2022/04/17

Iris Marion Young - Wikipedia Five faces of oppression

Iris Marion Young - Wikipedia

Iris Marion Young

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Iris Marion Young
Iris Marion Young.jpg
BornJanuary 2, 1949
New York City, United States
DiedAugust 1, 2006 (aged 57)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NationalityAmerican
Alma materQueens College (CUNY)
Pennsylvania State University
ChildrenMorgen Alexander-Young
Institutions
Main interests
Contemporary political theoryfeminist social theory, and public policy
Influences
Influenced

Iris Marion Young (2 January 1949 – 1 August 2006) was an American political theorist and socialist feminist[1] who focused on the nature of justice and social difference. She served as Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and was affiliated with the Center for Gender Studies and the Human Rights program there. Her research covered contemporary political theoryfeminist social theory, and normative analysis of public policy. She believed in the importance of political activism and encouraged her students to involve themselves in their communities.[2]

Early life[edit]

Young was born in New York City and studied philosophy and graduated with honors at Queens College. She was awarded a Master's degree and PhD in philosophy by Pennsylvania State University in 1974.[2]

Career[edit]

Before coming to the University of Chicago she taught political theory for nine years in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh, and before then taught philosophy at several institutions, including the Worcester Polytechnic Institute and Miami University.[2] During the summer term of 1995 Young was a Visiting Professor of Philosophy at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in FrankfurtGermany. Young held visiting fellowships at several universities and institutes around the world, including the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna, the Australian National University, the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, and the Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa.

Philosophical contributions[edit]

Young's interests ranged broadly, including contemporary theories of justicedemocracy and difference; feminist political theory; continental political theory including Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermasethics and international affairsgenderrace and public policy.

Social groups and the politics of difference[edit]

Central to Young's philosophy is the contention that concepts of justice were not limited to individual desert. Instead, the recognition of social groups was essential to redressing structural inequalities. Because the social rules, laws, and institutional routines constraining certain people constrain them as a group, and because our awareness of injustice almost universally compares classes of people rather than individuals directly, our evaluations of inequality and injustice must recognize the salience of social groups as constituent of a complete theory of justice.[3]

Young's recognition of social groups impelled her to argue for a post-liberal "politics of difference," in which equal treatment of individuals does not override the redress of group-based oppression. Young contrasted her approach with contemporary liberal political philosophers like John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin, who she claims conflate the moral equivalence of people with procedural rules that treat all people equally.

Five faces of oppression[edit]

Among Young's most widely disseminated ideas is her model of the "five faces of oppression", first published in Justice and the Politics of Difference (1990), in which she presented a relational approach to the question of justice, based upon a group theory of oppression.[4] Synthesizing feminist, queer, poststructuralist, and post-colonial critiques of classical Marxism, Young argued at least five distinct types of oppression could not be collapsed into more fundamental causes, and furthermore could not be reduced to dimensions of distributive justice.[5] Her "five faces" are:

  • Exploitation
  • Marginalization
  • Powerlessness
  • Cultural domination
  • Violence

Embodied phenomenology[edit]

One of Young's most well-known essays is "Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality," first published in Human Studies (1980). In it she explores differences in feminine and masculine movement in the context of a gendered and embodied phenomenological perspective[2] based on ideas from Simone de Beauvoir and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. She discusses how girls are socialized and conditioned to restrict their body movement and think of their bodies as fragile, which then has repercussions for their confidence in accomplishing tasks and goals later in life. The essay also serves as a critique and extension of Simone de Beauvoir's ideas of 'immanence' and 'transcendence'.

Structural Injustice[edit]

One of Young's contributions, of particular importance to moral and political philosophy, global ethics and global justice are the concepts of structural injustice and its associated approach to responsibility: the social connection model. In an idea developed at length in Responsibility for Justice,[6] a collection of Young's work published after her death as well as in several other writings,[7][8] Young argues that structural (social) injustice "exists when social processes put large categories of persons under a systematic threat of domination or deprivation of the means to develop and exercise their capacities, at the same time as these processes enable others to dominate or have a wide range of opportunities for developing and exercising their capacities".[9] Because most of us are implicated at some level in contributing to structural injustice, this also gives rise to what Young calls a social connection model of responsibility.[2] In this model, we are to ask ourselves how agents and institutions are to think of themselves in relation to structural injustice. This is starkly contrasted with a 'liability for harm' model of responsibility, which is more focused on finding guilt, blame or fault for a particular harm. According to Young, the main reason why the liability model fails to address structural injustice is that structures are produced and reproduced by a large number of people acting within accepted norms, rules and practices, and so harm cannot always be traced back to the actions or motivations of particular individuals. The social connection model, in contrast, is forward-looking suggesting that all those who contribute through their actions to structural processes that result in injustice[8] have a (political) responsibility to remedy that injustice. In this, she departs from and contrasts her approach to other political philosophers such as John Rawls and David Miller and the focus on distributive and statist approaches to justice, and draws much inspiration from Hannah Arendt's work.

Young applied her model of responsibility to a wide range of real-world scenarios, but perhaps most to global labour justice.[10] For example, in connection to the unjust conditions of sweatshop labour,[11] and the political responsibility of consumers in high income countries to remedy it. The social connection model has five main features. It is (1) Not isolating (unlike the liability model which seeks to define specific liable actors), it (2) judges the background conditions that other models would find normal or acceptable, it is (3) forward-looking not backward-looking, it is a model of (4) shared responsibilities, and it can only be (5) discharged through collective action (e.g. through community engagement rather than personal action).

Later life[edit]

Iris married David Alexander, and gave birth to a daughter, Morgen Alexander-Young.

After an 18-month struggle with esophageal cancer, Young died at her home in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago on 1 August 2006 at the age of 57.[12][13]

Memoriam activities[edit]

In recognition of her work with the Center for Gender Studies at the University of Chicago, the Center's distinguished faculty lecture series was renamed in her honor in November 2006. In addition, the University of Pittsburgh Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies Program, in collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, created the Iris Marion Young Award for Political Engagement in 2008 to honor Young's memory and to recognize faculty/staff, graduate, and undergraduate members of the University who impact the community.[14]

Young was also honored at Penn State University through a series of gifts which created the Iris Marion Young Diversity Scholar Award as part of the association for Feminist Ethics and Social Theory's and the Rock Ethics Institute's Philosophy in an Inclusive Key Summer Institute.[15] This Institute is designed to encourage undergraduate students from under-represented groups to consider future study in the field of philosophy. Students who are part of this summer institute are awarded the Iris Marion Young Diversity Award and their studies during the institute include her work.

In 2009, the Oxford University Press published an edited volume dedicated to Young's philosophy titled Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young.[16]

The American Political Science Association awards the Okin-Young Award in Feminist Political Theory, named in honor of Young and Susan Moller Okin.[17]

Selected bibliography[edit]

Books[edit]

Chapters in books[edit]

  • Young, Iris Marion (1995), "Gender as seriality: thinking about women as a social collective", in Brenner, Johanna; Laslett, Barbara; Arat, Yeşim (eds.), Rethinking the political: women, resistance, and the state, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 99–124ISBN 9780226073996.
  • Young, Iris Marion (2001), "Pushing for inclusion: Justice and the politics of difference", in Terchek, Ronald J.; Conte, Thomas C. (eds.), Theories of democracy: a reader, Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 268–278, ISBN 9780847697250.
  • Young, Iris Marion (2005), "Five faces of oppression", in Cudd, Ann E.; Andreasen, Robin O. (eds.), Feminist theory: a philosophical anthology, Oxford, UK Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 91–104, ISBN 9781405116619.
  • Young, Iris Marion (2005), "The logic of masculinist protection: reflections on the current security state", in Friedman, Marilyn (ed.), Women and citizenship, Studies in Feminist Philosophy, Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–34, ISBN 9780195175356.
  • Young, Iris Marion (2006), "The complexities of coalition", in Burns, Lynda (ed.), Feminist alliances, Amsterdam New York: Rodopi, pp. 11–18, ISBN 9789042017283.

Articles[edit]

Her writings have been translated into several languages, including GermanItalianPortugueseSpanishFrenchSwedish and Croatian, and she lectured widely in North AmericaEuropeAustralia and South Africa.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Aubert, Isabelle; Garrau, Marie; Guérard de Latour, Sophie (2019). "Iris Marion Young and Responsibility"Critical Horizons20 (2): 103–108. doi:10.1080/14409917.2019.1596200Iris Young defined herself as a socialist feminist
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e Nagel, Mechthild (May–June 2007). "Iris M. Young, 1949-2006". Retrieved July 31, 2016.
  3. ^ Young, Iris Marion (2001). "Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgements of Injustice" (PDF)The Journal of Political Philosophy9 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00115. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-10-10.
  4. ^ Contrast Young Kim, Justice as Right Actions: An Original Theory of Justice in Conversation with Major Contemporary Accounts (Lexington Books, 2015)(ISBN 978-1-4985-1651-8) for a relational approach of justice based on individual morality.
  5. ^ Young, Iris Marion (2004). "Five Faces of Oppression" (PDF). In Maree Heldke, Lisa; O'Conor, Peg (eds.). Oppression, Privilege, and Resistance: Theoretical Perspectives on Racism, Sexism, and Heterosexism. McGraw-Hill. pp. 37–63. ISBN 9780072882438. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-10-10.
  6. ^ Reiman, Jeffrey (2012-01-01). Young, Iris Marion (ed.). "The Structure of Structural Injustice: Thoughts on Iris Marion Young's "Responsibility for Justice"". Social Theory and Practice38 (4): 738–751. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201238439JSTOR 23558769.
  7. ^ Young, Iris Marion, 'Political Responsibility and Structural Justice', The Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas 2003.
  8. Jump up to:a b Young, Iris Marion (2005). "Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez39: 709–726.
  9. ^ Young, Iris, Marion (2011). Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-19-539238-8.
  10. ^ Young, Iris, Marion (2004). "Responsibility and Global Labour Justice" (PDF)Journal of Political Philosophy12 (4): 365–388. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00205.xhdl:1811/31843.
  11. ^ Young, Iris Marion Young (2006). "Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model" (PDF)Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation23: 102–129. doi:10.1017/S0265052506060043S2CID 143440640.
  12. ^ Jensen, Trevor (3 August 2006). "Iris Marion Young: 1949-2006: U. of C. Professor Focused on Inequality, Feminism"Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 19 November 2017.
  13. ^ Schonwald, Josh (2 August 2006). "Iris Marion Young, 1949-2006". Retrieved 19 December 2007.
  14. ^ "Iris Marion Young Award". Gender, sexuality, & women's studies program, University of Pittsburgh. Archived from the original on 29 May 2017. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  15. ^ "Iris Marion Young Award". Rock Ethiics Institute, The Pennsylvania State University. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
  16. ^ Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young. Studies in Feminist Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 2009-10-08. ISBN 9780195389128.
  17. ^ "2021 Section Awards – Women and Politics Research (Section 16)".

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

Amazon.com: n, Allen, Danielle S.: Books

Amazon.com: Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton Classics, 122): 9780691152622: Young, Iris Marion, Allen, Danielle S.: Books






Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton Classics, 122) Paperback – September 11, 2011
by Iris Marion Young (Author), Danielle S. Allen (Foreword)
4.6 out of 5 stars 61 ratings

Kindle
from AUD 19.08
Read with Our Free App
Hardcover
AUD 64.43
2 Used from AUD 64.43
Paperback
AUD 42.86
15 Used from AUD 23.3616 New from AUD 27.69

In this classic work of feminist political thought, Iris Marion Young challenges the prevailing reduction of social justice to distributive justice. It critically analyzes basic concepts underlying most theories of justice, including impartiality, formal equality, and the unitary moral subjectivity. The starting point for her critique is the experience and concerns of the new social movements about decision making, cultural expression, and division of labor--that were created by marginal and excluded groups, including women, African Americans, and American Indians, as well as gays and lesbians. Iris Young defines concepts of domination and oppression to cover issues eluding the distributive model. Democratic theorists, according to Young do not adequately address the problem of an inclusive participatory framework. By assuming a homogeneous public, they fail to consider institutional arrangements for including people not culturally identified with white European male norms of reason and respectability. Young urges that normative theory and public policy should undermine group-based oppression by affirming rather than suppressing social group difference. Basing her vision of the good society on the differentiated, culturally plural network of contemporary urban life, she argues for a principle of group representation in democratic publics and for group-differentiated policies.

Danielle Allen's new foreword contextualizes Young's work and explains how debates surrounding social justice have changed since―and been transformed by―the original publication of Justice and the Politics of Difference.
Read less

Report incorrect product information.




Print length

304 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Princeton University Press
Publication date

September 11, 2011
Dimensions

6 x 0.75 x 9 inches







Next page









Editorial Reviews

Review
"Winner of the 1991 Victoria Schuck Award, American Political Science Association"

"Young has written an extremely important book, articulating a position which challenges theorists of justice from Plato to Rawls."---Andrew Murphy, Journal of Politics

"This is a superb book which opens up many new vistas for theorists of justice. Young makes a number of insightful arguments both about the issues that need to be addressed by a theory of justice, and about the kind of theory capable of addressing them."---Will Kymlicka, Canadian Philosophical Reviews

"With remarkable precision and clarity, Young constructs a 'pluralized' account of oppression, aiming to describe all the groups and all the ways they are oppressed." ―

 
Review
"This is an innovative work, an important contribution to feminist theory and political thought, and one of the most impressive statements of the relationship between postmodernist critiques of universalism and concrete thinking.... Iris Young makes the most convincing case I know of for the emancipatory implications of postmodernism."―Seyla Benhabib, Yale University
Read more


Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Princeton University Press; Revised edition (September 11, 2011)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 304 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0691152624
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0691152622
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 15 ounces
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
Best Sellers Rank: #259,937 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
#707 in Political Philosophy (Books)
#725 in General Gender Studies
Customer Reviews:
4.6 out of 5 stars 61 ratings



Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
Top reviews from the United States


John Duff

4.0 out of 5 stars Enlightening ReadReviewed in the United States on October 7, 2017
Verified Purchase
A wonderful critique of the inherent problems with justice theories. Young demonstrates how contemporary theories of justice focus too narrowly on distribution, thereby diminishing the impact of oppression and domination perpetuated by institutions. Thus, justice ought to encompass a wider scope of social phenomena. Young, then, argues that impartial normative morality assumed in contemporary justice theories is impossible, due to the lack of capturing difference among communities and individuals. City Life is Young's suggestion for capturing difference and celebrating the fact of communal and individual partiality. This is a fantastic entering wedge into the underlying assumptions of contemporary justice theory, demonstrating that the debate is far from over.

One person found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse

Paul E CriderTop Contributor: Philosophy

3.0 out of 5 stars whatever) have a better understanding of their issues than the activists she believes ...Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2016
Verified Purchase
Iris Marion Young is by turns insightful and naive. The central thrust of her work is that justice should be understood not as a question of how to distribute wealth or other quantities, but as overcoming oppression and domination. Oppression is constraining an individual's development, through exploitation, marginalization, violence, cultural imperialism, or powerlessness (the five faces of oppression). Domination is preventing an individual from participating in determining their own actions and the rules constraining those actions. In general I think this is the right way to think about justice. It gets at what really matters, rather than chasing some phantom of distributive equality which wouldn't even guarantee improvements in the lives of those most disadvantaged.

Unfortunately, Young has a romantic vision of democracy that fails to acknowledge any strong criticism of the democratic process. Her arguments against expertise are interesting, but at the end of the day scientists (nuclear, biological, whatever) have a better understanding of their issues than the activists she believes they should have an equal stage with. Reading her chapter on democratic participation made me think she would almost certainly support anti-vaccine movements, in addition to any number of dubious causes.

Despite her astute analysis of the dangers of zealous zoning regulations and the benefits of city life, she nonetheless envisions an economic system ruled by committee. Her statements about regional governance knowing better than private actors whether and where to build, say, new shopping malls suggests she's never even considered the socialist calculation problem posed by libertarians. In general her refreshingly original ideas would be better served if she had a more mainstream and less leftist understanding of economics. That said, there is much to learn from the book.

3 people found this helpful

HelpfulReport abuse

Queenie

5.0 out of 5 stars very niceReviewed in the United States on December 12, 2019
Verified Purchase
just like a usual book, nothing special


HelpfulReport abuse

J**n

4.0 out of 5 stars Inspiring!Reviewed in the United States on December 29, 2020
Verified Purchase
My favourite part: Five Faces of Oppression!


HelpfulReport abuse

Annie

5.0 out of 5 stars Young is a MasterReviewed in the United States on October 18, 2013
Verified Purchase
Those of you familiar with Young's exemplary thinking and insight will not be disappointed. This book was used as part of a course, and well received by students.


HelpfulReport abuse

D. V. Evans

3.0 out of 5 stars Good buy for school.Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2015
Verified Purchase
The item arrived quickly and in great condition, as described. Great experience!


HelpfulReport abuse

Dan R

5.0 out of 5 stars I actually read this.Reviewed in the United States on October 29, 2015
Verified Purchase
Most of it anyway.

Actually just a few excerpts.

Pretty good.

I don't remember.


HelpfulReport abuse

Dennis and Rona Fischman

5.0 out of 5 stars conceptual building blocks for a better worldReviewed in the United States on August 20, 1997

Iris Young makes us think about justice not as a set of debts we owe other individuals but as a set of relations between social groups. In a just society, no group is oppressed. Her chapter "Five Faces of Oppression" is a classic. She brings new insights to debates about welfare, affirmative action, and disability. This book also offers a thought-provoking discussion of community. Young argues that we have based our idea of community on the rural life of an earlier age and that city life is where we should look for ideas about how community thrives in diversity.

Young tries to write for a general audience as well as for scholars. Sometimes, she succeeds, although the parts of the book that address particular groups and their predicaments or particular social policies are more accessible than the parts in which she critiques other theories. I would recommend this book for second-year students in college and up. It marks a turning point in social and political thought.

35 people found this helpful

한국교회총연합 / 자료실 / 한국교회선교사전기시리즈

한국교회총연합 / 자료실 / 한국교회선교사전기시리즈




한국교회선교사전기시리즈

처음으로>자료실>한국교회선교사전기시리즈


5
한국교회 선교사 전기 시리즈-05 인돈의 생애와 기독교 정신

관리자 2022.04.12 171

4
한국교회 선교사 전기 시리즈-04 전라도 기독교의 아버지 유진 벨

관리자 2022.04.12 99

3
한국교회 선교사 전기 시리즈-03 윌리엄 레이놀즈의 한국 선교

관리자 2022.04.12 79

2
한국교회 선교사 전기 시리즈-02 한국 최초의 선교사 아펜젤러의 생애와 신앙

관리자 2022.04.12 101

1
한국교회 선교사 전기 시리즈-01 개척자 언더우드

관리자 2022.04.12 331





1