2023/12/07

What Is A Slut?


What Is A Slut?

As/Is
1,157,290 views  Jun 14, 2015
Gaby Dunn investigates whether she is a slut or not.

Check out more awesome BuzzFeedYellow videos!
http://bit.ly/YTbuzzfeedyellow
====

Slut

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slut (archaic: slattern) is an English-language term for a person, usually a woman, who is sexually promiscuous or considered to have loose sexual morals.[1][2] It is usually used as an insultsexual slur or offensive term of disparagement.[2][3] It originally meant "a dirty, slovenly woman",[2] and is rarely used to refer to men, generally requiring clarification by use of the terms male slut or man whore.[4][5]

The word was used as early as the 1300s (in the form of an adjective, sluttish, referring to a man's untidy appearance) by Geoffrey Chaucer in The Canterbury Tales.[6] From the late 20th century, there have been attempts to reclaim the word, exemplified by various SlutWalk parades, and some individuals embrace the title as a source of pride.[7][better source needed][8]

Etymology, common usages and synonyms

The common denotative meanings of slut are 'sexually promiscuous woman',[1] or 'immoral or dissolute woman; prostitute'.[2] These definitions identify a slut as a woman of low character—a person who lacks the ability or chooses not to exercise a power of discernment to order her affairs. Similar terms used for men are cadrakemale slutman whorehimbowomanizerstud, and player.[4][5] The adjective slutty carries a similar connotation, but can be applied both to people and to clothing and accessories, such as Halloween costumes.[9]

Although the ultimate origin of the word slut is unknown, it first appeared in Middle English in 1402 as slutte (AHD), with the meaning of 'dirty, untidy, or slovenly woman'.[10] Even earlier, Geoffrey Chaucer used the word sluttish (c. 1386) to describe a slovenly man;[11][6][12][13] however, later uses appear almost exclusively associated with women.[10] The modern sense of 'sexually promiscuous woman' dates to at least 1450.[10] The word was originally used around 1450 in the late Middle English language. It was used to describe a woman as dirty, or refer to her as a prostitute, harlot, or immoral woman. The word slut also took a similar form around the same era in the Norwegian language as slutr 'sleet', also known as an impure liquor.[14]

Another early meaning was 'kitchen maid or drudge' (c. 1450), a meaning retained as late as the 18th century, when hard knots of dough found in bread were referred to as slut's pennies.[10] An example of this use is Samuel Pepys's diary description of his servant girl as "an admirable slut" who "pleases us mightily, doing more service than both the others and deserves wages better" (February 1664).[15] Slut and slutishness occur in Shakespeare's comedy As You Like It, written in 1599 or 1600.[16] In the nineteenth century, the word was used as a euphemism in place of bitch in the sense of a female dog.[10][17]

Today, the term slut has a pervasive presence in popular culture and pornography, but is almost exclusively used to describe women. An exact male equivalent of the term does not exist. The lack of a comparably popular term for men highlights the double standard in societal expectations (gender roles) between males and females, as negative terms for sexually promiscuous males are rare.[5][18] Out of the 220 terms ascribed to females and 20 terms ascribed to males,[4] all female terms are disapproving while some male terms signal approval or praise; these include studplayer, and man whore.[5] While colloquial terms such as male slut or man whore are used in popular culture, they are usually used in a joking manner.[19] There are, however, other terms that can be used to criticize men for their sexuality. For example, a man's masculinity can be undermined by using terms such as weaksissypussy, or whipped. They also dismiss female-on-male abuse, and are just as powerful and representative of modern societal prejudices. Hence, women may find it difficult to hold high positions at their workplace, whereas men may be mocked for choosing to be stay-at-home fathers. Although a sexually active and professionally successful woman might be seen as a threat, a man without those qualities is often regarded with suspicion and questions about his sexuality.[20]

The word slut is commonly interchanged with the words trampwhorehoenympho, and hooker. All of these words have a very negative connotation. Additional meanings and connotations of the term are negative and identify a slut as being a slovenly and ugly person, for example, as in these quotations from OED2:

Hearne, 1715: "Nor was she a Woman of any Beauty, but was a nasty Slut."

Shenstone, 1765: "She's ugly, she's old, ... And a slut, and a scold."

The attack on the character of the person is perhaps best brought together by the highly suggestive and related compound word, slut's-hole, meaning a place or receptacle for rubbish;[21] the associated quote provides a sense of this original meaning:

Saturday Review (London), 1862: "There are a good many slut-holes in London to rake out."

Slut can also be used as verb to denote behavior characterized as that of a slut. For example, in the 1972 play, That Championship Season, by Jason Miller, contained the exchange:

COACH: I don't care what that hot pantsed bitch said. Go home and kick her ass all over the kitchen. All that slutting around...
GEORGE. She's not a slut...
COACH. She was punished for slutting, wasn't she? She was punished and so were you![22]

Alternative usages and culture

A group of people walk in a demonstration (a SlutWalk) in New York City; many of them carry signs with slogans relating to and condemning sexual assault and discussing public perceptions thereof
There have been various efforts to both criticise and reclaim use of the word slut.

General

The word slut is used as a slang term in the BDSMpolyamorous, and gay and bisexual communities.[23][page needed] A parallel exists between the female term slut and the term gay for males. Unlike women, who are usually policed for being sexually promiscuous, men are often criticized for not being masculine or dominant enough, thus questioning their heterosexuality. Unlike women, who are expected to be sexually chaste, men are expected to be sexually active, thus having more sexual freedom.[19] Although slut is rarely used to describe heterosexual men, it is commonly used among gay males. When discussing sexual activity, slut is used to shame gay men for taking sexual risks, such as unprotected sex or having multiple partners. However, if used in a humorous way, slut may also favor sexual freedom and mark the shift from traditional gender roles in gay men.[24]

With BDSM, polyamorous, and non-monogamous people, in usage taken from the book The Ethical Slut, the term has been used as an expression of choice to openly have multiple partners, and revel in that choice: "a slut is a person of any gender who has the courage to lead life according to the radical proposition that sex is nice and pleasure is good for you."[23]: 4  A slut is a person who has taken control of their sexuality and has sex with whomever they choose, regardless of religious or social pressures or conventions to conform to a strait-laced monogamous lifestyle committed to one partner for life.

The term has been reappropriated to express the rejection of the concept that government, society, or religion may judge or control one's personal liberties, and the right to control one's own sexuality. In April 2013, Emily Lindin, founder of the UnSlut Project, created a blog to share her stories on sexual bullying to “provide some perspective to girls who currently feel trapped and ashamed". The blog now consists of entries from members of all ages, ethnicities, and genders. The film, UnSlut: A Documentary Film, coincides with the project and is screened across the country.[25]

The double standard associated with slut-labeling is part of the modern day rape culture. Rape culture is "the casual debasement [of women] ... that has become such a part of our lives that it is often invisible."[26] Though people in society are vocally anti-rape, there is an insinuation that certain types of rape are acceptable or that women are voluntarily taking actions that justify sexual advances. "For example, women continue to be blamed if they are raped because of how they are dressed, the assumption that women purportedly lie about being raped remains popular, and certain women, such as married women or women of colour, are still considered 'unrapeable'”.[27] The word slut and the double standard it contains reflects the gender norms and gender biases[26] that are prevalent in a culture in which rape is constantly justified. People from all sects of society contribute to this justification.[28]

There have been many movements or "SlutWalks" taking place around the world to regain a sense of pride in women. Many slut walks or movements protest against the idea that a woman's appearance, often considered promiscuous, is a justification of sexual assault and rape. The participants in these walks protest against individuals that excuse rape due to the woman's appearance, including victim blaming and slut shaming; slut walks have now become a worldwide movement.[29]

Women of color

The word slut means different things to white women and people of color, especially black women. Slut has different associations for black women. Anna North of The New York Times covered Leora Tanenbaum who stated, "As Black women, we do not have the privilege or the space to call ourselves 'slut' without validating the already historically entrenched ideology and recurring messages about what and who the Black woman is."[30] She argued that, for black women, the word slut does not mean anything very harmful due to the history of being treated as slaves in the past. Black women's "relationship to the term slut" is informed by a history of racism and slavery, of "having been seen as objects of property, not just for the sexual gratification of those in power but also for reproduction of whole generations of slaves, which involved rape most of the time."[30]

Most of the SlutWalks were coordinated by white women, and some black women felt uncomfortable when joining. Sociologist Jo Reger writes: "Women of color ... argued that the white women organizers and participants had not considered the ways in which the sexuality of women of color had been constructed through a history of oppression, rape, and sexual exploitation."[31]: 88  People of color, especially black people, had been avoiding words like slutjezebelhottentotmammymulesapphire, or welfare queens.[31]: 88 

Model and actress Amber Rose was one of the first people to conduct and take a lead for a SlutWalk for people of color. "The Amber Rose SlutWalk Festival is a completely inclusive space. This event is a zero tolerance event and we do not condone hateful language, racism, sexism, ableism, fat-shaming, transphobia or any other kind of bigotry. Further, we recognize that shaming, oppression, assault and violence have disproportionately impacted marginalized groups, including women of color, transgender people and sex workers, and thus we are actively working to center these groups at our events."[32]

See also

References

  1. Jump up to:a b "Slut"Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  2. Jump up to:a b c d "Slut"Reference.com. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  3. ^ Nathanson, Rebecca (2 October 2011). "SlutWalk Rally Against Sexual Violence Draws Huge Crowd of Feminists"The Village Voice. Archived from the original on 4 May 2012.
  4. Jump up to:a b c Paludi, Michele A.; Martin, Jennifer L.; Gruber, James E.; Fineran, Susan (2015). Sexual Harassment in Education and Work Settings: Current Research and Best Practices for PreventionABC-CLIO. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-4408-3294-9. Retrieved 4 December 2015.
  5. Jump up to:a b c d Julia Wood (2014). Gendered LivesCengage Learning. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-285-07593-8. Retrieved 4 December 2015.
  6. Jump up to:a b Bennett, Jessica (20 March 2015). "Monica Lewinsky and Why the Word Slut Is Still So Potent"Time. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  7. ^ Greer, Germaine (12 May 2011). "These 'slut walk' women are simply fighting for their right to be dirty"The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011.
  8. ^ Westcott, Kathryn (9 May 2011). "Why is the word 'slut' so powerful?"BBC News Magazine.
  9. ^ Carroll, Caitlin (31 October 2005). "What's the deal with slutty Halloween costumes?"The GW Hatchet (student newspaper)George Washington University. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  10. Jump up to:a b c d e Harper, Douglas. "slut"Online Etymology Dictionary.
  11. ^ Tanenbaum, Leora (2 February 2015). "A Brief History Of 'Slut'"HuffPost. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  12. ^ "From Geoffrey Chaucer's "The Canterbury Tales", The Manciple's Tale, lines 139-154"www.librarius.com. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  13. ^ "The Canon's Yeoman's Prologue. The Canterbury Tales. Geoffrey Chaucer. 1894. The Complete Poetical Works"www.bartleby.com. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
  14. ^ "the definition of slut".
  15. ^ "Samuel Pepys Diary February 1664 complete". Pepys.info. Archived from the original on 1 January 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
  16. ^ Shakespeare, William. As You Like It (III, iii, 1531–1537). "[Audrey:] Well, I am not fair; and therefore I pray the gods make me / honest. / [Touchstone:] Truly, and to cast away honesty upon a foul slut were / to put good meat into an unclean dish. / [Audrey:] I am not a slut, though I thank the gods I am foul. / [Touchstone:] Well, praised be the gods for thy foulness; / sluttishness may come hereafter. ..."
  17. ^ Soule, Richard (1900). Howison, George H. (ed.). A dictionary of English synonymes and synonymous or parallel expressions designed as a practical guide to aptness and variety of phraseology (revised and enlarged ed.). Boston: Little, Brown. p. 49. OCLC 7437533.
  18. ^ Sigal, Janet A.; Denmark, Florence L. (2013). Violence against girls and women: international perspectives. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. ISBN 978-1-4408-0335-2.[page needed]
  19. Jump up to:a b Flood, Michael (2013). "Male and Female Sluts"Australian Feminist Studies28 (75): 95–107. doi:10.1080/08164649.2012.758024S2CID 54991899. Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2018 – via Taylor & Francis Online.
  20. ^ Devon, Natasha (15 October 2014). "Is there a male equivalent to calling a woman a 'slut'?"The Daily TelegraphArchived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 2 December 2016.
  21. ^ "slut's-hole"Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  22. ^ Jason MillerThat Championship Season (1972), p. 43.
  23. Jump up to:a b Easton, Dossie; Liszt, Catherine A. (1997). The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities. San Francisco: Greenery Press. ISBN 1-890159-01-8.
  24. ^ McDavitt, Bryce; Mutchler, Matt G (2014). "'Dude, you're such a slut!' Barriers and facilitators of sexual communication among young gay men and their best friends"Journal of Adolescent Research29 (4): 464–498. doi:10.1177/0743558414528974PMC 4239541PMID 25419044.
  25. ^ Lindin, Emily. "The UnSlut Project".
  26. Jump up to:a b Breger, Melissa L. (1 July 2014). "Transforming cultural norms of sexual violence against women". Journal of Research in Gender Studies. Retrieved 10 August 2018 – via Free Online Library.
  27. ^ "Login Required"search.rdsinc.com. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
  28. ^ Mahler, Jonathan (11 October 2016). "For Many Women, Trump's 'Locker Room Talk' Brings Memories of Abuse"The New York Times.
  29. ^ "SlutWalk DC". Archived from the original on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  30. Jump up to:a b North, Anna (3 February 2015). "Should 'Slut' Be Retired?". Op-Talk. The New York Times.
  31. Jump up to:a b Reger, Jo (2015). "The Story of a Slut Walk: Sexuality, Race, and Generational Divisions in Contemporary Feminist Activism". Journal of Contemporary Ethnography44 (1): 84–112. doi:10.1177/0891241614526434.
  32. ^ Rose, Amber. "The Amber Rose Slutwalk"About the Walk. Amber Rose. Archived from the original on 3 December 2016. Retrieved 1 December 2016.

Further reading

====

淫蕩음탕한

출처 : 무료 백과 사전 "Wikipedia (Wikipedia)"

본 기사에서는淫蕩(이토)에 대해 설명한다. 또한 성에 관해 분방한 사람 에 대해서도 설명한다.


개요 편집 ]

'음탕'이라는 말은 명사나 형용동사로 사용되며, 음탕이란 '주색(슈쇼쿠)에 빠져 소행이 나쁘다'자나 '부드러운 향락(쿄라쿠)에 빠진다' 상태를 가리킨다[1] 2 ] . [주 1]

일본 편집 ]

전국 무장 의 오다 노부나가 가, 「야마몬, 야마시타의 승중왕성의 진수라고 해도, 업장업법(교토교호, 그 실태나 유양은 같은 의미), 출가의 작법에도 불구하고, 천하의 조롱도 부끄러워하지 않고, 천도의 두려움을 겪지 않고, 음란, 생선새를 먹고, 금은 뇌물에 뛰어들어”(노부나가 공기)라고 비판해, 1571년에 히에이산  있던 천대 종  연 력사 를  태웠다 ( 히에이산 구이 토벌 ).

에도시대에 있어서의 「음탕」이란, 「마시는」 「치는」 「사는」의 모두를 가리키는 말이었다고 하는 요출전 ] .

메이지 시대는 정부가 서민의 성도덕을 단번에 근대화하려고 한 시대였다. [ 요 출전 ] " 누구? ]

에도 시대 에 들어가 유교 의 도덕감이 무사도 에 통합되어 침투하게 되면, 여성에 대한 정조관념이 강하게 요구되게 되고, 그 후의 처녀 숭배에의 단서가 되었다 요출전 ] . 한편, 에도 막부 공인 의 유연 에서는 상인 이나 마을 사람 과 함께 무사도 여자 놀이 를 즐기고 있었던 것, 혈연 에 의지하지 않는 입양 이나 풍의 풍습 등이 활발했던 것, 주종 관계나 의형제 의 유대를 깊게 한다 때문에 남색이 유행한 것 등, 무사라도 성도덕에 관해서는 유연한 일면을 남기고 있었던 것을 알 수 있다 요출전 ] . 또, 서민 이나 지방의 농촌 등에서는 여전히 밤을 포기하는 것이 남녀 공통의 즐거움으로서 사회적으로 묵인되어 존재하고 있어, 여성으로부터 남성을 초대하는 것도 특히 부끄러운 것이 아니고, 지방에 따라서는 제일 등의 특별한 날 에 동정이 유부녀에게 지남을 청하기 위해 밤을 포기하는 것을 묵인하는 풍습도 있었다 [ 요 출전 ] 이라는 누구? ] .

에도나 메이지의 무렵까지 일상적이었던 혼욕 의 풍습은, 도래한 구미인들로부터 놀라움으로 기록되었다. 1853년 의 흑선 내항 으로 미국 함대를 이끌고, 1856년 에 귀국한 매튜 페리 제독은 미국 의회 도서관 에 거둔 공문서 「페리 함대 일본 원정기(원제:Narrative of the Expedition of an American Squadron to the China Seas) and Japan.) 중에서 "일본인은 예의 바르게 어른스럽지만 놀라운 습관을 가지고있다. 어떤 공중 목욕탕에서의 광경이지만, 남녀가 함께 흐트러져 서로의 맨몸을 신경 쓰지 않는다. 동양 국가의 그 중에서도 뛰어난 도덕을 가지고 있음에도 불구하고 이런 음란한 행위는 이해하기 어렵다.”고 말했다. 또, 봄화나 베쿠초지에 대해서도 견해를 남기고 있어, 「음란의 정을 촉구한다」의 것으로 「가슴이 나빠질 정도로 지나치고 있다」라고 불쾌감을 드러냈다 [3] [4] [주 2] . 어떠한 시대라도 지나친 놀이가 연인 이나 부부 의 사이와 같은 남녀 관계나 인간 관계를 험악하게 해 버리는 것은 당연한 결말이며, 성도덕에 망설임이 없는 것이 성병 의 위험성까지 높여 버리는 등은 (좋은 의미에서) 미신 까지 포함하여 사회적으로도 충분히 인식되고 있었다. 요출전 ] [5] .

해외 편집 ]

해외 에서는 기독교 나 유대교 라면 혼전 협상 이나 간음 은 중죄로 되어, 이슬람교 라면 여성의 피부를 타인에게 보여주는 것조차 금기 ( 금기 )로 생각되고 있는 등, 음탕한 것에 대해 비상 에 엄격한 교리 와 처벌이 많이 존재한다.



각주·출처 편집 ]

참고 편집 ]

  1.  「음(인)」또는 「사기(인)」라고 하는 글자에 대해서. 특히 “남녀의 성행위에 관하여 비난의 뜻을 담고 있는 경우가 많다”고 한다. (출처:고어 대사전 제1권( 카도카와 서점 , 1982년 ) “음”이나 “사위”라고 하는 한자 그 자체가 성교나 성기에 관련된 말로서 사용되고 있다. 낡은 사용예로서, 헤이안 시대( 후기 ) 의 설화집 「지금 옛 이야기」에는 「부정의 음란 붙어 스며들거나(정액이 부착하면 귀찮아 버린다)」나 「남녀 요가 없이 운데도, 몸 안에 흠뻑 젖으면,なむ子를 일으킬 수 있다(남녀가 결혼하지 않고, 제멋대로 음란한 행위를 하면, 원치 않는 아이를 임신해 버린다)」등이 있다.
  2. ↑ 1855년 에 빈센트호로 도래한 미국인의 사관 알렉산더 허버샴도, 만일 「반만 문명화하고 있는 동양인」이라고 해도, 「중류 및 하류 계급의 사람들」은 순조 관념이 부족해, 「 치기 (란치키) 게다가 "젊은 여성이라도 괜찮아 혼욕에 들어가는 것은 이해할 수 없다"고 말했다. 요출전 ]

출처 편집 ]

  1. 대사천 ( 쇼가쿠칸 , 1995년 )
  2. ↑ 히로사엔 제6판( 이와나미 서점 , 2008년 ) 「음탕」의 항목.
  3.  오피스 미야자키 편역 「페리 함대 일본 원정기」(만래사, 2009년 ).
  4. ^ 나카노 아키라 저작 "나체는 언제부터 부끄러워졌는가 - 일본인의 수치심"( 신시오 선서 , 2010년 )
  5. 야마모토 마 토리편 「성과 문화」( 호세이대학 출판국 , 2004년 )의 가미야 하루로 저 「제2장·매독 유행 제상」

관련 항목 편집 ]




=====






알라딘: 인공지능시대의 인간·윤리·사상 강병오 2023

알라딘: 인공지능시대의 인간·윤리·사상


인공지능시대의 인간·윤리·사상 
강병오 (지은이)열린서원2023-05-31






































미리보기

정가
18,000원







머리말 5

1부 인간 이해와 인간 본성론

1.1 인간의 이해 17
1.1.1 이성적 존재 18
1.1.2 호모 사피엔스 23
1.1.3 도구적 존재 27
1.1.4 사회적 존재 31
1.1.5 문화적 존재 35
1.1.6 유희적 존재 39
1.1.7 종교적 존재 44
1.1.8 결론 : 윤리적 존재 48

1.2 동서양의 인간 본성론 50
1.2.1 성선설 50
1.2.2 성악설 57
1.2.3 성무선무악설 63
1.2.4 성선악혼재설 68

참고문헌 73

2부 동서양의 인간관과 윤리

2.1 인간과 윤리의 관계 77
2.1.1 윤리적 존재로서의 인간 78
2.1.2 도덕과 윤리 81
2.1.3 인간과 윤리학 87
2.1.4 윤리학과 윤리 방법론 90

2.2 서양 철학의 인간관과 윤리 99
2.2.1 고대 인간관 99
2.2.2 중세 인간관 102
2.2.3 근대 인간관 105

2.3 동서양 종교의 인간관과 윤리 125
2.3.1 유대교의 인간관 126
2.3.2 기독교의 인간관 129
2.3.3 이슬람교의 인간관 132
2.3.4 유교의 인간관 137
2.3.5 불교의 인간관 143
2.3.6 도교의 인간관 149
2.3.7 한국 전통사상의 인간관 159


참고문헌 172

3부 사회사상과 윤리

3.1 사회사상이란 무엇인가? 177
3.1.1 사회사상과 인간 182
3.1.2 사회사상과 사회 186
3.1.3 사회사상과 윤리 189
3.1.4 사회사상과 사회운동 192

3.2 이데올로기란 무엇인가? 195
3.2.1 이데올로기의 개념 195
3.2.2 이데올로기와 유토피아 202
3.2.3 이데올로기의 현재적 의미 206

3.3 이데올로기와 윤리 210
3.3.1 자유주의 211
3.3.2 민주주의 225
3.3.3 자본주의 246
3.3.4 사회주의 258
3.3.5 보수주의 304
3.3.6 민족주의 309
3.3.7 페미니즘 313

참고문헌 319
접기


====
저자 및 역자소개
강병오 (지은이)

서울신학대학교(B.A.)
연세대학교 대학원(Th. M.)
독일 뮌스터대학교(Muenster Universitaet, Th. D.)
한국기독교윤리학회 회장 역임
현재 서울신학대학교 기독교윤리학 교수
서울신학대학교 한국기독교통일연구소 소장
홍은성결교회 협동목사

=====
저서 및 역서

『Geschichte, Gesellschaft, Religion(역사, 사회, 종교)』(Berlin: LIT, 2006)
『자연영성과 생태윤리』(공저, 생명의씨앗, 2009)
『통일시대로 가는 평화의 길』(공저, 열린서원, 2015)

『신학고전 20선』(공저, 서울신학대학교출판부, 2016)
『평화와통일』(공저, 열린서원, 2016)
『동유럽의 체제전환과 한반도통일』(공저, 올리브나무, 2020)
『역사와 윤리』(역서, 한들출판사, 2014)
『기독교윤리학』(저서, 한들출판사, 2022)

논문

「에른스트 트뢸취의 신학윤리 방법론」, 『한국기독교신학논총』 53(2007)
「촛불집회, 민주주의와 기독교윤리」, 『한국기독교윤리학논총』 11(2008)
「회페의 정의론」, 『한국기독교윤리학논총』 16(2011)
「리처드 니버의 신학방법론 이해」, 『한국조직신학논총』 34(2012)
「한국에서의 복지사회 논쟁과 기독교의 평화」, 『한국기독교윤리학논총』 17(2012)
「신학의 사회학 적용에 관한 연구」, 『신학연구』 62(2013)
「루마니아 과거청산에 관한 연구」, 『역사와 융합』 14(2023)
외 다수의 논문 접기

최근작 : <인공지능시대의 인간·윤리·사상>,<통일·윤리·선교>,<기독교윤리학> … 총 4종 (모두보기)

====

Some final advice - Woodbrooke Who can make a good clerk?

Some final advice - Woodbrooke

SOME FINAL ADVICE

Who can make a good clerk?

From Quaker Faith and Practice (BYM, 5th edition)

‘The clerk needs to have a spiritual capacity for discernment and sensitivity to the meeting.’ (para 3.12)

This looks frightening but in practice clerks find they do have this spiritual capacity – it seems to be given them once they embark on the role. Sensitivity to the meeting takes practice but can be learnt. A meeting that is sensitive to its clerk will also teach the clerk how to develop loving awareness in the moment.

‘The meeting has given you [the clerk] a measure of authority which includes an expectation and an acceptance of leadership and firm guidance’. (para 3.13)

This is the authority given to you temporarily. Good clerks learn to accept that leadership role as far as the process is concerned – and to relinquish it when the period of service comes to an end. This too takes spiritual grace and acceptance!


Why are minutes important in Quaker practice?

The practice of making minutes at the time in the meeting has taken place since the earliest period of Quaker history, back in the late seventeenth century. The meeting makes a decision and, in effect, asks the clerk to record that agreement, along with actions that must follow. The meeting has control of both the content of that decision and the wording that expresses the decision and sometimes the flavour of the discussion preceding it. Once those have been established by a ‘sense of the meeting’ understanding, the minute carries the authority of the meeting. All those present now own that decision and the wording recording it. There can be no subsequent changes. In a sense, it carries legal status in Quaker terms (and sometimes in civic legal terms as well, for example the minute that concludes a Quaker marriage). The language is couched in the present tense (‘we agree…, we will …, we ask …) as the minute records in real time the outcome of the matter in hand. These are not notes written up by a note-taker attending a meeting and which may be subject to revision and change by others to ‘improve’ or ‘correct’ the record of what had taken place. For many Quakers the authority residing in that minute comes from God, hence its central importance in Quaker decision-making.


Quaker discipline

What do we mean by Quaker discipline in a business meeting?
A personal reflection by Judith Roads

Corporate discipline is the discipline of the group.

‘Members of the community must know the Spirit, they must know each other and they must know the methods by which the decisions are made and the work is carried out’.
Robert Halliday: Mind the Oneness p.38

I understand the discipline as being a constraint on my own understanding and opinions. To the best of my ability I should leave my ego outside the meeting room door and move into a deeper concentration and dependency on listening to others in the meeting and to God. Some Friends talk about the ‘will of God’, others more about seeking the ‘mind of God’. This is hard discipline and goes against all we have been brought up to do in social situations. We learn to accept the silence in meeting for worship, in not debating or contradicting a previous spoken contribution. We go further in business meetings when we are corporately seeking what is required of us. This Quaker discipline asks that we don’t repeat a point someone else has made. If it has been said, and really heard, that should be sufficient. The phrase ‘that Friend speaks my mind’ is a tempting one but tends to move the meeting by persuasion, potentially silencing someone who was feeling led to respond differently to a proposal.

Part of the discipline is to address the clerk, not across the room to another Friend. Remembering this constraint prevents a kind of ding-dong two-way discussion, and if allowed to continue sometimes does not end well! Another aspect of good discipline is allow the clerk to work on a minute, or discuss quietly at the table, and not to stand waiting to be called or whisper to a neighbour. When you the clerk are busy, you should be upheld in supportive silence for as long as is needed, without pressure to start performing. Experienced Friends might, at some moments where the discipline lapses, call out ‘please uphold the clerk’ or ‘please remember our discipline while the clerk is occupied’.

The final aspect I want to mention now is the moment of agreeing a minute. The final decision about whether the minute represents the sense of the meeting is the responsibility of the meeting itself, not of the clerk. If you the clerk have offered a minute, and after possible revision it has been accepted (among British Friends by a quiet chorus of ‘I hope so’), someone may stand and say they cannot accept the minute. This tests corporate discipline deeply. There is a difference between Quaker unity and unanimity and it is often misunderstood. We don’t vote because that immediately creates majorities and minorities, but we do seek a clear sense of the meeting. You the clerk will be best placed to sense that, and it takes real courage and experience to say that if the meeting has expressed division. In Britain Quakers don’t allow anyone to stand aside from the minute. (In other yearly meetings such standing aside does occur and is recorded as such in the minute). If the meeting is clear that unity has been reached, those who were not happy are expected to accept the outcome while not agreeing with it. If the clerks have misread the sense of the meeting and the meeting expresses that unease, good clerks will not continue to push for the stated outcome but ask the meeting what should happen next. Clerks might want to offer options as to what might happen next as it’s hard for some meetings to respond corporately to open-ended questions. A well-disciplined meeting that knows and loves all its members will not find these constraints too hard. It is a glorious feature of our spiritual practice.

2023/12/06

thomas-berry-a-biography-columbia-2019 - Thomas Berry

thomas-berry-a-biography-columbia-2019 - Thomas Berry




Thomas Berry: Biography


Thomas Berry: A Biography
By Mary Evelyn Tucker, John Grim, and Andrew Angyal



(New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2019)


Order from Columbia Press and receive a 30% discount with code: CUP30


Book Flyer


Online class on “The Worldview of Thomas Berry: The Flourishing of the Earth Community” (audit for free)




Thomas Berry (1914–2009) was one of the twentieth century’s most prescient and profound thinkers. As a cultural historian, he sought a broader perspective on humanity’s relationship to the Earth in order to respond to the ecological and social challenges of our times. The first biography of Berry, this book illuminates his remarkable vision and its continuing relevance for achieving transformative social change and environmental renewal.

Berry began his studies in Western history and religions and expanded to include Asian and Indigenous religions, which he taught at Fordham University, Barnard College, and Columbia University. Drawing on his explorations of history, he came to see the evolutionary process as a story that could help restore the continuity of humans with the natural world. Berry urged humans to recognize their place on a planet with complex ecosystems in a vast evolving universe. He sought to replace the modern alienation from nature with a sense of intimacy and responsibility. Berry called for new forms of ecological education, law, and spirituality and the creation of resilient agricultural systems, bioregions, and ecocities. At a time of growing environmental crisis, this biography shows the ongoing significance of Berry’s conception of human interdependence with the Earth within the unfolding journey of the universe.


Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim teach at the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and the Yale Divinity School, where they direct the Yale Forum on Religion and Ecology. They worked closely with Thomas Berry for over thirty years as his students, editors, and literary executors and are the managing trustees of the Thomas Berry Foundation.

Andrew Angyal is professor emeritus of English and environmental studies at Elon University. He has also written biographies of Loren Eisley, Lewis Thomas, and Wendell Berry.


Table of Contents

Introduction: Thomas Berry and the Arc of History
1) An Independent Youth
2) The Call to Contemplation
3) Studying History and Living History
4) The Struggle to Teach
5) From Human History to Earth History
6) From New Story to Universe Story
7) Evoking the Great Work
8) Coming Home
Interlude: The Arc of a Life
9) Narratives of Time
10) Teilhard and the Zest for Life
11) Confucian Integration of Cosmos, Earth, and Humans
12) Indigenous Traditions of the Giving Earth
Epilogue


Praise for Thomas Berry: A Biography

“A tour de force biography: Thomas Berry was one of the most important thinkers on humanity and our trajectory on this wondrous living planet—and indeed in the journey of the universe. This is a book written with love and clarity and belongs on everyone’s required reading list. Read it and you will not only understand one of the most inspiring persons of our time, but also it will change how you think about the future.”
—Thomas E. Lovejoy, University Professor of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University

“This is a book one has waited impatiently for: some of our finest humanists telling the epic intellectual and human story of Thomas Berry. Most biographies illuminate the past, but this one helps chart the course for our future.”
—Bill McKibben, author of Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?


“To a bewildered world, Thomas Berry offers a moral compass. To a fragmented world, he offers the convergence of scientific and spiritual worldviews in a new story of the evolutionary unity of humans and the cosmos. For a despairing world, he offers meaning and hope. As Thomas Berry was a brilliant, erudite, joyous person who changed the world, so this biography is a brilliant, erudite, joyous book that will change your life.”
—Kathleen Dean Moore, author of Great Tide Rising: Towards Clarity and Moral Courage in a Time of Planetary Change


“To read this magnificent biography is to encounter the evolution of greatness, for Thomas Berry was truly one of the remarkable people of the twentieth century. Throughout, Berry’s decency and humanity, as well as his courage, are vividly displayed. I found this book to be a joy and an inspiration.”
—James Gustave Speth, cofounder, Natural Resources Defense Council and the World Resources Institute, former administrator, United Nations Development Programme

“In my first meeting with Thomas Berry, I sensed a depth of wisdom that was comprehensive and unique. This initial intuition only deepened as we worked together over decades. There is no better pathway into his vision than this profound biography.”
—Brian Thomas Swimme, coauthor, with Thomas Berry, of The Universe Story: From the Primordial Flaring Forth to the Ecozoic Era

“Thomas Berry was a visionary pathfinder for both the 20th and the 21st century. With this splendid biography, we discover how this came to be. It could hardly be more timely!”
—Larry Rasmussen, Reinhold Niebuhr Professor Emeritus of Social Ethics, Union Theological Seminary, New York City

Press Kit:Photos of Thomas Berry
Photos of Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim
Bio for Mary Evelyn Tucker
Bio for John Grim
Joint Bio for Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim
Book Cover Image (Low-Res)
Book Cover Image (High-Res)


Excerpts from the Biography:

“Introduction: Thomas Berry and the Arc of History” (You can also read this introduction on the Columbia University Press Blog.)

Selection on Earth Jurisprudence from Chapter 7: “Evoking the Great Work”


Articles by the Authors:

“Thomas Berry and the Rights of Nature: Evoking the Great Work”
By Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim, Kosmos Journal, Winter 2019.

“Why Thomas Berry Matters Today: Mary Evelyn Tucker Reflects on Her Latest Book, Thomas Berry: A Biography”
By H. Emerson Blake, Orion Magazine, August 22, 2019.

“Thomas Berry and Columbia University: Reflections from Mary Evelyn Tucker, Columbia PhD 1985”
Columbia University Press Blog, May 29, 2019.

“Q&A: Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim on Thomas Berry: A Biography“
Columbia University Press Blog, April 26, 2019.

“Biography of Thomas Berry”
By Mary Evelyn Tucker, Minding Nature, Vol. 2, No. 3, Winter 2009.



Conference at Georgetown University:

Watch the videos and read the papers from the “Thomas Berry and ‘The Great Work’” conference at Georgetown University on October 30-31, 2019



News Articles and Reviews:

Review by Kusumita Pedersen
Worldviews, 2022.

“Thomas Berry: Reflecting on Emotions, Heart and Conservation”
Review by Marc Bekoff. Psychology Today. November 20, 2020.

“The intersection of ecology and theology”
Review by Christiana Zenner. America: The Jesuit Review. September 18, 2020.

“The Cosmic Liturgy”: A Review by Peter Reason
Scientific and Medical Network, Paradigm Explorer, May 2020.

“Lifeways: A Review by J. Milburn Thompson”
Today’s American Catholic, November 2019.

“Pursuing Thomas Berry’s ‘New Story’ with an eye on climate change”
By Jesse Remedios, National Catholic Reporter, November 6, 2019.

“A saint among us: a new Thomas Berry biography”
Review by Thomas Crowe, Smoky Mountain News, October 30, 2019.

Review by Jules Cashford
Resurgence Magazine, Fall 2019.

Review by Ursula King
Times Higher Education, June 13, 2019.

“Pentecost and the language of spring”
By Judith Best, Global Sisters Report, June 6, 2019.

“Thomas Berry: A Biography”
Yale News, June 5, 2019.

“Rooting Rebellion in Nature”
By Liz Hosken, The Ecologist, May 24, 2019.

“Can the Universe Story Bring Us Together?”
By Michael Lerner, Angel of Vision, May 7, 2019.

Reflections and photos from the Green Mountain Monastery Celebration on June 1, 2019.


New Korean Translation:

The biography has been translated into Korean.

Read the translation here.



Thomas Berry: A Biography
Conversation with Mary Evelyn Tucker and Michael Lerner
The New School at Commonweal, Bolinas, CA, USA (March 17, 2019)



Live Q&A: Mary Evelyn Tucker on Thomas Berry: A Biography


With Jennifer Morgan of the Deeptime Network (May 23, 2019)

Notes about Photos:

See this page for high-res photos and photo credits.

Photos by Lou Niznik may be used with the proper attribution: “Photo by Lou Niznik, Courtesy of the Thomas Berry Foundation”

Photos by Gretchen McHugh may not be used or reproduced in any way without the written permission of the artist’s family

New biography of Thomas Berry reasserts importance of his work | National Catholic Reporter

New biography of Thomas Berry reasserts importance of his work | National Catholic Reporter



New biography of Thomas Berry reasserts importance of his work
'Geologian' fashioned an utterly compassionate vision of the universe




(Unsplash/NASA)


BY MARIAN RONAN

View Author Profile

Join the Conversation

Send your thoughts to Letters to the Editor. Learn more
January 1, 2020
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterEmail to a friendPrint

Thomas Berry: A Biography
Mary Evelyn Tucker, John Grim and Andrew Angyal
360 pages; Columbia University Press; 2019
$28.95


Back in the 1970s, when I was in my 20s, I was part of a community living at the Grail's national center on an organic farm in rural southwest Ohio. A tall, thin priest used to come visit us from time to time. He seemed quite old and wobbly to me, and I worried that he might fall off the steps on his way up to the altar to celebrate the liturgy.

The priest's name was Thomas Berry, and in recent years, I have been forced to admit that my concerns about his age and wobbliness — he was in his mid-60s at the time — were a bit off-point. And that his portrayal of the new story of the universe, shared with us in mimeographed form before he began publishing about it, was a great deal more significant.


The new biography of Berry by Yale's Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim, with Andrew Angyal, confirms big-time my revised estimation of that tall, thin priest. Berry, who in later years described himself as a "geologian" rather than as an eco-theologian, presented a vision of the universe, of all of creation, and of the Great Work we are called to within it. Such a vision was revolutionary for his time and is even more relevant to the current planetary crisis than it once was.

As detailed by the authors, Berry was born in North Carolina, to a prosperous family, and fell in love with nature at an early age. His early experiences of a numinous creation shaped his life's work. After attending a boarding school run by the Passionist Order and a year of college, he entered the Passionists, drawn in particular to their commitment to the suffering of the world. He eventually added a fourth vow to the three made by all Passionists: dedication to the passion of the Earth.

Berry was in large part a scholar, and the scope of his knowledge is mind-boggling. After seminary, he earned a Ph.D. in European cultural history, writing a dissertation on Giambattista Vico's universal philosophy of history. He went on to study Asian religions and cultures, learning Sanskrit and publishing books on Buddhism and the religions of India. He directed the graduate program in the history of religions at Fordham University. He also founded the Riverdale Center for Religious Research, one of the bedrocks of religious environmentalism.



ADVERTISEMENT


Furthermore, by the early 1970s, Berry was researching the cosmologies of native traditions, highlighting their "symbolic ways of knowing the interrelationships between bioregions … and the larger universe." The authors argue that the impact of indigenous worldviews on Berry was so profound that he became a shaman as well as a scholar. Also enormously important for Berry's thinking was the work of Jesuit Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the paleontologist and theologian of the cosmos.

Out of this extraordinary breadth of knowledge, Berry fashioned a cosmic, utterly compassionate vision of the universe. Fundamental to that vision was his conviction that a new narrative of the universe was essential to change. Only human understanding of the history of the ever-expanding universe would lead us out of our era of planetary destruction and mass extinction into a more compassionate, sustainable era. So enormous would the effort be that was required to move humanity into this new era in politics, economics, culture and religion that Berry called that effort the Great Work. Deeply hopeful, he continued throughout his life to trust that humanity would indeed take on this Great Work and move beyond planetary suicide to embrace its vital role as part of an interdependent "communion of subjects."


The authors also show that along with his massive contributions to our comprehension of this cosmic intercommunion, Berry impacted the wider society in other significant ways. At a time when the concept of a new geologic era, marked by human impact on and damage to the planet, the Anthropocene, has taken center stage, Berry's earlier concept of an Ecozoic Era, an evolutionary phase of mutually-enhancing relationships between the planet's ecosystems, provided a prescient alternative.

Berry also introduced the idea of legal rights and representation for the planet itself in response to widespread violations of those rights. This notion subsequently developed into the legal field of "earth jurisprudence," now taught in law schools and studied widely. And Berry's characterization of the domination and exploitation of the Earth through technological mastery as the "Technozoic" alternative to the Ecozoic Era, may well have laid the foundation for Pope Francis' critique of the "technocratic paradigm" in "Laudato Si', on Care for Our Common Home." Finally, Emmy-award winning 2011 film, "The Journey of the Universe" created by Brian Swimme with Tucker and Grim was dedicated to Berry and introduced many thousands of people to his profound ecological cosmology.

As well written and informative as the Grim, Tucker, Angyal biography of Berry is, I find one aspect of it puzzling: There is not a criticism of Berry or his work in the entire book. No mention, for example, of his economic privilege — attending a Catholic secondary boarding school in the 1930s when most U.S. Catholics were on the breadlines or in the Civilian Conservation Corps — and the connection between that privilege and his ability to spend his life studying the admittedly crucial subjects he did. And no mention either of the irony that the father of someone who dedicated much of his life to fighting planetary destruction was the owner of an oil company.

Perhaps the fact that two of the authors, Tucker and Grim, were Berry's students and deeply influenced by him over many years explains this absence of critique. Parts of the book read almost like a memoir of their collaboration with him.

At another level, though, the gratitude and admiration the authors express for Berry's life may well be a reflection of the cosmic, compassionate, unifying vision that underpins his entire body of work. Berry saw that everything in the cosmos is one, articulating the communion between groups, species and material entities that today are all too often seen as hostile opposites. Out of this cosmic worldview the authors constructed an interpretation of Berry's life that is positive, hopeful and badly needed.

[Marian Ronan is research professor of Catholic Studies at New York Theological Seminary in New York City. Her most recent book, with Mary O'Brien, is Women of Vision: Sixteen Founders of the International Grail Movement (Apocryphile Press, 2017).]
Read this next: Pursuing Thomas Berry's 'New Story' with an eye on climate change

큰 사상가 다석 유영모 이야기 | 박재순 - 교보문고

큰 사상가 다석 유영모 이야기 | 박재순 - 교보문고

큰 사상가 다석 유영모 이야기

박재순 저자(글)
나눔사 · 2023년 11월 27일

====
책 소개

다석 유영모는 누구인가? 도올 김용옥은 유영모를 만나지 못한 것이 ‘천추의 한’이라고 말했다. 성서학의 권위자 정양모는 “인도는 석가를 냈고 그리스는 플라톤, 독일은 칸트, 중국은 공자를 냈다면, 우리나라는 유영모를 냈다.”고 하였다. 우리가 세계에 내놓을 수 있는 위대한 사상가가 유영모라는 것이다. 호주의 대학교에서 교목으로서 가르치던 어떤 목사는 유영모의 어록을 수십 번 읽고 외우면서 평생 유영모의 사상을 연구하고 알리는 일에 전념하고 있다.

작가정보
저자(글) 박재순

인물정보
철학자
서울대 철학과를 졸업하고, 한신대 박사를 마쳤다. 한신대 연구교수, 성공회대 겸임교수, 씨알사상연구회 회장(2002~2007)을 지냈고, 지금 씨알사상연구소 소장으로 있다. 저서로는 '다석 유영모', '씨알, 생명, 평화'(공저), '한국생명신학의 모색', '예수운동과 밥상 공동체' 등이 있다.

펼치기
인간 역사 교육과 어린이 교육
인간 역사 교육과 어린이 교육
인성교육의 철학과 방법
인성교육의 철학과 방법
바닥에서 하나님을 만난 사람
바닥에서 하나님을 만난 사람
도산철학과 씨알철학
도산철학과 씨알철학
애국가 작사자 도산 안창호
애국가 작사자 도산 안창호
애기애타: 안창호의 삶과 사상
애기애타: 안창호의 삶과 사상
참사람 됨의 인성교육
생명의 길, 사람의 길
삼일운동의 정신과 철학
유영모의 천지인 명상
모두보기

====
목차
들어가는 말

제1강 창조적으로 철학하다
제2강 통합으로 가다
제3강 삶과 죽음의 가운데 길로 가다
제4강 하루를 영원처럼 살다
제5강 밥 철학과 깨끗한 삶
제6강 ‘가온 찍기’로 무등(無等) 세상을 열다
제7강 생각 : 존재의 끝을 불사르며 위로 오르다
제8강 숨은 생명과 얼의 줄
제9강 우리 말과 글로 철학하다
제10강 예수와 함께 그리스도로 살면서
제11강 기독교 ㆍ 유교 ㆍ 불교 ㆍ 도교의 회통
: 빈탕한데 맞혀 놀다
제12강 하나로 돌아가다(歸一)
제13강 동서정신문화를 융합하다.
=====
출판사 서평

유영모는 이승훈의 부름에 따라 20세 때 과학교사로서 오산학교에서 가르쳤다. 삼일운동이 일어난 후에는 오산학교 교장으로 잠시 일했는데 이때 삼일운동에 참여했다가 평양고보를 자퇴하고 오산학교로 편입했던 학생 함석헌을 만났다. 안창호와 이승훈의 교육 운동과 삼일운동의 정신과 뜻을 이어받은 유영모와 함석헌은 민주적이고 영적인 생명철학으로서 씨ᄋᆞᆯ사상을 형성했다.

성균관 대학교 유학대학장, 한국정신문화원장을 지낸 류승국은 30대 대학원생 시절에 유영모를 찾아가 배웠다. 말년에 류승국은 이른 아침에 일어나 유영모의 사진 앞에서 명상하며 하루를 시작하였다. 그는 이렇게 말했다. “유영모는 땅에 발을 딛고 살았지만, 정신은 하늘에서 살았다. 그의 정신과 사상을 이해할 수도 없지만 이해했다고 해도 남에게 전할 수가 없다.”

4년마다 열리는 세계철학대회가 2008년에 아시아에서는 처음으로 서울에서 열렸다. 세계철학대회를 앞두고 나는 ‘동서사상을 아우른 창조적 생명철학자 다석 유영모’란 제목으로 현암사에서 책을 내었다. 세계철학자대회에서 ‘유영모 함석헌 철학 발표회’를 열고 19명의 학자들이 이틀에 걸쳐 발표하고 토론하였다. 유영모와 함석헌의 철학사상이 한국의 현대철학으로 언론과 대중에게 큰 관심을 끌었다.

일본 교토의 공공철학연구소 소장 김태창 박사는 나의 책 ‘다석 유영모’의 내용을 소개하는 글을 2회에 걸쳐 공공철학연구소에서 발행하는 철학잡지에 실었다. ‘생각’을 생명의 근본행위로 보고 ‘생각의 불꽃’에서 ‘내’가 생겨난다는 유영모의 생명철학은 일본의 철학자들에게 큰 관심을 불러일으켰다. 그들은 유영모의 생명철학이 막다른 골목에 이른 서양철학의 길을 열어줄 것으로 기대하였다. 2009년에는 한국과 일본의 철학자 25명이 모여 ‘씨ᄋᆞᆯ철학과 공공철학의 대화’라는 주제를 내걸고 유영모와 함석헌의 사상에 대하여 3박 4일 동안 진지하고 치열한 대화와 토론을 하였다.

도쿄대학교에서 철학을 가르친 오가와 하루이사 교수는 한중일의 근현대 사상 연구자다. 그는 안창호와 이승훈처럼 겸허와 사랑으로 인간을 교육하며 독립과 해방운동에 헌신한 인물은 일본과 중국에서는 찾아볼 수 없다고 하였다. 오가와 교수는 안창호 이승훈의 교육운동과 유영모의 고결한 생명철학을 바탕으로 한중일에서 ‘사람 만들기 운동’을 벌이자고 제안하였다.

접기

Mind the Oneness: Halliday, Robert

Mind the Oneness: Foundation of Good Quaker Business Method : Halliday, Robert: Amazon.com.au: Books

Mind the Oneness: Foundation of Good Quaker Business Method Paperback – 1 May 1991
by Robert Halliday (Author)
===


Abe books

Mind the Oneness - Softcover
Halliday, Robert
Publication date
1991
US$ 15.38
Shipping: US$ 16.29
From U.S.A. to Australia
===
US$ 11.55
Choose a shipping option
US$ 18.04  Includes shipping

A$27.37
===

Thomas Berry - Religions of India: Hinduism, Yoga, Buddhism -

Religions of India: Hinduism, Yoga, Buddhism - Thomas Berry


Religions of India: Hinduism, Yoga, Buddhism
By Thomas Berry


New York: Bruce-Macmillan, 1971.

Second Edition: Chambersburg, PA: Anima Books, 1992.

Since 1996 available from Columbia University Press.

This in-depth study explores the history and philosophy of India’s major religions, explaining clearly the development of Buddhism, Yoga, and Hinduism over the centuries. A complete glossary of terms is included, as well as an index and suggestions for further reading.

Review

"In clear, concise discussions of Hinduism, Yoga, and Buddhism, Thomas Berry sets forth the insights that have developed on the subcontinent and illustrates their significance for the religious and spiritual life of all mankind.... Recommended as a concise introduction for general readers." -- "Religious Studies Review"
From the Back Cover


The relevance of this book is enhanced rather than diminished by the years since its original publication. The human situation has become even more critical. We are moving from a period of industrial plundering of the planet into a more intimate way of relating to the planet. We can no longer violate the integrity of Earth without becoming a destructive force for both the surrounding world and for ourselves.


About the Author
Thomas Berry (1914-2009) established the History of Religions Program at Fordham University and, with Wm. Theodore de Bary, founded the Oriental Thought and Religion Seminar at Columbia University. He was also the former director of the Riverdale Center for Religious Research. Along with his book Buddhism, his major publications include The Dream of the Earth, The Great Work, Evening Thoughts, and The Universe Story, with Brian Swimme.



BUY ON AMAZON


Religions of India: Hinduism, Yoga, Buddhism
Thomas Berry
4.50
226 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1971
====
July 17, 2023
THE RENOWNED CATHOLIC PRIEST LOOKS POSITIVELY AT INDIAN RELIGION

Author Thomas Berry wrote in the Introduction to this 1971 book, 

“This study is concerned with the spiritual formation of man in the Asian world. This spiritual formation has provided the Asian peoples with a bond of communion between the divine and the human worlds; it has established the ideals of perfection toward which human life is directed; it has enabled Asian people to manage the human condition in a creative manner; it has inspired the arts and sciences that have characterized the Asian civilizations up to modern times. These spiritual traditions of Asia are so highly developed that they frequently attain a level that corresponds more with the higher mystical traditions of the West than with its ordinary levels of religious and moral life.

“Some traditions, such as Hinduism, are principally concerned with the response of man to divine reality and to the final consummation of human life within this divine reality. Others, such as Buddhism, are less attracted to religion in its ordinary manifestations; rather, they are immediately concerned with forming a spiritual life that will enable men to master the human condition and eventually attain total release from the sorrowful aspect of life. But whatever the point of emphasis, these sacred traditions have been the supreme dynamic forces in structuring the civilizations of Asia. They are all keenly aware of a transphenomenal dimension of reality, whether this be the Brahman of the Hindu, the Nirvana of the Buddhist, the Kaivalya experience of the Yogin, or the Tao of the Chinese.”

He adds, 

“There is no on, universal Asian religious or spiritual tradition. Neither is there any ideal norm of Asian spirituality, just as there is no ideal flower or ideal tree. This is simply the variety, at times an interrelation and derivation within the variety. Within the Asian traditions it is difficult to designate each of them as spiritual traditions in the same sense of the word. This is a serious problem in any study that includes the multiplicity of traditions within the same frame of reference. Indeed, at first sight there seems to be more contradiction than agreement within Asia. At times the Asian traditions differ more among themselves than the individual traditions of the West. The first step in a study of Oriental religions must be to accept the diversity of man’s spiritual traditions as historical fact.”

He summarizes, 
“India is still creating new forms of spirituality, as is seen in such moderns as Ramakrishna and Vivekananda, in Tagore and Gandhi. India develops every doctrine to its extreme implication. Even contradictory doctrines are pushed to their extremes without rejection of with alternative. This is the baffing element in any study of India. There is insistence on extreme immanence and extreme transcendence at the same time. The two, it is felt, implicate each other and finally identify with each other. Absolute immanence and absolute transcendence must eventually be the same. So with all oppositions. Extreme intellectualism exists in India along with extreme devotionalism; extreme sensualism, along with an unbelievable asceticism. There is no wish to extinguish one in favor of the other. There is a certain ease within these manifold, opposing traditions, a feeling that everything has its proper pace, that nothing should be excluded.”

He states,

 “Hinduism must be studied not as a fixed and integrated body of doctrines, but as a developing tradition that has changed considerably throughout the centuries and which is still changing in a creative direction. Everything in India makes sense in the light of this changing process. Nothing makes sense without it. To give lists of Hindu beliefs of descriptions of Hindu practices without identifying the period and area in which they took place is top present a static picture of something very different from, Hinduism as it has actually existed. The basic unity is the unity of a changing life process, not the unity of a fixed pattern.” (Pg. 4)

He observes, 

“Yoga is a spirituality rather than a religion. As a spirituality it has influenced the entire range of Indian religious and spiritual development... Yoga is counted as one of the six thought systems of Hinduism. Yet before studying Yoga in this specific sense it is important to consider Yoga as an all-pervading element of Indian spirituality. Although Yoga is considered an inner discipline associated with special techniques of spiritual development leading to man’s release from the bonds of the phenomenal order, there is a great variety of yogic practices in India. There are the practices associated especially with the classical Hindu quest for intuitive vision, with Buddhism and Jainism, and with the devotional cults.” (Pg. 75)

He observes, 

“Historically Yoga has been associated with almost all phases of religious development in India from the earliest period until the present. It is true, however, that in its own structure Yoga represents a type of spiritual orientation that is barren in the ordinary terms of religion. There is no religious worship or prayer as such; there is no priesthood; there is nothing that can be identified as sacraments. There is simply the salvation discipline leading to an ineffable experience wherein the spiritual principle in man attains a blissful status beyond all affliction of the physical, emotional, and thought realms in which human life is lived within space and time. Yoga is primarily, then, a spiritual discipline leading to a salvation experience.” (Pg. 108)

He explains,

 “The entire world of change was experienced as an endless cycle of sorrow---birth, death, and rebirth. The solution of the problem of suffering was, most generally, an inner withdrawal that would remove man from the dense and destructive world of change. By the unfolding of man into his deepest self-identity the escape could be achieved. A man could remove himself from the world of nature, of matter, of mind, of thought, of consciousness, into an experience beyond all this. Alienated from himself, man must return to himself. Dispersed into a fragmented existence, man must restore the oneness of his being. Confined within a cyclic time process, man must recover his eternal status. Above all, movement must give way to quiescence. This is the mark of the eternal, the beginning of bliss. Because of this painful experience of the world of change a palpable tension is found within all the Indian traditions, an inner pressure exerted against all structured forms of existence. This spiritual dynamic sent forth incalculable numbers of people in India into the homeless life… Man needed to go into the homeless state of mind, the stage wherein the mind passed beyond itself... beyond its own conscious awareness.” (Pg. 121)

He observes, “Among the extraordinary achievements of Buddhism was the development of an explicit self-awareness of the Buddhist developmental process. This is not fond in Hinduism, nor is it found in Confucianism, nor indeed in any of the other major traditions of the Eurasian world except Christianity. This is not to say that these other traditions did not experience a developmental process; it is to say that they do not have a full understanding or explicated doctrine of development. There was in these other traditions a commitment to the earlier phase of the tradition, the original scriptures, as the basic norm for the later development.” (Pg. 182)

He concludes,

 “Hinduism, Y0oga and Buddhism are no longer merely Indian traditions, they are world traditions. India has lost forever its exclusive claim on these traditions. Now they are part of the universal human heritage; even the creative aspect of these traditions is no longer an exclusive concern of India. Mankind is now an integral part of the Indian spiritual process.” (Pg. 193) He adds, “The doctrine of constant change and development establishes the basis on which the present vital changes can take place within these traditions. One could say that at the present time these traditions are developing more profoundly and more soundly than they have developed for centuries. They are entering into a new phase of their existence, a new phase of significance not only for the societies that have in the past been associated with and guided by these traditions but for the entire world of man. All can now benefit from these traditions and can give to these traditions both a new challenge and new strength to fulfill a wider role than they have thus far envisaged for themselves.” (Pg. 200-201)

This book will be of keen interest to students of comparative religion.

=====
Tony Desantis
62 reviews
1 follower

Follow
May 3, 2015
The sections on Hinduism and yoga ware quite complex. you'll need to take notes to remember everything.

The section on Buddhism was very interesting, in that many of the stories about Buddha seem to parallel stories about Jesus.

Like

Comment