one's actions so how you live in this life determines how you will live in the
15:24
next life the aim of spiritual Pursuits is self-liberation Moksha from samsara
15:32
there are four objectives to life artha prosperity Hindus believe that you
15:38
should be prosperous and you should enjoy your prosperity this is a good thing you should have a
15:45
purpose in life you should enjoy your life you should be successful and this material satisfaction allows us
15:51
to pursue the other purusatha the other four goals arth is kept in check by Dharma which is
15:58
a moral obligation of righteousness so if you have a lot of good things that's wonderful
16:04
but keep it in check never have too much and make sure that you understand your obligation that with every Right comes a
16:11
responsibility and with Good Fortune comes responsibility to manage that fortune
16:18
since abundance and prosperity are qualities of the Divine seeking and possessing such qualities is in
16:24
accordance with the design with this design however artha is a stepping stone
16:31
it is not the Cornerstone it's meant to help you it's not meant to be the goal
16:36
finding contentment in the necessities of life such as shelter food and knowledge allows one to pursue the other
16:43
three purusatas however when you have too much it can cause an imbalance as
16:48
imbalance can happen in all things comma not to be confused with Karma
16:55
means desire or pleasure most of us are familiar with this although we'll say that we're not familiar with it in the
17:00
Kama Sutra right the comma offers enjoyment and love for life this is again essential to being
17:07
part of the Divine Kama contributes to a balanced life but
17:12
should not become an obsession if calm is not fulfilled with mindfulness or is
17:18
suppressed this stops us from becoming whole so we shouldn't obsess about it but we also
17:25
shouldn't deny ourselves because when we deny we want it even more and so one must give and receive comma in
17:32
accordance with Dharma and also create and appreciate comma to pursue maksha to
17:38
find this balance to continue to live and to in to leave this cycle comma and balance
17:44
and I say this for all of you here find this balance even while on board the cruise ship sometimes I see people who
17:50
are having their dessertness oh I shouldn't have this dessert have the dessert
17:55
don't have five of them but have a dessert and enjoy it be fully
18:01
in the moment of appreciating that dessert but then when that dessert is gone
18:06
recognize that you might have to walk a little bit too right there's this balance compassion find compassion find joy and
18:13
a humble gesture find enjoyment through a massage or through
18:19
the act of sex with your partner the aesthetic appreciate the beauty of all that surrounds us when we're looking out
18:25
from this beautiful ship and seeing the ocean and the beautiful sights that we're seeing appreciate all of that recognize it for what it is that it's
18:32
beautiful however to over indulge in these things gives us an unstable comma greed
18:39
addiction sloth Hedonism any of these things that come at the cost of another
18:46
puts us and puts our lives and our futures an imbalance
18:51
there is a moral obligation this is one of the other purus Dharma Dharma refers
18:56
not only to Social and moral ethics but to what is Right steadfast virtuous and true
19:02
Dharma is the way of living properly it's involved Duty it involves moral
19:09
actions and service to others and involves sacrifice following Dharma is different for each
19:14
person each of us has called according to our gifts to express our Dharma and to reveal
19:22
our life goals in very different ways living out once Dharma means to act in
19:28
accordance with the law to come into one's Supreme self what does that mean
19:33
it means that I can't judge Myself by your goals and by your life nor should
19:39
you mine that were each responsible for our own lives were each responsible for
19:44
recognizing our gifts first and foremost what is our gift we all have them some
19:50
of us spend our lives denying them and what this tells us is that we need
19:55
to accept our gifts and to recognize the responsibility that comes from that gift to have a gift and to not recognize
20:02
one's responsibility is to not fully Embrace one's Supreme self
20:08
and therein is the imbalance Dharma is the natural law that upholds the world and keeps the universe in
20:15
balance it's important to recognize that accepting an event
20:21
and feeling it fully is important when you lose someone in your life
20:27
feel it fully allow yourself to grieve into loss when you have something good in your
20:33
life allow yourself to feel it fully feel Fully Alive and accepted but recognize
20:40
all of this is fleeting it's here now be grateful for it appreciate it and Let It Go
20:47
because it's when we hold on to these things that we cause imbalance in our own lives
20:55
holding tightly too tightly to one's vision of how things should be this is what my life is supposed to be
21:02
we do this with ourselves and we also do it with our children we want our children to live certain
21:08
ways and we want them to live ways that we think we don't know what their path is we
21:14
don't know what their life is or their true gifts are only they can know that and only they can find their path we
21:19
have to let go again coming back to this idea that's rooted also in Islam surrender to one's life but surrendering
21:26
also to the recognition of your gifts and understanding that what we think is fixed and reality is neither fixed nor a
21:33
reality Moksha again is the ultimate goal for believers this release from the cycle of
21:40
death and birth this comes before Nirvana moksha's this point in time where you have achieved all that you
21:46
possibly can achieve and then the next step is nirvana Moksha is a place of self-acceptance and
21:54
Oneness with the universe to reveal the Supreme self it offers a place of freedom and release
21:59
from the karmic cycle Life In Balance again attain wealth but don't let wealth corrupt or distract you
22:07
indulge and enjoy life's Pleasures but don't become obsessed by them be moral and righteous but don't become fixed and
22:13
rigid now we get to talk about the 330 million
22:21
gods and goddesses of Hinduism according to the Epic Mahabharata there are 33
22:28
333 Hindu deities other sources multiply this a thousand fold and this was my
22:36
mistake the first time I only multiplied it a thousand times you have to multiply
22:42
it a thousand by a thousand and that's what reaches 330 million Gods however
22:49
the gods are actually referred to as the 33. so here's where the whole mix-up
22:56
happened and I'll tell you what a whole world full of Hindus still don't understand this which makes it really
23:01
difficult for the rest of us to understand it but when Hindus discuss the type of gods the phrase 33 quote ish
23:08
is used in a spiritual religious context means 33 types of gods however in
23:15
mathematics the word koti also means million so someone along the way got
23:22
confused with the types and used the other meaning for the word million and said ah there must be 330 million this
23:31
dual meaning has created a lot of problems over the years for Hindus creating even more uh misunderstanding
23:37
and confusion and created the understanding of the 330 million Gods today to clarify 33 Cody is not 33
23:45
million or 330 million but merely 33 types of Gods
23:52
what are the 33 types of gods 11 rudras 12 adityas eight vasas and tuasvinis
23:58
that means nothing to you but what I'm going to show you here is what that really means eight vastness
24:04
these are the elements of material so we have Sky Earth Wind Fire Stars sounds like a 70s rock band
24:11
and then you have the 12 aditias this list sometimes varies but here the the personified deities not the elements of
24:17
nature and then the 11 rudras and these are really interesting these are the abstractions Bliss knowledge thought
24:24
breath or life revealing Grace concealing Grace self these are the other gods and then the
24:31
two Ash beanies these are known as the Divine doctor so this are the 33 different types of Gods
24:39
this is a quote from a sarcastic Hindu friend and it's a favorite of mine there are approximately a 1.15 billion Hindus
24:46
on the planet at any given time an average of about three of us may agree on a particular conception or
24:52
understanding of God the idea that Hinduism has 330 million Gods isn't hard
24:58
for me to believe at all I would actually think there would be more Hindus generally see God in everything
25:04
and everything in God some Hindus are strict conformists to
25:10
the sacred texts but some conceive of their gods with greater freedom and allow themselves to explore this
25:17
beautiful faith without restrictions and to see their God as it makes sense to them in this faith Gods can be male and
25:24
female animal anthropomorphic having qualities of a man or qualities of
25:30
animals even an element of nature nothing is known all is Mystery
25:38
so the question are there three 33
25:45
33 million or 330 million gods
25:50
I would say that the answers are relevant the inherent truth is that a belief in Gods no matter the
25:56
number is an Act of Faith in an entity or being that's eminent in all things and yet
26:03
transcends our understanding and this is in fact the definition of faith isn't it
26:09
to believe in what we can't see or can't understand or know doesn't take any Act of Faith to believe
26:15
in what you can see that's what science is for this is Faith it's something different altogether
26:21
Hindus acknowledge that the most fundamental level God is one without a
26:26
second here again we see this principle and we'll see it now of a triadic godhead but a Unity there is one God
26:34
without a second the absolute formless and only reality known as the brahmana
26:39
the Supreme and Universal Soul Brahman is the universe and everything in it
26:45
whatever you can touch whatever you can see whatever you can feel is Brahman if you can imagine it it's
26:52
brahmana all things are brahmana and brahmana is in all things Brahman has no form and no
26:59
limits Brahman is reality Brahman is truth
27:06
Hinduism is a pantheistic religion meaning that it equates God with the
27:11
universe God is in all things God is imminent if you can see it it is a God
27:16
but yet Hinduism is also polytheistic it gives expression so there's one God but
27:22
many faces Brahma the Creator now we're going to
27:28
talk about the Triune godhead this is one of the first trinities first expressions of a Triune godhead and this
27:34
is Brahma the Creator he's the first member of the Hindu Trinity Vishnu the preserver is the second
27:40
member of the trinity she also or vishna also is worshiped in many forms such as Rana and Krishna some
27:47
somewhat mysterious God Vishnu is the Divine Essence that pervades the universe
27:53
and then you have Shiva the destroyer and this is where it gets interesting so you have Brahma the Creator
28:00
vision of the preserver and now Shiva the Destroyer but Sheba destroys for one
28:06
purpose because in order to build and to bring new again what was old must first be destroyed
28:14
and in this we see the first inklings of the concept of Resurrection
28:21
the idea that what needs to be reborn again must first die
28:27
and this happens through Sheba the Destroyer Ganesha is one of my favorite
28:33
Gods I have a statue of Ganesha in my office and
28:38
when you go to India please pay close attention to your taxi drivers they will
28:44
have a statue of Ganesha often on their dashboard or hanging from their rearview mirror because they're praying that with
28:51
Indian traffic in some of the major cities that this is going to remove the obstacles in front of them it's a
28:56
wonderful religious bit of Comedy then if you see it you're part of the inside joke now
29:02
Saraswati the goddess of learning for those of you ladies who came to one of our question and answer sessions and
29:08
we're asking about goddesses and the power of women in faith here we see
29:15
evidence of female goddesses and their power in this faithi the goddess of learning a
29:22
really powerful goddess is the consort of Brahma the Creator so brahma's the
29:28
Creator and who does he choose he chooses the goddess of learning she's
29:33
worshiped as the goddess of learning wisdom speech and music and this is also before Athena the goddess of wisdom
29:40
right so she gives Saraswati gives birth now to the concept to the Greeks of Athena
29:47
Hindus offer prayer to swarasuti before beginning any intellectual Pursuit children will be saying praying to
29:53
Saraswati so here early on we see a wonderful balanced
29:59
prayer not only to the Creator God who has perceived as male but the goddess of learning who is female and children are
30:07
raised with this concept Lakshmi the goddess also of Good Fortune
30:13
wealth and love and well-being so if you want good things in your life
30:19
you will pray and spend time thinking and giving homage to Lakshmi who provides All Good Things wealth and
30:26
well-being Indra is the king of heaven and Lord of the Gods he wields a thunderbolt so again try to compare with
30:33
other religions we have Thor we have Zeus right the Thunderbolt these are the
30:39
origins of these gods that all come from Hinduism now my Greek friends will argue
30:45
with me till they are blue in the faith about this blue in the face about this and that's okay but the simple truth is
30:50
that Hinduism did predate the Greek mythologies but again we see this idea of people trying to explain the forces
30:58
of nature through God's and that's the story here that's the truth that these myths are not necessarily truth in and
31:04
of themselves they point to a deeper truth Surya is the Sun and look at Surya
31:09
as a Golden Warrior arriving on a chariot pulled by seven white horses how many of you've seen Helios or Apollos
31:16
this is the same thing that we're talking about or even in the Egyptian model you have ra being pulled through
31:22
the sky on kefri the dung beetle right and you have different different movements here but this is a same idea
31:28
of the sun being pulled across the sky by horses Agni the fire god
31:34
Hanuman The Monkey King and devoted servant he's featured in The Great epic ramayana and he earned a path to
31:40
deification by performing Feats of Strength for those of you who know the story of Heracles who later became the
31:46
Roman god Hercules this is the same story Hanuman is Heracles Heracles is
31:53
Hercules it's all the same this is a story that Constantine believed in as well and he said I associate myself with
32:01
this God Heracles because Heracles through his 12 acts Rises to become a
32:08
god and the beauty of Hanuman is that through all of us that we can through
32:13
our actions rise to the level of becoming a God that we are capable of
32:19
great things if we allow ourselves to do the work and to make the sacrifices that
32:26
we can become like a god there's dualism
32:31
in all of these faiths but it's evident in Hinduism the distinction represented by the gods
32:37
is not a distinction however between good and evil but rather a distinction between the two ways in which the Divine
32:45
manifests itself in this world so it's not about Good and Evil this is about how God manifests himself or herself in
32:53
this world both as benevolent yet fearful harmonious and disharmonious and both
33:00
Transcendent and imminent in all things
33:06
there are some wonderful key beliefs in Hinduism and it's more of a value system
33:12
to learn a common threat is a belief in the Supreme Being and adherence to Concepts such as truth Dharma and Karma
33:20
belief in the authority of The Vedas is an important element as well although people differ on their impressions of
33:26
how what The Vedas mean Hindus pursue knowledge and understanding of the truth the very essence of the universe and the
33:33
only reality of Brahman according to The Vedas truth is one
33:39
but the wise express it in a variety of ways and in the same way they look at
33:45
their God that God is one but it's manifestations and its expressions are many and hence
33:52
we see this understanding of polytheism and pantheism Brahman is truth and reality formless
34:00
Limitless all-inclusive and eternal it's not an abstract concept brahmana is all
34:05
things and in all things The Vedas are the books that are the ultimate Authority Hindus believe that The Vedas
34:13
are without beginning and Without End even when everything else in the universe is destroyed The Vedas will
34:20
remain Christian hold the same thing to be true with
34:26
Jesus Jesus is the word the logos he is the beginning and the end the Alpha and
34:31
the Omega and that when all things are gone Jesus will remain and really what we're talking about here is truth
34:37
isn't it that when all things are gone what will remain is the truth Dharma can be described as right conduct
34:44
righteousness moral law and Duty and everyone should strive to achieve Dharma
34:50
we should all make Dharma the doing the right thing Central to our lives individual souls are Immortal this is an
34:57
important lesson a Hindu believes that the individual soul the Atman is neither created nor destroyed it has been is and
35:06
will be world without and amen sound familiar
35:13
actions of the Soul ryre residing in the body require that it reap the consequences of those actions in the
35:19
next life the same soul in a different body
35:24
the process of movement of the Atman from one body to another is known as
35:30
transmigration so when you die your soul remains and then continues on
35:36
to another body to continue its Journey the kind of body that the soul inhabits
35:42
is determined by Karma actions accumulated in a previous life
35:47
so if you don't like your body folks you just have to ask yourself what you
35:52
did in the last life to deserve it Moksha is Liberation the Soul's release
35:59
from the cycle of death and rebirth but several paths can lead to this
36:04
realization here's the beauty there isn't Just One path for any of us
36:10
the path of Duty is One path The Path of Knowledge is another and the path of
36:15
devotion is yet another and here again we see this connection to Islam
36:21
unconditional surrender to God submission to the will of Allah
36:28
we'll talk we can't really talk about Hinduism without talking about the caste system and I want to spend a little bit
36:34
of time thinking about this how does the caste system work the main cats were further divided into
36:40
3 000 castes and then 25 000 subcasts so what they did with their gods they also
36:46
did with the caste system most societies have some sort of social class based on education culture and
36:52
income levels however in Ancient India this was inspired by the Hindu scriptures and people assumed these
37:00
vital roles based on their abilities at 3 000 years old India's caste system
37:05
is among the oldest forms of surviving social stratification today
37:10
while the caste system is seriously flawed its concept was based on this division
37:16
there are three or four different elements the Brahman the Priestly intellectual class this is the top class
37:22
their duties include serving as the gatekeeper of knowledge so again we see someone who has to receive the message from the gods provide intellectual
37:29
advice to the governing bodies who's going to help the government understand the meanings of the scriptures offer Priestly services and religious
37:36
leadership and grapple with fundamental questions of life so everything was being done with them so that they could
37:41
think about the most important things modern moderate examples of this would be philosophers religious leaders and
37:47
teachers then we have the chatriyas the warrior class these would be today the police officers government officials
37:54
these are people who defend the country from internal from external aggression or internal strife and they specialize
38:00
in arms and ammunition and tactics of warfare the visayas the trade and commerce class
38:06
is also important these are the people who keep the wheels of the economy moving the visayas specialize in trade
38:12
and commerce and they're primarily Traders and entrepreneurs this would be Artists Craftsmen
38:19
Merchants entrepreneurs any business owner today and then you have the sudras the labor class these would be anyone involved in
38:25
labor in the field anyone who is a woodworker or Carpenter this sort of cast is just above the lowest class but
38:32
it's an important level because this is where the real work gets done Farm laborers construction workers this is
38:38
the real meat and potatoes of the economy and then we have the lowest class The Untouchables the
38:45
ashutalis Untouchables perform the most menial
38:50
labor such as sweeping streets cleaning sewers and Tanning leather the creation of this group was a perversion
38:59
that was set forth and misinterpreted in he in Hindu scripture this perversion was challenged by the
39:06
modern Indian leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi and in many respects is still at play even today so how does
39:14
the cast work for centuries cast dictated almost every aspect of Hindu religious and social life with each
39:21
group occupying a place in their hierarchy rural communities were were arranged on the basis of castes the
39:27
upper and lower caste lived in segregated colonies the water wells were not shared does this remind you of
39:33
anything that happened in the United States in the 1960s right these same things happen over and
39:39
over again and we have to question why does it happen and I'll discuss this towards the end
39:46
brahman's would not accept food or drink from the shudras one could not could only marry with whom once cast
39:52
and the system bestowed many privileges on the upper class while keeping the lowest classes
39:57
doing without even the basics most times is the caste system legal in 1950 it was
40:04
said that it was no longer legal and they needed to start hiring from the lowest economic classes in society
40:10
however in 1989 they were still having problems and they still have problems today they even talked about other
40:17
backwards classes obcs which fall between the traditional upper castes and the lowest so anything that's not the
40:22
highest and the lowest called other backwards casts and they're still trying to help bring these people into greater
40:29
levels of economic prosperity and recent decades with the spread of secular education and growing urbanization
40:37
the caste system is somewhat declined but you will see it in full effect when you travel throughout India you can't
40:43
but see it despite the changes cast identities remain strong and you'll see it even in
40:49
people's names so even though they have eliminated it people's names still reflect their cast
40:56
the caste system continues to be justified by the concept of samsara and reincarnation here we see
41:02
where religion itself contributes to the degradation of certain people at
41:08
the lowest ends the consequences obviously with Karma have to do with your current life right
41:14
so if you are at the bottom portion of society if you have nothing if you're being treated like a slave it's because
41:21
you must have done something in past lives to deserve this you are exactly where you are supposed to be and of
41:28
course those at the top continue to perpetuate this because it keeps them in power and allows the people at the
41:34
lowest and to continue to receive nothing while the people at the top receive most everything
41:42
there are some wonderful lessons from the bhagavad-gita which is one of the Hindu scriptures and I'll go over these
41:47
briefly but I hope that you will take some time to read from the bhagavad-gita
41:53
set thy heart upon thy work but never on its reward do what you love
41:59
and the reward will follow but don't do it for the reward do it because you love it and the reward will follow
42:05
dream big we're kept from our goal not by obstacles but by a clear path to a
42:10
lesser goal this is one of my favorites there's not obstacles that are stopping you it's just something easier that's
42:16
right in front of it that you choose to do instead why didn't I do this well I chose to do
42:22
something else he didn't choose to do nothing you chose to do something of lesser value that was easier to do we
42:28
have to choose the hard thing my wife told me today she heard a quote that said if your dream doesn't scare you
42:33
you're not dreaming big enough and that's the truth we should be dreaming big we should be setting our
42:39
hearts on great things and then working towards those not letting us being held up by smaller dreams
42:46
let go of attachment you came here empty-handed and you will leave empty-handed whatever you receive now
42:52
hold on to it for a little bit whether it's heart break
42:58
Joy sadness love hold on to it for a little bit
43:04
and then let it go because it's not meant to be yours to keep
43:09
this is a personal favorite of mine be careful when you follow the masses sometimes the m is silent
43:15
and I have to share with you this isn't from the bhagavad-gita but I had to share it anyways everything happens for a reason whatever
43:23
happened was good whatever is happening is good whatever
43:28
will happen will also be good what has happens happened it's all in how you choose to see it
43:35
there's nothing more to be done the future is a picture it's an illusion the future will never come because when the
43:41
future arrives it's no longer the future it's the present and it's called the present because it's a gift
43:47
it's ours to take into use and so you don't control the future you barely
43:53
control the present but we do control how we respond to it so live to the fullest We Are All One
43:59
this is a wonderful lesson the man who sees in me everything and everything within me will not be lost to me nor
44:06
will I ever be lost to him he was rooted in Oneness realizes that I am in every being wherever he goes he
44:13
remains in me when he sees all being as equal and suffering or enjoy because they are like
44:21
himself that man has grown perfect in yoga we are happiest and at our best when we
44:27
see the inherent goodness in all things everyone wants to be treated nicely kindly so do unto others as you
44:36
would do to yourself give without expecting something in return this is tough a gift is pure when
44:42
it's given from the heart to the right person at the right time and at the right place and when we expect nothing in return
44:50
because if we give expecting something in return it's not really a gift is it you are what you think you are we behold
44:57
what we are and we are what we behold whatever you think of yourself you're
45:03
right at any given moment whatever you believe about yourself is right
45:09
and so it's up to us to think better of ourselves and about others closing thought today
45:15
is what we believe determines how we Act if we believe that we are all equal
45:21
we strive for equality don't we if we believe that we are better than others we subjugate others or we accept the
45:28
status quo for our advantage this is a hard one to swallow but our
45:34
world today accurately reflects what we believe For Better or For Worse
45:40
be of good intention your words and your actions will follow
45:46
and more importantly be the change that you want to see in the world and in this I close thank you very much
46:12
thank you [Music]

2024/03/18

Choosing the Best Translation of the Bhagavad Gita

Choosing the Best Translation of the Bhagavad Gita

Choosing the Best Translation of the Bhagavad Gita
By Aimee Hughes
Published: June 4, 2018 | Last updated: February 25, 2020
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Here are five of the best handpicked English translations from several of the world’s leading spiritual authors so you can find your perfect Gita.


Source: Adistock/Dreamstime.com
The Bhagavad Gita, also known as the “Song of God,” has many translations from the ancient Sanskrit to modern day English. So much so that it may be challenging to know where to begin if you’re looking to immerse yourself in it's essential living wisdom.

Advertisement

The Gita, as it is also lovingly called, is a body of spiritual wisdom found within a larger work of ancient wisdom known as the Mahabharata, one of the largest texts known to man. The Gita was said to be spoken by Lord Krishna in a beautiful melodious manner — a rhyme that, when spoken, is harmonious and pleasing to the ear.


(For some background information to start, try Beat the Blues With Hindu's Lovable Lord Krishna.)

Advertisement

With such an intricately woven and delicate text, translations can be tricky. How do you know where to find the best one? Your copy of the Gita is one you’ll want to cherish as you study it slowly and carefully, so finding the perfect translation is essential.

Let’s take a look at some of the best translations of the Gita out there, so that you can make an educated choice when investing in your yogic and scholarly purchase.

Top 5 English Translations of the Bhagavad Gita:
1. The Accessible Translation
One of the most gorgeous translations of the Bhagavad Gita comes from the late scholar, Eknath Easwaran. Originally from Kerala in southern India, Easwaran was an English professor, meditation teacher, Hindu scholar and spiritual leader who moved to California to write and teach. His version of the Gita is one of the most revered for its accessibility and accuracy. The text reads smoothly and includes various notes, a Sanskrit glossary and colorful introductions. Easwaran also authored a treasure trove of spiritual books that you'll want to check out.

Advertisement

2. The Scholarly Translation
A more scholarly translation of the Gita comes from Georg Feuerstein, another prolific author who has made his name in the realm of yogic literature. His translation is good for those students looking for something more academic and with detailed notes. Most notably, this translation contains the entire original Sanskrit text, with both the Romanized version as well as the original Devanagari. There’s even a guide to pronunciation, a word-for-word translation and an extensive glossary. For students who are serious and want to delve deeply into the ins and outs of the Gita, Georg Feuerstein’s translation is one of the best.

3. The Easy-to-Read Translation
Another highly respected rendition of the Bhagavad Gita is the one brought to us by scholar Stephen Mitchell. Mitchell has made a name for himself as one of America’s most talented translators of spiritual literature. It’s an easy-to-read book, with poetry-like fluidity in its wording. He makes reading the ancient text enjoyable and fun. With its accessibility, this one would be a good pick for a book club or discussion group on the Bhagavad Gita. Many yogis enjoy this translation for it's accessibility without compromising any of the ancient meaning.

4. The Casual Translation
If you’re looking for a version of the Gita that’s not overly academic or large in size then you might consider “The Living Gita,” by Sri Swami Satchidananda. The notes and commentary in this translation are superb and there’s no Sanskrit to read, so if you're looking for something less bulky and academic, this may be a good fit. The author also provides commentary about his own life and spiritual journey, which is fun to read for further insights.

5. The Big, Beautiful Translation
Last but not least, if you’re looking for a version of the Gita that looks like The Bible, "The Holy Geeta" by Swami Chinmayananda is it. This is the type of heirloom you'll want resting permanently on your bedside table because it’s so pretty to look at. There’s even a ribbon attached to a bookmark inside. This beautiful hardcover book has a lot of commentary — 1,273 pages of it! If you love big, pretty sacred texts, you’ll love this one!

The Gita for You
Translations of the Bhagavad Gita are as widely varied as the yoga students that study them. We’re all different and we all have different preferences in our learning styles and capacity for knowledge. Therefore, the right translation should be one that speaks to you. It's the one that you get as much out of as you’d hope to get when studying an ancient book of profound knowledge and wisdom, which you'll hopefully soon see is quite a lot!

(Read on for Yogapedia's Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita.)

During These Times of Stress and Uncertainty Your Doshas May Be Unbalanced.
To help you bring attention to your doshas and to identify what your predominant dosha is, we created the following quiz.

Try not to stress over every question, but simply answer based off your intuition. After all, you know yourself better than anyone else.




Written by Aimee Hughes

Aimee Hughes
Aimee is a yogi and writer who's been practicing yoga daily for more than 21 years. Since a journey to India when she was 20, the practice has been her constant companion. She loves exploring the vast and seemingly endless worlds of yoga. Aimee has also written a book titled, "The Sexy Vegan Kitchen: Culinary Adventures in Love & Sex." You can find her at her new site: https://natura.yoga
====

Confused About English Translations Of The Bhagavad Gita?
LAST UPDATED ON: SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 BY DEEPIKA BIRKS

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/gatheringnectar/2014/09/confused-about-english-translations-of-the-bhagavad-gita/




Krishna revealing the Gita to Arjuna.



Translation is tricky. There is the issue of what the individual words mean, and the issue of the idea being translated. For example, you’ve probably seen signs in Spanish that say, “Prohibido fumar.” You could translate this, “smoking is prohibited” but everyone translates it, “no smoking.” Why? Because that’s how you say the exact same idea in English.

When you translate literally what the words actually mean in a dictionary, you risk a stilted rendering. When you translate freely the ideas expressed, you risk over-interpreting the text for the reader.

When I head to the bookstore, I hit the Hinduism section first. It’s usually tiny and comprised entirely of five books I’ve already read. Sometimes four of those books are translations of the Bhagavad Gita. Over the years I’ve read a dozen or so translations, some better than others. Here are a few of my favorites (for comparison, I’ve chosen chapter 4 śloka 11):

The Bhagavad Gita by Eknath Easwaran


4.11 “As men approach me, so I receive them. All paths, Arjuna, lead to me.”

Eknath Easwaran’s translation is hand-down my absolute favorite. The English is clear and beautiful. Easwaran fell in love with English literature as a child and grew up to be an English Professor before he moved to America to teach meditation. All of his writing, whether scripture translations or otherwise, reads smoothly. 

This translation contains neither the Sanskrit text nor a commentary. Easwaran also wrote a three volume commentary, The Bhagavad Gita for Daily Living, which does contain each verse in Devanagari script, as well as a simpler commentary called Essence of the Bhagavad Gita which does not.

The Living Gita by Sri Swami Satchidananda

4.11 “However people sincerely call on me, I come to them and fulfill their hearts’ desires. They use many paths to reach me.”

This is a translation with the commentary interspersed. The verses are offset in bold font and numbered, and every so many verses there is commentary that fills between a few paragraphs to a few pages and often includes stories about saints or little anecdotes from Satchidananda’s life. The commentary on this verse is about a page and a half and ends, “In a way, everybody has his or her own religion. Because minds vary, each mind has its religion. Your approach is your religion.” This version contains my favorite commentary. It doesn’t contain the Sanskrit.

The Holy Geeta by Swami Chinmayananda

4.11 “In whatever way men approach Me, even so do I reward them; My path do men tread in all ways, O son of Pritha.”


Ever notice that bookstores have an entire aisle (or two!) filled with Bibles? They come in all different sizes and various styles of cover. I browse those aisles just to look at all the beautiful options (even though, no matter how pretty the cover, the text still doesn’t resonate with me). I’ve often wished for a copy of the Gita in a beautiful cover.

This is my prettiest Gita. It’s hard cover, with an illustration on the inside and a bookmark attached with a ribbon. Unfortunately, the paper is also the onion paper used in Bibles, so thin the text on the other side bleeds through, and after only a few pages of reading it starts to cause eye strain (for this reason, I wish it also came in ebook form, but it doesn’t).


The verses appear in the original Sanskrit, both in Devanagari and transliterated, as well as in translation (but the translation is not directly under the Sanskrit).The commentary is meaty – a direct translation of just the verses with nothing else could easily come in at 100 pages, while this version is a whopping 1273 pages. No wonder it uses such thin paper! The commentary for 4.11 reads in part, “Attachment and aversion are not the weaknesses of the Lord. He is a mass of Dynamism, the source of all activities and achievements. We are given the equipment through which we can, as we like, invoke this Infinite Mind. If we rightly invoke and carefully use the equipments, as a reward for our intelligent self-application, we can reach the Goal of our activities. If we misuse them, the very same Divine Force can be the cause of our utter disaster.”

Bhagavad Gita by Swami Satyananda Saraswati

4.11 “Son of She Who Excels (Arjuna), in every way which men seek Me, in that same way I come to them, for every way that men follow is My path.”


I’ve been taking online classes from the Devi Mandir for years. Shree Maa and Swami Satyanana Saraswati have taught me how to do puja, and I’ve tuned in to their webcam on many holidays. I can’t tell you how many sentences I’ve started with, “Swamiji says…” I’ve watched thousands of hours of classes and bhajan and puja from these gurus and completed two separate courses on this text.

This translation contains the original text in Sanskrit, in large bold transliteration, and in English. The verses are sometimes awkward in English due to Swamiji’s habit of translating the meaning of names instead of the name itself. For example, in the first two ślokas, instead of “Dhritarashtra said” and “Sanjaya said,” it’s translated, “Blind Ambition said” and “He Who is Victorious Over All said.” This style of translation blends the commentary into the translation itself, which may or may not be what you want. This edition contains the Gita Mahatmya and the viniyoga – in other words, this book assumes you plan to chant the Gita in Sanskrit (or, in my case, listen along while a professional singer on my iPod chants the Gita in Sanskrit. I’m partial to Geetamritam: Melodious Rendition of the Complete Bhagavad Gita by Vanishree and Vijayalakshmi).

The Bhagavad-Gita: A New Translation by Georg Feuerstein


4.11 “Just as these [yogins] resort to Me, so do I love them [in turn]. Everywhere, O son-of-Prithā, humans follow My ‘track.’” (There is a footnote for the word track that reads, “The terms vartman (‘track’) can also be rendered as ‘path.’”

This is the most scholarly translation I own. The left-hand page contains the Sanskrit in both Devanagari and transliteration, while the right-hand page contains a very literal translation, usually with several footnotes. People who are familiar with how in-depth Bible studies are conducted would be at home with this version. A section in the back contains a word-by-word literal translation if you want to check which word meant what. For 4.11 it says, “ye (plural) = who; yatha – just as; mam = to me; prapadyante = they resort; tams (tan) = them; tathaiva (tatha + eva) = thus verily, here: so; bhajami = I love; aham = I; mama = my; vartmanuvartante (varma +anuvartante) = they follow [my] track; manusyas = humans; partha = O son-of-Pritha; sarvasas = everywhere.” This is clearly not a book you’d pick up for casual reading, but I’m just nerdy enough to appreciate it.


The translation you prefer will depend on how you plan to use the text.Want a version that reads clearly in excellent prose? Try The Bhagavad Gita by Eknath Easwaran.
Want a friendly commentary that isn’t too bulky or academic? Try The Living Gita by Sri Swami Satchidananda.
Want a beautiful, heirloom-quality book? Try The Holy Geeta by Swami Chinmayananda.
Want to chant the Gita or to follow along while someone chants? Try Bhagavad Gita by Swami Satyananda Saraswati.
Want to study the text verse-by-verse in-depth and study the Sanskrit? Try The Bhagavad-Gita: A New Translation by Georg Feuerstein.


The best translation is the one you get the most out of.


===
Profile photo for Tapas Vijaya
Tapas Vijaya
study, investigate & practice the philosophies of Hinduism1y
What is the best translation of the Bhagavad Gita? Why do you think so? What are its advantages over other translations, if any?
What is your intention of reading Srimad Baghavad Gita.

This is the most holiest books that is presented to mankind.

This is the condensed subtract of the teachings of Upanishads, Puranas, Yoga sutras techniques and it is possible to be get a wide knowledge about all the teachings of humanity. Since in this book, the Lord has ventured into a great task, it may not be understood for the beginners of spiritual life.

It is for this reason, Swami Vivekananda has elaborated this teachings into four folds such as Bhakti yoga, Jnana yoga, Karma yoga and Raja yoga. If one reads this book and understands the teachings of this religion, then take up a simple the simplified version of Baghavad Gita presented by Rajaji. When the overall teachings are clear, then get into the specifics by depending on the detailed commentary by Swami Tapasyananda.

Swami Tapasyananda has taken pains to cover all the minute details of the sayings of Sri Krishna without having any inclined mind as done by Dvaitist to interrupt Baghavad Gita in the dvaitic angle and the same by the advaitins.

Swami Tapasyananda’S books are available at Sri Ramakrishna mutt centres.

55 views4 shares



===


01.12.2020
After centuries of “colonized” English translations of the Bhagavad Gita a Canadian scholar restores it to its original meaning
Published in:  Languages/Linguistic curiosities, Literary translation
by Pisana Ferrari – cApStAn Ambassador to the Global Village

Hindu scholar and linguist Jeffrey Armstrong has spent the past 10 years translating and “decolonizing” the Bhagavad Gita, one of India’s most famous epic poems, written 5.000 (some say 7.000) years ago. His work was published this month with the title The Bhagavad Gita Comes Alive: A Radical Translation. The 701 verses of the Gita, written in Sanskrit, have been translated into English hundreds of times since the late 18th century. The poem recounts a dialogue between Arjuna, one of five Pandava princes, and the Hindu deity Krishna, who serves as Arjuna’s charioteer. The action of the Gita is set in the great Indian epic Mahabharata, which focuses on the interrelated families of the Pandavas and Kauravas and their struggle for control of the land of Bharat in India.

The Gita illustrates spiritual truths through its epic tale and touches on many different subjects, including self-knowledge, self-realization, discipline, sense of duty, the need to cultivate an attitude of non-attachment and detachment, reincarnation, devotion, the union of the individual with the Universe. Like all great works of literature, it can be read on many levels: metaphysical, moral, spiritual, and practical; hence its enduring appeal.

Armstrong says that the true meaning of the Gita is lost in Western translations. Christianity colonized the world and didn’t really take an interest in the cultures it wanted to take things from, he says. Christianity and colonialism are closely linked, as Protestantism and Catholicism were the state religions of the European colonial powers. Armstrong claims every English version of the Gita has the same Christian terminology: Lord, God, sin, angels, devils, soul, heaven, concepts that do not exist in Sanskrit or in Indian cultures and are totally foreign to the Gita’s world view

Armstrong’s radical approach to translating the Gita  

We found some details of Armstrong’s approach to the translation in the foreword of the book, written by Prof. Nilesh N. Oak, of the Institute of Advanced Sciences in Dartmouth, MA. Prof. Oak says Armstrong’s translation focuses on conveying the essential, innate and root meaning of each verse of the Gita. He has removed all the misleading English words of previous translations and identified, corrected and removed all “colonial” terms.

Oak also says that Armstrong made the careful choice to keep many of the original Sanskrit words within the English verse, where he felt that an English equivalent would only distort the Sanskrit meaning, or do more harm. Where necessary, he has inserted short English definitions within the verse, but for non-translatable or deeply nuanced words, he has provided in-depth definitions in a glossary.

References to the Gita in Western culture

One can find references to the Gita in some of the most famous works of American literature and philosophy, including Ralph Waldo Emerson’s poem “Brahma”, T.S. Eliot’s Four Quartets, and works by Henry David Thoreau, as well as in pop culture, e.g. songs by the Beatles. Dr. Jeffery D. Long, Professor of Religion and Asian Studies at Elizabethtown College, PA, claims that the Gita has had a profound influence also on George Lucas, the creator of “Star Wars”. “In the case of Lucas”, he says, “it is subtle, and must be teased out of a close viewing (or better yet, multiple viewings) of his films: the teachings of Yoda; the theme of detachment that runs throughout the tragic story of the rise, fall, and redemption of Anakin Skywalker; and so on”.

Long quotes one particular “Gita moment” in the Star Wars saga. The Gita, he says, is a dialogue which takes place whilst the events of the larger epic fade into the background, and the focus becomes the spiritual path. Likewise, he says, the most profound dialogue between Luke and Yoda occurs as Luke’s Starfighter sinks fully into the waters of the swamp, as the war between the rebellion and the empire rages in the space beyond.  Here Yoda challenges Luke to see well beyond our normal concepts of space, time, and causation. An interesting take, no doubt!

What about “male colonisation” in translation?

We venture to draw a parallel between what Armstrong calls the “Christian colonization” of works in translation, as in the Gita, and different forms of “male-culture-oriented colonization” of translated literature. To illustrate this concept we take the example of two epic poems recently retranslated by women scholars: the first is the Old English epic poem Beowulf (by Maria Dahvana Headley); the second is the Greek classic The Odyssey (by Emily Wilson).

In her translation of Beowulf, a very “testosterone-drenched narrative”, Headley says she worked to shine a light on the motivations, actions, and desires of the poem’s female characters, as well as to clarify their identities. The translation “makes interventions in the text to grant space to its women, and a chance at agency and grace”, in a way that previous translations had not allowed, thus restoring it to its original intent.

In The Odyssey, Wilson also “scraped away the barnacle layers of centuries of masculine readings” to restore a less judgmental and more gender neutral version, more faithful to the original. Wilson says there is nothing in Homer to correspond to the “modern pseudo-moral judgments” of previous translations and that this is a clear case where “modern bias has been projected back onto antiquity”. See some concrete examples from both these works in our articles on the topic, at this link for Beowulf, and here for The Odyssey

About the author

Jeffrey Armstrong is Founder of VASA Vedic Academy of Sciences & Arts, International Speaker, Best-selling Author, Vedic Scholar, Linguist and Poet. His passion for the Sanskrit language began 50 years ago when he was a young university student practicing yoga. Read more about him at this link

Sources

“Vancouver scholar pens first decolonized English translation of ancient Indian scripture”, Tiffany Crawford, The Province, November 14, 2020

“The Bhagavad Gita Comes Alive”, Jeffrey Armstrong, Foreword

“The First Book of Yoga: The Enduring Influence of the Bhagavad Gita”, Stefanie Syman, Yoga Journal, October 12, 2018

“Hindu Themes in Western Popular Culture: A Tale of Two Georges, Part One”, Dr. Jeffery D. Long, Patreon, April 2, 2018

 “Hindu Themes in Western Popular Culture: A Tale of Two Georges, Part Two”, Dr. Jeffery D. Long, Patreon, April 9, 2018

 “Bhagavad Gita” Ancient History Encyclopedia


===




===




===

Bhagavad Gita - The Song of God - Huxley Introduction 2

Bhagavad Gita - The Song of God


Contents

Translators’ Preface
Introduction by Aldous Huxley
Gita and Mahabharata

BHAGAVAD-GITA

I.

THE SORROW OF ARJUNA

II.

THE YOGA OF KNOWLEDGE

III.

KARMA YOGA

IV.

RENUNCIATION THROUGH KNOWLEDGE

V.

THE YOGA OF RENUNCIATION

VI.

THE YOGA OF MEDITATION

VII.

KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE

VIII.

THE WAY TO ETERNAL BRAHMAN

IX.

THE YOGA OF MYSTICISM

X.

DIVINE GLORY

XI.

THE VISION OF GOD IN HIS UNIVERSAL FORM

XII.

THE YOGA OF DEVOTION

XIII.

THE FIELD AND ITS KNOWER

XIV.

THE THREE GUNAS

XV.

DEVOTION TO THE SUPREME SPIRIT

XVI.

DIVINE AND DEMONIC TENDENCIES

XVII.

THREE KINDS OF FAITH

XVIII.

THE YOGA OF RENUNCIATION

Appendix I


THE COSMOLOGY OF THE GITA

Appendix II


THE GITA AND WAR


===
Introduction to the Bhagavad Gita by Aldous Huxley

(The Introduction is in the Translation of Bhagavad-Gita by Swami Prabhavananda and Christopher Isherwood.)


The Perennial Philosophy


More than twenty-five centuries have passed since that which has been called the Perennial Philosophy was first committed to writing; and in the course of those centuries it has found expression, now partial, now complete, now in this form, now in that, again and again. In Vedanta and Hebrew prophecy, in the Tao Teh King and the Platonic dialogues, in the Gospel according to St. John and Mahayana theology, in Plotinus and the Areopagite, among the Persian Sufis and the Christian mystics of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance–the Perennial Philosophy has spoken almost all the languages of Asia and Europe and has made use of the terminology and traditions of every one of the higher religions. But under all this confusion of tongues and myths, of local histories and particularist doctrines, there remains a Highest Common Factor, which is the Perennial Philosophy in what may be called its chemically pure state. This final purity can never, of course, be expressed by any verbal statement of the philosophy, however undogmatic that statement may be, however deliberately syncretistic. The very fact that it is set down at a certain time by a certain writer, using this or that language, automatically imposes a certain sociological and personal bias on the doctrines so formulated. It is only the act of contemplation when words and even personality are transcended, that the pure state of the Perennial Philosophy can actually be known. The records left by those who have known it in this way make it abundantly clear that all of them, whether Hindu, Buddhist, Hebrew, Taoist, Christian, or Mohammedan, were attempting to describe the same essentially indescribable Fact.


The original scriptures of most religions are poetical and unsystematic. Theology, which generally takes the form of a reasoned commentary on the parables and aphorisms of the scriptures, tends to make its appearance at a later stage of religious history. The Bhagavad-Gita occupies an intermediate position between scripture and theology; for it combines the poetical qualities of the first with the clear-cut methodicalness of the second. The book may be described, writes Ananda K. Coomaraswamy in his admirable Hinduism and Buddhism, “as a compendium of the whole Vedic doctrine to be found in the earlier Vedas, Brahmanas and Upanishads, and being therefore the basis of all the later developments, it can be regarded as the focus of all Indian religion” is also one of the clearest and most comprehensive summaries of the Perennial Philosophy ever to have been made. Hence its enduring value, not only for Indians, but for all mankind.





At the core of the Perennial Philosophy we find four fundamental doctrines.


First: the phenomenal world of matter and of individualized consciousness–the world of things and animals and men and even gods–is the manifestation of a Divine Ground within which all partial realities have their being, and apart from which they would be non-existent.


Second: human beings are capable not merely of knowing about the Divine Ground by inference; they can also realize its existence by a direct intuition, superior to discursive reasoning. This immediate knowledge unites the knower with that which is known.


Third: man possesses a double nature, a phenomenal ego and an eternal Self, which is the inner man, the spirit, the spark of divinity within the soul. It is possible for a man, if he so desires, to identify himself with the spirit and therefore with the Divine Ground, which is of the same or like nature with the spirit.





Fourth: man’s life on earth has only one end and purpose: to identify himself with his eternal Self and so to come to unitive knowledge of the Divine Ground.





In Hinduism the first of these four doctrines is stated in the most categorical terms. The Divine Ground is Brahman, whose creative, sustaining and transforming aspects are manifested the Hindu trinity. A hierarchy of manifestations connects inanimate matter with man, gods, High Gods, and the undifferentiated Godhead beyond.





In Mahayana Buddhism the Divine Ground is called Mind or the Pure Light of the Void, the place of the High Gods is taken by the Dhyani-Buddhas.


Similar conceptions are perfectly compatible with Christianity and have in fact been entertained, explicitly or implicitly, by many Catholic and Protestant mystics, when formulating a philosophy to fit facts observed by super-rational intuition. Thus, for Eckhart and Ruysbroeck, there is an Abyss of Godhead underlying the Trinity, just as Brahman underlies Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. Suso has even left a diagrammatic picture of the relations subsisting between Godhead, triune God and creatures. In this very curious and interesting drawing a chain of manifestation connects the mysterious symbol of the Divine Ground with the three Persons of the Trinity, and the Trinity in turn is connected in a descending scale with angels and human beings. These last, as the drawing vividly shows, may make one of two choices. They can either live the life of the outer man, the life of the separative selfhood; in which case they are lost (for, in the words of the Theologia Germanica, “nothing burns in hell but the self”). Or else they can identify themselves with the inner man, in which case it becomes possible for them, as Suso shows, to ascend again, through unitive knowledge, to the Trinity and even, beyond they Trinity, to the ultimate Unity of the Divine Ground.


Within the Mohammedan tradition such a rationalization of the immediate mystical experience would have been dangerously unorthodox. Nevertheless, one has the impression, while reading certain Sufi texts, that their authors did in fact conceive of al haqq, the Real, as being the Divine Ground or Unity of Allah, underlying the active and personal aspects of the Godhead.


The second doctrine of the Perennial Philosophy–that it is possible to know the Divine Ground by a direct intuition higher than discursive reasoning–is to be found in all the great religions of the world. A philosopher who is content merely to know about the ultimate Reality–theoretically and by hearsay–is compared by Buddha to a herdsman of other men’s cows. Mohammed uses an even homelier barnyard metaphor. For him the philosopher who has not realized his metaphysics is just an ass bearing a load of books. Christian, Hindu, Taoist teachers wrote no less emphatically about the absurd pretensions of mere learning and analytic reasoning. In the words of the Anglican Prayer Book, our eternal life, now and hereafter, “stands in the knowledge of God”; and this knowledge is not discursive, but “of the heart,” a super-rational intuition, direct, synthetic and timeless.


The third doctrine of the Perennial Philosophy, that which affirms the double nature of man, is fundamental in all the higher religions. The unitive knowledge of the Divine Ground has, as its necessary condition, self-abnegation and charity. Only by means of self-abnegation and charity can we clear away the evil, folly and ignorance which constitute the thing we call our personality and prevent us from becoming aware of the spark of divinity illuminating the inner man. But the spark within is akin to the Divine Ground. By identifying ourselves with the first we can come to unitive knowledge of the second. These empirical facts of the spiritual life have been variously rationalized in terms of the theologies of the various religions. The Hindus categorically affirm that thou art That–that the indwelling Atman is the same as Brahman. For orthodox Christianity there is not an identity between the spark and God. union of the human spirit with God takes place–union so complete that the word deification is applied to it; but it is not the union of identical substances. According to Christian theology, the saint is “deified,” not because Atman is Brahman, but because God has assimilated the purified human spirit in to the divine substance by an act of grace. Islamic theology seems to make a similar distinction. The Sufi, Mansur, was executed for giving to the words “union” and “deification” the literal meaning which they bear in the Hindu tradition. For our present purposes, however, the significant fact is that these words are actually used by Christians and Mohammedans to describe the empirical facts of metaphysical realization by means of direct, super-rational intuition.


in regard to man’s final end, all the higher religions are in complete agreement. The purpose of human life is the discovery of Truth, the unitive knowledge of the Godhead. The degree to which this unitive knowledge is achieved here on earth determines the degree to which it will be enjoyed in the posthumous state. Contemplation of truth is the end, action the means. In India, in China, in ancient Greece, in Christian Europe, this was regarded as the most obvious and axiomatic piece of orthodoxy. The invention of the steam engine produced a revolution, not merely in industrial techniques, but also much more significantly in philosophy. Because machines could be made progressively more and more efficient, Western man came to believe that men and societies would automatically register a corresponding moral and spiritual improvement. Attention and allegiance came to be paid, not to Eternity, but to the Utopian future. External circumstances came to be regarded as more important that states of mind about external circumstances, and the end of human life was held to be action, with contemplation as a means to that end. These false and historically, aberrant and heretical doctrines are now systematically taught in our schools and repeated, day in, day out, by those anonymous writers of advertising copy who, more than any other teachers, provide European and American adults with their current philosophy of life. And so effective has been the propaganda that even professing Christians accept the heresy unquestioningly and are quite unconscious of its complete incompatibility with their own or anybody else’s religion.





These four doctrines constitute the Perennial Philosophy in its minimal and basic form. A man who can practice what the Indians call Jnana yoga (the metaphysical discipline of discrimination between the real and the apparent) asks for nothing more. This simple working hypothesis is enough for his purposes. But such discrimination is exceedingly difficult & can hardly be practiced, at any rate in the preliminary stages of the spiritual life, except by persons endowed with a particular kind of mental constitution. That is why most statements of the Perennial Philosophy have included another doctrine, affirming the existence of one or more human Incarnations of the Divine Ground, by whose mediation & grace the worshipper is helped to achieve his goal–that unitive knowledge of the Godhead, which is man’s eternal life & beatitude. The Bhagavad-Gita is one such statement. Here, Krishna is an Incarnation of the Divine Ground in human form. Similarly, in Christian & Buddhist theology, Jesus and Gotama are Incarnations of divinity. But whereas in Hinduism and Buddhism more than one Incarnation of the Godhead is possible (and is regarded as having in fact taken place), for Christians there has been and can be only one.


An Incarnation of the Godhead and, to a lesser degree, any theocentric saint, sage or prophet is a human being who knows Who he is and can therefore effectively remind other human beings of what they have allowed themselves to forget: namely, that if they choose to become what potentially they already are, they too can be eternally united with the Divine Ground. (NB Baha’is argue that only Messengers or Manifestations of God can act as mediators between the finite and the Infinite – as in ‘the perfect mirror – sun – warmth/light and love/heat analogy’.


Worship of the Incarnation and contemplation of his attributes are for most men and women the best preparation for unitive knowledge of the Godhead. But whether the actual knowledge itself can be achieved by this means is another question. Many Catholic mystics have affirmed that, at a certain stage of that contemplative prayer in which, according to the most authoritative theologians, the life of Christian perfection ultimately consists, it is necessary to put aside all thought of the Incarnation as distracting from the higher knowledge of that which has been incarnated. From this fact have arisen misunderstandings in plenty and a number of intellectual difficulties. Here, for example, is what Abbot Josh Chapman writes in one of his admirable Spiritual Letters: “The problem of reconciling (not merely uniting) mysticism with Christianity is more difficult. The Abbot (Abbot Marmion) says that St. John of the Cross is like a sponge full of Christianity. You can squeeze it all out, and the full mystical theory remains. Consequently, for fifteen years or so, I hated St. John of the Cross and called him a Buddhist. I loved St. Teresa, and read her over and over again. She is first a Christian, only secondarily a mystic. Then I found that I had wasted fifteen years, so far as prayer was concerned.” And yet, he concludes, in spite of its “Buddhistic” character, the practice of mysticism (or, to put it in other terms, the realization of the Perennial Philosophy) makes good Christians. He might have added that it also makes good Hindus, good Buddhists, good Taoists, good Moslems and good Jews.


The solution to Abbot Chapman’s problem must be sought in the domain, not of philosophy, but of psychology. Human beings are not born identical. There are many different temperaments and constitutions; and within each psycho-physical class one can find people at very different stages of spiritual development. Forms of worship and spiritual discipline which may be valuable for one individual maybe useless or even positively harmful for another belonging to a different class and standing, within that class, at a lower or higher level of development. All this is clearly set forth in the Gita, where the psychological facts are linked up with general cosmology by means of the postulate of the gunas. Krishna, who is here the mouth-piece of Hinduism in all its manifestations, finds it perfectly natural that different men should have different methods and even apparently differently objects of worship. All roads lead to Rome–provided, of course, that it is Rome and not some other city which the traveler really wishes to reach. A similar attitude of charitable inclusiveness, somewhat surprising in a Moslem, is beautifully expressed in the parable of Moses and the Shepherd, told by Jalauddin Rumi in the second book of the Masnavi. And within the more exclusive Christian tradition these problems of temperament and degree of development have been searchingly discussed in their relation to the way of Mary and the way of Martha in general, and in particular to the vocation and private devotion of individuals.


We now have to consider the ethical corollaries of the perennial Philosophy. “Truth,” says St. Thomas Aquinas, “is the last end for the entire universe, and the contemplation of truth is the chief occupation of wisdom.” The moral virtues, he says in another place, belong to contemplation, not indeed essentially, but as a necessary predisposition. Virtue, in other words, is not the end, but the indispensable means to the knowledge of the divine reality. Shankara, the greatest of the Indian commentators on the Gita, hold the same doctrine. Right action is the way to knowledge; for it purifies the mind, and it is only to a mind purified from egotism that the intuition of the Divine Ground can come.


Self-abnegation, according to the Gita, can be achieved by the practice of two all-inclusive virtues–love and non-attachment. the latter is the same thing as that “holy indifference,” on which St. Francois de Sales is never tired of insisting. “He who refers every action to God,” writes Camus, summarizing his master’s teaching, “and has no aims save His Glory, will find rest everywhere, even amidst the most violent commotions.” So long as we practice this holy indifference to the fruits of action, “no lawful occupation will separate us from God; on the contrary, it can be made a means of closer union.” Here the word “lawful” supplies a necessary qualification to a teaching which, without it, is incomplete and even potentially dangerous. Some actions are intrinsically evil or inexpedient; and no good intentions, no conscious offering them to God, no renunciation of the fruits can alter their essential character. Holy indifference requires to be taught in conjunction not merely with a set of commandments prohibiting crimes, but also with a clear conception of what in Buddha’s Eightfold Path is called “right livelihood.” Thus, for the Buddhist, right livelihood was incompatible with the making of deadly weapons and of intoxicants; for the mediaeval Christian, with the taking of interest and with various monopolistic practices which have since come to be regarded as legitimate good business. John Woolman, the American Quaker, provides a most enlightening example of the way in which a man may live in the world, while practicing perfect non-attachment and remaining acutely sensitive to the claims of right livelihood. Thus, while it would have been profitable and perfectly lawful for him to sell West Indian sugar and rum to the customers who came to his shop, Woolman refrained from doing so, because these things were the products of slave labor. Similarly, when he was in England, it would have been both lawful and convenient for him to travel by stage coach. Nevertheless, he preferred to make his journeys on foot. Why?


Because the comforts of rapid travel could only be bought at the expense of great cruelty to the horses and the most atrocious working conditions for the post-boys. In Woolman’s eyes, such a system of transportation was intrinsically undesirable, and no amount of personal non-attachment could make it anything but undesirable. So he shouldered his knapsack and walked.


In the preceding pages I have tried to show that the Perennial Philosophy and its ethical corollaries constitute a Highest Common Factor, present in all the major religions of the world. To affirm this truth has never been more imperatively necessary than at the present time. There will never be enduring peace unless and until human beings come to accept a philosophy of life more adequate to the cosmic and psychological facts than the insane idolatries of nationalism and the advertising man’s apocalyptic faith in Progress towards a mechanized New Jerusalem. All the elements of this philosophy are present, as we have seen, in the traditional religions.





But in existing circumstances there is not the slightest chance that any of the traditional religions will obtain universal acceptance. Europeans and Americans will see no reason for being converted to Hinduism, say, or Buddhism. And the people of Asia can hardly be expected to renounce their own traditions for the Christianity professed, often sincerely, by the imperialists who, for four hundred years and more, have been systematically attacking, exploiting, and oppressing, and are now trying to finish off the work of destruction by “educating” them. But happily there is the Highest Common Factor of all religions, the Perennial Philosophy which has always and everywhere been the metaphysical system of prophets, saints and sages. It is perfectly possible for people to remain good Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, or Moslems and yet to be united in full agreement on the basic doctrines of the Perennial Philosophy.


The Bhagavad-Gita is perhaps the most systematic scriptural statement of the Perennial Philosophy to a world at war, a world that, because it lacks the intellectual and spiritual prerequisites to peace, can only hope to patch up some kind of precarious armed truce, it stands pointing, clearly and unmistakably, to the only road of escape from the self-imposed necessity of self-destruction. For this reason we should be grateful to Swami Prabhavananda and Mr. Isherwood for having given us this new version of the book–a version which can be read, not merely without that dull aesthetic pain inflicted by all too many English translations from the Sanskrit, but positively with enjoyment.





Helping build peace via Huxley’s Highest Common Factor – Dr Roger Prentice





I can see only two ways to help build peace. The one I am to discuss in this paper – reaching harmony in diversity by teaching the universality of what Aldous Huxley calls the Highest Common Factor – or Perennial Philosophy. Secondly there is the chance to unite around a deepening of what it is to be human, in the world with others. The greatest writer on this second subject that I have found is Abraham Joshua Heschel in his Who is Man?. This ‘humanistic’ line often gets confused with Humanism, but in truth it is a correlative of deepening in Huxley’s concern for the Highest Common Factor in The Perennial Philosophy. But I will focus here on the Highest Common Factor as presented by Huxley in his introduction to the translation of the Bhagavad Gita as translated by Swami Prabhavananda and Christopher Isherwood.





In outline form Huxley’s arguments in his Introduction are;





1





2





3


Outline to follow
===
Gita and Mahabharata THE MAHABHARATA is said to be the longest poem in the world. In its original form, it consisted of twenty-four thousand verses, and it grew to about one hundred thousand. Like the Old Testament, it is not a homogeneous work, but a collection of narratives. Its central theme, as the name indicates, is the story of the descendants of King Bharata (Maha means great), and of ancient India, the land where the Bharatas lived and ruled. After the death of King Pandu, the Mahabharata tells us, his brother Dhritarashtra succeeded to the throne. Dhritarashtra educated the five sons of Pandu, the Pandavas, along with his own one hundred sons. As they grew to be men, the Pandavas distinguished them- selves by their piety and heroic virtues. In consequence, Duryodhana, Dhritarashtra’s eldest son, became jealous and planned to mur- der them. Duryodhana’s scheme was to build a palace in a distant town, and invite the Pandavas to stay there during a religious festival. The palace was made of specially inflammable materials, so that Duryodhana’s servants could easily set it on fire. It burned to ashes, but the Pandavas and Kunti, their mother, had been warned in time, and escaped. Duryodhana believed them dead. The Pandavas lived in the forest, disguised as Brahmins, meeting all kinds of dangers and adventures. One day they heard that a neighbouring king was to choose a husband for his daughter. The winner must bend a bow of enormous strength and hit a tiny target. The Pandavas thought they would try. They went to the city in their disguise. Suitors had gathered from all over India, Duryodhana among them. One after another, they failed in the test. At last Arjuna, third of the Pandavas, stood up, bent the bow and hit the target with the greatest ease. Draupadi, the princess, threw him the victor’s garland. But the assembled princes could not accept this humiliation at the hands of a seemingly poor and unwarlike Brahmin. There would have been a fight—just as in the story of Ulysses—if Krishna, who was present, had not intervened and persuaded them that Arjuna had a right to his bride. Krishna was a cousin of the Pandavas, but he was not one of Dhritarashtra’s sons. The brothers took Draupadi back to the forest, where Kunti was awaiting them. ‘Mother,’ they cried, ‘we have brought home a won- derful treasure!’ ‘Be sure to share it equally, my children,’ Kunti answered; then she saw the girl, and exclaimed in dismay: ‘Oh, what have I said!’ But it was too late. Her word was sacred to her sons. So Draupadi married all the brothers together. Dhritarashtra and his son now knew that the Pandavas were not only alive, but allied by marriage to a powerful monarch. Duryodhana was for carrying on the feud, but Dhritarashtra wisely listened to the advice of his uncle Bhisma, which was to send for the brothers and offer them half of his kingdom. So the kingdom was divided. The Pandavas got the worst of the land, a wilderness along the Jamuna River. They cleared it, built a fine city, and crowned Yudhisthira, the eldest brother, as their king. Now the five brothers lived in triumph and splendour, and Duryodhana hated them more than ever. His jealousy hatched a new plot for their ruin. The pious and noble Yudhisthira had a dangerous weakness for gambling. So Duryodhana challenged him to play dice with a clever sharper named Sakuni, knowing that the king would feel bound in honour to accept. They played, Sakuni cheated, Yud- histhira lost game after game, staking his wealth, his kingdom, and finally his brothers, Draupadi and himself. All were now the slaves of Duryodhana’s vengeance, subject to insult and cruelty, until Dhritarashtra intervened, and insisted that they be set at liberty and their kingdom given back. But Duryodhana worked upon his father until he obtained permission for another dice-match. The loser was to forfeit his kingdom and retire to the forest for twelve years, then he must live for a year in the city without being recognized; if he was discovered, the term of exile would begin again. This game Yudhisthira also lost. So the Pandavas went back to the forest. They made a virtue of their misfor- tune, practising spiritual austerities and doing many heroic deeds. Once, during their wanderings, we are told, the brothers suffered greatly from thirst. Nakula, the youngest, was sent to look for water. He found a lake which was clear as crystal. As he bent over it, a voice said: ‘Stop, child. First answer my questions. Then you may drink.’ But Nakula, in his desperate thirst, paid no attention to the voice: he drank, and immediately fell dead. His brother Sahadeva went out to look for him. He, too, found the lake, and the same thing happened. In this manner, four of the brothers died. Last of all came Yudhisthira. He found the corpses, and began to lament. Then the voice told him: ‘Child, first answer my questions, and then I will cure your grief and your thirst.’ He turned, and saw Dharma, the personification of duty and virtue, standing beside him in the form of a crane. ‘What is the road to heaven?’ the crane asked. ‘Truthfulness.’ ‘How does a man find happiness?’ ‘Through right conduct.’ ‘What must he subdue, in order to escape grief?’ ‘His mind.’ ‘When is a man loved?’ ‘When he is without vanity.’ ‘Of all the world’s wonders, which is the most wonderful?’ ‘That no man, though he sees others dying all around him, believes that he himself will die.’ ‘How does one reach true religion?’ ‘Not by argument. Not by scriptures and doctrines; they cannot help. The path to religion is trodden by the saints.’ Dharma was satisfied. He revealed himself to Yudhisthira. Then he brought the four brothers back to life. When the period of exile was over at last, Yudhisthira asked for the return of his kingdom; but Duryodhana refused. Yudhisthira said he would be content with just one village for himself and for each of his brothers. But Duryodhana, in the insanity of his greed, would not agree even to this. The older members of the family tried to arbitrate, and failed. So war became inevitable. Neighbouring kings were



drawn into the quarrel, until the whole of India was involved. Both sides wanted Krishna’s aid. To both, Krishna offered the same choice. ‘Either you can have the help of my kinsmen, the Vrishnis, in the battle,’ the told them, ‘or you can have me alone. But I shall take no part in the fighting.’ Duryodhana chose the Vrishnis. Arjuna preferred to take Krishna himself, as his personal charioteer. The battle was fought on the plain of Kurukshetra, a sacred place of pilgrimage. It was here, just before the armies engaged, that Krishna and Arjuna had the conversation which is recorded in the Bhagavad-Gita. The battle lasted eighteen days, and ended with the death of Duryodhana and the complete victory of the Pandavas. Thereafter, Yud- histhira became undisputed ruler of India. He reigned for thirty-six years. The story ends with the pilgrimage of Draupadi and the Pandavas up the heights of the Himalayas to the abode of God. On the way, the queen and four of the brothers died: they were not sufficiently pure to be able to enter heaven in their human bodies. Only Yud- histhira, the royal saint, journeyed on, accompanied by his faithful dog. When they reached heaven, Indra, the king of gods, told him that the dog could not come in. Yudhisthira replied that, if this was so, he would stay outside heaven too; for he could not bring himself to desert any creature which trusted him and wished for his protection. Finally, after a long argument, both dog and king were admitted. Then the dog was revealed as Dharma himself. This had been another test of Yudhisthira’s spiritual greatness. One more was to follow. When the king looked around him, he found that heaven was filled with his mortal enemies. Where, he asked, were his brothers and his comrades? Indra conducted him to a gloomy and horrible region, the pit of hell itself. ‘I prefer to stay here,’ said Yudhisthira, ‘for the place where they are is heaven to me.’ At this, the blackness and horror vanished. Yudhisthira and the other Pandavas passed beyond the appearance of hell and heaven into the true Being of God which is immortality. The Bhagavad-Gita (meaning, literally, the Song of God) is not regarded by Hindus as Sruti (scriptural teaching actually revealed by God to man, as in the Upanishads) but only as Smriti (the teaching of divine incarnations, saints or prophets, who further explain and elaborate the God-given truths of the scriptures). Nevertheless, it is the most popular book in Hindu religious literature; the Gospel, one may say, of India. It has profoundly influenced the spiritual, cultural, intellectual and political life of the country throughout the cen- turies, and it continues to do so to-day. Every westerner should study it if he wants to understand the mental processes of India’s thinkers and leaders. The date of the Gita is generally placed by scholars somewhere between the fifth and second centuries, B.C. Most of them agree that it was not originally a part of the Mahabharata itself, but this does not necessarily mean that it was composed later than the epic. It seems to have existed for some time independently. In the Gita dialogue there are four speakers: King Dhritarashtra, Sanjaya, Arjuna and Krishna. Dhritarashtra is blind. The sage Vyasa (who is traditionally supposed to be the author of the Gita) offers to restore his sight, in order that he may watch the battle of Kurukshetra. But Dhritarashtra refuses. He cannot bear to see his kinsmen killed. So Vyasa confers the psychic powers of clairvoyance and clairaudience upon Sanjaya, who is Dhritarashtra’s minister and charioteer. As they sit together in the palace, Sanjaya describes to his master everything he sees and hears on the distant battlefield. Through his mouth, the words of Krishna and Arjuna are mediumistically reported. Occasionally, he pauses in his report to add descriptive remarks of his own. Sri Krishna (Sri is a title of reverence, such as Lord) has been called the Christ of India. There are, in fact, some striking parallels be- tween the life of Krishna, as related in the Bhagavatam and elsewhere, and the life of Jesus of Nazareth. In both cases, legend and fact mingle; but the historical problem has nothing to do with a consideration of the message of the Bhagavad-Gita. To a seeker after spir- itual reality who reads the Gita or the Sermon on the Mount, it cannot matter very much whether or not the historical Krishna and the historical Jesus ever existed at all. The Gita is not primarily concerned with Krishna as an individual, but with his aspect as Brahman, the ultimate Reality. When Krishna addresses Arjuna, he sometimes speaks as an individual, but often as God Himself: For I am Brahman Within this body, Life immortal That shall not perish: I am the Truth And the Joy forever. Arjuna, in his attitude to Krishna, also expresses this dual relationship. Krishna is the divine incarnation of Vishnu, Arjuna’s chosen deity. Arjuna knows this—yet, by a merciful ignorance, he sometimes forgets. Indeed, it is Krishna who makes him forget, since no ordi- nary man could bear the strain of constant companionship with God. After the vision of Krishna’s divine aspect, which is recorded in chapter eleven, Arjuna is appalled by the realization that he has been treating the Lord of the universe as ‘friend and fellow-mortal.’ He humbly begs Krishna’s pardon, but his awe soon leaves him. Again, he has forgotten. We may infer the same relationship between Jesus and his disciples after the vision of the transfiguration. King Dhritarashtra speaks but once. In fact, the whole narrative of the Gita is Sanjaya’s answer to his single opening question.

Gita and Mahabharata

THE MAHABHARATA is said to be the longest poem in the world. In its original form, it consisted of twenty-four thousand verses, and it grew to about one hundred thousand. Like the Old Testament, it is not a homogeneous work, but a collection of narratives. Its central theme, as the name indicates, is the story of the descendants of King Bharata (Maha means great), and of ancient India, the land where the Bharatas lived and ruled.

After the death of King Pandu, the Mahabharata tells us, his brother Dhritarashtra succeeded to the throne. Dhritarashtra educated the five sons of Pandu, the Pandavas, along with his own one hundred sons. As they grew to be men, the Pandavas distinguished themselves by their piety and heroic virtues. In consequence, Duryodhana, Dhritarashtra’s eldest son, became jealous and planned to murder them.

Duryodhana’s scheme was to build a palace in a distant town, and invite the Pandavas to stay there during a religious festival. The palace was made of specially inflammable materials, so that Duryodhana’s servants could easily set it on fire. It burned to ashes, but the Pandavas and Kunti, their mother, had been warned in time, and escaped. Duryodhana believed them dead.

The Pandavas lived in the forest, disguised as Brahmins, meeting all kinds of dangers and adventures. One day they heard that a neighbouring king was to choose a husband for his daughter. The winner must bend a bow of enormous strength and hit a tiny target. The Pandavas thought they would try. They went to the city in their disguise.

Suitors had gathered from all over India, Duryodhana among them. One after another, they failed in the test. At last Arjuna, third of the Pandavas, stood up, bent the bow and hit the target with the greatest ease. Draupadi, the princess, threw him the victor’s garland. But the assembled princes could not accept this humiliation at the hands of a seemingly poor and unwarlike Brahmin. There would have been a fight—just as in the story of Ulysses—if Krishna, who was present, had not intervened and persuaded them that Arjuna had a right to his bride. Krishna was a cousin of the Pandavas, but he was not one of Dhritarashtra’s sons.

The brothers took Draupadi back to the forest, where Kunti was awaiting them. ‘Mother,’ they cried, ‘we have brought home a wonderful treasure!’ ‘Be sure to share it equally, my children,’ Kunti answered; then she saw the girl, and exclaimed in dismay: ‘Oh, what have I said!’ But it was too late. Her word was sacred to her sons. So Draupadi married all the brothers together.

Dhritarashtra and his son now knew that the Pandavas were not only alive, but allied by marriage to a powerful monarch. Duryodhana was for carrying on the feud, but Dhritarashtra wisely listened to the advice of his uncle Bhisma, which was to send for the brothers and offer them half of his kingdom. So the kingdom was divided. The Pandavas got the worst of the land, a wilderness along the Jamuna River. They cleared it, built a fine city, and crowned Yudhisthira, the eldest brother, as their king.

Now the five brothers lived in triumph and splendour, and Duryodhana hated them more than ever. His jealousy hatched a new plot for their ruin. The pious and noble Yudhisthira had a dangerous weakness for gambling. So Duryodhana challenged him to play dice with a clever sharper named Sakuni, knowing that the king would feel bound in honour to accept. They played, Sakuni cheated, Yudhisthira lost game after game, staking his wealth, his kingdom, and finally his brothers, Draupadi and himself. All were now the slaves of Duryodhana’s vengeance, subject to insult and cruelty, until Dhritarashtra intervened, and insisted that they be set at liberty and their kingdom given back.

But Duryodhana worked upon his father until he obtained permission for another dice-match. The loser was to forfeit his kingdom and retire to the forest for twelve years, then he must live for a year in the city without being recognized; if he was discovered, the term of exile would begin again. This game Yudhisthira also lost. So the Pandavas went back to the forest. They made a virtue of their misfortune, practising spiritual austerities and doing many heroic deeds.

Once, during their wanderings, we are told, the brothers suffered greatly from thirst. Nakula, the youngest, was sent to look for water. He found a lake which was clear as crystal. As he bent over it, a voice said: ‘Stop, child. First answer my questions. Then you may drink.’ But Nakula, in his desperate thirst, paid no attention to the voice: he drank, and immediately fell dead. His brother Sahadeva went out to look for him. He, too, found the lake, and the same thing happened. In this manner, four of the brothers died.

Last of all came Yudhisthira. He found the corpses, and began to lament. Then the voice told him: ‘Child, first answer my questions, and then I will cure your grief and your thirst.’ He turned, and saw Dharma, the personification of duty and virtue, standing beside him in the form of a crane.

‘What is the road to heaven?’ the crane asked.

‘Truthfulness.’

‘How does a man find happiness?’

‘Through right conduct.’

‘What must he subdue, in order to escape grief?’

‘His mind.’

‘When is a man loved?’

‘When he is without vanity.’

‘Of all the world’s wonders, which is the most wonderful?’

‘That no man, though he sees others dying all around him, believes that he himself will die.’

‘How does one reach true religion?’

‘Not by argument. Not by scriptures and doctrines; they cannot help. The path to religion is trodden by the saints.’

Dharma was satisfied. He revealed himself to Yudhisthira. Then he brought the four brothers back to life.

When the period of exile was over at last, Yudhisthira asked for the return of his kingdom; but Duryodhana refused. Yudhisthira said he would be content with just one village for himself and for each of his brothers. But Duryodhana, in the insanity of his greed, would not agree even to this. The older members of the family tried to arbitrate, and failed. So war became inevitable. Neighbouring kings were

drawn into the quarrel, until the whole of India was involved. Both sides wanted Krishna’s aid. To both, Krishna offered the same choice. ‘Either you can have the help of my kinsmen, the Vrishnis, in the battle,’ the told them, ‘or you can have me alone. But I shall take no part in the fighting.’ Duryodhana chose the Vrishnis. Arjuna preferred to take Krishna himself, as his personal charioteer.

The battle was fought on the plain of Kurukshetra, a sacred place of pilgrimage. It was here, just before the armies engaged, that Krishna and Arjuna had the conversation which is recorded in the Bhagavad-Gita.

The battle lasted eighteen days, and ended with the death of Duryodhana and the complete victory of the Pandavas. Thereafter, Yudhisthira became undisputed ruler of India. He reigned for thirty-six years.

The story ends with the pilgrimage of Draupadi and the Pandavas up the heights of the Himalayas to the abode of God. On the way, the queen and four of the brothers died: they were not sufficiently pure to be able to enter heaven in their human bodies. Only Yudhisthira, the royal saint, journeyed on, accompanied by his faithful dog. When they reached heaven, Indra, the king of gods, told him that the dog could not come in. Yudhisthira replied that, if this was so, he would stay outside heaven too; for he could not bring himself to desert any creature which trusted him and wished for his protection. Finally, after a long argument, both dog and king were admitted. Then the dog was revealed as Dharma himself. This had been another test of Yudhisthira’s spiritual greatness. One more was to follow. When the king looked around him, he found that heaven was filled with his mortal enemies. Where, he asked, were his brothers and his comrades? Indra conducted him to a gloomy and horrible region, the pit of hell itself. ‘I prefer to stay here,’ said Yudhisthira, ‘for the place where they are is heaven to me.’ At this, the blackness and horror vanished. Yudhisthira and the other Pandavas passed beyond the appearance of hell and heaven into the true Being of God which is immortality.

The Bhagavad-Gita (meaning, literally, the Song of God) is not regarded by Hindus as Sruti (scriptural teaching actually revealed by God to man, as in the Upanishads) but only as Smriti (the teaching of divine incarnations, saints or prophets, who further explain and elaborate the God-given truths of the scriptures). Nevertheless, it is the most popular book in Hindu religious literature; the Gospel, one may say, of India. It has profoundly influenced the spiritual, cultural, intellectual and political life of the country throughout the centuries, and it continues to do so to-day. Every westerner should study it if he wants to understand the mental processes of India’s thinkers and leaders.

The date of the Gita is generally placed by scholars somewhere between the fifth and second centuries, B.C. Most of them agree that it was not originally a part of the Mahabharata itself, but this does not necessarily mean that it was composed later than the epic. It seems to have existed for some time independently.

In the Gita dialogue there are four speakers: King Dhritarashtra, Sanjaya, Arjuna and Krishna.

Dhritarashtra is blind. The sage Vyasa (who is traditionally supposed to be the author of the Gita) offers to restore his sight, in order that he may watch the battle of Kurukshetra. But Dhritarashtra refuses. He cannot bear to see his kinsmen killed. So Vyasa confers the psychic powers of clairvoyance and clairaudience upon Sanjaya, who is Dhritarashtra’s minister and charioteer. As they sit together in the palace, Sanjaya describes to his master everything he sees and hears on the distant battlefield. Through his mouth, the words of Krishna and Arjuna are mediumistically reported. Occasionally, he pauses in his report to add descriptive remarks of his own.

Sri Krishna (Sri is a title of reverence, such as Lord) has been called the Christ of India. There are, in fact, some striking parallels between the life of Krishna, as related in the Bhagavatam and elsewhere, and the life of Jesus of Nazareth. In both cases, legend and fact mingle; but the historical problem has nothing to do with a consideration of the message of the Bhagavad-Gita. To a seeker after spiritual reality who reads the Gita or the Sermon on the Mount, it cannot matter very much whether or not the historical Krishna and the historical Jesus ever existed at all.

The Gita is not primarily concerned with Krishna as an individual, but with his aspect as Brahman, the ultimate Reality. When Krishna addresses Arjuna, he sometimes speaks as an individual, but often as God Himself:

For I am Brahman

Within this body,

Life immortal

That shall not perish:

I am the Truth

And the Joy forever.

Arjuna, in his attitude to Krishna, also expresses this dual relationship. Krishna is the divine incarnation of Vishnu, Arjuna’s chosen deity. Arjuna knows this—yet, by a merciful ignorance, he sometimes forgets. Indeed, it is Krishna who makes him forget, since no ordinary man could bear the strain of constant companionship with God. After the vision of Krishna’s divine aspect, which is recorded in chapter eleven, Arjuna is appalled by the realization that he has been treating the Lord of the universe as ‘friend and fellow-mortal.’ He humbly begs Krishna’s pardon, but his awe soon leaves him. Again, he has forgotten. We may infer the same relationship between Jesus and his disciples after the vision of the transfiguration.

King Dhritarashtra speaks but once. In fact, the whole narrative of the Gita is Sanjaya’s answer to his single opening question.
Previous ChapterNext Chapter


===




===