2021/07/17

How Jesus Became God By Bart D. Ehrman. 2014.

How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee

By Bart D. Ehrman. HarperOne, 2014.





 

Reviewed by Douglas Bennett



I have been a member of Quaker meetings in which the conviction that Jesus is God’s Presence among us is a daily-told certainty, and also a member of meetings in which Jesus’s name is so rarely spoken as to make his naming a palpable disturbance in the holy silence. The rift over Jesus is so striking among us that we all have reason to pay attention to Bart Ehrman’s new book, How Jesus Became God.

Some Quakers see ourselves as the authentic Christianity revived; others prefer to avoid thinking of us as Christians at all. To both sides of Quakerism’s Bible divide, it can seem as if those who call themselves Christians have always believed that Jesus was God and always defined his divinity in identical ways.

Ehrman shows that simply is not so.

His argument moves through three stages. 

First, in the ancient world, the separation of the human and the godly was not nearly as sharp as we think it today. Jesus was hardly the only human regarded by many to be a god. Greek and Roman mythology have many accounts of gods taking human form and humans becoming divine. 
Roman emperors were widely regarded as divine figures. Moreover, the Bible is replete with godly figures—especially angels—that lie somewhere between God and man. Claiming divinity for a human was not as unusual as it is today. One could see Jesus as godly without seeing him as the one true God, and likely some of his early followers did.

Second, Ehrman subjects Paul’s letters and then the four Gospels to close analysis to demonstrate that they do not have a consistent view on whether or how Jesus was divine. He argues that Jesus’s preaching as it is conveyed to us through the first three Gospels makes no claim to divinity, only that the day of judgment was coming soon. 

It is in John where the strongest affirmations that Jesus is God are to be found. It was the crucifixion and resurrection that led his followers to begin to see Christ as divine. Among these early Christians, views of Jesus’s divinity progressed from those that ascribed no divinity to Jesus, to those that saw Jesus elevated (exalted) to divinity at his death, to those that understood Jesus to be God incarnate from his baptism or his birth, to those that understood Jesus to be simply God incarnate out of all time.

Finally, Ehrman traces the wrangles over the first four centuries of Christianity, in which theologians tried to work out a coherent, shared view of Jesus’s divinity. He shows they regularly declared as heretical positions that had been accepted as orthodox a few decades earlier. He lifts up the Nicene Creed (323 C.E.) as an Empire-sanctioned, unity-seeking compilation of now-orthodox views written to name and condemn a succession of such heresies. Even that agreement did not stop the wrangles.

You do not have to agree with every one of Ehrman’s arguments—especially regarding whether Jesus considered himself to be divine. But you do have to take to heart his demonstration that Christian views on whether, how, and when Jesus became God have been hotly contested ground at least since he was crucified.

Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. On the very first page, Ehrman lets us know that he was once a believer, but now considers himself an agnostic. He writes the book not to denigrate belief, but to invite us all into deeper consideration of what we know and believe, and why.

Why should we accept that there is only one God but also that God has three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit)? That Jesus was One, but equally human and divine? That he was begotten but eternal? Taken today as orthodox, these views are simply the ones currently being enforced as authoritative. Ehrman terms these “orthoparadoxes”: attempts to affirm all the apparently conflicting passages in the Bible lead to paradoxical affirmations. Why not instead see them as alternative possibilities in the divine mystery?

Perhaps if all Friends acknowledged the tensions among the various accounts we have of Jesus, we would find it more possible to talk together about his life and teachings. Even more likely, progressive Friends would find it easier to speak of Jesus if they knew the range of views Christians have espoused about Jesus as God.
----
Douglas Bennett is president emeritus of Earlham College. He is a member of First Friends Richmond in the New Association of Friends, the group recently set off from Indiana Yearly Meeting. He lives in Maine and worships at Brunswick Meeting.

Book Review 2014 - Friends Journal

Books November 2014 - Friends Journal


Quaker and Naturalist Too
By Os Cresson. Morning Walk Press, 2014. 177 pages. $18.50/paperback.
Reviewed by Harvey Gillman


Challenging, stimulating, exhilarating, and yet slightly depressing, reading this book is like being at a conference of many voices and wanting to go back to one’s own room to ask oneself why one has reservations in spite of agreeing with so much. At the end of the text, I wrote, “Yes, but . . .”

This penetrating book is an apologia for nontheism, describing both the part nontheists have in today’s Religious Society of Friends and the antecedents of nontheism in Quaker history. The tone is inclusive and welcoming. The words love, unity, and community abound. Definitions are given, which is important because, in spite of all the literature, I remain quite confused as to what nontheism means, as opposed to atheism and agnosticism. From what Cresson writes, it is a comprehensive word based on a rejection of the concept of a personal, intervening, supernatural reality and speculative, non-provable ways of thinking; at one point, however, he includes in it pantheists and wiccaists, which surprises me.

Reading the book I was introduced to people I had not heard of or knew little of before. I found it a useful anthology of open Quaker and near-Quaker thinking, and I feel that I shall long need to reflect on what these people have to tell and teach me. So why the reservation, not so much with the text, which has its purposes, but with the approach?

Although this book aims at inclusivity, there is an underlying dichotomy in its thinking between religion and science. Quakers stress action, experience, and ways of living. These are indeed observable phenomena. Like scientists, we live experimentally. Theological speculation may well lead us in circles and be divisive, especially if we think it will lead us to Truth (if it exists with a capital T). But we are living in a world where the scientific method itself may be seen to be culturally conditioned. We observe and measure with great objectivity, but the conclusions we draw from these activities may well themselves be subjective, however much we seek to put a distance between ourselves and what we discover. To me the religious life, or better the spiritual life, is about knowing one’s limitations, accepting not-knowing, respecting the dark as well as the light, standing in awe. Religion is not the ultimate revealer of truth, but neither is the scientific enterprise.

There is little in the book about meeting for worship, although the word worship is used throughout. Yet it is worship which is at the heart of the Quaker community: worship not simply as a time for calm speculation on the problems of the day or how to solve the many problems of the world—noble enterprises as these both are—but worship as communion at a deep level where self is transcended. Are Quakers of the silent persuasion just a vaguely religiously tinged humanitarian talking shop made up of nice intellectual middle-class people who enjoy an hour mostly of silence and who want to attract more of the same? And what of those people who do not fit sociologically into this category? What of those of narrower education? Those less articulate? So what are we for, in a way that humanitarian organizations or debating societies or college communities or self-help therapy groups are not? If we cannot answer these questions, why would the seeking soul come to us?

What came to me in the book was an old dilemma revamped: Are we a church of the saved (in modern terms, those who have made it intellectually and abound in good works) or a church of the sinner (in modern terms, those of us who know we need the community; who get things wrong because we are human; who try and fail and sometimes succeed; who need forgiveness; who need to embrace the dark and light side of self and the other; for whom the words theist, atheist, and nontheist are too big or too small; who may not seek great knowledge or intellectual definition but just a little wisdom from time to time)?

Friends will never agree on what God is, nor should we. To me the basic question is whether there is any transcendence possible in this life—whether there is just us, or whether there is any energy/power/force (you name it) that is both within us and beyond us. There are quite a few Friends who would call themselves nontheists, so any discussion of where Friends are today must take account of these members. This book makes a fine contribution to this discussion.
Born into a Jewish family, Harvey Gillman has been a seeker for most of his life. As outreach secretary for British Quakers, he wrote A Light That Is Shining. Other works include A Minority of One and Consider the Blackbird. He has led workshops and has lectured in many places in the Quaker world. He is a member of Brighton Meeting in England.

A Quaker Astronomer Reflects: Can a Scientist Also Be Religious?
By Jocelyn Bell Burnell. The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Australia, 2013. 54 pages. $15.95/paperback; $5 PDF on Quakers.org.au.
Faith, Hope & Doubt in Times of Uncertainty: Combining the Realms of Scientific and Spiritual Inquiry
By George Ellis. The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Australia, 2008. 69 pages. $15.95/paperback; free PDF on Quakers.org.au.
Universe as Revelation: An Ecomystical Theology for Friends
By Jo Farrow and Alex Wildwood. Pronoun Press, 2013. 186 pages. $14/paperback.
Three titles reviewed by Rob Pierson

“We are stardust, we are golden, we are billion-year-old carbon, / And we got to get ourselves back to the garden.” —“Woodstock” by Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young

Well, “Woodstock” got it right: we are, in fact, stardust—children of the light, you might say—or else nuclear waste. Science stands aside on interpreting the matter but asserts that all of the (multi)billion-year-old carbon in our bodies and the equally ancient oxygen we breathe exploded into space in the nuclear death throes of a supernova. But what do we make of this revelation?

Quakers, who three centuries ago began studying the garden of creation in their vegetable plots, eventually turned their telescopes to the skies, doing research that informed modern cosmology. At the same time, Friends sought to reconcile the world revealed by their scientific instruments with the world revealed by faith—to propose what the Quaker physicist Silvanus P. Thompson called “a not impossible religion.”

In his 1929 Swarthmore Lecture, “Science and the Unseen World,” the pioneering Quaker astrophysicist Arthur Stanley Eddington waxed mystical about the history of the universe and the seeking that drives both science and faith. Jocelyn Bell Burnell’s 2013 Backhouse Lecture, “A Quaker Astronomer Reflects,” continues in Eddington’s tradition. As a teenager, the future astronomer was drawn to both science and silent worship. Now, at age 70, having served as both president of the Royal Astronomical Society and clerk of Britain Yearly Meeting, she reflects on how science and faith have remained “comfortable bedfellows” over the years.

Burnell takes us on a guided tour of her home, the universe. We visit its planets, stars, and galaxies, and witness the threads of matter and energy stretching like filaments of cotton candy across distant space and time. The universe she shares with us explodes, evolves, and continues to expand due to pervasive but mysterious “dark matter” and “dark energy” that we do not understand. As a scientist, Burnell finds no reason to give God credit for the beauty of this universe, nor to blame God for its suffering. Yet the universe somehow inspires spontaneous reverence, gratitude, and joy. Nothing in nature proves nor contradicts her “working hypothesis” of a living, loving God who works through people, and calls us to hope and action.

So how do science and Quakerism relate? Burnell points out that scientific theories (contrary to popular misunderstanding) are always provisional, unprovable, and often tested until they fail. Testing depends on a scientific community sharing its common experience. In a similar way, Quaker spiritual truths are provisional and ultimately unprovable but tested in the shared experience of the faith community.

In either case, science or faith, we have to learn to live maturely with the unprovable. Our openness to new insight depends on our willingness to doubt and let go of previous assumptions. Burnell says that certainty, not doubt, is the opposite of faith.

George Ellis’s 2008 Backhouse Lecture, “Faith, Hope, and Doubt,” also highlights the role of doubt in inquiry. But when Ellis looks out at the universe, he finds something surprising: the self-emptying love that Christians have historically called kenosis.

As a South African mathematician and theoretical cosmologist, Friend Ellis easily summarizes the main issues in the ongoing science-faith dialogue and counters popular attacks on religion. Scientific materialists, he notes, limit their vision to only physical causes, i.e., the tennis ball flies because the racket hits it. This narrow vision ignores other types of causes at play in the universe, including intention. After all, the tennis ball wouldn’t fly if there weren’t a tennis game and a player who intended to hit the ball.

From this perspective, values, aesthetics, and ethics matter because they determine what is done and what is left undone. Ellis makes a strong case that ethics are discovered rather than invented. Our spiritual experiences, our sense of the sacred, provide valid data about the reality of which we are part. Most significantly, kenosis has real transformative power wherever it is discovered, and our Quaker history provides evidence of something powerful at work.

Science itself depends upon kenosis. One can’t seek truth without the willingness to give up even one’s dearly held theories. Like Burnell, Ellis concludes that we must remain uncertain but full of hope, or we will not be willing to take the essential leaps of faith.

In Universe as Revelation, Jo Farrow and Alex Wildwood pick up where cosmologists like Ellis and Burnell leave off. They accept the universe revealed by science and look at implications for faith—Quaker faith in particular—in a time of spiritual and ecological crisis.

Farrow, who served earlier in life as a Methodist deaconess and later in life as general secretary of Quaker Home Service, brings a background in feminist Christian theology. Wildwood, another convinced Friend, was shaped by wider influences, particularly Buddhism, and leads retreats helping British Friends explore their spiritual diversity. The two authors alternate their voices throughout the book, singing counterpoint rather than a single tune. They (particularly Wildwood) also include a chorus of supporting quotes, a kind of cloud of witnesses that sometimes borders on a distracting fog of chatter.

For Farrow and Wildwood, the story of the cosmos and the plight of the Earth reveal our core self-deception, that we think ourselves separate from, rather than deeply embedded in our world. The ecological crisis that threatens our existence also offers us a chance to grow up, to come of age. People want a spiritual story that helps in this context, and science increasingly inspires while traditional churches disillusion people by packaging faith as doctrinal belief offered for evangelical sale.

Ecomysticism celebrates our connection to the living systems of the Earth, which reveal themselves to us as sacred, interconnected, and engaged with us in an ongoing process of transformation. By accepting the cosmos itself as our primary revelation, ecomysticism splits decisively from traditional religions which offer faith as a comforting certainty. In ecomysticism, faith becomes a verb—not a fixed answer but a way of being at home in the midst of uncertainty.

In the face of such faith, a fundamentalist backlash—a clinging to certainty—becomes inevitable. Friends are not immune. Farrow notes our tendency to idolize the past and imitate a supposed golden age of Quaker conformity that never was. George Fox was the ultimate individualist, and imitation is not faithfulness to Spirit. Instead, spiritual diversity and openness are Quaker tradition needed for our time.

Even among liberal British Friends, Farrow discerns “fossilized” vestiges of Western theology that stand in the way of accepting a faith at home on the Earth. Are we heirs to the medieval theology of ascent away from Earth through obedient struggle? (Even the traditional path up Pendle Hill ascends by the steepest route, bypassing the wild hillside.) Are we separate from and superior to nature? (Both dominion and stewardship assume that we are.) Do we understand Spirit in the Western sense Fox inherited as the disembodied voice of Christ, or embrace the Eastern Orthodox view of Spirit as the breath that embodies itself wherever new life stirs?

Most tellingly, do we unconsciously accept a traditional Father God who will always lead us like children rather than encourage us to grow up and find our way? We emphasize light and God’s mystical presence, but Fox’s life alternated between periods of light and dark. In this time of crisis, we may need to live with the darkness and unknowing that shatters our old idolatrous images of God and allows new seeds to grow.

So in the end, these three quite different books look out to the cosmos as a source of revelation, and all three propose a close sympathy between science and Quakerism as complementary ways of knowing reality. But because we can never attain certainty in any absolute sense, we must learn how to live maturely with our science, faith, and hope grounded in our experience here and now.

Read Burnell for her quick tour of the universe, her understanding of science and Quakerism as bedfellows, and the “working hypothesis” of her faith. Read Ellis for his vision of a universe where values and intention matter, and kenosis offers the power to transform. And read Farrow and Wildwood to expose the hidden fundamentalisms that hold us back, and the ways we can place our faith firmly on the Earth to face the ecological crisis that confronts us.

All these works build upon modern cosmology: we are, in fact, stardust, and there may be no way back to the mythical garden except by accepting that reality and passing through, as it were, the flaming swords of galaxies twirling in our night sky. But perhaps, like Fox, we will find ourselves where “all things were new” and “beyond what words can utter.”
Rob Pierson is a member of Albuquerque (N.M.) Meeting, a systems engineer, and a graduate of Earlham School of Religion with an abiding interest in science, faith, and their interrelationship.


The Complete Antislavery Writings of Anthony Benezet, 1754–1783: An Annotated Critical Edition
Edited by David L. Crosby. Louisiana State University Press, 2014. 304 pages. $49.95/hardcover or eBook.
Reviewed by Cameron McWhirter


Anthony Benezet was one of those fierce Quaker characters that are so rare today—maybe they always were. He was humble yet devoid of meekness, audacious but without arrogance. He wanted to change the world, and hoped to be forgotten as soon as he left it.

When Benezet died in 1784, the well-known Philadelphia teacher was buried among other Quakers and freed slaves at the Arch Street Meeting House. Benezet demanded no headstone and said if Friends insisted on a marker after he was gone, it should read: “Anthony Benezet was a poor creature and, through Divine Favor, was enabled to know it.” His friends abided his request, and he has no headstone. Today he is buried somewhere around the meetinghouse. No one knows exactly where.

He was a man of many strongly held ethical positions. He taught white boys, but he also founded one of the first girls’ schools in the colonies—and gave free lessons to black children. He aided Native Americans and French Acadians forced out of Eastern Canada by the conquering British. He was a strict pacifist and vegetarian. Invited to eat at an acquaintance’s home, he learned the family was serving poultry. “What, would you have me eat my neighbors?” he said and promptly left.

But Benezet’s importance to the modern world was as an anti-slavery pioneer. Around 1750, he began a sustained and vocal campaign for abolition among fellow Quakers, other colonists, British political and religious leaders—anyone who would listen.

His logic was straightforward and at the time revolutionary: blacks were equal with whites in all respects, and any social system not grounded in that equality was immoral. “[T]he notion entertained by some that the blacks are inferior to the whites in their capacities is a vulgar prejudice, founded on the pride or ignorance of their lordly masters, who have kept their slaves at such a distance as to be unable to form a right judgment of them,” he wrote.

He organized one of the first abolitionist societies in the world and wrote numerous pamphlets, published at his own expense, attacking the institution of slavery and the slave trade as inconsistent with British, and later American, political concepts of individual liberty.

Benezet’s efforts influenced many people on both sides of the Atlantic, including Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Rush, and John Woolman in America, and abolitionists Granville Sharp and Thomas Clarkson in the United Kingdom. He helped form a movement to abolish the slave trade throughout the British Empire, and launched an anti-slavery movement among Quakers and others in America. Benezet and Woolman knew each other and were allies in the cause, though Woolman is better known today.

After his death, Benezet’s importance was largely forgotten, perhaps as the humble man would have wanted. Yet Benezet’s efforts so long ago deserve the attention today of anyone interested in social activism and bringing ethics to public discourse.

Thankfully, recent interest in the rise and fall of transatlantic slave trade has brought some attention to this extraordinary man. In 2006, Irv A. Brendlinger published To Be Silent . . . Would Be Criminal: The Antislavery Influence and Writings of Anthony Benezet. Now Louisiana State University Press has brought out The Complete Antislavery Writings of Anthony Benezet, 1754–1783, meticulously annotated by David L. Crosby, an emeritus professor at Alcorn State University in Mississippi.

Crosby has done excellent work compiling all of Benezet’s known anti-slavery writings and has provided detailed notes to put the material in context. Crosby’s effort to track down Benezet’s references to African kingdoms and places is extraordinary.

The book, however, does have some flaws. In an effort to be thorough, Crosby has reprinted every extant pamphlet that Benezet produced. Benezet often reused his own material in various publications. Compiled in one book, that repetition can weaken the average reader’s experience with Benezet. Another problem is not Crosby’s, but his publisher’s. The price is costly at nearly $50 for hardcover, with absolutely no art.

Still, it’s good that Benezet’s anti-slavery treatises, which once inspired so many, now can reach a wider audience. More people—especially Quakers—should pay attention to the life and work of this extraordinary man.

He was an extremely persuasive man. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting once considered requiring all members to emancipate their slaves. Some slave-owning Friends resisted. At a meeting over the issue, it looked for a while as though consensus could not be reached. Then a weeping Benezet rose and called out, “Ethiopia shall soon stretch out her hands unto God” (a quote from Psalms). The meeting reached consensus: Benezet’s position carried the day.
Cameron McWhirter is a journalist and the author of Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America. He is a member of Atlanta (Ga.) Meeting and serves on the board of trustees for Friends Publishing Corporation, publisher of Friends Journal.


How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee
By Bart D. Ehrman. HarperOne, 2014. 404 pages. $27.99/hardback; $15.99/paperback or eBook.
Reviewed by Douglas Bennett


I have been a member of Quaker meetings in which the conviction that Jesus is God’s Presence among us is a daily-told certainty, and also a member of meetings in which Jesus’s name is so rarely spoken as to make his naming a palpable disturbance in the holy silence. The rift over Jesus is so striking among us that we all have reason to pay attention to Bart Ehrman’s new book, How Jesus Became God.

Some Quakers see ourselves as the authentic Christianity revived; others prefer to avoid thinking of us as Christians at all. To both sides of Quakerism’s Bible divide, it can seem as if those who call themselves Christians have always believed that Jesus was God and always defined his divinity in identical ways. Ehrman shows that simply is not so.

His argument moves through three stages. First, in the ancient world, the separation of the human and the godly was not nearly as sharp as we think it today. Jesus was hardly the only human regarded by many to be a god. Greek and Roman mythology have many accounts of gods taking human form and humans becoming divine. Roman emperors were widely regarded as divine figures. Moreover, the Bible is replete with godly figures—especially angels—that lie somewhere between God and man. Claiming divinity for a human was not as unusual as it is today. One could see Jesus as godly without seeing him as the one true God, and likely some of his early followers did.

Second, Ehrman subjects Paul’s letters and then the four Gospels to close analysis to demonstrate that they do not have a consistent view on whether or how Jesus was divine. He argues that Jesus’s preaching as it is conveyed to us through the first three Gospels makes no claim to divinity, only that the day of judgment was coming soon. It is in John where the strongest affirmations that Jesus is God are to be found. It was the crucifixion and resurrection that led his followers to begin to see Christ as divine. Among these early Christians, views of Jesus’s divinity progressed from those that ascribed no divinity to Jesus, to those that saw Jesus elevated (exalted) to divinity at his death, to those that understood Jesus to be God incarnate from his baptism or his birth, to those that understood Jesus to be simply God incarnate out of all time.

Finally, Ehrman traces the wrangles over the first four centuries of Christianity, in which theologians tried to work out a coherent, shared view of Jesus’s divinity. He shows they regularly declared as heretical positions that had been accepted as orthodox a few decades earlier. He lifts up the Nicene Creed (323 C.E.) as an Empire-sanctioned, unity-seeking compilation of now-orthodox views written to name and condemn a succession of such heresies. Even that agreement did not stop the wrangles.

You do not have to agree with every one of Ehrman’s arguments—especially regarding whether Jesus considered himself to be divine. But you do have to take to heart his demonstration that Christian views on whether, how, and when Jesus became God have been hotly contested ground at least since he was crucified.

Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. On the very first page, Ehrman lets us know that he was once a believer, but now considers himself an agnostic. He writes the book not to denigrate belief, but to invite us all into deeper consideration of what we know and believe, and why.

Why should we accept that there is only one God but also that God has three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit)? That Jesus was One, but equally human and divine? That he was begotten but eternal? Taken today as orthodox, these views are simply the ones currently being enforced as authoritative. Ehrman terms these “orthoparadoxes”: attempts to affirm all the apparently conflicting passages in the Bible lead to paradoxical affirmations. Why not instead see them as alternative possibilities in the divine mystery?

Perhaps if all Friends acknowledged the tensions among the various accounts we have of Jesus, we would find it more possible to talk together about his life and teachings. Even more likely, progressive Friends would find it easier to speak of Jesus if they knew the range of views Christians have espoused about Jesus as God.
Douglas Bennett is president emeritus of Earlham College. He is a member of First Friends Richmond in the New Association of Friends, the group recently set off from Indiana Yearly Meeting. He lives in Maine and worships at Brunswick Meeting.


Radical Hospitality
By Lloyd Lee Wilson. Pendle Hill Pamphlets (Number 427), 2014. 36 pages. $7/pamphlet.
Reviewed by Paul Buckley


The parable of the Good Samaritan has seeped so deeply into our culture that we cannot imagine how it sounded—or how it felt—to Jesus’s audience when he first told it. Lloyd Lee Wilson has written a plea that we recognize and acknowledge the Samaritans in our lives. He invites us to have the courage to name those who are the enemies we are called on to love. Even harder, he wants us to actually love them—not theoretically or from a distance; he wants us to love them in-person and as persons.

Who is a Samaritan for us today? For our kind of Quaker, a Samaritan is a white, male, social conservative. A Samaritan stands outside an abortion clinic, pleading with the women coming up the sidewalk to turn around. She attends an evangelical megachurch, votes Republican, and works in public relations for a coal company. He has a concealed carry permit and takes his handgun with him whenever and wherever he can.

This pamphlet rests on the premise that we—not just Friends, but all humanity—are called to live, here and now, in the Kingdom of God. This requires us to turn our backs on the blandishments of our culture and follow the teachings and example of Jesus in our everyday lives. Wilson lists three fundamental principles for doing so: inclusiveness, kenosis, and nonviolence. We might identify these with the testimonies of equality, simplicity, and peace, but Wilson is calling for something deeper than our usual practice.

Inclusiveness requires us to truly love the rich and powerful, the politically unenlightened, the bigoted and narrow-minded, just as much as we love the oppressed, the needy, and the disadvantaged. The Kingdom of God includes those who are whiners, vindictive, and spiteful. If we live there, these are our neighbors.

Kenosis is the theological term for the “self-emptying” of Jesus when he took on human form. As it applies to people today, it starts with simplicity and selflessness, but it also compels us to admit the pride we feel for being simple and selfless, and to shed it.

Perhaps hardest of all, Wilson asks us to recognize how often coercion creeps into our nonviolence. The Kingdom of God will not be ushered in by shaming, legislation, or sanctions. When we attempt to achieve undeniably good results by coercive means, we are adopting the ways of what earlier Friends called “the world.” Well-intentioned coercion can change outward behavior, but it does not change hearts.

While you can profitably read this pamphlet alone, its message is multiplied when it is explored in the company of others. Part of what Wilson is asking of us is to renounce the wider culture’s cult of individualism. Living in the Kingdom of God entails accepting that we are members of communities and assuming the obligations that membership brings.

Read this with your meeting. Wrestle with it and with each other. It will strengthen you and your community.
Paul Buckley is a member of North Meadow Circle of Friends in Indianapolis, Ind. He is the author of numerous articles and books on Quaker history, faith, and practice. His most recent book is The Essential Elias Hicks.


Spiritual Accompaniment: An Experience of Two Friends Traveling in the Ministry
By Cathy Walling and Elaine Emily. Pendle Hill Pamphlets (Number 428), 2014. 36 pages. $7/pamphlet.


A Friend who feels a nudge, or urge, or leading, or call to travel in the ministry often seeks to learn from those who have gone before, and therefore reaches for journals of earlier Friends who experienced the same leading. But we do not have a rich supply of written experiences of those called to accompany, or elder, or mentor those led to a more visible ministry. In the past few decades, there has been a renewed interest in eldering. One of its manifestations is accompaniment. In an effort to begin to fill the void of written experiences that might offer guidance along the way for other Friends led to this form of eldership, Cathy Walling and Elaine Emily offer this honest account of their experience traveling to Australia in 2008. It is not intended as a template for the way accompaniment eldering must be done. Ministering Friends differ widely in their temperament; willingness to depend upon the Spirit in the moment; physical condition (health, strength, and endurance); and emotional stamina. A mature accompanying Friend is very important for keeping the one bringing the ministry grounded and in helping the message come forth.

For those readers nervous about the whole idea of eldering, this is the definition offered: “the practice of nurturing, affirming, and supporting the movement of the Spirit within the monthly meeting and within individuals.”

Those who confidently assume they can travel in the ministry alone may not be going deep enough, or surrendering sufficiently into the Life of the Spirit. The kind of ministry described here is different from facilitating a workshop, no matter how competently it may be accomplished. Jesus sent his disciples out in pairs, as did early Friends. We are now rediscovering how and why that is so important when working with matters of the Spirit.

The pamphlet tells of the process leading up to the trip with the multiple levels of discernment involving other Friends. This reflects a sense of participation in a larger, unfolding plan. Patience is both a requirement and a natural fruit of right order. It is not a question of making the trip happen but of obediently taking each step as way opens.

Walling recounts in some detail the contents and process of Emily’s workshop at the Australian Yearly Meeting sessions. She also holds up “reflections” on their process. Their roles as “minister” and “elder” were complementary and fluid, rather than rigid. There is a sense of inward joy at being rightly used, and being given inwardly everything that is needed. These are things that are recorded in old Friends journals and that I have experienced in my own yokefellowship with Connie Green. There is an interesting internal difference between the work one does when “on,” allowing the Spirit to minister through one, and the rest of life where one works out of one’s own intellect, strength, and experience. The difference is often observable to onlookers, as well.

Walling tells of the experience of night wakefulness and prayer, of ideas appearing while in bed. She writes of their ongoing discernment of how to spend their time, of the importance of remembering that the ministry is paramount and must be protected. Friends are hungry for spiritual leadership or assistance, and there are situations that can be emotionally and spiritually draining. The level of strength or tolerance varies widely among individuals, and a wise elder can be of great assistance in shielding a minister who has gone very deep and feels raw and exposed.

Walling is quick to label what others do as “ministry.” This helps evoke gifts that the community needs, and underscores the Quaker experience that each of us can be a minister. The danger comes if the label is applied too quickly so that the experience of ministry is cheapened and blurred with “kindness” or “hospitality.” Ministry is a spectrum, and these things minister, too. Spirit-led ministry is dependent upon God, and its possibility is cultivated by an intention to reorient one’s life to listen for and obey divine nudges. This is the antidote that our Society and “this age” so desperately need.

This pamphlet isn’t necessarily for everyone. But those who are looking for examples of accompanying eldership will find it offers some individual experiences, as well as more general helpful advice. Discussion questions are provided.
Marty Grundy, a member of Cleveland (Ohio) Meeting and Lake Erie Yearly Meeting, was the first clerk of Friend General Conference’s Traveling Ministries Program Committee. She and Connie McPeak Green have accompanied one another while traveling in the ministry.


Gaza Writes Back: Short Stories from Young Writers in Gaza, Palestine
Edited by Refaat Alareer. Just World Books, 2013. 205 pages. $20/paperback; $9.99/eBook.
Reviewed by Steve Tamari


Quaker engagement with Palestine goes back to the founding of the Friends Girls’ School in Ramallah in 1869. American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) was at the forefront of relief efforts for refugees flooding into Gaza in 1948. Since then, Gaza has been traumatized by a series of wars which have intensified in recent years. Since 2006, Gazans have been subject to a severe Israeli military blockade. In 2008–09, the territory suffered a bombardment which left over 1,400 dead, mostly civilians. As of this writing, over 2,200 Palestinians—again, the majority civilians—have been killed in the latest Israeli campaign.

It was not easy to concentrate while reading these stories by young authors responding to the 2008-09 bombings. Even as I read their words, they endured another more brutal assault. Editor Refaat Alareer’s brother Hamada was killed in late July. I wonder about the fate of the others and their families and friends.

Alareer, who teaches English and literature at the Islamic University in Gaza, wrote the introduction, which summarizes the events of 2008–09 and introduces the writers as a new voice in Palestinian literature and activism—where women writers outnumber their male counterparts and where the Internet and social media have transformed the literary and activist landscape. Alareer writes in the introduction:

Gaza Writes Back comes to resist Israel’s attempts to murder these emerging voices, to squander the suffering of the martyrs, and to bleach the blood, to dam the tears, and to smother the screams . . . Gaza Writes Back provides conclusive evidence that telling stories is an act of life, that telling stories is resistance, and that telling stories shapes our memories.

Alareer has collected 23 short stories from 15 writers, 12 of them women, and all in their early 20s. The majority are graduates of the English Language and Literature Program at the Islamic University of Gaza. Several are bloggers and media savvy human rights activists who are fighting for the sake of their compatriots, with keyboard and the Internet as their weapons of choice. The book includes short bios and photos.

The buzzing of drones, the roar of Merkava tanks, and the pounding of missiles launched by F-16s punctuate many of the stories. Characters in more than a few are trapped in underground tunnels or beneath destroyed buildings. In Rawan Yaghi’s “Please Shoot to Kill,” the narrator says, “I was never trapped in so little a space. My world felt so narrow.” The Gaza Strip itself is only 25 miles long and 5 miles wide with a population approaching two million. Yaghi’s story makes narrowness within narrowness palpable.

I was captivated by the portrayal of Israelis in several of the stories. In Noor El-Borno’s “A Wish for Insomnia,” Ezra, an Israeli soldier responsible for atrocities in Gaza, is wracked by nightmares in which he can’t distinguish between his victims and his own family. In “Canary” by Nour Al-Sousi, a dance of death unfolds when a female Israeli soldier begins to act on her attraction to another soldier. He turns out to be a Palestinian terrorist posing as an Israeli. As she approaches him, “Their eyes met. Fear and frustration flowed. It filled the place. Her finger was on the trigger. His finger was on the trigger. Death carried them both to the unknown.”

If these authors believed that death and destruction spelled the entirety of Gaza’s experience, they would not have been compelled to “write back.” These stories are grounded in a love for the land and its people and the conviction that justice will prevail. Hanan Habashi’s “L is for Life” captures the mix of attachment to family and land that keeps Palestinian hope alive: “It is when darkness prevails that I sit by the window to look past all those electricity-free houses, smell the sweet scent of a calm Gaza night, feel the fresh air going straight to my heart, and think of you, of me, of Palestine, of the crack, of the blank wall, of you, of Mama, of you, of my history class, of you, of God, of Palestine—of our incomplete story.”

Indeed, the story remains incomplete as one punishing chapter follows another. I am willing to wager, however, that all these authors will keep “writing back.”

In April, Alareer and contributing writers Yousef M. Aljamal and Rawan Yaghi did a national tour co-sponsored by AFSC. You can see an interview and a reading from the tour at afsc.org.
Steve Tamari is a member of St. Louis (Mo.) Meeting and has lived in Palestine. He teaches Middle East history at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville and is the son of a Palestinian father.


Outing the Bible: Queer Folks, God, Jesus, and the Christian Scriptures
By Nancy Wilson. LifeJourney Press, 2013. 182 pages. $14.99/paperback; $9.95/eBook.
Reviewed by Mitchell Santine Gould


I expected Reverend Nancy Wilson’s arguments for the appearance of same-sex love in the Bible to be rather superficial. However, she successfully exposes the entire tradition of biblical scholarship in covert or overt instances of homophobic editing. Modern scholarship conclusively explodes the popular myth that the Bible provides any significant advocacy for the inflammatory “one man, one woman” agenda of today’s fundamentalism. On the contrary, it’s inarguable that the Bible was the product of a polygamous culture, and as Wilson points out, Jesus himself could be pointedly dismissive of the institution of marriage, as was Paul subsequently.

Wilson begins by addressing the “clobber verses” used to demonize sexual minorities. But more essentially, Outing the Bible deals with the mystery of the eunuchs, whose frequent and prominent appearance throughout both the Jewish and Christian books has been anxiously minimized by nervous theologians. Wilson provides many cogent reasons for thinking eunuchs were not necessarily literally castrated males. However, Matthew 19:10–12 is the only proof one needs to see that Jesus himself understood the term to describe a variety of reasons a eunuch might be “cut off” from straight society: he could have been born that way; he could have been “made that way by others”; or he could have “made himself that way for the kingdom of heaven”!

At the same time, Wilson has very much of great importance yet to learn about the historic intersections of gay spirituality with religious traditions. For example, she writes: “The ‘love that dare not speak its name’ did not dare to theologize much about itself—or even to philosophize much—until recent times.”
Mitchell Santine Gould enables financial advisors to collect data for use in emergencies. Curator of Leavesofgrass.org, he is the leading authority on Walt Whitman’s rise among “sailors, lovers, and Quakers.” Together with the LGBT Religious Archives Network, he documents the historical intersection between Quakers and gay people.


Qur’an in Conversation
By Michael Birkel. Baylor University Press, 2014. 292 pages. $39.95/hardcover.
Reviewed by Ellen Michaud


With Qur’an in Conversation, Michael Birkel—author, scholar, and professor of religion at Earlham School of Religion—has opened a significant conversation with 20 North American Muslim scholars, professors, and imams that illuminates the evolution of what Birkel terms a “distinctively North American expression” of Islam. Birkel writes:

While it is admittedly not an easy season to be a Muslim here in an age of such suspicion, distrust, and misrepresentation, at the same time it is intellectually and spiritually an extraordinary time and place to be a Muslim thinker and believer. Muslims from a great variety of ethnic and sectarian backgrounds meet here and respond to the particular challenges and opportunities of North America in the early twenty-first century. Political and social realities that created tensions among these groups in their places of origin often have less meaning in this new context, allowing for a vibrant coming together of people and ideas. Just as Muslims found unique and pertinent manifestations in other lands and cultures, distinctly North American expressions are evolving in response to contemporary needs and conditions.

Drawing together myriad voices that reflect this emerging Islam, Birkel reveals an Islam rooted in reverence for the Qur’an “as it is understood, and lived out in North America.”

The result is a significant gift. In a series of 24 reflective essays focused on verses and themes within the Qur’an, the voices Birkel has gathered—including those of nine women—speak with clarity, intelligence, passion, and devotion to God.

While too many North Americans tend to view Muslims as “backward people from far away” who practice a religion that is “oppressive of women, intolerant of other faiths, zealous to impose a tyrannical theocracy, and incapable of freedom of thought,” the conversations to which Birkel’s essayists contribute challenge that view and show us a completely different people. They reveal Muslims who are concerned with not just the “right” way to read the Qur’an, but with reading it in the light of its core messages—messages that emphasize mercy, justice, kindness, good deeds, care for others, and religious diversity as a divine intention.

The conversation Birkel opens among his contributors is particularly important because while American Muslims have been having these conversations among themselves for 50 years or so, the North American non-Muslim has generally not been a part of the dialogue.

This book invites us to listen in.
Ellen Michaud is a former book review editor of Friends Journal and past Writer-in-Residence at Earlham School of Religion. She is the author of Blessed: Living a Grateful Life (which was named by USA BookNews as the #1 Spiritual Inspiration Book of the Year in 2011). She is a member of South Starksboro (Vt.) Meeting.


Belief without Borders: Inside the Minds of the Spiritual but Not Religious
By Linda A. Mercadante. Oxford University Press, 2014. 323 pages. $29.95/hardcover; $19.99/eBook.

Reviewed by Phila Hoopes

“Spiritual but not religious”—what comes into your mind when you hear those words? By some definitions, the phrase could be an apt description of Friends, as we seek the inward Light rather than the outward forms of religiosity.

However this term is defined—and there seems to be a unique definition for every person who self-identifies so—it is one of the monikers for the fastest-growing faith demographic in America today. Also known as “Unaffiliateds” and “Nones,” they represented at least 20 percent of the population in 2012, outnumbering mainline Protestants!

More than anything, these are experiential seekers (as found by author Linda A. Mercadante through nearly 100 in-depth interviews with “SBNRs” across the United States) who are turning away from pro forma, exclusivist institutional religion, and top-down dogma. In Belief without Borders, Mercandante, a former SBNR now ordained as a Presbyterian minister, chronicles her own changing approach to organized religion as she explores the perspectives of those who are choosing the periphery.

Make no mistake: this is an important book. Timely, topical, and scholarly, it’s exhaustively researched, endnoted, and indexed. Far from being a dry statistical study, however, it’s juicy and riveting, exploring some of the deepest questions and most pervasive trends in our culture today.

From an intellectual curiosity about the SBNR cultural phenomenon, Mercadante was propelled into their world through a personal brush with cancer, as “with my diagnosis came a free ticket to any number of classes, seminars, and lessons that dealt with the same spiritual practices my interviewees pursued at great expense.” Her journey led her through yoga and meditation centers, retreat houses, medical centers, and churches, and she came away “convinced that a profound spiritual change is going on in America.”

After putting the movement into a historical context, she lays out the framework of her research. Her interviewees ran the gamut—a bell curve ranging from the Greatest Generation (born between 1901 and 1924) through the Silent Generation (born 1925–1945) and the Baby Boomers (1946–1964) to the Gen Xers (1965–1981) and the Millennials (1981 and later).

Mercadante approached each interview with questions based on four themes: (1) Transcendence: Is there anything larger than myself, any sacred or transcendent dimension, any Higher Power?; (2) Human Nature: What does it mean to be human?; (3) Community: Is spiritual growth primarily a solitary process or is it done with others?; (4) Afterlife: What will happen to me, if anything, after death?

Emerging from a wide variety of religious heritages (Christian, non-Christian, atheist, and agnostic), the interviewees were grouped into five general categories: Dissenters (people who stay away from institutional religion); Casuals (for whom “religious and spiritual practices are primarily functional”); Explorers (characterized by a “spiritual wanderlust”); Seekers (those looking for a spiritual home); and Immigrants (who “have moved to a new spiritual ‘land’” and “were trying to adjust to this new identity and community”).

Mercadante dives deep in following her interviewees, their stories, and their thoughts on each of the themes, and—as an SBNR myself—I found her selections powerfully resonant. Some, for example, found a “righteousness of not belonging,” patching together interspiritual assortments of beliefs and practices, virtually creating religions of their own or finding other alternative approaches to personal faith and practice. Many were pursuing healing paths of personal development, feeling that this would automatically radiate out into the world. Some balanced precariously between personal goodness and doing good in the world through volunteerism and professional nonprofit work, though these were a minority. (For this latter group, a further theme, that of outward vocation or calling, fairly screamed its absence. The question was not asked, nor was it answered, even implicitly. Incredulously, I wrote to ask the author about this silence, and she verified: no one brought the topic up at all.)

With this in mind, I found Mercadente’s closing analysis particularly thought-provoking. She projects the implications of the growing SBNR movement on the future of religion in America as “authority, trust, belief, and divinity itself (are moved) from ‘out there’ to ‘in here.’” While this is laudable and healthy, she asks, what happens in a generation or so if institutional religion and all it provides to the culture—not only spiritually but also in terms of social services—is no longer a significant force? What happens when learned dogma and religious ethics have ceased to provide even an influence for building personal belief systems? What is valuable in institutional religion, how can it be healthily reframed for a changing population, and what should be allowed to die?

This is a conversation, I believe, to which the historically mystical and prophetic Friends could have much to add.
Phila Hoopes is a freelance copywriter, poet, and blogger (soulpathsthejourney.org), a student of creation spirituality and permaculture, with a passion for tracking deep connections in the mystical experience of the Divine across faith traditions. She is a member of Homewood Meeting in Baltimore, Md.


Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants
By Robin Wall Kimmerer. Milkweed Editions, 2013. 384 pages. $18/paperback or eBook.

In the Light of Justice: The Rise of Human Rights in Native America
By Walter R. Echo-Hawk. Fulcrum Publishing, 2013. 279 pages. $19.95/paperback.
Two titles reviewed by Pamela Haines

How does one sit with great love and great wrong? How does one look at brokenness all around one’s beloved people, treasure what is whole, and use the wisdom in one’s tradition to point a way forward for everyone? These books are guides on that journey. In the Light of Justice, by Walter Echo-Hawk, uses the framework of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People to suggest a way to address the human rights of Native Americans in this country. Robin Wall Kimmerer, in Braiding Sweetgrass, includes among her indigenous people the native plants and animals, braiding together that people’s wisdom, her botany expertise, and her deep and personal love for the land.

These books couldn’t be more different in tone. Echo-Hawk, a lawyer for decades, lays out the main points of his argument carefully at the beginning, then works his way methodically and exhaustively through them. Kimmerer, a storyteller as well as a botanist, draws you into her world from a variety of angles, pulling you ever deeper into her knowledge of the unity of all things. One speaks more to the head, the other more to the heart. Both expose the wounds that a colonist-and-settler mentality has inflicted on the natives of this land, and on all of us.

These unhealed wounds are familiar, though we don’t like to think of them: Native people defined as less than human—tricked, lied to, pushed off their land; children torn from families into forced assimilation in Indian schools, leaving a swath of trauma, poverty, and despair; virgin forests clear cut, prairie soils washed and blown away, wetlands filled in for monocultures and industry, leaving a traumatized, polluted, and impoverished land, struggling to support the life that depends on it.

We know all of this. We don’t want it to be true. Our hearts break, and many of us look away. Neither Echo-Hawk nor Kimmerer has the option to look away. Yet as they look back to the wrongs of the past and survey the damage in the present, they both are rooted in what is right and whole, and how that can light a way home.

Echo-Hawk argues that a major missing ingredient in the quest for justice for Native Americans has been a foundation of human rights law. While our country was founded on the these ideals, Native Americans were essentially written out of the contract, and a hodgepodge of mostly blatantly racist legal precedents has been built up over the years to address the vexing “Indian question”: “Tribal communities resemble the scene of a terrible crime, where residents reel from inherited suffering and scars of depression, prolonged unresolved grief, substance abuse, and suicide. And what is the crime? It is the legacy of conquest.” This legacy, he says, “sorely impugns our self-image, core values, and origin myth; and we cannot face those inner demons without being overcome by paralyzing guilt. Our legal system of remedial justice is adept at righting wrongs against victims who present individual claims, but it stops short at reparative justice for collective wrongs committed against groups, especially when the wrongdoer is the American nation.”

He sees the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People as offering the best new possibility in over 150 years to change this situation. Ratified in 2007 by 144 nations, with the United States finally signing under the Obama administration in 2010, its basic principles have been enacted into law in many countries. It creates both international precedent and a platform for similar action in the United States.

To begin mapping a way forward, Echo-Hawk considers the precedent of the decades of legal work led by the NAACP and Thurgood Marshall that culminated in the 1954 Brown vs. the Board of Education ruling. He also draws on the peace and reconciliation process and restorative justice models to imagine how something more than a legal remedy can come to pass.

In the Light of Justice is strong—if dry and repetitious at times—in its consideration of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People and the history of laws and Supreme Court rulings on Native Americans (including the ten best and the ten worst). Once he moves from legal ground into creating a movement for change, Echo-Hawk has more questions than answers, but the central point is one for all of us: grave injustice must be addressed if we are to be whole, and the Declaration might provide the impetus to help our country complete its nation-building process.

Braiding Sweetgrass defies easy description. With no narrative arc, it is more like a potter’s wheel, offering reflections and stories that center around a common theme. Whether she is contrasting the unity of indigenous knowledge with the separation required for a Western botany degree, discussing the symbiotic relationship between basket weavers and the plants they use, describing the riches of a cattail marsh, talking of salamanders and xenophobia, considering the elements of an honorable harvest, or reflecting on the lessons that her people’s creation and destruction tales might have for our times, Kimmerer is never far from grace. At the center always are learning from the earth, paying attention, connection and reciprocity, wholeness, gratitude, and love. How can I choose what to share from the riches of this book when doing so will leave out so much?

Reflecting on the grammar of native languages, she considers the implications in English of consigning everybody except human beings to the status of “it”; and what if our places were also verbs, so that their “beingness” was made explicit? What, she asks, if we in the Northeast claimed citizenship in the Maple Nation? Rather than a Bill of Rights, we would more likely have a Bill of Responsibilities. The Maples clearly fulfill theirs: providing oxygen, shade and natural air-conditioning, firewood, and syrup. Are we doing our share to sustain our communities?

Kimmerer calls forth the ancient ceremonies of the people whose lives were linked with the Chinook salmon, mourns their loss, and ponders the need for ceremonies that celebrate the land today. As a nation of immigrants, we brought our ceremonies of family and food with us, but left those of the land behind. Describing the heart-sickening destruction of a sacred lake through industrial waste and pollution, she considers different kinds of land restoration: just covering despoiled earth with something green, growing plants that help heal the environment, restoring a functional ecosystem, creating a home. She compares pioneer species that grow in a clear cut—flourishing on unlimited growth, sprawl, competition, and high-energy consumption—with the cooperation and stability of self-sustaining old-growth forest ecosystems, and the old-growth cultures that live in symbiosis with them.

These books hold wisdom for us. I learned a whole new body of information from In the Light of Justice, and I was pulled in, shaped, and nourished in ways I didn’t even know I needed by Braiding Sweetgrass. Looking toward the future, Kimmerer wonders what it will take for a nation of settlers to become indigenous to place, to lose the “species loneliness” that estranges us from the rest of creation. Echo-Hawk, in turn, notes that decolonizing the way that we look at the land goes hand-in-hand with decolonizing the way we look at Native Americans, and he suggests that restoration of their rights opens a door to a new land ethic.

He points out somewhat caustically that “some people care, but would rather be haunted by the legacy of conquest than do anything,” and notes that, while healing unresolved grief may be painfully difficult, it is not rocket science. Kimmerer calls for grieving and action as well, in the context of her recurring themes of reciprocity and gratitude, and I will close with her words: “If grief can be a doorway to love, then let us all weep for the world we are breaking apart so we can love it back to wholeness again. . . . More than anything, I want to hear a great song of thanks rise on the wind. I think that song might save us.”
Pamela Haines is a member of Central Philadelphia (Pa.) Meeting.


This Light that Pushes Me: Stories of African Peacebuilders
Edited by Laura Shipler Chico, photographs by Nigel Downe. Quaker Books, London, 2013. 71 pages. £12 (about $20)/hardcover.

Reviewed by Rosalie Dance

Do you feel that of God within you pushing you forward? This new and beautiful offering from Quaker Books in London gives us intimate accounts of the spiritual “push” that drives the work of each of 25 African Quakers (mostly) who work to build peace in Rwanda, Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Tanzania, South Africa, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.

The 25 one-page stories were chosen from interviews with 40 peacemakers and edited by Laura Shipler Chico, program manager of Peacebuilding in East Africa, an arm of Britain’s Quaker Peace and Social Witness. She has arranged each one beautifully on the page, often including a poem built by arranging words from the interview into a poetic format. The interviewees interviewed each other using a set of structured questions designed for the task.

Collectively, the stories convey journeys from violence to healing to activism. The circumstances of the journeys are all different: experience during a genocide, sexual violence, life in a refugee camp, child abuse, violence between Muslims and Christians. One peacebuilder said, “I think in this world there is no one who is holy. We need to come together and find an answer.” Another said, “And when I reached the place I fled to, . . . / There were people with wounds, / People who had been raped, / People who had witnessed their family being slaughtered. / This is the time that I got this light / that pushed me / to start helping / these people.”

To learn how to help, a pastor said, “We started with ourselves because we cannot offer what we do not have.” And another person spoke it this way: “Someone can’t forgive with a broken heart. / We need first to heal our wounds, our deep wounds. / Then / Start the work of peace and reconciliation. Heal, then forgive, then love.”

With each story is a photograph of the interview subject. The photographer, Nigel Downes, has given us the opportunity to look so deeply into the eyes of each of these committed and spiritual Friends that we feel we can see into their hearts.

This little book challenges us to renew our commitment to peace, justice, simplicity, and truth; it is a book that can give us courage to act. These 25 peacebuilders show us their courage to walk in the Light, with simplicity; they are beautiful examples, every one.

It is available from quaker.org.uk/shop for £12, and may also be purchased by sending $25 earmarked for the book to African Great Lakes Initiative at Friends Peace Teams, 1001 Park Aveue, St. Louis, MO, 63104.
Rosalie Dance is a member of Adelphi (Md.) Meeting and a sojourner at Stony Run Meeting in Baltimore, Md.


With Our Eyes Wide Open: Poems of the New American Century
Edited by Douglas Valentine. West End Press, 2014. 185 pages. $18.95/paperback.
Reviewed by Catherine Wald


This revealing and searching collection of poetry about how the rest of the world sees the United States is long overdue and, I hope, only the opening of a long and sustained conversation.

The title was inspired by Sam Hamill’s poem, “Eyes Wide Open,” which ends the book:

In Okinawa I wore the uniform / and carried the weapon / until my eyes began to open, / until I choked on Marine Corps pride, / until I realized / just how willfully I had been blind. / How much grief is a life? / And what can be done unless / we stand among the missing, among the murdered, / the orphaned, / our own armed children, and bear witness with our eyes wide open.

This devastating perspective on the unique American combination of innocence and imperialism is a fitting introduction to the many previously unheard voices in this book, and might have served better as the first poem in the collection rather than the last. Other poems give airtime to individuals quashed by poverty, political situation, or gender—like this one titled “Now do not tell me of men!” by Turkish poet Muesser Yeniay:

my womanhood / a moneybox filled with stones / a home to worms, woodpeckers / a cave to the wolves climbing down my body.

These howls of rage and loss, epitaphs to the innocent, indictments of the powerful, and prayers to an Entity that may or may not exist are well worth hearing.

I did find myself wishing that editor Douglas Valentine, who calls his role “an honorary title,” had taken a firmer hand in shaping and annotating the selections, which have much to offer on many different levels but often lack needed context.

I believe that if you are presenting startling new—and newly translated—material to a general readership, you need to present some background on of each poem as it is being read. Instead of needed information, consistently formatted, the book has only notes, some with the poems and some in the back of the book. I sometimes went back and forth in the material looking, for example, for a poet’s nationality without finding it.

Still, this illuminating collection makes a compelling read. As Friend David Morse says in his poem “Cell Phones Burning,” “Something is happening. Not here, never / here, but somewhere.” This book reminds us that we need to pay attention.
Catherine Wald is a poet and freelance writer whose first chapbook, Distant, Burned-out Stars, was published by Finishing Line Press. She is a member of Amawalk (N.Y.) Meeting.


A Permeable Life
By Carrie Newcomer. Available Light, 2014. 102 pages. $11.99/paperback. 12 tracks. $14.99/CD; $9.99/MP3 album.
Reviewed by Sandy Robson


Carrie Newcomer’s most recent album, A Permeable Life, speaks with a wisdom that only a deeply contemplative soul can articulate, and a coherence that only a seasoned songwriter can convey. With crystal-clear lyrics delivered by resonant, earthy vocals, Newcomer’s album is bold and deliberate, calmly signaling that she has important things to say and welcoming us to her hearth to listen.

The album eschews intellectual superfluities and instead offers the raw harvest of Newcomer’s long-cultivated relationship with God. It eagerly longs to reveal the magic that she has discovered in the present moment: to “listen more intently to something wordless and remaining, sure and ever changing, in the quietness of now.” This love of the Spirit overflows into an ever-increasing appreciation and concern for other people. ”The Work of Our Hands” expresses her gratitude to nurses, farmers, and everyone who spends their days doing physical work. “The Ten O’clock Line” tells the story of a broken treaty made with the native peoples of Indiana, and the upbeat “Room at the Table” joyously invites us all to keep our hearts open to those at the margins of society. Her sense of humor shows through on “Please Don’t Put Me on Hold,” which laments the frustrations of being caught in a labyrinthian customer-service call system.

Decisive swells of cellos, pedal steel, cooing harmonies, and softly pulsing hand drums add poignance to a core fingerpicking guitar part throughout several tracks. Newcomer’s musical vision for each composition is distinct and well-executed—every instrument makes a valuable contribution to an overall feeling. These are the marks of an experienced artist, so it comes as no surprise that A Permeable Life is her twelfth album. She knows what she is doing, and she does it well.

Newcomer has far more to say than can fit on a compact disc, so she released the album with a companion book of poetry and essays, also titled A Permeable Life. A number of the pieces are informed by her experiences traveling as a cultural ambassador to India, to Kenya performing at schools and hospitals, and to the Middle East visiting organizations dedicated to nonviolent conflict resolution through the arts. It is heartening to hear from so accomplished an individual that rather than rushing to achieve as much as possible in our short lives, we ought to slow down and make more room in our days for love:

Perhaps the goal / Is not to spend this day / Power skiing atop an ocean of multitasking. / Maybe the idea is to swim slower / Surer / Dive deeper / And really look around. / There is a difference between / A life of width / And a life of depth.

It is a singular blessing that Newcomer has created such an effective vehicle to share her life of depth with the world. Relish it and be inspired.
Sandy Robson is an Americana folk musician, performing under the name Letitia VanSant with her band the Bonafides. She works at Friends Committee on National Legislation and is a member of Stony Run Meeting in Baltimore, Md.

In Brief
Books
Nearly a Chinese: The Life of Clifford Stubbs
By Charles Tyzack. Book Guild Limited, 2013. 224 pages. $24/paperback; $8.91/eBook.


A biography can be an excellent way to enter into history. In the case of Clifford Stubbs, an English Quaker who was a university professor in pre-revoluntionary China, the tale is a tragedy. Stubbs was murdered in China; the title of the book comes from the highest of all praise his Chinese students could give a foreigner. It is ironic that Stubbs may have been attacked because he was a foreigner, since his insistence on respecting the Chinese people, culture, and history may have been unusual in an Anglo. A casual look at the book’s pictures piques the curiosity: Stubbs and a Chinese man at work with shovels, arms draped casually across one another’s shoulders; a portrait of the Stubbs household where the English sit with their Chinese cook and staff; the women included (though segregated from the men) in the university’s classes. This story is a way to learn about the long and complicated relationship between two countries who struggle for a relationship on equal footing, and the unfortunate loss of one who saw clearly the need for that equality.
Chequered Lives
By Iola Mathews with Chris Durrant. Wakefield Press, 2014. 320 pages. AU$29.95/paperback; US$7.99/eBook.


The great-great granddaughter of early Quaker settlers in Australia, Mathews tells the story of her ancestor and his brother carving out a life in an unknown land. They did very well in several different lines of business for a time, and then there was a major economic crash in 1841–43. When Mathews, a journalist, found a trunk of their letters, she decided to tell their story, including their success and the later events that “chequered” their lives.

Broken Mind, Persistent Hope: A Memoir of Recovery from Brain Damage and Manic Depression
By Thomas E. Hartmann. Tate Publishing, 2014. 320 pages. $18.99/paperback.


Thomas Hartmann courageously shares his story of mental illness and brain injury from a car accident, occurring together early in life. The memoir begins in his childhood, far earlier than the accident, but the whole picture he paints is a generous sharing of the confusion, obstacles, vulnerability, courage, and persistence that have been the center of Hartmann’s story, and of his recovery. It is always good to have stories to point the way to help others deal with similar situations that are initially confusing and frightening all at once. Hartmann offers his story for greater understanding and guidance not only for people who have these problems, but for the doctors who treat them.

Out of the Silence: Stories from a Quaker Life
By Judith Daniel Leasure. Self-published, 2013. 122 pages. $10.99/paperback; $2.99/eBook.


This is the memoir of a “Beatles girl” who grows into an adult who asks tough questions of Quakers today. Do we live as boldly and are we as willing to stake our own comfort and freedom on using our lives to speak for that of God in everyone? Leasure shares her insights as wife, mother, and grandmother, as well as friend to the marginalized, and reminds us that we are called “to prepare our children to be abolitionists for as long as it may take . . .” This memoir is a graceful weaving of story, fact, and observation, but it’s also a challenge to Friends today.

Crucified People: The Suffering of the Tortured in Today’s World
By John Neafsey. Orbis Books, 2014. 126 pages. $18/paperback.


Neafsey is a psychologist who treats survivors of torture. This book includes, in addition to his clinical insights (the book has an index as well as endnotes), chapters such as “Torture and the Cross: Christ Suffers in Ten Thousand Places.” It moves through chapters on the nature and scope of torture worldwide, some political analysis, and the wounds that result and persist. Toward the end, chapters focus on caring for survivors and the healing of nations. It is a difficult subject that needs to be raised up, and this book contributes to our awareness.
Poetry

A Speaking Silence: Quaker Poets of Today
Edited by R.V. Bailey and Stevie Krayer. Indigo Dreams Publishing, 2013. 136 pages. £9.95/paperback.


This anthology contains both established British poets and newcomers. Like other British writing, it has words we seldom use in American English, like “jots and tittles,” but that we recognize. The variety of voices is the product of anthology, so there is much to explore. Like American poetry by Quakers, the content is all over the map, if you will, and not only devotional in content. I was solemn, amused, and surprised in just half a dozen poems.

Quaker Poems: The Heart Opened
By Stanford J. Searl Jr. Self-published, 2014. 119 pages. $9.99/paperback; $2.99/eBook.


The Quaker manner of worship, never mind a Quakerly way of living, calls us to listen. Over decades, Stanford Searl listened to subtle sounds, and the long distillation of their interplay with his life gives us these poems. It is no easy thing to compose poetry, and here we have the work of decades—over 50 poems—collected by a thoughtful Friend.
Airplants
By William H. Matchett. Antrim House, 2013. 126 pages. $20/paperback.


Friend William Matchett had a long career as a literature professor and continues to write poetry, sharing through words the solitude, beauty, and peace of home; harmony with the natural surroundings; life’s transitions; and of the time to reflect.
We Learn to Swim in Winter
By Paul Lacey. Xlibris, 2013. 97 pages. $15.99/paperback.


This collection of poems opens with a meditation on the possibility of imminent death, and then touches sometimes gently, sometimes wryly, sometimes in joy on individual moments as well as meditations from throughout the author’s life. There is even one “goofing around poem,” which to me is a testament to the difficulty of composition. Memory is powerful, and here it is shared with compassion and wisdom.
Music
A Sense of Place
By Earth Mama. Round House Records, 2013. 10 tracks. $14.99/CD; $9.99/MP3 album.


Joyce Rouse, a.k.a. Earth Mama, is a singer/songwriter/eco-activist who uses music to share the spirit of Southern Appalachia in particular, and the special joy of belonging. “Bloom where you’re planted” could well describe the sentiment of Earth Mama’s songs about family, home, and the natural world. She uses various instrumentation and musical styles to encourage listeners to love; respect; and protect the native species, water, and land of wherever they call home. Earth Mama has recorded at least eight other albums, most recently Blessings of the Universe.

아둘람온라인공동체 |YoungMin Jung [도대체 신학이 왜 필요한가...??]

(10) 아둘람온라인공동체 | Facebook

아둘람온라인공동체

YoungMin Jung
14st SptnAuemlonacogusctec 2s0coro2e0dS ·



[도대체 신학이 왜 필요한가...??]

신학...철학, 법학, 의학과 함께
찬란했던 그 시절
신학은 학문의 여왕이라 했다.
아~ 옛날이여...
신학이 교회를 위한 학문이라고..??
그러면 교회밖의 사람들에게는
무슨 가치나 무슨 의미가 있을까?
“그 어떤 의미도 그 어떤 미소도
세월이 흩어 가는 것...”
(가수 이문세의
‘그녀의 웃음소리뿐’ 가사 ㅎㅎ)

이번에 한국에서 구입한 일본신학자 후쿠이 토모아키의 [신학을 다시 묻다-사회사를 통해 본 신학의 기능과 의미] 를 읽고있는데
괴테가 쓴 [파우스트]에 주인공 파우스트가 말하는 내용이 나온다.
 
“이 세계를 가장 내밀한 곳에서
통괄하는 힘이 무엇인가?
그것을 알고싶다.
모든 작용력과 근원은 무엇인가?
그것을 보고싶다.”
[파우스트 382-84행]

철학이나 법학, 의학을 배웠지만
아무리 애를 써도 그는
참된 앎을 얻지 못했다.
그리고 신학을 접하자
그는 한탄한다.
“아아, 신학마저도!”
[파우스트 356행]

한 때 서구 신학자들에게 신학함은
자신의 구원에 관한 ‘증언으로서의 신학’을
추구함이었다.
 
그렇다면 이미 비그리스도인에게
또는 기독교가 제시하는
‘증언의 진리성’을 받아드리지 않는
사람들에게 신학은 아무런 연관없는
탁상공론이 되어 버린단 말인가?

하지만 신학이 기독교를 믿는 사람들이
자신의 종교적 진리를 전제하고
그 내용을 체계적으로 설명하거나
혹은 그 내용이해를 돕는 학문이라는
전통적 정의가 무색하게
이제는 기독교인들에게도
신학은 시대착오적인 자가당착이요

폐기처분되어야 할 낡은 유물이 아니라
고물이 되어버렸다고 말해도 되는 걸까?

후카이 토모아키는 신학은 마치
있어도 그만이고 없어도 그만인
맹장과 같다고 했지만
나는 오늘 날의 수 많은
기독교신자에게 신학이란
복음의 진리를 일부러
어렵게 만들어버리며 딴지와
태클을 걸어대는 세속화된 간첩(?)이
되어버렸다고 생각되어진다.

‘그런 건 신학자들이나 관심있는 거니
그들끼리 싸우라고 해!....’
‘이건 너무 신학적인데요.
이렇게 긴 설명을 참고 들어줘야 할 이유가
도대체 뭡니까?....’
잡다한 신의 이름이
8백만가지도 더 된다는 일본사회...
‘신가쿠’(신학 神學)을
‘신가쿠’ (진학 進學) 으로 알아듣는
일본사회...
 
게다가 신학이란 말을 평생
들을 필요도 없으며
몰라도 살아가는 데
아무 지장없는 신학....
그 속에서 신학을 하는
후카이 토모아키는 말했다.
 
“...신학은 종교 그 자체가 아니며
신앙의 대상 또한. 아니다.
그 점에서 신학은
그리스도교 교리나
신조와는 다르다.
 
예를 들어
“예수는 참된 하느님이시며,
참된 인간이시다” 라는
고백(칼케돈 신조)은
그리스도 교회의 교리다.
또한 교회는 사도신경과 같은
신조를 갖고있다.
신학은 이 교리와 신조를 연구하고
해설하지만 그 자체가
교리나 신조는 아니며
이를 만들어 내지도 않는다”

“의학이 병원이라는,
법학이 법정이라는
‘실천의 장소’를 갖고 있듯
신학은 교회라는 실천의 장소를 갖고 있다.
 
그러한 의미에서 많은 사람이
신학을 사변적인 것만을
취급하는 일이라고
생각하더라도 실제 신학은
구체적인 현장을 가진
뚜렷한 실천적인 학문이다. “

생태여성신학과 토착화신학, 흑인신학등에
지대한 관심을 가진 민중신학자
아시아 해방신학자, 조직신학자인 나에게
신학은 지극히 현실적인 미국/한국의
정치, 사회, 종교, 문화적 현실을 해석하며
파생되는 온갖 문제에 대처하게 해주는
매우 탁월하고 유용한 학문적 도구이다.
 
최소한 나에게 만큼은 부인하기 힘든
사실이며 매일 매일의 삶과
깊게 관련된 현실이다.
 
하지만 나는 자주 듣는다...
조직신학이 신앙을 조직적으루다가
‘베려’ (?) 버리게 만든다고....
하지만 내가 섬기던 개척교회
예수행교회의 성도님들께서는
모두 한결같이 2019년부로 나를
놓아주시며 신학자의 길로
가라고 격려해주시고 응원해주셨다!

그러므로 신학연구차
한국에 나와있는 나

지금 이 순간도 그들에게
큰 사랑의 빚을 지고 있는 것이다.














+14





YoungMin Jung turned off commenting for this post.
===
신학을 다시 묻다 - 사회사를 통해 본 신학의 기능과 의미  | 비아 제안들 시리즈  
후카이 토모아키 (지은이),홍이표 (옮긴이)비아2018-02-26원제 : 神學の起源 - 社會における機能 (2013년)
-------
책소개

독일 근대 사상 연구자이자 신학자 후카이 토모아키의 신학 입문서. 그리스도교가 인류사에 등장한 이후 2,000년이라는 시간 동안 그리스도교 신학이 사회에서 어떠한 역할을 감당해왔는지 또한 신학은 사회에 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는지 설명한다. 이른바 세속화 시대, ‘신학무용론’이 등장한 이 시대에 작게는 신학의 의미, 넓게는 그리스도교의 의미를 되짚는 저작이다.

오늘날 무수한 사람들이 교회의 기능과 의미에 대해 묻는다. 심지어 인류와 사회가 어느 단계에 이르면 그리스도교 교회는 사라져야 한다고 말하기까지 한다. 그리스도교의 가르침을 체계화한 그리스도교 신학에 대해서는 더욱 날카로운 시선을 보낸다. 교회 밖의 사람들은 그리스도교 신학에 무관심하며, 교회에 다니는 이들조차 그리스도교 신학의 존재 이유와 기능에 대해 질문한다. 세속화 시대와 근본주의가 횡행하는 이 시대에 신학은 과연 어떠한 의미가 있는 것일까?

후카이 토모아키는 우리에게 거꾸로 되묻는다. 과연 우리는 그리스도교에 대해 정말 잘 알고 있을까? 우리는 신학이 무엇인지 알고 있을까? 인류사에 그리스도교는 실질적으로 어떠한 흔적을 남겨왔는가? 그리고 신학은 어떠한 기능을 해왔는가? 저자는 역사적 관점에서 이러한 질문들에 답하며 그리스도교와 신학에 대한 파편적인 평가와 비판에 응답하고자 한다. 40여권의 저서와 역사를 출간하며 현재 일본에서 가장 왕성하게 활동하는 신학자로 꼽히는 저자를 통해 한국을 포함한 비그리스도교 문화권의 사람들이 그리스도교와 신학을 어떻게 이해할 수 있는지, 어떻게 사유할 수 있는지에 대한 새로운 관점을 얻게 될 것이다.


목차
한국어판 서문

01. 아아, 신학마저도! - ‘신학이란 무엇인가?’라는 물음
전통적인 ‘신학 제 분야 해제’라는 답 / 신학 ‘입문’ / 우리 시대의 신학관 / ‘신학’이라는 학문의 사회사 / 이 책의 구성과 목적

02. 왜 “예수는 하느님 나라가 도래했다고 가르쳤지만, 이 땅에 생겨난 것은 교회”였던 것일까?
신학은 왜 필요하게 되었나? / 종말의 지연 / ‘하느님 나라’ 사상의 대개조 / 신학의 탄생 / 두 개의 신학관

03. 그리스도교적 유럽의 성립과 신학
중세라는 무대 설정 / 유럽의 그리스도교화 / 중세 신학의 탄생과 ‘바로 옆의 철학’ / 신학 논쟁으로서의 보편논쟁 / 과학으로서의 신학 / 신학과 정치 / 중세 신학의 종언

04. 종교개혁과 중세의 몰락
중세의 끝과 근대의 시작 / 종교개혁이라 불리는 사건들 / 종교개혁의 쇠퇴 과정 / 신학과 내셔널리즘

05. 17세기 영국의 개혁과 신학의 시장화
영국 국교회와 청교도 / 청교도의 등장과 신학의 성격 변화

06. 레 미제라블 - 프랑스 혁명과 신학
교회적이지는 않지만, 종교적인 그리스도교의 등장 / 그리스도교를 교회로부터 끊어내기 / 종교의 사사화로서의 세속화와 신학의 새로운 모습 / 대혁명으로부터 라이시테까지의 여정 / ‘교회의 신학’과 ‘교회를 혐오하는 그리스도교 신학’

07. 실용주의로서의 신학
‘자발적 결사’로서의 국가, 미국 / ‘브로드웨이’에서의 신학? / 실용주의와 신학

08. 신학의 현실성
교회에서의 신학 / 신학은 필요한가? / 철저한 상대화

집필 후기

옮긴이의 말

접기
책속에서
첫문장
이 장에서는 먼저 '신학이란 무엇인가?'라는 질문을 생각해 보려 한다.
P. 36 시대별로 신학이 놓였던 사회 상황을 분석하면 그 당시 신학이 무엇으로 존재했는지를 가늠할 수 있다는 말이 된다. 마찬가지로 시대별로 신학이 놓인 사회 상황을 분석하면 신학에 영향을 준 시대정신의 특징이나 지배적인 사상이 무엇이었는지도 알 수 있다. 이 책에서는 이 점에 주목해 신학이 과거에 무엇으로 존재했는지, 그리고 현재는 무엇으로 존재하고 있는지 살피려 한다.  접기
P. 61 예수는 신학 저작을 남기지 않았고 현세를 긍정적으로 조정하거나 제도로서 종교 단체를 규정하는 가르침도 전하지 않았다. 그렇기에 예수의 제자들, 특히 이후 예수의 영향을 받은 이들은 예수의 가르침과 각 시대의 문화권에서 발전한 다양한 학문이나 상식을 어떻게든 연결해야만 했다. 초기 그리스도교인들의 경우에는 예수의 가르침을 헬라 사상과 헬라어를 사용해 어떻게든 헬라 문명이라는 세계에 번역해야만 했다. 그들은 이를 위해 이미 사용되고 있던 ‘신학’이라는 말을 선택했다. 따라서 최초의 그리스도교 신학은 태어난 지 얼마 안 된 종교 공동체 내부에서는 자신들이 믿고 있던 내용을 동시대 문화 환경에 설명하는 역할을 맡았고 외부를 향해서는 예수가 전한 가르침을 사상적, 문화적으로 번역하는 역할을 맡았다.  접기
P. 78 이처럼 그리스도교화된 사회의 구조에서, 그리스도교는 세계의 모든 구조를 그리스도교적으로 설명하기 위한 체계, 즉 신학이 필요했다. 중세 신학은 이 시대적 요구의 산물이다. 따라서 이 시기 신학은 오늘날로 치면 정치학임과 동시에 사회학이었으며 철학임과 동시에 도덕이고, 자연을 설명하는 과학이기도 했다. 즉 신학은 모든 현상을 구체적으로 설명해낼 수 있는 이론과 사고방식을 제공했다.  접기
P. 128~129 청교도 교회의 등장은 국교회가 독점하던 종교 시장에 균열이 났음을 뜻한다. 좋게 보면 국가가 사실상 독점하고 있던 시장에 새로운 민간 업체가 도전장을 내민 것에 견줄 수도 있다. 영국 국교회의 경우 시초부터 국가 차원의 지원이 있었기에 자유롭게 경쟁을 한다 해도 시장 구조는 청교도 교회에게 불리했다. 게다가 국교회는 법으로 강제력... 더보기
P. 146 이렇게 종교는 교회의 손아귀에서 벗어나 (프랑스) 혁명정부의 통제 아래 놓였다. 무엇이 바뀐 것일까? 앞서 언급한 것처럼 종교의 장소가 바뀌었다. 그리스도교는 ‘교회’에서 ‘인간’, ‘인간의 마음’이라는 곳으로 장소를 옮겨 갔다. 인간의 내면, 혹은 마음은 근대 시기 가장 전형적인 ‘종교의 장소’다. 그 전까지 그리스도교는 그리스도교 세계 전체, 혹은 서유럽 전체, 한 국가 등 전체 사회의 공공성과 연관되어 있었으며 사회 전체의 윤리를 다루었다. 그러나 이제 새로운 그리스도교는 ‘개인’으로, ‘개인의 내면’으로 그 활동 장소를 옮겼고 이에 따라 신학도 새로운 모습을 갖추게 되었다.  접기
더보기
저자 및 역자소개
후카이 토모아키 (深井智朗) (지은이) 
저자파일
 
신간알리미 신청
1964년생. 도쿄신학대학 대학원에서 석사 학위, 독일 아우구스부르크대학교에서 19세기 독일 개신교에 관한 연구로 박사 학위Dr. Phil., 교토대학교 대학원에서 20세기 신학사에서의 신인식 문제에 관한 연구로 문학박사 학위Ph.D를 받았다. 도쿄대학교 대학원, 릿쿄대학교 대학원 등의 외래 교수, 세이가쿠인대학교, 긴조가쿠인대학교 교수를 거쳐 현재 토요에이와조가쿠인대학교 교수 및 동 학원 원장으로 재직중이다. 독일 근대 사상사 연구자이자, 지성사 및 사회사적 관점에서 신학을 성찰하고 비그리스도교 세계에서 그리스도교의 의미를 되새기려 하는 신학자이다. 40여권의 저서와 역서를 출간해 현재 일본에서 가장 왕성한 활동을 펼치고 있는 신학자로 꼽힌다. 지은 책으로 『초월과 인식』超越と認識(나카무라 하지메상 수상), 『하르낙과 그의 시대』ハルナックとその時代, 『사상으로서의 편집자』思想としての編集者(한울, 2015) 등이 있으며 슐라이어마허의 『종교론』, 하르낙의 『그리스도교의 본질』, 트뢸치의 『그리스도교의 절대성』, 판넨베르크의 『세속화된 세계에서의 그리스도교』 등을 일본어로 옮겼다. 접기
최근작 : <신학을 다시 묻다>,<사상으로서의 편집자 (반양장)>,<사상으로서의 편집자 (양장)> … 총 4종 (모두보기)
홍이표 (옮긴이) 
저자파일
 
신간알리미 신청
연세대에서 신학과 법학을 전공하였으며, 동대학원에서 신학석사(Th.M.)를, 교토대학(京都大學)에서 문학석사(M.L.) 학위를 취득했다. 이후 교토대 박사과정(사상문화학 전공)을 수료하였고, 연세대 대학원에서 신학박사(Ph.D.) 학위를 받은 뒤, 메이지가쿠인대학 그리스도교연구소 협력연구원, 교토대학 강사 등으로 연구를 이어가고 있다. 감리교 선교사로 도일한 후, 가가와 목사의 고향이자 첫 활동의 무대였던 일본기독교단 효고교구를 거쳐 교토교구 탄고미야즈교회(丹後宮津敎會) 주임목사로 활동했다.
최근작 : <아시아 공동체와 평화> … 총 9종 (모두보기)

-----
출판사 제공 책소개

신학의 존재 이유는 무엇인가?
신학과 사회, 신학과 역사는 어떤 영향을 주고 받아왔는가?
현재 일본에서 가장 왕성한 학문 활동을 펼치고 있는 신학자 후카이 토모아키의 흥미로운 그리스도교 역사 읽기

“이 책은 일종의 ‘학문사’라고 할 수 있을 것입니다. ... 제가 이러한 시도를 통해 말하고 싶은 것은 신학은 분명 ‘교회의 학문’이지만 교회라는 담을 넘어 지속해서 사회의 영향을 받았고 또 사회에 영향을 미치고 있다는 것입니다. 사회라는 컨텍스트는 신학의 텍스트를 낳고, 그렇게 나온 신학의 텍스트는 다시금 사회라는 컨텍스트에 영향을 미칩니다. 이러한 상호 관계를 잊지 않는 것이 중요합니다. 이 책에서는 이러한 문제의식 아래 신학이라는 학문이 사회에서 어떠한 역할을 감당해 왔는지, 특히 그 변천 과정을 살펴보았습니다. 이러한 접근은 ‘교회 안에 있는 사람들’ 뿐만 아니라 ‘교회 밖에 있는 사람들에게’, 그리스도교 신학의 기능과 의의에 의문을 표하는 모든 이에게 신학이라는 학문이 어떤 것인지 이해할 수 있도록 돕는 좋은 방법이 될 수 있다고 생각합니다.” - 한국어판 서문 中

독일 근현대 사상 연구자이자 신학자인 후카이 토모아키의 신학 입문서. ‘비그리스도교계’에서 활동하는 ‘그리스도교 신학자’라는 위치에서 일반 독자와 그리스도교인 독자 모두를 염두에 두고 쓴 신학 입문서. 역사적인 관점에서 그리스도교가 2,000년이라는 시간 동안 그리스도교 신학이 사회에서 어떠한 역할을 감당해왔는지 또한 사회는 신학에 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는지를 설명한다.
오늘날 무수한 사람들이 교회의 기능과 의미에 대해 묻는다. 심지어 인류와 사회가 어느 단계에 이르면 그리스도교, 혹은 교회는 사라져야 한다고 말하기도 한다. 그리스도교의 가르침을 체계화한 그리스도교 신학에 대한 시선은 더욱 싸늘하다. 한편에서는 그리스도교 신학에 무관심하며, 교회에 다니는 이들조차 그리스도교 신학의 존재 이유와 기능에 대해 질문한다. ‘예수의 가르침을 따르는 것’만으로 충분하지 않느냐면서 말이다. 세속화 시대와 근본주의가 횡행하는 이 시대에 신학은 과연 어떠한 의미가 있는 것일까?
지은이는 그리스도교가 어떻게 형성되었는지를 살피고 이와 맞물려 신학이 어떻게 형성되었으며 그 성격을 바꾸어왔는지를 탐구하면서 저 질문에 응답한다. 예수의 죽음 이후 초기 그리스도교 공동체에서 발생한 ‘신학적 물음’이 어떻게 신학이라는 학문으로 정착하는지, 로마 제국의 국교가 된 뒤 서유럽 세계로 확장하는 흐름과 맞물려 어떻게 그 성격이 변화하는지, 그리스도교 유럽의 붕괴 이후 신학은 어떻게 전환했는지, 그리고 근대 세계 출현 이후 새롭게 바뀐 모습은 어떠한지를 살핀다. 이를 통해 흔히 생각하듯 신학은 고정불변의 학문, 초월적인 영역에만 관심하는 학문이 아니라 자신이 속한 교회, 사회와 긴밀한 영향을 주고받으며 자신의 기능을 수행하는, 끊임없이 변화하는 학문, 지극히 현실적인 학문이라고 지은이는 역설한다.
40여권의 저서와 역서를 출간하며 현재 일본에서 가장 왕성하게 활동하는 신학자의 저작답게 역사와 신학에 대한 다채로운 지식과 흥미로운 생각거리를 접할 수 있다. 일반 독자들에게는 서구 사회에서 그리스도교와 신학이 어떠한 기능과 의미를 갖고 있는지를 살필 수 있는 교양서적으로, 그리스도교인들에게는 신학에 대한 새로운 형식의 입문서로 다가갈 수 있는 저작이다. 그리스도교와 신학에 대한 파편적인 평가와 비판에 대해 고민하는 이들, 신학이란 무엇인지, 오늘날 신학의 기능과 존재 이유에 대해 생각하는 모든 이에게 좋은 안내자가 되어줄 것이다.

구매자 (2)
전체 (4)
공감순 
     
평신도들이 신학의 역사를 개괄하기에도 아주 좋은 책입니다.
˝기독교 사회가 아닌 일본에서 신학이 사회에 어떤 의미를 가지느냐˝는 질문을 가지고, 답을 찾기 위해 초대교회부터 유럽-미국으로 이어지는 신학의 역사를 훑어봅니다. 한국교회도 같은 질문을 가지고 답을 모색해야할 때 아닐까요  구매
햇살보다 2018-03-29 공감 (1) 댓글 (0)
Thanks to
 
공감
     
쉽고 술술 읽히는 문체와 저자의 깊은 성찰이 절묘한 조화를 이루는 탁월한 신학 입문서. 전공자의 입장에서도, 이제 막 신학의 세계에 들어선 사람에게도 깊이 생각할 거리를 주는 보기드문 책이라 봅니다. 적극 추천합니다.  구매
parksinbu 2018-03-28 공감 (1) 댓글 (0)
Thanks to
 
공감
마이리뷰
     
기독교는, 필요한가? 새창으로 보기 구매
김지방
어제 오전 12:05 · 
기독교사회가 아닌 일본의 대학에 신학과가 필요한가?

도쿄대학에서 신학을 가르치기도 했던 저자는 이런 질문을 가지고 기독교 신학의 역사를 개괄한다.

초대교회는 왜 신학을 만들어야 했는가? 중세 유럽사회는 왜 신학에 매달렸나?

(종교개혁 이후) 독일에서, 영국에서, 프랑스와 미국에서 당대의 신학은 사회적으로 어떤 역할을 했는가?

모두 8차례 일본의 일반인들에게 강연한 내용을 묶은 책이다. 강연한 내용이라 그런지 잘 읽힌다. 수많은 신학자가 언급되지만 주석이 충실하게 돼 있어서 신학을 잘 모르는 나같은 사람들도 읽어나가기 어렵지 않다.

저자가 결론에서 하는 얘기가 요즘 한국사회를 보면서 내가 가지는 질문과 닿아 있어서 앞으로 그의 사상이 어떤 경로로 뻗어갈지 궁금해졌다.

"신학은 현대 사회에서, 현대인에게 진정한 상대화를 가르치는 학문이다. 그리스도교는, 그리고 신학은 현대 사회의 관용 없는 그릇된 절대주의, 그 반대편에 있는 무절제한 상대주의, 그리고 그 양쪽에 잠복해 있는 자기절대화 모두를 거부하고 비판한다. .... 그리스도교가 본래 가지고 있던 모습과 사회적인 기능을 회복하는 일에 신학이 기여함으로써 신학은 오늘날 세계에 말을 건네고 대화를 시작해야 한다."

현대인, 특히 대한민국에서 사는 대다수는 초월에 대한 믿음이나 절대적 진리가 있다는 믿음을 (잃어)버린 사람들이다.

포스트모더니즘은 '나'의 '느낌'이 가장 중요하다고 강조한다.

이런 시대에 사람들은 어떻게 '나' 바깥의 세계와 만날 수 있을까? 어떻게 나 바깥의 세계를 인정할 수 있을까?

사람들은 SNS나 미디어를 통해 바깥의 세계를 만나는 것 같이 착각하지만 사실은 자신과 같은 시각의 무수한 변주를 보면서 "음 나와 같은 생각인 사람이 많군=내가 맞군"이라고 착각하는 경향이 더 크다.

굳이 타인을 만나야 할까? 왜 낯선 세계와 조우해야할까?

지난 대통령선거 때 일이다. 사전투표 첫날 투표를 하고 온 사람들 중 일부가 "후보자들 이름 사이에 빈틈이 없어서 엄청 긴장하면서 도장을 찍었다"고 온라인에 올렸다. 후보자 이름 사이에 빈틈이 없으면 공식투표용지와 다르기 때문에 무효가 될 수 있다고 누군가 지적하자, 많은 사람들이 "나도 같은 경험을 했다"면서 무효표를 만들기 위한 음모일지 모른다고 흥분했다. 이들은 "바로 몇시간전에 내가 투표하고 왔는데, 분명히 후보자들 이름 사이에 빈틈이 없었다"고 확신하고 맹세했다. 투표조작 우려가 점점 커졌다. 하지만 사전투표 이틀째에는 그런 보고를 한 사람이 없었고, 최종투표 뒤 개표에서도 그런 표는 나오지 않았다. 후보가 많아서 칸이 좁아졌는데, 신중하게 투표하느라 긴장한 사람들이 착각한 일이었다.

사람들은 온라인을 통해 자신의 경험을 다른 사람과 공유하면서 더 큰 진실을 찾았다고 생각했지만, 같은 착각에 빠진 사람들이 서로 착각을 주고 받으며 잘못된 확신을 키웠을 뿐이었다.

낯선 세계를 받아들이지 않는 사람은 자폐적 나르시즘에 머무는 미숙한 존재가 되기 십상이다.

초월적인 세계가 있든 없든, 그게 나와 무슨 상관인가(So I don't care).

내가 보기에는, 어떤 면에서 현대(한국)인은 자신의 세계에서 신의 존재를 지우면서 타인의 존재마저 삭제해버렸다. 나보다 더 큰 어떤 존재-그것이 생명이든 세계이든 에너지든 우주든-앞에 나를 상대화시키는 경험은 이 책의 저자가 이야기한대로 관용없는 절대주의나 극단적인 상대주의의 오류에서 우리를 구원해줄 수 있다.

그런 길을 보여주는 것이 바로 신학이 이 시대에 해야하는 역할이라고 저자는 역설한다. 깊이 공감이 된다.

그러나 아쉬운 점이 있다. 한국이나 일본 같은 비기독교사회에 사는 우리는 이 지점에 머물지 못하고, 더 근본적인 질문과 마주친다.

그 구원의 길이 굳이 기독교의 야훼여야 하는가? 그것이 굳이 예수이어야 하고, 그 세계를 교회에서 찾아야 하는가?

이 질문에도 우리는 비기독교인들이 공감할 수 있는 답을 내놓을 수 있는가? 오늘 한국(과 일본)의 모든 기독교인에게 놓여진 질문이다.

물론 기독교 신앙을 장식으로 걸고 있지 않는 한 기독교인들은 저마다 이 질문에 답을 가지고 있을 것이다.

그 답들을 함께 내어놓고 자유롭게 토론할 수 있는 장이 있으면 좋겠는데, 그렇지 못하다.

교회에선 정해진 답만을 말하기를 바라고, 신학은 그런 교회에 복무하기만을 요구 받고 있다.

기독교인도 아닌 일반인들이 신학자와 이런 강연회를 가지고 또 그 내용을 책으로 정리해 펴내는 일본사회와 교회의 힘이 조금 부럽다.




신학은 현대 사회에서, 현대인에게 진정한 상대화를 가르치는 학문이다. 그리스도교는, 그리고 신학은 현대 사회의 관용 없는 그릇된 절대주의, 그 반대편에 있는 무절제한 상대주의, 그리고 그 양쪽에 잠복해 있는 자기절대화 모두를 거부하고 비판한다. .... 그리스도교가 본래 가지고 있던 모습과 사회적인 기능을 회복하는 일에 신학이 기여함으로써 신학은 오늘날 세계에 말을 건네고 대화를 시작해야 한다.

- 접기
햇살보다 2018-03-31 공감(5) 댓글(0)
Thanks to
 
공감