2022/08/19

Radha Soami - Wikipedia

Radha Soami - Wikipedia

Radha Soami

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Radha Soami
SethShivDayalSingh.jpg
Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji, a.k.a. Soami Ji Maharaj
Total population
c. 3,000,000[1]
Founder
Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji (1861)[2][3]
Regions with significant populations
AgraUttar PradeshIndia[3]
BeasPunjab, India[2]
Religions
Sant Mat
Scriptures
Sar Bāchan[4]
Languages
Hindi • Punjabi

Radha Soami or Radhasoami Panth is a spiritual tradition founded by Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji in 1861 on Basant Panchami Day in AgraIndia.[1][2][3][5][6]

His parents were followers of Guru Nanak of Sikhism and a spiritual guru Tulsi Sahib from Hathras. After completing his education, Singh gained employment as a Persian language translator, left that role and spent increasing amount of his time to religious pursuits. He was influenced by the teachings of Tulsi Sahib of Hathras, who taught Surat Shabd Yoga (which is defined by Radhasoami teachers as “union of the soul with the divine, inner sound”); guru bhakti (“devotion to the master”); and high moral living, including a strict lacto-vegetarian diet. He accompanied Tulsi Saheb a lot. He didn't take initiation from him, however. The movement does not promote celibacy, and most of the masters in its various lineages have been married. The teachings seem to be related to forms of 18th- and 19th-century esoteric mysticism that were circulating at the time in northern India. The founding date of the movement is considered to be 1861 when Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji began publicly to give discourses.[7][8]

As per some subtraditions, it derives its name from the word Radha Soami means Lord of the Soul. "Radha Soami" is used to indicate towards Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji.[9] The followers of Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji used to consider him the Living Master and incarnation of God (Lord Vishnu/Krishna).[10] After his death, Salig Ram and his other followers started the Radha Soami movement, which later got separated into different branches/denominations, including the Radhasoami Satsang Soami Bagh Agra, Radha Soami Satsang BeasRadha Soami Satsang Dayalbagh, and Radha Swami Satsang Dinod.

Nomenclature[edit]

According to Mark Juergensmeyer, the term Radhasoami literally refers to Radha as the soul and Soami (swami, lord).[11] According to Salig Ram, quotes Juergensmeyer, these terms are symbolic and mean "master of energy", derived from the Vaishnava understanding of "Radha as the power of energy of God" (Shakti). It is a referent to the consciousness in a person and the cosmic energy source, states Juergensmeyer.[11] However, the founder Shri Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji himself never used the term. According to some other scholars, the name is derived from Shiv Dayal's wife. His wife Narayani Devi was nicknamed Radha Ji by his followers.[12] So, being the husband (Soami) of Radha Ji (Narayani Devi), Shri Shiv Dayal was named Radha Soami.

The writings of Soami Shiv Dayal, Sar Bāchan, use the term Sat Nam, rather than Radhasoami. The gurus and the tradition that followed him used the term Radhasoami during the initiation rites, meditation practices and as mutual greeting. This has led to the fellowship being commonly called Radha Soami.[11] In some subtraditions of Radhasoami, states Lucy DuPertuis, the guru's charisma is considered as the "formless absolute", being in his presence is equivalent to experiencing the incarnation of the Satguru, the guru is identified as the Radhasoami.[10]

Founder[edit]

The Radhasoami tradition can be traced back to the spiritual master Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji Maharaj (honorifically titled Soami Ji Maharaj) who was born on August 25, 1818, in the north Indian city of Agra. His parents were followers of Guru Nanak of Sikhism and a spiritual guru Tulsi Saheb from Hathras. After completing his education, Singh gained employment as a Persian language translator, left that role and spent increasing amount of his time to religious pursuits. He was influenced by the teachings of Tulsi Sahib of Hathras, who taught Surat Shabd Yoga (which is defined by Radhasoami teachers as “union of the soul with the divine, inner sound”); guru bhakti (“devotion to the master”); and high moral living, including a strict lacto-vegetarian diet. He accompanied Tulsi Saheb a lot. He didn't take initiation from him, however. The movement does not promote celibacy, and most of the masters in its various lineages have been married. The teachings seem to be related to forms of 18th- and 19th-century esoteric mysticism that were circulating at the time in northern India. The founding date of the movement is considered to be 1861 when Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji began publicly to give discourses.[7][13]

Successors and branches[edit]

Radha Soami fellowships and sects have featured gurus from many parts of the world.

After Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji's death in 1878 he was succeeded by several disciples, including his wife Narayan Devi (“Radhaji”); his brother Partap Singh (“Chachaji”); Sanmukh Das (appointed head of the sadhus); the army havildar/sergeant Baba Jaimal Singh, Gharib Das of Delhi; and the postmaster general of the Northwest provinces, Salig Ram (alias Rai Salig Ram), each of whom started their own distinct centers. According to some scholars, Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji passed leadership to Salig Ram.[14] After their deaths, multiple followers were claimed to be the rightful heirs, and this eventually led to a large proliferation of various masters and satsangs (“fellowships”) throughout India that were regarded by their followers to be the true manifestations of Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji and his teachings, described as Sant Mat (“the path of the saints”).[15]

The masters gave birth to over 20 lineages (guru-shishya traditions), most of which already disappeared.[3][15] The most famous living branches are Radhasoami Satsang Soami Bagh AgraRadha Soami Satsang BeasRadha Soami Satsang Dayalbagh, and Ruhani Satsang.[3]

The Radha Soami Satsang Beas based out of BeasPunjab, India is the largest group.

The largest branch is the Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB) with the headquarters in Beas City, established by one of Seth Shiv Dayal Singh Ji's disciples, Baba Jaimal Singh, in the North Indian state of Punjab in the 1891, who practised Surat Shabd Yoga on the bank of river Beas.[16][3] The Beas has grown enormously over the decades under the guiding hands of each subsequent successor (from Baba Sawan Singh to Sardar Bahadur Maharaj Jagat Singh and Maharaj Charan Singh to the current master, Baba Gurinder Singh). There are estimated to be two million initiates of the Beas masters worldwide. The one of a split the Beas is Dera Sacha Sauda (1948) led by Mastana Baluchistani.[17]

In Agra, the birthplace of the movement, there are three main satsang centers of branches. The Radhasoami Satsang Soami Bagh Agra with center at Soami Bagh occupies the original site in Agra, where a large memorial tomb is being built to honor the movement founder, and administered by the Central Administrative Council which established by second successor Maharaj Saheb in 1902.[3][13] The second center is Peepal Mandi, which was founded by Rai Salig Ram who was then succeeded by his son, grandson, and currently his great-grandson, Agam Prasad Mathur. And the largest of the Agra-based branches is Radha Soami Satsang Dayalbagh with center at Dayalbagh, which is located across the street from Soami Bagh. This branch was founded in 1907 at Ghazipur by Kamta Prasad Sinha and in 1913 the headquarters were moved to Agra,[3] it has flourished under the following leadership of Anand Sarup, Gurcharandas Mehta, Dr. M.B. Lal Sahab, and most recently as of this date Prof. Prem Saran Satsangi.

The Ruhani Satsang (a.k.a. Kirpal Light Satsang) in Delhi, founded by Kirpal Singh, a disciple of the Beas master, Baba Sawan Singh, became popular in the United States under the leadership of Thakar Singh.[1][3][13] The Ruhani Satsang followed by the Sawan Kirpal Ruhani Mission and its international organization Science of Spirituality (SOS), founded by Kipral Singh's son.[1]

Radha Swami Dinod Lineage
Radha Swami Satsang Dinod, lineage.

Other Radha Soami subtraditions and groups that have garnered a significant following include Manavta Mandir, established by Baba Faqir Chand in 1962 at Hoshiarpur in the Punjab; the Tarn Taran satsang founded by Bagga Singh; Radha Swami Satsang Dinod, founded by Param Sant Tarachand Ji Maharaj (Bade Maharaj Ji), current master Param Sant Huzur Kanwar Saheb Ji Maharaj and several others scattered through North and South India.[13]

In addition, there are Radhasoami-influenced, derived from the Radhasoami often westernized groups but denies their connection, namely the Eckankar led by Paul Twitchell (a former disciple of Kirpal Singh), the similar American syncretistic Movement of Spiritual Inner Awareness of John-Roger Hinkins, the linked to the Beas Elan Vital (formerly Divine Light Mission), established by Hans Maharaj, and "Quan Yin method" of Ching Hai (a female student of Thakar Singh).[1][14][13]

List of notable gurus[edit]

General founder

Radha Soami subtraditions[edit]

Radha Soami Satsang Beas lineage
Radha Soami Satsang Dayalbagh lineage
Ruhani Satsang lineage
Manavta Mandir
Others

Radhasoami-related groups[edit]

Dera Sacha Sauda
Eckankar
Elan Vital
Movement of Spiritual Inner Awareness
Science of Spirituality
Jai Guru Dev Satsang
  • Gharibdas
  • Vishnudayal Sharma
  • Ghurelal Sharma
  • Tulsidas (Jai Guru Dev)
  • Umakant Tiwari
Others

Beliefs and practices[edit]

To the Radhsoamis, six elements form the framework of their faith:[18]

  • a living guru (someone as locus of trust and truth),
  • bhajan (remembering Sat Nam, other practices believed to be transformative),
  • satsang (fellowship, community),
  • seva (serve others without expecting anything in return),
  • kendra (community organization, shrine), and
  • bhandara (large community gathering).

The Radha Soami Satsang believes that living gurus are necessary for a guided spiritual life.[2] They do not install the Guru Granth Sahib or any other scriptures in their sanctum, as they consider it ritualistic. Instead, the guru sits in the sanctum with the satsang (group of Sikh faithfuls) and they listen to preachings from the Adi Granth and sing hymns together.[2] They believe in social equality, forbid caste distinctions and have also attracted Dalits to their tradition. They are active outside India too.[2]

The Radhasoami are strict vegetarians. They are active in charitable work such as providing free medical services and help to the needy. They do not believe in orthodox Sikh ritual practices such as covering one's head inside the temple or removing shoes, nor do they serve karah prasad (offering) at the end of prayers.[2] Their basic practices include Surat Shabd Yoga (meditation on inner light and sound), initiation of disciple into the path by a living guru, obedience to the guru, a moral life that is defined by abstinence from meat, drugs, alcohol and sex outside marriage. They also believe that jivanmukti or inner liberation is possible during one's lifetime with guidance of the living guru.[19] However, some of these practices vary depending on the branches of the Radhasoami faith (Beas, Dayalbagh, Dinod).

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e Zoccarelli, Pierluigi (2006). "Radhasoami movements". In Clarke, Peter B. (ed.). Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements. London; New York: Routledge. pp. 507–509. ISBN 9-78-0-415-26707-6.
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Kalsi, Sewa Singh (2005). Sikhism. Religions of the World. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers. pp. 12–13. ISBN 0-7910-8098-6.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Jones, Constance A.; Ryan, James D. (2007). "Radhasoami Movement"Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Encyclopedia of World Religions. J. Gordon Melton, Series Editor. New York: Facts On File. pp. 344–345. ISBN 978-0-8160-5458-9Archived from the original on 2016-12-20.
  4. ^ Singh 1934.
  5. ^ Juergensmeyer, Mark (1991). Radhasoami Reality: The Logic of a Modern Faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01092-7. p. 90 note 5, Quote: "The date of Seth Shiv Dayal's first public discourse is Basant Panchami Day, February 15, 1861".
  6. ^ Lorenzen, David N. (1995). Bhakti Religion in North India: Community Identity and Political Action. State University of New York Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0-7914-2025-6., Quote: "The movement traces its origins to Seth Shiv Dayal Singh, who began his public ministry in Agra in 1861."
  7. Jump up to:a b Juergensmeyer 1991, pp. 15–19, 38–42 with footnotes.
  8. ^ Juergensmeyer, MarkLane, David Christopher (May 24, 2018). "Radhasoami Tradition"oxfordbibliographies.com. Oxford Bibliographies. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780195399318-0203.
  9. ^ Saarbachan Radhasoami Vartik.
  10. Jump up to:a b DuPertuis, Lucy (1986). "How People Recognize Charisma: The Case of Darshan in Radhasoami and Divine Light Mission". Sociological Analysis. Oxford University Press. 47 (2): 111–124. doi:10.2307/3711456JSTOR 3711456., Quote: "Various branches of Radhasoami have argued about the incarnationalism of Satguru (Lane, 1981). Guru Maharaj Ji has accepted it and identifies with Krishna and other incarnations of Vishnu."
  11. Jump up to:a b c Juergensmeyer 1991, pp. 41–42 with footnotes, Quote: "The word Radhasoami literally refers to lord (swami) of his Souls., Radha" (p. 41); "The Beas group translates Radhasoami as 'lord of the soul' (p. 42).
  12. ^ Jeevan Charitra Soami Ji Maharaj.
  13. Jump up to:a b c d e Juergensmeyer, MarkLane, David Christopher (May 24, 2018). "Radhasoami Tradition"oxfordbibliographies.com. Oxford Bibliographies. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780195399318-0203.
  14. Jump up to:a b Jones, Constance A.; Ryan, James D. (2007). "Sant Mat movement"Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Encyclopedia of World Religions. J. Gordon Melton, Series Editor. New York: Facts On File. pp. 383–384. ISBN 978-0-8160-5458-9Archived from the original on 2016-12-20.
  15. Jump up to:a b Lane, David Christopher (1992). The Radhasoami tradition: a critical history of guru successorship. Sects and cults in America, Bibliographical guides, v. 14; Garland reference library of social science, v. 623. New York: Garland Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8240-5247-8OCLC 26013140.
  16. ^ Juergensmeyer 1991, pp. 16–17 with footnotes.
  17. ^ Lane, David Christopher (December 12, 2015). "Split i the Radha Soami Movement"Sach Khand: The Journal of Radhasoami Studies (10): 11. ISBN 9781329755628.
  18. ^ Juergensmeyer 1991, pp. 11–12, 40–42.
  19. ^ Lewis, James R. (2002). Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religions. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. pp. 590–592. ISBN 978-1-61592-738-8.

Further reading[edit]

  • Schomer, Karine; McLeod, William Hewat, eds (1987). The Sants: Studies in a Devotional Tradition of India, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1987. Academic papers from a 1978 Berkeley conference on the Sants organised by the Graduate Theological Union and the University of California Center for South Asia Studies. ISBN 81-208-0277-2

Primary sources[edit]

  • Singh, Seth Shiv Dayal (1934). Sar Bachan: An abstract of the teachings of Soami Ji Maharaj, the founder of the Radha Soami system of philosophy and spiritual science: The yoga of the Sound Current. Translated by Seva Singh and Julian Johnson from Hindi to English (9th ed.). Beas: Radha Soami Satsang Beas.

External links[edit]

Official websites[edit]

Radha Soami subtraditions
Radhasoami-related groups

[[Book Review - Spiritual Link A Testament of Devotion  By Thomas R. Kelly

Book Review - Spiritual Link

Spiritual Link

 Download | Print | Archives

Book Review

A Testament of Devotion  By Thomas R. Kelly
 Publisher: New York: Harper/Collins, 1996.
 ISBN 978-00606-43614

Thomas R. Kelly (1893–1941) was a devout member of the Society of Friends, commonly known as the Quakers. The central principle of Quakerism is that each individual must seek and be guided by the divine light within. Kelly served as a Quaker missionary, a college professor, and a writer. After his death Douglas Steere collected five essays by Kelly and published them under the title A Testament of Devotion. The book includes “A Biographical Memoir” of Kelly by Steere. This book has been continuously in print ever since it was first published in 1941 and is considered a classic of Quaker spirituality and mysticism.

The essays were written in the last few years of the author’s life. He had experienced a nervous breakdown, the effect of which was like a dark night of the soul, and he emerged from this with an intense and unshakeable love of and sense of unity with God. 

Kelly writes with intensity in a style sometimes like a sermon, and often poetic. Almost every paragraph is packed with religious imagery, and almost every page needs to be read and re-read slowly to be properly understood.

===

In the first essay, “The Light Within,” 

Kelly urges the reader to “secret habits of unceasing orientation of the deeps of our being about the Inward Light.” With this orientation, we stay attuned to the divine throughout the busy day. He quotes Meister Eckhart: “As thou art in church or cell, that same frame of mind carry out into the world, into its turmoil and its fitfulness.” Kelly uses a number of analogies to convey his idea of what this inner light is:

Deep within us all there is an amazing inner sanctuary of the soul, a holy place, a Divine Centre, a speaking Voice, to which we may continuously return. Eternity is at our hearts. … It is a Light Within which illuminates the face of God. … It is the Shekinah of the soul, the Presence in the midst. Here is the slumbering Christ, stirring to be awakened, to become the soul we clothe in earthly form and action. And He is within us all.

This “Divine Centre” is present within everyone. With rightly focused, devoted attention we may experience it. 

Yet he also explains that if we seek the divine within it is only because God is seeking us:

In this humanistic age we suppose man is the initiator and God is the responder. But the Living Christ within us is the initiator and we are the responders. God the Lover, the accuser, the revealer of light and darkness presses within us.

Quoting the Bible, Kelly notes that it is God who says, “Behold, I stand at the door.” The response of the soul to the Light Within is natural. Kelly says, “The basic response of the soul to the Light is internal adoration and joy, thanksgiving and worship, self-surrender and listening.”

===

In his second essay, “Holy Obedience,” 

Kelly refers to an inner “Shepherd.” He directs the reader to “the life of absolute and complete and holy obedience to the voice of the Shepherd.” Humility, suffering, and simplicity are all natural outcomes of obedience. Obedience, he says, may be intentional, arising from awareness of the divine within, or it may emerge from mystical experience:

It is an overwhelming experience to fall into the hands of the living God, to be invaded to the depths of one’s being by His presence, to be, without warning, wholly uprooted from all earth-born securities and assurances. … Then is the soul swept into a Loving Centre of ineffable sweetness, where calm and unspeakable peace and ravishing joy steal over one. … One emerges from such soul-shaking, Love-invaded times into more normal states of consciousness. But one knows ever after that the eternal Lover of the world, the Hound of heaven, is utterly, utterly real, and that life must henceforth be forever determined by that Real.

===

The third essay, “The Blessed Community,” 

focuses on the “Fellowship” of those who share a belief in the inner guidance of God within. The spiritual friendship and communion enjoyed by those who are attuned to the divine light within themselves – or are earnestly seeking it – is a source of great joy and spiritual vitality. In the early seventeenth century when the early Friends (or Quakers) began to meet, this “Fellowship” was evident. However, it was not unique in human history:

Every period of profound re-discovery of God’s joyous immediacy is a period of emergence of this amazing group inter-knittedness of God-enthralled men and women who know one another in Him. It appeared in vivid form among the early Friends.

Kelly says this is “the holy matrix of ‘the communion of the saints’.” While he extols the fellowship of the Society of Friends with its clear focus on turning within, Kelly asserts in no uncertain terms that the “spiritual fellowship” he is praising is incomplete until we treat all persons, without exception, as part of it: “For until the life of men in time is, in every relation, shot through with Eternity, the Blessed Community is not complete.”

===

In the fourth essay, “The Eternal Now and Social Concern,” 

Kelly states that the eternal can connect with time in a way that enables life to be lived on two levels, the “here” and the “beyond,” or “the eternal now and the temporal now.” Kelly thinks that people sometimes focus too much on the temporal but with serious commitment can shift their emphasis to the eternal. This shift in focus changes the entire quality of life:

The possibility of the experience of Divine presence, as a repeatedly realized and present fact, and its transforming and transfiguring effect upon all life – this is the central message of Friends. Once we discover this glorious secret, this new dimension of life, we no longer live merely in time but we live also in the eternal.

Quakers are known for taking positive action in the “temporal now,” through social concerns such as peace, non-violence, and fair treatment of all, following the guidance of the inner Voice.

Social concern is the dynamic Life of God at work in the world, made special and emphatic and unique, particularized in each individual or group who is sensitive and tender in the leading-strings of love. A concern is God-initiated, often surprising, always holy, for the Life of God is breaking through into the world. Its execution is in peace and power and astounding faith and joy, for in unhurried serenity the Eternal is at work in the midst of time, triumphantly bringing all things to Himself.

===

In the fifth and final essay, “The Simplification of Life,” 

Kelly addresses the stress and complexity of modern life. Describing the busyness of modern life, he says many of us feel “bowed down with burdens, crushed under committees, strained, breathless, and hurried, panting through a never-ending program of appointments.” He claims that the apparent complexity and unease of our lives is not due to external circumstances but to a lack of inner integration. “We Western peoples are apt to think our great problems are external, environmental. We are not skilled in the inner life, where the real roots of our problem lie.” 

Kelly suggests that basis of Quakerism is in this: “If the Society of Friends has anything to say, it lies in this region primarily. Life is meant to be lived from a Centre, a divine Centre. In that ‘divine Centre’ within us we will find ‘the welling-up whispers of divine guidance and love and presence, more precious than heaven or earth.’” The final paragraph of this essay summarizes its key points:

Life from the Centre is a life of unhurried peace and power. It is simple. It is serene. It is amazing. It is triumphant. It is radiant. It takes no time, but it occupies all our time. And it makes our life programs new and overcoming. We need not get frantic. He is at the helm. And when our little day is done we lie down quietly in peace, for all is well.

Book reviews express the opinions of the reviewers and not of the publisher.

Quakers in China

Quakers in China

Quakers in China

Quaker merchants from Britain, Ireland and North America traded extensively in China during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.  Hence when the opium trade was being imposed by Britain in the 1830s, Friends were well informed, and protested strongly: this was known in China, and Quaker merchants were permitted to continue trading when all other foreigners were expelled.

By the 1870s, Quakers were caught up in the evangelical movement, and in 1886 the Friends Foreign Missionary Association (FFMA) sent Irish Friends Robert and Mary Jane Davidson to China, followed by several others.  They set up a mission in Chongqing, in Sichuan, deep in the western interior, and later opened a second centre, in Sichuan’s capital, Chengdu.

Although they made few converts (when Sichuan Yearly Meeting was founded in 1904, there were only 56 Chinese Quakers), their work in the community had considerable impact. Chongqing Friends School thrived, and the International Friends Institute, opened in 1909, soon became a place where people could meet freely in a peaceful setting. In 1910, working with other missions, and Chinese Friends, they co-founded the West China Union University, in Chengdu (now the West China Institute of Medical Sciences, and one of the 6 key medical centres in China).

Ohio Yearly Meeting began a completely separate mission in 1887 when they sent nurse Esther Butler to Nanking, in eastern China, on the Yangste River, inland from Shanghai.  Other women soon joined her, and they opened an orphanage and a school for women, followed by a hospital for women and children in 1894. A new facility was opened in nearby Luh Hoh, and the pioneer women missionaries were joined by missionaries of both sexes, some from Ohio and others from New England and New York Yearly meetings.   Chinese men and women played an increasing part in the work, and by 1907 the Friends Church had a Chinese pastor, Pastor Gao.  As in Sichuan, Friends in Nanking and Luh Hoh worked extensively with other missions .

Both the Sichuan and Nanking Quaker missions had soon seen that ‘conversion’ was unusual, but that their community work was effective and helpful. It also demonstrated Quaker values in a tangible way, especially when done in equal partnership with their partnership with Chinese people.

There were a number of other Quaker initiatives. William Wardle Cadbury, from Pennsylvania, served as a Quaker medical missionary in Canton from 1909 to 1941.  He was Superintendent of Canton Hospital, and also served terms as vice-president of the Chinese Medical Association and chairman of the Chinese Red Cross. Lucy Burtt ran a Friends centre in a house in Beijing for 20 years from 1930.  There was a small Friends Centre in Shanghai, and a group of Quakers in Hong Kong.

By the 1930s major changes were afoot in China. Communism was on the rise, and Japan was a growing threat. War broke out in 1937 and the Chinese coast was soon occupied by Japan, while the Chinese Communists controlled the north. The  ‘Free China’ that was left, including Sichuan, was landlocked and soon in desperate need of relief.

The Friends Centre in occupied Shanghai provided help to refugees and street children, and ran feeding programmes, from 1938.  Relief for ‘Free China’ became a great concern for Friends elsewhere, and seven American organisations, including the AFSC, combined to form United China Relief, to fund such work, once the necessary permissions could be granted. In 1941 the Free China government in Chongqing finally agreed that the Friends Ambulance Unit (FAU) could send a team to provide medical assistance to the Chinese Red Cross in “Free China”.  They based themselves in Kunming, close to the Burmese border, and a key transport hub. From Kunming the FAU's China Convoy distributed supplies over much of China for the next 5 years.

In 1946 the China Convoy team was reconfigured as the Friends Service Unit (FSU). under the aegis of the AFSC. Locally they were known as the Gong Yi Diu Hu Dui, which roughly translates as the “Public/Justice Friendship Plead/Save Protect Group” – although they were also locally nicknamed the “Public Silence Group” – reflecting their practice of Meeting for Worship.  Activity continued up until 1951 including a major relief project during the 1946-7 famine, and work to relieve sufferings on both sides of the Chinese Civil War.

Eventually the presence of foreigners was untenable against the backdrop of growing tensions between the new Communist Government and the West. In 1951 the FSU and any remaining missionaries, of all persuasions, were expelled.

AFSC returned in the 1970s, with a programme of visits and exchanges, for mutual understanding, which still continues. They have a small office in Sichuan. QPS (now QPSW) has helped fund volunteer teachers.

Chinese Christians on the mainland today are non-denominational. There is a small and active Friends Meeting in Hong Kong: amongst other things, they founded Oxfam Hong Kong, and supported many Vietnamese refugees in the 1970s.



Further Reading and Credits

EXTERNAL LINKS
FURTHER READING
  • Tyzack, Charles
 Friends to China : the Davidson brothers and the Friends' Mission to China 1886-1939, The Friends' Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 6, April 1987

 

Thomas Kelly - Friends Journal

Thomas Kelly - Friends Journal:

Thomas Kelly

February 1, 2006
By Brian Drayton

Thomas Kelly is the first of four activist Friends that I intend to write about in this column over the next several months—Friends whose spiritual experience and their testimony for us are shaped in a fundamental way by purposeful engagement with the world. I say "purposeful" because everyone’s spiritual life is shaped by the manifold experiences of work, human relationships, and the sheer business of organismal being, but it is useful sometimes to try to trace in someone’s spiritual expression the impact of their intentionally hurling themselves into specific actions.

Now, it may come as a surprise to find Thomas Kelly grouped with such energetic bodies as John Bellers and Lucretia Mott. This view of Kelly dawned on me only recently, as I revisited his writings and biography after a long period in which I thought of him hardly at all. In his devotional pieces, I heard accents that come from fierce joy, commitments maintained under testing, and many kinds of longing. The three sorts of world-engagement that seem most important in Kelly’s life were his concern for souls, his direct service in Germany and other places with AFSC, and his almost lifelong ambition to make a significant academic mark, especially in philosophy. All of these seem to have in common a longing to be something special, which is epitomized vividly in the famous incident, in which as a Haverford student he comes to visit Rufus Jones, and in the course of the conversation says, "I just want my life to be a miracle!" While Rufus’ personality and style might well have played midwife to expansive statements from many admiring students, the heat and intensity of that ambition are Kelly’s.
Concern for souls

Kelly was born to an active, devout, evangelical Quaker family in Ohio. From an early age he was surrounded by rhythms of worship, persons of magnetic spirituality, Bible and preaching, hymns, and community life. Like other future ministers, he "played preacher," and exhibited early a commanding yet winning personality, as well as an acute mind. After college, he went to Hartford Theological Seminary, and received both theological and philosophical training; his original goal was to enter missions. He worked as a supply pastor in a variety of local Protestant and Quaker churches. While he swerved from the path to pastoral ministry for which he seemed (to others) well suited, his sense of the urgent value of each human soul and his fascination with the vagaries of inward and outward life remained strong. As he grew spiritually, his "authentic" voice more and more reached towards soul-health, high aspiration, the need for abandonment to God, and the realization that joy was part of the promise. Whether he was writing or speaking about political events, relief work, or problems of daily life, he had from youth an acute awareness of the soul life in all, and God’s beckoning and workman-like love.
Direct service

During World War I, Kelly sought alternative service with the YMCA in England, and then worked with German prisoners of war. He took an active part in AFSC work between the World Wars, going twice to Germany, once for an extended period of time as part of the relief effort there. He was articulate about the need to work in practical ways to relieve physical, psychological, and spiritual suffering; and as his writings reveal, he understood clearly how these are interrelated.
Ambition and failure

After his alternative service, and a teaching position at Wilmington College, Kelly returned to Hartford for a doctorate in philosophy. There followed several years of teaching at Earlham, in Hawaii, at Wellesley College, and finally at Haverford. During this period, deciding that his main goal was to become an accomplished and productive academic philosopher, he determined to take a second doctorate in Philosophy at Harvard. In the face of a policy not to grant a doctorate to someone who already had a PhD, Kelly wrote an agonizingly revealing letter in which he insisted that in order for him to really do first rate work in philosophy, he must both be trained at Harvard (the premier school in the country, in his opinion), and take a degree. This was reluctantly allowed, and Kelly wrote a thesis that was published to good notices. When he came to defend his thesis, however, he blanked out and was unstrung. The Harvard faculty both failed him, and barred him from ever trying again. Kelly fell into a major psychological crisis (though Haverford was happy with him on the faculty in any case).

The outcome of his failure, and his encounter with ultimate questions of his values and commitments, was a relatively sudden and dramatic integration of his personality, and a sense of liberation. His intense religious life seems to have gained an added mystical depth, and his writings from this period to his death are full of light, conviction, joy, and the sweetness that comes of walking in the Light, but knowing firsthand the ocean of darkness and death.

In Reality of the Spiritual World he writes:


"When our souls are utterly swept through and overturned by God’s invading love . . . we find ourselves enmeshed with some people in amazing bonds of love and nearness and togetherness of soul, such as we never knew before. . . . Into this fellowship of souls at the center we simply emerge. No one is chosen to the fellowship. When we discover God we discover the fellowship. When we find ourselves in Christ we find we are also amazingly united with those others who are also in Christ.

. . . Theological differences are forgotten, and liberals and conservatives eagerly exchange experiences concerning the wonders of the life of devotion. [Yet] the last depths of conversation in the fellowship go beyond spoken words. People who know one another in God do not need to talk much. They know one another already. In the last depths of understanding, words cease and we sit in silence together, yet in perfect touch with one another, more bound into the common life by the silence than we ever were by words."
For further reading

The most famous of Kelly’s writings is A Testament of Devotion, which was pulled together by Douglas Steere and a few others within months of Kelly’s death. It has a good, brief biographical sketch, as well, though this leaves out some important elements, and bears the marks of haste and grief. Recently I have found The Eternal Now and Social Concern of particular value. However, I strongly urge you to read Reality of the Spiritual World, if you have not done so recently. There is a great breadth of vision in this pamphlet, which embraces contemplation and action, prayer and service. Thomas Merton’s famous quip that Quakers have produced no great mystics finds one of its best refutations in this piece. In the 1960s, Thomas’ son, Richard Kelly, compiled a further collection of essays and short pieces under the title The Eternal Promise. For biography, the best source is still Richard Kelly’s Thomas Kelly: A Biography, which, among other virtues, quotes extensively from Thomas’ correspondence. In addition, though, the reader will enjoy T. Canby Jones’ Pendle Hill pamphlet, Thomas Kelly as I Remember Him. T. Canby Jones was part of the "gang" of inspired young people who gathered with Thomas Kelly at Haverford in his last years for study and prayer, and to feel their way into lives of service and witness. The pamphlet is warm in its recollection of Kelly’s personality, but it is especially valuable for its interpretation of his teaching on prayer and spiritual experience.

History
Personalities
Spiritual Growth
Features
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)


Brian Drayton

Brian Drayton is a member of Weare (N.H.) Meeting.

Search | Scribd Thomas Kelly books Writings of Thomas Kelly, The Eternal Promise

Search | Scribd



Writings of Thomas Kelly (Annotated)
byCSPtrade2
Writings of Thomas Kelly (Annotated)
By Upper Room Books

68 pages
2 hours

Description
With:

Historical commentary
Biographical info
Appendix with further readings
For nearly 2,000 years, Christian mystics, martyrs, and sages have documented their search for the divine. Their writings have bestowed boundless wisdom upon subsequent generations. But they have also burdened many spiritual seekers. The sheer volume of available material creates a seemingly insurmountable obstacle. Enter the Upper Room Spiritual Classics series, a collection of authoritative texts on Christian spirituality curated for the everyday reader. Designed to introduce 15 spiritual giants and the range of their works, these volumes are a first-rate resource for beginner and expert alike.

Writings of Thomas Kelly presents inspiring essays from this 20th-century Quaker whom Richard Foster called "a giant soul." This volume includes excerpts from Kelly's beloved Testament of Devotion, along with letters and other writings, some of which have not been widely available until now.
and a sequel to A Testament of Devotion
byThomas R Kelly

The Eternal Promise: A contemporary Quaker classic and a sequel to A Testament of Devotion
By Thomas R Kelly and Howard Macy

137 pages
5 hours

Description
One reason for Kelly’s broad appeal lies in his understanding of the “seeker.” He knows that many of us, both inside and outside of the church, long for something more than the “com­mon, mild, gentle, half-hearted conventional religiosity” which we so often experience. We want authentic, vital, life-changing faith

2022/08/18

인류세의 철학 - 사변적 실재론 이후의 ‘인간의 조건’시노하라 마사타케, 조성환, 이우진, 야규 마코토, 허남진

인류세의 철학 - YES24


인류세의 철학
사변적 실재론 이후의 ‘인간의 조건’시노하라 마사타케, 조성환, 이우진, 야규 마코토, 허남진 역 | 모시는사람들 | 2022년 08월 31일




지구인문학의 시선

원광대학교 원불교사상연구원 기획/박치완 등저

13,500원 (10% 할인)더보기이동

이 분야 베스트셀러





도올주역강해

도올 김용옥 저

35,100원 (10% 할인)

책소개
이 책은 인류가 새롭게 맞이한 인류세에 즈음하여 한나 아렌트가 제기한 ‘인간의 조건’이라는 철학적 물음을 재조명한다. 아렌트의 견해에 인류세를 인간사와 자연사의 얽힘으로 이해한 차크라바르티의 견해를 더하고, 퀑탱 메이야수의 사변적 실재론이나 티모시 모튼의 객체지향철학 등이 제기한 ‘사물’에 대한 철학적 고찰을 경유하여, 동일본대지진과 같은 자연재해의 체험과 연결시키면서 재구성하고 있다.

인류세란 “산업혁명 이래의 인간의 활동으로 인간과 자연의 경계가 붕괴되고, 그로 인해 인간의 조건이 위협받는 시대”이다. 이에 즈음하여 근대문명이 구축해 온 인공세계는 자연세계 위에 놓인 것이며, 자연 세계는 연약하고 깨지기 쉬우며 인간에게 우호적이지도 않다는 것이 밝혀지고 있다. 이 책은 인류세에 즈음하여 인간과 자연의 관계를 새롭게 인식하고 수용하며 이해해야 한다는 것을 밝히고, 인간이 붕괴의 길로 추락할 것인가, 성찰을 바탕으로 자연세계와 화해하고 붕괴 이후의 새로운 세계의 창조를 지향할 것인가를 묻는다.
책의 일부 내용을 미리 읽어보실 수 있습니다. 미리보기

목차
한국어판 저자 서문
프롤로그 『인류세의 철학』은 어떻게 탄생했나?
해제 〈붕괴〉 이전으로 돌아갈 수 있을까?

서론

제1장 인간과 자연의 관계

· 인공물과 자연 · 인공물로서의 경계
· 인간의 세계·경계·자연과의 만남 · 인간의 세계와 그 붕괴
· 인간세계의 한계로서의 경계 · ‘아우라의 붕괴’에서의 양의성(兩義性)
· 자연 이해의 어려움 · 세계의 사물성
· 상호연관의 펼쳐짐

제2장 인간세계의 이탈

· 인간이 아닌 것의 세계 · 인류세
· 인류세 시대의 인간의 조건 · 인간의 조건의 사물성
· 이탈하는 인간세계 · 인간세계를 교란시키는 자연

제3장 인간세계의 취약함

· 인간세계의 과학기술화 · 지구로부터의 인간 이탈
· 인간의 조건의 붕괴 · 환경 위기와 인간 소멸
· 무용해지는 기분과 인공세계의 구축 · 생태적 현실로

제4장 생태적 세계

· 데이터로 본 현실의 충격 · 데이터가 제시하는 현실의 역설
· 마음으로부터 독립되어 있다 · 유체적(流體的) 사고에 대한 비판
· 인간은 자연 속에 살아 있다 · 인간적인 것과 생태적인 것의 사이
· 취약성의 현실성

제5장 사물의 세계와 시적 언어의 가능성

· 사물과의 상호교섭 · 과학기술화 과정에서의 주체성 상실
· 시적으로 말하기 · 사물의 응시
· 정신의 극복 · 사물이 만나고 모이는 장소
· 과대 도시화와 공업화의 결말

제6장 생태적 공존

· 현전(現前)의 공간과 그곳으로부터의 제거
· 인간 아닌 것의 힘들과의 접촉 · 인간의 유한성
· 혼돈공간의 발생 · 확산에서의 연관
· 파편과 함께 있다는 것 · 빛과 어둠의 경계
· 분리되지 않지만 구별된다

결론
접어보기

저자 소개 (5명)
역 : 시노하라 마사타케 (篠原雅武)
관심작가 알림신청 작가 파일
교토대학(京都大?) 총합인간학부(?合人間?部) 졸업. 교토대학대학원 인간?환경학연구과 박사. 현재 교토대학대학원 총합생존학관(思修館) 특정 준교수. 저서로『공공공간의 정치이론(公共空間の政治理論)』(人文書院, 2007), 『공간을 위하여(空間のために)』(2011), 『전-생활론(全-生活論)』(2012), 『살아진 뉴타운(生きられたニュ?タウン)』(2015),『복수성의 에콜로지(複?性のエコロジ?)』(2016), 『‘인간 이후’의 철학(‘人間以後’の哲?)』(2020)이 있고, 번역서로 마누엘 데란다, 『사회의 새로운 철학(社?の新たな哲?)』(2015), 티모시 모튼, 『자연없는 생태학(自然なきエコロジ?)』(2018) 등이 있다.
접어보기
역 : 조성환
관심작가 알림신청 작가 파일
원광대학교 동북아시아인문사회연구소 HK교수. [다시개벽] 편집인. 지구지역학 연구자. 서강대와 와세다대학에서 동양철학을 공부하였고, 원광대학교 원불교사상연구원에서 『한국 근대의 탄생』과 『개벽파선언』(이병한과 공저)을 저술하였다. 20∼30대에는 노장사상에 끌려 중국철학을 공부하였고, 40대부터는 한국학에 눈을 떠 동학과 개벽사상을 연구하였다. 최근에는 1990년대부터 서양에서 대두되기 시작한 ‘지구인문학’에 관심을 갖고 있다. 그러나 일관된 문제의식은 ‘근대성’이다. 그것도 서구적 근대성이 아닌 비서구적 근대성이다. 동학과 개벽은 한국적 근대성에 대한 관심의 일환이고, 지구인문학은 ‘근대성에서 지구성으로’의 전환을 고민하고 있다. 양자를 아우르는 개념으로 ‘지구지역학’을 사용하고 있다. 동학이라는 한국학은 좁게는 지역학, 넓게는 지구학이라는 두 성격을 동시에 지니고 있기 때문이다. 이러한 관심을 바탕으로 장차 개화학과 개벽학이 어우러진 한국 근대사상사를 재구성하고, 토착적 근대와 지구인문학을 주제로 하는 총서를 기획할 계획이다.
접어보기
작가의 다른 상품





개벽의 사상사

20,900원 (5% 할인)





하늘을 그리는 사람들

19,800원 (10% 할인)





동학의 재해석과 신문명의 모색

13,500원 (10% 할인)





근대 한국종교, 세계와 만나다

16,200원 (10% 할인)
역 : 이우진
관심작가 알림신청 작가 파일
공주교육대학교 교수. 공주교육대학교 글로컬인문학연구소 소장. 공주교육대학교와 한국학중앙연구원에서 교육학과 철학을 공부하고, 차세대 한국학자로 선발되어 워싱턴대학교에서 연구하였다. 저서로 Korean Education:Educational Thought, Systems and Content (공저) 등이 있고, 역서로 『정의를 위한 교육 ? 야누시 코르차크』, 『동아시아 양명학의 전개』가 있다.
더보기
=======================
책 속으로
○ 아렌트는 근대 이후의 인간 생활의 문제를 ‘인간의 조건이 자연으로부터 분리되어 버린 문제’로 생각하고자 하였다. 『인간의 조건』 제2판(1998)에 실린 서문에서 마거릿 캐노번(Margaret Canovan, 1939~2018)은 아렌트가 인간의 영역인 공적 세계에 대한 고찰을 지구라는 행성, 즉 자연과의 관계 속에서 생각하려 했다고 말하고 있다. 아렌트는 1957년의 인공위성 발사를 인류 역사상 획기적인 사건으로 파악했는데, 그 이유는 “인간이 지구에서 벗어난다”는 사실을 의미하기 때문이었다. 즉 “지구에서 하늘로 달아나고, 핵기술과 같은 실험을 통해서 인간 존재는 자연의 한계에 도전해 나가게 된다.”는 것이다.4 아렌트는 인간의 영역이 지구에서 이탈하여, 그 자체로 자족하게 되는 징조를 인공위성 발사에서 감지했다.
--- p.42

○ 인간 생활의 조건이 취약한 것은 무엇 때문인가? 그것은 인간 생활의 조건이 인간적인 의도의 산물이라는 의미에서의 인공 공간만으로는 완결되지 못하고, 생활을 영위하는 사람들을 둘러싸고 지탱해 주는 자연과 만나는 곳에서 형성되기 때문이다. 모튼이 “사물에는 기묘한 구석이 있다.”라고 주장했던 것은 인공과 자연이 은밀하게 만나는 곳에 사물이 존재한다는 사실을 직관하고 있었기 때문이다. 하지만 일상적인 인간 생활에서는 사물의 기묘함을 대체로 의식하지 못한다. 인간이 만들어 내는 세계에 사는 데 익숙해지게 됨에 따라, 그 이외의 세계, 즉 인간이 만들어내는 것과는 무관하게 존재하는 세계는 아렌트가 말하는 ‘세계 아닌 것’으로 지각되고, 거기에서 감각이 닫히고 사고도 멈추기 때문이다.
--- p.90

○ 차크라바르티는 기후변화와 함께 일어나는 사태를 둘러싼 사유를 펼쳐나가는 일을 야스퍼스의 “전대미문의 사태에 대한 의식”에 관한 검토에서 시작하였다. 그 이유는 기술화가 인간 생활의 조건을 근본적으로 변화시킨 현실은 전문적으로 분화된 개별 지식의 테두리에 머물러서는 사유할 수 없는 문제라고 보았기 때문이다. 나아가서 인간이 지구로부터 분리됨으로써 뿌리 없는 풀과 같은 생활권을 형성하고 있다는 자각을 촉구하고, 그 결과에 대한 사유가 무엇보다 중요하다는 것을 말하기 위해서였다.
--- p.127

○ 아렌트는 인간의 조건을 사물성(事物性)이 있는 것으로 보았다. 그리고 사물을 두 가지 상태로 구분하였다. 하나는 인간적 세계의 구성 요소가 된 상태이고, 다른 하나는 그 바깥으로 내몰려 서로 무관한 것들이 퇴적되어 있는 상태이다. 인간 존재를 조건 지우는 상태에 있는 사물은, 인간 생활이 영위되는 인간적 세계의 영역 안에 확실히 존재하는 것으로 지각되고, 인간 생활을 현실에서 뒷받침하는 것으로 감지되며 인식되고 있다. 이에 반해 인간적 세계의 외부에 있는 것으로 간주되는 사물은 명확히 ‘세계 아닌 것’(non-world)으로 불리고 있다. ‘세계 아닌 것’이란 인간 생활과 무관하고 인간 생활이 영향을 미치지 않는 것, 인간 생활로부터 방치되고 있는 것을 의미한다.
--- p.153

○ 오노의 시는 공업화된 장소를 사물성에서 포착하고자 하였다. 그것은 균질 공간의 확장과 그 확장에 대한 대항이라는 관념적 도식과는 완전히 다른 곳에 있다고 생각되고 있다. 모튼의 표현을 빌리면, 오노의 시는 “인간이 구축한 장소보다 훨씬 더 거대한 장소에 우리가 있음을 발견한” 시로 읽을 수 있다. 거대한 장소에 있을 때 인간은 바람과 연기를 느끼며, 풀과 광물의 현실성을 느낀다. 이 드넓은 펼쳐짐 속에 들어감으로써, 인간이 문화적으로 건강한 생활을 영위하기 위해 만들어 낸 장소가 협소하고 제한적임을 느끼게 된다. 하지만 이를 위해서는 환영이나 정신으로 가득 찬 번화가와는 다른 ‘갈대밭’이라고 하는 변경의 정적 속에 몸을 두는 것이 요청된다.
--- p.182

○ 인간세계가 그 자기완결성을 완화하고, 생태적 세계와 만나는 것은 실로 이 사이, 중간적인 곳이다. 인간적인 세계가 원활한 작동을 멈추고 확장을 멈출 때, 거기에서 생성되는 것은 자신의 존재의 확실함을 깨닫게 해주는 공간, 즉 자연세계에서 다양한 것과 관련되어 있기 때문에 얻어지는 확실함을 알 수 있게 해주는 정적, 세누히마(せぬひま)의 공간이다. 그리고 그곳은 인간세계가 자연세계와 접하고 만나는 곳으로, 그래서 자연 그 자체에 삼켜지거나 자연과 일체화되는 곳과는 다르다. 자연과도 구별되면서, 그럼에도 불구하고 인간적인 세계의 자기완결성이 삐져나오는 곳으로 생각할 수 있을 것이다.
--- p.215

○ 아렌트는 인간이 자신의 세계를 만들어 내는 것이 중요하다고 생각했다. 파시즘 시대에서 인간이 자신의 거주지 감각을 상실하고 고립되고 기댈 곳 없는 존재가 되자, 인간의 내면적 자연성이 돌변하여 야만화되고 폭력적이 되는 공포를 몸소 경험했기 때문이다. 그것에 비하면 인간세계를 안정적인 것으로 만들고 유지하여, 자기보존을 위해 노력하는 것이 중요하게 될 것이다. 정치철학자로서 아렌트는 설령 인간세계의 형성이 자연에 대한 폭력의 행사를 동반한다고 하더라도, 인간이 고립되고 퇴행하고 야만화하는 것에 비하면, 이 폭력은 허용되어도 좋다고 생각했을 것이다.
--- p.221
접어보기

출판사 리뷰

동아시아 최초의 ‘인류세 철학서’
붕괴 이후의 인간의 조건을 사물철학의 관점에서 다시 생각한다
죽어갈 것인가, 살아볼 것인가?

이 책은 2018년에 교토대학의 시노하라 마사타케(篠原雅武, 1975~ ) 교수가 쓴 『人新世の哲?: 思弁的?在論以後の ‘人間の?件’』(東京: 人文書院, 2018.01)을 번역한 것이다. 여기에서 〈人新世(인신세)〉는 anthropocene의 일본어 번역으로, 한국에서는 ‘인류세’로 번역되고 있다. 〈思弁的?在論(사변적 실재론)〉은 speculative realism의 번역어로, 최신 철학의 한 흐름이다. 〈人間の?件(인간의 조건)〉은 한나 아렌트의 저서 『인간의 조건』에서 유래하는 개념이다.

‘인류세’는 2000년에 네델란드의 대기화학자 파울 크뤼천(Paul Jozef Crutzen)이 사용하여 널리 알려진 개념이고, ‘사변적 실재론’은 프랑스의 철학자 퀑탱 메이야수(Quentin Meillassoux)가 2006년에 쓴 『유한성 이후(Apres la finitude)』에 등장하는 용어이다. ‘인간의 조건’은 독일의 정치철학자 한나 아렌트(Hannah Arendt)가 1958년에 쓴 저서 제목이다. 그래서 이 책의 제목이 의미하는 바는 “인류세 시대의 인간의 조건을 사변적 실재론이라는 철학적 관점에서 다시 생각한다”가 된다.

‘인류세 철학’은 아직 국내에서는 낯선 개념이다. 서양에서도 인류세를 ‘철학적’ 관점에서 사유하기 시작한 것은 최근 몇 년 사이의 일이다. “인류세 철학”이라는 제목의 책이 처음 나온 것이 2016년이기 때문이다. 이 해에 덴마크의 철학자 Sverre Raffnsøe가 쓴 『인류세의 철학(Philosophy of the Anthropocene): 인간적 전환(The Human Turn)』(Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan)이 출판되었다. 그로부터 2년 뒤인 2018년에 ‘마침내’ 비서구권에서도 “인류세의 철학”을 제목으로 한 단행본이 간행된 것이다.

저자인 시노하라 마사타케는 일본에서는 인류세 철학의 최고 전문가로 평가받고 있다. 최근에 국내에도 번역되어 유명해진 『지속불가능한 자본주의』와 『마르크스의 생태사회주의』의 저자 사이토 고헤이(?藤幸平)와 『현대사상』에서 대담을 나눴고(?ポスト資本主義と人新世(포스트 자본주의와 인류세)?, 『現代思想』, 2020년 1월호), 객체지향존재론(object-oriented philosophy)의 철학자로 널리 알려져 있는 티모시 모튼(Timothy Morton, 1968~)과 대화를 나누고, 그것을 자신의 책 『複?性のエコロジ?(복수성의 생태학)』(2016)에 수록하였다.

이 책은 한나 아렌트가 제기한 ‘인간의 조건’이라는 철학적 물음을 ‘인류세’ 시대에 다시 생각하고자 하는 문제의식에서 출발하고 있다. 이와 같은 문제 제기는 이미 시카고대학의 역사학자 디페시 차크라바르티(Dipesh Chakrabarty)가 2009년에 ?역사의 기후 : 네 가지 테제?라는 논문에서 제기한 바 있다. 차크라바르티는 인류세의 의미를 인간사와 자연사의 얽힘으로 이해하였다. 저자는 여기에다 퀑탱 메이야수의 사변적 실재론이나 티모시 모튼의 객체지향철학 등이 제기한 ‘사물’에 대한 철학적 고찰을 추가하고, 그것을 고베지진이나 동일본대지진과 같은 자연재해의 체험과 연결시켜, ‘일본인’의 관점에서 인류세 철학을 재구성하고 있다.

‘인류세의 철학’이라는 논리와 개념이 함의하는, 그리고 이로부터 출발하는 사유의 지평은 긴박하고도 광범위한 문제를 포괄한다. 저자는 인간의 조건 문제를 특히 ‘동일본대지진’이라는 우발적(?) 자연재해와 그로 말미암은 쓰나미 그리고 그 이후에 펼쳐진 세계상이라는 지엽적 경험에서 출발하지만, 그것은 그 이전 반세기나 한 세기로 소급하고(1958년 한나 아렌트의 『인간의 조건』 출간), 또 그 이후로는 티모시 모튼, 디페시 차크라바르티 등과의 만남을 포함하여 미래로 ‘열린 구조’를 갖고 있으며, 생물 대멸종을 포함하여 인간의 조건에 심대한 영향을 끼치는 현재 진행형의 사건을 다루고 있기 때문이다.

일례로 매년 오늘날 전 세계적으로 유례없는 폭염, 폭우, 가뭄, 초대형 산불 등의 재난이 일상적이며 연례적인 사태로 전개되고 있다. 게다가 북극 해빙이나 북구 만년빙하의 급속한 해동, 그리고 시베리아 영구동토의 해빙으로 말미암은 재난과 재앙도 인류 역사와 사회변화의 상수로 자리매김하고 있기 때문이다. 그런 가운데서도 해결의 기미가 보이지 않는 탄소중립 일정표 문제나 플라스틱을 포함한 각종 쓰레기의 유출 등등은 이 책에서 제시하는 인간 조건의 문제가 범세계적이며 전 지구적인 현재진행형의 과제임을 여실히 보여준다. 한편으로, 이러한 자연과의 관계뿐만 아니라 인공지능을 비롯한 사물 세계의 인간 세계로의 진격과 혼섭(混涉) 또한 인류세 시대에 인간의 조건에 심대한 영향을 끼치는 문제가 되고 있다.

다시 원론적인 문제로 돌아가 보면 인류세란, 차크라바르티의 개념 정의를 참조할 때 “산업혁명 이래의 인간의 활동으로 인간과 자연의 경계가 붕괴되고, 그로 인해 인간의 조건이 위협받는 시대”로 요약될 수 있다(『인류세의 철학』 2장 1절 “인류세 시대의 인간의 조건”). 여기서 ‘인간의 조건’은 인간 자신을 제외한 인간 활동의 산물(인공물)과 동식물이나 광물, 나아가 바다나 대기와 같은 자연물과 최종적으로는 인간이 살아가는 이 ‘행성 지구’까지를 포함하는 것이다. ‘인류세’란 바로 이러한 ‘행성 지구’ 이하의 인간의 조건이 격변하고 급변하는 와중에 구온난화 사태의 경우에서 보듯이 인간의 생활은 물론 생존과 생명 전체가 위기에 처하게 된 시대를 의미한다.

지금 이 순간에도 불타고, 녹아내리고, 멸종하고, 숨 막혀 죽어 가는 이 인류세의 실제상황 시대에 ‘철학’을 이야기하는 이유와 의미와 여지는 무엇인가. 이제야말로 인간이 이 자연 세계, 인간의 조건의 주인이 아니라 일개 거주민일 뿐이라는 것, 그리고 인간은 결코 인공 세계(문명)만으로 생존하고 생활해 나갈 수 없음을 인식하고 인정하는 것이야말로, 급선무이기 때문이다. 돌이켜보면 인간이 자연(동물~바이러스)에 너무 깊숙이 침입하는 바람에 발생한 코로나19 팬데믹은 바로 이러한 인류세라는 거대 구조의 손바닥 위에서 펼쳐진 파노라마의 도입부였던 것이다.

인류세 시대에 철학적으로 고찰하고 확인하게 되는 사실은 인공의 세계만이 아니라, 인간을 둘러싼 자연이야말로 광범위하고 근원적인 인간의 조건이라는 사실이다. 다음으로 인간은 자연으로부터 분리된 예외적인 존재가 아니라, 자연 속에서 그 일원으로 살아가고 있다는 사실이다. 기후변화의 바깥으로 나갈 수 없다는 것이다. 자연은 정복의 대상이 아닐뿐더러, 그로부터의 해방이란 것도 원천적으로 환상, 환몽, 환각에 지나지 않는다는 말이다.

저자는 이 책에서, 근대 이후로 건설된 인간의 인공세계는 자연세계 위에 겹쳐지고 포개지듯이 성립하였고, 따라서 대단히 연약하고 깨지기 쉬우며, 자연재해나 기후변동으로 인해 쉽게 붕괴될 위험이 있다. 인류세의 철학은 바로 이 점을 지적하고 있다. 다시 말해 인류세는 인간세계가 더 이상 안정적이지 않고, 쉽게 붕괴될 수 있으며, 이러한 불안정 상황이 지속되는 시대를 말한다. 근대라는 안정된 시스템이 ‘붕괴’되는 지금 여기에서의 경험을 절망적인 것으로 받아들일 것인가, 아니면 이를 사물의 존재에 대한 새로운 이해의 기회로 삼아 성찰하고 자연세계와의 화해와 만남, 새로운 세계의 창조를 추구할 것인가?

한마디로 “죽어갈 것인가, 살아볼 것인가?”를 묻는 것이 바로 ‘인류세의 철학’이다.