2024/01/30

Jiddu Krishnamurti - Wikipedia

Jiddu Krishnamurti - Wikipedia

Jiddu Krishnamurti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Krishnamurti in the 1920s
Born11 May 1895
MadanapalleMadras Presidency, British India
Died17 February 1986 (aged 90)
Occupations
  • Philosopher
  • author
  • public speaker
Notable work
RelativesAnnie Besant (adoptive parent)
Era20th-century philosophy
Region
InstitutionsKrishnamurti Foundation (founder)

Jiddu Krishnamurti (/ˈɪd ˌkrɪʃnəˈmʊərti/ JID-oo KRISH-nə-MOOR-tee; 11 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was an Indian philosopher, speaker, writer, and spiritual figure. Adopted by members of the Theosophical tradition as a child, he was raised to fill the advanced role of World Teacher, but in adulthood he rejected this mantle and distanced himself from the related religious movement. He spent the rest of his life speaking to groups and individuals around the world; many of these talks have been published. He also wrote many books, among them The First and Last Freedom (1954) and Commentaries on Living (1956–60). His last public talk was in January 1986, a month before his death at his home in Ojai, California.

Krishnamurti asserted that "truth is a pathless land" and advised against following any doctrine, discipline, teacher, guru, or authority, including himself.[1] He emphasized topics such as choiceless awareness, psychological inquiry, and freedom from religious, spiritual, and cultural conditioning. His supporters — working through non-profit foundations in India, Britain, and the United States — oversee several independent schools based on his views on education, and continue to distribute his thousands of talks, group and individual discussions, and writings in a variety of media formats and languages.

Biography[edit]

Family background and childhood[edit]

House in which Krishnamurti was born
House in Madanapalle, in which Krishnamurti was born
Krishnamurti in 1910

The date of birth of Krishnamurti is a matter of dispute. Mary Lutyens determines it to be 11 May 1895,[2] but Christine Williams notes the unreliability of birth registrations in that period and that statements claiming dates ranging from 4 May 1895 to 25 May 1896 exist. She used calculations based on a published horoscope to derive a date of 11 May 1895 but "retains a measure of scepticism" about it.[3]

His birthplace was the small town of Madanapalle in Madras Presidency (modern-day Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh). He was born in a Telugu-speaking Brahmin family.[4][5] His father, Jiddu Narayanaiah, was employed as an official of the British colonial administration. Krishnamurti was fond of his mother Sanjeevamma, who died when he was ten.[6] His parents had a total of eleven children, of whom six survived childhood.[7]

In 1903 the family settled in Cudappah, where Krishnamurti had contracted malaria during a previous stay. He suffered recurrent bouts of the disease over many years.[8] A sensitive and sickly child, "vague and dreamy", he was often taken to be intellectually disabled, and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father.[9] In memoirs written when he was eighteen years old Krishnamurti described psychic experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.[10] Even from his childhood he felt a bond with nature which was to stay with him for the rest of his life.[11] Writing in his journal Krishnamurti states "He always had this strange lack of distance between himself and the trees, rivers, mountains. It wasn't cultivated."[12]

Krishnamurti's father retired at the end of 1907. He sought employment at the headquarters of the Theosophical Society at Adyar. Narayanaiah had been a Theosophist since 1882. He was eventually hired by the Society as a clerk, moving there with his family in January 1909.[13] Narayanaiah and his sons were at first assigned to live in a small cottage that was located just outside the society's compound.[14]

Krishnamurti was a vegetarian from birth and his family were strict vegetarians. He was an opponent of meat eating, based on ethical and spiritual reasons.[15][16]

Discovered[edit]

In April 1909, Krishnamurti first met Charles Webster Leadbeater, who claimed clairvoyance. Leadbeater had noticed Krishnamurti on the Society's beach on the Adyar river, and was amazed by the "most wonderful aura he had ever seen, without a particle of selfishness in it."[a] Ernest Wood, an adjutant of Leadbeater's at the time, who helped Krishnamurti with his homework, considered him to be "particularly dim-witted."[18] Leadbeater was convinced that the boy would become a spiritual teacher and a great orator; the likely "vehicle for the Lord Maitreya" in Theosophical doctrine, an advanced spiritual entity periodically appearing on Earth as a World Teacher to guide the evolution of humankind.[18]

In her biography of Krishnamurti, Pupul Jayakar quotes him speaking of that period in his life some 75 years later: "The boy had always said 'I will do whatever you want.' There was an element of subservience, obedience. The boy was vague, uncertain, woolly; he didn't seem to care what was happening. He was like a vessel with a large hole in it, whatever was put in, went through, nothing remained."[19] Krishnamurti himself described his state of mind as a young boy: "No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making. He often attempted to think but no thought would come."[20]

Krishnamurti by Tomás Povedano

Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called Krishnaji)[21] and his younger brother Nityananda (Nitya) were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to an opulent life among a segment of European high society as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14-year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months.[22] Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. When he was asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater he unhesitatingly replied "I would have died".[23]

During this time Krishnamurti had developed a strong bond with Annie Besant and came to view her as a surrogate mother. His father, who had initially assented to Besant's legal guardianship of Krishnamurti,[24] was pushed into the background by the swirl of attention around his son. In 1912 he sued Besant to annul the guardianship agreement. After a protracted legal battle, Besant took custody of Krishnamurti and Nitya.[25] As a result of this separation from family and home Krishnamurti and his brother (whose relationship had always been very close) became more dependent on each other, and in the following years often travelled together.[26]

In 1911 the Theosophical Society established the Order of the Star in the East (OSE) to prepare the world for the expected appearance of the World Teacher. Krishnamurti was named as its head, with senior Theosophists assigned various other positions. Membership was open to anybody who accepted the doctrine of the Coming of the World Teacher. Controversy soon erupted, both within the Theosophical Society and outside it, in Hindu circles and the Indian press.[b]

Growing up[edit]

Mary Lutyens, a biographer, says that there was a time when Krishnamurti believed that he was to become the World Teacher after correct spiritual and secular guidance and education.[27] Another biographer describes the daily program imposed on him by Leadbeater and his associates, which included rigorous exercise and sports, tutoring in a variety of school subjects, Theosophical and religious lessons, yoga and meditation, as well as instruction in proper hygiene and in the ways of British society and culture.[28] At the same time Leadbeater assumed the role of guide in a parallel mystical instruction of Krishnamurti; the existence and progress of this instruction was at the time known only to a select few.[29]

While he showed a natural aptitude in sports, Krishnamurti always had problems with formal schooling and was not academically inclined. He eventually gave up university education after several attempts at admission. He did take to foreign languages, in time speaking several with some fluency.[30]

His public image, cultivated by the Theosophists, "was to be characterized by a well-polished exterior, a sobriety of purpose, a cosmopolitan outlook and an otherworldly, almost beatific detachment in his demeanor."[31] Demonstrably, "all of these can be said to have characterized Krishnamurti's public image to the end of his life."[31] It was apparently clear early on that he "possessed an innate personal magnetism, not of a warm physical variety, but nonetheless emotive in its austerity, and inclined to inspire veneration."[32] However, as he was growing up, Krishnamurti showed signs of adolescent rebellion and emotional instability, chafing at the regimen imposed on him, visibly uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding him, and occasionally expressing doubts about the future prescribed for him.[c]

Photograph of Krishnamurti with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and others in London 1911
Krishnamurti in England in 1911 with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and George Arundale

Krishnamurti and Nitya were taken to England in April 1911.[33] During this trip Krishnamurti gave his first public speech to members of the OSE in London.[34] His first writings had also started to appear, published in booklets by the Theosophical Society and in Theosophical and OSE-affiliated magazines.[35] Between 1911 and the start of World War I in 1914, the brothers visited several other European countries, always accompanied by Theosophist chaperones.[36] Meanwhile, Krishnamurti had for the first time acquired a measure of personal financial independence, thanks to a wealthy benefactress, American Mary Melissa Hoadley Dodge, who was domiciled in England.[37]

After the war, Krishnamurti embarked on a series of lectures, meetings and discussions around the world, related to his duties as the Head of the OSE, accompanied by Nitya, by then the Organizing Secretary of the Order.[38] Krishnamurti also continued writing.[39] The content of his talks and writings revolved around the work of the Order and of its members in preparation for the Coming. He was initially described as a halting, hesitant, and repetitive speaker, but his delivery and confidence improved, and he gradually took command of the meetings.[40]

In 1921 Krishnamurti fell in love with Helen Knothe, a 17-year-old American whose family associated with the Theosophists. The experience was tempered by the realisation that his work and expected life-mission precluded what would otherwise be considered normal relationships and by the mid-1920s the two of them had drifted apart.[41]

Life-altering experiences[edit]

In 1922 Krishnamurti and Nitya travelled from Sydney to California. In California, they stayed at a cottage in the Ojai Valley. It was thought that the area's climate would be beneficial to Nitya, who had been diagnosed with tuberculosis. Nitya's failing health became a concern for Krishnamurti.[42][43] At Ojai they met Rosalind Williams, a young American who became close to them both, and who was later to play a significant role in Krishnamurti's life.[44] For the first time the brothers were without immediate supervision by their Theosophical Society minders.[45] They found the Valley to be very agreeable. Eventually, a trust, formed by supporters, bought a cottage and surrounding property there for them. This became Krishnamurti's official residence.[46]

At Ojai in August and September 1922, Krishnamurti went through an intense 'life-changing' experience.[47] This has been variously characterised as a spiritual awakening, a psychological transformation, and a physical reconditioning. The initial events happened in two distinct phases: first a three-day spiritual experience, and two weeks later, a longer-lasting condition that Krishnamurti and those around him referred to as the process. This condition recurred, at frequent intervals and with varying intensity, until his death.[48]

According to witnesses, it started on 17 August 1922 when Krishnamurti complained of a sharp pain at the nape of his neck. Over the next two days the symptoms worsened, with increasing pain and sensitivity, loss of appetite, and occasional delirious ramblings. He seemed to lapse into unconsciousness but later recounted that he was very much aware of his surroundings, and that while in that state he had an experience of "mystical union". The following day the symptoms and the experience intensified, climaxing with a sense of "immense peace".[49] Following — and apparently related to — these events[50] the condition that came to be known as the process started to affect him, in September and October that year, as a regular, almost nightly occurrence. Later the process resumed intermittently, with varying degrees of pain, physical discomfort, and sensitivity, occasionally a lapse into a childlike state, and sometimes an apparent fading out of consciousness, explained as either his body giving in to pain or his mind "going off".[d]

These experiences were accompanied or followed by what was interchangeably described as, "the benediction", "the immensity", "the sacredness", "the vastness" and, most often, "the otherness" or "the other".[52] It was a state distinct from the process.[53] According to Lutyens it is evident from his notebook that this experience of otherness was "with him almost continuously" during his life, and gave him "a sense of being protected".[52] Krishnamurti describes it in his notebook as typically following an acute experience of the process, for example, on awakening the next day:

... woke up early with that strong feeling of otherness, of another world that is beyond all thought ... there is a heightening of sensitivity. Sensitivity, not only to beauty but also to all other things. The blade of grass was astonishingly green; that one blade of grass contained the whole spectrum of colour; it was intense, dazzling and such a small thing, so easy to destroy ...[54]

This experience of the otherness was present with him in daily events:

It is strange how during one or two interviews that strength, that power filled the room. It seemed to be in one's eyes and breath. It comes into being, suddenly and most unexpectedly, with a force and intensity that is quite overpowering and at other times it's there, quietly and serenely. But it's there, whether one wants it or not. There is no possibility of getting used to it for it has never been nor will it ever be ..."[54]

Since the initial occurrences of 1922, several explanations have been proposed for this experience of Krishnamurti's.[e] Leadbeater and other Theosophists expected the "vehicle" to have certain paranormal experiences but were nevertheless mystified by these developments.[55] During Krishnamurti's later years, the nature and provenance of the continuing process often came up as a subject in private discussions between himself and associates; these discussions shed some light on the subject but were ultimately inconclusive.[56] Whatever the case, the process, and the inability of Leadbeater to explain it satisfactorily, if at all, had other consequences according to biographer Roland Vernon:

The process at Ojai, whatever its cause or validity, was a cataclysmic milestone for Krishna. Up until this time his spiritual progress, chequered though it might have been, had been planned with solemn deliberation by Theosophy's grandees. ... Something new had now occurred for which Krishna's training had not entirely prepared him. ... A burden was lifted from his conscience and he took his first step towards becoming an individual. ... In terms of his future role as a teacher, the process was his bedrock. ... It had come to him alone and had not been planted in him by his mentors ... it provided Krishna with the soil in which his newfound spirit of confidence and independence could take root.[57]

As news of these mystical experiences spread, rumours concerning the messianic status of Krishnamurti reached fever pitch as the 1925 Theosophical Society Convention was planned, on the 50th anniversary of its founding. There were expectations of significant happenings.[58] Paralleling the increasing adulation was Krishnamurti's growing discomfort with it. In related developments, prominent Theosophists and their factions within the Society were trying to position themselves favourably relative to the Coming, which was widely rumoured to be approaching. He stated that "Too much of everything is bad". "Extraordinary" pronouncements of spiritual advancement were made by various parties, disputed by others, and the internal Theosophical politics further alienated Krishnamurti.[59]

Nitya's persistent health problems had periodically resurfaced throughout this time. On 13 November 1925, at age 27, he died in Ojai from complications of influenza and tuberculosis.[60] Despite Nitya's poor health, his death was unexpected, and it fundamentally shook Krishnamurti's belief in Theosophy and in the leaders of the Theosophical Society. He had received their assurances regarding Nitya's health, and had come to believe that "Nitya was essential for [his] life-mission and therefore he would not be allowed to die," a belief shared by Annie Besant and Krishnamurti's circle.[61] Jayakar wrote that "his belief in the Masters and the hierarchy had undergone a total revolution."[62] Moreover, Nitya had been the "last surviving link to his family and childhood. ... The only person to whom he could talk openly, his best friend and companion."[63] According to eyewitness accounts, the news "broke him completely."[64] but 12 days after Nitya's death he was "immensely quiet, radiant, and free of all sentiment and emotion";[62] "there was not a shadow ... to show what he had been through."[65]

Break with the past[edit]

Over the next few years, Krishnamurti's new vision and consciousness continued to develop. New concepts appeared in his talks, discussions, and correspondence, together with an evolving vocabulary that was progressively free of Theosophical terminology.[66] His new direction reached a climax in 1929, when he rebuffed attempts by Leadbeater and Besant to continue with the Order of the Star.

Krishnamurti dissolved the Order during the annual Star Camp at Ommen, the Netherlands, on 3 August 1929.[67] He stated that he had made his decision after "careful consideration" during the previous two years, and that:

I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path. ... This is no magnificent deed, because I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects, nor to establish new theories and new philosophies.[68]

Krishnamurti in the early 1920s

Following the dissolution, prominent Theosophists turned against Krishnamurti, including Leadbeater who is said to have stated, "the Coming had gone wrong."[69] Krishnamurti had denounced all organised belief, the notion of gurus, and the whole teacher-follower relationship, vowing instead to work on setting people "absolutely, unconditionally free."[68] There is no record of his explicitly denying he was the World Teacher;[70] whenever he was asked to clarify his position he either asserted that the matter was irrelevant[71] or gave answers that, as he stated, were "purposely vague".[72]

In hind-sight it can be seen that the ongoing changes in his outlook had begun before the dissolution of the Order of the Star.[73] The subtlety of the new distinctions on the World Teacher issue was lost on many of his admirers, who were already bewildered or distraught because of the changes in Krishnamurti's outlook, vocabulary and pronouncements–among them Besant and Mary Lutyens' mother Emily, who had a very close relationship with him.[74][75] He soon disassociated himself from the Theosophical Society and its teachings and practices,[f] yet he remained on cordial terms with some of its members and ex-members throughout his life.[citation needed]

Krishnamurti often referred to the totality of his work as the teachings and not as my teachings.[76]

Krishnamurti resigned from the various trusts and other organisations that were affiliated with the defunct Order of the Star, including the Theosophical Society. He returned the money and properties donated to the Order, among them a castle in the Netherlands and 5,000 acres (2,023 ha) of land, to their donors.[77]

Middle years[edit]

From 1930 through 1944 Krishnamurti engaged in speaking tours and in the issue of publications under the auspice of the "Star Publishing Trust" (SPT), which he had founded with Desikacharya Rajagopal, a close associate and friend from the Order of the Star.[g] Ojai was the base of operations for the new enterprise, where Krishnamurti, Rajagopal, and Rosalind Williams (who had married Rajagopal in 1927) resided in the house known as Arya Vihara (meaning Realm of the Aryas, i.e. those noble by righteousness in Sanskrit). The business and organizational aspects of the SPT were administered chiefly by D. Rajagopal, as Krishnamurti devoted his time to speaking and meditation. The Rajagopals' marriage was not a happy one, and the two became physically estranged after the 1931 birth of their daughter, Radha.[78] Krishnamurti's friendship with Rosalind became a love affair. According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, the affair between Krishnamurti and Rosalind began in 1932 and it endured for about twenty-five years.[h][i][j] Radha Sloss, daughter of Rajagopal, wrote about the affair in her book Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti.

During the 1930s Krishnamurti spoke in Europe, Latin America, India, Australia and the United States. In 1938 he met Aldous Huxley.[79] The two began a close friendship which endured for many years. They held common concerns about the imminent conflict in Europe which they viewed as the outcome of the pernicious influence of nationalism.[80] Krishnamurti's stance on World War II was often construed as pacifism and even subversion during a time of patriotic fervor in the United States and for a time he came under the surveillance of the FBI.[81] He did not speak publicly for a period of about four years (between 1940 and 1944). During this time he lived and worked at Arya Vihara, which during the war operated as a largely self-sustaining farm, with its surplus goods donated for relief efforts in Europe.[82] Of the years spent in Ojai during the war he later said: "I think it was a period of no challenge, no demand, no outgoing. I think it was a kind of everything held in; and when I left Ojai it all burst."[83]

Krishnamurti broke the hiatus from public speaking in May 1944 with a series of talks in Ojai. These talks, and subsequent material, were published by "Krishnamurti Writings Inc." (KWINC), the successor organisation to the "Star Publishing Trust." This was to be the new central Krishnamurti-related entity worldwide, whose sole purpose was the dissemination of the teaching.[84] He had remained in contact with associates from India, and in the autumn of 1947 embarked on a speaking tour there, attracting a new following of young intellectuals.[k] On this trip he encountered the Mehta sisters, Pupul and Nandini, who became lifelong associates and confidants. The sisters also attended to Krishnamurti throughout a 1948 recurrence of the "process" in Ootacamund.[85] In Poona in 1948, Krishnamurti met Iyengar, who taught him Yoga practices every morning for the next three months, then on and off for twenty years.[86]

When Krishnamurti was in India after World War II many prominent personalities came to meet him, including Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. In his meetings with Nehru, Krishnamurti elaborated at length on the teachings, saying in one instance, "Understanding of the self only arises in relationship, in watching yourself in relationship to people, ideas, and things; to trees, the earth, and the world around you and within you. Relationship is the mirror in which the self is revealed. Without self-knowledge there is no basis for right thought and action." Nehru asked, "How does one start?" to which Krishnamurti replied, "Begin where you are. Read every word, every phrase, every paragraph of the mind, as it operates through thought."[87]

Later years[edit]

Krishnamurti continued speaking in public lectures, group discussions and with concerned individuals around the world. He met with many prominent religious leaders and scholars including Swami VenkatesanandaAnandamayi MaLakshman JooWalpola Rahula, and Eugene Schalert. In India he also met with many sanyasis and monks throughout his life. In the early 1960s, he made the acquaintance of physicist David Bohm, whose philosophical and scientific concerns regarding the essence of the physical world, and the psychological and sociological state of mankind, found parallels in Krishnamurti's philosophy. The two men soon became close friends and started a common inquiry, in the form of personal dialogues–and occasionally in group discussions with other participants–that continued, periodically, over nearly two decades.[l] Several of these discussions were published in the form of books or as parts of books, and introduced a wider audience (among scientists) to Krishnamurti's ideas.[88] Although Krishnamurti's philosophy delved into fields as diverse as religious studies, education, psychology, physics, and consciousness studies, he was not then, nor since, well known in academic circles. Nevertheless, Krishnamurti met and held discussions with physicists Fritjof Capra and E. C. George Sudarshan, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, psychiatrist David Shainberg, as well as psychotherapists representing various theoretical orientations.[89] The long friendship with Bohm went through a rocky interval in later years, and although they overcame their differences and remained friends until Krishnamurti's death, the relationship did not regain its previous intensity.[citation needed][m][n]

In the 1970s, Krishnamurti met several times with then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi, with whom he had far-ranging, and in some cases, very serious conversations. Jayakar considers his message in meetings with Indira Gandhi as a possible influence in the lifting of certain emergency measures Gandhi had imposed during periods of political turmoil.[90]

Meanwhile, Krishnamurti's once close relationship with the Rajagopals had deteriorated to the point where he took D. Rajagopal to court to recover donated property and funds as well as publication rights for his works, manuscripts, and personal correspondence, that were in Rajagopal's possession.[o] The litigation and ensuing cross complaints, which formally began in 1971, continued for many years. Much property and materials were returned to Krishnamurti during his lifetime; the parties to this case finally settled all other matters in 1986, shortly after his death.[p]

In 1984 and 1985, Krishnamurti spoke to an invited audience at the United Nations in New York, under the auspices of the Pacem in Terris Society chapter at the United Nations.[91] In October 1985, he visited India for the last time, holding a number of what came to be known as "farewell" talks and discussions between then and January 1986. These last talks included the fundamental questions he had been asking through the years, as well as newer concerns about advances in science and technology, and their effect on humankind. Krishnamurti had commented to friends that he did not wish to invite death, but was not sure how long his body would last (he had already lost considerable weight), and once he could no longer talk, he would have "no further purpose". In his final talk, on 4 January 1986, in Madras, he again invited the audience to examine with him the nature of inquiry, the effect of technology, the nature of life and meditation, and the nature of creation.[citation needed]

Krishnamurti was also concerned about his legacy, about being unwittingly turned into some personage whose teachings had been handed down to special individuals, rather than the world at large. He did not want anybody to pose as an interpreter of the teaching.[92] He warned his associates on several occasions that they were not to present themselves as spokesmen on his behalf, or as his successors after his death.[93]

A few days before his death, in a final statement, he declared that nobody among either his associates or the general public had understood what had happened to him (as the conduit of the teaching). He added that the "supreme intelligence" operating in his body would be gone with his death, again implying the impossibility of successors. However, he stated that people could perhaps get into touch with that somewhat "if they live the teachings".[94] In prior discussions, he had compared himself with Thomas Edison, implying that he did the hard work, and now all that was needed by others was a flick of the switch.[95]

Death[edit]

Krishnamurti died of pancreatic cancer on 17 February 1986, at the age of 90. The announcement of KFT (Krishnamurti Foundation Trust) refers to the course of his health condition until the moment of death. The first signs came almost nine months before his death, when he felt very tired. In October 1985, he went from England (Brockwood Park School) to India and after that, he suffered from exhaustion, fevers, and lost weight. Krishnamurti decided to go back to Ojai (10 January 1986) after his last talks in Madras, which necessitated a 24-hour flight. Once he arrived at Ojai he underwent medical tests that revealed he was suffering from pancreatic cancer. The cancer was untreatable, either surgically or otherwise, so Krishnamurti decided to go back to his home at Ojai, where he spent his last days. Friends and professionals nursed him. His mind was clear until the last moment. Krishnamurti died on 17 February 1986, at 10 minutes past midnight, California time. In accordance with his wishes, no memorial service was conducted.[96][97] His ashes were divided into three parts: for Ojai, India and England. In India they were immersed in River Ganga in Varanasi, Gangotri, and in the ocean Adayar beach.[98]

Schools[edit]

Krishnamurti on a 1987 Indian stamp

Krishnamurti founded five schools in India, one in England, Brockwood Park School, and one in California, Oak Grove School. When asked, he enumerated the following as his educational aims:

  1. Global outlook: A vision of the whole as distinct from the part; there should never be a sectarian outlook, but always a holistic outlook free from all prejudice.
  2. Concern for man and the environment: Humanity is part of nature, and if nature is not cared for, it will boomerang on man. Only the right education, and deep affection between people everywhere, will resolve many problems including the environmental challenges.
  3. Religious spirit, which includes the scientific temper: The religious mind is alone, not lonely. It is in communion with people and nature.[99]

The Krishnamurti Foundations, established in India, USA, and England in the 1960's manage seven schools in India and abroad.

Influence[edit]

KFI retreat at Rishi Valley
KFI retreat session at Rishi Valley on 2019 November 17 Padmanabhan Krishna addressing the gathering, with Radhika Herzberger presiding

Krishnamurti attracted the interest of the mainstream religious establishment in India. He engaged in discussions with several well known Hindu and Buddhist scholars and leaders, including the Dalai Lama.[q] Several of these discussions were later published as chapters in various Krishnamurti books.

Krishnamurti was very highly regarded by several leading religious figures in India. Nisargadatta Maharaj described Krishnamurti as 'complete Brahman'.[100] Anandamayi Ma addressed him as the 'Guru of gurus'.[101] When Ramana Maharshi was asked why Krishnamurti dissolved the Order of the Star in the East, he replied "The Order's purpose stood consummated in that the World Teacher had arrived; that is why it was dissolved."[102]

Notable individuals influenced by Krishnamurti include George Bernard ShawDavid BohmJawaharlal Nehru, the Dalai LamaAldous HuxleyAlan Watts,[103] Henry MillerBruce Lee,[104] Terence Stamp,[105] Jackson Pollock,[106] Toni Packer,[107] Achyut Patwardhan,[108] Dada Dharmadhikari,[109] Derek Trucks[110] and Eckhart Tolle.[111]

Interest in Krishnamurti and his work has persisted in the years since his death. Many books, audio, video, and computer materials, remain in print and are carried by major online and traditional retailers. The four official Foundations continue to maintain archives, disseminate the teachings in an increasing number of languages, convert print to digital and other media, develop websites, sponsor television programs, and organise meetings and dialogues of interested persons around the world.[112]

In popular culture[edit]

A sample of Krishnamurti's 1980 talk "Why Does The Mind Constantly Seek Pleasure" appears in the Tube & Berger song Imprint of Pleasure.[113]

Krishnamurti is one of the people who Indiana Jones meets in The Adventures of young Indiana Jones. Krishnamurti is shown as a young boy around 10-12 years old, this is around the time that he was first associated with the theosophical society. He meets and becomes friends with Indy in Season 1 episode 5 titled Journey of Radiance. Indy, his parents and his tutor Miss Seymour attend a meeting of the society. This episode can be seen on both the DVD’s and Disney + streaming service.

Krishnamurti appears as an important character in James Harpur's 2021 novel, The Pathless Country.[114]

Works[edit]

References[edit]

Notes

  1. ^ According to occult and Theosophical lore, auras are invisible emanations related to each individual's so-called subtler planes of existence, as well as her or his normal plane. The ability to discern a person's aura is considered one of the possible effects of clairvoyance. Leadbeater's occult knowledge and abilities were highly respected within the Society.[17]
  2. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 40–63 [cumulative]. The news regarding Krishnamurti and the World Teacher was not universally welcomed by Theosophists and led to upheavals in the Society; Lutyens (1983a), pp. 15–19, 40, 56. Part of the controversy was Leadbeater's role. He had a history of being in the company of young boys–pupils under his spiritual and Theosophical instruction, and there was gossip about child abuse — although no accusations were ever proven.
  3. ^ Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 10: Doubts and Difficulties" through "Chapter 15: In Love" pp. 80–132 [cumulative].
  4. ^ Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 18: The Turning Point" through "Chapter 21: Climax of the Process" pp. 152–188 [cumulative]. The use of the term "going off" in the accounts of the early occurrences of the process apparently signified so-called out-of-body experiences.[51] In later usage the meaning of "going off" was more nuanced.
  5. ^ Jayakar (1986), p. 46n. and Lutyens (1975), p. 166 provide a frequently given explanation, that it represented the so-called awakening of kundalini, a process that according to Hindu mysticism culminates in transcendent consciousness. Others view it in Freudian terms. Aberbach (1993) contends that the experiences were a projection of Krishnamurti's accumulated grief over the death of his mother. Sloss (1993), p. 61 considers the process to be a purely physical event centred on sickness or trauma, and suggests the possibility of epilepsy, a possibility that Lutyens (1990) rejects. According to Lutyens (1990), pp. 45–46., Krishnamurti believed the process was necessary for his spiritual development and not a medical matter or condition. As far as he was concerned, he had encountered Truth; he thought the process was in some way related to this encounter, and to later experiences.
  6. ^ Lutyens considers the last remaining tie with Theosophy to have been severed in 1933, with the death of Besant. He had resigned from the Society in 1930 (Lutyens, 1975; pp. 276, 285).
  7. ^ Born in India in 1900 and of Brahmin descent, Rajagopal had moved in Krishnamurti's circle since early youth. Although regarded as an excellent editor and organizer, he was also known for his difficult personality and high-handed manner. Upon Nitya's death, he had promised Besant that he would look after Krishnamurti. See Henri Methorst, Krishnamurti A Spiritual Revolutionary, Edwin Publishing House, 2003, ch 12.
  8. ^ The two also shared an interest in education: Krishnamurti helped to raise Radha, and the need to provide her with a suitable educational environment led to the founding of the Happy Valley School in 1946. The school has since re-established itself as an independent institution operating as the Besant Hill School Of Happy Valley. See Sloss, "Lives in the Shadow," ch 19.
  9. ^ Radha's account of the relationship, Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti, was first published in England by Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd. in 1991, and was soon followed by a rebuttal volume written by Mary Lutyens, Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1996, in which she acknowledges the relationship but was never confirmed by Krishnamurti himself.
  10. ^ Mark Lee: I heard it from Erna Lillifelt, who learned it from Krishnaji. Krishnaji has told Mary Zimbalist and Erna Lilliefelt that there was something that Rajagopal had against him. They asked him what it was. And he said "I had sexual relations with that woman". See Padmanabhan Krishna, "A jewel on a silver platter", Ch 8.
  11. ^ These included former freedom campaigners from the Indian Independence Movement, See Vernon, "Star in the East," p 219.
  12. ^ Bohm would eventually serve as a Krishnamurti Foundation trustee.
  13. ^ Their falling out was partly due to questions about Krishnamurti's private behaviour, especially his long and secret love affair with Rosalind Williams-Rajagopal, then unknown to the general public.[citation needed]
  14. ^ After their falling out, Bohm criticised certain aspects of the teaching on philosophical, methodological, and psychological grounds. He also criticised what he described as Krishnamurti's occasional "verbal manipulations" when deflecting challenges. Eventually, he questioned some of the reasoning about the nature of thought and self, although he never abandoned his belief that "Krishnamurti was onto something". See Infinite Potential: The Life and times of David Bohm, by F. David Peat, Addison Wesley, 1997.
  15. ^ D. Rajagopal was the head or co-head of a number of successive corporations and trusts, set up after the dissolution of the Order of the Star and chartered to publish Krishnamurti's talks, discussions and other writings.
  16. ^ Formation of the Krishnamurti Foundation of America and the Lawsuits Which Took Place Between 1968 and 1986 to Recover Assets for Krishnamurti's Work, by Erna Lilliefelt, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1995. The complicated settlement dissolved the K & R Foundation (a previous entity), and transferred assets to the Krishnamurti Foundation of America (KFA). However certain disputed documents remained in the possession of Rajagopal, and he received partial repayment for his attorney's fees.
  17. ^ The Dalai Lama characterised Krishnamurti as a "great soul" (Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" p 203). Krishnamurti very much enjoyed the Lama's company and by his own admission could not bring up his anti-guru views, mindful of the Lama's feelings.

Citations

  1. ^ Rodrigues, Hillary (January 1996). "J. Krishnamurti's 'religious mind'". Religious Studies and Theology. 15 (1): 40–55.
  2. ^ Lutyens (1995), footnotes 1, 2.
  3. ^ Williams (2004), p. 465.
  4. ^ Lutyens (1975). p. 7.
  5. ^ Lutyens, Mary (2003). Open Door. Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Ltd. ISBN 978-0-900506-21-5.
  6. ^ Lutyens (1975). p. 5.
  7. ^ Williams (2004), pp. 471–472.
  8. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp.2–4.
  9. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 3–4, 22, 25.
  10. ^ Lutyens (1983a), pp. 5, 309
  11. ^ J. Krishnamurti (2004), p. 16.
  12. ^ Krishnamurti’s Journal, 17 September 1973.
  13. ^ Lutyens (1983a), pp. 7–8.
  14. ^ Star In The East: The Invention of A Messiah, by Roland Vernon, Palgrave 2001, p 41.
  15. ^ Williams, C. V. (2004). Jiddu Krishnamurti World Philosopher (1895–1986) : His Life and Thoughts. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 104. ISBN 978-8120820326
  16. ^ "Krishnamurti on Eating Meat & Vegetarianism". krishnamurtiaustralia.org. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  17. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 15, 20–21
  18. Jump up to:a b Lutyens (1975), p. 21.
  19. ^ Pupul (1986), p. 28.
  20. ^ Krishnamurti’s Journal, 15 September 1973.
  21. ^ Jayakar (1986), p. xi. The suffix –ji in Hindu names is a sign of affection or respect.
  22. ^ Vernon (2001), pp. 51–72.
  23. ^ Lutyens (1995)
  24. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 40.
  25. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 54–63, 64–71, 82, 84.
  26. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 3, 32.
  27. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 10-11, 93.
  28. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 57.
  29. ^ Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 4: First Initiation" and "Chapter 5: First Teaching" pp. 29–46 [cumulative].
  30. ^ Lutyens (1997), pp. 83, 120, 149.
  31. Jump up to:a b Vernon (2001), p. 53.
  32. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 52.
  33. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 50–51.
  34. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 51–52.
  35. ^ Lutyens (1997), pp. 46, 74–75, 126. Krishnamurti was named Editor of the Herald of the Star, the official bulletin of the OSE. His position was mainly as a figurehead, yet he often wrote editorial notes, which along with his other contributions helped the magazine's circulation.
  36. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 65.
  37. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 4, 75, 77.
  38. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 125.
  39. ^ See Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography.
  40. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 134–35, 171–17.
  41. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 114, 118, 131–132, 258.
  42. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 97.
  43. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 149, 199, 209, 216–217.
  44. ^ Lutyens (1991), p. 35.
  45. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 113.
  46. ^ Lutyens (1983b), p. 6.
  47. ^ Jayakar (1986), pp. 46–57.
  48. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 282.
  49. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 158–160.
  50. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 165.
  51. ^ Lutyens (1990), pp. 134–135.
  52. Jump up to:a b Lutyens, M. (1988). J. Krishnamurti: The Open Door. Volume 3 of Biography, p. 12. ISBN 0-900506-21-0. Retrieved on: 19 November 2011.
  53. ^ "J. Krishnamurti, Krishnamurti's Notebook, Foreword by Mary Lutyens"jkrishnamurti.org. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  54. Jump up to:a b Krishnamurti, J. (1976). Krishnamurti's Notebook, Part 3 Gstaad, Switzerland 13th July to 3rd September 1961. J. Krishnamurti online. ISBN 1-888004-63-0ISBN 978-1-888004-63-2.
  55. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 163–4, 188–9.
  56. ^ Jayakar (1986), p. 133.
  57. ^ Vernon (2001), pp. 131–132.
  58. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 223.
  59. ^ Lutyens (1990), pp. 57–60.
  60. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 219.
  61. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 219, 221.
  62. Jump up to:a b Jayakar (1986), p. 69.
  63. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 152.
  64. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 220, 313 (note to p. 220).
  65. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 221.
  66. ^ Lutyens (1983c), p. 234.
  67. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 272.
  68. Jump up to:a b J. Krishnamurti (1929).
  69. ^ Lutyens (1997), pp. 277–279.
  70. ^ Vernon (2001), pp. 166–167.
  71. ^ J. Krishnamurti (1972), p. 9. "I think we shall have incessant wrangles over the corpse of Krishnamurti if we discuss this or that, wondering who is now speaking. Someone asked me: 'Do tell me if it is you speaking or someone else'. I said: 'I really do not know and it does not matter'." From the 1927 "Question and answer session" at Ommen. [Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website].
  72. ^ J. Krishnamurti (1928a), p. 43. "I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so. Because once you define a thing it becomes dead." Krishnamurti on the World Teacher, from "Who brings the truth," an address delivered at Ommen 2 August 1927. Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website. Link-specific content verified against original at New York Public Library Main Branch"YAM p.v. 519" [call no..
  73. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 262.
  74. ^ Vernon (2001), p. 189.
  75. ^ Lutyens (1975), p. 236.
  76. ^ Lutyens (1990), p. 210. Emphasis in source.
  77. ^ Lutyens (1975), pp. 276–284.
  78. ^ Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti by Radha Rajagopal Sloss, Bloomsbury Publishing, 1991, ch 12.
  79. ^ Vernon, "Star in the East," p 205.
  80. ^ "Journal of the Krishnamurti Schools". Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  81. ^ Vernon, "Star in the East," p 209.
  82. ^ Vernon, "Star in the East," p 210.
  83. ^ Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" p 98.
  84. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfillment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 59-60. Initially, Krishnamurti (along with Rajagopal and others) was a trustee of KWINC. Eventually he ceased being a trustee, leaving Rajagopal as President–a turn of events that according to Lutyens, constituted "... a circumstance that was to have most unhappy consequences."
  85. ^ See Jayakar, "Krishnamurti," ch 11 for Pupul Mehta's (later Jayakar) eyewitness account.
  86. ^ Elliot Goldberg, The Path of Modern Yoga (Rochester VT: Inner Traditions 2016), p. 380.
  87. ^ Jayakar, "Krishnamurti," p 142.
  88. ^ See Selected Publications/List of Books subsection.
  89. ^ See On Krishnamurti, by Raymond Martin, Wadsworth, 2003, for a discussion on Krishnamurti and the academic world.
  90. ^ See Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" pages 340–343.
  91. ^ Lutyens, "The Open Door," p 84-85. Also Lutyens, "The Life and Death of Krishnamurti," p. 185.
  92. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfilment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 171, statement of Krishnamurti published in the Foundation Bulletin, 1970.
  93. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfilment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 233.
  94. ^ See Lutyens, "The Life and Death of Krishnamurti," London: John Murray, p 206. Quoting Krishnamurti from tape-recording made on 7 February 1986.
  95. ^ Lutyens, "Fulfilment" Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 119.
  96. ^ Saxon, Wolfgang (18 February 1986). "JIDDU KRISHNAMURTI, 90, IS DEAD; RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHER FROM INDIA"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
  97. ^ "Jiddu Krishnamurti"meditativediaries.com. 17 February 2016. Archived from the original on 21 February 2016. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
  98. ^ Jayakar, Pupul (14 October 2000). J. Krishnamurti: A Biography. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-93-5118-284-9.
  99. ^ See As The River Joins The Ocean: Reflections about J. Krishnamurti, by Giddu Narayan, Edwin House Publishing 1999, p 64.
  100. ^ "I am Unborn (Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)", Page 100, Chapter 45.
  101. ^ Jayakar, Pupul (1986). Krishnamurti:A biography, page 144
  102. ^ Blutkeim, Aham Sphurana: Scintillations of Jnana from Sri Ramana Maharishi, page 408.
  103. ^ "Alan Watts talking about Jiddu Krishnamurti | He was an Extraordinary Mystic"YouTube.
  104. ^ https://jkrishnamurti.org/sites/default/files/Robert-Colet-Bruce-Lee.pdf[bare URL PDF]
  105. ^ "Terence Stamp speaking at the Krishnamurti Centre"YouTube.
  106. ^ "Jackson Pollock (By L. Proyect)"www.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 28 September 2020.
  107. ^ "Remembering meditation teacher Toni Packer (1927–2013) – Lion's Roar". 24 August 2013.
  108. ^ "Obituary: Achyut Patwardhan"The Independent. 23 October 2011. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  109. ^ "Dada Dharmadhikari Biography"mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org. Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  110. ^ Horowitz, Scott (3 July 2018). "INTERVIEW: Derek Trucks Talks New Album, 2017 Losses, & The New Generation"L4LM. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  111. ^ "Through the Eyes of Krishnamurti"YouTube.
  112. ^ See also The Complete Teachings Project Archived 2 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine, an ambitious effort to collect the entire body of Krishnamurti's work into a coherently edited master reference.
  113. ^ "Tube & Berger's 'Imprint of Pleasure' – Discover the Sample Source"WhoSampled. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  114. ^ "The Pathless Country"cinnamonpress.com. Retrieved 10 January 2024.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]

The Mystique of Enlightenment by U. G. Krishnamurti - Ebook | Everand

The Mystique of Enlightenment by U. G. Krishnamurti - Ebook | Everand


By U. G. Krishnamurti
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
Ebook222 pages6 hours
The Mystique of Enlightenment


About this ebook


The Mystique of Enlightenment is a critique of contemporary spirituality in a world in which spiritual techniques, teachers, concepts, and organizations are legion. This book is an underground spiritual classic distributed widely for the first time in the U.S. For those interested in the full spectrum of modern spiritual thought, this book is an indispensable classic.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherGood Press
Release dateDec 8, 2020



Read now


The Mystique of Enlightenment: The Radical Ideas of U.G. Krishnamurti

U.G. Krishnamurti
Rodney Arms
 (Editor)
4.28
185 ratings23 reviews


An underground spiritual classic distributed widely for the first time in the U.S., this is the story of one of the most unusual figures in contemporary spirituality, U.G. Krishnamurti, in his own words. The Mystique of Enlightenment is a scathing critique of contemporary spirituality. In a world in which spiritual techniques, teachers, concepts, and organizations are legion, U. G. stands nearly alone in his rejection of it all: "I am only interested in describing this state, in clearing away the occultation and mystification in which those people in the 'holy business' have shrouded the whole thing. Maybe I can convince you not to waste a lot of time and energy looking for a state that does not exist except in your imagination... The natural state is acausal: it just happens." The author does not equate the natural state with enlightenment, which he describes as an illusion created by our culture. He states emphatically that one can do nothing to attain the natural state. In fact, any movement towards it separates one from it. U. G. Krishnamurti is an original voice in which much of contemporary spirituality is understood in a new way. For those interested in the full spectrum of modern spiritual thought, this is a "must read." In the well-known history of J. Krishnamurti, few names have been so strongly associated with his message as U. G. Krishnamurti, who shared a close but contentious relationship with him over many years. U.G. was raised to take on the mantle of guru, much like J. Krishnamurti. When the two men eventually met, each had rejected the guru role, and for years they conversed regularly, struggling to uncover the nature of truth, before a falling out led each in a different direction. It is fairly common in reading modern spiritual books to find references to U. G. Krishnamurti's influence on both teachers and their students. His books have been translated into nearly every European language, as well as Chinese and Japanese. Widely regarded in India and Europe, The Mystique of Enlightenment is considered by U.G.'s closest associates to be the best summary of his ideas. The book consists of transcripts of informal talks with those who come to ask him questions. In one of these talks, he relates his life story, including the events leading up to and comprising what he calls his "calamity," or his entry into the natural state. Since his own experience of coming into the natural state at age 49, he has spent his time traveling throughout the world, staying with friends or in rented apartments for a few months at a time. He gives no public talks, but meets with people who come to see him. What he offers is not hope or encouragement, but stark reality: "Of one thing I am certain. I cannot help you solve your basic dilemma or save you from self-deception, and if I can't help you, no one can." His message is simple: he has no message. Nevertheless, his words can inspire you to face your own assumptions and motivations and discover for yourself what is true.

Show more
Genres
Philosophy
Spirituality
Nonfiction
Religion
Self Help
159 pages, Paperback
First published April 1, 2002
=====
23 people are currently reading



413 people want to read
About the author
Profile Image for U.G. Krishnamurti.
U.G. Krishnamurti
36 books121 followers

======
Uppaluri Gopala Krishnamurti also known as U.G. Krishnamurti, was an Indian thinker who said that there is no "enlightenment". Although necessary for day to day functioning of the individual, in terms of the Ultimate Reality or Truth he rejected the very basis of thought and in doing so negated all systems of thought and knowledge in reference to It.

U.G was born on July 9, 1918 in Machilipatnam, a town in coastal Andhra Pradesh, India, and raised in the nearby town of Gudivada. His mother died seven days after he was born, and he was brought up by his maternal grandfather, a wealthy Brahmin lawyer, who was also involved in the Theosophical Society. U.G. also became a member of the Theosophical Society during his teenage years.

During the same period of his life, U.G. reportedly practiced all kinds of austerities and apparently sought moksha or spiritual enlightenment. To that end, between the ages of fourteen and twenty-one, he undertook all kinds of spiritual exercise, determined to find out whether moksha was possible. Wanting to achieve that state, he had also resolved to prove that if there were people who have thus "realized" themselves, they could not be hypocritical.As part of this endeavor, he searched for a person who was an embodiment of such "realization".


U.G. emphasized the impossibility and non-necessity of any human change, radical or mundane. These assertions, he stated, cannot be considered as a "teaching", that is, something intended to be used to bring about a change. He insisted that the body and its actions are already perfect, and he considered attempts to change or mold the body as violations of the peace and the harmony that is already there. The psyche or self or mind, an entity which he denied as having any being, is composed of nothing but the "demand" to bring about change in the world, in itself, or in both. Furthermore, human self-consciousness is not a thing, but a movement, one characterized by "perpetual malcontent" and a "fascist insistence" on its own importance and survival.
U.G. denied the existence of an individual mind. However, he accepted the concept of a world mind, which according to him contained the accumulation of the totality of man's knowledge and experience. He also used 'thought sphere'(atmosphere of thoughts) synonymously with the term 'world mind'. He stated that human beings inhabit this thought realm or thought sphere and that the human brain acts like an antenna, picking and choosing thoughts according to its needs. U.G. held all human experience to be the result of this process of thought. The self-consciousness or 'I' in human beings is born out the need to give oneself continuity through the constant utilization of thought. When this continuity is broken, even for a split second, its hold on the body is broken and the body falls into its natural rhythm. Thought also falls into its natural place – then it can no longer interfere or influence the working of the human body. In the absence of any continuity the arising thoughts combust.He stated that we inhabit a thought realm. When the continuity of thought is broken, even for a split second, its hold on the body is broken and the body falls into its natural rhythm. Thought also falls into its natural place – then it can no longer interfere or influence the working of the human body. In the absence of any continuity the arising thoughts combust.
In its natural state, the senses of the body take on independent existences (uncoordinated by any 'inner self') and the ductless glands (that correspond to the locations of the Hindu chakras) become reactivated. UG described how it is the pineal gland (Ajna Chakra) that takes over the functioning of the body in the natural state, as opposed to thought.
U.G. also maintained that the reason people came to him (and to gurus), was in order to find solutions for their everyday real problems, and/or for solutions to a fabricated problem, namely, the search for spirituality
=====

Community Reviews
4.28
=====
Eddie Watkins
Author 
6 books
5,491 followers

Follow
October 9, 2014
Radical and ornery and barbed with contradictions, this is very stimulating stuff; though he does run on at the mouth.

I looked into him because of my interest in the weird/horror writer Thomas Ligotti, whose bleak cosmic vision of metaphysical terror was heavily influenced by U. G. Krishnamurti.

U. G. gets deep under the skin of the universal notion that so many give lip-service to, though so few actually contemplate the consequences of - that there is no one to be enlightened.

I discovered for myself and by myself that there is no self to realize. That's the realization I am talkng about. It comes as a shattering blow... You have invested everything in one basket, self-realization, and, in the end, suddenly you discover that there is no self to discover... And you say to yourself, "What the hell have I been doing all my life?!" That blasts you.

All kinds of things happened to me. The physical pain was unbearable. That is why I say you really don't want this. I wish I could give you a glimpse of it, a touch of it. Then you wouldn't want to touch this at all. What you are pursuing doesn't exist; it is a myth. You wouldn't want anything to do with this.

=====
Ebblibs Thekstein
9 reviews
11 followers

Follow
August 9, 2012
A must read for anyone of any persuasion or would be seeker of so-called 'enlightenment' - the spiritual equivalent of 'self-betterment' and other deeply misguided human foibles. Controversial, divisive and infuriatingly funny but above all vital. It could save your mind...with any luck it will destroy it and its illusions =====
Arttu
11 reviews
7 followers

Follow
January 3, 2018
UG makes it very clear, that there is no blissful enlightenment; what happens to some (very few) people is the complete and irreversible loss of the illusion of mind and self.

A recommended read for all people interested in the philosophy of mind and cognition, and a warning for those who are searching for something in the mystical and spiritual.
thought-provoking
====

Profile Image for Marcel Armstrong.
Marcel Armstrong
Author 
4 books
3 followers

Follow
January 23, 2019
This book is a compilation of excerpts from conversations in India and Switzerland from 1972 to 1980. U.G.'s is a unique voice - one in the wilderness. He is not for the faint of heart. Clearly a realized individual, U.G. rejects all notions of romanticizing enlightenment, preferring the term "natural state." This book provides 3 major insights into U.G.: his own autobiographical account, his description of the natural state, and his opinions on everything from "disease to divinity." His story is highly unusual and unique. His descriptions are lucidly clear and unmistakably those of one in the natural state. And his opinions will rattle you. Some describe U.G. as a spiritual terrorist. I would rather say he is more of a demolitionist. As with any great teacher, he will shatter any long-held or cherished beliefs, assumptions, or idealized values on spirituality and enlightenment. At the very least, reading U.G. will leave you standing on your own ground, questioning and thinking for yourself. A much-needed voice in an otherwise all too similar genre.

====
Michael
19 reviews

Follow
March 22, 2007
The Man. Period.
Kick you right in the ass at every turn philosopher.
philosophymetaphysics

2 likes

=====
Derek
57 reviews
34 followers

Follow
November 10, 2020
what an interesting chap

======
Comment

Shivam Gandhi
8 reviews
3 followers

Follow
May 20, 2021
Some random thoughts on this book. I give the book 5 stars since it helped me generate some interesting ideas.

Somatic experiencing and Krishnamurti’s “calamity”

After reading what Krishnamurti describes as the “calamity”, I’m convinced that his body was actually letting off a massive amount of stored up trauma. In particular, he talks of his body shaking and feeling pain, speaking of it as an explosion. From my own experiences of EMDR, I can say this is what I feel, though my experience was started by a therapist as opposed to Krishnamurti’s sudden release of this energy. I relate this to the book Waking the Tiger by Peter Levine which discusses somatic experiencing psychotherapy for trauma which involves allowing the body to vibrate and move as it needs to so that trauma is let out.

Here are a few random bullet points based off of this premise:
The natural state is a trauma free state. Enlightenment is to be free of trauma stored in the body. Thus animals are in their natural state since they have a naturally somatic experience and are enlightened. Moo.
Certain classes of thought prevent somatic experiencing. Much of trauma therapy is centered around moving past the cognitive level to the somatic level such that the underlying stored trauma can be discharged. We could relate this class of thoughts to cognitive distortions, though I’d say cognitive distortions are but a subclass of this whole class of thoughts. It is any thought which aims to solve a problem of ego that prevents somatic experiencing.
Krishnamurti mentions the notion of chakra or “ductless glands”. I like to think of this as vital energy (qi) that moves through the body. Perfect movement of qi corresponds to the natural state and enlightenment. Trauma can be thought of as a blockage of qi in the body and so thought is created from blocked qi.

From my experience, I find that I can enter the somatic experiencing state on my own if I’ve done enough breathing techniques to calm my body down. This is typically done by deep diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation. I also practice transcendental meditation during this time to unglue myself from whatever thought loop I am stuck in. After this, I allow the energy stored in my body to discharge through some sort of shaking or running movement (discharging trapped fight or flight energy). I’m not saying I’ve reached enlightenment, but I notice a significant movement towards what Krishnamurti has described as the natural state based on the delta from my severely traumatized state that I was in when I started healing my PTSD versus how I am right now.

Absence of division in the psyche and my second disagreement with Krishnamurti

Krishnamurti talks of the natural state as being one which is fully integrated. This corresponds to the internal family systems model of understanding trauma in that there are different parts of us within the mind that need to be led by a leadership self. Building off of the last point, blockages in qi which cause a certain class of thoughts to perpetuate correspond to built up trauma in the body, or in the IFS model, a part that is not in harmony with the rest of the psyche.

I don’t exactly disagree with Krishnamurti on this point but somewhat dispute it when he says that each person’s concept of enlightenment is different and that there is no real commonality. This is both true and false. It is true in that no two people will have the same natural state unless they have the same exact genetic code, if we’re assuming that enlightenment is based on biological realities as opposed to some grand spiritual idea. However, I do believe that there is a certain innate morality that each enlightened person will have that is intrinsic in biology because altruism is evolutionarily advantageous. This idea is echoed in the Erikson stages of development, which posits that for an individual, each phase of life presents a new challenge and a new virtue to be cultivated. Thus, there is some “skeleton” of moral development that an individual is meant to follow. I believe the primary variables that influence variations in the natural state among individuals is nervous system sensitivity (see highly sensitive people, or HSPs) and concentration in qi through the body (see the Enneagram, a system that describes different personality types).

An ordering principle to reality based on the notion of enlightenment

Let’s piggy back off the last topic and revisit the idea that altruism is evolutionarily advantageous. That won’t be the focus of this section, moreso the idea of why evolutionarily advantageous behaviors even exist.

Krishnamurti describes his natural state as one where the sensations are fully felt and thought is no longer self-inspecting but purely for the purpose of operating within the real world. The fact that these two things are paired together implies that thought focused on introspection and self-examination blocks one off from the senses and disconnects them from reality. It is described as “useless information”. If enlightenment is the ability to come fully into the senses, then the only “useful information” is that which is created purely through sensation that does not pass through the ego. In essence, the ultimate state of man, if that’s what enlightenment is, is a state that minimizes information waste.

Let’s ignore Krishnamurti for a moment. In many schools of thought, this highest form of enlightenment encompasses the creation of something that contributes to society. Many times, this is science, or art, or social change. But in all cases, it leads to the “betterment of humanity”, which we may roughly say as that which frees other humans from suffering or leads to greater compression of information. For more on information compression and why art and science are tied to it, see my essay Compressing God into a .txt File.

If evolution is selecting for this, we may opt to ascribe an animistic principle to the universe that aims for compression of information and self-realization. In vague terms, we may be thought of as fragments of the universe, collectively helping it understand itself. For more on this, I’ve picked my next book to be Jacques Monod’s Chance and Necessity as it tackles an animistic principle to the universe’s workings.

=====
Jacob Acosta
30 reviews
6 followers

Follow
June 25, 2023
Seek no further. This bleeds of Truth.

======
Magnus Lidbom
114 reviews
53 followers

Follow
October 4, 2022
I find no coherent helpful critique of enlightenment or spirituality here. Rather, I find little more than a flat out denial of the existence of enlightenment without the author even defining what he means by enlightenment first nor giving any coherent explanation for his position. Then, of course, he keeps doing an about turn by claiming to be enlightened himself, only he "does not like that term" and prefers "the natural state". Absurdly, the intimation seems to be that because U.G. is supposedly in "the natural state" (enlightened) he can authoritatively state that enlighenment does not exist, or is "acausal", and thus all teachers which claim to help students move towards enlightenment are frauds.

U.G. comes across to me as arrogant, uncaring, condescending, incoherent, aimlessly rambling, and constantly self contradicting. He also explicitly rejects striving to be compassionate, empathetic and kind.

Further, U.G. seems to either intentionally deceive and/or suffer from serious delusions and sensory hallucinations. Among these many delusions is that he believes that he no longer blinks automatically and instinctually. Something which is disproven in seconds by watching a youtube video of him.

Time and time again U.G. describes his state and tranformation as full of suffering. A calamity. This sounds like him being honest about his experience to me.

I could not recommend this book to anyone. Except maybe as an illustration of how easily we humans can be fooled into seeing enlightenment and wisdom in pseudo profundity and/or mental illness.
deluded_indeed
 
======

Zaubin Z
53 reviews

Follow
August 31, 2007
My second book by U.G. This book is again in the form of question and answer. What I found interesting in this book was the description of how U.G. became enlightened. It is a fascinated and intricate account. But this in spite of the fact that U.G. regularly states that there is no enlightenment, that it doesn't exist, that there is nothing to achieve. But then again, he also tells you not to listen to what he says, not to adopt any ideas you may find in what he says. Indeed, he embraces self-contradiction whole-heartedly. I admire this. So what's going on U.G.? Is there enlightenment, or isn't there? Maybe this thing that happened to you isn't "enlightenment," but it seems nearly as interesting. Fantastic, in fact. You tell us to be wary of gurus claiming special results, and then turn around and describe the special powers that you received! It is almost as if his entire account is a complete fabrication. Not to call him a liar, but when did he ever claim to tell the truth? But if it is true... then I'll find myself right on the enlightenment bandwagon all over again.

======

Sky - Clad: The Extraordinary Life and Times of Akka Mahadevi : Rao, Mukunda: Amazon.com.au: Books

Sky - Clad: The Extraordinary Life and Times of Akka Mahadevi : Rao, Mukunda: Amazon.com.au: Books


Sky - Clad: The Extraordinary Life and Times of Akka Mahadevi Paperback – 30 November 2022
by Mukunda Rao (Author)
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 54 ratings

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Westland (30 November 2022)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 160 pages
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 54 ratings




Top reviews

Top reviews from Australia

There are 0 reviews and 1 rating from Australia


Top reviews from other countries

gautam sasidharan
5.0 out of 5 stars A must readReviewed in India on 11 June 2019
Verified Purchase

Sky-clad (Digambara) is not the story of Akka Mahadevi. It is a narrative with the right amount of story telling about the Bhakthi movement in Karnataka. Skyclad traces the path of Akka Mahadevi, from Uduthadi through Kalyana to Kadali, finally ending at Srisailam. Through this narrative, the author explores some important personalities like Basavanna, Allama Prabhu and the entire sect of Virashaivas.

The book starts with a quick primer on what Bhakthi is and where it stands in the yogic pantheon. This is followed by the story of Mahadevi and how she transforms into Akka Mahadevi and the icon she is. The initial chapter takes the reader through her early life and the circumstances which make her shun her clothes. The story of Akka Mahadevi cannot be complete without the mention of Virashaivas and hence the author dedicates a complete chapter for them.
The author explains the circumstances which led to rising of this sect and how they demarcated themselves from the prevailing beliefs. Here, the author brings significance into the lives of Basavanna, Allama Prabhu and many other lesser known Virashaivas who wielded a powerful influence in the Kannada society. Then the author joins these two streams at the Anubhava Mantapa at Kalyana. Thereafter, it is brief account of the final stages of her life at Srisailam and exploratory essays of the many dimensions of Akka’s bhakthi.

The author has given a perspective of Akka Mahadevi’s life with the life of other contemporaries, which explains her magnitude as a bhakta and a rebel. It is the scenes at Kalyana, where her devotion is tested both orally and physically, which makes the narration compelling.

That said, the book becomes interesting with the insights into the prevailing religious conditions, the tides and currents brought in by the rising of the new sect, the perspective in comparison with the today’s situations, and the treatment of body and gender in the light of Akka Mahadevi’s clear stand on both.

Another aspect, which delights the reader, is the author’s approach to the subject through vachanas which are replete throughout the book.This book is highly recommended for everybody, to know about a personality who claimed fame by her acts of devotion. It would be a big delight for those who are interested in spiritual reads as it provides a clear understanding of the concept of bhakti.

For me it was a wonderful read. Overall, a book to taste, chew and digest.
Read less


8 people found this helpfulReport

Shobha
5.0 out of 5 stars Soak In ItReviewed in India on 7 April 2018
Verified Purchase

It's a beautiful read where the author takes us into the Bhakti movement of 12th century. Alongside Akka Mahadevi who is the protagonist of the book, the author also touches upon the journey/life of other saints and sages of 12th/13th century. The vachanas listed in the book are beautiful and takes one into the realm of Bhakti where there is Bhakti only for the sake of Bhakti and nothing else.

13 people found this helpfulReport

Divya Shankar
4.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant and well structuredReviewed in India on 12 May 2020
Verified Purchase

I had read about vachanas in another classic of kannada literature and wanted to explore more about these. This book with description of Shiva saranes and their vachanas proved to be an ideal pick to learn more , learnt not just about Virashaivism of the 12 th century , not just about life of Akka Mahadevi but also many important philosophical discussions that are well structured, allow easy understanding. Made a great read, a lot conveyed despite short length.
Report

NITIN KUMAR MISRA
5.0 out of 5 stars Beautiful book with good delivery service at convenient priceReviewed in India on 17 April 2019
Verified Purchase

Thanks Amazon for having such a wonderful collection of books at appropriate pricing n good delivery service. We are in touch with our roots with such books about lives of our legends.
Report

Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent and very SpiritualReviewed in India on 24 June 2019
Verified Purchase

Excellent and very Spiritual after reading the book I Viaited Akkamahadevis birthplace feeling good

5 people found this helpfulReport






Bala
5.0 out of 5 stars Extraordinary Work
Reviewed in India on 29 April 2019
Verified Purchase
Thanks a lot
Report
Jay Kay
1.0 out of 5 stars The book is a nice read & the author traces the anthomorphology of Bhakti ...
Reviewed in India on 27 June 2018
Verified Purchase
The book is a nice read & the author traces the anthomorphology of Bhakti cult especially in South India
during the past ages. He is able to trace similarities on the evolution, evaluation & successive metamorphosis of different sects.
However, this book is based on theoretical inputs only, as the author is unable to do justice beyond hearsay and facts on how the advanced movements with women being embraced both willingly & perforce , withered away in the subsequent ages to give rise to a deep fjord therafter -from which our Naaris have yet to sadly recover.
Case in point would also be the fact that the so called 'Virashaivas' gradually degenerated to a point where the 'Lingayats' of today are a mere political pawn ? Odd enough given the pathetic political turnaround in Karnataka being observed as on date.
Also, the book misses out on the describing parallels of saints/mothers outside South India - like Kabir, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu & even forgets mentioning Shankar Dev of Assam - a revolution in himself ?


Descriptions on Allama Prabhu, Basavanna are dichotomous and portayals weaves from one stance to another.
Advaita being touched upon does not connect Sri Ramakrishna with it, though he is fleeting mentioned - albeit minus references to his supreme disciple - Swami Vivekananda. Adi Shankara and Vivekananda proved what few saints over the years could actually do - that Self Realisation is achievable & can be demonstated - irrespective of Advaita, Dwaita & all such parallels Visishtaas - which bely naught
Surely there has to be some parallels around these enlightened souls and what drew to them to the Supreme ?


Akka Mahadevi preceded Lalleshwari by around 200 years - but both of them draw a rather queer parallel - being stark nude / naked 'Nirvastraa' by choice - something that would be sacrilegious even by today's standards. Surely jeers and laughs and erotic perceptions aside, what drew these two enlightened souls to such popularity that people forgot their physical bare form and awed at their transcendence to the Divine?


Was Lalleshwari a reincarnation of Akka - in colder lands ? Was Akka herself a reincarnation of the Her, the Supreme Kali - one who needs no modesty, is stark nude , beyond shame - ever young and the true Shakti of Shiva ? Does this explain her possible pining for Chenna Mallikarjuna/Siva in both births ?


More to be done in terms of spirituality when you choose such topics - unless you are essentially just essaying a biopic - which is the best description as per me.


Good for the average reader, but for a seeker of Supreme Truth and its parallels in disciples, this book has a far way to go still !!!
4 people found this helpful
Report

The Penguin U.G. Krishnamurti Reader eBook : Mukunda Rao, Rao, Mukunda: Amazon.com.au: Books

The Penguin U.G. Krishnamurti Reader eBook : Mukunda Rao, Rao, Mukunda: Amazon.com.au: Books




Click on the image to open expanded view

Read sample


Follow the author

Mukunda RaoMukunda Rao
Follow




The Penguin U.G. Krishnamurti Reader Kindle Edition
by Mukunda Rao (Author, Editor) Format: Kindle Edition


4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 24 ratings





See all formats and editions









My teaching, if that is the word you want to use, has no copyright. You are free to reproduce, distribute, interpret, misinterpret, distort, garble, do what you like, even claim authorship, without my consent or the permission of anybody.' Thus spoke U.G. Krishnamurti in his uniquely iconoclastic and subversive way, distancing himself from gurus, spiritual 'advisers', mystics, sages, 'enlightened' philosophers et al. UG's only advice was that people should throw away their crutches and free themselves from the 'stranglehold' of cultural conditioning. Uppaluri Gopala Krishnamurti was born on 9 July 1918 in Masulipatnam, a coastal town in Andhra Pradesh. He died on 22 March 2007 at the age of eighty-nine in Vallecrosia, Italy, at the villa of a friend. The effect that he had, and will continue to have, on legions of his admirers is difficult to put into words. With his flowing silvery hair, deep-set eyes and elongated Buddha-like ears, he was an explosive yet cleansing presence and has been variously described as 'a wild flower of the earth', 'a bird in constant flight', an 'anti-guru' and a 'cosmic Naxalite'. UG gave no lectures or discourses and had no organization or fixed address, but he travelled all over the world to meet people who flocked to listen to his 'anti-teaching'. His language was always uncompromisingly simple and unadorned, his conversational style informal, intimate, blasphemous and invigorating. This reader, edited by long-time friend and admirer Mukunda Rao, is a compilation of UG's freewheeling and radical utterances and ideas. UG unceasingly questioned and demolished the very foundations of human thought but, as Rao says, in the cathartic laughter or the silence after UG had spoken, there was a profound sense of freedom from illusory goals and 'the tyranny of knowledge, beauty, goodness, truth and God'
Read less



Print length

271 pages
Language





Product description

About the Author
Mukunda Rao is the author of six books of fiction, two plays: Mahatma - Khuda ka Hijra (1988 and 2009) and Baba Saheb Ambedkar (2008 and 2014), staged in different parts of Karnataka and much appreciated, and six insightful philosophical works, among which The Biology of Enlightenment is a much-read classic that has become a cult book amongst spiritual aspirants. After his retirement in 2010 from teaching service in a college, he lives with his wife on a farm outside Bengaluru. is the author of six books of fiction, two plays: Mahatma - Khuda ka Hijra (1988 and 2009) and Baba Saheb Ambedkar (2008 and 2014), staged in different parts of Karnataka and much appreciated, and six insightful philosophical works, among which The Biology of Enlightenment is a much-read classic that has become a cult book amongst spiritual aspirants. After his retirement in 2010 from teaching service in a college, he lives with his wife on a farm outside Bengaluru. --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B06XXJFWX4
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Penguin (11 July 2007)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1679 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 271 pages
Page numbers source ISBN ‏ : ‎ 0143101021Customer Reviews:
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 24 ratings






Top reviews

Top reviews from Australia

There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia


Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English

Chelseapoet
5.0 out of 5 stars EssentialReviewed in the United Kingdom on 22 August 2018
Verified Purchase

One of the two best books on nonduality I have ever read. The other is Nothing Being Everything by Tony Parsons. They are very different. This is hard-hitting, kinda sarcastic and amusing in places, whereas the latter is more accessible and plain.

One person found this helpfulReport

C & S
5.0 out of 5 stars InterestingReviewed in the United States on 12 November 2015
Verified Purchase

I read this every day when I wake up with my coffee. I haven't read it all yet but what I have read so far is definitely causing me to rethink things quite a bit. What's ironic is that U.G himself would probably laugh at the idea of people reading a book of his recorded words.

2 people found this helpfulReport

rammohan menon
5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in India on 27 January 2016
Verified Purchase

Very good summary of his words
Report


S. Serge
5.0 out of 5 stars A (non-)master anthology!Reviewed in France on 20 September 2014
Verified Purchase

Excellent anthology for my taste, quite voluminous, which gives an extensive and structured view of the "position" of UG Krishnamurti in all its aspects, largely avoiding repetitions and other "accidents" inevitable in multiple accumulated spontaneous verbal exchanges. If there only has to be one, this is THE book I recommend for tackling UG. For the rest, it's still UG: a great master swordsman, so much so that he is on the verge of swordsmanship. the sword itself... But it's also "heavy" on fundamental issues (we never believe him to the core when he says that nothing is possible, and he himself accepts when- even to speak...) A book obviously highly recommended for the "weary traveler".

Note: for the most part the author is indeed UG Krishnamurti, and not Mukunda Rao, especially since these texts are essentially, if not entirely, extracted from previous books, compiled by others, where UG is given as author. Mukunda Rao acted as author of the introduction and as compiler of the anthology (which supposes choices and cuts, organization by themes, etc.; not insignificant work in itself, however.)

2 people found this helpfulReport
Translate review to English

Manas Dutta
4.0 out of 5 stars UG's philosophy of lifeReviewed in India on 6 January 2016
Verified Purchase

The Penguin U.G. Krishnamurti Reader Read UG and his thoughts on life by reading this book.
Report