2023/03/27
30년 동안 면벽 수도하던 끝에 '도통'을 한 도인이 있다.
[오늘아침일기]
by소걸음
Mar 24. 2023
30년 동안 면벽 수도하던 끝에 '도통'을 한 도인이 있다.
그는 천신만고 끝에 "깨우쳤다."
그가 깨달은 인생과 세계의 진리를 설파하고자, 그가 시장-세속으로 내려온다.
그가 진리를 설파할 때, 시장 사람들은 그의 말에 귀를 귀울일까?
처음 얼마간은 '무슨 일이야?' 하는 호기심에 모여들겠지.
그러나 이내, '웬 미친 놈이!' 하고 돌아갈 것이다.
그 시장이, 저 먼 조선시대쯤의 시장이라면
혹, 그 도인의 깨달음이 '먹혀들지도' 모르겠다.
그러나, 21세기, 그리고 21.2세기를 지나는 지금-여기에서
자극적인 가십성 볼거리를 찾아다니는 1인미디어 창작자에게가 아니라면
그 도인의 깨달음이 각광을 받을 일은 없을 것이다.
도인이 '30년'간 면벽수도하면서,
세상이 흘러가는 시간과 공간을 염력으로 공유하고 있었다면 모를 일이지만,
그렇다면, 30년간의 면벽이 소용없는 일이고
오히려 '시장 속'에서 살아가며 수도하는 것만 같지 못한 일일 테다.
어떠한 진리도 영원한 것은 없다.
오늘날, 광자(光子)의 속도를 치달리고 결합-분열을 거듭하는
- 현상적으로는 변화로 나타나는 - 세속=시장 속에서 유의미한 메시지는
그 시장 속에서 단련되고 교감하며 소통하면서 성장한 메시지가 아니면 안 된다.
독백이나 방백조차도, 시장의 문법을 따르지 않는다면
관객들에게 공감을 불러일으키기는커녕, 이해조차 되지 못할 것이다.
그러나 한편, 시장 안에서 닳고 닳으며 영글어진 진리에 따라
살아가는 일은 결국, '시장 논리'에 지나지 않는다.
인간은 '시장-사회' 속에서 태어나 '시장-사회' 속에서 죽어 가는 존재일 뿐이지만
그런 속에서도 '저마다의 꽃' 한 송이는 피워 보고, 돌아가는 존재이기도 하다.
결국, 세상을 살아가는 일이나, 수도(도를 닦음)하는 일이나
이변비중(離邊非中), 중도와 화쟁의 태도를 잃지 않아야 한다는 것이다.
예컨대 화쟁이라 하면
저 신라의 원효가 설파한 최고의 설법이자 덕목이다.
얼핏 생각키로, '화쟁'이 아니면 제대로 세상을 살아갈 수 없다고 말하는 걸
결국 99%의 평범한 인간은 '제대로 세상을 살아갈 수 없다'고 말하는 것으로 이해하기 십상이다.
그러나 이변비중의 진리는 그러한 오해를 깨뜨리라고 말하는 것에 다름 아니다.
평범함 속에 비범함이 있고,
비범함이 잠재하지 않는 평범함은 없다는 말이다.
세상을 떠한 진리는 있지 않고
진리로 드러나지 않는 세상은, 아직 안전하지, 완전하지 못한 세상일 뿐이라는 말이다.
동학의 이치에
성령출세(性靈出世)라는 논리가 있다.
좁게 말하면, 이 세상을 떠난(환원한, 죽은) 사람의 '성령'이
그 후손이나 후학, 친척이나 친지들의 '심령'(心靈, 마음)
또는 평소에 그가 뜻을 두었던 '만물(萬物)' 속에 (살아 있어서)
이 세상에서 같이 살아간다는 말이다.
'나를 향하여 제사상을 차린다'(向我設位)라고 하는
좀더 잘 알려진 동학의 이치의 배경이 되는 것이 이 성령출세의 이치다.
(성령출세의 배경이 되는 것은, '시천주(侍天主)'이다)
여기서 '성령'을 '진리'라고 해도 무방하다.(=시천주)
진리는 나를 통하여, 현상계를 통하여 드러난다는 말이다.
이는 진리가 먼저 있고, 현상계를 '통로'로 하여 그 진리가 드러난다는 말이 아니다.
진리와 현상계가 하나요 둘이 아니라는 말이다.
그렇다고 진리가 곧 현상계인 것도 아니다.
이것이 '불일불이(不一不二)'의 이치이다.
얘기가 한참 돌아서 왔지만, 결국은
오늘 여기의 삶에서, 세상 사람들과, 세상의 잡다한 일들과 부대끼면서
깨닫는, 설파되는 진리여야 세상 사람들과 소통할 수 있고
세상 사람들에게 공감을 얻을 수 있다는 말이다.
우리는 모두 외계인(=한울님 = 시천주)이지만
인간세상에서 살아가며, 인간노릇(페르소나)을 하며 살아가야만 한다는 뜻이기도 하다.
그러면서도, 나의 본성(=외계인=한울님)을 잃지/잊지 않는 것,
다르게는 세상 속에서 세상을 떠나는 일이라 할 수 있다.
외로워하지 말 일이다.
https://www.mosinsaram.com/
2023/03/26
楚 - 위키낱말사전
遠藤周作原作の映画作品 - Wikipedia
「遠藤周作原作の映画作品」にあるページ
このカテゴリには 9 ページが含まれており、そのうち以下の 9 ページを表示しています。
あ愛する (映画)
う海と毒薬 (映画)
ささらば夏の光よ
ち沈黙 SILENCE
沈黙 -サイレンス-
に日本の青春
ふ深い河
よ妖女の時代
わ私が棄てた女
Where Sufism and Taoism Meets | Technology of the Heart ??
Technology of the HeartSEARCH
al-Hayy (the Living) - Calligraphy by Barefoot Ra Ra
Homesufismtao
Where Sufism and Taoism Meets
0 Sadiq Saturday, November 09, 2013
1.
The Black Pearl: Spiritual Illumination in Sufism and East Asian Philosophies by Henry Bayman
Where are you hurrying to?
you will see
the same moon tonight
wherever you go!
~ Izumi Shikibu
In the preface of this book the author shares how his study and interest earlier in Eastern Philosophies and Thoughts lead him on to Religious Traditions. According to him, Islamic Sufism has much in common with Buddhism, with Taoism, with Zen and Confucianism. He however doesn't deny the differences. This book was not meant to be a comparative study but rather a light on some of the understandings of reality from sufi view as well as that of the eastern religio-spiritual traditions.
I am quoting a part from this book where the concept of God and Taosim is discussed along with God concept in East Asian Culture which is mentioned in chapter 7 of the book. About this chapter the author summarizes as:
Chapter 7 takes up the subject of God in East Asian culture. Although there has not been a strong trend of monotheism in East Asia, yet the sages of various traditions have never been too far from the truth. It is only a slight rearrangement that will help us to discern this universal truth within East Asian wisdom as well. Especially important in this context is the concept of “nirvana in Brahman,” developed on the basis of an insight provided solely by Sufism. The chapter ends with the realization that “there is no deity but God.”
2.
Tao, T’ien, Ti, Kami
The earliest ancestors of the Chinese believed in One God (called Shang Ti or T’ien Ti). It is impossible to overemphasize the fact that Chinese culture and Chinese history begins with the concept of One God. Although today, God is not recognized explicitly in East Asian thought, yet His recognition is just around the corner. The Chinese terms Tao, T’ien, Ti, and the Japanese term Kami all refer to sacredness or the Absolute. Since there cannot be more than one Absolute, at bottom they all must refer to the same thing.
At first, a person may find the identification of Tao, T’ien, Ti, and Kami in this way unusual, even objectionable. They appear to be referring to different concepts. But in reality it is correct, for Truth is only One. It is called “Heavenly Oneness” (ch’ien i) in the Book of Changes, “the All-pervading One” (i kuan) in the Confucian classics, “Holding onto the One” (shou i) in Taoist scriptures, and “One” (Ahad) in the Koran. The goal of human beings, the end result of all self-cultivation, is to realize this Oneness. As the Zen master Hui-neng remarks in the T’an Ching (Platform Sermons), “When One is realized, nothing remains to be done.”
God and the Taoists
The concept of the Tao, Dao, or Way, is at first glance quite similar to the God concept. Further reflection may lead one away from such a notion. The Tao, one finds, is the ultimate metaphysical principle, is impersonal, and is never conceived of as Deity.
On the other hand, further study may also reveal deeper affinities between the Tao and God. In metaphysical terms, Taoism claims that the Tao both is everything and created everything. Only the Tao exists. It has no parts or divisions and nothing inside or outside It. It transcends both time and space. These are all equally valid descriptions of the Real from the standpoint of Sufism.
Probably the work that delves most deeply into the relationship between the concepts of God and Tao is Toshihiko Izutsu’s seminal study, Sufism and Taoism.
According to Izutsu, the Absolute is called Haqq (the Real) by Ibn Arabi and Tao (the Way) by Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu. Since Chuang Tzu wrote in greater detail than Lao Tzu, it is to the work of the former that we must turn to find references to God, if indeed there are any.
According to the Tao Te Ching, “the Tao produces, or makes grow, the ten thousand things.” So when Chuang Tzu says that the sage “reaches the primordial Purity, and stands side by side with the Great Beginning,” he is saying that the sage is made an eyewitness to the creation (“production”) of the universe (shêng: produce, bring into existence). This he calls the “Great Awakening” (ta chüeh), which he contrasts with the “Big Dream,” our mundane experience of the world in ordinary waking consciousness. Ibn Arabi concurs: “The world is an illusion; it has no real existence.”
According to Chuang Tzu, all things freely transform themselves into one another, which he calls the “Transmutation—or Transformation—of things” (wu hua). This is the Taoist version of “mutual interpenetration” or jijimuge, and is called “the flowing/spreading of Existence” (sarayan al-wujud) by the Sufi sage Ibn Arabi. This suggests that boundaries are real-yet-unreal (a situation highlighted by the phrase “No Boundary”), and that ultimately, all things are merged together into an absolute Unity.
If the Tao “produced” the ten thousand things, then the Tao is in some sense the “creator” of things. Do we find anywhere within the Chuang Tzu (the name of his work) explicit reference to a Creator? The answer is: Yes, we do.
… Chuang Tzu concludes that “there is some real Ruler (chên tsai)”:
It is impossible for us to see Him in a concrete form. He is acting—there can be no doubt about it... He does show His activity, but He has no sensible form.
The way Chuang Tzu uses another term, Virtue (tê), reminds us of another Name, Lord (Rabb), in its Arabic sense. Etymologically linked to the terms “trainer, teacher” (murabbi) and “governess” (murabbiya), rabb describes one who oversees something from beginning to end, who fosters it, nurtures it and brings it to completion. Chuang Tzu says: “The Way gives birth to the ten thousand things. The Virtue fosters them, makes them grow, feeds them, perfects them, crystallizes them, stabilizes, rears, and shelters them.”
Other affinities between Sufism and Taoism abound. Chuang Tzu’s expression, “sitting in oblivion” (tso wang) is the equivalent of the Sufic “Annihilation” (fana), or also perhaps One Who is Independent of all things. In this connection, Chuang Tzu makes a master say: “I have now lost myself,” which means that the sage is ego-less. This points to the annihilation of the subject/object boundary. As Izutsu explains, where there is no “I,” there are no “objects.” It is one of the most difficult things, however, to nullify one’s own self. Once this is achieved, says Chuang Tzu, “the ten thousand things are exactly the same as my own self.” Chuang Tzu’s “illumination” (ming) is another name for Gnosis (marifah).
The “sacred man,” he says, “illuminates everything in the light of Heaven,” and according to the Koran, “God is the Light of the heavens and the earth” (24:35). The Ultimate Man (chi jen) and God are inseparable. Chuang Tzu speaks of “those who, being completely unified with the Creator Himself, take delight in the realm of the original Unity before it is divided into Heaven and Earth.” A sage, according to him, is “the Helper of Heaven,” in parallel with Abdulqader Geylani, who was called the divine Helper (gaws). Chuang Tzu’s “Mystery of Mysteries” (hsüan chih yu hsüan), the ultimate metaphysical state of the Absolute, also happens to be the name of a book by Geylani, “The Mystery of Mysteries” (Sirr al-asrar). This, Izutsu explains, is none other than the Essence of the Absolute (zat al- mutlaq). According to Ibn Arabi, the world is the shadow of the Absolute: “He exists in every particular thing...as the very essence of that particular thing.”
All this points to a further confirmation of a central thesis of this book: God is non-explicit in the East, but this does not mean He is non-existent. Just below the threshold of consciousness, and ready to bloom at the earliest convenience, is the full acknowledgment that God exists.
The Knowledge of No Knowledge
The Taoist sages were well aware that the cognition of Unity entails an entirely different order of knowledge. Chuang Tzu asked: “Who knows this knowledge-without-knowledge?” Fung Yu-lan explains: “In order to be one with the Great One, the sage has to transcend and forget the distinctions between things. The way to do this is to discard knowledge...to discard knowledge means to forget these distinctions. Once all distinctions are forgotten, there remains only the undifferentiable one, which is the great whole. By achieving this condition, the sage may be said to have knowledge of another and higher level, which is called by the Taoists ‘knowledge which is not knowledge.’”
The Sufi sages agree. According to the famous Sufi Sahl Tustari: “Gnosis (marifa) is the knowledge of no-knowledge.”
Mahmud Shabistari explains:
Everything emerges with its opposite.
But God has neither an opposite, nor anything similar! And when He has no opposite, I don’t know:
How can one who follows reason know Him, how?
God informs the Grand Sheikh Abdulqader Geylani, “My Way for the Learned is in abandoning knowledge. The knowledge of knowledge is ignorance of knowledge.” In other words, all differentiation and distinctions have to be “unlearned.” The Yogic term samadhi (synthesis, integration) and the Vedantic advaita (non-duality) point to this undifferentiation, as do the Sufic terms tawhid (Unification) and jam (Fusion).
By “unknowing” the Many (Multiplicity), one comes to know the One (Unity). As Rumi says, “Where should we seek knowledge? In the abandonment of knowledge.” These views have found expression in the Sufi saying: “Forget all you know, transform your knowledge into ignorance.” The Hindu tradition also recognized this truth: as the Kena Upanishad puts it, “To know is not to know, not to know is to know.”
Let us conclude this section by statements to this effect by respective luminaries from the two teachings. Says Lao Tzu: “The further one travels along the Way, the less one knows.” And Abu Bakr, the foremost Companion of the Prophet: “O God, the pinnacle of knowing Whom is unknowing.” Can there be any doubt that both are speaking of the same thing, of “Knowledge of the One”?
None-self but One Self
The Chinese Secret of the Golden Flower begins with the words: “That which exists through itself is called the Way (Tao). Tao has neither name nor shape. It is the one essence, the one primal spirit.” In Sufism, self-existence (qiyam bi-nafsihi, svabhava) is one of the Attributes belonging to God’s Essence. The Sufic term translates literally as “standing by His own self,” and means “dependent on nothing and no one else for His existence.” It is one of the Attributes by which the Essence differs from all other things. All things which the Essence gives rise to, on the other hand, are other-dependent and non-self-existent (qiyam bi- ghayrihi, nihsvabhava, pratityasamutpada). That “other” is the rest of existence and—since the rest of manifestation is equally dependent and powerless—in the final analysis, the Other is the Essence. If Nagarjuna had not equated Emptiness with dependent origination, thus introducing a different ontological category (sunyata, adam), it would have been much easier to see this. Yet even this statement needs to be qualified by the fact that Nagarjuna was originally referring to the “void of self” that the Buddha spoke of, which is technically not at all inaccurate.
[+] The Book the Black Pearl has a copy available in public domain and can be accessed here.
> Also visit Official Website of Henry Bayman.
# Further:
* Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts
* The Perfect Man According to Taoism and Its Relevance with Sufism: A Brief Survey
* Sufism and Zen
* The Tao of Islam by Sachiko Murata
* Om Mani Padme Hum | a sufic interpretation
* How a Taoist Master sends his student to be a Sufi
Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study by Toshihiko Izutsu | Amazon Goodreads
Internet Archive
https://archive.org/details/sufism-and-taoism/page/n5/mode/2up
Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts
In this deeply learned work, Toshihiko Izutsu compares the metaphysical and mystical thought-systems of Sufism and Taoism and discovers that, although historically unrelated, the two share features and patterns which prove fruitful for a transhistorical dialogue. His original and suggestive approach opens new doors in the study of comparative philosophy and mysticism.
Izutsu begins with Ibn 'Arabi, analyzing and isolating the major ontological concepts of this most challenging of Islamic thinkers. Then, in the second part of the book, Izutsu turns his attention to an analysis of parallel concepts of two great Taoist thinkers, Lao-tzu and Chuang-tzu. Only after laying bare the fundamental structure of each world view does Izutsu embark, in the final section of the book, upon a comparative analysis. Only thus, he argues, can he be sure to avoid easy and superficial comparisons. Izutsu maintains that both the Sufi and Taoist world views are based on two pivots-the Absolute Man and the Perfect Man-with a whole system of oncological thought being developed between these two pivots. Izutsu discusses similarities in these ontological systems and advances the hypothesis that certain patterns of mystical and metaphysical thought may be shared even by systems with no apparent historical connection.
This second edition of Sufism and Taoism is the first published in the United States. The original edition, published in English and in Japan, was prized by the few English-speaking scholars who knew of it as a model in the field of comparative philosophy. Making available in English much new material on both sides of its comparison, Sufism and Taoism richly fulfills Izutsu's motivating desire "to open a new vista in the domain of comparative philosophy."
Product description
From the Back Cover
"Professor Izutsu's work is a pioneering attempt to bring into focus the shareable philosophical concerns of two seemingly unrelated landmarks into religious thought. His method is suggestive, interpretation new and bold, and material used important for further research. His book is useful to students of comparative religion, philosophy of religion, cultural anthropology, Asian thought and religion, and Islamic and Taoist studies."--Tu Wei-ming
"[This book] carries out a comparison in depth between Islamic and Chinese thought for the first time in modern scholarship. . . . Since this book appeared it has influenced every work on Ibn 'Arabi and metaphysical Sufism...[and] any cursory study of Sufism during the last fifteen years will reveal the extent of Izutsu's influence."--Seyyed Hossein Nasr
About the Author
Toshihiko Izutsu is Professor Emeritus at Keio University of Japan. A world authority on Islamic thought, he taught for ten years in Iran and has been active in promoting transcultural dialogue in philosophy.
Product details
Publisher : *University of California Press; 1st edition (6 August 1984)
Language : English
Hardcover : 493 pages
=======
Customer reviews
4.9 out of 5 stars
4.9 out of 5
38 global ratings
Top reviews
Dr. Don Whyte
5.0 out of 5 stars A scholarly work.Reviewed in Canada 🇨🇦 on 27 June 2014
Verified Purchase
This took alot of concentrated time to read but it was worth every minute. His study of Sufism and Taoism is original and well researched. Truly a work of scholarship, recommended for serious students of Sufism and Taoism.
Report abuse
PW108
5.0 out of 5 stars
Verified Purchase
Professor Toshihiko Izutsu’s writing in this stellar book is amazingly well researched and understandable. Either half of the book could stand on its own, but together they represent a (as far as I know) heretofore unattempted examination of the core aspects of the Sufism of Ibn ‘Arabi, in relation to the Taoist thought of Lao-Tzu and Chuang-Tzu.
My introduction to Izutsu was from footnotes in a well-worth exploring book titled “A Treasury of Sufi Wisdom: The Path of Unity” edited by Peter Samsel, and previously reviewed by me as well.
3 people found this helpful
Samuel W. Johnson
5.0 out of 5 stars Dr. Izutsu meticulously unpacks the profound metaphysics of Ibn ...Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on 22 May 2018
Verified Purchase
Dr. Izutsu patiently and meticulously unpacks the metaphysics of first, Ibn 'Arabi, and then Zhuangzi and Laozi. He also--particularly with regard to the Daoist masters--beautifully outlines the programs through and by which one comes to embody/become that metaphysics. Finally, he compares and locates deep congruences between Ibn 'Arabi and Zhuangzi/Laozi. This erudite and deeply felt work will stimulate and inspire anyone who is interested in spiritual expansion and/or comparitive mysticism; it might change the minds of those who feel the comparitive mysticism project is misguided, or impossible.
8 people found this helpful
Lydia Mills
5.0 out of 5 stars Classic, in depth , thoroughReviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on 26 October 2017
Verified Purchase
The mystics will recognise all the familiar "landmarks" in this amazing book, despite it sounding technical, formal and wordy.
I absolutely loved this book.
10 people found this helpful
William
5.0 out of 5 stars I couldn't be more pleased.Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on 15 May 2020
Verified Purchase
Excellent item, well described, packaging and speed of mailing were great. Thank you.
Report abuse
Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts of Ibn 'Arabi and Lao-tzu and Chuang-tzu by Toshihiko Izutsu
Toshihiko Izutsu
4.67
6 ratings1 review
Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts
493 pages, Hardcover
Book details & editions
Toshihiko Izutsu was a university professor and author of many books on Islam and other religions. He taught at the Institute of Cultural and Linguistic studies at Keio University in Tokyo, the Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy in Tehran, and McGill University in Montreal, Canada.
4.67
6 ratings1 review
Mamluk Qayser
199 reviews16 followers
Follow
April 13, 2022
This book is one of Isutzu's cornerstone: an epic expanding on the works of Ibnu Arabi, especially in his magnum opus Fusus al-Hikam.
Ibnu Arabi is one of the great physical that expounds the teaching of the Unity of Existence (wahdah al-wujud) into Islamic orthodoxy. While, of course, to say that that the orthodoxy fully accepted the idea is stretching too far. The ontological model would always be an uncomfortable fringe to many orthodox figures, for it is not that far from al-Asharite idea of "eternalness of substance" (in comparison to attributes), but the idea of Unity of Existence have too much of fringe of bombastic metaphors and also the cases of (misunderstood?) extremists such as al-Hallaj and other succumbed mystics. It took al-Attas to reformulate the idea in a more sober exposition, pulling it from the high heaven of similes to a robust digestible fact.
The model, in my opinion, is the only robust ontological model that bypasses the jettison between two indubitable facts; of the Absoluteness of God and the existence of the world. Spinoza has answered the first in a more chimerical way in his monism; by concluding God is so Absolute that He also includes within Himself the attributes of extension. The latter part has been answered in its most extreme form by the heretical mystic sects that affirms gross materialism, or perhaps the Asharites and the philosophers, who in their sincere way to retain the transcendence of God, affirm the theory of eternalness of substance.
This model has been expounded again and again somewhere in my reviews here, especially under al-Attas' "Degrees of Existence", al-Ghazzali's "Niche of Light" and Toshihko Isutzu's "Concept and Meaning of Existence".
2022
Henri Maspero - Wikipedia
Henri Maspero
Henri Maspero | |||
---|---|---|---|
Born | Henri Paul Gaston Maspero 15 December 1883 Paris, France | ||
Died | 17 March 1945 (aged 61) | ||
Scientific career | |||
Fields | Daoism, Chinese history | ||
Institutions | La Sorbonne École Pratique des Hautes Études | ||
Academic advisors | Édouard Chavannes Sylvain Lévi | ||
Chinese name | |||
Traditional Chinese | 馬伯樂 | ||
Simplified Chinese | 马伯乐 | ||
|
Henri Paul Gaston Maspero (15 December 1883 – 17 March 1945) was a French sinologist and professor who contributed to a variety of topics relating to East Asia. Maspero is best known for his pioneering studies of Daoism. He was imprisoned by the Nazis during World War II and died in the Buchenwald concentration camp.
Life and career[edit]
Henri Maspero was born on 15 December 1883 in Paris, France. His father, Gaston Maspero, was a famous French Egyptologist who was of Italian ancestry. Maspero was also Jewish.[1] After studies in history and literature, in 1905 he joined his father in Egypt and later published the study Les Finances de l'Egypte sous les Lagides. After returning to Paris in 1907, he studied the Chinese language under Édouard Chavannes and law at Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales. In 1908 he went to Hanoi, studying at the École française d'Extrême-Orient.
In 1918 he succeeded Édouard Chavannes as the chair of Chinese at the Collège de France. He published his monumental La Chine Antique in 1927. During the following years he replaced Marcel Granet for the chair of Chinese civilisation at the Sorbonne, directed the department of Chinese religions at the École pratique des hautes études, and was selected to be a member of the Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres.
On 26 July 1944, Maspero and his wife, who were still living in Nazi-occupied Paris, were arrested because of their son's involvement with the French Resistance.[2] Maspero was sent to the Buchenwald concentration camp, where he endured its brutal conditions for over six months before dying on 17 March 1945, aged 61, only three weeks before the camp's liberation by the U.S. Third Army.
See also[edit]
- Georges Maspero (1872–1942), French sinologist, son of Gaston, brother of Henri and Jean
- Jean Maspero (1885–1915), French papyrologist, brother of Henri and Georges
- François Maspero (1932–2015), French author, journalist and publisher, son of Henri
References[edit]
Citations[edit]
- ^ Katz (2014), p. xv.
- ^ Yetts (1946), p. 95.
Sources[edit]
- Auboyer, Jeannine (1947). "Henri Maspero (1883–1945)". Artibus Asiae (in French). 10 (1): 61–64. JSTOR 3248491.
- Demiéville, Paul (1947). "Henri Maspero et l'avenir des études chinoises" [Henri Maspero and the Future of Chinese Studies]. T'oung Pao (in French). 38 (1): 16–42. doi:10.1163/156853297x00473. JSTOR 4527248.
- Honey, David B. (2001). Incense at the Altar: Pioneering Sinologists and the Development of Classical Chinese Philology. American Oriental Series 86. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society. ISBN 0-940490-16-1.
- Katz, Paul R. (2014). Religion in China and Its Modern Fate. Waltham: Brandeis University Press.
- Yetts, W. Perceval (1946). "Obituary Notices – Henri Maspéro". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1): 95. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00100097. JSTOR 25222077.
External links[edit]
- Some of his works are available free online courtesy of the Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
- Henri Maspero, by E. Bruce Brooks: biography with photographs