2021/08/06

Celtic Christianity - Wikipedia

Celtic Christianity - Wikipedia

Celtic Christianity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Celtic Cross in Knock, Ireland

Celtic Christianity 

(CornishKristonethWelshCristnogaethScottish GaelicCrìosdaidheachdManxCredjue Creestee/CreestiaghtIrishCríostaíocht/CríostúlachtBretonKristeniezh) is a form of Christianity that was common, or held to be common, across the Celtic-speaking world during the Early Middle Ages.[1] Some writers have described a distinct Celtic Church uniting the Celtic peoples and distinguishing them from adherents of the Roman Church, while others classify Celtic Christianity as a set of distinctive practices occurring in those areas.[2] Varying scholars reject the former notion, but note that there were certain traditions and practices present in both the Irish and British churches that were not seen in the wider Christian world.[3]

Such practices include: a distinctive system for determining the dating of Easter, a style of monastic tonsure, a unique system of penance, and the popularity of going into "exile for Christ".[3] Additionally, there were other practices that developed in certain parts of Britain and Ireland that were not known to have spread beyond particular regions. The term typically denotes the regional practices among the insular churches and their associates rather than actual theological differences.

The term Celtic Church is deprecated by many historians as it implies a unified and identifiable entity entirely separate from that of mainstream Western Christendom.[4] For this reason, many prefer the term Insular Christianity.[5] As Patrick Wormald explained, "One of the common misconceptions is that there was a Roman Church to which the Celtic Church was nationally opposed."[6]

Popularized by German historian Lutz von Padberg, the term "Iroschottisch" is used to describe this supposed dichotomy between Irish-Scottish and Roman Christianity.[7] As a whole, Celtic-speaking areas were part of Latin Christendom at a time when there was significant regional variation of liturgy and structure. But a general collective veneration of the Papacy was no less intense in Celtic-speaking areas.[8]

Nonetheless, distinctive traditions developed and spread to both Ireland and Great Britain, especially in the 6th and 7th centuries. Some elements may have been introduced to Ireland by the Romano-British Saint Patrick, and later, others from Ireland to Great Britain through the Irish mission system of Saint Columba. However, the histories of the IrishWelshScotsBretonCornish, and Manx Churches diverge significantly after the 8th century.[9] Interest in the subject has led to a series of Celtic Christian Revival movements, which have shaped popular perceptions of the Celts and their Christian religious practices.

Definitions[edit source]

People have conceived of "Celtic Christianity" in different ways at different times. Writings on the topic frequently say more about the time in which they originate than about the historical state of Christianity in the early medieval Celtic-speaking world, and many notions are now discredited in modern academic discourse.[10][11] One particularly prominent feature ascribed to Celtic Christianity is that it is supposedly inherently distinct from – and generally opposed to – the Catholic Church.[12] Other common claims include that Celtic Christianity denied the authority of the Pope, was less authoritarian than the Catholic Church, more spiritual, friendlier to women, more connected with nature, and more comfortable dealing with Celtic polytheism.[12] One view, which gained substantial scholarly traction in the 19th century, was that there was a "Celtic Church", a significant organised Christian body or denomination uniting the Celtic peoples and separating them from the "Roman" church of continental Europe.[13]An example of this appears in Toynbee's Study of History (1934–1961), which identified Celtic Christianity with an "Abortive Far Western Civilization" – the nucleus of a new society, which was prevented from taking root by the Roman Church, Vikings, and Normans.[14][15] Others have been content to speak of "Celtic Christianity" as consisting of certain traditions and beliefs intrinsic to the Celts.[16]

However, modern scholars have identified problems with all of these claims, and find the term "Celtic Christianity" problematic in and of itself.[1] Modern scholarship roundly rejects the idea of a "Celtic Church" due to the lack of substantiating evidence.[16] Indeed, distinct Irish and British church traditions existed, each with their own practices, and there was significant local variation even within the individual Irish and British spheres.[17] While the Irish and British churches had some traditions in common, these were relatively few. Even these commonalities did not exist due to the "Celticity" of the regions, but due to other historical and geographical factors.[13] Additionally, the Christians of Ireland and Britain were not "anti-Roman"; Celtic areas respected the authority of Rome and the papacy as strongly as any other region of Europe.[18] Caitlin Corning further notes that the "Irish and British were no more pro-women, pro-environment, or even more spiritual than the rest of the Church."[12]

Developing image of Celtic Christianity[edit source]

Corning writes that scholars have identified three major strands of thought that have influenced the popular conceptions of Celtic Christianity:

  • The first arose in the English Reformation, when the Church of England declared itself separate from papal authority. Protestant writers of this time popularised the idea of an indigenous British Christianity that opposed the foreign "Roman" church and was purer (and proto-Protestant) in thought. The English church, they claimed, was not forming a new institution, but casting off the shackles of Rome and returning to its true roots as the indigenous national church of Britain.[19]
  • The Romantic movement of the 18th century, in particular Romantic notions of the noble savage and the intrinsic qualities of the "Celtic race", further influenced ideas about Celtic Christianity. Romantics idealised the Celts as a primitive, bucolic people who were far more poetic, spiritual, and freer of rationalism than their neighbours. The Celts were seen as having an inner spiritual nature that shone through even after their form of Christianity had been destroyed by the authoritarian and rational Rome.[20]
  • In the 20th and 21st centuries, ideas about "Celtic Christians" combined with appeals by certain modern churches, modern pagan groups, and New Age groups seeking to recover something of ancient spirituality that they believe is missing from the modern world. For these groups, Celtic Christianity becomes a cipher for whatever is lost in the modern religious experience. Corning notes that these notions say more about modern desires than about the reality of Christianity in the Early Middle Ages.[21]

Attempts to associate the early Christians of Celtic-speaking Galatia (purportedly recipients of Paul's Epistle to the Galatians) with later Christians of north-western Europe's Celtic fringe appear fanciful.[22]

History[edit source]

Britain[edit source]

According to medieval traditions, Christianity arrived in Britain in the 1st centuryGildas's 6th-century account dated its arrival to the latter part of the reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius:[23] an account of the seventy disciples discovered at Mount Athos in 1854 lists Aristobulus as "bishop of Britain".[24] Medieval accounts of King LuciusFagan and Deruvian, and Joseph of Arimathea, however, are now usually accounted as pious frauds.

The earliest certain historical evidence of Christianity among the Britons is found in the writings of such early Christian Fathers as Tertullian and Origen in the first years of the 3rd century, although the first Christian communities probably were established at least some decades earlier.

Amphibalus baptizing converts, from The Life of St. Alban, written and illustrated by Matthew Paris († 1259)
The discovery of St. Alban's bones, illustrated in The Life of St. Alban

Initially, Christianity was but one of a number of religions: in addition to the native and syncretic local forms of paganism, Roman legionaries and immigrants introduced other cults such as Mithraism. At various times, the Christians risked persecution, although the earliest known Christian martyrs in Britain – Saint Alban and "Amphibalus" – probably lived in the early 4th century.[a] Julius and Aaron, citizens of Caerleon, were said to have been martyred during the Diocletianic Persecution, although there is no textual or archaeological evidence to support the folk etymology of Lichfield as deriving from another thousand martyrs during the same years.[27]

Christianization intensified with the legalisation of the Christian religion under Constantine the Great in the early 4th century and its promotion by subsequent Christian emperors. Three Romano-British bishops, including Archbishop Restitutus of London, are known to have been present at the Synod of Arles in 314.[28] Others attended the Council of Serdica in 347 and the Council of Ariminum in 360. A number of references to the church in Roman Britain are also found in the writings of 4th-century Christian fathers. Britain was the home of Pelagius, who opposed Augustine of Hippo's doctrine of original sinSt Germanus was said to have visited the island in part to oppose the bishops who advocated his heresy.

Around 367, the Great Conspiracy saw the troops along Hadrian's Wall mutiny, allowing the Picts to overrun the northern areas of Roman Britain (in some cases joining in), in concert with Irish and Saxon attacks on the coast. The Roman provinces seem to have been retaken by Theodosius the Elder the next year, but many Romano-Britons had already been killed or taken as slaves. In 407, Constantine III declared himself "emperor of the West" and withdrew his legions to Gaul. The Byzantine historian Zosimus (c. 500) stated that Constantine's neglect of the area's defense against Irish and Saxon raids and invasions caused the Britons and Gauls to fully revolt from the Roman Empire, rejecting Roman law and reverting to their native customs.[29] In any case, Roman authority was greatly weakened following the Visigothssack of Rome in 410. Medieval legend attributed widespread Saxon immigration to mercenaries hired by the British king Vortigern. The Saxon communities followed a form of Germanic paganism, driving Christian Britons back to WalesCornwall, and Brittany or subjugating them under kingdoms with no formal church presence.

Columba at the gate of Bridei I's fortress, book illustration by Joseph Ratcliffe Skelton (1906)

Fifth and sixth century Britain, although poorly attested, saw the "Age of Saints" among the Welsh. Saint DubricSaint Illtud, and others first completed the Christianization of Wales. Unwilling or unable to missionize among the Saxons in England, Briton refugees and missionaries such as Saint Patrick[b] and Finnian of Clonard were then responsible for the Christianization of Ireland[30] and made up the Seven Founder Saints of Brittany.[31] The Irish in turn made Christians of the Picts and English. Saint Columba then began the conversion of the Dál Riata and the other peoples of Scotland, although native saints such as Mungo also arose. The history of Christianity in Cornwall is more obscure, but the native church seems to have been greatly strengthened by Welsh and Irish missionaries such as Saints PetrocPiran, and Breaca. Extreme weather (as around 535) and the attendant famines and disease, particularly the arrival of the Plague of Justinian in Wales around 547 and Ireland around 548, may have contributed to these missionary efforts.[32]

The title of "saint" was used quite broadly by British, Irish, and English Christians. Extreme cases are Irish accounts of Gerald of Mayo's presiding over 3,300 saints and Welsh claims that Bardsey Island held the remains of 20,000.[c] More often, the title was given to the founder of any ecclesiastical settlement, which would thenceforth be known as their llan. Such communities were organized on tribal models: founding saints were almost invariably lesser members of local dynasties, they were not infrequently married, and their successors were often chosen from among their kin.[34] In the 6th century, the "Three Saintly Families of Wales" – those of the invading Irish Brychan and Hen Ogledd's Cunedda Wledig and Caw of Strathclyde – displaced many of the local Silurian rulers in favor of their own families and clans.[34] By some estimates,[35] these traditions produced over 800 pre-congregational saints that were venerated locally in Wales, but invasions by SaxonsIrishmenVikingsNormans, and others destroyed many ecclesiastical records. Similarly, the distance from Rome, hostility to native practices and cults, and relative unimportance of the local sees has left only two local Welsh saints in the General Roman Calendar: Saints David and Winifred.

Insular Christianity developed distinct traditions and practices, most pointedly concerning the computus of Easter, as it produced the most obvious signs of disunity:[36] the old and new methods did not usually agree, causing Christians following one system to begin celebrating the feast of the Resurrection while others continued to solemnly observe Lent.[d] Monasticism spread widely; the Llandaff Charters record over fifty religious foundations in southeast Wales alone. Although the clasau were rather modest affairs, great monasteries and monastic schools also developed at Llantwit Major (Llanilltud Fawr), Bangor, and Iona. The tonsure differed from that elsewhere and also became a point of contention. A distinction that became increasingly important was the nature of church organisation: some monasteries were led by married clergy, inheritance of religious offices was common (in Wales, as late as the 12th century),[38] and illegitimacy was treated much more leniently with fathers simply needing to acknowledge the child for him to inherit an equal share with his brothers. Prior to their conquest by England, most churches have records of bishops and priests but not an established parish system. Pre-conquest, most Christians would not attend regular services but relied on members of the monastic communities who would occasionally make preaching tours through the area.[38]

Wales[edit source]

A portrait of Augustine of Canterbury from an 8th-century manuscript of Bede's Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum

At the end of the 6th century, Pope Gregory I dispatched a mission under Augustine of Canterbury to convert the Anglo-Saxons, establish new sees and churches throughout their territories, and reassert papal authority over the native church. Gregory intended for Augustine to become the metropolitan bishop over all of southern Britain, including the existing dioceses under Welsh and Cornish control. Augustine met with British bishops in a series of conferences – known as the Synod of Chester – that attempted to assert his authority and to compel them to abandon aspects of their service that had fallen out of line with Roman practice. The Northumbrian cleric Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People is the only surviving account of these meetings: according to it, some of the clerics of the nearest British province met Augustine at a site on the border of the Kingdom of Kent that was known thereafter as Augustine's Oak. Augustine focused on seeking assistance for his work among the Saxons and reforming the Britons' obsolete method for calculating Easter; the clerics responded that they would need to confer with their people and await a larger assembly.[39] Bede relates that the bishops particularly consulted a hermit on how to respond. He told them to respond based on Augustine's conduct: were he to rise to greet them, they would know him for a humble servant of Christ and should submit to his authority but, were he to remain seated, they would know him to be arrogant and prideful and should reject him. As it happened, Augustine did keep his seat, provoking outrage. In the negotiations that followed, he offered to allow the Britons to maintain all their native customs but three: they should adopt Rome's more advanced method of calculating the date of Easter, reform their baptismal ritual, and join the missionary efforts among the Saxons. The British clerics rejected all of these, as well as Augustine's authority over them.[39] John Edward Lloyd argues that the primary reason for the British bishops' rejection of Augustine – and especially his call for them to join his missionary effort – was his claim to sovereignty over them, given that his see would be so deeply entwined with Anglo-Saxon Kent.[40]

The death of hundreds of British clerics to the pagan king Æthelfrith of the Kingdom of Northumbria around 616 at the Battle of Chester was taken by Bede as fulfillment of the prophecy made by Augustine of Canterbury following the Synod of Chester.[41] The prophecy stated that the British church would receive war and death from the Saxons if they refused to proselytise.[42][43][44][e] Despite the inaccuracies of their system, the Britons did not adopt the Roman and Saxon computus until induced to do so around 768 by "ArchbishopElfodd of "Gwynedd". The Norman invasion of Wales finally brought Welsh dioceses under England's control. The development of legends about the mission of Fagan and Deruvian and Philip the Apostle's dispatch of Joseph of Arimathea in part aimed to preserve the priority and authority of the native establishments at St David'sLlandaff, and Glastonbury. It was not until the death of Bishop Bernard (c. 1147) that St Davids finally abandoned its claims to metropolitan status and submitted to the Province of Canterbury, by which point the popularity of Geoffrey of Monmouth's pseudohistorical Historia Regum Britanniae had begun spreading these inventions further afield. Such ideas were used by mediaeval anti-Roman movements such as the Lollards and followers of John Wycliffe,[45] as well as by English Catholics during the English Reformation. The legend that Jesus himself visited Britain is referred to in William Blake's 1804 poem "And did those feet in ancient time". The words of Blake's poem were set to music in 1916 by Hubert Parry as the well-known song "Jerusalem".

Scotland[edit source]

Saint Ninian as intercessor from Book of Hours of the Virgin and Saint Ninian (15th century)

According to Bede, Saint Ninian was born about 360 in what is present day Galloway, the son of a chief of the Novantae, apparently a Christian. He studied under Martin of Tours before returning to his own land about 397. He established himself at Whithorn where he built a church of stone, "Candida Casa". Tradition holds that Ninian established an episcopal see at the Candida Casa in Whithorn, and named the see for Saint Martin of Tours. He converted the southern Picts to Christianity,[46] and died around 432. Many Irish saints trained at the "Candida Casa", such as Tigernach of ClonesCiarán of Clonmacnoise, and Finnian of Movilla. Ninian's work was carried on by Palladius, who left Ireland to work among the Picts. The mission to the southern Picts apparently met with some setbacks, as Patrick charged Coroticus and the "apostate Picts" with conducting raids on the Irish coast and seizing Christians as slaves. Ternan and Saint Serf followed Palladius. Serf was the teacher of Saint Mungo,[47] the apostle of Strathclyde, and patron saint of Glasgow.

Cornwall & West Devon[edit source]

A Welshman of noble birth, Saint Petroc was educated in Ireland. He set out in a small boat with a few followers. In a type of peregrinatio, they let God determine their course. The winds and tides brought them to the Padstow estuary.[48] Kevin of Glendalough was a student of Petroc. Saint Endelienta was the daughter of the Welsh king Brychan. She also travelled to Cornwall - that is ancient Dumnonia - to evangelize the locals as did St Nonna mother of St David who travelled on to Brittany. Her brother Nectan of Hartland worked in Devon. Saint Piran is the patron saint of tin miners. An Irishman, Ciaran, he is said to have 'floated' across to Cornwall after being thrown into the sea tied to a millstone. He has been identified on occasion with Ciarán of Saigir.[49]

Ireland[edit source]

St. Patrick

By the early fifth century the religion had spread to Ireland, which had never been part of the Roman Empire. There were Christians in Ireland before Palladius arrived in 431 as the first missionary bishop sent by Rome. His mission does not seem to have been entirely successful. The subsequent mission of Saint Patrick established churches in conjunction with civitates like his own in Armagh; small enclosures in which groups of Christians, often of both sexes and including the married, lived together, served in various roles and ministered to the local population.[50][51][full citation needed] Patrick set up diocesan structures with a hierarchy of bishops, priests, and deacons. During the late 5th and 6th centuries true monasteries became the most important centres: in Patrick's own see of Armagh the change seems to have happened before the end of the 5th century, thereafter the bishop was the abbot also.[52] Within a few generations of the arrival of the first missionaries the monastic and clerical class of the isle had become fully integrated with the culture of Latin letters. Besides Latin, Irish ecclesiastics developed a written form of Old Irish. Others who influenced the development of Christianity in Ireland include BrigidMoluag and Caillín.

Universal practice[edit source]

Connections with the greater Latin West brought the nations of Britain and Ireland into closer contact with the orthodoxy of the councils. The customs and traditions particular to Insular Christianity became a matter of dispute, especially the matter of the proper calculation of Easter. In addition to Easter dating, Irish scholars and cleric-scholars in continental Europe found themselves implicated in theological controversies but it is not always possible to distinguish when a controversy was based on matters of substance or on political grounds or xenophobic sentiments.[53] Synods were held in Ireland, Gaul, and England (e.g. the Synod of Whitby) at which Irish and British religious rites were rejected but a degree of variation continued in Britain after the Ionan church accepted the Roman date.

The Easter question was settled at various times in different places. The following dates are derived from Haddan and Stubbs: southern Ireland, 626–628; northern Ireland, 692; Northumbria (converted by Irish missions), 664; East Devon and Somerset, the Britons under Wessex, 705; the Picts, 710; Iona, 716–718; Strathclyde, 721; North Wales, 768; South Wales, 777. Cornwall held out the longest of any, perhaps even, in parts, to the time of Bishop Aedwulf of Crediton (909).[54]

A uniquely Irish penitential system was eventually adopted as a universal practice of the Church by the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215.

Pan-Celtic traditions[edit source]

Caitlin Corning identifies four customs that were common to both the Irish and British churches but not used elsewhere in the Christian world.[55]

Easter calculation[edit source]

Easter was originally dated according to Hebrew calendar, which tried to place Passover on the first full moon following the Spring equinox but did not always succeed. In his Life of ConstantineEusebius records that the First Council of Nicaea (325) decided that all Christians should observe a common date for Easter separate from the Jewish calculations, according to the practice of the bishops of Rome and Alexandria.[56] Calculating the proper date of Easter (computus) then became a complicated process involving a lunisolar calendar, finding the first Sunday after an idealized Passover on the first full moon after the equinox.

Various tables were drawn up, aiming to produce the necessary alignment between the solar year and the phases of the calendrical moon. The less exact 8-year cycle was replaced by (or by the time of) Augustalis's treatise "On the measurement of Easter", which includes an 84-year cycle based on Meton. This was introduced to Britain, whose clerics at some point modified it to use the Julian calendar's original equinox on 25 March instead of the Nicaean equinox, which had already drifted to 21 March. This calendar was conserved by the Britons and Irish[57] while the Romans and French began to use the Victorian cycle of 532 years. The Romans (but not the French) then adopted the still-better work of Dionysius in 525, which brought them into harmony with the Church of Alexandria.

In the early 600s Christians in Ireland and Britain became aware of the divergence in dating between them and those in Europe. The first clash came in 602 when a synod of French bishops opposed the practices of the monasteries established by St Columbanus; Columbanus appealed to the pope but received no answer and finally moved from their jurisdiction. It was a primary concern for St Augustine and his mission, although Oswald's flight to Dál Riata and eventual restoration to his throne meant that Celtic practice was introduced to Northumbria until the 664 synod in Whitby. The groups furthest away from the Gregorian mission were generally the readiest to acknowledge the superiority of the new tables: the bishops of southern Ireland adopted the continental system at the Synod of Mag Léne (c. 630); the c. 697 Council of Birr saw the northern Irish bishops follow suit. The abbey at Iona and its satellites held out until 716,[58] while the Welsh did not adopt the Roman and Saxon computus until induced to do so around 768 by Elfodd"archbishop" of Bangor.

Monastic tonsure[edit source]

The Roman tonsure, in the shape of a crown, differing from the Irish tradition, which is unclear but involved shaving the hair from ear to ear in some fashion

All monks of the period, and apparently most or all clergy, kept a distinct tonsure, or method of cutting one's hair, to distinguish their social identity as men of the cloth. In Ireland men otherwise wore longish hair, and a shaved head was worn by slaves.[59]

The prevailing Roman custom was to shave a circle at the top of the head, leaving a halo of hair or corona; this was eventually associated with the imagery of Christ's crown of thorns.[60] The early material referring to the Celtic tonsure emphasizes its distinctiveness from the Roman alternative and invariably connects its use to the Celtic dating of Easter.[61] Those preferring the Roman tonsure considered the Celtic custom extremely unorthodox, and associated it with the form of tonsure worn by the heresiarch Simon Magus.[62] This association appears in a 672 letter from Saint Aldhelm to King Geraint of Dumnonia, but it may have been circulating since the Synod of Whitby.[63] The tonsure is also mentioned in a passage, probably of the 7th century but attributed wrongly to Gildas: "Britones toti mundo contrarii, moribus Romanis inimici, non solum in missa sed in tonsura etiam" ("Britons are contrary to the whole world, enemies of Roman customs, not only in the Mass but also in regard to the tonsure").[64]

The exact shape of the Irish tonsure is unclear from the early sources, although they agree that the hair was in some way shorn over the head from ear to ear.[65] In 1639 James Ussher suggested a semi-circular shape, rounded in the front and culminating at a line between the ears.[66] This suggestion was accepted by many subsequent writers, but in 1703 Jean Mabillon put forth a new hypothesis, claiming that the entire forehead was shaven back to the ears. Mabillon's version was widely accepted, but contradicts the early sources.[67] In 2003 Daniel McCarthy suggested a triangular shape, with one side between the ears and a vertex towards the front of the head.[65] The Collectio canonum Hibernensis cites the authority of Saint Patrick as indicating that the custom originated with the swineherd of Lóegaire mac Néill, the king who opposed Patrick.[68]

Penitentials[edit source]

In Christian Ireland – as well as Pictish and English peoples they Christianised – a distinctive form of penance developed, where confession was made privately to a priest, under the seal of secrecy, and where penance was given privately and ordinarily performed privately as well.[69] Certain handbooks were made, called "penitentials", designed as a guide for confessors and as a means of regularising the penance given for each particular sin.

In antiquity, penance had been a public ritual. Penitents were divided into a separate part of the church during liturgical worship, and they came to Mass wearing sackcloth and ashes in a process known as exomologesis that often involved some form of general confession.[70] There is evidence that this public penance was preceded by a private confession to a bishop or priest (sacerdos), and it seems that, for some sins, private penance was allowed instead.[71] Nonetheless, penance and reconciliation was prevailingly a public rite (sometimes unrepeatable), which included absolution at its conclusion.[72]

The Irish penitential practice spread throughout the continent, where the form of public penance had fallen into disuse. Saint Columbanus was credited with introducing the medicamenta paentitentiae, the "medicines of penance", to Gaul at a time when they had come to be neglected.[73] Though the process met some resistance, by 1215 the practice had become established as the norm, with the Fourth Lateran Council establishing a canonical statute requiring confession at a minimum of once per year.

Peregrinatio[edit source]

A final distinctive tradition common across Britain and Ireland was the popularity of peregrinatio pro Christo ("exile for Christ"). The term peregrinatio is Latin, and referred to the state of living or sojourning away from one's homeland in Roman law. It was later used by the Church Fathers, in particular Saint Augustine of Hippo, who wrote that Christians should live a life of peregrinatio in the present world while awaiting the Kingdom of God. Augustine's version of peregrinatio spread widely throughout the Christian church, but it took two additional unique meanings in Celtic countries.[74]

In the first sense, the penitentials prescribed permanent or temporary peregrinatio as penance for certain infractions. Additionally, there was a tradition of undertaking a voluntary peregrinatio pro Christo, in which individuals permanently left their homes and put themselves entirely in God's hands. In the Irish tradition there were two types of such peregrinatio, the "lesser" peregrinatio, involving leaving one's home area but not the island, and the "superior" peregrinatio, which meant leaving Ireland for good. This voluntary exile to spend one's life in a foreign land far from friends and family came to be termed the "white martyrdom".[75]

Most peregrini or exiles of this type were seeking personal spiritual fulfilment, but many became involved in missionary endeavours. The Briton Saint Patrick became the evangelist of Ireland during what he called his peregrinatio there, while Saint Samson left his home to ultimately become bishop in Brittany. The Irishmen Columba and Columbanus similarly founded highly important religious communities after leaving their homes.[74] Irish-educated English Christians such as Gerald of Mayo, the Two EwaldsWillehadWillibrordWilfridCeolfrith, and other English all followed these Irish traditions.

Other British and Irish traditions[edit source]

A number of other distinctive traditions and practices existed (or are taken to have existed) in Britain or Ireland, but are not known to have been in use across the entire region. Different writers and commenters have identified different traditions as representative of so-called Celtic Christianity.[76]

Monasticism[edit source]

Excerpt from the Martyrology of Oengus

Monastic spirituality came to Britain and then Ireland from Gaul, by way of Lérins, Tours, and Auxerre. Its spirituality was heavily influenced by the Desert Fathers. According to Richard Woods, the familial, democratic, and decentralized aspects of Egyptian Christianity were better suited to structures and values of Celtic culture than was a legalistic diocesan form.[75] Monasteries tended to be cenobitical in that monks lived in separate cells but came together for common prayer, meals, and other functions. Some more austere ascetics became hermits living in remote locations in what came to be called the "green martyrdom".[75] An example of this would be Kevin of Glendalough and Cuthbert of Lindisfarne.

One outdated belief is that the true ecclesiastical power in the Celtic world lay in the hands of abbots of monasteries, rather than bishops of dioceses.[12][77] It is certain that the ideal of monasticism was universally esteemed in Celtic Christianity.[78] This was especially true in Ireland and areas evangelised by Irish missionaries, where monasteries and their abbots came to be vested with a great deal of ecclesiastical and secular power. Following the growth of the monastic movement in the 6th century, abbots controlled not only individual monasteries, but also expansive estates and the secular communities that tended them.[79] As monastics, abbots were not necessarily ordained (i.e. they were not necessarily priests or bishops). They were usually descended from one of the many Irish royal families, and the founding regulations of the abbey sometimes specified that the abbotcy should if possible be kept within one family lineage.[80]

This focus on the monastery has led some scholars, most notably Kathleen Hughes, to argue that the monastic system came to be the dominant ecclesiastical structure in the Irish church, essentially replacing the earlier episcopal structure of the type found in most of the rest of the Christian world.[81] Hughes argued that the paruchia, or network of monasteries attached to an abbey, replaced the diocese as the chief administrative unit of the church, and the position of Abbot largely replaced that of bishop in authority and prominence.[82] According to this model, bishops were still needed, since certain sacramental functions were reserved only for the ordained, but they had little authority in the ecclesiastical structure.[83]

However, more recent scholarship, particularly the work of Donnchadh Ó Corráin and Richard Sharpe, has offered a more nuanced view of the interrelationships between the monastic system and the traditional Church structures.[81] Sharpe argues that there is no evidence that the paruchia overrode the diocese, or that the abbot replaced the Bishop;[78] Bishops still exercised ultimate spiritual authority and remained in charge of the diocesan clergy.[81] But either way, the monastic ideal was regarded as the utmost expression of the Christian life.[78]

The focus on powerful abbots and monasteries was limited to the Irish Church, however, and not in Britain. The British church employed an episcopal structure corresponding closely to the model used elsewhere in the Christian world.[12][77]

Irish monasticism was notable for its permeability. In permeable monasticism, people were able to move freely in and out of the monastic system at different points of life. Young boys and girls would enter the system to pursue Latin scholarship. Students would sometimes travel from faraway lands to enter the Irish monasteries. When these students became adults, they would leave the monastery to live out their lives. Eventually, these people would retire back to secure community provided by the monastery and stay until their death. However, some would stay within the monastery and become leaders. Since most of the clergy were Irish, native traditions were well-respected. Permeable monasticism popularised the use of vernacular and helped mesh the norms of secular and monastic element in Ireland, unlike other parts of Europe where monasteries were more isolated. Examples of these intertwining motifs can be seen in the hagiographies of St. Brigid and St. Columba.[84][page needed]

This willingness to learn, and also to teach, was a hallmark of the "permeable monasticism" that so characterised the Irish monastery. While a hermitage was still the highest form of dedication, the monasteries were very open to allowing students and children within the walls for an education, without requiring them to become monks. These students were then allowed to leave and live within the community, and were welcomed back in their old age to retire in peace. This style of monasticism allowed for the monastery to connect with, and become a part of, the community at large. The availability of the monks to the people was instrumental in converting Ireland from paganism to Christianity, allowing a blend of the two cultures.[84][page needed]

Wales[edit source]

According to hagiographies written some centuries later, Illtud and his pupils David, Gildas, and Deiniol were leading figures in 6th-century Britain.

Not far from Llantwit Fawr stood Cadoc's foundation of Llancarfan, founded in the latter part of the fifth century. The son of Gwynllyw, a prince of South Wales, who before his death renounced the world to lead an eremitical life. Cadoc followed his father's example and received the religious habit from St. Tathai, an Irish monk, superior of a small community at Swent near Chepstow, in Monmouthshire. Returning to his native county, Cadoc built a church and monastery, which was called Llancarfan, or the "Church of the Stags". Here he established a monastery, college and hospital. The spot at first seemed an impossible one, and an almost inaccessible marsh, but he and his monks drained and cultivated it, transforming it into one of the most famous religious houses in South Wales.[85] His legend recounts that he daily fed a hundred clergy and a hundred soldiers, a hundred workmen, a hundred poor men, and the same number of widows. When thousands left the world and became monks, they very often did so as clansmen, dutifully following the example of their chief. Bishoprics, canonries, and parochial benefices passed from one to another member of the same family, and frequently from father to son. Their tribal character is a feature which Irish and Welsh monasteries had in common.[86][page needed]

Illtud, said to have been an Armorican by descent, spent the first period of his religious life as a disciple of St. Cadoc at Llancarvan. He founded the monastery at Llantwit Major. The monastery stressed learning as well as devotion. One of his fellow students was Paul Aurelian, a key figure in Cornish monasticism.[87] Gildas the Wise was invited by Cadoc to deliver lectures in the monastery and spent a year there, during which he made a copy of a book of the Gospels, long treasured in the church of St. Cadoc.[85] One of the most notable pupils of Illtyd was St. Samson of Dol, who lived for a time the life of a hermit in a cave near the river Severn before founding a monastery in Brittany.

St David established his monastery on a promontory on the western sea. It was well placed to be a centre of Insular Christianity. When Alfred the Great sought a scholar for his court, he summoned Asser of Saint David's. Contemporary with David were Saint Teilo, Cadoc, PadarnBeuno and Tysilio among them. It was from Illtud and his successors that the Irish sought guidance on matters of ritual and discipline. Finnian of Clonard studied under Cadoc at Llancarfan in Glamorgan.

Ireland[edit source]

Finnian of Clonard is said to have trained the Twelve Apostles of Ireland at Clonard Abbey.

Saint Johnevangelist portrait from the Book of Mulling, Irish, late 8th century

The achievements of insular art, in illuminated manuscripts like the Book of Kellshigh crosses, and metalwork like the Ardagh Chalice remain very well known, and in the case of manuscript decoration had a profound influence on Western medieval art.[88] The manuscripts were certainly produced by and for monasteries, and the evidence suggests that metalwork was produced in both monastic and royal workshops, perhaps as well as secular commercial ones.[89]

In the 6th and 7th centuries, Irish monks established monastic institutions in parts of modern-day Scotland (especially Columba, also known as Colmcille or, in Old IrishColum Cille), and on the continent, particularly in Gaul (especially Columbanus). Monks from Iona under St. Aidan founded the See of Lindisfarne in Anglo-Saxon Northumbria in 635, whence Gaelic-Irish practice heavily influenced northern England.

Irish monks also founded monasteries across the continent, exerting influence greater than many more ancient continental centres.[90] The first issuance of a papal privilege granting a monastery freedom from episcopal oversight was that of Pope Honorius I to Bobbio Abbey, one of Columbanus's institutions.[91]

At least in Ireland, the monastic system became increasingly secularised from the 8th century, as close ties between ruling families and monasteries became apparent. The major monasteries were now wealthy in land and had political importance. On occasion they made war either upon each other or took part in secular wars – a battle in 764 is supposed to have killed 200 from Durrow Abbey when they were defeated by Clonmacnoise.[92] From early periods the kin nature of many monasteries had meant that some married men were part of the community, supplying labour and with some rights, including in the election of abbots (but obliged to abstain from sex during fasting periods). Some abbacies passed from father to son, and then even grandsons.[93] A revival of the ascetic tradition came in the second half of the century, with the culdee or "clients (vassals) of God" movement founding new monasteries detached from family groupings.[94]

Rule of Columbanus[edit source]

The monasteries of the Irish missions, and many at home, adopted the Rule of Saint Columbanus, which was stricter than the Rule of Saint Benedict, the main alternative in the West. In particular there was more fasting and an emphasis on corporal punishment. For some generations monks trained by Irish missionaries continued to use the Rule and to found new monasteries using it, but most converted to the Benedictine Rule over the 8th and 9th centuries.[f]

Again, however, the Rule of Columbanus was used exclusively in monasteries in the Irish sphere of influence; it was not followed in British monasteries.

Baptism[edit source]

Bede implies that in the time of Augustine of Canterbury, British churches used a baptismal rite that was in some way at variance with the Roman practice. According to Bede, the British Christians' failure to "complete" the sacrament of baptism was one of the three specific issues with British practice that Augustine could not overlook.[95] There is no indication as to how the baptism was "incomplete" according to the Roman custom. It may be that there was some difference in the confirmation rite, or that there was no confirmation at all.[40] At any rate, it is unlikely to have caused as much discord as the Easter controversy or the tonsure, as no other source mentions it.[40] As such there is no evidence that heterodox baptism figured into the practice of the Irish church.[12][77]

Accusations of Judaizing[edit source]

A recurrent accusation levelled against the Irish throughout the Middle Ages is that they were Judaizers, which is to say that they observed certain religious rites after the manner of the Jews.[53] The belief that Irish Christians were Judaizers can be observed in three main areas: the Easter Controversy, the notion that the Irish practiced obsolete laws from the Old Testament and (not unrelated to this) the view that they adhered too closely to the Old Testament. Quite apart from the intricate theological concerns that underpinned the debate over Easter in early 7th-century Gaul, Columbanus also found himself accused of Quartodecimanism, a heresy whose central tenet was observing Easter on the same date as the eve of the Jewish Passover, namely the fourteenth day of the Jewish lunar month of Nisan. Although this false accusation was raised at a time of heightened political tensions between Columbanus and the Gallic bishops, some historians have cautioned that it ought not be dismissed as a mere ruse because the Gauls may have been genuinely worried about blurring the boundaries between Gallic Christians and their Jewish neighbours.[96] That the Irish practiced obsolete Old Testament laws is another accusation that repeats itself a number of times in the early Middle Ages, most famously in the case of the 8th-century Irish charismatic preacher, Clement Scotus I (fl. 745), who was condemned as a heretic, in part for urging followers to follow Old Testament law in such controversial matters as obliging a man to marry his widowed sister-in-law upon his brother's death.[97] One example for the Irish tendency to adhere closely to the Old Testament is the Hibernensis, a late 7th- or early 8th-century Irish canon law collection which was the first text of church law to draw heavily on the Bible, and in particular the Old Testament. In Scotland similar accusations surround the supposed cultural taboo concerning pork.

Influence on Christianity in the British Isles[edit source]

According to John Bowden, "the singing of metrical psalms, many of them set to old Celtic Christianity Scottish traditional and folk tunes" is a feature that remains a "distinctive part of Scottish Presbyterian worship".[98]

Celtic Christian revivalism[edit source]

Ian Bradley notes that the recurrent interest in medieval insular Christianity has led to successive revival movements he terms "Celtic Christian revivalism".[99] He notes the establishment of the Celtic Orthodox Church, which maintains a relationship with the Syriac Orthodox Church, as an effort to maintain the "distinctive tenets of Celtic Christianity" in an autocephalous Christian denomination.[100]

According to Bradley, most, though not all, revivalists are non-Celts for whom Celtic Christianity has an "exotic and peripheral" appeal.[101] Adherents typically claim their revivals restore authentic practices and traits, though Bradley notes they reflect contemporary concerns and prejudices much more closely, and most are "at least partially inspired and driven by denominational and national rivalries, ecclesiastical and secular power politics, and an anti-Roman Catholic agenda." Though often inaccurate or distorted, the beliefs of these movements have greatly influenced popular conceptions of historical Celtic Christianity.[102]

Bradley traces the origins of Celtic Christian revivalism to the Middle Ages. In the 8th and 9th century, authors wrote idealised hagiographies of earlier saints, whose "golden age" of extraordinary holiness contrasted with the perceived corruption of later times. Similarly, the 12th- and 13th-century literary revival popularised and romanticised older Celtic traditions such as the Arthurian legend. These ideas were expanded during the English Reformation, as Protestant authors appropriated the concept of a "Celtic Church" as a native, anti-Roman predecessor to their own movement.[103] Nevertheless, despite his scholarly deconstruction of much of the popular view of "Celtic Christianity", in work such as his Celtic Christian Communities: Live The Tradition Bradley argues that historically well-founded insights can be applied to re-imagine life and ministry in contemporary churches.[104]

In the 18th and 19th centuries, antiquarianism, the Romantic movement, and growing nationalism influenced ideas about what was becoming known as "Celtic Christianity". Beginning in the early 20th century, a full-fledged revival movement began, centred on the island of Iona and influenced by the Irish Literary Revival and more general Christian revivals. By the end of the 20th century, another wave of enthusiasm began, this time influenced by New Age ideals.[103] Today, a self-identification with and use of "Celtic Christianity" is common in countries such as Ireland, both among participants in established churches and independent groups.[105]

See also[edit source]

Notes[edit source]

  1. ^ The date of Alban's execution has been a subject of discussion among historians with John Morris proposing that it took place during the persecutions of Emperor Septimius Severus as early as 209.[25] The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle lists the year 283,[26] and Bede places it in 305. Still others argue that sometime during the persecutors Decius or Valerian (251-259) is more likely.
  2. ^ Note, however, that many events of Patrick's hagiographies may have originally intended the earlier Saint Palladius, a Gaul dispatched to Ireland by Pope Celestine I.
  3. ^ The Bollandists compiling the Acta Sanctorum were even driven to complain of the Irish "canonising dead men in troops whenever they seemed to be somewhat better than usual".[33]
  4. ^ Indeed, this is noted as occurring in the household of King Oswiu of Northumbria, whose kingdom had been evangelised by both Irish and Roman missionaries.[37]
  5. ^ Bede says 1,200 British clergy died; the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle says 200. Bede is unclear on the date of the battle, but the current view is that it occurred in 616.
  6. ^ The main source for Columbanus's life or vita is recorded by Jonas of Bobbio, an Italian monk who entered the monastery in Bobbio in 618, three years after the Saint's death; Jonas wrote the life c. 643. This author lived during the abbacy of Attala, Columbanus's immediate successor, and his informants had been companions of the saint. Mabillon in the second volume of his "Acta Sanctorum O.S.B." gives the life in full, together with an appendix on the miracles of the saint, written by an anonymous member of the Bobbio community.

References[edit source]

  1. Jump up to:a b Koch 2006, p. 431
  2. ^ Koch 2006, pp. 431–432
  3. Jump up to:a b Corning 2006, p. 18
  4. ^ Ó Cróinín 1995[page needed]Charles-Edwards 2000[page needed]Davies 1992, pp. 12–21; Hughes 1981, pp. 1–20; Kathleen Hughes, The Church in Early English Society (London, 1966); W. Davies and P. Wormald, The Celtic Church (Audio Learning Tapes, 1980).
  5. ^ Brown 2003, pp. 16, 51, 129, 132
  6. ^ Wormald 2006, p. 207
  7. ^ Padberg, Lutz von (1998). Die Christianisierung Europas im Mittelalter. Reclam. ISBN 9783150170151.
  8. ^ Sharpe 1984, pp. 230–270; Wormald 2006, pp. 207–208, 220 n. 3
  9. ^ Wormald 2006, pp. 223–224 n. 1
  10. ^ Corning 2006, p. xii
  11. ^ Bradley 1999, pp. vii–ix
  12. Jump up to:a b c d e f Corning 2006, p. 1
  13. Jump up to:a b Koch 2006, p. 432
  14. ^ Toynbee, Arnold; Somervell, David (1987). A Study of History: Abridgment of, Volumes 1-6. New York: Oxford U Press. pp. 154–156. ISBN 978-0195050806.
  15. ^ AUCHMUTY, J. J. “IRELAND AND THE CELTIC PEOPLES IN TOYNBEE'S ‘STUDY OF HISTORY.’” Hermathena, no. 70, 1947, pp. 45–53. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23037506. Accessed 2 Aug. 2020.
  16. Jump up to:a b Koch 2006, pp. 432–434
  17. ^ Corning 2006, p. 4
  18. ^ Corning 2006, pp. 1, 4
  19. ^ Corning 2006, p. 2
  20. ^ Corning 2006, pp. 2–3
  21. ^ Corning 2006, p. 3
  22. ^ Boyle, Elizabeth (2017). "Writing Medieval Irish History in the Nineteenth Century". In Hill, Jacqueline; Lyons, Mary Ann (eds.). Representing Irish Religious Histories: Historiography, Ideology and Practice. Histories of the Sacred and Secular, 1700-2000. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. p. 72. ISBN 9783319415314. Retrieved 4 February 2018'[...] a Celtic Christianity, with its peculiar national faults and characteristics, finds place even in the New Testament. The Galatians, whose apostasy from pure Christianity has endowed the Church with St Paul's masterly defence of Christian freedom, were Celts [...]' There was a Celtic-speaking population in Galatia in the late centuries BC and perhaps into the early centuries AD, of which only fragmentary traces of the language survive in attested personal and place name evidence. However, the idea that the early Christian communities in Galatia shared certain 'national faults and characteristics' with the population of early medieval Ireland is entirely without foundation.
  23. ^ GildasDe Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae. 6th century. (in Latin) Translated by Thomas HabingtonThe Epistle of Gildas the most ancient British Author: who flourished in the yeere of our Lord, 546. And who by his great erudition, sanctitie, and wisdome, acquired the name of Sapiens. Faithfully translated out of the originall Latine (8 vols). T. Cotes for William Cooke (London), 1638. Edited and reprinted by John Allen Giles"The Works of Gildas, Surnamed 'Sapiens,' or the Wise", §8 in Six Old English Chronicles of Which Two Are Now First Translated from the Monkish Latin Originals: Ethelwerd's Chronicle, Asser's Life of Alfred, Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Gildas, Nennius, and Richard of Cirencester. Henry G. Bohn (London), 1848. Hosted at Wikisource.
  24. ^ Pseudo-Hippolytus (1999). "On the Seventy Apostles of Christ". Ante-Nicean Fathers5. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers. pp. 254–256.
  25. ^ "St. Alban the Martyr"Orthodoxy's Western Heritage, archived from the original on 15 November 2009, retrieved 21 November 2013
  26. ^ Ingram, James; Giles, J.A., eds. (1847). Anglo-Saxon ChroniclesProject Gutenberg.
  27. ^ "Explaining the origin of the 'field of the dead' legend". British History Online. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
  28. ^ Williams, Rowan (22 May 2004). "1400th anniversary of the re-organisation of the Diocese of London"Dr Rowan Williams: 104th Archbishop of Canterbury.
  29. ^ Snyder, Christopher A. (1998). An Age of Tyrants: Britain and the Britons A.D. 400–600. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. p. 22. ISBN 0-271-01780-5.
  30. ^ Baring-Gould 1898, p. 41
  31. ^ Baring-Gould 1898, p. 26
  32. ^ Hughes 2005, pp. 310–311
  33. ^ Quoted translated from the Latin in Baring-Gould 1898, p. 39
  34. Jump up to:a b Baring-Gould 1898, pp. 30–40
  35. ^ Williams, Rowan. "Reviews and comments on The Book of Welsh Saints".
  36. ^ Lloyd 1912, pp. 175–177
  37. ^ Lloyd 1912, p. 176 and note.
  38. Jump up to:a b "Early Christianity in Wales"Powys Digital History Project.
  39. Jump up to:a b Lloyd 1912, pp. 174–175
  40. Jump up to:a b c Lloyd 1912, p. 177
  41. ^ Bede 1995, pp. 106
  42. ^ Lloyd 1912, p. 180
  43. ^ Yorke 2006, pp. 118–119
  44. ^ Bede (1910). Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation. Book 1 Chapter XXII . London: J.M. Dent; E.P. Dutton – via Wikisource.
  45. ^ Tuchman, B. (1978). A Distant Mirror. New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-34957-1.
  46. ^ "Saint Ninian"The Whithorn Trust. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011.
  47. ^ "Butler, Alban. "The Lives of the Saints", Vol. VII, 1866"Bartleby.
  48. ^ "The Story of St. Petroc"St. Petroc's, Padstow. Archived from the original on 20 August 2013.
  49. ^ "Saint Ciaran of Saigir"New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. p. 117.
  50. ^ Hughes 2005, pp. 306 & 310
  51. ^ Riley, 82–93, 95–96
  52. ^ Ryan 1931, pp. 100–102
  53. Jump up to:a b Flechner & Meeder 2016, pp. 231–41
  54. ^ A. W. Haddan and W. Stubbs (ed.), Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents Relating to Great Britain and Ireland, 3 vols (Oxford, 1869–78), I, 112-3, Quoted in "The Catholic Encyclopedia".
  55. ^ Corning 2006, pp. 1–19
  56. ^ Constantine (325), "Letter on the Keeping of Easter to those not present at Nicaea", in Eusebius of Caesaria (ed.), The Life of ConstantineIII (published 1996), §18–20, ISBN 1-56085-072-8
  57. ^ Wormald 2006, p. 224 n. 1
  58. ^ John 2000, p. 34
  59. ^ Ryan 1931, p. 217
  60. ^ McCarthy 2003, p. 146
  61. ^ McCarthy 2003, p. 140
  62. ^ McCarthy 2003, pp. 141–143
  63. ^ McCarthy 2003, p. 141
  64. ^ A. W. Haddan and W. Stubbs (ed.), Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents Relating to Great Britain and Ireland, 3 vols (Oxford, 1869–78), I, 112-3
  65. Jump up to:a b McCarthy 2003, pp. 140–167
  66. ^ McCarthy 2003, pp. 147–148
  67. ^ McCarthy 2003, p. 149
  68. ^ McCarthy 2003, pp. 142–143
  69. ^ McNeill & Gamer 1938, p. 28
  70. ^ McNeill & Gamer 1938, pp. 7–9
  71. ^ McNeill & Gamer 1938, pp. 9–12
  72. ^ McNeill & Gamer 1938, pp. 13–17
  73. ^ Brown 2003, p. 252
  74. Jump up to:a b Corning 2006, p. 17
  75. Jump up to:a b c Woods, Richard (Fall 1985). "The Spirituality of the Celtic Church"Spirituality Today37 (3): 243–255. Archived from the original on 3 November 2013.
  76. ^ This list includes information from Plummer, Charles (1975) [1892]. "Excursus on the Paschal Controversy and Tonsure". In Plummer, Charles (ed.). Venerablilis Baedae, Historiam Ecclesiasticam Gentis Anglorum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 348–354.
  77. Jump up to:a b c Koch 2006, p. 433
  78. Jump up to:a b c Herren & Brown 2002, p. 13
  79. ^ Hughes 2005, pp. 311–312
  80. ^ Ó Cróinín, Dáibhí in Youngs 1989, pp. 13–14
  81. Jump up to:a b c Hughes 2005, p. 311 and note
  82. ^ Hughes 2005, p. 312
  83. ^ John 2000, pp. 32–34
  84. Jump up to:a b de Paor, Máire; de Paor, Liam (1958). Early Christian Ireland: Ancient Peoples and Places. Frederick A. Praeger.
  85. Jump up to:a b Chandlery, Peter (1912). "Welsh Monastic Foundations"The Catholic Encyclopedia15. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
  86. ^ Newell, E.J. (1895). "Chapter III"A History of the Welsh Church to the Dissolution of the Monasteries. London: Elliot Stock – via Internet Archive.
  87. ^ Thurston, Herbert (1912). "Welsh Church"The Catholic Encyclopedia15. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
  88. ^ Nordenfalk 1977[page needed]Pächt 1986[page needed]
  89. ^ Youngs 1989, pp. 15–16, 125
  90. ^ John 2000, p. 36
  91. ^ John 2000, p. 37
  92. ^ Hughes 2005, p. 317
  93. ^ Hughes 2005, pp. 313, 316, 319
  94. ^ Hughes 2005, pp. 319–320
  95. ^ Lloyd 1912, p. 175
  96. ^ Stancliffe 1992, pp. 211–12
  97. ^ Meeder 2011, pp. 251–80
  98. ^ Bowden, John Stephen (2005). Encyclopedia of ChristianityOxford University Press. p. 242. ISBN 9780195223934A distinctive part of Scottish Presbyterian worship is the singing of metrical psalms, many of them set to old Celtic Christianity Scottish traditional and folk tunes. These verse psalms have been exported to Africa, North America and other parts of the world where Presbyterian Scots missionaries or Emigres have been influential.
  99. ^ Bradley 1999, pp. viii–ix
  100. ^ Bradley, Ian (2020). Following the Celtic Way: A New Assessment of Celtic Christianity. Augsburg Books. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-5064-6743-6There has been little attempt to create a new denomination based on the supposed distinctive tenets of Celtic Christianity although there is a tiny Celtic Orthodox Church which has bases in Brittany, England and Wales and links with the Syrian Orthodox Church.
  101. ^ Bradley 1999, pp. viii–ix
  102. ^ Bradley 1999, p. ix
  103. Jump up to:a b Bradley 1999, p. viii
  104. ^ Bradley, Ian (2000). Celtic Christian communities : live the tradition. Kelowna, B.C.: Northstone Pub. ISBN 1-896836-43-7OCLC 44620654.
  105. ^ Gierek, Bozena (2011). "Celtic spirituality in contemporary Ireland". In Cosgrove, Olivia; Cox, Laurence; Kuhling, Carmen; Mulholland, Peter (eds.). Ireland's new religious movements: Alternative Spiritualities, Migrant Religions, the New Age and New Religious Movements. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. pp. 300–317. ISBN 978-1-4438-2588-7OCLC 758707463.

Bibliography[edit source]

Primary sources[edit source]

  • Adomnan (1991). Anderson, A.O.; Anderson, M.O. (eds.). Life of Columba (2nd ed.). Oxford Medieval Texts.
  • Williams, John, ed. (1860). Annales Cambriae. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts – via Internet Archive.
  • Bede (1896). Plummer, Charles (ed.). Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Angelorum. Venerabilis Baedae Opera Historica. Oxonii: E Typographeo Clarendoniano – via Internet Archive.
  • Cummian (1988). Walsh, Maura; Ó Cróinín, Dáibhí (eds.). De controversia paschali and De ratione conputandi. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. pp. 93–5.
  • Gildas (1848). Giles, J.A. (ed.). De Excidio Brittaniae. Six Old English Chronicles. London.
  • Giles, J.A., ed. (1848). Historia Brittonum. Six Old English Chronicles. London.
  • McNeill, John T.; Gamer, Helena M., eds. (1938). Medieval Handbooks of Penance. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Patrick (Saint) (1998). Skinner, John (ed.). Confessio. Translated by John Skinner. Image.
  • Baring-Gould, Sabine (1907). The Lives of the British Saints. Scanned by Google; alphabetized.

Secondary sources[edit source]

Further reading[edit source]

  • Cahill, Thomas (1996). How the Irish Saved Civilization. Anchor Books. ISBN 0-385-41849-3.
  • Mayr-Harting, Henry (1991). The Coming of Christianity to Anglo-Saxon England (3rd ed.). London: B.T. Batsford Ltd.

1973 A Tribute to Howard H. Brinton

 July 1/15, 1973 FRIENDS JOURNAL

Quaker Thought and Life Today

Contents

Quaker Sociology—Robert F. Tatman 356

A Tribute to Howard H. Brinton—Elizabeth Gray Vining, Wilson, Philip H. Wells, Elizabeth Brinton,

Edwin B. Bronner and Douglas Steere 357

Bicentennial of Luke Howard—Nuts' and Their 365

There Was an Old Man with a Beard—Noah Vail 365

On the Essential Differences Between Friends—R. W. Tucker,

Tom Abrams 166

Poetry by Richard F. Tirk, Jack Too'1l and PoU van no Sedz jot

Reviews of Hooks 369

Letters to the Editor 170

Friends Around the World. 173

Reports by Rosemary M. Elliott and Robert A. Martin, Jr.

Announcements and Coming Events 376

-----.

July 1/15, 1973 FRIENDS JOURNAL


The First Word The Darkness of Watergate;

The Light of Howard Brinton

MY READING MATERIAL and therefore my thoughts have been dominated recently by two Quakers. One of them, Howard Brinton, is physically dead but spiritually he will live forever through the impact of his light-filled, illum­inating life. Some reflections by others about that life are shared with readers in this issue of the Journal.

To me, some of the clearest of Howard Brinton's in­sights are in Quaker Education in Theory and Practice, a Pendle Hill pamphlet first published in 1940, and re­printed every nine years since. Particularly timely are some of his views on democracy. "A democratic society in order to function," he said, "must respect human per­sonality as sacred, inviolable and capable of genuine self-sacrifice. These are Christian doctrines. Democracy can­not work merely on a basis of sweet reasonableness and a general pooling of self-interests. There is no such thing as a successful secular democracy. English democracy was born out of the struggle for religious freedom in the seven­teenth century. The American democracy was founded by persons who came out of that struggle and who did not distinguish between their religion and their democracy."

I came across those words while reading and thinking about another, even more immortal Quaker, Richard Nixon. As Watergate deepened and became murkier, Howard Brinton's words, written more than three decades earlier, continued to shed light on this latest example of just how far America has come since it was founded.

"As long," Howard had said, "as we can draw on the accumulated reserve of Christian power stored up during an intensely religious era, so long will our American democracy prove workable. Only religion can overcome selfishness sufficiently to enable men and women to work together without compulsion . . . (Yet) it will be truly said that there is a power other than religion which en­ables men to work together with sufficient unselfishness to create a cooperative society. That power is patriotism

But patriotism is more likely in the long run to lead toward authoritarianism than toward democracy . . . there is a Higher Power than the state which can and will judge . .

Elsewhere, he also said true peacemaking was "a positive power by which an inner appeal is made to the best that is in man, rather than as an external pressure by forces from outside him."

As I read those words by one Quaker and compared them with the actions of the other one, it was all too sadly obvious how much closer to Richard Nixon and to Water­gate than to Howard Brinton and to Pendle Hill the American way of life really is in 1973.

The dollar and what it can do, not human personality, is sacred in modern America. As a result, there is ab­solutely nothing inviolable. Self-sacrifice is rare; self‑

FRIENDS JOURNAL July 1/15, 1973

service is much more common. The basic power of our national policy is negative, not positive, and with few ex­ceptions, it is the worst in man, not the best, to which America appeals. When these appeals not surprisingly fail to meet the needs of developing peoples, external pressure is applied through political, economic and, if need be, military forces.

And religion essentially has absolutely nothing to do with the process by which national decisions are made. That is how far we have come from the days when America was founded by persons "who did not distinguish between their religion and their democracy."

And we can't blame Richard Nixon for that. Instead, I suggest that we Americans, especially we "religious" Americans and particularly we American Quakers, take a long look at ourselves and ask some hard questions. How sacred do we consider each human personality? How capable are we of genuine self-sacrifice? How closely do we relate religion to not just democracy but our entire way of life? And do we indeed "appeal to the best that is in man?"

If even a few of us would consistently ask these ques­tions of ourselves and then try to honestly answer them in and through our own lives, religion would begin to be­come alive and well in America, rather than continue in its insipid and irrelevant way. But because we are not consistent and honest, we must share in the darkness of Watergate even as we share in the light of Howard Brin‑

ton that continues to point toward a better way. JDL

Shortly after the above was written, Martha Dart shared with us what she called "a poem-prayer-hymn" by G. K. Chesterton that had been read at the General Conference of Friends in India in early May. It seems, Martha said, to speak very clearly to the United States at the moment." It does, indeed.

o God of earth and altar,

Bow down and hear our cry;

Our earthly rulers falter,

Our people drift and die;

The walls of gold entomb us,

The swords of scorn divide;

Take not thy thunder from us,

But take away our pride.

From all that terror teaches,

From lies of tongue and pen;

From all the easy speeches

That comfort cruel men;

From sale and profanation

Of honor and the sword;

From sleep and from damnation,

Deliver us, good Lord!

Tie in a living tether

The priest and prince and thrall;

Bind all our lives together,

Smite us and save us all;

In ire and exultation

Aflame with faith, and free,

Lift up a living nation,

A single sword to Thee.

355

Quaker Sociology

by Robert F. Tatman

HAVE YOU EVER PLAYED "Quaker Sociology"? The rules are simple: list all the different Friends you can, and classify them according to their various characteristics. It's fun, and any number can play—(even attenders.)

First there are the Spirtual Friends. For them, the worship experience is paramount. They are usually some‑

what confused by and sometimes contemptuous of those

Friends who prefer to work in the world. There arc many different kinds of Spiritual Friends: the Children of Fox,

who see themselves as rekindling the spark of Original

Quakerism; the Oriental Friends, who discipline them­selves with yoga or Transcendental Meditation and who

sit in meeting meditating on the Whichness of What; the Philosophes, who spin marvelous webs of airy logic on the slim base of a split hair; the Biblical Friends, who know their Bible inside and out, backwards and forwards, and who are always ready with an apropos quote.

No Spiritual Friend, of course, can get along with the Activist Friends. These are the ones who see the meeting

for worship as a waste of precious time, choosing instead

to seek God on the picket line or in prison. Their mission is to Save the World, and they go about it relentlessly—

and God help any Friends who don't drop what they're

doing and follow them. Here, too, there are many different types: the Nonviolent Sociologists, whose woridview is

expressed in a scenario and who are forever running

situation analyses and scaling options to determine whether an action would be counterproductive (tactically speaking,

of course); the Politically Active Friends, usually liberal

Democrats, who like the American Way of Doing Things and who would like it better if they were running it; the

Friends With a Helping Hand, who collect old clothes and canned goods for the Poor People in the Ghetto, and who look forward to the one day a year when the Poor People come out to meeting for worship and a nice pot-Luck; the Communal Friends, who live in (what else?)

communes, sharing all the work and the child care and the vegetarian meals (for Communal Friends never eat

meat). Everyone, they say, should be a Communal Friend, because it's radical, ecologically sound, cheap, and healthy (not necessarily in that order; cheap usually goes first).

Then there are the Historical Friends. These are the ones of impeccable pedigree. Their ancestors were con‑

vinced by George Fox or Margaret Fell, and while maybe

those ancestors were poor working folk, you sure couldn't tell it by looking at their descendants. Their main interests

lie in maintaining old buildings and old records, so that everyone can know that their pedigrees are impeccable, and that their ancestors were convinced by George Fox or Margaret Fell .

And we can't forget the Committed Friends. (This is

Robert F. Tatman, a member of Merion, PA, Meetings, works with the Philadelphia Fellowship Commission.

not to say that the other Friends aren't committed, but these Friends are COMMITTED.) Simply defined, a Committed Friend is one who serves on so many com­mittees that he or she (usually she; Quaker committees are mostly female in membership and mostly male in leadership) runs the serious risk of being "committeed to death." The Society of Friends couldn't function without them. In a very real sense, they are the Society of Friends, for no one else ever comes to meetings. Of course it isn't really possible to divide up Friends—or any group—so neatly, although the temptation to do so is very strong. Most of you will have recognized your­selves in more than one of the categories, and others will have occured to you. Go ahead and make your own contributions to Quaker Sociology. As you do, you will realize that all of these Friends need nurturing. All of them need encouraging. All of them need each other, for they are all necessary to the life of the Society of Friends.

The Society of Friends is remarkably diverse. I seriously doubt that anyone can spell out all the ways Quakers take action. Yet all of us—Spiritual and Acitivist, His­torical and Committed—find our great strength in the direct and personal experience of God that lies at the heart of Quakerism. Just as American society as a whole is grappling with the question of pluralism, so is the Society of Friends. And perhaps—just perhaps—we are a little further along on the way to understanding what true pluralism means. One way to understand the diversity and beauty of Quakerism is to engage in this little game called Quaker Sociology. Once we Friends come to under­stand and appreciate the full spectrum of religious ex­perience in our Society, we will have begun the more difficult task of understanding and appreciating the full spectrum of cultural and political experience in the nation at large.

James Nayler Entering London

No, no, he had not thought himself to be the Christ of the Gospels; no, he had not thought London to be Jerusalem.

Then why, Friend James,

did you ride a donkey into London town? The Anglicans and Presbyterians laugh.

Confused, James Nay/er bowed his head and begged

forgiveness of the Society of Friends.

And then in him the inner Light burned low

which was his passion, utter and entire.

Could the Light betray him? Or betray Itself?

The vessel was insufficient for that Light;

his doubt and theirs would now turn down the wick.

Gentle my reader, do not pause to examine the wording incidental to this recital.

Mount your white donkey and set out straightway for a thousand Jerusalems plotting crucifixion.

JACK TOOTELL

----------------

HOWARD H. BRINTON 1884-1973 through whom the Light shone."


---------------------

Surrounded and Lifted Up

by Elizabeth Gray Vining

Image

DURING the Christmas holidays in 1936 at a Meeting Workers Institute at Pendle Hill, I met Howard Brinton for the first time. The seeds of all my later knowledge of him were there in that week.

I was a recently convinced Friend and I had just dis­covered the mystics. Howard Brinton and also Rufus Jones, though briefly at that institute, were to illumine both Quakerism and mysticism for me and to show me how they fitted together.

At that time Howard gave a series of lectures on the sources of Quakerism, which he traced not only to John and Paul, the great European mystics and spiritual re­formers, but also to the religions of the Orient. He had spent the previous spring and summer in China and Japan, where he talked with the great roshis and meditated with the monks at a temple in Kyoto. For the first time I heard of Zen.

Howard Brinton in 1936 already had the aureole of white hair that distinguished him to the last, a face luminous with wisdom and serenity and the unselfconscious simplicity that is the mark of the best mystics. He had, too, the mystic's fellowship with animals, although it was not till later that he came to meeting for worship with a baby rabbit in his pocket. His sense of fun surprised and delighted me when I saw him take part in the skits and songs of Log Night at the end of our week of study and worship. I did not then understand the deeper significance of Log Night: how by laughing at itself Pendle Hill seeks to produce not fanatics sure of their rightness but "humble truth-seekers who do not take themselves too seriously."

In 1969 and 1970 1 taught a course at Pendle Hill, which I called "Certain Mystics", in which I included both Rufus Jones and Howard Brinton, Before I lectured on Howard 1 had a long and memorable talk with him about his life and thought. There is room for only a highlight or two. His first piece of writing, at the age of twelve or thereabouts, was a collection of original poems entitled Extracts from the Thought of Howard H. Brinton. Studying under Rufus Jones at Haverford, he was led to Jakob Boehme who, he said, was his "favorite mystic, for he showed how to combine the affirmative and the negative ways." His comment on the six years he spent teaching at Pickering College, Ontario, was a rueful "I think I was just the same when I left there as I was when I went there." His work for the American Friends Service Committee in Germany provided him with a car to drive and a chance to take lovely young Anna Cox through the Riesengeberge to visit Boehme's grave.

He took his Ph.D. in physics and philosophy and his thesis on Jakob Boehme was later published as a hook, The Mystic Will. At Earlham he taught physics, but when he and Anna Cox Brinton went to Mills College, he taught religion and philosophy. "I thought there was plenty of physics in the world but not enough religion."

Howard and Yuki plant a tree. Photograph by Brad Nichols

The Mystic Will was followed by a distinguished list of books and pamphlets, chiefly on Quakerism. His last four pamphlets, soon to be published in book form with the title, The Philosophy of Quakerism, were written when he could no longer see to reread the sources he knew so well. The unique character of Howard Brinton's work on Quakerism lies to some extent in his sources: the little-read Epistles of George Fox and some three hundred Quaker journals. Over a period of years he and Anna Brinton together made an exhaustive study of the journals. He saw their Quakerism as mystical, with other elements.

"Quakerism," he wrote in Ethical Mysticism, "is de­rived from the ethical teachings of Jesus, the Christ-mysticism of Paul and the Logos- and God-mysticism of John." He defined mysticism many times, but perhaps his simplest definition is in Friends for Three Hundred Years: "a religion based on the spiritual search for an inward, immediate experience of the divine. . . . Quakerism is peculiar in being a group mysticism, grounded in Christian concepts." "By ethical mysticism," he explained, "I mean that type of mysticism which first withdraws from the world revealed by the senses to the inward Divine Source of Light, Truth and Power, and then returns to the world with strength renewed, insight cleared, and desire quickened to bind all life together in the bonds of love."

There are no spiritual ladders or stages to be found in Howard Brinton's mysticism, nor is the mystical journey mapped. But he does write of aridity and he does give advice as to how to meet what he calls "the dark forces of the soul." They "cannot be removed by direct attack. To fight them is to give them the only strength they can possess . . . It is not through a struggle to possess the Light but rather by permitting the Light to possess us

35 July 1/15, 1973 FRIENDS JOURNAL

that inner darkness is overcome." (The Quaker Doctrine of Inner Peace) He was very sure that insights received in retirement were to be carried out in service to others. "The negative journey to the Light was always followed by the positive journey to the needy but good world." (Friends for Three Hundred Years) And again, "A religion is better understood by what it does than by what it thinks."

Though Howard Brinton wrote about mysticism with the authority of direct knowledge, there are in his books no accounts of his own experiences. He was reticent about himself. But in his later years he did say to Dan Wilson that perhaps he should have revealed himself more, and he did tell me one afternoon, sitting in his

through whom the Light shone.

garden while students who had come to his regular Tues­day afternoon lecture drank tea all around us, of an ex­perience he had had in England.

"Do you know Glastonbury Tor? It stands up high—the ancient Isle of Avalon above what used to be a marsh. I climbed up there once years ago--it's quite a climb—and when I got to the top I had the most impressive ex­perience of my life. I felt surrounded and lifted up."

In his last years, after Anna Brinton's death, he used to come with Yuki Brinton's help, leaning on two sticks, to meeting for worship in the Barn at Pendle Hill. I see him now: with his white hair and frail, spare body, he was like a beautiful, translucent shell through which the Light shone.

Great and Humble Teacher, Warm Friend and Wise Counselor

I REMEMBER seeing him for the first time in the autumn of 1937. It was at the morning meeting for worship in the Pendle Hill Barn. Only during the previous summer had I discovered the Religious Society of Friends while serving in the American Friends Service Committee's Peace Caravan program. My literary introduction to the Quaker way of worshiping had come through reading his Swarthmore Lecture, Creative Worship. Though the meet­ing room was filled that morning with the Pendle Hill family, plus us sojourners for a peaceworkers roundup, my eyes were drawn at once to the man who had to be the author of that deeply convincing book. There he sat, back straight, head lifted, eminent eyebrows crowning closed eyes. He appeared to be listening, unafraid for whatever truth was to come purely out of the quiet. When he spoke, simply, briefly, clearly, I felt we were in the presence of a Friend, authentic as his writing. Quoting from Pascal's Pensées, "When we encounter a natural style we are always astonished and delighted, for we ex­pected to see an author, and found a man."

During his nearly forty years at Pendle Hill, Howard Brinton came to be known by seekers from around the world as a teacher of the religion he lived. Characteristics of the Quaker Journalists, whose religion he was so de­voted to portraying in contemporary terms, were pre­dominantly his own as well. Though he didn't keep a Journal, as such, I believe Pendle Hill has been his living autobiography.

He lived as simply as he spoke. In younger years he had worked as skillfully with his hands as with his mind; in later years he expressed wonder that he hadn't followed the way of the manual more than of the intellectual.

He could laugh and play heartily, as evidenced par­ticularly at Hallowe'en parties, Pendle Hill log nights, and with his grandchildren. Children and animals always seemed to feel at ease with him, and he with them. Never to be forgotten were the joyous family reunions, with Howard, Anna, their four children, spouses, and all six­teen grandchildren overflowing that humble little cottage, to which Howard and Anna had retired from Upmeads, in 1952. They had named it Matsudo (translated "Pine

FRIENDS JOURNAL July 1/15, 1973 by Dan Wilson

Door"), and had lived there for the rest of Anna's life; Howard's, too, except for his last few months. He and Yuki Takahashi Brinton had moved recently into one of the new apartments to make way for a new highway, the "Blue Route."

Mats udo had provided a special treat, once each week, tea being served by Anna before Howard's lectures there. How like them to take, in their usual unruffled stride, the awful announcement, some years ago now, that the high­way was to come right up to the front door. Anna had commented, "We'll use the back door," and Howard, "We'll not be living to see it."

In his presence could be felt the unusual degree to which he had been blessed with the inward peace, reverenced

He could laugh and play heartily. Photograph by Takao Akiyama

Image

HOWARD H. SRINTON 1554-197'

by him both as end and means, though in his modest way during one of our last visits, he commented, sadly, "I should have been less preoccupied with watching my mind. I could have revealed more, the depths of feeling in my heart."

Throughout my own twenty years of sitting almost daily with him, in the Pendle Hill meeting for worship, I knew him as a great and humble teacher, warm friend and wise counselor.

The Father of Pacific

by Phillihp H. Wells

HOWARD BRINTON has often been spoken of affectionately as the father of Pacific Yearly Meeting. During one yearly meeting at St. Mary's College I was sitting next to one of the Christian Brothers when Howard was introduced to make some remarks from the platform. Brother Girard leaned over and asked me, "Is he your pope?" Throughout the life of the yearly meeting he was an active par­ticipant, being present often, especially in the last ten years when he attended almost every year. While he never served in any office, he participated fully in the sessions.

Howard and Ann Brinton came to Mills College to teach in 1928 and stayed until 1936 when they became directors of Pendle Hill. They participated in Berkeley Meeting and the College Park Association, which in­cluded the Friends meetings in the San Francisco Bay area. In April, 1931 they called together Friends and friends of Friends from California, Oregon and Washing­ton for a two-day meeting at their home in Oakland. At that meeting the Pacific Coast Association of Friends, forerunner of Pacific Yearly Meeting, was formed. Howard also was the first editor of the Association's Friends Bul­letin, and the earliest issues were mostly his writing.

Even after Howard and Anna moved to Pendle Hill they continued to be interested in Friends on the West Coast. In the early 40's the number of Friends and Friends meetings in the West had increased, and there was a greatly felt need to unite them in a yearly meeting. Howard was always ready with wise counsel. It had been many, many years since a yearly meeting had been set up independently and not by an existing yearly meeting. Some Friends in the American Friends Fellowship Coun­cil (later the American Section of the World Committee) were very doubtful. Rufus Jones was especially con­cerned that we might offend California and Oregon Yearly Meetings of Friends Church. Howard labored with them patiently and helped us in our contacts with them until they all felt easy. Neither yearly meeting was troubled by the appearance of a new yearly meeting uniting the in­dependent unprogramed Western meetings.

In August of 1946 at a meeting of the Pacific Coast Association in Pasadena, attended by Howard and Anna Brinton, a yearly meeting was decided upon and the usual officers were appointed. The f011owing August we met at Palo Alto as the first session of Pacific Yearly Meeting. The Pasadena meeting had been especially enriched by

Image

Photograph by David I. Russell

Hoard and Anna at Pacific Yearly Meeting, 1968

an education conference held just before it, at which Howard was the resource leader. Howard also helped by directing Friends in Victoria, Vancouver and Mexico City to Pacific Yearly Meeting, so that we became an interna­tional yearly meeting.

During the 1950's, other concerns kept the Brintons from attending yearly meeting, but as Howard and Anna grew older they gradually became more regular attenders, partly because they could also visit their son, Edward, his wife, Desiree, and the grandchildren at La Jolla. It thus became a special dividend at yearly meeting to see and hear Howard and Anna as they spoke to the business of the meeting.

After Anna's death his devotion to the yearly meeting did not waver. He came to the 1971 session at McMinn­ville, Oregon, with a special concern to help Friends more clearly understand Quaker theology and its foundations in the writings of John. His enthusiasm sparked a renewed interest in the study of John and the Bible in many monthly meetings.

Yuki came with him and cared for him so carefully that he was able to be quite active. And again last year he and Yuki came to yearly meeting. Although he was feeble, his spirit pervaded the gathering. He was alert to all that went on, and he gave his approval to the next steps of growth that saw the grouping formed in his home 41 years before divide into three yearly meetings now. Who can foresee how much growth will eventually take place?

During all these years, the presence and writings of Howard Brinton have been a unifying and insipiring in­fluence for Friends everywhere, but particularly for us in the Pacific Coast region.

360 July 1/15, 1973 FRIENDS JOURNAL

through ,vho, the tigk

Family Occasions: Memories That Linger On

by Elizabeth Brinton

IT WAS NOVEMBER, and a familiar voice on the phone said "Of course we want everyone again this year." And so brothers, sisters, children, grandchildren and cousins of assorted ages would be gathering for another Thanks­giving dinner in Howard and Anna Brinton's home at Pendle Hill.

When our parents were no longer living, Howard's strong feeling for family solidarity, his real interest in each individual member, as well as his cordial invitations (backed wholeheartedly by Anna) made their home the natural gathering place for our particular branch of the Brinton family.

Howard was the oldest of our generation, but as the family gathered around the dinner table, his were the jokes we enjoyed the most, his stories the ones asked for year after year. Who among us will ever forget his ac­count of attending a very conservative meeting in the Middle West, years ago, and being preached at because he was wearing a necktie and his suit coat had the con­ventional collar? Howard's imitation of the elderly Friend's quavering voice—to the last cadence-.--was perfect, and his grandchildren were as entertained as we were.

One of the Thanksgiving dinner pictures, taken some years ago, shows Howard holding out a plate well filled with turkey. It portrays his hospitable sharing of food but symbolically it speaks of other things he shared with us, over the years.

We all knew that he had spiritual depths and religious insights far beyond anything any one of us could attain. We looked up to him with respect for his towering intellect and his literary ability and appreciated the place of prominence he held in the Religious Society of Friends. In spite of his achievements, however, he never talked down to any of us and his quiet simplicity made us all feel at ease with him.

Howard's July birthday meant another family gather-ing—usually an outdoor picnic. Part of the fun, which he entered into wholeheartedly, was the "crowning" ceremony when some of his grandchildren placed a wreath on his head—a green wreath they had made of honey­suckle or some trailing vine. Before the picnic was half over, the wreath was always askew, usually caught in a bushy eyebrow, but he always wore it bravely to the end of the meal, much to everyone's delight.

One year, a very young grandchild gave him a birthday present of a ball of wire twisted into an odd, complicated

shape. His grandfather looked at it carefully and said in

the kindest voice, "Thank you very much, I never saw anything like that before." None of the rest of us had

either! Howard had told the exact truth and the giver of the gift ran away, pleased that something he had made for his grandfather had been so well received.

During his growing-up years in Chester County, Howard

FRIENDS JOURNAL July 1/15, 1973 Image

The Quaker Reader by Jessamyn West | Goodreads

The Quaker Reader by Jessamyn West | Goodreads:

The Quaker Reader
by Jessamyn West (Editor)
 4.15  ·   Rating details ·  75 ratings  ·  6 reviews


This long-treasured introduction includes a rich selection of Quaker writings from 1650 to the present. The writings illuminate the tenets of a just and loving religious faith and practice, and can inform and guide those familiar with or new to Quakerism.
--
Paperback, 538 pages
Published December 12th 1992 by Pendle Hill Publications (first published 1962)
Original TitleThe Quaker Reader
----

Write a review
Silvio Curtis
Jun 15, 2009Silvio Curtis rated it it was amazing
A good collection of material, giving a historical overview of Quaker thought. A lot of primary sources by Quakers, some primary sources by non-Quakers, and a few secondary sources. A wide variety of styles, but the focus tends to be on the individual religious experiences of Quakers. If there's a weak spot, it's probably the difficulty integrating the individuals' experiences to get a sense of the history of Quakers as groups. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · 1 comment · see review
--
Daniel
Nov 09, 2009Daniel rated it liked it
some of the selections in this book are a little strange. the catalog as a whole fails to give a very comprehensive sense of the development of quaker thought, and the history behind that thought is often entirely obscured. west's idiosyncratic commentary sometimes trespasses into the nonsensical or simply irrelevant. that being said, it's a big, juicy anthology, and the foundational texts that form its early sections are tremendous. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
---
Eli
Apr 20, 2009Eli rated it it was ok
Shelves: religion-christianity
I have a much older edition, from 1960-something. The commentary feels quite dated, but the primary sources are fascinating.
flagLike  · comment · see review
Gregory Broderick
Nov 23, 2012Gregory Broderick rated it it was amazing
Fantastic Read

==
Top reviews from the United States
elderberryjam
5.0 out of 5 stars Great for study and meditation/worship
Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 2016
Verified Purchase
A small group was using this for a study prior to Quaker meeting-for-worship at a meeting I was visiting. Jessamyn West was the author of the book used for the movie, "Friendly Persuasion." I was so impressed with the discussion that I bought this book for myself. Each chapter has excerpts from different Quaker writers.
--
Richard D. Ackerman
5.0 out of 5 stars An Excellent Series of Essays on Quaker Theology and Conduct
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 1999
Verified Purchase
This books contains a variety of short essays on Quaker theology and conduct. It also contains important excerpts from the Journal of George Fox.
The book specifically and fairly acknowledges the scarcity of Friends' "theology" as an historical matter. However, this is amply supplanted by readings from the works of William Penn and others who were in a position to speak about the conduct of the Quakers and their effect on those around them. This 'third-person' perspective provides a unique insight into the lives of those known as the 'Quiet Rebels' in early American history and provides for a stimulating and educational reading experience. The editor should be credited with her fine selection of Quaker readings.
In short, the book is an excellent survey of Quaker thoughts and actions throughout history. By the time one reaches the end of this book, the reader should find themselves in the rather enjoyable position of feeling as though they know a 'Quaker'.
38 people found this helpful
---
Kenny
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Collection
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2011
Verified Purchase
This is a fine collection of writings from early Quakers to fairly recent times. The reader gets a sense of the times in which Quakerism was developed and also of what made its early practitioners special. This is, in my opinion, a very good source to those new to Quakerism or curious about what it's really about and whence it came. West includes background and analysis for each piece.

I would consider this a must-have book for any meeting house library or religious book collection.
2 people found this helpful
---
Thomas A. Renick
4.0 out of 5 stars Quakers -Searching for the inner light
Reviewed in the United States on September 10, 2010
Verified Purchase
This book is a compilation of writings from Quaker mystics. Goes from George Fox in 1600s England to more modern authors in their quest to understand God and social justice. Many members of the "Friends" today are agnostic and interested in only social programs, this book should be required reading for all who aspire to be a good "Quaker" and Christian.
2 people found this helpful
---
karin morgan
5.0 out of 5 stars good book on Quaker history from it's formation from the ...
Reviewed in the United States on August 23, 2014
Verified Purchase
good book on Quaker history from it's formation from the beginning .Why they are against war, slavery. And why they have silent prayer.
---
Sandra L. Sparks
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in the United States on December 20, 2016
Verified Purchase
A great reconnection to what is important about faith, to accept and experience "that of God in everyone."
---
t-squared
5.0 out of 5 stars Shapers of Ideas
Reviewed in the United States on July 21, 2014
Verified Purchase
I use this for my spiritual enhancement. Wisdom is always on time. And, this collection of wisdom is too.

2021/08/05

William Penn/Seeking Faithfulness Lectures - Pendle Hill

William Penn/Seeking Faithfulness Lectures - Pendle Hill - A Quaker study, retreat, and conference center near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania



William Penn/Seeking Faithfulness Lectures (free to download in epub & PDF formats)


There are many free epub readers available online for Windows, Mac, Android, and Apple iOS.

The William Penn Lectures started as a ministry of the Young Friends’ Movement of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting (PYM). In the beginning of the last century, “Young Friends” was the community of young adults from both the Hicksite and the Orthodox Philadelphia Yearly Meetings, which reunited in 1955. The Young Friends Movement began the lecture series “for the purpose of closer fellowship; for the strengthening by such association and the interchange of experience, of loyalty to the ideals of the Society of Friends; and for the preparation by such common ideals for more effective work through the Society of Friends for the growth of the Kingdom of God on Earth.” The name of William Penn was chosen because the Young Friends Movement found Penn to be “a Great Adventurer, who in fellowship with his friends started in his youth on the holy experiment of endeavoring ‘To live out the laws of Christ in every thought, and word, and deed; and that these might become the laws and habits of the State.’”

The first run of William Penn Lectures were given between 1916 and 1966, and are warmly remembered by Friends who attended them as occasions to look forward to for fellowship with our community, inspiration, and a challenge to live into our faith.

The lectures were published by the Book Committee of PYM, and PYM has since granted Pendle Hill and Quaker Heron Press permission to reproduce the lectures as free e-books.

Although it was announced in 1960 that the series would be discontinued, several lectures were published in the early ’60s. It appears that the lectures given between 1923 and 1931 were never published. If we come upon manuscripts of these lectures, we hope to publish them in future.

In 2010, the Young Adult Friends of PYM revived the series, officially launching the second run of the William Penn Lectures in 2011. The series was renamed the Seeking Faithfulness series in 2016, as part of the Young Adult Friends of PYM’s concern for dismantling racism within the yearly meeting and the wider society. It no longer felt rightly ordered to have a major event named after a slaveholder. The Seeking Faithfulness series is hosted by the Young Adult Friends for the benefit of the whole yearly meeting community, and invites a Friend to challenge us all to explore new ways to practice our Quaker faith. The Seeking Faithfulness series seeks to nourish our spiritual lives and call us to faithful witness in our communities and throughout the world.

Requests for permission to quote or to translate should be addressed to:

Pendle Hill Publications
338 Plush Mill Road
Wallingford, PA 19086-6023
E-mail: publications@pendlehill.org

Below is a chronological list of the lectures soon to be available in epub (e-book) and PDF format. Just click on the link(s) to download. For a list of recommended e-readers for Windows, Mac, Android, and Apple iOS platforms click here – many can be obtained for free online.

1916/05 Elbert Russell ~ The Christian Life ~ e-book | PDF
1916/11 George A. Walton ~ The Quaker of the Future Time ~ e-book | PDF
1917 Norman M. Thomas ~ The Christian Patriot ~ e-book | PDF
1918 Harry F. Ward ~ The Christian Demand for Social Reconstruction ~ e-book | PDF
1919 Rufus M. Jones ~ Religion As Reality, Life and Power ~ e-book | PDF
1920 John Haynes Holmes ~ Heros in Peace ~ e-book | PDF
1921 Paul Jones ~ Hidden from the Prudent ~ e-book | PDF
1922 Kirby Page ~ Incentives in Modern Life ~ e-book | PDF

1932 Henry T. Hodgkin ~ Can Quakerism Speak to this Generation? ~ e-book | PDF
1933 John A. Hughes ~ The Light of the World ~ e-book | PDF
1934 Harold E. B. Speight ~ Tradition and Progress ~ e-book | PDF
1935 Patrick Murphy Malin ~ Design for Living ~ e-book | PDF
1936 Howard W. Hintz ~ The Basic Necessity for Spiritual Reconstruction ~ e-book | PDF
1937 Douglas V. Steere ~ The Open Life ~ e-book | PDF
1938 Howard H. Brinton ~ Divine-Human Society ~ e-book | PDF
1939 Thomas R. Kelly ~ Holy Obedience ~ e-book | PDF
1940 Allen D. Hole ~ Sharpening the Edge of the Spiritual Message ~ e-book | PDF
1941 Rufus M. Jones ~ The Vital Cell ~ e-book | PDF
1942 Kenneth Boulding ~ The Practice of the Love of God ~ Kindle | Nook
1943 Edward R. Miller ~ In the Nurture of the Lord ~ e-book | PDF
1944 Henry J. Cadbury ~ Two Worlds ~ e-book | PDF
1945 Cecil E. Hinshaw ~ The Light Within as Redemptive Power ~ e-book | PDF
1946 Gilbert H. Kilpack ~ The City of God and the City of Man ~ e-book | PDF
1947 D. Elton Trueblood ~ A Radical Experiment ~ e-book | PDF
1948 Bayard Rustin ~ In Apprehension How Like A God! ~ e-book | PDF
1949 Jean Toomer ~ The Flavor of Man ~ e-book | PDF
1950 Amiya Chakravarty ~ A Saint at Work ~ e-book | PDF
1951 Clarence E. Pickett ~ Having Done All, To Stand ~ e-book | PDF
1952 A. Burns Chalmers ~ Declaring the Everlasting Truth ~ e-book | PDF
1953 H. Richard Niebuhr ~ The Churches and the Body of Christ ~ e-book | PDF
1954 Thomas Shipley Brown ~ The Personal Relevance of Truth ~ Kindle | Nook
1955 Elfrida Vipont Foulds ~ Living in the Kingdom ~ e-book | PDF
1956 Elise Boulding ~ The Joy That is Set Before Us ~ e-book | PDF
1957 Norman J. Whitney ~ Into Great Waters ~ e-book | PDF
1958 Ira De A. Reid ~ Peace and Tranquility: The Quaker Witnesses ~ e-book | PDF
1959 Henry J. Cadbury ~ The Character of a Quaker ~ Kindle | Nook

1962 Albert Bigelow ~ Freedom to Love ~ e-book | PDF
1963 Landrum Rymer Bolling ~ The Search for a Sense of Unity ~ e-book | PDF
1964 Allan A. Glatthorn ~ God’s Lonely Man ~ e-book | PDF
1965 Dorothy H. Hutchinson ~ Unless One is Born Anew ~ Kindle | Nook
1966 Warren W. Wiggins ~ If You Want to Have a Friend ~ e-book | PDF

Videos of recent William Penn/Seeking Faithfulness Lectures: