2023/06/23

Taechang Kim - 柳生真 教授による "チェハンギの <恩> と <孝>

(6) Taechang Kim - 昨夜(2023.6.20.火曜日、19:00-21:30)の公共する美学を共にデザインするワークショップ... | Facebook

昨夜(2023.6.20.火曜日、19:00-21:30)の公共する美学を共にデザインするワークショップでの柳生真(韓国円光大学)教授による "チェハンギの <恩> と <孝>関する発題講演を傾聴し、
聴講者たちと交わした対話を終えた感想:

1.チェハンギは勿論、日韓中の気学研究史上気と恩あるいは孝との関連で論及したのは前例のない 画期的な試みであったということで、先ず評価する.
2. しかし 恩は恵と、そして孝は慈と、共に一体として相恩互恵し、親慈子孝するという相互性という多次元的動態として体感 体験 体認することが大事である.
3. チェハンギの美学とは、生命開新美学の観点と立場から見れば <報謝の美>ではないか、という気がする.
4. チェハンギと柳宗悦との恩関連繋がりの話があったけれど、ラフカデイオ-
ハーンが日本の美を世界が十分理解していないなかで、日本人以上に高く評価し
世界に知らせようとしてもらったことに感謝し、それをまだ世界が十分知らない
韓国民衆の日常生活から生み出された民衆的生活用品にそれまで認識されなかった独特の美をはっけんし、そこから貴族的芸術美学とはちがう民衆的工芸美学を
整理提示することによって世界に知らせることを通じて報恩の実践に献身したと
いう深い結縁を感じるのである.
See translation

2 comments

  • Taechang Kim
    天地人三次元相関連動としての地球生態学的認識像は、歴史的状況的条件変化によって刷新を繰り返してきたけれど、恩恵生態学という新たな認識-実践像の
    整理と提示には大きな思考発展的意義と展望開新的可能性があるのではないだろうか?
    • Like
    • Reply
    • See translation
    • 2 d
  • Taechang Kim
    生態学と言うけれど、自然生態学が昨今の議論の主流になっているけれど、文化生態学や社会生態学、そして政治生態学や経済生態学等々いろんな専門分野が多元化しているなかで、韓国の一部では地球(生態)政治神学の吸収と波及こそが時代と現状の桎梏から解放される道筋であるかのように談論が続く. 果たしてそれで
    よいのか?

===
·
어젯밤(2023.6.20.화요일,19:00-21:30) 
공공하는 미학을 함께 디자인하는 워크숍에서 유생진(한국원광대학교) 교수의
 "최한기의 <은혜>와 <효>에 관한 발제 강연을 경청하고, 청강자들과 나눈 대화를 마친 소감:

1. 최한기는 물론 한중일 기학연구사상 기와 은혜 혹은 효와의 관련으로 논급한 것은 전례가 없는 획기적인 시도였다는 점에서 먼저 평가한다.
2. 그러나 은혜는 혜와, 그리고 효는 
자와 함께 일체로서 상은호혜하고, 친자자효한다는 상호성이라는 다차원적 동태로서 체감체험체인하는 것이 중요하다.
3. 최한기의 미학이란 생명개신미학의 관점과 입장에서 보면 <보사의 미>가 아닐까 하는 생각이 든다.
4. 최한기와 야나기무네요시의 은혜관련 이야기가 있었는데, 
라프카디오-한이 일본의 미를 세계가 충분히 이해하지 못하는 가운데 일본인 이상으로 높이 평가하고 세상에 알리려고 해준것에 감사하고 그것을 아직 세계가 충분히 알지 못한다

한국민중의 일상생활에서 창출된 민중적 생활용품에 그동안 인식되지 않았던 독특한 미를 발굴하고, 그로부터 귀족적 예술미학과는 다른 민중적 공예미학을 정리 제시함으로써 세계에 알리는 것을 통해 보은 실천에 헌신했다고 라는 깊은 결연을 느끼는 것이다.
===

천지인 3차원 상관연동으로서의 지구생태학적 인식상은 
역사적 상황적 조건변화에 따라 쇄신을 거듭해 왔으나 
수혜생태학이라는 새로운 인식-실천상의 정리와 제시에는 큰 사고 발전적 의의와 전망 개신적 가능성이 있지 않을까?

생태학이라고 하지만, 
자연생태학이 오늘날의 논의의 주류가 되고 있지만, 
문화생태학이나 사회생태학, 그리고 정치생태학이나 경제생태학 등 여러 전문분야가 다원화되고 있는 가운데 
우리나라 일각에서는 지구(생태)정치신학의 흡수와 파급이야말로 
시대와 현상의 질곡에서 해방되는 길인 것처럼 담론이 계속된다. 
과연 그것으로 좋으냐?

=====

The Gurdjieff Journal—Fourth Way Perspectives—Gurdjieff, Sufism & Mohammed

The Gurdjieff Journal—Fourth Way Perspectives—Gurdjieff, Sufism & Mohammed



==

The Fourth Way
The Original Teaching

What has been confusing to many people is that until Gurdjieff introduced the teaching in Russia in 1912 it was not known. Since chronologically all teachings and religions appear before The Fourth Way, it is easily supposed that it is last. This perception, however, is quite linear. Though The Fourth Way does appear last, it is actually first. All esoteric and religious history is thus stood on its head.

We see the world, as Gurdjieff said many times, "topsy-turvy." Original does not mean newly invented, as it is often taken to mean. An original teaching is "of the origin," meaning that the teaching existed first, from the beginning, before other teachings that may derive from it.

In other words, The Fourth Way predates not only Christianity but the Egyptian, Judaic, Persian, Buddhist and Islamic religions.

Gurdjieff tells us that the earliest indications of the teaching of The Fourth Way lie in prehistoric Egypt—an Egypt that existed before recorded history, which dates from 3000 B.C. "It will seem strange to many people," Gurdjieff said, "when I say that this prehistoric Egypt was Christian many thousands of years before the birth of Christ."

He said that the principles and ideas constituting true Christianity were known many thousands of years before the birth of Christ. In discovering these, he had "the blueprint," so to say, of the original Christianity.

As he said, "The Christian church, the Christian form of worship, was not invented by the fathers of the church. It was all taken in a ready-made form from Egypt, only not from the Egypt we know but from one which we do not know. This Egypt was in the same place as the other but it existed much earlier."


===

The Fourth Way
The Enneagram

Enneagram, The Fourth Way, Gurdjieff

One of the principal symbols of The Fourth Way is a circle whose circumference is divided into nine parts that are joined within the circle to a triangle and an irregular six-sided figure, the enneagram.

According to Gurdjieff, the enneagram is "the fundamental hieroglyph of a universal language." Gurdjieff's use of the word hieroglyph, of course, points to Egypt. In this context, it is interesting to consider the nine deities established at Heliopolis in the Early Dynastic Period as part of the cosmogonic or creation myths. These cosmogonic tenets are given in the Pyramid Texts of the Old Kingdom.

Athanasius Kircher, Enneagram, The Fourth Way, Gurdjieff

The frontispiece of the Arithmologia by the Jesuit Athanasius Kircher(1601–1680), published in 1665, shows a figure not identical but somewhat similar to the enneagram. Kircher was a man of the Renaissance in pursuit of origins. His studies in magnetics, acoustics and medicine led him to attempt to decode Egyptian hieroglyphics. According to one source, Kircher regarded the ancient Egyptian religion "as the source not only of Greek and Roman religion but of the beliefs of the later Hebrews, Chaldaeans and even the inhabitants of India, China, Japan and the Americas, colonized in turn by Ham's progeny. Therefore, he believed that by studying these later and better recorded beliefs one could extrapolate the earliest religion of mankind, that of ancient Egypt."

Like The Fourth Way itself, the enneagram has not been known up to the present time. "The enneagram," said Gurdjieff, "has for a very long time been preserved in secret and if it now is, so to speak, made available to all, it is only in an incomplete and theoretical form." This, and the fact that it is a part of a teaching, has not deterred those who have sought to market the enneagram, divested of its deeper meaning and application, as a psychological tool. See William Patrick Patterson's Taking With the Left Hand.


===

The Fourth Way
Esoteric Christianity

Symbols of Esoteric Christianity, The Fourth Way, Gurdjieff, Egypt

Gurdjieff was asked what was the origin of The Fourth Way, he said, "I don't know what you know about Christianity [he emphasized the word.] "It would be necessary to talk a great deal and to talk for a long time in order to make clear what you understand by this term. But for the benefit of those who know already, I will say that, if you like, this is esoteric Christianity."

What is at issue, obviously, is the meaning of the term "Christianity." Gurdjieff is not referring to contemporary Christianity. The Christianity he is referring to is the Christianity before Christ. As he said, "Prehistoric Egypt was Christian many thousands of years before the birth of Christ, that is to say, that its religion was composed of the same principles and ideas that constitute true Christianity. [Emphasis added.] He went on to say that every real religion consists of two parts—an exoteric and an esoteric. The exoteric teaches "what is to be done. The esoteric teaches how to do what the first part teaches. This part is preserved in special schools and with its help it is always possible to rectify what has been distorted in the first part or to restore what has been forgotten."


===

Fourth Way Perspectives

Gurdjieff, Sufism & Mohammed


GurdjieffEver since Mr. Gurdjieff's death, sufis have claimed him as one of theirs. Either that or claimed that the teaching he brought is really Sufism in disguise. Parallels between Sufism and the ancient teaching of The Fourth Way can be pointed out, of course, certain of his dances, music and perhaps some practices. No one reading the first two series of his LegominismAll & Everything, could doubt his familiarity with and respect for Mohammed, Islam and Sufism. But does that make Gurdjieff a Sufi?

Gurdjieff is a Christian. But not of contemporary vintage. He often made fun of contemporary Christianity. The Orthodox, he said, had retained at least something, but Roman Catholicism had degenerated entirely. He held that Jesus Christ was not the only divine messenger to the planet, which would of course exempt Gurdjieff's adhering to the Nicene Creed. Still, in even a casual look at his life, his 'Christianity' is so obvious as make one wonder why it would remain a question. Gurdjieff was baptized a Christian, educated by Russian Orthodox priests and at his death services were conducted at his request in the Russian Orthodox Church in Paris by a Russian priest.

Gurdjieff's Vision of Christianity

Coptic Cross, Egypt, Christianity

Four months after finally succeeding in opening his Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man, he declared, "The program of the Institute, the power of the Institute, the aim of the Institute, the possibilities of the Institute can be expressed in a few words: the Institute can help one to be able to be a Christian." [Emphasis added] He went on to say, "Christianity says precisely this, to love all men. But this is impossible. At the same time it is quite true that it is necessary to love. First one must be able, only then can one love. Unfortunately, with time, modern Christians have adopted the second half, to love, and lost view of the first, the religion [of being able to do], which should have preceded it."

He then added, "Half the world is Christian, the other half has other religions. For me, sensible man, this makes no difference; they are the same as the Christian. Therefore it is possible to say that the whole world is Christian, the difference is only in name. And it has been Christian not only for one year but for thousands of years. There were Christians long before the advent of Christianity." [Emphasis added]

This last statement accords with what P. D. Ouspensky reports Gurdjieff said in Russia some seven years before. When asked what is the origin of The Fourth WayGurdjieff said that to understand what is meant by the term Christianity one would have to "talk a great deal and to talk for a long time." Then he declared: "But for the benefit of those who know already [that is, know what he means when he says 'Christianity'] I will say that, if you like, this is esoteric Christianity." [Emphasis original]

Later on, Ouspensky reports Gurdjieff saying:

It will seem strange to many people when I say that this prehistoric Egypt was Christian many thousands of years before the birth of Christ, that is to say, that its religion was composed of the same principles and ideas that constitute true Christianity.... The Christian church, the Christian form of worship, was not invented by the fathers of the church. It was all taken in a ready-made form from Egypt, only not from the Egypt we know but from one which we do not know. This Egypt was in the same place as the other but it existed much earlier.

What isn't commonly understood, though the clues are there in Search, Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson and Meetings with Remarkable Men, is that Gurdjieff discovered the teaching of The Fourth Way in Egypt and Ethiopia (Abyssinia). That was his first journey. His second was to rediscover, reassemble and reformulate elements of the original prehistoric teaching of Christianity—existing in Egypt before 3,000 B.C.E.—that over time had moved northward with Pythagoras and into Central Asia.

Bennett's Bias

One of the advocates for the notion that Gurdjieff's teaching is based on Sufism is J. G. Bennett. In his Making a New World, an otherwise interesting study of Gurdjieff and his teaching, Bennett clearly overlooks the importance of Gurdjieff's connection with Egypt while greatly emphasizing that of Central Asia. But he does write:

We know that the Eastern churches have admirable spiritual exercises, some of which Gurdjieff taught his own pupils. He refers to a journey to Abyssinia with Professor Skridlov. He stayed for three months in Abyssinia where he followed up indications he had found in Egypt of the importance of the Coptic tradition. At the end of his life, I more than once heard him speak of Abyssinia, even referring to it as his 'second home,' where he hoped to retire and finish his days. He also mentioned the special knowledge of Christian origins possessed by the Coptic Church that had been lost by the Orthodox and Catholic branches of Christianity.

So, like a good bit of what has happened to the Work since Gurdjieff's death, the Work has largely brought this confusion upon itself. The recent new edition of Ouspensky's Search shows on the cover a Sufi in a turban. This is congruent with covers of Gurdjieff books which show either Arabic writing or Persian rugs. This denial of the origins of Gurdjieff's Fourth Way, intentional or otherwise, now, with a historical clash between Judaeo-Christianity and Islam coming to the fore, must be righted if Gurdjieff and the teaching are not to suffer by association.

Thus, with the understanding that Gurdjieff is a true Christian and that the Fourth Way is an ancient teaching rooted in prehistoric Egypt—and therefore, being the original source teaching for all subsequent teachings—let us look at Gurdjieff's connection with Islam and Sufism.


===