2022/05/26

Ralph Waldo Emerson - Wikipedia

Ralph Waldo Emerson - Wikipedia

Ralph Waldo Emerson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Ralph Waldo Emerson by Josiah Johnson Hawes 1857.jpg
1880 albumen print from a daguerreotype by Josiah Johnson Hawesc. 1857
BornMay 25, 1803
DiedApril 27, 1882 (aged 78)
Alma materHarvard Divinity School
Spouse(s)
Ellen Louisa Tucker
(m. 1829; died 1831)
[1]
 
(m. 1835)
Era19th-century philosophy
RegionAmerican philosophy
SchoolTranscendentalism
InstitutionsHarvard College
Main interests
Individualismnaturedivinitycultural criticism
Notable ideas
Self-reliancetransparent eyeballdouble consciousness, stream of thought, "Build a better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door"
Influences
Influenced
Signature
Appletons' Emerson Ralph Waldo signature.svg

Ralph Waldo Emerson (May 25, 1803 – April 27, 1882),[7] who went by his middle name Waldo, was an American essayist, lecturer, philosopher, abolitionist, and poet who led the transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century. He was seen as a champion of individualism and a prescient critic of the countervailing pressures of society, and his ideology was disseminated through dozens of published essays and more than 1,500 public lectures across the United States.

Emerson gradually moved away from the religious and social beliefs of his contemporaries, formulating and expressing the philosophy of transcendentalism in his 1836 essay "Nature". Following this work, he gave a speech entitled "The American Scholar" in 1837, which Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. considered to be America's "intellectual Declaration of Independence."[8]

Emerson wrote most of his important essays as lectures first and then revised them for print. His first two collections of essays, Essays: First Series (1841) and Essays: Second Series (1844), represent the core of his thinking. They include the well-known essays "Self-Reliance",[9] "The Over-Soul", "Circles", "The Poet", and "Experience." Together with "Nature",[10] these essays made the decade from the mid-1830s to the mid-1840s Emerson's most fertile period. Emerson wrote on a number of subjects, never espousing fixed philosophical tenets, but developing certain ideas such as individualityfreedom, the ability for mankind to realize almost anything, and the relationship between the soul and the surrounding world. Emerson's "nature" was more philosophical than naturalistic: "Philosophically considered, the universe is composed of Nature and the Soul." Emerson is one of several figures who "took a more pantheist or pandeist approach by rejecting views of God as separate from the world."[11]

He remains among the linchpins of the American romantic movement,[12] and his work has greatly influenced the thinkers, writers and poets that followed him. "In all my lectures," he wrote, "I have taught one doctrine, namely, the infinitude of the private man."[13] Emerson is also well known as a mentor and friend of Henry David Thoreau, a fellow transcendentalist.[14]

Early life, family, and education[edit]

Emerson was born in Boston, Massachusetts, on May 25, 1803,[15] a son of Ruth Haskins and the Rev. William Emerson, a Unitarian minister. He was named after his mother's brother Ralph and his father's great-grandmother Rebecca Waldo.[16] Ralph Waldo was the second of five sons who survived into adulthood; the others were William, Edward, Robert Bulkeley, and Charles.[17] Three other children—Phoebe, John Clarke, and Mary Caroline—died in childhood.[17] Emerson was entirely of English ancestry, and his family had been in New England since the early colonial period.[18]

Emerson's father died from stomach cancer on May 12, 1811, less than two weeks before Emerson's eighth birthday.[19] Emerson was raised by his mother, with the help of the other women in the family; his aunt Mary Moody Emerson in particular had a profound effect on him.[20] She lived with the family off and on and maintained a constant correspondence with Emerson until her death in 1863.[21]

Emerson's formal schooling began at the Boston Latin School in 1812, when he was nine.[22] In October 1817, at age 14, Emerson went to Harvard College and was appointed freshman messenger for the president, requiring Emerson to fetch delinquent students and send messages to faculty.[23] Midway through his junior year, Emerson began keeping a list of books he had read and started a journal in a series of notebooks that would be called "Wide World".[24] He took outside jobs to cover his school expenses, including as a waiter for the Junior Commons and as an occasional teacher working with his uncle Samuel and aunt Sarah Ripley in Waltham, Massachusetts.[25] By his senior year, Emerson decided to go by his middle name, Waldo.[26] Emerson served as Class Poet; as was custom, he presented an original poem on Harvard's Class Day, a month before his official graduation on August 29, 1821, when he was 18.[27] He did not stand out as a student and graduated in the exact middle of his class of 59 people.[28] In the early 1820s, Emerson was a teacher at the School for Young Ladies (which was run by his brother William). He would next spend two years living in a cabin in the Canterbury section of Roxbury, Massachusetts, where he wrote and studied nature. In his honor, this area is now called Schoolmaster Hill in Boston's Franklin Park.[29]

In 1826, faced with poor health, Emerson went to seek a warmer climate. He first went to Charleston, South Carolina, but found the weather was still too cold.[30] He then went farther south, to St. Augustine, Florida, where he took long walks on the beach and began writing poetry. While in St. Augustine he made the acquaintance of Prince Achille Murat, the nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte. Murat was two years his senior; they became good friends and enjoyed each other's company. The two engaged in enlightening discussions of religion, society, philosophy, and government. Emerson considered Murat an important figure in his intellectual education.[31]

While in St. Augustine, Emerson had his first encounter with slavery. At one point, he attended a meeting of the Bible Society while a slave auction was taking place in the yard outside. He wrote, "One ear therefore heard the glad tidings of great joy, whilst the other was regaled with 'Going, gentlemen, going!'"[32]

Early career[edit]

Engraved drawing, 1878

After Harvard, Emerson assisted his brother William[33] in a school for young women[34] established in their mother's house, after he had established his own school in Chelmsford, Massachusetts; when his brother William[35] went to Göttingen to study law in mid-1824, Ralph Waldo closed the school but continued to teach in Cambridge, Massachusetts, until early 1825.[36] Emerson was accepted into the Harvard Divinity School in late 1824,[36] and was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa in 1828.[37] Emerson's brother Edward,[38] two years younger than he, entered the office of the lawyer Daniel Webster, after graduating from Harvard first in his class. Edward's physical health began to deteriorate, and he soon suffered a mental collapse as well; he was taken to McLean Asylum in June 1828 at age 25. Although he recovered his mental equilibrium, he died in 1834, apparently from long-standing tuberculosis.[39] Another of Emerson's bright and promising younger brothers, Charles, born in 1808, died in 1836, also of tuberculosis,[40] making him the third young person in Emerson's innermost circle to die in a period of a few years.

Emerson met his first wife, Ellen Louisa Tucker, in Concord, New Hampshire, on Christmas Day, 1827, and married her when she was 18 two years later.[41] The couple moved to Boston, with Emerson's mother, Ruth, moving with them to help take care of Ellen, who was already ill with tuberculosis.[42] Less than two years after that, on February 8, 1831, Ellen died, at the age of 20, after uttering her last words: "I have not forgotten the peace and joy".[43] Emerson was heavily affected by her death and visited her grave in Roxbury daily.[44] In a journal entry dated March 29, 1832, he wrote, "I visited Ellen's tomb & opened the coffin".[45]

Boston's Second Church invited Emerson to serve as its junior pastor, and he was ordained on January 11, 1829.[46] His initial salary was $1,200 per year (equivalent to $30,536 in 2021), increasing to $1,400 in July,[47] but with his church role he took on other responsibilities: he was the chaplain of the Massachusetts legislature and a member of the Boston school committee. His church activities kept him busy, though during this period, facing the imminent death of his wife, he began to doubt his own beliefs.

After his wife's death, he began to disagree with the church's methods, writing in his journal in June 1832, "I have sometimes thought that, in order to be a good minister, it was necessary to leave the ministry. The profession is antiquated. In an altered age, we worship in the dead forms of our forefathers".[48] His disagreements with church officials over the administration of the Communion service and misgivings about public prayer eventually led to his resignation in 1832. As he wrote, "This mode of commemorating Christ is not suitable to me. That is reason enough why I should abandon it".[49][50] As one Emerson scholar has pointed out, "Doffing the decent black of the pastor, he was free to choose the gown of the lecturer and teacher, of the thinker not confined within the limits of an institution or a tradition".[51]

External video
video icon Booknotes interview with Robert D. Richardson on Emerson: The Mind on Fire, August 13, 1995C-SPAN

Emerson toured Europe in 1833 and later wrote of his travels in English Traits (1856).[52] He left aboard the brig Jasper on Christmas Day, 1832, sailing first to Malta.[53] During his European trip, he spent several months in Italy, visiting Rome, Florence and Venice, among other cities. When in Rome, he met with John Stuart Mill, who gave him a letter of recommendation to meet Thomas Carlyle. He went to Switzerland, and had to be dragged by fellow passengers to visit Voltaire's home in Ferney, "protesting all the way upon the unworthiness of his memory".[54] He then went on to Paris, a "loud modern New York of a place",[54] where he visited the Jardin des Plantes. He was greatly moved by the organization of plants according to Jussieu's system of classification, and the way all such objects were related and connected. As Robert D. Richardson says, "Emerson's moment of insight into the interconnectedness of things in the Jardin des Plantes was a moment of almost visionary intensity that pointed him away from theology and toward science".[55]

Moving north to England, Emerson met William WordsworthSamuel Taylor Coleridge, and Thomas Carlyle. Carlyle in particular was a strong influence on him; Emerson would later serve as an unofficial literary agent in the United States for Carlyle, and in March 1835, he tried to persuade Carlyle to come to America to lecture.[56] The two maintained a correspondence until Carlyle's death in 1881.[57]

Emerson returned to the United States on October 9, 1833, and lived with his mother in Newton, Massachusetts. In October 1834, he moved to Concord, Massachusetts, to live with his step-grandfather, Dr. Ezra Ripley, at what was later named The Old Manse.[58] Given the budding Lyceum movement, which provided lectures on all sorts of topics, Emerson saw a possible career as a lecturer. On November 5, 1833, he made the first of what would eventually be some 1,500 lectures, "The Uses of Natural History", in Boston. This was an expanded account of his experience in Paris.[59] In this lecture, he set out some of his important beliefs and the ideas he would later develop in his first published essay, "Nature":

Nature is a language and every new fact one learns is a new word; but it is not a language taken to pieces and dead in the dictionary, but the language put together into a most significant and universal sense. I wish to learn this language, not that I may know a new grammar, but that I may read the great book that is written in that tongue.[60]

On January 24, 1835, Emerson wrote a letter to Lydia Jackson proposing marriage.[61] Her acceptance reached him by mail on the 28th. In July 1835, he bought a house on the Cambridge and Concord Turnpike in Concord, Massachusetts, which he named Bush; it is now open to the public as the Ralph Waldo Emerson House.[62] Emerson quickly became one of the leading citizens in the town. He gave a lecture to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the town of Concord on September 12, 1835.[63] Two days later, he married Jackson in her home town of Plymouth, Massachusetts,[64] and moved to the new home in Concord together with Emerson's mother on September 15.[65]

Emerson quickly changed his wife's name to Lidian, and would call her Queenie,[66] and sometimes Asia,[67] and she called him Mr. Emerson.[68] Their children were Waldo, Ellen, Edith, and Edward Waldo Emerson. Edward Waldo Emerson was the father of Raymond Emerson. Ellen was named for his first wife, at Lidian's suggestion.[69]

Emerson was poor when he was at Harvard,[70] but was later able to support his family for much of his life.[71][72] He inherited a fair amount of money after his first wife's death, though he had to file a lawsuit against the Tucker family in 1836 to get it.[72] He received $11,600 in May 1834 (equivalent to $314,863 in 2021),[73] and a further $11,674.49 in July 1837 (equivalent to $279,592 in 2021).[74] In 1834, he considered that he had an income of $1,200 a year from the initial payment of the estate,[71] equivalent to what he had earned as a pastor.

Literary career and transcendentalism[edit]

Emerson in 1859

On September 8, 1836, the day before the publication of Nature, Emerson met with Frederic Henry HedgeGeorge Putnam, and George Ripley to plan periodic gatherings of other like-minded intellectuals.[75] This was the beginning of the Transcendental Club, which served as a center for the movement. Its first official meeting was held on September 19, 1836.[76] On September 1, 1837, women attended a meeting of the Transcendental Club for the first time. Emerson invited Margaret Fuller, Elizabeth Hoar, and Sarah Ripley for dinner at his home before the meeting to ensure that they would be present for the evening get-together.[77] Fuller would prove to be an important figure in transcendentalism.

Emerson anonymously published his first essay, "Nature", on September 9, 1836.[where?] A year later, on August 31, 1837, he delivered his now-famous Phi Beta Kappa address, "The American Scholar",[78] then entitled "An Oration, Delivered before the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Cambridge"; it was renamed for a collection of essays (which included the first general publication of "Nature") in 1849.[79] Friends urged him to publish the talk, and he did so at his own expense, in an edition of 500 copies, which sold out in a month.[8] In the speech, Emerson declared literary independence in the United States and urged Americans to create a writing style all their own, free from Europe.[80] James Russell Lowell, who was a student at Harvard at the time, called it "an event without former parallel on our literary annals".[81] Another member of the audience, Reverend John Pierce, called it "an apparently incoherent and unintelligible address".[82]

In 1837, Emerson befriended Henry David Thoreau. Though they had likely met as early as 1835, in the fall of 1837, Emerson asked Thoreau, "Do you keep a journal?" The question went on to be a lifelong inspiration for Thoreau.[83] Emerson's own journal was published in 16 large volumes, in the definitive Harvard University Press edition issued between 1960 and 1982. Some scholars consider the journal to be Emerson's key literary work.[84][page needed]

In March 1837, Emerson gave a series of lectures on the philosophy of history at the Masonic Temple in Boston. This was the first time he managed a lecture series on his own, and it was the beginning of his career as a lecturer.[85] The profits from this series of lectures were much larger than when he was paid by an organization to talk, and he continued to manage his own lectures often throughout his lifetime. He eventually gave as many as 80 lectures a year, traveling across the northern United States as far as St. Louis, Des Moines, Minneapolis, and California.[86]

On July 15, 1838,[87] Emerson was invited to Divinity Hall, Harvard Divinity School, to deliver the school's graduation address, which came to be known as the "Divinity School Address". Emerson discounted biblical miracles and proclaimed that, while Jesus was a great man, he was not God: historical Christianity, he said, had turned Jesus into a "demigod, as the Orientals or the Greeks would describe Osiris or Apollo".[88] His comments outraged the establishment and the general Protestant community. He was denounced as an atheist[88] and a poisoner of young men's minds. Despite the roar of critics, he made no reply, leaving others to put forward a defense. He was not invited back to speak at Harvard for another thirty years.[89]

The transcendental group began to publish its flagship journal, The Dial, in July 1840.[90] They planned the journal as early as October 1839, but work did not begin until the first week of 1840.[91] George Ripley was the managing editor.[92] Margaret Fuller was the first editor, having been approached by Emerson after several others had declined the role.[93] Fuller stayed on for about two years, when Emerson took over, using the journal to promote talented young writers including Ellery Channing and Thoreau.[83]

In 1841 Emerson published Essays, his second book, which included the famous essay "Self-Reliance".[94] His aunt called it a "strange medley of atheism and false independence", but it gained favorable reviews in London and Paris. This book, and its popular reception, more than any of Emerson's contributions to date laid the groundwork for his international fame.[95]

In January 1842 Emerson's first son, Waldo, died of scarlet fever.[96] Emerson wrote of his grief in the poem "Threnody" ("For this losing is true dying"),[97] and the essay "Experience". In the same month, William James was born, and Emerson agreed to be his godfather.

Bronson Alcott announced his plans in November 1842 to find "a farm of a hundred acres in excellent condition with good buildings, a good orchard and grounds".[98] Charles Lane purchased a 90-acre (36 ha) farm in Harvard, Massachusetts, in May 1843 for what would become Fruitlands, a community based on Utopian ideals inspired in part by transcendentalism.[99] The farm would run based on a communal effort, using no animals for labor; its participants would eat no meat and use no wool or leather.[100] Emerson said he felt "sad at heart" for not engaging in the experiment himself.[101] Even so, he did not feel Fruitlands would be a success. "Their whole doctrine is spiritual", he wrote, "but they always end with saying, Give us much land and money".[102] Even Alcott admitted he was not prepared for the difficulty in operating Fruitlands. "None of us were prepared to actualize practically the ideal life of which we dreamed. So we fell apart", he wrote.[103] After its failure, Emerson helped buy a farm for Alcott's family in Concord[102] which Alcott named "Hillside".[103]

The Dial ceased publication in April 1844; Horace Greeley reported it as an end to the "most original and thoughtful periodical ever published in this country".[104]

In 1844, Emerson published his second collection of essays, Essays: Second Series. This collection included "The Poet", "Experience", "Gifts", and an essay entitled "Nature", a different work from the 1836 essay of the same name.

Emerson made a living as a popular lecturer in New England and much of the rest of the country. He had begun lecturing in 1833; by the 1850s he was giving as many as 80 lectures per year.[105] He addressed the Boston Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge and the Gloucester Lyceum, among others. Emerson spoke on a wide variety of subjects, and many of his essays grew out of his lectures. He charged between $10 and $50 for each appearance, bringing him as much as $2,000 in a typical winter lecture season. This was more than his earnings from other sources. In some years, he earned as much as $900 for a series of six lectures, and in another, for a winter series of talks in Boston, he netted $1,600.[106] He eventually gave some 1,500 lectures in his lifetime. His earnings allowed him to expand his property, buying 11 acres (4.5 ha) of land by Walden Pond and a few more acres in a neighboring pine grove. He wrote that he was "landlord and waterlord of 14 acres, more or less".[102]

Emerson was introduced to Indian philosophy through the works of the French philosopher Victor Cousin.[107] In 1845, Emerson's journals show he was reading the Bhagavad Gita and Henry Thomas Colebrooke's Essays on the Vedas.[108] He was strongly influenced by Vedanta, and much of his writing has strong shades of nondualism. One of the clearest examples of this can be found in his essay "The Over-soul":

We live in succession, in division, in parts, in particles. Meantime within man is the soul of the whole; the wise silence; the universal beauty, to which every part and particle is equally related, the eternal ONE. And this deep power in which we exist and whose beatitude is all accessible to us, is not only self-sufficing and perfect in every hour, but the act of seeing and the thing seen, the seer and the spectacle, the subject and the object, are one. We see the world piece by piece, as the sun, the moon, the animal, the tree; but the whole, of which these are shining parts, is the soul.[109]

The central message Emerson drew from his Asian studies was that "the purpose of life was spiritual transformation and direct experience of divine power, here and now on earth."[110][111]

In 1847–48, he toured the British Isles.[112] He also visited Paris between the French Revolution of 1848 and the bloody June Days. When he arrived, he saw the stumps of trees that had been cut down to form barricades in the February riots. On May 21, he stood on the Champ de Mars in the midst of mass celebrations for concord, peace and labor. He wrote in his journal, "At the end of the year we shall take account, & see if the Revolution was worth the trees."[113] The trip left an important imprint on Emerson's later work. His 1856 book English Traits is based largely on observations recorded in his travel journals and notebooks. Emerson later came to see the American Civil War as a "revolution" that shared common ground with the European revolutions of 1848.[114]

In a speech in Concord, Massachusetts on May 3, 1851, Emerson denounced the Fugitive Slave Act:

The act of Congress is a law which every one of you will break on the earliest occasion—a law which no man can obey, or abet the obeying, without loss of self-respect and forfeiture of the name of gentleman.[115]

That summer, he wrote in his diary:

This filthy enactment was made in the nineteenth century by people who could read and write. I will not obey it.[116]

In February 1852 Emerson and James Freeman Clarke and William Henry Channing edited an edition of the works and letters of Margaret Fuller, who had died in 1850.[117] Within a week of her death, her New York editor, Horace Greeley, suggested to Emerson that a biography of Fuller, to be called Margaret and Her Friends, be prepared quickly "before the interest excited by her sad decease has passed away".[118] Published under the title The Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli,[119] Fuller's words were heavily censored or rewritten.[120] The three editors were not concerned about accuracy; they believed public interest in Fuller was temporary and that she would not survive as a historical figure.[121] Even so, it was the best-selling biography of the decade and went through thirteen editions before the end of the century.[119]

Walt Whitman published the innovative poetry collection Leaves of Grass in 1855 and sent a copy to Emerson for his opinion. Emerson responded positively, sending Whitman a flattering five-page letter in response.[122] Emerson's approval helped the first edition of Leaves of Grass stir up significant interest[123] and convinced Whitman to issue a second edition shortly thereafter.[124] This edition quoted a phrase from Emerson's letter, printed in gold leaf on the cover: "I Greet You at the Beginning of a Great Career".[125] Emerson took offense that this letter was made public[126] and later was more critical of the work.[127]

Philosophers Camp at Follensbee Pond – Adirondacks[edit]

Ralph Waldo Emerson, in the summer of 1858, would venture into the great wilderness of upstate New York.

Joining him were nine of the most illustrious intellectuals ever to camp out in the Adirondacks to connect with nature: Louis AgassizJames Russell Lowell, John Holmes, Horatio Woodman, Ebenezer Rockwell Hoar, Jeffries Wyman, Estes Howe, Amos Binney, and William James Stillman. Invited, but unable to make the trip for diverse reasons, were: Oliver Wendell HolmesHenry Wadsworth Longfellow, and Charles Eliot Norton, all members of the Saturday Club (Boston, Massachusetts).[128]

This social club was mostly a literary membership that met the last Saturday of the month at the Boston Parker House Hotel (Omni Parker House). William James Stillman was a painter and founding editor of an art journal called the Crayon. Stillman was born and grew up in Schenectady which was just south of the Adirondack mountains. He would later travel there to paint the wilderness landscape and to fish and hunt. He would share his experiences in this wilderness to the members of the Saturday Club, raising their interest in this unknown region.

James Russell Lowell[129] and William Stillman would lead the effort to organize a trip to the Adirondacks. They would begin their journey on August 2, 1858, traveling by train, steam boat, stagecoach, and canoe guide boats. News that these cultured men were living like "Sacs and Sioux" in the wilderness appeared in newspapers across the nation. This would become known as the "Philosophers Camp".[130]

This event was a landmark in the nineteenth-century intellectual movement, linking nature with art and literature.

Although much has been written over many years by scholars and biographers of Emerson's life, little has been written of what has become known as the "Philosophers Camp" at Follensbee Pond. Yet, his epic poem "Adirondac"[131] reads like a journal of his day to day detailed description of adventures in the wilderness with his fellow members of the Saturday Club. This two week camping excursion (1858 in the Adirondacks) brought him face to face with a true wilderness, something he spoke of in his essay "Nature", published in 1836. He said, "in the wilderness I find something more dear and connate than in streets or villages".[132]

Civil War years[edit]

Emerson was staunchly opposed to slavery, but he did not appreciate being in the public limelight and was hesitant about lecturing on the subject. In the years leading up to the Civil War, he did give a number of lectures, however, beginning as early as November 1837.[133] A number of his friends and family members were more active abolitionists than he, at first, but from 1844 on he more actively opposed slavery. He gave a number of speeches and lectures, and welcomed John Brown to his home during Brown's visits to Concord.[134][page needed] He voted for Abraham Lincoln in 1860, but was disappointed that Lincoln was more concerned about preserving the Union than eliminating slavery outright.[135] Once the American Civil War broke out, Emerson made it clear that he believed in immediate emancipation of the slaves.[136]

Around this time, in 1860, Emerson published The Conduct of Life, his seventh collection of essays. It "grappled with some of the thorniest issues of the moment," and "his experience in the abolition ranks is a telling influence in his conclusions."[137] In these essays Emerson strongly embraced the idea of war as a means of national rebirth: "Civil war, national bankruptcy, or revolution, [are] more rich in the central tones than languid years of prosperity."[138]

Emerson visited Washington, D.C, at the end of January 1862. He gave a public lecture at the Smithsonian on January 31, 1862, and declared:, "The South calls slavery an institution ... I call it destitution ... Emancipation is the demand of civilization".[139] The next day, February 1, his friend Charles Sumner took him to meet Lincoln at the White House. Lincoln was familiar with Emerson's work, having previously seen him lecture.[140] Emerson's misgivings about Lincoln began to soften after this meeting.[141] In 1865, he spoke at a memorial service held for Lincoln in Concord: "Old as history is, and manifold as are its tragedies, I doubt if any death has caused so much pain as this has caused, or will have caused, on its announcement."[140] Emerson also met a number of high-ranking government officials, including Salmon P. Chase, the secretary of the treasury; Edward Bates, the attorney general; Edwin M. Stanton, the secretary of war; Gideon Welles, the secretary of the navy; and William Seward, the secretary of state.[142]

On May 6, 1862, Emerson's protégé Henry David Thoreau died of tuberculosis at the age of 44. Emerson delivered his eulogy. He often referred to Thoreau as his best friend,[143] despite a falling-out that began in 1849 after Thoreau published A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers.[144] Another friend, Nathaniel Hawthorne, died two years after Thoreau, in 1864. Emerson served as a pallbearer when Hawthorne was buried in Concord, as Emerson wrote, "in a pomp of sunshine and verdure".[145]

He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1864.[146] In 1867, he was elected as a member to the American Philosophical Society.[147]

Final years and death[edit]

Emerson in later years

Starting in 1867, Emerson's health began declining; he wrote much less in his journals.[148] Beginning as early as the summer of 1871 or in the spring of 1872, he started experiencing memory problems[149] and suffered from aphasia.[150] By the end of the decade, he forgot his own name at times and, when anyone asked how he felt, he responded, "Quite well; I have lost my mental faculties, but am perfectly well".[151]

In the spring of 1871, Emerson took a trip on the transcontinental railroad, barely two years after its completion. Along the way and in California he met a number of dignitaries, including Brigham Young during a stopover in Salt Lake City. Part of his California visit included a trip to Yosemite, and while there he met a young and unknown John Muir, a signature event in Muir's career.[152]

Emerson's Concord home caught fire on July 24, 1872. He called for help from neighbors and, giving up on putting out the flames, all tried to save as many objects as possible.[153] The fire was put out by Ephraim Bull Jr., the one-armed son of Ephraim Wales Bull.[154] Donations were collected by friends to help the Emersons rebuild, including $5,000 gathered by Francis Cabot Lowell, another $10,000 collected by LeBaron Russell Briggs, and a personal donation of $1,000 from George Bancroft.[155] Support for shelter was offered as well; though the Emersons ended up staying with family at the Old Manse, invitations came from Anne Lynch BottaJames Elliot CabotJames T. Fields and Annie Adams Fields.[156] The fire marked an end to Emerson's serious lecturing career; from then on, he would lecture only on special occasions and only in front of familiar audiences.[157]

While the house was being rebuilt, Emerson took a trip to England, continental Europe, and Egypt. He left on October 23, 1872, along with his daughter Ellen,[158] while his wife Lidian spent time at the Old Manse and with friends.[159] Emerson and his daughter Ellen returned to the United States on the ship Olympus along with friend Charles Eliot Norton on April 15, 1873.[160] Emerson's return to Concord was celebrated by the town, and school was canceled that day.[150]

Emerson's grave – Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, Concord, Massachusetts
Emerson's grave marker

In late 1874, Emerson published an anthology of poetry entitled Parnassus,[161][162] which included poems by Anna Laetitia BarbauldJulia Caroline DorrJean IngelowLucy LarcomJones Very, as well as Thoreau and several others.[163] Originally, the anthology had been prepared as early as the fall of 1871, but it was delayed when the publishers asked for revisions.[164]

The problems with his memory had become embarrassing to Emerson and he ceased his public appearances by 1879. In reply to an invitation to a retirement celebration for Octavius B. Frothingham, he wrote, “I am not in condition to make visits, or take any part in conversation. Old age has rushed on me in the last year, and tied my tongue, and hid my memory, and thus made it a duty to stay at home.” The New York Times quoted his reply and noted that his regrets were read aloud at the celebration.[165] Holmes wrote of the problem saying, "Emerson is afraid to trust himself in society much, on account of the failure of his memory and the great difficulty he finds in getting the words he wants. It is painful to witness his embarrassment at times".[151]

On April 21, 1882, Emerson was found to be suffering from pneumonia.[166] He died six days later. Emerson is buried in Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, Concord, Massachusetts.[167] He was placed in his coffin wearing a white robe given by the American sculptor Daniel Chester French.[168]

Lifestyle and beliefs[edit]

Emerson's religious views were often considered radical at the time. He believed that all things are connected to God and, therefore, all things are divine.[169] Critics believed that Emerson was removing the central God figure; as Henry Ware Jr. said, Emerson was in danger of taking away "the Father of the Universe" and leaving "but a company of children in an orphan asylum".[170] Emerson was partly influenced by German philosophy and Biblical criticism.[171] His views, the basis of Transcendentalism, suggested that God does not have to reveal the truth, but that the truth could be intuitively experienced directly from nature.[172] When asked his religious belief, Emerson stated, "I am more of a Quaker than anything else. I believe in the 'still, small voice', and that voice is Christ within us."[173]

Emerson was a supporter of the spread of community libraries in the 19th century, having this to say of them: "Consider what you have in the smallest chosen library. A company of the wisest and wittiest men that could be picked out of all civil countries, in a thousand years, have set in best order the results of their learning and wisdom."[174]

Emerson may have had erotic thoughts about at least one man.[175] During his early years at Harvard, he found himself attracted to a young freshman named Martin Gay about whom he wrote sexually charged poetry.[70][176] He also had a number of romantic interests in various women throughout his life,[70] such as Anna Barker[177] and Caroline Sturgis.[178]

Race and slavery[edit]

Emerson did not become an ardent abolitionist until 1844, though his journals show he was concerned with slavery beginning in his youth, even dreaming about helping to free slaves. In June 1856, shortly after Charles Sumner, a United States Senator, was beaten for his staunch abolitionist views, Emerson lamented that he himself was not as committed to the cause. He wrote, "There are men who as soon as they are born take a bee-line to the axe of the inquisitor. ... Wonderful the way in which we are saved by this unfailing supply of the moral element".[179] After Sumner's attack, Emerson began to speak out about slavery. "I think we must get rid of slavery, or we must get rid of freedom", he said at a meeting at Concord that summer.[180] Emerson used slavery as an example of a human injustice, especially in his role as a minister. In early 1838, provoked by the murder of an abolitionist publisher from Alton, Illinois named Elijah Parish Lovejoy, Emerson gave his first public antislavery address. As he said, "It is but the other day that the brave Lovejoy gave his breast to the bullets of a mob, for the rights of free speech and opinion, and died when it was better not to live".[179] John Quincy Adams said the mob-murder of Lovejoy "sent a shock as of any earthquake throughout this continent".[181] However, Emerson maintained that reform would be achieved through moral agreement rather than by militant action. By August 1, 1844, at a lecture in Concord, he stated more clearly his support for the abolitionist movement: "We are indebted mainly to this movement, and to the continuers of it, for the popular discussion of every point of practical ethics".[182]

Emerson is often known as one of the most liberal democratic thinkers of his time who believed that through the democratic process, slavery should be abolished. While being an avid abolitionist who was known for his criticism of the legality of slavery, Emerson struggled with the implications of race.[183] His usual liberal leanings did not clearly translate when it came to believing that all races had equal capability or function, which was a common conception for the period in which he lived.[183] Many critics believe that it was his views on race that inhibited him from becoming an abolitionist earlier in his life and also inhibited him from being more active in the antislavery movement.[184] Much of his early life, he was silent on the topic of race and slavery. Not until he was well into his 30s did Emerson begin to publish writings on race and slavery, and not until he was in his late 40s and 50s did he became known as an antislavery activist.[183]

During his early life, Emerson seemed to develop a hierarchy of races based on faculty to reason or rather, whether African slaves were distinguishably equal to white men based on their ability to reason.[183] In a journal entry written in 1822, Emerson wrote about a personal observation: "It can hardly be true that the difference lies in the attribute of reason. I saw ten, twenty, a hundred large lipped, lowbrowed black men in the streets who, except in the mere matter of language, did not exceed the sagacity of the elephant. Now is it true that these were created superior to this wise animal, and designed to control it? And in comparison with the highest orders of men, the Africans will stand so low as to make the difference which subsists between themselves & the sagacious beasts inconsiderable."[185]

As with many supporters of slavery, during his early years, Emerson seems to have thought that the faculties of African slaves were not equal to those of white slave-owners. But this belief in racial inferiorities did not make Emerson a supporter of slavery.[183] Emerson wrote later that year that "No ingenious sophistry can ever reconcile the unperverted mind to the pardon of Slavery; nothing but tremendous familiarity, and the bias of private interest".[185] Emerson saw the removal of people from their homeland, the treatment of slaves, and the self-seeking benefactors of slaves as gross injustices.[184] For Emerson, slavery was a moral issue, while superiority of the races was an issue he tried to analyze from a scientific perspective based what he believed to be inherited traits.[186]

Emerson saw himself as a man of "Saxon descent". In a speech given in 1835 titled "Permanent Traits of the English National Genius", he said, "The inhabitants of the United States, especially of the Northern portion, are descended from the people of England and have inherited the traits of their national character".[187] He saw direct ties between race based on national identity and the inherent nature of the human being. White Americans who were native-born in the United States and of English ancestry were categorized by him as a separate "race", which he thought had a position of being superior to other nations. His idea of race was based on a shared culture, environment, and history. He believed that native-born Americans of English descent were superior to European immigrants, including the Irish, French, and Germans, and also as being superior to English people from England, whom he considered a close second and the only really comparable group.[183]

Later in his life, Emerson's ideas on race changed when he became more involved in the abolitionist movement while at the same time he began to more thoroughly analyze the philosophical implications of race and racial hierarchies. His beliefs shifted focus to the potential outcomes of racial conflicts. Emerson's racial views were closely related to his views on nationalism and national superiority, which was a common view in the United States at that time. Emerson used contemporary theories of race and natural science to support a theory of race development.[186] He believed that the current political battle and the current enslavement of other races was an inevitable racial struggle, one that would result in the inevitable union of the United States. Such conflicts were necessary for the dialectic of change that would eventually allow the progress of the nation.[186] In much of his later work, Emerson seems to allow the notion that different European races will eventually mix in America. This hybridization process would lead to a superior race that would be to the advantage of the superiority of the United States.[188]

Legacy[edit]

Emerson postage stamp, issue of 1940

As a lecturer and orator, Emerson—nicknamed the Sage of Concord—became the leading voice of intellectual culture in the United States.[189] James Russell Lowell, editor of the Atlantic Monthly and the North American Review, commented in his book My Study Windows (1871), that Emerson was not only the "most steadily attractive lecturer in America," but also "one of the pioneers of the lecturing system."[190] Herman Melville, who had met Emerson in 1849, originally thought he had "a defect in the region of the heart" and a "self-conceit so intensely intellectual that at first one hesitates to call it by its right name", though he later admitted Emerson was "a great man".[191] Theodore Parker, a minister and transcendentalist, noted Emerson's ability to influence and inspire others: "the brilliant genius of Emerson rose in the winter nights, and hung over Boston, drawing the eyes of ingenuous young people to look up to that great new star, a beauty and a mystery, which charmed for the moment, while it gave also perennial inspiration, as it led them forward along new paths, and towards new hopes".[192]

Emerson's work not only influenced his contemporaries, such as Walt Whitman and Henry David Thoreau, but would continue to influence thinkers and writers in the United States and around the world down to the present.[193] Notable thinkers who recognize Emerson's influence include Nietzsche and William James, Emerson's godson. There is little disagreement that Emerson was the most influential writer of 19th-century America, though these days he is largely the concern of scholars.[citation needed] Walt WhitmanHenry David Thoreau and William James were all positive Emersonians, while Herman MelvilleNathaniel Hawthorne and Henry James were Emersonians in denial—while they set themselves in opposition to the sage, there was no escaping his influence. To T. S. Eliot, Emerson's essays were an "encumbrance".[citation needed] Waldo the Sage was eclipsed from 1914 until 1965, when he returned to shine, after surviving in the work of major American poets like Robert FrostWallace Stevens and Hart Crane.[194]

In his book The American ReligionHarold Bloom repeatedly refers to Emerson as "The prophet of the American Religion", which in the context of the book refers to indigenously American religions such as Mormonism and Christian Science, which arose largely in Emerson's lifetime, but also to mainline Protestant churches that Bloom says have become in the United States more gnostic than their European counterparts. In The Western Canon, Bloom compares Emerson to Michel de Montaigne: "The only equivalent reading experience that I know is to reread endlessly in the notebooks and journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, the American version of Montaigne."[195] Several of Emerson's poems were included in Bloom's The Best Poems of the English Language, although he wrote that none of the poems are as outstanding as the best of Emerson's essays, which Bloom listed as "Self-Reliance", "Circles", "Experience", and "nearly all of Conduct of Life". In his belief that line lengths, rhythms, and phrases are determined by breath, Emerson's poetry foreshadowed the theories of Charles Olson.[196]

Namesakes[edit]

  • In May 2006, 168 years after Emerson delivered his "Divinity School Address", Harvard Divinity School announced the establishment of the Emerson Unitarian Universalist Association Professorship.[197] Harvard has also named a building, Emerson Hall (1900), after him.[198]
  • The Emerson String Quartet, formed in 1976, took their name from him.[199]
  • The Ralph Waldo Emerson Prize is awarded annually to high school students for essays on historical subjects.[200]
  • The Emerson Collective is a company devoted to social change.[201]

Selected works[edit]

Representative Men (1850)

Collections

Individual essays

Poems

Letters

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Richardson, p. 92.
  2. ^ "Cousin, Victor (1782–1867)". Encyclopedia of Transcendentalism. Infobase Publishing, 2014.
  3. ^ Richardson, Robert D. Jr. (2015). Emerson: The Mind on Fire. University of California Press. p. 102.
  4. ^ Yohannan, John D. (December 15, 1998). "Emerson, Ralph Waldo"Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. VIII, Fasc. 4. pp. 414–415.
  5. ^ "Montaigne; or, the Skeptic"rwe.org. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  6. ^ Richardson, Robert D. Jr. (2015). Emerson: The Mind on Fire. University of California Press. p. 52.
  7. ^ Ralph Waldo Emerson at the Encyclopædia Britannica
  8. Jump up to:a b Richardson, p. 263.
  9. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1841). "Self-Reliance". In Charles William Eliot (ed.). Essays and English Traits. Harvard Classics. Vol. 5, with introduction and notes. (56th printing, 1965 ed.). New York: P.F.Collier & Son Corporation. pp. 59–69. It is for want of self-culture that the idol of Travelling, the idol of Italy, of England, of Egypt, remains for all educated Americans. They who made England, Italy, or Greece venerable in the imagination, did so not by rambling round creation as a moth round a lamp, but by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth. ... The soul is no traveller: the wise man stays at home with the soul, and when his necessities, his duties, on any occasion call him from his house, or into foreign lands, he is at home still and is not gadding abroad from himself. p. 78
  10. ^ Lewis, Jone Johnson. "Ralph Waldo Emerson – Essays"Transcendentalists.com. Retrieved August 10, 2017.
  11. ^ Lachs, JohnTalisse, Robert (2007). American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia. p. 310. ISBN 978-0415939263.
  12. ^ Gregory Garvey, T. (January 2001). The Emerson DilemmaISBN 978-0820322414. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
  13. ^ Journal, April 7, 1840.
  14. ^ "Emerson & Thoreau"Wisdomportal.com. June 6, 2000. Archived from the original on February 3, 2012. Retrieved October 26, 2012.
  15. ^ Richardson, p. 18.
  16. ^ Allen, p. 5.
  17. Jump up to:a b Baker, p. 3.
  18. ^ Cooke, George Willis. Ralph Waldo Emerson. pp. 1, 2.
  19. ^ McAleer, p. 40.
  20. ^ Richardson, pp. 22–23.
  21. ^ Baker, p. 35.
  22. ^ McAleer, p. 44.
  23. ^ McAleer, p. 52.
  24. ^ Richardson, p. 11.
  25. ^ McAleer, p. 53.
  26. ^ Richardson, p. 6.
  27. ^ McAleer, p. 61.
  28. ^ Buell, p. 13.
  29. ^ "Ralph Waldo Emerson : The Schoolmaster of Franklin Park" (PDF)Franklinparkcoalition.org. Retrieved February 28, 2022.
  30. ^ Richardson, p. 72.
  31. ^ Field, Peter S. (2003). Ralph Waldo Emerson: The Making of a Democratic Intellectual. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8476-8843-2.
  32. ^ Richardson, p. 76.
  33. ^ Richardson, p. 29.
  34. ^ McAleer, p. 66.
  35. ^ Richardson, p. 35.
  36. Jump up to:a b Franklin Park Coalition (May 1980). Ralph Waldo Emerson: The Schoolmaster of Franklin Park (pdf format) (PDF). Boston Parks and Recreation Department. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
  37. ^ Phi Beta Kappa. Massachusetts Alpha (1912). Catalogue of the Harvard Chapter of Phi Beta Kappa, Alpha of Massachusetts. Harvard University. p. 20. Retrieved September 11, 2017 – via Google Books.
  38. ^ Richardson, pp. 36–37.
  39. ^ Richardson, p. 37.
  40. ^ Richardson, pp. 38–40.
  41. ^ Richardson, p. 92.
  42. ^ McAleer, p. 105.
  43. ^ Richardson, p. 108.
  44. ^ Richardson, p. 116.
  45. ^ Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Volume I. p. 7.
  46. ^ Richardson, p. 88.
  47. ^ Richardson, p. 90.
  48. ^ Sullivan, p. 6.
  49. ^ Packer, p. 39.
  50. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1832). "The Lord's Supper"Uncollected Prose.
  51. ^ Ferguson, Alfred R. (1964). "Introduction". The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Volume IV. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, p. xi.
  52. ^ McAleer, p. 132.
  53. ^ Baker, p. 23.
  54. Jump up to:a b Richardson, p. 138.
  55. ^ Richardson, p. 143.
  56. ^ Richardson, p. 200.
  57. ^ Packer, p. 40.
  58. ^ Richardson, p. 182.
  59. ^ Richardson, p. 154.
  60. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1959). Early Lectures 1833–36. Stephen Whicher, ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-22150-5.
  61. ^ Richardson, p, 190.
  62. ^ Wilson, Susan (2000). Literary Trail of Greater Boston. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 127. ISBN 0-618-05013-2.
  63. ^ Richardson, p. 206.
  64. ^ Lydia (Jackson) Emerson was a descendant of Abraham Jackson, one of the original proprietors of Plymouth, who married the daughter of Nathaniel Morton, the longtime Secretary of the Plymouth Colony.
  65. ^ Richardson, pp. 207–208.
  66. ^ "Ideas and Thought". Vcu.edu. Retrieved October 26, 2012.
  67. ^ Richardson, p. 193.
  68. ^ Richardson, p. 192.
  69. ^ Baker, p. 86.
  70. Jump up to:a b c Richardson, p. 9.
  71. Jump up to:a b Richardson, p. 91.
  72. Jump up to:a b Richardson, 175
  73. ^ von Frank, p. 91.
  74. ^ von Frank, p. 125.
  75. ^ Richardson, p. 245.
  76. ^ Baker, p. 53.
  77. ^ Richardson, p. 266.
  78. ^ Sullivan, p. 13.
  79. ^ Buell, p. 45.
  80. ^ Watson, Peter (2005). Ideas: A History of Thought and Invention, from Fire to Freud. New York: Harper Perennial. p. 688. ISBN 978-0-06-093564-1.
  81. ^ Mowat, R. B. (1995). The Victorian Age. London: Senate. p. 83. ISBN 1-85958-161-7.
  82. ^ Menand, Louis (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 18. ISBN 0-374-19963-9.
  83. Jump up to:a b Buell, p. 121.
  84. ^ Rosenwald
  85. ^ Richardson, p. 257.
  86. ^ Richardson, pp. 418–422.
  87. ^ Packer, p. 73.
  88. Jump up to:a b Buell, p. 161.
  89. ^ Sullivan, p. 14.
  90. ^ Gura, p. 129.
  91. ^ Von Mehren, p. 120.
  92. ^ Slater, Abby (1978). In Search of Margaret Fuller. New York: Delacorte Press. pp. 61–62. ISBN 0-440-03944-4.
  93. ^ Gura, pp. 128–129.
  94. ^ "Essays: First Series (1841)". emersoncentral.com. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  95. ^ Rubel, David, ed. (2008). The Bedside Baccalaureate, Sterling. p. 153.
  96. ^ Cheever, p. 93.
  97. ^ McAleer, p. 313.
  98. ^ Baker, p. 218.
  99. ^ Packer, p. 148.
  100. ^ Richardson, p. 381.
  101. ^ Baker, p. 219.
  102. Jump up to:a b c Packer, p. 150.
  103. Jump up to:a b Baker, p. 221.
  104. ^ Gura, p. 130. An unrelated magazine of the same name was published during several periods through 1929.
  105. ^ Richardson, p. 418.
  106. ^ Wilson, R. Jackson (1999). "Emerson as Lecturer". The Cambridge Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson. Cambridge University Press.
  107. ^ Richardson, p. 114.
  108. ^ Pradhan, Sachin N. (1996). India in the United States: Contribution of India and Indians in the United States of America. Bethesda, Maryland: SP Press International. p. 12.
  109. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1841). "The Over-Soul". Essays: First Series.
  110. ^ Gordon, Robert C. (Robert Cartwright) (2007). Emerson and the light of India : an intellectual history (1st ed.). New Delhi: National Book Trust, India. ISBN 978-8123749341OCLC 196264051.
  111. ^ Goldberg, Philip (2013). American Veda : from Emerson and the Beatles to yoga and meditation—how Indian spirituality changed the West (First paperback ed.). New York. ISBN 978-0385521352OCLC 808413359.
  112. ^ Buell, p. 31.
  113. ^ Allen, Gay Wilson (1982). Waldo Emerson. New York: Penguin Books. pp. 512–514.
  114. ^ Koch, Daniel (2012). Ralph Waldo Emerson in Europe: Class, Race and Revolution in the Making of an American Thinker. I.B.Tauris. pp. 181–195. ISBN 978-1-84885-946-3.
  115. ^ "VI. The Fugitive Slave Law – Address at Concord. Ralph Waldo Emerson. 1904. The Complete Works"Bartleby.com.
  116. ^ "Impact of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850"score.rims.k12.ca.us.
  117. ^ Baker, p. 321.
  118. ^ Von Mehren, p. 340.
  119. Jump up to:a b Von Mehren, p. 343.
  120. ^ Blanchard, Paula (1987). Margaret Fuller: From Transcendentalism to Revolution. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. p. 339. ISBN 0-201-10458-X.
  121. ^ Von Mehren, p. 342.
  122. ^ Kaplan, p. 203.
  123. ^ Callow, Philip (1992). From Noon to Starry Night: A Life of Walt Whitman. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. p. 232. ISBN 0-929587-95-2.
  124. ^ Miller, James E. Jr. (1962). Walt Whitman. New York: Twayne Publishers. p. 27.
  125. ^ Reynolds, David S. (1995). Walt Whitman's America: A Cultural Biography. New York: Vintage Books. p. 352. ISBN 0-679-76709-6.
  126. ^ Callow, Philip (1992). From Noon to Starry Night: A Life of Walt Whitman. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. p. 236. ISBN 0-929587-95-2.
  127. ^ Reynolds, David S. (1995). Walt Whitman's America: A Cultural Biography. New York: Vintage Books. p. 343. ISBN 0-679-76709-6.
  128. ^ Emerson, Edward (1918). The Early Years of the Saturday Club 1855–1870. Houghton Mifflin.
  129. ^ Norton, Charles (1894). Letters of James Russel Lowell. Houghton Library, Harvard University: Harper & Brothers.
  130. ^ Schlett, James (2015). A Not Too Greatly Changed Eden – The Story of the Philosophers Camp in the Adirondacks. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-5352-6.
  131. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1867). May-Day and Other Pieces. Ticknor and Fields.
  132. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1905). Nature. The Roycrofters. pp. 16–17.
  133. ^ Gougeon, p. 38.
  134. ^ Gougeon
  135. ^ McAleer, pp. 569–570.
  136. ^ Richardson, p. 547.
  137. ^ Gougeon, p. 260.
  138. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1860). The Conduct of Life. Boston: Ticknor & Fields. p. 230.
  139. ^ Baker, p. 433.
  140. Jump up to:a b Brooks, Atkinson; Mary Oliver (2000). The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Modern Library. pp. 827, 829. ISBN 978-0-679-78322-0.
  141. ^ McAleer, p. 570.
  142. ^ Gougeon, p. 276.
  143. ^ Richardson, p. 548.
  144. ^ Packer, p. 193.
  145. ^ Baker, p. 448.
  146. ^ "E" (PDF)Members of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 1780–2012. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. p. 162. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 21, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2011.
  147. ^ "APS Member History"search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  148. ^ Gougeon, p. 325.
  149. ^ Baker, p. 502.
  150. Jump up to:a b Richardson, p. 569.
  151. Jump up to:a b McAleer, p. 629.
  152. ^ Thayer, James Bradley (1884). A Western Journey with Mr. Emerson. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company. Retrieved August 1, 2014.
  153. ^ Richardson, p. 566.
  154. ^ Baker, p. 504.
  155. ^ Baker, p. 506.
  156. ^ McAleer, p. 613.
  157. ^ Richardson, p. 567.
  158. ^ Richardson, p. 568.
  159. ^ Baker, p. 507.
  160. ^ McAleer, p. 618.
  161. ^ Wayne, Tiffany K. (2014). Encyclopedia of Transcendentalism. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1438109169.
  162. ^ Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. (1880). "Parnassus: An Anthology of Poetry"Bartleby.com. Retrieved January 26, 2018.
  163. ^ Richardson, p. 570.
  164. ^ Baker, p. 497.
  165. ^ The New York Times, p. 1, April 23, 1879
  166. ^ Richardson, p. 572.
  167. ^ Sullivan, p. 25.
  168. ^ McAleer, p. 662.
  169. ^ Richardson, p. 538.
  170. ^ Buell, p. 165.
  171. ^ Packer, p. 23.
  172. ^ Hankins, Barry (2004). The Second Great Awakening and the Transcendentalists. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. p. 136. ISBN 0-313-31848-4.
  173. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1932). Uncollected Lectures. Clarence Gohdes, ed. New York. p. 57.
  174. ^ Murray, Stuart A. P. (2009). The Library: An Illustrated History. New York: Skyhorse Pub. ISBN 978-1602397064.
  175. ^ Shand-Tucci, Douglas (2003). The Crimson Letter. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 15–16. ISBN 0-312-19896-5.
  176. ^ Kaplan, p. 248.
  177. ^ Richardson, p. 326.
  178. ^ Richardson, p. 327.
  179. Jump up to:a b McAleer, p. 531.
  180. ^ Packer, p. 232.
  181. ^ Richardson, p. 269.
  182. ^ Lowance, Mason (2000). Against Slavery: An Abolitionist Reader. Penguin Classics. pp. 301–302. ISBN 0-14-043758-4.
  183. Jump up to:a b c d e f Field, Peter S. (2001). "The Strange Career of Emerson and Race." American Nineteenth Century History 2.1.
  184. Jump up to:a b Turner, Jack (2008). "Emerson, Slavery, and Citizenship." Raritan 28.2:127–146.
  185. Jump up to:a b Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1982). The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson. William H. Gilman, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap.
  186. Jump up to:a b c Finseth, Ian (2005). "Evolution, Cosmopolitanism, and Emerson's Antislavery Politics." American Literature 77.4:729–760.
  187. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1959). The Early Lectures of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Harvard University Press. p. 233.
  188. ^ Field, p. 9.
  189. ^ Buell, p. 34.
  190. ^ Bosco and Myerson. Emerson in His Own Time. p. 54
  191. ^ Sullivan, p. 123.
  192. ^ Baker, p. 201.
  193. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (2013). Delphi Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Illustrated). Delphi Classics. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-909496-86-6.
  194. ^ New York Times, October 12, 2008.
  195. ^ Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon. London: Papermac. pp. 147–148.
  196. ^ Schmidt, Michael (1999). The Lives of the Poets. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 978-0753807453
  197. ^ "Emerson Unitarian Universalist Association Professorship Established at Harvard Divinity School" (Press release). Harvard Divinity School. May 2006. Archived from the original on February 8, 2007. Retrieved February 22, 2007.
  198. ^ "Emerson Hall Opened" – The Harvard Crimson, January 3, 1906
  199. ^ "Full Biography 2012–2013 | Emerson String Quartet". Emersonquartet.com. Retrieved October 26, 2012.
  200. ^ "Varsity Academics: Home of the Concord Review, the National Writing Board, and the National History Club". Tcr.org. April 22, 2011. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved October 26, 2012.
  201. ^ "The Quest of Laurene Powell Jobs"Washington Post. Retrieved August 31, 2018.
  202. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Representative men. Philadelphia: H. ALtemus. Retrieved February 28, 2022 – via Internet Archive.
  203. ^ Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1860). The conduct of life. Boston: Ticknor and Fields. Retrieved February 28, 2022 – via Internet Archive.
  204. ^ York, Maurice; Spaulding, Rick, eds. (2008). Natural History of the Intellect: The Last Lectures of Ralph Waldo Emerson (PDF). Chicago: Wrightwood Press. ISBN 978-0980119015.
  205. ^ Norton, Charles Eliot, ed. (1883). The Correspondence of Thomas Carlyle and Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1834–72. Correspondence.Selections. Boston: James R. Osgood & Company.
  206. ^ Ireland, Alexander (April 7, 1883). "Review of The Correspondence of Thomas Carlyle and Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1834–72"The Academy23 (570): 231–233.

References[edit]

Further reading[edit]

Archival sources[edit]

External links[edit]



==

Emerson - GROWTH AND CHANGE

Quotation used by Yujin on the occation of Marsha's departure

---
주제: 성장과 변화
 출처: Emerson의 Essars Everyman's Library, New York, 1906) +
 "보상"에 대한 에세이 (p.75)

---

THEME: GROWTH AND CHANGE
From: Emerson's Essays Everyman's Library, New York, 1906) +
Essay on "Compensation" (p.75)

===
 The changes which break up at short intervals the prosperity of men are advertisements of a nature whose law is growth. Every soul is by this intrinsic necessity quitting its whole system of things, its friends and home and laws and faith, as the shell-fish crawls out of its beautiful but stony case, because it no longer admits of its growth, and slowly forms a new house. In proportion to the vigor of the individual these revolutions are frequent, until in some happier mind they are incessant and all worldly relations hang very loosely about him, becoming as it were a transparent fluid membrane through which the living form is seen, and not, as in most men, an indurated heterogeneous fabric of many dates and of no settled character, in which the man is imprisoned. Then there can be enlargement, and the man of to-day scarcely recognizes the man of yesterday. And such should be the outward biography of man in time, a putting off of dead circumstances day by day, as he renews his raiment day by day. But to us, in our lapsed estate, resting, not advancing, resisting, not cooperating with the divine expansion, this growth comes by shocks. --

We cannot part with our friends. We cannot let our angels go. We do not see that they only go out that archangels may come in. We are idolaters of the old. We do not believe in the riches of the soul, in its proper eternity and omnipresence. We do not believe there is any force in to-day to rival or recreate that beautiful yesterday. We linger in the ruins of the old tent where once we had bread and shelter and organs, nor believe that the spirit can feed, cover, and nerve us again. We cannot again find aught so dear, so sweet, so graceful. But we sit and weep in vain. The voice of the Almighty saith, 'Up and onward for evermore!' We cannot stay amid the ruins. Neither will we rely on the new; and so we walk ever with reverted eyes, like those monsters who look backwards. --

And yet the compensations of calamity are made apparent to the understanding also, after long intervals of time. A fever, a mutilation, a cruel disappointment, a loss of wealth, a loss of friends, seems at the moment unpaid loss, and unpayable. But the sure years reveal the deep remedial force that underlies all facts. The death of a dear friend, wife, brother, lover, which seemed nothing but privation, somewhat later assumes the aspect of a guide or genius; for it commonly operates revolutions in our way of life, terminates an epoch of infancy or of youth which was waiting to be closed, breaks up a wonted occupation, or a household, or style of living, and allows the formation of new ones more friendly to the growth of character. It permits or constrains the formation of new acquaintances and the reception of new influences that prove of the first importance to the next years; and the man or woman who would have remained a sunny garden-flower, with no room for its roots and too much sunshine for its head, by the falling of the walls and the neglect of the gardener is made the banian of the forest, yielding shade and fruit to wide neighborhoods of men.

=
파파고 번역

인간의 번영을 짧은 간격으로 깨뜨리는 변화는 성장을 법칙으로 하는 본성의 공표입니다. 모든 영혼은 이 본질적인 필연에 의해, 자신의 전체 체계, 친구, 집, 법률, 믿음을 떠나게 됩니다, 마치 갑각류가 아름답지만 딱딱하고 더 이상 성장을 허용하지 않는 껍데기에서 기어 나와서 천천히 새 집을 형성하듯이. 개인의 활력에 따라 이러한 혁명은 자주 발생하여 더 행복한 존재에서는 끊임없고, 모든 세속적 관계는 그에 매우 느슨하게 걸려 있으며 대부분의 사람들 안에 안정적 성격도 없고 많은 날짜로 구성되어 본인을 감금하는 경화된 이질 직물이 아니라 살아있는 형태를 보여주는 투명한 유체막이 되어갑니다. 그러면 확장이 올 수 있고 오늘의 사람은 어제의 사람을 거의 알아보지 못합니다.  그것이 흘러가는 시간 안에서의 사람의 외적 전기가 되어야 합니다. 사람이 날마다 자기 옷을 새롭게 함처럼, 날마다 죽은 상황을 벗어야 합니다. 그러나 우리의 타락한 상태, 안주하고, 전진하지 않고, 저항하고, 신성한 확장에 협력하지 않는 우리에게는 이 성장은 충격으로 옵니다.

우리는 친구와 헤어지질 못합니다. 우리는 우리의 천사를 보내지 못합니다. 우리는 그들이 가는 이유는  대천사가 들어오길 위하여라는 것을 보지 못합니다. 우리는 옛 것의 우상 숭배자들입니다. 우리는 영혼의 고유한 영원성과 편재성을 믿지 않습니다. 우리는 그 아름다운 어제와 경쟁하거나 재창조할 힘이 오늘날에는 없다고 생각합니다. 우리는 한때 빵과 피난처가 있었던 오래된 천막의 폐허에서 머뭇거리며, 영이 다시 우리를 먹여 살리고 덮고 신경을 쓸 수 있다고 믿지 않습니다. 우리는 그토록 사랑스럽고 달콤하고 우아한 것을 다시 찾을 수 없다고 생각합니다. 그러나 우리는 헛되이 앉아서 웁니다. 그러나 하늘의 음성이 말합니다:  '일서서서 앞으로! 영원히!' 우리는 폐허 속에 머물 수도 없고, 새로운 것에도 의존하지 못합니다. 그래서 우리는 뒤를 돌아보는 그 괴물들처럼 거꾸로 된 눈으로 항상 걷습니다.

재난의 보상은 오랜 시간이 지난 뒤에 우리의 이해에게 분명해집니다. 열병, 신체 절단, 잔인한 실망, 재산의 상실, 친구의 상실은 현재로서는 지불될 수 없는 손실이자 지불할 수 없는 것처럼 보입니다. 그러나 시간의 흐름은 모든 사실의 바탕이 되는 깊은 치유력을 드러냅니다. 궁핍한 것처럼 보였던 친애했던 친구, 아내, 형제, 연인의 죽음은 어느 정도 후에 안내자나 천재의 면모를 띠게 됩니다. 그것은 일반적으로 우리 삶의 방식에 혁명을 일으키고, 폐쇄되기를 기다리고 있던 유아기 또는 젊음의 시대를 끝내고, 원치 않는 직업, 가정 또는 생활 방식을 해체하고, 우리의 성장에보다 친근한 새로운 것들의 형성을 허용하기 때문입니다. 그것은 새로운 지인의 형성과 다음 시기에 가장 중요할 새로운 영향력의 수용을 허용하거나 제한합니다. 그리고 벽이 무너지고 정원사의 방치로 인해 뿌리가 자랄 수 있는 공간이 없고 머리에 너무 많은 햇빛을 받는 정원 꽃으로 남아 있었을 남자 또는 여자는 숲의 거목이 됩니다. 넓은 지역의 사람들에게 그늘과 과일을 제공하는 거목. 



===
구글 번역

인간의 번영을 짧은 간격으로 깨뜨리는 변화는 성장을 법칙으로 하는 본성의 광고이다. 모든 영혼은 이 본질적인 필연성에 의해 조개류가 아름답지만 돌이 많은 상자에서 기어 나오는 것처럼 사물의 전체 체계, 친구, 집, 법과 믿음을 그만두게 됩니다. 왜냐하면 조개류는 더 이상 성장을 인정하지 않고 서서히 새 집. 개인의 활력에 비례하여 이러한 혁명은 빈번하여, 더 행복한 마음에서는 끊임 없이 일어나고 모든 세속적 관계가 그 주위에 매우 느슨해져서 마치 살아있는 형태를 볼 수 있는 투명한 유체 막과 같이 되고 그렇지 않을 때까지 됩니다. 대부분의 남성과 마찬가지로, 날짜가 많고 안정된 성격이 없는 이질적인 구조로 남성이 수감되어 있습니다. 그러면 확대될 수 있고 오늘의 사람은 어제의 사람을 거의 알아보지 못합니다. 그리고 사람이 날마다 자기 옷을 새롭게 함에 따라 사람의 외적 전기가 날마다 죽은 상황을 벗어 버려야 합니다. 그러나 우리의 타락한 지위에서 쉬고, 전진하지 않고, 저항하고, 신성한 확장에 협력하지 않는 우리에게 이 성장은 충격으로 옵니다. -- 

우리는 친구와 헤어질 수 없습니다. 우리는 우리의 천사를 보낼 수 없습니다. 천사장들이 들어오기 위해서만 나가는 것이 아니라 우리는 옛적 우상 숭배자들입니다. 우리는 영혼의 고유한 영원성과 편재성을 믿지 않습니다. 우리는 그 아름다운 어제와 경쟁하거나 재창조할 힘이 오늘날에 없다고 생각합니다. 우리는 한때 빵과 피난처와 장기가 있었던 오래된 천막의 폐허에 머물며 영이 다시 우리를 먹여 살리고 덮고 신경을 쓸 수 있다고 믿지 않습니다. 우리는 그토록 사랑스럽고 달콤하고 우아한 것을 다시 찾을 수 없습니다. 그러나 우리는 앉아서 우는 것은 헛된 것입니다. 전능하신 분의 음성이 '앞으로 영원히!' 우리는 폐허 속에 머물 수 없습니다. 또한 우리는 새로운 것에 의존하지 않을 것입니다. 그래서 우리는 뒤를 돌아보는 그 괴물들처럼 거꾸로 된 눈으로 항상 걷습니다. -- 

그럼에도 불구하고 오랜 시간이 지난 후에 재난에 대한 보상이 이해자들에게도 분명해졌습니다. 열병, 신체 절단, 잔인한 실망, 재산의 상실, 친구의 상실은 현재로서는 지불할 수 없는 손실이자 지불할 수 없는 것처럼 보입니다. 그러나 확실한 연도는 모든 사실의 기초가 되는 깊은 치유력을 드러냅니다. 궁핍한 것처럼 보였던 친애하는 친구, 아내, 형제, 연인의 죽음은 어느 정도 후에 안내자나 천재의 면모를 띠게 됩니다. 그것은 일반적으로 우리 삶의 방식에 혁명을 일으키고, 폐쇄되기를 기다리고 있던 유아기 또는 젊음의 시대를 끝내고, 원치 않는 직업이나 가정, 또는 생활 방식을 해체하고 더 친근한 새로운 직업을 형성할 수 있게 해주기 때문입니다. 캐릭터의 성장에. 그것은 새로운 지인의 형성과 다음 해에 가장 중요함을 증명하는 새로운 영향력의 수용을 허용하거나 제한합니다. 그리고 그 뿌리를 위한 공간은 없고 머리에는 너무 많은 햇빛이 없는 햇살 가득한 정원 꽃으로 남아 있을 남자나 여자는 벽이 무너지고 정원사의 방치로 인해 숲의 바니안이 되어 굴복한다. 넓은 지역의 남성들에게 그늘과 과일을 제공합니다.

===

Emerson. (essay) Compensation - Wikipedia

Compensation (essay) - Wikipedia

Compensation (essay)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

"Compensation" is an essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson. It appeared in his book Essays, first published 1841. In 1844, Essays: Second Series was published, and subsequent republishings of Essays were renamed Essays: First Series.

Summary[edit]

Emerson is writing about the law of Karma or of Cause and Effect. Everywhere in nature there is dualism. Dualism is present within us because it balances life instead of having excess to destroy. Action or reaction, day/night, up/down, even/odd and spirit/matter is used to balance the universe. We must all use moderation in life instead of excess to cause us defects in our lives. If there is excess it needs to be moderated for proper balance.

Quotations[edit]

"To empty here, you must condense there."

"There is a crack in every thing God has made."

"Whilst the world is thus dual, so is every one of its parts. The entire system of things gets represented in every particle. There is somewhat that resembles the ebb and flow of the sea, day and night, man and woman, in a single needle of the pine, in a kernel of corn, in each individual of every animal tribe."

 "The same dualism underlies the nature and condition of man."

"Every sweet hath its sour; every evil its good. Every faculty which is a receiver of pleasure has an equal penalty put on its abuse. It is to answer for its moderation with its life."

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

===
Poetry
"The Rhodora" (1834)
"Concord Hymn" (1836)
"Uriel" (1846)
"Brahma" (1856)
"Boston Hymn" (1863)

Essays
"Nature" (1836)
"Self-Reliance" (1841)
"Compensation" (1841)
"The Over-Soul" (1841)
"Circles" (1841)
"The Poet" (1844)
"Experience" (1844)
"Politics" (1844)






Compensation


The wings of Time are black and white,
Pied with morning and with night.
Mountain tall and ocean deep
Trembling balance duly keep.
In changing moon, in tidal wave,
Glows the feud of Want and Have.
Gauge of more and less through space
Electric star and pencil plays.
The lonely Earth amid the balls
That hurry through the eternal halls,
A makeweight flying to the void,
Supplemental asteroid,
Or compensatory spark,
Shoots across the neutral Dark.

Man's the elm, and Wealth the vine;
Stanch and strong the tendrils twine:
Though the frail ringlets thee deceive,
None from its stock that vine can reave.
Fear not, then, thou child infirm,
There's no god dare wrong a worm.
Laurel crowns cleave to deserts,
And power to him who power exerts;
Hast not thy share? On winged feet,
Lo! it rushes thee to meet;
And all that Nature made thy own,
Floating in air or pent in stone,
Will rive the hills and swim the sea,
And, like thy shadow, follow thee.

Ever since I was a boy, I have wished to write a discourse on Compensation: for it seemed to me when very young, that on this subject life was ahead of theology, and the people knew more than the preachers taught. The documents, too, from which the doctrine is to be drawn, charmed my fancy by their endless variety, and lay always before me, even in sleep; for they are the tools in our hands, the bread in our basket, the transactions of the street, the farm, and the dwelling-house, greetings, relations, debts and credits, the influence of character, the nature and endowment of all men. It seemed to me, also, that in it might be shown men a ray of divinity, the present action of the soul of this world, clean from all vestige of tradition, and so the heart of man might be bathed by an inundation of eternal love, conversing with that which he knows was always and always must be, because it really is now. It appeared, moreover, that if this doctrine could be stated in terms with any resemblance to those bright intuitions in which this truth is sometimes revealed to us, it would be a star in many dark hours and crooked passages in our journey that would not suffer us to lose our way.

I was lately confirmed in these desires by hearing a sermon at church. The preacher, a man esteemed for his orthodoxy, unfolded in the ordinary manner the doctrine of the Last Judgment. He assumed, that judgment is not executed in this world; that the wicked are successful; that the good are miserable; and then urged from reason and from Scripture a compensation to be made to both parties in the next life. No offence appeared to be taken by the congregation at this doctrine. As far as I could observe, when the meeting broke up, they separated without remark on the sermon.

Yet what was the import of this teaching? What did the preacher mean by saying that the good are miserable in the present life? Was it that houses and lands, offices, wine, horses, dress, luxury, are had by unprincipled men, whilst the saints are poor and despised; and that a compensation is to be made to these last hereafter, by giving them the like gratifications another day,--bank-stock and doubloons, venison and champagne? This must be the compensation intended; for what else? Is it that they are to have leave to pray and praise? to love and serve men? Why, that they can do now. The legitimate inference the disciple would draw was,--'We are to have such a good time as the sinners have now';--or, to push it to its extreme import, --'You sin now; we shall sin by and by; we would sin now, if we could; not being successful, we expect our revenge to-morrow.'

The fallacy lay in the immense concession, that the bad are successful; that justice is not done now. The blindness of the preacher consisted in deferring to the base estimate of the market of what constitutes a manly success, instead of confronting and convicting the world from the truth; announcing the presence of the soul; the omnipotence of the will: and so establishing the standard of good and ill, of success and falsehood.

I find a similar base tone in the popular religious works of the day, and the same doctrines assumed by the literary men when occasionally they treat the related topics. I think that our popular theology has gained in decorum, and not in principle, over the superstitions it has displaced. But men are better than this theology. Their daily life gives it the lie. Every ingenuous and aspiring soul leaves the doctrine behind him in his own experience; and all men feel sometimes the falsehood which they cannot demonstrate. For men are wiser than they know. That which they hear in schools and pulpits without after-thought, if said in conversation, would probably be questioned in silence. If a man dogmatize in a mixed company on Providence and the divine laws, he is answered by a silence which conveys well enough to an observer the dissatisfaction of the hearer, but his incapacity to make his own statement.

I shall attempt in this and the following chapter to record some facts that indicate the path of the law of Compensation; happy beyond my expectation, if I shall truly draw the smallest arc of this circle.



POLARITY, or action and reaction, we meet in every part of nature; in darkness and light; in heat and cold; in the ebb and flow of waters; in male and female; in the inspiration and expiration of plants and animals; in the equation of quantity and quality in the fluids of the animal body; in the systole and diastole of the heart; in the undulations of fluids, and of sound; in the centrifugal and centripetal gravity; in electricity, galvanism, and chemical affinity. Superinduce magnetism at one end of a needle; the opposite magnetism takes place at the other end. If the south attracts, the north repels. To empty here, you must condense there. An inevitable dualism bisects nature, so that each thing is a half, and suggests another thing to make it whole; as, spirit, matter; man, woman; odd, even; subjective, objective; in, out; upper, under; motion, rest; yea, nay.

Whilst the world is thus dual, so is every one of its parts. The entire system of things gets represented in every particle. There is somewhat that resembles the ebb and flow of the sea, day and night, man and woman, in a single needle of the pine, in a kernel of corn, in each individual of every animal tribe. The reaction, so grand in the elements, is repeated within these small boundaries. For example, in the animal kingdom the physiologist has observed that no creatures are favorites, but a certain compensation balances every gift and every defect. A surplusage given to one part is paid out of a reduction from another part of the same creature. If the head and neck are enlarged, the trunk and extremities are cut short.

The theory of the mechanic forces is another example. What we gain in power is lost in time; and the converse. The periodic or compensating errors of the planets is another instance. The influences of climate and soil in political history are another. The cold climate invigorates. The barren soil does not breed fevers, crocodiles, tigers, or scorpions.

The same dualism underlies the nature and condition of man. Every excess causes a defect; every defect an excess. Every sweet hath its sour; every evil its good. Every faculty which is a receiver of pleasure has an equal penalty put on its abuse. It is to answer for its moderation with its life. For every grain of wit there is a grain of folly. For every thing you have missed, you have gained something else; and for every thing you gain, you lose something. If riches increase, they are increased that use them. If the gatherer gathers too much, nature takes out of the man what she puts into his chest; swells the estate, but kills the owner. Nature hates monopolies and exceptions. The waves of the sea do not more speedily seek a level from their loftiest tossing, than the varieties of condition tend to equalize themselves. There is always some levelling circumstance that puts down the overbearing, the strong, the rich, the fortunate, substantially on the same ground with all others. Is a man too strong and fierce for society, and by temper and position a bad citizen, — a morose ruffian, with a dash of the pirate in him;—— nature sends him a troop of pretty sons and daughters, who are getting along in the dame's classes at the village school, and love and fear for them smooths his grim scowl to courtesy. Thus she contrives to intenerate the granite and felspar, takes the boar out and puts the lamb in, and keeps her balance true.

The farmer imagines power and place are fine things. But the President has paid dear for his White House. It has commonly cost him all his peace, and the best of his manly attributes. To preserve for a short time so conspicuous an appearance before the world, he is content to eat dust before the real masters who stand erect behind the throne. Or, do men desire the more substantial and permanent grandeur of genius? Neither has this an immunity. He who by force of will or of thought is great, and overlooks thousands, has the charges of that eminence. With every influx of light comes new danger. Has he light? he must bear witness to the light, and always outrun that sympathy which gives him such keen satisfaction, by his fidelity to new revelations of the incessant soul. He must hate father and mother, wife and child. Has he all that the world loves and admires and covets? — he must cast behind him their admiration, and afflict them by faithfulness to his truth, and become a byword and a hissing.

This law writes the laws of cities and nations. It is in vain to build or plot or combine against it. Things refuse to be mismanaged long. Res nolunt diu male administrari. Though no checks to a new evil appear, the checks exist, and will appear. If the government is cruel, the governor's life is not safe. If you tax too high, the revenue will yield nothing. If you make the criminal code sanguinary, juries will not convict. If the law is too mild, private vengeance comes in. If the government is a terrific democracy, the pressure is resisted by an overcharge of energy in the citizen, and life glows with a fiercer flame. The true life and satisfactions of man seem to elude the utmost rigors or felicities of condition, and to establish themselves with great indifferency under all varieties of circumstances. Under all governments the influence of character remains the same, — in Turkey and in New England about alike. Under the primeval despots of Egypt, history honestly confesses that man must have been as free as culture could make him.

These appearances indicate the fact that the universe is represented in every one of its particles. Every thing in nature contains all the powers of nature. Every thing is made of one hidden stuff; as the naturalist sees one type under every metamorphosis, and regards a horse as a running man, a fish as a swimming man, a bird as a flying man, a tree as a rooted man. Each new form repeats not only the main character of the type, but part for part all the details, all the aims, furtherances, hindrances, energies, and whole system of every other. Every occupation, trade, art, transaction, is a compend of the world, and a correlative of every other. Each one is an entire emblem of human life; of its good and ill, its trials, its enemies, its course and its end. And each one must somehow accommodate the whole man, and recite all his destiny.

The world globes itself in a drop of dew. The microscope cannot find the animalcule which is less perfect for being little. Eyes, ears, taste, smell, motion, resistance, appetite, and organs of reproduction that take hold on eternity, — all find room to consist in the small creature. So do we put our life into every act. The true doctrine of omnipresence is, that God reappears with all his parts in every moss and cobweb. The value of the universe contrives to throw itself into every point. If the good is there, so is the evil; if the affinity, so the repulsion; if the force, so the limitation.

Thus is the universe alive. All things are moral. That soul, which within us is a sentiment, outside of us is a law. We feel its inspiration; out there in history we can see its fatal strength. "It is in the world, and the world was made by it." Justice is not postponed. A perfect equity adjusts its balance in all parts of life. {Oi chusoi Dios aei enpiptousi}, — The dice of God are always loaded. The world looks like a multiplication-table, or a mathematical equation, which, turn it how you will, balances itself. Take what figure you will, its exact value, nor more nor less, still returns to you. Every secret is told, every crime is punished, every virtue rewarded, every wrong redressed, in silence and certainty. What we call retribution is the universal necessity by which the whole appears wherever a part appears. If you see smoke, there must be fire. If you see a hand or a limb, you know that the trunk to which it belongs is there behind.

Every act rewards itself, or, in other words, integrates itself, in a twofold manner; first, in the thing, or in real nature; and secondly, in the circumstance, or in apparent nature. Men call the circumstance the retribution. The causal retribution is in the thing, and is seen by the soul. The retribution in the circumstance is seen by the understanding; it is inseparable from the thing, but is often spread over a long time, and so does not become distinct until after many years. The specific stripes may follow late after the offence, but they follow because they accompany it. Crime and punishment grow out of one stem. Punishment is a fruit that unsuspected ripens within the flower of the pleasure which concealed it. Cause and effect, means and ends, seed and fruit, cannot be severed; for the effect already blooms in the cause, the end preexists in the means, the fruit in the seed.

Whilst thus the world will be whole, and refuses to be disparted, we seek to act partially, to sunder, to appropriate; for example, — to gratify the senses, we sever the pleasure of the senses from the needs of the character. The ingenuity of man has always been dedicated to the solution of one problem,--how to detach the sensual sweet, the sensual strong, the sensual bright, &c., from the moral sweet, the moral deep, the moral fair; that is, again, to contrive to cut clean off this upper surface so thin as to leave it bottomless; to get a one end, without an other end. The soul says, Eat; the body would feast. The soul says, The man and woman shall be one flesh and one soul; the body would join the flesh only. The soul says, Have dominion over all things to the ends of virtue; the body would have the power over things to its own ends.

The soul strives amain to live and work through all things. It would be the only fact. All things shall be added unto it power, pleasure, knowledge, beauty. The particular man aims to be somebody; to set up for himself; to truck and higgle for a private good; and, in particulars, to ride, that he may ride; to dress, that he may be dressed; to eat, that he may eat; and to govern, that he may be seen. Men seek to be great; they would have offices, wealth, power, and fame. They think that to be great is to possess one side of nature,--the sweet, without the other side,--the bitter.

This dividing and detaching is steadily counteracted. Up to this day, it must be owned, no projector has had the smallest success. The parted water reunites behind our hand. Pleasure is taken out of pleasant things, profit out of profitable things, power out of strong things, as soon as we seek to separate them from the whole. We can no more halve things and get the sensual good, by itself, than we can get an inside that shall have no outside, or a light without a shadow. "Drive out nature with a fork, she comes running back."

Life invests itself with inevitable conditions, which the unwise seek to dodge, which one and another brags that he does not know; that they do not touch him; — but the brag is on his lips, the conditions are in his soul. If he escapes them in one part, they attack him in another more vital part. If he has escaped them in form, and in the appearance, it is because he has resisted his life, and fled from himself, and the retribution is so much death. So signal is the failure of all attempts to make this separation of the good from the tax, that the experiment would not be tried,--since to try it is to be mad,--but for the circumstance, that when the disease began in the will, of rebellion and separation, the intellect is at once infected, so that the man ceases to see God whole in each object, but is able to see the sensual allurement of an object, and not see the sensual hurt; he sees the mermaid's head, but not the dragon's tail; and thinks he can cut off that which he would have, from that which he would not have. "How secret art thou who dwellest in the highest heavens in silence, O thou only great God, sprinkling with an unwearied Providence certain penal blindnesses upon such as have unbridled desires!"

The human soul is true to these facts in the painting of fable, of history, of law, of proverbs, of conversation. It finds a tongue in literature unawares. Thus the Greeks called Jupiter, Supreme Mind; but having traditionally ascribed to him many base actions, they involuntarily made amends to reason, by tying up the hands of so bad a god. He is made as helpless as a king of England. Prometheus knows one secret which Jove must bargain for; Minerva, another. He cannot get his own thunders; Minerva keeps the key of them.



"Of all the gods, I only know the keys
That ope the solid doors within whose vaults
His thunders sleep." [Aeschylus]

A plain confession of the in-working of the All, and of its moral aim. The Indian mythology ends in the same ethics; and it would seem impossible for any fable to be invented and get any currency which was not moral. Aurora forgot to ask youth for her lover, and though Tithonus is immortal, he is old. Achilles is not quite invulnerable; the sacred waters did not wash the heel by which Thetis held him. Siegfried, in the Nibelungen, is not quite immortal, for a leaf fell on his back whilst he was bathing in the dragon's blood, and that spot which it covered is mortal. And so it must be. There is a crack in every thing God has made. It would seem, there is always this vindictive circumstance stealing in at unawares, even into the wild poesy in which the human fancy attempted to make bold holiday, and to shake itself free of the old laws, — this back-stroke, this kick of the gun, certifying that the law is fatal; that in nature nothing can be given, all things are sold.

This is that ancient doctrine of Nemesis, who keeps watch in the universe, and lets no offence go unchastised. The Furies, they said, are attendants on justice, and if the sun in heaven should transgress his path, they would punish him. The poets related that stone walls, and iron swords, and leathern thongs had an occult sympathy with the wrongs of their owners; that the belt which Ajax gave Hector dragged the Trojan hero over the field at the wheels of the car of Achilles, and the sword which Hector gave Ajax was that on whose point Ajax fell. They recorded, that when the Thasians erected a statue to Theagenes, a victor in the games, one of his rivals went to it by night, and endeavoured to throw it down by repeated blows, until at last he moved it from its pedestal, and was crushed to death beneath its fall.

This voice of fable has in it somewhat divine. It came from thought above the will of the writer. That is the best part of each writer, which has nothing private in it; that which he does not know; that which flowed out of his constitution, and not from his too active invention; that which in the study of a single artist you might not easily find, but in the study of many, you would abstract as the spirit of them all. Phidias it is not, but the work of man in that early Hellenic world, that I would know. The name and circumstance of Phidias, however convenient for history, embarrass when we come to the highest criticism. We are to see that which man was tending to do in a given period, and was hindered, or, if you will, modified in doing, by the interfering volitions of Phidias, of Dante, of Shakspeare, the organ whereby man at the moment wrought.

Still more striking is the expression of this fact in the proverbs of all nations, which are always the literature of reason, or the statements of an absolute truth, without qualification. Proverbs, like the sacred books of each nation, are the sanctuary of the intuitions. That which the droning world, chained to appearances, will not allow the realist to say in his own words, it will suffer him to say in proverbs without contradiction. And this law of laws which the pulpit, the senate, and the college deny, is hourly preached in all markets and workshops by flights of proverbs, whose teaching is as true and as omnipresent as that of birds and flies.

All things are double, one against another.--Tit for tat; an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth; blood for blood; measure for measure; love for love.--Give and it shall be given you.--He that watereth shall be watered himself.--What will you have? quoth God; pay for it and take it.--Nothing venture, nothing have.--Thou shalt be paid exactly for what thou hast done, no more, no less.--Who doth not work shall not eat.--Harm watch, harm catch.--Curses always recoil on the head of him who imprecates them. --If you put a chain around the neck of a slave, the other end fastens itself around your own.--Bad counsel confounds the adviser.--The Devil is an ass.

It is thus written, because it is thus in life. Our action is overmastered and characterized above our will by the law of nature. We aim at a petty end quite aside from the public good, but our act arranges itself by irresistible magnetism in a line with the poles of the world.

A man cannot speak but he judges himself. With his will, or against his will, he draws his portrait to the eye of his companions by every word. Every opinion reacts on him who utters it. It is a thread-ball thrown at a mark, but the other end remains in the thrower's bag. Or, rather, it is a harpoon hurled at the whale, unwinding, as it flies, a coil of cord in the boat, and if the harpoon is not good, or not well thrown, it will go nigh to cut the steersman in twain, or to sink the boat.

You cannot do wrong without suffering wrong. "No man had ever a point of pride that was not injurious to him," said Burke. The exclusive in fashionable life does not see that he excludes himself from enjoyment, in the attempt to appropriate it. The exclusionist in religion does not see that he shuts the door of heaven on himself, in striving to shut out others. Treat men as pawns and ninepins, and you shall suffer as well as they. If you leave out their heart, you shall lose your own. The senses would make things of all persons; of women, of children, of the poor. The vulgar proverb, "I will get it from his purse or get it from his skin," is sound philosophy.

All infractions of love and equity in our social relations are speedily punished. They are punished by fear. Whilst I stand in simple relations to my fellow-man, I have no displeasure in meeting him. We meet as water meets water, or as two currents of air mix, with perfect diffusion and interpenetration of nature. But as soon as there is any departure from simplicity, and attempt at halfness, or good for me that is not good for him, my neighbour feels the wrong; he shrinks from me as far as I have shrunk from him; his eyes no longer seek mine; there is war between us; there is hate in him and fear in me.

All the old abuses in society, universal and particular, all unjust accumulations of property and power, are avenged in the same manner. Fear is an instructer of great sagacity, and the herald of all revolutions. One thing he teaches, that there is rottenness where he appears. He is a carrion crow, and though you see not well what he hovers for, there is death somewhere. Our property is timid, our laws are timid, our cultivated classes are timid. Fear for ages has boded and mowed and gibbered over government and property. That obscene bird is not there for nothing. He indicates great wrongs which must be revised.

Of the like nature is that expectation of change which instantly follows the suspension of our voluntary activity. The terror of cloudless noon, the emerald of Polycrates, the awe of prosperity, the instinct which leads every generous soul to impose on itself tasks of a noble asceticism and vicarious virtue, are the tremblings of the balance of justice through the heart and mind of man.

Experienced men of the world know very well that it is best to pay scot and lot as they go along, and that a man often pays dear for a small frugality. The borrower runs in his own debt. Has a man gained any thing who has received a hundred favors and rendered none? Has he gained by borrowing, through indolence or cunning, his neighbour's wares, or horses, or money? There arises on the deed the instant acknowledgment of benefit on the one part, and of debt on the other; that is, of superiority and inferiority. The transaction remains in the memory of himself and his neighbour; and every new transaction alters, according to its nature, their relation to each other. He may soon come to see that he had better have broken his own bones than to have ridden in his neighbour's coach, and that "the highest price he can pay for a thing is to ask for it."

A wise man will extend this lesson to all parts of life, and know that it is the part of prudence to face every claimant, and pay every just demand on your time, your talents, or your heart. Always pay; for, first or last, you must pay your entire debt. Persons and events may stand for a time between you and justice, but it is only a postponement. You must pay at last your own debt. If you are wise, you will dread a prosperity which only loads you with more. Benefit is the end of nature. But for every benefit which you receive, a tax is levied. He is great who confers the most benefits. He is base--and that is the one base thing in the universe--to receive favors and render none. In the order of nature we cannot render benefits to those from whom we receive them, or only seldom. But the benefit we receive must be rendered again, line for line, deed for deed, cent for cent, to somebody. Beware of too much good staying in your hand. It will fast corrupt and worm worms. Pay it away quickly in some sort.

Labor is watched over by the same pitiless laws. Cheapest, say the prudent, is the dearest labor. What we buy in a broom, a mat, a wagon, a knife, is some application of good sense to a common want. It is best to pay in your land a skilful gardener, or to buy good sense applied to gardening; in your sailor, good sense applied to navigation; in the house, good sense applied to cooking, sewing, serving; in your agent, good sense applied to accounts and affairs. So do you multiply your presence, or spread yourself throughout your estate. But because of the dual constitution of things, in labor as in life there can be no cheating. The thief steals from himself. The swindler swindles himself. For the real price of labor is knowledge and virtue, whereof wealth and credit are signs. These signs, like paper money, may be counterfeited or stolen, but that which they represent, namely, knowledge and virtue, cannot be counterfeited or stolen. These ends of labor cannot be answered but by real exertions of the mind, and in obedience to pure motives. The cheat, the defaulter, the gambler, cannot extort the knowledge of material and moral nature which his honest care and pains yield to the operative. The law of nature is, Do the thing, and you shall have the power: but they who do not the thing have not the power.

Human labor, through all its forms, from the sharpening of a stake to the construction of a city or an epic, is one immense illustration of the perfect compensation of the universe. The absolute balance of Give and Take, the doctrine that every thing has its price,--and if that price is not paid, not that thing but something else is obtained, and that it is impossible to get any thing without its price,--is not less sublime in the columns of a leger than in the budgets of states, in the laws of light and darkness, in all the action and reaction of nature. I cannot doubt that the high laws which each man sees implicated in those processes with which he is conversant, the stern ethics which sparkle on his chisel-edge, which are measured out by his plumb and foot-rule, which stand as manifest in the footing of the shop-bill as in the history of a state, --do recommend to him his trade, and though seldom named, exalt his business to his imagination.

The league between virtue and nature engages all things to assume a hostile front to vice. The beautiful laws and substances of the world persecute and whip the traitor. He finds that things are arranged for truth and benefit, but there is no den in the wide world to hide a rogue. Commit a crime, and the earth is made of glass. Commit a crime, and it seems as if a coat of snow fell on the ground, such as reveals in the woods the track of every partridge and fox and squirrel and mole. You cannot recall the spoken word, you cannot wipe out the foot-track, you cannot draw up the ladder, so as to leave no inlet or clew. Some damning circumstance always transpires. The laws and substances of nature--water, snow, wind, gravitation--become penalties to the thief.

On the other hand, the law holds with equal sureness for all right action. Love, and you shall be loved. All love is mathematically just, as much as the two sides of an algebraic equation. The good man has absolute good, which like fire turns every thing to its own nature, so that you cannot do him any harm; but as the royal armies sent against Napoleon, when he approached, cast down their colors and from enemies became friends, so disasters of all kinds, as sickness, offence, poverty, prove benefactors:--



"Winds blow and waters roll
Strength to the brave, and power and deity,
Yet in themselves are nothing."

The good are befriended even by weakness and defect. As no man had ever a point of pride that was not injurious to him, so no man had ever a defect that was not somewhere made useful to him. The stag in the fable admired his horns and blamed his feet, but when the hunter came, his feet saved him, and afterwards, caught in the thicket, his horns destroyed him. Every man in his lifetime needs to thank his faults. As no man thoroughly understands a truth until he has contended against it, so no man has a thorough acquaintance with the hindrances or talents of men, until he has suffered from the one, and seen the triumph of the other over his own want of the same. Has he a defect of temper that unfits him to live in society? Thereby he is driven to entertain himself alone, and acquire habits of self-help; and thus, like the wounded oyster, he mends his shell with pearl.

Our strength grows out of our weakness. The indignation which arms itself with secret forces does not awaken until we are pricked and stung and sorely assailed. A great man is always willing to be little. Whilst he sits on the cushion of advantages, he goes to sleep. When he is pushed, tormented, defeated, he has a chance to learn something; he has been put on his wits, on his manhood; he has gained facts; learns his ignorance; is cured of the insanity of conceit; has got moderation and real skill. The wise man throws himself on the side of his assailants. It is more his interest than it is theirs to find his weak point. The wound cicatrizes and falls off from him like a dead skin, and when they would triumph, lo! he has passed on invulnerable. Blame is safer than praise. I hate to be defended in a newspaper. As long as all that is said is said against me, I feel a certain assurance of success. But as soon as honeyed words of praise are spoken for me, I feel as one that lies unprotected before his enemies. In general, every evil to which we do not succumb is a benefactor. As the Sandwich Islander believes that the strength and valor of the enemy he kills passes into himself, so we gain the strength of the temptation we resist.

The same guards which protect us from disaster, defect, and enmity, defend us, if we will, from selfishness and fraud. Bolts and bars are not the best of our institutions, nor is shrewdness in trade a mark of wisdom. Men suffer all their life long, under the foolish superstition that they can be cheated. But it is as impossible for a man to be cheated by any one but himself, as for a thing to be and not to be at the same time. There is a third silent party to all our bargains. The nature and soul of things takes on itself the guaranty of the fulfilment of every contract, so that honest service cannot come to loss. If you serve an ungrateful master, serve him the more. Put God in your debt. Every stroke shall be repaid. The longer the payment is withholden, the better for you; for compound interest on compound interest is the rate and usage of this exchequer.

The history of persecution is a history of endeavours to cheat nature, to make water run up hill, to twist a rope of sand. It makes no difference whether the actors be many or one, a tyrant or a mob. A mob is a society of bodies voluntarily bereaving themselves of reason, and traversing its work. The mob is man voluntarily descending to the nature of the beast. Its fit hour of activity is night. Its actions are insane like its whole constitution. It persecutes a principle; it would whip a right; it would tar and feather justice, by inflicting fire and outrage upon the houses and persons of those who have these. It resembles the prank of boys, who run with fire-engines to put out the ruddy aurora streaming to the stars. The inviolate spirit turns their spite against the wrongdoers. The martyr cannot be dishonored. Every lash inflicted is a tongue of fame; every prison, a more illustrious abode; every burned book or house enlightens the world; every suppressed or expunged word reverberates through the earth from side to side. Hours of sanity and consideration are always arriving to communities, as to individuals, when the truth is seen, and the martyrs are justified.



Thus do all things preach the indifferency of circumstances. The man is all. Every thing has two sides, a good and an evil. Every advantage has its tax. I learn to be content. But the doctrine of compensation is not the doctrine of indifferency. The thoughtless say, on hearing these representations,--What boots it to do well? there is one event to good and evil; if I gain any good, I must pay for it; if I lose any good, I gain some other; all actions are indifferent.

There is a deeper fact in the soul than compensation, to wit, its own nature. The soul is not a compensation, but a life. The soul is. Under all this running sea of circumstance, whose waters ebb and flow with perfect balance, lies the aboriginal abyss of real Being. Essence, or God, is not a relation, or a part, but the whole. Being is the vast affirmative, excluding negation, self-balanced, and swallowing up all relations, parts, and times within itself. Nature, truth, virtue, are the influx from thence. Vice is the absence or departure of the same. Nothing, Falsehood, may indeed stand as the great Night or shade, on which, as a background, the living universe paints itself forth; but no fact is begotten by it; it cannot work; for it is not. It cannot work any good; it cannot work any harm. It is harm inasmuch as it is worse not to be than to be.

We feel defrauded of the retribution due to evil acts, because the criminal adheres to his vice and contumacy, and does not come to a crisis or judgment anywhere in visible nature. There is no stunning confutation of his nonsense before men and angels. Has he therefore outwitted the law? Inasmuch as he carries the malignity and the lie with him, he so far deceases from nature. In some manner there will be a demonstration of the wrong to the understanding also; but should we not see it, this deadly deduction makes square the eternal account.

Neither can it be said, on the other hand, that the gain of rectitude must be bought by any loss. There is no penalty to virtue; no penalty to wisdom; they are proper additions of being. In a virtuous action, I properly am; in a virtuous act, I add to the world; I plant into deserts conquered from Chaos and Nothing, and see the darkness receding on the limits of the horizon. There can be no excess to love; none to knowledge; none to beauty, when these attributes are considered in the purest sense. The soul refuses limits, and always affirms an Optimism, never a Pessimism.

His life is a progress, and not a station. His instinct is trust. Our instinct uses "more" and "less" in application to man, of the presence of the soul, and not of its absence; the brave man is greater than the coward; the true, the benevolent, the wise, is more a man, and not less, than the fool and knave. There is no tax on the good of virtue; for that is the incoming of God himself, or absolute existence, without any comparative. Material good has its tax, and if it came without desert or sweat, has no root in me, and the next wind will blow it away. But all the good of nature is the soul's, and may be had, if paid for in nature's lawful coin, that is, by labor which the heart and the head allow. I no longer wish to meet a good I do not earn, for example, to find a pot of buried gold, knowing that it brings with it new burdens. I do not wish more external goods,--neither possessions, nor honors, nor powers, nor persons. The gain is apparent; the tax is certain. But there is no tax on the knowledge that the compensation exists, and that it is not desirable to dig up treasure. Herein I rejoice with a serene eternal peace. I contract the boundaries of possible mischief. I learn the wisdom of St. Bernard, --"Nothing can work me damage except myself; the harm that I sustain I carry about with me, and never am a real sufferer but by my own fault."

In the nature of the soul is the compensation for the inequalities of condition. The radical tragedy of nature seems to be the distinction of More and Less. How can Less not feel the pain; how not feel indignation or malevolence towards More? Look at those who have less faculty, and one feels sad, and knows not well what to make of it. He almost shuns their eye; he fears they will upbraid God. What should they do? It seems a great injustice. But see the facts nearly, and these mountainous inequalities vanish. Love reduces them, as the sun melts the iceberg in the sea. The heart and soul of all men being one, this bitterness of His and Mine ceases. His is mine. I am my brother, and my brother is me. If I feel overshadowed and outdone by great neighbours, I can yet love; I can still receive; and he that loveth maketh his own the grandeur he loves. Thereby I make the discovery that my brother is my guardian, acting for me with the friendliest designs, and the estate I so admired and envied is my own. It is the nature of the soul to appropriate all things. Jesus and Shakspeare are fragments of the soul, and by love I conquer and incorporate them in my own conscious domain. His virtue,--is not that mine? His wit,--if it cannot be made mine, it is not wit.

Such, also, is the natural history of calamity. The changes which break up at short intervals the prosperity of men are advertisements of a nature whose law is growth. Every soul is by this intrinsic necessity quitting its whole system of things, its friends, and home, and laws, and faith, as the shell-fish crawls out of its beautiful but stony case, because it no longer admits of its growth, and slowly forms a new house. [Compare with Oliver Wendell Holmes' poem, "Nautilus."] In proportion to the vigor of the individual, these revolutions are frequent, until in some happier mind they are incessant, and all worldly relations hang very loosely about him, becoming, as it were, a transparent fluid membrane through which the living form is seen, and not, as in most men, an indurated heterogeneous fabric of many dates, and of no settled character in which the man is imprisoned. Then there can be enlargement, and the man of to-day scarcely recognizes the man of yesterday. And such should be the outward biography of man in time, a putting off of dead circumstances day by day, as he renews his raiment day by day. But to us, in our lapsed estate, resting, not advancing, resisting, not cooperating with the divine expansion, this growth comes by shocks.

We cannot part with our friends. We cannot let our angels go. We do not see that they only go out, that archangels may come in. We are idolaters of the old. We do not believe in the riches of the soul, in its proper eternity and omnipresence. We do not believe there is any force in to-day to rival or recreate that beautiful yesterday. We linger in the ruins of the old tent, where once we had bread and shelter and organs, nor believe that the spirit can feed, cover, and nerve us again. We cannot again find aught so dear, so sweet, so graceful. But we sit and weep in vain. The voice of the Almighty saith, 'Up and onward for evermore!' We cannot stay amid the ruins. Neither will we rely on the new; and so we walk ever with reverted eyes, like those monsters who look backwards.

And yet the compensations of calamity are made apparent to the understanding also, after long intervals of time. A fever, a mutilation, a cruel disappointment, a loss of wealth, a loss of friends, seems at the moment unpaid loss, and unpayable. But the sure years reveal the deep remedial force that underlies all facts. The death of a dear friend, wife, brother, lover, which seemed nothing but privation, somewhat later assumes the aspect of a guide or genius; for it commonly operates revolutions in our way of life, terminates an epoch of infancy or of youth which was waiting to be closed, breaks up a wonted occupation, or a household, or style of living, and allows the formation of new ones more friendly to the growth of character. It permits or constrains the formation of new acquaintances, and the reception of new influences that prove of the first importance to the next years; and the man or woman who would have remained a sunny garden-flower, with no room for its roots and too much sunshine for its head, by the falling of the walls and the neglect of the gardener, is made the banian of the forest, yielding shade and fruit to wide neighbourhoods of men.

Selected Criticism on "Compensation"

Pommer, Henry F. "The Contents and Basis of Emerson's Belief in Compensation." PMLA 77 (June 1962): 248-53. Also in American Literature, ed. Young and Fine.
Panek, Le Roy Lad. "Imagery and Emerson's 'Compensation.'" 18 (4 Quarter 1962): 218-221.
Lee, Roland F. "Emerson's 'Compensation' as Argument and Art." New England Quarterly 37 (Sept 1964): 291-305.
Riepe, Dale. "Emerson and Indian PHilosophy." Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (Jan-March 1967): 115-22.
Bottorff, William K. "'Compensation,' Emerson's Ebb and Flow." American Studies [Taiwan] 9 (March 1979): 1-9.
Hughes, Gertrude Reif. Emerson's Demanding Optimism. Baton Rouge: LSU P, 1984.
Lasch, Christopher. The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics. NY: W. W. Norton, 1991.
Jacobson, David. "'Compensation': Exteriority Beyond the Spirit of Revenge. ESQ 33 (2 Quarter 1987): 110-119.
Larson, Kerry. "Justice to Emerson." Raritan: A Quarterly Review, 21:3 (2002 Winter), 46-67.





Home: Emerson Essays