2016/10/04

Germany - Freiburg - Green City | The EcoTipping Points Project

Germany - Freiburg - Green City | The EcoTipping Points Project

Freiburg - Green City

Long famous for its cathedral, university, and cuckoo clocks, Freiburg is now also famous as a “Green City.” It excels in the areas of transportation, energy, waste management, and land conservation, and has created a green economy that perpetuates even more environmental progress.
Photo: Courtesy Freiburg Wirtschaft Touristik u. Messe GmbH
Photo: Courtesy Freiburg Wirtschaft Touristik u. Messe GmbH
Freiburg, a city of about 220,000 people and 155 km2 of land, is located in the southwest corner of Germany, at the edge of the Black Forest and near the borders with France and Switzerland. It was founded in the year 1120, and through the centuries of growth and modernization still maintains its Old World charm and surrounding beauty.
With its large academic community, Freiburg was an early stronghold of the Green Movement in the 1970s. A successful protest against a nearby nuclear power plant is thought to be the galvanizing moment. According to Energie-Cites (1999), “The most committed leaders [of the anti-nuclear movement] joined the political arena, the administration, the utilities, found a job in educational or research activities or founded green-spirited companies.”  Freiburg’s mayor and one-fourth of the city council are Green Party members.
Freiburg promotes itself as a Green city—especially in the areas of transportation, energy, waste management, land conservation, and green economics—and the city has won various national and international environmental awards. Actually, in some respects (e.g., waste management), Freiburg is much like other German cities. But in the areas of energy and green economics, it is particularly outstanding.

Transportation

Freiburg was heavily bombed during World War II; little remained of the city center besides the cathedral. It was decided to rebuild without altering the city’s character, following the old street plan and architectural style. As the roads were rebuilt, they were widened just enough for a tram track, not for more lanes of cars.
In 1969 Freiburg devised its first integrated traffic management plan and cycle path network. The plan, which aims to improve mobility while reducing traffic and benefitting the environment, is updated every 10 years. It prioritizes traffic avoidance and gives preference to environment-friendly modes of transport such as walking, cycling, and public transit. Traffic avoidance is achieved in conjunction with urban planning that makes Freiburg a city of “short distances”—a compact city with strong neighborhood centers where people’s needs are within walking distance.
In 1973 the entire city center was converted to a pedestrian zone (shown in white on the map below).
Source: Schick, n.d.
Source: Schick, n.d.
The public transit network has been steadily expanded and modernized since 1972. Today the tramway network comprises 30 km and is connected to the 168 km of city bus routes as well as to the regional railway system. 70% of the population lives within 500 meters of a tram stop, and the trains appear every 7.5 minutes during rush hours. Besides working to make public transport convenient, fast, reliable and comfortable, the city administration also made it cheap. In 1984 the city-wide Environmental Card was introduced for 38 DM per month (US$13 at the time) for unlimited travel within the urban network (tram and bus). A monthly ticket had previously cost 50 DM. In 1991 the Environmental Card was replaced with a RegioCard. The current price is 47 euros (US$61) per month. The RegioCard allows passengers unlimited use of not only Freiburg’s urban transit but also public transport in the whole region—about 2,900 km of routes of 17 different transportation companies, plus the tracks of the German Rail. In its first year alone, the card is credited with increasing regional public transit trips by 26,400 while the number of car trips fell by 29,000. Besides this, there is a policy that any ticket for a concert, sports event, fair, or big conference also serves as a ticket for public transport.
City tram
City tram
Source: Schick, n.d.
Freiburg’s administration has developed over 400 km of cycle paths. This includes bike-friendly streets, streetside bikepaths, and separate bikepaths, e.g., along the river Dreisam. About 9,000 bicycle parking spaces were also developed, including “bike and ride” lots at transit stations. Cycling is promoted with free maps and other information.
As a result of all this, between 1982 and 1999, the contribution of cycling to the city’s volume of traffic increased from 15% to 28% and public transport from 11% to 18%, while miles travelled by car fell from 38% to 30% of the total (see chart below).
Source: Schick, n.d.
Source: Schick, n.d.
Another notable aspect of Freiburg’s transport policy is traffic calming. As the map above shows, for most streets (other than main streets) the speed limit is 30 km (19 mi) per hour. On some streets (shown in blue) cars can travel no faster than walking speed, and children are allowed to play in the streets. Residents may apply for this status for their street by petitioning the city’s Department of Civil Engineering.
Parking space management also contributes to the reduction of motor vehicle traffic. Multi-story garages are located at the edge of residential districts and at major mass transit stations. The new district of Vauban is one extreme example of parking space management. Parking there is limited to garages on the outskirts of the neighborhood. Each parking space costs 18,000 Euro (approx. US$23,000). To avoid this cost, some people are said to lie about owning a car in their annual declarations. But officially there are about 250 motor vehicles per 1,000 Vauban residents, compared to 423 for Freiburg as a whole (and 500 for Germany).
Car-sharing is also encouraged. About 140 vehicles currently are available through the Freiburger Auto-Gemeinschaft e.V. Members have occasional use of a car (e.g., for big shopping trips or going to the mountains for skiing, as one woman interviewed by Purvis (2008) explained). They also receive a yearly free pass for public transport within the city, and a 50% discount on national rail tickets.
Looking to the future, the official “traffic development plan 2020” (published in 2008, see Huber-Erler et al.), after consideration of various scenarios and their costs, includes 4 measures for pedestrian traffic, 13 for bicycle traffic, 12 for city public transport, 7 for regional public transport, and 19 for motor vehicles.

Energy

Freiburg’s progressive energy policy has its roots in the early 1970s, when the state of Baden-Württemberg’s plan to build a nuclear power plant in the town of Wyhl, just 30 km away, provoked intense protest among Freiburg residents. Thomas Dresel (who is now the city environmental manager) recalls that there was widespread civil disobedience; the conflict began to look like a “civil war.” Dresel says that as the protesters stood there in the mud (created by police water cannons), they began to ponder the question, If not nukes, then what?  The plan was dropped in 1975, and in the years since then Freiburg has sought to become a model of sustainable energy development. The Chernobyl disaster of 1986 and concern over acid rain damaging the Black Forest—and more recently concern regarding climate change—strengthened the determination to find alternatives to nuclear and fossil fuel energy. Germany’s national energy policy, such as the decision to phase out nuclear power and the 2001 federal renewable energy law, which requires utilities to buy power from independent producers, promote such a policy as well.
Freiburg’s energy policy has three basic pillars: Energy saving, efficient technologies, and renewable energy sources.

Energy Saving

In 1992, Freiburg’s building design standards were amended to require that all new houses built on city land (or land sold by the city) use no more than 65 kilowatt-hours of heating energy per square meter per year, compared to the national standard of 75 kWh/m2/yr. This adds about 3% to the cost of the house, but the energy savings make it worthwhile in a short time. It is estimated that the standard reduces heating oil consumption from 12-15 liters to 6.5 liters per square meter. The entire new districts of Vauban and Rieselfeld were built according to this standard.
To improve energy efficiency in existing buildings, Freiburg instituted a support program for home insulation and energy retrofits. About 1.2 million Euros in subsidies were provided in 2002-2008, complementing about 14 million Euros of investments. Reduction of energy consumption averaged 38% per building. Most municipal buildings (e.g., schools, offices) were also retrofitted.
In 2008, after the federal government revised its standard downward, so did Freiburg—to ensure that the city stays at the forefront of low-energy development. A two-step revision was to be implemented in 2009 and 2011 to move new housing even closer to the “passive house” standard of just 15 kWh/m2/yr. These cost 10% more to build, but can achieve an 80-90% reduction in energy consumption. Purvis (2008) describes a passive house he visited:
It is 6C outside, and a dusting of snow can be seen …. In Meinhard Hansen’s apartment, however, it is perpetual summer; the sun streams in through tall, south-facing windows and a gauge on the wall reads ‘24C.’ Next to it, the words ‘Heizung 0’ appear in a small glass window. ‘Heating, zero,’ Meinhard translates. ‘In fact, we haven’t switched the heating on for weeks….’ On one wall there is a radiator, but it is stone cold…. Super-insulated with foam and lagging up to 30 cm thick, the flat is triple-glazed and externally sealed. Fresh air enters at ceiling level and is sucked out through a funnel on one wall. ‘The heat from the warm air going out is transferred to the cold air coming in,’ says Meinhard, Freiburg’s chief architect and a world authority on passive houses. So far, his company has built about 100.
Opening a cupboard, he shows me how the cold and warm ducts meet in a knot of corrugated silver piping.
While consumption of heating oil has decreased, Freiburg’s electricity consumption increased by 3% between 2004 and 2010. The goal had been a 10% reduction. This is mainly due to population increase (about 1% per year) and also to growing commercial and industrial demand. Per capita consumption actually went down by 1.6%.

Efficient Technology

Chief among the efficient technologies developed in Freiburg (in fact, the only one mentioned in the literature) is combined heat and power (CHP). As the name implies, CHP produces both electricity and heat by capturing the waste heat from electricity production to generate more electricity and useful heat, e.g., for district heating systems. About 50% of Freiburg’s electricity is now produced with CHP (compared to just 3% in 1993). There are 14 large-scale CHP plants and about 90 small-scale CHP plants (e.g., at the city theater and indoor swimming pools). The two large-scale plants located near landfills use landfill gas as fuel. The others use natural gas, biogas, geothermal, wood chips, and/or heating oil.  Vauban’s CHP plant, for example, uses 80% wood chips and 20% natural gas to provide the district with electricity and heat. An important concomitant development is new district heating systems which can replace individual oil or gas burning furnaces.
CHP plant in Vauban
CHP plant in Vauban
Source: Wörner n.d.
The increase in CHP’s share from 3% to 50% has enabled Freiburg to reduce its reliance on nuclear power from 60% to 30%--and provides local heating at the same time.

Renewable Energy Sources

Renewables at Freiburg’s disposal include solar, wind, hydropower, and biomass. (Geothermal is also a possibility, but its use to date has been negligible.)
Solar. Solar energy is by far the most visible renewable resource used in Freiburg. The city is home to approximately 400 photovoltaic installations on both public and private buildings. Prominent among these are:
  • The 19-story façade of the main train station
  • The roof of the convention center
  • The roof of the soccer stadium
  • The Solarsiedlung (Solar Settlement) and its neighboring Solarschiff (Solar Ship) business park
  • The Solar Factory (SolarFabrik)
  • The “Heliotrope,” a structure that rotates to follow the sun
  • The roof of the city’s waste management offices and its recycling center
Solar Settlement and business park
Solar Settlement and business park
Source: Website plusenergiehaus.de


Heliotrope
Heliotrope
Source: Wörner n.d.
SolarFabrik
SolarFabrik
Source: Freiburg Wirtschaft Touristik u. Messe GmbH
Currently Freiburg’s 150,000 m2 of photovoltaic cells produce over 10 million kWh/year. The 60 “plus-energy” homes of the Solar Settlement create more energy than they consume, and earn 6,000 euros per year for their residents.
Solar thermal (mostly hot water) panels cover 16,000 m2, but their total contribution to Freiburg’s energy supply has not been quantified.
Wind. Unlike coastal or plains areas, Freiburg is not ideally suited for wind energy, since it is in a hilly, wooded area. Still, there are five windmills situated on hilltops within the city’s boundaries, producing an average of 14 million kWh/year. The planning authority for more windmills is now in the hands of a regional council (Regionalverband Südlicher Oberrhein). Confounding Freiburg’s plan for 10% renewables by 2010, the regional authority did not plan any new wind projects in the Freiburg municipality.
Windmills near Freiburg
Windmills near Freiburg
Source: Ökostromgruppe Freiburg
Hydropower. The Dreisam River runs through Freiburg, but there are no major hydropower stations. Small, eco-friendly run-of-the-river facilities are on the river and on smaller canals and streams. Hydropower generation within Freiburg amounts to about 1.9 million kWh/year, but the regional utility, badenova, also imports hydropower. According to badenova literature, the 120,000 customers who selected “regiostrom basis”—a slightly more expensive, nuclear-free alternative to conventional power—receive half their electricity from hydropower plants in Switzerland and Austria, and half from CHP plants. The 10,000 customers who selected “regiostrom aktiv” are guaranteed 100% electricity from renewable resources—a hydropower plant in Norway. The 1.8 euro-cents per kWh extra they pay goes to the regiostrom fund for developing more renewable energy. (How the renewable electrons make their way to the higher-paying customers remains unclear.)
Since January 2009, according to badenova, Freiburg’s 60 trams have been running on 100% renewable energy (80% hydropower and 20% a mix of other renewables).
Biomass. With 16.6 million kWh/year, biomass has the largest share of Freiburg’s renewable electricity generation. The Black Forest provides an ample supply of wood chips and wood pellets (much of it waste from woodworking industries). The Solar Factory burns rape seed oil in its CHP plant.
A more exciting innovation is the development of biogas. Through a joint venture of private and city-owned waste management companies, the organic waste from Freiburg’s households is fed into a digester that produces biogas and compost. The biogas is burned in a CHP plant to produce about 7 million kWh of electricity, plus heat. In 2009, badenova subsidiary WÄRMEPLUS switched all three of Freiburg’s indoor swimming pools to biogas for their CHP generators. The same year, badenova began work on three of five planned biogas projects in the region, using mainly corn silage and cow manure as the feedstock. One of the projects is an existing biogas plant where badenova is adding a refinery to improve the quality of the gas by removing the high carbon dioxide content, making it equivalent to regular natural gas. The gas will be used in CHP plants to produce electricity and heat, but it will also be mixed with conventional natural gas to create “BIO 10,” a 10% biogas mixture. This is especially important because since 2008, any homeowner who modernizes his/her heating system must switch to at least 10% renewable energy for heat. On a smaller and more experimental scale, one apartment building in Vauban is equipped with vacuum toilets connected to a biogas digester; in 8 years of experience it seems to work satisfactorily.
Unfortunately, Freiburg’s total electricity demand is well over 1,000 million kWh/year, so despite all the efforts described above, only 3.7% of the city’s electricity comes from locally generated, renewable resources. This is the same percentage as in 2005, and far short of the 10% goal set by the city council in 2004. However, if solar water heating and imported renewables were included, the number would be much higher. Mayor Salomon expects that the CO2 emissions reduction report (goal: 40% reduction versus 1992 by 2030) will yield much better results, since it includes heat and transportation as well as electricity, and has a much longer timeline.

Waste Management

Everywhere in Germany, the volume of solid waste is declining because of waste avoidance and aggressive recycling efforts. Around 70% of the country’s waste is recovered and reused. The number of landfills fell from 50,000 in the 1970s to 200 today.
Each household or apartment building is equipped with three bins: one for paper, one for organic food and garden wastes (the “bio-bin”), and one for non-recyclables (“rest-waste”). They also have a “yellow sack” for packaging, such as yogurt cups and tin cans. The bins are emptied and the sacks picked up regularly by the local waste management company. In Freiburg the bio-bin is emptied once a week, the others once every two weeks. Glass must be sorted by color and deposited in community bins. There are 350 of these in Freiburg. Hazardous wastes like batteries, paints, pesticides, etc. can be dropped off at temporary collection sites or at recycling yards.  Freiburg has 26 rotating collection sites that each accept hazardous waste twice a year, plus three permanent recycling yards. In addition, Freiburg recycles over 1 million corks per year. These are processed into “Recykork,” an eco-friendly insulation material, by handicapped workers at the local Epilepsy Center. Mayor Salomon points out that Freiburgers recycle more than the state or national average.
Community glass bins
Community glass bins
Source: abfallwirtschaft-freiburg.de
Apart from making recycling easy for consumers, Germany has strong laws that start at the other end of the waste cycle—with manufacturers. Since 1996, manufacturers must consider waste avoidance, waste recovery, and environmentally compatible disposal in designing products. In fact, under the concept of “product responsibility,” manufacturers are required to collect and recycle or reuse their packaging after it is disposed of by consumers. Because of the complexity involved with that, the companies formed the non-profit organization Duales System Deutschland (DSD) GmbH. Manufacturers pay a membership fee to DSD and are then allowed to print the “Green Dot” on their packaging to show they have paid for proper disposal. The “Green Dot” items go into the “yellow sack” mentioned above and are recycled by DSD. According to Look (2009), in 2007 over 88% of Germany’s packaging waste was recovered.
Freiburg reduced its annual waste disposal from 140,000 tons in 1988 to 50,000 tons in 2000. This is burned for energy at an incinerator 20 km from the city. As mentioned above, the contents of the bio-bins are fed to a biogas digester.

Land Conservation

Freiburg is also “green” in appearance. It is home to Germany’s largest communal forest, covering over 40% of the municipal territory. The forest is home to Germany’s tallest tree—a 63-meter douglas fir. It has a surprisingly diverse terrain and ecosystems—from high mountains to boggy lowlands. About 44% of the forest is used as an “environmentally appropriate economic forest.” Wood is harvested at a rate of 35,000 m3, which is about three-fourths of the amount that grows back in a year. Monocropping is avoided; there is no clearcutting and no use of pesticides. For this sustainable management Freiburg’s Forestry Office earned certification from the Forest Stewardship Council, and its timber can be marketed with the FSC eco-label. The remaining 56% of the city forest are nature conservation areas—50% managed and 6% wild.
Freiburg’s city forest
Freiburg’s city forest
Source: Inspirenation 2008
According to the Forestry Office, besides providing wood, and jobs in the forestry and woodworking sectors, the city forest has a wide variety of beneficial functions. It:
  • serves as the city’s “green lungs” and cleans the air
  • moderates temperature
  • protects the soil
  • stores water
  • is a natural and free recreational resource
  • provides habitat for wildlife, including rare and endangered species
  • gives food from deer, wild pigs, and goats
  • beautifies the landscape
Besides the 5,000 hectares of forest, Freiburg has over 600 hectares of parks and 160 playgrounds providing greenery, recreation, and biodiversity. The parks range from the carefully manicured and flowery site of a former international flower show, to the more unkempt nature conservation areas. Pesticides are not used, and only indigenous tees and shrubs are planted. Changing the lawn mowing schedule from 12 times to only twice a year has “markedly revived the biodiversity in the meadows.” 22,000 trees were planted in the parks, and the same number along streets.
Park with bike path along the Dreisam River
Park with bike path along the Dreisam River
Source: City of Freiburg (n.d.)
There are also 3,800 small garden allotments on the outskirts of the city, which serve as private oases for the city dwellers as well as a source of fresh fruits and vegetables. The number is expected to increase, according to the new land use plan.
All this green space is the result of deliberate urban planning that seeks to keep development compact while accommodating population growth. In the new neighborhoods of Vauban and Rieselfeld, for example, the homes are four- to five-story apartment buildings instead of single-family houses, allowing for more green space. (In the Rieselfeld district, 240 hectares were designated as landscape conservation area and only 78 hectares for residential development.) Shops and offices are located on the ground floor of the apartment buildings, allowing residents easy access, on foot or bicycle, to their daily needs—so that “no supermarkets will be constructed on green meadows.” The urban planning has been participatory. For the new Land Use Plan 2020, citizens formed 19 working groups to discuss potential construction areas and make recommendations to the city council.

Green Economy

Renewable energy production is encouraged with tax credits from the federal government and subsidies from the regional utility (badenova provides 200 euros for solar water heaters and 900 euros for photovoltaic systems). But especially noteworthy as an economic model are grassroots financing schemes that allow concerned citizens to invest directly in renewable energy resources. For example, through one local association for the promotion of renewable energy (fesa, or Förderverein Energie und Solar Agentur e.V.), citizens invested over 6 million Euros in 9 windmills, 8 photovoltaic arrays (including the soccer stadium), 1 hydropower plant, and a major energy conservation retrofit project at the Staudinger public school. Investors get a return on their investment and, in the case of the soccer stadium, free season tickets. Under the heading “with us one can buy power plants,” badenova (2009) describes four such plans, the most recent of which bundles wind, hydro, and solar power due to a dearth of new wind sites.
Thus Mayor Dieter Salomon credits the citizens themselves for Freiburg’s success:
“Freiburg has developed its profile from eco-capital into the leading centre of competence for alternative energy. The city’s many small and large scale alternative energy facilities exist thanks to the dedication of the citizens – citizens who equip their own houses with solar panels, hold shares of communal facilities and order regionally produced electricity from renewable energy through our local energy supplier Badenova” (Inspirenation 2008).
Freiburg has become the European Union’s “Solar Valley,” similar to California’s Silicon Valley. The economic benefits are especially noticeable in the sectors of manufacturing, research and education, and tourism. Overall the “environmental economy” employs nearly 10,000 people in 1,500 businesses, generating 500 million euros per year.
Freiburg companies produce not only state-of-the-art solar cells, but also the machinery needed to manufacture the cells. Companies such as Solarfabrik, Concentrix Solar, SolarMarkt, and Solarstrom are served by a wide web of suppliers and service providers. One exciting new development is Concentrix’s creation of solar cells that double the efficiency of photovoltaics by using lenses to concentrate the solar radiation. Overall about 80 business operations employ over 1,000 people in the solar technology industry.
A network of prestigious research institutions has developed in Freiburg, most notably the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (Europe’s largest solar research institute) and the Ökoinstitut. The International Solar Energy Society (a worldwide organization) has its headquarters in Freiburg. According to the City of Freiburg (n.d., p. 4),
Centres of private and public research investigating renewable energy resources, such as the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, function as a centre of gravity, around which hundreds of spin-off companies, service providers and organisations are based. These include: from the Solar Factory to the Regio Freiburg Energy Agency, from consultancies to solar architects, from a zero-emission hotel to the Future Workshop of the Chamber of Crafts. Also the farmers, foresters and organic vintners profit from the research done in the region by institutions such as the Viticulture Institute, the Forest Research Institute or the Albert Ludwigs University.
The city frequently hosts international conferences that serve the transfer of science and technology. The Photovoltaics Industry Forum was held in 2007, and the Intersolar conference was held in Freiburg every year from 2000 to 2008 (with 53,000 visitors in its last year). Intersolar moved to Munich, but the Gebäude-Energie-Technik (Building Energy Technology) fair takes its place. The city also hosts the annual Freiburg Solar Summits which attract people from around the world.
Environmental education is another booming business. According to the City of Freiburg (n.d., p. 4),
In the field of environmental education alone, 700 new jobs were created, among which was a university chair of environmental economics. In the scope of the Solar University, which obtained the status of an elite university in 2007, an Interdisciplinary Centre for Renewable Energies and an international masters study course “Renewable Energy Management (M.sc.)” have been established.
There is also a Solar Training Center for technicians and installers. Environmental education in schools (e.g. the Fraunhofer program for 9th and 10th graders) and outdoors (e.g., forest trails, deer park, and the Eco-Station at Seepark) encourages environmental consciousness in the younger generation.
Besides all the researchers, conference-goers, and students who come to Freiburg from around the world, the city’s green reputation also attracts eco-tourists. Even from as far away as China, South Korea, and Japan, eco-tourists—equipped with solar city maps and bicycles—enjoy the “solar tour.”

EcoTipping Points Analysis

Tipping Points and Feedback Loops

The roots of the problem can be traced back to the Industrial Revolution, when increased use of fossil fuels and new manufacturing technology led to mass production and mass consumption of goods. The economy was then “eating the earth” and polluting it as well. People’s livelihoods became dependent on this economy, and a vicious cycle of unsustainable economic growth developed.
vicious cycle
The “positive tip” came in the form of an awareness of the economy’s unsustainability, and a desire to do something about it, which developed into the Green Movement. In Germany, the Green Movement—and Green Party—became quite strong. From 1998 to 2005 the country was governed by a “Red-Green Coalition” that was able to implement a number of important policies (e.g., phasing out nuclear power and promoting renewable energy).
In Freiburg, the Green Movement became established in the early 1970s. The city’s Green Party mayor was elected in 2002, and re-elected in 2010 for another 8 years. The Green Party promotes resource conservation and a shift to renewable energy. The new “eco-economy” provides jobs that further these goals, and a “virtuous cycle” of progress toward greater sustainability is created.
virtuous cycle

Ingredients for Success

At least seven of the EcoTipping Points “ingredients for success” are apparent in Freiburg:
  1. Outside stimulation and facilitation.  The planned nuclear plant at Wyhl in the early 1970s is said to have been a catalyst for Freiburg’s Green Movement. More recently, federal policies regarding waste management and renewable energy promoted Freiburg’s progress toward being a Green City. The European Union’s directive regarding combined heat and power undoubtedly also played a role.
  2. Strong democratic local institutions and enduring commitment of local leadership.  Freiburg’s democratically elected mayor and city council, and the various local agencies, set crucial policy in the areas of transportation, energy, waste management, and land use. They also invest money and create jobs that further more environmental protection.  Direct citizen participation is important especially in land use planning and energy investments. Participatory decision-making at the neighborhood level governs the Vauban neighborhood (see our related story at http://ecotippingpoints.org/our-stories/region-europe.html#Neighborhood).
  3. Co-adaptation between social system and ecosystem.  The overall strategy for Freiburg’s development has always been to provide for the needs of the people while minimizing environmental harm. Recent improvements in human behavior (e.g., recycling and using public transit) benefit the ecosystem even more. And the green economy ensures that people and land prosper together.
  4. Letting nature do the work. Freiburg is working hard to maximize the use of sunshine for heating homes, heating water, and generating electricity. The large communal forest also provides valuable environmental services.
  5. Transforming waste into resources. Freiburg's extensive recycling system makes use of almost every conceivable waste. Paper, plastics, tin cans, glass, and even corks are converted to new raw materials. Energy is derived from wastes such as landfill gas, wood chips, waste heat (CHP), and organic household waste, which in addition provides a high-quality compost for gardens.
  6. Overcoming social obstacles.  Freiburgers battled the state government over nuclear power decades ago, and now the problem is wind power. The “Black-Yellow Coalition” (Christian Democrats and Free Democrats) that rules the state of Baden-Württemberg is said to have a “wind blockade policy.” (The state government could change in the March 2011 elections.) Also, there seems to be conflict over wind with the regional energy planning authority. Moreover, a “Black-Yellow Coalition” is currently in power at the national level. The federal government recently decided to slow down the phase-out of nuclear power.
  7. Building resilience.  Thanks to its green economy, plus another ingredient we notice in many stories—community solidarity and pride—Freiburg is likely to remain a Green City.

References

  • badenova.  2009. Ökologie- und NachhaltigkeitsberichtWebsite
  • Berg, Rick. 2009. Madison conservative visits the car-light Vauban neighborhood in Freiburg. The Daily Page, (Madison, Wisconsin), July 24. Website
  • Breyer, Franziska. 2009. Freiburg Energy Policy: Approaches to Sustainability. Presentation at the Local Renewables Conference, Freiburg, April 28. Website
  • Brunsig, Jürgen, Nadine Möller, and Jürgen Wixforth. n.d. Freiburg-Rieselfeld: urban expansion and public transport.  Website
  • C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. n.d. Buildings – Freiburg, GermanyWebsite
  • C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. n.d. Transport – Freiburg, Germany.  Website
  • City of Freiburg. 2010. Dächer des städtischen Betriebshofs werden zur Stromproduktion genutztWebsite
  • City of Freiburg. 2010. Ziel verfehlt mit AnsageWebsite
  • City of Freiburg. n.d. Freiburg Green City: Approaches to SustainabilityWebsite
  • Dauncey, Guy. 2003. Freiburg Solar CityWebsite
  • Energie-Cites. 1999. Thermal Solar Energy – Freiburg (Germany)Website
  • European Academy of the Urban Environment. n.d. Freiburg: Low-energy Housing Construction Project.Website
  • European Academy of the Urban Environment. 2001. Freiburg: Public transport policy as a key element of traffic displacementWebsite
  • Hildebrandt, Andreas. 2008. Traffic planning and Public Transport in Freiburg. Presentation at the Tsukuba 3E Forum, May 31, on behalf of VAG Freiburg. Website
  • Huber-Erler, Ralf, Sebastian Hofherr, and Tomas Pickel. 2008. Verkehrsentwicklungsplan VEP 2020, Stadt Freiburg im Breisgau, Endbericht Mai 2008. City of Freiburg, Garten- und Tiefbauamt. Website
  • Inspirenation. 2008.  Sustainable Buildings, Transport and Energy Study TourWebsite
  • Look, Marie. 2009.  Trash Planet: Germany. Website
  • Mayrhofer, Max. Creating reduced traffic areas in Freiburg/ GermanyWebsite
  • Purvis, Andrew. 2008. Is this the greenest city in the world? The Guardian (UK), March 23. Website
  • Salomon, Dieter. 2009. Freiburg Green City: Approaches to Sustainability. Presentation to European Green Capital Award, Brussels, Dec. 1. Website
  • Schick, Peter. n.d.  Freiburg – A Smarter Travel Town? Website
  • Sperling, Carsten. 2002. Sustainable Urban District Freiburg-VaubanWebsite
  • UNEP Climate Neutral Network. n.d. FreiburgWebsite
  • Wörner, Dieter. n.d. Sustainable energy solutions for cities – case of FreiburgWebsite
  • Zurbonsen, Karl-Heinz. 2010. “Green City” is nicht grün genug. Stuttgarter Nachrichten, Oct. 11. Website

Germany - Freiburg - Green City | The EcoTipping Points Project

Germany - Freiburg - Green City | The EcoTipping Points Project

[독일의 생태도시] 프라이부르크(Freibur.. : 네이버블로그

[독일의 생태도시] 프라이부르크(Freibur.. : 네이버블로그

2016/10/02

좋은 것은 달팽이처럼

(14) Facebook



나의 신간 「좋은 것은 달팽이처럼」가 출판되었다. 꼭 읽어 보시기 바랍니다. (이하, 그 홍보 글과 책 「서」에서 발췌) 간디는 "예기치 것은 달팽이처럼 천천히 걷는"고 말했다. 이 말을 지금 이야말로 음미 해 보자. 직선적 인 성장이 아닌 진정한 풍요 로움은 무엇인가? 간단하다, 슬로우임을 가치는 무엇인가? 이 책은 슬로우 라이프를 옹호 해 온 저자가 세계의 구석에서 천천히 진행하고있는 선한 일, 좋은 곡식을 바라 간다. 에너지 식품에서 환경 보전, 그리고 민주주의의 모습까지. 자신의 페이스로 차근 차근 "더 나은 사회 '를 향해 활동하는 사람들을 소개하고 내일의 팁을 비추는. 3 · 11 이후 우리가 가장 소중히하고 싶은 것이 가득한 1 권. 마흔 여섯 上製 248 페이지 본체 가격 1,800 엔 + 세금 978-4-393-33353-2 춘추 사 간행 ···················· 책의 제목 「좋은 것은 달팽이처럼 "는 마하트마 간디의 말에서왔다. 그는 이렇게 말했다. Good travels at a snail 's pace (선한 것은 달팽이처럼 천천히 걷는)하지만 그 중요한 '선한 일'은 도대체 어디에 있는지, 당신은 말할지도 모른다. 그래, 확실히, 선한 일이 보이지 어려운 세상 인 것이다. 괴테는 이렇게 말했다 그렇다. "보라, 기쁜 것은 가까이에있다"고. 가까이에서 천천히, 선한 일, 기쁜 것은 진행하고있다. 그것이 우리들에게 보이지 않는, 보이지 않는면, 그것은 왜 일까,라고 물어 보면 안되는 것이다. 친구에서 환경 운동가로서의 나에게 스승이기도 한 캐나다 과학자 데이비드 스즈키의 수많은 저서에 "굿 뉴스"특이한 제목의 책이있다. 원제의 Good News for a Change는 "변혁을위한 좋은 소식"며 "가끔은 좋은 뉴스"라고 두 가지 의미를 걸었다 말장난 - 일종의 말장난하는 것이었다. 거기에 표현 된 바와 같이, 우리들의 사회는 나쁜 뉴스에 넘쳐있다. 뉴스 바류 -라는 말이 있듯이 가치가있는 것은, 전쟁, 폭력 범죄, 많은 사상자가 나올 테러 (특히 선진국에서의) 큰 사고 대 재해, 권력의 남용 ... 물론 희소식도 있긴하지만 나쁜 소식 몇 점에서도 가치면에서도 도저히 이길 수 없다. 나처럼 환경과 평화라는 주제에 관심을 가진 사람이라면 누구나 알고있는 것처럼 미디어에서 뉴스에서 희소식은 수십 하나도 보이지 않는다. 그래서 스즈키처럼 좀 아이러니를 담아 "가끔은 좋은 뉴스"라고 말하고 싶지도되는 것이다. 뉴스 가치는 가치의 핵에있는 것은 '새로움'이다. 뉴스 (news)라는 말 자체가 그것을 보여주고있다. 이렇게 말해도 좋다. 거기에서 "새로움"이 바로 "선한 일"이다,라고. 잔인한 사건을 전하는 나쁜 소식도 그것이 최신 정보 인만큼 기쁜 일이다. 평화와 민주주의와 생태를 구하는 자들도 나쁜 소식 만에 익숙 할되어 어느새 그것에 의존하기 시작한다. 그리고 오죽하면 어느 쪽이 더 비관적인가를 겨루는 같은 모양이다. 새로움의 뒷면은 '속도'와 '속도'이다. 충분히 빠른시기에 신속한 보도를함으로써 새로움은 보장된다. 이렇게 말할 쪽도받는 쪽도 점점 새로움이라는 가치에 심취 해 나가면 '오래됨'과 '느림'은 간과되고 무시되어 그 가치는 잊혀져 간다. 만약 「좋은 것은 천천히 "라는 간디의 말이 맞다면, 우리들은 또"선한 일 "이 보이지 않게되어있는 것이 아닌가. 우리들이 위기의 시대를 살고 있다는 것은 바로이 것 인 것은 아닐까? 세계 위기는 우리들 자신의 위기이기도했다. 이 위기에서 벗어날 위해서는 여하튼 천천히 진행하는 선한 일에 눈을 박고 제대로 마주 것이다. 그리고 그러기 위해서는 먼저 나 자신, 자신이 멈춰 천천히해야한다. 그 동일본 대지진 이후 일본에서, 아니 전세계 위기가 심화되고 있다고 저는 느꼈습니다. 그런 가운데 세계의 구석에서 조용히, 천천히 生起하고있다 "선한 일"과 "예기치 것"에게, 저는 나름대로의 방식으로 단단히 눈을 돌리고 싶었다. 이 책은 그런 나의 느린 여행의 기록이다.

石原慎太郎の葛藤と、相模原障害者殺傷事件の背景を考える。 | 雨宮処凛

石原慎太郎の葛藤と、相模原障害者殺傷事件の背景を考える。 | 雨宮処凛



石原慎太郎の葛藤と、相模原障害者殺傷事件の背景を考える。

投稿日: 更新: 
印刷
またあの人が、ロクでもないことを言っている…。
「石原慎太郎が『やまゆり園事件犯の気持ちがわかる』と暴言、天皇には『スキューバで人生観変わる』と仰天アドバイス」というリテラの記事タイトルを見て、まず思った。
記事によると、「文學界」10月号で精神科医の斎藤環氏と対談した石原氏は、「この間の、障害者を十九人殺した相模原の事件。あれは僕、ある意味でわかるんですよ」などと発言。
また、知的障害の息子を持つ大江健三郎氏に対し、「大江なんかも今困ってるだろうね。ああいう不幸な子どもさんを持ったことが、深層のベースメントにあって、そのトラウマが全部小説に出てるね」との発言もしているのだという。
ならばぜひ全編をと思い、文學界を読んでみると、確かにそんな発言もしているのだが、それ以上に私には大きな驚きがあった。対談の中で斎藤環氏も「この対談は、読者にとってかなり衝撃的なものになると思います」と言っている。その言葉のあとには、以下のように続く。
「石原さんが生と死の間で葛藤しているとか、自分の衰弱に苦しんでいる、悩んでいるというようなことがあるとは誰も思っていないでしょうから」
その言葉通り、対談では、石原氏が「老い」や病(脳梗塞)に直面し、そんな自分を受け入れられずに戸惑いまくっている様子が率直に語られているのだ。
脳梗塞で海馬がダメージを受け、字を忘れたという話になると「斎藤さん、どうしたらいいんですか。こういう日々っていうのは」と尋ね、「自分で自分にイライラする感じ」「自分でこのごろ鏡に向かって言うんだ。『おまえ、もう駄目だな』って」と葛藤を吐露。
既に亡くなった人の名前を出しては「あの先生が生きていたら、すがって相談して迷妄を解いてもらえたと思うんだけど、そういう人が今、いないんだよな」と嘆き、また「いや、若者のつもりで居ても、日に日に老いさらばえていくとね。本当に超越者みたいな人が居たら、すがれたらすがりたいんだけどね」と思いを語る。
そうして対談の最後には斎藤氏に、「今日はお話しできて少しは気が楽になったような気がします。ありがとうございました」
私は心の底から驚いた。あの石原慎太郎が弱音を吐いている! しかも「すがりたい」とか助けを求めてる! そして「ありがとうございました」って、お礼を言ってる! なんかもう、完全に精神科医・斎藤環の「患者」になってる! と。
しかし、「高齢者」「病者」という弱者性を抱え、まさにそんなテーマを語りながらも、同じ対談で障害者差別発言をする彼の存在が、私の中でますますわからなくなった。普通、自分も弱さを抱えれば、種類は違っても「弱さ」を持つ人への共感の気持ちが生まれるのでは? と。
そんな私の疑問に鮮やかに答えてくれたのは、「相模原障害者殺傷事件」を丸ごと一冊特集した「現代思想」10月号に掲載された上野千鶴子氏の「障害と高齢の狭間から」だ。
文章の冒頭では、相模原の事件後、同市で開催された在宅医療を巡るシンポジウムで、「相模原事件を取り上げましょうか」とコーディネーターに言われたものの、上野氏が「ここに来る聴衆には、関心がないと思う」と答えるエピソードから始まる。以下、引用だ。
「なぜか? わたしには理由がわかる。高齢者は自分を障害者とは思っていないからだ。それどころか、障害者と自分を区別して、一緒にしないでくれ、と思っているからだ。脳血管障害の後遺症が固定して、周囲が障害者手帳を取得するよう勧めても、それに頑強に抵抗するのは高齢者自身である。
なぜか? その理由もわかっている。高齢者自身が、そうでなかったときに、障害者差別をしてきたからだ。自分が差別してきた当の存在に、自分自身がなることを認められないからだ」
だからこそ、上野氏は講演で「齢(よわい)を重ねる」とは「弱いを重ねる」ことだと強調しているという。
「超高齢化社会とは、どんな強者も強者のままでは死ねない、弱者になっていく社会であること。すなわち、誰もが身体的・精神的・知的な意味で、中途障害者になる社会だと。
脳梗塞で半身マヒの後遺障害が残れば、車椅子生活にもなるし、言語障害も残る。認知症になれば、一種の知的障害と言っていいし、レビー小体型の認知症なら幻覚・妄想などの精神障害も起きる。いくらそう伝えても、いま健康な聴衆には将来への不安を与えるのみで、それなら、と認知症予防や健康寿命の延長のための体操教室がはやるばかりだ。(中略)
いついかなるときに、自分が弱者にならないとも限らない。弱者になれば、他人のお世話を受ける必要も出てくる。そのための介護保険である。それだからこそ弱者にならないように個人的な努力をするより、弱者になっても安心して生きられる社会を、とわたしは訴えてきたのだ」
しかし、多くの人が弱者になった自分を受け入れられない。講演会のあとの懇親会で、上野氏は初老の男性にこう言われたことがあるという。
「脳梗塞で倒れたあと、必死でリハビリをしてようやくここまで来ました。あの時、家族が救急車を呼ばずにいてくれたら、と何度恨んだかしれません」
障害者になった自分を受け入れられない。「役に立ってこそ男」という考えから抜けられない。「社会のお荷物」になる自分を受け入れられない。このような「高齢者の自己否定感」が、老後問題の最大の課題だと上野氏は指摘する。
石原氏も、今までの「強者」の思想と現在の自分との落差に愕然としているのだろう。
その背景にあるのは、生産性が高く、効率が良く、その上費用対効果がいいものでないと価値がないとする考え方だろう。すべてが数値化され、どれくらい経済効果が得られるかのみに換算される社会。そんな価値観は、結果的には「弱さ」を抱えた自分自身に牙を剥く。石原氏の苛立ちや葛藤は、そのような効率原理から抜け出せない限り、終わらない。そしてそれは今、多くの高齢者を苦しめているものだろう。
さて、そんなジレンマを「迷惑」というキーワードから論じているのは大澤真幸氏だ。同じ号の「現代思想」で、氏は「この不安をどうしたら取り除くことができるのか」という原稿を書いている。読んでいて、ハッとさせられた。
「たとえば、私たちは、できるだけ多くの人ができるだけたくさん幸福であることがよい、と考えている。言い換えれば、不幸や不快ができるだけ少なく、小さくなることがよい、と。これには、ほとんどの人が賛同するだろう。このアイデアを、倫理学的な原理にまで高めたものを、功利主義と言う。
だが、功利主義は危険な思想である。功利主義に基づくと、他人に多くの快楽や幸福をもたらす人の生は重んじられ、逆に、他人に苦労を要求せざるを得ない弱者の生は軽いものになってしまうからだ。その弱者には、障害者や老人が含まれる。すると、気づかぬうちに、私たちはUの主張のすぐ近くに来てしまう」(Uとは、植松容疑者のこと)
「素朴な功利主義と同じことだが、もっと単純に、ほとんどの人が、こう思っているし、こう言って子どもたちを教育しているのではないか。『他人に迷惑をかけてはいけないよ』と。確かに、これは文句のつけようがない道徳的な項目だ。
しかし、今見てきたように、これには、なおどこか落とし穴のようなものがあるのだ。その合意をどんどん拡張していくと、まったく賛成できない主張(Uの主張)にたどり着いてしまうのだから。それゆえ、こう問わないといけない。ほんとうに、迷惑をかけることは何もかもいけないことなのか」
この文章を読んで、思った。
相模原事件が私の心を離れないのは、彼の主張と現実の社会が奇妙に符合していることによるのかもしれないと。ネット上の悪意に満ちた言説を突き詰め、学校で教えられるタテマエを突き詰め、経済原理ばかりを追求して財源論で命を値切るような社会の空気を突き詰めた場合の最悪の「解」のような。
一方、事件後から容疑者の措置入院解除が問題視されているが、同誌で斎藤環氏は以下のように書いている。
「しかしこの議論の行き着くところは必然的に『予防拘禁』の肯定である。精神障害者は再犯の怖れが完璧になくなるまで隔離せよという主張は、『障害者に生きる価値はない』とする植松容疑者の主張とほとんど重なり合う」
同誌には、ここに紹介した以外にも、当事者や障害者団体による非常に興味深い考察が多く掲載されている。
あの事件が突きつけた、様々な課題。
同誌でもっとも心に残ったのは、DPI日本会議の尾上浩二氏の原稿に出てきた言葉だ。それは、以下のようなものである。
「殺されてよい命、死んでよかったというような命はない」
本当に、当たり前に、そういうことなのだ。
(2016年9月28日 「雨宮処凛がゆく!」より転載)
 
今、あなたにオススメ
---
コメント9件
並び替え 
コメントを追加...
Isao Matsumoto
右翼を同じ人間だと思ったら、もう左翼の世界の中では生きていけません。
第3の道を探されるべきです。なんか他でも同じことを書いたような気がするんですがどうも。
庄秀之 · 
体が衰えて社会から排除されるのは、まあしゃーないなーと諦めがつくけど、今、一番問題なのは体が若者以上に元気なのに、定年とか還暦迎えて、強引に引退させられちゃう人がたくさんいることじゃないのかな?たとえば今マラソン大会で4時間切るような老人、ゴロゴロいるでしょ。それで工事の交通整理や公園の掃除ぐらいしか仕事が無いと…。あと若者から見ても何で俺より1時間近く早いやつが年金もらってるんだよーとなるし。
Yuko Tamanaha · 
勤務先: Freelance Writer
たしかに、能力もやる気もある人を歳だけでよってたかって「老人」にしていっているケースは多いと思いました。もったいないよね。
いいね!返信2016年9月30日 21:47
Yoshihiro Sugie · 
いつかこういう日が来ると思っていました。何事にも強気な石原慎太郎氏ですが、自らの老いは受け止めざるをえない。要介護高齢者と障害者は実質的に変わらない。つまり誰もが、自らが障害者となる未来を抱えていることから、目を逸らしてはいけないのです。
Koh Iwasaki
殺されてよい命は無いかも知れないけど(あるかな?他人を大量虐殺した人間の命は、殺されて良いかも)、死んでよかったと思う命は、あるねえ。例えば私の父親。7年間きっちり呆けてくれて、死んだ時は心底ほっとしたな。
Keizou Uehara · 
「それだからこそ弱者にならないように個人的な努力をするより、弱者になっても安心して生きられる社会を、とわたしは訴えてきたのだ」って嘘つけ!上野千鶴子は「頑張って強者になりましょう。弱者になってしまったら弱者らしくつつましく暮らしとけ」って主義だったろ。
 弱者に対して差別してきた人間が弱者になった場合、弱者になったことを認めない人もいれば、弱者に差別してきたことを認めない人もいるわけだ。上野千鶴子は後者。まあ、弱者って言ってもお金はあるし、頼れるお仲間はたくさんいるし本当の弱者にはならんでしょうが。
Naotaka Igarashi · 
石原氏は歯に衣着せぬ物言いで嫌う人も多いですが、最近はともかく現役当時は一理あることも言っていたというのが私の印象ですし、方法はともあれ国のためにも働きました、尖閣がそうです。そして、今や力を失い「昔有名だったが今や老いさらばえる老人」となった石原氏をあれこれ言うのは、障害児・者を不要と言った某容疑者と、「自分の気に入らないものを排除しようとし否定する」ことにおいて本質的に違いは無い、同じと私は感じます。

ちなみにな容疑者は精神疾患既往が無いとの報道がありました。鑑定待ちですが、彼が精神疾患であるとの前提で考える論じる、ましてや精神科医療において人権との関係で極めてデリケートかつ危険な制度でもある措置入院を論じるのは極めて危険です。明治に我が国の精神科医療の雄、呉秀三氏が「我が国の精神病者の不幸は、我が国に生まれたることなり」と喝破して以来の我が国の精神科医利用の闇を、これ以上深く暗くしてはなりません。
Mi Ogawa
石原氏といい、曽野氏といい、旧時代の負の遺産どもが負の遺産ばかりをがっつり増やして、自分自身に問題がふりかかると、これまでの己の発言の責任もとらずに逃げようとするの絶望的にきもちわるい...。ふたりとも文筆業で片方は更に政治家だったこともあるんだから、己の大量の妄言暴言の責任全部とれよと。体調の問題や病気や老いを抱えながら更にお前と違って財産も住む場所もないひとたちに、あんたらこれまで何をしてきた?
Kunito Koyama · 
「しかしこの議論の行き着くところは必然的に『予防拘禁』の肯定である。精神障害者は再犯の怖れが完璧になくなるまで隔離せよという主張は、『障害者に生きる価値はない』とする植松容疑者の主張とほとんど重なり合う」
これを認めてしまえば、八方塞がりとなり、どこにも進めない。
Arata Nakajima · 
勤務先: Fixstars
社会の役に立てないから高齢者は自己嫌悪に陥っているという見方は少し表面的だと思います。老いや自分の弱さを受け入れるだけの強さがなければ、そうなるでしょうが、本当に石原さんや高齢者の方々はそこまで弱いのでしょうか?弱くなっていく自分が受け入れられないのではなく、自然や運命が自分に何を求めているかを熟慮した結果、穏やかに消えていく事が世の中に対する一番の貢献かも知れないのに、その重い決断を周囲に認めて貰えないジレンマもあるのではないでしょうか。

肉体の死を回避する事は現代医学の至上命題ですが、生存の定義は心臓が動いていてかつ脳波が取れる事であるので、その条件さえ満たしていればどんな状態であっても生かしておく事が今の世の中では肯定されます。そこに大きな矛盾がある事は明白で、個人の意思において潔く死んでいく自由が尊重されてもいいと、私は思います。