2021/06/04

Belief in God in an Age of Science: Polkinghorne, John: 9780300099492: Amazon.com: Books

Belief in God in an Age of Science: Polkinghorne, John: 9780300099492: Amazon.com: Books

Belief in God in an Age of Science Paperback – February 8, 2003
by John Polkinghorne (Author)
4.3 out of 5 stars    54 ratings
Part of: The Terry Lectures (18 Books)

 Report incorrect product information.
Print length
258 pages
February 8, 2003
John Polkinghorne is a major figure in today’s debates over the compatibility of science and religion. Internationally known as both a theoretical physicist and a theologian—the only ordained member of the Royal Society—Polkinghorne brings unique qualifications to his inquiry into the possibilities of believing in God in an age of science. In this thought-provoking book, the author focuses on the collegiality between science and theology, contending that these "intellectual cousins" are both concerned with interpreted experience and with the quest for truth about reality. He argues eloquently that scientific and theological inquiries are parallel.

The book begins with a discussion of what belief in God can mean in our times. Polkinghorne explores a new natural theology and emphasizes the importance of moral and aesthetic experience and the human intuition of value and hope. In other chapters, he compares science’s struggle to understand the nature of light with Christian theology’s struggle to understand the nature of Christ. He addresses the question, Does God act in the physical world? And he extends his ideas about the role of chaos theory, surveys the prospects for future dialogue between scientific and theological thinkers, and defends a critical realist understanding of the activities of both disciplines. Polkinghorne concludes with a consideration of the nature of mathematical truths and the links between the complementary realities of physical and mental experience.


Editorial Reviews
Review
“Polkinghorne articulates a faith strengthened, not threatened, by the latest scientific research. Whether puzzling over the curious fit between the laws of physics and the requirements for life or tracing the similarities between the methods of the scientist and those of the theologian, Polkinghorne reasons with rare sophistication. . . . This book . . . holds rare promise for healing the secular-religious fissures in our fractured culture.”—Bryce Christensen, Booklist


"[This book is] short, accessible and authoritative. . . . It’s richly stimulating stuff."—Carlin Romano, Philadelphia Inquirer


"Polkinghorne is sound and scholarly."―The Globe and Mail


"Polkinghorne is clear that, by projecting on science his belief in God, he is following just one possible path in the human quest for meaning. This gives his book a feeling of mutual exploration that drew me in as a reader."—David K. Nartonis, Christian Science Monitor


"This book will certainly be of interest to theologians and scientists."—Publisher’s Weekly


“A new dialog between religion and science has begun, . . . and in that conversation Polkinghorne holds a special place.”—Library Journal


"A few major authors have helped convince readers that science and religion might have more in common than meets the eye, John Polkinghorne perhaps foremost among them."—Publishers Weekly


“An elegant, brief foray into the intersections of theology and science. While God-and-science appears to be a bandwagon, with a recent spate of books on this topic, few scientists or theologians could address its ramifications as gracefully as Polkinghorne of both subjects: a theoretical physicist of some renown, he is also an ordained clergyman and past president of Queens College. If you read one book on science and religion, this should be it.”—Kirkus Reviews


"Polkinghorne finds faith strengthened by means of open dialogue between it and science, in which, for instance, chaos theory invites reflection on divine providence."―Booklist (From Booklist's Top 10 Books in Religion)


"A sophisticated, scientifically informed outlook, which is nonetheless animated by a firm, rationally supported religious faith. . . . Theologians and scientists alike will find food for thought here, and philosophers should take heed—for John Polkinghorne's intermarriage of scientific and theological insight may well presage a new 'post-secular' stage in Western thought."—Patrick Glynn, National Review


"Polkinghorne has a clear, focused style, and offers much to the reader seeking a synthesis of science with the tenets of established religion."―Jerome Groopman, Spirit and Science


"This book . . . presents many interesting arguments on the topics of theology and science . . . the book presents an interesting and thought provoking discussion of the relationship between religion and science."—Virginia Quarterly Review


"Belief in God in an Age of Science offers a scholarly presentation that should nevertheless have broad appeal, as Polkinghorne wields technical, scientific and theological terms with alacrity and eloquence without losing sight of the larger lay audience he clearly hopes to reach."―Edward B. Davis, American Scientist


"Polkinghorne’s mastery of science and theology makes for some startlingly original and arresting insights and analogies. . . . Polkinghorne’s book is full of . . . startling insights and observations. . . . The reader who invests the time and effort will find Belief in God in an Age of Science intellectually exciting and profoundly rewarding on the spiritual level."—James C. Roberts, Human Events


"This book represents a concise reformulation of [Polkinghorne's] most recent Terry Lectures and provides a much-needed summation to his work as a whole. . . . Its prose is dense and its arguments intellectually challenging. . . . Polkinghorne's analysis is welcome. . . . [His] work offers an important reminder, . . . that underlying all scientific endeavor is the inescapable presence of social values."—Steven W. Hook, Crisis


"Polkinghorne [presents] a polished and logically coherent argument."—Freeman J. Dyson, New York Review


"Any individual actively involved in the pursuit of knowledge and truth would do well to read and understand the arguments and challenges presented within the pages of this book."―Clyde L. Webster, Seminary Studies


"Those who wish to better understand the continuing debate about the compatibility of science and religion  should begin here."—William C. Graham, National Catholic Reporter


"A very impressive, intelligent, and lucid exploration into the relationship between science and religion."—Santiago Sia, Religion and the Arts


"Polkinghorne . . . is first and foremost a professional scientist, as he admits, and only secondarily a theologian. Yet his appeal for the need for more intense interdisciplinary work is a point well taken."—Barry Whitney, Religious Studies Review


Selected by American Library Association's Booklist as one of the Top Ten Books in Religion in 1998


Winner of the 1999 Prize for Outstanding Books in Theology and the Natural Sciences given by the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences


Selected by Publishers Weekly as one of the Best Books of 1998


Shortlisted for a 2000 TORGI (Talking Book of the Year) Award, sponsored by the Canadian National Institute for the Blind


Winner of a 1999 Christianity Today Book Award


"In this lucid and honest work, John Polkinghorne states clearly where and why he agrees or disagrees with other contemporary writers. He presents a serious defense of a world view that must be considered seriously even by atheists."—Owen Gingerich, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics


From the Publisher
Selected by Publishers Weekly as one of the Best Books in Religion of 1998
Selected by Booklist as one of the Top Ten Books in Religion in 1998

From the Inside Flap
"Polkinghorne [presents] a polished and logically coherent argument."—Freeman J. Dyson, New York Review of Books; "Short, accessible, and authoritative."—Carlin Romano, Philadelphia Inquirer; "This book should be widely read."—Colin Tudge, New Statesman and Society; "If you read one book on science and religion, this should be it."—Kirkus Reviews
About the Author
John Polkinghorne, K.B.E., F.R.S., is past President and now Fellow of Queens’ College, Cambridge, and Canon Theologian of Liverpool, England. He is the winner of the 2002 Templeton Prize for Progress Toward Research or Discoveries about Spiritual Realities. Among his many other books are Faith, Science, and Understanding and The God of Hope and the End of the World, both published by Yale University Press.

Read less
Product details
Publisher : Yale University Press; Revised ed. edition (February 8, 2003)
Language : English
Paperback : 258 pages
ISBN-10 : 0300099495
ISBN-13 : 978-0300099492
Item Weight : 5.9 ounces
Dimensions : 7.92 x 4.98 x 0.45 inches
Best Sellers Rank: #925,536 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
#1,519 in Science & Religion (Books)
#1,834 in Religion & Philosophy (Books)
#4,778 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
Customer Reviews: 4.3 out of 5 stars    54 ratings
Videos
Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!
Upload video
More about the author
› Visit Amazon's John C. Polkinghorne Page
John C. Polkinghorne
 Follow
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.


How would you rate your experience shopping for books on Amazon today





Very poor Neutral Great
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
54 global ratings
5 star
 65%
4 star
 15%
3 star
 10%
2 star
 3%
1 star
 7%
How are ratings calculated?
Review this product
Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Sponsored 
Read reviews that mention
science and theology physical world science and religion adequately construed generously and adequately partners in a common unique status common quest unity of knowledge laws of nature belief in god religious experience human experience critical realism physicist and theologian within humanity accommodate such thoughts accounts will seek alternative interpretation appearances will mislead

Top reviews
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
M Campbell
5.0 out of 5 stars Insightful
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2018
Verified Purchase
As a layman reading and learning it was difficult to follow ALL aspects of Polkinghorne's writing but the aspects I did understand were very enlightening and I feel like I have a better embrace of my faith and less scepticism of science. I am a recent convert to old age evolutionary thought after 40 years of following hard after young earth creationist theory, and I am trying to understand.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Michael David Newton
5.0 out of 5 stars A brilliant Christian speaking.
Reviewed in the United States on December 20, 2018
Verified Purchase
The writer is a Fellow of the Royal Society, The highest honour Britain gives to scientists. He uses VERY difficult words. He is more accessible via his presentations on U tube.
Helpful
Report abuse
Fred101
5.0 out of 5 stars Intellectually satisfying
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2001
Verified Purchase
As a Christian with an undergraduate exposure to theology and a Ph.D. in physics (and a continuing interest in both), I am offended by the lack of intellectual integrity shown by so many authors who address science/theology issues. Whether from the "creationist" side (which seems to be the principal voice being heard from the Christian viewpoint) or the secular-humanist side (which has been the principal voice being heard from the scientific community) the "discussion" (if you can call it that) is all too often characterized by a circular kind of reasoning which begins with a particular world-view and then, by entertaining nothing but "evidence" congenial to that viewpoint, proceeds to arrive at the pre-held viewpoint as the only "logical" conclusion. Equally insidious are the "post modernists" and "subjectivists" who essentially question the point in seeking "truth" of any kind since they regard our perception of "reality" to be hopelessly distorted by our individual and societal agendas, or those who try to compartmentalize faith and reason as equally legitimate but incompatible activities -- as if the reality of faith is somehow different from the reality of the physical universe.
Polkinghorne is a refreshing change from this usual dismal discourse. If you are seeking confirmation that a first-rate scientific mind can exist in company with an unapologetically orthodox Christian faith, this book should do the trick. This is not to say that all readers will agree with all of Polkinghorne's stances. Those of the "Biblical literalist" stripe will undoubtedly be offended that Polkinghorne tolerates no traffic in the Creationist agenda. Secularists will be offended that Polkinghorne unabashedly holds that the revelation of God through scripture and the experience of the Church are expressions of a legitimate reality. Many Christians will be offended that Polkinghorne isn't dogmatic that the Christian faith has a "lock" on theological truth and that he is willing to accept that the other great world religions also have something to contribute to the dialogue. On the other hand, non-Christian religious may well be offended that Polkinghorne is not prepared to negotiate the truth of primary Christian doctrines, such as that of the incarnation. And anyone looking for a "light read" or pat answers will become quickly discouraged -- this is the kind of book you have to read carefully, with the brain fully engaged and open. The satisfaction comes not from achieving closure, but from being engaged with interesting and meaningful questions.
Polkinghorne skilfully and credibly notes how the insights and discoveries of modern physical science have, contrary to the expectations of the 19th century scientific community, become more, rather than less amicable to a theistic worldview. He regards this, not as "proof" of the latter, but rather as a demonstration of his principal thesis: that there is a cosmic reality in the search for which both science and theology are fellow travelers. Science, using tools of experiment and quantification seeks to comprehend the mechanism by which the universe operates. Theology, using the insights of revelation and experience seeks to understand the author of the mechanism and His ongoing purposes. But there is only one reality -- the reality of theology must ultimately be congruent with the reality of science, and vice versa.
Another prevailing theme is that a true seeker of truth must be prepared to accept the tentativeness of our current state of knowledge on any subject -- reality is complex, and our understanding will always be incomplete. At the same time, Polkinghorne believes passionately that reality is accessible to our intellect (which is in itself a pregnant truth to ponder) and he convincingly demonstrates how the journey of truth discovery (allowing for the occasional mis-step along the way) inevitably enlarges rather than overthrows the prior reality. Just as physicists were challenged in the early 20th century to integrate the new realities of relativity and quantum mechanics into the durably functional framework of classical Newtonian physics, so too the early Christian church was challenged to integrate the new reality of the risen Christ and the tangible activity of the Holy Spirit into the durable truth of traditional monotheistic Judaism, resulting ultimately in the Trinitarian formulation. In neither case was the new synthesis achieved by an instant and tidy process (or without controversy surviving even to the present), but this should not be perceived as an embarassment in either case, but rather as a testament to the integrity of the process -- "orthodoxy", whether in science or theology, is the end result of surviving controversy and challenge. In science, the hallmarks of an ultimately acceptable theory are not only that it encompasses all available information, but also that it is fruitful in suggesting new areas of insight, and also conforms to a certain aesthetic of "elegance". The requirements for achieving theological orthodoxy are, in fact, not all that different. Polkinghorne believes that, in both cases, the process does indeed help us to ever more closely apprehend the reality which is our objective.
Periodically, I have been fortunate to have encountered a book whose pages offered both insight and on-going intellectual challenge. This is one of those rare finds. I highly recommend this book for the serious inquirer.
Read less
113 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Dianelos Georgoudis
5.0 out of 5 stars An amazing intellectual trip - walking on water.
Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 1998
Verified Purchase
In this book Polkinghorne tries to show that theology is a rational discipline. The book is intensely honest and filled with intelligent ideas you enjoy thinking about even if at the end you disagree with. Some of them, such as what the Christian dogma of the Fall of Man means within humanity's evolution, took my breath away. The same goes for his proposal on how actually God acts in the world and scientist's model on how He will act to resurrect all souls on the Second Coming. To see a scientist try to make science compatible with religion not to mention Christian mythology is really amazing.
Since Galileo, the Church has been frantically retreating from its claims about nature and about natural theology. Today theology finds itself in the corner and Polkinghorne builds his last line defense on arguments such as the "unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" in physics, the Anthropic Principle and the physicists' subjective search for beautiful theory. These arguments, even though brilliantly constructed, will not convince anybody who is not convinced already, and are, I think, wrong.
Polkinghorne, being a scientist, is too respectful of science for my taste. I would have enjoyed a more aggressive stand, showing, for example, that human agency, not to mention human consciousness, is difficult to reconcile with the scientific view. Also, he devotes exactly one phrase on the spooky phenomenon of uniform mystical experience that cuts through time and religious denominations. He plays by the rules of science and insists on the losing proposition that theology is rational and therefore should be as convincing and taken as seriously as science. Polkinghorne puts a lot of emphasis on the "unity of knowledge" and tries to unify science and theology and to show that these are aspects of the same search for truth. A better strategy would be to have theology engulf science and explain that science forms only a small (not even a very relevant part) of knowledge. After all, how we should manage our spouse and kids, how to understand pain and failure in life, are matters outside of science and much more relevant to our well-being and to our understanding of the world and its meaning. For literally everybody, this kind of knowledge is more important than scientific knowledge. To a religious person God is everything and knowledge starts with God and passes through layers before reaching at its most basic level knowledge about the physical world.
On the whole, this is a very worthwhile book that is filled with ideas and references to other books. I have not read much on this subject but this book probably shows how far rational theology can go which is not very far - a sobering and important conclusion.
Read less
25 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Jimi Hendricks
5.0 out of 5 stars A scientist-theologian looks at the intersection
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2014
Verified Purchase
John Polkinghorne provides a view from both perspectives. There is no conflict for him between science and religion, particularly Christianity. While he does provide his beliefs, he does not debate other views. He encourages others to join the discussion. While his science is presented in an understandable manner, his impressive and poetic vocabulary had me using the "define" function a lot.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
Top reviews from other countries
David
4.0 out of 5 stars Deus sive natura... it is not!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 24, 2013
Verified Purchase
In this helpful contribution to the Science/Religion debate written for Jane & Joe Public - Polkinghorne (both scientist and theologian) - says that he is not engaged in "an apologetic exercise, trying to make the faith appear acceptable in a scientific age." Equally, he warns against a "scientific takeover bid, offering no more than a religious gloss on a basically naturalistic account." Indeed, he specifically declines to adopt Baruch Spinoza's deus sive natura argument; stating bluntly, "That was Einstein's God, but it is certainly not mine".

He argues that the vast majority of what is done in science is, as he puts it, "the creative interpretation of experience, not rigorous deduction from it." It is not "truth" that it seeks but "verisimilitude" - a philosophical concept that distinguishes between the truth and the falsity of assertions and hypotheses. Absolute truth is as illusive to the scientist as the theologian. That said, though he acknowledges the capacity of science to test its theories against observation, theology too has a reasonable claim on the basis of verisimilitude.

He insists that theology is concerned with "ontological questions" which do not profit much from "science's fascinating, but largely theologically irrelevant, talk of temporal origins." In this regard, he is somewhat different from other theistic scientists who find much in current cosmology that appears to offer evidence that the universe has been fine-tuned for life. For him what is of much greater significance "in cosmic history to date - (is) the dawn of consciousness."

Drawing on chaos and complexity theory, he concludes that "holistic and relational concepts are coming to play an increasing role in science." These, he argues, are "congenial to theological thinking," as exemplified by "much Trinitarian discussion that emphasizes relationship (communion) as the ground of being." In this way, he finds room for God to act within the framework of chaos theory. God does not randomly or selectively insert "energy" into various places in the universe requiring his intervention, instead, as "pure spirit," he injects "information". Thus, as the complex nonlinear systems of life oscillate back and forth trying to decide towards which strange attractor to move, God intervenes in a way that moves the system in the direction towards which he desires for it.
Read less
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Traveller
4.0 out of 5 stars Enlightening
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 29, 2020
Verified Purchase
Not an easy read but one that is balanced and informative. While not following every argument many helped me to understand both science and faith better.
Report abuse
Pen Name
4.0 out of 5 stars Readable but possibly wrong!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 16, 2018
Verified Purchase
Readable, but in discussing life after death he goes beyond the scientific evidence.
Report abuse
charlie
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 7, 2016
Verified Purchase
Good !
Report abuse
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 3, 2016
Verified Purchase
Read and re-read.
Report abuse
See all reviews

알라딘: 가온 찍기 - 다석 유영모의 글로벌 한국신학 서설 김흡영

알라딘: 가온 찍기



가온 찍기 - 다석 유영모의 글로벌 한국신학 서설   
김흡영 (지은이)동연출판사2013-05-30



가온 찍기

책소개

한국 기독교 1세대 사상가 다석 유영모의 사상을 담아낸 책. 다석 사상을 서양 조직신학적 체계에 따라 기술하여 다석 사상의 신학적 보편성을 알리고 있다. 김 교수는 지금까지 다석연구의 일반적인 오해들을 지적하며 독창적인 새로운 해석을 내놓는다. 특히 생태계의 위기와 인류의 기계화를 주장하는 트랜스휴머니즘의 거센 도전에 한계에 봉착한 21세기 글로벌 신학의 한 대안으로 ‘몸신학’과 ‘숨신학’을 발굴하여 제안한다.

목차
머리말

제1부 다석신학 서론: 참나(제소리)를 찾아서
1장 다석신학 서론
2장 다석신학의 특징
3장 다석신학 방법론
4장 다석 말씀론

제2부 다석 신론: 없이 계신 하나님(게소리)
5장 다석 신론
6장 다석 삼위일체론
7장 다석 인간론

제3부 다석 그리스도론: 한나신 아들 그이(가온소리)
8장 다석의 도-그리스도론
9장 유일한 스승, 한 나신 아들 예수
10장 다석 구원론

제4부 다석 몸신학: 빈탕한데 맞혀 하늘몸놀이
11장 몸과 숨의 영성: 여러 밤 그이의 하늘놀이
12장 다석 몸신학
13장 다석 숨신학(氣)

제5부 서구 신학의 위기와 도의 신학
14장 생명 · 생태계의 위기와 도의 신학
15장 도 그리스도론 서설
16장 도 삼위일체론 서설

제6부 다석 유영모를 통해 본 한국신학: 한국신학의 정체성과 세계 신학의 가능성
17장 한국신학사상사와 다석신학
18장 다석 유영모를 통해 본 한국신학: 한국신학의 정체성과 세계 신학의 가능성

부록
The Word Made Flesh: Ryo Young-mo's Christo-dao
참고문헌
-----
책속에서
P. 12
방대한 동양 종교사상의 지평에서 동서양을 오가며 자유로이 펼쳐지는 다석의 종교사상을 한 권의 책에 집약해보겠다는 것은 지나친 욕심이라 할 것이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 이 작업을 감행하는 것은, 비유컨대 누군가는 세계 신학이라는 엑스포 속에 한국관을 만들고 그 독창성을 다석신학이란 브랜드로 개발해야 한다는 시대적 사명감을 절실하게 느꼈기 때문이다. 비록 그것이 원의를 다소 훼손한다 하더라도, 그 위험성 때문에 한국신학과 글로벌 신학의 발전을 위해 중대한 시대적 요청을 더 이상 외면하는 것은 한국 신학자의 한 사람으로서 직무유기를 범하는 것이라는 생각이 들었다  접기
P. 20

다석의 생각을 현대신학의 입장에서 신학적 담론으로 재정립 한다는 것은 무척 어려운 일이었다. 비유컨대 그것은 다석 사상이라는 산맥에 드라이브하기 좋은 길을 내고 터널을 뚫는 것과 같다. 그런 공사를 하게 되면 어쩔 수 없이 산의 생태계를 부분적으로 파괴할 수밖에 없는 것같이, 이러한 작업은 다석 사상이 가진 본래의 창의성과 통전성을 훼손할 수 있기 때문이다.… (중략) … 다석의 자유분방한 동양적 사유를 서양에서 발전한 전통적 조직신학의 틀에 넣어 보려는 시도는 매우 어려운 일이었다. 다석의 독창적 신학사상을 현대 조직신학의 범주와 잣대에서 체계화systematize하는 작업 자체가 범주 착오적 오류일 수 있기 때문이다. 그러나 다석 사상을 현대신학에 활용하기 위해서는 어쩔 수 없이 ‘다석’이라는 원광석을 글로벌 신학이라는 큰 틀 안에서 사용할 수 있게 가공하는 손질을 할 수밖에 없다. 그러므로 이 연구는 다석의 사상을 현대신학과 소통시켜 보고자하는 하나의 시도, 서설, 프로레고메나prolegomena, 또는 습작이라고 할 수 있을 것이다. 비유컨대, 이러한 시도는 ‘글로벌 그리스도교 신학’이라는 도서관에 ‘다석신학’ 그리고 ‘한국신학’이라는 분야를 정착시키기 위한 자기 발견적heuristic 노력의 일환이라고 할 수 있을 것이다.  접기
P. 356

물론 유영모는 서구적 신학교육을 전혀 받은 적이 없고, 전문적인 신학저술을 한 적도 없다. 그가 쓴 단지 몇 점의 신학 수상록들과 제자들이 수집한 그의 강의록들, 그리고 그의 일기장 ??다석일지??가 있을 뿐이다. 그러나 서구적 신학교육의 부재가 오히려 그로 하여금 가장 독창적인 한국신학을 구성하게 하였다. 아직 그의 신학이 신학적 단상들을 수집한 단계에 머물고 있지만, 그것은 장래 한국 조직신학이 세계 신학으로 도약할 때 승부수를 던질 수 있는 최대의 보고이다. 마치 서구 신학이 19세기의 키에르케고르를 20세기에 발견하고 자유신학을 극복하였듯이, 한국 신학계가 1990년대에 들어서서야 유영모의 가치를 발견했지만 그의 신학은 앞으로 한국신학이 서구신학의 올무에서 벗어나는데 큰 도움을 줄 것이다.  접기
P. 392

한국 신학이 세계 신학으로 우뚝 서서 이러한 역할을 감당하기 위해서는 하루바삐 이 땅에도 학술 신학으로서 신학 풍토가 조성되어야 할 것이다. 신학은 우선적으로 교회를 섬겨야 하지만 또한 교회로부터 학문적 자유를 보장받아야만 그 창조적인 기능을 제대로 발휘할 수 있다. 지금은 한국의 신학자들이 넓은 세계로 나아가서 세계적인 지평에서 한국신학을 거론해야 할 때이다. 우리들은 더 이상 서구 신학을 수입하여 파는 오파상이나 또는 그들의 대리전이나 치루는 용병이 되어서는 안 될 것이다. 우리들은 스스로의 참신한 한국신학을 제작하여 세계무대에 진출시키고, 궁지에 몰려 있는 세계 신학을 바로잡고 혁신하는 지구촌적 지평에서 이 시대를 위한 신학자의 사명을 감당해야 할 것이다.  접기


저자 및 역자소개
김흡영 (지은이) 

홈페이지: http://www.heupkim.com

▶ 학력
- 1987-1992, Graduate Theological Union, 철학 박사(Ph.D)
- 1986-1987, Princeton Theological Seminary, 신학 석사(Th.M)
- 1984-1986, Princeton Theological Seminary, 교역학 석사(M.Div)
- 1967-1971, 서울대학교, 공과대학, 항공공학, 학사(BSE)
- 1964-1967, 경기고등학교

▶ 현재
- 강남대학교 인문대학 신학과 교수 (전공 : 조직신학)
- 세계과학종교학회(ISSR) 창립정회원
- 아시아신학자협의회(CATS) 직전 공동대표
- 한국조직신학회 회장
- 한국과학생명포럼 대표
- 미국장로교회(PCUSA) 목사

▶ 저서
- 도의 신학 II, 동연, 2012
- 현대과학과 그리스도교, 기독교서회, 2006
- 도의 신학, 다산글방, 2000
- Christ and the Tao, Christian Conference of Asia, 2003
- Wang Yang-Ming and Karl Barth: A Confucian-Christian Dialogue, 1996 등 다수
접기
최근작 : <왕양명과 칼 바르트>,<가온 찍기>,<도의 신학 2> … 총 6종 (모두보기)
-----------

출판사 제공
책소개

1. 도의 신학자, 다석을 말하다

서양 신학계에 한국적 신학을 알리는데 앞장서고 있는 ‘도의 신학자’ 김흡영 교수(강남대, 신학)가 이번에는 다석 유영모의 사상을 세계에 알리기 위한 책을 썼다.
한국 기독교 1세대 사상가 다석 유영모의 신학은 동?서양의 사상을 창의적으로 접목시킨 독창성으로 한국적 토착화 신학의 원형으로 평가받고 있다. 그러나 다석 사상의 우수성은 이제까지 우물 안의 개구리처럼 국내 학자들에게만 회자될 뿐이었다. 그러던 중 2008년 서울에서 열린 세계철학자대회에서 유영모와 함석헌의 사상이 소개되면서 세계 철학계에 주목을 받기 시작했다.
당시 세계철학자대회에서 다석 사상을 세계에 알렸던 한 주역이 바로 김흡영 교수였다. 2008년 세계철학자대회에서는 다석 사상을 여러 나라의 학자들에게 개괄적으로 소개했다면, 김 교수는 이 책을 통해 다석 사상을 서양 조직신학적 체계에 따라 기술하여 다석 사상의 신학적 보편성을 세계에 알리고자 한다.

2. 신학의 독립선언

김 교수는 작금의 한국 기독교는 교회의 성장에 비해 신학의 성장이 더디다고 일갈한다. 오로지 서양 신학을 수입하기 급급했고, 이를 한국의 문화와 영성을 고려치 않고 무분별하게 적용한 탓에 부작용은 물론 역효과까지 나타났다. 이런 한국 신학의 서양 신학의 과도한 의존을 김 교수는 올무에 걸린 상황으로 진단한다.
김 교수는 서양 신학이라는 올무를 넘어 한국인이 할 수 있는 한국적 신학의 광맥을 다석에게서 찾는다. 그리고 이것이 한국적 신학을 넘어서 글로벌 신학이 될 수 있는 보편성의 가능성까지 발견한다. 앞으로 김 교수는 이 책을 통해 세계 유수의 신학자들과 다석 사상에 관해 토론하고, 세계신학으로서의 가능성을 타진하면서 다석 사상을 널리 알리는데 주력할 예정이다.

3. 새로운 다석 해석, 몸신학과 숨신학 제안

김 교수는 지금까지 다석연구의 일반적인 오해들을 지적하며 독창적인 새로운 해석을 내놓는다. 특히 생태계의 위기와 인류의 기계화를 주장하는 트랜스휴머니즘의 거센 도전에 한계에 봉착한 21세기 글로벌 신학의 한 대안으로 ‘몸신학’과 ‘숨신학’을 발굴하여 제안한다.
다석의 작업은 한마디로 동양 문명의 뼈에 서양 문명의 골수를 넣는 것이었다. 여기서 서양문명의 골수는 일반적으로 알려진 것과는 달리 전통신학에 뿌리를 두고 있다. 그러나 다석은 일반 신학과 달리 그 골수를 우리의 종교문화적 전통을 그리스도 안에서 성화시키며 체화하려 했다.
또한 다석은 서구의 교회중심적 신학의 폐단을 극복하고 몸으로 하는 수행중심적 신학으로 패러다임 전환을 시도했다. 이를 통해 그리스도교를 동양의 수도, 수행 전통에 접목시켜, 희랍철학의 정신과 육체의 이원론에 의한 영향으로 말과 글 중심이 되어 몸을 상실한 그리스도교 신학에 몸을 회복할 수 있는 ‘몸신학’을 정립할 수 있는 토대를 마련해 주었다. 사실 다석일지는 관념적인 사상을 기록한 것이라고 하기 보다는 수행일지였다. 그것은 사이버스페이스를 앞세운 디지털 문명과 포스트휴머니즘의 거센 도전에 의해 잃어가는 몸과 숨을 되살릴 수 있는 영성의 마지막 보루인 ‘숨신학’을 발전시킬 수 있든 토대를 마련해 주었다는 점에서 특히 중요하다.
접기

기독교사상 2008년 8월호특집 : 왜 유영모와 함석헌인가 유영모와 함석헌, 어떻게 읽을 것인가 이용수352 한종호

기독교사상 2008년 8월호(통권 제596호) - 대한기독교서회 논문 : 전문잡지 - DBpia, 연구자를 돕는 똑똑한 학술콘텐츠 플랫폼

기독교사상 2008년 8월호(통권 제596호)

발행기관명
 
대한기독교서회
저널명
 
기독교사상
주제분류
 
인문학 > 종교학/신학
발행연도
 
2008
권호 내 총 논문수
 
27

표지 이야기

특집 : 왜 유영모와 함석헌인가

짦은 두레박

특집 : 왜 유영모와 함석헌인가

짦은 두레박

특집 : 왜 유영모와 함석헌인가

성서와 설교

옛글 나들이