2021/09/08

Perennial Phil Ch 16 PRAYER [6,2932]

Perennial Phil Ch 16 PRAYER [6,2932]

THE word 'prayer' is applied to at least four distinct procedures—petition, intercession, adoration, contemplation. 

  1. Petition is the asking of something for ourselves. 
  2. Intercession 중재is the asking of something for other people. 
  3. Adoration 동경is the use of intellect, feeling, will and imagination in making acts of devotion directed towards God in his personal aspect or as incarnated in human form. 
  4. Contemplation 묵상is that condition of alert passivity in which the soul lays itself open to the divine Ground within and without, the immanent and transcendent Godhead.

Psychologically, it is all but impossible for a human being to practise contemplation without preparing for it by some kind of adoration and without feeling the need to revert at more or less frequent intervals to intercession and some form at least of petition. 
On the other hand, it is both possible and easy to practise petition apart not only from contemplation, but also from adoration and, in rare cases of extreme and unmiti­gated egotism, even from intercession. 

Petitionary and inter­cessory prayer may be used—and used, what is more, with what would ordinarily be regarded as success—without any but the most perfunctory and superficial reference to God in any of his aspects. 

To acquire the knack of getting his petitions answered, a man does not have to know or love God, or even to know or love the image of God in his own mind. 
All that he requires is a burning sense of the importance of his own ego and its desires, coupled with a firm conviction that there exists, out there in the universe, something not himself which can be wheedled or dragooned into satisfying those desires. 
If I repeat 'My will be done,' with the necessary degree of faith and persistency, the chances are that, sooner or later and some­how or other, I shall get what I want. 
---
“Thy will be done” means 'may Gods will be done'. It is the will of God that should be done in the world, not man's will, because God is the one who created the heavens and the earth, man, and everything else in it that has life.

What is the meaning of 'thy will be done' in The Lord's Prayer?
---
What does my will be done and They will be done ? mean?

So.. "My will be done" means that the speaker is saying that what he want (his will) is what should happen. "They will be done" means that it will happen.
---
261 252    

Whether my will coincides with the will of God, and whether in getting what I want I shall get what is spiritually, morally or even materially good for me, are questions which I cannot answer in advance. 
Only time and eternity will show. 
Meanwhile we shall be well ad­vised to heed the warnings of folk-lore. Those anonymous realists who wrote the world's fairy stories knew a great deal about wishes and their fulfilment. 
They knew, first of all, that in certain circumstances petitions actually get themselves answered; but they also knew that God is not the only answerer and that if one asks for something in the wrong spirit, it may in effect be given—but given with a vengeance and not by a divine Giver. 

Getting what one wants by means of self-regarding petition is a form of hubris거만, which invites its condign and appropriate nemesis. 


As nouns the difference between arrogance and hubris is that 
arrogance is the act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption while 
hubris is excessive pride, presumption or arrogance (originally toward the gods).
--
nemesis. a downfall caused by an inescapable agent.
---
Thus, the folk-lore of the North American Indian is full of stories about people who fast and pray egotistically, in order to get more than a reasonable man ought to have, and who, receiving what they ask for, thereby bring about their own downfall. 

From the other side of the world come all the tales of the men and women who make use of some kind of magic to get their petitions answered —always with farcical or catastrophic consequence. Hardly ever do the Three Wishes of our traditional fairy lore lead to anything but a bad end for the successful wisher.

Picture God as saying to you, 'My son, why is it that day by day you rise and pray, and genuflect, and even strike the ground with your forehead, nay, sometimes even shed tears, while you say to Me: "My Father, my God, give me wealth!" 
If I were to give it to you, you would think yourself of some importance, you would fancy you had gained something very great. 
Because you asked for it, you have it. But take care to make good use of it. Before you had it you were humble; now that you have begun to be rich you despise the poor. 
What kind of a good is that which only makes you worse? For worse you are, since you were bad already. And that it would make you worse you knew not; hence you asked it of Me. I gave it you and I proved you; you have found—and you are found out! 
253
Ask of Me better  things than these, greater things than these. Ask of Me spiritual things. Ask of Me Myself.'
St. Augustine

O Lord, I, a beggar, ask of Thee more than a thousand kings may ask of Thee. Each one has something he needs to ask of Thee; I have come to ask Thee to give me Thyself.
Ansari of Herat

In the words of Aquinas, it is legitimate for us to pray for any­thing which it is legitimate for us to desire. There are some things that nobody has the right to desire—such as the fruits of crime or wrong-doing. 
Other things may be legitimately desired by people on one level of spiritual development, but should not be desired (and indeed cease to be desired) by those on another, higher level. 
Thus, St. François de Sales had reached a point where he could say, 'I have hardly any desires, but if I were to be born again I should have none at all. 
We should ask nothing and refuse nothing, but leave ourselves in the arms of divine Providence 신의 섭리without wasting time in any desire, except to will what God wills of us.' 
But meanwhile the third clause of the Lord's Prayer is repeated daily by mil­lions, who have not the slightest intention of letting any will be done, except their own.

The savour of wandering in the ocean of deathless life has rid me of all my asking;As the tree is in the seed, so all diseases are in this asking.
Kabir

Lord, I know not what to ask of thee. Thou only knowest what I need. Thou lovest me better than I know how to love myself. Father, give to thy child that which he himself knows not how to ask. Smite or heal, depress me or raise me up: I adore all thy purposes without knowing them. I am silent; I offer myself up in a sacrifice; I yield myself to Thee; I would have no other desire than to accomplish thy will. Teach me to pray. Pray Thyself in me.
Fénelon
254 

(A dervish was tempted by the devil to cease calling upon Allah, on the ground that Allah never answered, 'Here am I.' The Prophet Khadir appeared to him in a vision with a message from God.)

Was it not I who summoned thee to my service?
Was it not I who made thee busy with my name?
Thy calling 'Allah!' was my 'Here am I.'
Jalal-uddin Rumi

I pray God the Omnipotent to place us in the ranks of his chosen, among the number of those whom He directs to the path of safety; in whom He inspires fervour lest they forget Him; whom He cleanses from all defilement, that nothing may remain in them except Himself; yea, of those whom He indwells com­pletely, that they may adore none beside Him.
Al-G/za,a1i

About intercession, as about so many other subjects, it is William Law who writes most clearly, simply and to the point.

By considering yourself as an advocate with God for your neigh­bours and acquaintances, you would never find it hard to be at peace with them yourself. It would be easy for you to bear with and forgive those, for whom you particularly implored 간청하다the divine mercy and forgiveness.
William Law

Intercession중재is the best arbitrator of all differences, the best pro­moter of true friendship, the best cure and preservative against all unkind tempers, all angry and haughty passions.
William Law
255
You cannot possibly have any ill-temper, or show any unkind behaviour to a man for whose welfare you are so much con­cerned, as to be his advocate with God in private. For you cannot possibly despise and ridicule that man whom your private prayers recommend to the love and favour of God.
William Law

Intercession, then, is at once the means to, and the expression of, the love of one's neighbour. And in the same way adora­tion is the means to, and the expression of, the love of God—a love that finds its consummation in the unitive knowledge of the Godhead which is the fruit of contemplation. It is to these higher forms of communion with God that the authors of the following extracts refer whenever they use the word 'prayer.'

The aim and end of prayer is to revere, to recognize and to adore the sovereign majesty of God, through what He is in Himself rather than what He is in regard to us, and rather to love his goodness by the love of that goodness itself than for what it sends us.
Bourgoing

In prayer he (Charles de Condren) did not stop at the frontiers of his knowledge and his reasoning. He adored God and his mysteries as they are in themselves and not as he understood them.
Amelote

'What God is in Himself,' 'God and his mysteries as they are in themselves'—the phrases have a Kantian ring. But if Kant was right and the Thing in itself is unknowable, Bourgoing, Dc Condren and all the other masters of the spiritual life were engaged in a wild-goose chase. But Kant was right only as regards minds that have not yet come to enlightenment and deliverance. To such minds Reality, whether material, psychic or spiritual, presents itself as it is darkened, tinged and refracted by the medium of their own individual natures. 
156 But in those who are pure in heart and poor in spirit there is no distortion of Reality, because there is no separate selfhood to obscure or refract, no painted lantern slide of intellectual beliefs and hal­lowed imagery to give a personal and historical colouring to the 'white radiance of Eternity.' 
For such minds, as Olier says, 'even ideas of the saints, of the Blessed Virgin, and the sight of Jesus Christ in his humanity are impediments in the way of the sight of God in his purity.' The Thing in itself can be per-ceived—but only by one who, in himself, is no-thing.

By prayer I do not understand petition or supplication which, according to the doctrines of the schools, is exercised principally by the understanding, being a signification of what the person desires to receive from God. 
But prayer here specially meant is an offering and giving to God whatsoever He may justly require from us.

Now prayer, in its general notion, may be defined to be an elevation of the mind to God, or more largely and expressly thus: prayer is an actuation of an intellective soul towards God, ex­pressing, or at least implying, an entire dependence on Him as the author and fountain of all good, a will and readiness to give Him his due, which is no less than all love, all obedience, adoration, glory and worship, by humbling and annihilating the self and all creatures in his presence; and lastly, a desire and intention to aspire to an union of spirit with Him.

Hence it appears that prayer is the most perfect and most divine action that a rational soul is capable of. It is of all actions and duties the most indispensably necessary.
Augustine Baker
257
Lord, teach me to seek Thee and reveal Thyself to me when I seek Thee. For I cannot seek Thee except Thou teach me, nor find Thee except Thou reveal Thyself. Let me seek Thee in longing, let me long for Thee in seeking: let me find Thee in love and love Thee in finding.

 Lord, I acknowledge and I thank Thee that Thou hast created me in this Thine image, in order that I may be mindful of Thee, may conceive of Thee and love Thee: but that image has been so consumed and wasted away by vices and obscured by the smoke of wrong-doing that it cannot achieve that for which it was made, except Thou renew it and create it anew. Is the eye of the soul darkened by its infirm­ity, or dazzled by Thy glory? Surely, it is both darkened in itself and dazzled by Thee. Lord, this is the unapproachable light in which Thou dwellest. Truly I see it not, because it is too bright for me; and yet whatever I see, I see through it, as the weak eye sees what it sees through the light of the sun, which in the sun itself it cannot look upon. Oh supreme and unapproachable light, oh holy and blessed truth, how far art Thou from me who am so near to Thee, how far art Thou removed from my vision, though I am so near to Thine! Everywhere Thou art wholly present, and I see Thee not. In Thee I move and in Thee I have my being, and cannot come to Thee, Thou art within me and about me, and I feel Thee not.

St. Ans6lm

Oh Lord, put no trust in me; for I shall surely fail if Thou uphold me not.
St. PAilip Neri

To pretend to devotion without great humility and renunciation of all worldly tempers is to pretend to impossibilities. He that would be devout must first be humble, have a full sense of his own miseries and wants and the vanity of the world, and then his soul will be full of desire after God. A proud, or vain, or worldly-minded man may use a manual of prayers, but he cannot be de­vout, because devotion is the application of an humble heart to God as its only happiness.
William Law

The spirit, in order to work, must have all sensible images, both good and bad, removed. The beginner in a spiritual course com­mences with the use of good sensible images, and it is impossible to begin in a good spiritual course with the exercises of the spirit. 
258 
Those souls who have not a propensity to the interior must abide always in the exercises, in which sensible images are used,and these souls will find the sensible exercises very profitable to themselves and to others, and pleasing to God. And this is the way of the active life. But others, who have the propensity to the interior, do not always remain in the exercises of the senses, but after a time these will give place to the exercises of the spirit, which are independent of the senses and the imagination and con­sist simply in the elevation of the will of the intellective soul to God.... The soul elevates her will towards God, apprehended by the understanding as a spirit, and not as an imaginary thing, the human spirit in this way aspiring to a union with the Divine Spirit.
Augustine Baker

You tell me you do nothing in prayer. But what do you want to do in prayer except what you are doing, which is, presenting and representing your nothingness and misery to God When beggars expose their ulcers and their necessities to our sight, that is the best appeal 호소 항소 애원 they can make. But from what you tell me, you sometimes do nothing of this, but lie there like a shadow or a statue. They put statues in palaces simply to please the prince's eyes. Be content to be that in the presence of God: He will bring the statue to life when He pleases.
St. FrwzçoLc de Sales

I have come to see that I do not limit my mind enough simply to prayer, that I always want to do something myself in it, wherein I do very wrong.. . . I wish most definitely to cut off and separate my mind from all that, and to hold it with all my strength, as much as I can, to the sole regard and simple unity. By allowing the fear of being ineffectual to enter into the state of prayer, and by wishing to accomplish something myself, I spoilt it all.
St. Jeanne Chantal

So long as you seek Buddhahood, specifically exercising yourself for it, there is no attainment for you.[?]
Yung.c/&ia Thsk

29

'How does a man set himself in harmony with the Tao?' 'I am already out of harmony.'
Si/,-t'ou

How shall I grasp it? Do not grasp it. That which remains when there is no more grasping is the Self.
PancAadasi

I order you to remain simply either in God or close to God, without trying to do anything there, and without asking anything of Him, unless He urges it. 
 St. François de Sales

Adoration is an activity of the loving, but still separate, indi­viduality. Contemplation is the state of union with the divine Ground of all being. 
The highest prayer is the most passive. 

뭔가를 바라지 않는 (간절한) 기도, 
"나"라는 것이 없어지는 기도, 
"신성"에 가까와지는 기도

Inevitably; for the less there is of self, the more there is of God

That is why the path to passive or infused contempla­tion is so hard and, for many, so painful—a passage through successive or simultaneous Dark Nights, in which the pilgrim 순례자must die [?]
  • to the life of sense [?] as an end in itself
  • to the life of private and even of traditionally hallowed 신성한 thinking and be­lieving, and finally 
  • to the deep source of all ignorance and evil, the life of the separate, individualized will.[self?]

Perennial Phil Ch 15 SILENCE [4,1108]

Perennial Phil Ch 15 SILENCE [4,1108]

The Father uttered one Word; that Word is His Son, and He utters Him for ever in everlasting silence; and in silence the soul has to hear it.
St. John of the Cross

The spiritual life is nothing else but the working of the Spirit of God within us, and therefore our own silence must be a great part of our preparation for it, and much speaking or delight in it will be often no small hindrance of that good which we can only have from hearing what the Spirit and voice of God speaketh within us. . .. Rhetoric and fine language about the things of the spirit is a vainer babble than in other matters; and he that thinks to grow in true goodness by hearing or speaking flaming words or striking expressions, as is now much the way of the world, may have a great deal of talk, but will have little of his conversa­tion in heaven.
William Law

He who knows does not speak;
He who speaks does not know.
Lao Tru

UNRESTRAINED and indiscriminate talk is morally evil and spiritually dangerous. 
'But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.' Matthew 12:36–37 -
--
 idle words - empty rhetoric or insincere or exaggerated talk
--
What does it mean that we will give an account to God?
The reference to us giving an account of ourselves to God means 
- that moment of judgment isn't something pronounced against us from on high, the judgment we pronounce on ourselves will be an expression of our own full awareness of who we are, who we have been, and what we have done with our lives.18 Jan 2017
---


This may seem a very hard saying. And yet if we pass in review the words we have given vent to in the. course of the average day, we shall find that the greater number of them may be classified under three main heads: 
  • words inspired by malice and uncharitableness towards our neighbours; 
  • words inspired by greed, sensuality and self-love; 
  • words inspired by pure imbecility and uttered without rhyme or reason, 
  • but merely for the sake of making a distract­ing noise. 
 utter foolishness
--
These are idle words; and we shall find, if we look into the matter, that they tend to outnumber the words that are dictated by reason, charity or necessity. And if the unspoken words of our mind's endless, idiot monologue are counted, the majority for idleness becomes, for most of us, overwhelmingly large.247248 

All these idle words, the silly no less than the self-regarding and the uncharitable, are impediments in the way of the unitive knowledge of the divine Ground, a dance of dust and flies obscuring the inward and the outward Light. The guard of the tongue (which is also, of course, a guard of the mind) is not only one of the most difficult and searching of all mortifica-tions; it is also the most fruitful.

When the hen has laid, she must needs cackle. And what does she get by it? Straightway comes the chough 
붉은 부리까마귀 and robs her of her eggs, and devours all that of which she should have brought forth her live birds. And just so that wicked chough, the devil, beareth away from the cackling anchoresses, and swalloweth up all the goods they have brought forth, and which ought, as birds, to bear them up towards heaven, if it had not been cackled.

Moderniqed from the Ancren Riwle
You cannot practise too rigid a fast from the charms of worldly talk.
Fénelon

What need of so much news from abroad, when all that concerns either life or death is all transacting and at work within us?
William Law
249
My dear Mother, heed well the precepts of the saints, who have all warned those who would become holy to speak little of them­selves and their own affairs.
St. François de Sales
(in a letter to St. Jeanne tie C/iantal)

A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker.
Chuang Tu

The dog barks; the Caravan passes.
Arabic Proverb

It was not from want of will that I have refrained from writing to you, for truly do I wish you all good; but because it seemed to me that enough has been said already to effect all that is need­ful, and that what is wanting (if indeed anything be wanting) is not writing or speaking—whereof ordinarily there is more than enough--but silence and work. For whereas speaking distracts, silence and work collect the thoughts and strengthen the spirit. As soon therefore as a person understands what has been said to him for his good, there is no further need to hear or to discuss; but to set himself in earnest to practise what he has learnt with silence and attention, in humility, charity and contempt of self.
St. John of the Cross

Molinos
(and doubtless he was not the first to use this classifica­tion) distinguished three degrees of silence
  • silence of the mouth, 
  • silence of the mind and 
  • silence of the will. 

  • To refrain from idle talk is hard; 
  • to quiet the gibbering of memory and imagination is much harder; 
  • hardest of all is to still the voices of craving and aversion within the will.

The twentieth century is, among other things, the Age of Noise. 
  • Physical noise, 
  • mental noise and 
  • noise of desire
  • —we hold history's record for all of them. 

And no wonder; for all the resources of our almost miraculous technology have been thrown into the current assault against silence. 
That most popular and influential of all recent inventions, the'radio, is nothing but a conduit through which pre-fabricated din can flow into our homes.
 And this din goes far deeper, of course, than the ear-drums. 
It penetrates the mind, filling it with a babel of distractions—news items, mutually irrelevant bits of information, blasts of corybantic or sentimental music, con­tinually repeated doses of drama that bring no catharsis, but merely create a craving for daily or even hourly emotional enemas. 

And where, as in most countries, the broadcasting stations support themselves by selling time to advertisers, the noise is carried from the ears, through the realms of phantasy, knowledge and feeling to the ego's central core of wish and desire.

 Spoken or printed, broadcast over the ether or on wood-pulp, all advertising copy has but one purpose—to pre­vent the will from ever achieving silence.

Desirelessness is the condition of deliverance and illumination. The condition of an expanding and technologically progressive system of mass-production is universal craving. 
Advertising is the organized effort to extend and intensify craving—to extend and intensify, that is to say, the workings of that force, which (as all the saints and teachers of all the higher religions have always taught) is the principal cause of suffering and wrong-doing and the greatest obstacle between the human soul and its divine Ground.

Perennial Phil Ch 14 IMMORTALITY AND SURVIVAL [3,1512]

Perennial Phil Ch 14 IMMORTALITY AND SURVIVAL [3,1512]
불명 존속

IMMORTALITY is participation in the eternal now of the divine Ground;

survival is persistence in one of the forms of time. 

Immortality is the result of total deliverance. 
Sur­vival is the lot of those who are partially delivered into some heaven, 
or who are not delivered at all, but find themselves, by the law of their own untranscended nature, compelled to choose some purgatorial or embodied servitude even more painful than the one they have just left.

Goodness and virtue make men know and love, believe and delight in their immortality. When the soul is purged and en­lightened by true sanctity, it is more capable of those divine irradiations, whereby it feels itself in conjunction with God. It knows that almighty Love, by which it lives, is stronger than death. It knows that God will never forsake His own life, which He has quickened in the soul. Those breathings and gaspings after an eternal participation of Him are but the energy of His own breath within us.

John Smith, the Platonist

I have maintained ere this and I still maintain that I already pos­sess all that is granted to me in eternity. For God in the fullness of his Godhead dwells eternally in his image—the soul.

Eckhart

Troubled or still, water is always water. What difference can embodiment or disembodiment make to the Liberated? Whether calm or in tempest, the sameness of the Ocean suffers no change. 
Yogavasistha
242 243

To the question 'Where does the soul go, when the body dies?' Jacob Boehme answered: 'There is no necessity for it to go anywhere.'

The word Tathagata (one of the names of the Buddha) signifies one who does not go to anywhere and does not come from any­where; and therefore is he called Tathagata (Thus-gone), holy and fully enlightened.

Diamond Sutra

Seeing Him alone, one transcends death; there is no other way.
Svetasvatara Upanishad

God, in knowledge of whom standeth our eternal life....
Book of Common Prayer

I died a mineral and became a plant.
I died a plant and rose an animal.
I died an animal and I was man.
Why should I fear? When was I less by dying?
Yet once more I shall die as man, to soar
With the blessed angels; but even from angelhood
I must pass on. All except God perishes.
When I have sacrificed my angel soul,
I shall become that which no mind ever conceived.
O, let me not exist! for Non-Existence proclaims,
'To Him we shall return.'

Jalal-uddin Rumi
===
나는 광물로 죽어 식물이 되었다. 
나는 식물로 죽고 동물을 살아났다. 
나는 동물로 죽었고 나는 인간이 되었다.
내가 왜 두려워해야 할까? 내가 죽는다고 못했던 때가 언제 있었나? 
그러나 다시 한 번 나는 인간으로 죽어 축복받은 천사들과 함께 날아오르리라. 그러나 나는 천사의 신분에서 부터도 넘어야 한다. 하나님 외에는 다 멸망한다.
 내가 내 천사 영혼을 희생했을 때, 나는 아무 생각도 해본 적이 없는 사람이 될 것입니다. 
오, 내가 존재하지 않게 하소서! 
비존재(Non-Existence)는 '우리는 그에게로 돌아갈 것이다'라고 선언한다.
===
세진: 여기서 "하나님"은 보통 의미의 God이 아니다.

There is a general agreement, East and West, that life in a body provides uniquely good opportunities for achieving salvation or deliverance. Catholic and Mahayana Buddhist doctrine is alike in insisting that the soul in its disembodied state after death cannot acquire merit, but merely suffers in purgatory the consequences of its past acts. 
But whereas Catholic orthodoxy declares that there is no possibility of progress in the next world, and that the degree of the soul's beatitude is determined solely by what it has done and thought in its earthly life, the eschatologists of the Orient affirm that there are certain posthu­mous conditions in which meritorious souls are capable of advancing from a heaven of happy personal survival to genuine immortality in union with the timeless, eternal Godhead. 

And, of course, there is also the possibility (indeed, for most indi­viduals, the necessity) of returning to some form of embodied life, in which the advance towards complete beatification, or deliverance through enlightenment, can be continued. Mean­while, the fact that one has been born in a human body is one of the things for which, says Shankara, one should daily give thanks to God.244 

The spiritual creature which we are has need of a body, without which it could nowise attain that knowledge which it obtains as the only approach to those things, by knowledge of which it is made blessed.
St. Bernard

Having achieved human birth, a rare and blessed incarnation, the wise man, leaving all vanity to those who are vain, should strive to know God, and Him only, before life passes into death.
Srimad Bliagavatam

Good men spiritualize their bodies; had men incarnate their souls.
Benjamin Whickcote
245

More precisely, 
  • good men spiritualize their mind-bodies; 
  • bad men incarnate and mentalize their spirits. 

The completely spiritualized mind-body is a Tathagata, who doesn't go any­where when he dies, for the good reason that he is already, actually and consciously, where everyone has always poten­tially been without knowing. 

The person who has not, in this life, gone into Thusness, into the eternal principle of all states of being, goes at death into some particular state, either purga­torial or paradisal. 

In the Hindu scriptures and their commentaries several different kinds of posthumous salvation are distinguished. 
The 'thus-gone' soul is completely delivered into complete union with the divine Ground; but it is also possible to achieve other kinds of mulcti, or liberation, even while retaining a form of purified I-consciousness. 

The nature of any individual's deliverance after death depends upon three factors: 
  1. the degree of holiness achieved by him while in the body, 
  2. the particular aspect of the divine Reality to which he gave his primary allegiance, and 
  3. the particular path he chose to follow. 

Similarly, in the Divine Comedy, Paradise has its various circles; but whereas in the oriental eschatologies the saved soul can go out of even sublimated individuality, out of survival even in some kind of celestial time, to a complete deliverance into the eternal, Dante's souls remain for ever where (after passing through the unmeritorious sufferings of purgatory) they find themselves as the result of their single incarnation in a body. 

Orthodox Christian doctrine does not admit the possibility, either in the posthumous state or in some other embodiment, of any further growth towards the ultimate perfection of a total union with the Godhead. But in the Hindu and Buddhist versions of the Perennial Philosophy the divine mercy is matched by the divine patience: both are infinite. For oriental theologians there is no eternal damna­tion; there are only purgatories and then an indefinite series of second chances to go forward towards not only man's, but the whole creation's final end—total reunion with the Ground of all being.

----

Preoccupation with posthumous deliverance is not one of the means to such deliverance, and may easily, indeed, become an obstacle in the way of advance towards it. 
There is not the slightest reason to suppose that ardent spiritualists are more likely to be saved than those who have never attended a séance or familiarized themselves with the literature, speculative or evidential. My intention here is not to add to that literature, but rather to give the baldest summary of what has been written about the subject of survival within the various religious traditions.  246 

In oriental discussions of the subject, that which survives death is not the personality. Buddhism accepts the doctrine of reincarnation; but it is not a soul that passes on (Buddhism denies the existence of a soul); it is the character.

'What we choose to make of our mental and physical constitution in the course of our life on earth affects the psychic medium within which individual minds lead a part at least of their amphibious existence, and this modification of the medium results, after the body's death, in the initiation of a new existence either in a heaven, or a purgatory, or another body.

In the Vedanta cosmology there is, over and above the Atman or spiritual Self, identical with the divine Ground
something in the nature of a soul that reincarnates in a gross or subtle body, or manifests itself in some incorporeal state. 
This soul is not the personality of the defunct, but rather the particularized I-consciousness out of which a personality arises.

Either one of these conceptions of survival is logically self-consistent and can be made to 'save the appearances'—in other words, to fit the odd and obscure facts of psychical research. 
The only personalities with which we have any direct acquaint­ance are incarnate beings, compounds Of a body and some un­known x. But if x plus a body equals a personality, then, obviously, it is impossible for x minus a body to equal the same thing. The apparently personal entities which psychical research sometimes seems to discover can only be regarded as temporary pseudo-personalities compounded of x and the medium's body.

These two conceptions are not mutually exclusive, and sur­vival may be the joint product of a persistent consciousness and a modification of the psychic medium. 
If this is so, it is possible for a given human being to survive in more than one posthumous form. 
His 'soul'—the non-personal ground and principle of past and future personalities—may go marching on in one mode of being, while the traces left by his thoughts and volitions in the psychic medium may become the origin of new individualized existences, having quite other modes of being.

Perennial Phil Ch 13 SALVATION, DELIVERANCE, ENLIGHTENMENT [9,4060]

Perennial Phil Ch 13 SALVATION, DELIVERANCE, ENLIGHTENMENT [9,4060]

SALVATION—but from what? 
Deliverance—out of which particular situation into what other situation? 
Men have given many answers to these questions, and because human temperaments are of such profoundly different kinds, because social situations are so various and fashions of thought and feeling so compelling while they last, the answers are many and mutually incompatible.

There is first of all material salvationism. In its simplest form this is merely the will to live expressing itself in a formu­lated desire to escape from circumstances that menace life. 
In practice, the effective fulfilment of such a wish depends on two things: the application of intelligence to particular economic and political problems, and the creation and maintenance of an atmosphere of goodwill, in which intelligence can do its work to the best advantage. 
But men are not content to be merely kind and clever within the limits of a concrete situation. They aspire to relate their actions, and the thoughts and feelings accompanying those actions, to general principles and a philo­sophy on the cosmic scale. 
When this directing and explana­tory philosophy is not the Perennial Philosophy or one of the historical theologies more or less closely connected with the Perennial Philosophy, it takes the form of a pseudo-religion, a system of organized idolatry. Thus, the simple wish not to starve, the well-founded conviction that it is very difficult to be good or wise or happy when one is desperately hungry, comes to be elaborated, under the influence of the metaphysic of Inevitable Progress, into prophetic Utopianism; the desire to escape from oppression and exploitation comes to be ex­plained and guided by a belief in apocalyptic revolutionism, combined, not always in theory, but invariably in practice, with the Moloch-worship of the nation as the highest of all goods. In all these cases salvation is regarded as a deliverance, by means of a variety of political and economic devices, out of the miseries and evils associated with bad material conditions into another set of future material conditions so much better than the present that, somehow or other, they will cause everybody to be perfectly happy, wise and virtuous. 230 231  

Officially promul­gated in all the totalitarian countries, whether of the right or the left, this confession of faith is still only semi-official in the nominally Christian world of capitalistic democracy, where it is drummed into the popular mind, not by the representatives of state or church, but by those most influential of popular moralists and philosophers, the writers of advertising copy (the only authors in all the history of literature whose works are read every day by every member of the population).

In the theologies of the various religions, salvation is also regarded as a deliverance out of folly, evil and misery into happiness, goodness and wisdom.

 But political and economic means are held to be subsidiary to the cultivation of personal holiness, to the acquiring of personal merit and to the main­tenance of personal faith in some divine principle or person having power, in one way or another, to forgive and sanctify the individual soul. 

Moreover, the end to be achieved is not regarded as existing in some Utopian future period, beginning, say, in the twenty-second century or perhaps even a little earlier, if our favourite politicians remain in power and make the right laws; the end exists 'in heaven.' 

This last phrase has two very different meanings. 
For what is probably the major­ity of those who profess the great historical religions, it signifies and has always signified a happy posthumous condition of indefinite personal survival, conceived of as a reward for good behaviour and correct belief and a compensation for the miseries inseparable from life in a body. 232 But for those who, within the various religious traditions, have accepted the Perennial Philo­sophy as a theory and have done their best to live it out in prac­tice, 'heaven' is something else. 

They aspire to be delivered out of separate selfhood in time and into eternity as realized in the unitive knowledge of the divine Ground. Since the Ground can and ought to be unitively known in the present life (whose ultimate end and purpose is nothing but this knowledge), 'heaven' is not an exclusively posthumous condition. 

He only is completely 'saved' who is delivered here and now. 
As to the means to salvation, these are simultaneously ethical, intel­lectual and spiritual and have been summed up with admirable clarity and economy in the Buddha's Eightfold Path

===

Com­plete deliverance is conditional on the following: 
  1. first, Right Belief in the all too obvious truth that the cause of pain and evil is craving for separative, egocentred existence, with its corollary that there can be no deliverance from evil, whether personal or collective, except by getting rid of such craving and the obsession of 'I,' 'me,' 'mine'; 
  2. second, Right Will, the will to deliver oneself and others; 
  3. third, Right Speech, directed by compassion and charity towards all sentient beings; 
  4. fourth, Right Action, with the aim of creating and maintaining peace and goodwill; 
  5. fifth, Right Means of Livelihood, or the choice only of such professions as are not harmful, in their exercise, to any human being or, if possible, any living creature; 
  6. sixth, Right Effort towards Self-control
  7. seventh, Right Attention or Recollectedness, to be practised in all the circumstances of life, so that we may never do evil by mere thoughtlessness, because 'we know not what we do'; and, 
  8. eighth, Right Con­templation, the unitive knowledge of the Ground, to which recollectedness and the ethical self-naughting prescribed in the first six branches of the Path give access. 

Such then are the means which it is within the power of the human being to employ in order to achieve man's final end and be 'saved.' 
Of the means which are employed by the divine Ground for help­ing human beings to reach their goal, the Buddha of the Pali scriptures (a teacher whose dislike of 'footless questions' is no less intense than that of the severest experimental physicist of the twentieth century) declines to speak

All he is prepared to talk about is 'sorrow [suffering?] and the ending of sorrow'—the huge brute fact of pain and evil and the other, no less empirical fact that there is a method by which the individual can free himself  from evil and do something to diminish the sum of evil in the world around him.  233 

It is only in Mahayana Buddhism that the mysterie& of grace are discussed with anything like the fullness of treatment accorded to the subject in the speculations of Hindu and especially Christian theology. 
The primitive, Hinayana teaching on deliverance is simply an elaboration of the Buddha's last recorded words:

 'Decay is inherent in all component things. Work out your own salvation with dili­gence.' As in the well-known passage quoted below, all the stress is upon personal effort.

Therefore, Ananda, be ye lamps unto yourselves, be ye a refuge to yourselves. Betake yourselves to no external refuge. Hold fast to the Truth as a lamp; hold fast to the Truth as a refuge. Look not for a refuge in anyone beside yourselves. And those, Ananda, who either now or after I am dead shall be a lamp unto themselves, shall betake themselves to no external refuge, but holding fast to the Truth as their lamp, and holding fast to the Truth as their refuge, shall not look for refuge to anyone beside themselves--it is they who shall reach the very topmost Height. But they must be anxious to learn.

What follows is a passage freely translated from the Chan-dogya Upanishad. The truth which this little myth is meant to illustrate is that there are as many conceptions of salvation as there are degrees of spiritual knowledge and that the kind of liberation (or enslavement) actually achieved by any individual soul depends upon the extent to which that soul chooses to dissipate its essentially voluntary ignorance.

That Self who is free from impurities, from old age and death, from grief and thirst and hunger, whose desire is true and whose desires come true that Self is to be sought after and enquired about, that Self is to be realized.234

The Devas (gods or angels) and the Asuras (demons or titans) both heard of this Truth. They thought: 'Let us seek after and realize this Self, so that we can obtain all worlds and the fulfil­ment of all desires.'

Thereupon Indra from the Devas and Virochana from the Asuras approached Prajapati, the famous teacher. They lived with him as pupils for thirty-two years. Then Prajapati asked them: 'For what reason have you both lived here all this time?'

They replied: 'We have heard that one who realizes the Self obtains all the worlds and all his desires. We have lived here because we want to be taught the Self.'

Prajapati said to them: 'The person who is seen in the eye—that is the Self. That is immortal, that is fearless and that is Brahman.'

'Sir,' enquired the disciples, 'who is seen reflected in water or in a mirror?'

'He, the Atman,' was the reply. 'He indeed is seen in all these.' Then Prajapati added: 'Look at yourselves in the water, and whatever you do not understand, come and tell me.'

Indra and Virochana pored over their reflections in the water, and when they were asked what they had seen of the Self, they replied: 'Sir, we see the Self; we see even the hair and nails.'

Then Prajapati ordered them to put on their finest clothes and look again at their 'selves' in the water. This they did and when asked again what they had seen, they answered: 'We see the Self, exactly like ourselves, well adorned and in our finest clothes.'

Then said Prajapati: 'The Self is indeed seen in these. That Self is immortal and fearless, and that is Brahman.' And the pupils went away, pleased at heart.

But looking after them, Prajapati lamented thus: 'Both of them departed without analysing or discriminating, and without comprehending the true Self. Whoever follows this false doc­trine of the Self must perish.'

Satisfied that he had found the Self, Virochana returned to the Asuras and began to teach them that the bodily self alone is to be worshipped, that the body alone is to be served, and that he who worships the ego and serves the body gains both worlds, this and the next. And this in effect is the doctrine of the Asuras.23

But Indra, on his way back to the Devas, realized the useless­ness of this knowledge. 'As this Self,' he reflected, 'seems to be well adorned when the body is well adorned, well dressed when the body is well dressed, so too will it be blind if the body is blind, lame if the body is lame, deformed if the body is de­formed. Nay more, this same Self will die when the body dies. I see no good in such knowledge.' So Indra returned to Praja-pati for further instruction. Prajapati compelled him to live with him for another span of thirty-two years; after which he began to instruct him, step by step, as it were.

Prajapati said: 'He who moves about in dreams, enjoying and glorified—he is the Self. That is immortal and fearless, and that is Brahman.'

Pleased at heart, Indra again departed. But before he had rejoined the other angelic beings, he realized the uselessness of that knowledge also. 'True it is,' he thought within himself, 'that this new Self is not blind if the body is blind, not lame, nor hurt, if the body is lame or hurt. But even in dreams the Self is conscious of many sufferings. So I see no good in this teaching.'

Accordingly he went back to Prajapati for more instruction, and Prajapati made him live with him for thirty-two years more.

At the end of that time Prajapati taught him thus: 'When a per­son is asleep, resting in perfect tranquillity, dreaming no dreams, then he realizes the Self. That is immortal and fearless, and that is Brahman.'

Satisfied, Indra went away. But even before he had reached home, he felt the uselessness of this knowledge also. "When one is asleep,' he thought, 'one does not know oneself as "This is I." One is not in fact conscious of any existence. That state is almost annihilation. I see no good in this knowledge either.'

So Indra went back once again to be taught. Prajapati made him stay with him for five years more. At the end of that time Prajapati taught him
the highest truth of the Self.
===
'This body,' he said, 'is mortal, for ever in the clutch of death.
But within it resides the Self, immortal, and without form. 
This Self, when associated in consciousness with the body, is subject to pleasure and pain; and so long as this association continues, no man can find freedom from pains and pleasures.
But when the association comes to an end, there is an end also of pain and pleasure. Rising above physical consciousness, knowing the Self as distinct from the sense-organs and the mind, knowing Him in his true light, one rejoices and one is free.'

From the Chandogya Upanishad

Having realized his own self as the SeIf, a man becomes selfless; and in virtue of selflessness he is to be conceived as unconditioned. This is the highest mystery, betokening emancipation; through selflessness he has no part in pleasure or pain, but attains abso­luteness.

Maitrayana Upanishad

We should mark and know of a very truth that all manner of virtue and goodness, and even that Eternal Good, which is God Himself, can never make a man virtuous, good or happy so long as it is outside the soul, that is, so long as the man is holding con­verse with outward things through his senses and reason, and does not withdraw into himself and learn to understand his own life, who and what he is.

Theologia Germanica

Indeed, the saving truth has never been preached by the Buddha, seeing that one has to realize it within oneself.

Sutralamkara

In what does salvation consist? Not in any historic faith or know­ledge of anything absent or distant, not in any variety of restraints, rules and methods of practising virtue, not in any formality of opinion about faith and works, repentance, forgiveness of sins, or justification and sanctification, not in any truth or righteousness that you can have from yourself, from the best of men and books,
but solely and wholly from the life of God, or Christ of God,  quickened and born again in you,
in other words in the restoration and perfect union of the first twofold life in humanity.
William Law

Law is using here the phraseology of Boehme and those other 'Spiritual Reformers,' whom the orthodox Protestants, Lutheran, Calvinistic and Anglican, agreed (it was one of the very few points they were able to agree on) either to ignore or to persecute. 
But it is clear that what he and they call the new birth of God within the soul is essentially the same fact of experience as that which the Hindus, two thousand and more years before, described as the realization of the Self as within and yet transcendentally other than the individual ego.

Not by the slothful, nor the fool, the undisceming, is that Nir­vana to be reached, which is the untying of all knots.

Iti-vuttaka

This seems sufficiently self-evident. 
But most of us take pleasure in being lazy, cannot be bothered to be constantly recollected and yet passionately desire to be saved from the results of sloth and unawareness. 

Consequently there has been a widespread wish for and belief in Saviours who will step into our lives, above all at the hour of their termination, and, like Alexander, cut the Gordian knots which we have been too lazy to untie. But God is not mocked. 
The nature of things is such that the unitive knowledge of the Ground which is contingent upon the achievement of a total selflessness cannot possibly be realized, even with outside help, by those who are not yet selfless. 

The salvation obtained by belief in the saving power of Amida, say, or Jesus is not the total deliverance described in the Upanishads, the Buddhist scriptures and the writings of the Christian mystics. It is something 44T not merely in degree, but in kind.  238

Talk asmuch philosophy as you please, worship as many gods as you like, observe all ceremonies, sing devoted praises to any number of divine beings—liberation never comes, even at the end of a hundred aeons, without the realization of the Oneness of Self.

Shankara

This Self is not realizable by study nor even by intelligence and learning. The Self reveals its essence only to him who applies himself to the Self.
He who has not given up the ways of vice, who cannot control himself, who is not at peace within, whose mind is distracted, can never realize the Self, though full of all the learning in the world.

Katha Upanishad

Nirvana is where there is no birth, no extinction; it is seeing into the state of Suchness, absolutely transcending all the cate­gories constructed by mind; for it is the Tathagata's inner consciousness.

Lankavazara Sutra

The false or at best imperfect salvations described in the Chandogya Upanishad are of three kinds. 
1] There is first the pseudo-salvation associated with the belief that matter is the ultimate Reality. Virochana, the demonic being who is the apotheosis of power-loving, extraverted somatotonia, finds it perfectly natural to identify himself with his body, and he goes back to the other Titans to seek a purely material salvation
Incarnated in the present century, Virochana would have been an ardent Communist, Fascist or nationalist. Indra sees through material salvationism and is then offered dream-salvation
deliverance out of bodily existence into the inter­mediate world between matter and spirit—that fascinatingly odd and exciting psychic universe, out of which miracles and foreknowledge,' 
spirit communications' and extra-sensory per­ceptions make their startling irruptions into ordinary life. 

2] But this freer kind of individualized existence is still all too personal and egocentric to satisfy a soul conscious of its own incompleteness and eager to be made whole. Indra accordingly goes further and is tempted to accept the undifferentiated conscious­ness of deep sleep, of false samadhi and quietistic trance, as the final deliverance.239 But he refuses, in Brahmananda's words, to mistake tamas for sattvas, sloth and sub-consciousness for poise and super-consciousness. And so, by discrimination, he comes to the realization of the Self, which is the enlightenment of the darkness that is ignorance and the deliverance from the mortal consequences of that ignorance.

The illusory salvations, against which we are warned in the other extracts, are of a different kind. The emphasis here is upon idolatry and superstition—above all the idolatrous wor­ship of the analytical reason and its notions, and the super­stitious belief in rites, dogmas and confessions of faith as being somehow magically efficacious in themselves. 
Many Christians, as Law implies, have been guilty of these idolatries and super­stitions. For them, complete deliverance into union with the divine Ground is impossible, either in this world or posthu­mously. The best they can hope for is a meritorious but still egocentric life in the body and some sort of happy posthu­mous 'longevity,' as the Chinese call it, some form of survival, paradisal perhaps, but still involved in time, separateness and multiplicity.

3] The beatitude into which the enlightened soul is delivered is something quite different from pleasure. What, then, is its nature? The quotations which follow provide at least a partial answer. 

Blessedness depends on non-attachment and selfless­ness, therefore can be enjoyed without satiety and without revulsion; is a participation in eternity, and therefore remains itself without diminution or fluctuation.

Henceforth in the real Brahman, he (the liberated spirit) becomes perfected and another. His fruit is the untying of bonds. With­out desires, he attains to bliss eternal and immeasurable, and therein abides.

Maitrayana Upanishad

240

God is to be enjoyed, creatures only used as means to That which is to be enjoyed.

St. Augustine

There is this difference between spiritual and corporal pleasures, that corporal ones beget a desire before we have obtained them and, after we have obtained them, a disgust; but spiritual pleasures, on the contrary, are not cared for when we have them not, but are desired when we have them.

St. Gregory the Great

When a man is in one of these two states (beatitude or dark night of the soul) all is right with him, and he is as safe in hell as in heaven. And so long as a man is on earth, it is possible for him to pass often-times from the one to the other—nay, even within the space of a day and night, and all without his own doing. But when a man is in neither of these two states, he holds converse with the creatures, and wavereth hither and thither and knoweth not what manner of man he is.

Theologia Germanica

Much of the literature of Sufism is poetical. Sometimes this poetry is rather strained and extravagant, sometimes beautiful with a luminous simplicity, sometimes darkly and almost dis­quietingly enigmatic. To this last class belong the utterances of that Moslem saint of the tenth century, Niffari the Egyptian. This is what he wrote on the subject of salvation.

God made me behold the sea, and I saw the ships sinking and the planks floating; then the planks too were submerged. And God said to me, 'Those who voyage are not saved.' And He said to me, 'Those who, instead of voyaging, cast themselves into the sea, take a risk.' And He said to me, 'Those who voyage and take no risk shall perish.' And He said to me, 'The surface of the sea is a gleam that cannot be reached. And the bottom is a darkness impenetrable. And between the two are great fishes, which are to be feared.'   241

The allegory is fairly clear. 
The ships that bear the individual voyagers across the sea of life are sects and churches, collec­tions of dogmas and religious organizations. The planks which also sink at last are all good works falling short of total self-surrender and all faith less absolute than the unitive knowledge of God. 

Liberation into eternity is the result of 'throwing oneself into the sea'; in the language of the Gospels, one must lose one's life in order to save it. 

But throwing oneself into the sea is a risky business—not so risky, of course, as travelling in a vast Queen Mary, fitted up with the very latest in dog­matic conveniences and liturgical decorations, and bound either for Davy Jones's locker or at best, the wrong port, but still quite dangerous enough. 

For the surface of the sea—the divine Ground as it is manifested in the world of time and multiplicity—gleams with a reflected radiance that can no more be seized than the image of beauty in a mirror; 
while the bottom, the Ground as it is eternally in itself, seems merely darkness to the analytic mind, 
as it peers down into the depths; and when the analytic mind decides to join the will in the final necessary plunge into self-naughting it must run the gauntlet, as it sinks down, of those devouring pseudo-salvations de­scribed in the Chandogya Upanishad
—dream-salvation into that fascinating psychic world, where the ego still survives, but with a happier and more untrammelled kind of life, or else the sleep-salvation of false swnadki, of unity in sub-consciousness instead of unity in super-consciousness.

Niffari's estimate of any individual's chances of achieving man's final end does not err on the side of excessive optimism. But then no saint or founder of a religion, no exponent of the Perennial Philosophy, has ever been optimistic. 'Many are called, but few are chosen.' Those who do not choose to be chosen cannot hope for anything better than some form of partial salvation under conditions that will permit them to advance towards complete deliverance.

===============================================

'This body,' he said, 'is mortal, for ever in the clutch of death.
But within it resides the Self, immortal, and without form. 
This Self, when associated in consciousness with the body, is subject to pleasure and pain; and so long as this association continues, no man can find freedom from pains and pleasures.
But when the association comes to an end, there is an end also of pain and pleasure. Rising above physical consciousness, knowing the Self as distinct from the sense-organs and the mindknowing Him in his true light, one rejoices and one is free.'

From the Chandogya Upanishad
---
Having realized his own self as the SeIfa man becomes selfless; and in virtue of selflessness he is to be conceived as unconditioned. This is the highest mystery, betokening emancipation; through selflessness he has no part in pleasure or pain, but attains abso­luteness.

Maitrayana Upanishad
---

Indeed, the saving truth has never been preached by the Buddha, seeing that one has to realize it within oneself.

Sutralamkara
---
In what does salvation consist? Not in any historic faith or know­ledge of anything absent or distant, not in any variety of restraints, rules and methods of practising virtue, not in any formality of opinion about faith and works, repentance, forgiveness of sins, or justification and sanctification, not in any truth or righteousness that you can have from yourself, from the best of men and books,
but solely and wholly from the life of God, or Christ of God,  quickened and born again in you,
in other words in the restoration and perfect union of the first twofold life in humanity.
William Law
---
Law is using here the phraseology of Boehme and those other 'Spiritual Reformers,' whom the orthodox Protestants, Lutheran, Calvinistic and Anglican, agreed (it was one of the very few points they were able to agree on) either to ignore or to persecute. 
But it is clear that what he and they call the new birth of God within the soul is essentially the same fact of experience as that which the Hindus, two thousand and more years before, described as the realization of the Self as within and yet transcendentally other than the individual ego.
----
Not by the slothful, nor the fool, the undisceming, is that Nir­vana to be reached, which is the untying of all knots.

Iti-vuttaka

This seems sufficiently self-evident. 
But most of us take pleasure in being lazy, cannot be bothered to be constantly recollected and yet passionately desire to be saved from the results of sloth and unawareness. 

Consequently there has been a widespread wish for and belief in Saviours who will step into our lives, above all at the hour of their termination, and, like Alexander, cut the Gordian knots which we have been too lazy to untie. But God is not mocked. 
The nature of things is such that the unitive knowledge of the Ground which is contingent upon the achievement of a total selflessness cannot possibly be realized, even with outside help, by those who are not yet selfless. 
===
The salvation obtained by belief in the saving power of Amida, say, or Jesus is not the total deliverance described in the Upanishads, the Buddhist scriptures and the writings of the Christian mystics. It is something 44T not merely in degree, but in kind.  238

Talk asmuch philosophy as you please, worship as many gods as you like, observe all ceremonies, sing devoted praises to any number of divine beings—liberation never comes, even at the end of a hundred aeons, without the realization of the Oneness of Self.

Shankara

This Self is not realizable by study nor even by intelligence and learning. The Self reveals its essence only to him who applies himself to the Self.
He who has not given up the ways of vice, who cannot control himself, who is not at peace within, whose mind is distracted, can never realize the Self, though full of all the learning in the world.

Katha Upanishad

Nirvana is where there is no birth, no extinction; it is seeing into the state of Suchness, absolutely transcending all the cate­gories constructed by mind; for it is the Tathagata's inner consciousness.

Lankavazara Sutra

The false or at best imperfect salvations described in the Chandogya Upanishad are of three kinds. 
1] There is first the pseudo-salvation associated with the belief that matter is the ultimate Reality. Virochana, the demonic being who is the apotheosis of power-loving, extraverted somatotonia, finds it perfectly natural to identify himself with his body, and he goes back to the other Titans to seek a purely material salvation
Incarnated in the present century, Virochana would have been an ardent Communist, Fascist or nationalist. Indra sees through material salvationism and is then offered dream-salvation
deliverance out of bodily existence into the inter­mediate world between matter and spirit—that fascinatingly odd and exciting psychic universe, out of which miracles and foreknowledge,' 
spirit communications' and extra-sensory per­ceptions make their startling irruptions into ordinary life. 

2] But this freer kind of individualized existence is still all too personal and egocentric to satisfy a soul conscious of its own incompleteness and eager to be made whole. Indra accordingly goes further and is tempted to accept the undifferentiated conscious­ness of deep sleep, of false samadhi and quietistic trance, as the final deliverance.239 But he refuses, in Brahmananda's words, to mistake tamas for sattvas, sloth and sub-consciousness for poise and super-consciousness. And so, by discrimination, he comes to the realization of the Self, which is the enlightenment of the darkness that is ignorance and the deliverance from the mortal consequences of that ignorance.

The illusory salvations, against which we are warned in the other extracts, are of a different kind. The emphasis here is upon idolatry and superstition—above all the idolatrous wor­ship of the analytical reason and its notions, and the super­stitious belief in rites, dogmas and confessions of faith as being somehow magically efficacious in themselves. 
Many Christians, as Law implies, have been guilty of these idolatries and super­stitions. For them, complete deliverance into union with the divine Ground is impossible, either in this world or posthu­mously. The best they can hope for is a meritorious but still egocentric life in the body and some sort of happy posthu­mous 'longevity,' as the Chinese call it, some form of survival, paradisal perhaps, but still involved in time, separateness and multiplicity.

3] The beatitude into which the enlightened soul is delivered is something quite different from pleasure. What, then, is its nature? The quotations which follow provide at least a partial answer. 

Blessedness depends on non-attachment and selfless­ness, therefore can be enjoyed without satiety and without revulsion; is a participation in eternity, and therefore remains itself without diminution or fluctuation.

Henceforth in the real Brahman, he (the liberated spirit) becomes perfected and another. His fruit is the untying of bonds. With­out desires, he attains to bliss eternal and immeasurable, and therein abides.

Maitrayana Upanishad

240

God is to be enjoyed, creatures only used as means to That which is to be enjoyed.

St. Augustine

There is this difference between spiritual and corporal pleasures, that corporal ones beget a desire before we have obtained them and, after we have obtained them, a disgust; but spiritual pleasures, on the contrary, are not cared for when we have them not, but are desired when we have them.

St. Gregory the Great

When a man is in one of these two states (beatitude or dark night of the soul) all is right with him, and he is as safe in hell as in heaven. And so long as a man is on earth, it is possible for him to pass often-times from the one to the other—nay, even within the space of a day and night, and all without his own doing. But when a man is in neither of these two states, he holds converse with the creatures, and wavereth hither and thither and knoweth not what manner of man he is.

Theologia Germanica

Much of the literature of Sufism is poetical. Sometimes this poetry is rather strained and extravagant, sometimes beautiful with a luminous simplicity, sometimes darkly and almost dis­quietingly enigmatic. To this last class belong the utterances of that Moslem saint of the tenth century, Niffari the Egyptian. This is what he wrote on the subject of salvation.

God made me behold the sea, and I saw the ships sinking and the planks floating; then the planks too were submerged. And God said to me, 'Those who voyage are not saved.' And He said to me, 'Those who, instead of voyaging, cast themselves into the sea, take a risk.' And He said to me, 'Those who voyage and take no risk shall perish.' And He said to me, 'The surface of the sea is a gleam that cannot be reached. And the bottom is a darkness impenetrable. And between the two are great fishes, which are to be feared.'   241

The allegory is fairly clear. 
The ships that bear the individual voyagers across the sea of life are sects and churches, collec­tions of dogmas and religious organizations. The planks which also sink at last are all good works falling short of total self-surrender and all faith less absolute than the unitive knowledge of God. 

Liberation into eternity is the result of 'throwing oneself into the sea'; in the language of the Gospels, one must lose one's life in order to save it. 

But throwing oneself into the sea is a risky business—not so risky, of course, as travelling in a vast Queen Mary, fitted up with the very latest in dog­matic conveniences and liturgical decorations, and bound either for Davy Jones's locker or at best, the wrong port, but still quite dangerous enough. 

For the surface of the sea—the divine Ground as it is manifested in the world of time and multiplicity—gleams with a reflected radiance that can no more be seized than the image of beauty in a mirror; 
while the bottom, the Ground as it is eternally in itself, seems merely darkness to the analytic mind, 
as it peers down into the depths; and when the analytic mind decides to join the will in the final necessary plunge into self-naughting it must run the gauntlet, as it sinks down, of those devouring pseudo-salvations de­scribed in the Chandogya Upanishad
—dream-salvation into that fascinating psychic world, where the ego still survives, but with a happier and more untrammelled kind of life, or else the sleep-salvation of false swnadki, of unity in sub-consciousness instead of unity in super-consciousness.

Niffari's estimate of any individual's chances of achieving man's final end does not err on the side of excessive optimism. But then no saint or founder of a religion, no exponent of the Perennial Philosophy, has ever been optimistic. 'Many are called, but few are chosen.' Those who do not choose to be chosen cannot hope for anything better than some form of partial salvation under conditions that will permit them to advance towards complete deliverance.

9