2021/03/04

12] Right Concentration | The Noble Eightfold Path : 13 Meditation Talks

12] Right Concentration | The Noble Eightfold Path : 13 Meditation Talks

Right Concentration

December 27, 2007

I don’t know if you’ve noticed when we chant the sutta, “The Analysis of the Path,” as we did last night, that the longest section is the one describing right concentration. It’s the only section that talks about stages in the practice. And it gives a fairly detailed map of the different elements in each stage. The question is, how do we relate to the map? It’s tempting to say, well, there’s this ingredient, there’s that ingredient, and so you pull the different ingredients together and hope that what you’ve got is a state of jhana.

But it doesn’t really work that way. It’s like being told that durian tastes a little bit like garlic, a little bit like onions, a little bit like custard. It has a little bit of cyanide, a little bit of vitamin E. So you throw all those things together, thinking that you’re going to get durian, but what you get is an inedible mess. If you want to get durian, you have to plant the seed. Here the seed is the topic of the meditation. The topic, as the Buddha said, is the four establishings of mindfulness. For example, staying focused on the body in and of itself, ardent, alert, and mindful, putting aside greed and distress with reference to the world: That’s the process you focus on. Once you’ve planted the seed and keep watering the seed, the tree will grow. When it’s mature, the tree will start giving fruit. If you’ve planted the right seed, you’re going to get the right fruit. So you don’t have to go designing the fruit. You just have to be very careful to plant the right seed and care for it well.

So focus on the breath in and of itself. As you’re focusing on the breath, put aside any sensual passions. There’s the phrase in the description of jhana, “secluded from sensuality.” Some people interpret that as meaning totally cut off from any input from the physical senses. Some interpret it as meaning secluded from sensual pleasures, so that you have to meditate in a place that’s unpleasant or a place that’s very boring. But neither of those interpretations is what the Buddha means. Sensuality, in his sense of the word, is your passion for your sensual thoughts and plans: the extent to which you love to obsess about those things. So in being secluded from sensuality, you’re not trying to close off any contact with outside senses and you’re not trying to put yourself in a dull, boring place. You’re trying to develop a more internal seclusion: If you see any sensual passion coming up, you sidestep it. You put it aside.

Right here is where the analysis of the body into different parts comes in handy. If there’s anything in the body that’s got you lusting for it, you can think about all the other disgusting things right next to it in the body. If you’re feeling some greed for food, think about the whole process of getting and eating food: exactly how much work goes into preparing the food, how short a time it actually tastes good in the mouth, and then what it’s like as it goes through the digestive system and comes out the other end. In other words, you’re using some thinking here to protect yourself, to pull you away from unskillful thoughts, and in particular from sensual passion.

Another way of gaining seclusion from sensuality is to fully inhabit your sense of the body. This is what rupa, or form, means when you’re in jhana: the sense of the body as felt from within. You feel the inside of your hands, the inside of your feet, the inside of everything. The mind isn’t living out in the world with its thoughts about sights or sounds or smells or tastes or things that come and touch the body. You want to be on the level of form: the body in and of itself as it’s present to you right here from the inside right now. And as you’re alert and mindful, you’re ardent: You want to use your alertness and mindfulness in a skillful way.

In other words, notice how the breath feels and ask yourself: Is this the kind of breath sensation you could settle down and spend lots of time with? If it’s not, what can you do to change it? This is where evaluation comes in. The classic image for the first jhana is of a bathman working water through his lump of bath powder and turning it into a kind of dough. Of the different images used for the jhanas, this is the only one with a conscious agent deliberately doing something and evaluating the results. You’re finding a sense of pleasure and fullness with the breath, and then you deliberately work it through the body as a whole, evaluating the results as you go along.

In doing so, you learn an awful lot about this sense of the form of the body and how the energy moves through it and around it: how the energy can move in a comfortable way and how, if you force it in the wrong way, it can get very uncomfortable. You have to observe and learn what works and what doesn’t. In this way you’re not only developing a nice place to be in the present moment, but also learning about how the different aggregates—such as the aggregate of feeling and the aggregate of form—interact; how your perception has an effect on these things. You’ll see how you come to the meditation with specific perceptions in mind, a particular idea of how the mind focuses itself, of how the breath works, of how the energy in one part of the body relates to the energy in another part of the body. As you meditate, you get a chance to test those perceptions. If they’re not working, try out other perceptions.

All of this is evaluation. When you’ve got the right focal point, you’re evaluating it properly, and you’re keeping a specific topic in mind as continually as you can, you’ve got all the causal factors needed to get you into right concentration. Then you don’t have to think about anything else. You don’t have to ask yourself, “Do I need to add a little bit more rapture, a little bit more pleasure?” If you’ve got the causes right, the results will come on their own. The rapture and pleasure are results. If you aren’t getting the right results, focus back on the causes, which are directed thought, evaluation, and singleness of preoccupation. When these are right, the pleasure will come as a sense of ease, whereas the rapture can come in many different forms. In some cases it’s simply a sense of refreshment, of lightness or fullness in the body. Other times it’s more intense: a sense of thrill running through the body, or your hair standing on end. Again, your main concern is to stick with the causes. You don’t want to go out redesigning the fruit, painting the fruit, squeezing the fruit, or pulling on it. Focus on the causes, and the fruit will mature on its own.

Then there’s always the question: How do you know you’ve hit the first jhana? You can’t really know at first. It doesn’t come with a sign that says, “Now entering jhana, Population One.” When you find the mind in a state that feels really good, really comfortable, with a sense of coming home, then when you leave it, put a post-it note on it: This might be something important. In other words, you apply a label to it, but at the same time you realize you’re not yet really familiar with the territory, so you don’t want to be too quick to incise the label in marble.

The only level of jhana with a really definite signpost is the fourth, which is where the in-and-out breathing stops. There’s a sense of awareness filling the body and it’s all very still. The mind is still, the body is still, and everything’s perfectly balanced. All the breath-energy channels in the body are connected, so they nourish one another. There’s no need to breathe in and out, so there’s no in-and-out breathing at all. At that point you know you’ve hit the fourth jhana and you can put a more confident note there. Then you can look back at the various stages you’ve been through, and you might have to rearrange the notes a little bit. Or you find that you’ve taken more than four steps coming in. There are passages in the Canon that talk about five stages in jhana practice, others that talk about three. So it’s possible that your path into the fourth jhana might not have the same number of steps as somebody else’s.

I noticed that when Ajaan Fuang was teaching his students, different people would have all sorts of different experiences in the meditation until they got to the point where everything was very still in the body. The in-and-out breathing finally stopped. Breath energy was filling the body, awareness was filling the body, everything felt very connected, balanced, and very bright: not necessarily with a light, but with a sense of real clarity. Then from that point on everyone seemed to go through the same stages.

But the process of getting into that point is going to be a very individual thing. The important factor is that you find a meditation topic you really like. There’s got to be an element of delight here because you’re trying to develop a state of becoming, a healthy state of becoming, an alternative to the unhealthy and unskillful states of becoming you’ve been engaged in before. And an important component in becoming is delight. With right concentration, you have to develop a strong sense of ease and wellbeing. That’s the only way to pull yourself away from the temptation to keep falling back to the sensual delight that feeds your old sensual indulgences.

The Buddha once said that even though you may have a right understanding about the drawbacks of sensuality, if you don’t have access to the kind of pleasure and rapture that jhana can provide, you’re always going to be tempted to go back. So mere insight on its own isn’t enough to pull you away from those temptations. You need something else—something stronger and more visceral—to provide the mind with a sense of wellbeing. This is what right concentration provides.

There’s a nice sutta in which the Buddha talks about a bull elephant who wants to go down to the river and bathe alone. When he lives with an elephant herd and goes down to the river, the she elephants and baby elephants bump into him. He wants to drink clear water and of course they’ve muddied up the river. So he decides to go off on his own. Then, as he’s living alone, when he goes down to the river, the water is clear. Nobody is bumping into him as he bathes. He comes out, breaks a twig off the tree, and scratches himself with the twig. He finds satisfaction. He allays his itch.

The Buddha said that it’s the same when you practice right concentration. You gain a sense of seclusion, and then the pleasure, the rapture, and the sense of equanimity are like scratching yourself with the twig. It feels good. It allays your itch. And that’s an important part of the practice. Without that sense of ease and wellbeing, everything gets very dry. At the same time, once the mind is satisfied in this way, you get to see the activities of the mind really clearly, you get to see the body really clearly, because you’re right here. Very consistently here. Alert. Mindful.

Then you begin to see your body and mind in terms of the aggregates in action. You see form, i.e., the form you’re inhabiting. You see feelings, the feelings that come from the different ways the breath energy moves through the body. You see your perceptions in action, your fabrications in action. For instance, when you move from the first to the second jhana, you let go of verbal fabrication, and your relationship to the breath changes. Singleness of preoccupation is a factor of all the levels of jhana, but when you get into the second jhana, the Buddha uses a new term: unification. In unification, it feels as if your awareness and the breath become one. You no longer feel like you’re sitting outside of the breath kneading it through the body; you’re immersed in a lake with the cool water of a spring welling up inside. You’re actually one with the breath. You don’t have to adjust it anymore; you don’t have to evaluate it anymore. Things begin to meld together, merge together, with a sense of oneness. That oneness remains as a factor of your concentration all the way up through the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness. This is what happens when you let go of the verbal fabrications of directed thought and evaluation. When you get to the third jhana, you let go of one aspect of mental fabrication—the sense of rapture—because it starts feeling gross. When you get to the fourth jhana, you let go of bodily fabrication. In other words, the in-and-out breath actually stops.

There are two ways you can observe the mind in the course of practicing jhana. One is as it’s in a particular state of jhana. In fact, all the way up through the dimension of nothingness, you can observe each state while you’re in it. It’s like having your hand in a glove. It can be fully in the glove, partly in the glove, or totally removed. When you’re fully in the higher jhanas you can’t observe them, but when you’re partly in them, you can. You pull the mind slightly above its full absorption—but not totally out—so that you can observe what’s going on in that particular state. Another way to observe it is, as you move from one level to the next, to see different fabrications, different perceptions, just peeling away.

So you’re beginning to see exactly what the Buddha is talking about when he talks about the five aggregates. You see them in action—for they are actions. You see the distinctions among them.

You also see how they interact, which means that you’re not only in a really nice shady place with a branch that you can use to scratch yourself anywhere you itch. You’re also in an ideal place to watch what’s going on right here in the present moment in terms of the aggregates. This allows you to start looking at things in and of themselves as they come into being right here, right now.

This is why right concentration is the heart of the path. It’s the first element of the path that the Buddha discovered. You probably know the story. He’d gone to the extreme end of self-affliction through the various austerities he had forced himself to undergo, and after six years he realized that this wasn’t working. In spite of all his investment in that particular path, he had the good sense and the humility to realize that there must be another way. So at that point he hearkened back to the time when he was a child and had entered the first jhana while sitting under a tree. The question arose in his mind: “Could this be the path?” And he said, “Yes, this is the path.” So right concentration is the factor that he first realized was part of the path. From that point on, as he worked with it, he began to realize that other factors had to support it as well. But right concentration is the central one, the one you can’t do without. And the time spent on developing right concentration is very well spent: both because it’s a good place to stay and because it’s an ideal place to start seeing the process of becoming in terms of the five aggregates.

So you keep it in the back of your mind that this is what you want in the practice, this is where you’re headed as an interim goal on the path. But as with every aspect of the path, you have to combine your desire for a particular goal with an understanding of the steps that will take you there. As the Canon says, desire for awakening is a good thing. But it’s a good thing only when it gets you to focus on the actual steps that will take you to awakening. And the same principle applies to jhana. You know in the back of your mind that this is where you’re headed but you can’t be obsessed with what’s written on the map. You have to be more obsessed with the causes that will get you there. You seclude the mind from sensuality. And where do you do that? By focusing on the four establishings of mindfulness.

The Buddha says that this is your territory as a meditator. If you wander off your territory, it’s like the quail who wandered away from the plowed field where he could hide from the hawk. He suddenly finds himself out in an open meadow where a hawk swoops down and catches him. As the hawk carries him off, he laments his bad fate, “Ah, I shouldn’t have left my safe field. If I hadn’t, this hawk would have been no match for me!” The hawk says, “Okay, I’ll let you go there, but even there you won’t escape me.” He lets the quail go. The quail goes and stands on top of a stone turned up by the plow and shouts to the hawk, “Okay, come and get me, you hawk. Come and get me, you hawk.” And the hawk, without bragging, just folds his wings and dives down. The quail sees that the hawk is coming at him full speed and so jumps behind the stone. The hawk crashes into the stone and dies.

This is the analogy for when you wander off into sensual passions: You’re out where the hawk can get you. But when you’re here in the body—ardent, alert, and mindful—you’re in your safe territory. Just keep inhabiting the body as you go through the day. Whether you’re in jhana or not doesn’t matter. As long as you have this sense of fully inhabiting the body, being in touch with the breath energy in the body, you’re in the right location, you’re in the proper territory. As for the map of the different stages, keep that in the back of your mind. If you look at the map while you’re driving, you’ll drive off the road. Use the map after you’ve come out of meditation to reflect on what you experienced, what happened in the course of the meditation. Over time you’ll arrive at your own more complete map of the different stages the mind goes through, the different ways it settles down, the different types of concentration you can get into. But all this comes from having a proper sense of cause and effect.

This is why the Buddha put right view at the very beginning of the path: seeing the practice of meditation as a type of kamma, something you do to get the results that you want, with the realization that the results have to come from causes. If you focus on the causes, with the sense of where you want to go kept in the back of the mind, the causes will take you there. In this case, it’s not done by focusing on your memory of what was stated in the texts about jhana. It’s done by focusing on the breath, getting to know the breath by evaluating it, adjusting it, settling in. That’s where you’ll see right concentration.


----

希修

< Right Concentration/Jhana/선정 >

.

(이하의 내용은 '호흡 명상'이라는 제목의 포스팅 아래에도 댓글로 달아 두었습니다.)

.

- Right concentration의 요건: 

(i) unskillful 요소가 없을 때 ; 

(ii) discernment에 의해 인도된 팔정도의 1번~7번 요소들이 바탕이 되었을 때; 

(iii) concentration이 1~7번 요소들의 심화/발전에도 도움을 줄 때.

.

- Cause & effect( = 업 = 12연기)를 실험하고 체험하는 작업. Deliberate하고 proactive한 작업이지 수동적으로 관조만 하는 것이 아님. 멍때리기는 더더욱 아님.

.

- "한 30분쯤 명상한 줄 알았는데 눈떠 보니 3시간이 지나 있더라!"거나

 "명상 중 무슨 일이 있었는지를 어떻게 말로 하느냐? 

이성으로 이해하거나 말로 표현할 수 있는 경지를 넘어선 경험!" 등의 얘기는, 

그 명상에 mindfulness의 alertness요소가 없었음을 의미. 

=> 잠들지 않았어도 수면과 거의 다름없는 상태였다는 얘기. 

의도한 시각에 선정에 들어 예정한 시각에 정확히 눈을 뜨는 등의 '내공'을 보인다 해도 

여전히 wrong concentration, wrong jhana.

.

- Right jhana를 이루면 깨달음의 4단계들 중의 하나로 들어가게 됨.

.

- [출처] SN 54:1, SN 14:11, AN 6:73~74, AN 6:72, MN 20, AN 3:100, MN 137, "The Wings to Awakening" (by Venerable Ṭhānissaro), etc..

.-----

1. Form Jhanas

.

1.1. 1st Jhana

- Mindfulness of body에 의해 성취되는 lowest 단계. Mindfulness of body만으로 cessation of perception and feeling까지 갈 수도 있음.

- Directed thought, evaluation, singleness of attention, rapture, pleasure.

.

1.2. 2nd Jhana

- Directed thought & evaluation (verbal fabrication)을 멈춤으로써 성취되는 단계.

.

1.3. 3rd Jhana

- Rapture를 내려놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.

.

1.4. 4th Jhana

- Pleasure를 내려놓아 equanimity를 얻음으로써 성취되는 단계.

- 호흡 (bodily fabrication)이 멈춤.

- Light or radiance (pure bright awareness) fills the entire body.

- 'Beautiful'이라는 perception.

.

.----

2. Formless Jhanas

.

2.1. Infinite Space

- Form에 대한 perception을 놓고 form 이외의 space에 집중함으로써 성취되는 단계.

.

2.2. Infinite Consciousness

- Infinite space에 대한 perception을 놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.

.

2.3. Nothingness

- Infinite consciousness에 대한 perception을 놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.

- 여기까지를 perception attainments라고 부름.

- 空/無는 대승불교와 도교에서 절대시하는 개념. 초기불교에서는 空/無조차 그저 거쳐가는 명상 단계들 중의 하나일 뿐, 부처님은 이걸 reality나 본질이라고 보지 않으셨음.

.

2.4. Neither Perception Nor Non-Perception

- Nothingness에 대한 perception을 놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.

- Perception이라는 마음 작용이 극도로 미세해짐.

- Remnant-of-fabrication attainment라고 부름.

.

2.5. Cessation of Perception & Feeling

- Perception과 feeling 등의 모든 mental fabrication까지도 멈춤으로써 성취되는 단계.

- Cessation attainment라고 부름.

- 2.1~2.4 단계를 거치지 않고 4th jhana에서 곧장 이 단계로 올 수도 있음.

- 고통을 낳는 것은 의식/말/행동의 fabrication이고, fabrication을 낳는 것은 ignorance라는 것이 12연기의 내용.

.

* 12연기: 

  1. ignorance => 
  2. fabrications => 
  3. consciousness => 
  4. name-&-form => 
  5. six sense media => 
  6. contact => 
  7. feeling => 
  8. craving => 
  9. clinging/sustenance => 
  10. becoming => 
  11. birth => 
  12. aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair.

.---

希修

Author Admin

< Four Uses of Right Concentration/Jhana >

.

1. Pleasant abiding

a. nourishing food and rest for the mind.

b. 마음의 well-being 없이 자신을 정직하게 분석할 수 없음.

.

2. Developing psychic powers

a. 높은 경지의 right concentration/jhana를 성취한 모든 사람이 신통력을 얻는 것은 아님. => 신통력은 선정의 경지나 의식의 측정 수단이 될 수 없음.

b. 해탈에 꼭 필요하지도 않음.

.

3. Developing mindfulness and alertness regarding how physical and mental phenomena arise and pass away.

a. 모든 현상의 일어남과 사라짐을 보다 정확하게 관찰하고 인과를 직접 체험할 수 있음.

b. 분별력/지혜가 있어야 바른 선정에 이를 수 있지만, 바른 선정은 그 분별력/지혜를 더욱 날카롭게 벼림.

c. 선정이 깊어지는 과정은 스트레스 요소를 하나씩 버려 가는 과정이며, aggregates는 서로 상호작용.

.

4. Putting an end to the mental effluents of sensuality, becoming, and ignorance.

a. “There's no jhana for one with no discernment; no discernment for one with no jhana. But one with both jhana & discernment: he's on the verge of Unbinding." -- Dhammapada 372.

b. 해탈: 물리적, 감각적, 정신적 ‘음식’이 필요없는 영원한 자유, 완전한 행복.

.

[참고] ‘불교에 대한 오해 #9. 집착 않는다는 건 판단 기준마저 버린다는 뜻’

https://www.facebook.com/keepsurfinglife/posts/1370018730036873


< 불교에 대한 오해 #9. 집착 않는다는 건 판단 기준마저 버린다는 뜻 >

.

해탈은 10단계 프로세스다 (사진 #8, 9. MN 78, MN 117, AN 10:103, AN 10:108). 

팔정도의 8요소를 순서대로 계발하여 만랩을 이루면, 부처님이 하신 말씀이 사실임을 깨닫게 된다. 

비유하자면, 10대나 20대에 잘 생긴 이성을 보고 반할 때는 "배우자 외모는 안 중요하다"는 어른들의 얘기가 잘 실감이 안 가므로 무조건 어른들 얘기를 믿거나 아니면 '그럴 수도 있겠네.'하고 짐작을 할 뿐이다. 

그러나 결혼하고 나서 몇 년 살고 나면 배우자 외모가 안 중요함이 체감되며, 직접 체험한 '사실'은 더이상은 '믿음'의 대일 필요도 없다. 

이렇게 부처님의 말씀이 모두 사실 자체임을 확인하는 것이 바로 '깨달음'이고 'Right Knowledge'이며 9단계. (초기경전에선 “directly knowing and realizing it for himself”라는 표현을 사용한다.) 

직접 체험 후에는 집착이라는 것을 하지 않게 된다 (사진 #5). 그렇기에 모든 것 ('나'라는 관념과 모든 의식적인 노력까지도 포함)을 놓는 것이 바로 '해탈'이고 'Right Release'이며 10단계. 윤회의 강 건너편에 도달해 뗏목에서 내려 두 발로 땅을 딛고 서는 것이다. (초기경전에선 “birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, and the task done”이라고 기술한다.)

.

그런데 문제는, 뗏목이 아직 강 한가운데에 있는데도 불구하고 배에서 내려 익사하는 사람들도 있고, 강의 건너편에 도달하기는 커녕 뗏목에 오르지조차 않은 채 아직도 강의 이쪽에 있으면서 자신은 강을 건넜다는 망상에 빠져 탐진치가 오히려 더욱 악화만 되었는데도 자신은 '영적'이라고 착각하는 사람들도 존재한다는 사실이다. 이 모두가, 10단계인 해탈 프로세스에서 1~9단계를 전부 건너뛴 채 처음부터 무조건 "생각 말고 분별 말고 그저 내려놓기만 하면 된다"는 과잉단순화의 오류 탓. (“암수술이라는 게 결국 배를 갈라 암세포가 퍼진 부위를 제거하고 다시 배를 덮는 일”이라는 기술에 ‘틀린’ 부분은 없지만, 그렇다고 의사 면허조차 없는 일반인도 아무나 암수술 집도할 수 있는 것도 아니다. ‘틀리지 않음’과 ‘목적하는 결과를 실제로 성취함’ 사이에는 때로 무한대의 거리가 존재할 수도 있다.)

.

우선은 팔정도의 8요소 하나 하나를 순서대로 직접 경작해야 하고, 그 재료들을 갖고서 뗏목을 튼튼하게 지어야 한다. (8요소 각각이 다른 요소들의 성장에 도움이 될 때만 'right'이라는 단어를 사용할 수 있다는 것이 타니사로 스님의 견해.) 그리고는 그 뗏목을 꼭 붙들고서 강을 건너야 한다 (사진 #1, 2). 뗏목을 붙잡는 것은 익사 예방을 위한 필수이지만, 모든 다른 종류의 집착들은 아다시피 고통의 원인이 되니 놓을 수 있으면 놓는 게 당연히 좋다. 그러나, 건강, 안전한 삶, 남들에게 인정은 못 받아도 존중은 받는 삶, 최소한 몇 명의 주위 사람들과는 화목하고 즐겁게 보내는 삶, 이런 것들에 대한 집착 (강한 소망)을, 깨닫지 못 한 이가 완전히 놓을 수 있을 리는 물론 만무하다. 그래서 딜레마이고, 그래서 나온 것이 12연기와 not self, no conceit 교리. 즉, "나는 이타적인 사람이 되어야지!"라는 생각조차 나에 대한 '자기중심적' 사고이고 윤회를 강화하므로, 그렇게 존재/주체 중심으로 생각하지 말고 인과의 관점에서 개개의 행위/사건 중심으로만 impersonally 사고함으로써 '나 집착'( =모든 집착의 근원)을 약화시켜 나가라는 것 (사진 #2, 3, 4). 

.

현실적으로, 팔정도의 8요소들을 만랩으로 완성하지 못 한 사람으로서 가능한 최대치는, 매사를 연기=인과의 관점에서 to take impersonally하는 not self, no conceit의 노력. Not self, no conceit의 실천 정도에 비례하여 탐진치가 떨어져 나갈 것이고, 그럴수록 해탈에 가까워지게 되며, ‘나 집착’의 대표적 증상인 자존심 때문에 자신의 오류를 인정 못 하고 계속 우기거나 책임 인정을 끝내 회피하는 일도 물론 없을 것이다. 

.

하나 주의할 점은, 해탈을 했어도 타고난 수명이 다 하는 날까지는 목숨이 붙어 있는데, 해탈 후 남은 삶은 '죄지을 내가 없으니 아무렇게나 막 산다!'가 전혀 아니라 완성된 팔정도 안에 여전히 머무르면서 보낸다는 것이다. “나는 깨달았으므로 세상의 비판에 아랑곳 않는다. ‘나’라는 것이 없는데 누가 죄를 짓고 누가 욕을 먹는단 말인가?” 류의 궤변을 늘어놓으며 '자유롭게'( =방탕하게) 사는 자칭 '도인'들이 가끔 있는데, 초기불교의 가르침에 비춰본다면 그건 천지분간도 못 하는 어리석음일 뿐. "Right View조차 고집 않고, 무엇이 right이고 무엇이 wrong인지 따지지 않으며, 모든 것을 무조건 긍정적으로 수용하는 태도가 바로 수행자의 자세"라는 식의 얘기는 그러므로 초기불교와는 무관한 것 (사진 #1, 2). 깨달았다고 해서 부처님의 가르침을 버리는 게 아니라 (해탈할 정도의 수준이 되면 부처님의 가르침이 세포 하나 하나 속에 녹아들어 완전히 체화되었다는 얘기인데 어떻게 버리겠나?) 여전히 그 안에 머물되 '나'라는 생각 없이 머물 뿐이라는 것이 타니사로 스님의 해석이다 (사진 #6, 7). 

.

뗏목에서 내리는 비유 때문에 부처님의 가르침을 떠난다는 식의 오해가 가능한데, 다음과 같이 생각하면 이해가 된다. 독약( =집착)을 알아보지 못 할 때는 전문가가 마시지 말라고 하면 그 말을 믿고 따를 수밖에 없지만, 스스로 독약 전문가가 되면 누가 마시지 말라 해서가 아니라 뻔히 보이고 뻔히 알기 때문에 안 마신다. 다른 전문가( =부처님)의 말에 의존하는 것은 아니어도 여전히 그 전문지식( =이미 체화된 부처님의 가르침) 안에 머무는 것. 그러나 'to take personally 않음'이기에 여전히 '집착 않음'인 것.  

.

.

사진들 출처: "The Shape of Suffering" by Venerable Ṭhānissaro.  https://www.dhammatalks.org/ebook_index.html 

.

'무아와 윤회'

https://www.facebook.com/keepsurfinglife/posts/1150079848697430

.< 무아와 윤회 >

.
.
(이 글에서 언급되는 1, 3, 4 단계는 초기불교에 이미 있는 것이고, 2단계는 이해를 돕기 위해 제가 중간에 넣은 것입니다.)
.
.
1. 1단계 (Mundane Level): 업의 책임자로서의 '나'는 있다
.
모든 존재들이 업에 의해 생겨나고 자기 업의 상속자가 된다고 AN 5.57은 말한다. 하지만, 건강, 적성, 부모 등 삶의 큰 윤곽을 결정하는 요소들은 타고났어도, 마치 어떤 방송국에서 TV 연속극 제작을 시작할 때는 대충의 플롯만 있고 스토리의 디테일은 시청자 반응을 보면서 전개해 가는 것처럼 삶의 구체성은 매순간 자유의지로 내리는 선택 (생각, 말, 행동)과 노력에 의해 스스로 완성해 간다. 물론 삶을 특정한 방향으로 흐르게끔 하는 모멘텀을 그 윤곽 자체가 이미 갖고 있기는 하며, 그 모멘텀을 바꾸는 게 쉽지도 않지만 불가능하지도 않다. (모멘텀을 바꾸지 못 한다는 전제 하에 미래를 예측하는 것이 바로 점성술이라고 나는 생각.) 나의 현재 행동 (생각과 말 포함)이 얼마나 skillful 혹은 wholesome한지, 즉 어떤 貪瞋痴가 얼마나 많이/적게 들어 있는지에 따라, 이것이 새로운 업으로서, 전생/과거 업과 상호작용을 계속하면서 나의 삶을 확정해 나간다. (삶에 저항 않고 분별 없이 무조건 수용하는 것이 영성이라고 생각하는 분들이 많은데, 그건 그야말로 운명/팔자의 노예로 살겠다는 얘기. 저런 수용적 태도는, 최선을 다 해도 당장 바뀌지 않는 부분에 대해서만 적용해야 하는 것.) 남에게 피해를 주면서까지 자신의 쾌락/이익만 좇는 이기적인 사람은 내세에 고통스러운 곳으로 윤회하고, 바른 과정/방법을 통해 행복을 추구하는 사람은 내세에 행복한 곳으로 윤회한다는 내용을 초기불교에서는 mundane right view라고 부른다. 암튼 이 삶의 책임( ≠탓)은 오로지 '나'의 것이다.
.
"Purity and impurity are one's own doing. No on purifies another." -- Dhp 165
.
"I am the owner of my actions, heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator. Whatever I do, for good or for evil, to that will I fall heir." -- AN 5:57
.
.
2. 2단계: '나'라고 동일시/집착하지 마라
.
.
2.1. 기독교에서 말하는 것과 같은, 영원불변하는 그런 영혼을 불교에선 인정하지 않는다. One and the same 영혼이 옷을 갈아입듯 몸을 바꾸는 것이 힌두교의 윤회(reincarnation)이고, 한 양초의 불로써 다른 양초에 불을 붙이듯 그렇게 불=업이 다음 양초=생으로 넘어간다고 보는 것이 불교의 윤회(rebirth). 힌두교의 윤회와 다른 점은, 불교의 윤회에서는 이전 양초의 불과 이후 양초의 불이 같다고도 다르다고도 말하기가 애매하다는 것이다. 전생의 A가 남긴 업이 물질을 끌어 와 B라는 이승의 육체를 형성한다. 이 때 A의 업 때문에 몸을 받는 B는 A의 업도 상속받는다. (마치, 부모님의 사업체 상속시 채무도 함께 상속되는 것과도 비슷하다고 나는 이해한다.) 그리고 상속받은 업을 요리할 책임은 B에게 있고, 그 요리의 결과가 B의 미래 and/or B의 업을 상속할 내세의 C에게 영향을 미친다. 다만 어떤 업이 이승의 B 자신에게 결과를 가져오고 어떤 업이 내세의 C에게 갈지 알 수 없기에, B로서는 그저 요리에 최선을 다 할 수 밖에 없다. 이것이 불교에서의 윤회이며, 해탈로써 정지시키지 않는 한 이 과정은 영원히 무한히 반복된다. 겉모습으로만 A-B-C의 '세 사람'인 것이지 업은 그렇게 명확히 구분되지 않고, 그렇다고 해서 이 셋이 100% 동일한 인물인 것도 아니며 ("전생의 나" 같은 구절은 편의상의 표현), 한 생 안에서도 새로운 업에 의해 매 순간 계속 만들어져 가는 B를 딱히 규정할 방법도 없다. 예를 들어, B가 사고로 팔 하나를 잃어도 심지어 식물인간이 되어도 그는 D나 E 아닌 여전히 B다. 이런 식으로 하나씩 살피다 보면, B가 누구인지를 규정하는 근거로 삼을 만한 본질적/필수적 부분/요소를 단 한 가지도 확정할 수 없음을 발견하게 된다. 또 B의 타고난 성격은 A의 업의 결과이기에, B의 뜻대로 컨트롤이 잘 안 될 밖에. 이런 내용들을 한 마디로 간단히 표현한 것이 바로 無我.
.
2.2. 하지만 이걸 글자 그대로 '내가 없다'고 과잉 단순화하는 데에서 온갖 문제가 비롯된다. 글자 그대로 '나'도 없고 '너'도 없다면, 모든 것이 완전히 '空'하다면, 내가 너를, 혹은 네가 나를 죽이면 안 되는 이유가 대체 무엇인가? 이 문제는 無我와 空의 해석에 매우 섬세해야 함을 반증한다. "내 생각은 내가 아니다" 류도 지나친 단순화. 동일시/집착하지 말으라는 얘기일 뿐, 모든 행동 (생각과 말 포함)에 대한 책임은 여전히 나에게 있다. 부처님이라고 해서 배고플 때 남의 입에 밥숟갈 넣지 않으셨다. 나와 남을 구분 못/안 하는 게 무아인 것이 아니다.
.
.
3. 3단계 (Transcendent Level): 매사를 process로서, impersonally 파악하라
.
3.1. "불교는 윤회와 무아를 말하는데, 내가 없다면 대체 무엇이 윤회한다는 말인가? 이 둘은 서로 모순되지 않는가?"라며 많은 이들이 헷갈려 한다. (윤회 방편설이 등장한 이유 중 하나가 아닐런지.) 하지만 '나'라는 것이 있는지 없는지, 무엇이 윤회하는지, 해탈한 존재들은 어떤 식으로 존재하는지, 업을 짓는 나와 그 과보를 받는 내가 동일인물인지 아닌지, 우주의 시작과 끝이 무엇인지, 세상 만사가 내 마음 속에만 존재하는 환상인지 아닌지, 만물이 결국 하나인지 모두 제각각인지 등의 문제들은 고와 고의 해결에 오히려 방해만 되니 이런 문제들에 대한 형이상학적 사변은 아예 하지도 말라고, 부처님은 초기경전의 여러 곳에서 명시하셨다 (SN 44.10, MN 2, MN 72, MN 63, SN 12:15). 어떤 문제든 self라는 관점에서도 not-self라는 관점에서도, existence의 관점에서도 non-existence의 관점에서도 생각하지 말고, 다만 "이것이 있기에 저것이 있다"는 연기의 관점으로만 파악하라고 하셨다 (SN 12:12, SN 12:15, SN 12:48). 이것이 transcendent right view.
.
디지털 카메라로 사진 찍을 때 portrait 모드로 찍으면 주인공 얼굴만 또렷이 나오고 그 외에는 흐릿하게 나오듯이, 우리가 하는 모든 생각은 '나'라는 주체에 모든 포커스가 맞춰져 있다. 그러나 촛점을 행위의 주체나 존재가 아닌 행동 (생각과 말 포함) 자체에 두고서, 심지어 자기 자신 포함 세상 만사를 자신의 생각/감정/이익 아닌 오직 인과의 관점에서만 impersonal하게 바라보는 것이 바로 'not self,' 'no conceit'인 것. 그래서 Thanissaro 스님은 '나' 포함 세상 만사를 process로 파악하라고, Bodhi 스님은 a series of events로 이해하라고 말씀하시는 것이며, Vimalaramsi 스님은 impersonalization이라고 말씀하신다.
.
Bhikkhu Bodhi on Brahman / Atman / Oneness / Fullness (Brahmanism) vs. Emptiness (Early Buddhism)
.
Bhikkhu Bodhi on 'not self'
.
3.2. 다음은 SN 21.2의 일화.
.
[아난다] "우리의 스승인 부처님에게 어떤 변화 (죽음을 의미)가 생긴다면 사리풋타 존자님은 그로 인해 슬픔, 탄식, 고통, 번뇌, 절망 등의 영향을 받으실 것 같습니까?"
.
[사리풋타] "부처님이 오래 사신다면 무수한 존재들을 위해 물론 훨씬 더 좋은 일이겠지만, 스승님께 어떤 변화가 생긴다 해도 내게 슬픔, 탄식, 고통, 번뇌, 절망 등이 일어나지는 않을 것."
.
[아난다]
(번역 i) "That must be because Venerable Sāriputta has long ago totally eradicated ego, possessiveness, and the underlying tendency to conceit. ... ..." https://suttacentral.net/sn21.2/en/sujato...
(번역 ii) "Surely, it's because Ven. Sariputta's I-making & mine-making and obsessions with conceit have long been well uprooted ... ..." https://www.accesstoinsight.org/.../sn21/sn21.002.than.html.
.
위 경은, '나'라는 존재를 중심에 놓고서 take personally하는 '자기중심주의'를 버리라는 메세지로 해석해야만 이해가 된다. 즉 불교의 ‘not self,’ ‘no conceit’는 우리가 흔히 생각해 오던 상식적 의미의 '겸손'이나 ‘자기희생’이 아니라 to take things impersonally하라는 가르침인 것.
.
.
4. 4단계 (Final Level): 모든 것을 초월하라
.
八正道의 right view에서부터 시작하여 팔정도의 8요소를 모두 계발한 후 다시 right view로 돌아와 해탈이 완성된다. 시작 단계의 right view = mundane discernment는 부처님의 말씀을 기준으로 하여 매사를 바라보는 분별력이고, 주체 아닌 인과의 관점에서만 impersonal 하게 매사를 바라보는 right view는 transcendent discernment. 그리고 부처님이 하신 말씀을 단순히 '이해'하는 차원이 아니라 직접 '확인'/'체험'하는 것이 final right view 혹은 right knowledge (9단계). 그리고 이 경지에 이르면 모든 것, '나' 포함 모든 관념 및 수행의 노력까지도 놓게 된다: 10단계인 right release (MN 78, MN 117, AN 10:103, AN 10:108). 이것이 바로, 윤회의 강 건너편에 안착한 뗏목에서 내리는 행위이며, 이렇듯 해탈은 10단계 프로세스인 것.
.
다시 말해, '나'에 대한 집착은 강의 건너편에 안착했을 때에야 비로소 완전히 내려놓을 수 있으며, 그래서 타니사로 스님은 강을 건너가고 있는 수행의 와중에는 건강한 '에고' (프로이드가 말한 원래 의미 그대로의 에고)가 오히려 필요하다고 말씀하신다. 팔정도의 8요소를 계발하고 있는 과정에서는 매사를 오직 인과의 관점에서만 impersonally 하게 분석하는 노력으로 충분하며, 강의 건너편에 안착하기도 전에 '에고없는 척'하는 것은 강의 한가운데에서 배에서 내려 물에 빠져 죽는 행위와도 같다는 얘기.
.
#103~122: The Wisdom of Ego. Mature Wisdom Requires a Mature Ego
.
"Then, at a later time, he abandons conceit, having relied on conceit." -- AN 4:159
.
그러니 강의 건너편에 도달도 못 했으면서 심오한 척하느라 4단계의 얘기를 주문처럼 읊조리는 사람이 있다면 그의 integrity에 주의해야 하고, '나 없다'의 과잉단순화된 무아에 취해 있는 사람은 3단계의 skillful vs. unskillful 사고를 '수준 낮은 이분법'으로 착각하지 말아야 한다. 영성에 관심있는 이들이 가장 빠지기 쉬운 함정도 바로 과잉단순화된 무아나 oneness/nonduality에 대한 집착인데, 초기불교는 이 oneness/nonduality마저 거쳐 가는 명상 단계일 뿐 truth/reality는 아니라고 말한다.
.
5. 윤회
.
매사를 주체 아닌 행위에 촛점을 두고서 인과의 관점에서만 impersonal 하게 파악해야 하는 이유는 그럼 무엇인가? '나'라는 주체를 위주로 생각할수록 존재에 집중=집착하게 되고, 그 집중력이 바로 윤회의 동력이 되기 때문:
.
"Wherever one’s selfhood turns up, there that action will ripen. Where that action ripens, there one will experience its fruit, either in this very life that has arisen or further along in the sequence." -- AN 3:34.
.
그래서 not self = no conceit을 가르치는 것이며, 이런 교리들의 목적도 상식적 의미의 '겸손'이나 '원만한 인간관계' 혹은 '사랑'이 아니라 바로 '윤회로부터의 해방' 즉 '해탈'인 것. 그러니 "불교에서 윤회는 방편설" 류의 얘기는, 불교의 대전제부터 아예 부정하고 들어가는 셈.
.
부처님이 해탈하실 때 3가지를 보셨다.
.
(a) 본인의 윤회. 수십만 번에 걸치는 윤회동안 어떤 생에서 어떤 음식을 먹었었는지까지 자세히.
(b) 인간들의 윤회 패턴. 어떤 행동을 하면 결과가 어떻게 되고 그 결과가 언제 찾아오고 등등.
(c) 심리적 윤회. 어떤 마음을 먹으면 그 결과로 내 생각과 감정이 어떻게 되고 그로 인해 어떤 경험이 찾아오고 등등.
.
그리고 b와 c를 관통하는 공통된 법칙을 찾으셨는데 그게 12연기=인과이다. 그러니까 b는 12연기가 거시적 레벨 (생과 생 사이)에서 작용하는 것이고 c는 미시적 레벨 (한 개인의 한 순간의 의식과 다음 순간의 의식 사이)에서 작용하는 것인 셈. 그래서 매사를 주체 아닌 행위에 촛점을 두고서 인과의 한 과정으로만 파악하라고 하신 것.
.
윤회는 경험적으로 확인할 수 없지만 자기 마음의 변화는 직접 확인할 수 있고 어차피 미시적 차원에서의 원리와 거시적 차원에서의 원리는 동일하기에, 윤회가 믿기지 않는다면 안 믿어도 상관은 없다. 미시적 차원에서의 연기 공부를 열심히 하다 보면, 윤회가 있을 경우 좋은 곳으로 윤회할 것이고, 설사 윤회가 없다 한들 이미 이승에서 마음 수행의 효용을 보았으니 억울할 이유가 없는 것. 하지만 누가 죽을 때마다 제자들이 부처님에게 그 사람은 어디로 윤회했느냐고 묻고 이에 대해 부처님이 대답하시거나, 어떤 행동은 이승에서 그 결과가 오고 어떤 행동은 다음 생에서 그 결과가 오며 또 어떤 행동은 몇 생 후에 결과가 온다고 말씀하시는 것 같은 얘기들이 초기경전에 줄줄이 나온다.
.
6. 無我之境
.
한 가지만 추가로 언급하고 맺으려고 한다. 예술 작품/활동에 푸욱 빠져 잠시나마 '나'를 완전히 망각할 때 무아지경이라는 표현을 쓰고, 이걸 바람직한 상태로 오해하기에 그래서 심지어는 섹스를 '수행'으로 삼는 탄트라라는 것도 생긴 것이지만, 이런 해석은 초기경전의 관점과는 전혀! 무관하다. 초기불교는 섹스, 도박, 권력, 쇼핑, 예술, 여행, 우정/사랑, 심지어 학문마저도 모두 감각적 즐거움을 위한 feeding이라 간주한다. 물론 도박보다는 예술이 건전하고 인간관계보다는 자연에서 즐거움을 찾는 것이 건강하지만, 가장 이상적인 즐거움은 명상을 통해 자가발전하는 것. 또, 예술이든 뭐든 그런 외부 자극에 distract되지 않기 위해 일상생활 중에도 늘상 자신의 호흡에 대한 관조를 자기 마음/의식의 anchor로 삼으라고 (바로 이것이 'centered'의 의미) 초기불교는 가르친다. 그러니 외부의 무언가에 빠져 잠시나마 자신을 망각/상실하는 의미의, 우리가 흔히 말하는 무아/무아지경은, 부처님의 가르침과 완전히 정반대의 방향을 가리키는 것. What an irony.
.
.
'불교에 대한 오해 #8. 무아는 영원한 실체가 없다는 뜻'
.
'불교에 대한 오해 #7. 남 집착이 Not Self, No Conceit'
.
'불교에 대한 오해 #6. 어머니가 외아들을 사랑하듯 세상 모든 존재를 사랑하는 것이 불교의 자비'
.
'불교에 대한 오해 #5. 무조건 남을 내 위에/앞에 두는 것이 무아/겸손'
.
'불교에 대한 오해 #3. 남을 내 몸처럼 사랑하고 남의 일을 내 일처럼 생각하는 것이 무아'
.
.
ACCESSTOINSIGHT.ORG
Purity of Heart




--

11] The Fourth Frame of Reference | The Noble Eightfold Path : 13 Meditation Talks

11] The Fourth Frame of Reference | The Noble Eightfold Path : 13 Meditation Talks

The Fourth Frame of Reference

March 29, 2009

Ajaan Lee often made the point that when you’re focused on the breath, you don’t have just the first frame of reference. You have all four right there. 

  1. The breath is the body in and of itself. That’s the first frame of reference.
  2.  The feelings of pleasure or pain that you’re encountering as you attend to the breath count as feelings in and of themselves. That’s the second. 
  3. As for the mind state you’re trying to develop, you find that it’s either defiled or not. Or as you get further into this third frame of reference, you start noticing when the mind is concentrated or when it’s not; when it’s expanded or enlarged, or when it’s not; whether it’s released or not; whether it’s ever been excelled or not.
  4. And then there’s the fourth frame of reference, the dhammas. Often we don’t have a real handle on how to make use of that fourth frame of reference, because it looks like little more than a list of Dhamma teachings. But it’s much more than that. It’s a list of different frameworks to keep in mind for dealing with problems that come up in the course of your practice. 

You can look at things in terms of 

    • the five hindrances, 
    • the five clinging-aggregates, 
    • the six sense media, 
    • the seven factors for awakening, or 
    • the four noble truths. 

Each list provides a useful framework for looking at what’s actually going on in different aspects of the practice. And not just looking: They also give you guidance in what to do. These are not exercises in bare awareness, because each member of each list carries a specific duty. Once you’ve figured out what’s happening in terms of that particular framework, you know what to do in response. You know what to do proactively.

For instance, as we’re going through daily life, one of the main issues in practice is restraint of the senses. This is an area where it’s good to use the framework of the six sense media. As the Buddha said in this context, 

  • when you’re looking, try to notice: Where is the fetter in the looking? 
  • If you’re listening, where is the fetter in the listening? 

And the “fetter” here is defined as a sense of passion and delight for what you’re looking at, or for why you’re looking. 

It’s not always the case that a sense of delight comes up only after you’ve noticed something delightful. Sometimes you have a very clear idea ahead of time of what you want to look for: You want to get riled up about something, you want to get attracted by something, so you go looking for trouble.


This is especially true with thoughts. Notice, when a thought comes up, “What’s the appeal of this thought? Why do I go for this particular kind of thinking?” 

Once you’ve looked at the appeal, then look for the drawbacks. 

What are the drawbacks of going along with that kind of thinking? 

If you gave that particular kind of thinking free rein in your mind, where would it lead you? 

If you notice a fetter—in other words, you really are delighting in something to the point where it pulls you away from your center—don’t just sit there and say, “Oh, I’m fettered,” and leave it at that. 

You’ve got to do something to cut the fetter—because those fetters are the cause of suffering, which means that your duty with regard to them is to abandon them as soon as you notice them. 

Of course, the big problem here is that we often enjoy our fetters. We actually create them for the purpose of enjoying them. So we have to do something we usually don’t like to do: to look squarely at our enjoyment and see where it’s causing problems. The delight may seem pleasant and entertaining right now, but where is it going to take you down the line?


That’s a framework you can use as you go through the day. And you can use it during your meditation as well. You’re sitting here focusing on the breath, and all of a sudden your mind is off on something you saw last week, something you read yesterday, or something you’re anticipating tomorrow. 

Look for the fetter. Where is the sense of passion? Where is the sense of delight in that particular thinking? What can you do to see through it to pry yourself away from that enjoyment? 

As the Buddha noted, the best thing is to pull yourself away from these unskillful ways of thinking and to encourage harmless ways of thinking instead. From there you direct the mind into concentration.

This is where the two frameworks of the hindrances and the factors for awakening become useful. 

When you sit down and try to get the mind concentrated, it’s useful to figure out exactly, “What’s going on here? Which hindrance is bedeviling me right now?” 

Once you’re able to classify a disturbance as sensual desire, ill will, torpor and lethargy, restlessness and anxiety, or uncertainty, then you know what to do with it. And sometimes just recognizing it as a problem gets you over the hump.

This is because one of the characteristics of the hindrances is that they deceive you

When desire arises, your mind is usually already on the side of the desire. You don’t see it as a problem. The thing you desire really is something desirable. 

When you have ill will for somebody, that person really is awful. 

When the mind is torpid, well, it really is time to get some rest. It’s time to sleep. The mind is getting too tired. 

And so on down the line. 

You have to learn to see these attitudes as genuine hindrances, as real obstacles on your path, and not be fooled into siding with them. 

Ask yourself, “What is this hindering me from?” Well, for one thing, it’s hindering you from learning about the potentials of concentration. You sit here rehashing your old ways of thinking and will never get out of your old ruts.

We read about the ajaans, about the people in the Canon who gained strong states of concentration. 

We read about the descriptions of concentration. 

But what’s the reality of concentration? Exactly what do those words correspond to? If you spend all your time playing around with the hindrances, you never get to know. 

The only way to gain direct knowledge of these things is to bring some appropriate attention to the hindrance, seeing that it’s a cause of suffering. Try to look for where the stress is, look for where the limitation is, to see how that hindrance is squandering your energy. And then look for ways to abandon it.

When you do this, you’re developing the first three factors for awakening: mindfulness, analysis of qualities, and persistence. 

  1. Mindfulness is what helps you remember to look for what’s skillful and unskillful; 
  2. analysis of qualities—which is nurtured by appropriate attention—is what enables you to recognize skillful and unskillful qualities as they arise; 
  3. and persistence is what carries through with the desire to develop the skillful and abandon the unskillful ones. 


Analysis of qualities actually helps you in many ways. It not only recognizes what’s skillful and not, but also helps you figure out how to undercut an unskillful state of mind, like a hindrance, and how to develop the remaining factors for awakening in its place. 

As a set, these seven factors for awakening are a good framework for figuring out how to use discernment to get the mind to settle down. In particular, you look to see that these factors are balanced. If they’re not, how do you bring them into balance?

There’s a sutta that compares this balancing act to getting a fire to burn at just the right level of intensity

In other words, you’re trying to develop 

  • the fire of concentration, 
  • the fire of jhana, 
  • a steady flame of centered awareness. 

Sometimes it looks like it’s about to go out because the level of energy is too low. In cases like that, you don’t want to emphasize qualities like calm, concentration, or equanimity. 

You want to emphasize more active qualities. 

Get the mind moving again. Analyze things as to what’s skillful and unskillful, and then put in whatever effort is needed to get rid of the unskillful qualities and develop the skillful ones. 

In taking this more active role, you can develop a strong sense of rapture, refreshment, as the skillful qualities get strengthened. This further energizes the mind. If, on the other hand, your mind is too active and antsy, that’s when you try to soothe it. Go for calm. Get the mind to focus on easing the breath, calming the breath down, working through tension in the body, until the mind gets more solid in concentration and can come to a state of equanimity and equipoise.

So, again, these frameworks of the five hindrances and the seven factors for awakening are not just guidelines for bare awareness. They’re frameworks telling you what to do if you find yourself facing a particular type of mind state as you’re trying to bring the mind to strong concentration. 

They help you get a sense of what your duty is, where you can find the path out of that particular unbalanced or unskillful state. 

Or if you find that you’re balanced and the mind is doing fine, then your duty is to maintain it. 

You don’t just say, “Oh, that’s what concentration is like,” and just let it drop from fear of being attached to it. You try to keep it going.

 You try to understand what causes it so that you can maintain it. This is where you try to bring in an element of willpower.


A couple of years back, I was talking to a group of people in training to become vipassana teachers. I was mentioning just this element of trying to keep the mind steady, and one of them said, “Well, it sounds like you’re talking about using willpower, but I know that that can’t be what you mean.” 

And I said, “That’s precisely what I mean.” The element of intention is willpower, and it’s something you’ve got to use in the practice. 

But you can’t use just strength of will to get things done. 

You also have to use your understanding of cause and effect so that your use of your willpower is skillful. 

This is what the categories of the fourth frame of reference are for. 

They’re there to help give you guidance, once a particular state comes up in the mind, as to what you’ve got to do if you really want to find true happiness. 

In other words, they’re not just instructions in how to respond to situations. They’re also instructions in how to take a proactive role in giving rise to the path.

This is even clearer in the categories of the four noble truths. You analyze things first in terms of the first noble truth—the five clinging-aggregates—to understand where’s the stress here, where’s the suffering here, where and how you’re clinging to these things. 

In particular, you want to learn how to identify each of the clinging-aggregates—form, feeling, perception, fabrication, and consciousness—as events, activities, to see what spurs them into action and how they stop. 

Then you try to notice how you’re clinging to them, how you keep compulsively repeating them. Then you take your clinging apart. If something’s disturbing your concentration, take it apart in terms of the four types of clinging: Where’s the clinging? What kind of clinging is it? Is it sensual clinging? Is it clinging in terms of habits and practices? Views? Ideas of what you are or what belongs to you? Try to comprehend it—which, after all, is the duty with regard to the first noble truth.

Once you’ve comprehended the suffering or stress, you should be able to see where its cause is. What’s causing you to cling? Where’s the craving? Try to catch it happening. When you can catch it happening, the duty there is to abandon it, to stop doing it. As for whichever aspects of the path that can help you see these things, you develop them, all eight factors of the path, and particularly right concentration. This is where you get proactive.

When you’ve mastered concentration, the framework of the five clinging-aggregates comes in handy again. When all the factors of the path are in a good state of balance, you start analyzing the concentration in terms of the five aggregates to see where it, too, is stressful. Even the equanimity of the fourth jhana has its element of stress. You’ve got to look for that so you can develop dispassion all around.

This is why, when you’ve mastered concentration, it’s useful to take these states of concentration apart in these ways. Where is feeling playing a role there? Where’s the perception? Where are the thought fabrications? Where’s the consciousness of this? Which aspect are you clinging to? Can you see the drawbacks of that clinging? It’s helpful here to look in terms of the three perceptions of inconstancy, stress, or not-self—or of any of the perceptions that help to develop a sense of dispassion. You look for the inconstancy. Once you’ve perceived the inconstancy, you look to see that that’s stressful. When you see the stress, you realize that it can’t possibly be a happiness you’d like to claim as your own. Or you learn to perceive the aggregates that make up your concentration as empty, a disease, a wound. There must be something better.

This line of perceiving, this approach, is what finally gets you past all your attachments and brings you to something really solid, something unfabricated. 

At that point, you can put even these strategic perceptions down, for they’ve done their work. You’ve been carrying out these skillful duties to arrive at something that doesn’t carry a duty. As Ajaan Mun once said, nibbana carries no duty for the mind at all. Each of the four noble truths entails a duty, but nibbana is something beyond the four noble truths, something outside of the framework of the four frames of reference and their attendant duties. It’s not an activity in any way.

So it’s helpful to look at this fourth frame of reference as a series of guidelines for action, as guidelines for your ardency. When a problem comes up, figure out which framework is useful for analyzing where you are in the practice and for pointing the practice in the direction you want to go. 

Learn to see what’s going on in your mind in terms of these frameworks, so you can figure out what to do, what’s the duty here. This helps you to step back from just being in your thought worlds and allows you to take them apart in terms of their elements: the events and activities that put them together. This in turn gives you a much better idea of what to do with them—instead of what you have been doing, which has been to cling to them and suffer.

This is how you take apart this big mass of suffering in the mind. If you learn how to take it apart, you really see it’s not a solid mountain of rock. It’s just a pile of gravel. And each little piece of gravel is not all that heavy. You can deal with it much more easily as a piece of gravel than as part of a solid mass of rock.

So try to familiarize yourself with these different frameworks and you’ll get a much better handle on how to deal with the problems of the mind.



希修

다음 주는 The Fourth Frame of Reference (Mental Qualities)를 할 차례이고 
그 다음 두 챕터는 jhana/선정에 대한 것이니 

매주 한 챕터씩 커버한다면 앞으로 3주가 남은 것인데.. 기술적으로 너무 자세히 들어가는 게 아무래도 지루하게? 복잡하게? 느껴지실 수도 있을 것 같아서, 여러분이 보이시는 반응의 정도에 따라 속도를 조절해 볼까 합니다. 즉, 질문을 많이 하시면 차근차근 3주동안 하고, 질문이 별로 없으시면 남은 3챕터를 2주에 하는 것이지요. 

암튼, Mental Qualities와 Right Concentration/선정 요약은 일단 올려 드리겠습니다.
.
.
< The Fourth Frame of Reference – Mental Qualities >
.
1. 명상할 때 올라오는 잡념 혹은 unskillful한 요소들을 알아차릴 것.
.
2. 표면적으로는 그 어떤 필요나 정당성을 가장하든 무관하게, 의식에서 인정하든 않든 실은 우리가 그것들을 즐기기 때문.
.
3. 때로 그 잡념은 불유쾌한 경험이나 생각인데, 어떤 측면에서 우리가 그것들을 즐기는지 찾아 볼 것. (예) 타인이 내게 잘못한 것을 떠올리는 일은 나를 세상의 중심에 위치시킴. 피해망상이 과대망상이기도 한 이유.
.
4. 그 잡념을 계속 추구할 경우 어떤 결과가 될 것이며, 그런 잡념을 즐기고 추구하는 기회비용은 무엇인지 생각해 볼 것.
.
5. 어떤 수단을 사용해서라도 제거할 것. (예) 알아차리기, 무시하기, 억누르기, ‘무상, 고, 무아’ 등.

.
6. skillful한 방향으로 생각을 리드할 것 = Direct your thought/mind into something skillful. (예) 상대가 내게 ‘잘못’했다는 내 판단의 근거가 무엇인지 따져묻고, 상대가 실제로 잘못했다면 그의 잘못은 그의 업이고 나의 화/짜증은 나의 업임을 기억하면서 상대에게 연민을 가질 것.
.
7. 내 마음에서 어떤 일이 일어나고 있는지에 대해 정직함, 정확한 판단/분석, skillful한 요소를 계발하려는 의지, 인과에 대한 이해 등이 모두 필요. 명상은 수동적 관조가 아니라 proactive한 작업.

.

希修

< Right Concentration/Jhana/선정 >
.
(이하의 내용은 '호흡 명상'이라는 제목의 포스팅 아래에도 댓글로 달아 두었습니다.)
.
- Right concentration의 요건: (i) unskillful 요소가 없을 때 ; (ii) discernment에 의해 인도된 팔정도의 1번~7번 요소들이 바탕이 되었을 때; (iii) concentration이 1~7번 요소들의 심화/발전에도 도움을 줄 때.
.
- Cause & effect( = 업 = 12연기)를 실험하고 체험하는 작업. Deliberate하고 proactive한 작업이지 수동적으로 관조만 하는 것이 아님. 멍때리기는 더더욱 아님.
.
- "한 30분쯤 명상한 줄 알았는데 눈떠 보니 3시간이 지나 있더라!"거나 "명상 중 무슨 일이 있었는지를 어떻게 말로 하느냐? 이성으로 이해하거나 말로 표현할 수 있는 경지를 넘어선 경험!" 등의 얘기는, 그 명상에 mindfulness의 alertness요소가 없었음을 의미. => 잠들지 않았어도 수면과 거의 다름없는 상태였다는 얘기. 의도한 시각에 선정에 들어 예정한 시각에 정확히 눈을 뜨는 등의 '내공'을 보인다 해도 여전히 wrong concentration, wrong jhana.
.
- Right jhana를 이루면 깨달음의 4단계들 중의 하나로 들어가게 됨.
.
- [출처] SN 54:1, SN 14:11, AN 6:73~74, AN 6:72, MN 20, AN 3:100, MN 137, "The Wings to Awakening" (by Venerable Ṭhānissaro), etc..
.
.
1. Form Jhanas
.
1.1. 1st Jhana
- Mindfulness of body에 의해 성취되는 단계.
- Directed thought & evaluation, rapture, pleasure.
.
1.2. 2nd Jhana
- Directed thought & evaluation (verbal fabrication)을 멈춤으로써 성취되는 단계.
.
1.3. 3rd Jhana
- Rapture를 내려놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.
.
1.4. 4th Jhana
- Pleasure를 내려놓아 equanimity를 얻음으로써 성취되는 단계.
- 호흡 (bodily fabrication)이 멈춤.
- Light or radiance (pure bright awareness) fills the entire body.
- 'Beautiful'이라는 perception.
.
.
2. Formless Jhanas
.
2.1. Infinite Space
- Form에 대한 perception을 놓고 form 이외의 space에 집중함으로써 성취되는 단계.
.
2.2. Infinite Consciousness
- Infinite space에 대한 perception을 놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.
.
2.3. Nothingness
- Infinite consciousness에 대한 perception을 놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.
- 여기까지를 perception attainments라고 부름.
- 空/無는 대승불교와 도교에서 절대시하는 개념. 초기불교에서는 空/無조차 그저 거쳐가는 명상 단계들 중의 하나일 뿐, 부처님은 이걸 reality나 본질이라고 보지 않으셨음.
.
2.4. Neither Perception Nor Non-Perception
- Nothingness에 대한 perception을 놓음으로써 성취되는 단계.
- Perception이라는 마음 작용이 극도로 미세해짐.
- Remnant-of-fabrication attainment라고 부름.
.
2.5. Cessation of Perception & Feeling
- Perception과 feeling 등의 모든 mental fabrication까지도 멈춤으로써 성취되는 단계.
- Cessation attainment라고 부름.
- 2.1~2.4 단계를 거치지 않고 4th jhana에서 곧장 이 단계로 올 수도 있음.
- 고통을 낳는 것은 의식/말/행동의 fabrication이고, fabrication을 낳는 것은 ignorance라는 것이 12연기의 내용.
----

.










10] The Third Frame of Reference | The Noble Eightfold Path : 13 Meditation Talks

10] The Third Frame of Reference | The Noble Eightfold Path : 13 Meditation Talks

The Third Frame of Reference

October 15, 2009

One of the important skills we need to learn to develop as meditators is how to read our own mind

This comes in the third frame of reference, keeping track of the mind in and of itself

Keeping track here means not only 

  1. watching the mind, but also 
  2. figuring out what the mind needs

This is the part that tends to get left out.


In other words, when the mind feels a desire for something, when it feels angry about something, when it’s deluded about things, when it feels constricted, you don’t just leave it there. 

You ask yourself: What is it lacking? 

This comes from the Buddha’s explanation of breath meditation

As you know, those instructions come in sixteen steps divided into four tetrads, or sets of four. 

The third tetrad—which corresponds to the third frame of reference, the mind in and of itself—starts out by saying that 

you’re sensitive to the mind as you breathe in and breathe out, and 

then you train yourself

to gladden the mind, to steady the mind, and to release the mind

as you breathe in, as you breathe out. 

That’s the active side. That’s what you do in response to reading the mind and seeing what’s there.