2019/10/10

Red China's Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development Under the Commune: Joshua Eisenman: 9780231186674: Amazon.com: Books

[중국의 현대농업사] 개혁이후의 중국에 컴뮨이 사라진 것은흔히 생각하듯이 생산성이 낮은 것이 이유가 아니었다고 한다. 사실은 생산성이 아주 높았고, 이윤창출도 높았는데 정치적인 이유로 죽인 것이라고 한다.
---
- 북한이나 큐바에도 적용되는 혁명적인 분석틀이다.
---
<China's Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development Under the Commune> (2018) by Joshua Eisenman
---
PROLOGUE:: CHINA’S MISSING INSTITUTION
2 INSTITUTIONAL ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION
3 CHINA’S GREEN REVOLUTION
4 ECONOMICS:: Super-Optimal Investment
5 POLITICS:: Maoism
6 ORGANIZATION:: Size and Structure
7 BURYING THE COMMUNE
CONCLUSION
Appendix A.: NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION DATA, 1949–1979
Appendix B.: SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS FOR CHAPTER 6
Appendix C.: ESSENTIAL OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL POLICY STATEMENTS ON THE COMMUNE, 1958-1983
NOTES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
---
[China’s dismantling of the Mao-era rural commune system and return to individual household farming under Deng Xiaoping has been seen as a successful turn away from a misguided social experiment and a rejection of the disastrous policies that produced widespread famine.
In this revisionist study, Joshua Eisenman marshals previously inaccessible data to overturn this narrative, showing that the commune modernized agriculture, increased productivity, and spurred an agricultural green revolution that laid the foundation for China’s future rapid growth.
Red China’s Green Revolution tells the story of the commune’s origins, evolution, and downfall, demonstrating its role in China’s economic ascendance. After 1970, the commune emerged as a hybrid institution, including both collective and private elements, with a high degree of local control over economic decision but almost no say over political ones. It had an integrated agricultural research and extension system that promoted agricultural modernization and collectively owned local enterprises and small factories that spread rural industrialization. The commune transmitted Mao’s collectivist ideology and enforced collective isolation so it could overwork and underpay its households. Eisenman argues that the commune was eliminated not because it was unproductive, but because it was politically undesirable: it was the post-Mao leadership led by Deng Xiaoping—not rural residents—who chose to abandon the commune in order to consolidate their control over China. Based on detailed and systematic national, provincial, and county-level data, as well as interviews with agricultural experts and former commune members, Red China’s Green Revolution is a comprehensive historical and social scientific analysis that fundamentally challenges our understanding of recent Chinese economic history.]

Red China's Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development Under the Commune: Joshua Eisenman: 9780231186674: Amazon.com: Books





Red China's Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development Under the Commune Paperback 

April 3, 2018
by Joshua Eisenman (Author)



China’s dismantling of the Mao-era rural commune system and return to individual household farming under Deng Xiaoping has been seen as a successful turn away from a misguided social experiment and a rejection of the disastrous policies that produced widespread famine. 
In this revisionist study, Joshua Eisenman marshals previously inaccessible data to overturn this narrative, showing that the commune modernized agriculture, increased productivity, and spurred an agricultural green revolution that laid the foundation for China’s future rapid growth.
Red China’s Green Revolution tells the story of the commune’s origins, evolution, and downfall, demonstrating its role in China’s economic ascendance. After 1970, the commune emerged as a hybrid institution, including both collective and private elements, with a high degree of local control over economic decision but almost no say over political ones. It had an integrated agricultural research and extension system that promoted agricultural modernization and collectively owned local enterprises and small factories that spread rural industrialization. The commune transmitted Mao’s collectivist ideology and enforced collective isolation so it could overwork and underpay its households. Eisenman argues that the commune was eliminated not because it was unproductive, but because it was politically undesirable: it was the post-Mao leadership led by Deng Xiaoping—not rural residents—who chose to abandon the commune in order to consolidate their control over China. Based on detailed and systematic national, provincial, and county-level data, as well as interviews with agricultural experts and former commune members, Red China’s Green Revolution is a comprehensive historical and social scientific analysis that fundamentally challenges our understanding of recent Chinese economic history.

=================

Editorial Reviews

Review


This is a truly important book. Eisenman shows how the People’s Communes created contemporary China, both through what they built and through what they destroyed. His work is of enormous significance for anyone trying to understand China’s road from revolution to reform. (Odd Arne Westad, S. T. Lee Professor of U.S.-Asia Relations, Harvard University)

Red China’s Green Revolution is a great book. It develops an innovative and contrarian interpretation of China’s rural communes, describing a technological revolution that occurred in China’s countryside in the 1970s. What makes this book truly outstanding is that Eisenman provides new perspectives on the importance of commune organization and incentive structures, as well as a reassessment of what Maoism meant in the lives of ordinary rural people. One after another, he drags into the sunshine topics that have been overshadowed in recent years by over-simplification and myth-making. The book concludes with a compelling new narrative of elite politics in the late 1970s that explains why the commune was ultimately abolished. (Barry Naughton, Sokwanlok Chair of Chinese International Affairs, University of California, San Diego)

Red China’s Green Revolution revolutionizes our understanding of the Maoist period and history's biggest experiment with collective agriculture. It challenges the widely held view that the commune was a failure that required privatization, and thus calls into question the very basis by which structural reforms have been legitimated and propagated to shape economic development, not just in China, but around the globe. Everyone who studies contemporary China―and, indeed, the entire neo-liberal project―must confront this book. (Marc Blecher, James Monroe Professor of Politics and East Asian Studies, Oberlin College)

Red China’s Green Revolution totally remakes our understanding of Chinese economic development on the eve of Deng Xiaoping’s reforms. This carefully documented study shows that rather than being a total failure on the verge of collapse, the commune system introduced under Mao actually resulted in considerable increases in agricultural productivity, which provided a positive foundation for Deng’s economic reforms. Joshua Eisenman opens the way for an important reconsideration of how political motivations, rather than economic concerns, were a main driver behind Deng’s reforms. (Edward A. McCord, George Washington University)

Joshua Eisenman questions the conventional wisdom that China’s communes, which were failing institutions in the Great Leap Forward of 1958, continued to be so. Eisenman offers hard data to refute the conventional, quasi-official story that before 1978 China’s rural economy was in dire straits, requiring neoliberal efficiencies to fix it. (Lynn T. White, Princeton University)

In this thought-provoking volume, Eisenman offers a unique analysis of China's most important local institution in Mao's time: the people's commune. (Choice)

Mr. Eisenman calls for readers to look anew at one of the darker periods of human history. It's a worthy intellectual exercise and a useful check on lazy approaches to China's modern history. (Wall Street Journal)

Joshua Eisenman brings a refreshing perspective to the field because his book challenges the mainstream evaluation – both inside and outside China – of the era of Mao Zedong. (Mobo Gao China Information)

The book is well researched, drawing on careful readings of government documents, newspapers and other materials from the period. (Li Zhang Journal of Asian Studies)
Read more


About the Author


Joshua Eisenman is associate professor at the University of Notre Dame's Keough School of Global Affairs and senior fellow for China studies at the American Foreign Policy Council. He is coauthor of China and Africa: A Century of Engagement (2012) and coeditor of China Steps Out: Beijing’s Major Power Engagement with the Developing World (2018).


Product details

Paperback: 472 pages
Publisher: Columbia University Press (April 24, 2018)
Language: English

Amazon.com - Rural Development in China: 1950s-90s



Amazon.com - Rural Development in China: 1950s-90s




Rural Development in China: 1950s-90s 0






$35.00$35.





$32.00$32.





$46.00$46.




$25.00$25.





$69.00$69.





$235.00$235.





$62.00$62.





$48.00$48.





$36.00$36.





$32.00$32.





$32.00$32.





$125.00$125.





$60.00$60.





$30.00$30.





$31.00$31.





$65.00$65.











$20.00$20.




$31.00$31.





$119.00$119.










$20.00$20.







Heart this idea list to save it
0
Inspire others and create your own
+ CREATE AN IDEA LIST
More Idea Lists by Brian

Marilyn Strathern - Wikipedia

Marilyn Strathern - Wikipedia

Marilyn Strathern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search


Marilyn Strathern

Born
Ann Marilyn Evans

6 March 1941 (age 78)
Wales, United Kingdom
ResidenceUnited Kingdom
CitizenshipBritish
Alma materGirton College
Scientific career
FieldsSocial anthropology
InstitutionsGirton College
Trinity College
University of California, Berkeley
Manchester University
ThesisWomen's status in the Mount Hagen area: a study of marital relations and court disputes among the Melpa-speaking people, New Guinea (1969)
Doctoral advisorPaula Brown Glick
Esther N. Goody
Dame Ann Marilyn StrathernDBE (née Evans; born 6 March 1941)[1] is a British anthropologist, who has worked largely with the Mount Hagen people of Papua New Guinea and dealt with issues in the UK of reproductive technologies.[2] She was William Wyse Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Cambridge from 1993 to 2008, and Mistress of Girton College, Cambridge from 1998 to 2009.

Early life[edit]

Marilyn Strathern was born to Eric Evans and Joyce Evans in North Wales on 6 March 1941.[2][3] Her first formal education experience was at Crofton Lane Primary School, followed by her attendance at Bromley High School. Strathern excelled academically, in part thanks to support and guidance from her mother, a teacher by trade.[2] Following school, she enrolled in Girton College to study Archaeology and Anthropology. She then became a research student there[4] and went on to obtain her PhD in 1968.[3] She married fellow anthropologist Andrew Strathern in 1964 and they had three children together before ending their marriage.[5]

Career[edit]

Strathern has held numerous positions over her career, all of which involved her work with the people of Papua New Guinea and her expertise in feminist anthropology. Her career began in 1970, when she was a Researcher for the New Guinea Research Unit of the Australian National University, followed by a stint from 1976 to 1983 where she was a lecturer at Girton College and then Trinity College from 1984-1985, occasionally making guest lectures at the University of California, Berkeley in the United States,[3] Europe and Australia.[6]
She left Cambridge to become Professor of Social Anthropology at Manchester University in 1985. She then returned to Cambridge for the final time in 1993 to take the position of William Wyse Professor of Social Anthropology until her retirement in 2008. During this time, she also held the position of Mistress of Girton College from 1998 to October 2009.[7][8] Strathern was also co-opted member of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics while also chairing the Working Party on "Human bodies: donation for medicine and research" from 2000 to 2006 and 2010 until 2011.[9]

Fieldwork in Papua New Guinea[edit]

From her doctoral thesis published in 1972 titled "Women in Between"[8] to her more recent publications, Strathern is constantly challenging the definitions and social constructs of gender "norms". In her piece "Self-Interest and the Social Good: Some Implications of Hagen Gender Imagery" (1981), Strathern notes that "[g]ender imagery is… a symbolic mechanism whereby "collective" and "personal" interests are made to seem to be of different orders".[10] As editor of a collection of articles in "Dealing with Inequality: Analysing gender relations in Melanesia and beyond", she also brings to the surface the issue of gender "equality" and what it really means, asking if the definitions of the Western world are in fact correct, or if there is still a sense of patriarchal dominance.[11]
Taking this approach when studying in such fields as societies in Papua New Guinea has allowed Strathern to push the boundaries of thought on such topics as reproductive technology, intellectual property, and gender in both Melanesia and the United Kingdom.[12]
Strathern has spent much time among the Hagen of Papua New Guinea.[10] From here she has developed one of the main themes occurring across her work, that the world is ontologically multiple.[10][11][13][14][clarification needed] The world is made up of identifiable parts; however, these parts are not separate from one another. She does not address society specifically, but rather looks at socially-constructed multiple realities which exist interdependently with one another.[14]

Reproductive Technologies[edit]

Strathern's work in the 1990s became the basis for a new subdiscipline in anthropology concerned with new reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization. In her two 1992 publications, After Nature: English Kinship in the Late 20th Century and Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies, Strathern argued that existing models of nature and culture were transformed by the explicit use of technology to achieve reproduction. In the co-authored study Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception she and her colleagues proposed that new definitions of kinship and descent would emerge as a result of the expansion of new reproductive technologies. These studies paved the way for what has since come to be known as the new kinship studies.[15][16]

Selected publications[edit]

Strathern is the author of numerous publications, including 44 single-authored journal articles, 57 book chapters, and over 15 books written alone or with another author.[8] Her topics vary from Melanesian culture to the culture of the United Kingdom. Strathern’s publications on the Melanesian culture focus on gender relations, legal anthropology and feminist scholarship, while her publications on the culture of the United Kingdom lean towards kinship, audit culture, reproductive and genetic technologies.[7] The book she enjoyed writing the most, according to an interview with the American Anthropological Association in 2011, was Partial Connections, written in 1991.[6] Her most famous book, however, is The Gender of Gift published in 1988.[3]
In The Gender of Gift, she uses a feminist approach in a new way to argue that Papuan women are not being exploited, but rather the definition is different.[clarification needed] Gender, she notes, is defined differently there than it is in the United Kingdom.[17] Strathern also brings to the surface the fact that theories are dominating themselves and while she knows as an anthropologist, she cannot separate herself from them, she does state that she offers a "narrative" over an analysis of the situation.[17]

Other publications[edit]

  • Self-Decoration in Mount Hagen (1971)
  • Women in Between (1972)
  • No Money on Our Skins: Hagen Migrants in Port Moresby (1975) ISBN 0-85818-027-8
  • (ed. with C. MacCormack) Nature, Culture and Gender (1980) ISBN 978-0-521-28001-3
  • Kinship at the Core: an Anthropology of Elmdon, Essex (1981) ISBN 0-521-23360-7
  • The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia (1988) ISBN 0-520-07202-2
  • Partial connections. Savage, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield (1991). Re-issued by AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA. (2004)
  • After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century (1992) ISBN 978-0-521-42680-0
  • Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies (1992) ISBN 978-0-719-03674-3
  • (with Jeanette Edwards, Sarah Franklin, Eric Hirsch and Frances Price) Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception (1993) ISBN 9780415170567
  • Property, substance and effect. Anthropological essays on persons and things. London: Athlone Press (1999) Collected essays, 1992-98 ISBN 0-485-12149-2
  • Commons and borderlands: working papers on interdisciplinarity, accountability and the flow of knowledge (2004) ISBN 0-9545572-2-0
  • (ed. with Eric Hirsch) Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia (2004), Oxford: Berghahn.
  • (ed) Audit Cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. (2000) London: Routledge.
  • Kinship, law and the unexpected: Relatives are always a surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2005) ISBN 0-521-61509-7

Honours[edit]

In 1987, she was elected Fellow of the British Academy (FBA).[18]
  • Foreign Honorary Member, American Academy of Arts & Sciences (1996)[7]
  • Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire for services to Social Anthropology (2001)[7]
  • Rivers Memorial Medal, Royal Anthropologist Inst. (1976)[7]
  • Viking Fund Medal, Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research (2003) (last awarded in 1972.[6])
  • Huxley Medal (2004)[7]
  • 30th Anniversary Independence Medal, Papua New Guinea (2005)[7]
In 2000, artist Daphne Todd was commissioned by Girton College, Cambridge, to paint a portrait of Mistress Marilyn Strathern. This painting, which depicted Marilyn with two heads on separate panels, went on to win Todd the Royal Society of Portrait Painters’ Ondaatje for Portraiture in 2001.[3][19]

Honorary degrees[edit]

  • Honorary Degree Sc. Edinburgh (1993)[7]
  • Honorary Degree Sc. Copenhagen (1994)[7]
  • Honorary Degree Lit, Oxford (2004)[7]
  • Honorary Degree Pol., Helsinki (2006)[7]
  • Honorary Degree, Panteion University, Athens (2006)[7]
  • Honorary Degree Sc., Durham (2007)[7]
  • Honorary Degree Philosophy, University Papua New Guinea (2009)[7]
  • Honorary Degree Social Sciences, Belfast (2009)[7]
  • Honorary Doctorate, Australian National University (2015)[20]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Birthdays", The Guardian, p. 35, 2014
  2. Jump up to:a b c Video Recording of Marilyn Strathern by Alan Macfarlane, 6 May 2009.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e University of Cambridge Archived 15 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Marilyn Strathern.
  4. ^ http://www.girton.cam.ac.uk/fellows-and-staff/mistress/past-mistresses/ Girton College
  5. ^ Template:Verified by subject of article
  6. Jump up to:a b c American Anthropological Association, 2011. Inside the Presidents Studio - Marilyn Strathern.
  7. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Girton College, 2010 Past Mistresses: Marilyn Strathern
  8. Jump up to:a b c Association for Social Anthropology in Oceania Archived 18 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine by Mark Maosko and Margaret Jolly, April.
  9. ^ Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2012. "Past Council Members." London, England.
  10. Jump up to:a b c Marilyn Strathern. 1981 "Self-Interest and the Social Good: Some Implications of Hagen Gender Imagery." Pp. 370-391 in Readings for a History of Anthropological Theory,edited by Paul A. Erickson and Liam Murphy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  11. Jump up to:a b Marilyn Strathern. 1987 "Dealing with inequality: analyzing gender relations in Melanesia and beyond." Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference Mosko Template:Verified by subject of article, Mark and Margret Jolly. 2004 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Mikala Hansbol, "Marilyn Strathern, ontological multiplicity and partial connections." Mikalas Klumme: A Researchers Blog.
  14. Jump up to:a b Marilyn Strathern 2005. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: relatives are always a surprise. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  15. ^ Carsten, Janet (2004). After Kinship. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521661986.
  16. ^ Franklin, Sarah; McKinnon, Susan (2001). Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822327967.
  17. Jump up to:a b Mary Douglas 1989, "A Gentle Deconstruction." The London Review of Books.London: London Review of Books 11(9): 17-18.
  18. ^ "STRATHERN, Dame Marilyn"British Academy Fellows. British Academy. Archived from the original on 22 June 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  19. ^ Times Higher Education, 2001 "Capturing a two-headed creature." England:London.
  20. ^ "ANU honours influential anthropologist". Retrieved 17 July 2015.
13. Strathern, M. (1992, 17 May). The decomposition of an event. Retrieved from http://culanth.org/supplementals/403-the-decomposition-of-an-event

External links[edit]