2018/09/01

What Is to Be Done? (novel) - Wikipedia



What Is to Be Done? (novel) - Wikipedia



What Is to Be Done? (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search
For other uses, see What Is To Be Done? (disambiguation).
What Is To Be Done?
1905 title page
Author Nikolai Chernyshevsky
Original title Что дѣлать?
Country Russian Empire
Language Russian
Genre Novel

Publication date 1863

Published in English 1886
Media type Print (Hardback & Paperback)


What Is To Be Done?(Russian: Что делать?, tr. Chto délat'?; also translated as What Shall We Do? and literally translated as "What To Do?") is an 1863 novel written by the Russian philosopher, journalist and literary critic Nikolai Chernyshevsky. It was written in response to Fathers and Sons(1862) by Ivan Turgenev. The chief character is a woman, Vera Pavlovna, who escapes the control of her family and an arranged marriage to seek economic independence. The novel advocates the creation of small socialist cooperatives based on the Russian peasant commune, but oriented toward industrial production.

The author promoted the idea that the intellectual's duty was to educate and lead the laboring masses in Russia along a path to socialism that bypassed capitalism. One of the characters in the novel, Rakhmetov(Рахметов), became an emblem of the philosophical materialism and nobility of Russian radicalism despite his minor role. The novel also expresses, in one character's dream, a society gaining "eternal joy" of an earthly kind. 

The novel has been called "a handbook of radicalism"[1]and led to the founding of the Land and Liberty society.[2]

When he wrote the novel, the author was himself imprisoned in the Peter and Paul fortress of St. Petersburg, and he was to spend years in Siberia. Chernyshevsky asked for and received permission to write the novel in prison, and the authorities passed the manuscript along to his former employer, the newspaper Sovremennik, which also approved it for publication in installments in its pages. Lenin, Plekhanov, Peter Kropotkin, Alexandra Kollontay, Rosa Luxemburg, and also the Swedish writer August Strindberg[3] were all highly impressed with the book, and it came to be officially regarded as a Russian classic in the Sovietperiod.[4][5]


Contents
1Plot introduction
2Reactions
3Interesting facts
4References in other work
5Footnotes
6References
7External links


Plot introduction[edit]

Within the framework of a story of a privileged couple who decide to work for the revolution, and ruthlessly subordinate everything in their lives to the cause, the work furnished a blueprint for the asceticism and dedication unto death which became an ideal of the early socialist underground of the Russian Empire.


Reactions[edit]

The book is perhaps better known in the English-speaking world for the responses it created than as a novel in its own right.

  Fyodor Dostoevskymocked the utilitarianism and utopianism of the novel in his 1864 novella Notes from Underground, as well as in his 1872 novel Devils

Leo Tolstoy wrote a different What Is To Be Done?, published in 1886, based on his own ideas of moral responsibility.[6] 

Vladimir Lenin, however, found it inspiring and named a 1902 pamphlet "What Is To Be Done?". Lenin is said to have read the book five times in one summer, and according to Professor Emeritus of Slavic and Comparative Literature at Stanford, Joseph Frank, 'Chernyshevsky's novel, far more than Marx's Capital, supplied the emotional dynamic that eventually went to make the Russian Revolution.'[7]


Interesting facts[edit]

The novel mentions (in the 4th dream of Vera Pavlovna) aluminium as the "metal of the future". In fact aluminium became widely used only starting with World War I (1914).

The "Dame in mourning" appearing at the end of the novel is Olga S. Chernyshevskaya, the author's wife.


References in other work[edit]

Characters with the last name "Kirsanov" also appear in Ivan Turgenev's Fathers and Sons.

Dostoyevsky argues with Chernyshevsky's ideas in Notes from Underground. In particular, he responds negatively to Chernyshevsky's idealization of The Crystal Palace, a theme which is referenced throughout Russian literature.

American playwright Tony Kushner referenced the book multiple times in his play Slavs!.

The main character of Gide's Les caves du Vatican (En. Lafcadio's Adventures), Lafcadio, resembles Rakhmetov.

In the book Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical, author Chris Matthew Sciabarra claims that What Is to Be Done? is one of the sources of inspiration for Rand's thought.[8] For example, the book's main character Lopuhov says "I am not a man to make sacrifices. And indeed there are no such things. One acts in the way that one finds most pleasant."

Vladimir Nabokov's final novel in Russian, The Gift, ridicules What is to Be Done? in its fourth chapter.

Nikolay Chernyshevsky - Wikipedia



Nikolay Chernyshevsky - Wikipedia
Nikolay Chernyshevsky
Никола́й Черныше́вский

Born July 12, 1828
Saratov, Imperial Russia
Died October 17, 1889 (aged 61)
Saratov, Imperial Russia


Nikolay Gavrilovich Chernyshevsky[a] (12 July 1828 – 17 October 1889) was a Russian revolutionary democrat, materialist philosopher, critic, and socialist (seen by some as a utopian socialist). He was the leader of the revolutionary democratic movement of the 1860s, and had an influence on Vladimir Lenin, Emma Goldman, and Serbian political writer and socialist Svetozar Marković.


Contents
1Biography
2Ideas and influence
3Works about Chernyshevsky
4Works
5References
6External links
Biography[edit]

The son of a priest, Chernyshevsky was born in Saratov in 1828, and stayed there till 1846. He graduated at the local seminary where he learned English, French, German, Italian, Latin, Greek and Old Slavonic. It was there he gained a love of literature.[1] At St Petersburg university he often struggled to warm his room. He kept a diary of trivia like the number of tears he shed over a dead friend. It was here that he became an atheist.[2]

He was inspired by the works of Ludwig Feuerbach and Charles Fourier. After graduating from Saint Petersburg University in 1850, he taught literature at a gymnasium in Saratov. From 1853 to 1862, he lived in Saint Petersburg, and became the chief editor of Sovremennik (“The Contemporary”), in which he published his main literary reviews and his essays on philosophy.

In 1862, he was arrested and confined in the Fortress of St. Peter and Paul, where he wrote his famous novel What Is to Be Done? The novel was an inspiration to many later Russian revolutionaries, who sought to emulate the novel's hero Rakhmetov, who was wholly dedicated to the revolution, ascetic in his habits and ruthlessly disciplined, to the point of sleeping on a bed of nails and eating only raw steak in order to build strength for the Revolution. Among those who have referenced the novel include Lenin, who wrote a work of political theory of the same name.

In 1862, Chernyshevsky was sentenced to civil execution (mock execution), followed by penal servitude (1864–72), and by exile to Vilyuisk, Siberia (1872–83). He died at the age of 61.
Ideas and influence[edit]

Chernyshevsky was a founder of Narodism, Russian populism, and agitated for the revolutionary overthrow of the autocracy and the creation of a socialist society based on the old peasant commune.

Chernyshevsky’s ideas were heavily influenced by Alexander Herzen, Vissarion Belinsky, and Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach. He saw class struggle as the means of society’s forward movement and advocated for the interests of the working people. In his view, the masses were the chief maker of history. He is reputed to have used the phrase “the worse the better”, to indicate that the worse the social conditions became for the poor, the more inclined they would be to launch a revolution.

There are those arguing, in the words of Professor Joseph Frank, that “Chernyshevsky’s novel What Is to Be Done?, far more than Marx’s Das Kapital, supplied the emotional dynamic that eventually went to make the Russian Revolution”.[3]

Fyodor Dostoyevsky was enraged by what he saw as the simplicity of the political and psychological ideas expressed in the book,[4] and wrote Notes from Underground largely as a reaction against it.
-------------------
Works about Chernyshevsky[edit]

Vladimir Nabokov’s The Gift has the protagonist, Fyodor Godunov-Cherdyntsev, study Chernyshevsky and write the critical biography The Life of Chernychevski which represents Chapter Four of the novel. The publication of this work caused a literary scandal.[5]
Paperno, Irina, Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism: A Study in the Semiotics of Behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.
Pereira, N.G.O., The Thought and Teachings of N.G. Černyševskij. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
----------------
Works[edit]

Aesthetic Relations of Art to Reality [1] From:Russian Philosophy Volume II: The Nihilists, The Populists, Critics of Religion and Culture, Quadrangle Books 1965;
Essays on the Gogol Period in Russian Literature
Critique of Philosophical Prejudices Against Communal Ownership
The Anthropological Principle in Philosophy
What Is to Be Done? (1863)
Prologue
The Nature of Human Knowledge

알라딘: 무엇을 할 것인가 (상) - 열린책들 세계문학 088



알라딘: 무엇을 할 것인가 (상) - 열린책들 세계문학 088







프롤로그

제1장 베라 빠블로브나의 소녀 시절
제2장 첫 번째 사랑과 결혼
제3장 결혼과 두 번째 사랑



제3장 결혼과 두 번째 사랑(계속)
제4장 두 번째 결혼
제5장 새로운 인민의 출현과 대단원
제6장 장면의 전환

진보와 인간성에 대한 확고한 신념
니꼴라이 체르니셰프스끼 연보







지은이 : 니꼴라이 체르니셰프스키 (Николай Гаврилович Чернышевский)
저자파일
최고의 작품 투표
신간알리미 신청
최근작 : <무엇을 할 것인가 (천줄읽기, 큰글씨책)>,<무엇을 할 것인가>,<무엇을 할 것인가 - 하> … 총 11종 (모두보기)
소개 :
19세기 러시아 사상계를 대표하는 급진적인 정치적 사상가이며, 문학 비평가이자 과격한 혁명가이고 소설가에 영향력 있는 저널리스트다.

체르니솁스키는 1828년 7월 28일 볼가 강 근처의 중부 도시 사라토프의 한 성직자 가정에서 태어났다. 대학시절 그 유명한 페트라솁스키 서클에서 활동하면서 러시아, 프랑스, 독일에서 출판된 많은 사회학 서적을 섭렵했으며 1853년 당대의 급진적 문학잡지인 ≪동시대인≫에 기고하며 문학적 활동을 시작한다. 그는 이 잡지를 통해 1860년대의 급진주의적인 젊은 세대들에게 과격한 진보주의적 사상과 미래...




옮긴이 : 서정록
저자파일
최고의 작품 투표
신간알리미 신청
최근작 : <인라케시 알라킨>,<우리가 이 세상에 온 이유>,<마음을 잡는 자, 세상을 잡는다> … 총 25종 (모두보기)
소개 :
경기도 평택에서 태어나 서울대학교 철학과와 동 대학원을 졸업했다. 한살림모임 창립멤버이다. 문화사를 중심으로 고대 동북아시아 역사에 관한 책을 쓰고 있으며, 2000년 이후에는 아메리카 인디언들과 제3세계 원주민들의 문화와 영성에 대해 공부해오고 있다.

그에게는 두 번의 큰 열림이 있었다고 한다. 첫 번째는 무위당 장일순 선생님을 만난 것이다. 무위당 선생님을 만나고 나서 세상에 대한 모든 번뇌와 갈등이 얼음 녹듯이 사라졌으며, 스승의 존재가 얼마나 중요한 것인지 깨달았다고 한다. 두 번째는 아메리카 인디언들에 대해 공부하면서...





레닌을 감동시키고 뜨로츠키를 움직인, 사회주의 리얼리즘 문학의 원형

러시아의 정치사회 소설의 대표 작가 니꼴라이 체르니셰프스끼의 대표작이다. 저자가 수용소에 투옥되어 있는 동안 집필한 이 소설은 사회주의 이념을 최초로 구현한 소설일뿐만 아니라 레닌, 스딸린, 뜨로츠끼 등의 읽고 큰 영향을 받은 책으로 유명하다. 레닌은 자신의 책 제목을 이 책의 제목에서 따와 그대로 사용하기도 했다.
이 책은 러시아의 혁명적인 인텔리겐찌야에게 영감을 불어넣어 주는 모델을 제시함으로써 사회를 변화시키려는 인텔리겐찌야의 자기 희생적인 모습을 보여 주고 있다. 또한 비합리적인 아버지 세대에게 '누구의 죄인가'라는 무력한 비판의식이, 아들 세대에 와서는 '무엇을 할 것인가'라는 구체적 행동으로 전화되는 것을 보여준다. 이 작품에서 보여 주는 진보와 인간성에 대한 확고한 신념은, 당대 지식인들뿐 아니라 수많은 청년들을 움직이게 했다. 러시아 지식인들을 움직이게 했던 체르이셰프스끼의 진정한 힘을 이 책을 통해 발견할 수 있을 것이다.

------------------------------

제정 러시아 당시 여자의 삶은 단순했다. 탄생, 결혼, 죽음.. 여기서 자유와 행복을 외치고 밖으로 나선 여성을 그린다는 것은 혁신임에 틀림 없다. 읽어 볼 만한 책이지만 번역이 영 신통치 않다 마치 기계가 번역한 것 같음.
ock9014 ㅣ 2015-10-23 l 공감(0) ㅣ 댓글(0)



상당히 괜찮네요. 처음에 제목이 좋아서 사게 되었는데 읽어보니까 참 좋아요.
sevenrosekim ㅣ 2011-04-14 l 공감(1) ㅣ 댓글(0)








총 : 3편




[서평] 19세기 혁명적 인텔리겐찌야의 자기 희생적인 모습 <무엇을 할 것인가?> 붉은구름 ㅣ 2015-10-31 ㅣ 공감(0) ㅣ 댓글 (0)
[서평] 니꼴라이 체르니셰프스끼(Chernyshevksy, Nikolai) 저, 서정록 역 <무엇을 할 것인가? (상,하)>를 읽고 / 2009. 02., 748쪽, 열린책들


<무엇을 할 것인가>는 러시아의 정치사회 소설의 대표 작가로 평가받는 니꼴라이 체르니셰프스끼(1828-1889)의 대표작이다. 소설 작품임에도 저자는 단락마다 독자와 대화하는 것처럼 주인공과 이야기 전개 흐름에 대해 독자들에게 말을 건다. 별로 접해보지 않은 색다른 방식이었다.


“나는 자유롭고 싶어요!”
소설은 ‘자유’를 향한 베라 빠블로브나의 당찬 외침과 함께 시작한다. 하지만 그녀의 외침은 그녀가 처한 현실 앞에서 무기력하다.
성년이 되었으나 가난하고 비천한 대저택 관리인의 딸, 19세기 중반 러시아에서 그런 여성에게 허락된 삶이란 자신을 구원해 줄 남자를 기다리거나 하급 노동자가 되는 것뿐이다. 이미 정해진 삶만이 강요되는 곳, 누구도 다른 삶의 가능성을 말하지 않는 곳, 베라는 이런 자신의 현실을 ‘지하실’이라고 말한다.


그런데 이 ‘지하실’에 ‘사랑’이 넘치기 시작한다. 그렇지만 바로 이 ‘사랑’이 곧 그녀를 구속하는 지하실의 정체다. 흔히 사랑한다면 상대방을 위해 기꺼이 자신을 희생하고, 서로가 서로에게 의존해야 한다고 생각한다. 하지만 이것은 사랑이 아니라 상대에 대한 집착과 소유욕에 불과하다.
베라의 어머니가 ‘사랑’을 내세워 자신이 원하는 삶을 딸에게 강요하고, 부잣집 아들 이반이 오로지 헌신적으로 남편을 보필해줄 여성을 배우자로 찾는 것처럼 말이다. 이런 모순투성이의 관계와 억압상태가 지속되는 한 베라에게 자유란 불가능하다. 그래서 베라는 이 ‘지하실’로부터 탈출하기 위해 전혀 다른 방식의 사랑의 모험을 감행한다.


베라와 사랑에 빠지게 될 두 남자 로뿌호프와 끼르사노프. 그들은 언제나 자신의 이익에 따라 행동하는 '이기적 유물론자'들이다. 물론 여기서 ‘이익’과 ‘유물'은 화폐적 척도로 계산되는 무엇이 아니라 존재를 충만하게 하고 삶을 고양시키는 선택을 말한다. 이를 위해 그들은 원하는 것들의 ‘무게를 하나씩 달아’보고 ‘그중에서 가장 유리한 것을 선택’한다.
사랑도 마찬가지다. 동정, 연민, 희생으로 점철된 관계는 서로를 구속하고 괴롭게 한다. 그러니 오로지 저 자신을 위하여 사랑하고, 일하고, 관계하는 이 이기적 계산법에 따라 베라는 집을 나오고 새로운 시대를 앞당기고자 노력하는 신청년, 로뿌호프와 결혼을 한다.


베라와 로뿌호프의 사랑은 그 자체가 ‘지하실’로부터 탈출하는 일이며, 동시에 새로운 삶을 개척하는 일이기도 하다. 두 사람의 부부 관계는 아주 파격적이다. 그들은 서로에 대한 존경과 신뢰를 유지하기 위하여 각방을 썼고, 각방에서도 서로의 자유와 독립을 존중했다. 그러나 그들은 ‘중립의 방’이라는 공간을 만들어 외부와 소통하는 것을 멈추지는 않았다.
또한 베라는 자신의 꿈을 살려 가난한 여자들과 함께 운영하는 ‘봉제공장’을 만든다. 구성원 모두가 공장의 주인이기에 그들은 각자의 관심과 능력에 따라 소비조합, 공동주택, 배움터 등의 새로운 관계와 생활들을 조직해 간다. 공장은 이제 단순히 생계를 위한 노동의 현장이 아니다. 그곳은 새로운 관계와 실험 속에서 가난한 여성들이 삶을 바꾸고 존재를 충만하게 하는 자유와 해방의 공간이 되어 있었다.
베라와 로뿌호프는 단지 스스로의 자유와 행복을 위해 노력했다. 그런데 그 일련의 행보들이 구체제를 타도하기 위해 바꾸고 외쳤던 바로 그 혁명의 실천이 된 것이다.


<무엇을 할 것인가>의 혁명성은 여기서 그치지 않는다. 작가는 이제 사회를 바꾸고, 일상을 바꾸는 것을 넘어 존재의 근본적인 고양을 시도한다. 그런데 놀랍게도 그것은 베라와 로뿌호프의 결별 과정 속에서 이루어진다. 그리고 언제나 그러하듯이 이들의 사랑 또한 머무르지 않는다.


19세기 중반 저자가 짜르 치하의 수용소에 투옥되어 있는 동안 집필한 이 소설은 '사회주의 이념을 최초로 구현한 소설’로 인정받을 뿐만 아니라 레닌, 스딸린, 뜨로츠끼 등 20세기 초반 소련의 혁명가들이 읽고 큰 영향을 받은 책으로도 유명하다. 레닌은 자신의 책 제목을 이 책의 제목에서 따와 그대로 사용하기도 했다고 알려져 있다.
살벌한 짜르 체제에 의해 옥중에서 감시와 검열이라는 처지에서 저술 활동을 할 수밖에 없었기 때문에 체르니셰프스끼는 자신이 당시의 청년들에게 제시하고자 하는 것을 소설 작품을 통해 우회적으로 전달한 것이다. 이 책은 1860~70년대 러시아의 ‘인민주의 운동’에 결정적인 영향을 미친 것으로 알려졌다.


체르니셰프스끼는 베라와 로뿌호프, 끼르사노프와 라흐메또프(그는 이상적인 인물로 그려지는 데, 자기의 생활을 포기하고 사회로부터 소외되면서도 민족과 사회를 위해 사히적 책임을 다하려는 비판적 지식인이다) 등 러시아의 혁명적인 인텔리겐찌야에게 영감을 불어넣어 주는 모델-새로운 도덕적 정열을 지닌 합리적이고 유물적인 인물들-을 제시함으로써 사회를 변화시키려는 인텔리겐찌야의 자기 희생적인 모습을 보여 주고 있다. 자신의 삶을 변화시키는 것이 다른 이들의 삶을 함께 변화시키는 바람직하고 긍정적인 모델인 것이다. 또한 비합리적인 아버지 세대에게 '누구의 죄인가'라는 무력한 비판의식이, 아들 세대에 와서는 '무엇을 할 것인가'라는 구체적 행동으로 전화되는 것을 보여준다.
이 작품에서 보여 주는 진보와 인간성에 대한 확고한 신념 그리고 '새로운 인민의 출현'에 대한 확신은, 당대 지식인들뿐 아니라 수많은 청년들을 움직이게 했다. 러시아 지식인들을 움직이게 했던 체르이셰프스끼의 진정한 힘을 이 책을 통해 발견할 수 있을 것이다.


체르니셰프스끼는 1828년 7월 28일 볼가 강 근처의 중부 도시의 한 성직자 가정에서 태어났다. 대학시절 '페트라셰프스키 서클'에서 활동하면서 러시아, 프랑스, 독일에서 출판된 많은 사회학 서적을 섭렵했으며 1853년 당대의 급진적 문학잡지인 <동시대인>에 기고하며 문학적 활동을 시작한다. 그는 이 잡지를 통해 1860년대의 급진주의적인 젊은 세대들에게 진보주의적 사상과 미래에 다가올 이상적 사회와 인간상, 그 미래를 준비하기 위한 현재의 삶의 목표와 실천해야 할 점 등을 설파했다.
1862년 혁명적 사상을 고취하던 잡지 <동시대인>은 출판 정지를 당하고, 진보적 사상 전파의 선봉에 서 있던 체르니셰프스끼는 체포되어 페트로파블롭스크 형무소에 투옥된다. 1863년 이 감옥 생활 중 그의 대표적인 사회·정치소설 <무엇을 할 것인가?>를 <동시대인>에 연재하게 된 것이다.


체르니셰프스끼는 애초부터 예술적 형상화라든가 <예술을 위한 예술> 같은 것에는 애시당초 관심이 없었다. 그는 삶(生)을 능가하는 예술은 결코 존재하지 않는다고 단언했다. 예술의 기능은 인간의 삶에 내포되어 있는 진실과 아름다움을 이해하고 즐기는 데 도움을 주는 '생의 교과서의 역할이라는 것이다.
그에게 중요한 것은 그의 인간관을 실천함으로써 사회를 개선시키는 것이었고, 그 실천의 일환이 바로 새로운 인간상을 제시하기 위한 소설쓰기였다. 따라서 이 책은 단순히 소설로만 읽을 책은 아닌 것이다. 문학적으로는 분명히 빈약하기 짝이 없다고 평가받기도 하는 이 소설이 높은 명성을 누려 온 것도 쟁쟁한 혁명가들의 칭송 때문이기도 하지만, 이 책은 출간 당시인 1860년대부터 기존의 문화를 전면적으로 거부코자 햇던 젊은 지식인들과 대학생들 사이에서 광범위한 환영을 받았다. 이는 이 책이 당시 러시아 사회의 지적이고 감성적이고 도한 사회적인 요구에 부응했음을 증명하는 것이다.


19세기 중반 러시아의 사회와 문화, 그리고 인민들의 삶이나 생활이 어떠했는지에 대해 제대로 알지 못하는 필자는 작품의 주인공 베라와 로뿌호프의 말과 행동이 당시 청년들이나 지식인들에게 어느 정도의 파급력을 미쳤는지 느끼기 어렵다. 다만 19세기 중반 러시아의 상황에 대한 여러 자료들은 '유럽의 산업화가 가져온 프롤레타리아트의 비참한 모습과 귀족과 소시민들의 이기적이고 부패한 사회’라고 지적하는 것을 보면, 이 작품이 큰 파장을 일으켰음을 짐작할 수 있다.
19세기 중반 러시아에 만연한 비참함과 무기력함, 그리고 부정부패와 이기주의는 21세기 한국 사회도 많은 부분 닮았음을 부정하기 어렵다. 이러한 상황은 한국의 지배층과 기득권 세력에게 1차적인 책임이 있는 것이지만, 진보와 개혁을 주창해왔던 많은 인사들과 지식인들이 베라와 로뿌호프 정도의 헌신과 열정, 그리고 사랑을 보여주지 못했다는 점에서 두 번째로 책임을 느껴야 할 것이다.
그런 면에서 <무엇을 할 것인가>라는 작품 하나만으로도 체르니셰프스끼는 기나긴 복역과 유배 끝에 1889년 61세의 나이로 세상을 떠났으나 지금까지도 전세계 청년들과 진보주의자들에게 숭배와 영감의 대상으로 남을 것이다.



[ 2015년 9월 22일 ]

---------------

무엇을 할것인가. 체르니셰프스키 태양석주 ㅣ 2013-12-11 ㅣ 공감(0) ㅣ 댓글 (0)자금 읽어도 너무나 신선하고 충격적인 내용이다.나를 깨우는 소설.

무엇을 할 것인가? ... 사랑 쥬베이 ㅣ 2013-09-14 ㅣ 공감(5) ㅣ 댓글 (0)


1.



니꼴라이 체르니셰프스키의 <무엇을 할 것인가>는 한권짜리 신판 양장, 분권된 세계문학판을 모두 갖고 있다. 하지만 어디까지나 '갖고 있던 거'지 읽진 못했다. 제목이 왠지 인문서를 연상시켜서 '지루하지 않을까'란 걱정이 들었기 때문이다. 하지만, 역시 책은 읽어보지 않으면 모르는 거였다. <무엇을 할 것인가>는 굉장히 재미있는 소설이다. 남녀 간 사랑, 삼각관계, 우정과 갈등 등이 마치 주말연속극을 보는 듯 흥미롭게 이어진다. 이 때문에 1800년대 텍스트를 거부감 없이 읽을 수 있었다.



2.



프롤로그에 이어, 이야기는 '베라 빠블로브나'(베로치카)의 소녀시절부터 시작된다. 베로치까의 가족은 아버지(빠벨 콘스탄찌노비치 로잘스키), 어머니(마리아 알렉세예브나), 베로치카, 남동생 표도르 이렇게 4식구인데, 아버지는 관청 서기보이며 어머니는 전당포를 운영하고 금전대여를 한다. 어머니의 관심은 베로치카를 돈 많고, 힘있는 집안에 시집보내는 것이다. 그래서 부잣집 장교 '미하일 이바노비치 스토레쉬니코프'가 베로치카를 원하자, 어떻게든 그와 딸을 결혼시키려 안달을 한다.



하지만, 베로치카는 미하일 이바노비치의 청혼을 거절(p.77)한다. 그러자, 마리아 알렉세예브나는 이런 반응을 보인다. 딸의 머리를 주먹으로 쥐어박으며 "너 정신이 나갔구나, 이 바보 같으니? 감히 순종하지 않고, 어디 다시 한번 말해 봐!"(p.77) / "짐승 같은 년! 베르까!(베르까는 베로치카를 경멸하듯 부르는 명칭임) 그가 네 얼굴에 미쳐 너를 원하는 것만 아니라면 피가 나도록 흠씬 때려 줬을 거야! (중략) 이 지긋지긋한 바보 같은 년!"(p.78) 마리아 알렉세예브나가 어떤 성격인지, 딸을 어떻게 대하는지 더 이상의 설명은 필요 없을 거라 믿는다.



그러던 중, 남동생 표도르의 가정교사로 '로뿌호프'(드미트리 세르게이치)가 들어오고, 베로치카와 로뿌호프는 서로 묘한 감정을 느끼는데...과연 베로치카는 마리아 알렉세예브나의 압박에서 벗어나 사랑을 쟁취할 수 있을까?



3.



구성상 주목한 것은, 작가가 무성영화의 변사처럼 직접 개입한다는 점이다. 예를 들어, 로뿌호프의 독백장면 바로 뒤에서, "나는 독자들에게 미리 경고해 두고자 한다. 로뿌호프의 이 독백이 장차 로뿌호프와 베라 빠블로브나의 관계이 미칠 어떤 중요한 동기를 내포하고 있다고 미리 넘겨짚지 말라는 것이다."(p.206)라는 식으로 말이다. 특히, 프롤로그의 [서론을 대신하여](p.21)에서는 무려 5페이지 가까이 개입하는데 마치 [작가후기]를 땡겨 읽는 듯한 느낌이었다. 이런 점이 불만요소는 아니다. 크게 작품흐름을 끊지도 않았고, 작가와 호흡하고 있다는 생각이 들어 도리어 좋았다.



4.



<무엇을 할 것인가>는 사회주의 리얼리즘 문학의 걸작으로 손꼽히지만, 사실 저런 걸 몰라도 상관없다. 베로치카가 봉제조합을 설립하는 p.274이전까지는 그냥 남녀 간 사랑을 다룬 연애소설로 읽어도 된다. 집안의 반대를 무릅쓰고 사랑을 쟁취한다는 점에서, 마치 [로미오와 줄리엣]같은 느낌도 받았다. (물론, 봉제조합 설립이후, 조합운영이나 이익분배 장면은 사회주의 느낌이 강하게 풍긴다.)



"아니, 처음에 우정, 갈등, 삼각관계도 있다면서 왜 이야기 안하지?"라고 궁금해 하실 분도 계실지 모른다. 자세히 이야기하면 스포일러가 되니, 살짝만 던지고 가겠다. 로뿌호프의 베스트프렌드, '끼르사노프'란 인물이 있다. 어느 정도 절친인가 하면, 베로치카가 하루 종일 붙어다니는 둘을 (반쯤 장난식으로) 질투할 정도였다. 그런데, 끼르사노프는 로뿌호프, 베로치카 커플을 보고 점점 심한 마음의 갈등을 일으킨다. 왜? 아시죠? ^_^ 그런데, 또 그런 끼르사노프를 짝사랑하는 '나스쩬카'란 아가씨가 있으니, '아, 사랑은 어렵군.'



5.



생소한 작가, 1800년대 작품, 엄청난 분량, 분명 <무엇을 할 것인가>의 첫인상은 부담스러울 것이다. 하지만, 생소한 작가의 1800년대 작품이, 오늘날 우리에게 소개되는 이유는 분명히 있다. 사회주의 리얼리즘 소설의 걸작이니 뭐니 상관없다. <무엇을 할 것인가>는 그냥 읽어서 재미있고 즐거운 소설이다. 대충보고 절대 겁먹지 마시길.


[시 론] 4자 종전선언 오고 있나 - 미주 중앙일보





[시 론] 4자 종전선언 오고 있나 - 미주 중앙일보



곽태환 / 한반도미래전략연구원 이사장



[LA중앙일보] 발행 2018/08/18 미주판 9면 기사입력 2018/08/17 19:39



문재인 대통령은 73주년 광복절 경축사에서 역사적인 첫 북미정상회담 이후 교착상태에 빠진 북미 간 비핵화 후속 협상을 통해 비핵화조치에 양국이 합의할 것을 촉구했다. 문 대통령은 이날 "한반도 평화와 번영은 (북미) 양 정상이 세계와 나눈 약속"이라며 "북한의 완전한 비핵화 이행과 이에 상응하는 미국의 포괄적 조치가 신속하게 추진되길 바란다"고 말했다. 이어 "한반도 문제는 우리가 주인이라는 인식이 매우 중요하다"며 "남북 간에 더 깊은 신뢰관계를 구축하고 북미 간 비핵화 대화를 촉진하는 주도적 노력도 함께해 나가겠다"고 밝히면서 향후 문 정부가 더욱 적극적인 가교역할을 할 의지를 노정하였다.



광복절 경축사에서 워싱턴과 평양에 보내는 메시지는 의미심장하다. 문재인 대통령과 김정은 국무위원장이 오는 9월에 개최하는 제3차 남북정상 평양회담에서 한반도 비핵화의 단계적 로드맵이 구체적으로 제시될 것을 기대한다. 특히 제3차 정상회담에서 논의될 구체적인 핵심의제까지 제시한 것은 보다 적극적인 가교역할을 하겠다는 의지를 잘 나타내고 있다. 문 대통령이 비핵화이행 로드맵을 준비하여 미국과 북한에 적극적 협조를 구하고 설득하면 4자간 종전선언과 북한의 핵 신고 리스트 제출과 맞교환을 하게 될 것으로 관측된다.



광복절 경축사에서 문 대통령이 강조한 2개 핵심이슈가 북한당국에는 논란의 대상이 될 수 있어서 우려된다. 첫째, 4.27 판문점 선언에서 '완전한 한반도 비핵화'를 명시했는데 이번 경축사에서도 한반도 비핵화로 표현했지만 '북한의 완전한 비핵화'로 표현하기도 해 시비의 불씨가 남아 있다. 둘째, '선(先) 비핵화 후(後) 경제협력'을 강조한 점이다. 선 비핵화 표현은 북한이 아주 싫어하는 표현인데 의미가 정확하게 무엇을 의미하는지에 관해 북한이 어떤 반응을 보일지 궁금하다.



'한반도 비핵화'와 '북한의 비핵화'는 상당한 차이가 있기 때문에 정확한 개념에 대한 합의가 있어야 한다. 북한은 조선(한)반도의 비핵화를 주창하기 때문이다.







올해 경축사 키워드는 평화정착과 한반도 비핵화 실현이고 '평화가 경제다'이다. 문 대통령은 이 정책 기조로 '선 비핵화 후 경제협력'을 강조했다. 그가 제시한 선 비핵화의 의미가 무엇인가를 놓고 해석이 다양하다. 비핵화는 북한의 비핵화 인지 한반도 비핵화 인지 불분명하다. 그러면서도 철도 및 도로 연결을 위한 착공식을 연내 목표로 제시하고 있어 혼란스럽다. 한반도의 '완전한 비핵화'를 어떻게 실현할 것인가에 대한 구체적인 비핵화 로드맵을 문 정부가 제시해야 하고 비핵화의 개념에 대한 남북미 3자간의 합의가 도출돼야 한다.



현시점에서 북미 간 비핵화 대화가 교착상태에 빠진 이유는 북한은 비핵화의 초동단계에서 체제안전 보장으로 종전선언을 강력히 원하고 있는 입장이다. 반면 미국은 종전선언을 위해서 먼저 북한의 비핵화 조치로 최소한 '핵신고서 제출' 정도는 있어야 한다는 입장이다. 이 두 입장이 평행선을 달리고 있어 교착상태에 빠진 상황이다. 북·미실무팀에서 종전선언과 핵 신고서 제출을 절충하여 구체적인 방안에 협의를 끝내고 합의단계로 진전되고 있는 것으로 알려져 있다.



8월 하순이나 9월 초 폼페이오 국무장관의 방북이 성사될 경우 시진핑 주석은 북한정권수립70주년 9.9절에 참석하게 될 가능성이 높다. 남·북·미·중의 조율에 따라 2차 북미정상회담 시기와 핵 신고 및 종전선언 빅딜, 그리고 김정은 위원장의 유엔총회 연설 여부 등이 구체화할 것으로 보인다. 김정은 위원장의 첫 유엔총회참석을 계기로 9월말 유엔에서 북한의 핵 신고서 제출과 동시에 남북미중 4국 정상이 종전선언에 서명하는 결단의 순간을 기대한다.

How a business bootcamp is fostering Palestinian-Israeli collaboration | PBS NewsHour

How a business bootcamp is fostering Palestinian-Israeli collaboration | PBS NewsHour



https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-a-business-bootcamp-is-fostering-palestinian-israeli-collaboration




2018/08/31

Albert Ellis - Wikipedia



Albert Ellis - Wikipedia






Albert Ellis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search
For other people named Albert Ellis, see Albert Ellis (disambiguation).
Albert Ellis

Born September 27, 1913
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Died July 24, 2007 (aged 93)
New York, New York, US
Residence United States
Nationality American
Known for Formulating and developing rational emotive behavior therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy
Awards 2003 award from the Association for Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (UK), Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies 2005 Lifetime Achievement Award, Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies1996 Outstanding Clinician Award, American Psychological Association1985 award for Distinguished professional contributions to Applied Research, American Humanist Association 1971 award for "Humanist of the Year", New York State Psychological Association 2006 Lifetime Distinguished Service Award, American Counseling Association 1988 ACA Professional Development Award, National Association of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapists' Outstanding Contributions to CBT Award, American Psychological Association 2013 Award For Outstanding Lifetime Contributions to Psychology
Scientific career
Fields Clinical psychology, philosophy and psychotherapy

---------------------

Albert Ellis (September 27, 1913 – July 24, 2007) was an American psychologist who in 1955 developed Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy(REBT). He held MA and PhD degrees in clinical psychologyfrom Columbia University and the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP). He also founded and was the President of the New York City-based Albert Ellis Institute for decades.[1] He is generally considered to be one of the originators of the cognitive revolutionary paradigm shift in psychotherapy and one of the founders of cognitive-behavioral therapies.[2]

Based on a 1982 professional survey of US and Canadian psychologists, he was considered as the second most influential psychotherapist in history (Carl Rogers ranked first in the survey; Sigmund Freud was ranked third).[3][4] Psychology Today noted, "No individual—not even Freud himself—has had a greater impact on modern psychotherapy."[5]


Contents
1Early life
2Education and early career
3Early theoretical contributions to psychotherapy
4Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT)
5Integrity assessment studies
6Work as sexologist and sex and love researcher
7Ellis and religion
8Later life
8.1Professional contributions
8.2Public appearance
8.3Final years
9Criticism
10Philosophical works
11Autobiographical works
12Published works
13See also
14References
15Further reading
16External links
16.1Main websites
16.2Articles and features
Early life[edit]

Ellis was born to a Jewish family in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, in 1913. He was the eldest of three children. Ellis' father was a businessman, often away from home on business trips, who reportedly showed only a modicum of affection to his children.

In his autobiography, Ellis characterized his mother as a self-absorbed woman with a bipolar disorder. At times, according to Ellis, she was a "bustling chatterbox who never listened." She would expound on her strong opinions on most subjects, but rarely provided a factual basis for these views. Like his father, Ellis' mother was emotionally distant from her children. Ellis recounted that she was often sleeping when he left for school and usually not home when he returned. Instead of reporting feeling bitter, he took on the responsibility of caring for his siblings. He purchased an alarm clock with his own money and woke and dressed his younger brother and sister. When the Great Depression struck, all three children sought work to assist the family. Ellis was sickly as a child and suffered numerous health problems throughout his youth. At the age of five he was hospitalized with a kidney disease.[6] He was also hospitalized with tonsillitis, which led to a severe streptococcal infectionrequiring emergency surgery. He reported that he had eight hospitalizations between the ages of five and seven, one of which lasted nearly a year. His parents provided little emotional support for him during these years, rarely visiting or consoling him. Ellis stated that he learned to confront his adversities as he had "developed a growing indifference to that dereliction". Illness was to follow Ellis throughout his life; at age 40 he developed diabetes.[7]

Ellis had exaggerated fears of speaking in public and during his adolescence, he was extremely shy around women. At age 19, already showing signs of thinking like a cognitive-behavioral therapist, he forced himself to talk to 100 women in the Bronx Botanical Gardens over a period of a month. Even though he did not get a date, he reported that he desensitized himself to his fear of rejection by women.[8]
Education and early career[edit]

Ellis entered the field of clinical psychology after first earning a Bachelor of Arts degree in business from what was then known as the City College of New York Downtown in 1934.[9] He began a brief career in business, followed by one as a writer. These endeavors took place during the Great Depression that began in 1929, and Ellis found that business was poor and had no success in publishing his fiction. Finding that he could write non-fiction well, Ellis researched and wrote on human sexuality. His lay counseling in this subject convinced him to seek a new career in clinical psychology.

In 1942, Ellis began his studies for a PhD in clinical psychology at Teachers College, Columbia University, which trained psychologists mostly in psychoanalysis. He completed his Master of Arts in clinical psychology from Teachers College in June 1943, and started a part-time private practice while still working on his PhD degree—possibly because there was no licensing of psychologists in New York at that time. Ellis began publishing articles even before receiving his PhD; in 1946 he wrote a critique of many widely used pencil-and-paper personality tests. He concluded that only the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventorymet the standards of a research-based instrument.

In 1947, he was awarded a PhD in Clinical Psychology at Columbia, and at that time Ellis had come to believe that psychoanalysis was the deepest and most effective form of therapy. Like most psychologists of that time, he was interested in the theories of Sigmund Freud. He sought additional training in psychoanalysis and then began to practice classical psychoanalysis. Shortly after receiving his PhD in 1947, Ellis began a Jungian analysis and program of supervision with Richard Hulbeck, a leading analyst at the Karen Horney Institute (whose own analyst had been Hermann Rorschach, the developer of the Rorschach inkblot test). At that time he taught at New York University, Rutgers University, and Pittsburg State University[10] and held a couple of leading staff positions. At this time, Ellis' faith in psychoanalysis was gradually crumbling.[11]
Early theoretical contributions to psychotherapy[edit]

The writings of Karen Horney, Alfred Adler, Erich Fromm and Harry Stack Sullivan would be some of the influences in Ellis's thinking and played a role in shaping his psychological models. Ellis credits Alfred Korzybski,[12] his book, Science and Sanity,[13] and general semanticsfor starting him on the philosophical path for founding rational therapy. In addition, modern and ancient philosophy (particularly stoicism), and his own experiences heavily influenced his new theoretical developments to psychotherapy.[14] Ellis acknowledged that his therapy was "by no means entirely new", as in particular Paul Charles Dubois's "rational persuasion" had prefigured some of its main principals; Ellis stated he had read him some years after inventing his therapy, but had studied Émile Coué since a young age.[15]

From the late 1940s onwards, Ellis worked on rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT), and by January 1953 his break with psychoanalysis was complete, and he began calling himself a rational therapist. Ellis was now advocating a new more active and directive type of psychotherapy. In 1955, he presented rational therapy (RT). In RT, the therapist sought to help the client understand—and act on the understanding—that his personal philosophy contained beliefs that contributed to his own emotional pain. This new approach stressed actively working to change a client's self-defeating beliefs and behaviours by demonstrating their irrationality, self-defeatism and rigidity. Ellis believed that through rational analysis and cognitivereconstruction, people could understand their self-defeatingness in light of their core irrational beliefs and then develop more rational constructs.

In 1954, Ellis began teaching his new techniques to other therapists, and by 1957, he formally set forth the first cognitive behavior therapy by proposing that therapists help people adjust their thinking and behavior as the treatment for emotional and behavioral problems. Two years later, Ellis published How to Live with a Neurotic, which elaborated on his new method. In 1960, Ellis presented a paper on his new approach at the American Psychological Association (APA) convention in Chicago. There was mild interest, but few recognized that the paradigm set forth would become the zeitgeist within a generation. At that time, the prevailing interest in experimental psychology was behaviorism, while in clinical psychology it was the psychoanalytic schools of notables such as Freud, Jung, Adler, and Perls. Despite the fact that Ellis' approach emphasized cognitive, emotive, and behavioral methods, his strong cognitive emphasis provoked the psychotherapeutic establishment with the possible exception of the followers of Adler. Consequently, he was often received with significant hostility at professional conferences and in print.[16] He regularly held seminars where he would bring a participant up on stage and treat them. His own therapeutical style was famed for often being delivered in a rough, confrontational style; however, it should not be confused with his rational-emotive and cognitive-behavioral therapy school that is practiced by his students and followers in a large variety of therapeutic styles (e.g., often depending on client's personality, client's clinical problem, and evidence-based information regarding the appropriate intervention, but also including therapist's own preference).

Despite the relative slow adoption of his approach in the beginning, Ellis founded his own institute. The Institute for Rational Living was founded as a non-profit organization in 1959. By 1968, it was chartered by the New York State Board of Regents as a training institute and psychological clinic.
Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT)[edit]

Ellis published his first major book on Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) in 1962.[17] REBT is an active-directive, philosophically and empirically based psychotherapy, the aim of which is to resolve emotional and behavioral problems and disturbances and to help people to lead happier and more fulfilling lives.[18] REBT is seen as the first form of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).[19][20][21]
Integrity assessment studies[edit]

In 1979 and during the next two decades Ellis focuses part of his research on behavioral integrity through applied experimental psychology, focusing on reliability, honesty and loyalty as psychosocial behavior. Organizational commitment as a cognitive norm, evaluating concretely through images developed in his Institute.

In his book Personality Theories[22] developed with Mike Abrams and Lidia Dengelegi Abrams establish the opinions of evaluation of integrity understanding the reason of each personality can have a change in their attitude, reliability is the common factor of their samples taken and of the which great advances were obtained to look for a tool to work with the human mind.
Work as sexologist and sex and love researcher[edit]

By the 1960s, Ellis had come to be seen as one of the founders of the American sexual revolution. Especially in his earlier career, he was well known for his work as a sexologist and for his liberal humanistic, and in some camps controversial[23] opinions on human sexuality. He also worked with noted zoologist and sex researcher Alfred Kinsey and explored in a number of books and articles the topic of human sexuality and love. Sex and love relations were his professional interests even from the beginning of his career. Norman Haire, in his preface to Ellis' 1952 book Sex Beliefs and Customs, applauded the work of the Society for the Prevention of Venereal Disease while he ridiculed its rival, the National Council for Combating Venereal Disease, who argued that preventive measures such as condoms would encourage vice: Haire called them "the Society for the Prevention of the Prevention of Venereal Disease".[24]

In 1958, Ellis published his classic work Sex Without Guilt which came to be known for its advocacy of a liberal attitude towards sex. He contributed to Paul Krassner's magazine The Realist; among its articles, in 1964 he wrote if this be heresy... Is pornography harmful to children?[25] In 1965, Ellis published a book entitled Homosexuality: Its Causes and Cure, which partly saw homosexuality as a pathology and therefore a condition to be cured. In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association reversed its position on homosexuality by declaring that it was not a mental disorder and thus not properly subject to cure, and in 1976, Ellis clarified his earlier views in Sex and the Liberated Man, expounding that some homosexual disturbed behaviors may be subject to treatment but, in most cases, that should not be attempted as homosexuality is not inherently good or evil, except from a religious viewpoint (See "Ellis and religion", below). Near the end of his life, he finally updated and re-wrote Sex Without Guilt in 2001 and released as Sex Without Guilt in the Twenty-First Century. In this book, he expounded and enhanced his humanistic view on sexual ethics and morality and dedicated a chapter on homosexuality to giving homosexuals advice and suggestion on how to more greatly enjoy and enhance their sexual love lives. While preserving some of the ideas about human sexuality from the original, the revision described his later humanistic opinions and ethical ideals as they had evolved in his academic work and practice.
Ellis and religion[edit]

In his original version of his book Sex Without Guilt, Ellis expressed the opinion that religious restrictions on sexual expression are often needless and harmful to emotional health. He also famously debated religious psychologists, including Orval Hobart Mowrer and Allen Bergin, over the proposition that religion often contributed to psychological distress. Because of his forthright espousal of a nontheistic humanism, he was recognized in 1971 as Humanist of the Year by the American Humanist Association. By 2003, he was one of the signers of the Humanist Manifesto.[26] Ellis most recently described himself as a probabilistic atheist, meaning that while he acknowledged that he could not be completely certain there is no god, he believed the probability a god exists was so small that it was not worth his or anyone else's attention.[27]

While Ellis' personal atheism and humanism remained consistent, his views about the role of religion in mental health changed over time. In early comments delivered at conventions and at his institute in New York City, Ellis overtly and often with characteristically acerbic delivery stated that devout religious beliefs and practices were harmful to mental health. In "The Case Against Religiosity", a 1980 pamphlet published by his New York institute, he offered an idiosyncratic definition of religiosity as any devout, dogmatic and demanding belief. He noted that religious codes and religious individuals often manifest religiosity, but added that devout, demanding religiosity is also obvious among many orthodox psychotherapists and psychoanalysts, devout political believers and aggressive atheists.

Ellis was careful to state that REBT was independent of his atheism, noting that many skilled REBT practitioners are religious, including some who are ordained ministers. In his later days, he significantly toned down his opposition to religion. While Ellis maintained his firm atheistic stance, proposing that thoughtful, probabilistic atheism was likely the most emotionally healthy approach to life, he acknowledged and agreed with survey evidence suggesting that belief in a loving God can also be psychologically healthy.[28] Based on this later approach to religion, he reformulated his professional and personal view in one of his last books The Road to Tolerance, and he also co-authored a book, Counseling and Psychotherapy with Religious Persons: A Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Approach, with two religious psychologists, Stevan Lars Nielsen and W. Brad Johnson, describing principles for integrating religious material and beliefs with REBT during treatment of religious clients.

Ellis was a lifelong advocate for peace and an opponent of militarism.[29][30][31]
Later life[edit]
Professional contributions[edit]

While many of his ideas were criticized during the 1950s and '60s by the psychotherapeutic establishment, his reputation grew immensely in the subsequent decades. From the 1960s on, his prominence was steadily growing as the cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) were gaining further theoretical and scientific ground.[32] From then, CBT gradually became one of the most popular systems of psychotherapy in many countries, mainly due to the large body of rigorously conducted research that underpinned the work of the cognitive therapy school (a key part of the CBT family) founded by Aaron T. Beck. In the late 1960s, his institute launched a professional journal, and in the early 70s established "The Living School" for children between 6 and 13. The school provided a curriculum that incorporated the principles of RE(B)T. Despite its relative short life, interest groups generally expressed satisfaction with its programmer.[32] Many schools of psychological thought became influenced by Albert Ellis, including Rational Behavior Therapy created by a student of his, Maxie Clarence Maultsby, Jr..[33] Ellis had such an impact that in a 1982 survey, American and Canadian clinical psychologists and counsellors ranked him ahead of Freud when asked to name the figure who had exerted the average influence on their field. Also in 1982, in an analysis of psychology journals published in the US it was found that Ellis was the most cited author after 1957.[32] In 1985, the APA presented Dr. Ellis with its award for "distinguished professional contributions".

He held many important positions in many professional societies including the Division of Consulting Psychology of the APA, Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, American Association of Marital and Family Therapy, the American Academy of Psychotherapists and the American Association of Sex Educators, Counsellors, and Therapists. In addition Ellis also served as consulting or associate editor of many scientific journals. Many professional societies gave Ellis their highest professional and clinical awards.

In the mid-1990s, he renamed his psychotherapy and behavior change system rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). (It was originally known as rational therapy and then rational-emotive therapy.) This he did to stress the interrelated importance of cognition, emotion and behaviour in his therapeutic approach. In 1994, he also updated and revised his original, 1962 classic book, Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy.[34] During the remainder of his life, he continued developing the theory that cognition, emotion and behaviour are intertwined, and that a system for psychotherapy and behaviour change must involve all three.
Public appearance[edit]

Ellis's work extended into areas other than psychology, including education, politics, business and philosophy. He eventually became a prominent and confrontational social commenter and public speaker on a wide array of issues. During his career he publicly debated a vast number of people who represented opposing views to his; this included for example debates with psychologist Nathaniel Branden on Objectivismand psychiatrist Thomas Szasz on the topic of mental illness. On numerous occasions he critiqued opposing psychotherapeutic approaches, and questioned some of the doctrines in certain dogmatic religious systems, i.e.:spiritualism and mysticism.

From 1965 until the end of his life he led his famous Friday Night Workshops, in which he conducted therapy sessions with volunteers from the audience. The 1970s found him introducing his popular "rational humorous songs" which combined humorous lyrics with a rational self-help message set to a popular tune. Ellis also held workshops and seminars on mental health and psychotherapy all over the world until his 90s.
Final years[edit]

Until he fell ill at the age of 92 in 2006, Ellis typically worked at least 16 hours a day, writing books in longhand on legal tablets, visiting with clients, and teaching. On his 90th birthday in 2003, he received congratulatory messages from well-known public figures such as then-President George W. Bush, New York senators Charles Schumer and Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and the Dalai Lama, who sent a silk scarf blessed for the occasion.[35][36] In 2004, Ellis was taken ill with serious intestinal problems, which led to hospitalization and the removal of his large intestine. He returned to work after a few months of supportive care.

In 2005, he was removed from all professional duties and from the board of his own institute after a dispute over the management policies of the institute. Ellis was reinstated to the board in January 2006 after winning civil proceedings against the board members who removed him.[37] On June 6, 2007, lawyers acting for Albert Ellis filed a suit against the Albert Ellis Institute in New York state court. The suit alleges a breach of a long-term contract with the AEI and sought recovery of the 45 East 65th Street property through the imposition of a constructive trust.[38]

Despite his series of health issues and profound hearing loss, Ellis never stopped working with the assistance of his wife, Australian psychologist Debbie Joffe Ellis.[39] In April 2006, Ellis was hospitalized with pneumonia, and spent more than a year shuttling between hospital and a rehabilitation facility. He eventually returned to his residence on the top floor of the Albert Ellis Institute where he died on July 24, 2007 in his wife's arms. Ellis had authored and co-authored more than 80 books and 1200 articles (including eight hundred scientific papers) during his lifetime. He died aged 93.[6]

During his final years he worked on his only college textbook with longtime collaborator Mike Abrams[40] with whom he co-authored 3 books along with several research articles and chapters, including the textbook Personality Theories: Critical Perspectives.[41] Ellis' penultimate book was an autobiography entitled "All Out!" published by Prometheus Books in June 2010. The book was dedicated to and included contributions by his wife, Dr Debbie Joffe Ellis, to whom he entrusted the legacy of REBT. In early 2011, the book Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy by Albert and Debbie Joffe Ellis was released by the American Psychological Association.[42] The book explains the essentials of the theory of REBT for students and practitioners of psychology as well as for the general public.

In eulogy of Albert Ellis, APA past president Frank Farley states:


Psychology has had only of a handful of legendary figures who not only command attention across much of the discipline but also receive high recognition from the public for their work. Albert Ellis was such a figure, known inside and outside of psychology for his astounding originality, his provocative ideas, and his provocative personality. He bestrode the practice of psychotherapy like a colossus…[43]

In the opening ceremony of the 2013 American Psychological Association Convention, Ellis was posthumously awarded the APA Award For Outstanding Lifetime Contributions to Psychology. It highlights the profound and historic role played in the life and evolution of the fields of psychology and psychotherapy.[44]
Criticism[edit]

Fellow psychologists often criticized Ellis for his weak tone and for not offering any evidence to back his views on psychotherapy.[45] In his obituary in the British newspaper The Guardian, it was noted that others, such as Aaron T. Beck, had conducted more rigorous testing than what Ellis was willing to undertake and were able to better advance cognitive therapy.[45] His approach to treatment of severe depression was also criticized as suggesting simplistic things like "pull your socks up."[45]
Philosophical works[edit]

The Road To Tolerance (Prometheus Books, 2004) explains the philosophies underlying REBT - particularly an attitude of tolerance - and relates it to many religious, philosophical and social movements.
Autobiographical works[edit]

Most of the books Ellis wrote after inventing REBT had a strong autobiographical element. He used anecdotes from his personal life to explain how the insights of REBT occurred to him and how they helped him cope with personal problems such as shyness, anger and chronic illness.[46][47][48] He also used anecdotes from client sessions to illustrate how his therapy worked.[47][49] Two of Ellis last books were explicitly autobiographical. Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy: It Works for Me -- It Can Work for You (Prometheus Books, 2004) recounts his early life and crises in an unusually candid way. It illustrates the way he handled his problems, at first through philosophy, and later through the application of his emerging therapeutic skills and insights. All Out!: An Autobiography (Prometheus Books, 2009) —published after his death—is a more traditional narrative of his life and work (though it also meant to be an inspirational story of the use of rational thinking in self-help).
Published works[edit]
This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
The Folklore of Sex, Oxford, England: Charles Boni, 1951.
The Homosexual in America: A Subjective Approach (introduction). NY: Greenberg, 1951.
Sex Beliefs and Customs, London: Peter Nevill, 1952.
The American Sexual Tragedy. NY: Twayne, 1954.
Sex Life of the American woman and the Kinsey Report. Oxford, England: Greenberg, 1954.
The Psychology of Sex Offenders. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1956.
How To Live with a Neurotic. Oxford, England: Crown Publishers, 1957.
Sex Without Guilt. NY: Hillman, 1958.
The Art and Science of Love. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1960.
A Guide to Successful Marriage, with Robert A. Harper. North Hollywood, CA: Wilshire Book, 1961.
Creative Marriage, with Robert A. Harper. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1961.
A Guide to Rational Living. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1961.
The Encyclopedia of Sexual Behavior, edited with Albert Abarbanel. NY: Hawthorn, 1961.
The American Sexual Tragedy, 2nd Ed. rev. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1962.
Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1962.
Sex and the Single Man. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1963.
If This Be Sexual Heresy. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1963.
The intelligent woman's guide to man-hunting. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1963.
Nymphomania: A Study of the Oversexed Woman, with Edward Sagarin. NY: Gilbert Press, 1964.
Homosexuality: Its causes and Cures. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1965.
The Art of Erotic Seduction, with Roger Conway. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1967.
Is Objectivism a Religion?. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1968.
Murder and Assassination, with John M. Gullo. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1971.
Executive Leadership: A Rational Approach, 1972. ISBN 0-917476115.
Humanistic Psychotherapy, NY McGraw, 1974 Sagarin ed.
A New Guide to Rational Living. Wilshire Book Company, 1975. ISBN 0-87980-042-9.
Sex and the Liberated Man, Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart, 1976. ISBN 0-8184-0222-9
Anger: How to Live With and Without It. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press, 1977. ISBN 0-8065-0937-6.
Handbook of Rational-Emotive Therapy, with Russell Greiger & contributors. NY: Springer Publishing, 1977.
Overcoming Procrastination: Or How to Think and Act Rationally in Spite of Life's Inevitable Hassles, with William J. Knaus. Institute for Rational Living, 1977. ISBN 0-917476-04-2.
How to Live With a Neurotic. Wilshire Book Company, 1979. ISBN 0-87980-404-1.
Overcoming Resistance: Rational-Emotive Therapy With Difficult Clients. NY: Springer Publishing, 1985. ISBN 0-8261-4910-3.
When AA Doesn't Work For You: Rational Steps to Quitting Alcohol, with Emmett Velten. Barricade Books, 1992. ISBN 0-942637-53-4.
The Art and Science of Rational Eating, with Mike Abrams and Lidia Abrams. Barricade Books, 1992. ISBN 0-942637-60-7.
How to Cope with a Fatal Illness, with Mike Abrams. Barricade Books, 1994. ISBN 1-56980-005-7.
Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy, Revised and Updated. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Publishing Group, 1994. ISBN 1-55972-248-7.
How to Keep People from Pushing Your Buttons, with Arthur Lange. Citadel Press, 1995. ISBN 0-8065-1670-4.
Alcohol: How to Give It Up and Be Glad You Did, with Philip Tate Ph.D. See Sharp Press, 1996. ISBN 1-884365-10-8.
Rational Interviews, with Stephen Palmer, Windy Dryden and Robin Yapp, (Eds). London: Centre for Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy, 1995. ISBN 0-9524605-0-5.
Better, Deeper, and More Enduring Brief Therapy: The Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Approach Brunner/Mazel Publishers, NY 1996. ISBN 0-87630-792-6.
Stress Counselling: A Rational Emotive Behaviour Approach, with Jack Gordon, Michael Neenan and Stephen Palmer. London: Cassell, 1997. ISBN 0-304-33469-3.
How to Control Your Anger Before It Controls You, with Raymond Chip Tafrate. Citadel Press, 1998. ISBN 0-8065-2010-8.
Optimal Aging: Get Over Getting Older, with Emmett Velten. Chicago, Open Court Press, 1998. ISBN 0-8126-9383-3.
How to Stubbornly Refuse to Make Yourself Miserable About Anything: Yes, Anything", Lyle Stuart, 2000, ISBN 0-8184-0456-6.
Making Intimate Connections: Seven Guidelines for Great Relationships and Better Communication, with Ted Crawford. Impact Publishers, 2000. ISBN 1-886230-33-1.
The Secret of Overcoming Verbal Abuse: Getting Off the Emotional Roller Coaster and Regaining Control of Your Life, with Marcia Grad Powers. Wilshire Book Company, 2000. ISBN 0-87980-445-9.
Counseling and Psychotherapy With Religious Persons: A Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Approach, with Stevan Lars Nielsen and W. Brad Johnson. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. ISBN 0-8058-2878-8.
Overcoming Destructive Beliefs, Feelings, and Behaviors: New Directions for Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. Prometheus Books, 2001. ISBN 1-57392-879-8.
Feeling Better, Getting Better, Staying Better: Profound Self-Help Therapy For Your Emotions. Impact Publishers, 2001. ISBN 1-886230-35-8.
Case Studies in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy With Children and Adolescents, with Jerry Wilde. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2002. ISBN 0-13-087281-4.
Overcoming Resistance: A Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Integrated Approach, 2nd ed. NY: Springer Publishing, 2002. ISBN 0-8261-4912-X.
Ask Albert Ellis: Straight Answers and Sound Advice from America's Best-Known Psychologist. Impact Publishers, 2003. ISBN 1-886230-51-X.
Sex Without Guilt in the 21st Century. Barricade Books, 2003. ISBN 1-56980-258-0.
Dating, Mating, and Relating. How to Build a Healthy Relationship, with Robert A. Harper. Citadel Press Books, 2003. ISBN 0-8065-2454-5
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy: It Works For Me—It Can Work For You. Prometheus Books, 2004. ISBN 1-59102-184-7.
The Road to Tolerance: The Philosophy of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. Prometheus Books, 2004. ISBN 1-59102-237-1.
The Myth of Self-Esteem. Prometheus Books, 2005. ISBN 1-59102-354-8.
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy: A Therapist's Guide (2nd Edition), with Catharine MacLaren. Impact Publishers, 2005. ISBN 1-886230-61-7.
How to Make Yourself Happy and Remarkably Less Disturbable. Impact Publishers, 1999. ISBN 1-886230-18-8.
Rational Emotive Behavioral Approaches to Childhood Disorders • Theory, Practice and Research 2nd Edition. With Michael E. Bernard (Eds.). Springer SBM, 2006. ISBN 978-0-387-26374-8
Growth Through Reason: Verbatim Cases in Rational-Emotive Therapy Science and Behavior Books. Palo Alto, California. 1971.
All Out!. Prometheus Books, 2009. ISBN 1-59102-452-8.
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, American Psychological Association, ISBN 978-1-4338-0961-3
How to Master Your Fear of Flying. Institute Rational Emotive Therapy, 1977. ISBN 978-0-917476-10-5.
How to Control your Anxiety before it Controls you. Citadel Press, 2000. ISBN 0806521368.
Are Capitalism, Objectivism, And Libertarianism Religions? Yes!: Greenspan And Ayn Rand Debunked. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2007. ISBN 1434808858
Theories of Personality: Critical Perspectives, with Mike Abrams, PhD, and Lidia Abrams, PhD. New York: Sage Press, 7/2008 ISBN 978-1-4129-1422-2 (This was his final work, published posthumously).
See also[edit]


Alfred Korzybski
Paul Tillich
Bertrand Russell
Karl Popper
George Kelly
Maxie Clarence Maultsby, Jr.
Alfred Adler
Aaron T. Beck
Martin Seligman
Albert Bandura
William Glasser