2023/08/18

Cosmology - Wikipedia

Cosmology - Wikipedia

Cosmology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Hubble eXtreme Deep Field (XDF) was completed in September 2012 and shows the farthest galaxies ever photographed at that time. Except for the few stars in the foreground (which are bright and easily recognizable because only they have diffraction spikes), every speck of light in the photo is an individual galaxy, some of them as old as 13.2 billion years; the observable universe is estimated to contain more than 2 trillion galaxies.[1]

Cosmology (from Ancient Greek κόσμος (kósmos) 'world', and -λογία (-logía) 'study of') is a branch of physics and metaphysics dealing with the nature of the universe. The term cosmology was first used in English in 1656 in Thomas Blount's Glossographia,[2] and in 1731 taken up in Latin by German philosopher Christian Wolff, in Cosmologia Generalis.[3] Religious or mythological cosmology is a body of beliefs based on mythologicalreligious, and esoteric literature and traditions of creation myths and eschatology. In the science of astronomy, cosmology is concerned with the study of the chronology of the universe.

Physical cosmology is the study of the observable universe's origin, its large-scale structures and dynamics, and the ultimate fate of the universe, including the laws of science that govern these areas.[4] It is investigated by scientists, including astronomers and physicists, as well as philosophers, such as metaphysiciansphilosophers of physics, and philosophers of space and time. Because of this shared scope with philosophytheories in physical cosmology may include both scientific and non-scientific propositions and may depend upon assumptions that cannot be tested. Physical cosmology is a sub-branch of astronomy that is concerned with the universe as a whole. Modern physical cosmology is dominated by the Big Bang Theory which attempts to bring together observational astronomy and particle physics;[5][6] more specifically, a standard parameterization of the Big Bang with dark matter and dark energy, known as the Lambda-CDM model.

Theoretical astrophysicist David N. Spergel has described cosmology as a "historical science" because "when we look out in space, we look back in time" due to the finite nature of the speed of light.[7]

Disciplines[edit]

Physics and Astrophysics have played central roles in shaping our understanding of the universe through scientific observation and experiment. Physical cosmology was shaped through both mathematics and observation in an analysis of the whole universe. The universe is generally understood to have begun with the Big Bang, followed almost instantaneously by cosmic inflation, an expansion of space from which the universe is thought to have emerged 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years ago.[8] Cosmogony studies the origin of the universe, and cosmography maps the features of the universe.

In Diderot's Encyclopédie, cosmology is broken down into uranology (the science of the heavens), aerology (the science of the air), geology (the science of the continents), and hydrology (the science of waters).[9]

Metaphysical cosmology has also been described as the placing of humans in the universe in relationship to all other entities. This is exemplified by Marcus Aurelius's observation that a man's place in that relationship: "He who does not know what the world is does not know where he is, and he who does not know for what purpose the world exists, does not know who he is, nor what the world is."[10]

Discoveries[edit]

Physical cosmology[edit]

Physical cosmology is the branch of physics and astrophysics that deals with the study of the physical origins and evolution of the universe. It also includes the study of the nature of the universe on a large scale. In its earliest form, it was what is now known as "celestial mechanics", the study of the heavens. Greek philosophers Aristarchus of SamosAristotle, and Ptolemy proposed different cosmological theories. The geocentric Ptolemaic system was the prevailing theory until the 16th century when Nicolaus Copernicus, and subsequently Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei, proposed a heliocentric system. This is one of the most famous examples of epistemological rupture in physical cosmology.

Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica, published in 1687, was the first description of the law of universal gravitation. It provided a physical mechanism for Kepler's laws and also allowed the anomalies in previous systems, caused by gravitational interaction between the planets, to be resolved. A fundamental difference between Newton's cosmology and those preceding it was the Copernican principle—that the bodies on Earth obey the same physical laws as all celestial bodies. This was a crucial philosophical advance in physical cosmology.

Modern scientific cosmology is widely considered to have begun in 1917 with Albert Einstein's publication of his final modification of general relativity in the paper "Cosmological Considerations of the General Theory of Relativity"[11] (although this paper was not widely available outside of Germany until the end of World War I). General relativity prompted cosmogonists such as Willem de SitterKarl Schwarzschild, and Arthur Eddington to explore its astronomical ramifications, which enhanced the ability of astronomers to study very distant objects. Physicists began changing the assumption that the universe was static and unchanging. In 1922, Alexander Friedmann introduced the idea of an expanding universe that contained moving matter.

In parallel to this dynamic approach to cosmology, one long-standing debate about the structure of the cosmos was coming to a climax - the Great Debate (1917 to 1922) - with early cosmologists such as Heber Curtis and Ernst Öpik determining that some nebulae seen in telescopes were separate galaxies far distant from our own.[12] While Heber Curtis argued for the idea that spiral nebulae were star systems in their own right as island universes, Mount Wilson astronomer Harlow Shapley championed the model of a cosmos made up of the Milky Way star system only. This difference of ideas came to a climax with the organization of the Great Debate on 26 April 1920 at the meeting of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C. The debate was resolved when Edwin Hubble detected Cepheid Variables in the Andromeda Galaxy in 1923 and 1924.[13][14] Their distance established spiral nebulae well beyond the edge of the Milky Way.

Subsequent modelling of the universe explored the possibility that the cosmological constant, introduced by Einstein in his 1917 paper, may result in an expanding universe, depending on its value. Thus the Big Bang model was proposed by the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître in 1927[15] which was subsequently corroborated by Edwin Hubble's discovery of the redshift in 1929[16] and later by the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation by Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson in 1964.[17] These findings were a first step to rule out some of many alternative cosmologies.

Since around 1990, several dramatic advances in observational cosmology have transformed cosmology from a largely speculative science into a predictive science with precise agreement between theory and observation. These advances include observations of the microwave background from the COBE,[18] WMAP[19] and Planck satellites,[20] large new galaxy redshift surveys including 2dfGRS[21] and SDSS,[22] and observations of distant supernovae and gravitational lensing. These observations matched the predictions of the cosmic inflation theory, a modified Big Bang theory, and the specific version known as the Lambda-CDM model. This has led many to refer to modern times as the "golden age of cosmology".[23]

In 2014, the BICEP2 collaboration claimed that they had detected the imprint of gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave background. However, this result was later found to be spurious: the supposed evidence of gravitational waves was in fact due to interstellar dust.[24][25]

On 1 December 2014, at the Planck 2014 meeting in FerraraItaly, astronomers reported that the universe is 13.8 billion years old and composed of 4.9% atomic matter, 26.6% dark matter and 68.5% dark energy.[26]

Religious or mythological cosmology[edit]

Religious or mythological cosmology is a body of beliefs based on mythologicalreligious, and esoteric literature and traditions of creation and eschatology. Creation myths are found in most religions, and are typically split into five different classifications, based on a system created by Mircea Eliade and his colleague Charles Long.

  • Types of Creation Myths based on similar motifs:
    • Creation ex nihilo in which the creation is through the thought, word, dream or bodily secretions of a divine being.
    • Earth diver creation in which a diver, usually a bird or amphibian sent by a creator, plunges to the seabed through a primordial ocean to bring up sand or mud which develops into a terrestrial world.
    • Emergence myths in which progenitors pass through a series of worlds and metamorphoses until reaching the present world.
    • Creation by the dismemberment of a primordial being.
    • Creation by the splitting or ordering of a primordial unity such as the cracking of a cosmic egg or a bringing order from chaos.[27]

Philosophy[edit]

Representation of the observable universe on a logarithmic scale. Distance from the Sun increases from center to edge. Planets and other celestial bodies were enlarged to appreciate their shapes.

Cosmology deals with the world as the totality of space, time and all phenomena. Historically, it has had quite a broad scope, and in many cases was found in religion.[28] Some questions about the Universe are beyond the scope of scientific inquiry, but may still be interrogated through appeals to other philosophical approaches like dialectics. Some questions that are included in extra-scientific endeavors may include:[29][30]

  • What is the origin of the universe? What is its first cause (if any)? Is its existence necessary? (see monismpantheismemanationism and creationism)
  • What are the ultimate material components of the universe? (see mechanismdynamismhylomorphismatomism)
  • What is the ultimate reason (if any) for the existence of the universe? Does the cosmos have a purpose? (see teleology)
  • Does the existence of consciousness have a role in the existence of reality? How do we know what we know about the totality of the cosmos? Does cosmological reasoning reveal metaphysical truths? (see epistemology)

Historical cosmologies[edit]

NameAuthor and dateClassificationRemarks
Hindu cosmologyRigveda (c. 1700–1100 BCE)Cyclical or oscillating, Infinite in timePrimal matter remains manifest for 311.04 trillion years and unmanifest for an equal length. The universe remains manifest for 4.32 billion years and unmanifest for an equal length. Innumerable universes exist simultaneously. These cycles have and will last forever, driven by desires.
Jain cosmologyJain Agamas (written around 500 CE as per the teachings of Mahavira 599–527 BCE)Cyclical or oscillating, eternal and finiteJain cosmology considers the loka, or universe, as an uncreated entity, existing since infinity, the shape of the universe as similar to a man standing with legs apart and arm resting on his waist. This Universe, according to Jainism, is broad at the top, narrow at the middle and once again becomes broad at the bottom.
Babylonian cosmologyBabylonian literature (c. 2300–500 BCE)Flat earth floating in infinite "waters of chaos"The Earth and the Heavens form a unit within infinite "waters of chaos"; the earth is flat and circular, and a solid dome (the "firmament") keeps out the outer "chaos"-ocean.
Eleatic cosmologyParmenides (c. 515 BCE)Finite and spherical in extentThe Universe is unchanging, uniform, perfect, necessary, timeless, and neither generated nor perishable. Void is impossible. Plurality and change are products of epistemic ignorance derived from sense experience. Temporal and spatial limits are arbitrary and relative to the Parmenidean whole.
Samkhya Cosmic EvolutionKapila (6th century BCE), pupil AsuriPrakriti (Matter) and Purusha (Consiouness) RelationPrakriti (Matter) is the source of the world of becoming. It is pure potentiality that evolves itself successively into twenty four tattvas or principles. The evolution itself is possible because Prakriti is always in a state of tension among its constituent strands known as gunas (Sattva (lightness or purity), Rajas (passion or activity), and Tamas (inertia or heaviness)). The cause and effect theory of Sankhya is called Satkaarya-vaada (theory of existent causes), and holds that nothing can really be created from or destroyed into nothingness—all evolution is simply the transformation of primal Nature from one form to another.[citation needed]
Biblical cosmologyGenesis creation narrativeEarth floating in infinite "waters of chaos"The Earth and the Heavens form a unit within infinite "waters of chaos"; the "firmament" keeps out the outer "chaos"-ocean.
Anaximander's modelAnaximander (c. 560 BCE)Geocentric, cylindrical Earth, infinite in extent, finite time; first purely mechanical modelThe Earth floats very still in the centre of the infinite, not supported by anything.[31] At the origin, after the separation of hot and cold, a ball of flame appeared that surrounded Earth like bark on a tree. This ball broke apart to form the rest of the Universe. It resembled a system of hollow concentric wheels, filled with fire, with the rims pierced by holes like those of a flute; no heavenly bodies as such, only light through the holes. Three wheels, in order outwards from Earth: stars (including planets), Moon and a large Sun.[32]
Atomist universeAnaxagoras (500–428 BCE) & later EpicurusInfinite in extentThe universe contains only two things: an infinite number of tiny seeds (atoms) and the void of infinite extent. All atoms are made of the same substance, but differ in size and shape. Objects are formed from atom aggregations and decay back into atoms. Incorporates Leucippus' principle of causality: "nothing happens at random; everything happens out of reason and necessity". The universe was not ruled by gods.[citation needed]
Pythagorean universePhilolaus (d. 390 BCE)Existence of a "Central Fire" at the center of the Universe.At the center of the Universe is a central fire, around which the Earth, Sun, Moon and planets revolve uniformly. The Sun revolves around the central fire once a year, the stars are immobile. The earth in its motion maintains the same hidden face towards the central fire, hence it is never seen. First known non-geocentric model of the Universe.[33]
De MundoPseudo-Aristotle (d. 250 BCE or between 350 and 200 BCE)The Universe is a system made up of heaven and earth and the elements which are contained in them.There are "five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater – namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by ether – make up the whole Universe."[34]
Stoic universeStoics (300 BCE – 200 CE)Island universeThe cosmos is finite and surrounded by an infinite void. It is in a state of flux, and pulsates in size and undergoes periodic upheavals and conflagrations.
Platonic universePlato (c. 360 BCE)Geocentric, complex cosmogony, finite extent, implied finite time, cyclicalStatic Earth at center, surrounded by heavenly bodies which move in perfect circles, arranged by the will of the demiurge[35] in order: Moon, Sun, planets and fixed stars.[36][37] Complex motions repeat every 'perfect' year.[38]
Eudoxus' modelEudoxus of Cnidus (c. 340 BCE) and later CallippusGeocentric, first geometric-mathematical modelThe heavenly bodies move as if they were attached to a number of Earth centered concentrical, invisible spheres, every of them rotating around its own and different axis and at different paces.[39] There are twenty-seven homocentric spheres with each sphere explaining a type of observable motion for each celestial object. Eudoxus emphasised that this is a purely mathematical construct of the model in the sense that the spheres of each celestial body do not exist, it just shows the possible positions of the bodies.[40]
Aristotelian universeAristotle (384–322 BCE)Geocentric (based on Eudoxus' model), static, steady state, finite extent, infinite timeStatic and spherical Earth is surrounded by 43 to 55 concentric celestial spheres, which are material and crystalline.[41] Universe exists unchanged throughout eternity. Contains a fifth element, called aether, that was added to the four classical elements.[42]
Aristarchean universeAristarchus (c. 280 BCE)HeliocentricEarth rotates daily on its axis and revolves annually about the Sun in a circular orbit. Sphere of fixed stars is centered about the Sun.[43]
Ptolemaic modelPtolemy (2nd century CE)Geocentric (based on Aristotelian universe)Universe orbits around a stationary Earth. Planets move in circular epicycles, each having a center that moved in a larger circular orbit (called an eccentric or a deferent) around a center-point near Earth. The use of equants added another level of complexity and allowed astronomers to predict the positions of the planets. The most successful universe model of all time, using the criterion of longevity. The Almagest (the Great System).
Capella's modelMartianus Capella (c. 420)Geocentric and HeliocentricThe Earth is at rest in the center of the universe and circled by the Moon, the Sun, three planets and the stars, while Mercury and Venus circle the Sun.[44]
Aryabhatan modelAryabhata (499)Geocentric or HeliocentricThe Earth rotates and the planets move in elliptical orbits around either the Earth or Sun; uncertain whether the model is geocentric or heliocentric due to planetary orbits given with respect to both the Earth and Sun.
Medieval universeMedieval philosophers (500–1200)Finite in timeA universe that is finite in time and has a beginning is proposed by the Christian philosopher John Philoponus, who argues against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past. Logical arguments supporting a finite universe are developed by the early Muslim philosopher Al-Kindi, the Jewish philosopher Saadia Gaon, and the Muslim theologian Al-Ghazali.
Non-Parallel MultiverseBhagvata Puran(800–1000)Multiverse, Non ParallelInnumerable universes is comparable to the multiverse theory, except nonparallel where each universe is different and individual jiva-atmas (embodied souls) exist in exactly one universe at a time. All universes manifest from the same matter, and so they all follow parallel time cycles, manifesting and unmanifesting at the same time.[45]
Multiversal cosmologyFakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209)Multiverse, multiple worlds and universesThere exists an infinite outer space beyond the known world, and God has the power to fill the vacuum with an infinite number of universes.
Maragha modelsMaragha school (1259–1528)GeocentricVarious modifications to Ptolemaic model and Aristotelian universe, including rejection of equant and eccentrics at Maragheh observatory, and introduction of Tusi-couple by Al-Tusi. Alternative models later proposed, including the first accurate lunar model by Ibn al-Shatir, a model rejecting stationary Earth in favour of Earth's rotation by Ali Kuşçu, and planetary model incorporating "circular inertia" by Al-Birjandi.
Nilakanthan modelNilakantha Somayaji (1444–1544)Geocentric and heliocentricA universe in which the planets orbit the Sun, which orbits the Earth; similar to the later Tychonic system.
Copernican universeNicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543)Heliocentric with circular planetary orbits, finite extentFirst described in De revolutionibus orbium coelestium. The Sun is in the center of the universe, planets including Earth orbit the Sun, but the Moon orbits the Earth. The universe is limited by the sphere of the fixed stars.
Tychonic systemTycho Brahe (1546–1601)Geocentric and HeliocentricA universe in which the planets orbit the Sun and the Sun orbits the Earth, similar to the earlier Nilakanthan model.
Bruno's cosmologyGiordano Bruno (1548–1600)Infinite extent, infinite time, homogeneous, isotropic, non-hierarchicalRejects the idea of a hierarchical universe. Earth and Sun have no special properties in comparison with the other heavenly bodies. The void between the stars is filled with aether, and matter is composed of the same four elements (water, earth, fire, and air), and is atomistic, animistic and intelligent.
De MagneteWilliam Gilbert (1544–1603)Heliocentric, indefinitely extendedCopernican heliocentrism, but he rejects the idea of a limiting sphere of the fixed stars for which no proof has been offered.[46]
KeplerianJohannes Kepler (1571–1630)Heliocentric with elliptical planetary orbitsKepler's discoveries, marrying mathematics and physics, provided the foundation for our present conception of the Solar system, but distant stars were still seen as objects in a thin, fixed celestial sphere.
Static NewtonianIsaac Newton (1642–1727)Static (evolving), steady state, infiniteEvery particle in the universe attracts every other particle. Matter on the large scale is uniformly distributed. Gravitationally balanced but unstable.
Cartesian Vortex universeRené Descartes, 17th centuryStatic (evolving), steady state, infiniteSystem of huge swirling whirlpools of aethereal or fine matter produces what we would call gravitational effects. But his vacuum was not empty; all space was filled with matter.
Hierarchical universeImmanuel KantJohann Lambert, 18th centuryStatic (evolving), steady state, infiniteMatter is clustered on ever larger scales of hierarchy. Matter is endlessly recycled.
Einstein Universe with a cosmological constantAlbert Einstein, 1917Static (nominally). Bounded (finite)"Matter without motion". Contains uniformly distributed matter. Uniformly curved spherical space; based on Riemann's hypersphere. Curvature is set equal to Λ. In effect Λ is equivalent to a repulsive force which counteracts gravity. Unstable.
De Sitter universeWillem de Sitter, 1917Expanding flat space.

Steady state. Λ > 0

"Motion without matter." Only apparently static. Based on Einstein's general relativity. Space expands with constant accelerationScale factor increases exponentially (constant inflation).
MacMillan universeWilliam Duncan MacMillan 1920sStatic and steady stateNew matter is created from radiation; starlight perpetually recycled into new matter particles.
Friedmann universe, spherical spaceAlexander Friedmann 1922Spherical expanding space.

k = +1 ; no Λ

Positive curvature. Curvature constant k = +1

Expands then recollapsesSpatially closed (finite).

Friedmann universe, hyperbolic spaceAlexander Friedmann, 1924Hyperbolic expanding space.

k = −1 ; no Λ

Negative curvature. Said to be infinite (but ambiguous). Unbounded. Expands forever.
Dirac large numbers hypothesisPaul Dirac 1930sExpandingDemands a large variation in G, which decreases with time. Gravity weakens as universe evolves.
Friedmann zero-curvatureEinstein and De Sitter, 1932Expanding flat space

k = 0 ; Λ = 0 Critical density

Curvature constant k = 0. Said to be infinite (but ambiguous). "Unbounded cosmos of limited extent". Expands forever. "Simplest" of all known universes. Named after but not considered by Friedmann. Has a deceleration term q = 1/2, which means that its expansion rate slows down.
The original Big Bang (Friedmann-Lemaître)Georges Lemaître 1927–29Expansion

Λ > 0 ; Λ > |Gravity|

Λ is positive and has a magnitude greater than gravity. Universe has initial high-density state ("primeval atom"). Followed by a two-stage expansion. Λ is used to destabilize the universe. (Lemaître is considered the father of the Big Bang model.)
Oscillating universe (Friedmann-Einstein)Favored by Friedmann, 1920sExpanding and contracting in cyclesTime is endless and beginningless; thus avoids the beginning-of-time paradox. Perpetual cycles of Big Bang followed by Big Crunch. (Einstein's first choice after he rejected his 1917 model.)
Eddington universeArthur Eddington 1930First static then expandsStatic Einstein 1917 universe with its instability disturbed into expansion mode; with relentless matter dilution becomes a De Sitter universe. Λ dominates gravity.
Milne universe of kinematic relativityEdward Milne, 1933, 1935;

William H. McCrea, 1930s

Kinematic expansion without space expansionRejects general relativity and the expanding space paradigm. Gravity not included as initial assumption. Obeys cosmological principle and special relativity; consists of a finite spherical cloud of particles (or galaxies) that expands within an infinite and otherwise empty flat space. It has a center and a cosmic edge (surface of the particle cloud) that expands at light speed. Explanation of gravity was elaborate and unconvincing.
Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker class of modelsHoward RobertsonArthur Walker, 1935Uniformly expandingClass of universes that are homogeneous and isotropic. Spacetime separates into uniformly curved space and cosmic time common to all co-moving observers. The formulation system is now known as the FLRW or Robertson–Walker metrics of cosmic time and curved space.
Steady-stateHermann BondiThomas Gold, 1948Expanding, steady state, infiniteMatter creation rate maintains constant density. Continuous creation out of nothing from nowhere. Exponential expansion. Deceleration term q = −1.
Steady-stateFred Hoyle 1948Expanding, steady state; but unstableMatter creation rate maintains constant density. But since matter creation rate must be exactly balanced with the space expansion rate the system is unstable.
AmbiplasmaHannes Alfvén 1965 Oskar KleinCellular universe, expanding by means of matter–antimatter annihilationBased on the concept of plasma cosmology. The universe is viewed as "meta-galaxies" divided by double layers and thus a bubble-like nature. Other universes are formed from other bubbles. Ongoing cosmic matter-antimatter annihilations keep the bubbles separated and moving apart preventing them from interacting.
Brans–Dicke theoryCarl H. BransRobert H. DickeExpandingBased on Mach's principleG varies with time as universe expands. "But nobody is quite sure what Mach's principle actually means."[citation needed]
Cosmic inflationAlan Guth 1980Big Bang modified to solve horizon and flatness problemsBased on the concept of hot inflation. The universe is viewed as a multiple quantum flux – hence its bubble-like nature. Other universes are formed from other bubbles. Ongoing cosmic expansion kept the bubbles separated and moving apart.
Eternal inflation (a multiple universe model)Andreï Linde, 1983Big Bang with cosmic inflationMultiverse based on the concept of cold inflation, in which inflationary events occur at random each with independent initial conditions; some expand into bubble universes supposedly like our entire cosmos. Bubbles nucleate in a spacetime foam.
Cyclic modelPaul SteinhardtNeil Turok 2002Expanding and contracting in cycles; M-theory.Two parallel orbifold planes or M-branes collide periodically in a higher-dimensional space. With quintessence or dark energy.
Cyclic modelLauris Baum; Paul Frampton 2007Solution of Tolman's entropy problemPhantom dark energy fragments universe into large number of disconnected patches. Our patch contracts containing only dark energy with zero entropy.

Table notes: the term "static" simply means not expanding and not contracting. Symbol G represents Newton's gravitational constant; Λ (Lambda) is the cosmological constant.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Karl Hille, ed. (13 October 2016). "Hubble Reveals Observable Universe Contains 10 Times More Galaxies Than Previously Thought"NASA. Retrieved 17 October 2016.
  2. ^ Hetherington, Norriss S. (2014). Encyclopedia of Cosmology (Routledge Revivals): Historical, Philosophical, and Scientific Foundations of Modern Cosmology. Routledge. p. 116. ISBN 978-1-317-67766-6.
  3. ^ Luminet, Jean-Pierre (2008). The Wraparound Universe. CRC Press. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-4398-6496-8. Extract of page 170
  4. ^ "Introduction: Cosmology – space" Archived 3 July 2015 at the Wayback MachineNew Scientist. 4 September 2006
  5. ^ "Cosmology" Oxford Dictionaries
  6. ^ Overbye, Dennis (25 February 2019). "Have Dark Forces Been Messing With the Cosmos? – Axions? Phantom energy? Astrophysicists scramble to patch a hole in the universe, rewriting cosmic history in the process"The New York Times. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  7. ^ David N. Spergel (Fall 2014). "Cosmology Today"Daedalus143 (4): 125–133. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00312S2CID 57568214.
  8. ^ Planck Collaboration (1 October 2016). "Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters"Astronomy & Astrophysics594 (13). Table 4 on page 31 of PDF. arXiv:1502.01589Bibcode:2016A&A...594A..13Pdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830S2CID 119262962.
  9. ^ Diderot (Biography), Denis (1 April 2015). "Detailed Explanation of the System of Human Knowledge"Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert – Collaborative Translation Project. Retrieved 1 April 2015.
  10. ^ The thoughts of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus viii. 52.
  11. ^ Einstein, A. (1952). "Cosmological considerations on the general theory of relativity"The Principle of Relativity. Dover Books on Physics. June 1, 1952. 240 Pages. 0486600815, P. 175-188: 175–188. Bibcode:1952prel.book..175E.
  12. ^ Dodelson, Scott (30 March 2003). Modern Cosmology. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-051197-9.
  13. ^ Falk, Dan (18 March 2009). "Review: The Day We Found the Universe by Marcia Bartusiak"New Scientist201 (2700): 45. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(09)60809-5ISSN 0262-4079.
  14. ^ Hubble, E. P. (1 December 1926). "Extragalactic nebulae"The Astrophysical Journal64: 321. Bibcode:1926ApJ....64..321Hdoi:10.1086/143018ISSN 0004-637X.
  15. ^ Martin, G. (1883). "G. DELSAULX. — Sur une propriété de la diffraction des ondes planes; Annales de la Société scientifique de Bruxelles; 1882"Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée (in French). 2 (1): 175. doi:10.1051/jphystap:018830020017501ISSN 0368-3893.
  16. ^ Hubble, Edwin (15 March 1929). "A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America15 (3): 168–173. Bibcode:1929PNAS...15..168Hdoi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168ISSN 0027-8424PMC 522427PMID 16577160.
  17. ^ Penzias, A. A.; Wilson, R. W. (1 July 1965). "A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s"The Astrophysical Journal142: 419–421. Bibcode:1965ApJ...142..419Pdoi:10.1086/148307ISSN 0004-637X.
  18. ^ Boggess, N. W.; Mather, J. C.; Weiss, R.; Bennett, C. L.; Cheng, E. S.; Dwek, E.; Gulkis, S.; Hauser, M. G.; Janssen, M. A.; Kelsall, T.; Meyer, S. S. (1 October 1992). "The COBE mission – Its design and performance two years after launch"The Astrophysical Journal397: 420–429. Bibcode:1992ApJ...397..420Bdoi:10.1086/171797ISSN 0004-637X.
  19. ^ Parker, Barry R. (1993). The vindication of the big bang : breakthroughs and barriers. New York: Plenum Press. ISBN 0-306-44469-0OCLC 27069165.
  20. ^ "Computer Graphics Achievement Award"ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Awards. SIGGRAPH '18. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery: 1. 12 August 2018. doi:10.1145/3225151.3232529ISBN 978-1-4503-5830-9S2CID 51979217.
  21. ^ Science, American Association for the Advancement of (15 June 2007). "NETWATCH: Botany's Wayback Machine"Science316 (5831): 1547. doi:10.1126/science.316.5831.1547dISSN 0036-8075S2CID 220096361.
  22. ^ Paraficz, D.; Hjorth, J.; Elíasdóttir, Á (1 May 2009). "Results of optical monitoring of 5 SDSS double QSOs with the Nordic Optical Telescope"Astronomy & Astrophysics499 (2): 395–408. arXiv:0903.1027Bibcode:2009A&A...499..395Pdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811387ISSN 0004-6361.
  23. ^ Alan Guth is reported to have made this very claim in an Edge Foundation interview EDGE Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  24. ^ Sample, Ian (4 June 2014). "Gravitational waves turn to dust after claims of flawed analysis"the Guardian.
  25. ^ Cowen, Ron (30 January 2015). "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead". Naturedoi:10.1038/nature.2015.16830S2CID 124938210.
  26. ^ Dennis Overbye (1 December 2014). "New Images Refine View of Infant Universe"The New York Times. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  27. ^ Leonard & McClure 2004, pp. 32–33
  28. ^ Crouch, C. L. (8 February 2010). "Genesis 1:26-7 As a statement of humanity's divine parentage"The Journal of Theological Studies61 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1093/jts/flp185.
  29. ^ "BICEP2 2014 Results Release"National Science Foundation. 17 March 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  30. ^ "Publications – Cosmos"www.cosmos.esa.int. Retrieved 19 August 2018.
  31. ^ Aristotle, On the Heavens, ii, 13
  32. ^ Most of Anaximander's model of the Universe comes from pseudo-Plutarch (II, 20–28):
    "[The Sun] is a circle twenty-eight times as big as the Earth, with the outline similar to that of a fire-filled chariot wheel, on which appears a mouth in certain places and through which it exposes its fire, as through the hole on a flute. [...] the Sun is equal to the Earth, but the circle on which it breathes and on which it's borne is twenty-seven times as big as the whole earth. [...] [The eclipse] is when the mouth from which comes the fire heat is closed. [...] [The Moon] is a circle nineteen times as big as the whole earth, all filled with fire, like that of the Sun".
  33. ^ Carl B. Boyer (1968), A History of Mathematics. Wiley. ISBN 0471543977. p. 54.
  34. ^ Aristotle (1914). Forster, E. S.; Dobson, J. F. (eds.). De Mundo. Oxford University Press. 393a.
  35. ^ "The components from which he made the soul and the way in which he made it were as follows: In between the Being that is indivisible and always changeless, and the one that is divisible and comes to be in the corporeal realm, he mixed a third, intermediate form of being, derived from the other two. Similarly, he made a mixture of the Same, and then one of the Different, in between their indivisible and their corporeal, divisible counterparts. And he took the three mixtures and mixed them together to make a uniform mixture, forcing the Different, which was hard to mix, into conformity with the Same. Now when he had mixed these two with Being, and from the three had made a single mixture, he redivided the whole mixture into as many parts as his task required, each part remaining a mixture of the Same, the Different and Being." (35a-b), translation Donald J. Zeyl
  36. ^ Plato, Timaeus, 36c
  37. ^ Plato, Timaeus, 36d
  38. ^ Plato, Timaeus, 39d
  39. ^ Yavetz, Ido (February 1998). "On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus". Archive for History of Exact Sciences52 (3): 222–225. Bibcode:1998AHES...52..222Ydoi:10.1007/s004070050017JSTOR 41134047S2CID 121186044.
  40. ^ Crowe, Michael (2001). Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution. Mineola, NY: Dover. p. 23. ISBN 0-486-41444-2.
  41. ^ Easterling, H (1961). "Homocentric Spheres in De Caelo". Phronesis6 (2): 138–141. doi:10.1163/156852861x00161JSTOR 4181694.
  42. ^ Lloyd, G. E. R. (1968). The critic of Plato. Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-09456-6.
  43. ^ Hirshfeld, Alan W. (2004). "The Triangles of Aristarchus"The Mathematics Teacher97 (4): 228–231. doi:10.5951/MT.97.4.0228ISSN 0025-5769JSTOR 20871578.
  44. ^ Bruce S. Eastwood, Ordering the Heavens: Roman Astronomy and Cosmology in the Carolingian Renaissance (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 238-9.
  45. ^ Mirabello, Mark (15 September 2016). A Traveler's Guide to the Afterlife: Traditions and Beliefs on Death, Dying, and What Lies Beyond. Simon and Schuster. p. 23. ISBN 978-1-62055-598-9.
  46. ^ Gilbert, William (1893). "Book 6, Chapter III". De Magnete. Translated by Mottelay, P. Fleury. (Facsimile). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-26761-X.

Sources[edit]

  • Bragg, Melvyn (2023). "The Universe's Shape"bbc.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 23 May 2023Melvyn Bragg discusses shape, size and topology of the universe and examines theories about its expansion. If it is already infinite, how can it be getting any bigger? And is there really only one?
  • "Cosmic Journey: A History of Scientific Cosmology"history.aip.org. American Institute of Physics. 2023. Retrieved 23 May 2023The history of cosmology is a grand story of discovery, from ancient Greek astronomy to -space telescopes.
  • Dodelson, Scott; Schmidt, Fabian (2020). Modern Cosmology 2nd Edition. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0128159484. Download full text: Dodelson, Scott; Schmidt, Fabian (2020). "Scott Dodelson - Fabian Schmidt - Modern Cosmology (2021) PDF" (PDF)scribd.com. Academic Press. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  • "Genesis, Search for Origins. End of mission wrap up"genesismission.jpl.nasa.gov. NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Retrieved 23 May 2023About 4.6 billion years ago, the solar nebula transformed into the present solar system. In order to chemically model the processes which drove that transformation, we would, ideally, like to have a sample of that original nebula to use as a baseline from which we can track changes.
  • Leonard, Scott A; McClure, Michael (2004). Myth and Knowing. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-7674-1957-4.
  • Lyth, David (12 December 1993). "Introduction to Cosmology". arXiv:astro-ph/9312022These notes form an introduction to cosmology with special emphasis on large scale structure, the cmb anisotropy and inflation. Lectures given at the Summer School in High Energy Physics and Cosmology, ICTP (Trieste) 1993.) 60 pages, plus 5 Figures.
  • "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)"ned.ipac.caltech.edu. NASA. 2023. Retrieved 23 May 2023April 2023 Release Highlights Database Updates
  • Sophia Centre. The Sophia Centre for the Study of Cosmology in Culture, University of Wales Trinity Saint David.


불교와 과학 — Study Buddhism

불교와 과학 — Study Buddhism

불교와 과학
알렉산더 베르젠 박사


Share on facebook

북마크

기타 언어العربية
བོད་ཡིག་
Deutsch
영어
Español
فارسی
Français
दिन्दी
Indonesia
Italiano
Монгол
پنجابی
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
اُردو
Tiếng Việt
简体中文
번체중문

질문: 불교와 과학의 관계에 대해 좀 더 이야기해 주었으면 하는 것과 공통점에 대해서 몇가지 구체적인 예를 들어 주세요.

베르젠 박사: 달라이 라마 교황과 같은 불교도의 위대한 스승과 과학자 간의 상호작용은 주로 세 분야에 초점을 맞추었다. 첫 번째는 천체 물리학이며, 이것은 주로 우주가 어떻게 발달해 왔는가 – 우주에는 시작이 있는가? 우주는 창조되었는가, 아니면 영원한 과정의 일부인가? – 에 관심이 있습니다. 또 다른 주제는 원자와 물질의 구조에 관심을 가진 소립자 물리학입니다. 세 번째는 뇌의 작용에 관심이 있는 뇌신경학입니다. 이들은 주요 분야입니다.

과학과 불교 모두가 공통적으로 얻은 결론 중 하나는 창조주가 존재하지 않는다는 것입니다. 과학에서는 물질과 에너지 보존의 법칙에서 물질과 에너지는 만들어지는 것도 파괴되지도 않고, 변화할 뿐이라고 합니다. 불교도는 이것에 동의하고 이 이론을 마음(마인드)으로까지 확장할 수 있다고 생각합니다. 불교에서의 "마인드"는 현상의 인식 - 의식적이든 무의식이든 -를 의미하며, 현상 인식은 발생하지 않고 파괴되지 않고 단지 변용하는 것만 가능합니다 . 따라서 윤회전생이란 개인의 현상인식이 계속되는 연속성(심상속) 중 단순히 변용함으로써 그 연속성(심상속)의 변용이 환생한 다른 신체라는 물질적 토대 에서 일어나는 것입니다.

소립자 물리학자가 무언가를 정의할 때 관찰자의 역할을 강조합니다. 예를 들어, 한 관점에서 빛은 물질이고 다른 관점에서는 에너지입니다. 빛이 어떤 현상으로 존재하는지는 수많은 요소에 의존하며, 특히 그것을 분석하는 연구자의 개념 체계에 달려 있습니다. 그러므로, 현상은 그것을 인지하는 의식과 무관하게, 이라든지 저것이라고 하는 것처럼 자립해 존재는 하고 있지 않습니다.

불교는 비슷한 견해를 가지고 있습니다. 즉, 사물이 어떻게 존재하는지는 관찰자와 관찰자가 어떻게 생각하는지의 개념 체계에 의존한다는 것입니다. 예를 들어, 어떤 상황이 엄청난 문제인지 해결할 수 있는 것인지는 관찰자, 즉 그 문제에 관련된 본인에 의합니다. 만약 그 사람이, 「이것은 불가능한 상황에서 어떻게 할 수 없다」라고 하는 개념 체계를 가지면, 실제 해결책이 없는 어려운 문제가 있는 것입니다. 그러나 "이것은 상당히 복잡하지만, 다른 방향에서 접근하면 해결책은 있을 수 있다"라고 생각하는 마음의 잡는 방법으로 접하면 그 사람은 해결책을 찾으려고 좀 더 열릴 수 있습니다. . 한 사람에게는 엄청나게 큰 문제가 다른 사람에게는 특히 큰 일이 아니다. 그것은 관찰자에 달려 있습니다. 즉, 우리의 문제는 그 자체로 엄청난 문제로 존재하지 않습니다. 그러므로 과학과 불교는 같은 결론에 이르게 됩니다.

마찬가지로, 신경학자와 불교도는 사물이 종속적으로 일어난다고 생각한다. 예를 들어, 우리가 어떤 것을 결심할 때, 도대체 무엇이 그 결심을 하는가를 찾았다고 하면, 신경학자는 뇌를 연구합니다만, 뇌에는 단독의 「결심하는 것」은 존재하지 않는 것 가 밝혀졌습니다. 머리 속에는 – 눈이나 귀 등으로부터 정보를 받고 마치 컴퓨터 화면처럼 버튼을 누르는 것으로 결심을 하고, 팔에는 이렇게, 다리에는 오히려 지시한다 – 작은 개인 "나"가 앉아있는 것은 아닙니다. 오히려 신경 충동과 화학적 및 전기적 프로세스의 엄청난 네트워크의 복잡한 상호 관련 결과가 결정된다는 것입니다. 함께 되어 결심이라는 결과를 일으키는 것입니다. 이것은 명확한 실체로서의, 결심하는 것 같은 존재 등 없어도 일어나는 것입니다. 불교에서도 같은 일을 강조합니다. 즉, 머리 속에 앉아, 항상 실체로서의 결정을 내리는 "나"는 존재하지 않습니다. 관습으로서 우리는 "이것을 체험하고 있다. 저것을 하고 있다"라고 말합니다. 이와 관련하여 과학과 불교는 매우 비슷한 견해를 가지고 있습니다.
시간이란 무엇인가? 학생으로서, 우리는 강의에 늦지 않도록 하거나, 예습하는 시간을 충분히 만들거나, 작업장에서 책임을 완수하기에 충분한 시간을 만드는 등입니다. 인생을 좀 더 잘 하기 위해 시간을 어떻게 이해해야 하나요?

불교에서는 시간을 "변화 측정"으로 정의합니다. 우리는 변화를 빈 행성의 움직임이나 태양의 위치 등에 의해 측정할 수 있습니다. 1학기간에 얼마나 강의가 있는가 – 12개의 강의는 끝났기 때문에, 뒤 두 개 남아 있다 – 하지만 측정할 수 있고, 혹은 월경주기, 또는 몇 번 호흡했는지 등과 신체의 주기 에 의해서도 측정할 수 있습니다. 변화를 측정하는 방법은 다양하며 시간은 단순히 그 중 하나입니다.

시간은 존재하지만, 우리가 시간에 대해 어떻게 생각하는지에 따라 시간은 우리에게 다른 영향을 미칩니다. 예를 들어, 우리는 "시험 전에 하루 밖에 없다!"라고 생각합니다. 시간을 작은 숫자로 생각하기 때문에 충분한 시간이 없으면 불안해집니다. 그것과는 다르게 생각하면, 「24시간 남아 있다」로부터 준비에는 충분한 시간이 있는 것 같다고 할 수 있습니다. 심리적으로, 어떻게 보는지에 의한 것입니다. 시간을 뭔가 고정하고 괴로운 것이라고 보면, 그것에 압도되어 버려, 충분한 시간은 없게 됩니다. 하지만 얼마나 시간이 있는지를 오픈으로 보면, 동요하는 대신에 건설적으로 시간을 사용하려고 하는 것입니다.
불교는 논리와 이성을 강조하지만, 다른 종교처럼 어떤 시점에서 신앙으로의 도약이 필요합니까?

불교에서는 요구되지 않습니다. 이것을 불교의 무엇이 존재하는가 하는 정의에서 찾아낼 수 있습니다. 무엇이 존재하는지를 "그것으로 알 수있는 것"이라고 정의합니다. 제대로 인식 할 수없는 것이라면 존재하지 않습니다. (반죽 없음) 예를 들어 토끼의 뿔, 거북이의 털, 새의 입술 등입니다. 새가 인간의 입술을 가지고 있다고 우리가 상상하거나 만화 속에 인간의 입술을 가지고 있는 새가 있었다고 해도 이상하지는 않지만, 있을 수 없는 새의 입술 등을 절대로 본다 아무것도 없습니다. 그것은 알 수 있는 것이 아니다, 즉 올바른 인식의 대상이 될 수 없기 때문에 존재하지 않는 것입니다.

이것이 의미하는 바는 존재하는 것은 모두 알 수있는 것입니다. 우리의 마음(마인드)은 – 즉 현상을 인식하는 마음의 (정신적인) 활동은 – 모든 것을 포괄할 수 있습니다. 일부 경전에는 절대는 마음을 넘어 말을 넘는 것이라고 쓰고 있습니다. 우선, 나는이 용어를 영어로 "절대 (absolute)"로 번역하는 것을 좋아하지 않습니다. 왜냐하면 그 함의하는 것이 마치 그것이 하늘에 있는 것처럼 우리를 초월하고 있다고 할 수 있기 때문입니다. 대신 저는 “사물의 가장 깊은 사실”이라고 번역했습니다. "사물의 가장 깊은 사실"은 존재합니다. 우리의 통상의 지각작용을 뛰어넘는 의미에서 그 사실은 마음을 넘어 개념과 말을 넘은 것입니다. 단어와 개념은 사물이 흑백 범주에 적용된다는 것을 암시합니다. 좋은 사람, 나쁜 사람, 바보, 천재 등과 언어를 사용하는 것의 함의는, 사물이 뚜렷하게 정의된, 독립한 카테고리에 적용되어 버린다는 것입니다. 즉, "이 사람은 어리석은 사람이다. 그는 아무것도 제대로 할 수 없다"거나 "이 사람은 위대한 사람이다"가 되는 것입니다. 현실을 지각한다는 것은 이와 같은 흑백이라는 카테고리에 사물을 적용하는 것이 아닙니다. 그러한 분리 방법은 환상이며 사물의 본성에 맞지 않습니다. 사물은 더 개방적이고 역동적입니다. 어떤 사람이 지금 뭔가를 할 수 없다고 해도, 그 사람이 바보 같은 사람이 아니라는 것을 의미하지는 않습니다. 사람은 친구, 부모 등과 그 밖에도 다양한 것이 될 수 있습니다.

그러므로 '사물의 가장 깊은 사실'이 마음과 말을 넘어 존재한다고 우리가 언급할 때는 일상적인 개념이나 언어가 어둡게 보여주는 것과 같은 방식과는 다르다. 존재한다는 사실입니다. 우리의 마음은 그것을 포괄할 수 있습니다.

우리의 마음이 있는 사물을 포괄할 수 없기 때문에 그것을 믿는 신앙으로의 도약이 필요하다는 것은 아닙니다. 반대로, “나에게 존경심만으로 내가 말하는 것을 믿지 말아야 한다. 이것은 모든 수준에서 적용됩니다.

어떤 점의 논리는 우리에게 곧 명확하지 않을 때도 있지만, 처음에는 이해할 수 없기 때문에 그냥 무언가를 거부해서는 안됩니다. 인내심 있게 배우고 탐구하는 것으로, 이전에 이해할 수 없었던 것이라도, 철쭉이 맞으면 납득하기 시작하는 일은 있습니다.

비디오 : 게세 락돌 — 불교가 과학에 어떤 기여를 할 수 있는지 자막을 보려면 비디오 화면의 오른쪽 하단에 있는 자막 아이콘을 클릭합니다
. 자막 언어를 변경하려면 설정 아이콘을 클릭하고 자막을 클릭하여 표시 언어를 선택하십시오.