Showing posts with label Naikan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Naikan. Show all posts

2022/06/20

Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism. By T Izutsu. Book Rev by DAVId A. KOLB 1977

Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism. By Toshihiko Izutsu. 
Tehran: Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy, 1977. Pp. xii + 259.

====
J Amazon
禪佛敎の哲學に向けて
선불교의 철학을 향해
-----
책 소개

井筒俊彦 (이즈츠 토시히코)
노히라 무네히로 (노히라 무네히로) 번역
출판사·취급자 :  푸네우마사
발행 연월 :  2014년 1월 23일
본체 가격 :  본체 3,600엔+세금

목차
I 무위의 진인-선에서의 필드각지의 문제
-II 자아의식의 2개의 차원
III 선불교에 있어서의 의미와 무의미
IV 분절의 철학적 문제 
V 공안을 통한 사고와 비사고 

VII 동아시아의 예술과 철학에 있어서 의 색채 의 배제



収録内容

1 1 無位の真人―禅におけるフィールド覚知の問題
2 2 自我意識の二つの次元
3 3 禅仏教における意味と無意味
4 4 分節の哲学的問題
5 5 公案を通じての思考と非思考
6 6 禅における内部と外部
7 7 東アジアの芸術と哲学における色彩の排除


「조사가 서쪽으로부터 온 의의란 무엇인가, 나에게 가르쳐 주세요」 「정원의 카시와의 나무!」――이런 소위 「선문답」은, 언뜻 보면 미명의 수수께끼 걸린 것 같다. 그것은 선어가 말로 진리를 밝히는 것이 아니라 오히려 말에 의해 분절되기 이전의 무분절 진리의 세계를 깨닫게 하기에 힘들기 때문이다. 선의 세계는 "사고와 언어적 묘사를 허락하지 않는 비범한 체험의 세계이다"라고 알면서, 저자가 "선 체험에 자신을 철학화시키는 사소한 시도"(서)를 감행한 것이 이 책이다. 『임제록』의 일절 「운수 시법 법 시심법」을 「너희들은 <리얼리티>를 무엇이라고 생각하는가.<리얼리티>는 <마음의 리얼리티>에 다름없다" , 『무문관』 『바리무록』 등의 선어록·공안집을 대담하게 읽어내면서, 화엄교학, 유식사상, 수묵화까지를 회통해, 선에 있어서의 분절된 표현과 무분절의 진리와 의 역동적인 왕환을 명백한 말로 풀어낸다.

이통 슌히코(1914~1993)는 그리스 신비 사상, 이슬람 사상, 노장 사상, 불교 사상 등을 망라해 보편적인 <동양 철학>을 고찰한 세계적인 언어 철학자이다. 국내에서는 '꾸란' 전역을 비롯한 이슬람학의 실적으로 알려져 있지만 불교에 익숙한 독자에게는 '대승기신론'을 논고한 명저 '의식의 형이상학'이 유명할 것이다.

저작의 대부분이 영문으로 쓰여졌기 때문에 오히려 구미에서의 평가가 높다. 본서는 그 중 선을 주제로 하는 것을 정리해 1977년에 간행된 저작권의 방역이다. 주저 『의식과 본질』에서도 다루어지는 대로, 저자에게 있어서 선은 중요한 요소였지만, 정리된 일본어의 논집은 없었다. 첫출은 어색하기 때문에 어디서 읽어도 좋다. 구체적으로 선어가 피로되는 III장, IV장당부터 들어가면 읽기 쉬울 것이다. 지적공간에 해방된 선체험의 섬광을 엿볼 수 있다.


평자:히노 케이운(조토 마무네 혼간지파 종합 연구소 연구 조수)
====
■영문 그대로 남겨진, 가학 혼신의 노작. 선과 철학──부립문자의 핵심에 오늘의 사상과 말로 다가온다. ■구미인을 향해, 동방불교 사상의 근원을 말하는 것. 그 궁리에 따라 선의 정신이 새로운 빛의 아래에 일어난다. 개념적 사고를 싫어하고 오로지 태어난 현실적인 경험의 장소로의 돌파를 목표로 하는 실천을 말로 옮기고 심으려고 한다. ■동서종교사상의 호응과 교차를, 그 최심부로 파악하는, 섬세하게 하고 역동적인 이통종교사상의 도전.
====
일본에서
테츠
별점 5점 만점에 5.0점 이통씨의 원점을 확인하고, 읽어내면 좋다.
2020년 3월 20일에 일본에서 작성함
확인된 구매
'신비철학'(이와나미 문고)의 '서문'에 이츠루씨는 '아버지로부터 그 독특한 내관법을 가르쳤다'고 써 그 방법을 기술하고 있다. 그것은 결과적으로 "여의 마음을 보지 말고, 내외 일체의 혼란을 떠나 오로지 무사히 귀몰하라. 「지적 사색을 가하는 것은 무서운 사도」이며, 「「사유할 수 없고, 사유할 수 없어」」라고 한다. 이 사고 방법은 범인에게는 무리다. 범인의 사고방법으로는 본서는 이해할 수 없다. 그러나 알 수 있는 곳도 있다. P210에 있다.
 "한 스님이 한 번 조주 선사에게 물었다. "개에는 불성이 있습니까?"
  스승은 대답했다. "무!
" 개 '에 대해 '지적 레벨'로 물었다. 그에 대해 「사」는 위에 쓴 이통씨의 「무」(무.「없음」이 아니다)의 위상으로부터 발언한 것이다. 「무!」라고. 절대 위상이다. 문답이 되어 있지 않은 것은 위상이 다르기 때문이다. 상대 위상과 절대 위상의 차이입니다. P231에도 이 문답의 해설이 있다.

이 생각을 누르면 다음(P167)은 어떻게 될까.
"바쇼(신라의 선사)는 한 번 모인 승려들에게 말한 적이 있다." 하지만 지팡이가 없다면, 나는 그것을 빼앗자.”
“지팡이”라고 말하는 이상, 그것은 상대의 개인의·분절된 “지팡이”이다. "하나 주는" 지팡이는 절대적이다. 다음에 「지팡이가 없다」라고 하는 「지팡이」는 상대이다. 빼앗기게 된다. 하지만 생각합니다. 절대는 「주는」것인가.

 이통씨는 이 절대가 지금·여기에·모두에 와 있는 것을 「공시적 구조」(『의식과 본질』)이라고 말하고 있다. 이 위상으로부터 세계사에 남는 문학 작품은 쓰여져 있다. 이 책은 그 추출물이다.
3명이 이 정보가 도움이 되었다고 평가했습니다.
----
바다
TOP 500 리뷰어
별점 5점 만점에 5.0점 호설 조각 별처에 떨어지지 않고.
2014년 4월 7일에 일본에서 작성
확인된 구매
이원적 분절이 지배하는 표층 세계, 무분절의 심층 세계에 대한 깊은 고찰이다.
선(=언어 배제)은 '실체'를 인정하지 않는다.
사물의 초월적, 초감각적 질서(=본질)의 존재도 인정하지 않는다.
따라서 '주체'·'객체'가 없는 세계이다.
'아는'대신 '완성=현성'이 필요하다.
여기에 이르려면 '신심'이 '탈락'되어야 한다. 그것은 동시에 '탈락신심'이기도 하다.
"좌선"은 그 최상의 가능성입니다. 그것은 "비사량"(=순수한 <각지>)으로서의 활동이다.
그것은, 예를 들면 「나는 산을 본다」가 1, 「나는 산을 본다」 2, 「산은 나를 본다」 3, 「산은 산을 본다」4, 「나는 나를 본다」라고 하는 등 상호 치환의 차원입니다. A=비A의 세계이다.
나를 잊어서 물건에 비추게 된다. 그때 자기 의식은 없다. "일종"(= 의미적 동일성)이 된다.

선으로 말하는 <마음(대문자)>은 존재=절대 무분절의 형이상학적 <무언가>이며, 무수한 형태로 분절되기 이전의 <현실>(=존재의 기초), 부모 미생 이전의 면목의 의미이다.

호설편편 별처에 떨어지지 않고 (호거사)
깊숙히 눈이 내리고 있다. 하지만 '주'·'객'은 근원적 통일체 <마음>에 관입하고 있기 때문에 눈송이가 떨어지는 곳은 없다.
움직임이 있는 것은 외부 체계가 있는 상대적 세계뿐이다.
외부 체계가 없는 차원에서 그 움직임에 대해 말하는 것은 의미가 없는 것이다.

「어떻게 될까 조사 서래의 뜻」 주정부 「정원 앞의 카시와 수코」(조주 와즈)
선문답의 질문은, 분절. 대답은 무분절이다.
선문답은, 묻는 사람을 초원적 단계에 멈추게 하기 위해, 간발을 넣지 않고 대답시킨다. 생각은 배제되어야 한다. 기계가 익고 있으면 거기에 <깨달음>=현성이 일어난다.
선은 <현상>을 절대화하고 구체적인 것을 넘은 <초월적 절대자>를 부정한다.
그리고, 무분절을 통해 상호 관입한 「무분절 즉분절」의 차원에서, 「지금·여기」에 있어서, 그 때마다 자유롭고 <열린, 투명한> 분절체가 현성된다.
<각자>는 <무언가>의 무분절 시점에서 각 사물 일체를 보고 있다. 사물은 모든 사물이면서 자기입니다.
화엄철학에서는 모든 사물간의 방해받지 않는 상호관입의 형이상학적 차원을 '사사무리법계'라고 한다. <무언가>와 현상이라면 「이사무사」라고 한다.
무분절 즉분절의 구조는 무분절이 자신을 자신으로 분절한다는 것이다. (도원의 표현에서는, 물이 물을 본다)
존재론적으로는, 자신의 분절 행위를 순간마다 무효화하고 있는 것이 된다.
무분절은 섬광처럼 분절하고 순간 무분절로 돌아간다.
도원의 고찰에서는, 이것은 곳곳에서 모든 순간에 일어나고 있다. 세계는 다이나믹하게 살고 있는 것이다.

언어는 <현실>을 의미적으로 구분한다.
선은 의식의 정상 수준에 기원과 기초를 가진 언어는 의미가 없는 것이다. 「부립문자」이다. 그것보다는, 완전한 침묵이다.
선문답에서는 "강은 가만히 머물고 다리는 흐른다"처럼 의미분절 기능은 변형된다.
선에게 결정적 중요성을 갖는 것은 말의 발발된 근원에 있다.

향엄선사의 깨달음 체험이 있다.
그것은 주·객 2분을 초월한 <삼매>로부터 주·객의 각지를 되찾는 순간에 찾아온다. 그것은 감각적 자극 (그것은 자갈이 대나무에 붙어있는 소리였다)에 의해서였다. 그리고 그 소리는 우주 전체이기도 했다. 그 때, 향엄도 소리가 되어 있었다.
<견성>에서는 나를 잊고 대나무로 만들어야 하고 종소리로 만들어야 하고 꽃으로 이루어져야 한다.
그리고 대나무도 종소리도 꽃도 사라지고 주·객이 사라지고 단지 <각지>뿐이 된다.
그리고 사람은 이 <각지>에서 깨어나 무분절인 <무언가>는 '나'와 예를 들면 '대나무'로서 다시 자신을 분절한다.
그리고, 이 2분의 바로 그 순간, 대나무는 갑작스럽게 절대적인 <대나무>로서 현성하는 것이다.
그리고 뛰어난 시인도 화가도 그것을 그리는 것이다.

영문으로부터의 번역이다. 그 의미에서 알기 쉬운 면이 있다.
이통은 "색 즉 시공", "공 즉 시색"을 "감각적인 것은 <무>이고, <무>는 바로 감각적인 것이다"라고 표현하고 있다.
<무위의 진인>(임제)이 <무언가>(=무분절의 세계)에 관입(무분절 즉분절)하여 현상을 <각지>한다는 구도이다.
기존의 추상적이고 정적 인 설명과 달리 구체적이고 동적입니다.
힘줄에 떨어지는 경우가 많았다.
16명이 이 정보가 도움이 되었다고 평가했습니다.
 -  - -  -
스카치 미스트
별점 5점 만점에 5.0점 번역가의 역량이 굉장하다
2014년 2월 22일에 일본에서 작성됨
확인된 구매
이통의 원문과 이 책을 나란히, 양쪽을 맞대면서 정중하게 읽으면, 동양적 사고의 논리와 감성을, 영어로 구미인에게 설명할 때의 강력한 참고서로서 가장 적합한 책.
15명이 이 정보가 도움이 되었다고 평가했습니다.
-- -- 
카리타스77
TOP 500 리뷰어
별점 5점 만점에 5.0점 현재 진행형으로 말하면
2015년 7월 28일에 일본에서 검토함
본서의 독서 체험은, 만일 현재 진행형으로 말하면, 「선이란 무엇인가」에 대해 정중하게 생각해 가는 강의에 사귀고 있는 작업이 됩니다.

철학의 행위는 다양한 직무분담을 가지고 있지만, 기초부착 작업도 그 중 중요한 하나입니다.

지금까지 선에 대해 경험에서 알고 있었던 것에 저자의 가리키려는 의미가 주어집니다.

'해석'이라기보다는 '재확인'을 지남하는 텍스트일 것입니다.

이 재확인 작업을 필요로 하는 독자에게는 중요하고 흥미로운 서술이 되고, 재확인 작업을 특별히 필요로 하지 않는 독자에게는, 전체의 7개의 장립 중에서, 괄호로 묶어 두고, 방치 해도 문제없는 것도 포함되어 있다고 생각합니다.

따라서 필요한 부분이나 필요할 수없는 부분이 독자에게 중요합니다.

그런데 달은 달이 된다는 표현은 동일률이 아닌 경우가 있습니다. 만약을 위해.
한 사람이 이 정보가 도움이 되었습니다.
----
타이 미소
별점 5점 만점에 5.0점 너무 어려워! ! 영혼의 구제에는 도움이 되지 않는다
2014년 5월 14일에 일본에서 작성함
선불교 그것도 임제종계의 해설서의 느낌일까요 내용은 완전히 철학적인 사고를 할 수 없는 사람은 읽을 수 없습니다! ! 나도 그 중~~:: 이통씨는 역시 너무 어려운 것이 난점이지요 이것을 강의 혹은 이야기해도 아는 사람은 거의 없는 것이 아닐까 전문가 이외에서는! ! 마음을 위해 죄송합니다! !
7명이 이 정보가 도움이 되었다고 평가했습니다.
도움이 되는
남용 신고
====
izumowol 님 의

팔로우
2016년 7월 6일

원래 '이리'를 뛰어넘어 세계를 파악하고자 하는 선과 세계
를 이성으로 포착하려고 하는 철학을 나란히 논하려고 하는 것은
무리가 있을 것 같은 이야기이다. 그러나 선도 사람의 영업이며,
거기에는 움직임 일하는 마음이 존재하기 때문에, 무엇인가의 철학적
이라고 말해도 좋은 동향은 존재할 것이다. 무리문답이라고 밖에
생각할 수 없는 공안이나, 선에 있어서의 깨달음에 대해, 거기서
일하고 있는 철학을 매우 알기 쉽게 해설하고 있는 이 책은,
읽은 것만으로 선을 알게 된 것 같은 신경이 쓰이는 위험한 서적
이다 (웃음).
=====



Review by  David A. KOLB
Bates College
Philosophy East and West
Vol. 30, No. 4 (Oct., 1980), pp. 540-542 (3 pages)
Published By: University of Hawai'i Press
====
Professor Izutsu, a noted Islamicist, has published a set of essays on Zen which are thoroughly unified in theme and style despite their various origins; many were
originally given at the Eranos conferences. Besides its considerable intrinsic interest, the book merits note as perhaps one of the last of its kind, published as it is by the Imperial Iranian Academy.

Izutsu sets out to develop "the philosophical potential hidden in the Zen experience of reality" (p. ×). 
He deals with a variety of topics but 
approaches them all on the basis of a fundamental duality which is developed into a three-part scheme. 
The duality is 
  • metaphysical, between the realm of names and forms and its unformed, 
  • unarticulated ground.
  •  This duality is expanded into a triplicity by the use of "our old familiar metaphysical theme, namely that 
  • the Undifferentiated ex-ists only through its own differentiations" (p. 171). 

The developed scheme 
  • starts with the formed things of ordinary experience
  • moves to the unformed ground, and 
  • then back to the formed things, now seen as the unformed ground
    • or as divested of "their ontological opaqueness ... totally transparent, pervading each other, submerged into one" ' (p. 204).

Zen experience moves along this same are: 
from concentration on things to submersion in the primal ground to seeing things as the ground. 
Zen use of language moves similarly: 
from the usual referential use of language, to silence, to language use where the usual semantic articulation is suspended and everything means everything else in a linguistic parallel to the Hua Yen interplay suggested earlier. 

This is the language of koan and mondo.

Given these tools Izutsu discusses 
  • Zen views of man and consciousness,
  • the place of language, 
  • rationality and thought in Zen practice, 
  • satori, and 
  • various aspects of Eastern artistic practice, 
  • especially the tendency toward black-and-white painting.

Izutsu manages to give an exposition of Zen which shows 
why it can be a transforming and saving religion
not just a form of play, discipline, or psychotherapy.

His threefold scheme, patterned on the famous koan of mountain/no mountain/ 
mountain, enables him to avoid facile interpretations of Zen as an inexpressible 
experience coupled with nonsensical language. He can suggest the sounder notion of an experience articulating itself in a new language use. Along this line his remarks about the centrality of language in Zen despite its official denials are directly on target (confer pp. 111, 123). Also very suggestive is his conception of a use of language which parallels the Hu Yen transparent and interrelated world.

The threefold metaphysical scheme reminds us forcibly of the Heart Sutra's "form is emptiness and emptiness is form."

* Yet I wonder if the anatta doctrine has been given its due. Izutsu freely uses words from a variety of philosophical traditions East and West to describe the undifferentiated reality: pure self (p. 21), a field of pure energy (p. 24), pure light (p. 32), Mind (p. 33), the Eternal Present (p. 37), a relational field (p. 45), emptiness (p. 106), the Ur-grund (p. 127), the Plenitude of Reality (p. 127), ultimate reality (p. 130). Despite his disclaimers that this is not to indicate an absolute beyond the world of names and forms, the impression of substantiality persists. This is reinforced by such phrases as "The Eternal Present is eternally calm and tranquil in spite of all the motions of the mind on another dimension" (p. 42). At the core of Izutsu's threefold scheme we get only metaphors: the Undifferentiated "articulates itself" and things "are transparent.

Such carefree collisions of diverse philosophical terms raise serious problems of method. Izutsu can use terms from German idealism, Platonism, Buddhism, and  Hinduism indiscriminately because he means them all to be qualified by "the Zen experience of reality.'

" But how do we know there is one Zen experience? And granted there is one, how do we know that it is so prior to learning the concepts as to be an independent check on their meanings? Izutsu's quick dismissal of Soto Zen on pages 161-167 is not encouraging here. Has he overunified the tradition?

More generally, why should we assume that "at the original point of all Philosophieren in any form whatsoever there is and there must be a peculiar reality-experience" (p. ix). Are such "experiences" to be the point of unity within any tradition? The result of this hermeneutical rule is to break thought into large blocks each ruled by one reality-experience and within which details of argument and terminological differences become secondary. Philosophy reduces to high-level show-and-tell.

Izutsu's translations of mondo and koan into his scheme are very helpful. His choice of examples for interpretation is always interesting and the vast range of his scholarship continually surprises the reader. Yet the very ease of translation should worry us. His principles lead him to find over and over the same threefold scheme behind every example. While this is illuminating in dismissing simpler interpretations, should we perhaps worry that Izutsu has created a unique object or structure to be the signified of every expression, thus making Zen "metaphysical" in the sense recently discussed by Derrida and Heidegger? Izutsu's text will not help us here because his ideas on meaning are too limited. He justly attacks a simple reference-theory of meaning, but we are no longer Naiyäyikas today. Denial of their theory does not help us all that much.

Although Izutsu shows an awareness of contextual factors in Zen expression (confer p. 102), he does not integrate these into a better theory of meaning to realize his intriguing suggestions about Zen language.

Despite these problems and in part because of them Izutsu's book remains a 
stimulating and unified picture of Zen.

DAVId A. KOLB

Bates College
===

===
David Kolb 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
For the educational theorist, see David A. Kolb.

David Kolb (born 1939[1]) is an American philosopher and the Charles A. Dana Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Bates College in Maine.

Kolb received a B.A. from Fordham University in 1963 and an M.A. in 1965. He later received a M.Phil. from Yale University in 1970 and a Ph.D. in 1972. Kolb's Dissertation was titled "Conceptual Pluralism and Rationality." Most of Kolb's writing deals with "what it means to live with historical connections and traditions at a time when we can no longer be totally defined by that history." Professor Kolb taught at the University of Chicago before moving to Bates in 1977 and teaching there until 2005, when he took emeritus status.


Contents
1 Works
2 See also
3 References
4 External links


Works
Kolb has written many articles and published several books including:

  • The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After, 1987
  • Postmodern Sophistications: Philosophy, Architecture, and Tradition, 1990
  • New Perspectives on Hegel's Philosophy of Religion, 1992
  • Socrates in the Labyrinth: Hypertext, Argument, Philosophy, 1994
  • Sprawling Places, 2008

===
Not to be confused with
===
David Allen Kolb 2
Born December 12, 1939
Era 20th-century philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
Main interests experiential learning
Notable ideas Experiential Learning Model (ELM)
Influences
David Allen Kolb (born December 12, 1939 in Moline, Illinois) is an American educational theorist whose interests and publications focus on experiential learning, the individual and social change, career development, and executive and professional education. He is the founder and chairman of Experience Based Learning Systems, Inc. (EBLS),[1] and an Emeritus Professor of Organizational Behavior in the Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Kolb earned his BA from Knox College in 1961 and his MA and Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1964 and 1967 respectively, in social psychology.


Contents
1 Experiential learning
2 Learning Style Inventory
3 Bibliography
4 See also
5 References
6 External links
Experiential learning
Main article: Experiential learning
In the early 1970s, Kolb and Ron Fry (now both at the Weatherhead School of Management) developed the Experiential Learning Model (ELM),[2] composed of four elements:

concrete experience,
observation of and reflection on that experience,
formation of abstract concepts based upon the reflection,
testing the new concepts,
(repeat).
These four elements are the essence of a spiral of learning that can begin with any one of the four elements, but typically begins with a concrete experience.

Learning Style Inventory
Kolb is renowned in educational circles for his Learning Style Inventory (LSI). His model is built upon the idea that learning preferences can be described using two continuums:

Active experimentation ↔ Reflective observation
Abstract conceptualization ↔ Concrete experience.
The result is four types of learners: converger (Active experimentation - Abstract conceptualization), accommodator (Active experimentation - Concrete experience), assimilator (Reflective observation - Abstract conceptualization), and diverger (Reflective observation - Concrete experience). The LSI is designed to determine an individual's learning preference.[3]

Bibliography
Kolb, D.A., Rubin, I.M., McIntyre, J.M. (1974). Organizational Psychology: A Book of Readings, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D.A., Fry, R.E. (1974). Toward an Applied Theory of Experiential Learning
Kolb, D. A., Kolb, A.Y. (2011). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory 4.0
See also
Experiential learning
Constructivism (philosophy of education)
References
 Experience Based Learning Systems, LLC. (EBLS)
 Kolb. D. A. and Fry, R. (1975) Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. in C. Cooper (ed.), Theories of Group Process, London: John Wiley.
 Experience Based Learning Systems, Inc. (EBLS)
External links
Wikiquote has quotations related to David A. Kolb.
Kolb's Faculty Profile at Case Western University
===

===
David Kolb
Department of Philosophy 130 Nottingham Road
Bates College, 73 Campus Avenue Auburn, Maine 04210
Lewiston, Maine 04240 USA Tel: (207) 782-6817
Tel: (207) 786-6308 Email: dkolb@bates.edu
Fax: (207) 786-6123 http://www.bates.edu/~dkolb/
Education:
1972 Ph.D., Yale University. Dissertation: "Conceptual Pluralism and Rationality"
1970 M. Phil., Yale University
1965 M.A., philosophy, Fordham University
1963 B.A., Fordham University, summa cum laude, double major, classics and philosophy

Academic Honors:
1999-00 Charles Phillips Research Fellowship
1989 Charles A. Dana Professor of Philosophy
1983-84 Fulbright Lectureship, Nagoya, Japan
1982-83 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship for College Teachers
1976-1982 Danforth Associate
1970 Tew Prize in Philosophy, Yale University
1969-72 Kent Fellowship (Danforth Foundation)
1967 Scholarship for summer Asian studies, University of Pennsylvania
1964 Licentiate in Philosophy, summa cum laude

Professional Experience:
1999 Guest Researcher, School of Architecture, Lund, Sweden (autumn only)
1989 on Charles A. Dana Professor of Philosophy, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine
1983-9 Professor of Philosophy, Bates College
1983-4 Fulbright Lecturer, Nanzan University and Aichi Kenritsu University, Nagoya, Japan.
1980-82 Chair, Division of the Humanities, Bates College.
1977-91 Chair, Department of Philosophy and Religion, Bates College
1977-83 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Bates College
1972-77 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Chicago
1971 Teaching Assistant, Yale University
1969 Intern, Department of City Planning, City of Baltimore, Maryland
1968-69 Instructor (part-time), Mt. St. Agnes College and Woodstock College, Baltimore
1964-67 Instructor, Fordham College, Bronx, New York

Books:
The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After. University of Chicago Press, 1987.
Postmodern Sophistications: Philosophy, Architecture, and Tradition. University of Chicago Press, 1990.
New Perspectives on Hegel's Philosophy of Religion. SUNY Press, 1992. (edited)
Socrates in the Labyrinth: Hypertext, Argument, Philosophy. Eastgate Systems, 1994. (hypertext essay collection)

Essays and Articles:
"Impure Postmodernity -- Philosophy Today," preface for the Chinese translation of The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After.
"Hegelian Buddhist Hypertextual Media Inhabitation, or, Criticism in the Age of Electronic Immersion," in Adrift in the Technological Matrix, Bucknell Review 46.2, Autumn 2002, 90-108.
"Et blandet selskab: Laesekundskaber inden for trykte tekster og hypertekst på én og samme tid," in Standart 4/5, Copenhagen. (A translation of a portion of the talk "Ruminations in Mixed Company: Literacy in Print and Hypertext Together")
"Borders and Centers in an Age of Mobility," forthcoming in a Festschrift.
"Why Hegel? Why Now?" Introductory essay to the Hegel issue, Dialogue XXXIX (2000), 651-6. (with Suzanne Foisy)
"Exposing an English Speculative Word," The Owl of Minerva, Fall 2000, xx.
"Learning Places: Building Dwelling Thinking On-Line," Journal Of Philosophy Of Education, vol. 34, no. 1,Winter 2000, 121-133.
"Hypertext as Subversive?" a hypertext essay, in Culture Machine 2, http:culturemachine.tees.ac.uk
"Genius Fluxus: The Spirit of Change," Proceedings of a Conference on The Flux of Place, forthcoming.
"The Particular Logic of Modernity," Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, Nos. 41.42, 2000, 31-42.
"Hegel's Architecture," in A Companion to Hegel's Aesthetics, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
"Modernity's Self-Justification," The Owl of Minerva, vo. 30, no. 2, Spring 1999, 253-276.
"Collisions and Interactions: Philosophical Reflections on CATAC '98," at the conference on Cultural Attitudes toward Technology and Communication, London, August 1998. Available at http://www.bates.edu/~dkolb/catac-dk.html
"Four Questions and a Funeral: Hegel on Spirit's Self-Division and New Life," Proceedings of a Colloquium on Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, forthcoming.
"Steps to the Futures," Proceedings of the Conference on Religion and Education at the Millennium, forthcoming.
"The Age of the List,"in Algreen-Ussing, Gregers, et al, ed.. Urban Space and Urban Conservation as an Aesthetic Problem. Rome: Accademica Danica, L'Erma di Bretschneider, 2000, 27-35.
"The Spirit of Gravity: Architecture and Externality in Hegel," in Hegel and Aesthetics, SUNY Press, 2000, 83-96.
"Tradition and Modernity in Architecture," in the Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Oxford Unversity Press, 1998.
"Circulation and Constitution at the End of History,"in Endings: Questions of Memory in Hegel and Heidegger, ed. by Rebecca Comay and John McCumber.Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1999, 57-76.
"Filling the Blanks," in Language Beyond Postmodernism: Saying and Thinking in Gendlin's Philosophy, ed. by David Michael Levin. Northwestern University Press, 1998, 65-83.
"Scholarly Hypertext: Self-Represented Complexity," Hypertext '97, Association For Computing Machinery, 1997, 29-37.
"The Final Name of God: Hegel on Determinate Religion," Hegel and the Tradition:. University of Toronto Press, 1997, 162-175.
"Communicating Across Links," Philosophical Perspectives on Computer Mediated Communication, SUNY Press, 1996, 15-26.
"Circulation Bound: Hegel and Heidegger on the State," Phenomenology, Interpretation, and Community, SUNY Press, 1996.
"Raising Atlantis: The Later Heidegger and Contemporary Philosophy," From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire, Kluwer, 1995, 55-69.
"Identity and Judgment: Five Theses and a Program,"Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, Fall 1994, 37-40.
"Home on the Range: Planning and Totality," Research in Phenomenology, 1992, 3-11. (Reprinted in Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, Spring 1995.)
"Heidegger and Habermas on Criticism and Totality," Philosophy andPhenomenological Research, vol. LII, no. 2, 1992, 683-693.
"What is Open and What is Closed in the Philosophy of Hegel?" Philosophical Topics, vol. 19, no. 2, Fall 1991, 29-50.
"Heidegger at 100, in America," Journal of the History of Ideas, 1991, 140-151.
"Criticism and the Formless Center," in a forthcoming book on Technology and Culture, University of South Florida.
"Before Beyond Function," Proceedings of the Conference on Hegel and Architecture, School of Architecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, forthcoming.
"Socrates in the Labyrinth," a linear version of one hypertext essay from the above collection, in Hyper/Text/Theory Johns Hopkins Press, 1994, 323-344.
"Call for Submission Recycled," a hypertext, in Perforations 4.
"Postmodern Sophistications"Postmodernism on Trial, A/D Profile, London: Academy Editions,1990, 13-19.
"Haughty and Humble Ironies," Annals of Scholarship, vi, 1989, .
"American Individualism: Does it Exist?," Nanzan Review of American Studies, vi, 1984, 21-45.
"Pythagoras Bound: Limit and Unlimited in Plato's Philebus,"Journal of the History of Philosophy, 1984, 497-512.
"Dialectic and Phenomenology: Heidegger's Lectures on Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit," The Owl of Minerva, 1982.
"Heidegger on the Limits of Science," Journal of the British Society forPhenomenology, January 1983, 50-64.
"Hegel and Heidegger as Critics," The Monist, 1981, 481-499.
"On the Objective and Subjective Grounding of Knowledge," translation, with introduction and notes, of an essay by the Neo-Kantian Paul Natorp,Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 1981, 245-261.
"Language and Metalanguage in Aquinas," Journal of Religion, 1981, 428-432.
"A Place Without a Form," Proceedings of the Fifteenth Heidegger Conference, 1981.
"Socrates and Stories," Spring, 1981, 177-184.
"Sellars on the Measure of All Things," Philosophical Studies, 1979, 381-400.
"Ontological Priorities: A Critique of the Announced Goals of Descriptive Metaphysics," Metaphilosophy, 1975, 238-258.
"Time and the Timeless in Greek Thought," Philosophy East-West, 1974, 137-143.

Interviews
"Ma tu come scrivi col computer: Fra rete e ipertesti: scrittori esperti," interview published in Domenico Fiormonte and Ferdinanda Cremascoli, Manuale di scrittura (Turin: Bollati Boringhieri, 1998).
"An Analysis of the concept of hypertext," an interview with Italian public television 's Mediamente, RAI, Rome, October, 1997. Available at http://www.mediamente.rai.it/english/bibliote/intervis/k/kolb.htm
"Socrates Apology," essay/interview in Seulemonde (University of South Florida, Web journal; the essay is at http://www.bates.edu/~dkolb/seulmonde/Apology.html), Spring 1995.

Book Reviews:
Another Modernism?: Form, Content and Meaning of the new Housing Architecture of Hanoi, by Tran Hoi Anh, in Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, forthcoming.
Substance or Context: A Study of the Concept of Place, byWang Jun-Yang , in Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 1995:3, 123-127, and a second review in Arkitectur 1995:7, 62-64.
Freedom, Truth, and History: an Introduction to Hegel's Philosophy, by Stephen Houlgate, The Owl of Minerva, Volume 26, Number 2, Spring 1995.
The Modernist City: an Anthropological Critique of Brasília, by James Holston, Visual Anthropology Review.
Hegel's Theory of Mental Activity, by Willem A. deVries, Idealistic Studies, Fall 1992.
Hegel and Mass Death, by Edith Wyschgrod, The Owl of Minerva, Fall 1989.
Hegel, Heidegger, and the Ground of History, by Michael Gillespie, Journal of the History of Philosophy, January 1987, 569-571.
The Eclipse of the Self, by Michael Zimmerman, Canadian Philosophical Reviews, January 1985.
The Turning Point, by Fritjof Capra, and The Reenchantment of the World, by Morris Berman, Commonweal, June 18, 1982.
Naturalism and Ontology, by Wilfrid Sellars, Philosophical Books, April 1982, 108-111.
Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism, by T. Izutsu, Philosophy East-West, 1980, 540-542.
Plato: The Written and Unwritten Doctrines, by J. N. Findlay, Ethics, 1976.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. by Imre Lakatos, in Main Currents of Modern Thought, 1972.

Book Notes:
The Moral Order of a Suburb, by M. P. Baumgartner, Ethics.
Relationship and Solitude, by Maurice Natanson, Ethics, October 1988, 200.

Professional Talks:
"The Logic of Language Change," Presidential Address, Hegel Society of America, Penn State, October 2002.
"Why Hegel?" at a panel at the APA Central meeting, Chicago, April 2002.
"The Logic of the Critical Process," at a panel on Hegel and Critical Theory, SPEP, Baltimore, October 2001.
"Space and Meaning Stability," at the Hypertext 01 Workshop on Spatial Hypertext, Aarhus, Denmark, August 2001.
"Saving the Suburbs," Faculty lecture, Bates College, January 2001.
"Variations on a Theme by Disney," at Architecture, Language and Design, Bowdoin College, April, 2000.
"Hypertext and Print," to the Center for the Study of Digital Libraries, Texas A and M University, March, 2000.
"Full Theme Ahead," to the Center for the Study of American Design, University of Texas School of Architecture, March, 2000.
"Complex Grammars: Saving Suburbia," to Studio E, and the Building Function department, School of Architecture, Lund, Sweden, October 1999.
"Genius Fluxus: The Spirit of Change," at a conference on the flux of place, Sandbjerg, Denmark, October, 1999.
"Hypertext at Work," to the Design@Work group, Lund, Sweden, October 1999.
"Casey on Site and Place," Seminar on Edward Casey's The Fate of Place, School of Architecture, University of Lund, Sweden, October 1999.
"The Particular Logic of Modernity," to the Hegel Society of Great Britain, Pembroke College, Oxford, September 1999.
"Steps to the Futures," to a conference on religion and education at the millennium, Bates College, January 1999.
"Four Questions and a Funeral: Hegel on Spirit's Self-Division and New Life," to a colloquium on Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, Pennsylvania State University, March, 1999.
"Ruminations in Mixed Company: Literacy in Print and Hypertext Together," a talk given at the Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, July 1998. Available at http://www.bates.edu/~dkolb/ou-dk.html
"Hypertext and Argument," a seminar given at the University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy, October 1997.
"The Age of the List" a talk at the conference on Urban Preservation as an Aesthetic Problem, Rome, October 1997.
"Scholarly Hypertext: Self-Represented Complexity" at Hypertext 97, University of Southampton, England, April 1997.
The Spirit of Gravity: Hegel Society of America, Denver, Colorado, October, 1996.
"Hypertext and Literacy," SPEP, Washington, October 1996.
"Hypertext in the Classroom and Research," Nercomp, Sturbridge, March 1996.
"Hyper-Literacy: Re-forming Reading in a Media Age," University of Manitoba, April 1996.
"The Prose of Hypertext: Hypertext for Teaching and Writing Philosophy," CHUG (Brown University Computers in the Humanities User Group), October 1995.
Panelist at a Conference on "King Ludd and the Resistance to Technology," University of South Florida at Tampa, September 1995 (Virtual panel session through IATH Moo, University of Virginia)
"Re-writing Socrates: Hypertext Prose and Argument," Workshop "Serious Hypertext," Boston, May, 1995.
"Before Beyond Function," Conference on Hegel and Architecture, School of Architecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, March 1995.
"Postmodernism and Pluralism," and "Japanese Architecture Today," School of Architecture, Chalmers Technical University, Gothenburg, Sweden, February 1995.
"Irony and Postmodernism," University of Tokyo, October 1994.
"Form and Flow: Is there a Postmodern Age?," two lectures at a conference on The European City in the Age of Pluralism, School of Architecture, Aarhus, Denmark, September 1994.
"Socrates in the Labyrinth," remote video presentation of a hypertext essay, at ECHT '94 Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1994.
"Subdivisions, Metaphysics, and the History of Classification," Pennsylvania State University, February 1994, and Northwestern University, March 1994
"Raising Atlantis: the Later Heidegger and Contemporary Philosophy," invited symposium talk, American Philosophy Association, Eastern Division, Atlanta, December 1993.
"Building and Thinking at the End of History," Holy Cross College, October 1993.
"Coming Down out of the Trees: Kant and Hegel on the Transcendentals,"University of New Hampshire, October 1993.
"Hypertext and Philosophy," Conference on Computers in Philosophy, Pittsburgh, August 1993.
"Socrates in the Labyrinth," Vassar College, April, 1993.
"Computers, Communication, and Walls," Kanazawa Nichibei Kyokai Kanazawa, Japan, April 1993.
"Locality and Identity: Escaping Hierarchy," University of Nagoya, Japan, April, 1993.
"How do we build and think at the end of history?," University of Maine at Orono, November 1992.
"Es spielet, weil es spielet," Between Heidegger and Nietzsche, Trieste, April, 1992.
"Scholars, Scholasticisms, and the End of Philosophy," Wabash College, March 1992.
"Circulation Bound: Hegel and Heidegger on the State," Invited paper, Society for Phenomenological and Existential Philosophy, Memphis, October 1991.
"Circulation and Constitution at the End of History," Invited symposium participant, American Phiilosophical Association Central Division, Chicago, April 1991.
"Planning and Totality," Center for Sustainable Cities, University of Kentucky, April 1991.
"Postmodernism in Thought and Architecture," Vassar College, April 1990.
"Hegel and Religion: an Open and Shut Case," Brown University, March 1990.
"What is Open and What is Closed in the Philosophy of Hegel (Version 2)," Society for Systematic Philosophy, Atlanta, December, 1989.
"Heidegger and Habermas on Criticism and Totality," Heidegger Conference 1989, University of Notre Dame.
"Haughty and Humble Ironies," University of South Carolina, April 1989.
"What is Modern about Postmodern Architecture," Clemson University School of Architecture, April 1989.
"Traditional Japanese Crafts in the Modern Context," Olin Museum of Art, Bates College Museum of Art, November, 1988.
"What is Open and What is Closed in the Philosophy of Hegel," Loyola University of Chicago, October, 1988.
"Projects and Roots: Heidegger on Where We Are," American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1988.
"The Power of the Sophist," Maine Philosophical Institute, April, 1988.
"Modernity in America and Japan," delivered at ELEC, Tokyo, Japan, December, 1987.
"From Pillar to Post: Modernity and Postmodernity in Architecture," International Association for Philosophy and Literature, University of Kansas, May, 1987.
"The Semantics of Modern Dance," panelist, Bates Dance Festival, July, 1987.
"Heidegger and Transcendental Arguments," Nagoya Philosophical Society, January 1984.
"Rationality and Persuasion," Nagoya Business Debate Group, December 1983.
"American Individualism and Law," (with Richard Parker), the American Centers, Osaka and Nagoya, Japan, November 1983.
"Hegel and Heidegger: Locating Modernity," New School for Social Research Graduate Faculty, February 1983.
"Humanism Letter: The Price of Land Around The House of Being," Collegium Phenomenologicum, Perugia, Italy, Summer 1982.
"Hegel: The Whole Story," at Hegel Today: the Meaning of Hegel's Absolute Spirit, University of Ottawa, October 1981.
"A Place Without a Form," Heidegger Circle, Pennsylvania State University, Spring 1981.
"Animal Rights or Animal Values?" Bates College Colloquium on Animal Experimentation, 1979.
"Heidegger and Hegel as Critics," Collegium Phenomenologicum, Perugia, Italy, Summer, 1978, and at Northern New England Philosophy Association, November 1979.
"The Last Word in Greek Philosophy," Symposium on Early Greek Thought and Culture, University of Chicago, 1977; also delivered to the Department of Philosophy, University of Maine at Orono, 1978.
"Myth, Truth, and Translation," Conference on Myth, University of Chicago, 1975.
"The Varieties of Transcendental Method in Philosophy," Washington and Lee University, 1975.
"Mysticism and Philosophy," Washington and Lee University, 1975.
"Sellars on the Measure of All Things," Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois Chicago, 1975.
Talks delivered to the philosophy colloquium at the University of Chicago, 1973-7: "The Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars" "Relations between European and American Philosophy" "De Re and De Dicto in Medieval Logic" "Ontological Priorities in Strawson" "Eternity in Plato and Plotinus"
"Heidegger on the Limits of Science," Heidegger Circle, Tulane University, Spring 1974.
"Ontological Priorities," Department of Philosophy, Rice University, 1974.
"Time and the Timeless in Greek Thought," Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy, 1973.

Comments on presentations:
"Collisions and Interactions: Philosophical Reflections on CATAC '98," at the conference on Cultural Attitudes toward Technology and Communication, London, August 1998. Available at http://www.bates.edu/~dkolb/catac-dk.html
Recollecting Design," comments on a paper by Robert Mugerauer on Daniel Liebeskind's addition to the Berlin Museum, at the Society for Phenomenological and Existential Philosophy, Chicago, October 1995.
"Training and Architecture," Conference on "Das Unheimliche" in Architecture and the City, DePaul University, April 1991.
"Heidegger and Politics," American Political Science Association, New England Regional Meeting, April 1990.
"Me and My Shadow," Heidegger Circle, 1982, (on Robert Bernasconi)
"The Community of Inquiry," Boston Colloquium on Philosophy and Religion, 1980. (on Robert Neville)
"Two Cheers for the Ontic," Heidegger Circle, University of Toronto, Spring 1980. (on Charles Scott)
"Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis," Heidegger Circle, Duquesne University Spring 1979. (on William Richardson)
"Aquinas on God," Symposium on Medieval Thought, University of Chicago, 1974. (on David Burrell)

Performances:
"Touring," a reading given at Hypertext 01, Aarhus, Denmark, August 2001.

Other:
Fifty or so small journalistic articles and reviews of varying lengths concerning computers and word processing, published in a newsletter, a computer magazine, and the APA Newsletter on Computing in Philosophy.

Courses Taught:

At Bates College:
Architecture, Tradition, Innovation
Between Text and Hypertext (first year seminar)
Contemporary Continental Philosophy
Contemporary Debates about Subjectivity
Designs, Traditions, and Powers
Dilemmas of Architecture and Design in the Post-Modern Age (Alumni Course)
Doing Philosophy
Dwelling and Dispersion
Feminist and Postmodern Critiques of Philosophy
From Text to Hypertext (first year seminar)
Greek Philosophy
Habermas and Foucault
Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit
Hegel's Philosophy of Art (short term unit)
Hyperwriting (short term unit)
Intention and Meaning (co-taught with five colleagues)
Interpretation and Deconstruction
Introduction to Logic
Japanese Places: Modern, Feudal, Postmodern (Bates Fall Program in Japan, Tokyo, 1989)
Metaphysics and its Enemies
Modernization: an Introduction to Japanese Civilization (Bates Fall Program in Japan 1987)
Nietzsche
Nineteenth Century Philosophy
Normative Ethics
Phenomenology and Existentialism
Phenomenology and Science
Philosophy of Art
Philosophy of Science
Postmodernism: Lyotard and Habermas
Readings in Greek Philosophy: Plato's Phaedrus and Plotinus, "On Beauty,"
Readings in Greek Philosophy: Plato's Philebus and Gorgias
Readings in Greek Philosophy: The Nichomachean Ethics
Religion and Science (co-taught with Thomas Tracy)
Rorty on Heidegger and Derrida
Self and Individual East and West (co-taught with Lily de Silva)
Seminar on Major Thinkers: Aristotle
Seminar on Major Thinkers: Wittgenstein
Seminar: Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit
Seminar: World and Reality

Short Term Symposium: The Exploration of Space (co-taught with physics and mathematics)
Short Term trip to Japan, Spring 1985
Tokyo as City and as Myth (Bates Fall Program in Japan 1994)
Topics in the Philosophy of Art: Place and Placelessness
Transcendental Arguments in Analytic Philosophy

At Japanese Universities:
American Thought.
The Idea of Progress

At the University of Chicago:
Ancient Philosophy
General Humanities
Greek Thought and Literature
Hegel's Logic
Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit (with Paul Ricoeur)
Heidegger's "Origin of the Art Work" (with Ted Cohen).
Nietzsche (with Paul Ricoeur)
Phenomenology and Science
Philosophy of Religion: Mysticism
Strawson and Heidegger on Kant
The Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars
Transcendental Method in Philosophy

At Yale University:
Political Philosophy (teaching assistant)
At Mt. St. Agnes College:
Introduction to Asian Religions
The Problem of Evil.
At Woodstock College:
Introduction to Asian Religions.

At Fordham University:
Epistemology
Ethics
History of Philosophy
Ontology and Metaphysics.
Philosophy of Man
Philosophy of Nature
Philosophy of Religion

Administrative Experience:
At Bates College:
Chair, Humanities Division
Chair, Department of Philosophy and Religion
Committee Chair: Library Committee, Long Range Planning Committee, Ad Hoc Committee on Extracurricular Life, Computing Service Committee, Information Services Advisory Committee, Task Force on Strategic Planning for Technology, Information Services Advisory Committee
Committee Member: Personnel Committee, Educational Policy Committee, Academic Computing Service Committee, Ad Hoc Committee on Computers and the Liberal Arts, Graduate Study Committee, Ad Hoc Committee on Tenure Rules, Planning Group for New Residential Construction, Committee on Teaching Awards, Vision 2005 Planning Committee, Interdepartmental Hiring Committees in Education, Art History, and for the Dean of the Faculty, Architectural Advisory Committees for a new student residence, a new academic building, and the renovation of Coram Library, President's Advisory Committee
Planned, administered, and taught a spring term trip to Japan, 1985, and the Bates Fall Semesters in Japan, 1987, 1989, 1994.
At The University of Chicago:
Chair, Departmental Committees on Admissions, Financial Aid, Library
Member, Departmental Committee on Placement, Humanities Collegiate Division Advisory Board, University Advisory Board on Continuing Education
At Fordham University:
Director, Fordham College Debate Program.

Other Services:
Guest Editor, special issue on Hegel, Dialogue: a Canadian Journal of Philosophy.
Reviewed manuscripts for the University of Chicago Press, University of Minnesota Press, Critical Inquiry, Continental Philosophy Review, Journal of Digital Information, SUNY Press, Duke University Press, The Review of Politics, Dialogue, Cambridge University Press, Northwestern University Press, Rowan and Littlefield, the ACM Hypertext Conference, World Wide Web Conference.
Reviewed PhD dissertations for Northwestern University, University of Sydney, University of Chicago, University of Toronto.
External examiner for PhD defenses at the University of Toronto and at Chalmers Technical University, Sweden; External examiner for the Swarthmore College Honors Program in Philosophy
External Reviewer of the Philosophy Department, Wabash College
Reviewed dossiers and interviewed candidates for fellowships, planned and helped run annual conferences for the Danforth Foundation.
Participant in seminars, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Chalmers Technical University School of Architecture, Aarhus University School of Architecture, Lund University School of Architecture.
Member, Lewiston Historical Preservation Review Board

Professional Organizations:
American Philosophical Association
Hegel Society of America (Vice-President, 1988-1990, President, 2000-2002))
Heidegger Conference
Association for Computing Machines
Society for Phenomenological and Existential Philosophy

2022/06/10

Zen - Wikipedia

Zen - Wikipedia

Zen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Zen
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese
Simplified Chinese
Vietnamese name
Vietnamese alphabetThiền
Chữ Hán
Korean name
Hangul
Hanja
Japanese name
Kanji
Kanaぜん

Zen (ChinesepinyinChánJapaneseromanizedzenKoreanromanizedSeonVietnameseThiền) is a school of Mahayana Buddhism that originated in China during the Tang dynasty, known as the Chan School (Chánzong 禪宗), and later developed into various sub-schools and branches. From China, Chán spread south to Vietnam and became Vietnamese Thiền, northeast to Korea to become Seon Buddhism, and east to Japan, becoming Japanese Zen.[1]

The term Zen is derived from the Japanese pronunciation of the Middle Chinese word 禪 (chán), an abbreviation of 禪那 (chánnà), which is a Chinese transliteration of the Sanskrit word ध्यान dhyāna ("meditation").[note 1] 

Zen emphasizes rigorous self-restraintmeditation-practiceinsight into the nature of mind (見性, Ch. jiànxìng, Jp. kensho, "perceiving the true nature") and nature of things (without arrogance or egotism), and the personal expression of this insight in daily life, especially for the benefit of others.[3][4] As such, it de-emphasizes knowledge alone of sutras and doctrine,[5][6] and favors direct understanding through spiritual practice and interaction with an accomplished teacher[7] or Master.

Zen teaching draws from numerous sources of Mahāyāna thought, especially Yogachara, the Tathāgatagarbha sūtras, the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, and the Huayan school, with their emphasis on Buddha-naturetotality, and the Bodhisattva-ideal.[8][9] 

The Prajñāpāramitā literature[10] as well as Madhyamaka thought have also been influential in the shaping of the apophatic and sometimes iconoclastic nature of Zen rhetoric.[11]

Furthermore, the Chan School was also influenced by Taoist philosophy, especially Neo-Daoist thought.[12]

Etymology[edit]

The word Zen is derived from the Japanese pronunciation (kana: ぜん) of the Middle Chinese word 禪 (Middle Chinese: [dʑian]; pinyinChán), which in turn is derived from the Sanskrit word dhyāna (ध्यान),[2] which can be approximately translated as "contemplation" or "absorption" or "meditative state".[13]

The actual Chinese term for the "Zen school" is 禪宗 (pinyinChánzōng), while "Chan" just refers to the practice of meditation itself (Chinese習禪pinyinxíchán) or the study of meditation (Chinese禪學pinyinchánxué) though it is often used as an abbreviated form of Chánzong.[14]

"Zen" is traditionally a proper noun as it usually describes a particular Buddhist sect. In more recent times, the lowercase "zen" is used when discussing the philosophy and was officially added to the Merriam-Webster dictionary in 2018.[15]

Practice[edit]

Dhyāna[edit]

The practice of dhyana or meditation, especially sitting meditation (坐禪,ChinesezuòchánJapanesezazen / ざぜん) is a central part of Zen Buddhism.[16]

Chinese Buddhism[edit]

The practice of Buddhist meditation first entered China through the translations of An Shigao (fl. c. 148–180 CE), and Kumārajīva (334–413 CE), who both translated Dhyāna sutras, which were influential early meditation texts mostly based on the Yogacara (yoga praxis) teachings of the Kashmiri Sarvāstivāda circa 1st–4th centuries CE.[17] Among the most influential early Chinese meditation texts include the Anban Shouyi Jing (安般守意經, Sutra on ānāpānasmṛti), the Zuochan Sanmei Jing (坐禪三昧經,Sutra of sitting dhyāna samādhi) and the Damoduoluo Chan Jing (達摩多羅禪經,[18] Dharmatrata dhyāna sutra).[19] These early Chinese meditation works continued to exert influence on Zen practice well into the modern era. For example, the 18th century Rinzai Zen master Tōrei Enji wrote a commentary on the Damoduoluo Chan Jing and used the Zuochan Sanmei Jing as source in the writing of this commentary. Tōrei believed that the Damoduoluo Chan Jing had been authored by Bodhidharma.[20]

While dhyāna in a strict sense refers to the four dhyānas, in Chinese Buddhismdhyāna may refer to various kinds of meditation techniques and their preparatory practices, which are necessary to practice dhyāna.[21] The five main types of meditation in the Dhyāna sutras are ānāpānasmṛti (mindfulness of breathing); paṭikūlamanasikāra meditation (mindfulness of the impurities of the body); maitrī meditation (loving-kindness); the contemplation on the twelve links of pratītyasamutpāda; and contemplation on the Buddha.[22] According to the modern Chan master Sheng Yen, these practices are termed the "five methods for stilling or pacifying the mind" and serve to focus and purify the mind, and support the development of the stages of dhyana.[23] Chan also shares the practice of the four foundations of mindfulness and the Three Gates of Liberation (emptyness or śūnyatā, signlessness or animitta, and wishlessness or apraṇihita) with early Buddhism and classic Mahayana.[24]

Pointing to the nature of the mind[edit]

According to Charles Luk, in the earliest traditions of Chán, there was no fixed method or formula for teaching meditation, and all instructions were simply heuristic methods, to point to the true nature of the mind, also known as Buddha-nature.[25] According to Luk, this method is referred to as the "Mind Dharma", and exemplified in the story (in the Flower Sermon) of Śākyamuni Buddha holding up a flower silently, and Mahākāśyapa smiling as he understood.[25] A traditional formula of this is, "Chán points directly to the human mind, to enable people to see their true nature and become buddhas."[26]

Observing the mind[edit]

According to John R. McRae the "first explicit statement of the sudden and direct approach that was to become the hallmark of Ch'an religious practice" is associated with the East Mountain School.[27] It is a method named "Maintaining the one without wavering" (shou-i pu i, 守一不移),[27] the one being the nature of mind, which is equated with Buddha-nature.[28] According to Sharf, in this practice, one turns the attention from the objects of experience, to the nature of mind, the perceiving subject itself, which is equated with Buddha-nature.[29] According to McRae, this type of meditation resembles the methods of "virtually all schools of Mahāyāna Buddhism," but differs in that "no preparatory requirements, no moral prerequisites or preliminary exercises are given," and is "without steps or gradations. One concentrates, understands, and is enlightened, all in one undifferentiated practice."[27][note 2] Sharf notes that the notion of "Mind" came to be criticised by radical subitists, and was replaced by "No Mind," to avoid any reifications.[31][note 3]

Meditation manuals[edit]

Early Chan texts also teach forms of meditation that are unique to Mahāyāna Buddhism, for example, the Treatise on the Essentials of Cultivating the Mind, which depicts the teachings of the 7th-century East Mountain school teaches a visualization of a sun disk, similar to that taught in the Sutra of the Contemplation of the Buddha Amitáyus.[33]

Later Chinese Buddhists developed their own meditation manuals and texts, one of the most influential being the works of the Tiantai patriarch, Zhiyi. His works seemed to have exerted some influence on the earliest meditation manuals of the Chán school proper, an early work being the widely imitated and influential Tso-chan-i (Principles of sitting meditation, c. 11th century).[34]

Common contemporary meditation forms[edit]

Mindfulness of breathing[edit]

Venerable Hsuan Hua meditating in the lotus position, Hong Kong, 1953
The 'meditation hall' (Jp. zendō, Ch. chántáng) of Dai Bosatsu Zendo Kongo-Ji

During sitting meditation (坐禅, Ch. zuòchán, Jp. zazenKo. jwaseon), practitioners usually assume a position such as the lotus positionhalf-lotusBurmese, or seiza, often using the dhyāna mudrā. Often, a square or round cushion placed on a padded mat is used to sit on; in some other cases, a chair may be used.

To regulate the mind, Zen students are often directed towards counting breaths. Either both exhalations and inhalations are counted, or one of them only. The count can be up to ten, and then this process is repeated until the mind is calmed.[35] Zen teachers like Omori Sogen teach a series of long and deep exhalations and inhalations as a way to prepare for regular breath meditation.[36] Attention is usually placed on the energy center (dantian) below the navel.[37] Zen teachers often promote diaphragmatic breathing, stating that the breath must come from the lower abdomen (known as hara or tanden in Japanese), and that this part of the body should expand forward slightly as one breathes.[38] Over time the breathing should become smoother, deeper and slower.[39] When the counting becomes an encumbrance, the practice of simply following the natural rhythm of breathing with concentrated attention is recommended.[40][41]

Silent Illumination and shikantaza[edit]

A common form of sitting meditation is called "Silent illumination" (Ch. mòzhào, Jp. mokushō). This practice was traditionally promoted by the Caodong school of Chinese Chan and is associated with Hongzhi Zhengjue (1091—1157) who wrote various works on the practice.[42] This method derives from the Indian Buddhist practice of the union (Skt. yuganaddha) of śamatha and vipaśyanā.[43]

In Hongzhi's practice of "nondual objectless meditation" the mediator strives to be aware of the totality of phenomena instead of focusing on a single object, without any interference, conceptualizinggraspinggoal seeking, or subject-object duality.[44]

This practice is also popular in the major schools of Japanese Zen, but especially Sōtō, where it is more widely known as Shikantaza (Ch. zhǐguǎn dǎzuò, "Just sitting"). Considerable textual, philosophical, and phenomenological justification of the practice can be found throughout the work of the Japanese Sōtō Zen thinker Dōgen, especially in his Shōbōgenzō, for example in the "Principles of Zazen"[45] and the "Universally Recommended Instructions for Zazen".[46] While the Japanese and the Chinese forms are similar, they are distinct approaches.[47]

Hua Tou and Kōan contemplation[edit]

Calligraphy of "Mu" (Hanyu Pinyin) by Torei Enji. It figures in the famous Zhaozhou's dog kōan

During the Tang dynastygōng'àn (Jp. kōan) literature became popular. Literally meaning "public case", they were stories or dialogues, describing teachings and interactions between Zen masters and their students. These anecdotes give a demonstration of the master's insight. Kōan are meant to illustrate the non-conceptual insight (prajña) that the Buddhist teachings point to. During the Sòng dynasty, a new meditation method was popularized by figures such as Dahui, which was called kanhua chan ("observing the phrase" meditation), which referred to contemplation on a single word or phrase (called the huatou, "critical phrase") of a gōng'àn.[48] In Chinese Chan and Korean Seon, this practice of "observing the huatou" (hwadu in Korean) is a widely practiced method.[49] It was taught by the influential Seon master Chinul (1158–1210), and modern Chinese masters like Sheng Yen and Xuyun. Yet, while Dahui famously criticised "silent illumination,"[50][51] he nevertheless "did not completely condemn quiet-sitting; in fact, he seems to have recommended it, at least to his monastic disciples."[50]

In the Japanese Rinzai school, kōan introspection developed its own formalized style, with a standardized curriculum of kōans, which must be studied and "passed" in sequence. This process includes standardized "checking questions" (sassho) and common sets of "capping phrases" (jakugo) or poetry citations that are memorized by students as answers.[52] The Zen student's mastery of a given kōan is presented to the teacher in a private interview (referred to in Japanese as dokusandaisan, or sanzen). While there is no unique answer to a kōan, practitioners are expected to demonstrate their spiritual understanding through their responses. The teacher may approve or disapprove of the answer and guide the student in the right direction. The interaction with a teacher is central in Zen, but makes Zen practice also vulnerable to misunderstanding and exploitation.[53] Kōan-inquiry may be practiced during zazen (sitting meditation)kinhin (walking meditation), and throughout all the activities of daily life. The goal of the practice is often termed kensho (seeing one's true nature), and is to be followed by further practice to attain a natural, effortless, down-to-earth state of being, the "ultimate liberation", "knowing without any kind of defilement".[54]

Kōan practice is particularly emphasized in Rinzai, but it also occurs in other schools or branches of Zen depending on the teaching line.[55]

Nianfo chan[edit]

Nianfo (Jp. nembutsu, from Skt. buddhānusmṛti "recollection of the Buddha") refers to the recitation of the Buddha's name, in most cases the Buddha Amitabha. In Chinese Chan, the Pure Land practice of nianfo based on the phrase Nāmó Āmítuófó (Homage to Amitabha) is a widely practiced form of Zen meditation. This practice was adopted from Pure land Buddhism and syncretized with Chan meditation by Chinese figures such as Yongming YanshouZhongfen Mingben, and Tianru Weize. During the late Ming, the harmonization of Pure land practices with Chan meditation was continued by figures such as Yunqi Zhuhong and Hanshan Deqing.[56]

This practice, as well as its adaptation into the "nembutsu kōan" was also used by the Japanese Ōbaku school of Zen.

Bodhisattva virtues and vows[edit]

Victoria Zen Centre Jukai ceremony, January 2009

Since Zen is a form of Mahayana Buddhism, it is grounded on the schema of the bodhisattva path, which is based on the practice of the "transcendent virtues" or "perfections" (Sktpāramitā, Ch. bōluómì, Jp. baramitsu) as well as the taking of the bodhisattva vows.[57][58] The most widely used list of six virtues is: generositymoral training (incl. five precepts), patient enduranceenergy or effortmeditation (dhyana), wisdom. An important source for these teachings is the Avatamsaka sutra, which also outlines the grounds (bhumis) or levels of the bodhisattva path.[59] The pāramitās are mentioned in early Chan works such as Bodhidharma's Two entrances and four practices and are seen as an important part of gradual cultivation (jianxiu) by later Chan figures like Zongmi.[60][61]

An important element of this practice is the formal and ceremonial taking of refuge in the three jewelsbodhisattva vows and precepts. Various sets of precepts are taken in Zen including the five precepts"ten essential precepts", and the sixteen bodhisattva precepts.[62][63][64][65] This is commonly done in an initiation ritual (Chshòu jièJpJukaiKosugye, "receiving the precepts"), which is also undertaken by lay followers and marks a layperson as a formal Buddhist.[66]

The Chinese Buddhist practice of fasting (zhai), especially during the uposatha days (Ch. zhairi, "days of fasting") can also be an element of Chan training.[67] Chan masters may go on extended absolute fasts, as exemplified by master Hsuan Hua's 35 day fast, which he undertook during the Cuban missile crisis for the generation of merit.[68]

Physical cultivation[edit]

Two grandmasters of the Shaolin Temple of Chinese Chan, Shi DeRu and Shi DeYang

Traditional martial arts, like Japanese archery, other forms of Japanese budō and Chinese martial arts (gōngfu) have also been seen as forms of zen praxis. This tradition goes back to the influential Shaolin Monastery in Henan, which developed the first institutionalized form of gōngfu.[69] By the late Ming, Shaolin gōngfu was very popular and widespread, as evidenced by mentions in various forms of Ming literature (featuring staff wielding fighting monks like Sun Wukong) and historical sources, which also speak of Shaolin's impressive monastic army that rendered military service to the state in return for patronage.[70] These Shaolin practices, which began to develop around the 12th century, were also traditionally seen as a form of Chan Buddhist inner cultivation (today called wuchan, "martial chan"). The Shaolin arts also made use of Taoist physical exercises (taoyin) breathing and energy cultivation (qìgōng) practices.[71] They were seen as therapeutic practices, which improved "internal strength" (neili), health and longevity (lit. "nourishing life" yangsheng), as well as means to spiritual liberation.[72]

The influence of these Taoist practices can be seen in the work of Wang Zuyuan (ca. 1820–after 1882), a scholar and minor bureaucrat who studied at Shaolin. Wang's Illustrated Exposition of Internal Techniques (Neigong tushuo) shows how Shaolin exercises were drawn from Taoist methods like those of the Yi jin jing and Eight pieces of brocade, possibly influenced by the Ming dynasty's spirit of religious syncretism.[73] According to the modern Chan master Sheng Yen, Chinese Buddhism has adopted internal cultivation exercises from the Shaolin tradition as ways to "harmonize the body and develop concentration in the midst of activity." This is because, "techniques for harmonizing the vital energy are powerful assistants to the cultivation of samadhi and spiritual insight."[74] Korean Seon also has developed a similar form of active physical training, termed Sunmudo.

Bows and quivers at Engaku-ji temple, the temple also has a Dōjō for the practice of Kyūdō and the Zen priests practice this art here.[75]

In Japan, the classic combat arts (budō) and zen practice have been in contact since the embrace of Rinzai Zen by the Hōjō clan in the 13th century, who applied zen discipline to their martial practice.[76] One influential figure in this relationship was the Rinzai priest Takuan Sōhō who was well known for his writings on zen and budō addressed to the samurai class (especially his The Unfettered Mind) .[77] The Rinzai school also adopted certain Taoist energy practices. They were introduced by Hakuin (1686–1769) who learned various techniques from a hermit named Hakuyu who helped Hakuin cure his "Zen sickness" (a condition of physical and mental exhaustion).[78] These energetic practices, known as Naikan, are based on focusing the mind and one's vital energy (ki) on the tanden (a spot slightly below the navel).[79][80]

The arts[edit]

Hakuin EkakuHotei in a Boat, Yale University Art Gallery
The kare-sansui (dry landscape) zen garden at Ryōan-ji

Certain arts such as paintingcalligraphypoetrygardeningflower arrangementtea ceremony and others have also been used as part of zen training and practice. Classical Chinese arts like brush painting and calligraphy were used by Chan monk painters such as Guanxiu and Muqi Fachang to communicate their spiritual understanding in unique ways to their students.[81] Zen paintings are sometimes termed zenga in Japanese.[82] Hakuin is one Japanese Zen master who was known to create a large corpus of unique sumi-e (ink and wash paintings) and Japanese calligraphy to communicate zen in a visual way. His work and that of his disciples were widely influential in Japanese Zen.[83] Another example of Zen arts can be seen in the short lived Fuke sect of Japanese Zen, which practiced a unique form of "blowing zen" (suizen) by playing the shakuhachi bamboo flute.

Intensive group practice[edit]

Intensive group meditation may be practiced by serious Zen practitioners. In the Japanese language, this practice is called sesshin. While the daily routine may require monks to meditate for several hours each day, during the intensive period they devote themselves almost exclusively to zen practice. The numerous 30–50 minute long sitting meditation (zazen) periods are interwoven with rest breaks, ritualized formal meals (Jp. oryoki), and short periods of work (Jp. samu) that are to be performed with the same state of mindfulness. In modern Buddhist practice in Japan, Taiwan, and the West, lay students often attend these intensive practice sessions or retreats. These are held at many Zen centers or temples.

Chanting and rituals[edit]

Chanting the Buddhist Scriptures, by Taiwanese painter Li Mei-shu
Gifu Daibutsu and altar at Shōhō-ji
Monks chanting the "Heart Sutra" in Sōji-ji Temple in YokohamaJapan

Most Zen monasteries, temples and centers perform various rituals, services and ceremonies (such as initiation ceremonies and funerals), which are always accompanied by the chanting of verses, poems or sutras.[84] There are also ceremonies that are specifically for the purpose of sutra recitation (Ch. niansong, Jp. nenju) itself.[85]

Zen schools may have an official sutra book that collects these writings (in Japanese, these are called kyohon).[84] Practitioners may chant major Mahayana sutras such as the Heart Sutra and chapter 25 of the Lotus Sutra (often called the "Avalokiteśvara Sutra"). Dhāraṇīs and Zen poems may also be part of a Zen temple liturgy, including texts like the Song of the Precious Mirror Samadhi, the Sandokai, the Nīlakaṇṭha Dhāraṇī, and the Uṣṇīṣa Vijaya Dhāraṇī Sūtra.

The butsudan is the altar in a monastery, temple or a lay person's home, where offerings are made to the images of the Buddha, bodhisattvas and deceased family members and ancestors. Rituals usually center on major Buddhas or bodhisattvas like Avalokiteśvara (see Guanyin), Kṣitigarbha and Manjushri.

An important element in Zen ritual practice is the performance of ritual prostrations (Jp. raihai) or bows.[86]

One popular form of ritual in Japanese Zen is Mizuko kuyō (Water child) ceremonies, which are performed for those who have had a miscarriagestillbirth, or abortion. These ceremonies are also performed in American Zen Buddhism.[87]

A widely practiced ritual in Chinese Chan is variously called the "Rite for releasing the hungry ghosts" or the "Releasing flaming mouth". The ritual might date back to the Tang dynasty, and was very popular during the Ming and Qing dynasties, when Chinese Esoteric Buddhist practices became diffused throughout Chinese Buddhism.[88] The Chinese holiday of the Ghost Festival might also be celebrated with similar rituals for the dead. These ghost rituals are a source of contention in modern Chinese Chan, and masters such as Sheng Yen criticize the practice for not having "any basis in Buddhist teachings".[89]

Another important type of ritual practiced in Zen are various repentance or confession rituals (Jp. zange) that were widely practiced in all forms of Chinese Mahayana Buddhism. One popular Chan text on this is known as the Emperor Liang Repentance Ritual, composed by Chan master Baozhi.[90] Dogen also wrote a treatise on repentance, the Shushogi.[91] Other rituals could include rites dealing with local deities (kami in Japan), and ceremonies on Buddhist holidays such as Buddha's Birthday.[92]

Funerals are also an important ritual and are a common point of contact between Zen monastics and the laity. Statistics published by the Sōtō school state that 80 percent of Sōtō laymen visit their temple only for reasons having to do with funerals and death. Seventeen percent visit for spiritual reasons and 3 percent visit a Zen priest at a time of personal trouble or crisis.[93]

Esoteric practices[edit]

Depending on the tradition, esoteric methods such as mantra and dhāraṇī are also used for different purposes including meditation practice, protection from evil, invoking great compassion, invoking the power of certain bodhisattvas, and are chanted during ceremonies and rituals.[94][95] In the Kwan Um school of Zen for example, a mantra of Guanyin ("Kwanseum Bosal") is used during sitting meditation.[96] The Heart Sutra Mantra is also another mantra that is used in Zen during various rituals.[97] Another example is the Mantra of Light (kōmyō shingon), which is common in Japanese Soto Zen and was derived from the Shingon sect.[98]

In Chinese Chan, the usage of esoteric mantras in Zen goes back to the Tang dynasty. There is evidence that Chan Buddhists adopted practices from Chinese Esoteric Buddhism in findings from Dunhuang.[99] According to Henrik Sørensen, several successors of Shenxiu (such as Jingxian and Yixing) were also students of the Zhenyan (Mantra) school.[100] Influential esoteric dhāraṇī, such as the Uṣṇīṣa Vijaya Dhāraṇī Sūtra and the Nīlakaṇṭha Dhāraṇī, also begin to be cited in the literature of the Baotang school during the Tang dynasty.[101] Many mantras have been preserved since the Tang period and continue to be practiced in modern Chan monasteries. One common example is the Śūraṅgama Mantra,which has been heavily propagated by various prominent Chan monks, such as Venerable Hsuan Hua who founded the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas.[102] Another example of esoteric rituals practiced by the Chan school is the Mengshan Rite for Feeding Hungry Ghosts, which is practiced by both monks and laypeople during the Hungry Ghost Festival.[103][104][105] Chan repentance rituals, such as the Liberation Rite of Water and Land, also involve various esoteric aspects, including the invocation of esoteric deities such as the Five Wisdom Buddhas and the Ten Wisdom Kings.[106][107]

There is documentation that monks living at Shaolin temple during the eighth century performed esoteric practices there such as mantra and dharani, and that these also influenced Korean Seon Buddhism.[108] During the Joseon dynasty, the Seon school was not only the dominant tradition in Korea, but it was also highly inclusive and ecumenical in its doctrine and practices, and this included Esoteric Buddhist lore and rituals (that appear in Seon literature from the 15th century onwards). According to Sørensen, the writings of several Seon masters (such as Hyujeong) reveal they were esoteric adepts.[109]

In Japanese Zen, the use of esoteric practices within Zen is sometimes termed "mixed Zen" (kenshū zen 兼修禪), and the figure of Keizan Jōkin (1264–1325) is seen as introducing this into the Soto school.[110][111] The Japanese founder of the Rinzai school, Myōan Eisai (1141–1215) was also a well known practitioner of esoteric Buddhism and wrote various works on the subject.[112]

According to William Bodiford, a very common dhāraṇī in Japanese Zen is the Śūraṅgama spell (Ryōgon shu 楞嚴呪; T. 944A), which is repeatedly chanted during summer training retreats as well as at "every important monastic ceremony throughout the year" in Zen monasteries.[113] Some Zen temples also perform esoteric rituals, such as the homa ritual, which is performed at the Soto temple of Eigen-ji (in Saitama prefecture). As Bodiford writes, "perhaps the most notable examples of this phenomenon is the ambrosia gate (kanro mon 甘露門) ritual performed at every Sōtō Zen temple", which is associated feeding hungry ghostsancestor memorial rites and the ghost festival.[114] Bodiford also notes that formal Zen rituals of Dharma transmission often involve esoteric initiations.

Doctrine[edit]

Dharma talk by Seon nun Daehaeng Kun Sunim, Hanmaum Seon Center, South Korea

Zen teachings can be likened to "the finger pointing at the moon".[115] Zen teachings point to the moon, awakening, "a realization of the unimpeded interpenetration of the dharmadhatu".[116] But the Zen-tradition also warns against taking its teachings, the pointing finger, to be this insight itself.[117][118][119][120]

Buddhist Mahayana influences[edit]

Though Zen-narrative states that it is a "special transmission outside scriptures", which "did not stand upon words",[121] Zen does have a rich doctrinal background that is firmly grounded in the Buddhist tradition.[122] It was thoroughly influenced by Mahayana teachings on the bodhisattva path, Chinese Madhyamaka (Sānlùn), Yogacara (Wéishí), Prajñaparamita, the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, and other Buddha nature texts.[123][124][125] The influence of Madhyamaka and Prajñaparamita can be discerned in the stress on non-conceptual wisdom (prajña) and the apophatic language of Zen literature.[123][126][127][note 4]

The philosophy of the Huayan school also had an influence on Chinese Chan. One example is the Huayan doctrine of the interpenetration of phenomena, which also makes use of native Chinese philosophical concepts such as principle (li) and phenomena (shi).[128] The Huayan theory of the Fourfold Dharmadhatu also influenced the Five Ranks of Dongshan Liangjie (806–869), the founder of the Caodong Chan lineage.[129]

Buddha-nature and subitism[edit]

Central in the doctrinal development of Chan Buddhism was the notion of Buddha-nature, the idea that the awakened mind of a Buddha is already present in each sentient being[130] (pen chueh in Chinese Buddhism, hongaku in Japanese Zen).[131] This Buddha-nature was initially equated with the nature of mind, while later Chan-teachings evaded any reification by rejecting any positivist terminology.[132][note 3] The idea of the immanent character of the Buddha-nature took shape in a characteristic emphasis on direct insight into, and expression of this Buddha-nature.[133][134] It led to a reinterpretation and Sinification of Indian meditation terminology, and an emphasis on subitism, the idea that the Buddhist teachings and practices are comprehended and expressed "sudden,"[135] c.q. "in one glance," "uncovered all together," or "together, completely, simultaneously," in contrast to gradualism, "successively or being uncovered one after the other."[136] The emphasis on subitism led to the idea that "enlightenment occurs in a single transformation that is both total and instantaneous"[137] (Ch. shih-chueh).[138]

While the attribution of gradualism, attributed by Shenhui to a concurring faction, was a rhetoric device, it led to a conceptual dominance in the Chan-tradition of subitism, in which any charge of gradualism was to be avoided.[133][note 5] This "rhetorical purity" was hard to reconcile conceptually with the actual practice of meditation,[140][133] and left little place in Zen texts for the description of actual meditation practices, apparently rejecting any form of practice.[141][133][132][note 6] Instead, those texts directly pointed to and expressed this awakened nature, giving way to the paradoxically nature of encounter dialogue and koans.[133][132]

Caodong/Sōtō/Tào Động[edit]

Japanese Buddhist monk from the Sōtō Zen sect

Sōtō is the Japanese line of the Chinese Caodong school, which was founded during the Tang Dynasty by Dongshan Liangjie. The Sōtō-school has de-emphasized kōans since Gentō Sokuchū (circa 1800), and instead emphasized on shikantaza.[143] Dogen, the founder of Soto in Japan, emphasized that practice and awakening cannot be separated. By practicing shikantaza, attainment and Buddhahood are already being expressed.[144] For Dogen, zazen, or shikantaza, is the essence of Buddhist practice.[145] Gradual cultivation was also recognized by Dongshan Liangjie.[146]

A lineage also exists in Vietnam, founded by 17th-century Chan master Thông Giác Đạo Nam. In Vietnamese, the school is known as "Tào Động."[147]

Linji/Rinzai[edit]

The Rinzai school is the Japanese lineage of the Chinese Linji school, which was founded during the Tang dynasty by Linji Yixuan. The Rinzai school emphasizes kensho, insight into one's true nature.[148] This is followed by so-called post-satori practice, further practice to attain Buddhahood.[149][150][151]

Other Zen-teachers have also expressed sudden insight followed by gradual cultivation. Jinul, a 12th-century Korean Seon master, followed Zongmi, and also emphasized that insight into our true nature is sudden, but is to be followed by practice to ripen the insight and attain full buddhahood. This is also the standpoint of the contemporary Sanbo Kyodan, according to whom kenshō is at the start of the path to full enlightenment.[152]

To attain this primary insight and to deepen it, zazen and kōan-study is deemed essential. This trajectory of initial insight followed by a gradual deepening and ripening is expressed by Linji in his Three Mysterious Gates and Hakuin Ekaku's Four Ways of Knowing.[153] Another example of depiction of stages on the path are the Ten Bulls, which detail the steps on the path.

Scripture[edit]

Archaeologist Aurel Stein's 1907 view of Mogao Cave 16, with altar and sutra scrolls
Tablets of the Tripiṭaka Koreana, an early edition of the Chinese Buddhist canon, in Haeinsa TempleSouth Korea

The role of the scripture[edit]

Zen is deeply rooted in the teachings and doctrines of Mahāyāna Buddhism.[154] Classic Zen texts, such as the Platform sutra, contain numerous references to Buddhist canonical sutras.[155] Unsui (Zen-monks), "are expected to become familiar with the classics of the Zen canon".[156] A review of the early historical documents and literature of early Zen masters clearly reveals that they were well versed in numerous Mahāyāna sūtras,[5][note 7][note 8][5][note 9] as well as Mahayana Buddhist philosophy such as Madhyamaka.[123]

Nevertheless, Zen is often pictured as anti-intellectual.[154] This picture of Zen emerged during the Song Dynasty (960–1297), when Chán became the dominant form of Buddhism in China, and gained great popularity among the educated and literary classes of Chinese society. The use of koans, which are highly stylized literary texts, reflects this popularity among the higher classes.[133] The famous saying "do not establish words and letters", attributed in this period to Bodhidharma,[159]

...was taken not as a denial of the recorded words of the Buddha or the doctrinal elaborations by learned monks, but as a warning to those who had become confused about the relationship between Buddhist teaching as a guide to the truth and mistook it for the truth itself.[160]

What the Zen tradition emphasizes is that the enlightenment of the Buddha came not through conceptualization but rather through direct insight.[161] But direct insight has to be supported by study and understanding (hori[162]) of the Buddhist teachings and texts.[163][note 10] Intellectual understanding without practice is called yako-zen"wild fox Zen", but "one who has only experience without intellectual understanding is a zen temma, 'Zen devil'".[165]

Grounding Chán in scripture[edit]

The early Buddhist schools in China were each based on a specific sutra. At the beginning of the Tang Dynasty, by the time of the Fifth Patriarch Hongren (601–674), the Zen school became established as a separate school of Buddhism.[166] It had to develop a doctrinal tradition of its own to ascertain its position[133] and to ground its teachings in a specific sutra. Various sutras were used for this even before the time of Hongren: the Śrīmālādevī Sūtra (Huike),[167] Awakening of Faith (Daoxin),[167] the Lankavatara Sutra (East Mountain School),[167][5] the Diamond Sutra[168] (Shenhui),[167] and the Platform Sutra.[5][168] None of these sutras were decisive though, since the school drew inspiration from a variety of sources.[169] Subsequently, the Zen tradition produced a rich corpus of written literature, which has become a part of its practice and teaching. Other influential sutras are the Vimalakirti Sutra,[170][171][172] Avatamsaka Sutra,[173] the Shurangama Sutra,[174] and the Mahaparinirvana Sutra.[175]

Literature[edit]

The Zen-tradition developed a rich textual tradition, based on the interpretation of the Buddhist teachings and the recorded sayings of Zen-masters. Important texts are the Platform Sutra (8th century), attributed to Huineng ;[133] the Chán transmission records, teng-lu,[176] such as The Records of the Transmission of the Lamp (Ching-te ch'uan-teng lu), compiled by Tao-yün and published in 1004;[177] the "yü-lü" genre[178] consisting of the recorded sayings of the masters, and the encounter dialogues; the koan-collections, such as the "Gateless Gate" and the "Blue Cliff Record".

Organization and institutions[edit]

Religion is not only an individual matter, but "also a collective endeavour".[179] Though individual experience[180] and the iconoclastic picture of Zen[181] are emphasised in the Western world, the Zen-tradition is maintained and transferred by a high degree of institutionalisation and hierarchy.[182][183] In Japan, modernity has led to criticism of the formal system and the commencement of lay-oriented Zen-schools such as the Sanbo Kyodan[184] and the Ningen Zen Kyodan.[185] How to organize the continuity of the Zen-tradition in the West, constraining charismatic authority and the derailment it may bring on the one hand,[186][187][53] and maintaining the legitimacy and authority by limiting the number of authorized teachers on the other hand,[179] is a challenge for the developing Zen-communities in the West.

Narratives[edit]

The Chán of the Tang Dynasty, especially that of Mazu and Linji with its emphasis on "shock techniques", in retrospect was seen as a golden age of Chán.[133] It became dominant during the Song Dynasty, when Chán was the dominant form of Buddhism in China, due to support from the Imperial Court.[133] This picture has gained great popularity in the West in the 20th century, especially due to the influence of D.T. Suzuki,[188] and further popularized by Hakuun Yasutani and the Sanbo Kyodan.[180] This picture has been challenged, and complemented, since the 1970s by modern scientific research on Zen.[133][189][190][191][192][193]

Modern scientific research on the history of Zen discerns three main narratives concerning Zen, its history and its teachings: Traditional Zen Narrative (TZN),[194][195] Buddhist Modernism (BM),[188] Historical and Cultural Criticism (HCC).[194] An external narrative is Nondualism, which claims Zen to be a token of a universal nondualist essence of religions.[196][197]

History[edit]

Chinese Chán[edit]

Huike Offering His Arm to BodhidharmaSesshū Tōyō (1496).

Zen (ChineseChán 禪) Buddhism, as we know it today, is the result of a long history, with many changes and contingent factors. Each period had different types of Zen, some of which remained influential, while others vanished.[133] The history of Chán in China is divided into various periods by different scholars, who generally distinguish a classical phase and a post-classical period.

Ferguson distinguishes three periods from the 5th century into the 13th century:

  1. The Legendary period, from Bodhidharma in the late 5th century to the An Lushan Rebellion around 765 CE, in the middle of the Tang Dynasty. Little written information is left from this period.[198] It is the time of the Six Patriarchs, including Bodhidharma and Huineng, and the legendary "split" between the Northern and the Southern School of Chán.[133]
  2. The Classical period, from the end of the An Lushan Rebellion around 765 CE to the beginning of the Song Dynasty around 950 CE.[198] This is the time of the great masters of Chán, such as Mazu Daoyi and Linji Yixuan, and the creation of the yü-lü genre, the recordings of the sayings and teachings of these great masters.
  3. The Literary period, from around 950 to 1250,[198] which spans the era of the Song Dynasty (960–1279). In this time the gongan-collections were compiled, collections of sayings and deeds by the famous masters, appended with poetry and commentary. This genre reflects the influence of literati on the development of Chán. This period idealized the previous period as the "golden age" of Chán, producing the literature in which the spontaneity of the celebrated masters was portrayed.

Although McRae has reservations about the division of Chán-history in phases or periods,[199] he nevertheless distinguishes four phases in the history of Chán:[200]

  1. Proto-Chán (c. 500–600) (Southern and Northern Dynasties (420 to 589) and Sui Dynasty (589–618 CE)). In this phase, Chán developed in multiple locations in northern China. It was based on the practice of dhyana and is connected to the figures of Bodhidharma and Huike. Its principal text is the Two Entrances and Four Practices, attributed to Bodhidharma.[201]
  2. Early Chán (c. 600–900) (Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE)). In this phase Chán took its first clear contours. Prime figures are the fifth patriarch Daman Hongren (601–674), his dharma-heir Yuquan Shenxiu (606?–706), the sixth patriarch Huineng (638–713), protagonist of the quintessential Platform Sutra, and Shenhui (670–762), whose propaganda elevated Huineng to the status of sixth patriarch. Prime factions are the Northern School, Southern School and Oxhead school.[202]
  3. Middle Chán (c. 750–1000) (from An Lushan Rebellion (755–763) till Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period (907–960/979)). In this phase developed the well-known Chán of the iconoclastic zen-masters. Prime figures are Mazu Daoyi (709–788), Shitou Xiqian (710–790), Linji Yixuan (died 867), and Xuefeng Yicun (822–908). Prime factions are the Hongzhou school and the Hubei faction[note 11] An important text is the Anthology of the Patriarchal Hall (952), which gives a great amount of "encounter-stories", and the well-known genealogy of the Chán-school.[205]
  4. Song Dynasty Chán (c. 950–1300). In this phase Chán took its definitive shape including the picture of the "golden age" of the Chán of the Tang-Dynasty, and the use of koans for individual study and meditation. Prime figures are Dahui Zonggao (1089–1163) who introduced the Hua Tou practice and Hongzhi Zhengjue (1091–1157) who emphasized Shikantaza. Prime factions are the Linji school and the Caodong school. The classic koan-collections, such as the Blue Cliff Record were assembled in this period,[206] which reflect the influence of the "literati" on the development of Chán.[207][159] In this phase Chán is transported to Japan, and exerts a great influence on Korean Seon via Jinul.

Neither Ferguson nor McRae give a periodisation for Chinese Chán following the Song-dynasty, though McRae mentions "at least a post-classical phase or perhaps multiple phases".[208] According to David McMahan:

During the Ming dynasty (1368–1644) and the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912) Chán was part of a larger, syncretic Buddhist culture. A final phase can be distinguished from the 19th century onward, when western imperialism had a growing influence in South-East Asia, including China. A side effect of this imperial influence was the modernisation of Asian religions, adapting them to western ideas and rhetorical strategies.[188]

Origins[edit]

Before the arrival of the "founder" of Chan, Bodhidharma, various Buddhist masters of meditation or dhyana (i.e. Chan) had taught in China. These figures also brought with them various meditation texts, called the Dhyāna sutras (Chinese: 禪經 chan jing). These early meditation works mainly drew from the teachings of the Sarvāstivāda school of Kashmir.[17] These texts include the translations of the Parthian An Shigao (147–168 CE) like the Anban shouyi jing (Sanskrit: Ānāpānasmṛti-sūtra), the numerous translations of Kumārajīva (334–413 CE, such as the Zuochan sanmei jing (Sutra of Sitting Dhyāna samādhi) and those of Buddhabhadra (like the Damoduoluo chan jing, Dharmatrāta Dhyāna sūtra).[209][210][211] These early meditation texts laid the groundwork for the practices of Chan Buddhism (Zen) and the works of the Tiantai meditation master Zhiyi.[212]

The translation work of Kumārajīva (especially his Prajñāpāramitā translations and his Vimalakirti Sutra), Buddhabhadra (Avatamsaka Sutra) and Gunabhadra (Lankāvatāra sūtra) were also key formative influences on the origins of Chan. These Buddhist texts are some of the key sources for later Chan masters.[213] Indeed, in some early Chan texts (like the Masters of the Lankāvatāra), it is Gunabhadra, not Bodhidharma, which is seen as the first patriarch who transmits the Chan lineage (here seen as synonymous with the Lankāvatāra tradition) from India.[214] The meditation works of the fourth Tiantai patriarch Zhiyi, such as his monumental Mohezhiguan, were also important sources on later Chan meditation manuals, like the Tso-chan-i.[34]

A further possible influence on the origin of Chan Buddhism is Taoism. Some of the earliest Chinese Buddhists were influenced by Daoist thought and terminology and this has led some scholars to see a Taoist influence on Chan.[215][216][217][218] In his history of Zen, Heinrich Dumoulin argued that Chan Buddhist developed out of the confluence of Indian Mahayana and Chinese Taoism.[219] Two Chinese disciples of Kumārajīva, Sengzhao and Tao Sheng were influenced by Taoist works like the Laozi and Zhuangzi.[218] These Sanlun figures in turn had an influence on some early Chan masters.[220]

Proto-Chán[edit]

Bodhidharma, stone carving in Shaolin Temple.

Proto-Chán (c. 500–600) encompasses the Southern and Northern Dynasties period (420 to 589) and Sui Dynasty (589–618 CE). In this phase, Chán developed in multiple locations in northern China. It was based on the practice of dhyana and is connected to the figures of Bodhidharma, Seng-fu and Huike, though there is little actual historical information about these early figures and most legendary stories about their life come from later, mostly Tang sources. What is known is that they were considered Mahayana meditation masters.[221][133]

An important text from this period is the Two Entrances and Four Practices, found in Dunhuang, and attributed to Bodhidharma.[201] Later sources mention that these figures taught using the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra though there is no direct evidence of this from the earliest sources.[222][223] According to John McRae, the earliest Chan sources on these masters show considerable influence from Madhyamaka thought, while the influence from the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra is actually much less pronounced and it is questionable if it was there at all with regards to the earliest figures like Bodhidharma and Huike.[221]

Early Chán[edit]

Hongren

Early Chán refers to early Tang Dynasty (618–750) Chán. The fifth patriarch Daman Hongren (601–674), and his dharma-heir Yuquan Shenxiu (606?–706) were influential in founding the first Chan institution in Chinese history, known as the "East Mountain school" (Dongshan famen).[224] Hongren taught the practice of shou-hsin, "maintaining (guarding) the mind," in which "an awareness of True Mind or Buddha-nature within" is maintained, "[exhorting] the practitioners to unremittingly apply themselves to the practice of meditation."[225]

Shenxiu was the most influential and charismatic student of Hongren, he was even invited to the Imperial Court by Empress Wu.[226] Shenxiu also became the target of much criticism by Shenhui (670–762), for his "gradualist" teachings. Shenhui instead promoted the "sudden" teachings of his teacher Huineng (638–713) as well as what later became a very influential Chán classic called the Platform Sutra.[227] Shenhui's propaganda campaign eventually succeeded in elevating Huineng to the status of sixth patriarch of Chinese Chán.[228][133] The sudden vs. gradual debate that developed in this era came to define later forms of Chan Buddhism.[229]

Middle Chán[edit]

Mazu

The Middle Chán (c. 750–1000) period runs from the An Lushan Rebellion (755–763) to the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period (907–960/979). This phase saw the development new schools of Chan. The most important of these schools is the Hongzhou school of Mazu Daoyi (709–788), to which also belong ShitouBaizhang, and Huangbo. This school is sometimes seen as the archetypal expression of Chán, with its emphasis on the personal expression of insight, and its rejection of positive statements, as well as the importance it placed on spontaneous and unconventional "questions and answers during an encounter" (linji wenda) between master and disciple.[124][230]

However, modern scholars have seen much of the literature that presents these "iconoclastic" encounters as being later revisions during the Song era, and instead see the Hongzhou masters as not being very radical, instead promoting pretty conservative ideas, such as keeping precepts, accumulating good karma and practicing meditation.[230] The school did produce innovative teachings and perspectives such as Mazu's views that "this mind is Buddha" and that "ordinary mind is the way", which were also critiqued by later figures, such as the influential Guifeng Zongmi (780–841), for failing to differentiate between ignorance and enlightenment.[231]

By the end of the late Tang, the Hongzhou school was gradually superseded by various regional traditions, which became known as the Five Houses of ChánShitou Xiqian (710–790) is regarded as the Patriarch of Cáodòng (Jp. Sōtō) school, while Linji Yixuan (died 867) is regarded as the founder of Línjì (Jp. Rinzai) school. Both of these traditions were quite influential both in and outside of China. Another influential Chán master of the late Tang was Xuefeng Yicun. During the later Tang, the practice of the "encounter dialogue" reached its full maturity. These formal dialogues between master and disciple may have used absurd, illogical and iconoclastic language as well as non-verbal forms of communication such as the drawing of circles and physical gestures like shouting and hitting.[232]

It was also common to write fictional encounter dialogues and attribute them to previous Chán figures.[232] An important text from this period is the Anthology of the Patriarchal Hall (952), which gives many "encounter-stories", as well as establishing a genealogy of the Chán school.[205] The Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution in 845 was devastating for metropolitan Chan, but the Chan school of Mazu survived, and took a leading role in the Chan of the later Tang.[233]

Song Dynasty Chán[edit]

Dahui introduced the method of kan huatou, or "inspecting the critical phrase", of a kōan story. This method was called the "Chan of kōan introspection" (Kanhua Chan).[234]

During Song Dynasty Chán (c. 950–1300), Chán Buddhism took its definitive shape, through the development of the use of koans for individual study and meditation. It was also during the Song that Chan literati developed their own idealized history of Chan, particularly promoting the idea of a Tang "golden age" of Chan.[235] During the Song, Chán became the largest sect of Chinese Buddhism and had strong ties to the imperial government, which led to the development of a highly organized system of temple rank and administration.[236]

The dominant form of Song Chán was the Linji school due to support from the scholar-official class and the imperial court.[237] 

This school developed the study of gong'an ("public case") literature, which depicted stories of master-student encounters that were seen as demonstrations of the awakened mind. Most of these stories depicted the idealized encounters of past Chan masters, particularly from the Tang era, and show the influence of the Chinese literati class.[238][235][207][159] The most influential of these works are the Blue Cliff Record, the Book of Equanimity and The Gateless Gate.[206]

During the 12th century, a rivalry emerged between the Linji and the Caodong schools for the support of the scholar-official class. Hongzhi Zhengjue (1091–1157) of the Caodong school emphasized silent illumination or serene reflection (mòzhào) as a means for solitary practice, which could be undertaken by lay-followers. The Linji school's Dahui Zonggao (1089–1163) meanwhile, introduced k'an-hua chan ("observing the word-head" chan), which involved meditation on the crucial phrase or "punch line" (hua-tou) of a gong'an.[239][240]

The Song also saw the syncretism of Chán and Pure Land Buddhism by Yongming Yanshou (904–975), which would later become extremely influential.[241] Yongming also echoed Zongmi's work in indicating that the values of Taoism and Confucianism could also be embraced and integrated into Buddhism. Chán also influenced Neo-Confucianism as well as certain forms of Taoism, such as the Quanzhen school.[242][243]

During the Song, Chán was also transported to Japan by figures like Eisai and exerted a great influence on Korean Seon via Jinul.

Post-Classical Chán[edit]

During the Ming Dynasty, the Chán school was so dominant that all Chinese monks were affiliated with either the Linji school or the Caodong school.[244]

Some scholars see the post-classical phase as being an "age of syncretism."[245] The post-classical period saw the increasing popularity of the dual practice of Chán and Pure Land Buddhism (known as nianfo Chan), as seen in the teachings of Zhongfeng Mingben (1263–1323) and the great reformer Hanshan Deqing (1546–1623). This became a widespread phenomenon and in time much of the distinction between them was lost, with many monasteries teaching both Chán meditation and the Pure Land practice of nianfo.[246][247][56]

The Ming dynasty also saw the efforts of figures such as Yunqi Zhuhong (1535–1615) and Daguan Zhenke (1543–1603) to revive and reconcile Chan Buddhism with the practice of Buddhist scriptural study and writing.[245]

In the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, Chán was "reinvented", by the "revival of beating and shouting practices" by Miyun Yuanwu (1566–1642), and the publication of the Wudeng yantong ("The strict transmission of the five Chan schools") by Feiyin Tongrong's (1593–1662), a dharma heir of Miyun Yuanwu. The book placed self-proclaimed Chan monks without proper Dharma transmission in the category of "lineage unknown" (sifa weixiang), thereby excluding several prominent Caodong monks.[248]

Modern era[edit]

Xuyun was one of the most influential Chán Buddhists of the 19th and 20th centuries.[249]

After further centuries of decline during the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912), Chán activity was revived again in the 19th and 20th centuries by a flurry of modernist activity. This period saw the rise of worldly Chan activism, what is sometimes called Humanistic Buddhism (or more literally "Buddhism for human life", rensheng fojiao), promoted by figures like Jing'an (1851–1912), Yuanying (1878–1953), Taixu (1890–1947), Xuyun (1840–1959) and Yinshun (1906–2005). These figures promoted social activism to address issues such as poverty and social injustice, as well as participation in political movements. They also promoted modern science and scholarship, including the use of the methods of modern critical scholarship to study the history of Chan.[250]

Many Chán teachers today trace their lineage back to Xuyun, including Sheng-yen and Hsuan Hua, who have propagated Chán in the West where it has grown steadily through the 20th and 21st centuries. Chán Buddhism was repressed in China during the 1960s in the Cultural Revolution, but in the subsequent reform and opening up period in the 1970s, a revival of Chinese Buddhism has been taking place on the mainland, while Buddhism has a significant following in Taiwan and Hong Kong as well as among Overseas Chinese.

Spread outside of China[edit]

Vietnamese Thiền[edit]

Thích Nhất Hạnh leading a namo avalokiteshvaraya chanting session with monastics from his Order of Interbeing, Germany 2010

Chan was introduced to Vietnam during the early Chinese occupation periods (111 BCE to 939 CE) as Thiền. During the  (1009–1225) and Trần (1225 to 1400) dynasties, Thiền rose to prominence among the elites and the royal court and a new native tradition was founded, the Trúc Lâm ("Bamboo Grove") school, which also contained Confucian and Taoist influences. In the 17th century, the Linji school was brought to Vietnam as the Lâm Tế, which also mixed Chan and Pure landLâm Tế remains the largest monastic order in the country today.[251]

Modern Vietnamese Thiền is influenced by Buddhist modernism.[252] Important figures include Thiền master Thích Thanh Từ (1924–), the activist and popularizer Thích Nhất Hạnh (1926–2022) and the philosopher Thích Thiên-Ân. Vietnamese Thiền is eclectic and inclusive, bringing in many practices such as breath meditationnianfomantraTheravada influences, chanting, sutra recitation and engaged Buddhism activism.

Korean Seon[edit]

Jogyesa is the headquarters of the Jogye Order. The temple was first established in 1395, at the dawn of the Joseon Dynasty.

Seon (선) was gradually transmitted into Korea during the late Silla period (7th through 9th centuries) as Korean monks began to travel to China to learn the newly developing Chan tradition of Mazu Daoyi and returned home to establish the Chan school. They established the initial Seon schools of Korea, which were known as the "nine mountain schools" (九山, gusan).

Seon received its most significant impetus and consolidation from the Goryeo monk Jinul (1158–1210), who is considered the most influential figure in the formation of the mature Seon school. He founded the Jogye Order, which remains the largest Seon tradition in Korea today. Jinul founded the Songgwangsa temple as a new center of Seon study and practice. Jinul also wrote extensive works on Seon, developing a comprehensive system of thought and practice. From Dahui Zonggao, Jinul adopted the hwadu method, which remains the main meditation form taught in Seon today.

Buddhism was mostly suppressed during the strictly Confucian Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910), and the number of monasteries and clergy sharply declined. The period of Japanese occupation also brought numerous modernist ideas and changes to Korean Seon. Some monks began to adopt the Japanese practice of marrying and having families, while others such as Yongseong, worked to resist the Japanese occupation. Today, the largest Seon school, the Jogye, enforces celibacy, while the second largest, the Taego Order, allows for married priests. Important modernist figures that influenced contemporary Seon include Seongcheol and Gyeongheo. Seon has also been transmitted to West, with new traditions such as the Kwan Um School of Zen.

Japanese Zen[edit]

Sojiji Temple, of the Soto Zen school, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Japan

Zen was not introduced as a separate school until the 12th century, when Myōan Eisai traveled to China and returned to establish a Linji lineage, which eventually perished.[253] Decades later, Nanpo Shōmyō (南浦紹明) (1235–1308) also studied Linji teachings in China before founding the Japanese Otokan lineage, the most influential and only surviving lineage of Rinzai in Japan.[253] In 1215, Dōgen, a younger contemporary of Eisai's, journeyed to China himself, where he became a disciple of the Caodong master Tiantong Rujing. After his return, Dōgen established the Sōtō school, the Japanese branch of Caodong.

The three traditional schools of Zen in contemporary Japan are the Sōtō (曹洞), Rinzai (臨済), and Ōbaku (黃檗). Of these, Sōtō is the largest, and Ōbaku the smallest, with Rinzai in the middle. These schools are further divided into subschools by head temple, with two head temples for Sōtō (Sōji-ji and Eihei-ji, with Sōji-ji having a much larger network), fourteen head temples for Rinzai, and one head temple (Manpuku-ji) for Ōbaku, for a total of 17 head temples. The Rinzai head temples, which are most numerous, have substantial overlap with the traditional Five Mountain System, and include Myoshin-jiNanzen-jiTenryū-jiDaitoku-ji, and Tofuku-ji, among others.

Besides these traditional organizations, there are modern Zen organizations that have especially attracted Western lay followers, namely the Sanbo Kyodan and the FAS Society.

Zen in the West[edit]

Although it is difficult to trace the precise moment when the West first became aware of Zen as a distinct form of Buddhism, the visit of Soyen Shaku, a Japanese Zen monk, to Chicago during the World Parliament of Religions in 1893 is often pointed to as an event that enhanced the profile of Zen in the Western world. It was during the late 1950s and the early 1960s that the number of Westerners other than the descendants of Asian immigrants who were pursuing a serious interest in Zen began to reach a significant level. Japanese Zen has gained the greatest popularity in the West. The various books on Zen by Reginald Horace BlythAlan WattsPhilip Kapleau and D. T. Suzuki[citation needed] published between 1950 and 1975, contributed to this growing interest in Zen in the West, as did the interest on the part of beat poets such as Jack KerouacAllen Ginsberg and Gary Snyder.[254] In 1958, the literary magazine Chicago Review played a significant role in introducing Zen to the American literary community[255] when it published a special issue[256] on Zen featuring the aforementioned beat poets and works in translation. Erich Fromm quotes D. T. Suzuki in his 1960 book Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism.[257]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Dumoulin writes in his preface to Zen. A History. Part One: India and China: "Zen (Chin. Ch'an, an abbreviation of ch'an-na, which transliterates the Sanskrit Dhyāna (Devanagari: ध्यान) or its Pali cognate Jhāna (Sanskrit; Pāli झान) , terms meaning "meditation") is the name of a Mahāyāna Buddhist school of meditation originating in China. It is characterized by the practice of meditation in the lotus position (Jpn., zazen; Chin., tso-ch'an and the use of the koan (Chin., kung-an) as well as by the enlightenment experience of satori[2]
  2. ^ It first appears in a Chinese text named the Ju-tao an-hsin yao-fang-pien fa-men (JTFM, Instructions on essential expedients for calming the mind and accessing the path), itself a part of the Leng Ch'ieh Shih TZu Chi (Records of the Masters of the Lankavatara).[27] The Records of the Masters of the Lankavatara is associated with the early Chan tradition known as the "East Mountain School" and has been dated to around 713.[30]
  3. Jump up to:a b Compare Mazu's "Mind is Buddha" versus "No mind, no Buddha": "When Ch'an Master Fa-ch'ang of Ta-mei Mountain went to see the Patriarch for the first time, he asked, "What is Buddha?"
    The Patriarch replied, "Mind is Buddha." [On hearing this] Fa-ch'ang had great awakening.
    Later he went to live on Ta-mei mountain. When the Patriarch heard that he was residing on the mountain, he sent one of his monks to go there and ask Fa-ch'ang, "What did the Venerable obtain when he saw Ma-tsu, so that he has come to live on this mountain?"
    Fach'ang said, "Ma-tsu told me that mind is Buddha; so I came to live here."
    The monk said, "Ma-tsu's teaching has changed recently."
    Fa-ch'ang asked, "What is the difference?"
    The monk said, "Nowadays he also says, 'Neither mind nor Buddha."'
    Fa-ch'ang said, "That old man still hasn't stopped confusing people. You can have 'neither mind nor Buddha,' I only care for 'mind is Buddha."'
    The monk returned to the Patriarch and reported what has happened. "The plum is ripe." said the Patriarch."[32]
  4. ^ According to Kalupahana, the influence of Yofacara is stronger in the ts'ao-tung school and the tradition of silent meditation, while the influence of Madhyamaka is clear in the koan-tradition and its stress on insight and the use of paradoxical language.[127]
  5. ^ Nevertheless, the Platform Sutra attempts to reconcile Shenhui's rhetorics with the actual Zen practices, just like later Chan writers like Zong-mi did.[139]
  6. ^ Nevertheless, the classical texts of Chan which seem to reject practice, also contain references to practice.[132] Chieng Cheng: "...in the writings that are associated with [Ma-tsu's] school there is a marked tendency towards elocutionary purity, where all forms of verbal formulation are eschewed, including any instructions about practice. However,the fact that practical advice about day-to-day cultivation is something that is usually lacking in the records of the masters of this tradition does not necessary means that it was not given by them. In the records of Ma-tsu's Hung-chou school there are instances with very clear "gradual" ting [...] In looking for possible reasons for the apparent lack of expedient means in the extant records of the teachings of the Hung-chou school, it might be useful to remind ourselves of the audience to whom the teaching was directed. As the records make it clear, most of the teachings were received by monks who were familiar with the basic Buddhist practices and (ideally) had good command of the doctrinal teachings [...] It seems that the basic practices of worship, study, precepts, and meditation were all too familiar to be regarded as somethingthat was necessary to be recorded."[142]
  7. ^ Sasaki's translation of the Linji yulu contains an extensive biography of 62 pages, listing influential Chinese Buddhist texts that played a role in Song dynasty Chán.[157]
  8. ^ Albert Low: "It is evident that the masters were well versed in the sutras. Zen master Tokusan, for example, knew the Diamond Sutra well and, before meeting with his own Zen master, lectured upon it extensively; the founder of the Zen sect, Bodhidharma, the very one who preached selfrealization outside the scriptures, nevertheless advocated the Lankavatara Sutra; Zen master Hogen knew the Avatamsaka Sutra well, and koan twenty-six in the Mumonkan, in which Hogen is involved, comes out of the teaching of that sutra. Other koans, too, make reference directly or indirectly to the sutras. The autobiography of yet another Zen master, Hui Neng, subsequently became the Platform Sutra, one of those sutras so condemned by those who reject intellectual and sutra studies"[158]
  9. ^ Poceski: "Direct references to specific scriptures are relatively rare in the records of Mazu and his disciples, but that does not mean that they rejected the canon or repudiated its authority. On the contrary, one of the striking features of their records is that they are filled with scriptural quotations and allusions, even though the full extent of their usage of canonical sources is not immediately obvious and its discernment requires familiarity with Buddhist literature." See source for a full-length example from "one of Mazu's sermons", in which can be found references to the Vimalakīrti Scripture, the Huayan Scripture, the Mahāsamnipata-sūtra, the Foshuo Foming Scripture 佛說佛名經, the Lankāvatāra scripture and the Faju jing.[5]
  10. ^ Hakuin goes as far as to state that the buddhat path even starts with study: "[A] person [...] must first gain wide-ranging knowledge, accumulate a treasure-store of wisdom by studying all the Buddhist sutras and commentaries, reading through all the classic works Buddhist and nonBuddhist and perusing the writings of the wise men of other traditions. It is for that reason the vow states "the Dharma teachings are infinite, I vow to study them all.""[164]
  11. ^ McRae gives no further information on this "Hubei faction". It may be the continuation of Shenxiu's "Northern School". See Nadeau 2012 p.89.[203] Hebei was also the place where the Linji branch of chán arose.[204]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 159–169.
  2. Jump up to:a b Dumoulin 2005a, p. xvii.
  3. ^ Yoshizawa 2009, p. 41.
  4. ^ Sekida 1989.
  5. Jump up to:a b c d e f Poceski n.d.
  6. ^ Borup 2008, p. 8.
  7. ^ Yampolski 2003a, p. 3.
  8. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, p. 48.
  9. ^ Lievens 1981, p. 52–53.
  10. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 41–45.
  11. ^ Andre van der Braak (2011), Self Overcoming Without a Self, p.117
  12. ^ Wang 2017, p. 79.
  13. ^ Kasulis 2003, p. 24.
  14. ^ Wang 2017, p. 58.
  15. ^ Zimmer, Ben (September 28, 2018). "Zen and the Art of Scrabble Dictionary Maintenance"Wall Street Journal – via www.wsj.com.
  16. ^ Schlütter 2008, p. 169.
  17. Jump up to:a b Deleanu, Florin (1992); Mindfulness of Breathing in the Dhyāna Sūtras. Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan (TICOJ) 37, 42–57.
  18. ^ Jr, Robert E. Buswell; Jr, Donald S. Lopez (2013-11-24). The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691157863.
  19. ^ Wang 2017, p. 59.
  20. ^ Mohr, Michel. 2006. Imagining Indian Zen: Tōrei's Commentary on the Ta-Mo-to-Lo Ch'an Ching and the Rediscovery of Early Meditation Techniques During the Tokugawa Era. In Zen Classics: Formative Texts in the History of Zen Buddhism, edited by Steven Heine, and Dale S. Wright. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–246.
  21. ^ Fischer-Schreiber, Ehrhard & Diener 2008, p. 103.
  22. ^ Ven. Dr. Yuanci, A Study of the Meditation Methods in the DESM and Other Early Chinese Texts, The Buddhist Academy of China.
  23. ^ Zhang & Stevenson 2002, pp. 27–28.
  24. ^ Zhang & Stevenson 2002, pp. 29–30.
  25. Jump up to:a b Luk, Charles. The Secrets of Chinese Meditation. 1964. p. 44
  26. ^ Nan, Huai-Chin. Basic Buddhism: Exploring Buddhism and Zen. 1997. p. 92
  27. Jump up to:a b c d McRae 1986, p. 143.
  28. ^ Sharf 2014, p. 939, 951.
  29. ^ Sharf 2014, p. 939.
  30. ^ Robert E. Buswell Jr. (2017). The Formation of Ch'an Ideology in China and Korea: The Vajrasamadhi-Sutra, a Buddhist Apocryphon. Princeton University Press, p. 141.
  31. ^ Sharf 2014, p. 945-950.
  32. ^ Cheng Chien Bhikshu 1992.
  33. ^ McRae 2004, p. 39.
  34. Jump up to:a b Gregory, Peter N. (1986). "Ch 'ang-lu Tsung-tse and Zen Meditation". Traditions of Meditation in Chinese Buddhism. University of Hawaii Press.
  35. ^ Katsuki Sekida, Zen Training: Methods and Philosophy, Shambhala Publications, 2005, p. 60.
  36. ^ Omori Sogen, Introduction To Zen Training, Routledge, 2012, p. 49.
  37. ^ Sheng, Yen. "Fundamentals of Meditation".
  38. ^ Katsuki Sekida, Zen Training: Methods and Philosophy, Shambhala Publications, 2005, p. 61.
  39. ^ Taizan Maezumi, Bernie Glassman (editors) On Zen Practice: Body, Breath, and Mind, pp. 41–42.
  40. ^ Katsuki Sekida, Zen Training: Methods and Philosophy, Shambhala Publications, 2005, p. 64.
  41. ^ Kapleau, P. The Three Pillars of Zen, 2013, p. 12.
  42. ^ Taigen Dan Leighton. Cultivating the Empty Field: The Silent Illumination of Zen Master Hongzhi, Tuttle, 2000, p. 17
  43. ^ Sheng Yen, John Hurrell Crook, Shengyan, Illuminating Silence: The Practice of Chinese Zen, Watkins Publishing,, 2002, p. 93.
  44. ^ Taigen Dan Leighton. Cultivating the Empty Field: The Silent Illumination of Zen Master Hongzhi, Tuttle, 2000, pp. 1–2.
  45. ^ Sōtō Zen Text Project. "Zazengi translation"Stanford University. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
  46. ^ Sōtō Zen Text Project. "Fukan Zazengi". Stanford University. Archived from the original on 2008-04-29. Retrieved 2008-03-26.
  47. ^ Zhang & Stevenson 2002, p. 152.
  48. ^ Blyth 1966.
  49. ^ Buswell, Robert E. (1991). Tracing Back the Radiance: Chinul's Korean Way of Zen (Classics in East Asian Buddhism). University of Hawaii Press. pp. 68–69. ISBN 0824814274.
  50. Jump up to:a b Schlütter 2008, p. 116.
  51. ^ McRae 2003, p. 125.
  52. ^ Bodiford 2006, p. 94.
  53. Jump up to:a b Lachs 2006.
  54. ^ Low 2006, p. 37-39.
  55. ^ Loori 2006, p. [page needed].
  56. Jump up to:a b Wang 2017, p. 35.
  57. ^ Aitken, Robert, The Practice of Perfection: The Paramitas from a Zen Buddhist Perspective, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2012.
  58. ^ Shohaku Okumura 2012, p. 15.
  59. ^ Sheng Yen, Shengyan, Dharma Drum: The Life and Heart of Chan Practice, Shambhala Publications, 2006.
  60. ^ McRae 2004, p. 32.
  61. ^ Jeffrey Lyle Broughton, Zongmi on Chan, p. 171.
  62. ^ "The ten essential precepts"San Francisco Zen Center.
  63. ^ Kenji Matsuo, A History of Japanese Buddhism, Global Oriental, 2007, p. 32.
  64. ^ Baroni, Helen J. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Zen Buddhism, p. 93.
  65. ^ Borup 2008, p. 247.
  66. ^ Ling, Haicheng (2004). Buddhism in China. Chinese Intercontinental Press, p. 184.
  67. ^ Zhang & Stevenson 2002, p. 56.
  68. ^ Asian American Religious Cultures [2 volumes], edited by Jonathan H. X. Lee, Fumitaka Matsuoka, Edmond Yee, Ronald Y. Nakasone, ABC-CLIO, 2015, p. 470.
  69. ^ Christensen, Matthew B. A Geek in China: Discovering the Land of Alibaba, Bullet Trains and Dim Sum. Tuttle Publishing. p. 40. ISBN 1462918360.
  70. ^ Shahar 2008, pp. 55, 80.
  71. ^ Shahar 2008, pp. 2, 80, 144.
  72. ^ Shahar 2008, p. 147.
  73. ^ Shahar 2008, pp. 138, 173.
  74. ^ Zhang & Stevenson 2002, p. 34–35.
  75. ^ Hideharu Onuma, Dan DeProspero, Jackie DeProspero (1993) "Kyudo: The Essence and Practice of Japanese Archery," p. ix, Kodansha International.
  76. ^ Mann, Jeffrey, When Buddhists Attack: The Curious Relationship Between Zen and the Martial Arts, p. 61.
  77. ^ Takuan Soho, The Unfettered Mind: Writings from a Zen Master to a Master Swordsman, p. xv.
  78. ^ Waddell, Norman (ed. & trans.), Hakuin's Precious Mirror Cave: A Zen Miscellany, 2009, p. 83.
  79. ^ Julian Daizan Skinner (2017), "Practical Zen: Meditation and Beyond," pp. 203–204. Singing Dragon
  80. ^ Hakuin Ekaku (2010), "Wild Ivy: The Spiritual Autobiography of Zen Master Hakuin", p. 150. Shambhala Publications
  81. ^ Addiss & Loori, p. 1.
  82. ^ Addiss & Loori, p. 4.
  83. ^ Addiss & Loori, p. 15.
  84. Jump up to:a b Shohaku Okumura 2012, p. 1.
  85. ^ Heine & Wright 2008, p. 127.
  86. ^ Kapleau, Phillip (1989a). The Three Pillars of Zen: Teaching, Practice and Enlightenment. NY: Anchor Books, p. 21.
  87. ^ Wilson, Jeff, Mourning the Unborn Dead: A Buddhist Ritual Comes to America
  88. ^ Jiang Wu, Enlightenment in Dispute: The Reinvention of Chan Buddhism in Seventeenth-Century China, Oxford University Press, USA, 2011, pp. 145–147.
  89. ^ Sheng Yen, Shengyan, Orthodox Chinese Buddhism: A Contemporary Chan Master's Answers to Common Questions, North Atlantic Books, 2007, p. 76.
  90. ^ Repentance Ritual of the Emperor of Liang: A complete translation of Repentance Dharma of Kindness and Compassion in the Bodhimanda, Buddhist Text Translation Society, 2017.
  91. ^ Dumoulin, Heinrich , Zen Enlightenment: Origins and Meaning, Shambhala Publications, 2007, p. 136.
  92. ^ Heine & Wright 2008, pp. 124–125.
  93. ^ Bodiford 1992.
  94. ^ Baroni, Helen J. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Zen Buddhism, The Rosen Publishing Group, 2002, p. 215.
  95. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, p. 926.
  96. ^ "How to Practice Sitting Meditation"Kwan Um School of Zen.
  97. ^ Borup 2008, pp. 218, 241.
  98. ^ Unno, Mark, Shingon Refractions: Myoe and the Mantra of Light, Ch. 1.
  99. ^ Meinert 2015, pp. 277–278.
  100. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, pp. 298–299.
  101. ^ Meinert 2015, p. 300.
  102. ^ Keyworth, George A. (2016). "Zen and the "Hero's March Spell" of the Shoulengyan jing"The Eastern Buddhist47 (1): 81–120. ISSN 0012-8708JSTOR 26799795.
  103. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, p. [page needed].
  104. ^ Orzech, Charles D. (November 1989). "Seeing Chen-Yen Buddhism: Traditional Scholarship and the Vajrayāna in China"History of Religions29 (2): 87–114. doi:10.1086/463182ISSN 0018-2710S2CID 162235701.
  105. ^ Lye, Hun Yeow. Feeding Ghosts: A Study of the Yuqie Yankou Rite (Thesis). University of Virginia. doi:10.18130/v3s82z.
  106. ^ Bloom, Phillip Emmanual (2013). Descent of the Deities: The Water-Land Retreat and the Transformation of the Visual Culture of Song-Dynasty (960-1279) Buddhism (Thesis). Harvard University. Retrieved 2021-08-28 – via ProQuest.
  107. ^ Hong, Tsai-Hsia (2007). The Water-Land Dharma Function Platform ritual and the Great Compassion Repentance ritual (Thesis). University of the West. Retrieved 2021-08-28 – via ProQuest.
  108. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, p. 589.
  109. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, pp. 617, 635–639.
  110. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, pp. 924–925.
  111. ^ D. T. Suzuki discusses what he calls "the Shingon elements of Chinese Zen" in his Manual of Zen Buddhism (1960, 21) and "the Chinese Shingon element" in The Training of the Zen Buddhist Monk (1965, 80).
  112. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, pp. 827–829.
  113. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, p. 927.
  114. ^ Orzech, Sørensen & Payne 2011, p. 931.
  115. ^ Suzuki 1997, p. 154.
  116. ^ Buswell 1993, p. 245.
  117. ^ Abe & Heine 1996, p. 19.
  118. ^ "Pointing at the moon". Khandro.net. Retrieved 2013-02-04.
  119. ^ "Lankavatara Sutra". Translated by Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki. Lirs.ru. 2008-06-16. chapter LXXXII, p.192, p.223 (224). Retrieved 2013-02-04.
  120. ^ The Surangama Sutra (PDF), translated by Luk, Charles, Buddha Dharma Education Association, pp. 59–60, archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2013
  121. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 85–94.
  122. ^ Lai 1985, p. 17-18.
  123. Jump up to:a b c Cheng 1981.
  124. Jump up to:a b Lai 1985.
  125. ^ Newland 2001, p. 137.
  126. ^ "Madhyamaka Buddhist Philosophy | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy".
  127. Jump up to:a b Kalupahana 1994, p. 228-236.
  128. ^ Gregory, Peter N. Tsung-Mi and the Sinification of Buddhism, University of Hawaii Press, 2002, p. 7.
  129. ^ Payne, Richard Karl; Leighton, Taigen Dan, eds. (2006). Discourse and Ideology in Medieval Japanese Buddhism. Critical Studies in Buddhism. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415359177.
  130. ^ Buswell 1991, p. 324.
  131. ^ Schlütter 2008, p. 3.
  132. Jump up to:a b c d Sharf 2014.
  133. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o McRae 2003, p. [page needed].
  134. ^ Buswell 1991.
  135. ^ McRae 1991.
  136. ^ Stein 1991, p. 43.
  137. ^ McRae 2004, pp. 57, 63.
  138. ^ Lachs 2012, p. 4.
  139. ^ McRae 2004, p. 60.
  140. ^ Buswell 1991, p. 328-330.
  141. ^ Buswell 1991, p. 335-336.
  142. ^ Cheng Chien Bhikshu 1992, p. 24-25.
  143. ^ Heine & Wright 2000, p. 245.
  144. ^ Tomoaki 2003, p. 280.
  145. ^ Tomoaki 2003, p. 284.
  146. ^ "Soto Zen". The Soto Zen Buddhist Association. Retrieved February 19, 2013.
  147. ^ "Thiền Sư THỦY NGUYỆT hiệu THÔNG GIÁC"Thiền Viện Thường Chiếu (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 2019-08-17.
  148. ^ Dumoulin 2005b, p. 380.
  149. ^ Sekida 1996.
  150. ^ Cleary 2010, p. xii–xiii, quoting Hakuin.
  151. ^ Yen 1996, p. 54).
  152. ^ Kapleau 1989.
  153. ^ Low 2006.
  154. Jump up to:a b Low 2000.
  155. ^ Yampolski 1967, p. 112–114.
  156. ^ Sharf 1995c, p. 427.
  157. ^ Sasaki 2009.
  158. ^ Low 2000, p. 4.
  159. Jump up to:a b c Welter 2000.
  160. ^ Welter 2000, p. 94.
  161. ^ Yanagida 2009, p. 62.
  162. ^ Hori 2000, p. 296.
  163. ^ Hori 2000, p. 295-297.
  164. ^ Yoshizawa 2009, p. 42.
  165. ^ Hori 2000, p. 297.
  166. ^ Ferguson 2000, p. 17.
  167. Jump up to:a b c d Lai 2003, p. 17.
  168. Jump up to:a b McRae 2003, p. 62.
  169. ^ Lai 2003, p. 18.
  170. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 49–51.
  171. ^ Snelling 1987, p. 157-158.
  172. ^ Low 2000, p. 83-112.
  173. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 45–49.
  174. ^ Low 2000, p. 135-154.
  175. ^ Lai 2003.
  176. ^ Welter 2000, p. 82-86.
  177. ^ Welter 2000, p. 83.
  178. ^ Chappell 1993, p. 192.
  179. Jump up to:a b Koné 2000.
  180. Jump up to:a b Sharf 1995b.
  181. ^ McRae 2002.
  182. ^ Borup 2008, p. [page needed].
  183. ^ Hori 1994.
  184. ^ Sharf 1995c.
  185. ^ "Start your Zen meditation practice with an authentic Zen Master of Ningen Zen Kyodan". Ningen Zen Meditation Center. Archived from the original on 2013-03-16. Retrieved 2013-02-04.
  186. ^ Bell 2002.
  187. ^ Lachs 1999.
  188. Jump up to:a b c McMahan 2008.
  189. ^ Sharf 1993.
  190. ^ Sharf 1995a.
  191. ^ McRae 2005.
  192. ^ Heine 2007.
  193. ^ Jorgensen 1991.
  194. Jump up to:a b Heine 2008, p. 6.
  195. ^ "Andre van de Braak, ZEN SPIRITUALITY IN A SECULAR AGE. Charles Taylor and Zen Buddhism in the West". Retrieved 2013-02-04.
  196. ^ Wolfe 2009, p. iii.
  197. ^ Katz 2007.
  198. Jump up to:a b c Ferguson 2000, p. 3.
  199. ^ McRae 2003, p. 11-15.
  200. ^ McRae 2003, p. 11-21.
  201. Jump up to:a b McRae 2003, p. 13, 15–17.
  202. ^ McRae 2003, p. 13, 17–18.
  203. ^ Nadeau 2012, p. 89.
  204. ^ Yanagida 2009, p. 63.
  205. Jump up to:a b McRae 2003, p. 13, 18–19.
  206. Jump up to:a b McRae 2003, p. 13, 19–21.
  207. Jump up to:a b Gimello 1994.
  208. ^ McRae 2003, p. 13.
  209. ^ Phra Kiattisak Ponampon Kittipanyo (2014), Mission, Meditation and Miracles: An Shigao in Chinese Tradition, MA thesis, Dunedin, NZ: University of Otago.
  210. ^ Yuanci. "A Study of the Meditation Methods in the DESM and Other Early Chinese Texts" (PDF). The Buddhist Academy of China. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-05-08.
  211. ^ Chan, Yiu-wing (2013). An English translation of the Dharmatrta-Dhyna Sutra (PDF) (PhD). University of Hongkong. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-22.
  212. ^ Thich Hang Dat. A REAPPRAISAL OF KUMĀRAJĪVA'S ROLE IN MEDIEVAL CHINESE BUDDHISM: AN EXAMINATION OF KUMĀRAJĪVA'S TRANSLATION TEXT ON "THE ESSENTIAL EXPLANATION OF THE METHOD OF DHYANA" (PDF) (Thesis). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-18. Retrieved 2015-05-18.
  213. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 50–55, 66, 68–69.
  214. ^ van Schaik, Sam (2019). The Spirit of Zen, p. 55. Yale University Press.
  215. ^ Verstappen 2004, p. 5.
  216. ^ Fowler 2005, p. 79.
  217. ^ Grigg 1994.
  218. Jump up to:a b Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 70 & 74.
  219. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. xx, 65, 68, 148, 167–168, 190.
  220. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, pp. 71–77.
  221. Jump up to:a b McRae 1986, pp. 19–29.
  222. ^ Yampolski 1967, p. 29, note 87.
  223. ^ Wang 2017, p. 4.
  224. ^ Wang 2017, p. 5.
  225. ^ Cheng Chien Bhikshu 1992, p. 9.
  226. ^ Wang 2017, p. 6.
  227. ^ Wang 2017, p. 7-9.
  228. ^ Dumoulin 2005a, p. [page needed].
  229. ^ Ray, Gary L. The Northern Ch'an School And Sudden Versus Gradual Enlightenment Debates In China And Tibet, Institute Of Buddhist Studies Berkeley.
  230. Jump up to:a b Wang 2017, p. 13.
  231. ^ Wang 2017, p. 14.
  232. Jump up to:a b Wang 2017, p. 20.
  233. ^ Yampolski 2003a, p. 15.
  234. ^ Yu, Chun-Fang, 1979, Ta-hui Tsung-kao and Kung-an Ch'an, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, v. 6, p. 211-235
  235. Jump up to:a b McRae 2003, pp. 119–120.
  236. ^ Yampolski 2003b, p. 266.
  237. ^ Welter 2006.
  238. ^ Wang 2017, p. 23, 27.
  239. ^ Schlütter 2008.
  240. ^ Wang 2017, p. 29.
  241. ^ Heng-Ching Shih (1987). Yung-Ming's Syncretism of Pure Land and Chan, The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 10 (1), p. 117
  242. ^ Wang 2017, p. 31.
  243. ^ Littlejohn, Ronnie. "Daoist Philosophy"The Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyISSN 2161-0002.
  244. ^ Stanley Weinstein, "The Schools of Chinese Buddhism," in Kitagawa & Cummings (eds.), Buddhism and Asian History (New York: Macmillan 1987) pp. 257–265, 264.
  245. Jump up to:a b Wang 2017, p. 34.
  246. ^ Sharf 2002.
  247. ^ Keown, Damien. A Dictionary of Buddhism. 2003. p. 104
  248. ^ Meng-Tat Chia 2011.
  249. ^ Buswell, Robert JrLopez, Donald S. Jr., eds. (2013). "Xuyun", in Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 1017. ISBN 9780691157863.
  250. ^ Wang 2017, p. 38-39.
  251. ^ Powers, John, A Concise Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Oneworld Publications, 2013 , p.238
  252. ^ Borup, Jørn; Qvortrup Fibiger, Marianne; Eastspirit: Transnational Spirituality and Religious Circulation in East and West, BRILL, 2017, p. 168.
  253. Jump up to:a b "Rinzai-Obaku Zen – What is Zen? – History"Zen.rinnou.net. Retrieved 2013-02-04.
  254. ^ Aitken 1994.
  255. ^ Josephine Nock-Hee Park, Apparitions of Asia: modernist form and Asian American poetics, p. 63
  256. ^ Watts, Alan W. (1958). "Beat Zen, Square Zen, and Zen". Chicago Review. Vol. 12, no. 2. pp. 3–11. JSTOR 25293448.
  257. ^ Fromm, Erich (1960). Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism. George Allen & Unwin. ISBN 0-04-616029-9.

Sources[edit]

Printed sources

Further reading[edit]

Modern popular works
  • D.T. SuzukiEssays in Zen Buddhism, First Series (1927), Second Series (1933), Third Series (1934)
  • R. H. BlythZen and Zen Classics, 5 volumes (1960–1970; reprints of works from 1942 into the 1960s)
  • Alan WattsThe Way of Zen (1957)
  • Lu K'uan Yu (Charles Luk), Ch'an and Zen Teachings, 3 vols (1960, 1971, 1974), The Transmission of the Mind: Outside the Teaching (1974)
  • Paul Reps & Nyogen SenzakiZen Flesh, Zen Bones (1957)
  • Philip KapleauThe Three Pillars of Zen (1966)
  • Shunryu SuzukiZen Mind, Beginner's Mind (1970)
  • Katsuki Sekida, Zen Training: Methods & Philosophy (1975)
Classic historiography
  • Dumoulin, Heinrich (2005), Zen Buddhism: A History. Volume 1: India and China. World Wisdom Books.ISBN 978-0-941532-89-1
  • Dumoulin, Heinrich (2005), Zen Buddhism: A History. Volume 2: Japan. World Wisdom Books.ISBN 978-0-941532-90-7
Critical historiography

Overview

Formation of Chán in Tang & Song China

  • McRae, John (2004), The Sutra of Queen Śrīmālā of the Lion's Roar and the Vimalakīrti Sutra (PDF), Berkeley, CA: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, ISBN 1886439311, archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-09-12
  • Welter, Albert (2000), "Mahakasyapa's smile. Silent Transmission and the Kung-an (Koan) Tradition", in Steven Heine; Dale S. Wright (eds.), The Koan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Schlütter, Morten (2008), How Zen became Zen. The Dispute over Enlightenment and the Formation of Chan Buddhism in Song-Dynasty China, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-3508-8

Japan

Modern times

  • Victoria, Brian Daizen (2006), Zen at war (Second ed.), Lanham e.a.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Orientalism and East-West interchange

Contemporary practice

External links[edit]



===