2021/01/03

Exile Spirit - Tricycle: The Buddhist Review

Exile Spirit - Tricycle: The Buddhist Review


Exile Spirit

A Profile of Thanissaro Bhikkhu and the Metta Forest MonasteryBy Barbara RoetherWINTER 1995

DARKNESS CLIMBS THE WILD SAGEBRUSH SLOPES around the Metta Forest Monastery northeast of San Diego. Coyotes bark. In a leveled clearing, light spills out from a simple wooden shrine. Inside all is quiet except for a single voice—pausing . . . going on, pausing . . . going on again.The Arhat Kalika, from Cave 17, Dunhuang, Tang Dynasty, 9th c. C.E., ink on paper, courtesy of The Trustees of The British Museum.



In clear and certain tones, the voice of Thanissaro Bhikkhu leads a guided meditation for a handful of people sitting Thai-style on their ankles under the gaze of a huge golden Buddha. There are three young men from the outskirts of Los Angeles, a lone schoolteacher from Alaska, a Thai family, and several women and men.

“We look for true happiness and think about where true happiness would be found. Breath anchors us in the present, but even there we find there is change, so we have to dig deeper. The breath and one’s inner happiness are the only real things to rely on. Why wouldn’t you want something you can rely on to be happy? So think about the breath—how the breath is shallow or deep, fast or slow—and concentrate on getting to know the breath.”

It is the voice of a farmer selling his crop to the shipper next door, smoothly arguing for the quality and ripeness of his produce. It’s a voice that recalls Thoreau. Economy, confidence, simplicity, reason. Indeed, it is Thoreau whom Thanissaro identities as one of his earliest heroes.

Like Thoreau, Thanissaro Bhikkhu has founded a kind of Walden as the Abbot of the Metta Forest Monastery near San Diego, the first and only Thai forest tradition monastery in this country. Just as the utopian movement in America was sparked by the advent of the industrial revolution, the forest tradition of Theravada Buddhism was developed in Thailand around the tum of the century by Ajahn Mun Bhuridatto in reaction to the increasing urbanization of the Buddhist monastic communities there. Forest monks abandoned the heavy social demands of the city and devoted themselves to meditation instead.

FROM AN ELGHT-LANE FREEWAY the roads grow increasingly narrow. A country road meanders through orchards heavy with lemons and oranges, then turns to dirt and climbs into a mountainous landscape of native chaparral thick with wild rosemary and sage. There is something rough in the dusty air, a whiff of something wild from the Mojave that stretches out over the next ridge.

At the entrance to the Metta Forest, there is no gate, no fence. Nor is there really a forest at all, but a lush 40-acre orchard of avocado trees. From the sunstruck clearing where the monastery’s temple building stands, there is a dazzling view, framed by young palm trees and scarlet blooms of proteus. On a ridge off in the distance the white finger of the Mount Palomar telescope points its lens to infinity.

The handful of buildings are built for an outdoor life. Raised platforms for meditation line the outside edges. There are outdoor sinks and kitchens, broad swatches of white rice drying in the sun. Orchard workers in wide straw hats move hoses around, and here and there are the temporary piles of things that signal a work in progress.Thanissaro Bhikkhu.

Thanissaro’s robes are the color of the dirt road. His body is lean and relaxed. As we talk at the long table under the overhanging roof, he explains the orchard, sounding like a farmer: “Sometimes the avocados pay us, and sometimes we pay for them. But they are good trees for meditating under; their shade is thick and it’s always cool underneath.”

As we begin to talk a car pulls up and a large Thai family gets out. They shout greetings to Thanissaro in Thai. “We’re on the pilgrimage route,” he explains.” The local Thai people visit us on family outings, but most come from the John Wayne Dharma Study Group in Ontario [California].” The growing Thai community in the area—professionals, doctors, and bankers—have come to the spreading suburbs around Riverside, California, but the land for Metta Forest was donated by a wealthy patron from Massachusetts in 1991 under the condition that the community would find some monks to run it.

Stretched out under a shady trellis on an old Volkswagen back seat, a lanky young man shifts his long bronzed limbs like a local lizard, glancing up periodically to check out the action. The lounging teenager seems an anomaly until Thanissaro mentions that the Buddhist monastic code, or Vinaya, states that a bhikkhu is never to be left alone with a woman; the teenager is our chaperon. The monastic code shapes the setting here as it does all aspects of Thanissaro’s life.

Thanissaro (Geoffrey DeGraff) was born on Long Island, where his father had a potato farm, though later the family moved to Virginia. His father was an elder in the local Presbyterian Church. He remembers the first time he heard the Four Noble Truths. He was in an airplane over the Pacific Ocean flying back from Asia with his fellow exchange students, several of whom had taken temporary monastic vows in Thailand. In his second year at Oberlin College, a special class in Buddhist meditation was offered, and he began meditating with some seriousness. When he had a chance to go to Asia to teach English, he chose Thailand. That was in 1974.

In Thailand, he found his way to the jungle hermitage of Ajahn Fuang Jutiko. Fuang had been a student of Ajahn Lee, a teacher well known in Thailand and a member of the Dhammayut lineage of the forest tradition. When Ajahn Lee died, everyone expected Ajahn Fuang to take over Asoka Monastery in Bangkok; instead, Fuang slipped away as soon as he could to a fledgling monastery in Rayong. Choosing meditation over administration is the forest way.

Thanissaro writes of that time:


Vlat Dhammasathit had the look of a summer camp down on its luck: three monks living in three small huts, a lean-to where they would eat their meals . . . and a small wooden structure on top of the hill—where I stayed—which had a view of the sea off to the south. Yearly fires swept through the area, preventing trees from taking hold, although the area on the mountain above the monastery was covered with a thick malarial forest.

In essence, it was a poorer version of the very place where we are sitting now: a handful of buildings, a few students, a hideout off the beaten track, a forest—of sorts. And after Fuang’s death, Thanissaro also retreated rather than run Wat Dhammasathit, which by now was firmly established. As he explains, ”Ajahn Fuang said to keep moving; this is not a tradition that works well in big groups.”

“When l first saw Ajahn Fuang,” Thanissaro recounts, “he was smoking a cigarette, and I said, ‘Now what kind of a monk smokes cigarettes?’ Bur there was something about him. He seemed very kind and down-to-earth. I had planned on staying three days; instead, I stayed for three weeks, had my visa renewed, and returned for three months until I contracted malaria and had to leave.

“I came back to the U.S. and thought hard about taking vows. I thought of all the professors I knew who were thinking and writing about Buddhism, but l wanted to do it, not just talk about it. Before I met Ajahn Fuang, I thought: If someone spends their life meditating, what are they going to be like? Are they going to be dull and dried up? But Ajahn Fuang was such a lively, interesting person. Finally I decided, I’ll give it five years, and if it doesn’t work I can always come back. That was in 1976. When I said I wanted to be ordained, Ajahn Fuang made me promise either to succeed in the meditation or die in Thailand. There was to be no equivocating. When he said that, it made me certain. I thought, yes, this is what I want.Metta Forest Monastery, California, courtesy of Barbara Roether.



“In my experience, practicing as a layperson was like looking into a mirror that had a wall of glass blocks in front of it. Living with my teacher was like stripping all the glass blocks away. It was very concentrated one-on­one type of study, which is the essential focus of the forest tradition. Fuang had this uncanny way of mentioning something in passing that was exactly what was coming up in my meditation, even before l told him. I sometimes had the sense that we were merely continuing a relationship from a previous life. By the third year I had become Fuang’s attendant and pretty much stayed with him until the end.”

“In part because of his years living in the jungle humidity, Fuang had a terrible case of psoriasis, and how he handled this sickness made me see what a tough person he was. This is a serious disease in its most extreme cases—fever, weakness, the whole thing. Often it would get so bad that he had to lie on banana leaves because cloth would stick to his skin. When he was very sick he would talk very softly with the accent of southeastern Thailand, where he came from. He would ask for something once, and if you didn’t hear him, he would crawl over and get it himself. So you had to be very quick. Also, you had to be very quiet, so as not to wake him. You did it because it had to be done. He wasn’t always pleasant to be around.”

AJAHN FUANG HAD BEEN orphaned early in his life and had taken vows as the only available means of supporting himself. “I have sometimes thought that if he hadn’t become a monk he would have been a gangster,” says Thanissaro. “He had that kind of roughness. As it turns out, one of his best students in Thailand was a former gangster. If you think about it, some of the same skills are required: a sense of subtlety, roughness, independence. In the forest, you are very much thrown back on your own resources.

“In Thailand, a culture where having family and connections is everything, being an orphan has a special stigma. The fact that I was an American in Thailand, without any real connections, meant that I was in essence an orphan, too.” The intimacy of exiles is often the strongest intimacy of all, and the exile spirit is certainly in keeping with the forest tradition. Thanissaro is firm in his conviction that real dharma practice in any culture, to be successful, must be countercultural. Ajahn Fuang wrote: “Our practice is to go against the stream, against the flow. And where are we going? To the source of the stream. That’s the cause side of the practice. The result side is that we can let go and be completely at ease.”

In Thailand, a country where Buddhism is the national religion, complete with “Monk of the Month” magazines and patrons eager to invest stock in the great Merit Market of the monastic universe, countercultural Buddhism has meant, to a large degree, the forest monk tradition.

What countercultural Buddhism means in America (where any Buddhist tradition is arguably already countercultural) may also have something to do with the forest tradition.

In comparison with some other traditions, which in their current efforts to serve an increasingly middle-class following offer attractive weekend seminars at varying prices on popular subjects like “skillful means” or “practice in daily life,” the forest tradition offers absolutely nothing—and charges nothing for it. What it does offer is not exactly quantifiable: knowledge of the breath through meditation; space for, and instruction in, meditation.

When someone comes to the monastery to practice, Thanissaro gives them a basic lesson in breath meditation and shows them to a place under the trees. Scattered through the orchard are a number of simple wooden platforms: one for sitting and a larger one to pitch a tent on. Around each set is a smooth swept path for walking meditation. Mornings and evenings there is a chanting session and a reaching. The subject is usually breath meditation. The simplicity suggested by such a curriculum, in its refusal to be attractive or compelling, is part of the outlaw flavor of Metta Forest.

What students offer in return for the teachings varies: they have brought rice, ice, and bottled water. In a discreet corner of the shrine room behind the giant Thai Buddha there is a book where one may leave monetary donations, but you must ask for it.

The Vinaya prohibition against the use of money extends to not charging those who come to use the monastery, as well as barring Thanissaro from using money. He has traveled through the modem world in yellow robes without a penny in his pocket (nor even having a pocket), and has often waited long hours for rides that were slow in corning.

“In the beginning I was not that enthusiastic about the rules,” admits Thanissaro. “But then, living in the community, I saw how well designed they were. They not only serve to help and protect the monks, but the people around them as well.” Thanissaro has held to those rules faithfully since his ordination 17 years ago.Two young monks, Hadda, India, c. 3rd-century C.E., stucco, courtesy of Musée Guimet, Paris.

Recently he translated from the Pali the voluminous “Buddhist Monastic Code,” a comprehensive guide to 227 precepts that, along with detailed chapters on dealings with women, clothing, food, and diplomacy, also includes admonitions against eavesdropping, tickling, and stopping in the village to talk of kings, robbers, ministers of state, armies, or scents. But in his introduction Thanissaro suggests the real import of the Vinaya: they are not just “rules” but “qualities developed in the mind and character” of those practicing the dharma. lt is as a way of being in the world that the Vinaya finds its real meaning.

Though the Theravada has been faulted by Other Buddhist schools for not actively attending to the practice of compassion, Thanissaro points out that adhering to the Vinaya and devoting oneself to meditation creates, of necessity, a more compassionate person. The way Theravada monks live, being totally dependent on what is given them, is a situation in which both givers and receivers are able to act with generosity and humility.

THE DAILY GIVING AND RECEIVING OF ALMS is a mark of this practice. Early in the morning, amid the sound of blue jays and laughter, Thai women in black skirts and white blouses squat on the linoleum floor of the kitchen, chatting and drinking instant coffee. Outside a few of the men are smoking cigarettes as they wait for the rice to finish cooking.

This Thai family (one always seems to be in attendance) is overseeing the preparation of the food that we will offer as alms to Thanissaro and a young Thai monk, Path Phai Thita Bho. Wide rice noodles and fish, watermelon, mango and raisins arranged in bright patterns, soup, some salads, whole fruits and biscuits and cookies and flowers, and rice mounded up in elaborate aluminum serving bowls.

When the monks are spotted on the path between the rows of avocado trees we line up with our offering of rice, and we bow. The monks stop in front of each person as they place their portion of rice into the metal alms bowls (rice has become the symbolic offering of all the foods). Then the two monks turn deliberately, without hurrying, and disappear again into the avocado forest.

The twentieth century floods back in as a yellow Lincoln Continental screeches into place in front of the kitchen and the remainder of the elaborate feast on the table is quickly loaded into its capacious trunk. The trunk is slammed shut and the car races down to the table by the shrine room where the monks eat first from the vast feast, and then the laypeople finish whatever is left.

“When I talked with Ajahn Fuang about going back to the West, about taking the tradition to America, he was very explicit. ‘This will probably be your life’s work,’ he said. He felt, as many teachers have, that the forest tradition would die out in Thailand but would then take root in the West.”

As we walk along one of the dusty perimeter paths of the property, Thanissaro points out the native flora he is beginning to know and talks of the future. Currently he is translating many of the “forest teachings” into English.

He is also the author of The Mind Like Fire Unbound, a scholarly exploration of the Pali canon in relation to the Buddhist term nirvana, which literally means “the extinguishing of a fire.” For Thanissaro, the original meaning of nirvana is the “unbinding” or freeing of a fire from its fuel, rather than “extinguishing.” Once unbound, the fire “remains” in some other nascent state. One Buddhist scholar called Thanissaro’s understanding “too original”; others have welcomed its important implications.

It seems appropriate that “unbinding” would be a theme in Thanissaro Bhikkhu’s teachings. After all, he has unbound himself from several cultures, and unbinding (from the city, from habits, from popular Buddhist trends) is at the core of the forest tradition in which he trained.

As we walk, Thani bends periodically to check the progress of his newly planted trees. Native trees—California walnut, scrub oak, and digger pine—no more than a foot or so high now, they’re barely visible in the waist­high chaparral. These trees grow naturally on the edge of the California desert, not dependent on irrigation or human care to survive. Thanissaro has planted them with the hope that they will eventually replace the avocado orchard altogether. When that happens the Metta Forest will be in America to stay: a wild forest, yet a native one, able to thrive and spread on its own.

The Rewards of the Contemplative Life
SAMANNAPHAIA SUTIANTA
Adapted from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu

SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA

There is the case where a Tathagata (the Buddha) appears in the world, worthy and rightly self­awakened. He teaches the Dhamma admirable in its beginning, admirable in its middle, admirable in its end. He proclaims the holy life both in its particulars and in its essence, entirely perfect, surpassingly pure.

A householder or householder’s son, hearing the Dhamma, gains conviction in the Tathagata and reflects: ‘Household life is crowded, a dusty path. The life gone forth is like the open air. It is not easy living at home to practice the holy life totally perfect, totally pure, like a polished shell. Suppose I were to go forth?’ So after some time he abandons his mass of wealth, large or small; leaves his circle of relatives, large or small; shaves off his hair and beard, puts on the saffron robes, and goes forth from the household life into homelessness.

When he has thus gone forth, he lives restrained by the rules of the monastic code, seeing danger in the slightest faults. Consummate in his virtue, he guards the doors of his senses, is possessed of mindfulness and presence of mind, and is content.

Now, how does a monk guard the doors of his senses? On seeing a form with the eye, he does not grasp at any theme or variations by which—if he were to dwell without restraint over the faculty of the eye-evil—unskillful qualities such as greed or distress might assail him. (Similarly with the ear, nose, tongue, body, and intellect.)

And how is a monk possessed of mindfulness and presence of mind? When going forward and returning, he acts with full presence of mind. When looking toward and looking away . . . when bending and extending his limbs . . . when carrying his outer cloak, his upper robe, and his bowl . . . when eating, drinking, chewing, and tasting. . . when urinating and defecating . . . when walking, standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, talking, and remaining silent, he acts with full presence of mind.

And how is a monk content? Just as a bird, wherever it goes, flies with its wings as its only burden; so too is he content with a set of robes to provide for his body and almsfood to provide for his hunger. Wherever he goes, he takes only his barest necessities along.

He seeks out a secluded dwelling: a forest, the shade of a tree, a mountain, a glen, a hillside cave, a charnel ground, a jungle grove, the open air, a heap of straw. After his meal, returning from his almsround, he sits down, crosses his legs, holds his body

erect, and brings mindfulness to the fore. He purifies his mind from greed, ill will, sloth and torpor, restlessness and anxiety, and uncertainty. As long as these five hindrances are not abandoned within him, he regards it as a debt, a sickness, a prison, slavery, a road through desolate country. But when these five hindrances are abandoned within him, he regards it as unindebtedness, good health, release from prison, freedom, a place of security. Seeing that they have been abandoned within him, he becomes glad, enraptured, tranquil, sensitive to pleasure. Feeling pleasure, his mind becomes concentrated.

Quite withdrawn from sensual pleasures, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters and remains in the first jhana (mental absorption): rapture and pleasure born of withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought and evaluation. He permeates and pervades, suffuses and fills this very body with the rapture and pleasure born of withdrawal. Just as if a skilled bathman or bathman’s apprentice would pour bath powder into a brass basin and knead it together, sprinkling it again and again with water, so that his ball of bath powder—saturated, moisture­laden, permeated within and without—would nevertheless not drip; even so, the monk permeates . . . this very body with the rapture and pleasure born of withdrawal. There is nothing of his entire body unpervaded by rapture and pleasure born of withdrawal. This is a reward of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime.

Furthermore, with the stilling of directed thought and evaluation, he enters and remains in the second jhana: rapture and pleasure born of composure, one-pointedness of awareness free from directed thought and evaluation—internal assurance. He permeates and pervades, suffuses and fills this very body with the rapture and pleasure born of composure. Just like a lake with spring-water welling up from within, having no inflow from east, west, north, or south, and with the skies supplying abundant showers time and again, so that the cool fount of water welling up from within the lake would permeate and pervade, suffuse and fill it with cool waters, there being no part of the lake unpervaded by the cool waters; even so, the monk permeates . . . this very body with the rapture and pleasure born of composure. There is nothing of his entire body unpervaded by rapture and pleasure born of composure. This, too, is a reward of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime.

And furthermore, with the fading of rapture, he remains in equanimity, mindful and fully aware, and physically sensitive of pleasure. He enters and remains in the third jhana, and of him the Noble Ones declare, ‘Equanimous and mindful, he has a pleasurable abiding.’ He permeates and pervades, suffuses and fills this very body with the pleasure divested of rapture. Just as in a lotus pond, some of the lotuses, born and growing in the water, stay immersed in the water and flourish without standing up out of the water, so that they are permeated and pervaded, suffused and filled with cool water from their roots to their tips, and nothing of those lotuses would be unpervaded with cool water; even so, the monk permeates . . . this very body with the pleasure divested of rapture. There is nothing of his entire body unpervaded with pleasure divested of rapture. This, too, is a reward of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime.

And furthermore, with the abandoning of pleasure and stress—as with the earlier disappearance of elation and distress—he enters and remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity and mindfulness, neither pleasure nor stress. He sits, permeating the body with a pure, bright awareness. Just as if a man were sitting covered from head to foot with a white cloth so that there would be no part of his body to which the white cloth did not extend; even so, the monk sits, permeating the body with a pure, bright awareness. There is nothing of his entire body unpervaded by pure, bright awareness. This, too, is a reward of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime.

With his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, he directs it to the knowledge of the ending of the mental fermentations. Just as if there were a pool of water in a mountain glen—clear, limpid, and unsullied—where a man with good eyesight standing on the bank could see shells, gravel, and pebbles, and also shoals of fish swimming about and resting, and it would occur to him, ‘This pool of water is clear, limpid, and unsullied. Here are these shells, gravel, and pebbles, and also these shoals of fish swimming about and resting.’ In the same way, the monk discerns, as it is actually present, that ‘This is stress. . . This is the origination of stress. . . This is the stopping of stress. . . This is the way leading to the stopping of stress. . . These are mental fermentations. . . This is the origination of fermentations. . . This is the stopping of fermentations . . . This is the way leading to the stopping of fermentations.’ His heart, thus knowing, thus seeing, is released from the fermentations of sensuality, becoming, and ignorance. With release, there is the knowledge, ‘Released.’ He discerns that ‘Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for this world.’ This, too, is a reward of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime. And as for another visible fruit of the contemplative life, higher and more sublime than this, there is none.

Get Daily Dharma in your email

Start your day with a fresh perspective

Barbara Roether is a freelance writer and editor living in San Francisco.






--

Making Peace: Telling Truth - Friends Journal

Making Peace: Telling Truth - Friends Journal
Making Peace: Telling Truth
January 1, 2004

By Paul A. Lacey

From 1959, as a graduate student teaching my first classes, until 2002, when I taught my last classes at Earlham, my day job has been as a teacher of literature and writing. For 50 years, since I became a Quaker at the same time I was finding my vocation, the study of literature has enriched my political and social witness, and my work for civil liberties, civil rights, international understanding, peace, and justice has deepened my reading of literature. So I am going to begin with a poem by Denise Levertov called "Making Peace":

A voice from the dark called out,
"The poets must give us
imagination of peace, to oust the intense, familiar
imagination of disaster. Peace, not only
the absence of war."
But peace, like a poem,
is not there ahead of itself,
can’t be imagined before it is made,
can’t be known except
in the words of its making,
grammar of justice,
syntax of mutual aid.
A feeling towards it,
dimly sensing a rhythm, is all we have
until we begin to utter its metaphors,
learning them as we speak.
A line of peace might appear
if we restructured the sentence our lives are making,
revoked its affirmation of profit and power,
questioned our needs, allowed
long pauses . . .
A cadence of peace might balance its weight
on that different fulcrum; peace, a presence,
an energy field more intense than war,
might pulse then,
stanza by stanza into the world,
each act of living
one of its words, each word
a vibration of light—facets
of the forming crystal.

You can see why this poem sustains so many peace activists. That voice from the dark speaks for us: "The poets must give us imagination of peace. . . . Peace, not only the absence of war." Those of us who have spent much of our lives resisting war have also longed to go beyond that to be a part of a genuine peace movement. Denise Levertov reminds us that peace is not something that is found but something that is made, constructed out of complex and often unyielding materials. And, because she is a poet as well as a peace activist, she makes a rich connection between those two aspects of her inner life. Peace is like a poem. It does not exist until it is made. Each of them is imagined in the act of making it, "in the words of its making," she says. And both peace and poetry are made of words, sentences, metaphors, the formal unity of grammar and syntax. Each has cadences, silences, presence, is an energy field, pulse, vibration of light, facets of the forming crystal.

You may feel there is too much poetic license in all those assertions—beautiful and intense, but perhaps too metaphorical to be practical in doing the work of peacemaking. But I want to invite you to imagine some of the connections between these ways of making two precious human artifacts—a poem and peace. Each is produced by hard work and trial and error. Each seeks the right order, a pattern, that enlarges us and connects us with others. At its best, making peace or making any art (though here poetry stands in for all of them) is soul-satisfying work that continually enhances our humanity.

I began by saying I thought there is a crucial connection between peacemaking and truth-telling, and I will try to puzzle out, very tentatively, what I think it means to tell the truth. The late philosopher Bernard Williams’s book Truth and Truthfulness has been of great help to me. He begins by identifying "two currents of ideas . . . very prominent in modern thought and culture." First, "an intense commitment to truthfulness," and second, as a "reflex against deceptiveness, . . . a pervasive suspicion about truth itself, whether there is such a thing." Bernard Williams argues that truth serves an evolutionary function in helping humans to live cooperatively. Humans have to be able to depend on the accurate communication of a great deal of information that would be too hard or dangerous for us to discover for ourselves. For example: "The fire will burn you." "This water is safe to drink." "Eating that will make you sick." He argues that "assertions perform one of their most basic functions, to convey information to a hearer who is going to have to rely on it, in circumstances of trust, and someone who is conscientiously acting in circumstances of trust will not only say what he believes, but will take the trouble to do the best he can to make sure that what he believes is true."

Truthfulness, the determination to act conscientiously in circumstances of trust, rests on what Bernard Williams calls "two virtues of truth"—accuracy and sincerity. Language must be used to communicate correct information, but prior to that, language itself must be learned. "Children learn languages in many ways and in many different kinds of situations," he writes, "but one essential way is that they hear sentences being used in situations in which those sentences are plainly true." For example, "This is Mamma," or "Daddy will be home soon." Some of us may recall how the Dick and Jane books taught reading with such down-to-earth facts as, "This is Spot. See Spot run," with illustrations to confirm the factual accuracy of each sentence.

Of course, we must understand that what any one of us perceives to be the truth is refracted by our experience, our perspective, and by what we have been taught to see. The poet and lifelong peace activist William Stafford says: "Some people are blinded by their experience. Soldiers know how important war is. Owners of slaves learn every day how inferior subject peoples are."

We also know that truth is pluralistic in how it functions in different kinds of discourse. Some statements have what we might call a local truth. It is 7:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, August 1, 2003, in Harrisonburg, Virginia. It is an hour earlier in Richmond, Indiana, on Eastern Standard Time, which many of our farmers call "God’s Time." In Japan it is tomorrow, in the Gregorian calendar, but not according to the traditional Japanese method of dating according to an emperor’s reign, nor according to the Jewish or Chinese calendars. The facts, in this case, are not contradictory but depend entirely on where we are, our cultural perspectives, and the agreed-on, constructed conventions of watches and calendars.

But the truth is also pluralistic to the degree that we are talking about feelings or our responses to experience. I have spent a career trying to help people read for what the novelist Tim O’Brien calls "story-truth" as distinct from "happening-truth." And I offer Denise Levertov’s poem as an expression of feeling-truth, metaphoric truth, a truth largely dependent on our being willing to grant that similitudes give us something upon which we can build our beliefs and actions. Here I want to make a claim that is implicit in all the connections between peace and poetry that Denise Levertov is making: each is a work of truth-telling. The integrity and power of each rests on truth and truthfulness. That means seeking out the truth, pledging ourselves to speak the truth and to live by the truth.

At first that may not appear to be a very big revelation. After all, we Quakers claim the original copyright on the phrase "Speak Truth to Power." But, of course, matters are more complicated than that. The definitions of all the most important words we have created to describe our most desired, sought-after social and political values—all the capital-letter words: Peace, Justice, Truth, Love; the words for values for which many have willingly died, and willingly killed—the meanings of all those words are always under contention. An emperor said that the Roman legions created a desert and called it peace. Socrates’s most dangerous adversary in Plato’s Republic says that justice is whatever the strong say it is. And Pontius Pilate sends Jesus to his death with the flippant question, "What is truth?"

Ever since the American Friends Service Committee booklet Speak Truth to Power appeared in 1955, that phrase has been a favorite rallying cry, slogan, even a cliché for a lot of people. It fairly bristles with capital letters: Truth, Power, and behind them a whole bouquet of other capital-letter values such as Justice, Equality, Reconciliation, and Love. But Truth with a capital T has fallen on hard times, not only because the most authoritarian and oppressive governments and movements in the world claim its warrant to justify how they use power, but also because the very concept of truth—however you print the word—is under assault on behalf of communities that have been without voice and without power.

I want to stress this point. On behalf of the previously voiceless and oppressed, such as women, Third World communities, communities of color, and ethnic and sexual minorities, there has arisen a powerful, skeptical critique. Often politically radical, this critique questions traditional authoritarian, religious, and political systems and the European ideology of rationalism, empiricism, and science called the Enlightenment. This critique challenges the assumption that there is anything we can appropriately call even the most modest lowercase "truth." Instead, we are being asked to regard all truth-claims merely as expressions of ideology, which the British literary critic Terry Eagleton, in Literary Theory: An Introduction, defines as "the ways in which what we say and believe connects with the power-structure and power-relations of the society we live in, . . . more particularly those modes of feeling, valuing, perceiving, and believing which have some kind of relation to the maintenance and reproduction of social power."

The French philosopher Pascal Engel says that the American philosopher Richard Rorty calls truth just a "’compliment’ we pay our assertions, a little ‘rhetorical pat’ on their backs." He claims that Richard Rorty believes such skeptical views about truth "are apt to promote the values of democracy and social solidarity better than foundationalist moves in moral and political theory that emphasize the values of justice and truth."

Todd Gitlin, one of the founders of Students for a Democratic Society in the 1960s, reports a woman graduate student in sociology recently telling him, "There are no truths, only truth-effects." If I understand her, she is asserting that all that really matters is power, that power hides itself behind ideology in order to pass itself off as truth, and to impose what it calls truth on others. Either truth is what those in power say it is and are prepared to back up with force, or there is only rhetorical power, the power to convince or deceive others by manipulation of words, data, and information, so they accept your ideology and make it an absolute in their own lives. If that is so, we can’t speak truth to power because all truth-claims are merely expressions of the will to power. But if we can only introduce the voices of the silenced and oppressed into our discourse by denying that our purpose is to get at the truth, what have we accomplished? If truth is merely a sweet name for the will to power, the powerful have no reason to listen.

ere is the great conflict immediately before us: Peacemaking depends absolutely on a commitment to truth-telling, but we know that what constitutes truth is always under contention because our truth-claims are always connected to how power will be used. Those who win the wars write not only the histories but the dictionaries. They control the master narratives that will express or embody the received truth.

Take one obvious example: In the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, are Gaza and the West Bank "the disputed territories" or "the occupied territories"? Ought we use their present-day place names, or Biblical names like Samaria and Judea? Grant the validity of one name, and you appear to grant the political, social, and military legitimacy entangled in that name. Use one set of terms instead of another, and you will be criticized for lacking objectivity. "Be objective; tell the objective truth," we are told, but that translates to: "Accept that my words are the true ones for the political situation and therefore mine is the true solution." What words can the peacemaker use in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict that might help bring about an end to violence and steps toward reconciliation? If we speak only of Gaza and the West Bank, will the Palestinians and Israelis believe we are maintaining the objectivity of a mediator or the evasiveness of someone who will not grant their respective truth-claims? In such a case, how does the peacemaker speak truthfully, with integrity?

For another example, consider the following three sentences:

Every human life is sacred.
Human life begins at the moment of conception.
Every fetus is a human being from the moment of conception.
The first sentence, every human life is sacred, expresses a profound conviction, to which all of us may give assent. The second is an assertion of fact, a truth-claim. It seems logical. When else would we say life actually begins? But it is also packed with political implication, and some of us may agree while others find ourselves holding back, saying, "Yes, but . . .", or proposing an alternative moment at which to start counting human life—viability outside the mother’s body, for example. Either we are on our guard against the power implications implicit in the truth-claim, or we are urgently pressing the truth-claim about what seems to be a simple fact, but which becomes a matter of how we "construct" the truth to point us toward one or another political stance. The third sentence is a conclusion, a truth-claim derived from the first two sentences, and if it is a truth it implies a very specific exercise of power.

You will recognize that the three sentences are the moral and intellectual foundation for the right-to-life movement, and from those three truth-claims—which, I want to remind you, were indisputable truths in this culture through a large part of my adult years—have followed fierce political battles, stringent legislative and judicial initiatives, and political victories and defeats profoundly affecting millions of people.

I am describing a present-day reality. Those who are pro-choice, as I am, and those who are pro-life, including many Quakers and other peace activists who derive their convictions from an absolute belief in the sacredness of all human life, recognize that all the truth-claims, on both sides, are also power-claims. We want something to happen according to our truth-claims. In such a situation, does the peacemaker try to find neutral words to describe the conflict, or take a stand on one side or the other and try from that vantage point to bring about change leading to reconciliation?

I have been corresponding with Friend Julie Meadows, a member of Baltimore Yearly Meeting and a student of ethics, about these issues. She offered me a formulation used by Murray Wagner of Earlham School of Religion. It might be called the Parable of the Three Umpires. The first umpire says: "There is a ball, there is a strike. I call it as it is." The second umpire says: "There is a ball, there is a strike. I call it as I see it." The third umpire says: "There ain’t nothing till I call it." Julie Meadows suggests it would be useful to invite each person to contemplate which kind of umpire one is. She thinks there are a lot of first and third kinds of umpires among Quakers; the first umpires ("I call it as it is") think everyone who is at all faithful will agree with them; the third umpires ("There ain’t nothing till I call it") assume everyone who is halfway intelligent will agree with them. A lot of us also seem to believe we should be free to shift from one to another umpiring stance in the middle of the game. Like Julie, I am the second kind of umpire: I believe there is a ball, there is a strike, and I call it only as I see it, trying to see clearly what is there and to report honestly what I have seen.

We could try to avoid the whole problem and resort to the current popular formulation, "This is my truth. That is your truth." But this apparently humble approach has some practical problems for the peacemaker. "Speak the deeply held but unexamined, ideologically inflected, opinions of your race, class, and gender to Power" is not a compelling rallying cry. Nor is "In my humble opinion, the truth as I see it will set you free, I think" much of a sign to carry in a protest march.

Even in the best case, this apparent openness may be only a way of hunkering down in one’s own ideological enclave and refusing to engage with the truth-claims of others. Bernard Williams calls the "my truth/your truth" approach "an idle relativism." He says it "often complacently presents itself as a witness to human equality, a refusal to impose our concepts on others, but in fact, if it does anything at all, it simply imposes one of our conceptions rather than another. It gives up before the real work of understanding human similarities and differences even begins."

I have another problem with the "my truth/your truth" formulation: it seems to claim the authority of truth while relieving the speaker of responsibility to check the known facts against one’s own opinions or to test the validity of one’s actions. A number of times in recent years I have sat in meetings where people misrepresented what I and others had said, repeated unfounded rumors as fact, made judgments on the motives of others, and sugarcoated it all as speaking one’s own truth. Am I daring to suggest that some Quakers might now and again be careless of facts, in the name of truth? Yes, I am. I am daring to suggest that we are all fallible human beings.

You may have heard of the child in Sunday School who got the Biblical texts mixed up and said, "A lie is an abomination unto the Lord but a very present help in time of trouble." If there are no truths, only truth-effects, and "truth" is only a little rhetorical pat on the back we give ourselves, is there any such a thing as a lie? And does it matter?

In a letter from 1802, Samuel Taylor Coleridge wrote, "My mind misgave me . . . that thousands who would rather die than tell a lie for a lie, will tell 20 to help out what they believe to be a certain truth." Millions of people around the world look at the assertions by which the leaders of the United States justified the war against Iraq—that Saddam Hussein had and intended to use weapons of mass destruction, that he was actively pursuing a nuclear weapons program, that he was associated with al-Qaida, that "time is not on our side"—and they ask, were we deliberately misled? Was correct information knowingly withheld or manipulated to justify an unnecessary and terrible war? To put the question bluntly: were we lied to?

You know how these questions are being answered by our leaders. Apologists for the war say the weapons of mass destruction argument was a bureaucratic choice, the argument most likely to succeed. The claim that Saddam Hussein was actively pursuing nuclear weapons was only 16 little words in a long State of the Union address. They may be inaccurate, but so what? We got rid of a terrible dictator, one who killed thousands of his own people. Surely that is a good result from a little bending of the facts. As I understand them, Prime Minister Tony Blair as well as President George W. Bush and his associates have been arguing exactly that case: we didn’t intentionally mislead, but if we got the facts wrong, look on the bright side; the outcome is excellent. One U.S. journalist, when asked recently whether he thought the president of the United States had told the truth about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, said, "He told his truth." I am tempted to say simply, "The prosecution rests its case." As William Stafford has written, "Today in society you need a tendency not to believe."

believe there is such a thing as a lie, not just "my truth" or a "truth-effect." And the distinction matters precisely because sometimes people of integrity have to decide whether to tell lies in order to preserve some value without which they find their integrity is meaningless. You may know the famous formulation of this issue by Immanuel Kant. If a known murderer intending to kill your friend asks you if your friend is hidden in your house, are you required to answer truthfully? Immanuel Kant says yes, because you owe more to sustaining the moral law than to saving a single life. You must ask, what would happen to us if everyone told lies when faced with difficult moral choices?

You may also know the case of Pastor André Trocmé, who organized his community in France to hide and save Jews from the Nazis. Time after time an official would come to him and say some-thing like, "Pastor Trocmé, we know as a Christian you are required to tell the truth, so let me ask, do you know of any Jews being hidden in this area?" And André Trocmé would not evade the question, or try to be clever; he would take advantage of his position as pastor, as Occupational and Professional Truth-Teller, to lie flat out, in order to save people’s lives. Every night he would confess the sin of lying to God but could never ask for forgiveness, because he knew he would have to tell more lies the next day, for all the years of the German occupation of France. He saw the conflict Immanuel Kant was identifying, and lived with that torment in order to keep faith with both the moral law and the moral necessity to save innocent lives.

While in prison, Diet-rich Bonhoeffer, the German theologian who was executed for his part in the assassination attempt on Adolf Hitler, worked on an essay about what it means to tell the truth. His circumstances made it impossible for him to draw on the most compelling test cases in his own life without betraying his friends to the Nazi authorities, so he addressed the question with this Aesopian example: "A teacher asks a child in front of the class whether it is true that his father often comes home drunk. It is true, but the child denies it." As a simple no to the question, Dietrich Bonhoeffer says, the child’s answer is certainly untrue, but the child rightly feels that the teacher is prying unreasonably into his family life, thus the child’s lie "contains more truth, that is to say it is more in accordance with reality than would have been the case if the child had betrayed his father’s weakness in front of the class." The blame for the lie falls upon the teacher, Bonhoeffer argues. "Telling the truth" means something different according to each particular situation one finds oneself in, the nature of the relationships at each particular time, "and in what way a man is entitled to demand truthful speech of others."

Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s way of resolving the conflict of when to tell the truth is different, but he and Andre Trocme are alike in finding that they must tell lies in order to live in the truth. The first generation of Quakers were especially insistent that their yea would be yea, and their nay, nay. Other persecuted groups of the time would hold prayer meetings around tables holding playing cards and drinks, so that if they were interrupted they could pretend they were merely dissipating, not praying. The first Quakers would not follow any such stratagem. And we honor them for that costly integrity. But what of those Quakers and others in the 19th century who helped escaped slaves to freedom along the Underground Railroad? Did they deceive and lie to the slave-takers? I assume so. And what of Quakers in Germany, Austria, and the occupied countries during the Second World War? Hans Schmitt’s book Quakers and Nazis: Inner Light in Outer Darkness documents how individual Friends and meetings were sensitive to the issues of truth-telling and evasion, and the ways they found to negotiate those ethical dilemmas in hiding Jews and other victims of Naziism.

I think you and I honor them, and those like them, who have deliberately falsified facts to save lives, but we do not do so without misgivings. I will no doubt disappoint Immanuel Kant, but I promise you, if a known murderer comes and asks me if I know where you are, I will do my very best to lie skillfully and earnestly, to try for a convincing "truth-effect," but not because I believe there is no such thing as truth or that telling the truth does not matter.

That the commitment to truthfulness helps make us suspicious of the idea of truth, is all the more reason for us to cling to those two capital-letter virtues, Sincerity and Accuracy, which Bernard Williams identifies as key tests of how we speak and act the truth. Sincerity and accuracy need to go together, to test and sustain one another. I think that is why I am so troubled by the easy formula of "my truth" and "your truth." I may be completely sincere in what I believe and what I tell you, but if I trust only in my own sincerity, my good-heartedness about what I am saying, I may misinform, mislead, help out one of those undoubted certain truths by my sincerely told lies. The test of sincerity is one we must apply rigorously to ourselves. It is at the heart of both André Trocmé’s and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s struggles. Does our motive affect what we are saying? Is it in my self-interest to be speaking this way? Perhaps the only way we can get at the influence of our ideology, our perspective shaped by our desire to hold or keep power, is to be rigorous about sincerity, testing it always against accuracy.

A good example of such sincerity is John Woolman’s searching his conscience in the midst of his travel among Native Americans. He had already given a great deal of thought to what might happen to him on this trip. He might die, he might be captured and used as a slave by the Indians. One night, he reflected on the day’s news of violent events nearby. He writes in his Journal, "In this great distress I grew jealous of myself, lest the desire of reputation as a man firmly settled to persevere through dangers, or the fear of disgrace arising on my returning without performing the visit, might have some place in me." That is to say, he looks hard at the purity of his motives for acting. For most of that night, he tries to bring his motives and all he knows about himself into God’s Light, "till the Lord my gracious Father, who saw the conflicts of my soul, was pleased to give quietness." In this passage we see John Woolman testing his sincerity twice—first by that close self-examination itself, and then by writing about it so you and I can see him not as a brave, self-assured saint but as someone conflicted by what he has gotten himself into, "jealous of himself"—which I take to mean suspicious of and perhaps shamed by his motives—and finally only given quietness, not even renewed confidence in his own integrity.

So sincerity is one pillar of truth and accuracy is another. Bernard Williams says that, in the territory of sincerity, we may ask "’Shall I tell the truth?’ But in the territory of accuracy, there is no such question as ‘Shall I believe the truth?’" Accuracy, he says, is the virtue that encourages us to spend more effort than we might have in trying to find out the truth, "and not just to accept any belief-shaped thing that comes into [our] head." Accuracy requires us to devise, and restrict ourselves by, careful, precise methods of investigation that can generate truth, the practice of detachment, rigorous self-examination for bias. We must be, in John Woolman’s words, "jealous of ourselves" about haste, laziness, wishful thinking, and self-serving. To prove trustworthy to others, we must start by questioning our own motives, our evidence, our conclusions.

The Latin etymology of the word "accuracy" means "done with care." The American poet Adrienne Rich says in Women and Honor: Some Notes on Lying, "Truthfulness anywhere means a heightened complexity." Truth is complex; truthfulness is a heightened complexity. That is so for all the reasons I have been asking you to consider with me: truth is pluralistic, modified according to the discourses it is imbedded in; what we say and believe is deeply influenced by ideology, which in turn is entangled in our wish to gain or hold onto power; and new voices get a hearing only if they can challenge what has been taken as received truth. People will tell lies to "help out a certain truth," says Samuel Taylor Coleridge. There is no such thing as truth, only the will to power; it is whatever the strong say it is, says the cynic, the philosopher who deals in irony.

And yet, I believe, through all that contention and complexity, we must persist in trying to find what is most dependably true, we must pledge ourselves to tell what we believe is the truth, to try to shape our lives as testimony to it. Julie Meadows wrote to me:

Quakers have understood . . . that certain truths are fragile and can only be passed between people who know and care about each other. . . . Only people who worship together, who know each other well enough, and respect each other enough to take the time to listen and be changed will be able to dedicate themselves not just to slogans but to tasks, will grasp the kind of truth that doesn’t exclude all other possibilities but tries to find the best harmony of them possible in this moment, knowing that in the next moment it may well change.

Adrienne Rich says, "An honorable human relationship—that is, one in which two people have the right to use the word ‘love’—is a process, delicate, violent, often terrifying to both persons involved, a process of refining the truths they will tell each other." What she says of the honorable relationship between two people I believe also applies to the possible relationships between groups, people, even nations. "We are too ready to retaliate," says William Penn in Fruits of Solitude, rather "than forgive, or gain by Love and Information." By information he means accurate facts, dependable knowledge, workable truths. Our love must be accurately informed; our information must be held and used in care, as the etymology of the word "accuracy" reminds us.

Earlier I promised I would do my best to lie convincingly if a murderer came looking for you. I was making a glib joke, but promising is a very serious act. To promise, to give one’s word, is to say one will stand by what one believes. The Irish use a very evocative image of a relation to the truth when they speak of "standing over" their words. One stands over one’s words protectively, but one also takes one’s stand on them as the foundation of one’s being. One makes an identity between one’s deepest self, the soul, the conscience, and the veracity of the acts one performs and the words one says. God help me if I make such a serious promise and cannot keep it. To give a serious promise, one must be both sincere and accurate.

Remember the words of Denise Levertov’s poem:

But peace, like a poem,
is not there ahead of itself,
can’t be imagined before it is made,
can’t be known except
in the words of its making,
grammar of justice,
syntax of mutual aid.
A feeling towards it,
dimly sensing a rhythm, is all we have
until we begin to utter its metaphors,
learning them as we speak.

Making peace and making poetry are similar in that they require of us the most ethical, precise, and respectful use of language. Each grows from and expresses truthfulness. We negotiate peace by finding the form of words by which we can bind ourselves to pledges we can keep. Peace grows as we find the right words for the right deeds and put them together in the right order. "A line of peace might appear," Denise Levertov says, "if we restructured the sentence our lives are making. . . . Grammar of justice, syntax of mutual aid." Peace comes about through treaties and promises made and kept. To make peace we must make a self that is trustworthy, a self that persists in trusting.

Confucius taught that our great ethical work is to call things by their right names; to recognize and use the most accurate and truthful words for our actions, for our social inventions, and for the institutions we have created to serve us. Every generation has its particular struggle to reclaim and rehabilitate its most precious words from the cynical, the power brokers, and the oppressors and their tame rhetoricians. Every generation has to find ways to live by the great words, the great promise- words, with courage and integrity. Truth is a complexity, but our work is to seek the truth sincerely; to listen to even the most painful truth-claims and weigh them against our own convictions; to demand of ourselves sincerity and accuracy in what we say; to learn to speak the truth in love; and to speak it to each other, to the world, and in our own hearts.

A cadence of peace might balance its
weight
on that different fulcrum; peace, a
presence,
an energy field more intense than war, might pulse then,
stanza by stanza into the world,
each act of living
one of its words, each word
a vibration of light—facets
of the forming crystal.

———————
An earlier version of this paper was presented as the Carey Lecture at Baltimore Yearly Meeting on August 2, 2003.

Bernard Williams
Conflict Resolution
Denise Levertov
Earlham School of Religion
esr
Friend Julie Meadows
Immanuel Kant
Inner Light
integrity
John Woolman
Peace
Quakers
Second World War
work
Features
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Paul A. Lacey
Paul A. Lacey, a member of Clear Creek Meeting in Richmond, Ind., is emeritus professor of English at Earlham College and clerk of the national board of directors of American Friends Service Committee. He authored Growing into Goodness: Essays on Quaker Education. He is also the literary executor for Denise Levertov and edited her Selected Poems.

Feminist Encounters with Confucius | Brill

Feminist Encounters with Confucius | Brill



Feminist Encounters with Confucius
Series:
Modern Chinese Philosophy, Volume: 12
Editors: Mathew Foust and Sor-Hoon Tan
This work builds on earlier works, which defend Confucianism against charges of sexism and present interpretations of Confucianism compatible with Feminism, but contributors go beyond the much discussed care ethics, and common arguments of howSee More
E-Book (PDF)
Availability: PublishedISBN: 978-90-04-33211-9Publication Date: 11 Oct 2016
Hardback
Availability: PublishedISBN: 978-90-04-33210-2Publication Date: 20 Oct 2016
Login via Institution


Prices from (excl. VAT):
€127.00$147.00

​Available formatsAdd to Cart


View PDF Flyer


Contents
About


Restricted Access
Preliminary Material
Editors: Mathew A. Foust and Sor-hoon Tan
Pages: i–vi

Restricted Access
Introduction
Authors: Mathew A. Foust and Sor-hoon Tan
Pages: 1–13
Restricted Access
1 Confucius and the Four Books for Women (Nü Sishu «女四書»)
Author: Ann A. Pang-White
Pages: 15–39
Restricted Access
2 Confucian Mothering: The Origin of Tiger Mothering?
Author: Ranjoo Seodu Herr
Pages: 40–68
Restricted Access
3 Beyond Sexism: The Need for an Intersectional Approach to Confucianism
Authors: George Wrisley and Samantha Wrisley
Pages: 69–97
Restricted Access
4 Confucian Reliability and Epistemic Agency: Engagements with Feminist Epistemology
Author: Karyn Lai
Pages: 99–126
Restricted Access
5 Role Epistemology: Confucian Resources for Feminist Standpoint Theory
Author: Kevin DeLapp
Pages: 127–146
Restricted Access
6 How Relational Selfhood Rearranges the Debate between Feminists and Confucians
Authors: Andrew Komasinski and Stephanie Midori Komashin
Pages: 147–170
Restricted Access
7 Confucian Ethics and Care: An Amicable Split?
Author: Andrew Lambert
Pages: 171–197
Restricted Access
8 Confucian Role Ethics in the 21st Century: Domestic Violence, Same-sex Marriage, and Christian Family Values
Author: Sarah A. Mattice
Pages: 198–225
Restricted Access
9 Contemporary Ecofeminism and Confucian Cosmology
Authors: Taine Duncan and Nicholas S. Brasovan
Pages: 226–251
Restricted Access
Index
Editors: Mathew A. Foust and Sor-hoon Tan
Pages: 253–256

Quakers and Mysticism - Comparative and Syncretic Approaches to Spirituality | Jon R. Kershner | Palgrave Macmillan

Quakers and Mysticism - Comparative and Syncretic Approaches to Spirituality | Jon R. Kershner | Palgrave Macmillan

cover
© 2019
Quakers and Mysticism
Comparative and Syncretic Approaches to Spirituality
Editors: Kershner, Jon R. (Ed.)

Proposes new ways for understanding Quaker interactions with mysticism
see more benefits
About this book
About the authors
Reviews
This book examines the nearly 400-year tradition of Quaker engagements with mystical ideas and sources. It provides a fresh assessment of the way tradition and social context can shape a religious community while interplaying with historical and theological antecedents within the tradition. Quaker concepts such as “Meeting,” the “Light,” and embodied spirituality, have led Friends to develop an interior spirituality that intersects with extra-Quaker sources, such as those found in Jakob Boehme, Abū Bakr ibn Tufayl, the Continental Quietists, Kabbalah, Buddhist thought, and Luyia indigenous religion. Through time and across cultures, these and other conversations have shaped Quaker self-understanding and, so, expanded previous models of how religious ideas take root within a tradition. The thinkers engaged in this globally-focused, interdisciplinary volume include George Fox, James Nayler, Robert Barclay, Elizabeth Ashbridge, John Woolman, Hannah Whitall Smith, Rufus Jones, Inazo Nitobe, Howard Thurman, and Gideon W. H. Mweresa, among others.
-----------------

Table of contents (13 chapters)
Introduction: Quaker Engagements with Mysticism

Pages 1-22
Kershner, Jon R.

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
“Meeting”: The Mystical Legacy of George Fox

Pages 23-42
Birkel, Michael (et al.)

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
James Nayler and Jacob Boehme’s The Way to Christ

Pages 43-61
Spencer, Carole Dale

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
How Ecology and Economics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism

Pages 63-83
Komashin, Stephanie Midori

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
Robert Barclay and Kabbalah

Pages 85-99
Birkel, Michael

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
Elizabeth Ashbridge and Spiritual Autobiography: The Old Awakened in the New

Pages 101-119
Tarter, Michele Lise

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
John Woolman’s Christological Model of Discernment

Pages 121-140
Kershner, Jon R.

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
Hannah Whitall Smith’s Highway of Holiness

Pages 141-159
Spencer, Carole Dale

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
The Unifying Light of Allah: Ibn Tufayl and Rufus Jones in Dialogue

Pages 161-180
Randazzo, Christy (et al.)

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
Howard Thurman (1899–1981): Universalist Approaches to Buddhism and Quakerism

Pages 181-199
Angell, Stephen W.

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
The Singing Mysticism: Kenyan Quakerism, the Case of Gideon W. H. Mweresa

Pages 201-219
Mombo, Esther

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
Liberal Quakers and Buddhism

Pages 221-239
King, Sallie B.

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €
Conclusion

Pages 241-248
Cattoi, Thomas

Preview Buy Chapter 24,95 €

6 How Relational Selfhood Rearranges the Debate between Feminists and Confucians in: Feminist Encounters with Confucius

6 How Relational Selfhood Rearranges the Debate between Feminists and Confucians in: Feminist Encounters with Confucius

Feminist Encounters with Confucius
Series: Modern Chinese Philosophy, Volume: 12
Cover Feminist Encounters with Confucius
E-Book ISBN: 9789004332119
Publisher: Brill
Online Publication Date: 01 Jan 2016

 6 How Relational Selfhood Rearranges the Debate between Feminists and Confucians
In: Feminist Encounters with Confucius
Authors: Andrew Komasinski and Stephanie Midori Komashin
Type: Chapter
Pages: 147–170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004332119_008
Table of Contents

Introduction
Restricted Access
1 Confucius and the Four Books for Women (Nü Sishu «女四書»)
Restricted Access
2 Confucian Mothering: The Origin of Tiger Mothering?
Restricted Access
3 Beyond Sexism: The Need for an Intersectional Approach to Confucianism
Restricted Access
4 Confucian Reliability and Epistemic Agency: Engagements with Feminist Epistemology
Restricted Access
5 Role Epistemology: Confucian Resources for Feminist Standpoint Theory
Restricted Access
6 How Relational Selfhood Rearranges the Debate between Feminists and Confucians
Restricted Access
7 Confucian Ethics and Care: An Amicable Split?
Restricted Access
8 Confucian Role Ethics in the 21st Century: Domestic Violence, Same-sex Marriage, and Christian Family Values
Restricted Access
9 Contemporary Ecofeminism and Confucian Cosmology
Restricted Access
Index

How Ecology and Economics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism

How Ecology and Economics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism

How Ecology and Economics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism
August 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21653-5_4
In book: Quakers and Mysticism (pp.63-83)
Authors:
Stephanie Midori Komashin
Request Full-text Paper PDF
Request full-text PDF
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Download citation
Copy link
References (32)

Abstract
Komashin connects England’s Gerrard Winstanley and Japan’s Inazo Nitobe as fellow converts to Quakerism from their respective Christian indigenous movements, the Diggers and the Sapporo Band. She analyzes the roles of mystical experience, agricultural ecology, and economic justice in their religious thought by presenting evidence from Winstanley’s tracts, Nitobe’s essays and newspaper articles, and the Sapporo Band’s letters and journals that demonstrates their ecospirituality and theologically-motivated theory of equitable economics. Komashin also explores Winstanley’s relation to George Fox and his followers and the contours of Nitobe’s colonialism. Throughout the chapter, she explains how Winstanley and Nitobe contribute to the ethnographic and historical quilt of the Society of Friends through their advocacy for ecotheology, environmentalism, agroecology, and sustainability.

The Cambridge Companion to Quakerism, Angell, Stephen W., Dandelion, Pink

The Cambridge Companion to Quakerism (Cambridge Companions to Religion): Angell, Stephen W., Dandelion, Pink: 9781316501948: Amazon.com: Books

The Cambridge Companion to Quakerism (Cambridge Companions to Religion) Paperback – April 19, 2018
by Stephen W. Angell (Editor), Pink Dandelion (Editor)
4.6 out of 5 stars    6 ratings
Part of: Cambridge Companions to Religion (63 Books)
 See all formats and editions
Kindle
from AUD 23.02
Read with Our Free App
----
Paperback
13 New from AUD 33.92
----
410 pages, 2018
===

Contents

Introduction
Part I History of Quaker Faith and Practice
Part II Expressions of Quaker Faith

Part III Regional Studies
9 Quakers in North America
10 Latin American Quakerism
11 Quakers in Africa
12 Quakers in Europe and the Middle East
13 Quakers in Asia-Pacific

Part IV Emerging Spiritualities

References
Index

------------
Editorial Reviews
Review
'The Cambridge Companion to Quakerism is ... the most useful resource on all things Quaker in its breadth and multi-disciplinary approach. It is the most concise, yet comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and up-to-date guide to Quaker faith and practice in its diverse contemporary manifestations.' Carole Dale Spencer, Reading Religion

'This book provides a valuable introduction to Quakerism (the Religious Society of Friends) and its diverse contemporary manifestations ... A key strength of the book is its global focus, which extends to a geographically diverse range of contributors, representative of the reality that the majority of Quakers in the world today live in Africa and other non-North American, non-European areas. Also helpful is the volume's attention to theological diversity among Friends and to shared features that make Quakerism distinctive among the world's religious traditions.' J. H. Sniegocki, Choice
--------------
Book Description

An up-to-date, innovative, highly accessible introduction to Quaker studies, the first that is explicitly global in its authorship and giving full coverage of the different branches of Quakerism. Includes major sections on the history of Quaker faith and practice, expressions of Quaker faith, regional studies, and emerging spiritualities.
----
About the Author
Stephen W. Angell is Leatherock Professor of Quaker Studies at the Earlham School of Religion, Indiana. He has published extensively in the areas of Quaker Studies and African-American Religious Studies.

Pink Dandelion directs the work of the Centre for Research in Quaker Studies, Woodbrooke and is Professor of Quaker Studies at the University of Birmingham and a Research Fellow at Lancaster University.
 He is the author and editor of a number of books, most recently (with Stephen W. Angell), Early Quakers and their Theological Thought (Cambridge, 2015).
----
Product details
ASIN : 1316501949
Publisher : Cambridge University Press (April 19, 2018)
Language: : English
Paperback : 410 pages

Amazon.com: Quakers and Nazis: Inner Light in Outer Darkness : Schmitt, Hans A.: Books

Amazon.com: Quakers and Nazis: Inner Light in Outer Darkness (9780826211347): Schmitt, Hans A.: Books


----
Quakers and Nazis: Inner Light in Outer Darkness First Edition
by Hans A. Schmitt  (Author)
4.4 out of 5 stars    4 ratings
---
Subjects
National socialism and religion
Quakers -- Germany -- History -- 20th century
c1997

Description

Introduction: Quakers Seeking God, Peace, and an End to Human Suffering -- 
1. Quakers and Germans, 1919-1932 -- 
2. The Trials of Revolution -- 
3. Quakers and Nazis beyond Germany's Borders -- 
4. From Nuremberg to Danzig -- 
5. British Friends and the Appeasement of Nazi Germany -- 
6. Quaker Work in Time of War -- 
7. The Year 1945 and All That.
---
Publisher
Columbia : University of Missouri Press
Format
xiii, 296 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
---
Editorial Reviews

Hans Schmitt knows well the humanitarian work performed by German Quakers during World War II--he was a recipient of their kindness and faith. In a world torn by hate and war, the Society of Friends ministered to all people in pain--Jews and Nazis alike--while risking their lives during meetings in open opposition to Hitler's Reich. In this excellent historical account of both German Quakers and Germany itself, Schmitt details the lives of the Quakers, their fearless work of peace, and the criticism they received for not choosing sides.
From Library Journal
---
Schmitt (history, Univ. of Virginia), a recipient of Quaker benevolence, presents a comprehensive study of the response of the American, British, and German Quakers to Nazism. He appears to be the first to have so thoroughly researched the subject. The Quakers' beliefs in nonviolence and in the equality of all people led them to great efforts to alleviate the suffering caused by the Nazis. The effects of their efforts outweighed their small number and often came at great personal expense. They first helped Jews emigrate from Nazi Germany, then hid them, risking their jobs, well-being, and even lives in the process. This important volume belongs in any collection on peace movements or World War II. It is scholarly but also accessible to the informed reader.?
John Moryl, Yeshiva Univ. Libs., New York
---
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Read more
Product details
Publisher : University of Missouri; First edition (September 25, 1997)
Language: : English
Hardcover : 312 pages
Customer Reviews: 4.4 out of 5 stars    4 ratings
--
Top reviews from the United States
Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Carosaari
4.0 out of 5 stars And
Reviewed in the United States on August 22, 2003

Schmitt repeatedly stresses in his book the title- Quakers *and* Nazis, not Quakers *verses* Nazis. And that is the beauty of this book. Schmitt writes of how the Quakers in WWII worked to protect people from the Nazis, to engage in feeding programs, clothing the hungry, serving those the Nazis were oppressing, working to release them from prison and concentration camps. All this they do before WWII, during the war, and afterward, throughout the world- Germany, Austria, Poland, Latvia, Holland, Denmark, and even Morocco.

But Schmitt also writes of how the Friends worked to free Nazis from prison, to feed the Nazis and German soldiers, and make sure they were clothed. They believed that no one should be imprisoned for the sake of their conscience, no one should be mistreated for what they believed- no matter how insiduous those beliefs.

There are times when the Quakers struggle with their missions, and times when they don't agree. Reflecting the standard Quaker doctrine that each individual should be guided by the internal Light of the Holy Spirit, some choose to fight for Germany, though most choose the ancient Quaker doctrine of pacifism. Some choose to work in England to try to appease Germany; others realize early on this will not happen. Some are willing to agree with Germany's Semitic separations in feeding the poor and oppressed, in order that they might at least help some; others refuse to be involved in anti-Semitism at all.

Schmitt writes with copious detail, which can lead to some boredom at times- there's a lot of research here, and sometimes you have to wade through it to get to the better parts. I was particularly impressed how, as one reads step by step in the history of the period, how easy it was to not realize the horrific nature of the Nazi regime, from the perspective of the time. Even the Quakers who disagree with the anti-Semitism, violence, and injustice of the Nazis, don't realize the full gamut of the evil of the Nazi regime until the stories come out at war's end. In the beginning, it is one's own country, which has taken a wrong turn, as every country does, in every age. And the wrong turn gets a little worse. And a little worse. And it is so easy to disagree with the actions of one's country, to fight them, but still not realize that that last turn was the one that went far, far too far.

The Friends respond to these wrong turns with love. They decided they would love the Jews, and their fellow Germans. And that they would love the Nazis, as brothers and friends. Just as they won slave-owners in the South to the cause of abolition by loving the slave-owners as brothers, they hoped to win over the Nazis. They succeeded in some small measure in gaining greater rights to care for the oppressed. But most of all, they remained a witness of love and peace, a light in a time of great darkness.
16 people found this helpful
---
Coyner Thomas Lee
5.0 out of 5 stars A worthy read for both the historian and the faith seeker.
Reviewed in the United States on October 7, 1998
Though not the only source of knowledge about the Quakers during the Nazi period, it is currently the best. It can also be a practical guide for those confronting how pacificism and apolitical compassion may be applied in the face of modern, often evil, totalitarianism. The books documents the mistakes, the triumphs, the ideals and tactics of the Friends during one of their most trying of times. It is not surprising that the Quakers were recognized via their Friends Service Committee the 1947 Nobel Peace Prize. Strongly recommended.
16 people found this helpful
---
Rohit@roadrunner.com
5.0 out of 5 stars The incredible work of a group of selfless, unsung heroes
Reviewed in the United States on August 4, 1998
Mr Schmidt extensively researched this book to not only reveal the work of the Quakers in Nazi Germany, but also to allow the reader inside the minds of so many of the participants. Though the book can become tedious because of its depth of detail, it also finds its power in those personal stories. Imagine a member of the Gestapo allowing the Quakers to feed the oppressed because he himself had been fed by the Quakers in post WWI relief efforts. This is a piece of history few if any know about, and Mr. Schmidt makes it all interesting.
13 people found this helpful
----

Notes on Professor Hans Schmitt
https://www.ctevans.net/Historians/Schmitt.html

"Schmitt speaking." That is how Mr. Schmitt--at the University of Virginia professors were always addressed as "Mr." not "professor"--that was how Mr. Schmitt, professor of European history always answered his phone. It could scare you half to death if you weren't ready for it.

First, let me say that I am sure that if it had not been for "Hans," I would not have made it through the history graduate program, but getting to know him and being able to work with him was not without its trials and tribulations. Once you got to know him and what he demanded of you, then all was OK. Up until that point it could be brutal. In fact, a lot of students enrolled in his twentieth-century Europe seminar with pure fear in their hearts and minds, and never really got over that fear. I had a great time.

My first experience was with his colloquium on modern Europe (a reading and discussion course). I think that it was the spring semester of my first year. What an absolute disaster. I remember that we were assigned seemingly bizarre books to read from a long list, and then we had to report on them, etc. There never seemed to be any order or logic to the books or the presentations or the questions to which we had to respond. We would just look at each other helpless. I remember having to read something on the Balkans and then something on the Sykes-Picot agreement regarding the Middle East, but I am never sure if we ever even got around to discussing those specific books. For a friend of mine and myself, the class was pure terror; we never knew what was going to happen or what exactly we were supposed to be doing.

Now, by my second year, I think that I had gotten things figured out about how to succeed in graduate school, and I finally realized the level of work that I would have to do to succeed in one of Mr. Schmitt's courses. I was in his seminar, a research paper class in the fall, and I had an absolutely great time. I was in command of my subject, knew my sources, worked my tail off and got an outstanding grade and a thumbs up from Mr. Schmitt. Both he and I had figured out that I could do this grad school thing. My work in that seminar, eventually turned into my M.A. thesis with Mr. Schmitt as one of my readers.

If you had to ask yourself if you had done enough work, then you hadn't done enough work. As he once told me about interviews for history positions at UVa, he knew a candidate was not cut out for UVa if the candidate asked how much publishing he/she was expected to do.

Now, to turn the corner, the next course that I had with Mr. Schmitt, was also a twentieth-century Europe class that was a lecture for the undergraduates and a Friday afternoon meeting for the graduate students in a classroom in the basement of New Cabell Hall. Now this time I could enjoy the class, because I knew what was coming, and I could watch all the other younger grad students squirm, squirm, squirm. It was so much fun, especially on a Friday afternoon. I was always easily prepared, having done loads of background preparation; the others now were the ones with no idea of what to do. At one point in the semester, Mr. Schmitt, even called me aside to basically tell me to let him work with the younger ones and that he was not counting on me having to participate.

I also enjoyed stopping by his office to talk things over with him at times. He helped, as I have said, a bit with my M.A. He had that office on the top floor of Randall Hall, western end of the hall, on the right, near the steps, and he would sometimes sit in there smoking his pipe or a cigar. I can't even remember anymore but am pretty sure that it was a pipe.

He did give me all of his copies of Revue moderne et contemporaine when he moved out of his office, and he commented to me that he thought that I would find it useful. I thought that it was great that he would respect me by giving me his copies of this leading European history journal (in French) to a Russian history major. He had clearly come to have some degree of respect for me as a European historian. That was something about him. He always considered himself a student of history and not just a historian of Germany.

A couple of other random thoughts in no particular order.

I always found it interesting that the the UVa profs expected to be called at home to transact business--guess since they did not have much in the way of office hours, a bad habit. I never really got used to having to call them at home.

In my years in grad school, I ended up taking a bunch of Mr. Schmitt's courses and I always thought that he was better with his graduate students than in the larger undergraduate lecture courses where Sablinsky really shined.

He also signed a copy of his autobiography, A Lucky Man, for me when I bought a copy years ago. I know that he had a very interesting life, to say the least, but I've got to say that I've never gotten around to reading the book!

I would always run into him on one of the floors in Alderman Library doing research on one topic or another, even years after he had retired from the department. He would always start our conversations, in his German accent, something along the lines, of "Well, you know, Mr. Evans..."

Finally, when we had lunch together with Meg and Jim Trott in the spring of 2006, I recalled for Mr. Schmitt the gum-chewing incident which still was fresh in my memory after all of these years. In one of my classes with Mr. Schmitt, I remember that we used to sit around a large circular table. It was at some point that I was trying to quit smoking, and I had hit upon gum-chewing as the answer. (Well, that did not work.) Anyway, one day, I must have been happily chomping away in class, and afterwards, Mr. Schmitt, expressed to me in that kind of German-accented voice that he had, something to the extent, "Well, Mr. Evans, now what is it with the gum?" I explained that I was trying to quit smoking, and he replied that while he found the goal praise-worthy, he would ask that I keep the gum a bit under wraps during class. I still find this humorous to recall.

OK, last but certainly not the least, Mr. Schmitt was always ready to help me out with any of my grad school requirements. He read my MA thesis and then later read my PhD dissertation and served on my defense, and he understood my desire to have him do these things instead of some others in the department. He really did help with my dissertation, offering numerous comments and suggestions that did make it a better work.



Mr. and Mrs. Schmitt

Some books:
  • The Path to European Union: From the Marshall Plan to the Common Market, Louisiana State University Press, 1962.
  • Charles Peguy: The Decline of an Idealist, Louisiana State University Press, 1967.
  • European Union: From Hitler to De Gaulle, Van Nostrand, 1969.
  • (Editor and author of introduction) Historians of Modern Europe, Louisiana State University Press, 1971.
  • (With John L. Snell) The Democratic Movement in Germany, 1789-1914, University of North Carolina Press, 1976.
  • U.S. Occupation in Europe after World War II, Regents Press of Kansas, 1978.
  • The First Year of the Nazi Era: A Schoolboy's Perspective, East Carolina University, 1985.
  • (Editor) Neutral Europe Between War and Revolution, 1917-23, University Press of Virginia, 1988.
  • Lucky Victim: An Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times, 1933-1946, Louisiana State University Press, 1989.
  • Quakers and Nazis: Inner Light in Outer Darkness, University of Missouri Press, 1997.

-----