Showing posts with label Carl Jung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carl Jung. Show all posts

2022/06/30

The Spectrum of Consciousness — Personality Type in Depth

The Spectrum of Consciousness — Personality Type in Depth


ABOUT US
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
AUTHORS
TERMS & THEORY
SUBMISSION AND STYLE GUIDE
DEPTH TYPOLOGY CENTER

Bridging psychological type and depth psychology
Editors: Carol Shumate, Mark Hunziker, Jenny Soper, Lori Green, Olivia Ireland (Art Editor), and Erin Temple

Next Issue: July
=======

The Spectrum of Consciousness


25 / Culture and Cultural Typology / Research, Theory, and History

Tags: alchemy, Buddhism, cauda pavonis, color symbolism, individuation, Intuition, Kiley Laughlin, mandala, psychoid, quaternity, Secret of the Golden Flower, Wolfgang Pauli, yoga
October 20156


Color Symbolism in the Typology of C. G. Jung

Jung viewed color as a primary component of human experience and symbolic of psychic processes. Because of their qualitative properties—a type of qualia—colors can say a great deal about the modes of consciousness. By the end of the 1920s, Jung had begun to correlate four primary colors with the four psychic functions—thinking, feeling, sensation, and intuition—described in his theory of types. In Jung’s view, the colors—blue, red, green, and yellow—aptly symbolized the four functions (Figure 1) and comprised a color quaternity. Jung suggested that this color quaternity, alternatively called a rainbow tetrad, was not an arbitrary assertion but rather a formulation founded on the empirical observations derived from alchemical studies, mythology, literature, folklore, religion, and individual case studies (i.e., Mann and Pauli). What did Jung intend to convey with this scheme? It seems that he believed that colors symbolize dynamic psychic factors that evolve in lockstep with consciousness. An analysis of his color studies suggests that the psyche uses color as a way to distinguish different kinds (i.e., functions) of consciousness. Furthermore, the appearance of the four rainbow colors suggests that consciousness aims at a purposeful goal and evokes the alchemical symbol of the cauda pavonis, which announces the completion of the alchemical work. Jung explained the relationship of the cauda pavonis or peacock’s tail with its multitude of colors to individuation as follows:


Psychologically it means that during the assimilation of the unconscious the personality passes through many transformations which show it in different lights and are followed by ever-changing moods. These stages precede the coming birth. (1956/1963, CW 14, para. 430)

Jung’s thinking regarding the color quaternity was mainly predicated on two empirical sources. The first source was the array of dreams and visions that Jung initially observed in himself and later in his analysands. The second source was the archive of cross-cultural studies, which included his exploration of Eastern traditions. Jung does not seem to have arrived at a mature understanding of the color quaternity until late 1929, which coincided with the publication of his commentary on The Secret of the Golden Flower, wherein he indirectly suggested a color quaternity. Yet, in this commentary the colors Jung (1929) alluded to are not red, yellow, green, and blue, but black, white, yellow (or gold), and red, which parallel the colors of the four alchemical stages—nigredo, albedo, citrinitas, and rubedo (CW13, para. 220, n. 108) (Figure 2).

In Jung’s commentary on The Secret of the Golden Flower he included one of his own mandalas, which came from Liber Novus, image 105. Jung (1929) provided the following description of the image:


In the centre, the white light, shining in the firmament; in the first circle, protoplasmic life-seeds; in the second, rotating cosmic principles which contain the four primary colours [italics added]; in the third and fourth, creative forces working inward and outward. At the cardinal points, the masculine and feminine souls, both again divided into light and dark. (CW 13, p. A6)

Over 20 years later, Jung (1950) provided additional commentary on the same image in his essay “Concerning Mandala Symbolism,” wherein he wrote:


In the center is a star. The blue sky contains golden clouds. … The circle enclosing the sky contains structures or organisms that look like protozoa. The sixteen globes painted in four colors [italics added] just outside the circle derived originally from an eye motif and therefore stand for the observing and discriminating consciousness. (CW 9i, para. 682)

In his second commentary Jung refrained from calling them primary colors. Author John Irwin (1994) has suggested that at some point in Jung’s career his understanding of the color quaternity evolved.


As we noted earlier, one form that the quaternity symbol takes in alchemy is the four colors linked to the stages of alchemical work—black, white, yellow, and red. But Jung points out that there is another quaternity of colors associated with the marriage of the king and queen of heaven—yellow, red, green, and blue. (p. 68)

Irwin’s observations are further elucidated by Jung’s 1933 commentary:


The quaternity in alchemy, incidentally, was usually expressed by the four colours of the old painters, mentioned in a fragment of Heraclitus: red, black, yellow, and white; or in diagrams as the four points of the compass. In modern times the unconscious usually chooses red, blue (instead of black), yellow or gold, and green (instead of white). The quaternity is merely another expression of the totality. These colors embrace the whole of the rainbow. The alchemists said that the appearance of the cauda pavonis, the peacock’s tail, was a sign that the process was coming to a successful conclusion. (1940, p. 48)

The Missing Fourth

Jung suggested that sometime within the last 500 years, between the end of the Middle Ages (500 C.E.–1500 C.E.) and the beginning of the Modern Era (1600 C.E.–2000 C.E.), the color symbolism corresponding to the four functions underwent a transformation within the western psyche, which implies a major restructuring of collective psychic contents. Regarding the alchemical quaternity, Jung (1956/1963) further noted that:


Four stages are distinguished, characterized by the original colours mentioned in Heraclitus: melanosis (blackening), leukosis (whitening), xanthosis (yellowing), and iosis (reddening). This division of the process into four was called the quartering of the philosophy. Later, about the fifteenth or sixteenth century, the colours were reduced to three, and the xanthosis, otherwise called the citrinitas, gradually fell into disuse or was but seldom mentioned. … Whereas the original tetrameria corresponded exactly to the quaternity of elements, it was now frequently stressed that although there were four elements (earth, water, fire, and air) and four qualities (hot, cold, dry, and moist), there were only three colours: black, white, and red. (CW 12, para. 333)

In this way, Jung suggested that not only did the color symbolism change but also the corresponding number symbolism. An analysis of the foregoing passage indicates that the reduction of the colors from four to three corresponds to an omission of the fourth typological function, intuition—perception through the unconscious—which the alchemists rendered as citrinitas or xanthosis—the inner light of the soul. The gradual disappearance of citrinitas in the alchemical system suggests a undervaluing of intuition. Thus, Jung’s (1952) color quaternity, as opposed to a color trinity, highlights the problem of the three and the four, or what is also called the Axiom of Maria—“Out of the third, comes the One as the Fourth” (CW 8, para. 962). One of the central aims of Jung’s psychology was to compensate for the number four’s state of neglect during the Christian Era. The number four is a symbol of wholeness, as suggested by Socrates’ original question: “One, two, three—but where, my dear Timaeus, is the fourth?” (Cornford, 1937, p. 9). Although in Psychological Types Jung (1921/1971) does not mention a color quaternity—a tetrad of rainbow colors—that corresponds to the four functions, he does correlate three of the psychic functions to a Gnostic typology consisting of pneumatikoi (thinking), psychikoi (feeling), and hylikoi (sensation), but the Gnostic’s tripartite system omitted the fourth function or intuition. So the problem of the missing fourth is also present in Gnosticism.

Thus, between 1929 and 1950—when he published “Concerning Mandala Symbolism”—Jung’s thinking on the color quaternity changed. As previously suggested, his re-visioning of the color scheme seems predicated on the symbolism expressed in the dreams and fantasies of individuals on the one hand and Jung’s intense study of Eastern philosophy and religion on the other. Jung’s propensity to connect things together was bolstered by his syncretistic impulse.

Dreams and Visions

Throughout his long career, Jung gathered a plethora of analytic and clinical material which he used to support his theories. He incorporated a good deal of case material into his papers, including “A Study in the Process of Individuation.” Jung originally presented this paper at the 1933 Eranos Conference in Ascona, Switzerland. Therein he first alluded to a color quaternity comprised of red, yellow, green, and blue. The paper dealt with a middle-aged female analysand, Miss X, who had reached an impasse in her life and found herself stuck. Her unconscious compensated for the inadequacies of her conscious attitude by producing elaborate archetypal dreams and fantasies. In addition to this imagery, she had a collection of 24 paintings that Jung viewed as charting the course of her individuation journey. It should be noted that Jung included one picture (i.e., Picture 9) from her collection in his commentary for The Secret of the Golden Flower. Jung encouraged Miss X to document her fantasies in an imagistic and aesthetic way, not unlike what he had done with his own Red Book material. During the span of their analytic sessions, Jung understood that colors could help activate the unconscious and encouraged her to creatively express them in pictures: “I also advised her not to be afraid of bright colours, for I knew from experience that vivid colours seem to attract the unconscious. Thereupon, a new picture arose” (CW 9i, para. 530). Miss X was later identified as one of Jung’s close colleagues, an American woman named Kristine Mann (1873-1945) (Kirsch, 2000, p. 65). Although we cannot say for certain, it seems that Mann began her analysis with Jung around 1928, which turned out to be a pivotal year in the development of Jung’s ideas. Her analysis with Jung apparently concluded in May 1938. Regarding the mandala pictures rendered by Mann, Jung (1934/1959) noted the same color quaternity:


This takes place in stages: a combination first of blue and red, then of yellow and green [italics added]. These four colours symbolize four qualities, as we have seen, which can be interpreted in various ways. Psychologically this quaternity points to the orienting functions of consciousness, of which at least one is unconscious and therefore not available for conscious use. (CW 9i, para. 582)

Jung observed that Mann herself correlated her colors with the four functions:


The inner, undifferentiated quaternity is balanced by an outer, differentiated one, which Miss X equated with the four functions of consciousness. To these she assigned the following colours: yellow = intuition, light blue = thinking, flesh pink = feeling, brown = sensation. (CW 9i, para. 588)

Elsewhere, Jung provided the following correlation in regards to the symbolism contained in Mann’s pictures: “Red means blood and affectivity, the physiological reaction that joins spirit to body, and blue means the spiritual process (mind or nous)” (CW9i, para. 555), and gold “expresses sunlight, value, divinity even” (CW 9i, para. 543). In a footnote on the same page, Jung (1934/1959) observed that, “The colour correlated with sensation in the mandalas of other persons is usually green” (CW 9i, p. 335, n. 134). Jung’s descriptions suggest that the color scheme was not universally applicable and could vary from person to person depending on a range of factors—culture, context, etc. In this way, Jung was not unequivocal about his color scheme, but he did say that, “It happens with some regularity that these colours are correlated with the four orienting functions of consciousness” (1942/1948, CW 11, para. 281). Furthermore, he was prone to insert conditional statements like “usually” when he encountering an exceptional case that deviated from the general scheme.

Another individual case study that played a major role in shaping Jung’s understanding of the color quaternity is found in the dreams, visions, and waking fantasies of the physicist Wolfgang Pauli (1900 -1958), who underwent analysis between February 1932 and October 1934 (Gieser, 2005, p. 147). In 1931, Pauli was suffering from depression and frequently had disturbing dreams (Gieser, 2005, p. 142). Besides drinking heavily and embracing a roguish lifestyle, Pauli’s mother had died abruptly in 1927. In December 1929, he married Käthe Margarethe Deppner. The marriage quickly disintegrated resulting in a divorce less than a year later. One could say then that the late 1920s marked a period of personal upheaval and crisis for Pauli, who finally sought out Jung’s help through correspondence in late 1931. Jung, aware of Pauli’s reputation as a brilliant scientist, wished to avoid inadvertently influencing his analytical material or interfering with what would otherwise be an objective process. Jung initially assigned the task of analysis to one of his pupils, a female doctor named Erna Rosenbaum. Pauli worked with Rosenbaum for about five months until Jung took over his analysis. Jung and Pauli’s relationship eventually evolved into a highly creative intellectual partnership which yielded a number of original ideas, including that of synchronicity.

Jung included Pauli’s fantasy material in two major essays: “Psychology and Religion” and “Dream Symbols of the Process of Individuation,” which was later revised and renamed “Individual Dream Symbols in Relation to Alchemy” and published in Psychology and Alchemy. Jung presented this paper at the 1934 Eranos Conference. Pauli’s fantasy material was comprised of over one thousand dreams and visual impressions, although Jung only included a sampling consisting of 355 for his study (Gieser, 2005, p. 144). Jung selected only the dreams that dealt with what he considered mandala symbolism, which paralleled the Eastern motifs and ideas Jung had earlier encountered in The Secret of the Golden Flower. Jung (1940) added:


I have chosen the term “mandala” because this word denotes the ritualistic or magical circle employed in Lamaism and also in the Tantric yoga as a yantra or aid to contemplation. The Eastern mandalas used in ceremonial are formations fixed by tradition, and are not only drawn or painted, but are even represented bodily in certain ritualistic celebrations. I refer the reader to Zimmer’s exposition in Kunstform und Yoga im indischen Kultbild [Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India], as well as to Wilhelm and Jung, The Secret of the Golden Flower. (p. 127)

That Jung felt it necessary to name Heinrich Zimmer’s work—Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India—alongside The Secret of the Golden Flower underscores its importance to Jung’s study of Eastern Philosophy and religion.

Pauli’s dreams and visions were strewn with number and color symbolism, which Jung found to roughly accord with his typological color quaternity. For instance, the following dream describes the same combination of the four colors:


23. Dream: In the square space. The dreamer is sitting opposite the unknown woman whose portrait he is supposed to be drawing. What he draws, however, is not a face but three-leaved clovers or distorted crosses in four different colours: red, yellow, green, and blue. (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 212)

Another one of Pauli’s fantasies presents the same color sequence:


39. Visual Impression: The dreamer is falling into the abyss. At the bottom there is a bear whose eyes gleam alternately in four colours: red, yellow, green, and blue. Actually it has four eyes that change into four lights. The bear disappears and the dreamer goes through a long dark tunnel. Light is shimmering at the far end. A treasure is there, and on top of it the ring with the diamond. It is said that this ring will lead him on a long journey to the east. (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 262)

Jung’s commentary on the foregoing dream is notable for his reliance on Eastern and alchemical amplifications:


This waking dream shows that the dreamer is still preoccupied with the dark centre. The bear stands for the chthonic element that might seize him. But then it becomes clear that the animal is only leading up to the four colours (cf. dream 23, par. 212), which in their turn lead to the lapis, i.e., the diamond whose prism contains all the hues of the rainbow. The way to the east probably points to the unconscious as an antipode. According to the legend the Grail-stone comes from the east and must return there again. In alchemy the bear corresponds to the nigredo of the prima materia, whence comes the colourful cauda pavonis. (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 263)

Thus, one could say that the appearance of the four colors in Pauli’s dreams symbolized the cauda pavonis (i.e., peacock’s tail), which suggests a completion of the alchemical opus and viewed in depth psychological terms is tantamount to knowledge of the self—the archetype of wholeness. Jung subsequently turns to another dream that alludes to the four colors:


51. Dream: There is a feeling of great tension. Many people are circulating around a large central oblong with four smaller oblongs on its sides. The circulation in the larger oblong goes to the left and in the smaller oblongs to the right. In the middle there is an eight-rayed star. A Bowl is placed in the centre of each of the smaller oblongs, containing red, yellow, green, and the colourless water. The water rotates to the left. The disquieting question arises: is there enough water? (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 286)

In Jung’s extended commentary on the dream material, he correlated the four colors to the four functions of consciousness (1944/1970, CW 12, para. 287).

Pauli’s fantasy material culminates in the appearance of what he described as a “great vision,” which principally consisted of a “world clock” (Figure 3). The world clock is comprised of a vertical and a horizontal circle carried on the back of a black bird. The horizontal circle is divided by four sections and four colors, which Jung associated with his typological quaternity. It also merits mention that on the same circle stand four little men who hold pendulums (CW 11, para. 307). According to Jung (1938/1969), “The four little men of our vision are dwarfs or Cabiri. They represent the four cardinal points and the four seasons, as well as the four colours [italics added] and the four elements” (CW 11, para. 120). Given the relative regularity of the appearance of such number and color symbols in dreams of people like Kristine Mann and Wolfgang Pauli, Jung felt that the motifs could be best understood as spontaneous products of the objective psyche, which in his mind lent empirical support to his theories.

Parallels in Eastern Culture

As previously indicated, prior to 1933, there is no explicit mention of Jung’s rainbow color quaternity. The first reference of it ostensibly appeared in the 1933 Eranos conference which was followed by Jung’s 1934 presentation of Pauli’s dreams. Jung published both papers in the 1940 book The Integration of Personality. During the late 1920s, Jung’s interests began to shift to areas where he could find broader cross-cultural and archetypal consensus for his psychological theories.

By 1928, Jung’s preoccupation with The Red Book and Black Books was winding down and around the same time he received Wilhelm’s manuscript of The Secret of the Golden Flower, which Jung found profoundly meaningful, even synchronistic. In his autobiography, Jung (1961/1989) indicated that he received Wilhelm’s Taoist-alchemical manuscript in 1928 (p. 204). Jung described this serendipitous encounter in a margin note in The Red Book, Jung (2009) wrote:


1928. When I painted this image, which showed the golden well-fortified castle, Richard Wilhelm sent me from Frankfurt the Chinese, thousand-year-old text of the golden castle, the embryo of the immortal body. Ecclesia catholic et protestantes et seclusi in secreto. Aeon finitus. [The Catholic Church and the Protestants and those secluded in secret. The end of an aeon.]. (p. 163)

According to E.A. Bennet (1985), after Jung wrote “The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious” in 1928 his interest in Chinese thought intensified, which coincided with his reading of Wilhelm’s manuscript on The Secret of the Golden Flower, for which he would later write a commentary. Jung viewed his typology as a western parallel to the Chinese notion of Tao (p. 71).

Around the same time Jung started his dream analysis seminar, which took place between November 7, 1928 and June 25, 1930. During this time period, Jung was still working through a stack of fantasy material that originated both from analytic encounters and cross-cultural studies. In the seminar, Jung indicated that he had already read Zimmer’s Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India, which was instrumental to Jung’s psychological understanding of Eastern traditions and likely informed his reading of the Shri-chakra-sambhara Tantra.

In the foreword of Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India, Joseph Campbell (1984) wrote that, “The crucial moment was of Jung’s reading of Indologist Heinrich Zimmer’s Kunstform und Yoga” (p. xvi). Thus, the importance of this work in regards to Jung’s understanding of mandala symbolism should not be understated. Jung indicated that he first read the book after writing his commentary for Richard Wilhelm’s translation of The Secret of the Golden Flower (1929) and before he met Zimmer: “I first met Heinrich Zimmer at the beginning of the thirties. I had read his fascinating book Kunstform und Yoga and long wished to meet him in person” (Jung as cited in Campbell, 1984, p. xix). Jung actually met Zimmer in May 1932. The fact that Jung (1984) mentioned Zimmer in his dream analysis seminar on February 26, 1930 (p. 492) suggests that he read it around January 1930. Based on the contents of Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India, one can infer that the material informed his dream analysis seminar in regards to Jung’s understanding of Eastern philosophy and symbolism.

In a lecture dated February 12, 1930, Jung discussed the parallels between his typology and Tantric Buddhist symbolism, with reference to the architecture of a Buddhist monastery:


Extraversion means going out through the gates of the courtyard. The inside square is divided like this: and each of the triangles is characterized by a different colour and represents particular philosophical conceptions. Red is the north below, the cardinal points of the horizon being all reversed: A most interesting book, the Bardo Thodol, or the Tibetan Book of the Dead, has been translated recently by an American named Evans-Wentz. There the coloured triangles are explained, and one can identify them with the four functions as we know them in our Western Psychology, the basis of our consciousness, the four qualities of our orientation in space, and therefore identical with cardinal points of the horizon. One leaves the gates through the different functions or habitual attitudes. The man who leaves through the south gate will live in the southern world, and the man who goes out through the gate of thinking will live in the thought world. But when they return, the functions do not matter; only as long as they are outside are the functions important. When he enters the courtyard of the monastery, he approaches the place where all the functions meet; in the very centre he goes into the void where there is nothing. We cannot say that it is unconsciousness, it is a consciousness that is not. (1984, p 467)

The foregoing passage is prescient on three points: 1) Jung (1935/1953) would eventually write a commentary for Evans-Wentz’ (1927/2000) translation of the said work which he apparently read between the date it was published and 1930 (1984, p. 467); 2) the color quaternity—red, yellow, green, and blue—would eventually be imported into his typology; and 3) in 1938 and 1939 Jung gave three lectures on the symbolism of Tantric Buddhism that closely paralleled his abovementioned commentary.

In another lecture in the same month as the previous one, on February 19, 1930, Jung discussed a Tibetan mandala, which he described at length, and he further elaborated on the comparisons between his typological system and the four functions:


I have brought you today the picture of which I spoke last week, the reproduction of the Tibetan mandala. It is a yantra, used for the purpose of concentration upon the most philosophical thought of the Tibetan Lamas. It shows in the innermost circle the diamond wedge or thunderbolt, that symbol of potential energy, and the white light symbolizing absolute truth. And here are the four functions, the four fields of colour, and then the four gates to the world. Then comes the gazelle garden, and finally the ring of fire of desirousness outside. (1984, p. 479)

The passage above demonstrates not only Jung’s interest in the East, but that as early as 1930 he recognized definite parallels between the structure of Western and Eastern mandalas such as the Tibetan yantra. At this time, Jung had already written his commentary for Wilhelm’s The Secret of the Golden Flower, and his attention began to drift to other fields and disciplines (i.e., alchemy, Kundalini yoga, Tantric Buddhism, etc.).

In Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India Zimmer provided extensive commentary on an obscure tantric text called the Shri-chakra-Sambhara Tantra. Zimmer (1926/1984) described this work as a “product of an era in Buddhism’s development in which the main stream of the Buddha doctrine in its course through time acquired an influx from the tributaries of Hinduism [such] that its content became virtually indistinguishable from Hinduism” (p. 81). The Shri-Chakra-Sambhara Tantra has its roots in the diamond vehicle (Vajrayana) doctrine of Tantric Buddhism and consists of a series of instructional mantras—meditational techniques—informed by Tantric doctrine and teachings. Shri Chakra translates to the “Circle of Bliss” (Zimmer, p. 90) and is visualized as a circular mandala consisting of four gates, which evoke Jung’s four functions. The adept or Yogin focuses on the mandala and visualizes a god. The god (Devata) represents the “guru-essence” which could be interpreted psychologically as emanations or projections originating from the background activity of the psyche. Zimmer suggested that the culminating point of the ritual is the attainment of the vajrasattva (diamond essence), which would be analogous to the alchemical lapis. Zimmer added:


Then the adept develops internally the feeling proper to his awareness of the undifferentiated sameness of all phenomena. In the Emptiness that constitutes their essence … he sends out rays in every direction, colored according to the cardinal points–blue, green, red, and yellow [italics added]. Their colors are a surety that his feeling of Total Compassion (karuna) permeates the entire cosmos. (p. 93)

Understandably, the color symbolism would have garnered Jung’s attention when he read the book early in 1930. Around the same time (1930-1931), Jung prepared a two-page manuscript headed “Tantric Texts” which he evidently used in preparation for his lectures at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (Shamdasani, 1996, p. xxxiv, n. 66). Shamdasani further indicated that the source material for these manuscripts was Artistic Form and Yoga in the Sacred Images of India (pp. 2-87), wherein can be found Zimmer’s exposition of the Shri-Chakra-Sambhara Tantra.

Jung’s study of the Tantric texts culminated in his 1938 and 1939 lectures at ETH, where he presented psychological commentary on the material in its most lucid form. In these ETH lectures, Jung (1958) provided a historical and etymological overview in accordance with his own hermeneutic understanding. In his commentary, Jung (1958) cited the following passage: “From the Mantra ‘Hum’ rays of blue, green, red and yellow light shoot forth through the four heads of the Devata and gradually fill the whole universe” (p. 48). Jung added:


The Yogin is in the centre, saying “Hum,” the first quality of consciousness, the world principle. The four colours emanate from the centre, the four qualities of consciousness, that is the four functions of consciousness, the four possibilities of consciousness. (p. 48)

Thus, Jung tried to correlate the four colors with his four functions of consciousness, and in a syncretistic turn, proceeded to associate the principal skandhas—the basic building blocks of the phenomenal world in Buddhist tradition—mentioned in the text with his four functions: Rupa skandha (thinking), Vedana skandha (sensation), Samjna skandha (feeling), and Sangskara skandha (intuition). The skandhas are reminiscent of the four classical elements—earth, air, fire, and water—found in ancient philosophy. The text also identifies a fifth skandha or function, Vijnana which Jung equated with a kind of centralized knowledge which united all four functions. Jung (1958) wrote: “The aggregate of cognition (knowledge) is the Buddha, the enlightened diamond essence. The highest essence proceeds out of the four functions as the final result” (p. 51). What seems to emerge from the combination of all functions is the quintessence of Buddha consciousness, made available to us through the mediating service of the Buddhist master, or yogi: “The quaternity is dissolved in the essence of the Yogin, and the fourfold image of consciousness disappears” (p. 51). In his analysis, Jung interpreted the phenomenon as follows:


Then he assimilates all beings into the mandala. One could say that the Yogin hangs like a spider in its web, and draws all beings through the rays of light into the mandala of his personality. He establishes himself as the centre of the world. The light, which emanated from the “Hum,” is withdrawn and absorbed by the Self. (1958, p. 55)

Just as the Yogin may achieve the diamond body through the fifth skandha, the western adept may realize the self by integrating the four functions into a fifth. Thus, one could say that in vijnana (i.e., wisdom) one reconciles the opposites and the self. Vijnana is the path to the center or the self. As mentioned, one could also compare the idea of the vajrasattva to the alchemical lapis, which Jung also viewed as a symbol of the self. Jung’s commentary in the ETH Lectures demonstrates his most mature understanding of the color quaternity. The breadth of his commentary suggests that it took him nearly a decade to work through his analytic material and cross-cultural studies before he was able to synthesize a symbolic understanding of the four functions which he represented by color (Figure 4). In the same lecture, Jung attributed the discovery of the functions to the Chinese “centuries ago” (1958, p. 105). Elsewhere in the ETH Lectures, Jung provided a primer for his color code:


The four colours attributed to the functions are based on certain feeling values. Feeling is red, this is connected with blood and fire, with passion and love which is supposed to be warm and glowing. Sensation is green, this is connected with the earth and perceiving reality. Thinking is white, or blue, cold like snow and Intuition is gold or yellow because it is felt to shine and radiate. (1958, p. 78)

The fact that Jung uses white interchangeably with blue warrants some explanation. In his book Secret Doctrines of the Tibetan Book of the Dead, author and Buddhist scholar Detlef Ingo Lauf (1977) points out that in Buddhism, blue and white are frequently used interchangeably (p. 129). Furthermore, in his commentary for the Tibetan Book of the Dead, Jung (1935/1953) correlated the color white with thinking:


It gradually becomes clearer that all these deities are organized into mandalas, or circles, containing a cross of the four colours. The colours are co-ordinated with the four aspects of wisdom: (1) White = the light-path of the mirror-like wisdom; (2) Yellow = the light-path of the wisdom of equality; (3) Red = the light-path of the discriminative wisdom; (4) Green = the light-path of the all-performing wisdom. (CW 11, para. 850)

Thus, one could say that what was most essential for Jung was not establishing a universally valid psychological schema predicated on color symbolism but empirically demonstrating a semi-regular chromatic pattern which more or less indicated the same psychological meaning. Jung accepted that there would always be some variation in the way the psyche expressed color symbolism.

The Psychoid Factor

Why in modern times does the unconscious select the colors red, yellow, blue, and green? Although addressing such a question presents a difficult task, Jung left behind a few conceptual clues that may provide at least a partial answer. In On the Nature of the Psyche Jung (1947/1954) introduced the concept of the psychoid factor, which one may define as the part of the psyche that is incapable of consciousness and thus only quasi-psychic in nature. In the same work, he employed the analogy of a color spectrum as an analogy to describe his psychoid concept.


Using the analogy of the spectrum, we could compare the lowering of unconscious contents to a displacement towards the red end of the colour band, a comparison which is especially edifying in that red, the blood colour, has always signified emotion and instinct. (CW 8, para. 384)

With his introduction of the psychoid concept, Jung seems to have expanded his original color scheme into the deep unconscious. Just as the electromagnetic spectrum extends far beyond the limited range of visible light, a psychophysical continuum would comprise a broader range of psychic and physiological phenomena than does consciousness and its four functions (Figure 5). Jung extended this metaphor as follows: “The dynamism of instinct is lodged as it were in the infra-red part of the spectrum, whereas the instinctual image lies in the ultra-violet part” (CW 8, para. 414). Thus, if we were to read the color symbolism in the appropriate context, we could suppose that the psychoid concept is a natural progression of Jung’s typological system. Accordingly, typology comprises the four functions of consciousness whereas the psychoid concept subsumes the totality of unconscious psychic states. Jung’s psychoid concept is understandably difficult to grasp and merits some further explanation. Jung viewed psychic processes as analogous to the concept of an electromagnetic spectrum (Figure 5) on which consciousness slides to the left and to the right. To the left one finds the instincts grounded in somatic processes whereas to the right one encounters the archetypes found in images and ideas. However, either side of the spectrum eventually reaches a threshold that is inaccessible to both image and instincts. On both ends of the spectrum, instinct and archetype gradually fade into the psychoid domain. In Jung’s later work he opined that the archetypes originated from this psychoid domain, which rests on a transcendental substrate. Jung believed however that although psychoid processes are inaccessible to consciousness, through the image-making faculty of the human mind we could expand our reach into those heretofore untrodden regions of the psychoid domain just as through the advent of the telescope our ancestors learned to extend the reach of the eye.

The color symbolism also seems to parallel the alchemical idea of the cauda pavonis, for Jung (1934/1959) suggested that “we may expect the miracle of the cauda pavonis, the appearance of “all Colours,” the unfolding and realization of wholeness, once the dark dividing wall has broken down” (CW 9i, para. 685). Thus, one could associate the color symbolism of Jung’s typology with the appearance of the cauda pavonis—a symbol of wholeness. The cauda pavonis seems to herald the gradual broadening of the total representable bandwidth accessible to the human species. Because Western consciousness occupies but a narrow sliver of this bandwidth of psychic energy, Jung’s assertion that, “Psychic processes therefore behave like a scale along which consciousness ‘slides’” (CW 8, para. 408), suggests that the ego could be viewed as a pointer that can move freely, left and right, on a sliding scale of consciousness and thus could eventually access all the colors of the spectrum analogy alluded to earlier. Viewed in this way, the colors symbolize different modes of consciousness, which probably exceed a mere number of four.

Jung’s typology then, with its emphasis on four functions and four colors should not be viewed as a complete system for it seems possible, even probable, that the human species has the potential to extend the boundaries of consciousness into the psychoid domain and thereby develop heretofore latent functions within the psyche, whose distinct features can only be imagined. Toward the end of his long life, Jung (1956/1963) intimated that more colors, up to seven, could be included into his color scheme: “Consequently the synthesis of the four or seven colours would mean nothing less than the integration of the personality, the union of the four basic functions, which are customarily represented by the colour quaternio blue-red-yellow-green” (CW 14, para. 390).

References


Bennet, E.A. (1985). Meetings with Jung. Zurich, CH: Daimon.

Campbell, J. (1984). Preface. In H. Zimmer, Artistic form and yoga in the sacred images of India (pp. xvii-xxvii). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1926).

Cornford, F. (1937). Plato’s cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato translated with a running commentary. London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul, Ltd.

Evans-Wentz, W.Y. & Karma-Glin-Pa. (2000). The Tibetan Book of the Dead. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1927).

Gieser, S. (2005). The innermost kernel: Depth psychology and quantum mechanics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.

Irwin, J. (1994). The mystery to a solution: Poe, Borges, and the analytic detective story. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1929). Commentary on The secret of the golden flower. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 13). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1940). The integration of personality. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., LTD.

Jung, C. G. (1948). A psychological approach to the dogma of trinity. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 106-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1942)

Jung, C. G. (1950). Concerning Mandala Symbolism. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 9i, pp. 355-384). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1952). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1953). Commentary on the Tibetan book of the dead. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 11). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1935)

Jung, C. G. (1954). On the nature of the psyche. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1947)

Jung, C. G. (1958). Modern psychology: The ETH lectures. Barbara Hannah (Ed.). Unpublished.

Jung, C. G. (1959). A study in the process of individuation. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung. (Vol. 9i). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1934)

Jung, C. G. (1963). Mysterium coniunctionis. In R.F.C Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C .G. Jung. (Vol. 14). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1956)

Jung, C. G. (1969). Psychology and religion. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 5-105). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1938)

Jung, C. G. (1970). Psychology and alchemy. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 12). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1944)

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 6). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)

Jung, C. G. (1984). Dream analysis: Notes on the seminar given in 1928-1930 by C. G. Jung (W. McGuire, Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1938)

Jung, C. G. (1989). Memories, dreams, reflections. Aniela Jaffé (Ed.) (Richard and Clara Winston, Trans.). New York: NY: Vintage Book. (Original work published 1962)

Jung, C. G. (1996). The psychology of Kundalini Yoga: Notes of the seminar given in 1932 by C. G. Jung. Sonu Shamdasani (Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (2009). The Red Book: Liber novus. Sonu Shamdasani (Ed.). Philemon Series. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.

Kirsch, T. (2000). The Jungians. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.

Lauf, D. I. (1977). Secret doctrines of the Tibetan Book of the Dead. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

Zimmer, H. (1984). Artistic form and yoga in the sacred images of India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1926)

Images:

Hee Choung Yi, “In the Mountains,” (2010), Courtesy: Korean Art Museum Assoc.

Pietro Longhi, “The Alchemist,” (c. 1757). Courtesy: The Yorck Project.

Figure 3: W. Byers-Brown, “World Clock,” (1887). Appeared originally in Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Matter and Mind, (London, 1987), p. 19.

Figure 4: Reconstruction of Jung’s drawing, p. 104, ETH Lectures (1958).

Share with friends and colleagues:
Share


1Save
Email




6 Comments

Erik Meyer
Oct 9, 2015, 5:25




Might Jung being alive today arrive to an even more evolved conclusion as to the comparison of heightened energy states of atoms emitting of photons at defined wave-lengths may also correlate to heighten states of consciousness in the “psychoid domain”? With differing photon wavelengths equaling the spectrum of visible color, might the mind’s energy level also equate to different levels of consciousness?



Kiley Laughlin
Oct 30, 2015, 7:45




Erik, thank you for the comment. Jung was very interested in atomic theory and quantum physics. He really didn’t get the mathematics but had a solid grasp of the philosophical implications. I think your thinking is headed in the right direction and thus, is on the mark. In Jung’s essay “On the Nature of the Psyche,” Jung uses the EM spectrum as an analogy to consciousness, which descends, as it were, into the psychoid domain. Jung recognized that what we view as unconscious may, from a different vantage point, actually be conscious. Consciousness after all suggests that somebody or something is conscious “of something.” Your question is highly relevant to the importance of models (and metaphors) in constructing our picture of reality. It’s always changing. Jung viewed analytical psychology as tantamount to a bridge from one weltanschauung to another. Again, thanks for taking the time to read the article. – Kiley



Ian
Feb 8, 2016, 0:57




I absolutely love this! So much information and patterns to trace. Thank you for providing such an article.

I was wondering if the image of the color spectrum with the functions labeled has an error. Is the red band “feeling” or sensation?

https://typeindepth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/typological-spectrum-Redux-250x.jpg

There is the image link for you.
And here is a nice resource that I am conferring as I read this:

http://www.terrapsych.com/jungdefs.html

Best, IAN!



Nader Khaghani
Aug 2, 2017, 9:02




As a painter/writer, I do appreciate your insightful scholarly article. Thank you for sharing.
As you know the color qualities are flexible things–not written in stone; we choose them to represent our feelings, thoughts, intuitions, and perceptions.
My preferred way of looking at intuition is the fire that cooks all the previous functions. I must admit my bias. I am an introvert intuitive type with the inferior function as a sensate.

Here is how I see it: Green: sensation/manifestation, Blue: feeling/formation, Yellow/creation, and finally Red of our being as emanation–the numinous–Spirit. The ultimate lightning that hits us from the blue yonder of consciousness

is Red of spirit and not yellow of thinking.

I am curious as to your informed thoughts.
Thanks again for sharing, that is what life is all about. We stand on each other’s shoulder and take a peek into the darkness of unconscious just like the trail blazer wise Jung that we all love.



Nader Khaghani
Aug 2, 2017, 9:05




Oh, by the way, I will be in Pacifica for the alchemy seminar coming up the end of August. Love to say hello and shake hands.

Nader



Carl Andrews
Sep 4, 2021, 23:56




I have only skimmed over a bit of this essay and already it helped me with what I was looking for and gave me insight on something profound in my life which I have wondered about for years. Thank you!


2022/06/29

Gilbert Durand - Wikipedia The Anthropological Structures of the Imaginary

Gilbert Durand - Wikipedia

Gilbert Durand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gilbert Durand
Gilbert Durand.jpg
Gilbert Durand
Born1 May 1921
Chambéry, France
Died7 December 2012 (aged 91)
Moye, France
Era20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
InstitutionsGrenoble-II
Doctoral advisorGaston Bachelard
Main interests
AnthropologySymbologyDepth psychologyHistory of religion
Influences

Gilbert Durand (1 May 1921, Chambéry – 7 December 2012, Moye) was a French academic known for his work on the imaginarysymbolic anthropology[1] and mythology.[2]

According to Durand, Imagination and Reason can be complementary. He defended the status of the image, traditionally devalued in Western thought, particularly in French philosophy. He advocated a multidisciplinary approach.

He distinguished between two regimes : Diurnal and Nocturnal, to classify symbols and archetypes.

Biography[edit]

During World War Two he joined the French Resistance in the Vercors.

He began his career by teaching philosophy in the secondary school system from 1947 to 1956 (philosophy is taught in France at high school level), and then became a university professor of Sociology and Anthropology at the University of Grenoble II.

Gilbert Durand was the co-founder — with Léon Cellier and Paul Deschamps in 1966, — and the director, of the Centre de recherche sur l'imaginaire[3] and a member of Eranos. In 1988 he founded the humanities and social sciences review Les Cahiers de L'imaginaire.

He was a follower of Gaston BachelardHenry Corbin[4] and Carl Gustav Jung and the teacher of Michel Maffesoli. Gilbert Durand gained a worldwide notoriety and his Center is currently the small group of an international network of over sixty laboratories. In his most famous work, Les Structures anthropologiques de l'imaginaire (1960), he formulated the influential concept of the anthropological trajectory (sometimes translated anthropological dialectic or anthropological course),[5] according to which there is a bijective influence between physiology and society.[6][7]

In 1984, Gilbert Durand supervised the thesis by Michel Gaucher on L'Intuition astrologique dans l'imaginaire (Université Grenoble II).

In 1991 a special colloquium organized by Michel Maffesoli was held in his honour at the prestigious Centre culturel international de Cerisy-la-Salle.

On 14 March 2007, in Chambéry, Durand was raised to the title of Commander of the Légion d'honneur, which was bestowed on him by a personality of his choice, in this case Raymond Aubrac on behalf of the President (as is customary).

Durand died on 7 December 2012.[2]

Bibliography[edit]

  • Les Structures anthropologiques de l'imaginaire, Paris, Dunod (first edition, Paris, P.U.F., 1960).
  • Le Décor mythique de la Chartreuse de Parme, Paris, José Corti (1961)
  • L'Imagination symbolique, Paris, PUF (first édition in 1964).
  • Sciences de l’homme et tradition. Le nouvel esprit anthropologique, Paris, Albin Michel (first ed. Tête de feuille-Sirac, Paris, 1975).
  • Figures mythiques et visages de l’œuvre. De la mythocritique à la mythanalyse, Paris, Berg International, 1979.
  • L'Âme tigrée, Paris, Denoël, 1980.
  • La Foi du cordonnier, Paris, Denoël, 1984.
  • Beaux-arts et archétypes. La religion de l'art, Paris, P.U.F., 1989.
  • L’Imaginaire. Essai sur les sciences et la philosophie de l'image, Paris, Hatier, 1994.
  • Introduction à la mythodologie. Mythes et sociétés, Paris, Albin Michel, 1996.
  • Champs de l’imaginaire. Textes réunis par Danièle Chauvin, Grenoble, Ellug, 1996.
  • Les Mythes fondateurs de la franc-maçonnerie, Paris, Dervy, 2002.
  • With Simone Vierne, Le Mythe et le Mythique, Paris, Albin Michel, 1987.
  • With Sun Chaoying, Mythes, thèmes et variations, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 2000.
  • Imagens e Reflexos do Imaginário Português, Lisbon, Hugin Editores, 2000. New Ed. with the addition of his correspondence with Lima de Freitas, under the title: Portugal - Tesouro Oculto da Europa, Lisbon, Ésquilo, 2008.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Wouter J. Hanegraaff Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture Quotation:

    the scholar of symbolic anthropology Gilbert Durand

  2. Jump up to:a b Staff (10 December 2012). "Décès de Gilbert Durand, résistant et anthropologue de l'imaginaire" (in French). Le Soir. Retrieved 11 December 2012.
  3. ^ Centre de recherche sur l'imaginaire (CRI) Archived 2012-07-21 at archive.today
  4. ^ Gilbert Durand, "La pensée d'Henry Corbin et le Temple maçonnique", Travaux de la loge nationale de recherches Villard de Hoonecourt, 3, 1981, pp. 173–182
  5. ^ Michel Maffesoli (1996) The emotional community : research arguments in The time of the tribes: the decline of individualism in mass society p. 23, 30n. Also published in Gelder, Ken (2005) The subcultures reader
  6. ^ Les Structures anthropologiques de l'imaginaire (1960) quotation:

    genèse réciproque qui oscille du geste pulsionnel à l'environnement matériel et social, et vice versa

    English translation:

    ..there is a reciprocal genesis which alternates between the drive-motivated gesture and the material and social environment, and vice versa

  7. ^ Durand (1964) L'Imagination symbolique quotation:

    Le « trajet anthropologique » peut être suivi dans le sens : physiologie -> société, ou au contraire : société -> physiologie. ... il n'ya aucun lien de cause à effet.

Further reading[edit]

  • Dominique Raynaud, Architectures comparées: essai sur la dynamique des formes, 1998, pp. 11–2.
  • Maffesoli Michel (ed.), La Galaxie de l’imaginaire. Dérive autour de l’œuvre de Gilbert Durand, Paris, Berg international, 1980.
  • Pachter Michèle, Gilbert DurandSociétés, vol. 1, no 4, juin 1985.
  • Durand Jean-Pierre & Robert Weil, Sociologie contemporaine, Paris, Vigot, 1993, pp. 212–215.
  • Godinho Helder, « Gilbert Durand » in Thomas Joël (ed.), Introduction aux méthodologies de l'imaginaire, Paris, Ellipses, 1998, pp. 140–149.
  • Cabin Philippe, Une cartographie de l’imaginaire : Entretien avec Gilbert DurandSciences humaines, janvier 1999.[1]
  • Patrice Van EerselLe retour des dieux. Entretien avec Gilbert DurandNouvelles Clés, 30, été 2001, p. 54-59.[2]
  • Bertin Georges, Pour l'Imaginaire, principes et méthodesEsprit critique, vol. 4 n°2, Février 2002[3]
  • Xiberras Martine, Pratique de l'imaginaire. Lecture de Gilbert Durand, Laval, Presses de l'Université Laval, 2002.

External links[edit]

  1. ^ Propos recueillis par PHILIPPE CABIN (2011-06-15). "Une cartographie de l'imaginaire". Scienceshumaines.com. Retrieved 2012-12-11.
  2. ^ [1] Archived January 12, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ [2] Archived October 12, 2008, at the Wayback Machine


Gilbert Durand
The Anthropological Structures of the Imaginary


Extracts
 This book's main page
 Boombana Home
 Catalogue

END

From the Author's Foreword
From the Translators' Foreword
From the Author's Foreword
This book, which is about to go into its twelfth edition in France, was first published thirty years ago. Translated in many languages (Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Roumanian, Polish, Korean, Brazilian, Japanese, Chinese) it has been, through a combination of unlucky events, inaccessible until now to the English-speaking world.

Today's readers, however, will find the propositions and theses here expounded far from obsolete. They have in fact been confirmed by numerous contemporary developments in the sciences. We pointed out these convergences in the various Prefaces added over the years to the original work, which this Foreword simply wants to summarise.

In 1969, on the occasion of the third edition, we emphasised the agreement of our 'figurative structuralism' with the position of Stéphane Lupasco who suggested the need for a change in logic if the most recent scientific data were to be understood. We saw the imaginary, more than ever, as constituting the dynamic spiritual and intellectual capital of homo sapiens. We saw imagination as the common denominator of all human thought, and an earnest study of its field as an indispensable cure to the paralysing effects of the compartmentalisation of the university 'disciplines', the 'methods' of which had become scientifically incoherent, thus creating the necessity for systematic pluridisciplinarity. This position was resoundingly confirmed by the UNESCO International Symposium on Interdisciplinarity in Paris in April 1991 (proceedings published under the title Entre savoirs: l'interdisciplinarité en acte: enjeux, obstacles, perspectives, Eres, Toulouse, 1992).

In the sixth French edition in 1980, we noted that the systemic pluralism at the origin of our empirical gathering of data had been theoretically and practically confirmed by the progress of science over the last twenty years. We hailed the victory of the 'New Anthropological Spirit', originating in the New Scientific Spirit (celebrated in its time by my mentor, Gaston Bachelard), and the convergence with the Lupascian topic that we had adopted of ground-breaking research from very diverse scientific horizons, namely the work of historians of religion (Mircea Eliade, Georges Dumézil and Henry Corbin), that of depth psychologists (such as James Hillman), and work in the 'hard' sciences such as Bertalanffy's systemics, F. Jacob's biology, René Thom's mathematics. At the same time, our research and our theses were being confirmed and developed in the numerous Centres of Research on the Imaginary originating from the 'mother house', the CRI of Grenoble founded in 1966 (CNRS GRECO in 1981). Finally, work in ethology by people such as Spitz, Kayla and Portmann, leading up to the awarding of the Nobel Prize for Medicine (1973) to K. Lorenz, N. Tinbergen and E. von Frisch, had splendidly validated and developed the pioneering work of Russian reflexology on which our theses were based.

The Preface of the tenth edition three years later (1983) emphasised the coherence of our theories with the 'Great Change', then clearly being signalled in all sciences. Since 1979 -- the date emblematically marked by the famous Cordoba Colloquium -- the hitherto incompatible 'two readings of the universe', that of the sciences and that of other spiritual endeavours, tended to coalesce -- fusing Bachelard's two great loves: science and poetry. Scientists, like the American physicist G. Holton, discovered that the sciences, and even the most up-to-date physical sciences -- that of Einstein or Niels Bohr -- were modeled and defined in their essential directions by important 'themata' closely related to our ideas of the Imaginary's 'verbal schemata'. The different notions of space/time that we had intuited when contrasting the two 'Orders of the image', and that we had been exploring (under the heading of 'semantic basin') using as a framework moments of great socio-cultural change, were discovered anew by many scholars who attributed various names to them. The Anglo-Saxon biologists Waddington and Sheldrake called them 'causative agents' or 'chreodes', while the mathematician René Thom used the terms 'logos' and 'morphogenetic fields', and the French historian Braudel theorised the idea of well-defined 'longues durées' underpinning the events of history and 'economies/worlds' in socio-cultural spaces. In turn, the English physicist David Bohm substituted for the old idea of 'explanation', that of 'implication' closely related to the old alchemical ideas (adopted by Schelling and Jung) of the Unus Mundus. Clearly, such groupings of discoveries and conceptualisations extinguished the 'pure reason' of Aristotle, inherited by Kant. In contemporary physics space was no longer a homogeneous field of separabilities (Feynman, d'Espagnat) and time was no longer considered to be irreversible (A. Aspect, O. Costa de Beauregard, A. Sakharov). What we had defined in our book as the ambivalence of the 'anthropological dialectic' -- that is, the symmetry of causative chains originating equally in the psychological and in the socio-cultural -- was confirmed by recent scientific developments. Such a radical and profound epistemological revolution, upsetting as it does the binary logic of the 'excluded middle', necessarily subverts the bases of the old ethnocentric Western philosophy, just as had been foreseen by physicists such as F. Capra or E. Schr&otrem;dinger, and as was affirmed by Niels Bohr or R. Ruyer, or confirmed in philosophy by Edgar Morin, M. Beigbeider and J. J. Wunenberger.

The 1991 Colloquium at Cerisy-la-Salle, which brought together specialised researchers from fourteen countries, and which was devoted to our work, confirmed the continued relevance and fecundity of our analyses. There are at present approximately fifty Centres of Research on the Imaginary throughout the world. English-speaking researchers will find that the theses proposed here are receiving ever-increasing confirmation from the totality of the epistemological, logical and philosophical currents which constitute our age and its 'real presences', as George Steiner calls them. We are sure that this book will be of benefit to researchers in many fields and we hope that it will entice some of them to pursue research in the areas of mythocriticism and mythanalysis . . .

Gilbert DURAND


From the Translators' Foreword
Our decision to translate this work coincides with an increasing interest in the English-speaking world in the conceptualisation of the human imagination -- already a rich tradition in French philosophical thought. Our use of the word 'imaginary' in the English title acknowledges the introduction of the word and concept into English. In the latest edition of the Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy, we read the following:

Imaginary 1. adj. pertaining to the imagination; fictitious. 2. n. As a noun, the word is a recent import from the French and bears the traces of a long history of theorisation about the imaginary within French philosophy, aesthetics, literary theory, cultural anthropology and psychoanalysis.
The term has been in common use at least since the Surrealists, with reference to all kinds of imagined or invented meanings. It is a key concept in work as diverse as that of the cultural anthropologist Gilbert Durand and that of the philosopher Michele Le Doeuff. Its recent history also owes much to the work of the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan and critics such as Luce Irigaray and Cornelius Castoriadis.
[...] Gilbert Durand, a disciple of Bachelard, adopts an anthropological point of view in order to undertake a systematic classification of the human imaginary.
Durand's book deals with the structure of the human imaginary, within which it establishes a typology of figures, organised structurally according to several central archetypes and focussing on man's subjective experience of space and ultimately time. Durand is a disciple of Gaston Bachelard and his work can be seen to some extent as a continuation and formalisation of the intuitions of that great French philosopher. The complex structural synthesis which Durand has evolved uses as its basis aspects of the Russian Bechterev's reflexology and Jung's notion of archetypes. It uses as material for its demonstration the Bechterevian notion of dominant human reflexes (postural, digestive, sexual) and examples taken from important world myths.

Written at the height of the Structuralist vogue, the book belongs, as its name indicates, to that tradition. It has not dated, however, because it does not leave itself open to the same criticisms -- the refusal to incorporate change and the diachronic perspective -- as does the work of certain other Structuralists. The protean nature of the image is at the heart of Durand's thought and the binary structural base he posits is dynamised at the outset by the possibilities of the ternary, which he incorporates in his model. Thus he postulates two main Orders of image, the diurnal and the nocturnal, corresponding to two general types of imagination. The Diurnal Order is characterised as diaeretic, whereas within the Nocturnal Order are to be found two subgroupings: the synthetic and the mystical. These categories are underpinned by the reflex dominants.

In France, Durand's work is well known to scholars in the areas of philosophy, psychology and psychoanalysis, literary and cultural studies, sociology, history of religions and anthropology. In the English-speaking world, however, because of the language barrier, his work tends to be known only to literary scholars in the area of French Studies. In translating this book into English we have sought to make this rich and fascinating work available to the full range of Anglophone scholars who could profitably read it . . .

Margaret SANKEY(E-mail)
& Judith HATTEN

=========================



상상계의 인류학적 구조들 
질베르 뒤랑 (지은이),
진형준 (옮긴이)문학동네2007-08-31

원제 : Les Structure Anthropologiques De L'lmaginaire (1960년)
====

책소개


거대하고 종합적인 인류학의 체계를 확립한 프랑스 인문학자 질베르 뒤랑의 기념비적 작품으로 평가받는 책. 문학과 예술비평 분야를 포함해 철학, 인류학, 사회 이론, 심리학, 종교사를 모두 아우른 신인류학의 기틀을 마련한 저작이자 상상력 연구의 고전적 작품으로 평가받는다.

지은이 뒤랑은 이 책에서 상상계의 인류학적 구조라는 이름으로 인간에 대한 보편적이고 종합적인 이해의 틀을 제공하고 있는데, 그에 의하면 합리주의의 이름하에 평가절하 되어왔던 상상력은 바로 그러한 틀을 제공하는 인간 인식의 불변적 토대이다. 인간은 구체적 작품(표현)이 없이는 존재할 수 없으며 인간의 구체적 작품은 모두 상상력의 소산이라고 그는 강조한다.

'이미지의 낮의 체제', '이미지의 밤의 체제', '초월적 환상을 위한 요소들' 등 총 3권으로 구성되어 있으며, 고대의 신화로부터 현대의 예술 작품에 이르기까지 인간이 이룩한 온갖 상상력의 산물들을 구체적으로 참조하고 있을 뿐만 아니라 비정상적인 표현, 즉 광기의 표현까지도 탐사의 대상으로 삼아 그 의미를 밝히고 있다. '상상하는 동물'로서 인간의 의미에 대한 깊이있는 탐구를 보여주는 책이다.


목차
서문<제10판&rt;


서론
"서푼짜리" 이미지
상징과 동기부여
수렴적 방법과 방법적 심리주의
인류학적 요청, 구도와 용어


제1권│이미지의 낮의 체제

제1부 시간의 얼굴들
제1장 동물의 모습을 한 상징들
제2장 밤의 형태를 한 상징들
제3장 추락의 형태를 한 상징들

제2부 홀과 검
제1장 상승의 상징들
제2장 빛나는 상징들
제3장 분리의 상징들
제4장 상상계의 낮의 체제와 분열 형태적인 구조들


제2권│이미지의 밤의 체제

제1부 하강과 잔
제1장 도치의 상징들
제2장 내면의 상징들
제3장 상상계의 신비적 구조들

제2부 은화에서 지팡이로
제1장 순환의 상징들
제2장 리듬의 구도에서 진보의 신화로
제3장 상상계의 종합적 구조와 역사의 스타일
제4장 신화와 의미화

제3권│ 초월적 환상을 위한 요소들

제1장 원형의 보편성
제2장 공간, 상사아력의 선험적 형태
제3장 완곡화의 초월적 구도론

결론

상상계의 동위적 분류도
본문에 인용된 저술들
옮기고 나서
찾아보기
접기



책속에서


상상계는 수동적 부대 현상이나 무화이거나 지나간 과거에 대한 헛된 성찰이 아니다. 상상력은 스스로 세상을 변화시키는 창조적 활동임을 보여주며 이 세상을 완곡화해서 근본적으로 변화 시킨다. 그리고 그렇게 변화한 세상은 '성스러운 지성<intellectus sanctus&rt;'이 되고 가장 최선의 질서를 지니게 된다. 객관성은 우리가 갈증을 느끼는 순간들에 이정표를 세우고 그것들을 잘게 잘라놓는다. 시간은 우리가 절망적으로 갈망하는 충족의 순간을 끊임없이 지연시킨다. 반면에 상상된 공간은 매 순간 자유롭게 그리고 즉각적으로 존재의 지평과 희망을 영원 속에서 재건립한다. 상상계는 우리의 의식이 궁극적으로 의지하는 존재이며, 영혼이 살아 있는 심장이다.  접기



추천글


저자 및 역자소개
질베르 뒤랑 (Durand, Gilbert) (지은이) 

1921년에 태어나 2차 대전에 참전, 레지스탕스 운동으로 레종 도뇌르 훈장을 받았다. 1947년 철학과 교수 자격, 1959년 문학박사 학위를 취득했으며 그르노블 대학 문화인류학, 사회학 교수를 역임. 1966년 이후 사브와 대학 상상력 연구소와 <상상력 연구>지를 주관. <상상계의 인류학적 구조>, <신화방법론 서설> 등 다수의 저술을 통해 신화 비평의 이론적 기틀을 마련한 학자로 평가받고 있다.
최근작 : <상상계의 인류학적 구조들>,<상징적 상상력>,<신화비평과 신화분석> … 총 12종 (모두보기)


진형준 (옮긴이) 

서울대학교 불어불문학과를 졸업하고 같은 대학원에서 문학 석사?박사 학위를 받았다. 홍익대학교 문과대학장, 세계상상력센터 한국 지회장, 한국상상학회 회장을 맡고 있다. 문학평론가이자 불문학자 그리고 한국문학번역원 원장으로서 한국이 주빈국이던 프랑크푸르트 도서전을 성공적으로 주관하며 한국문학과 한국문화의 세계화에 기여했다. 이런 활동의 연장선에서 생각하는 힘: 진형준 교수의 세계문학컬렉션 시리즈를 기획하여 출간하고 있다.
지은 책으로 『상상력이란 무엇인가』 『프리메이슨 비밀의 역사』 등이 있으며, 옮긴 책으로 『상상계의 인류학적 구조... 더보기
최근작 : <위기를 비웃어라>,<공자님의 상상력>,<상상력 혁명> … 총 178종 (모두보기)


질베르 뒤랑(지은이)의 말

우리는 역설적인게도 가스통 바슐라르의 신과학 정신과 상상계의 현상학 덕분에 바슐라르 이후의 국면에 들어오게 되었다. 우리의 이 책은 4반세기 전에 그러한 커다란 변화를 의식하지도 못하면서 그 변화를 명확히 해놓은 셈이다. 그러니 결국 '결과'가 - 이 경우 그것은 경험적인 연구였고 거의 철저하게 상상계의 조율에 입각한 것이었다 - 학문의 온갖 지평들에서 나타난 이론들이 크게 합류하게 될 것을 예비한 셈이니 여러 지평에서 나온 이론들은 나름대로의 공식, 때로는 자신만의 수학적 공식을 가지고 융, 엘리아데, 바슐라르, 그리고 나 자신의 경험적 탐구의 '원인' 역할을 한 셈인 것이다.


출판사 제공 책소개


거대하고 종합적인 인류학의 체계를 확립한 프랑스 인문학자 질베르 뒤랑의 기념비적 저서 『상상계의 인류학적 구조들』이 1960년 프랑스에서 초관을 선보인 이래 거의 오십여 년 만에 드디어 우리나라에서도 출간되었다. 『상상계의 인류학적 구조들』은 문학과 예술비평 분야를 포함해 철학, 인류학, 사회 이론, 심리학, 종교사를 모두 아우르며 신인류학의 기틀을 마련한 뒤랑의 대표적 저작이자 상상력 연구의 고전.
상상계의 인류학적 구조라는 이름으로 인간에 대한 보편적이고 종합적인 이해의 틀을 제공하는 이 작품은 그 내용의 난해함과 방대한 분량으로 인해, 중도에 번역자가 교체되는 등 온갖 우여곡절을 겪은 끝에 1996년 번역 출간 계약을 체결한 지 11년 만에야 비로소 빛을 보게 되었다. 국내 상상학자들의 숙원 사업이었던 『상상계의 인류학적 구조들』을 번역한 홍익대학교 불문과 진형준 교수는 3년여에걸친 번역, 편집 작업을 통해 선보이는 이 책에 대해 "이미지 상상력의 시대를 맞이하고 있는 현대인 모두에게 길잡이가 될 수 있는 책을 우리가 하나 가질 수 있게 되었다"며 그 기쁨과 소회를 밝히고 있다. 접기
====
출판사 리뷰

상상력에 입각한 총체적 신인류학의 탄생
바슐라르가 상상력 연구의 갈릴레이라면, 뒤랑은 코페르니쿠스다!
상상력의 절대성 및 자주성을 주장하는 입장에서 볼 때, 뒤랑은 바슐라르의 연장선상에 있다. 우리는 바슐라르를 통해, 서구 정신사에서 ‘오
류와 거짓의 원흉’으로 점 찍혀왔으며 심지어는 ‘영혼에 대한 범죄’라는 낙인까지 찍혔던 상상력이, 사실은 객관적 합리주의에 물든 영혼의 소
외를 막아주는 수호천사이며, 상상력이 이루는 세계 또한 과학의 세계만큼 현실적이라는 사실을 알고 있다. 그리고 한 걸음 더 나아가 인간을
세계와 연결시키고 나아가 신의 위치에까지 끌어올리는 것이 상상력의 역동적인 힘이라는 것을 알고 있다. 뒤랑은 철저히 바슐라르의 뒤를
잇고 있으나, 바슐라르의 현상학이 시의 현상학에 국한된 점, 또한 바슐라르가 과학의 축과 상상력의 축을 엄밀히 구분한 점에 불만을 품는
것으로부터 출발한다. 그에 의하면 상상력과 과학의 축은 엄밀히 구분되는 것이 아니라, 보다 폭넓은 상상적 기능 속에서 통합되는 것이다.
즉 과학적 진실은, 상상력이 보여주는 현실과 다른 축에 위치하는 것이 아니라, 상상적인 것의 총체적 구조 속의 한 부분에 불과할 뿐인 것이
다. "상상계의 인류학적 구조들"은 바로 이 상상력에 입각한 총체적 인류학의 구조를 세워보겠다는 야심의, 실증적 작업의 결과이다.
뒤랑의 이런 시도는 학제 간 교류의 구체적 방법론을 제공하기도 한다는 점에서도 그 의의가 있다. 인간의 공통적 특성인 상상력을 제반 학문
들을 연결시키는 접합제로 작동시켜 동시에 모든 학문들을 통합하는 역할을 하게 하는 것이다. 1966년 뒤랑에 의해 창설된 그르노블의 상상
력 연구소는 처음부터 인문학 전반을 아우르는 새로운 상상계 연구를 표방했다. 현재까지도 ‘상상계 연구소’라는 기치 아래 전 세계의 문학,
사회학, 인류학, 종교학 등 모든 분야의 연구자들의 연구를 직?간접적으로 지원하고 있다. 이러한 다양한 국가의 다양한 분야에서 상상계를
축으로 이루어지고 있는 연구들은 처음에는 독자적 연구의 성격을 띠고 있었지만 이제는 서로 긴밀한 연락망을 구성하여 학문의 경계를 넘어
서는 거대한 상상계 연구 조직을 형성하는 데까지 이르고 있다. 이는 상상력에 대한 기존의 연구가 구체적이고 한정적인 영역에서 이루어졌
던 반면에, 최근에 들어서는 어느 한 영역에 국한되지 않는 보편적인 상상력 연구의 필요성이 대두되고 있다는 사실의 반증이기도 하다.
한국상상학회를 이끌고 있는 진형준 교수는 국내 상상학자들의 숙원 사업이었던 이 책의 번역을 마치며, 과정은 힘들었지만 이 책이 출간됨
으로써 우리도 현대인 모두에게 길잡이가 될 수 있는 책을 하나 가질 수 있게 되었다고 그 소회를 밝혔다.
인류의 존재 안에서 찾아낸 상상계의 질서!

뒤랑은 호모사피엔스로서의 인류의 특질 자체에서 상상계의 근거를 찾는다. 다른 무엇보다 다양한 ‘몸짓’들이 인류에게 가장 근원적이라는 결론에 이른 그는, 자세를 유지하기 위한 몸짓(자세 지배반사), 영양을 섭취하기 위한 몸짓(영양 섭취 지배반사), 성적인 몸짓(짝짓기 지배반사) 등 인류의 세 가지 기본 몸짓을 정리한다. 그리고 그에 대응하는 상상계의 법칙으로 ‘분열형태 구조’ ‘신비 구조’ ‘종합 구조’라는 상상계의 기본 도식을 세운다.
상상계의 인류학적 구조에 대한 뒤랑의 탐구는 동시에 두 방향으로 행해진다. 하나는 형식적인 구조면에서의 논리라든가, 상상계가 가진 길항관계 혹은 융합관계 같은 것을 추구하는 것이다. 다른 하나는 이 상상계에 존재론적인 가치와 정감적 가치를 부여하는 것으로서, 이 정감적 가치는 공격적 요소라든가 융합적 통합을 추구하는 요소를 다 포함할 수 있다.
이러한 종합적인 관점에서 뒤랑은 상상계를 커다란 두 체제로 분류한다. 뒤랑에 의하면 인간은 죽음을 의식하는 유일한 동물이다. 그리고 바
로 그 죽음에 대한 의식이 인간 상상력의 출발이다. 상상력의 낮의 체제는 죽음의 공포를 극대화하고 과장하여 결국은 죽음을 퇴치하는 상상
력의 영역이다. 그 체제에서는 근본적으로 대립의 상상력이 작동하며 영웅적 모험, 분리, 정화의 의식과 악과 괴물을 퇴치하는 전투적 무기들
이 만들어진다. 밤의 체제는 죽음의 공포의 완화를 통해 죽음을 극복하는 상상력으로 이루어진다. 신비적 구조와 종합적 구조의 둘로 나누어
지는 밤의 체제는 가치전도, 순환 등의 상상력을 통해 낮의 체제에서는 부정적인 가치가 부여되었던 것에 긍정적인 가치를 부여하고 모순되
는 것이 공존하기도 한다. 상상력의 낮의 체제는 반어법의 세계이며 모순어법의 세계이다. 뒤랑의 상상계의 구조는 이 모든 것을 다 포함한
다.

뒤랑, 웅대하고 심오한 상상계의 원형을 파헤치다!
뒤랑은 자유로움을 그 특징으로 하는 ‘상상력’과 일정한 틀을 갖춘 ‘구조’라는 개념을 결합시켜 “상상계의 구조들”이라는 개념을 만듦으로써,
인간의 상상력은 무한히 자유로운 것이 아니라 몇 개의 커다란 축을 중심으로 분류할 수 있다고 이야기한다. 그는 “상상계의 구조들”이라는
개념을 통해 인간을 총체적으로 연구할 수 있는 틀을 세우되 그것이 어떻게 역동적으로 변화하는가를 동시에 고찰한다. 그는 단수의 ‘구조’가
아니라 복수의 ‘구조들’의 관계를 살핌으로써 자신이 제시한 상상계의 틀에 역동성을 부여한다. 그는 인간이 이룩한 문명의 이름으로 포유동
물로서 인간이 지닌 생물학적 특징을 지워버리는 인류학이 아니라, 인간이 지닌 모든 특질들을 유기적으로 연결시키는 인류학을 설립하였다.
인간에 관한 한 그 어느 것도 낯설지 않다는 관점에서 설립한 인류학만이 보편성을 가질 수 있다고 주장한 그는 서구적인 관점에서 설립된 기
존 인류학의 편협성을 비판하면서 객관과 주관, 역동성과 정태성, 불변적인 것과 가변적인 것을 두루 포함하고 종합하는 인류학을 설립한다.
따라서 그의 인류학적 구조들은 우리의 일상, 하찮아 보이는 우리의 행동과 사고, 더 나아가 우리의 광기까지도 그 안에 포함하는, 인간 존재
의 방대함과 섬세함을 있는 그대로 반영한다. 다시 말해 인간에 관한 모든 학문을 종합하는 구조들인 것이다. 이런 이유로 우리는 뒤랑을, 지
동설을 하나의 체계로 정립한 코페르니쿠스에 비유할 수 있다. 그리고 그러한 인류학의 코페르니쿠스적 혁명의 중심에 상상력이 있고 신화가
있는 것이다.

인간 정신의 원형을 찾아나선 호모사피엔스의 인류학적 도정!
이 책에서 뒤랑은 상상계는 다양한 인류학적 동기부여들을 모두 포괄하는 복수의 원형들로 구성되는 영역이므로 호모사피엔스를 연구하는
여러 학문들의 집합으로서의 인류학이 제시하는 길을 따라야 한다고 주장한다. 그가 인류학적 도정이라 이름붙인 이 과정은 상상계의 차원에
서 주관적·동화적 충동들과 우주적·사회적 환경으로부터 비롯되는 객관적 요청들 사이에 존재하는 끊임없는 교류 과정을 일컫는다.
뒤랑은 “상상력은 이미지들을 형성하는 능력이 아니라 지각이 제공하는 실제적 복제물들을 변형하는 역동적 힘이고, 이것은 정신적 삶 전체
의 기초가 된다”는 바슐라르의 말을 인용하면서 근원적인 범주들을 움직임의 비유에서 찾고자 했다. 또한 베흐테레프의 반사학에서 분류의
원칙과 “지배 몸짓”의 개념을 차용한다. 뒤랑은 자세 지배소, 섭취 지배소, 소화 지배소를 원동 감각적 모태로 간주하며, 그 속에서 재현들이
자연스럽게 통합된다고 가정한다. 지배반사가 표상과 원형, 상징에 이르면서 발생과 쇠퇴를 거듭하는 인류학적 도정에서 표상과 원형, 상징
을 연결해주는 것이 신화이다. 신화는 담론적 성격과 반복적인 성격을 지니고 있어 그 자체로 ‘종합적인 구조’를 품는 동시에 상상계의 전 구
조를 모두 포함하고 있는 인간 상상계의 집합소이기도 하다. “신화는 잃어버린 시간을 찾아서 정복되어 낙원의 모험으로 변형된 죽음과 화해
하려는 포괄적인 노력이며 바로 그것이 모든 위대한 신화들의 궁극적 의미”라고 뒤랑은 말한다.
상상계는 반사의 순수 동화와 객관적 실재에 대한 의식의 전적인 적응 사이에서 인간 정신의 정수, 즉 죽음이라는 객관적 세계에 대항하여 생
생한 희망을 세우려는 인간 존재의 노력을 구성한다. 그러한 도정에 의해 각각의 체제에 따라 구도들과 원형들과 상징들이 쌓이고 그것들이
구조들로 조율된다. 또한 이러한 범주들은 이미지들의 동위성, 별자리와 신화적 이야기로 모양을 형성한다.
한편 그는 상징체제를 ‘낮의 체제’와 ‘밤의 체제’로 광범위하게 나누는 이분법을 채택하였다. ‘낮의 체제’에서는 객관적으로 이질화를 지향하고
주관적으로는 동질화를 지향하는 모티브가 주어진다. 한편 ‘밤의 체제’는 구별에 입각한 낮과 태양의 세계보다 논쟁적이지 않고 공격적이지
않으며 그 마음은 행복과 화해를 향해 있다.
홀과 검의 원형으로 상징되는 ‘낮의 체제’는 기본적으로 죽음에 대한 공포의 과장과 그 과장된 공포의 퇴치를 지향하는 상상력으로 이루어진
다. 그러므로 낮의 체제는 분열적이고 전투적이며 영웅적이다. 정신의 밤의 체제에서는 인간 존재가 불가피하게 가질 수밖에 없는 ‘시간의 흐
름’이라는 공포를 싸워서 극복하는 것이 아니라 받아들이고 살아냄으로써 극복한다. 상승을 통해 어둠에서 벗어나고자 하는 것이 아니라 친
밀한 곳으로 깊숙이 ‘하강’함으로써 평온을 되찾고자 한다. 인간은 어머니의 자궁 같은 친밀하고 따뜻한 영역에 침잠함으로써 삶과 시간의 흐
름에 대한 두려움을 완화한다. 또한 달의 순환과 반복에서처럼 리드미컬한 시간의 무한한 반복을 강조하면서 시간을 극복한다. 이런 마음은
낮의 이미지와 밤의 형상들이 혼합되어 있는 종합적이고 극적인 우주론까지 이르게 된다.
이 책이 보여주는 인류의 위대한 상상력의 산물들은 단순히 인간의 상상력에 대한 목록이 아니다. 그것은 상상력의 이름으로 재조명된 인간
의 모든 작품들에 대한 새로운 의미 부여이다. 이 책을 통해 우리는 인간 상상력의 의미를 심도 있게 이해할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 인간에 대한
새로운 이해의 길을 열 수 있다. 우리가 맞이한 ‘이미지 상상력의 시대’는 단순한 연대기적 시대가 아니라 인간과 자연과 우주에 대한 새로운
인식을 요구하는 시대이다.
이미지 상상력의 시대를 일반인들은 시대적 현상의 하나로 이해하는 경향이 있다. 하지만 상상력을 중시하는 사회가 되었다는 것은 인간과
사회와 자연에 대한 근본적인 인식의 변화를 의미한다. 상상하는 주체로서의 인간에 대한 새로운 이해는 다원주의, 환경주의, 페미니즘 운동
등 현 사회의 새로운 여러 경향들의 의미를 심층적으로 성찰하게 한다. 그리하여 뒤랑의 상상계의 인류학은 인간과 인간의 사회들을 모두 인
간이라는 이름으로 유기적으로 연결시켜주는 인간학이라고 말할 수 있는 것이다.


추천평
뒤랑의 『상상계의 인류학적 구조들』은 지식인 세계에서는 기념비적인 작품이다. 프랑스에서는 이미 오래전에 고전의 반열에 오
른 이 작품이 번역 출간됨으로써, 문학과 예술비평 분야를 포함해 철학, 인류학, 사회 이론, 심리학, 종교사 분야의 독자들은 지난
40년간 신비의 베일에 싸여 있던 이 저작을 마침내 (안타깝게도 이제야) 접할 수 있게 되었다.……『상상계의 인류학적 구조들』
은 한편으로는 다양한 분야에 대한 특별한 박학다식함의 종합이라는 점에서, 다른 한편으로는 이론적 깊이와 통찰력 있는 분석이
라는 측면에서 매우 놀라운 저작이다. (1999년 영어판 출간 당시)
- 존. P. 클라크 (미국 뉴올리언스 로욜라 대학 철학과 교수)



====
평점 분포
    7.5
===
구매자 (3)
전체 (3)
공감순 
     
잡상식으로 알았던 내용들의 정리판?글쓴이의 편견도 약간 엿보임..  구매
세라피스 2009-11-03 공감 (2) 댓글 (0)
Thanks to
 
공감
     
신화의귀환을알린뒤랑의대작이다/융의사상과바슐라르의철학을집대성한작품으로상상력과신화의철학적의미를집요하게판저술이다/시적문체로이렇게방대하면서도깊은정보를완벽하게담은사례를보기힘들다/타로를연구하다가탐독하게된이책은가치를매길수없는보물이다/사대와오행을공부하는이라면심오한환희로  구매
게라심 2014-12-08 공감 (1) 댓글 (0)
Thanks to
 
공감
     
좋은 책입니다  구매
mjua2630 2007-11-13 공감 (1) 댓글 (0)
Thanks to
 
공감
마이리뷰

     
내공이 부족한 탓인가?

상상계의 인류학적 구조들을 사 놓은지 꽤 오래 되었다. 하루가 지루할 찰나에 꺼내어 읽었더니 나름데로 호기심이 가는 대목이 있었다. 인류의 상상력이 이미지와 결합되어져 나타나는 것을 현상학적으로 규명하여, 밤과 낮의 체계로 한것은 훌륭한 대목이다.

이 책에 대해서 이정도만 언급하겠다. 이 책을 읽으면서 난 깊은 회의에 빠졌다. 자연속의 인간과 시간과 공간의 축적된 역사속에 살아가는 구체적인 인간상은 이 글에서 찾아본다는 사실상 힘이 들다. 작자는 상상력이야말로 인간의 존재의 실현을 이야기한다고 한다. 그러한 상상력의 근원을 정신분석적인 견해에 근거하여, 사회의 여러 현상들을 연결시키는 작업을 한다.

내가 보기에 이렇나 저자의 작업은 혼란 스러운 시대에 인간의 존재를 상상력에서 근거하고 싶은 욕망에 근거하고 있는것 같다. 존재에 대한 의미를 자신의 내부를 깊이 파고 들어가, 데카르트의 이성적 회의를 상상적 회의로 바꾸어 놓는 것을 통하여 그 자신의 풍부한 담론을 신화와 전설들과 함께 연결하여 정당화 시킨다고 생각한다.

결국 이러한 신화적 상상력은 사람의 내부적인 심리적인 묘사로 더욱 기울어지는 것을 통하여, 탈사회적이고, 탈 역사적인 측면을 부추기는 결과를 낳는것 같다. 20세기와 21세기를 지나면서, 혼란의 시대에 사람들은 자신들을 둘러싸고 있는 자연과 환경을 벗어나서, 자신의 내부에서 그 무엇인가의 자유로운 세계를 건설하고 싶었던 것이 아닐까. 유토피아를 현실의 세계에서 구축할 수 없다는 절망감이 이러한 책들을 만들어 내는게 아닌가 하는 생각이 잇닿는다.

그래서 이 책을 읽으면서, 나 자신이 더욱 고양된다는 느낌보다는 의미가 상실되어지고, 허무가 더욱 내 마음을 깊이 물들어 버린다는 사실에 더욱 힘겹기만 하다.

- 접기
minority 2008-05-31 공감(10) 댓글(0)
Thanks to
 
공감