2024/01/30

공(空), 공(公), 공(共) -이정배, 에큐메니안

공(空), 공(公), 공(共) - 에큐메니안


공(空), 공(公), 공(共)소위 개벽 신학의 세 토대로서
이정배(顯藏아카데미) | 승인 2024.01.28
icon트위터
icon페이스북


▲ ‘空’을 깨닫고, ‘公’을 확장하고, ‘共’을 되살리는 개벽 기독교의 모습을 상상해 보라. ⓒGetty Images

이 글의 아이디어는 신익상 박사가 이끄는 ‘기후 환경 포럼’에서 강의 후 박영식 교수의 질문에서 비롯했다. - 저자 주


“종교(기독교)는 ‘空’을 몰랐고, 경제(자본주의)는 ‘公’을 독점했으며,
정치(민주주의)는 ‘共’을 파괴시켰다”

개벽(開闢)은 다시 세상을 연다는 뜻이다. 다른 세상을 꿈꿨다는 의미겠다. 19세기 말 서세동점 시기, 외세의 침략과 기존체제(질서)의 폭정 속에서 ‘오심즉여심’(吾心卽汝心)의 종교체험을 통해 계급해방, 민족(국가)해방 나아가 종교해방의 길을 열었던 사건이었다. 개벽 체험은 하늘과 인간 사이에 틈이 없다는 ⟪천부경⟫ 속 ‘천인무간’(天人無間)의 사유가 화급한 정세 속에서 발화한 것이었다. 유불선 속에 내주하며 사람들을 살려냈던 ‘인중천지일’(人中天地一)의 현묘(玄妙)한 도(道)가 난세에 보국안민(輔國安民)의 에토스로서 창발 된 것이다.

하지만 기독교는 이런 개벽 사상을 신흥종교의 범주로 간주하고 무시, 홀대했다. 기독교 최고의 사상가로 일컫는 다석과 함석헌 역시 이를 미신적 종교로 여겼다. 토착화 전통을 지닌 감리교 신학은 소위 고등종교인 유교와 불교와만 대화했고 민중신학의 경우 이들의 혁명성에 경도된 관심을 보였다. 전자는 정세에 둔감했고 후자는 종교, 문화적 측면을 간과했다. 더러 필요한 만큼 인용했을 뿐 개벽 종교들 속에 스며든 개벽 사상을 총체적으로 수용한 경우를 개신교 내에서 찾기 어렵다.

개벽 사상이 유교 속에서 동학, 천도교가 되었고 도교(선도)와 만나 천지공사(天地公事)와 해원 상생(解冤相生)을 말하는 증산교를 탄생시켰으며, 불교 원리와 접해 정신 개벽을 개교표어로 내건 원불교로 재탄생되었다면, 항차 기독교 또한 개벽 사상과 만나 ‘개벽적 기독교’로 재(再)구성될 수도 있겠다. 이 시대의 난제인 기후 붕괴, 자본의 횡포에 맞서 종교 간 대화와 협력이 필요한 시점에서 ‘개벽’을 매개로 서로 뜻을 나눌 때가 된 것이다.

이를 위해 백 오십 년 역사를 훌쩍 넘긴 기독교는 이제 일방적 선포(전달)자의 입장을 그치고 수용자의 입장에 설 필요가 있다. 지금껏 기독교가 자신의 진리를 주장, 선포했던 것 같으나 실상 우리 민족의 기초이념-하늘 경험과 힘 지향성-이 기독교를 수용토록 도왔다고 말하는 종교학자도 있었다. 동학에 부정적이었으나 정작 多夕의 동양적 기독교 이해가 이런 과제를 수행하는 매개고리가 될 수 있다.

1.

이 글에서는 - 사실 이 글은 갑작스레 떠오른 생각 탓에 청탁 여부와 관계없이 쓰게 되었다 - 제목으로 언급한 세 개념, 空, 公, 共을 갖고서 개벽 신학의 기초를 서술코자 한다. 이후 거듭 보완, 수정되어야 마땅한 일이겠으나 거칠게나마 떠오른 생각을 일단 정리할 목적에서 썼다.

첫 번째 ‘空’은 있음(有)만 강조하는 서구와 변별되는 동양적 개념으로서 동학의 무위이화(無爲而化), 다석의 ‘없이 있음’의 관점에서 서술될 수 있다. 기후 붕괴에 대처하는 생태학적 토대로서 무엇보다 공(公)개념 회복을 위해 아주 중요하게 사용될 것이다. 두 번째 公은 앞선 空을 전제하는바 공적인 것을 사사화하는 자본주의 체제 비판과 연계시켜 논할 주제이다. 기독교를 비롯한 모든 종교 속에 미래를 위해 남겨진 씨앗(碩果不食)이 바로 ‘公’이다. 이를 통해 개벽 사유의 일환으로서 공유경제를 논할 수 있다.

마지막 共은 公을 公 되게 하는 것으로 ‘空’을 지향하는 삶의 에토스를 일컫는다. 한마디로 있음(有)에 마음을 빼앗기지 않는 견물불가생(見物不可生)의 경지라 하겠다. 이 경우 共은 공생공빈(共生共貧), 곧 최소한의 물질로 사는 삶을 목적한다. 여기서 세 공, 空, 公, 共은 각기 인간의 내면적 각성, 자본주의 이후의 체제, 시민사회의 정치적 삶의 에토스를 적시한다. 첫 것이 종교적 과제라면 둘째는 국가적 소임이겠고 마지막 것은 시민사회의 정치적 책무가 되어야 할 것이다.

2.

무엇보다 개벽적 기독교를 위해 ‘空’개념이 우선 되어야 옳다. 서구 기독교는 지금껏 대상적 사유와 친밀했다. 소위 ‘있음’(有)이 하느님을 이해하는 근본 범주로 여긴 것이다. 숨어계신 하느님을 말했으나 소수 신비주의 신학을 제외하곤 십자가에 달린 예수(역사성)로 환원되었고 영의 보편성을 통해 神을 확장시켰으나 그것은 그리스도 영에 종속되어야만 했다. 철학으로부터 존재자의 ‘존재’, ‘과정’(Process)으로서의 神 사유를 배웠음에도 결국 ‘존재 신비주의’ 내지는 미래적인 ‘목적’ 개념에 머물고 말았다. 한마디로 ‘A=非(Non)A’라는 배중률 논리를 수용할 수 없었기 때문이다.

이점에서 ‘내 마음이 그(네)마음’이라는 수운의 神 체험은 대개 동양적 사유가 그렇듯이 서구 神 이해의 지평을 벗어났다. 시천주(侍天主)의 자각에서 비롯하여 양(養)천주, 체(體)천주를 거쳐 인내천(人乃天)으로 귀결된 것이다. 천인무간(天人無間)의 개벽적 체험은 사람을 하늘로 여기는 사인여천(事人如天)의 생각으로 이어져 서구와 전통, 양면적 억압으로부터 씨알을 구원했고 향아설위(向我設位)를 통해 신/인간 틈새를 만들었던 기성종교를 허물었다.

기독교로 말하자면 예수에게로 집중된 神의 대상(배타)성을 실종시킨 것이다. 성전 종교가 가로막은 神/人의 직접성을 열어젖혔다고 볼 수 있다. 사람을 위해 안식일이 있다는 말뜻도 의당 담겼다. 여기서 다석은 예수를 우리와 같은 미정고(未定稿)의 존재로 여겼고 우리가 예수보다 항차 더 큰 일을 할 수 있다고 믿었다.

주지하듯 한울을 자기 속에 모셨다는 시천주는 자신 속의 영(內有神靈)과 우주 속에서 활동하는 기운(外有氣化)을 달리 보지 않았다. 인격(개체)과 비(非)인격(전체)을 아우르는 존재를 한울이자 지기(至氣)로 여긴 것이다. 여기서 종종 서구와 견줘 범(凡)재신론이 말해지나 여기서 至氣는 이에 더해 ‘있음’과 ‘없음’을 초월하는 개념이다. 없이 있는 ‘있없’의 차원을 지녔다는 뜻이다. 가득 찼고 늘 있기에 없는 듯할 뿐이다.

허공 없이는 어떤 존재도 있을 수 없다. 허공이 존재의 토대이자 근거란 말이다. 이런 허공은 지기로 가득 차 있고 그것이 인간 속에 바탈(받할)로 주어졌다고 다석은 사유했다. 이 경우 바탈과 지기는 허공의 양면으로서의 모두 영(靈)의 다른 표현이다. 수운은 기독교 서구는 인격(내유신령)만 알았고 외유기화, 곧 우주를 몰랐으며 성리학은 후자만 생각했기에 전자의 신적 측면을 놓쳤다고 비판했다. 달리 말하자면 서구는 허공을 잃었고 성리학은 능동적 평등한 개인, 곧 영적 주체성을 상실했다는 것이다.

허공, 곧 없음을 놓친 서구는 견물생심(見物生心)의 자본주의적 소비문화(GDP 위주의 경제)를 구축할 수밖에 없었다. 인간뿐 아니라 우주 자연을 ‘있음(有)’의 영역으로 소급, 환원시켰기에 작금의 기후 붕괴를 초래한 것이다. 그렇기에 이어 언급할 公의 회복을 위해서도 존재의 空적 측면은 거듭 강조해도 지나치지 않다. 空의 전제 속에서만 公의 개념도 뜻을 얻을 수 있기 때문이다.

3.

앞에서 有로부터 無(없음), 혹은 허공으로의 전회를 요청했다면 여기서는 私로부터 公으로의 전환을 논한다. 앞선 空에서 봤듯이 우주가 지기(至氣)로 가득 찼고 인간 개체 역시 허공을 품었기에 애초에 私的인 것은 없다. 종교, 정치를 비롯한 기존체제가 틈을 만든 것이지 태초에 허공, 없음만이 존재했다. 모든 것을 품는 허공이 하느님, 곧 ‘없이 계신 이’였다. 동학에서 말하는 무위이화(無爲而化) 역시 이런 배경에서 비롯한 한울님의 활동이었다. 허공이 결국 모든 것을 있게 하는 근거인 까닭이다. 세상이 모두 하느님의 것(시편 24:1)이란 말도 이런 선상에서 비롯했을 법하다.

여기서 시천주의 시(侍)의 마지막 풀이, 곧 각지불이(各知不移)란 말이 중요하다. 하늘이 곧 나이고 우주가 곧 개체이기에 이런 관계를 파괴하고 빼앗는 일을 그치라는 뜻이다. 거듭 말하나 우주의 기운과 내 속의 영이 다르지 않은 까닭이다. 하여 사람은 누구든지 자신의 위치와 자리를 자각해야 옳다. 스스로든 강제적으로든 잊(잃)지도 빼앗겨서는 결코 아니 될 것이다. 누구든 터-사이(空間), 때-사이(時間) 그리고 사람-사이(인간)에 있기에, 사이(間) 즉 그 허공을 독점할 수 없는바 空은 반듯이 公이 되어야만 한다. 하여 앞의 공을 뒤의 공의 존재근거라 말해도 있겠다. 公을 지켜 내는 일이 사람을 하늘처럼 여기고(事人如天) 우주를 지켜 그 속의 영을 살리는 길이다.

이런 이유로 사인여천은 敬天, 敬人, 敬物의 三敬 사상으로 이어진다. 敬天을 앞세웠으나 실상 이는 경물, 경인을 통해서만 가능할 수 있다. 보이지 않는 하늘(天)은 가시적 사람(人)과 물(物)에서 자신을 드러내는 까닭이다. 전통 기독교는 하느님-사람-자연 순으로 가치를 매겼으나 개벽 사유는 자연 없이 사람 없고 사람 없이는 허공(空) 또한 없다고 말할 수 있다. 자연(物)과 인간의 영이 至氣이자 空의 실재이기 때문이다. 앞서 말했듯이 여기서 무위이화(無爲而化)란 말도 비롯했다.

⟪도덕경⟫의 무위이무불위(無爲而無不爲)란 말 또한 그 뜻이다. 아무 일도 하지 않으면서 모든 것을 완성하는 道는 정작 이름은 물론 형체도 없다. 여기에 하늘은 사람을 통해 일한다는 뜻도 담겼다. 터, 때, 사람의 사이 존재인 인간이 저마다 ‘各知不移’ 할 때 사람 일은 하늘 일이 된다. 동학의 경우 ‘베 짜는 하느님’이란 말도 있다. 우주 허공(氣化)이 인간의 ‘바탈’(神靈)이 되었기 때문이다. 기독교 신학이 과정신학과 여성 신학의 틀을 사용하여 세 조건-자신의 본질을 드러낼 것, 공동체를 이롭게 할 것, 자연을 돌보는 일을 할 것-을 지닌 노동을 하느님 일로 여기는 이유와 맥락이 같다.

‘한울로서 한울을 먹는다’(以天食天)란 말은 (내유)神靈이 곧 (외유)氣化인 것을 자각하는 것은 公을 회복시켜 空에 이르려는 聖/俗 경계를 허문 삶의 영적 차원을 일컫는다. 다석의 용어로 말하자면 ‘빈탕 한데 맞혀(맞쳐) 노니는 일’이 될 것이다. 원불교의 경우 사은(四恩) 사상-천지 恩, 동포 恩, 부모 恩, 법률 恩-이 여기에 해당한다. 만물의 이치와 운행을 恩의 관계로 본 것에 주목할 필요가 있다. 기독교의 경우 원죄보다 원(原)은총을 강조할 이유이기도 하다.

만약에 ‘빈탕’이 어렵다면 최소한 덜어내는 일이라도 결심해야 옳다. 단순성(simplicity)이 우리 시대의 화두이기 때문이다. 어렵지만 인류가 가야 할 방향은 분명하다. 그것은 공생공빈(共生共貧)의 길인바 약탈 된 공유지의 회복(공유경제)을 통해 가능할 것이다. 자본주의에 잠식되었으나 軸의 종교들을 비롯한 개벽 사유 속에 사회주의적 에토스가 석과불식(碩果不食)처럼 그렇게 존재한다.

4.

이제 마지막 공(共)은 정치와 관계되는 부분이다. 앞서 필자는 서구는 空을 놓쳤고 자본주의는 公을 빼앗았고 정치(민주주의)는 共(共生)을 망각했다고 적었다. 지금껏 자본주의는 공유지의 약탈사와 궤적을 함께해왔다. 공(公)을 무력과 돈과 기술로 사유화한 것이 자본주의 실상이다. 하늘. 땅, 바다, 심지어 전자파, 종자까지 모든 것을 사사 화했다. 최근에는 문화적 공유재마저 이들의 돈벌이 수단이 되었다. 글로벌 사우스(Global South) 지역의 자원을 착취했고 그곳을 자신들 시장으로 만들었으며 급기야 쓰레기 집산지로 더럽혔고 사람들 영혼마저 황폐토록 했다.

주지하듯 근대 이후 정치와 종교, 정치와 경제가 분리되면서 사람들은 사적개인이 되어 버렸다. 기독교의 경우 개인의 ‘믿음’을 강조했고 경제도 사적 ‘재산’을 추동하였던바 모든 것이 ‘개인’ 문제로 귀결되었다. 公을 빼앗은 자본주의 체제가 ‘私的’ 개인을 정치, 경제 및 종교의 핵심 개념으로 부상시킨 것이다. 사회주의마저 내쳤던 자본주의가 서구 기독교와 공생 공조했다는 것 또한 정설이다. 신/인간 간의 중개자를 강조한 기독교와 대의(代議) 민주주의가 한 쌍이며 사적개인의 ‘오직’ 믿음과 자본주의 체제의 골격인 사유재산제가 또 다른 쌍으로 결합 되었다.

같은 유일신 종교라도 유대교와 이슬람에서 자본주의가 발생치 않았다는 사실이 중요하다. 대의 민주제는 다수를 대변한다는 미명으로 더불어 함, 곧 共을 버렸고 편을 갈랐으며 결국 소수 이익을 대변했다. 公을 약탈하는 자본에 힘을 실어준 것이다. 이점서 국민의 힘과 민주당의 차이가 없다. 그럴수록 시민 사회주의의 등장, 곧 직접적 민주주의에 대한 열망이 크다. 지역 차원에서 과거 ‘두레’와 같은 민회(民會)의 출현을 기다리고 있다.

본래 에클레시아란 이름의 교회도 두레, 민회와 같은 형태이자 모습이라는 것이 성서학자들의 견해다. 직면한 문제를 공동으로 내걸고 그 해결 과정에 모두가 참여하는 직접민주주의가 실현되는 곳이었다. 오늘처럼 예배공동체로서만이 아니라 현실 문제를 해결하는 공론의 장 그것이 교회였다. 상하(上下) 위계질서 대신 평등한 민주적 토론 과정을 중히 여겼다.

개벽 종교로 시작했던 원불교는 삼동(三同) 윤리 중 하나인 ‘동척사업(東拓事業)’에 역점을 두었다. 분리된 세상을 하나로 만들기 위해 밖이 아닌 세상 속으로 출가(出家)하자는 가르침이다. 여기서는 평신도와 성직자의 구별도 없다. 다석의 귀일(歸一) 사상은 이점에서 중요하다. 내적 귀일(歸一)과 외적 대동(大同) 세상이 동전의 앞뒷면처럼 나뉠 수 없기 때문이다. 개벽 사상으로서의 동척사업은 聖/俗 구별조차 폐하고 세상을 달리 만드는 일이다.

창시자 소태산은 입산하여 道를 깨친 후 정작 세상으로 나올 때 삭발했다. 세상을 위해 종교가 있고 사람을 위해 안식일이 있을 뿐이다. 한마디로 향아설위(向我設位)의 종교가 되란 말이다. 이런 동척사업을 위해 종교가 할 일은 힘 합쳐 하나(共)가 되는 일이다. 종교조차 私의 영역에 머물러 편 가르는 역할에 자족하면 세상은 끝이다. 四恩에 대한 背恩이다.

다른 세상을 위해 종교가 함께(共)할 때 - 그러려면 歸一해야 한다- 정치도 경제도 달라질 수 있다. 共을 잊고 편 만들기에 여념 없는 정치, 私를 키우는 경제체제 하에서 종교마저 共과 담쌓고 있기에 종차(宗差)를 넘어 함께 개벽(開闢)해야 옳다. 그래, 다시 개벽이다. 백여 년 전 기독교가 손잡지 못했던 개벽, 하지만 이제 지금 그를 품고 세상을 구원할 일이다. 이것이 개벽 종교로의 기독교의 전회를 꿈꾸는 이유이자 교회가 지향할 목표라고 생각한다.

5.

본디 기독교는 논란의 여지가 있으나 묵시문학 배경에서 탄생했다. 지혜문학과의 연계를 강조하는 역사적 예수 연구 경향에 전적으로 동의하기 어렵다. 묵시문학은 바벨론 포로기 이후 외세에 종노릇 한 습성과 기존 성전 체제에 안주했던 종교 지도자들에 대한 서기관(신학자)들의 저항과 반란의 산물이다.

신학자 李信은 여기서 종래 예언서를 능가하는 ‘영적 양극성’을 읽었다. 세계 부정을 통한 대 긍정의 힘을 본 것이다. 신약성서는 예수의 탄생을 이런 선상에서 살폈고 하느님 나라 운동 역시 묵시 의식의 절정으로 여겼다. ‘없이 있는’ 하느님(空)의 한 모습인 예수는 당대 정치적 정세 속에서 핍박받은 자의 모습으로 세상에 태어났다. 神이기를 포기한 그의 겸비는 ‘없이 있는’ 이의 모습이었다.

하지만 그는 우리와 존재론적으로 차이가 없다. 우리 역시도 하늘 바탈(至氣)을 갖고 태어났기 때문이다. 마리아 찬가에서 드러나듯 예수는 기존 질서를 전복시키고자 했다. 禧年 사상이 말하듯 하느님 것(公)의 회복을 위해서였다. 그는 하느님 나라 운동을 민중들과 더불어 펼쳤으나 없이 있는 하느님을 자신들 소유로 삼았던 종교 기득권자들의 눈 또한 뜨게 하려고 부단히 애썼다. 이/저곳도 아닌 우리들 속(사이)에 하느님 나라가 있다고 말했으니 그는 공공성(公共性)을 역설한 것이다. 교회가 예배 지상주의를 벗고 두레처럼 민회(民會)의 형식으로 변혁되어야 할 이유가 여기에 있다.

여기서 필자는 기독교의 탄생과 개벽 사유를 기존의 유비를 넘어 ‘역사 유비’의 차원에서 관계 짓고자 한다. 이는 자연과 초자연의 관계를 강조하는 존재 유비(가톨릭), 개인의 내적 믿음에 역점을 둔 신앙 유비(개신교)와 변별되는 개념이다. 묵시적 배경 속에 탄생한 기독교와 개벽 사상은 모든 차이에도 불구하고 의식의 지향성 차원에서 닮았다.

이것은 하느님 영의 활동과 무관치 않다. 존재 유비가 神을, 신앙 유비가 기독론에 함몰되었다면 역사 유비는 성령론에 방점을 둔다. 이 경우 성령은 J. 몰트만이 주장하듯 그리스도 영에 의존되지 않는다. 요아킴 휘오레의 靈 이해에 근접할 수 있겠다. 至氣라 말할 수도 있을 법하다.

따라서 역사 유비는 종교 차(差)를 부정할 수 있는 토대 또한 제공한다. 이웃 종교에 대한 기독교의 두 시각인 포괄주의, 배타주의를 무화(無化)시킨다. 여러 유형의 다원주의와도 구별될 것이다. 굳이 말하자면 정행(正行, Ortho-Praxis) 중심의 다원주의라 말할 수 있겠다. 동시에 이는 신구약 성서 간의 관계 역시 새롭게 조명한다. 구속사 및 보편사의 틀도 훌쩍 뛰어넘을 수 있다. 실패한 역사에 관심하기 때문이다. 영적 양극성을 중시하는 까닭이다.

하여 개벽적 기독교는 자신의 신관(神觀)부터 바꿔야 한다. 서구가 간과했던 空의 회복이 그 시작이다. 그로써 자본주의에 영혼을 빼앗긴 기독교는 公을 회복시킬 수 있다. 이를 위해 교회는 세상 의제를 내놓고 함께 토론, 해결하는 共의 기구로 거듭나야 한다. 神學에서 ‘信學’으로의 전회를 제시한 이은선의 주장이 그래서 중요하다. 그래야 다수를 빌미로 편파적인 대의 민주제를 비판하고 자본주의 체제와 맞설 것이며 기후 붕괴 현실에 대응할 수 있다.

이정배(顯藏아카데미) ljbae2016@naver.com

The Other Side of Belief: Interpreting U. G. Krishnamurti eBook : Rao, Mukunda

The Other Side of Belief: Interpreting U. G. Krishnamurti eBook : Rao, Mukunda: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

Kindle
$14.99
Available instantly
Paperback
$24.18

Other New from $24.18

Kindle Price: $14.99
Price includes tax, if applicable

Mukunda RaoMukunda Rao
Follow




The Other Side of Belief: Interpreting U. G. Krishnamurti Kindle Edition
by Mukunda Rao (Author) Format: Kindle Edition


4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 32 ratings

Described as the thinker who shuns thought, U.G. Krishnamurti is the most enigmatic and iconoclastic 'anti-guru' of our times. His conviction that doubt is the other side of belief emerged from an uncompromising negation of everything that can be expressed, not from a desire for some 'comfy dialectical thesis'.
The Other Side of Belief Interpreting U G. Krishnamurti is a candid and refreshing chronicle ofUG's life and the evolution of his radical outlook and ideas. Tracing the development of UG's notion of enlightenment as a series of biological mutations devoid of mystical or religious connotations, Mukunda Rao weaves a complex portrait---of a man who doesn't hesitate to challenge and demolish society's most cherished and comforting values and ideals, but nonetheless commands a most fervent respect and veneration from multitudes of admirers.
UG has always been adamant that life must be described in pure and simple physical and physiological terms so that it is de-psychologized and demystified. He underwent, in his own words, a 'calamity': a series of bodily metamorphoses that catapulted him into the unique state of the 'declutched' mind. This book gives the reader a vivid description of UG's cellular revolution' and an intensely personal insight into UG's unflinching and relentless insistence on freedom from the 'stranglehold of thought.'
With a foreword by Mahesh Bhatt, film-maker and lifelong admirer of UG, The Other Side of Belief offers a searching exploration of the incredible charisma of a man who has transformed the lives of people all over the world.
Read less



Print length

367 pages
Product description

About the Author
Mukunda Rao is the author of six books of fiction, two plays: Mahatma - Khuda ka Hijra (1988 and 2009) and Baba Saheb Ambedkar (2008 and 2014), staged in different parts of Karnataka and much appreciated, and six insightful philosophical works, among which The Biology of Enlightenment is a much-read classic that has become a cult book amongst spiritual aspirants. After his retirement in 2010 from teaching service in a college, he lives with his wife on a farm outside Bengaluru. is the author of six books of fiction, two plays: Mahatma - Khuda ka Hijra (1988 and 2009) and Baba Saheb Ambedkar (2008 and 2014), staged in different parts of Karnataka and much appreciated, and six insightful philosophical works, among which The Biology of Enlightenment is a much-read classic that has become a cult book amongst spiritual aspirants. After his retirement in 2010 from teaching service in a college, he lives with his wife on a farm outside Bengaluru. --This text refers to the paperback edition.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B06XYR9PYQ
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Penguin (26 July 2005)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 3151 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 367 pagesBest Sellers Rank: 852,042 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)11,424 in Memoirs (Kindle Store)
31,094 in Memoirs (Books)
142,595 in Humour & Entertainment (Books)Customer Reviews:
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 32 ratings

Mukunda Rao


Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews from other countries

Sb
5.0 out of 5 stars Very well researched and written bookReviewed in India on 9 October 2022
Verified Purchase

This is my book number 8 on UG. There are details sprinkled in it that are new. Very well written. Rao is professor of English. It shows. And a words craftsman. He weaves through different subjects and aspects of UGs teachings smoothly. There is a typo on page 308, line 14 counting from bottom of page up. I ended up buying his two other books on UG. And three recent ones he’s written.

I hope the Shruti pipal tree has continued to take ever deeper roots. Love. Sb
Report

PG
5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 July 2017
Verified Purchase

Delivered as Expected.
Report

Michael R. Young
5.0 out of 5 stars The most complete book on UGReviewed in the United States on 21 March 2013
Verified Purchase

If you would like to read only one complete book about UG or if you have read a few or even several books on UG then this book will either satisfy or serve as an introduction or fill in on his incredible story even more. On reading UG books in general they all have the same unmistakable theme there is nothing to think, speak, do, experience or know. Transformation is biological and having experienced it, according to UG, there is no reason now or after spiritual transformation (enlightenment, self realization, moksha, kensho, or as UG might say - "Whatever you may want to call it!";) to dwell on anything any sage or any book or tradition has communicated what so ever. "We are already in that state" according to UG and only a full physiological mutation purging our entire thought system must happen to experience it as he describes it. Obviously, if there is nothing to do, you then don't need to read any book about UG either. However, from my experience, reading his own words are unmistakingly convincing and in some sense shocking. No one I can think of, and I have read many books on the perennial philosophy, says it quite like UG. Even if reading multiple books is knowingly redundant on his main point to read it again in a different book format helps, in my opinion, the reader to begin to appreciate the depth, profundity and singularity of UG Khrisnamurti.

8 people found this helpfulReport

Manu
5.0 out of 5 stars Radical to the core.Reviewed in India on 15 April 2022
Verified Purchase

A different perspective. Take it or leave. However there are many areas that appeals to the logical thinker. But who knows if the person is thinking or thoughts just come and go according to a universal play!! But, definitely worth buying, reading and gifting 👍
Report

vijey18
4.0 out of 5 stars This is the book to put a full stop to ...Reviewed in India on 11 April 2016
Verified Purchase

This is the book to put a full stop to the so called spiritual search. The book is intense and is not for someone who is looking for another self help book that promises the sky. This book is intended to bring to surface all the unquestioned beliefs such as enlightenment, moksha and the likes and critically examine whether these things really exist.

Worth every penny. A must read for all "Spiritual Aspirants"

One person found this helpfulReport
====

From other countries
Sb
5.0 out of 5 stars Very well researched and written book
Reviewed in India on 9 October 2022
Verified Purchase
This is my book number 8 on UG. There are details sprinkled in it that are new. Very well written. Rao is professor of English. It shows. And a words craftsman. He weaves through different subjects and aspects of UGs teachings smoothly. There is a typo on page 308, line 14 counting from bottom of page up. I ended up buying his two other books on UG. And three recent ones he’s written.

I hope the Shruti pipal tree has continued to take ever deeper roots. Love. Sb
Report
PG
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 July 2017
Verified Purchase
Delivered as Expected.
Report
Michael R. Young
5.0 out of 5 stars The most complete book on UG
Reviewed in the United States on 21 March 2013
Verified Purchase
If you would like to read only one complete book about UG or if you have read a few or even several books on UG then this book will either satisfy or serve as an introduction or fill in on his incredible story even more. On reading UG books in general they all have the same unmistakable theme there is nothing to think, speak, do, experience or know. Transformation is biological and having experienced it, according to UG, there is no reason now or after spiritual transformation (enlightenment, self realization, moksha, kensho, or as UG might say - "Whatever you may want to call it!";) to dwell on anything any sage or any book or tradition has communicated what so ever. "We are already in that state" according to UG and only a full physiological mutation purging our entire thought system must happen to experience it as he describes it. Obviously, if there is nothing to do, you then don't need to read any book about UG either. However, from my experience, reading his own words are unmistakingly convincing and in some sense shocking. No one I can think of, and I have read many books on the perennial philosophy, says it quite like UG. Even if reading multiple books is knowingly redundant on his main point to read it again in a different book format helps, in my opinion, the reader to begin to appreciate the depth, profundity and singularity of UG Khrisnamurti.
8 people found this helpful
Report
Manu
5.0 out of 5 stars Radical to the core.
Reviewed in India on 15 April 2022
Verified Purchase
A different perspective. Take it or leave. However there are many areas that appeals to the logical thinker. But who knows if the person is thinking or thoughts just come and go according to a universal play!! But, definitely worth buying, reading and gifting 👍
Report
vijey18
4.0 out of 5 stars This is the book to put a full stop to ...
Reviewed in India on 11 April 2016
Verified Purchase
This is the book to put a full stop to the so called spiritual search. The book is intense and is not for someone who is looking for another self help book that promises the sky. This book is intended to bring to surface all the unquestioned beliefs such as enlightenment, moksha and the likes and critically examine whether these things really exist.

Worth every penny. A must read for all "Spiritual Aspirants"
One person found this helpful
Report
Paresh
5.0 out of 5 stars Flower
Reviewed in India on 8 July 2016
Verified Purchase
It's good book
I don't understand why author angage in comparison of 2 krishnamurtis

Sir ug is ug
Krishnaji is krishnaji
UG is final hump for understanding spirituality in fact
It's undoubtedly true that love, god, etc falsifying
It means if someone talking abt love no matter he is enlightened he is misguiding gullible people or seeker who believe in him

This is my humble review after carefully read
It is however a best book because you will really get understand spirituality who is being misguided.
One person found this helpful
Report
Manas Dutta
5.0 out of 5 stars Love UG!
Reviewed in India on 6 January 2016
Verified Purchase
Everything UG has to deliver. The Other Side of Belief: Interpreting U.G.Krishnamurti
Report
tarun
4.0 out of 5 stars Thought provoking
Reviewed in India on 17 October 2016
Verified Purchase
The book has some moments of brilliance followed by moments of dullness.
UG forces you to re consider what ever you believed in . But to truly understand this work of fiction you need to question this one too.
2 people found this helpful
Report
R.N Mishra
2.0 out of 5 stars Two Stars
Reviewed in India on 30 December 2015
Verified Purchase
Worth reading but poor print and paper quality.
Report
======





Biology Of Enlightenment
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: HarperCollins Publishers (AU) | 21 July 2012
4.4 out of 5 stars 57
Kindle Edition
$9.99$9.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





The Other Side of Belief: Interpreting U. G. Krishnamurti
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: Random House India | 26 July 2005
4.5 out of 5 stars 32
Kindle Edition
$14.99$14.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





The Indian Book of Big Ideas: The 45 Greatest Thinkers, Philosophers and Reformers of All Time!
by Mukunda Rao and Ashwitha Jayakumar | Sold by: Hachette Book Group (AU) | 25 June 2023
Kindle Edition
$9.99$9.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®
Ages: 11+ years, from publishers




India’s Greatest Minds: Spiritual Masters, Philosophers, Reformers
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: Hachette Book Group (AU) | 25 April 2022
4.8 out of 5 stars 18
Kindle Edition
$12.99$12.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





Studies in Skin Perfusion Dynamics: Photoplethysmography and its Applications in Medical Diagnostics (Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering)
by Vladimir Blazek, Jagadeesh Kumar V., et al. | Sold by: Amazon Australia Services, Inc. | 20 January 2021
Kindle Edition
$177.65$177.65

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





Belief and Beyond: Adventures in Consciousness from the Upanishads to Modern Times
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: HarperCollins Publishers (AU) | 25 June 2019
4.1 out of 5 stars 29
Kindle Edition
$9.99$9.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®
Great On Kindle: A high quality digital reading experience.






The Mahatma- a novel
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: Amazon Australia Services, Inc. | 20 August 2018
5.0 out of 5 stars 3
Kindle Edition
$4.08$4.08

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





The Death of An Activist
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: Amazon Australia Services, Inc. | 12 June 2018
Kindle Edition
$16.87$16.87

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





Shambuka Rama: Three Tales Retold
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: HarperCollins Publishers (AU) | 1 April 2018
4.2 out of 5 stars 12
Kindle Edition
$9.99$9.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





The Buddha: An Alternative Narrative of His Life and Teaching
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: HarperCollins Publishers (AU) | 10 May 2017
4.2 out of 5 stars 39
Kindle Edition
$9.99$9.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®





The Penguin U.G. Krishnamurti Reader
by Mukunda Rao | Sold by: Random House India | 11 July 2007
4.4 out of 5 stars 24
Kindle Edition
$14.99$14.99

Includes Tax, if applicable
Available instantly
Buy now with 1-Click ®







=====

Jiddu Krishnamurti - Wikipedia

Jiddu Krishnamurti - Wikipedia

Jiddu Krishnamurti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Krishnamurti in the 1920s
Born11 May 1895
MadanapalleMadras Presidency, British India
Died17 February 1986 (aged 90)
Occupations
  • Philosopher
  • author
  • public speaker
Notable work
RelativesAnnie Besant (adoptive parent)
Era20th-century philosophy
Region
InstitutionsKrishnamurti Foundation (founder)

Jiddu Krishnamurti (/ˈɪd ˌkrɪʃnəˈmʊərti/ JID-oo KRISH-nə-MOOR-tee; 11 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was an Indian philosopher, speaker, writer, and spiritual figure. Adopted by members of the Theosophical tradition as a child, he was raised to fill the advanced role of World Teacher, but in adulthood he rejected this mantle and distanced himself from the related religious movement. He spent the rest of his life speaking to groups and individuals around the world; many of these talks have been published. He also wrote many books, among them The First and Last Freedom (1954) and Commentaries on Living (1956–60). His last public talk was in January 1986, a month before his death at his home in Ojai, California.

Krishnamurti asserted that "truth is a pathless land" and advised against following any doctrine, discipline, teacher, guru, or authority, including himself.[1] He emphasized topics such as choiceless awareness, psychological inquiry, and freedom from religious, spiritual, and cultural conditioning. His supporters — working through non-profit foundations in India, Britain, and the United States — oversee several independent schools based on his views on education, and continue to distribute his thousands of talks, group and individual discussions, and writings in a variety of media formats and languages.

Biography[edit]

Family background and childhood[edit]

House in which Krishnamurti was born
House in Madanapalle, in which Krishnamurti was born
Krishnamurti in 1910

The date of birth of Krishnamurti is a matter of dispute. Mary Lutyens determines it to be 11 May 1895,[2] but Christine Williams notes the unreliability of birth registrations in that period and that statements claiming dates ranging from 4 May 1895 to 25 May 1896 exist. She used calculations based on a published horoscope to derive a date of 11 May 1895 but "retains a measure of scepticism" about it.[3]

His birthplace was the small town of Madanapalle in Madras Presidency (modern-day Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh). He was born in a Telugu-speaking Brahmin family.[4][5] His father, Jiddu Narayanaiah, was employed as an official of the British colonial administration. Krishnamurti was fond of his mother Sanjeevamma, who died when he was ten.[6] His parents had a total of eleven children, of whom six survived childhood.[7]

In 1903 the family settled in Cudappah, where Krishnamurti had contracted malaria during a previous stay. He suffered recurrent bouts of the disease over many years.[8] A sensitive and sickly child, "vague and dreamy", he was often taken to be intellectually disabled, and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father.[9] In memoirs written when he was eighteen years old Krishnamurti described psychic experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.[10] Even from his childhood he felt a bond with nature which was to stay with him for the rest of his life.[11] Writing in his journal Krishnamurti states "He always had this strange lack of distance between himself and the trees, rivers, mountains. It wasn't cultivated."[12]

Krishnamurti's father retired at the end of 1907. He sought employment at the headquarters of the Theosophical Society at Adyar. Narayanaiah had been a Theosophist since 1882. He was eventually hired by the Society as a clerk, moving there with his family in January 1909.[13] Narayanaiah and his sons were at first assigned to live in a small cottage that was located just outside the society's compound.[14]

Krishnamurti was a vegetarian from birth and his family were strict vegetarians. He was an opponent of meat eating, based on ethical and spiritual reasons.[15][16]

Discovered[edit]

In April 1909, Krishnamurti first met Charles Webster Leadbeater, who claimed clairvoyance. Leadbeater had noticed Krishnamurti on the Society's beach on the Adyar river, and was amazed by the "most wonderful aura he had ever seen, without a particle of selfishness in it."[a] Ernest Wood, an adjutant of Leadbeater's at the time, who helped Krishnamurti with his homework, considered him to be "particularly dim-witted."[18] Leadbeater was convinced that the boy would become a spiritual teacher and a great orator; the likely "vehicle for the Lord Maitreya" in Theosophical doctrine, an advanced spiritual entity periodically appearing on Earth as a World Teacher to guide the evolution of humankind.[18]

In her biography of Krishnamurti, Pupul Jayakar quotes him speaking of that period in his life some 75 years later: "The boy had always said 'I will do whatever you want.' There was an element of subservience, obedience. The boy was vague, uncertain, woolly; he didn't seem to care what was happening. He was like a vessel with a large hole in it, whatever was put in, went through, nothing remained."[19] Krishnamurti himself described his state of mind as a young boy: "No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making. He often attempted to think but no thought would come."[20]

Krishnamurti by Tomás Povedano

Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called Krishnaji)[21] and his younger brother Nityananda (Nitya) were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to an opulent life among a segment of European high society as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14-year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months.[22] Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. When he was asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater he unhesitatingly replied "I would have died".[23]

During this time Krishnamurti had developed a strong bond with Annie Besant and came to view her as a surrogate mother. His father, who had initially assented to Besant's legal guardianship of Krishnamurti,[24] was pushed into the background by the swirl of attention around his son. In 1912 he sued Besant to annul the guardianship agreement. After a protracted legal battle, Besant took custody of Krishnamurti and Nitya.[25] As a result of this separation from family and home Krishnamurti and his brother (whose relationship had always been very close) became more dependent on each other, and in the following years often travelled together.[26]

In 1911 the Theosophical Society established the Order of the Star in the East (OSE) to prepare the world for the expected appearance of the World Teacher. Krishnamurti was named as its head, with senior Theosophists assigned various other positions. Membership was open to anybody who accepted the doctrine of the Coming of the World Teacher. Controversy soon erupted, both within the Theosophical Society and outside it, in Hindu circles and the Indian press.[b]

Growing up[edit]

Mary Lutyens, a biographer, says that there was a time when Krishnamurti believed that he was to become the World Teacher after correct spiritual and secular guidance and education.[27] Another biographer describes the daily program imposed on him by Leadbeater and his associates, which included rigorous exercise and sports, tutoring in a variety of school subjects, Theosophical and religious lessons, yoga and meditation, as well as instruction in proper hygiene and in the ways of British society and culture.[28] At the same time Leadbeater assumed the role of guide in a parallel mystical instruction of Krishnamurti; the existence and progress of this instruction was at the time known only to a select few.[29]

While he showed a natural aptitude in sports, Krishnamurti always had problems with formal schooling and was not academically inclined. He eventually gave up university education after several attempts at admission. He did take to foreign languages, in time speaking several with some fluency.[30]

His public image, cultivated by the Theosophists, "was to be characterized by a well-polished exterior, a sobriety of purpose, a cosmopolitan outlook and an otherworldly, almost beatific detachment in his demeanor."[31] Demonstrably, "all of these can be said to have characterized Krishnamurti's public image to the end of his life."[31] It was apparently clear early on that he "possessed an innate personal magnetism, not of a warm physical variety, but nonetheless emotive in its austerity, and inclined to inspire veneration."[32] However, as he was growing up, Krishnamurti showed signs of adolescent rebellion and emotional instability, chafing at the regimen imposed on him, visibly uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding him, and occasionally expressing doubts about the future prescribed for him.[c]

Photograph of Krishnamurti with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and others in London 1911
Krishnamurti in England in 1911 with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and George Arundale

Krishnamurti and Nitya were taken to England in April 1911.[33] During this trip Krishnamurti gave his first public speech to members of the OSE in London.[34] His first writings had also started to appear, published in booklets by the Theosophical Society and in Theosophical and OSE-affiliated magazines.[35] Between 1911 and the start of World War I in 1914, the brothers visited several other European countries, always accompanied by Theosophist chaperones.[36] Meanwhile, Krishnamurti had for the first time acquired a measure of personal financial independence, thanks to a wealthy benefactress, American Mary Melissa Hoadley Dodge, who was domiciled in England.[37]

After the war, Krishnamurti embarked on a series of lectures, meetings and discussions around the world, related to his duties as the Head of the OSE, accompanied by Nitya, by then the Organizing Secretary of the Order.[38] Krishnamurti also continued writing.[39] The content of his talks and writings revolved around the work of the Order and of its members in preparation for the Coming. He was initially described as a halting, hesitant, and repetitive speaker, but his delivery and confidence improved, and he gradually took command of the meetings.[40]

In 1921 Krishnamurti fell in love with Helen Knothe, a 17-year-old American whose family associated with the Theosophists. The experience was tempered by the realisation that his work and expected life-mission precluded what would otherwise be considered normal relationships and by the mid-1920s the two of them had drifted apart.[41]

Life-altering experiences[edit]

In 1922 Krishnamurti and Nitya travelled from Sydney to California. In California, they stayed at a cottage in the Ojai Valley. It was thought that the area's climate would be beneficial to Nitya, who had been diagnosed with tuberculosis. Nitya's failing health became a concern for Krishnamurti.[42][43] At Ojai they met Rosalind Williams, a young American who became close to them both, and who was later to play a significant role in Krishnamurti's life.[44] For the first time the brothers were without immediate supervision by their Theosophical Society minders.[45] They found the Valley to be very agreeable. Eventually, a trust, formed by supporters, bought a cottage and surrounding property there for them. This became Krishnamurti's official residence.[46]

At Ojai in August and September 1922, Krishnamurti went through an intense 'life-changing' experience.[47] This has been variously characterised as a spiritual awakening, a psychological transformation, and a physical reconditioning. The initial events happened in two distinct phases: first a three-day spiritual experience, and two weeks later, a longer-lasting condition that Krishnamurti and those around him referred to as the process. This condition recurred, at frequent intervals and with varying intensity, until his death.[48]

According to witnesses, it started on 17 August 1922 when Krishnamurti complained of a sharp pain at the nape of his neck. Over the next two days the symptoms worsened, with increasing pain and sensitivity, loss of appetite, and occasional delirious ramblings. He seemed to lapse into unconsciousness but later recounted that he was very much aware of his surroundings, and that while in that state he had an experience of "mystical union". The following day the symptoms and the experience intensified, climaxing with a sense of "immense peace".[49] Following — and apparently related to — these events[50] the condition that came to be known as the process started to affect him, in September and October that year, as a regular, almost nightly occurrence. Later the process resumed intermittently, with varying degrees of pain, physical discomfort, and sensitivity, occasionally a lapse into a childlike state, and sometimes an apparent fading out of consciousness, explained as either his body giving in to pain or his mind "going off".[d]

These experiences were accompanied or followed by what was interchangeably described as, "the benediction", "the immensity", "the sacredness", "the vastness" and, most often, "the otherness" or "the other".[52] It was a state distinct from the process.[53] According to Lutyens it is evident from his notebook that this experience of otherness was "with him almost continuously" during his life, and gave him "a sense of being protected".[52] Krishnamurti describes it in his notebook as typically following an acute experience of the process, for example, on awakening the next day:

... woke up early with that strong feeling of otherness, of another world that is beyond all thought ... there is a heightening of sensitivity. Sensitivity, not only to beauty but also to all other things. The blade of grass was astonishingly green; that one blade of grass contained the whole spectrum of colour; it was intense, dazzling and such a small thing, so easy to destroy ...[54]

This experience of the otherness was present with him in daily events:

It is strange how during one or two interviews that strength, that power filled the room. It seemed to be in one's eyes and breath. It comes into being, suddenly and most unexpectedly, with a force and intensity that is quite overpowering and at other times it's there, quietly and serenely. But it's there, whether one wants it or not. There is no possibility of getting used to it for it has never been nor will it ever be ..."[54]

Since the initial occurrences of 1922, several explanations have been proposed for this experience of Krishnamurti's.[e] Leadbeater and other Theosophists expected the "vehicle" to have certain paranormal experiences but were nevertheless mystified by these developments.[55] During Krishnamurti's later years, the nature and provenance of the continuing process often came up as a subject in private discussions between himself and associates; these discussions shed some light on the subject but were ultimately inconclusive.[56] Whatever the case, the process, and the inability of Leadbeater to explain it satisfactorily, if at all, had other consequences according to biographer Roland Vernon:

The process at Ojai, whatever its cause or validity, was a cataclysmic milestone for Krishna. Up until this time his spiritual progress, chequered though it might have been, had been planned with solemn deliberation by Theosophy's grandees. ... Something new had now occurred for which Krishna's training had not entirely prepared him. ... A burden was lifted from his conscience and he took his first step towards becoming an individual. ... In terms of his future role as a teacher, the process was his bedrock. ... It had come to him alone and had not been planted in him by his mentors ... it provided Krishna with the soil in which his newfound spirit of confidence and independence could take root.[57]

As news of these mystical experiences spread, rumours concerning the messianic status of Krishnamurti reached fever pitch as the 1925 Theosophical Society Convention was planned, on the 50th anniversary of its founding. There were expectations of significant happenings.[58] Paralleling the increasing adulation was Krishnamurti's growing discomfort with it. In related developments, prominent Theosophists and their factions within the Society were trying to position themselves favourably relative to the Coming, which was widely rumoured to be approaching. He stated that "Too much of everything is bad". "Extraordinary" pronouncements of spiritual advancement were made by various parties, disputed by others, and the internal Theosophical politics further alienated Krishnamurti.[59]

Nitya's persistent health problems had periodically resurfaced throughout this time. On 13 November 1925, at age 27, he died in Ojai from complications of influenza and tuberculosis.[60] Despite Nitya's poor health, his death was unexpected, and it fundamentally shook Krishnamurti's belief in Theosophy and in the leaders of the Theosophical Society. He had received their assurances regarding Nitya's health, and had come to believe that "Nitya was essential for [his] life-mission and therefore he would not be allowed to die," a belief shared by Annie Besant and Krishnamurti's circle.[61] Jayakar wrote that "his belief in the Masters and the hierarchy had undergone a total revolution."[62] Moreover, Nitya had been the "last surviving link to his family and childhood. ... The only person to whom he could talk openly, his best friend and companion."[63] According to eyewitness accounts, the news "broke him completely."[64] but 12 days after Nitya's death he was "immensely quiet, radiant, and free of all sentiment and emotion";[62] "there was not a shadow ... to show what he had been through."[65]

Break with the past[edit]

Over the next few years, Krishnamurti's new vision and consciousness continued to develop. New concepts appeared in his talks, discussions, and correspondence, together with an evolving vocabulary that was progressively free of Theosophical terminology.[66] His new direction reached a climax in 1929, when he rebuffed attempts by Leadbeater and Besant to continue with the Order of the Star.

Krishnamurti dissolved the Order during the annual Star Camp at Ommen, the Netherlands, on 3 August 1929.[67] He stated that he had made his decision after "careful consideration" during the previous two years, and that:

I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path. ... This is no magnificent deed, because I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects, nor to establish new theories and new philosophies.[68]

Krishnamurti in the early 1920s

Following the dissolution, prominent Theosophists turned against Krishnamurti, including Leadbeater who is said to have stated, "the Coming had gone wrong."[69] Krishnamurti had denounced all organised belief, the notion of gurus, and the whole teacher-follower relationship, vowing instead to work on setting people "absolutely, unconditionally free."[68] There is no record of his explicitly denying he was the World Teacher;[70] whenever he was asked to clarify his position he either asserted that the matter was irrelevant[71] or gave answers that, as he stated, were "purposely vague".[72]

In hind-sight it can be seen that the ongoing changes in his outlook had begun before the dissolution of the Order of the Star.[73] The subtlety of the new distinctions on the World Teacher issue was lost on many of his admirers, who were already bewildered or distraught because of the changes in Krishnamurti's outlook, vocabulary and pronouncements–among them Besant and Mary Lutyens' mother Emily, who had a very close relationship with him.[74][75] He soon disassociated himself from the Theosophical Society and its teachings and practices,[f] yet he remained on cordial terms with some of its members and ex-members throughout his life.[citation needed]

Krishnamurti often referred to the totality of his work as the teachings and not as my teachings.[76]

Krishnamurti resigned from the various trusts and other organisations that were affiliated with the defunct Order of the Star, including the Theosophical Society. He returned the money and properties donated to the Order, among them a castle in the Netherlands and 5,000 acres (2,023 ha) of land, to their donors.[77]

Middle years[edit]

From 1930 through 1944 Krishnamurti engaged in speaking tours and in the issue of publications under the auspice of the "Star Publishing Trust" (SPT), which he had founded with Desikacharya Rajagopal, a close associate and friend from the Order of the Star.[g] Ojai was the base of operations for the new enterprise, where Krishnamurti, Rajagopal, and Rosalind Williams (who had married Rajagopal in 1927) resided in the house known as Arya Vihara (meaning Realm of the Aryas, i.e. those noble by righteousness in Sanskrit). The business and organizational aspects of the SPT were administered chiefly by D. Rajagopal, as Krishnamurti devoted his time to speaking and meditation. The Rajagopals' marriage was not a happy one, and the two became physically estranged after the 1931 birth of their daughter, Radha.[78] Krishnamurti's friendship with Rosalind became a love affair. According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, the affair between Krishnamurti and Rosalind began in 1932 and it endured for about twenty-five years.[h][i][j] Radha Sloss, daughter of Rajagopal, wrote about the affair in her book Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti.

During the 1930s Krishnamurti spoke in Europe, Latin America, India, Australia and the United States. In 1938 he met Aldous Huxley.[79] The two began a close friendship which endured for many years. They held common concerns about the imminent conflict in Europe which they viewed as the outcome of the pernicious influence of nationalism.[80] Krishnamurti's stance on World War II was often construed as pacifism and even subversion during a time of patriotic fervor in the United States and for a time he came under the surveillance of the FBI.[81] He did not speak publicly for a period of about four years (between 1940 and 1944). During this time he lived and worked at Arya Vihara, which during the war operated as a largely self-sustaining farm, with its surplus goods donated for relief efforts in Europe.[82] Of the years spent in Ojai during the war he later said: "I think it was a period of no challenge, no demand, no outgoing. I think it was a kind of everything held in; and when I left Ojai it all burst."[83]

Krishnamurti broke the hiatus from public speaking in May 1944 with a series of talks in Ojai. These talks, and subsequent material, were published by "Krishnamurti Writings Inc." (KWINC), the successor organisation to the "Star Publishing Trust." This was to be the new central Krishnamurti-related entity worldwide, whose sole purpose was the dissemination of the teaching.[84] He had remained in contact with associates from India, and in the autumn of 1947 embarked on a speaking tour there, attracting a new following of young intellectuals.[k] On this trip he encountered the Mehta sisters, Pupul and Nandini, who became lifelong associates and confidants. The sisters also attended to Krishnamurti throughout a 1948 recurrence of the "process" in Ootacamund.[85] In Poona in 1948, Krishnamurti met Iyengar, who taught him Yoga practices every morning for the next three months, then on and off for twenty years.[86]

When Krishnamurti was in India after World War II many prominent personalities came to meet him, including Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. In his meetings with Nehru, Krishnamurti elaborated at length on the teachings, saying in one instance, "Understanding of the self only arises in relationship, in watching yourself in relationship to people, ideas, and things; to trees, the earth, and the world around you and within you. Relationship is the mirror in which the self is revealed. Without self-knowledge there is no basis for right thought and action." Nehru asked, "How does one start?" to which Krishnamurti replied, "Begin where you are. Read every word, every phrase, every paragraph of the mind, as it operates through thought."[87]

Later years[edit]

Krishnamurti continued speaking in public lectures, group discussions and with concerned individuals around the world. He met with many prominent religious leaders and scholars including Swami VenkatesanandaAnandamayi MaLakshman JooWalpola Rahula, and Eugene Schalert. In India he also met with many sanyasis and monks throughout his life. In the early 1960s, he made the acquaintance of physicist David Bohm, whose philosophical and scientific concerns regarding the essence of the physical world, and the psychological and sociological state of mankind, found parallels in Krishnamurti's philosophy. The two men soon became close friends and started a common inquiry, in the form of personal dialogues–and occasionally in group discussions with other participants–that continued, periodically, over nearly two decades.[l] Several of these discussions were published in the form of books or as parts of books, and introduced a wider audience (among scientists) to Krishnamurti's ideas.[88] Although Krishnamurti's philosophy delved into fields as diverse as religious studies, education, psychology, physics, and consciousness studies, he was not then, nor since, well known in academic circles. Nevertheless, Krishnamurti met and held discussions with physicists Fritjof Capra and E. C. George Sudarshan, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, psychiatrist David Shainberg, as well as psychotherapists representing various theoretical orientations.[89] The long friendship with Bohm went through a rocky interval in later years, and although they overcame their differences and remained friends until Krishnamurti's death, the relationship did not regain its previous intensity.[citation needed][m][n]

In the 1970s, Krishnamurti met several times with then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi, with whom he had far-ranging, and in some cases, very serious conversations. Jayakar considers his message in meetings with Indira Gandhi as a possible influence in the lifting of certain emergency measures Gandhi had imposed during periods of political turmoil.[90]

Meanwhile, Krishnamurti's once close relationship with the Rajagopals had deteriorated to the point where he took D. Rajagopal to court to recover donated property and funds as well as publication rights for his works, manuscripts, and personal correspondence, that were in Rajagopal's possession.[o] The litigation and ensuing cross complaints, which formally began in 1971, continued for many years. Much property and materials were returned to Krishnamurti during his lifetime; the parties to this case finally settled all other matters in 1986, shortly after his death.[p]

In 1984 and 1985, Krishnamurti spoke to an invited audience at the United Nations in New York, under the auspices of the Pacem in Terris Society chapter at the United Nations.[91] In October 1985, he visited India for the last time, holding a number of what came to be known as "farewell" talks and discussions between then and January 1986. These last talks included the fundamental questions he had been asking through the years, as well as newer concerns about advances in science and technology, and their effect on humankind. Krishnamurti had commented to friends that he did not wish to invite death, but was not sure how long his body would last (he had already lost considerable weight), and once he could no longer talk, he would have "no further purpose". In his final talk, on 4 January 1986, in Madras, he again invited the audience to examine with him the nature of inquiry, the effect of technology, the nature of life and meditation, and the nature of creation.[citation needed]

Krishnamurti was also concerned about his legacy, about being unwittingly turned into some personage whose teachings had been handed down to special individuals, rather than the world at large. He did not want anybody to pose as an interpreter of the teaching.[92] He warned his associates on several occasions that they were not to present themselves as spokesmen on his behalf, or as his successors after his death.[93]

A few days before his death, in a final statement, he declared that nobody among either his associates or the general public had understood what had happened to him (as the conduit of the teaching). He added that the "supreme intelligence" operating in his body would be gone with his death, again implying the impossibility of successors. However, he stated that people could perhaps get into touch with that somewhat "if they live the teachings".[94] In prior discussions, he had compared himself with Thomas Edison, implying that he did the hard work, and now all that was needed by others was a flick of the switch.[95]

Death[edit]

Krishnamurti died of pancreatic cancer on 17 February 1986, at the age of 90. The announcement of KFT (Krishnamurti Foundation Trust) refers to the course of his health condition until the moment of death. The first signs came almost nine months before his death, when he felt very tired. In October 1985, he went from England (Brockwood Park School) to India and after that, he suffered from exhaustion, fevers, and lost weight. Krishnamurti decided to go back to Ojai (10 January 1986) after his last talks in Madras, which necessitated a 24-hour flight. Once he arrived at Ojai he underwent medical tests that revealed he was suffering from pancreatic cancer. The cancer was untreatable, either surgically or otherwise, so Krishnamurti decided to go back to his home at Ojai, where he spent his last days. Friends and professionals nursed him. His mind was clear until the last moment. Krishnamurti died on 17 February 1986, at 10 minutes past midnight, California time. In accordance with his wishes, no memorial service was conducted.[96][97] His ashes were divided into three parts: for Ojai, India and England. In India they were immersed in River Ganga in Varanasi, Gangotri, and in the ocean Adayar beach.[98]

Schools[edit]

Krishnamurti on a 1987 Indian stamp

Krishnamurti founded five schools in India, one in England, Brockwood Park School, and one in California, Oak Grove School. When asked, he enumerated the following as his educational aims:

  1. Global outlook: A vision of the whole as distinct from the part; there should never be a sectarian outlook, but always a holistic outlook free from all prejudice.
  2. Concern for man and the environment: Humanity is part of nature, and if nature is not cared for, it will boomerang on man. Only the right education, and deep affection between people everywhere, will resolve many problems including the environmental challenges.
  3. Religious spirit, which includes the scientific temper: The religious mind is alone, not lonely. It is in communion with people and nature.[99]

The Krishnamurti Foundations, established in India, USA, and England in the 1960's manage seven schools in India and abroad.

Influence[edit]

KFI retreat at Rishi Valley
KFI retreat session at Rishi Valley on 2019 November 17 Padmanabhan Krishna addressing the gathering, with Radhika Herzberger presiding

Krishnamurti attracted the interest of the mainstream religious establishment in India. He engaged in discussions with several well known Hindu and Buddhist scholars and leaders, including the Dalai Lama.[q] Several of these discussions were later published as chapters in various Krishnamurti books.

Krishnamurti was very highly regarded by several leading religious figures in India. Nisargadatta Maharaj described Krishnamurti as 'complete Brahman'.[100] Anandamayi Ma addressed him as the 'Guru of gurus'.[101] When Ramana Maharshi was asked why Krishnamurti dissolved the Order of the Star in the East, he replied "The Order's purpose stood consummated in that the World Teacher had arrived; that is why it was dissolved."[102]

Notable individuals influenced by Krishnamurti include George Bernard ShawDavid BohmJawaharlal Nehru, the Dalai LamaAldous HuxleyAlan Watts,[103] Henry MillerBruce Lee,[104] Terence Stamp,[105] Jackson Pollock,[106] Toni Packer,[107] Achyut Patwardhan,[108] Dada Dharmadhikari,[109] Derek Trucks[110] and Eckhart Tolle.[111]

Interest in Krishnamurti and his work has persisted in the years since his death. Many books, audio, video, and computer materials, remain in print and are carried by major online and traditional retailers. The four official Foundations continue to maintain archives, disseminate the teachings in an increasing number of languages, convert print to digital and other media, develop websites, sponsor television programs, and organise meetings and dialogues of interested persons around the world.[112]

In popular culture[edit]

A sample of Krishnamurti's 1980 talk "Why Does The Mind Constantly Seek Pleasure" appears in the Tube & Berger song Imprint of Pleasure.[113]

Krishnamurti is one of the people who Indiana Jones meets in The Adventures of young Indiana Jones. Krishnamurti is shown as a young boy around 10-12 years old, this is around the time that he was first associated with the theosophical society. He meets and becomes friends with Indy in Season 1 episode 5 titled Journey of Radiance. Indy, his parents and his tutor Miss Seymour attend a meeting of the society. This episode can be seen on both the DVD’s and Disney + streaming service.

Krishnamurti appears as an important character in James Harpur's 2021 novel, The Pathless Country.[114]

Works[edit]

References[edit]

Notes

  1. ^ According to occult and Theosophical lore, auras are invisible emanations related to each individual's so-called subtler planes of existence, as well as her or his normal plane. The ability to discern a person's aura is considered one of the possible effects of clairvoyance. Leadbeater's occult knowledge and abilities were highly respected within the Society.[17]
  2. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 40–63 [cumulative]. The news regarding Krishnamurti and the World Teacher was not universally welcomed by Theosophists and led to upheavals in the Society; Lutyens (1983a), pp. 15–19, 40, 56. Part of the controversy was Leadbeater's role. He had a history of being in the company of young boys–pupils under his spiritual and Theosophical instruction, and there was gossip about child abuse — although no accusations were ever proven.
  3. ^ Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 10: Doubts and Difficulties" through "Chapter 15: In Love" pp. 80–132 [cumulative].
  4. ^ Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 18: The Turning Point" through "Chapter 21: Climax of the Process" pp. 152–188 [cumulative]. The use of the term "going off" in the accounts of the early occurrences of the process apparently signified so-called out-of-body experiences.[51] In later usage the meaning of "going off" was more nuanced.
  5. ^ Jayakar (1986), p. 46n. and Lutyens (1975), p. 166 provide a frequently given explanation, that it represented the so-called awakening of kundalini, a process that according to Hindu mysticism culminates in transcendent consciousness. Others view it in Freudian terms. Aberbach (1993) contends that the experiences were a projection of Krishnamurti's accumulated grief over the death of his mother. Sloss (1993), p. 61 considers the process to be a purely physical event centred on sickness or trauma, and suggests the possibility of epilepsy, a possibility that Lutyens (1990) rejects. According to Lutyens (1990), pp. 45–46., Krishnamurti believed the process was necessary for his spiritual development and not a medical matter or condition. As far as he was concerned, he had encountered Truth; he thought the process was in some way related to this encounter, and to later experiences.
  6. ^ Lutyens considers the last remaining tie with Theosophy to have been severed in 1933, with the death of Besant. He had resigned from the Society in 1930 (Lutyens, 1975; pp. 276, 285).
  7. ^ Born in India in 1900 and of Brahmin descent, Rajagopal had moved in Krishnamurti's circle since early youth. Although regarded as an excellent editor and organizer, he was also known for his difficult personality and high-handed manner. Upon Nitya's death, he had promised Besant that he would look after Krishnamurti. See Henri Methorst, Krishnamurti A Spiritual Revolutionary, Edwin Publishing House, 2003, ch 12.
  8. ^ The two also shared an interest in education: Krishnamurti helped to raise Radha, and the need to provide her with a suitable educational environment led to the founding of the Happy Valley School in 1946. The school has since re-established itself as an independent institution operating as the Besant Hill School Of Happy Valley. See Sloss, "Lives in the Shadow," ch 19.
  9. ^ Radha's account of the relationship, Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti, was first published in England by Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd. in 1991, and was soon followed by a rebuttal volume written by Mary Lutyens, Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1996, in which she acknowledges the relationship but was never confirmed by Krishnamurti himself.
  10. ^ Mark Lee: I heard it from Erna Lillifelt, who learned it from Krishnaji. Krishnaji has told Mary Zimbalist and Erna Lilliefelt that there was something that Rajagopal had against him. They asked him what it was. And he said "I had sexual relations with that woman". See Padmanabhan Krishna, "A jewel on a silver platter", Ch 8.
  11. ^ These included former freedom campaigners from the Indian Independence Movement, See Vernon, "Star in the East," p 219.
  12. ^ Bohm would eventually serve as a Krishnamurti Foundation trustee.
  13. ^ Their falling out was partly due to questions about Krishnamurti's private behaviour, especially his long and secret love affair with Rosalind Williams-Rajagopal, then unknown to the general public.[citation needed]
  14. ^ After their falling out, Bohm criticised certain aspects of the teaching on philosophical, methodological, and psychological grounds. He also criticised what he described as Krishnamurti's occasional "verbal manipulations" when deflecting challenges. Eventually, he questioned some of the reasoning about the nature of thought and self, although he never abandoned his belief that "Krishnamurti was onto something". See Infinite Potential: The Life and times of David Bohm, by F. David Peat, Addison Wesley, 1997.
  15. ^ D. Rajagopal was the head or co-head of a number of successive corporations and trusts, set up after the dissolution of the Order of the Star and chartered to publish Krishnamurti's talks, discussions and other writings.
  16. ^ Formation of the Krishnamurti Foundation of America and the Lawsuits Which Took Place Between 1968 and 1986 to Recover Assets for Krishnamurti's Work, by Erna Lilliefelt, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1995. The complicated settlement dissolved the K & R Foundation (a previous entity), and transferred assets to the Krishnamurti Foundation of America (KFA). However certain disputed documents remained in the possession of Rajagopal, and he received partial repayment for his attorney's fees.
  17. ^ The Dalai Lama characterised Krishnamurti as a "great soul" (Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" p 203). Krishnamurti very much enjoyed the Lama's company and by his own admission could not bring up his anti-guru views, mindful of the Lama's feelings.

Citations

  1. ^ Rodrigues, Hillary (January 1996). "J. Krishnamurti's 'religious mind'". Religious Studies and Theology. 15 (1): 40–55.
  2. ^ Lutyens (1995), footnotes 1, 2.
  3. ^ Williams (2004), p. 465.
  4. ^ Lutyens (1975). p. 7.
  5. ^ Lutyens, Mary (2003). Open Door. Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Ltd. ISBN 978-0-900506-21-5.
  6. ^ Lutyens (1975). p. 5.
  7. ^ Williams (2004), pp. 471–472.
  8. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp.2–4.
  9. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 3–4, 22, 25.
  10. ^ Lutyens (1983a), pp. 5, 309
  11. ^ J. Krishnamurti (2004), p. 16.
  12. ^ Krishnamurti’s Journal, 17 September 1973.
  13. ^ Lutyens (1983a), pp. 7–8.
  14. ^ Star In The East: The Invention of A Messiah, by Roland Vernon, Palgrave 2001, p 41.
  15. ^ Williams, C. V. (2004). Jiddu Krishnamurti World Philosopher (1895–1986) : His Life and Thoughts. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 104. ISBN 978-8120820326
  16. ^ "Krishnamurti on Eating Meat & Vegetarianism". krishnamurtiaustralia.org. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  17. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 15, 20–21
  18. Jump up to:a b Lutyens (1975), p. 21.
  19. ^ Pupul (1986), p. 28.
  20. ^ Krishnamurti’s Journal, 15 September 1973.
  21. ^ Jayakar (1986), p. xi. The suffix –ji in Hindu names is a sign of affection or respect.
  22. ^ Vernon (2001), pp. 51–72.
  23. ^ Lutyens (1995)
  24. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 40.
  25. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 54–63, 64–71, 82, 84.
  26. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 3, 32.
  27. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 10-11, 93.
  28. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 57.
  29. ^ Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 4: First Initiation" and "Chapter 5: First Teaching" pp. 29–46 [cumulative].
  30. ^ Lutyens (1997), pp. 83, 120, 149.
  31. Jump up to:a b Vernon (2001), p. 53.
  32. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 52.
  33. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 50–51.
  34. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 51–52.
  35. ^ Lutyens (1997), pp. 46, 74–75, 126. Krishnamurti was named Editor of the Herald of the Star, the official bulletin of the OSE. His position was mainly as a figurehead, yet he often wrote editorial notes, which along with his other contributions helped the magazine's circulation.
  36. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 65.
  37. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 4, 75, 77.
  38. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 125.
  39. ^ See Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography.
  40. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 134–35, 171–17.
  41. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 114, 118, 131–132, 258.
  42. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 97.
  43. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 149, 199, 209, 216–217.
  44. ^ Lutyens (1991), p. 35.
  45. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 113.
  46. ^ Lutyens (1983b), p. 6.
  47. ^ Jayakar (1986), pp. 46–57.
  48. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 282.
  49. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 158–160.
  50. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 165.
  51. ^ Lutyens (1990), pp. 134–135.
  52. Jump up to:a b Lutyens, M. (1988). J. Krishnamurti: The Open Door. Volume 3 of Biography, p. 12. ISBN 0-900506-21-0. Retrieved on: 19 November 2011.
  53. ^ "J. Krishnamurti, Krishnamurti's Notebook, Foreword by Mary Lutyens"jkrishnamurti.org. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  54. Jump up to:a b Krishnamurti, J. (1976). Krishnamurti's Notebook, Part 3 Gstaad, Switzerland 13th July to 3rd September 1961. J. Krishnamurti online. ISBN 1-888004-63-0ISBN 978-1-888004-63-2.
  55. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 163–4, 188–9.
  56. ^ Jayakar (1986), p. 133.
  57. ^ Vernon (2001), pp. 131–132.
  58. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 223.
  59. ^ Lutyens (1990), pp. 57–60.
  60. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 219.
  61. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 219, 221.
  62. Jump up to:a b Jayakar (1986), p. 69.
  63. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 152.
  64. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 220, 313 (note to p. 220).
  65. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 221.
  66. ^ Lutyens (1983c), p. 234.
  67. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 272.
  68. Jump up to:a b J. Krishnamurti (1929).
  69. ^ Lutyens (1997), pp. 277–279.
  70. ^ Vernon (2001), pp. 166–167.
  71. ^ J. Krishnamurti (1972), p. 9. "I think we shall have incessant wrangles over the corpse of Krishnamurti if we discuss this or that, wondering who is now speaking. Someone asked me: 'Do tell me if it is you speaking or someone else'. I said: 'I really do not know and it does not matter'." From the 1927 "Question and answer session" at Ommen. [Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website].
  72. ^ J. Krishnamurti (1928a), p. 43. "I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so. Because once you define a thing it becomes dead." Krishnamurti on the World Teacher, from "Who brings the truth," an address delivered at Ommen 2 August 1927. Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website. Link-specific content verified against original at New York Public Library Main Branch"YAM p.v. 519" [call no..
  73. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 262.
  74. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 189.
  75. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 236.
  76. ^ Lutyens (1990), p. 210. Emphasis in source.
  77. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 276–284.
  78. ^ Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti by Radha Rajagopal Sloss, Bloomsbury Publishing, 1991, ch 12.
  79. ^ Vernon, "Star in the East," p 205.
  80. ^ "Journal of the Krishnamurti Schools". Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  81. ^ Vernon, "Star in the East," p 209.
  82. ^ Vernon, "Star in the East," p 210.
  83. ^ Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" p 98.
  84. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfillment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 59-60. Initially, Krishnamurti (along with Rajagopal and others) was a trustee of KWINC. Eventually he ceased being a trustee, leaving Rajagopal as President–a turn of events that according to Lutyens, constituted "... a circumstance that was to have most unhappy consequences."
  85. ^ See Jayakar, "Krishnamurti," ch 11 for Pupul Mehta's (later Jayakar) eyewitness account.
  86. ^ Elliot Goldberg, The Path of Modern Yoga (Rochester VT: Inner Traditions 2016), p. 380.
  87. ^ Jayakar, "Krishnamurti," p 142.
  88. ^ See Selected Publications/List of Books subsection.
  89. ^ See On Krishnamurti, by Raymond Martin, Wadsworth, 2003, for a discussion on Krishnamurti and the academic world.
  90. ^ See Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" pages 340–343.
  91. ^ Lutyens, "The Open Door," p 84-85. Also Lutyens, "The Life and Death of Krishnamurti," p. 185.
  92. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfilment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 171, statement of Krishnamurti published in the Foundation Bulletin, 1970.
  93. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfilment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 233.
  94. ^ See Lutyens, "The Life and Death of Krishnamurti," London: John Murray, p 206. Quoting Krishnamurti from tape-recording made on 7 February 1986.
  95. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfilment" Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 119.
  96. ^ Saxon, Wolfgang (18 February 1986). "JIDDU KRISHNAMURTI, 90, IS DEAD; RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHER FROM INDIA"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
  97. ^ "Jiddu Krishnamurti"meditativediaries.com. 17 February 2016. Archived from the original on 21 February 2016. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
  98. ^ Jayakar, Pupul (14 October 2000). J. Krishnamurti: A Biography. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-93-5118-284-9.
  99. ^ See As The River Joins The Ocean: Reflections about J. Krishnamurti, by Giddu Narayan, Edwin House Publishing 1999, p 64.
  100. ^ "I am Unborn (Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)", Page 100, Chapter 45.
  101. ^ Jayakar, Pupul (1986). Krishnamurti:A biography, page 144
  102. ^ Blutkeim, Aham Sphurana: Scintillations of Jnana from Sri Ramana Maharishi, page 408.
  103. ^ "Alan Watts talking about Jiddu Krishnamurti | He was an Extraordinary Mystic"YouTube.
  104. ^ https://jkrishnamurti.org/sites/default/files/Robert-Colet-Bruce-Lee.pdf[bare URL PDF]
  105. ^ "Terence Stamp speaking at the Krishnamurti Centre"YouTube.
  106. ^ "Jackson Pollock (By L. Proyect)"www.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 28 September 2020.
  107. ^ "Remembering meditation teacher Toni Packer (1927–2013) – Lion's Roar". 24 August 2013.
  108. ^ "Obituary: Achyut Patwardhan"The Independent. 23 October 2011. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  109. ^ "Dada Dharmadhikari Biography"mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org. Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  110. ^ Horowitz, Scott (3 July 2018). "INTERVIEW: Derek Trucks Talks New Album, 2017 Losses, & The New Generation"L4LM. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  111. ^ "Through the Eyes of Krishnamurti"YouTube.
  112. ^ See also The Complete Teachings Project Archived 2 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine, an ambitious effort to collect the entire body of Krishnamurti's work into a coherently edited master reference.
  113. ^ "Tube & Berger's 'Imprint of Pleasure' – Discover the Sample Source"WhoSampled. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  114. ^ "The Pathless Country"cinnamonpress.com. Retrieved 10 January 2024.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]