2017/08/07

Mindfulness: When Not to Use It

Mindfulness: When Not to Use It

Mindfulness: When Not to Use It

By Anna O'Faolan on Thursday August 3rd, 2017


A Better Approach to Healing Trauma



Does the body remember our past hurts? And if so, where do they go?
Seemingly trivial childhood events, humiliations, disappointments, mistakes. Over the course of our lives, our bodies become impacted by emotional experiences we are supposed to know how to navigate. A natural to response to these painful experiences is to avoid thinking about them. As life goes on the layers build up. A difficult break-up, infidelity, chronic workplace dynamics, illness or the death of a loved one. All leave traces in our bodies, and often the scarring inhibits our ability to sit with our thoughts. Yet too often, despite our avoidance, the energy is nonetheless at work in our bodies.
In his latest work, The Body Keeps Score, Clinical psychiatrist, Bessel Van der Kolk, discusses the embodiment of trauma and the ways in which body memory can interfere with the benefits of mindfulness. In his view, traumatic experiences literally change the wiring in our brains, affecting our physiology, social behaviour and capacity for self-analysis from that time forward. In these cases, commonly used therapies–such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, which draw on the rational brain–can be difficult for some patients to access.
Psychomotor therapies, which bypass the rational brain and tap into the primitive, could be the way forward. Yoga, dance, qigong, and voice work are just some of the physical practices that can reach the primitive brain to heal trauma where it is deeply embedded in our physiology. This then opens the way for the healing process of mindfulness to take place.
Avoiding our feelingsWe tend to avoid difficult emotions, which can later manifest as physical problems.
The problem as Van der Kolk sees it, is the reluctance of conventional practice to shift away mindfulness therapies. So why the resistance?

The Problem with Mind

Mindfulness refers to the process of becoming aware of the thoughts, feelings and sensations in our body. The aim is to take a clear view of them, without judgement, and accept them rather than block them. But the mind has limitations, and rational pathways are not always useful.
As we sit to centre our minds in a practice or therapy session, many people encounter a range of distracting sensations. Worries, discordant thoughts, and uncomfortable sensations come uninvited as we embark on our inward journey. Mostly, we can sit with them until they pass. But for some, they don’t pass. Rather, the uncomfortable sensations persist, becoming so unbearable that it is impossible to continue.
As a Clinical psychiatrist, Bessel Van der Kolk has dedicated his life to the study and treatment of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. For those who have experienced trauma, the practice of mindfulness can become physically intolerable. The physical sensations experienced as the mind turns to focus on itself are overwhelming; to a point where intense agitation and physical pain or illness occur. For others with PTSD, the experience of physical discomfort has meant that they have learnt to dissociate themselves from feeling anything at all. The benefits of mindfulness then become inaccessible.
These experiences in a therapy setting can leave traumatised patients feeling alienated and frightened and are the key reason why people in need of healing will not seek out and continue with mindfulness centred practices and therapies.
Mindfulness and talking therapies can be counter-productiveUsing mindfulness on trauma can be unbearable for some, rendering it counter-productive.
Van der Kolk is not alone in his observations on the limitations of mindfulness as a therapeutic practice. The problem seems to lie in the way the practice has been relocated from its context as a Buddhist spiritual practice and applied undiscerningly across a broad spectrum of client cases.
Jill Margo, in Mindfulness Under the Microscope, writes:
The practice is unregulated and the common view that if it does no good, at least it will do no harm, may not be accurate.
While talking therapies may seem a safe and practical treatment option, the absence of quality control could lead to unintentional harm where patients are not ready for this process.

Shifting Conventional Treatment Pathways

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Exposure Therapy are both used in the treatment of trauma. CBT is a heady processing tool, using a kind of Socratic dialogue to guide a patient to a logical understanding of the relationship between thoughts, feelings and actions, and the ways in which we can change these. Exposure therapy involves repeated exposure to the trauma trigger, with the aim of desensitising the emotional response. Van der Kolk explores conventional treatments at length in his work.
It [recovery] is only partly an issue of consciousness. Much has to do with unconscious parts of the brain that keep interpreting the world as being dangerous and frightening and feeling helpless. You know you shouldn’t feel that way, but you do, and that makes you feel defective and ashamed…trying to find a chemical to abolish bad memories is an interesting academic enterprise, but it’s unlikely to help many patients. Your whole mind, brain and sense of self is changed in response to trauma. ~ Interview with David Bullard
Since beginning his career in the 1970s, Van der Kolk has observed hundreds of patients in a post-traumatic state. From post war emotional wounding to victims of childhood abuse, violent attacks and psychological scarring. Van der Kolk believes that psychiatric conditions and self-destructive behaviours that ensue are a result of embedded trauma.
Drug and alcohol dependence, self-harm, eating disorders, mood imbalances, and social behaviours–such as unhealthy sexual relationships–all are borne out of a desire to flee the physical pain created by exposure to the body memory of trauma. Many of the difficult sensations can be traced to a disturbance in the nervous system, and this is where the healing work can begin.
Trauma changes you, on many levels“…Your whole mind, brain and sense of self is changed in response to trauma.”

The Vagus Nerve and Embodied Trauma

Our gut feelings signal what is safe, life sustaining, or threatening; even if we cannot quite explain why we feel a particular way. ~ Van der Kolk, The Body Keeps Score
Acute physical sensations and responses are often triggered when trauma is revisited, and this is largely to do with the function of the Vagus Nerve. The Vagus nerve, also known as the wandering nerve, comes from the Latin ‘Vagus’ meaning straying or wandering. It is the primary nerve in the parasympathetic nervous system, and functions without our conscious effort; always at work as we go about life. When the parasympathetic nervous system is upset, our body is in a chronic state of imbalance.
The Vagus nerve connects the gut (stomach and intestines), heart and brain, and operates as a kind of phone line between them, sending messages up to the brain from the gut. This makes sense of ‘gut feelings’, and explains why we feel our emotions–especially anxiety, fear and sadness–so keenly in our bodies. ‘Gut wrenching’ and ‘heart wrenching’, are physical sensations borne of these emotions.
Beyond these three organs systems, the system extends to connect with our greater visceral complex, meaning all our major organs, including lungs, spleen, liver, kidney, pancreas, and the reproductive system in women.
This is the love nerve in your body; it is the caretaking nerve in your body. ~ Steve Porges, The Polyvagal Perspective
When emotional pain resides in the body, the primary nurturing function of this system is compromised. Anxiety, depression and digestive upsets are common first signs, with a plethora of health issues close behind. But Van der Kolk is hopeful about recovery and draws our attention to heart rate variability as a clue to what is going on in our deeper body system.
Butterflies in my tummyThe Vagus nerve facilitates the feelings we experience in our bodies, like butterflies.

HRV and The Healing Power of Responsiveness

Heart rate variability is the fluctuation in intervals between each heartbeat. Steady heart rate was formerly understood to mean better health, but we now know that heart rate variability is a sign of the bodies responsiveness and healthy self-regulatory processes. It means the heart is responding to and working with the body to create homeostasis.
Many people who have not processed emotional pain have been found to experience a lack of variance, highlighting Van der Kolk’s reasoning that trauma freezes the body in a kind of chronic pain avoidance. But the good news is we can work on toning these deeper systems. Strengthening heart rate variance, toning the Vagus nerve, and even resetting neural pathways are aspects of our physiology which are not beyond our reach. In fact, there are a range of day to day things we can do to improve these fundamental building blocks for health. Singing, humming and chanting, yoga, tai chi, laughter, prayer, exercise, deep breathing and positive social engagement have all been shown to change these deep systems for the better. And make us smile along the way.

The Traces of Everyday Hurts

While many of us will never face the horrific wounding experienced by those at the heart of Van der Kolk’s work, we are all touched by painful moments. There is no doubt that talking therapies and mindfulness can make a phenomenal change in the right person at the right time. But if you are finding these aren’t working, it could be a sign that pain has slipped beyond your rational grasp. Body therapies and daily toning practices can help release these hurts, bringing them back into view, where you can begin to make peace with them.

2017/07/28

Obituary: Arne Næss | Environment | The Guardian

Obituary: Arne Næss | Environment | The Guardian

Ethical and green living
Arne Næss

Walter Schwarz

Thursday 15 January 2009 11.01 AEDT

Arne Næss, who has died aged 96, was Norway's best-known philosopher, whose concept of deep ecology enriched and divided the environmental movement. A keen mountaineer, for a quarter of his life he lived in an isolated hut high in the Hallingskarvet mountains in southern Norway.

Through his books and lectures in many countries, Næss taught that ecology should not be concerned with man's place in nature but with every part of nature on an equal basis, because the natural order has intrinsic value that transcends human values. Indeed, humans could only attain "realisation of the Self" as part of an entire ecosphere. He urged the green movement to "not only protect the planet for the sake of humans, but also, for the sake of the planet itself, to keep ecosystems healthy for their own sake".
Advertisement


Shallow ecology, he believed, meant thinking the big ecological problems could be resolved within an industrial, capitalist society. Deep meant asking deeper questions and understanding that society itself has caused the Earth-threatening ecological crisis. His concept, grounded in the teachings of Spinoza, Gandhi and Buddha, entered the mainstream green movement in the 1980s and was later elaborated by George Sessions in Deep Ecology for the Twenty-first Century (1995).

Deep ecology teaches that belief in an objective comprehension of nature is belief in a flat world seen from above, without depth, and that such cool, disembodied detachment is an illusion, and a primary cause of our destructive relation to the land.

Næss was also an activist, inspired by Rachel Carson's 1962 book Silent Spring. In 1970, together with a large number of demonstrators, he chained himself to rocks in front of Mardalsfossen, a waterfall in a Norwegian fjord, and refused to descend until plans to build a dam were dropped. The demonstrators were carried away by police but the action was a success. He was the first chairman of Greenpeace Norway when it was founded in 1988 and was also a Green party candidate.

As a mountaineer, Næss led the first expedition to conquer the 7,708m (25,289ft) Tirich Mir, in Pakistan, in 1950. He led a second Norwegian expedition up the mountain in 1964. Mountains were at the centre of his vision and he often asked audiences to practise the Taoist injuction to "listen with the third ear" and "think like a mountain".

In its first form his philosophy was known as ecosophy T - the T standing for the Tvergastein mountain hut where he lived and worked. It was as a teenager on a mountain that Næss met a Norwegian judge who advised him to read Spinoza, the 17th-century Jewish philosopher who taught that God is present throughout nature.
Advertisement


Born in Oslo, Næss earned his doctorate at the city's university and, at the age of 27, became its youngest professor. He continued to teach until 1970. Over the years he published more than 30 books as well as numerous essays and articles.

He faced controversy when deep ecology was attacked as "eco-la-la" by Murray Bookchin, who had founded the social ecology movement in Vermont, US. Bookchin claimed the philosophy came mainly from white, male academics and their students, and that its concerns were akin to New Age occultism, with undertones of paganism, and redolent of quasi-fascist Aryan movements.

Næss did not feel the need to confront the social ecologists, but his movement faced embarrassment at the other extreme when activists of Earth First used its concepts to justify violent action, green Luddism, and a campaign to enforce sterilisation and end food aid to developing nations.

Næss countered that his movement for widening compassion towards non-humans did not imply diminishing compassion towards humans. "We don't say that every living being has the same value as a human, but that it has an intrinsic value which is not quantifiable. It is not equal or unequal. It has a right to live and blossom. I may kill a mosquito if it is on the face of my baby but I will never say I have a higher right to life than a mosquito."

His closest friend in Britain, Stephan Harding, the head of holistic science at Schumacher college, in Dartington, Devon, where Næss conducted courses, said Næss was horrified by suggestions of enforced sterilisation and that droughts and famines were good. Harding argued that Næss accepted that "since we are humans, we have to put humans first. He was against violence."

Næss never managed to translate his awareness of overpopulation into a scheme of practical action. He maintained that a world population of 100 million - roughly a 60th of the present figure - would be compatible with quality of life, but 11 or 12 billion - the level predicted for the end of the next century - would not. He said: "I am, to the astonishment of certain journalists, an optimist. But then, I add, I am an optimist about the 22nd century. And they say, 'Oh, you mean the 21st ...' 'No, the 22nd century.' I think that in the 21st century, we have to go through very bad times and it will hurt even rich countries ... So, I am a short-range pessimist, long-range optimist."

Næss was appreciated, even in old age, for his exuberant, frolicsome manner, which reminded people of Gandhi or the Dalai Lama. He believed awareness of deep ecology was present in us all, especially in childhood, when a butterfly could be regarded as a brother or sister. Like Wordsworth, he lamented the attenuation of such awareness in later life through loss of contact with animals, plants and significant places.

He was knighted by King Harald in 2005 and made a commander with star of the Royal Norwegian order of St Olav First Class.

His nephew was the mountaineer and businessman Arne Næss Jr, the husband of Diana Ross, who was killed in a climbing accident in South Africa in 2004.

Næss was married twice, first to Else, with whom he had two children. She predeceased him. He later married Kit Fai, a Chinese student four decades his junior, whom he met when he was 61. She survives him, along with his children.

• Arne Dekke Eide Næss, philosopher, born 27 January 1912; died 12 January 2009

The Call of the Mountain ~ Arne Naess and the Deep Ecology Movement (full version) - YouTube

The Call of the Mountain ~ Arne Naess and the Deep Ecology Movement (full version) - YouTube








The Call of the Mountain ~ Arne Naess and the Deep Ecology Movement (full version)

Arne Næss / Deep EcologySubscribe114

Add to Share
More
12,614 views
Published on 22 Aug 2015


The Call of the Mountain: Arne Naess and the Deep Ecology Movement :
Director: Jan van Boeckel | Producer: Karin van der Molen/Pat van Boeckel
Genre: Documentary | Produced In: 1997 | Story Teller's Country: Netherlands
Tags: Ecology, Environment, Global, Spiritual Awareness

~

Transcript of the film
The full transcript of the interview with philosopher Arne Naess, that was made for the documentary film The Call of the Mountain is available here:
http://www.naturearteducation.org/R/I...

Interview: Jan van Boeckel
© ReRun Producties, 1997
Blokzijlerdijk 4, 8373 EK Blankenham, The Netherlands
E-mail: welcome(at)rerunproducties.nl
www.rerunproducties.nl

~

Synopsis:
On 1500 metres above sea level, on the slope of the mountain Hallingskarvet, stands "Tvergastein', the cabin of Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess. In his life he has spent nearly 12 years in this hut, where he wrote several books and essays on philosophy and ecology. In this film, Naess tells about the concept of 'deep ecology', which was first introduced by him in 1973. One of the basic tenets of deep ecology is that nature has a value in itself, apart from its possible use value to humans. Next to being a famous mountaineer, Naess has been a longtime activist in the environmental movement.

He gives an inspiring account of his participation in blockades to prevent the Alta river in northern Norway (the area of the Sami, an indigenous people) from being dammed.

With contributions by Helena Norberg-Hodge, Vandana Shiva, Bill Devall, George Sessions and Harold Glasser.

Request DVD: You may purchase the DVD of this film directly from this StoryTeller/Producer. Please visit: http://www.rerunproducties.nl/

Or contribute:
http://www.cultureunplugged.com/docum...

~

Arne Næss (27 January 1912 – 12 January 2009) was a Norwegian philosopher who coined the term deep ecology and was an important intellectual and inspirational figure within the environmental movement of the late twentieth century.
In 1939, Næss was the youngest person to be appointed full professor at the University of Oslo and the only professor of philosophy in the country at the time.
He was a noted mountaineer, who in 1950 led the expedition that made the first ascent of Tirich Mir(7,708 m).
The Tvergastein hut in the Hallingskarvet massif played an important role in Ecosophy T, as "T" is said to represent his mountain hut Tvergastein.
More:
Arne Næss (Google+): https://plus.google.com/u/0/112673322...

~

This video is a copy from "rerunproducties", DailyMotion: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8me...

~


Category
Education

Deep Green: The Living Mountain: Arne Naess 1912-2009 | Greenpeace International



Deep Green: The Living Mountain: Arne Naess 1912-2009 | Greenpeace International

Deep Green: The Living Mountain: Arne Naess 1912-2009
On this page


On the mountain
Ecology in Action
The names of things
Deep ecology
Background - 30 March, 2009
Those who love wild nature and work toward a day when humankind might inhabit this abundant planet with greater wonder, humility, and compassion, mourn the loss of a great ecological visionary - Arne Naess - who died on January 12, leaving behind a legacy of environmental awareness and action.


Naess, one of the most influential philosophers of his generation, died in his sleep at the age of 96 in Oslo, Norway. The avid mountaineer founded the Deep Ecology movement, drawing inspiration from Buddhism, Rachel Carson, Aldo Leopold, and above all from nature itself. Greenpeace can be proud that he served as the first chairman of Greenpeace Norway in 1988. His personal story illuminates the path of ecology in the 21st century.


Arne Naess at the opening of the Greenpeace office in Oslo, 1988

(c) Henrik Laurvik NTB/Scanpix - used under licence
On the mountain

Naess was born in 1912, in Slemdal, near Oslo, and his father, banker Ragnar Naess, died the next year. Naess later recalled that his mother, Christine Dekke, appeared preoccupied with raising his two older brothers, so he often wandered alone into nature for companionship.

In How My Philosophy Seemed to Develop he revealed, at the age of four, "I would stand or sit for hours … in shallow water on the coast, marvelling at the overwhelming diversity and richness of life in the sea."

At the age of 17, while climbing on Norway's Hallingskarvet massif, he met a kind Norwegian judge, who also adored nature. This mentor advised young Arne to read Dutch Jewish philosopher Spinoza, who equated the 'highest virtue' with knowledge of nature. For Spinoza, Naess learned, all thinking about truth and human society begins with recognising the basic 'substance', the diversity and magnificence of the natural world.

In his 20s, Naess built a life-long writing cabin, Tvergastein, high on this mountain. "In the mountains," Naess once said, "you are small compared to the surrounding view, so you more easily and more intensely feel that you are a part of something greater. You find that your idea of your 'self' is more vast and deeper." This depth he felt in vast nature - mountains, sea, forests - inspired his use of the word 'deep' to describe his understanding of ecology
Ecology in Action

After graduation from the University of Oslo, Naess studied in Austria where he met the famous Vienna Circle of philosophers and psychoanalysts influenced by Sigmund Freud. Although inspired by the Vienna group, Naess found their philosophy too disembodied and intellectual. He pointed out that their understanding of the 'self' failed to include nature, and was therefore 'dead wrong'. Based on the notion from Spinoza that all being exists wholly in nature, he expanded the Freudian idea of 'self' and 'ego' to include our place in nature. Thus began one of the most influential traditions of modern ecology, Naess' development of 'Deep Ecology'.

Naess returned to Norway, became Oslo University's youngest professor, and during World War II joined the Norwegian resistance, helping prevent the shipment of Norwegian students to German concentration camps. After the war, he led a UNESCO project to improve communication between the East and West by exploring how various cultures use similar words. The resulting report sold out, but UNESCO never reprinted it, according to Naess, "due to the politically dangerous character of its items." During the Cold War, listening to each other was not a high priority in Washington, Moscow, or London.

In the meantime, by learning about Buddhism and Gandhi, and by reading Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, Naess realised that his love of nature had to be put into action if his ideas were to matter. In 1969, at the age of 57, he resigned his position at the University of Oslo and became active in environmental protection, "to live," he said, "rather than function." In 1970, he joined rural farming families near the town of Myvatn, Norway to stop a dam on the Laxá ('Salmon') River that threatened to flood their farms. This successful campaign, along with the Chipko movement in India, marks the beginning of environmental action that inspired the early Greenpeace movement.
The names of things

In the early 1970s, members of the nascent Greenpeace group in Vancouver, Canada began to hear about the Norwegian activist, Arne Naess, and his ideas about 'deep ecology'. As Greenpeace evolved from peace protests to full-fledged ecological action, Naess served as one of our inspirations. We agreed with his belief that other beings in nature - whales, seals, insects or trees - had their own 'intrinsic value'. We protected whales or seals not just to preserve the environment for human purposes, but for their own sake. This fundamental respect for nature became an important distinction in the environmental movement.

I met Arne Naess in Los Angeles in the mid-1980s and later at a conference convened by Thomas Berry and Brian Swimme in Northern California. I discovered that the best way to engage him in conversation was to walk with him in whatever natural setting was close by. I recall his genuine sense of curiosity about species of trees, birds, or being engulfed in what he called 'the total-field' of nature. He never seemed intellectual, but rather spoke with a humourous, teasing quality that appeared to be always searching for some fresh, new understanding. He said his ideas were not 'philosophy' in the classic sense but rather 'intuition' gained from observation. We once pondered whether a particular sparrow was a 'Fox' or 'Song' sparrow, and I recall how he laughed that humans believe they understand something because they have named it. We talked about seeing an 'individual' in an animal, not simply a 'species'.

In 1988, we felt honoured when Naess agreed to serve as the first chairman of Greenpeace Norway. Upon hearing of his passing, Greenpeace Nordic's Truls Gulowsen remarked, "Naess' ecological philosophy is still important to Greenpeace." So, what is that philosophy?
Deep ecology

Deep ecology starts with accepting the intrinsic value of all beings in nature and of the ecosystem itself. Naess challenged environmentalists to think beyond 'humans in nature' to recognise that the ecological system is not something separate that we are 'in'. Nature made us, made our eyes to see, made our limbs, tastes, and even our thoughts. He taught 'diversity and symbiosis', both in nature and in human ideas. A rich culture, he said, like nature finds stability in diversity and recognises how distinct parts and points of view serve the larger whole. This did not invite, he insisted, lazy thinking, but rather required precise language to express observations and experiences.

Naess believed that humanity has no right to reduce the richness and diversity of nature except to meet vital needs of health and survival. He taught that our current impact on the world was excessive, perhaps obvious today, but a radical idea in the 1960s. He believed that the human population was too large, and that we should stabilise population growth and eventually allow human population to decrease. He believed this might take a century or more, but he believed humanity could eventually achieve a state in which our technology was non-invasive and "children could grow up in nature".

"Then," he said, "we are back in the direction of paradise."

Some environmentalists and human rights activists thought Naess's ideas were 'anti-human', but his compassion remained universal. "Appreciating a forest or mountain does not diminish anything humans do," he said. "We don't say that every living being has the same value as a human, but that it has an intrinsic value … it has a right to live and blossom."

He challenged the common psychological notion that the 'self' develops from childish 'ego' to an adult social-awareness and finally to spiritual awareness. "Nature is left out of this formula," he noticed. "Humanism displays a certain arrogance, as if we are somehow separate or superior to nature." He believed that with enough attention to the world around us, "we cannot help but identify our self with all living beings; beautiful or ugly, big or small, sentient or not."

He insisted that through this sort of maturity, we will discover that genuine quality of life has very little to do with consumption, wealth, and power. He summarised this in a proverb for living lightly on the earth, and which defined his life: "Simpler means, richer ends."

- RexWeyler

You can respond to "Deep Green" columns at my Ecolog, where I post portions of this column and dialogue with readers.


Categories
about us
Tags
founders,
photographer,
deep green,
history,
original,
rex weyler,
whaling,
article

Arne Næss - Wikipedia



Arne Næss - Wikipedia
Arne Næss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


For other people with similar names, see Arne Naess.
Arne Næss

Arne Næss in 2003
Born Arne Dekke Eide Næss
27 January 1912
Slemdal, Oslo, Norway[1][2]
Died 12 January 2009(aged 96)

Era 20th-century philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
School Deep ecology

Main interests Environmental ethics
Philosophy of science

Influences[show]


Arne Dekke Eide Næss (/ˈɑːrnə ˈnæs/ AR-nə NASS; Norwegian pronunciation: [ˈnes]; 27 January 1912 – 12 January 2009) was a Norwegian philosopher who coined the term "deep ecology" and was an important intellectual and inspirational figure within the environmental movement of the late twentieth century.[6] Næss cited Rachel Carson's 1962 book Silent Spring as being a key influence in his vision of deep ecology. Næss combined his ecological vision with Gandhian nonviolence and on several occasions participated in direct action.

Næss averred that while western environmental groups of the early post-war period had raised public awareness of the environmental issues of the time, they had largely failed to have insight into and address what he argued were the underlying cultural and philosophical background to these problems. Naess believed that the environmental crisis of the twentieth century had arisen due to certain unspoken philosophical presuppositions and attitudes within modern western developed societies which remained unacknowledged.[7]

He thereby distinguished between what he called deepand shallow ecological thinking. In contrast to the prevailing utilitarian pragmatism of western businesses and governments, he advocated that a true understanding of nature would give rise to a point of view that appreciates the value of biological diversity, understanding that each living thing is dependent on the existence of other creatures in the complex web of interrelationships that is the natural world.[7]



Contents [hide]
1Life and career
2Philosophy
2.1Recommendations for public debate
2.2Ecosophy T
3Family
4Works
5Notes
6References
7External links


Life and career[edit]

Næss was born in Slemdal, Oslo, Norway, the son of Christine (Dekke) and Ragnar Eide Næss.[8]In 1939, Næss was the youngest person to be appointed full professor at the University of Osloand the only professor of philosophy in the country at the time.[9] He was a noted mountaineer, who in 1950 led the expedition that made the first ascent of Tirich Mir (7,708 m). The Tvergastein hut in the Hallingskarvet massif played an important role in Ecosophy T, as "T" is said to represent his mountain hut Tvergastein.[10] In 1958, he founded the interdisciplinary journal of philosophy Inquiry.[11]

Professor Arne Næss campaigning for the Norwegian Green party in 2003

In 1970, together with a large number of protesters, he chained himself to rocks in front of Mardalsfossen, a waterfall in a Norwegian fjord, and refused to descend until plans to build a dam were dropped. Though the demonstrators were carried away by police and the dam was eventually built, the demonstration launched a more activist phase of Norwegian environmentalism.[12]

In 1996, he won the Swedish Academy Nordic Prize, known as the 'little Nobel'. In 2005 he was decorated as a Commander with Star of the Royal Norwegian Order of St. Olav for socially useful work. Næss was a minor political candidate for the Norwegian Green Party in 2005.[13]
Philosophy[edit]

Næss' Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten (1936) anticipated many themes familiar in post-war analytic philosophy.[14] Næss' main philosophical work from the 1950s was entitled "Interpretation and Preciseness". This was an application of set theory to the problems of language interpretation, extending the work of semanticists such as Charles Kay Ogden in The Meaning of Meaning. A simple way of explaining it is that any given utterance (word, phrase, or sentence) can be considered as having different potential interpretations, depending on prevailing language norms, the characteristics of particular persons or groups of users, and the language situation in which the utterance occurred. These differing interpretations are to be formulated in more precise language represented as subsets of the original utterance. Each subset can, in its turn, have further subsets (theoretically ad infinitum). The advantages of this conceptualisation of interpretation are various. It enables systematic demonstration of possible interpretation, making possible evaluation of which are the more and less "reasonable interpretations". It is a logical instrument for demonstrating language vagueness, undue generalisation, conflation, pseudo-agreement and effective communication.[15]

Næss developed a simplified, practical textbook embodying these advantages, entitled Communication and Argument, which became a valued introduction to this pragmatics or "language logic", and was used over many decades as a sine qua non for the preparatory examination at the University of Oslo, later known as "Examen Philosophicum" ("Exphil").[16]
Recommendations for public debate[edit]

Communication and Argument included his recommendations for objective public debate. Næss argued for adhering to the following rules to make discussions as fruitful and pleasant as possible:
Avoid tendentious irrelevance
Examples: Personal attacks, claims of opponents' motivation, explaining reasons for an argument.
Avoid tendentious quoting
Quotes should not be edited regarding the subject of the debate.
Avoid tendentious ambiguity
Ambiguity can be exploited to support criticism.
Avoid tendentious use of straw men
Assigning views to the opponent that he or she does not hold.
Avoid tendentious statements of fact
Information put forward should never be untrue or incomplete, and one should not withhold relevant information.
Avoid tendentious tone of presentation
Examples: irony, sarcasm, pejoratives, exaggeration, subtle (or open) threats.[17]

For many years these points were part of two compulsory courses in philosophy taught in Norwegian universities ("Examen philosophicum" and "Examen facultatum").
Ecosophy T[edit]

Ecosophy T, as distinct from deep ecology, was originally the name of his personal philosophy. Others such as Warwick Fox have interpreted deep ecology as a commitment to ecosophy T, Næss's personal beliefs. The T referred to Tvergastein, a mountain hut where he wrote many of his books, and reflected Næss's view that everyone should develop his own philosophy.[18]

Although a very rich and complex philosophy, Næss's ecosophy can be summed up as having Self-realization as its core. According to Næss, every being, whether human, animal, or vegetablehas an equal right to live and to blossom.[19] Through this capitalized Self, Næss emphasizes, in distinction to realization of man’s narrow selves, the realization of our selves as part of an ecospheric whole. It is in this whole that our true ecological Self can be realized. Practically Self-realization for Næss means that, if one does not know how the outcomes of one's actions will affect other beings, one should not act,[20] similar to the liberal harm principle.
Family[edit]

Næss' father, Ragnar Næss, was a successful banker and Næss was the younger brother of shipowner Erling Dekke Næss.[21] Næss himself was a married father of two and was the uncle of mountaineer and businessman Arne Næss Jr. (1937–2004), who was once married to Diana Ross.[22]
Works[edit]
Harold Glasser (ed), ed. (2005). The Selected Works of Arne Naess, Volumes 1-10. Springer. ISBN 1-4020-3727-9. (review)
Communication and Argument, Elements of Applied Semantics, translated from the Norwegian by Alastair Hannay, London, Allen & Unwin, 1966.
Scepticism, New York, Humanities Press, 1968.
Ecology, community, and lifestyle, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989
Notes[edit]

References[edit]

^ Jump up to:a b c d e Schwarz, Walter (2009-01-15). "Arne Næss". The Guardian. London.
Jump up^ Grimes, William (2009-01-15). "Arne Naess, Norwegian Philosopher, Dies at 96". The New York Times.
Jump up^ Naess, Arne. Translated and edited by Rothenberg, David. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. (page 10).
^ Jump up to:a b http://www.noelgcharlton.info/9DeepEcology.html
Jump up^ A. Næss "Heidegger, Postmodern Theory and Deep Ecology," Trumpeter 14, no. 4 (1997).
Jump up^ Krabbe, Erik C. (2010). "Arne Næss (1912-2009)". Argumentation. 24 (4): 527–30. doi:10.1007/s10503-010-9188-1.
^ Jump up to:a b Luke, Timothy W. (June 2002). "Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered". Organization & Environment. 15 (2): 178–186. doi:10.1177/10826602015002005.
Jump up^ http://www.boslekt.com/html/fam291xx/fam29101.htm
Jump up^ Krabbe, Erik C. (2010). "Arne Næss (1912-2009)". Argumentation. 24 (4): 527–530. doi:10.1007/s10503-010-9188-1.
Jump up^ Arne Naess 1989, Ecology Community and Lifestyle, (trans) David Rothenberg, CUP, Cambridge, p. 4
Jump up^ Krabbe, Erik C. (2010). "Arne Næss (1912-2009)". Argumentation. 24 (4): 527–530. doi:10.1007/s10503-010-9188-1.
Jump up^ J. Seed, J. Macy, P. Flemming, A. Naess, Thinking like a mountain: towards a council of all beings, Heritic Books (1988), ISBN 0-946097-26-7, ISBN 0-86571-133-X
Jump up^ Statistics Norway (2005). "Storting Election 2005. Official electoral lists, by county". Storting Election 2005. Archived from the original on 2007-07-02. Retrieved 2007-04-17.
Jump up^ Hannay, Alastair (1995). Honderich, Ted, ed. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 627. ISBN 0-19-866132-0.
Jump up^ Eriksson, Darek (2007). "Phenomeno-semantic complexity: A proposal for an alternative notion of complexity as a foundation for the management of complexity in human affairs". Complexity and Organization. 9 (1): 11–21.
Jump up^ Krabbe, Erik C W (2010). "Arne Næss (1912-2009)". Argumentation. 24 (4): 528. doi:10.1007/s10503-010-9188-1.
Jump up^ Krabbe, Erik C W (2010). "Arne Næss (1912-2009)". Argumentation. 24 (4): 529. doi:10.1007/s10503-010-9188-1.
Jump up^ Murray Bookchin, Graham Purchase, Brian Morris, Rodney Aitchtey, Robert Hart, Chris Wilbert, Deep Ecology and Anarchism, Freedom Press (1993) ISBN 0-900384-67-0.
Jump up^ Næss, Arne (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge University Press. pp. 164-65
Jump up^ Luke, Timothy (June 2002). "Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered". Organization and Environment. 15 (2): 178–186. doi:10.1177/10826602015002005.
Jump up^ Anonymous (Jan 27, 2009). "Philosopher and Mountaineer". The Gazette (Montreal, QC).
Jump up^ Anonymous (Jan 14, 2009). "Thinker behind 'deep ecology' dies". The Ottawa Citizen (Ottawa, ON).
External links[edit]
The Trumpeter collected works on Arne Næss vol 1 The Trumpeter collected works on Arne Næss vol 2 (2005)
"Ecosophy from T to X" - article about Arne's philosophy, by Jim Cocola, in n+1 magazine, April 2006.
The Trumpeter Volume 9.2 (1992)
Arne Næss: A Biographical Sketch, by Warwick Fox.
Arne Naess - Ecophilosophy and Ecology Page from the University of Oslo. Contains basic information about Arne Næss and his publications from 1936-2005.
Jens Bjørneboe: How Arne Næss and I conquered NATO
Photos of Næss' arrest at Mardalsfossen (in Norwegian)
Inquiry An Interdiciplinary Journal of Philosophy founded by Arne Næss
Crossing the Stones: A Portrait of Arne Naess
The Call of the Mountain (transcript) Transcript of the film The Call of the Mountain on Arne Naess and the Deep Ecology Movement (1997)
The Call of the Mountain (excerpts) on YouTube Excerpts of the film.
The Call of the Mountain (complete) See "The Call of the Mountain" as one whole online
"Arne Naess, Norwegian Philosopher, Dies at 96", New York Times obituary
"Philosopher Developed 'Deep Ecology' Phrase", Washington Post obituary
Arne Næss obituary in The Guardian