Showing posts with label dark matter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dark matter. Show all posts

2023/09/29

If dark matter and dark energy make up 95% of the universe, isn't it plausible that they have causal influences on our brains and consciousness? - Quora

If dark matter and dark energy make up 95% of the universe, isn't it plausible that they have causal influences on our brains and consciousness? - Quora



If dark matter and dark energy make up 95% of the universe, isn't it plausible that they have causal influences on our brains and consciousness?

===


All related (38)
Sort


Recommended




ChatGPT ·
Bot


Dark matter and dark energy are thought to make up most of the universe, but scientists currently have very little understanding of their properties. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that they have any direct causal influences on

Continue reading






Gavin Rowland ·
Follow
Pioneering a theory of dark energy and consciousness8y


RelatedCould dark matter and/or dark energy play an important role in the phenomenon of consciousness?


On the question of dark matter I am inclined to agree with Frank Heile. Regarding dark energy, I have to disagree. The density of dark energy has nothing to do with its ability to interact with matter. We know very little about dark energy, but there is room for it to interact with matter via quantum mechanics. This would need to be through transmission of patterns, or information. Much work has been done on this area, termed 'quantum consciousness'.
Dark energy brings a number of useful features to the problem of consciousness. Important figures in the field such as David Chalmers are openly … (more)


Upvote
22





Viktor T. Toth ·
Follow
IT pro, part-time physicistUpvoted by
Stephen Selipsky, ex-theorist (particle & astro/cosmo); Stanford Ph.D., research at CERN, BU, Yale6y


RelatedHow do we know that 5% of the universe is normal matter, 25% is dark matter and 70% is dark energy?


Good question. The answer has to do with the so-called equation of state.

Cosmologists characterize stuff with the equation of state: w=p/ρ�=�/�, where p� is the pressure, ρ� is the energy density. Since pressure and energy density are measured in the same units (force divided by area, which is pressure, is the same as energy divided by volume), their ratio is just a plain number, independent of the system of units used.

As the cosmos expands, stuff with different values of w� behave differently.

First, there is so-called dust, characterized by w=0�=0. Dust only interacts with itself and other forms… (more)


Upvote
170







5











Kendra Morgan ·
Follow
Tune into the Judgment Call Podcast for Tech & Philosophy.Aug 1


RelatedWhat is the amount of dark matter and dark energy that the universe contains?


The universe is vast and mysterious, and we can only guess the exact amount of dark matter and dark energy that it contains.

However, we do know that the majority of the universe's mass-energy density is comprised of dark energy, and this may be constant throughout.

We also know that dark matter makes up around 85% of the total mass-energy of the universe, though its exact distribution and properties remain unknown.

As we learn more about this enigmatic force, we may be able to make a more accurate estimation of the amount of dark matter and dark energy that the universe holds.


Upvote
81


Related questions

More answers below

How likely is it that, since dark matter and dark energy are basically unknowns, we might be wrong at the very basics? If we can't observe what most of the universe is made of, could it be that our theories are simply wrong?


Can dark matter have consciousness?


Could dark matter and/or dark energy play an important role in the phenomenon of consciousness?








Jennifer Collins ·
Follow
Get 90% smarter by listening to The JudgmentCall Podcast.Apr 24


RelatedHow does dark matter affect the universe?


Dark matter is an invisible form of matter that cannot be seen with ordinary telescopes.

It makes up an estimated 25% of the universe, and exists in vast, invisible clouds that permeate the universe.

It has been proposed as an explanation for the unusual behavior of galaxies and other large-scale cosmic structures.Dark matter affects the universe in a number of ways.

It helps hold galaxies together by providing an invisible gravitational field that keeps them from being torn apart by their own centrifugal forces.

It also has a role in the formation of stars, galaxies, and other structures within t… (more)


Upvote
153






3



3











Aswin Vijayan ·
Follow
MSc in Astronomy, Leiden University (Graduated 2017)Updated 5y


RelatedHow were dark matter and dark energy discovered?


Nobody has discovered dark matter and dark energy, but there are plenty of evidences for their existence (there has been a few papers claiming observation of a dark matter annihilation signal). Currently the scientific community do not know if their presence is due to a particle or due to new physics that arise at these scales. So I present some of the observational evidences that lead to the acceptance of the current model of the Universe with dark matter and dark energy.

Dark Matter:The primary evidence for dark matter came from the observations of the Coma cluster by Fritz Zwicky in the 1930… (more)


Upvote
42






5



13











Rome Viharo ·
Follow
Founder (2021–present)4y


RelatedCan dark matter have consciousness?


I’m not a physicist, so likely my answer SHOULD NOT hold much weight at all. As a layman non-scientist, however - I keep up as best I can with the latest in cosmology and consciousness, more as nerd hobby.

So, to answer your question “Is Dark Matter consciousness?” is really vague to address from a scientific perspective.We don’t know what dark matter, or dark energy is. Zip. We just know that it makes the majority of our known universe, and without this none of our models and physics work like we predict they should.
Consciousness itself is probably the least understood and most difficult pheno… (more)


Upvote
7








3











Kendra Morgan ·
Follow
Tune into the Judgment Call Podcast for Tech & Philosophy.May 7


RelatedDoes dark matter or dark energy even exist?


The answer to this question is both yes and no.

We have strong evidence that dark matter and dark energy do exist, but that evidence comes from indirect measurements.

In other words, we can measure the effects of these substances on galaxies and other sources of light, but we have yet to directly observe either dark matter or dark energy.

We believe dark matter and dark energy exist because of their gravitational effect on the visible matter in our universe, which suggests that these two substances together make up about 95% of the universe.

Moreover, we know that dark matter and dark energy are v… (more)


Upvote
115








2











Joao ·
Follow
PhD in Astrophysics, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) (Graduated 2006)6y


RelatedHow do we know that 5% of the universe is normal matter, 25% is dark matter and 70% is dark energy?


Actually the matter-energy balance is given by the following chart:


The simple answer is: when astronomers measure the relation between distance and velocity indicated by distant supernovae they find a bunch of points and a diagram like this:


Never mind the details and please concentrate only on the upper plot. See all those points? They need to be fitted by a function so that the relationship between z (velocity) and m-M (distance) can be properly understood!

See the blue, green and black lines in the upper plot all fitting the data? These are multiple models with different parameters.

The author… (more)


Upvote
36






15



15











Jonathan Devor ·
Follow
PhD in Astronomy, Harvard University (Graduated 2008)Upvoted by
Science Communicator, Science Communicator and Astrophysicist and
Altuğ Mert Mısırlıoğlu, studied Physics at Bilkent University (2020)Updated 3y


RelatedDoes dark matter cause gravity?


The two previous answers here so far… how should I put this diplomatically… are unorthodox.

This is the generally accepted model of dark matter: We don’t know what it’s made of. We know it’s not made of atoms or anything similar to that (i.e. baryonic matter), and we know that it has very little or no interaction with bayonic matter. That is, with one exception - it has mass and therefore it exerts a gravitational force just like any other massive object. So in theory you could orbit around a clump of dark matter, but you wouldn’t be able to see or feel it.

And just to be clear. You don’t need d… (more)


Upvote
404






61



28











Kendra Morgan ·
Follow
Tune into the Judgment Call Podcast for Tech & Philosophy.Jul 9


RelatedCould dark matter and/or dark energy play an important role in the phenomenon of consciousness?


I believe that consciousness is more than just a phenomenon caused by physical matter, and is instead a non-physical phenomenon.

In fact, after much research, I can confidently say that consciousness is beyond physical matter, and dark matter and dark energy can not explain it accurately.

It's a much more complex phenomenon than what we are capable of understanding with current scientific models.


Upvote
87








3











Kirsten Hacker ·
Follow
PhD in Accelerator Physics, University of Hamburg (Graduated 2010)5y


RelatedWhat is the difference between dark energy and dark matter?


Dark energy is the positive deviation from what general relativity predicts for masses which are not moving.

Dark matter is the negative deviation from what general relativity predicts for masses which are not moving.

When masses are moving relative to one another, general relativity delivers erroneous predictions of matter that doesn’t actually exist. The appearance of dark matter and dark energy in the systems we study in the sky is the result of the movement of masses relative to each other.

Dark energy is the apparent result when masses are moving in the same direction relative to each other.… (more)


Upvote
21






9













Krister Sundelin ·
Follow
E-learning Producer (2020–present)Upvoted by
Dr. Alexander Peach, PhD Theoretical Physics (2017), Durham University, UK. and
Steve N., MS Physics & Cosmology, Syracuse University (2000)Jan 19


RelatedWhat is dark matter in a very simple term? Why do scientists know it can exist? Why and how is it important for the universe? If dark matter doesn't exist, what would universes really be like?


Hello, Seeker of Science !


Q: What is dark matter in a very simple term?


A: Dark matter is a placeholder term for the observed phenomenon that there seems to be about 5 times more invisible matter than visible matter. It is called “dark matter” because it interacts through gravity like matter, and it only interacts through gravity, meaning that we can’t see it.


Q: Why do scientists know it can exist?


A: Have you heard this old joke?


–How do you know there was an invisible elephant in the fridge?
–There are footprints in the butter.


And that is basically what dark matter and dark energy is: we have o… (more)


Upvote
805





Supayan Chakma Gautam ·
Follow
Studied PhysicsUpvoted by
Mack / Mac, PHD Physics & Mathematics, Max Plank Institute (1987) and
Chamindra Perera, Bsc Physics & Mathematics, Open University of Sri Lanka (2018)3y


RelatedWhat is dark energy and dark matter? If it can be explained in simple language yet in detail?


27% of the universe is made up of a mysterious substance dark matter and 68% of invisible form of energy dark energy (the rest only 5% is visible ordinary matter).

These two things do not interact with electromagnetic waves and light. So these are completely hidden and invisible. However, they have a strong gravitational effect on objects in space, which is why their presence in space is predictable.Dark matter attracts other objects toward it by exerting gravitational force. The amount of dark matter in each galaxy is enough to hold all the objects in the galaxy. It is responsible for the stru… (more)


Upvote
350





Rachel Ryan ·
Follow
Aug 26


RelatedIs dark matter antimatter?


Ah, the eternal cosmic conundrum, right?

Antimatter and dark matter might sound like they share the same mysterious nightclub, but trust me, they're not sipping the same cosmic cocktail.

Let me break it down without the cosmic jargon.

Antimatter is like the rebellious cousin of regular matter.

It's made up of particles that have the same mass as their counterparts but with opposite charges.

So, if we could gather enough antimatter, we'd have a galactic fireworks show with regular matter, releasing energy that could power your spaceship to the farthest reaches of the universe.

Just don't forget your … (more)


Upvote
103








Daniel Hodous ·
Follow
Independent Physicist, Amateur Cosmologist, Free Thinker6y


RelatedAre dark matter and dark energy: energy?


I have several theories about Dark Matter and Energy but (in layman's terms) Light is both a particle and a wave... Dark Matter and Dark Energy maybe shouldn't be looked at as separate things. Maybe the Dark is the Yang to the Ying of Light and the Dark is both a particle and a wave and is increasing in expansion because "The Dark" is the natural process of the decay of the universe. As everything Decays the Light fades and the Dark increases. This Dark Matter/Energy is nothing more than what I call the Entropy Particle (haven't found it yet but mathematically its a sound argument). My theory … (more)


Upvote
5






Frank Heile ·
Follow
Ph.D. in Physics from Stanford University10y


RelatedCould dark matter and/or dark energy play an important role in the phenomenon of consciousness?


No. dark matter and dark energy cannot play any role in consciousness. We know quite a bit about dark matter - for example, we know that it interact very rarely with ordinary matter. We know that it is uncharged and that it does not interact with light. However, we do not know the mass of the dark matter particle (or particles - there could be more than one kind of dark matter particle). For more about what we do and don't know about dark matter see my answer to: "What do we know about dark matter?".

Dark energy has even less interaction with ordinary matter. In fact there is no evidence that … (more)


Upvote
14






Vivek Keshore ·
Follow
8y


RelatedWhat is dark energy?
Originally Answered: What is black energy?


The answer is "We still don't know/understand it"

Universe comprises of about 70% dark energy, 25% dark matter and 5% visible matter. All galaxies, stars, planets, moons, asteroids, black holes etc are in that 5%.

As we know that the universe is expanding continously, and its rate of expansion is also increasing significantly. Then the question is from where the universe is getting that energy to expand, and energy to increase the rate of expansion. The answer is mysterious dark energy.
It was calculated that in our universe the density of dark energy is around 6.91 × 10−27 kg/m3, which is a ver… (more)


Upvote
54






Shayne O'Neill ·
Follow
Former head of r&d at vTel MobileUpvoted by
Jan Cernohorsky, PhD Theoretical Physics & Astrophysics, University of Amsterdam (1990) and
Science Communicator, Science Communicator and Astrophysicist4y


RelatedAre dark matter and dark energy excuses for not being able to explain how the universe works?


Not excuses. It's not even an attempt to explain it. It's a statement of what the actual problem is. Let's consider the two separately, because they are seperate.

Dark matter is a reference to the something that's providing extra gravitational mass that's keeping galaxies spinning at the rate they do (and a few other similar problems). We know there has to be vastly more mass than we can see otherwise things would behave differently. So "Dark matter" is sciences name for the problem in physics that "we don't know where all this extra matter is, or even what it is".

Dark energy is a reference to … (more)


Upvote
12






Viktor T. Toth ·
Follow
IT pro, part-time physicist6y


RelatedAre dark matter and dark energy: energy?


Well, for starters, mass and energy, as we know since 1905, are really just two different names for the same thing.

But dark matter and dark energy (however awkward these two terms are) have specific properties and play specific roles in physical cosmology.

Cosmologists like to categorize all the “stuff” that fills the universe in a very simple manner, by the so-called equation of state. Which really is just the ratio of the pressure and energy density of that stuff. Now it so happens that pressure (which is force, divided by area) and energy density (which is energy divided by volume; but energ… (more)


Upvote
23






Jerzy Michał Pawlak ·
Follow
PhD in High Energy Physics (experimental)8y


RelatedCould dark matter be regular matter, just in other dimensions?


The theories you have read about, that postulate 11 dimensions, also postulate that those 7 extra dimensions are curled up very tightly so, that looking at any object with resolution accessible to us at present, you completely don't see them. Like a surface of a cylinder is two dimensional, but if you make the cylinder very thin and long, it will start to look to you like an one-dimensional line. Therefore the extra dimensions proposed by string theories can't "hide" any mass from you, because you always see them completely, with everything inside them.

Now, it is not a priori excluded, that t… (more)


Upvote
105






Abhijith Nv ·
Follow
Marine Engineer Officer Class IV at Wilhelmsen Ship Management (2017–present)6y


RelatedWhat is dark matter? And dark energy?


Dark matter and dark energy are something that we are not pretty sure about what they actually are. We know that they are present out there but we cannot detect them or see them because they do not interact with light or any baryonic matter (normal matter).

The baryonic matter account for only 5% of the entire universe. 25% is dark matter and 70% is dark energy (these numbers are not precise).

Dark Matter:

We came to know about the existence of dark matter because of its influence on gravity.

The galaxies in our universe are spinning so fast that normal matter we see around us does not have enough… (more)


Upvote
7








Leo C. Stein ·
Follow
Ph.D. from MIT, B.S. from Caltech. Specializing in gravity.Upvoted by
Jay Wacker, physicist: PhD + postdoc + faculty and
Eric Gentry, PhD Student in Astrophysics13y


RelatedWhat is dark matter?


Dark matter is the name given to additional mass whose presence is inferred only from gravitational attraction but which does not interact with light. It accounts for roughly 25% of the energy density of the universe. Dark matter is presumed to be a massive (~100 GeV scale) particle which is basically non-interacting except through gravity. There are several ongoing efforts to directly or indirectly detect the presumed dark matter particle.

Reasons we believe in dark matter:
Galactic rotation curves: spiral galaxies's angular rotation as a function of radius allows one to measure the mass inter… (more)


Upvote
374







A Arun Prasath ·
Follow
passionately curious, plagued with boredomUpdated 4y


RelatedAre there any theories as to what dark matter and dark energy are?


Dark matter and Dark energy are both hypothetical entities that are required to explain a few known cosmological phenomena, but they do not have a known solid physical basis yet. There are definitely few theories that attempt to explain them, but none very good so far. There are several observational pieces of evidence that point to the existence of dark matter (For more details see Jay Wacker's answer to What is dark matter?). I have tried to explain the motivation for dark matter and dark energy below, with some attempts to explain them.

DARK MATTER

MOTIVATION - It is a well known phenomenon t… (more)


Upvote
110







Manik Uppal ·
Follow
B.A. in Physics & Mathematics, Columbia University (Graduated 2014)Upvoted by
Erik Nelson, M.S. Physics & Computational Cosmology, University of California, San Diego (2005)9y


RelatedHow can dark matter / energy be detected?


I'm going to shamelessly copy and paste part of an article I wrote for a pop-science publication at my school:

If dark matter isn’t just a red herring, then it must consist of something. Physicists have ruled out all usual suspects, ie. all the particles that constitute the Standard Model of particle physics. It can’t consist of normal atoms, since normal atoms interact with light and dark matter patently does not, nor can it consist of neutrinos or any force-mediating particle. Thus, dark matter must constitute a new class of particle heretofore undiscovered. And given that normal matter consi… (more)


Upvote
10






2













Leo C. Stein ·
Follow
Ph.D. from MIT, B.S. from Caltech. Specializing in gravity.Upvoted by
Jay Wacker, physicist: PhD + postdoc + faculty and
Dimosthenis E. Gkotsis, BSc Physics, University of Aberdeen (2013)Updated 12y


RelatedWhat is dark energy? Why does it matter?
Originally Answered: What is dark energy?


Dark energy is the name given to a class of possibilities to explain the late time acceleration of the expansion of the universe. It accounts for roughly 70% of the energy density of the universe. There are several dark energy models. The simplest is a "cosmological constant", but other options are vacuum energy, quintessence, and more. Most of these models predict that dark energy does not vary spatially, and so it is difficult to distinguish the models.

The expansion of the universe is governed by the Friedman equation(s), which quantify the rate of change of expansion as determined by the en… (more)


Upvote
173








Prakyat Prasad ·
Follow
Analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland9y


RelatedCould dark matter really be the "other dimensions" theorized by physicists?


Firstly, extra dimensions are not parallel and most certainly do not exist in a parallel universe. So calling extra dimensions "parallel" isn't the best approach. Anything that exists in the extra dimensions will still be considered a part of our universe.

Second, other universes cannot interact with our universe, except in the case of Brane theory or some exceptional events like some Big Bang models. There are some theories out there that predict extra dimensions, most notably String Theory. These extra dimensions exist entirely within our universe and are folded up microscopically. Similar t… (more)


Upvote
56









Stephen Perrenod ·
Follow
Ph.D. astronomy/astrophysics; blog darkmatterdarkenergy.com6y



Completely implausible. Jupiter in your Sun sign would have more influence (and it doesn’t have any).

The density of dark energy is the equivalent of 4 protons per cubic meter.

And while dark matter is somewhat concentrated in our galaxy, it is less than the equivalent of 1 proton per cc.

Dark Matter in the Solar System: Does it Matter?




Jim Roberts ·
Follow
Working to become an expert6y



Its actually implausible dark matter only indirectly interact with neutrinos and directly interact with gravity over extremely large scale. As far as scientists know dark matter don’t interact with normal matter at all. So your brain and everyone else's is safe.


Upvote


















Shaun Vesey ·
Follow
Sales rep at Energy Sales6y



Dark energy and dark matter is something that we cant see but only observe the effects of its gravity ,i think it makes up 75% of the universe,i beleive it is the gravitational waves from another universe ,or many.



David A. Smith ·
Follow
6y



Let’s scale Dark Energy right away. I think it is currently at about 75% of the Universe’s contents. Dark Energy has no effect within bound systems. So it is “weaker than gravity” at the scale of the Virgo supercluster (to which the Milky Way belongs). Since gravity has a very minor influence on mood, and brain function (via the Moon and Sun), let’s say that the effect of Dark Energy is about as powerful as a mouse fart on the Moon.

As for Dark Matter, there is no Dark Matter in our solar system, since we can clearly see and account for all the matter here. So Dark Matter is only as effective a… (more)


Upvote


















Wayne Francis ·
Follow
Interested in literally the biggest questions about the cosmos6y



No.

First off Dark Matter doesn’t make up 95% of the universe. It makes up about 27% of the universe and the stuff you and I are made up of makes up about 5%.

Now because of the properties of Dark Matter there doesn’t seem that there is any way for it to influence our brains or consciousness.

Just like nitrogen makes up 78% of atmosphere yet has no affect on our physiology. We don’t interact with it in our respiration cycle.

So the answer to this is “No” until such time as there is actual evidence that it does. The amount of it doesn’t matter it could make up .1% or 99.9999%. If there is no known … (more)


Upvote
5






9













Dan Sharpe ·
Follow
Software Engineer and Author6y



Absolutely, Yes

Cosmic energy goes back as much as the 17th century BC in the written record, but who knows how far back that mankind has recognized this primal and essential energy of the universe for health, vitality and longevity.

Cosmic energy is the Hindu translation of “Shakti” which means “Empowerment” or “Power” and represents the dynamic forces thought to move through the entire universe.

Other cultural terms include Hindu Prana, Apana and Yyana, Chinese Chi (Qi), Vietnamese Khi, Korean Gi, Japanese Ki, subtle energy and woo energy, Hebrew koach-ha-guf, Greek Bios, English Aether, Americ… (more)


Upvote
1







3











James Swingland ·
Follow
Data Scientist6y




If dark matter and dark energy make up 95% of the universe, isn't it plausible that they have causal influences on our brains and consciousness?


Not really.

Dark matter only interacts gravitationally - which wouldn't affect us like that, even if there was dark matter nearby (there isn't much in our solar system).

Dark energy similarly doesn't act in a way that could affect us - and is only important on a scale of millions/billions of light years.

Every second billions of neutrinos pass through your fingers, and they don't affect you…


Upvote
1






1













Sash.M ·
Follow
Been looking through telescopes since age 76y



What most people don't realize is when scientists say dark matter and dark energy it simply means they don't know what it is. It could be some physical stuff that we can't see/detect, or it could be something we don't understand about how the universe works.

Since we don't know what dark matter/energy is we can't assume it has some effect on our brains and such.

Furthermore, if it did have some effect on our brains and consciousness then we would be able to detect/measure it.


Upvote
5






1








4 answers collapsed
(Why?)

Related questions



How likely is it that, since dark matter and dark energy are basically unknowns, we might be wrong at the very basics? If we can't observe what most of the universe is made of, could it be that our theories are simply wrong?


Can dark matter have consciousness?


Could dark matter and/or dark energy play an important role in the phenomenon of consciousness?


How can the universe keep on expanding if it's infinite? Expanding metal, like a cube of aluminium, has a surface area which forms a border for the matter contained inside. So the universe must have a border for the matter it contains.


Does dark matter (or dark energy) cause gravity?


What is dark energy? Why does it matter?


Is dark matter and dark energy linked together?


Can consciousness be dark matter or dark energy?


How were dark matter and dark energy discovered?


Do black holes destroy dark matter?


What is dark energy and dark matter? If it can be explained in simple language yet in detail?


What is exactly dark matter and dark energy?


If we have no pieces of evidence of the dark energy and dark matter, then on what basis we can say that they are 27% and 68% respectively of the total universe? How are we so sure about their participation in the whole universe?


What is the difference between dark energy and dark matter?


Is dark matter actually matter?

iZenTzu: Is Qi [Chi Energy] Dark Matter?

iZenTzu: Is Qi [Chi Energy] Dark Matter?

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Is Qi [Chi Energy] Dark Matter?


As I was thinking in my last post that I want to paint 111 Qi Ghost paintings .. this morning when I woke up I was told by my guides that 111=3 .. that is 3x11=33 / number 6. This made sense to me because I like simple numbers: Three artistic themes of 11 paintings in the style I saw [experienced] in the dream. One theme may be realism .. one theme will be time-travel and I don't see the third theme yet.As I was working all this out I saw a report that: European Space Observatory claim they detected Dark Matter streaming from the Sun. It is suggested this is the first direct detection of Dark Matter's Signature.

In earlier posts I suggested [using only my brain] that so-called Dark Matter is related to water .. forms of water we currently do not understand nor recognise. Current physical sciences want to understand fragments of reality. Like one specialises in understanding a single cell. But .. you are not going to understand the functions of a single cell unless you understand its conectedness and energy relationship signatures in relation to the whole spectrum of life.

In my mind gathered from profound experiences I have had in my dreams since I was a child .. all matter [sound / light / energy] comes from the same source. For fun let's say you have a white goddess and a black god [yin and yang] .. sorry I got that the wrong way round. Let's say you have a white god and a dark goddess perfectly matched in force and energy [balance] .. out of which the Universe is created and maintained in all its forms.

In other words .. Dark Matter is Light and Light is Dark Matter.

Humans today imagine they rely on light .. daylight .. the light of the Sun to survive and humans do not think that the darkness and the night [Dark Matter] is also essential for their survival and well-being. If you look into a clear night sky most of the sky is dark [filled with hidden undetected light] and there are tiny points of light of the Stars and Galaxies.

Let's take a totally new hi-tech computer in the future...

Computer technologies today rely on light = quartz crystal electrical impulses to carry information and like the human body to function on a day to day basis. In terms of my theory that our world today relies heavily on excessive yang out-of-balance energies [psyche] .. this is what I mean: Computer technology = yang male light fire [electricity+heat] that is also related to spirit [intellect / mind].

Excessive yang-tech principles ignore = are unable to comprehend in their out-of-balance state: Yin female matter / Earth water [opposite the yang fire principle] and cooling [darkness]. In this sense I imagine we are talking about obsidian crystals .. smoky quartz .. amethyst crystals. Most interesting of all is that obsidian [volcanic silica glass] is the result of lava coming into contact with water!

Is Qi [Chi Energy] Dark Matter?

In the future they have structures that gather and store energy more efficiently from the night [darkness] than can be gathered during daylight. To be simple about this the reason is that light bounces around and is very difficult to absorb. Even in the future it is more costly to catch and absorb daylight from the Sun than to absorb energy from darkness [Dark Energy].

It is the same with the human body. It is exactly the same principle with Qi [Chi energy]. Electrical energy heats up your computer and light bulbs .. and motors .. but does life force Qi heat up your body wearing out your cells? No .. it does not! The life force Qi maintains inner balance of physical cells .. organs .. the brain and the psyche [psychic field].

Inside the body life force Qi seamlessly interacts [powers] the physical body .. the glands .. the heart and the nervous systems .. the energy field .. the brain / mind and the psyche. Is Qi the Dark Matter signature within the body?

If yin and yang are one .. male and female are one .. then light and dark matter are one #_# .. it is really very simple building block geometry. For example .. your physical body is powered by the same force that powers the Universe. But do you feel this power is blowing your consciousness .. nervous system or your mind?

This is what I mean by Dark Matter!

The Catholic Church got their Black Madonna from the earlier Tibetan: Thanka Black Tara! Why black ?? Yin feminine dark cold night [some say death but it may be re-birth]. When you consider that the male force gives life [fire / Sun] and the female force gives birth [water / Moon] then you also have to consider that light and dark are one and the same force.

What is a Dark Computer?

When you take time to meditate what do you see feel in your mind / consciousness? In my mind the brain is mostly dark [at rest / passive] and within that inner mind resonance electrical [light] signals effortlessly go back and forth over the whole body. Just as with yang active male and yin passive female the body follows the same inner principles as male-female / yin-yang!

I have another crazy idea!

Is most of your internal energy conserved in the light connected process / impulses .. or is most of your internal energy conserved in the dark water that makes up most of your physical body? Water cools .. fire heats. Water transmits energy flows .. light travels through water. Darkness absorbs .. light travels effortlessly through darkness.

What I am trying to say is you have Dark Matter within and around your body / brain .. there are Dark Matter processes in and around the Earth! It is incredibly stupid to imagine that light processes are the only factors operating in matter within a yin yang duality balanced Universe!

The ultimate secret code of all is Life Force Qi.

Either Qi is Dark Matter .. or Life Force Qi is a yin/yang combination of light and dark as one core process. I tend to go for the core process signature because I can see and feel both forces working within me. But .. at the same time .. what DUALITY allows us to do is isolate and adapt those processes in terms of physical and energy technology. IN BALANCE!



Posted by ZenSu at October 19, 2014
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Asia-Atlan, ZenQi

QI Talk Forum | View topic - Dark Matter/Energy

QI Talk Forum | View topic - Dark Matter/Energy

Dark Matter/Energy

Page 1 of 8
Goto page 12345678  Next

grizzly
52948.  Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:18 pmReply with quote

Dark Matter and Dark Energy are both theoretical ideas.

Virtually all the matter in the Universe is dark, i.e. it does not emit radiation that can be observed by astronomers. But it can be detected by measuring the velocity of objects in the galaxy's outlying regions. If there were no additional matter to hold objects at the edge of galaxies in place then these objects would simply fly off into space.

Dark Energy is a theory to account for the accelerating expansion of the universe. The accelerating expansion of the universe implies that some form of energy, as yet unknown is forcing the universe to expand.

As to precisely what dark matter and dark energy are there is as yet no definite answer. Some explanations for the dark energy include neutrinos (already known to exist) and many other more exotic particles (tachyons for example are particles that travel faster than the speed of light so also travel back in time), a quantum soup or the cosmological constant.

 
Quaintly Ignorant
52974.  Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:27 pmReply with quote

It is also possible that our understanding of gravity is wrong:

Quote:
There's something wrong with our understanding of spiral galaxies such as our own Milky Way. The stars in their outer parts are being whirled around far too fast. Like children on a speeded-up roundabout, they should be flung into intergalactic space.
To explain why this does not happen, astronomers have been forced to propose that the visible stars and nebulae are supplemented by at least 10 times more invisible stuff. The gravity of this "dark matter" holds on to the fast-orbiting stars and stops them going AWOL. But not everyone is happy with this picture.

"If Newton were alive today and saw the evidence," says Mordechai Milgrom, of Israel's Weizmann Institute, "he would have come up with a different law of gravity." In Newton's absence, Milgrom has obliged. And a sizeable minority of astronomers think he may be on to something. For Milgrom, it began at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study in the early 1980s.

Quote:
Mond has made predictions that have been confirmed by subsequent observations of galaxies. But it is yet to come up with the killer prediction that will cause a stampede of theorists to the Mond camp. Milgrom doubts such a prediction exists. He believes it more likely that Mond will be accepted because of general dissatisfaction with dark matter - which wrongly predicts stellar motion in the centre of galaxies.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4604208-111019,00.html

 
AndyE
52982.  Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:56 pmReply with quote

Once upon a time I wanted to be an astrophysicist, and I studied this kind of stuff.

Observable matter (i.e. stuff that we can see) is reckoned only to make up about 4% of the mass of the Universe.

23% is reckoned to be dark matter. What that is is not known for certain, but the current favourite is that it's made of neutralinos (different from neutrinos). Much as I'd love to tell you all what a neutralino is, to do so would require the use of terms such as "the superpartner of the neutral higgsino" and "conservation of R parity". So I'll settle for saying that they are extremely small, have a mass infinitely close to zero, and travel at the speed of light.

Neutralinos are basically impossible to detect; it is only possible to infer their presence from the absence of other things. Particle physics is a bit like that, which is at least partly why I stopped trying to become a physicist and specialised in geography instead ...

The other 77% of the mass of the Universe is reckoned to be dark energy. What that is is even harder to get a handle on, because nobody really has a clue. Dark matter is at least "stuff", in a vague sense of the word, but dark energy just is. We know how much it ought to weigh: the amount of dark energy required to fill a sphere the size of the Earth would weigh one ten millionth part of a gram. Therefore, there's an awful lot of it about! A group in 1982 claimed to have detected some dark energy, but not many physicists really believe them ...

There are all sorts of theories for dark energy, which rely on things like "the cosmological constant", "quintessence", "it doesn't exist, ergo Einstein's Theory of General Relativity was wrong", or the wonderfully ludicrous "brane cosmology".

I'd love to go into brane cosmology, but I'm two series too late ...

 
dr.bob
53369.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:53 amReply with quote

AndyE wrote:
Observable matter (i.e. stuff that we can see) is reckoned only to make up about 4% of the mass of the Universe.

23% is reckoned to be dark matter.

The other 77% of the mass of the Universe is reckoned to be dark energy.


You've just accounted for 104% of the mass of the universe :)

 
djgordy
53373.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:58 amReply with quote

Just sweep the excess 4% under the carpet. Nobody will notice.

 
AndyE
53408.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:21 amReply with quote

dr.bob wrote:
You've just accounted for 104% of the mass of the universe :)


Oh dear so I have. I meant 73% of course, but I was distracted by my fiancée's post about lesbians! That's my excuse anyway!

 
dr.bob
53414.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:46 amReply with quote

Yeah yeah, that's what they all say :)

 
Tas
53434.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:39 amReply with quote

Just a few quick questions. I know very little about astro-physicals, neutrinos, neutralinos, neutragenas and all that stuff.

According to astronomers and physicists and so on, the observable universe is missing 'x' amount of matter.

1. How do we know the calculation on the amount of matter is correct?

2. Could the matter be beyond other matter. EG hiding behind other stars, nebulae, supernovae and so on?

3. Maybe the speed at which matter was flung away from the big bang or whatever is greater than supposed, and thus beyond the limits of the visible universe. People say that the universe is 'x' billion years old, but this number keeps jumping around. Shouldn't it be that the observable universe is 'x' billions of years old, as we can only see as far as 'x' billion light years, and matter could be 'x+1' billion light years away?

4. If matter=energy (I think I read that somewhere before), couldn't the missing matter be all the radiation and so on that is flying around the cosmos?

Sorry for seeming a bit thick, but the other half tries to cut down on the amount of Space I watch on the televisual box, and tries to inundate it with reality (*SPIT*) tv!

:-)

Tas

 
Quaintly Ignorant
53443.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:46 amReply with quote

I had virtually the same thoughts.

The missing matter, as I understand it, is infered due to the motion of the visible universe i.e the rate of spin of the galaxies and what have you. The fact that we can only see bright shining objects implies to me that alot of the matter missing to tie in with calculations could be the general everyday non-shining matter i.e asteroids, planets, dead stars, black holes et al.

 
grizzly
53479.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:22 amReply with quote

Quaintly Ignorant wrote:
I had virtually the same thoughts.

The missing matter, as I understand it, is infered due to the motion of the visible universe i.e the rate of spin of the galaxies and what have you. The fact that we can only see bright shining objects implies to me that alot of the matter missing to tie in with calculations could be the general everyday non-shining matter i.e asteroids, planets, dead stars, black holes et al.


I think the suggestion made by a lot of astrophysicists is that even this non-visible normal matter could not make up what is missing. Considering the huge mass that we can see (that 4% afterall is a hell of a lot of matter) it would seem nearly impossible to say that this type of matter made up the whole of the rest. I suppose this is the reason that there is the search for these other particles that would ensure that all of space had some sort of intrinsic mass that would make up for the missing value.

 
Kevino7
53483.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:27 amReply with quote

Another problem is the fact that 90% of the universe cannot be seen by us and could contain anything.

 
dr.bob
53485.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:30 amReply with quote

Tas wrote:
Just a few quick questions. I know very little about astro-physicals, neutrinos, neutralinos, neutragenas and all that stuff.


I want to do a cosmological investigation of neutragenas now :)

Tas wrote:
According to astronomers and physicists and so on, the observable universe is missing 'x' amount of matter.

1. How do we know the calculation on the amount of matter is correct?


It's not. It's a rough guess based on extrapolating from an incomplete data set.

Tas wrote:
2. Could the matter be beyond other matter. EG hiding behind other stars, nebulae, supernovae and so on?


Not really. As I understand it most of these quotes come from observing the motion of galaxies. The outer reaches of these move in a manner which, according to Newtonian theories of gravity, imply that there's a lot of matter beyond the visible edge. This occurs in galaxies even where there are no other matter obscuring the view.

The quotes about "missing 'x' amount of matter" then comes from comparing the gravitational effects of the bits you can see to the bits you can't see, and extrapolating that across the entire universe.

Tas wrote:
People say that the universe is 'x' billion years old, but this number keeps jumping around.


That's because it's really hard to date the universe, so most ages people come out with have pretty hefty error bars on them. They don't usually mention those, though.

Tas wrote:
4. If matter=energy (I think I read that somewhere before), couldn't the missing matter be all the radiation and so on that is flying around the cosmos?


I don't think so, though I can't think of a good way to explain why off hte top of my head.

Tas wrote:
Sorry for seeming a bit thick, but the other half tries to cut down on the amount of Space I watch on the televisual box, and tries to inundate it with reality (*SPIT*) tv!


That's cruel and unusual punishment :)

 
Kevino7
53488.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:33 amReply with quote

Neurinos are very interesting. From what I know is that they have bizarre behaviour.

 
dr.bob
53492.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:34 amReply with quote

Neutrinos are freaky.

Some people have suggested they have mass. I didn't even know they were catholic.

(sorry, old joke!)

 
grizzly
53505.  Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:57 amReply with quote

dr.bob wrote:
Tas wrote:
4. If matter=energy (I think I read that somewhere before), couldn't the missing matter be all the radiation and so on that is flying around the cosmos?


I don't think so, though I can't think of a good way to explain why off hte top of my head.


I assume that by refering to matter=energy that Tas is refering to the E=MC2. Matter can be changed into energy and back again through the processes of nuclear fussion and nuclear fission. It is not radiation itself that changes into matter. So it isn't a candidate for the missing matter in the universe, neither is background radiation much of a candidate for the missing dark energy. Dark energy needs to be causing the force that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate and I don't believe radiation is a candidate for this.