2023/06/19

Christian mysticism - Wikipedia

Christian mysticism - Wikipedia

Christian mysticism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Christian contemplation)

Christian mysticism is the tradition of mystical practices and mystical theology within Christianity which "concerns the preparation [of the person] for, the consciousness of, and the effect of [...] a direct and transformative presence of God"[1] or Divine love.[2] 

Until the sixth century the practice of what is now called mysticism was referred to by the term contemplatio, c.q. theoria, from contemplatio (LatinGreek θεωρίαtheoria),[3] "looking at", "gazing at", "being aware of" God or the Divine.[4][5][6] 

Christianity took up the use of both the Greek (theoria) and Latin (contemplatio, contemplation) terminology to describe various forms of prayer and the process of coming to know God.

Contemplative practices range from simple prayerful meditation of Holy Scripture (i.e. Lectio Divina) to contemplation on the presence of God, resulting in 

Three stages are discerned in contemplative practice, namely

  •  catharsis (purification),[7][8] 
  • contemplation proper, and 
  • the vision of God.


Contemplative practices have a prominent place in the Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy, and have gained a renewed interest in western Christianity.

Etymology[edit]

Theoria[edit]

The Greek theoria (θεωρία) meant "contemplation, speculation, a looking at, things looked at", from theorein (θεωρεῖν) "to consider, speculate, look at", from theoros (θεωρός) "spectator", from thea (θέα) "a view" + horan (ὁρᾶν) "to see".[9] It expressed the state of being a spectator. Both Greek θεωρία and Latin contemplatio primarily meant looking at things, whether with the eyes or with the mind.[10]

According to William Johnston, until the sixth century the practice of what is now called mysticism was referred to by the term contemplatio, c.q. theoria.[4] According to Johnston, "[b]oth contemplation and mysticism speak of the eye of love which is looking at, gazing at, aware of divine realities."[4]

Several scholars have demonstrated similarities between the Greek idea of theoria and the Indian idea of darśana (darshan), including Ian Rutherford[11] and Gregory Grieve.[12]

Mysticism[edit]

Mystic marriage of Christ and the Church.

"Mysticism" is derived from the Greek μυω, meaning "to conceal,"[13] and its derivative μυστικόςmystikos, meaning "an initiate." In the Hellenistic world, a "mystikos" was an initiate of a mystery religion. "Mystical" referred to secret religious rituals[14] and use of the word lacked any direct references to the transcendental.[15]

In early Christianity the term mystikos referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely 

  • the biblical, 
  • the liturgical and 
  • the spiritual or contemplative.[16] 

The biblical dimension refers to "hidden" or allegorical interpretations of Scriptures.[14][16] The liturgical dimension refers to the liturgical mystery of the Eucharist, the presence of Christ at the Eucharist.[14][16] The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.[16]

Definition of mysticism[edit]

Transformative presence of God[edit]

Bernard McGinn defines Christian mysticism as:

[T]hat part, or element, of Christian belief and practice that concerns the preparation for, the consciousness of, and the effect of [...] a direct and transformative presence of God.[1]

McGinn argues that "presence" is more accurate than "union," since not all mystics spoke of union with God, and since many visions and miracles were not necessarily related to union.[1]

Presence versus experience[edit]

McGinn also argues that we should speak of "consciousness" of God's presence, rather than of "experience", since mystical activity is not simply about the sensation of God as an external object, but more broadly about

...new ways of knowing and loving based on states of awareness in which God becomes present in our inner acts.[1]

William James popularized the use of the term "religious experience" in his 1902 book The Varieties of Religious Experience.[17] It has also influenced the understanding of mysticism as a distinctive experience which supplies knowledge.[14]

Wayne Proudfoot traces the roots of the notion of religious experience further back to the German theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768–1834), who argued that religion is based on a feeling of the infinite. The notion of religious experience was used by Schleiermacher to defend religion against the growing scientific and secular critique. It was adopted by many scholars of religion, of which William James was the most influential.[18]

Interpersonal transformation[edit]

Resurrection of JesusMatthias Grünewald

McGinn's emphasis on the transformation that occurs through mystical activity relates to this idea of "presence" instead of "experience":

This is why the only test that Christianity has known for determining the authenticity of a mystic and her or his message has been that of personal transformation, both on the mystic's part and—especially—on the part of those whom the mystic has affected.[1]

Parsons points out that the stress on "experience" is accompanied by favoring the atomic individual, instead of the shared life on the community. It also fails to distinguish between episodic experience, and mysticism as a process that is embedded in a total religious matrix of liturgy, scripture, worship, virtues, theology, rituals and practices.[19]

Richard King also points to disjunction between "mystical experience" and social justice:[20]

The privatisation of mysticism - that is, the increasing tendency to locate the mystical in the psychological realm of personal experiences - serves to exclude it from political issues as social justice. Mysticism thus becomes seen as a personal matter of cultivating inner states of tranquility and equanimity, which, rather than seeking to transform the world, serve to accommodate the individual to the status quo through the alleviation of anxiety and stress.[20]

Social construction[edit]

Mystical experience is not simply a matter between the mystic and God, but is often shaped by cultural issues. For instance, Caroline Bynum has shown how, in the late Middle Ages, miracles attending the taking of the Eucharist were not simply symbolic of the Passion story, but served as vindication of the mystic's theological orthodoxy by proving that the mystic had not fallen prey to heretical ideas, such as the Cathar rejection of the material world as evil, contrary to orthodox teaching that God took on human flesh and remained sinless.[21] Thus, the nature of mystical experience could be tailored to the particular cultural and theological issues of the time.

Origins[edit]

The idea of mystical realities has been widely held in Christianity since the second century AD, referring not simply to spiritual practices, but also to the belief that their rituals and even their scriptures have hidden ("mystical") meanings.[1]

The link between mysticism and the vision of the Divine was introduced by the early Church Fathers, who used the term as an adjective, as in mystical theology and mystical contemplation.[15]

In subsequent centuries, especially as Christian apologetics began to use Greek philosophy to explain Christian ideas, Neoplatonism became an influence on Christian mystical thought and practice via such authors as Augustine of Hippo and Origen.[22]

Jewish antecedents[edit]

Jewish spirituality in the period before Jesus was highly corporate and public, based mostly on the worship services of the synagogues, which included the reading and interpretation of the Hebrew Scriptures and the recitation of prayers, and on the major festivals. Thus, private spirituality was strongly influenced by the liturgies and by the scriptures (e.g., the use of the Psalms for prayer), and individual prayers often recalled historical events just as much as they recalled their own immediate needs.[23]

Of special importance are the following concepts:

  • Binah (understanding), and Chokhmah (wisdom), which come from years of reading, praying and meditating the scriptures;
  • Shekhinah, the presence of God in our daily lives, the superiority of that presence to earthly wealth, the pain and longing that come when God is absent; and the nurturing, feminine aspect of God;
  • the hiddenness of God, which comes from our inability to survive the full revelation of God's glory and which forces us to seek to know God through faith and obedience;
  • "Torah-mysticism", a view of God's laws as the central expression of God's will and therefore as worthy object not only of obedience but also of loving meditation and Torah study; and
  • poverty, an ascetic value, based on the apocalyptic expectation of God's impending arrival, that characterized the Jewish people's reaction to being oppressed by a series of foreign empires.

In Christian mysticism, Shekhinah became mysteryDa'at (knowledge) became gnosis, and poverty became an important component of monasticism.[24]

Greek influences[edit]

The term theoria was used by the ancient Greeks to refer to the act of experiencing or observing, and then comprehending through nous.

The influences of Greek thought are apparent in the earliest Christian mystics and their writings. Plato (428–348 BC) is considered the most important of ancient philosophers, and his philosophical system provides the basis of most later mystical forms. Plotinus (c. 205 – 270 AD) provided the non-Christian, neo-Platonic basis for much Christian, Jewish and Islamic mysticism.[25]

Plato[edit]

Plato (Πλάτων)

For Plato, what the contemplative (theoros) contemplates (theorei) are the Forms, the realities underlying the individual appearances, and one who contemplates these atemporal and aspatial realities is enriched with a perspective on ordinary things superior to that of ordinary people.[26] Philip of Opus viewed theoria as contemplation of the stars, with practical effects in everyday life similar to those that Plato saw as following from contemplation of the Forms.[26]

Plotinus[edit]

Plotinus (Πλωτίνος)

In the Enneads of Plotinus (c.204/5–270 CE), a founder of Neoplatonism, everything is contemplation (theoria)[27] and everything is derived from contemplation.[28] The first hypostasis, the One, is contemplation[29][30] (by the nous, or second hypostasis)[failed verification] in that "it turns to itself in the simplest regard, implying no complexity or need"; this reflecting back on itself emanated (not created)[failed verification] the second hypostasis, Intellect (in Greek Νοῦς, Nous), Plotinus describes as "living contemplation", being "self-reflective and contemplative activity par excellence", and the third hypostatic level has theoria.[31] Knowledge of The One is achieved through experience of its power, an experience that is contemplation (theoria) of the source of all things.[32]

Plotinus agreed with Aristotle's systematic distinction between contemplation (theoria) and practice (praxis): dedication to the superior life of theoria requires abstention from practical, active life. Plotinus explained: "The point of action is contemplation. ... Contemplation is therefore the end of action" and "Such is the life of the divinity and of divine and blessed men: detachments from all things here below, scorn of all earthly pleasures, the flight of the lone to the Alone."[33]

Early church[edit]

New Testamentical writings[edit]

Transfiguration of Jesus depicting him with ElijahMoses and 3 apostles, by Carracci, 1594

The Christian scriptures, insofar as they are the founding narrative of the Christian church, provide many key stories and concepts that become important for Christian mystics in all later generations: practices such as the Eucharistbaptism and the Lord's Prayer all become activities that take on importance for both their ritual and symbolic values. Other scriptural narratives present scenes that become the focus of meditation: the Crucifixion of Jesus and his appearances after his Resurrection are two of the most central to Christian theology; but Jesus' conception, in which the Holy Spirit overshadows Mary, and his Transfiguration, in which he is briefly revealed in his heavenly glory, also become important images for meditation. Moreover, many of the Christian texts build on Jewish spiritual foundations, such as chokhmahshekhinah.[34]

But different writers present different images and ideas. The Synoptic Gospels (in spite of their many differences) introduce several important ideas, two of which are related to Greco-Judaic notions of knowledge/gnosis by virtue of being mental acts: purity of heart, in which we will to see in God's light; and repentance, which involves allowing God to judge and then transform us. Another key idea presented by the Synoptics is the desert, which is used as a metaphor for the place where we meet God in the poverty of our spirit.[35]

The Gospel of John focuses on God's glory in his use of light imagery and in his presentation of the Cross as a moment of exaltation; he also sees the Cross as the example of agape love, a love which is not so much an emotion as a willingness to serve and care for others. But in stressing love, John shifts the goal of spiritual growth away from knowledge/gnosis, which he presents more in terms of Stoic ideas about the role of reason as being the underlying principle of the universe and as the spiritual principle within all people. Although John does not follow up on the Stoic notion that this principle makes union with the divine possible for humanity, it is an idea that later Christian writers develop. Later generations will also shift back and forth between whether to follow the Synoptics in stressing knowledge or John in stressing love.[36]

In his letters, Paul also focuses on mental activities, but not in the same way as the Synoptics, which equate renewing the mind with repentance. Instead, Paul sees the renewal of our minds as happening as we contemplate what Jesus did on the Cross, which then opens us to grace and to the movement of the Holy Spirit into our hearts. Like John, Paul is less interested in knowledge, preferring to emphasize the hiddenness, the "mystery" of God's plan as revealed through Christ. But Paul's discussion of the Cross differs from John's in being less about how it reveals God's glory and more about how it becomes the stumbling block that turns our minds back to God. Paul also describes the Christian life as that of an athlete, demanding practice and training for the sake of the prize; later writers will see in this image a call to ascetical practices.[37]

Apostolic Fathers[edit]

The texts attributed to the Apostolic Fathers, the earliest post-Biblical texts we have, share several key themes, particularly the call to unity in the face of internal divisions and perceptions of persecution, the reality of the charisms, especially prophecy, visions, and Christian gnosis, which is understood as "a gift of the Holy Spirit that enables us to know Christ" through meditating on the scriptures and on the Cross of Christ.[38] (This understanding of gnosis is not the same as that developed by the Gnostics, who focused on esoteric knowledge that is available only to a few people but that allows them to free themselves from the evil world.[39][40]) These authors also discuss the notion of the "two ways", that is, the way of life and the way of death; this idea has biblical roots, being found in both the Sermon on the Mount and the Torah. The two ways are then related to the notion of purity of heart, which is developed by contrasting it against the divided or duplicitous heart and by linking it to the need for asceticism, which keeps the heart whole/pure.[41][42] Purity of heart was especially important given perceptions of martyrdom, which many writers discussed in theological terms, seeing it not as an evil but as an opportunity to truly die for the sake of God—the ultimate example of ascetic practice.[43] Martyrdom could also be seen as symbolic in its connections with the Eucharist and with baptism.[44]

Theoria enabled the Fathers to perceive depths of meaning in the biblical writings that escape a purely scientific or empirical approach to interpretation.[45] The Antiochene Fathers, in particular, saw in every passage of Scripture a double meaning, both literal and spiritual.[46][note 1] As Frances Margaret Young notes, "Best translated in this context as a type of "insight", theoria was the act of perceiving in the wording and "story" of Scripture a moral and spiritual meaning,"[48] and may be regarded as a form of allegory.[49]

Alexandrian mysticism[edit]

The Alexandrian contribution to Christian mysticism centers on Origen (c. 185 – c. 253) and Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD). Clement was an early Christian humanist who argued that reason is the most important aspect of human existence and that gnosis (not something we can attain by ourselves, but the gift of Christ) helps us find the spiritual realities that are hidden behind the natural world and within the scriptures. Given the importance of reason, Clement stresses apatheia as a reasonable ordering of our passions in order to live within God's love, which is seen as a form of truth.[50] Origen, who had a lasting influence on Eastern Christian thought, further develops the idea that the spiritual realities can be found through allegorical readings of the scriptures (along the lines of Jewish aggadah tradition), but he focuses his attention on the Cross and on the importance of imitating Christ through the Cross, especially through spiritual combat and asceticism. Origen stresses the importance of combining intellect and virtue (theoria and praxis) in our spiritual exercises, drawing on the image of Moses and Aaron leading the Israelites through the wilderness, and he describes our union with God as the marriage of our souls with Christ the Logos, using the wedding imagery from the Song of Songs.[51] Alexandrian mysticism developed alongside Hermeticism and Neoplatonism and therefore share some of the same ideas, images, etc. in spite of their differences.[52]

Philo of Alexandria (20 BCE – c.  50 CE) was a Jewish Hellenistic philosopher who was important for connecting the Hebrew Scriptures to Greek thought, and thereby to Greek Christians, who struggled to understand their connection to Jewish history. In particular, Philo taught that allegorical interpretations of the Hebrew Scriptures provides access to the real meanings of the texts. Philo also taught the need to bring together the contemplative focus of the Stoics and Essenes with the active lives of virtue and community worship found in Platonism and the Therapeutae. Using terms reminiscent of the Platonists, Philo described the intellectual component of faith as a sort of spiritual ecstasy in which our nous (mind) is suspended and God's Spirit takes its place. Philo's ideas influenced the Alexandrian Christians, Clement, and Origen, and through them, Gregory of Nyssa.[53]

Monasticism[edit]

Desert Fathers[edit]

Inspired by Christ's teaching and example, men and women withdrew to the deserts of Sketes where, either as solitary individuals or communities, they lived lives of austere simplicity oriented towards contemplative prayer. These communities formed the basis for what later would become known as Christian monasticism.[54]

Early monasticism[edit]

John Cassian (Ioannes Cassianus)

The Eastern church then saw the development of monasticism and the mystical contributions of Gregory of NyssaEvagrius Ponticus, and Pseudo-Dionysius. Monasticism, also known as anchoritism (meaning "to withdraw") was seen as an alternative to martyrdom, and was less about escaping the world than about fighting demons (who were thought to live in the desert) and about gaining liberation from our bodily passions in order to be open to the Word of God. Anchorites practiced continuous meditation on the scriptures as a means of climbing the ladder of perfection—a common religious image in the Mediterranean world and one found in Christianity through the story of Jacob's ladder—and sought to fend off the demon of acedia ("un-caring"), a boredom or apathy that prevents us from continuing on in our spiritual training. Anchorites could live in total solitude ("hermits", from the word erēmitēs, "of the desert") or in loose communities ("cenobites", meaning "common life").[55]

Monasticism eventually made its way to the West and was established by the work of John Cassian and Benedict of Nursia. Meanwhile, Western spiritual writing was deeply influenced by the works of such men as Jerome and Augustine of Hippo.[56]

Neo-Platonism[edit]

Neo-Platonism has had a profound influence on Christian contemplative traditions. Neoplatonic ideas were adopted by Christianity,[note 2] among them the idea of theoria or contemplation, taken over by Gregory of Nyssa for example.[note 3] The Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa remarks that contemplation in Gregory is described as a "loving contemplation",[59] and, according to Thomas Keating, the Greek Fathers of the Church, in taking over from the Neoplatonists the word theoria, attached to it the idea expressed by the Hebrew word da'ath, which, though usually translated as "knowledge", is a much stronger term, since it indicates the experiential knowledge that comes with love and that involves the whole person, not merely the mind.[60] Among the Greek Fathers, Christian theoria was not contemplation of Platonic Ideas nor of the astronomical heavens of Pontic Heraclitus, but "studying the Scriptures", with an emphasis on the spiritual sense.[10]

Later, contemplation came to be distinguished from intellectual life, leading to the identification of θεωρία or contemplatio with a form of prayer[10] distinguished from discursive meditation in both East[61] and West.[62] Some make a further distinction, within contemplation, between contemplation acquired by human effort and infused contemplation.[62][63]

Mystical theology[edit]

In early Christianity the term "mystikos" referred to three dimensions, which soon became intertwined, namely the biblical, the liturgical and the spiritual or contemplative.[64] The biblical dimension refers to "hidden" or allegorical interpretations of Scriptures.[65][64] The liturgical dimension refers to the liturgical mystery of the Eucharist, the presence of Christ at the Eucharist.[65][64] The third dimension is the contemplative or experiential knowledge of God.[64]

The 9th century saw the development of mystical theology through the introduction of the works of sixth-century theologian Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, such as On Mystical Theology. His discussion of the via negativa was especially influential.[66]

Under the influence of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite (late 5th to early 6th century) the mystical theology came to denote the investigation of the allegorical truth of the Bible,[64] and "the spiritual awareness of the ineffable Absolute beyond the theology of divine names."[67] Pseudo-Dionysius' apophatic theology, or "negative theology", exerted a great influence on medieval monastic religiosity.[68] It was influenced by Neo-Platonism, and very influential in Eastern Orthodox Christian theology. In western Christianity it was a counter-current to the prevailing Cataphatic theology or "positive theology".

Practice[edit]

Cataphatic and apophatic mysticism[edit]

Within theistic mysticism two broad tendencies can be identified. One is a tendency to understand God by asserting what He is and the other by asserting what He is not. The former leads to what is called cataphatic theology and the latter to apophatic theology.

  1. Cataphatic (imaging God, imagination or words) - e.g., The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, Julian of NorwichFrancis of Assisi; and
  2. Apophatic (imageless, stillness, and wordlessness) - inspired by the writings of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, which forms the basis of Eastern Orthodox mysticism and hesychasm, and became influential in western Catholic mysticism from the 12th century AD onward, as in The Cloud of Unknowing and Meister Eckhart.[69]

Urban T. Holmes III categorized mystical theology in terms of whether it focuses on illuminating the mind, which Holmes refers to as speculative practice, or the heart/emotions, which he calls affective practice. Combining the speculative/affective scale with the apophatic/cataphatic scale allows for a range of categories:[70]

Meditation and contemplation[edit]

In discursive meditation, such as Lectio Divina, mind and imagination and other faculties are actively employed in an effort to understand our relationship with God.[71][72] In contemplative prayer, this activity is curtailed, so that contemplation has been described as "a gaze of faith", "a silent love".[note 4] There is no clear-cut boundary between Christian meditation and Christian contemplation, and they sometimes overlap. Meditation serves as a foundation on which the contemplative life stands, the practice by which someone begins the state of contemplation.[73]

John of the Cross described the difference between discursive meditation and contemplation by saying:

The difference between these two conditions of the soul is like the difference between working, and enjoyment of the fruit of our work; between receiving a gift, and profiting by it; between the toil of travelling and the rest of our journey's end".[74][75]

Mattá al-Miskīn, an Oriental Orthodox monk has posited:

Meditation is an activity of one's spirit by reading or otherwise, while contemplation is a spontaneous activity of that spirit. In meditation, man's imaginative and thinking power exert some effort. Contemplation then follows to relieve man of all effort. Contemplation is the soul's inward vision and the heart's simple repose in God.[73]

Threefold path[edit]

According to the standard formulation of the process of Christian perfection, going back to Evagrius Ponticus (345–399 AD)[76] and Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite (late 5th to early 6th century),[77][78] there are three stages:[79][62][78]

  • Katharsis or purification;
  • Theoria or illumination, also called "natural" or "acquired contemplation;"
  • Union or Theosis; also called "infused" or "higher contemplation"; indwelling in God; vision of God; deification; union with God

These stages correspond to body (soma), soul (psyche), and spirit (pneuma). In 869, the 8th Ecumenical Council reduced the image of the human to only body and soul but within mystics a model of three aspects continued. The three aspects later became purgative, illuminative, and unitive in the western churches and prayer of the lips, the mind, the heart in the eastern churches.[76]

Purification and illumination of the noetic faculty are preparations for the vision of God. Without these preparations it is impossible for man's selfish love to be transformed into selfless love. This transformation takes place during the higher level of the stage of illumination called theoria, literally meaning vision, in this case vision by means of unceasing and uninterrupted memory of God. Those who remain selfish and self-centered with a hardened heart, closed to God's love, will not see the glory of God in this life. However, they will see God's glory eventually, but as an eternal and consuming fire and outer darkness.[80]

Catharsis (purification)[edit]

In the Orthodox Churches, theosis results from leading a pure life, practicing restraint and adhering to the commandments, putting the love of God before all else. This metamorphosis (transfiguration) or transformation results from a deep love of God. Saint Isaac the Syrian says in his Ascetical Homilies that "Paradise is the love of God, in which the bliss of all the beatitudes is contained," and that "the tree of life is the love of God" (Homily 72). Theoria is thus achieved by the pure of heart who are no longer subject to the afflictions of the passions. It is a gift from the Holy Spirit to those who, through observance of the commandments of God and ascetic practices (see praxiskenosisPoustinia and schema), have achieved dispassion.[note 5]

Purification precedes conversion and constitutes a turning away from all that is unclean and unwholesome. This is a purification of mind and body. As preparation for theoria, however, the concept of purification in this three-part scheme refers most importantly to the purification of consciousness (nous), the faculty of discernment and knowledge (wisdom), whose awakening is essential to coming out of the state of delusion that is characteristic of the worldly-minded. After the nous has been cleansed, the faculty of wisdom may then begin to operate more consistently. With a purified nous, clear vision and understanding become possible, making one fit for contemplative prayer.

In the Eastern Orthodox ascetic tradition called hesychasm, humility, as a saintly attribute, is called Holy Wisdom or sophia. Humility is the most critical component to humanity's salvation.[note 6] Following Christ's instruction to "go into your room or closet and shut the door and pray to your father who is in secret" (Matthew 6:6), the hesychast withdraws into solitude in order that he or she may enter into a deeper state of contemplative stillness. By means of this stillness, the mind is calmed, and the ability to see reality is enhanced. The practitioner seeks to attain what the apostle Paul called 'unceasing prayer'.

Some Eastern Orthodox theologians object to what they consider an overly speculative, rationalistic, and insufficiently experiential nature of Roman Catholic theology.[note 7] and confusion between different aspects of the Trinity.[note 8]

Discipline[edit]

The first, purification is where aspiring traditionally Christian mystics start. This aspect focuses on discipline, particularly in terms of the human body; thus, it emphasizes prayer at certain times, either alone or with others, and in certain postures, often standing or kneeling. It also emphasizes the other disciplines of fasting and alms-giving, the latter including those activities called "the works of mercy," both spiritual and corporal, such as feeding the hungry and sheltering the homeless.[citation needed]

Purification, which grounds Christian spirituality in general, is primarily focused on efforts to, in the words of St. Paul, "put to death the deeds of the flesh by the Holy Spirit" (Romans 8:13). This is considered a result of the Spirit working in the person and is not a result of personal deeds. Also in the words of St. Paul, "...he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus." (Epistle to the Philippians 1:6). The "deeds of the flesh" here include not only external behavior, but also those habits, attitudes, compulsions, addictions, etc. (sometimes called egoic passions) which oppose themselves to true being and living as a Christian not only exteriorly, but interiorly as well. Evelyn Underhill describes purification as an awareness of one's own imperfections and finiteness, followed by self-discipline and mortification.[85]

Ascetic practices[edit]

Because of its physical, disciplinary aspect, this phase, as well as the entire Christian spiritual path, is often referred to as "ascetic," a term which is derived from the Greek word, ἄσκησις ([i]askesis[/i]), meaning "to train" or "to discipline." As the athlete trains and disciplines their body or eating habits, many mystics,[who?] following the model of Paul's metaphor of the athlete, as well as the story of the disciples sleeping while Jesus prayed, disciplined their bodies in order to train the soul and its appetites (passions). In ancient Christian literature, prominent mystics are often called "spiritual athletes," an image which is also used several times in the New Testament to describe the Christian life. In a religious context this [i]askesis[/i] serves to bring both body and the soul under control in order to diminish the passions which harm the soul and to elevate virtues for the purpose of apatheia (a state of being without passion), ultimately for the goal of theosis. "The purpose of Christian asceticism," therefore, "is not to weaken the flesh, but to strengthen the spirit for the transfiguration of the flesh." [86] It is an active involvement in passitivity:

It remains a paradox of the mystics that the passivity at which they appear to aim is really a state of the most intense activity: more, that where it is wholly absent no great creative action can take place. In it, the superficial self compels itself to be still, in order that it may liberate another more deep-seated power which is, in the ecstasy of the contemplative genius, raised to the highest pitch of efficiency.

— Underhill 1911, p. 50

This training of the body and the spiritual discipline of the soul takes many forms, but fasting is among the primary means. Other practices often included sexual abstinence, self-imposed poverty, sleep deprivation, and solitude, while other more extreme practices such as self-flagellation have occurred, though this practice has been heavily discouraged by the Church and by many ascetical masters.[citation needed] The practice of Lectio Divina, a form of meditative prayer that centers on scripture reading, was developed in its best-known form in the sixth century, through the work of Benedict of Nursia and Pope Gregory I, and described and promoted more widely in the 12th century by Guigo II.

Theoria (illumination) - contemplative prayer[edit]

The Great Schema worn by Orthodox monks and nuns of the most advanced degree.

An exercise long used among Christians for acquiring contemplation, one that is "available to everyone, whether he be of the clergy or of any secular occupation",[87] is that of focusing the mind by constant repetition a phrase or word. Saint John Cassian recommended use of the phrase "O God, make speed to save me: O Lord, make haste to help me".[88][89] Another formula for repetition is the name of Jesus.[90][91] or the Jesus Prayer, "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner," which has been called "the mantra of the Orthodox Church",[89] although the term "Jesus Prayer" is not found in the Fathers of the Church.[92] The author of The Cloud of Unknowing recommended use of a monosyllabic word, such as "God" or "Love".[93]

Contemplative prayer in the Eastern Church[edit]

In the Eastern Church, noetic prayer is the first stage of theoria,[94][note 9] the vision of God, which is beyond conceptual knowledge,[95] like the difference between reading about the experience of another, and reading about one's own experience.[81] Noetic prayer is the first stage of the Jesus Prayer, a short formulaic prayer: "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner."[96] The second stage of the Jesus Prayer is the Prayer of the Heart (Καρδιακή Προσευχή), in which the prayer is internalized into 'the heart'.[97]

The Jesus Prayer, which, for the early Fathers, was just a training for repose,[98] the later Byzantines developed into hesychasm, a spiritual work of its own, attaching to it technical requirements and various stipulations that became a matter of serious theological controversy,[98] and are still of great interest to Byzantine, Russian and other eastern churches.[98] While he maintains his practice of the Jesus Prayer, the Hesychast cultivates nepsis, watchful attention. Sobriety contributes to this mental askesis that rejects tempting thoughts; it puts a great emphasis on focus and attention. The Hesychast is to pay extreme attention to the consciousness of his inner world and to the words of the Jesus Prayer, not letting his mind wander in any way at all. The Jesus Prayer invokes an attitude of humility essential for the attainment of theoria.[note 10] The Jesus Prayer is also invoked to pacify the passions, as well as the illusions that lead a person to actively express these passions. The worldly, neurotic mind is habitually accustomed to seek perpetuation of pleasant sensations and to avoid unpleasant ones. This state of incessant agitation of the mind is attributed to the corruption of primordial knowledge and union with God (the Fall of Man and the defilement and corruption of consciousness, or nous).[note 11] According to St. Theophan the Recluse, though the Jesus Prayer has long been associated with the Prayer of the Heart, they are not synonymous.[101]

Contemplative prayer in the Roman Catholic Church[edit]

Methods of prayer in the Roman Catholic Church include recitation of the Jesus Prayer, which "combines the Christological hymn of Philippians 2:6–11 with the cry of the publican (Luke 18:13) and the blind man begging for light (Mark 10:46–52). By it the heart is opened to human wretchedness and the Saviour's mercy";[102] invocation of the holy name of Jesus;[102] recitation, as recommended by Saint John Cassian, of "O God, come to my assistance; O Lord, make haste to help me" or other verses of Scripture; repetition of a single monosyllabic word, as suggested by the Cloud of Unknowing, such as "God" or "Love";[93] the method used in Centering Prayer; the use of Lectio Divina.[103] The Congregation for Divine Worship's directory of popular piety and the liturgy emphasizes the contemplative characteristic of the Holy Rosary and states that the Rosary is essentially a contemplative prayer which requires "tranquility of rhythm or even a mental lingering which encourages the faithful to meditate on the mysteries of the Lord's life."[104] Pope John Paul II placed the Rosary at the very center of Christian spirituality and called it "among the finest and most praiseworthy traditions of Christian contemplation."[105] In modern times, centering prayer, which is also called "Prayer of the heart" and "Prayer of Simplicity,"[note 12] has been popularized by Thomas Keating, drawing on Hesychasm and the Cloud of Unknowing.[note 13] The practice of contemplative prayer has also been encouraged by the formation of associations like The Julian Meetings and the Fellowship of Meditation.

Unification[edit]

The third phase, starting with infused or higher contemplation (or Mystical Contemplative Prayer[107]) in the Western tradition, refers to the presence or consciousness of God. This presence or consciousness varies, but it is first and foremost always associated with a reuniting with Divine love, the underlying theme being that God, the perfect goodness,[2] is known or experienced at least as much by the heart as by the intellect since, in the words 1 John 4:16: "God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God and God in him." Some approaches to classical mysticism would consider the first two phases as preparatory to the third, explicitly mystical experience, but others state that these three phases overlap and intertwine.[108]

In the Orthodox Churches, the highest theoria, the highest consciousness that can be experienced by the whole person, is the vision of God.[note 14] God is beyond being; He is a hyper-being; God is beyond nothingness. Nothingness is a gulf between God and man. God is the origin of everything, including nothingness. This experience of God in hypostasis shows God's essence as incomprehensible, or uncreated. God is the origin, but has no origin; hence, he is apophatic and transcendent in essence or being, and cataphatic in foundational realitiesimmanence and energies. This ontic or ontological theoria is the observation of God.[109]

A nous in a state of ecstasy or ekstasis, called the eighth day, is not internal or external to the world, outside of time and space; it experiences the infinite and limitless God.[note 5][note 15] Nous is the "eye of the soul" (Matthew 6:22–34).[note 16] Insight into being and becoming (called noesis) through the intuitive truth called faith, in God (action through faith and love for God), leads to truth through our contemplative faculties. This theory, or speculation, as action in faith and love for God, is then expressed famously as "Beauty shall Save the World". This expression comes from a mystical or gnosiological perspective, rather than a scientific, philosophical or cultural one.[112][113][114][115]

Alternate models[edit]

Augustine[edit]

In the advance to contemplation Augustine spoke of seven stages:[116]

  1. the first three are merely natural preliminary stages, corresponding to the vegetative, sensitive and rational levels of human life;
  2. the fourth stage is that of virtue or purification;
  3. the fifth is that of the tranquillity attained by control of the passions;
  4. the sixth is entrance into the divine light (the illuminative stage);
  5. the seventh is the indwelling or unitive stage that is truly mystical contemplation.

Meister Eckhart[edit]

Meister Eckhart did not articulate clear-cut stages,[117] yet a number of divisions can be found in his works.[118]

Teresa of Avila[edit]

Ecstasy of Saint Teresa of Avila by Josefa de Óbidos (1672)

According to Jordan Aumann, Teresa of Ávila distinguishes nine grades of prayer:

  1. vocal prayer,
  2. mental prayer or prayer of meditation,
  3. affective prayer,
  4. prayer of simplicity, or acquired contemplation or recollection,
  5. infused contemplation or recollection,
  6. prayer of quiet,
  7. prayer of union,
  8. prayer of conforming union, and
  9. prayer of transforming union.

According to Aumann, "The first four grades belong to the predominantly ascetical stage of spiritual life; the remaining five grades are infused prayer and belong to the mystical phase of spiritual life."[119] According to Augustin Pulain, for Teresa of Avila ordinary prayer "comprises these four degrees: first, vocal prayer; second, meditation, also called methodical prayer, or prayer of reflection, in which may be included meditative reading; third, affective prayer; fourth, prayer of simplicity, or of simple gaze."[62]

Prayer of simplicity - natural or acquired contemplation[edit]

For Teresa of Avila, in natural or acquired contemplation, also called the prayer of simplicity[note 12] there is one dominant thought or sentiment which recurs constantly and easily (although with little or no development) amid many other thoughts, beneficial or otherwise. The prayer of simplicity often has a tendency to simplify itself even in respect to its object, leading one to think chiefly of God and of his presence, but in a confused manner.[62] Definitions similar to that of Saint Alphonsus Maria de Liguori are given by Adolphe Tanquerey ("a simple gaze on God and divine things proceeding from love and tending thereto") and Saint Francis de Sales ("a loving, simple and permanent attentiveness of the mind to divine things").[120]

In the words of Saint Alphonsus Maria de Liguori, acquired contemplation "consists in seeing at a simple glance the truths which could previously be discovered only through prolonged discourse": reasoning is largely replaced by intuition and affections and resolutions, though not absent, are only slightly varied and expressed in a few words. Similarly, Saint Ignatius of Loyola, in his 30-day retreat or Spiritual Exercises beginning in the "second week" with its focus on the life of Jesus, describes less reflection and more simple contemplation on the events of Jesus' life. These contemplations consist mainly in a simple gaze and include an "application of the senses" to the events,[121]: 121  to further one's empathy for Jesus' values, "to love him more and to follow him more closely."[121]: 104 

Natural or acquired contemplation has been compared to the attitude of a mother watching over the cradle of her child: she thinks lovingly of the child without reflection and amid interruptions. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states:

What is contemplative prayer? St. Teresa answers: 'Contemplative [sic][note 17] prayer [oración mental] in my opinion is nothing else than a close sharing between friends; it means taking time frequently to be alone with him who we know loves us.' Contemplative prayer seeks him 'whom my soul loves'. It is Jesus, and in him, the Father. We seek him, because to desire him is always the beginning of love, and we seek him in that pure faith which causes us to be born of him and to live in him. In this inner prayer we can still meditate, but our attention is fixed on the Lord himself.[125]

Infused or higher contemplation[edit]

In the mystical experience of Teresa of Avila, infused or higher contemplation, also called intuitive, passive or extraordinary, is a supernatural gift by which a person's mind will become totally centered on God.[126] It is a form of mystical union with God, a union characterized by the fact that it is God, and God only, who manifests himself.[62] Under this influence of God, which assumes the free cooperation of the human will, the intellect receives special insights into things of the spirit, and the affections are extraordinarily animated with divine love.[126] This union that it entails may be linked with manifestations of a created object, as, for example, visions of the humanity of Christ or an angel or revelations of a future event, etc. They include miraculous bodily phenomena sometimes observed in ecstatics.[62]

In Teresa's mysticism, infused contemplation is described as a "divinely originated, general, non-conceptual, loving awareness of God."[127] According to Dubay:

It is a wordless awareness and love that we of ourselves cannot initiate or prolong. The beginnings of this contemplation are brief and frequently interrupted by distractions. The reality is so unimposing that one who lacks instruction can fail to appreciate what exactly is taking place. Initial infused prayer is so ordinary and unspectacular in the early stages that many fail to recognize it for what it is. Yet with generous people, that is, with those who try to live the whole Gospel wholeheartedly and who engage in an earnest prayer life, it is common.[127]

According to Thomas Dubay, infused contemplation is the normal, ordinary development of discursive prayer (mental prayer, meditative prayer), which it gradually replaces.[127] Dubay considers infused contemplation as common only among "those who try to live the whole Gospel wholeheartedly and who engage in an earnest prayer life". Other writers view contemplative prayer in its infused supernatural form as far from common. John Baptist Scaramelli, reacting in the 17th century against quietism, taught that asceticism and mysticism are two distinct paths to perfection, the former being the normal, ordinary end of the Christian life, and the latter something extraordinary and very rare.[128] Jordan Aumann considered that this idea of the two paths was "an innovation in spiritual theology and a departure from the traditional Catholic teaching".[129] And Jacques Maritain proposed that one should not say that every mystic necessarily enjoys habitual infused contemplation in the mystical state, since the gifts of the Holy Spirit are not limited to intellectual operations.[130]

Mystical union[edit]

According to Charles G. Herbermann, in the Catholic Encyclopedia (1908), saint Teresa of Avila described four degrees or stages of mystical union:

  1. incomplete mystical union, or the prayer of quiet or supernatural recollection, when the action of God is not strong enough to prevent distractions, and the imagination still retains a certain liberty;
  2. full or semi-ecstatic union, when the strength of the divine action keeps the person fully occupied but the senses continue to act, so that by making an effort, the person can cease from prayer;
  3. ecstatic union, or ecstasy, when communications with the external world are severed or nearly so, and one can no longer at will move from that state; and
  4. transforming or deifying union, or spiritual marriage (properly) of the soul with God.

The first three are weak, medium, and the energetic states of the same grace.

The Prayer of Quiet[edit]

For Teresa of Avila, the Prayer of Quiet is a state in which the soul experiences an extraordinary peace and rest, accompanied by delight or pleasure in contemplating God as present.[131][132][133][134][135] The Prayer of Quiet is discussed in the writings of Teresa of ÁvilaFrancis de SalesThomas Merton and others.[136][137]

Transforming union[edit]

The transforming union differs from the other three specifically and not merely in intensity. It consists in the habitual consciousness of a mysterious grace which all shall possess in heaven: the anticipation of the Divine nature. The soul is conscious of the Divine assistance in its superior supernatural operations, those of the intellect and the will. Spiritual marriage differs from spiritual espousals inasmuch as the first of these states is permanent and the second only transitory.[62]

Evelyn Underhill[edit]

Author and mystic Evelyn Underhill recognizes two additional phases to the mystical path. First comes the awakening, the stage in which one begins to have some consciousness of absolute or divine reality. Purgation and illumination are followed by a fourth stage which Underhill, borrowing the language of St. John of the Cross, calls the dark night of the soul. This stage, experienced by the few, is one of final and complete purification and is marked by confusion, helplessness, stagnation of the will, and a sense of the withdrawal of God's presence. This dark night of the soul is not, in Underhill's conception, the Divine Darkness of the pseudo-Dionysius and German Christian mysticism. It is the period of final "unselfing" and the surrender to the hidden purposes of the divine will. Her fifth and final stage is union with the object of love, the one Reality, God. Here the self has been permanently established on a transcendental level and liberated for a new purpose.[138]

Eastern Orthodox Christianity[edit]

Eastern Christianity has preserved a mystical emphasis in its theology[139] and retains in hesychasm a tradition of mystical prayer dating back to Christianity's beginnings. Hesychasm concerns a spiritual transformation of the egoic self, the following of a path designed to produce more fully realized human persons, "created in the Image and Likeness of God" and as such, living in harmonious communion with God, the Church[citation needed], the rest of the world, and all creation, including oneself. The Eastern Christian tradition speaks of this transformation in terms of theosis or divinization, perhaps best summed up by an ancient aphorism usually attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria: "God became human so that man might become god."[note 18]

According to John Romanides, in the teachings of Eastern Orthodox Christianity the quintessential purpose and goal of the Christian life is to attain theosis or 'deification', understood as 'likeness to' or 'union with' God.[note 19] Theosis is expressed as "Being, union with God" and having a relationship or synergy between God and man.[note 20] God is the Kingdom of Heaven.

Theosis or unity with God is obtained by engaging in contemplative prayer, the first stage of theoria,[94][note 9] which results from the cultivation of watchfulness (Gk: nepsis). In theoria, one comes to see or "behold" God or "uncreated light," a grace which is "uncreated."[note 21][note 22] In the Eastern Christian traditions, theoria is the most critical component needed for a person to be considered a theologian; however it is not necessary for one's salvation.[147] An experience of God is necessary to the spiritual and mental health of every created thing, including human beings.[80] Knowledge of God is not intellectual, but existential. According to eastern theologian Andrew Louth, the purpose of theology as a science is to prepare for contemplation,[148] rather than theology being the purpose of contemplation.

Theoria is the main aim of hesychasm, which has its roots in the contemplative practices taught by Evagrius Ponticus (345–399), John Climacus (6th–7th century), Maximus the Confessor (c. 580–662), and Symeon the New Theologian (949–1022).[149] John Climacus, in his influential Ladder of Divine Ascent, describes several stages of contemplative or hesychast practice, culminating in agape. Symeon believed that direct experience gave monks the authority to preach and give absolution of sins, without the need for formal ordination. While Church authorities also taught from a speculative and philosophical perspective, Symeon taught from his own direct mystical experience,[150] and met with strong resistance for his charismatic approach, and his support of individual direct experience of God's grace.[150] According to John Romanides, this difference in teachings on the possibility to experience God or the uncreated light is at the very heart of many theological conflicts between Eastern Orthodox Christianity and Western Christianity, which is seen to culminate in the conflict over hesychasm.[83][note 23]

According to John Romanides, following Vladimir Lossky[151] in his interpretation of St. Gregory Palamas, the teaching that God is transcendent (incomprehensible in ousia, essence or being), has led in the West to the (mis)understanding that God cannot be experienced in this life.[note 24] Romanides states that Western theology is more dependent upon logic and reason, culminating in scholasticism used to validate truth and the existence of God, than upon establishing a relationship with God (theosis and theoria).[note 25][note 26]

False spiritual knowledge[edit]

In the Orthodox Churches, theoria is regarded to lead to true spiritual knowledge, in contrast to the false or incomplete knowledge of rational thought, c.q. conjecturespeculation,[note 15] dianoiastochastic and dialectics).[157] After illumination or theoria, humanity is in union with God and can properly discern, or have holy wisdom. Hence theoria, the experience or vision of God, silences all humanity.

The most common false spiritual knowledge is derived not from an experience of God, but from reading another person's experience of God and subsequently arriving at one's own conclusions, believing those conclusions to be indistinguishable from the actual experienced knowledge.

False spiritual knowledge can also be iniquitous, generated from an evil rather than a holy source. The gift of the knowledge of good and evil is then required, which is given by God. Humanity, in its finite existence as created beings or creatures, can never, by its own accord, arrive at a sufficiently objective consciousness. Theosis is the gradual submission of a person to the good, who then with divine grace from the person's relationship or union with God, attains deification. Illumination restores humanity to that state of faith existent in God, called noesis, before humanity's consciousness and reality was changed by their fall.[100]

Spiritual somnolence[edit]

In the orthodox Churches, false spiritual knowledge is regarded as leading to spiritual delusion (Russian prelest, Greek plani), which is the opposite of sobriety. Sobriety (called nepsis) means full consciousness and self-realization (enstasis), giving true spiritual knowledge (called true gnosis).[158] Prelest or plani is the estrangement of the person to existence or objective reality, an alienation called amartía. This includes damaging or vilifying the nous, or simply having a non-functioning noetic and neptic faculty.[note 27]

Evil is, by definition, the act of turning humanity against its creator and existence. Misotheism, a hatred of God, is a catalyst that separates humanity from nature, or vilifies the realities of ontology, the spiritual world and the natural or material world. Reconciliation between God (the uncreated) and man is reached through submission in faith to God the eternal, i.e. transcendence rather than transgression[note 28] (magic).

The Trinity as Nous, Word and Spirit (hypostasis) is, ontologically, the basis of humanity's being or existence. The Trinity is the creator of humanity's being via each component of humanity's existence: origin as nous (ex nihilo), inner experience or spiritual experience, and physical experience, which is exemplified by Christ (logos or the uncreated prototype of the highest ideal) and his saints. The following of false knowledge is marked by the symptom of somnolence or "awake sleep" and, later, psychosis.[160] Theoria is opposed to allegorical or symbolic interpretations of church traditions.[161]

False asceticism or cults[edit]

In the Orthodox practice, once the stage of true discernment (diakrisis) is reached (called phronema), one is able to distinguish false gnosis from valid gnosis and has holy wisdom. The highest holy wisdom, Sophia, or Hagia Sophia, is cultivated by humility or meekness, akin to that personified by the Theotokos and all of the saints that came after her and Christ, collectively referred to as the ecclesia or church. This community of unbroken witnesses is the Orthodox Church.[100]

Wisdom is cultivated by humility (emptying of oneself) and remembrance of death against thymos (ego, greed and selfishness) and the passions. Vlachos of Nafpaktos wrote:[159]

But let him not remain in this condition. If he wishes to see Christ, then let him do what Zacchaeus did. Let him receive the Word in his home, after having previously climbed up into the sycamore tree, 'mortifying his limbs on the earth and raising up the body of humility'.

— Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos (1996), Life after Death

Practicing asceticism is being dead to the passions and the ego, collectively known as the world.

God is beyond knowledge and the fallen human mind, and, as such, can only be experienced in his hypostases through faith (noetically). False ascetism leads not to reconciliation with God and existence, but toward a false existence based on rebellion to existence.[note 28]

Western Catholic mysticism[edit]

Contemplatio[edit]

In the Latin or Western Church terms derived from the Latin word contemplatio such as, in English, "contemplation" are generally used in languages largely derived from Latin, rather than the Greek term theoria. The equivalence of the Latin and Greek terms[162] was noted by John Cassian, whose writings influenced the whole of Western monasticism,[163] in his Conferences.[164] However, Catholic writers do sometimes use the Greek term.[165]

Middle ages[edit]

Stigmatization of St Francis, by Giotto

The Early Middle Ages in the West includes the work of Gregory the Great and Bede, as well as developments in Celtic Christianity and Anglo-Saxon Christianity, and comes to fulfillment in the work of Johannes Scotus Eriugena and the Carolingian Renaissance.[166]

The High Middle Ages saw a flourishing of mystical practice and theorization corresponding to the flourishing of new monastic orders, with such figures as Guigo IIHildegard of BingenBernard of Clairvaux, the Victorines, all coming from different orders, as well as the first real flowering of popular piety among the laypeople.

The Late Middle Ages saw the clash between the Dominican and Franciscan schools of thought, which was also a conflict between two different mystical theologies: on the one hand that of Dominic de Guzmán and on the other that of Francis of AssisiAnthony of PaduaBonaventureJacopone da TodiAngela of Foligno. Moreover, there was the growth of groups of mystics centered on geographic regions: the Beguines, such as Mechthild of Magdeburg and Hadewijch (among others); the Rhenish-Flemish mystics Meister EckhartJohannes TaulerHenry Suso, and John of Ruysbroeck; and the English mystics Richard RolleWalter Hilton and Julian of Norwich. This period also saw such individuals as Catherine of Siena and Catherine of Genoa, the Devotio Moderna, and such books as the Theologia GermanicaThe Cloud of Unknowing and The Imitation of Christ.[citation needed]

Reformation[edit]

The Protestant Reformation downplayed mysticism, although it still produced a fair amount of spiritual literature. Even the most active reformers can be linked to Medieval mystical traditions. Martin Luther, for instance, was a monk who was influenced by the German Dominican mystical tradition of Eckhart and Tauler as well by the Dionysian-influenced Wesenmystik ("essence mysticism") tradition. He also published the Theologia Germanica, which he claimed was the most important book after the Bible and Augustine for teaching him about God, Christ, and humanity.[167] Even John Calvin, who rejected many Medieval ascetic practices and who favored doctrinal knowledge of God over affective experience, has Medieval influences, namely, Jean Gerson and the Devotio Moderna, with its emphasis on piety as the method of spiritual growth in which the individual practices dependence on God by imitating Christ and the son-father relationship. Meanwhile, his notion that we can begin to enjoy our eternal salvation through our earthly successes leads in later generations to "a mysticism of consolation".[168] Nevertheless, Protestantism was not devoid of mystics. Several leaders of the Radical Reformation had mystical leanings such as Caspar Schwenckfeld and Sebastian Franck. The Magisterial traditions also produced mystics, notably Peter Sterry (Calvinist), and Jakob Böhme (Lutheran).

As part of the Protestant Reformation, theologians turned away from the traditions developed in the Middle Ages and returned to what they consider to be biblical and early Christian practices. Accordingly, they were often skeptical of Catholic mystical practices, which seemed to them to downplay the role of grace in redemption and to support the idea that human works can play a role in salvation. Thus, Protestant theology developed a strong critical attitude, oftentimes even an animosity towards Christian mysticism.[169] However, QuakersAnglicansMethodistsEpiscopaliansLutheransPresbyteriansLocal ChurchesPentecostals and Charismatics have in various ways remained open to the idea of mystical experiences.[170]

Counter-reformation[edit]

But the Reformation brought about the Counter-Reformation and, with it, a new flowering of mystical literature, often grouped by nationality.[171]

Spanish mysticism[edit]

The Spanish had Ignatius Loyola, whose Spiritual Exercises were designed to open people to a receptive mode of consciousness in which they can experience God through careful spiritual direction and through understanding how the mind connects to the will and how to weather the experiences of spiritual consolation and desolation;[172] Teresa of Ávila, who used the metaphors of watering a garden and walking through the rooms of a castle to explain how meditation leads to union with God;[173] and John of the Cross, who used a wide range of biblical and spiritual influences both to rewrite the traditional "three ways" of mysticism after the manner of bridal mysticism and to present the two "dark nights": the dark night of the senses and the dark night of the soul, during which the individual renounces everything that might become an obstacle between the soul and God and then experiences the pain of feeling separated from God, unable to carry on normal spiritual exercises, as it encounters the enormous gap between its human nature and God's divine wisdom and light and moves up the 10-step ladder of ascent towards God.[174] Another prominent mystic was Miguel de Molinos, the chief apostle of the religious revival known as Quietism. No breath of suspicion arose against Molinos until 1681, when the Jesuit preacher Paolo Segneri, attacked his views, though without mentioning his name, in his Concordia tra la fatica e la quiete nell' orazione. The matter was referred to the Inquisition. A report got abroad that Molinos had been convicted of moral enormities, as well as of heretical doctrines; and it was seen that he was doomed. On September 3, 1687 he made public profession of his errors, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life. Contemporary Protestants saw in the fate of Molinos nothing more than a persecution by the Jesuits of a wise and enlightened man, who had dared to withstand the petty ceremonialism of the Italian piety of the day. Molinos died in prison in 1696 or 1697.[175]

Italy[edit]

Lorenzo Scupoli, from Otranto in Apulia, was an Italian mystic best known for authoring The Spiritual Combat, a key work in Catholic mysticism.[176]

France[edit]

Sculpture of Our Lady of Lourdes in Valais

French mystics included Francis de SalesJeanne GuyonFrançois FénelonBrother Lawrence and Blaise Pascal.[177]

England[edit]

The English had a denominational mix, from Catholic Augustine Baker and Julian of Norwich (the first woman to write in English), to Anglicans William LawJohn Donne, and Lancelot Andrewes, to Puritans Richard Baxter and John Bunyan (The Pilgrim's Progress), to the first "Quaker", George Fox and the first "Methodist", John Wesley, who was well-versed in the continental mystics.[citation needed]

An example of "scientific reason lit up by mysticism in the Church of England"[178]is seen in the work of Sir Thomas Browne, a Norwich physician and scientist whose thought often meanders into mystical realms, as in his self-portrait, Religio Medici, and in the "mystical mathematics" of The Garden of Cyrus, whose full running title reads, Or, The Quincuncial Lozenge, or Network Plantations of the ancients, Naturally, Artificially, Mystically considered. Browne's highly original and dense symbolism frequently involves scientific, medical, or optical imagery to illustrate a religious or spiritual truth, often to striking effect, notably in Religio Medici, but also in his posthumous advisory Christian Morals.[179]

Browne's latitudinarian Anglicanism, hermetic inclinations, and Montaigne-like self-analysis on the enigmas, idiosyncrasies, and devoutness of his own personality and soul, along with his observations upon the relationship between science and faith, are on display in Religio Medici. His spiritual testament and psychological self-portrait thematically structured upon the Christian virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity, also reveal him as "one of the immortal spirits waiting to introduce the reader to his own unique and intense experience of reality".[180] Though his work is difficult and rarely read, he remains, paradoxically, one of England's perennial, yet first, "scientific" mystics.[citation needed]

Germany[edit]

Similarly, well-versed in the mystic tradition was the German Johann Arndt, who, along with the English Puritans, influenced such continental Pietists as Philipp Jakob SpenerGottfried ArnoldNicholas Ludwig von Zinzendorf of the Moravians, and the hymnodist Gerhard Tersteegen. Arndt, whose book True Christianity was popular among Protestants, Catholics and Anglicans alike, combined influences from Bernard of Clairvaux, John Tauler and the Devotio Moderna into a spirituality that focused its attention away from the theological squabbles of contemporary Lutheranism and onto the development of the new life in the heart and mind of the believer.[181] Arndt influenced Spener, who formed a group known as the collegia pietatis ("college of piety") that stressed the role of spiritual direction among lay-people—a practice with a long tradition going back to Aelred of Rievaulx and known in Spener's own time from the work of Francis de Sales. Pietism as known through Spener's formation of it tended not just to reject the theological debates of the time, but to reject both intellectualism and organized religious practice in favor of a personalized, sentimentalized spirituality.[182]

Pietism[edit]

This sentimental, anti-intellectual form of pietism is seen in the thought and teaching of Zinzendorf, founder of the Moravians; but more intellectually rigorous forms of pietism are seen in the teachings of John Wesley, which were themselves influenced by Zinzendorf, and in the teachings of American preachers Jonathan Edwards, who restored to pietism Gerson's focus on obedience and borrowed from early church teachers Origen and Gregory of Nyssa the notion that humans yearn for God,[183] and John Woolman, who combined a mystical view of the world with a deep concern for social issues; like Wesley, Woolman was influenced by Jakob BöhmeWilliam Law and The Imitation of Christ.[184] The combination of pietistic devotion and mystical experiences that are found in Woolman and Wesley are also found in their Dutch contemporary Tersteegen, who brings back the notion of the nous ("mind") as the site of God's interaction with our souls; through the work of the Spirit, our mind is able to intuitively recognize the immediate presence of God in our midst.[185]

Scientific research[edit]

Fifteen Carmelite nuns allowed scientists to scan their brains with fMRI while they were meditating, in a state known as Unio Mystica or Theoria.[186] The results showed that multiple regions of the brain that were activated when they considered themselves to be in mystical union with God. These regions included the right medial orbitofrontal cortex, right middle temporal cortex, right inferior and superior parietal lobulescaudate, left medial prefrontal cortex, left anterior cingulate cortex, left inferior parietal lobule, left insula, left caudate, left brainstem, and extra-striate visual cortex.[186]

Modern philosophy[edit]

In modern times theoria is sometimes treated as distinct from the meaning given to it in Christianity, linking the word not with contemplation but with speculation. Boethius (c. 480–524 or 525) translated the Greek word theoria into Latin, not as contemplatio but as speculatio, and theoria is taken to mean speculative philosophy.[187] A distinction is made, more radical than in ancient philosophy, between theoria and praxis, theory and practice.[188]

Influential Christian mystics and texts[edit]

Early Christians[edit]

Eastern-Orthodox Christianity[edit]

Western European Middle Ages and Renaissance[edit]

Meditative mystical image of the Trinity, from the early 14th-century Flemish Rothschild Canticles, Yale Beinecke MS 404, fol. 40v.
Catherine of SienaLibro della divina dottrina (commonly known as The Dialogue of Divine Providence), c. 1475
The opening page of an illuminated manuscript of Blessed Amadeus's Apocalypsis nova, c. 1500
  • John Scotus Eriugena (c. 810 – c. 877): Periphyseon. Eriugena translated Pseudo-Dionysius from Greek into Latin. Influenced by: Plotinus, Augustine, Pseudo-Dionysius.
  • Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153): Cistercian theologian, author of The Steps of Humility and PrideOn Loving God, and Sermons on the Song of Songs; strong blend of scripture and personal experience.
  • Hildegard of Bingen (1098–1179): Benedictine abbess and reformist preacher, known for her visions, recorded in such works as Scivias (Know the Ways) and Liber Divinorum Operum (Book of Divine Works). Influenced by: Pseudo-Dionysius, Gregory the Great, Rhabanus Maurus, John Scotus Eriugena.
  • Victorines: fl. 11th century; stressed meditation and contemplation; helped popularize Pseudo-Dionysius; influenced by Augustine
    • Hugh of Saint Victor (d. 1141): The Mysteries of the Christian FaithNoah's Mystical Ark, etc.
    • Richard of Saint Victor (d. 1173): The Twelve Patriarchs and The Mystical Ark (e.g. Benjamin Minor and Benjamin Major). Influenced Dante, Bonaventure, Cloud of Unknowing.
  • Franciscans:
    • Francis of Assisi (c.1182 – 1226): founder of the order, stressed simplicity and penitence; first documented case of stigmata
    • Anthony of Padua (1195–1231): priest, Franciscan friar and theologian; visions; sermons
    • Bonaventure (c. 1217 – 1274): The Soul's Journey into GodThe Triple WayThe Tree of Life and others. Influenced by: Pseudo-Dionysius, Augustine, Bernard, Victorines.
    • Jacopone da Todi (c. 1230 – 1306): Franciscan friar; prominent member of "The Spirituals"; The Lauds
    • Angela of Foligno (c. 1248 – 1309): tertiary anchoress; focused on Christ's Passion; Memorial and Instructions.
    • Amadeus of Portugal (c. 1420 – 1482): Franciscan friar; revelations; Apocalypsis nova
  • Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274): priest, Dominican friar and theologian.
  • Beguines (fl. 13th century):
    • Mechthild of Magdeburg (c. 1212 – c. 1297): visions, bridal mysticism, reformist; The Flowing Light of the Godhead
    • Hadewijch of Antwerp (13th century): visions, bridal mysticism, essence mysticism; writings are mostly letters and poems. Influenced John of Ruysbroeck.
  • Rhineland mystics (fl. 14th century): sharp move towards speculation and apophasis; mostly Dominicans
  • John of Ruysbroeck (1293 – 1381): Flemish, Augustinian; The Spiritual Espousals and many others. Similar themes as the Rhineland Mystics. Influenced by: Beguines, Cistercians. Influenced: Geert Groote and the Devotio Moderna.
  • Catherine of Siena (1347–1380): Letters
  • The English Mystics (fl. 14th century):
    • Anonymous - The Cloud of the Unknowing (c. 1375)—Intended by ascetic author as a means of instruction in the practice of mystic and contemplative prayer.
    • Richard Rolle (c. 1300 – 1349): The Fire of LoveMending of LifeMeditations on the Passion
    • Walter Hilton (c. 1340 – 1396): The Ladder of Perfection (a.k.a., The Scale of Perfection) -- suggesting familiarity with the works of Pseudo-Dionysius (see above), the author provides an early English language seminal work for the beginner.
    • Julian of Norwich (1342 – c. 1416): Revelations of Divine Love (a.k.a. Showing of Love)

Renaissance, Reformation and Counter-Reformation[edit]

Modern era[edit]

The Blessed Sister Mary of the Divine Heart was a nun from the Good Shepherd Sisters who reported several revelations from the Sacred Heart of Jesus.[192]
A strong believer in Christian meditationPadre Pio of Pietrelcina stated: "Through the study of books one seeks God; by meditation one finds him".[193]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ In their biblical exegesis, whether of Alexandrian or Antiochene tradition, the Fathers, "with little or no understanding of the progressive nature of revelation, where the literal sense would not suffice, [...] resorted to allegory or to theoria (Chrysostom and the Antiochenes)."[47]
  2. ^ "From the point of view of the historian, the presence of Neoplatonic ideas in Christian thought is undeniable" [57]
  3. ^ "The analogy between (Gregory's) terminology and thought and that of the ancient initiators of the philosophic ideal of life is a perfect one. The ascetics themselves are called by him 'philosophers' or 'the philosophic chorus'. Their activity is called 'contemplation' (θεωρία), and to the present day this word, even when we use it to designate the θεωρητικός βίος of the ancient Greek philosophers, has preserved the overtone which transformation into a technical term of Christian asceticism has added to it"[58]
  4. ^ "Contemplative prayer is the simple expression of the mystery of prayer. It is a gaze of faith fixed on Jesus, an attentiveness to the Word of God, a silent love. It achieves real union with the prayer of Christ to the extent that it makes us share in his mystery" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2724).
  5. Jump up to:a b Ecstasy comes when, in prayer, the nous abandons every connection with created things: first "with everything evil and bad, then with neutral things" (2, 3, 35; CWS p.65). Ecstasy is mainly withdrawal from the opinion of the world and the flesh. With sincere prayer the nous "abandons all created things" (2, 3, 35; CWS p.65). This ecstasy is higher than abstract theology, that is, than rational theology, and it belongs only to those who have attained dispassion. It is not yet union; the ecstasy which is unceasing prayer of the nous, in which one's nous has continuous remembrance of God and has no relation with the `world of sin', is not yet union with God. This union comes about when the Paraclete "...illuminates from on high the man who attains in prayer the stage which is superior to the highest natural possibilities and who is awaiting the promise of the Father, and by His revelation ravishes him to the contemplation of the light" (2, 3, 35; CWS p.65). Illumination by God is what shows His union with man. (Greekἀπάθειαromanizedapatheia) and clarity of vision. Vision here refers to the vision of the nous that has been purified by ascetic practice.[81]
  6. ^ There was an anchorite (hermit) who was able to banish demons; and he asked them: Hermit: What make you go away? Is it fasting? The demons: We do not eat or drink. Hermit: Is it vigils? The demons: We do not sleep. Hermit: Is it separation from the world? The demons: We live in the deserts. Hermit: What power sends you away then? The demons: Nothing can overcome us, but only humility. Do you see how humility is victorious over the demons?[82]
  7. ^ A basic characteristic of the Frankish scholastic method, mislead by Augustinian Platonism and Thomistic Aristotelianism, had been its naive confidence in the objective existence of things rationally speculated about. By following Augustine, the Franks substituted the patristic concern for spiritual observation, (which they had found firmly established in Gaul when they first conquered the area) with a fascination for metaphysics. They did not suspect that such speculations had foundations neither in created nor in spiritual reality. No one would today accept as true what is not empirically observable, or at least verifiable by inference, from an attested effect. So it is with patristic theology. Dialectical speculation about God and the Incarnation as such are rejected. Only those things which can be tested by the experience of the grace of God in the heart are to be accepted. "Be not carried about by divers and strange teachings. For it is good that the heart be confirmed by grace," a passage from Hebrews 13.9, quoted by the Fathers to this effect.[83]
  8. ^ In the present case, Roman Catholic theologians are either confusing two dogmas — that is, the dogma of the personal existence of the Hypostases and the dogma of the Oneness of Essence, and it is absolutely essential to distinguish this from another dogma — or else they are confusing the inner relations of the All Holy Trinity with the providential actions and manifestations of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, which are directed towards the world and the human race. That the Holy Spirit is One in Essence with the Father and the Son, that therefore He is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son, is an indisputable Christian truth, for God is a Trinity One in Essence and Indivisible. [...] The expression, 'the Spirit of the Father and the Son", is likewise in itself quite Orthodox. But these expressions refer to the dogma of the Oneness of Essence, and it is absolutely essential to distinguish this from another dogma, the dogma of the begetting and the procession, in which, as the Holy Fathers express it, is shown the Cause of the existence of the Son and the Spirit. All of the Eastern Fathers acknowledge that the Father is monos aitios, the sole Cause” of the Son and the Spirit.[84]
  9. Jump up to:a b Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos: "Noetic prayer is the first stage of theoria."[94]
  10. ^ There was an anchorite (hermit) who was able to banish demons; and he asked them:
    Hermit: What makes you go away? Is it fasting?
    The demons: We do not eat or drink.
    Hermit: Is it vigils?
    The demons: We do not sleep.
    Hermit: Is it separation from the world?
    The demons: We live in the deserts.
    Hermit: What power sends you away then?
    The demons: Nothing can overcome us, but only humility. Do you see how humility is victorious over the demons?[99]
  11. ^ The illness and cure of the soul in the Orthodox tradition, by Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos: "If one wishes to be an Orthodox theologian one must begin from the state of Adam as it was before the Fall, what happened with the Fall and how we can be restored to our former state, even reach there where Adam did not. If a theology does not speak of man's fall; if it does not designate precisely what it is, and if it does not speak of man's resurrection, then what kind of theology is it? Surely, it is not Orthodox. In any case, we were saying earlier that Orthodoxy is a therapeutic treatment and science, and also that Theology is a therapeutic treatment. It cures man. Yet, if we do not examine where man's illness lies, how can we know what we should heal? If, regarding his body, man follows a wrong treatment he will never be cured. The same also happens with the soul. It must become clear to us that the darkness of nous is its illness and illumination is its cure. Mysteries and all the ascetic tradition of the Church are meant to lead us where Adam was before the Fall, that is, to the illumination of the nous, and from there to theosis, which is man's original destination. Therefore, it is very important for us to know exactly what the illness is. If we ignore our inner sickness our spiritual life ends up in an empty moralism, in a superficiality. Many people are against the social system. They blame society, family, the existing evil, etc. for their own problem. However the basic problem, man's real malady is the darkness of his nous. When one's nous is illumined one thus becomes free from slavery to everything in the environment, e.g. anxiety, insecurity, etc."[100]
  12. Jump up to:a b c catholicculture.org: "Meditation replaced by a purer, more intimate prayer consisting in a simple regard or loving thought on God, or on one of his attributes, or on some mystery of the Christian faith. Reasoning is put aside and the soul peacefully attends to the operations of the Spirit with sentiments of love."[196]
  13. ^ "Over the centuries, this prayer has been called by various names such as the Prayer of Faith, Prayer of the Heart, Prayer of Simplicity, Prayer of Simple Regard, Active Recollection, Active Quiet and Acquired Contemplation"[106]
  14. ^ That is to say, the man who beholds the uncreated light sees it because he is united with God. He sees it with his inner eyes, and also with his bodily eyes, which, however, have been altered by God's action. Consequently, theoria is union with God. And this union is knowledge of God. At this time one is granted knowledge of God, which is above human knowledge and above the senses.[81]
  15. Jump up to:a b Vladimir Lossky: "It is necessary to renounce both sense and all the workings of reason, everything which may be known by the senses or the understanding, both that which is and all that is not, in order to be able to attain in perfect ignorance to union with Him who transcends all being and all knowledge. It is already evident that this is not simply a question of a process of dialectic but of something else: a purification, a katharis, is necessary. One must abandon all that is impure and even all that is pure. One must then scale the most sublime heights of sanctity leaving behind one all the divine luminaries, all the heavenly sounds and words. It is only thus that one may penetrate to the darkness wherein He who is beyond all created things makes His dwelling."[110]
  16. ^ "The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eye is healthy, your whole body will be full of light. But if your eye is unhealthy, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!" NRSV But what is the noetic function? In the Holy Scriptures there is, already, the distinction between the spirit of man (his nous) and the intellect (the logos or mind). The spirit of man in patristics is called nous to distinguish it from the Holy Spirit. The spirit, the nous, is the eye of the soul (see Matt. 6:226).[111]
  17. ^ Mental prayer, "oración mental," is not contemplative prayer.[122][123][124]
  18. ^ Literally, "God became man so that man might become god." Here, man is understood as human and no debate exists within the Church concerning a contrary interpretation.
  19. ^ (Greek for "making divine",[140] "deification",[141][142] "to become gods by Grace",[142] and for "divinization", "reconciliation, union with God."[143] and "glorification")[144] According to John Ramonides, theosis is "the selfless love of glorification (theosis) dedicated to the common good." — John Romanides[92]
  20. ^ Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos: "Theosis-Divinisation is the participation in the Uncreated grace of God. Theosis is identified and connected with the theoria (vision) of the Uncreated Light (see note above). It is called theosis in grace because it is attained through the energy, of the divine grace. It is a co-operation of God with man, since God is He Who operates and man is he who co-operates."[145]
  21. ^ Theophan the Recluse: "The contemplative mind sees God, in so far as this is possible for man."[146]
  22. ^ Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos: "This is what Saint Symeon the New Theologian teaches. In his poems, proclaims over and over that, while beholding the uncreated Light, the deified man acquires the Revelation of God the Trinity. Being in "theoria" (vision of God), the saints do not confuse the hypostatic attributes. The fact that the Latin tradition came to the point of confusing these hypostatic attributes and teaching that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son also, shows the non-existence of empirical theology for them. Latin tradition speaks also of created grace, a fact which suggests that there is no experience of the grace of God. For, when man obtains the experience of God, then he comes to understand well that this grace is uncreated. Without this experience there can be no genuine "therapeutic tradition.""[94]
  23. ^ A basic characteristic of the Frankish scholastic method, mislead by Augustinian Platonism and Thomistic Aristotelianism, had been its naive confidence in the objective existence of things rationally speculated about. By following Augustine, the Franks substituted the patristic concern for spiritual observation, (which they had found firmly established in Gaul when they first conquered the area) with a fascination for metaphysics. They did not suspect that such speculations had foundations neither in created nor in spiritual reality. No one would today accept as true what is not empirically observable, or at least verifiable by inference, from an attested effect. so it is with patristic theology. Dialectical speculation about God and the Incarnation as such are rejected. Only those things which can be tested by the experience of the grace of God in the heart are to be accepted. "Be not carried about by divers and strange teachings. For it is good that the heart by confirmed by grace," a passage from Hebrews 13.9, quoted by the Fathers to this effect.[83]
  24. ^ www.monachos.net: "At the heart of Barlaam's teaching is the idea that God cannot truly be perceived by man; that God the Transcendent can never be wholly known by man, who is created and finite."[152]
  25. ^ Romanides: "And, indeed, the Franks believed that the prophets and apostles did not see God himself, except possibly with the exception of Moses and Paul. What the prophets and apostles allegedly did see and hear were phantasmic symbols of God, whose purpose was to pass on concepts about God to human reason. Whereas these symbols passed into and out of existence, the human nature of Christ is a permanent reality and the best conveyor of concepts about God.[153]
  26. ^ Romanides ideas have been very influential in the contemporary Greek Orthodox Churches, and are supported by man like Metropolitan Hierotheos (Vlachos) of Nafpaktos,[154] Thomas Hopko,[155] Professor George D. Metallinos[subnote 1] Nikolaos LoudovikosDumitru StăniloaeStanley S. Harakas and Archimandrite George, Abbot of the Holy Monastery of St. Gregorios of Mount Athos.[144]
  27. ^ Man has a malfunctioning or non-functioning noetic faculty in the heart, and it is the task especially of the clergy to apply the cure of unceasing memory of God, otherwise called unceasing prayer or illumination. "Those who have selfless love and are friends of God see God in light - divine light, while the selfish and impure see God the judge as fire - darkness".[159]
  28. Jump up to:a b c History of Russian Philosophy «История российской Философии »(1951) by N. O. Lossky. Section on N. O. Lossky's philosophy p. 262: "There is another kind of selfishness which violates the hierarchy of values much more: some agents who strive for perfection and the absolute fullness of being and even for the good of the whole world are determined to do it in their own way, so that they should occupy the first place and stand higher than all other beings and even the Lord God himself. Pride is the ruling passion of such beings. They enter into rivalry with God, thinking that they are capable of ordering the world better than its Creator. Pursuing an impossible aim, they suffer defeat at every step and begin to hate God. This is what Satan does. Selfishness separates us from God in so far as we put before us purposes incompatible with God's will that the world should be perfect. In the same way selfishness separates an agent in a greater or lesser degree from other agents: his aims and actions cannot be harmonized with the actions of other beings and often lead to hostility and mutual opposition.[197]

Subnotes[edit]

  1. ^ "We have a culture that creates saints, holy people. Our people's ideal is not to create wisemen. Nor was this the ideal of ancient Hellenic culture and civilization. Hellenic anthropocentric (human-centered) Humanism is transformed into Theanthropism (God-humanism) and its ideal is now the creation of Saints, Holy people who have reached the state of theosis (deification)."[156]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e f McGinn 2006.
  2. Jump up to:a b Anon. 1857.
  3. ^ Andrew Louth, "Theology of the Philokalia" in Abba: The Tradition of Orthodoxy in the West (St Vladimir's Seminary Press 2003 ISBN 0-88141-248-1), p. 358
  4. Jump up to:a b c William Johnson, The Inner Eye of Love: Mysticism and Religion (HarperCollins 1997 ISBN 0-8232-1777-9), p. 24
  5. ^ Liddell and Scott: θεωρία
  6. ^ Lewis and Short: contemplatio
  7. ^ Egan, Harvey D. (September 16, 1998). Christian Mysticism: The Future of a Tradition. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 9781579101534 – via Google Books.
  8. ^ Watts, Joel L. (March 10, 2014). Praying in God's Theater: Meditations on the Book of Revelation. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 9781625641939 – via Google Books.
  9. ^ "t | Search Online Etymology Dictionary"www.etymonline.com.
  10. Jump up to:a b c Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (Oxford University Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3), article contemplation, contemplative life
  11. ^ Ian Rutherford, Theoria and Darshan: Pilgrimage as Gaze in Greece and India, Classical Quarterly, Vol. 50, 2000, pp. 133-146
  12. ^ Re-theorizing Politics, Culture and Religion in Nepal: A conversation with Frederick Young and Gregory Grieve
  13. ^ Green 2011, p. 182.
  14. Jump up to:a b c d Gellman 2011.
  15. Jump up to:a b Parsons 2011, p. 3.
  16. Jump up to:a b c d King 1999, p. 15.
  17. ^ Hori 1999, p. 47.
  18. ^ Sharf 2000, p. 271.
  19. ^ Parsons 2011, p. 4-5.
  20. Jump up to:a b King 1999, p. 21.
  21. ^ Bynum 1987, pp. 64, 253.
  22. ^ Stępień, Tomasz; Kochańczyk-Bonińska, Karolina. "Unknown God, Known in His Activities" (PDF)Peter Lang. European Studies in T heolog y, Philosophy and History of Religions. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  23. ^ Barton 1986, pp. 47–57.
  24. ^ Holmes 2002, p. 15.
  25. ^ Janz 2009.
  26. Jump up to:a b Andrea Wilson Nightingale, Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context (Cambridge University Press 2004 ISBN 0-521-83825-8), p. 5
  27. ^ "Everything is contemplation" (Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, p. 32).
  28. ^ "Everything comes from contemplation" (Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, p. 32).
  29. ^ "According to his (Plotinus) metaphysical conception, everything was endowed with this supreme activity (contemplation), beginning with the One, which turns to itself in the simplest regard, implying no complexity of need" (Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, p. 32)
  30. ^ "Plotinus suggests that the One subsists by thinking itself as itself" (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A Peer-Reviewed Academic Resource: Neoplatonism).
  31. ^ Lloyd P. Gerson, The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (Cambridge University Press 1996 ISBN 0-521-47093-5), p. 32
  32. ^ "Plotinus | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy".
  33. ^ Quoted in Jorge M. Ferrer, Jacob H. Sherman (editors), The Participatory Turn: Spirituality, Mysticism, Religious Studies (State University of New York Press 2008 ISBN 978-0-7914-7601-7), p. 353
  34. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 14–16.
  35. ^ Holmes 2002, p. 17.
  36. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 19–20.
  37. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 18–19.
  38. ^ Healey 1999, p. 2.
  39. ^ Healey 1999, pp. 8–9.
  40. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 20–21.
  41. ^ Healey 1999, pp. 3–4.
  42. ^ Holmes 2002, p. 21.
  43. ^ Healey 1999, pp. 4–6.
  44. ^ Holmes 2002, p. 22.
  45. ^ John Breck, Scripture in Tradition: The Bible and Its Interpretation in the Orthodox Church, St Vladimir's Seminary Press 2001, p. 11.
  46. ^ Breck, Scripture in Tradition, p. 37).
  47. ^ Montague, George T. (December 31, 2007). Understanding the Bible: A Basic Introduction to Biblical Interpretation. Paulist Press. ISBN 9780809143443 – via Google Books.
  48. ^ Frances Margaret Young, Biblical exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture (Cambridge University Press 1997 ISBN 0-521-58153-2), p. 175
  49. ^ John J. O'Keefe, Russell R. Reno, Sanctified Vision (JHU Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-8018-8088-9), p. 15).
  50. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 25–26.
  51. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 26–28.
  52. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 23–25.
  53. ^ Holmes 2002, p. 16.
  54. ^ "Monasticism | Encyclopedia.com"www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
  55. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 29–31.
  56. ^ OGLIARI, Donato (2000). "The Conciliation of Grace and Free Will. Cassian's "Conlatio" 13 Revisited"Augustiniana50 (1/4): 141–173. ISSN 0004-8003JSTOR 44991731. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  57. ^ Dominic J. O'Meara (editor), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought (State University of New York Press 1982 ISBN 0-87395-492-0), p. x).
  58. ^ (Werner Jaeger, Two Rediscovered Works of Ancient Christian Literature: Gregory of Nyssa and Macarius (Brill, Leiden 1954), pp. 21-22).
  59. ^ The Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa (Brill, Leiden 2010 ISBN 978-90-04-16965-4), p. 528
  60. ^ Thomas Keating, Open Mind, Open Heart: The Contemplative Dimension of the Gospel (Continuum International 1986 ISBN 0-8264-0696-3), p. 19
  61. ^ Mattá al-Miskīn, Orthodox Prayer Life: The Interior Way (St Vladimir's Seminary Press 2003 ISBN 0-88141-250-3), pp. 55-56
  62. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h "Augustin Poulain, "Contemplation", in The Catholic Encyclopedia 1908". Archived from the original on 2012-01-13. Retrieved 2011-11-24.
  63. ^ al-Miskīn, Mattá (December 31, 2003). Orthodox Prayer Life: The Interior Way. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 9780881412505 – via Google Books.
  64. Jump up to:a b c d e King 2002, p. 15.
  65. Jump up to:a b "Gellman, Jerome, "Mysticism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)". Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2013-11-06.
  66. ^ "Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite | Biography, Works, & Facts"Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  67. ^ Dupré 2005, p. 6341.
  68. ^ King 2002, p. 195.
  69. ^ McBrien 1995, p. 901.
  70. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 4–5.
  71. ^ "Meditation and Contemplation". Archived from the original on 2011-12-11. Retrieved 2011-11-24.
  72. ^ "Meditation is a prayerful quest engaging thought, imagination, emotion, and desire. Its goal is to make our own in faith the subject considered, by confronting it with the reality of our own life"(Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2723).
  73. Jump up to:a b Mattá al-Miskīn, Orthodox Prayer Life: The Interior Way (St Vladimir's Seminary Press 2003 ISBN 0-88141-250-3), p. 56
  74. ^ Cross, John Of the (July 31, 2009). The Ascent of Mount Carmel. BiblioBazaar. ISBN 9781113187048 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Frost, Reverend Bede (November 30, 2008). The Art of Mental Prayer. Read Books. ISBN 9781443733106 – via Google Books.
  76. Jump up to:a b Holmes 2002, p. 37.
  77. ^ Oxford Reference, purgative, illuminative, and unitive ways
  78. Jump up to:a b Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange (1938/1939), The Three Ages of the Interior Life, chapter Christian Perfection
  79. ^ "Arthur Devine, "State or Way" in Catholic Encyclopedia". Archived from the original on 2012-11-03. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
  80. Jump up to:a b Romanides 1981b, "Diagnosis and Therapy".
  81. Jump up to:a b c Vlachos, Hierotheos (1994). "VI. Orthodox Epistemology [Section 2: The Knowledge of God according to St. Gregory Palamas]"Orthodox psychotherapy (2005 reissued ed.). Levadia, Greece: Birth of the Theotokos Monastery. ISBN 978-960-7070-27-2. By Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos. Archived from the original on January 5, 2009. Retrieved September 12, 2010.
  82. ^ The Forgotten Desert Mothers: Sayings, Lives, and Stories of Early Christian Women By Laura Swan p. 67 Published by Paulist Press, 2001 ISBN 978-0-8091-4016-9
  83. Jump up to:a b c Romanides 1981b.
  84. ^ Orthodox Dogmatic Theology Michael Pomazansky [1]
  85. ^ Underhill 1911, p. 198, Part II, Ch. 3.
  86. ^ Solovyof 1950, p. 120.
  87. ^ Orthodox Prayer Life: The Interior Way, p. 59
  88. ^ "CHURCH FATHERS: Conference 10 (John Cassian)"www.newadvent.org.
  89. Jump up to:a b "canadian christian meditation community"wccm.
  90. ^ Cabasilas, Nicolaus (December 31, 1974). The Life in Christ. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 9780913836125 – via Google Books.
  91. ^ James W. Skehan, Place Me with Your Son (Georgetown University Press 1991 ISBN 0-87840-525-9), p. 89
  92. Jump up to:a b Romanides, John"Some underlying positions of this ['Romanity'] website reflecting the studies herein included"www.romanity.org.
  93. Jump up to:a b The Cloud of Unknowing (Wordsworth Classics of World Literature 2005 ISBN 1-84022-126-7), p. 18
  94. Jump up to:a b c d Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos, The Difference Between Orthodox Spirituality and Other Traditions
  95. ^ V Lossky Vision of God p. 123: "Knowledge is limited to what exists: now, as the cause of all being (The Divine Names, I, 1, col.588) or rather He is superior to all oppositions between being and non-being."
  96. ^ "Jesus Prayer". OrthodoxWiki. 2010-04-21. Retrieved 2010-07-03.
  97. ^ "What is the "Jesus Prayer", the "Prayer of the mind" and the "Prayer of the heart"?". October 8, 2019.
  98. Jump up to:a b c Orthodox Prayer Life: The Interior Way, p. 58
  99. ^ The Forgotten Desert Mothers: Sayings, Lives, and Stories of Early Christian Women, By Laura Swan p. 67 Published by Paulist Press, 2001 ISBN 978-0-8091-4016-9
  100. Jump up to:a b c Vlachos, Hierotheos (1993). "2. The illness of the soul"The illness and cure of the soul in the Orthodox tradition. Levadia, Greece: Birth of the Theotokos Monastery Press. ISBN 978-960-7070-18-0. By Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos. Archived from the original on 2009-03-26.
  101. ^ "People say: attain the Jesus Prayer, for that is inner prayer. This is not correct. The Jesus Prayer is a good means to arrive at inner prayer but in itself it is not inner but outer prayer" – St Theophan the Recluse, 'What Is Prayer?' cited in The Art of Prayer: An Orthodox Anthology p.98 by Igumen Chariton ISBN 978-0-571-19165-9
  102. Jump up to:a b "Catechism of the Catholic Church - IntraText"www.vatican.va.
  103. ^ "Magid | Safety at work"www.washington-state.net. Archived from the original on March 10, 2012.
  104. ^ Directory of popular piety and the liturgy, §197, Congregation of Divine Worship, Vatican, 2001.
  105. ^ "Rosarium Virginis Mariae on the Most Holy Rosary (October 16, 2002) | John Paul II"www.vatican.va.
  106. ^ "Thomas Keating, Centering Prayer and the Christian Contemplative Tradition" (PDF).
  107. ^ Lehodey 1982.
  108. ^ Hunt, Harry T. (2000). "Experiences of Radical Personal Transformation in Mysticism, Religious Conversion, and Psychosis: A Review of the Varieties, Processes, and Consequences of the Numinous"The Journal of Mind and Behavior21 (4): 353–397. ISSN 0271-0137JSTOR 43853939. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  109. ^ Vlachos, Hierotheos (1994). "VI. Orthodox Epistemology"Orthodox psychotherapy (2005 reissued ed.). Levadia, Greece: Birth of the Theotokos Monastery. ISBN 978-960-7070-27-2. By Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos. Archived from the original on January 5, 2009. Retrieved September 12, 2010.
  110. ^ Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church by Vladimir Lossky, p. 27)
  111. ^ Faith And Science In Orthodox Gnosiology and Methodology by George Metallinos [2]
  112. ^ Saint Symeon the New Theologian On Faith Palmer, G.E.H; Sherrard, Philip; Ware, Kallistos (Timothy). The Philokalia, Vol. 4
  113. ^ Nikitas Stithatos (Nikitas Stethatos) On the Practice of the Virtues: One Hundred Texts
  114. ^ Nikitas Stithatos (Nikitas Stethatos) On the Inner Nature of Things and on the Purification of the Intellect: One Hundred Texts
  115. ^ Nikitas Stithatos (Nikitas Stethatos) On Spiritual Knowledge, Love and the Perfection of Living: One Hundred Texts
  116. ^ Jordan Aumann, Christian Spirituality in the Catholic Tradition (Ignatius Press 1985 ISBN 978-0-89870068-8), p. 64
  117. ^ James Clark, as cited in Forman (1987), Eckhart's Stages of Mystical Progression
  118. ^ Saeed Zarrabi-Zadeh (2016), Stages and practices of mystical perfection. In: Practical Mysticism in Islam and Christianity, Routledge
  119. ^ "St"www.catholic-church.org.
  120. ^ William Johnston, The Inner Eye of Love: Mysticism and Religion (Harper Collins 2004 ISBN 0-8232-1777-9), p. 24
  121. Jump up to:a b "Louis J. Puhl, S.J. Translation - The Spiritual Exercises"Ignatian Spirituality. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  122. ^ Wallenfang & Wallenfang (2021), p. "B. Mental Prayer or the Prayer of meditation".
  123. ^ Hollenback (1996), p. 535.
  124. ^ Wyhe (2008), p. 174.
  125. ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2709". Archived from the original on August 1, 2016.
  126. Jump up to:a b "Dictionary : INFUSED CONTEMPLATION"www.catholicculture.org.
  127. Jump up to:a b c Thomas Dubay, Fire Within (Ignatius Press 1989 ISBN 0-89870-263-1), chapter 5
  128. ^ Jordan Aumann, Christian Spirituality in the Catholic Tradition (Sheed & Ward 1985 ISBN 0-89870-068-X), p. 247 and p. 273
  129. ^ Aumann, Christian Spirituality in the Catholic Tradition, p. 248
  130. ^ Aumann, Christian Spirituality in the Catholic Tradition, p. 276
  131. ^ St Teresa of Ávila (2007). "31. Prayer of Quiet"The Way of Perfection. Translated by Benedictines of Stanbrook Abbey. Cosimo, Inc. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-60206-261-0.
  132. ^ St Teresa of Ávila (1921). "The Fourth Mansions: Chapter III. Prayer of Quiet". In Benedict Zimmerman (ed.). The Interior Castle. Translated by The Benedictines of Stanbrook. London: Thomas Baker. p. 104.
  133. ^ Grade 6: Prayer of the Quiet catholic-church.org.
  134. ^ Thouless, Robert Henry (1971). An introduction to the psychology of religion. CUP Archive. p. 125. ISBN 0-521-09665-0.
  135. ^ Liguori, Alfonso Maria de' (1999). "14. Prayer of Quiet". In Frederick M. Jones (ed.). Selected writings. New York: Paulist Press. p. 176. ISBN 0-8091-3771-2.
  136. ^ Bielecki, Tessa (2008). "15. Prayer of Quiet"Teresa of Ávila: The Book of My Life. Translated by Mirabai Starr. Shambhala Publications. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-59030-573-7.
  137. ^ Merton, Thomas (1976). "14. Intelligence in the Prayer of Quiet"The ascent to truth. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 161. ISBN 0-86012-024-4.
  138. ^ Greene 1987, pp. 22–38.
  139. ^ Lossky 1976.
  140. ^ "The ARTFL Project | The ARTFL Project"artfl-project.uchicago.edu.
  141. ^ "Theosis - Deification As The Purpose Of Man's Life greekorthodoxchrch.org"greekorthodoxchurch.org.
  142. Jump up to:a b "On Union With God and Life of Theoria by Kallistos Katafygiotis (Kallistos Angelikoudis) greekorthodoxchrch.org"www.greekorthodoxchurch.org.
  143. ^ Fellow Workers With God: Orthodox Thinking on Theosis (Foundations) by Normal Russell p.
  144. Jump up to:a b Kapsanēs 2006.
  145. ^ The Difference Between Orthodox Spirituality and Other Traditions by Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos [3]
  146. ^ Theophan the RecluseWhat Is prayer?. Cited in The Art of Prayer: An Orthodox Anthology, p.73, compiled by Igumen Chariton of Valamo, trans, E. Kadloubovsky and E.M. Palmer, ed. Timothy Ware, 1966, Faber & Faber, London.
  147. ^ The Vision of God, SVS Press, 1997. (ISBN 0-913836-19-2)
  148. ^ "Andrew Louth, Theology, Contemplation and the University (abstract)".
  149. ^ Ware (1995), p. 5.
  150. Jump up to:a b deCatanzaro 1980, pp. 9–10.
  151. ^ The mystical theology of the Eastern Church By Vladimir Lossky pp. 237–238 [4]
  152. ^ monachos.net, Gregory Palma Archived 2009-11-19 at the Wayback Machine
  153. ^ Romanides 1981a.
  154. ^ The Difference Between Orthodox Spirituality and Other Traditions by Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos [5]
  155. ^ "St. Nicholas Orthodox Church » Mysticism, Women and the Christian Orient". Stnicholaspdx.org. Archived from the original on July 28, 2011. Retrieved September 4, 2013.
  156. ^ George D. Metallinos (1995), Orthodox and European Civilization: The struggle between Hellenism and Frankism, [Excerpts from the speech of Fr. Georgios Metallinos, Professor at the University of Athens, during the February 1995 Theological Conference in Pirgos, Greece.] – via www.romanity.org
  157. ^ "Those who speak from their own thoughts, before having acquired purity, are seduced by the spirit of self-esteem." St. Gregory of Sinai
  158. ^ *History of Russian Philosophy «История российской Философии »(1951) by N. O. Lossky [section on V. Lossky] p. 400. Allen & Unwin: London. International Universities Press Inc: New York. ASIN B000H45QTY ISBN 978-0-8236-8074-0 sponsored by Saint Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary
  159. Jump up to:a b Vlachos 1996.
  160. ^ Vlachos 2005.
  161. ^ Hall 1998, p. 158.
  162. ^ Cf. Josef Pieper, An Anthology (Ignatius Press 1989 ISBN 978-0-89870226-2), 43; Eugene Victor Walter, Placeways (UNC Press Books 1988 ISBN 978-0-80784200-3), p. 218; Thomas Hibbs, Aquinas, Ethics and Philosophy of Religion (Indiana University Press 2007 ISBN 978-0-25311676-5), pp. 8, 89; Steven Chase, Angelic Spirituality (Paulist Press 2002 ISBN 978-0-80913948-4), p. 63
  163. ^ "Saint John Cassian | Biography, Theology, & Facts | Britannica"www.britannica.com.
  164. ^ John Cassian, The Conferences (English translation by Boniface Ramsey, Newman Press 1997 ISBN 978-0-80910484-0), p. 47
  165. ^ Christopher A. Dustin, "The Liturgy of Theory" in Bruce T. Morrill et al. (editors), Practicing Catholic (Palgrave Macmillan 2005) ISBN 978-1-40398296-4), pp. 257-274;
  166. ^ LADNER, GERHART B. (1953). "The History of Ideas in the Christian Middle Ages: From the Fathers to Dante in American and Canadian Publications of the Years 1940-1952"Traditio9: 439–514. doi:10.1017/S0362152900003822ISSN 0362-1529JSTOR 27830285S2CID 152099684. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
  167. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 125–127.
  168. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 127–128.
  169. ^ Cornuz 2003, p. 149.
  170. ^ Fremantle 1964.
  171. ^ "Counter-Reformation | Definition, Summary, Outcomes, Jesuits, Facts, & Significance"Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
  172. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 94–97.
  173. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 98–99.
  174. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 99–102.
  175. ^ "Christian Mystics Full Library Part Two Revelations of Divine Love in..." 1 October 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  176. ^ Gardner 1910.
  177. ^ "A medieval mystic untimely born? | Christian History Magazine"Christian History Institute. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  178. ^ Sencourt 1925, p. 126.
  179. ^ Coulehan, Jack (May 2010). "Everything in Its Proper Season: Sir Thomas Browne's Religio Medici"Journal of General Internal Medicine25 (5): 478–479. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1307-zPMC 2855008PMID 20229138.
  180. ^ Huxley 1929.
  181. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 136–137.
  182. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 136–138.
  183. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 138–139.
  184. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 139–140.
  185. ^ Holmes 2002, pp. 143–144.
  186. Jump up to:a b Beauregard, M.; Paquette, V. (2006). "Neural correlates of a mystical experience in Carmelite nuns". Neuroscience Letters. Elsevier. 405 (3): 186–90. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.060ISSN 0304-3940PMID 16872743S2CID 13563460.
  187. ^ Olga Taxidou, Tragedy, Modernity and Mourning (Edinburgh University Press 2004 ISBN 978-0-74861987-0), pp. 34, 79
  188. ^ Donald Phillip Verene, Speculative Philosophy (Lexington Books 2009 ISBN 978-0-73913661-4), p. 15
  189. ^ Schaff 1892, p. 194.
  190. ^ "Life of St. Ignatius - Founder of the Society of Jesus"Loyola Jesuit College. Archived from the original on 2011-02-11. Retrieved 2011-04-18.
  191. ^ Pastrovicchi 1918.
  192. ^ Chasle 1906.
  193. ^ Kelly 2009, pp. 79, 86.
  194. ^ Tiku, Nitasha (June 11, 2022). "The Google engineer who thinks the company's AI has come to life"The Washington PostArchived from the original on June 11, 2022. Retrieved June 12, 2022.
  195. ^ Luscombe, Richard (June 12, 2022). "Google engineer put on leave after saying AI chatbot has become sentient"The GuardianArchived from the original on June 12, 2022. Retrieved June 18, 2022.
  196. ^ catholicculture.org, Catholic Dictionary: Prayer of simplicity
  197. ^ Lossky, N. O. (1970). History of Russian Philosophy. Intl Universities Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-8236-8074-0.

Sources[edit]

Further reading[edit]

General[edit]

Eastern Orthodox[edit]

Catholicism[edit]

Centering prayer[edit]

Other[edit]

Diverse[edit]

  • Tito Colliander: Way of the Ascetics, 1981, ISBN 0-06-061526-5
  • Samuel Fanous and Vincent Gillespie, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Mysticism, Cambridge University Press, 2011
  • Richard Foster: Celebration of Discipline: The Path to Spiritual Growth, 1978, ISBN 0-06-062831-6
  • Patrick Grant. 1983. Literature of Mysticism in Western Tradition. London: MacMillan. ISBN 0333287983
  • Patrick Grant. ed, A Dazzling Darkness: An Anthology of Western Mysticism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. ISBN 0-8028-0088-2
  • Kathleen Lyons: Mysticism and Narcissism. Cabbridge Scholars, 2016, ISBN 978-1-4438-8043-5
  • Cheslyn Jones, Geoffrey Wainwright and Edward Yarnold, eds.: The Study of Spirituality, Oxford University Press, 1986, ISBN 0-19-504170-4
  • Tarjei Park, The English Mystics, SPCK, 1998, ISBN 0-281-05110-0
  • Thomas E. Powers: Invitation to a Great Experiment: Exploring the Possibility that God can be Known, 1979, ISBN 0-385-14187-4
  • Ryan Stark, "Some Aspects of Christian Mystical Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Poetry," Philosophy & Rhetoric 41 (2008): 260–77.
  • William Thiele: "Monks in the World: Seeking God in a Frantic Culture", 2014, ISBN 978-1-62564-540-1
  • Evelyn Underhill: The Spiritual Life: Four Broadcast Talks, Hodder & Stoughton, 1937, x, 141 p.

External links[edit]

Ancient Greek[edit]

Eastern-Orthodox[edit]

Catholic[edit]

Centering prayer[edit]

Prayer of Quiet[edit]

A PATH TO OUR COMMON SOURCE - Site de hhuysegoms !

A PATH TO OUR COMMON SOURCE - Site de hhuysegoms !

Life is full of encounters... In 1967, I came to Japan from Belgium and discovered the path of Zen, which allowed me to approach the heart of Jesus from a new angle. In addition, I have met many people with physical disabilities and have walked the path of life together with them. With gratitude, I would like to share my experiences and thoughts on this site. I would appreciate it if you could refer to the article on here. Henri Huisgoms
At the heart of spiritualities

Living in Japan since September 1967, it seemed appropriate to me to put on line certain texts that I have composed up to this day. These are articles or texts not yet published .

You can also find photos of people and landscapes on this site.

I hope that the material presented will become an inspiration to you .

 

Henri Huysegoms
Henri Huysegoms アンリ・ホイスゴムス


A Path to our Common Source (Henri Huysegoms)



(Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, 16/2006/2, p. 211-214, Peeters, Leuven)



The practice of contemplative prayer inspired from Zen spirituality can become for followers of Christ the occasion to project a new light on the gospel. Moreover, the rediscovery of the rich tradition of mystics like Meister Eckhart and the anonymous author of “The Cloud of Unknowing” can foster the dialogue of Christians with Buddhists because Buddhists recognize their experience as one of enlightenment.



Christian spiritual guides usually stress that the fruit of Christian meditation is not only obtained by one’s own efforts but through grace as well. On that point, they are prone to assert the originality and superiority of Christian prayer over oriental spirituality. In fact, such a discussion about a salvation obtained through grace or through deeds appeared in Christianity from the beginning. At the time of St. Paul, the Christian community had already discussed this distinction. In Japanese Buddhism too, people make a distinction between stressing one’s own efforts as in Zen and stressing the “power of Another,” as in Pure Land Buddhism. But if one deepens Zen meditation, he discovers that such a distinction is quite shallow. It is a fact that Zen training includes physical and spiritual efforts that are exacting. But they are efforts for letting go of the self so that one can discover one’s relation to a reality that is the source of our existence. Jesus also invited his disciples to engage in the same struggle to renounce the self.



One of the methods recommended by the Zen masters as a way for abandoning all images and thoughts which reason conceives in one’s mind and for making possible the discovery of one’s essential nature is the repetition of the word “Mu” in every breath, focusing one’s mind constantly in the region below the navel. One must forget one’s self completely and even reject the desire to obtain some kind of spiritual experience like enlightenment.



In regard to this point, the Zen masters tell the story of a mysterious bird. One day, a woodsman went to the forest to work. From afar he noticed a bird he had never seen before. He found it strange. The bird said to him: “Why am I so strange?” The man thought: “What? A speaking bird?” The bird answered: “I see that you can’t believe that I’m able to speak.” The man dreamed about catching that bird and selling it for a good price in town. But the bird exposed this intention too. At the end the man began to work earnestly and forgot about the bird. After a while, the bird felt secure and little by little came quite close to him. When the bird arrived next to the man, he caught the bird at once.



When taking part in a Zen retreat of five days, we will find that if a strict instructor is next to us for supporting our efforts, we can throw ourselves totally into that sound of Mu so that we become one with it. At the end, it is Mu that is doing Mu in ourselves, and we notice that the ego has completely vanished. This discovery has been made possible by an effort to make us available to an experience that we accept as a gift. We waken to a reality that we did not have to search for because it has always been there from the beginning.



To concentrate on a sound like Mu when we inhale or exhale might not seem a very spiritual activity. However, the anonymous mystic of the 14th century who wrote “The Cloud of Unknowing” also recommended this kind of method. He said: “If you want to gather all your desire into a simple word that the mind can easily retain, choose a short word rather than a long one. A one-syllable word such as ‘God’ or ‘love’ is best. But choose one that is meaningful to you. Then fix it in your mind so that it will remain there come what may. Should some thought go on annoying you demanding to know what you are doing, answer with this one word alone. If your mind begins to intellectualize over the meanings and connotations of this little word, remind yourself that its value lies in its simplicity.” This author recommends a word like “God,” but he does not cling to it. One can discover the source of one’s being through the repetition of any word provided it is short. Choosing something other than the word “God” has the advantage of making it easier to avoid any thoughts about the divine and to cut off all duality. “When we are able to pray in our heart with purity, without any distractions, we renounce plurality, division and diversity, and we are immediately, above all discourse, at one with the One, the Simple, with Him who unifies” (Callistus and Ignatius Xanthopouloi).



One might feel uneasy about the appropriateness of a meditation without any object, without any trace of dialogue. But this kind of training makes it possible to act in daily life with a purity of intention without expecting some kind of recognition.



During a Zen retreat, the Master sometimes tells the following story: A young man visits a Zen Master and asks to allow him to become his disciple. But he is not easily accepted because the Master wants to be sure about the man’s determination. The young man persists in his request and is finally accepted. One day, all the monks go out in line to beg for their food in the village. The young man notices an old man drawing his cart up a slope. He leaves the line and rushes forward to help the man. On the way back, the Master blames him for his action and sends him away. The monk did not realize the importance of the training he had been receiving.



This story might come as a shock to many Christians, but it stresses the necessity of a period of spiritual training for renouncing one’s self so that one can act with an absolute purity of intention. Prayer as a dialogue should also be grounded in a contemplative activity without duality. “Between You and me, there is that ‘me’ which troubles me,” wrote Allaj, the Iranian Sufi Master.



Jesus used to tell to those who opposed him: “My teaching is not from me, but from the One who sent me.” The religious leaders of his time interpreted this assertion as the expression of an inordinate arrogance bordering on blasphemy, although it was the expression of the humiliation of Him Who, with His baptism, accepted to abase Himself all the way to death. This self-denial made Him able to proclaim His unity with the Father by saying: “Before Abraham was, I am.” Jesus was disappointed to notice that His disciples could not see the Father in him.



We may not think that these statements concern also ourselves. But in the “Blue Cliff Record,” a collection of one hundred Zen koans compiled in China in the twelfth century, we can find: “In the heavens and on earth I alone am the Honored One.” This sentence echoes that of Jesus. In this koan, the Honored One does not point to the Buddha but is said by a Zen Master. It is not an expression of ostentation, but an assertion of the ultimate I who is immortal and can only be perceived by a complete renouncement of the self. This koan, like the sentence “Show me your original face before your parents were born” is given to those who perform Zen training in order to become one with the Reality of the absolute “I am” and to express their understanding of that Reality through words or deeds.



A Buddhist Zen Master is able to certify the discovery of one’s essential nature made by a disciple even if he belongs to a different religious tradition because that experience lies beyond the realm of concepts and teachings.



In the preface to the “Gateless Gate,” translated with Commentary by Zen Master Kôun Yamada, H. M. Enomiya-Lassalle, S.J. wrote: “Zen practice has nothing to do with Buddhist philosophy.” The expression “If you meet a Buddha, you will kill him,” found in Case 1 of that manuscript of the 13th century, points to the same reality. Any attempt to conceptualize lays a yoke on a borderless Reality.



The ultimate experience of one’s essential nature, although being a source of joy drawing sometimes near ecstasy, is exempt from images and thoughts. Therefore, it is possible to think that Meister Eckhart, the Buddhists, and meditating people of all ages and traditions have essentially had a similar experience but have put it in words with their own cultural and religious background. Differences appear when people try to express a reality that is inexpressible.



St. Paul, in his second Letter to the Corinthians, says he was snatched up to the highest heaven and heard things which cannot be put into words, things that human lips may not speak. Trying to express that experience, he notes in his Letter to the Galatians: “It is no longer I who lives, but it is Christ who lives in me.” Based on a similar experience, a Buddhist says that it is no longer he who lives, but the Buddha living in him.



The more essential words expressed by Christ and people like St. Paul about their being can become our own if, in meditation, we bring silence to all discursive thoughts so that we can become one with a power which unifies all beings.



* * *
====
https://hhuysegoms.jimdofree.com/le-silence-des-pensees/



THE SILENCE OF THOUGHTS,

WELCOMING THE PRESENT IN ITS FULLNESS

 

Henri Huysegoms

 

 
 

" All man's misfortune comes from one thing,

 which is not knowing how to remain at rest in a room."

 

Blaise Pascal, Thought 205

 

 
We generally agree to recognize the virtues of silence, but when we want to specify its nature, we discover a great diversity. Some find peace of heart by listening to the murmur of a spring, the song of a bird during a solitary walk. Others may find peace of soul reading a book of deep spiritual density. By listening or by thoughts, these silences are furnished.

 There is, however, a silence of another quality that the following pages will attempt to describe. They point out that many spiritual guides belonging to a theistic religion have sought it, but that it is in Buddhism that it is practiced in a radical way. Silence, the fruit of a very demanding mental activity, is maintained there , during meditation, in its nudity . The following fact may make one imagine the asceticism it requires.

 

The silence of Sister R.

 It was the spring of 1987. In the meditation center founded by the Jesuit priest HM Lassalle in the suburbs of Tokyo, a Zen retreat was held , led by the nun Sister R. During this kind of spiritual exercises, there is a daily instruction to help the meditators to exercise correctly the seat disposing to the awakening. It generally consists of commenting on an ancient Chinese story which describes a dialogue between a Zen master and one of his disciples. Sister R., in her first interview, used such a story to account for a tragic event. She announced that her sister and her husband had just been murdered. The author of the double murder was none other than their son. The act was the consequence of the delusional state of a person suffering from mental illness.

 I wondered how the nun was going to comment on this drama. Was she going to hold a religious discourse, affirm the need to surrender oneself to the will of God? Invite participants to pray for the soul of the victims as well as for the culprit? Or would it remain consistent with the intuition that constitutes the center of the Buddha's message, namely, to abstain, during meditation, from indulging in considerations that distance us from the present reality recognized as our only absolute?

She introduced two characters. First of all, Job who wondered about the reason for the heavy tests to which he was subjected. Unable to pierce the mystery of his suffering, he ends up recognizing his radical powerlessness to judge his fate: " I am not the weight, what will I reply to you? I put my hand on my mouth. I spoke once , I will answer no more, twice, I will add nothing. " (Jb 40, 4-5) . He gave up asking “ whys ” . He does not conclude that God is absent, but accepts His silence. What had created his confusion became an acceptance of the human condition.

 

 
   
She then introduced Yuima (in Sanskrit, Vimalakīrti ), considered by tradition to be one of the most eminent disciples of the Buddha's lifetime. An episode of his life is detailed in case 84 of the " Green Cliff Collection " , a set of koans (lit. public treatises) composed in China in the 10th century and completed in their present form in the 12th century . A koan is a short story, often in the form of a dialogue between a disciple and his teacher, of which one must demonstrate one's understanding without resorting to discursive thought.

This collection constitutes the basis of the teaching of Rinzai Zen Buddhism. Legend has it that when Yuima was seriously ill, Bodhisattvas  , personifications of mercy, went to his bedside. Yuima asked them, " What is the Bodhisattvas' gateway to non-duality  ? " Each offered an answer. A Bodhisattva then invited Yuima to give an answer himself . He maintained silence. But this silence, it is said, was more deafening than the thunder. When words and notions expire, the heart of reality is revealed.

 It is quite probable that the nun had felt shaken in her faith in a God of love and tenderness, but she concluded by saying simply: " Now let us return to our seat. " She recognized, like Job and Yuima, having been confronted with a situation that defies all interpretation. In the zen sitting that followed, the words of the nun doubtless awakened in everyone, and in herself, images and reflections, but we tried to maintain ourselves in the silence of our thoughts.

 

The silence of the Buddha

 It is common to define Buddhism as a religion, but since the message of the Buddha is independent of any discourse and does not require adherence to " truths " , it is at a more fundamental level than any religion understood as a teaching which requires adherence to faith.

 Among the abundant writings of the Indian Jesuit Raimon Panikkar is the work " The Silence of the Buddha " (Actes Sud, 2006). He highlighted in his work a sentence of Saint John of the Cross: " Nothing is more necessary for us than to keep in the presence of our great God the silence of desires and that of the tongue. The language he hears, it is the silent language of love. " He emphasized in his work that the Buddha refrains from any questioning on the destiny of man because it is necessary to get down to the most urgent. The important thing is elsewhere. The Buddha is credited with the following remark: when a house catches fire, it is not the time to ask questions about the cause of the fire. It is necessary to deal with the most urgent: to endeavor to extinguish the flames. This underlines the importance of adopting the correct attitude in the situations which present themselves at every moment.

 

The Zen practice of silence

 The practice of silent meditation as it is traditionally practiced in a Zen room is very demanding from a physical and mental point of view. The five-day sessions include ten sittings a day, lasting forty minutes. The pose is that of the lotus or the half-lotus. The gaze is lowered, the body straight, but without tension. From a mental point of view, you are asked to focus on your breathing while remaining well aware of your surroundings. Sometimes noises are heard, the sound of footsteps, a door opening, the cry of a bird. Continually come to mind scattered thoughts, ideas, feelings. The exercise is not to act on it. They will vanish like the clouds that dissipate in the blue sky.

 

To avoid getting carried away by these solicitations, it is advisable to exhale the mu sound throughout the exhalation. Watched by the person in charge of the room who encourages them and pushes them to give their all, some beginners make this sound loudly. Expressions of a desire to maintain rigorous inner silence, they do not disturb other meditators. They can also become a support for them in their own practice. Meditators, to whatever religious tradition they belong, are united in the same quality of silence if they strive for the complete emptiness of thoughts which alone allows awakening.

 The silence of Jesus and his kenosis [1]

 At the beginning of the Gospels, we can see Jesus inviting men to follow him, to renounce all attachment and to lay down their lives for every human being. These are its primary requirements. He did not care to give an answer to those who asked questions that were not essential for their action.

 To the one who asked him: " Will there be only a few people who will be saved? " , he contented himself with answering: " Strive to enter through the narrow door " (Lk 13, 23-24). The Gospel of John records a meeting of the disciples with their Master after his resurrection. Peter , after having been chosen as leader of the disciples, casts a glance on the disciple John and asks Jesus : " And him, Lord, what will happen to him? " . As in the previous case, Jesus is silent on this subject. He asks Peter not to concern himself with the fate of the beloved disciple, a subject that has no bearing on his behavior, and to fulfill his mission as a disciple: " If I want him to remain until let me come, what does it matter to you? You follow me! ” (Jn 21:22)

 This affirmation of the priority given to a concrete commitment is also found in the episode of Jesus' encounter with Nicodemus. This Jewish notable, imbued with his knowledge, comes to find Jesus at night and authenticates him as a Rabbi. But Jesus presented him with a requirement he had not expected: to be reborn. He demands of him a death to himself , a total stripping in order to act faithfully according to the Spirit who, like the wind, will lead him on ever new paths.

 

Jesus himself had previously signified this plunge into death by his immersion in the Jordan. He came out animated by " the Spirit " . His affirmations such as " I and the Father are one " (Jn 10, 30) and " This word which you hear is not from me but from the Father who sent me " (Jn 14, 24), are the testimony of this perfect unity with the Source of his being.

 The moment of his passion bears witness to the putting into practice of the commitment made at his baptism. In his letter to the Philippians, the apostle Paul noted this fact remarkably when he said of Jesus that " he emptied himself [literal translation in Japanese: " he was moved " ], taking on the condition of a servant. [ …] He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, and death on a cross. ” (Phil 2:7). Jesus pushed his renunciation so far as to accept being deprived of the perception of a compassionate God. The attitude in which Jesus arrived at the end of a fight testifies to his acceptance of an inescapable reality, which theistic religions describe as " the will of God " . : " Let not my will but yours come true ! " (Lk 22, 42).

 

 The Silence of Past Christian Spirituals

 The Buddhist practice of a radical silence as a spiritual activity par excellence seems difficult to accept for the Christian who defines prayer as a dialogue with God. Saint Francis de Sales and others have presented discursive meditation and affective prayer as the only valid ones. They advise to start from considerations of a doctrinal order based on a biblical text or on a book of spirituality and to express feelings of gratitude, regrets, resolutions.

 It was not always so. It was not until the 16th century that the importance of contemplative, non-objective prayer was misunderstood. During the first fifteen centuries of the life of the Church, objectless contemplation is considered the normal evolution of an authentic spiritual life. In the 7th century , Jean Climaque noted: " A hair is enough to blur the gaze, a simple worry to destroy solitude (hésychia) because solitude is the stripping of thoughts and the renunciation of reasonable worries. " ( Small ph i localie of the prayer of the heart, Cahiers du Sud, 1953, p.89)

 

It is even more remarkable to read in the work " The Cloud of Unknowing " , an anonymous text in English from the 14th century: " [For the work of meditation,] a direct and naked impulse towards God is sufficient, without no cause but Himself, and that if this impetus, it behooves you to have it folded up and bundled up in a word, in order to hold on to it more firmly, even if it is a small word, and very short in syllables: for the shorter it is, the better it is attuned to the work of the Spirit. A similar word is the word: God, or again the word: love. Choose the one you want, or such other as you like, provided that "It is short of syllables. And that one, attach it so firmly to your heart, that it never deviates from it, whatever happens." (The Cloud of Unknowing, Seuil, 1977, p. 39) . This advice basically agrees with that of the Zen masters about sitting .

 

Master Eckhart seems to me the closest to the Buddhist masters in his way of presenting the spiritual attitude to keep during meditation. We can read , for example, in his sermon 1: " It is [like Jesus] that the man should stand who would find himself receptive to the supreme truth and living there without before and without after and without being hindered by all the works and all the images of which he was ever aware, distraught and free, receiving again in this now the divine gift. ” (L’eclair de l’âme, Albin Miche l , 1998, p. 35). "Should Jesus discourse in the soul, then she must be alone and she herself must be silent, if she is to hear Jesus discourse. " (Ibid. p. 37)

 

One can easily notice similarities between the meditation of these spiritual Christians and the meditation practices of Buddhists. But these have two distinct characteristics. First of all, it precisely determines the position of the body most favorable to self-forgetfulness. Moreover, there is maintained a more bare silence concerning the present reality, the ultimate mystery of which no words can account. This is a sign of deep respect for her.

 

Conclusion

 The practice of a spiritual exercise aimed at maintaining oneself in such a radical silence can be disorienting: it can be considered futile and insignificant. However, a state of emptiness of all thought is the only one that can consciously put us in the presence of the absolute: the real in its elusive dimension.

 

In this time when we are inundated with information, assaulted by noisy advertisements which delight our inner peace, this inner silence which " brings nothing, but changes everything " is all the more necessary for us. We can already notice that in the West, seeds of this silence have again been sown and are beginning to blossom, signs of a more stripped-down spirituality . ▣            H.H. 

 

 hhuysegoms@gmail.com

 (Free Christian Thought, No 28/2014, pp. 17-22)

 

[1] Concept of Christian theology expressed by a Greek wordkenosiscoming from
  from the epistle of Paul to the Philippians 2, 7: action to make empty, to deprive of everything.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 Zazen itself is a prayer...

 

When my interest in Zen began almost 30 years ago, I could never have imagined that this path would have a profound impact on my life for the rest of my life . He was educated in Christianity and developed a habit of meditation. Before coming to Japan, I studied the basic teachings of Buddhism so that I could understand the feelings of Japanese people.

 About 12 years ago, a Zen friend wrote me a letter and said, "I think that zazen itself is a prayer." I knew that through zazen I could lose myself and be thoroughly purified, but I saw this as a condition of pure dialogue between God and man rather than the highest form of prayer.

 However, I have found that for the Christian priests and nuns who introduced me to the path of Zen, this practice and enlightenment is a much more important part of their lives. One incident made this clear to me.

 Last spring, I was informed by an American nun who had conducted sesshin that my sister and her husband had been murdered. Although she has been practicing Zen for many years and has become a junior teacher, I thought that she would refer to the comforting words of the Bible after encountering this tragic event. He talked about the 84th rule of Hekiganroku . According to the sutra on which this koan is based, when Monju Shiri came to visit Yuima, who was ill, he asked Monju, 'What does it mean to enter the school of Fuji?' Manjushri replied, "This is leaving the questions and answers." Later, Monju asked Yuima the same question, but he was silent. But this silence resounded louder than thunder.

 Through this story, she was trying to say that when a person is in a situation of great misery, no explanation is necessary, and the correct attitude is to simply sit down. .

 In her advocacy the next day, she quoted the Book of Job from the Bible. Job, who was a righteous man, lost his property, livestock, and family. and I have told you wonderful works that are beyond my knowledge, and I despise myself.” This also means that death and suffering cannot be properly explained.

 As you get to know your best friend for a long time, even if you exchange few words, you will be able to communicate with each other. In the same way, for me, zazen is becoming more than a dialogue and a prayer.

 Zen is said to be a Sanskrit-derived word that means meditation. Before Jesus began his public life, we are told that he lived a life of prayer and fasting in the wilderness for some time. Immediately afterwards, by the sign of completely immersing his body in the Jordan under John the Baptist, Jesus emptied himself, humbled himself, and expressed his determination to accept whatever sufferings were to come.

 Jesus often went to the mountain and spent the night to pray. Even then, he completely emptied himself. Could it be that he had disappeared and only the work of God was there?

 

( 1997 , 1997, Korekoan Senshinkai, 11th Sesshinkai Bulletin , H. Henry)

 






Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit: The Place of Zen in Christian Life - Kindle edition by Kennedy, Robert. Religion & Spirituality Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.

Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit: The Place of Zen in Christian Life - Kindle edition by Kennedy, Robert. Religion & Spirituality Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.







Read sample

Follow the Author

Robert Kennedy
Follow


Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit: The Place of Zen in Christian Life Kindle Edition
by Robert Kennedy (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 28 ratings
3.7 on Goodreads
96 ratings


A new revised edition of the classic title on Zen and Christian living.

Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit is a study of the intersection between Zen Buddhism and Christianity. Robert Kennedy explores how Zen can help us to live deeper lives and how we can return from a study of Zen to a more profound understanding of Christian living and practice.

"What I looked for in Zen," says the author, "was not a new faith, but a new way of being Catholic that grew out of my own lived experience and would not be blown away by authority or by changing theological fashion." Kennedy is unique in being competent in both Catholic and Zen practice and who responds to people who are drawn to this form of prayer and life. This is a refreshingly simple but also most beautiful book.
Read less



Print length

192 pages
Language
June 10, 2021


Editorial Reviews

Review


“This revised edition of Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit could not appear at a more appropriate time ... Robert E. Kennedy, a Jesuit priest and a Zen roshi, reveals in this book and in his own life the path that we, both believers and non-believers, need to take in order to grow in knowledge, love, purification, and union with what is truly real. A more spiritually transformative book and guide can hardly be found.” ―Dr Peter C. Phan, Ignacio Ellacuria , S.J. Chair of Catholic Social Thought, Department of Theology, Georgetown University

“Robert Kennedy's unpretentious personal reflections on Zen koans draw the reader into Buddhist practice in an uncanny way; one sees with new eyes … Kennedy opens a door and throws light across the spectrum of Christian spiritual wisdom.” ―Roger Haight, S.J., Scholar in Residence, Union Theological Seminary--This text refers to the paperback edition.
About the Author
Robert Kennedy is an American Jesuit priest and Zen Roshi (master). He holds a doctorate in Theology from the University of Ottawa, and another in psychology from Andover Newton Theological School in Boston. He continues his Zen practice in Los Angeles and with Glassman Roshi in New York. He founded Morning Star Zendo in Jersey City. He teaches in Ireland, UK, Ecuador, Mexico and in several Zen centers in the USA. He resides in New York City. --This text refers to the paperback edition.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0956SWHFH
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Bloomsbury Continuum; 1st edition (June 10, 2021)
Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 10, 2021
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 2456 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 192 pagesBest Sellers Rank: #558,219 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)#180 in Christian Meditation Worship & Devotion (Kindle Store)
#479 in Spiritual Devotionals
#936 in Buddhism (Kindle Store)Customer Reviews:
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 28 ratings





Videos
Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!Upload your video



About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Follow

Robert Kennedy



Robert E. Kennedy, S.J., author of Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit and Zen Gifts to Christians, is one of several practicing Catholic men and women who are recognized by the Buddhist community as zen teachers. He is a licensed psychoanalyst and professor emeritus of theology at St. Peter’s College in Jersey City.

As a Christian Fr. Kennedy has found meaning and deep reverence in the practice of zen. He is active in interfaith work, teaching zen to persons of all faiths, conducting retreats in the United States, Mexico, Ireland and England.

He studied zen in Japan with the Japanese master Yamada Roshi. He continued his study under Maezumi Roshi in Los Angeles and Bernard Tetsugen Glassman Roshi in New York; in 1997 he received inka, the formal seal of approval, from Glassman Roshi and received the title Roshi, or Master. He holds doctorates in Theology from the University of Ottawa and from St. Paul University in Ottawa, a Masters in Theology from Sophia University in Tokyo, and a Doctor of Ministry in Psychology and Clinical Studies from Andover-Newton in Boston. He is a graduate of the Blanton-Peale Institute of Religion and Health in New York.

Roshi Kennedy has written two books on Zen and Christianity: Zen Gifts to Christians and Zen Spirit, Christian Spirit.

In 2017, Roshi Kennedy received two honorary doctorates, one from St. Peter's University, and one from the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts.


Top reviews from the United States


tmbarritt

5.0 out of 5 stars BookReviewed in the United States on January 26, 2022
Verified Purchase
Good quality and arrived early



HelpfulReport

Eastern Garden

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book on zen for Catholic/ChristianReviewed in the United States on June 19, 2020
Verified Purchase
An amazing entry level book for a Catholic interesting in zen meditation like me. After reading this book, I bought Fr. Kennedy’s another one “Zen Gifts to Christians”. Really enjoyed the reading.


5 people found this helpful


HelpfulReport

Peter J Economou

5.0 out of 5 stars The same work!Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2021

Robert Kennedy is able to bring his years as a Jesuit and training in Zen to all people, from all faiths. He eloquently highlights how these two practices work well and only heighten spiritual living. I’m lucky to have come across this book!

2 people found this helpful


HelpfulReport

禅との出会い - Site de hhuysegoms !

禅との出会い - Site de hhuysegoms !





레브 신부가 되십시오.
공통 소스로 가는 길
선과의 만남
사진 갤러리
예수 시대의 민중의 고뇌
예수의 조상의 고뇌
요셉, 노예에서 궁궐의 책임자가 되다
간통한 다윗 왕, 회개
선지자, 학대받은 자의 보호자
세례, 예수의 소중한 때
예수님은 제자들을 부른다.



Henri Huysegoms 앙리 호이스 고무스








만남이 인생을 바꾼다――선과의 만남

 저는 벨기에 출신입니다. 학생 시절, 친구가 신체장애인의 자원봉사를 하고 있어, 어느 때, 그가 갑자기 참가할 수 없게 되어, 갑자기, 대신에 참가했습니다.

 그것이 나와 장애인과의 만남이었습니다. 나는 장애인에게서 다양한 것을 가르쳤다. 내 인생은 장애인을 제외하고 말할 수 없습니다. 니가타에서는 장애인과 공동 생활을 현재도 계속하고 있습니다.

 일본은 쇼와 42 년입니다. 저 자신이 일본에 부임을 희망한 것은 아니고 예수회에서 파견된 결과입니다.

 처음에는 도쿄에 있는 세인트 요셉 일본어 학교에서 일본어를 배웠습니다.

 니가타에 살 예정은 특별히 없었습니다. 우연히 니가타 교구장이 비서를 모집하고 있었기 때문에, 쇼와 44 년에 니가타로 옮겼습니다.

 제가 처음 선에 접한 것은 44 년입니다. 가미치 대학에서 일본 문화에 관한 외국인을 위한 강연회가 있고, 독일인으로부터 일본 국적으로 귀화한 예수회 신부·아미야 마비(에미야·마키비/후고·라사르)사의 선에 대한 강연을 듣고 , 깊은 감동을 얻었습니다. 좌선에 의해 "나"를 없애는 것은 하나님과 깊은 대화가 될 것이라는 것을 알았기 때문입니다 (그러나 나중에 그것은 대화이며 동시에기도임을 경험합니다).

 저에게 이 운명적인 만남을 가져온 애궁 마비 신부는 어떤 사람이었는지 소개하고 싶습니다.

 애궁사는 메이지 31 년 독일 제국 출생. 쇼와 4년에 일본에 파견되어 상지대학에서 독일어를 가르치는 것과 함께 사회복지에 관여하고 있었습니다. 예수회 일본관 구장이 되면 히로시마에 부임하고, 거기서 피폭하고 있습니다.

 23년 에 귀화. 세계평화기념성당(히로시마시)의 건설을 주도했습니다.

 애궁사가 선에 접한 것은 쇼와 18 년, 시마네현 쓰와노의 영명사(요메이지/조동종)에서의 참선이 최초로, 그 후 오랫동안 후쿠이현 오바마의 발심사(호신지)로, 하라다 조다케 노사 밑에서 참선했습니다. 하라다 노사는 조동선의 스님이면서 임제선에서 사용하는 「공안」(말에 의한 선문답)을 잡은 좌선을 하고 있었습니다. 조동선은 '관관타좌'(단타자)라고 하며 단지 오로지 앉는 선도입니다. 앉게 되는 좌선입니다. 그러므로, 공안은 이용하지 않습니다. 다만, 현재에서도 전국의 조동종의 일부 선도장에서는, 공안을 사용하고 있습니다(애궁사는, 공안은 사용하지 않았습니다 ) .

 애궁사는 히로시마에서 '신진굴'이라는 선도장을 열고 가톨릭 성직자에게도 참선을 장려하고 지도했습니다. 지금은 전세계의 가톨릭 속에 참선자는 있습니다만, 처음 실행한 것이 애궁사입니다. 가톨릭 신자가 심지어 개신교 교회에 들어가는 것도 용서받지 못했던 시대였기 때문에, 스승의 대담한 행동은 비판과 저항의 대상이 되었습니다. 다만, 애궁사는 뭐니뭐니해도 예수회의 일본관 구장이기 때문에. 일본에 있는 한은, 아무도 그에게 의견할 수 없었어요(웃음).

 선생님은 선과 비슷한 전통이 기독교에 있다고 주장했습니다.





 어느 날, 나는 그의 신관굴이 댐 공사에서 사라졌고, 도쿄 교외에 "아키카와 신관굴"을 건설했다는 것을 들었다. 거기서, 태어나 처음의 접심회(숙박이 어려운 좌선회)에 참가했습니다. 확실히 쇼와 46 년이었습니다.

「기독교에는 선과 비슷한 사상과 실천이 있다」라는 애궁사의 설명 덕분에, 나는 불교의 스승 밑에서 점점 선의 길을 걸어 그 지도를 자연스럽게 받아들일 수 있다. 네.

 그러나 저에게는 좌선의 경험이 없었고, 접심회에서의 육체적인 고통은 상상할 수 없을 정도로 상당한 것이었습니다. 다리와 등이 매우 아팠다. 접심의 1주일이 지나고, 확실히 얻은 것은 인내력이었습니다(웃음).

 다만, 선에 대한 흥미가 싹트었을 때, 이 길이 그 후의 나의 인생을 깊이 좌우한다고는 꿈에도 상상할 수 없었습니다. 기독교 교육을 받고 일본에 오기 전에 일본인의 기분을 알 수 있도록 불교의 기본적인 가르침을 공부한 적도 있었습니다만, 좌선에 의해 바꾸어 없는 것을 얻을 수 있다고 생각해도 없었습니다.

 아키가와 신 명굴에서는 다시 접심에 참가했습니다. 집에서도 좌선을 계속했습니다. 그렇게 하고 있는 동안, 「니가타에 살고 있는데, 접심을 위해 관동에 나갈 필요는 없는 것이 아닐까」라고 생각했습니다. 거기서, 니가타현의 조동종 사원에서, 3번째의 접심회에 참가했습니다. 쇼와 49 년이었습니다.

 12 월 초순에, 넓은 니가타의 시골을 눈이 하얀 일색으로 물들고 있었습니다. 나는 "접심은 3번째다. 좌선의 자세에 조금은 익숙했기 때문에, 다소는 전보다는 편할 것이다"라고 확신하고 있었습니다. 그러나 그 결과는 아침부터 저녁까지 추위에서 계속 떨고있었습니다.

 그 접심으로 함께 수행한 친구가 있을 때, “만약 좋으면, 나의 사사하고 있는 노사를 소개할까요”라고 말했습니다. 솔직히, 나는 조동종의 노사에 대해 본격적으로 좌선 수행을 필요로 했고, 그때는 그렇게 느끼지 않았다. 그러나 그 친구는 여러 번 열심히 초대했습니다. 그래서 3년 후의 쇼와 53 년 , 조동 종인 가승당인 흥운사(아오모리현 카미키타군 오이라세초)의 오이라세 접심회에서, 기무라 키요만 노사의 아래에서 접심에 참가했습니다 . 그 후 10 회 이상, 맛있게 접심회에 참가할 수 있었으므로, 초대해 준 친구에게는 감사하고 있습니다. 인생은 사람과의 만남으로 바뀝니다.

 쇼와 54 년, 니가타 시내에서 신장자와 건강한 사람과의 공동 생활을 시작했습니다. 62 년에는 공동 생활의 장소를 「카사 돈 키호테」(돈키호테의 집/니가타시 니시구 카미신에이쵸)라고 하는 아파트에 옮겨, 그 안에 선도장을 만들었습니다. 접심 등으로 외박하는 것 외에는, 매일 아침, 근처의 아오야마 카톨릭 교회(니시구 아오야마)에서 기도하고 나서 앉습니다. 현재는 호국사(후쿠시마현 후쿠시마시/조동종)의 접심회에 참가하고 있습니다. 공안을 사용해, 심신 모두 극한에 몰리는 매우 엄격한 도장입니다.



기독교 속의 선――「자신을 무로한다」라고 하는 유사성



 좌선을 계속하는 동안 선의 전통이 내 기독교를 더욱 심화시키는 데 필수적인 존재가되었다는 것을 깨달았습니다. 그리고 또한 기독교 속에도 선종의 사고방식과 매우 비슷한 것이 있다는 것을 실감했습니다. 특히 예수의 기도가 완전히 자신을 무시하는 것이며, 그것이 선과 매우 비슷합니다.

 예수께서는 자신과 아버지와의 관계를 제자들에게도 일반 유대인들에게 말씀하셨습니다 . 내 아버지가 내 안에 계신다는 것을 믿지 않습니까? 하고 계시는 것이다 ”( 14 :9~ 10 )라고 했습니다. " 나와 아버지는 하나이다 "( 10:30 ) 라고도 말했습니다. 이것은 두 가지 사실을 보여줍니다. 즉, 예수님의 사업이 완전히 아버지에게 적합하다는 것입니다.

 빌립보 신도들에게 보내는 편지(2:7~8)에는 “그리스도께서 자신을 무시하고 내 신분이 되어 십자가의 죽음에 이르기까지 순종하셨습니다”라고 적었 습니다 . 이것은 예수님의 신분에 대해 가장 심각한 발언이라고 생각합니다. '자신을 무시했다'는 '자신을 망쳤다'라는 말은 그리스어의 '세아운트 에케노센'의 번역으로, 원형 동사 '케네오'는 비어 있다는 뜻입니다. 예수께서는 그분까지 자신을 버리실 수 있으니 완전히 아버지의 숨결로 살아 계셨습니다. 예수께서는 모든 명예의 부름을 부인하여 그저 섬기는 사람이 되셨습니다. 그는 세례 때 자신을 포기하고 무죄가 되고, 앞으로 인생이 가져오는 어려움과 고통을 받아들이는 각오를 하고 자비의 숨결로 인도된 인생을 걷기 시작한 것입니다. 이 길은 물질적인 포기뿐만 아니라 자기 포기이기도 했다고 생각합니다. 그리고 제자들에게 이 길을 권유한 것입니다.

 선에서는 「대사 제일, 절후에 되살아난다」라고 하는 불평이 있습니다. 성 바울은 이 포기를 일종의 죽음이라고 부릅니다. “ 우리는 세례에 의해 그리스도와 함께 묻혀 그 죽음에 부딪히게 되었습니다. 그리스도가 아버지의 영광으로 죽은 자 안에서 부활하신 것처럼 우리도 새로운 생명에 살기 때문입니다. ” (로마 6:3~6). " 살아있는 것은 더 이상 나가 아닙니다. 그리스도는 내 안에 살아 계십니다. " 이 완전한 무 나는 선의 가장 높은 경지와 매우 비슷합니다.

 다음으로 “기도”에 대해 생각해 봅시다.

 예를 들어 4세기 초 이집트 사막에 은둔자 집단이 있었습니다. 그들은 생각을 끊고 '순수한 기도'를 했습니다. 이들에 의하면 “기도는 사고의 정지이며, 말에 의한 기도는 초보자 방향”이라고 했다. 한 은자는 이렇게 말했다고 합니다. “여도기도할 때, 여의 속에 신성함을 안지 마라. 동시에, 여의의 지성을 하고 어떠한 형태의 각인도 받아들이지 말아라. 란」.

 자신을 무시함으로써 하나님을 만난다. 그러나 신성함의 선입견은 하나님으로부터 우리를 멀리한다. 이것은 생각을 배제하는 선 그 자체가 아닐까요?

 서유럽에서도 12 세기 이후에 신비한 기독교 그룹이 나타났습니다. 특히 라인강 유역인 에크하르트와 제자의 타울러, 플랑드르 지방의 로이스부르크가 뛰어났다.

 로이스버그는 “자주 내적 인간은 그의 모든 행동과 덕을 넘어 자기로 돌아갈 수 있다. 빛이 비추고, 이 빛은 그에게 어둠과 드러나는 상태와 허무를 보여준다. 하지만 머무르는 한 명상할 수 있다. 하지만 느끼고 있는 것을 규제하려고 하면 즉시 추리적 사고에 다시 빠진다. 전도의 유사성은 일목요연합니다.

 이탈리아의 아시지의 세인트 프란시스코도 완전한 무사, 무소유를 목표로 한 사람입니다. 그는 은둔자처럼 하늘에 감사하고 태양, 달, 작은 새의 혜택을 느꼈고 자연 찬송을 불렀습니다. 료칸은 비슷한 자연의 혜택을 '바보만큼 감기가 가져오는 낙엽일까' 등의 하이쿠에서 전하고 싶었던 것이 아닐까요. 두 사람은 매우 비슷합니다.

 아무리 용어나 관점이 다르더라도, 기독교 은둔자나 신비사상가와 선의 노사들은 그들의 최고 단계의 체험에 대해 말할 때 같은 사실에 근거하고 있는 것처럼 나에게는 보인다.

 제가 선을 실행하는 것은 자기 나름대로 예수님이 한 경험, 즉 그의 가르침의 근원인 경험을 추가 체험하는 것입니다. 예수께서는 자기의 포기를 제자에게 권유하셨다고 앞에서 말씀하셨습니다만, 나는 선을 만나서 예수님의 요구를 이해할 수 있다고 생각하고 그분의 요구를 실천하는 방법을 주셨습니다. 있다고 생각합니다.



(이 담화 원고는, 니가타 현립암 센터 니가타 병원 “제18 회 “생명”을 둘러싼 연속 강연회”에서의 앙리 신부의 강연에, 신부의 담화를 더한 것입니다 )





앙리 휘세곰스

쇼와 15년 , 벨기에 왕국 브뤼셀시 출생. 동국 루반 대학 철학부를 졸업 후, 예수 회진 학원 입학. 41 년, 가톨릭 사제 서층. 42 년, 일본. 세인트 요셉 일본어 학교 (도쿄) 입학. 46 년, 아미야 진비사 하에서 첫 접심 참가. 같은 해 니가타 대학 인문학부에 청강생으로 입학. 연구생을 거쳐 48 년 동학부 비상근 강사. 63 년, 니가타 청심 여자 고등학교 조교사(윤리·종교). 헤세이 17 년, 동교 퇴직. 22 년, 니가타 대학 퇴관. 현재 니가타 교구 부사제.

トマトのような日本人、カボチャのような欧米人!?国内外の禅修行者を導いて感じたこと [6]

トマトのような日本人、カボチャのような欧米人!?国内外の禅修行者を導いて感じたこと - ENGLISH JOURNAL



토마토 같은 일본인, 호박 같은 서양인! ? 국내외 선선수를 이끌어 느낀 것
문화 일본소개 월드 젠 도장 네르케 무방2021-05-20


1990년에 독일에서 일본에 출가하여 선수행을 시작해 안태사의 주직도 맡은 네르케 무방씨가, 「세계에 있어서의 일본의 선」을 테마로 집필하는 에세이 연재 「네르케 무방의 세계선 도장」. 최종회에서는, 안태지의 주직으로서 세계에서 모인 제자를 이끈 경험을 이야기하겠습니다.
노숙자가 되기 시작한 야외 좌선회

제5회에서는, 제가 선승이 되어 처음으로 부딪친 벽에 대해 이야기했습니다.ej.alc.co.jp

1993년 정식으로 불문에 들어간 저는 2001년까지 안태사의 스승 밑에서 수행했습니다.

유쿠유쿠는 귀국해, 「독일을 중심으로 서양에서 선을 전파한다」라고 하는 비전도 있었습니다만, 당시의 저는 그것보다 「일본의 대도시에 모두가 좌선할 수 있는 도장을 설립하고 싶다」라고 생각 하고 있었습니다 했다.

왜냐하면 구미에는 불교의 사원이야말로 적지 만, 일반 사회인이 불교계의 명상을 실천할 수 있는 메디테이션 센터는 곳곳에 있습니다 . 단지 일본의 요가 교실과 같은 느낌으로, 지방 도시에서도 조금 찾으면 찾을 수 있습니다.

일본에서는 절의 수는 편의점의 수를 넘을 정도로 많은 한편, 어느 절에 가면 좌선을 가르쳐 줄지 모르는 일본인도 적지 않을 것입니다. 혹은 절보다 요가 교실에서 마인드풀네스를 배운 것이 안심이라고 하는 분도 있는 것은 아닐까요.

“모처럼 일본에서 배운 선을 독일에 가져가기 전에 일반 일본인과도 공유하고 싶다”. 이런 생각을 가슴에, 나는 2001년의 여름에 안태사가 있는 산을 내려 오사카로 향했습니다.

그런데 대도시의 집세가 높다는 것에 놀랐습니다. 좌선도장의 설립 이전에, 자신이 사는 장소조차 빌릴 수 없다! 고민하면서 오사카성 공원을 걸어서 산책하고 있으면, 여기저기에서, 블루 시트 아래에서 생활하고 있는, 이른바 노숙자의 모습을 보았습니다. 그때 어떤 섬광이 방문한 것입니다.

"그러고 보니 2500년 전의 석존도 궁전을 도망쳐 보리수(보다이주)라는 한 나무 아래에서 앉고 있었다고 한다. 도장을 열자”.

오사카성의 해자 근처의 보기 좋은 장소에, 딱 텐트 1개분의 공간이 열려 있는 것을 발견했기 때문에, 양옆의 텐트의 주민에게 「나도 오늘부터 여기에서 생활해도 좋을까요? "라고 물었다. 그러자 「부디, 자유롭게」라고 쾌적하게 승낙해 주셔, 20년전, 눈길을 끄는 노숙자가 될 수 있었습니다 .

텐트에서 침묵을 하고, 아침 6시부터 해자 위에서 2시간 정도 야외 좌선을 했습니다. 빨리 두드려지는 것이 아닌가 하는 불안도 있어서, 좌선회에는 「루텐 회」라는 이름을 붙였습니다.

"회"라고 해도 처음 몇 주 동안 혼자 앉는 것이 대부분이었습니다. 그 중 인터넷 카페의 단골이 된 저는 유전회 홈페이지를 만들고 널리 참가를 호소했습니다.

"33세의 독일인이 매일 아침, 오사카성 공원에서 좌선하고 있습니다. 당신도 한 번, 함께 앉지 않겠습니까? "

이윽고 홈페이지의 정보를 보아 온 사람이 1명, 또 1명으로 늘어나 갔습니다. 공원에서 자신의 곳을 발견한 저는 최소한 3년간 이 좌선회를 계속 하려고 했습니다.
뜻밖에 안태사의 주직을 이어가는 것에

그런데 2002년 2월 14일 안태사에 있는 스승이 참배길을 제설하고 있는 도중에 사고를 당해 죽어버렸습니다. 스승의 마지막 제자인 저는 선배님께 이렇게 말씀하셨습니다.

"우리 OB는 모두 각각 절을 가지고 있기 때문에, 곧바로 안태사로 돌아갈 수 없다. 너만은 여가할 수 있게 하고 있다.

본심을 말하면, 저도 그 눈 깊은 안태사로 돌아가는 것은 싫었던 것입니다. 하물며 2월 14일, 스승이 죽은 날의 밤에는 오사카에서 사귀기 시작해 6주간의 젊은 여성과 데이트의 약속이 있었습니다 .

2월의 안태사. 가란은 눈에 묻혀있다.

안태사에서 자동 응답을 하는 것보다, 그녀와의 인연을 깊게 하고 싶다… 전했습니다.

그녀가 「알았어, 봄까지 기다려」라고, 관음씨 같은 상냥한 목소리로 대답해 준 것을 기억하고 있습니다.

그런데, 봄에 행해진 스승의 백개일 법요의 때, 「어차피 그 밖에 할 일도 없으니까, 그대로 안태사의 주직이 되면?」라는 주위의 의견에 밀려 정식 으로 주직의 자리를 이어가게 되었습니다 .

그것을 계기로, 오사카에서 기다리고 있던 그녀에게 프로포즈를 하고, 안태사에 아내 받았습니다. 좋은 배우자로서, 또 3명의 아이 의 확고한 어머니로서, 때로는 관음씨처럼 상냥하고, 때로는 인왕씨처럼 엄격하게 채찍을 받고 있습니다.
토마토와 같은 일본인, 호박과 같은 서양인

그 후 작년까지 18년간 저 아래 20명 정도의 제자가 출가득점을 했습니다. 절반은 일본인, 절반은 구미인입니다.

출가득도식으로 제자의 머리를 면도하고 계명을 주는 필자

그들에게도, 내가 스승으로부터 배운 「안태사를 만드는 것은 너다. 그러나, 그 너는 아무래도 좋다」라고 하는 가르침을 전하고 있습니다.

그 와 동시에 「오이처럼 자라라」 라고도 말합니다. 오이는 봄에 씨를 뿌려 어느 정도 키우면 1개의 끈만 늘어뜨리면 곧게 뻗어 여름에는 맛있는 열매를 실어 주는 우수한 야채입니다. 불제자에게도 이 모종처럼 부처의 가르침을 따라 스스로 성장해 주었으면 하는 것이 나의 소원입니다.

그런데 제 제자들 중에는 토마토 같은 종류도 결코 적지 않습니다 . 토마토는 하나의 끈에서 자라지 않고 견고한 버팀대까지 준비해야합니다. 며칠마다 그 버팀대에 다시 묶지 않으면 바람을 닦을 때 쓰러져 버리고, 여분의 싹을 따지 않으면 녹색만 우거져 열매가 되지 않습니다. 지붕을 만들어 비로부터 지키지 않으면 열매가 썩어 버립니다.

여름에 그 열매가 되면 오이 이상으로 맛있는 토마토입니다만, 번거로움 걸려 주체성이 없습니다. 특히 일본인의 제자 중에는 그러한 타입이 많은 것 같습니다.

처음으로 袈裟(케사)를 착용할 수 있는 미국인 제자

그럼, 구미인은 모두 오이라고 하면, 그런 것도 아닙니다. 오이보다 호박 같은 종류가 많습니다 .

부처님의 가르침이라는 하나의 끈을 무시하고 "내가 내가"라고 말하면서 그곳에 덩굴을 늘려 버립니다. 그대로 두면 잘못하면 의 야채를 덮어 약화시켜 버린다고 할 수 있습니다.

일본인은 주체성이 약하고 구미인은 협조성이 약하다. 왜 괜찮은 제자가 안태사에 오지 않을까 하고 한숨을 쉬는 때도 있었습니다만, 10년 전부터 안태사에서 수행에 힘쓰고 있던 일본인 수녀의 제자가 작년 드디어 나의 흔적을 이어 , 안태우 절의 10대째의 주직이 되었습니다.

스승을 넘는 훌륭한 오이입니다.

저는 지금 다시 오사카에서 야외 좌선회를 주최하고 온라인에서도 리얼 세계에서도 강연 활동을 하고 있습니다. 수행 도장에서 맥들과 부처님의 가르침을 전하는 것도 물론 중요합니다만, 일반 사회 중에서도 혼자라도 많은 오이가 자라면 좋겠습니다.

일본의 장래, 아니 이 행성에 살고 있는 우리 모두에게도, 내가 안태사에서 배운 것이 힌트가 될 것이라고 기대하고 있습니다.