2019/09/28

The Sacred Depths of Nature eBook: Ursula Goodenough: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store



The Sacred Depths of Nature eBook: Ursula Goodenough: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store






For many of us, the great scientific discoveries of the modern age--the Big Bang, evolution, quantum physics, relativity-- point to an existence that is bleak, devoid of meaning, pointless. But in The Sacred Depths of Nature, eminent biologist Ursula Goodenough shows us that the scientific world view need not be a source of despair. Indeed, it can be a wellspring of solace and hope.
This eloquent volume reconciles the modern scientific understanding of reality with our timeless spiritual yearnings for reverence and continuity. Looking at topics such as evolution, emotions, sexuality, and death, Goodenough writes with rich, uncluttered detail about the workings of nature in general and of living creatures in particular. Her luminous clarity makes it possible for even non-scientists to appreciate that the origins of life and the universe are no less meaningful because of our increasingly scientific understanding of them. At the end of each chapter, Goodenough's spiritual reflections respond to the complexity of nature with vibrant emotional intensity and a sense of reverent wonder.
A beautifully written celebration of molecular biology with meditations on the spiritual and religious meaning that can be found at the heart of science, this volume makes an important contribution to the ongoing dialog between science and religion. This book will engage anyone who was ever mesmerized--or terrified--by the mysteries of existence.






Product description

Review
"Goodenough gives us a new bridge between science and religion that is both eloquent and elegant. She offers us the poetry, power, and passion of her vision of nature, a vision born from scientific knowledge, nurtured by religious sensibility, and inspired by nature itself." --Mary Evelyn Tucker, historian of religion, Bucknell University "An engaging, authoritative and lyrical account of the molecular basis of life and its evolution. Goodenough...explains the dynamics of biology with the evident pleasure of a gifted science writer. Her reflections evoke a deep gratitude for the magic of our existence and the necessity to preserve that which makes it possible."--Thomas Pollard, cell biologist, President, The Salk Institute "Incisive, comprehensive, witty, and beautiful, with paragraph after paragraph of lucidity and significance. We could be witnessing one of the most important cultural events of the last three centuries--the moment when scientists themselves take seriously their role in forging a planetary wisdom."--Brian Swimme, cosmologist, California Institute of Integral Studies "A celebration of molecular biology, with meditations on the spiritual and religious meaning that can be found at the heart of science, makes an important contribution to the ongoing dialog between science and religion. This book well engage anyone who has ever been mesmerized--or terrified--by the mysteries of existence."--Biology Digest "Her descriptions of enzymes, zygotes, and eukaryotes are crystal clear, and warmly complement her outlook."--Gilbert Taylor,Booklist "In this unique book...Goodenough has accomplished what few scientists dare to try: to provide a clear, even reductionist, account of the most modern concepts in science."--San Francisco Examiner & Chronicle "For a scientist like myself, Goodenough's elegant narratives provide a refreshing way to encounter familiar material. I was especially impressed with her ability to cut right to the quick, so that within a few short pages the reader is whisked from the big bang to the emergence of our planet and the birth of life on earth."--Scientific American

Product Description
For many of us, the great scientific discoveries of the modern age--the Big Bang, evolution, quantum physics, relativity-- point to an existence that is bleak, devoid of meaning, pointless. But in The Sacred Depths of Nature, eminent biologist Ursula Goodenough shows us that the scientific world view need not be a source of despair. Indeed, it can be a wellspring of solace and hope.
This eloquent volume reconciles the modern scientific understanding of reality with our timeless spiritual yearnings for reverence and continuity. Looking at topics such as evolution, emotions, sexuality, and death, Goodenough writes with rich, uncluttered detail about the workings of nature in general and of living creatures in particular. Her luminous clarity makes it possible for even non-scientists to appreciate that the origins of life and the universe are no less meaningful because of our increasingly scientific understanding of them. At the end of each chapter, Goodenough's spiritual reflections respond to the complexity of nature with vibrant emotional intensity and a sense of reverent wonder.
A beautifully written celebration of molecular biology with meditations on the spiritual and religious meaning that can be found at the heart of science, this volume makes an important contribution to the ongoing dialog between science and religion. This book will engage anyone who was ever mesmerized--or terrified--by the mysteries of existence.




Showing 1-10 of 50 reviews

Paul Chadwick

5.0 out of 5 starsExcellent discussion of current biological science as it relates to popular religionsApril 23, 2017
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
Ursula Goodenough was an assistant professor in the Biology Department at Harvard during the same time in the early 1970s that I was a graduate student there in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. I didn't know her, but we both worked in the Biological Laboratories, I on the fourth floor, and she may be been one floor down. In any case, I saw her around. She appeared to me at the time to be one of those hippyish characters that were common in that era, and I didn't think much more about it.
Her book is excellent. I little out of date, published in 1998, but only with regard to a few minor details that have emerged since the sequencing of the human genome was completed about three years after its publication. It is a very thoughtful synthesis of the understandings of current biological science with the human tendency toward religiosity and the myths and tenets of popular religions. On reading, I was amazed at how much it reflected my own views. Well worth reading!

4 people found this helpful

Helpful1 comment Report abuse

John W

5.0 out of 5 starsReverence for realitySeptember 12, 2018
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
The idea of having a spiritual reflection on each step of the evolutionary process seems like something that could make you cringe. But Ursula has a deep reverence for the science that she knows and an equally deep understanding of Christian culture, so she pulls it off. Definitely quote worthy.

2 people found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

KateTheGreat

5.0 out of 5 starsAn illuminating journey into the sacred depths of biology.December 9, 2018
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
I did find Ursula Goodenough's "Sacred Depths of Nature" an illuminating ride. She has a true appreciation for the--religious-- mystery to be found scientific discovery. And explains it, step-by-step, in a way a lay-person such as myself can follow. Richard Dawkins and Neil de Grasse Tyson need to read this book.

3 people found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

Joyce Converse

5.0 out of 5 starsA Sustaining ConsciousnessJanuary 11, 2014
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
With absolutely no background in physics, chemistry or biology, this was a difficult book technically but what the author manages is miraculous. First, she is a great teacher, using metaphor to help with understanding since there really ARE no visuals for her subject matter -- matter itself. In each chapter she teaches a scientific process. Then she adds her reflections on it -- i.e. she brings it into a personal/emotional realm and finally, she often ends the chapter with a quote or a poem. If one were able to really take it in, to understand it well enough to absorb it deeply, it translates to love, awe, wonder -- of all things, of life, of self and becomes the foundation for a way of being in the world that accepts even death as a gift of life (as contradictory as that may sound). What emerges is a reverence toward life itself --- its individual uniqueness and its improbability -- a non-theistic consciousness not dependent on belief, therefore not a religion. It takes the human cravings that create religion and grounds them in fact. For me, this is a life-changing book. My metaphor: the ingredients, the cooking tools, the chopping, mixing, stirring, baking, the time necessary to produce fabulous food, wherein the whole is greater than the sum of the parts -- these are all the nucleotides, cascades, cells, genes, proteins that engage and produce species -- both plant and animal, each of which is truly one of a kind.

8 people found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

Robert L. Bartz

5.0 out of 5 starsClear and simple explainations of how the world came to be and how it works.October 10, 2015
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
This book is a clearly written source of how our world came to be and how it works. I've sent it to my granddaughters as a primary source
to acquaint them with how things really work. My only reservation is that Ursula toys around with "beliefs" as a crutch for what can't be
explained by science. Later in the book she rejects this use of "beliefs". With the scientific method there is no place for beliefs (you only accept
what you can prove under controlled conditions). Yet she has a knack for explaining things clearly and simply.

3 people found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

Rose

5.0 out of 5 starsExcellent!May 15, 2017
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
Excellent is the only word I can say. This book is truly speaking of my heart as an agnostic and as a naturalist. I highly recommend this book to anyone trying to seek meaning of life in the world of laws of nature and not in any dogma, you'll not be disappointed!

3 people found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

Allen K. Lang

5.0 out of 5 starsHard science and thoughtful ethical thought in balance.September 15, 2018
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
Our Humanist group has spent four meetings discussing Goodenough's book, to our great advantage. Her review of molecular biology is available—just available!—to readers not at home in DNA science. Her thoughts on ethics and religion are great for stimulating thoughtful conversation.

One person found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

Beth C.

5.0 out of 5 starsRespecting our world.April 12, 2019
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
I just received the book yesterday. I’m mesmerized by it. Loving the 🌍 earth, taking good are of humans, animals,every living thing. Book arrived super fast. I can’t wait to read the rest.


HelpfulComment Report abuse

C. Iyizob

3.0 out of 5 starsIt's kindof ok but it's not what i thought it ...November 26, 2016
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
It's kindof ok but it's not what i thought it would be. It's just a biology textbook. The only thing that makes it different from a textbook is just that at the end of each chapter she writes a single page called "reflections" that summarizes the science with a religious tone. Religous naturalism in this book is purely emotional and not philosophical.

2 people found this helpful

HelpfulComment Report abuse

Rebecca Anne Turner

4.0 out of 5 starsNiceDecember 28, 2018
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Nice

One person found this helpful
=============



The Sacred Depths of Nature

 3.88  ·   Rating details ·  304 ratings  ·  39 reviews
This volume reconciles the modern scientific understanding of reality with our timeless spiritual yearnings for reverence and continuity. Looking at topics such as evolution, emotions, sexuality, and death, Goodenough writes with rich, uncluttered detail about the workings of nature in general and of living creatures in particular. Her luminous clarity makes it possible for even non-scientists to appreciate that the origins of life and the universe are no less meaningful because of our increasingly scientific understanding of them. At the end of each chapter, Goodenough's spiritual reflections respond to the complexity of nature with vibrant emotional intensity and a sense of reverent wonder. (less)

GET A COPY

Paperback224 pages
Published June 1st 2000 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published January 1st 1998)


COMMUNITY REVIEWS

Showing 1-30
 3.88  · 
 ·  304 ratings  ·  39 reviews

 | 
Amy Drew
Dec 26, 2010rated it it was amazing
as someone who identifies as a religious naturalist, I consider this book to be canon; it is one book of my bible. While I am hopelessly inept at articulating the deep and transcendent reverence for nature that keeps me warm all through these winters of our cultural discontent, the unjustly named Goodenough gracefully conveys -- and celebrates -- the soulfulness of the spiritual scientist. if there is anyone on earth I share a worldview with exactly, it's ursula goodenough, and her explanation of this viewpoint is triumphant in its clarity. (less)
Nick
Ursula Goodenough's ideas and thoughts are very similar to my own. One big difference between us might be that she was brought up in a family and community where religion played a major role. I did not, and I have always considered myself to be an atheist. Or better yet: What I would call myself if people asked whether I was religious. In my teen years I even was a very active member of a discussion group about religion and non-religion. It says something about what I (don't) believe about a personal God, and that I find the subject fascinating. But "atheism" doesn't say a lot about what I dó believe. Some terms might describe me: humanist, skeptic, openminded, curious, etc.
But does that say anything about how I experience this world, this existence, this Universe? Probably not, since it can't get more personal than this. I am Nick, with my personal thoughts and feelings about this world. There is no need to categorize myself, to use an ultimate term to describe me, but spiritual naturalism comes as close as possible. In my whole life I've been in awe of The Universe. The grandness of it, the tiny parts that it constitutes of. Life has always made me feel connected and hopeful. Science and philosophy have been my ways to research this complex world, to somehow praise the beauty and intricacies of it, and even to give great meaning and enjoyment to my life. The remaining mysteries excite me, existing knowledge attracts me to learn about it without end, existential questions keep me up at night, music and art make me feel more alive than just my biochemical interactions what life is made out of. And all of this, all the emotions, experiences, thoughts and concepts take place in my personal "thinking organ" called the brain, evolved out of billions of biological evolution, evolved out of billions of cosmic evolution. All these emergent functions... It's simply amazing.

Whether you would call me an atheist or spiritual naturalist... I don't mind. All I can say is that I am a person with both feet on the ground who's deeply in love with The Universe.
 (less)
Timothy Urges
Aug 01, 2017rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
3.5

Asking those profound questions that no one can answer, but also important observations are made on the genesis of life on earth and its continuation.

Half of this reads like a textbook. The other half reflects on scientific facts, and how cells are as holy as gods.
Eli
Jun 10, 2012rated it liked it
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Adam
Jul 20, 2010rated it liked it
Recommended to Adam by: Melody Moberg
I am somewhat ambivalent about this book. I was expecting a book of Deep Ecology, featuring the author's personal spiritual reactions to scientific epiphanies. Instead, Goodenough takes it upon herself to organize all human spiritual and cultural traditions around that set of scientific epiphanies in an effort to create a unifying Global Ethos. Instead of responding personally to things, she merely collects a few random scraps of sacred text and waxes briefly on how different spiritual traditions responded to the biological concepts she's describing. Since much of the scientific material is old hat to most people, much of the book ends up being fairly innocuous light reading. What bits of science held more interest for me did so by virtue of their novelty to me personally. Those few things definitely did make me more excited to take Intro Bio next fall.

What I did find very positive and valuable about this book, however, was the way it inspired me to respond with deep and reflective thoughts. I found myself writing a lot in response to her ideas, and thinking and reflecting even more, even though I didn't find her ideas or the way she articulated them very interesting in themselves. Therefore, I definitely found it a worthwhile read, and would probably recommend you follow through and read it if you're interested. But it's not vital.

The best part of the book was the final chapter or epilogue, and this passage in particular:
"Reproductive success is governed by many variables, but key adaptations have included the evolution of awareness, valuation, and purpose. In order to continue, genomes must dictate organisms that are aware of their environmental circumstances, evaluate those inputs correctly, and respond with intentionality.
And so, I profess my Faith. For me, the existenec of all this complexity and awareness and intent and beauty, and my ability to apprehend it, serves as the ultimate meaning and the ultimate value. the continuation of life reaches around, grabs its own tail, and forms a sacred circle that requires no further justification, no Creator, no superordinate meaning of meaning, no purpose other than that the continuation continue until the sun collapses or the final meteor collides. I confess a credo of continuation."
 (less)
Jessica
May 01, 2013rated it liked it
Meh. I really was hoping for more from this - I had heard the author speak on a podcast. It was fine and it was short - so I'll likely read it again for the evolutionary biology - but the reflections were too short and as someone else said she just threw in a lot of quotes from other sources without really explaining them (plus she used a lot of Christian hymns to, I guess, try to explain the religious feelings she gets from nature - but that really didn't fit with the whole premise of the book to me - frankly I hated it). I'm not saying I got nothing from it beyond the biology - It just promised much more than it delivered. There were a couple of takeaway reflections but I wished she had spent more time on them overall. (less)
Barbara
Dec 13, 2009rated it it was amazing
I read this first in December of 2009 but was reminded of it again when I attended a panel discussion on science & religion. So, I read it again with a renewed interest in spiritual naturalism. This remains a special book I will pick up for inspiration and renewal.

Understanding how life works from a cellular biological perspective could result in confusion about religious beliefs but Ursula Goodenough makes sense of it all. Despite the technical discussion of amino acids, proteins, reproduction, evolution, etc. she can still experience and appreciate the profound and the sacred. She ends up with a theory of continuation or Religious Naturalism. I want to read it again.
 (less)
Mark Johnson
Apr 25, 2012rated it really liked it
As a religious person that is finding traditional religion to be lacking, I greatly welcomed this book. The author is an atheist, but attends church regular. Her Dad, a former theology prof, and also an athist, says that, nonetheless, he stills prays and 'Jesus answers.' For me, this book accepts the scientific version of the world (as I do) but does not throw the baby out with the bathwater--that is, it still recognizes the spiritual nature of ourselves and hat we must have ways of touching that nd letting our 'souls' (which likely don't exit) express themselves. (less)
Anjie Brown
Jan 06, 2012rated it liked it
Excellent book if you're looking for an easy to understand break-down of cellular biology and chemistry. It is indeed, a fascinating read, but, for me, it still lacks the depth of spirituality that I'm looking for and striving to understand. Pantheism is an extraordinary concept, and even given how well this book is written, it still lacks the close, personal experience that I want and crave. Great book...just not the book for me.
Carla
A little too deep for Jane Q. Public. Maybe even for some of us who have had courses in biology and physiology, genetics and chemistry. Maybe this reader been away from the sciences for too long. It's hard to make it relate to one's everyday life.
Frank Jude
Ursula Goodenough is one of America's leading cell biologists and the author of a wonderful textbook, Genetics. She has served as President of the American Society of Cell Biology and of the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science. She is the current president of the Religious Naturalist Association (RNA... and yes, it is a conscious pun) of which I am a member.

There is a growing movement of naturalists who find religious or spiritual experience within nature while rejecting the supernatural. Along with the Religious Naturalist Association, for instance, is the Spiritual Naturalist Society and the Sacred Naturalism Project spearheaded by my friend, Alice Andrews. And of course, I've been creating and teaching what I call Zen Naturalism for just over ten years now.

This little book from Goodenough is divided up into twelve chapters, each beginning with a story about the dynamic processes of Nature. The first, "Origins of the Earth" is one from physics, but staring with the second, "Origins of Life" her emphasis is on biology starting with the fascinating story of molecules, genes and cells. From chapter to chapter she walks us through what she calls the "Epic of Evolution" including the patterns of biological evolution and the arising of biodiversity; multicellularity, and the emergence of sex and sexuality and death (they are intimately related), to awareness, emotion, and value.

She shows convincingly how the arising of the deepest sense of meaning and value can be accounted for through natural causes, not requiring any supernatural "Creator" or given meaning to life. Each story is followed by a short "religious response" which may include some poetry or commentary on a re-valuation of traditional religious concepts such as the central importance of "fellowship and community" which she grounds in our common ancestry with all of life as understood through the mechanism of evolution.

I heartily recommend this book! If you are a lay-reader, you will learn more about biological processes and the working of evolution than you might expect -- all told in an engaging way that makes the science easier to digest and the religious experience via nature fully accessible.
(less)

Religious naturalism - Wikipedia



Religious naturalism - Wikipedia



Religious naturalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

The interconnectivity of nature is a key postulate in religious naturalism.

Religious naturalism (RN) combines a naturalist worldview with perceptions and values commonly associated with religions.[1][2] In this, "religious" is understood in general terms, separate from established traditions, in designating feelings and concerns (e.g. gratitude, wonder, humility, compassion) that are often described as spiritual or religious.[3][4][5] Naturalism refers to a view that the natural world is all we have substantiated reason to believe exists, and there is no substantiated reason to believe that anything else, including deities, exists or may act in ways that are independent of the natural order.[6][7]

Areas of inquiry include attempts to understand the natural world and the spiritual and moral implications of naturalist views.[8] Understanding is based in knowledge obtained through scientific inquiry and insights from the humanities and the arts.[9] Religious naturalists use these perspectives in responding to personal and social challenges (e.g. finding purpose, seeking justice, coming to terms with mortality) and in relating to the natural world.[8]


Contents
1Naturalism
2Religious
3History
4Tenets
5Varieties
6Shared principles



Naturalism[edit]

Naturalism is the "idea or belief that only natural (as opposed to supernatural or spiritual) laws and forces operate in the world".[10]

All forms of religious naturalism, being naturalistic in their basic beliefs, assert that the natural world is the center of our most significant experiences and understandings. Consequently, nature is considered as the ultimate value in assessing one's being. Religious naturalists, despite having followed differing cultural and individual paths, affirm the human need for meaning and value in their lives. They draw on two fundamental convictions in those quests: the sense of Nature's richness, spectacular complexity, and fertility, and the recognition that Nature is the only realm in which people live out their lives. Humans are considered interconnected parts of Nature.

Science is a fundamental, indispensable component of the paradigm of religious naturalism. It relies on mainstream science to reinforce religious and spiritual perspectives. Science is the primary interpretive tool for religious naturalism, because, scientific methods are thought to provide the most reliable understanding of Nature and the world, including human nature.


"Truth is sought for its own sake. And those who are engaged upon the quest for anything for its own sake are not interested in other things. Finding the truth is difficult, and the road to it is rough."[11]


Therefore, the seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them, the one who submits to argument and demonstration, and not to the sayings of a human being whose nature is fraught with all kinds of imperfection and deficiency. Thus the duty of the man who investigates the writings of scientists, if learning the truth is his goal, is to make himself an enemy of all that he reads, and, applying his mind to the core and margins of its content, attack it from every side. He should also suspect himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency.[12]
Religious[edit]

A religious attitude towards nature

Religious naturalists use the term "religious" to refer to an attitude – of being appreciative of and interested in concerns that have long been parts of religions.[13][14] These include:[15]

A spiritual sense (which may include a sense of mystery or wonder or feelings of reverence or awe in response to the scope and power and beauty of the natural world)
A moral sense (with compassion, desire for justice, and attempts to do what is right – with respect to other people, other creatures, and the natural environment)

As the source of all that is and the reason why all things are as they are, the natural world may be seen as being of ultimate importance.[16]

As in other religious orientations, religious naturalism includes a central story – a modern creation myth – to describe ourselves and our place in the world. This begins with the Big Bang and the emergence of galaxies, stars, planets, and life, and evolution that led to the presence of human beings. As this gives insight into who we are and how we came to be, religious naturalists look to the natural world (the source of our intelligence and inclinations) for information and insights that may help us to understand and respond to important questions:
Why do we want what we want?
Why we do the things we do?
What we might try to point ourselves toward?

and to try to find ways to minimize problems (in ourselves and in our world), become our better selves, and relate to others and the world we are part of.[17]

When discussing distinctions between "religious" naturalists and "plain old" (secular) naturalists, Loyal Rue said: "I regard a religious or spiritual person to be one who takes ultimate concerns to heart."[18]
He noted that, while "plain old" naturalists are concerned with morals and may have emotional responses to the mysteries and wonders of the world, those who describe themselves as religious naturalists take it more "to heart" and show active interest in this area.[19]

History[edit]

Core themes in religious naturalism have been present, in varied cultures, for centuries. But active discussion, with use of this name, is relatively recent.

Zeno (c. 334 – c. 262 BCE, a founder of Stoicism) said:


All things are parts of one single system, which is called Nature ... Virtue consists in a will which is in agreement with Nature.[20]

Views consistent with religious naturalism can be seen in ancient Daoist texts (e.g., Dao De Jing) and some Hindu views (such as God as Nirguṇa Brahman, God without attributes). They may also be seen in Western images that do not focus on active, personal aspects of God, such as Thomas Aquinas' view of God as Pure Act, Augustine's God as Being Itself, and Paul Tillich's view of God as Ground of Being. 

As Wesley Wildman has described, views consistent with RN have long existed as part of the underside of major religious traditions, often quietly and sometimes in mystical strands or intellectual sub-traditions, by practitioners who are not drawn to supernatural claims.[21]

The earliest uses of the term, religious naturalism, seem to have occurred in the 1800s. In 1846, the American Whig Review described "a seeming 'religious naturalism'",[22] In 1869, American Unitarian Association literature adjudged:"Religious naturalism differs from this mainly in the fact that it extends the domain of nature farther outward into space and time. ...It never transcends nature".[23] Ludwig Feuerbach wrote that religious naturalism was "the acknowledgment of the Divine in Nature" and also "an element of the Christian religion", but by no means that religion's definitive "characteristic" or "tendency".[24]

Lao Tzu, traditionally the author of the Tao Te Ching

In 1864, Pope Pius IX condemned religious naturalism in the first seven articles of the Syllabus of Errors.

Mordecai Kaplan (1881–1983), one of the great rabbis of the 20th century and the founder of the Jewish reconstructionism movement,[25] early advocated religious naturalism. He believed that a naturalistic approach to religion and ethics was possible in a desacralizing world. He saw God as the sum of all natural processes.[26]

Other verified usages of the term came in 1940 from George Perrigo Conger[27] and from Edgar S. Brightman.[28] Shortly thereafter, H. H. Dubs wrote an article entitled Religious Naturalism – an Evaluation (The Journal of Religion, XXIII: 4, October, 1943), which begins "Religious naturalism is today one of the outstanding American philosophies of religion…" and discusses ideas developed by Henry Nelson Wieman in books that predate Dubs's article by 20 years.

In 1991 Jerome A. Stone wrote The Minimalist Vision of Transcendence explicitly "to sketch a philosophy of religious naturalism".[29] Use of the term was expanded in the 1990s by Loyal Rue, who was familiar with the term from Brightman's book. Rue used the term in conversations with several people before 1994, and subsequent conversations between Rue and Ursula Goodenough [both of whom were active in IRAS (The Institute on Religion in an Age of Science) led to Goodenough's use in her book "The Sacred Depths of Nature" and by Rue in "Religion is not about God" and other writings. Since 1994 numerous authors have used the phrase or expressed similar thinking. Examples are Chet Raymo, Stuart Kauffman and Karl E. Peters.

Ursula Goodenough

Mike Ignatowski states that "there were many religious naturalists in the first half of the 20th century and some even before that" but that "religious naturalism as a movement didn't really come into its own until about 1990 [and] took a major leap forward in 1998 when Ursula Goodenough published The Sacred Depths of Nature, which is considered one of the founding texts of this movement."[30]

Biologist Ursula Goodenough states:


I profess my Faith. For me, the existence of all this complexity and awareness and intent and beauty, and my ability to apprehend it, serves as the ultimate meaning and the ultimate value. The continuation of life reaches around, grabs its own tail, and forms a sacred circle that requires no further justification, no Creator, no super-ordinate meaning of meaning, no purpose other than that the continuation continue until the sun collapses or the final meteor collides. I confess a credo of continuation. And in so doing, I confess as well a credo of human continuation[31][32]

Donald Crosby's Living with Ambiguity published in 2008, has, as its first chapter, Religion of Nature as a Form of Religious Naturalism.[33]

Loyal Rue's Nature is Enough published in 2011, discusses "Religion Naturalized, Nature Sanctified" and "The Promise of Religious Naturalism".[34]

Jerome A. Stone

Religious Naturalism Today: 

The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative is a history by Dr. Jerome A. Stone (Dec. 2008 release) that presents this paradigm as a once-forgotten option in religious thinking that is making a rapid revival. It seeks to explore and encourage religious ways of responding to the world on a completely naturalistic basis without a supreme being or ground of being. This book traces this history and analyzes some of the issues dividing religious naturalists. It covers the birth of religious naturalism, from George Santayana to Henry Nelson Wieman and briefly explores religious naturalism in literature and art. Contested issues are discussed including whether nature's power or goodness is the focus of attention and also on the appropriateness of using the term "God". The contributions of more than twenty living Religious Naturalists are presented. The last chapter ends the study by exploring what it is like on the inside to live as a religious naturalist.[35]

Chet Raymo writes that he had come to the same conclusion as Teilhard de Chardin: "Grace is everywhere",[36] and that naturalistic emergence is in everything and far more magical than religion-based miracles. A future humankind religion should be ecumenical, ecological, and embrace the story provided by science as the "most reliable cosmology".[37]

As P. Roger Gillette summarizes:


Thus was religious naturalism born. It takes the findings of modern science seriously, and thus is inherently naturalistic. But it also takes the human needs that led to the emergence of religious systems seriously, and thus is also religious. It is religious, or reconnective, in that it seeks and facilitates human reconnection with one's self, family, larger human community, local and global ecosystem, and unitary universe (…) Religious reconnection implies love. And love implies concern, concern for the well-being of the beloved. Religious naturalism thus is marked by concern for the well-being of the whole of nature. This concern provides a basis and drive for ethical behavior toward the whole holy unitary universe.[38]

Tenets[edit]

Due to the high importance placed on nature, some religious naturalists have a strong sense of stewardship for the Earth. Luther College professor Loyal Rue has written:


Religious naturalists will be known for their reverence and awe before Nature, their love for Nature and natural forms, their sympathy for all living things, their guilt for enlarging the ecological footprints, their pride in reducing them, their sense of gratitude directed towards the matrix of life, their contempt for those who abstract themselves from natural values, and their solidarity with those who link their self-esteem to sustainable living.[39]

Varieties[edit]


The literature related to religious naturalism includes many variations in conceptual framing. This reflects individual takes on various issues, to some extent various schools of thought, such as basic naturalism, religious humanism, pantheism, panentheism, and spiritual naturalism that have had time on the conceptual stage, and to some extent differing ways of characterizing Nature.

Current discussion often relates to the issue of whether belief in a God or God-language and associated concepts have any place in a framework that treats the physical universe as its essential frame of reference and the methods of science as providing the preeminent means for determining what Nature is. There are at least three varieties of religious naturalism, and three similar but somewhat different ways to categorize them. They are:
----
A kind of naturalism that does use theological language but fundamentally treats God metaphorically.

A commitment to naturalism using theological language, but as either (1) a faith statement or supported by philosophical arguments, or (2) both, usually leaving open the question of whether that usage as metaphor or refers to the ultimate answer that Nature can be.
---
Neo-theistic (process theology, progressive religions) – Gordon Kaufman, Karl E. Peters, Ralph Wendell Burhoe, Edmund Robinson[40]
Non-theistic (agnostic, naturalistic concepts of god) – Robertson himself, Stanley Klein, Stuart Kauffman, Naturalistic Paganism.
----
atheistic (no God concept, some modern naturalisms, Process Naturalism, C. Robert Mesle, non-militant atheism, antitheism) – Jerome A. Stone, Michael Cavanaugh, Donald A. Crosby,[41] Ursula Goodenough, Daniel Dennett[42]
A hodgepodge of individual perspectives – Philip Hefner
----
The first category has as many sub-groups as there are distinct definitions for god. Believers in a supernatural entity (transcendent) are by definition not religious naturalists however the matter of a naturalistic concept of God (Immanence) is currently debated. Strong atheists are not considered Religious Naturalists in this differentiation. Some individuals call themselves religious naturalists but refuse to be categorized. The unique theories of religious naturalists Loyal Rue, Donald A. Crosby, Jerome A. Stone, and Ursula Goodenough are discussed by Michael Hogue in his 2010 book The Promise of Religious Naturalism.[43]

God concepts[44]

Those who conceive of God as the creative process within the universe – example, Henry Nelson Wieman
Those who think of God as the totality of the universe considered religiously – Bernard Loomer.
A third type of religious naturalism sees no need to use the concept or terminology of God – Stone himself and Ursula Goodenough

Stone emphasizes that some Religious Naturalists do not reject the concept of God, but if they use the concept, it involves a radical alteration of the idea such as Gordon Kaufman who defines God as creativity.

Ignatowski divides RN into only two types – theistic and non-theistic.[30]

Shared principles[edit]

Biological classification

There are several principles shared by all the aforementioned varieties of religious naturalism:[45]
All varieties of religious naturalism see humans as an interconnected, emergent part of nature.
Accept the primacy of science with regard to what is measurable via the scientific method.
Recognize science's limitations in accounting for judgments of value and in providing a full account of human experience. Thus religious naturalism embraces nature's creativity, beauty and mystery and honors many aspects of the artistic, cultural and religious traditions that respond to and attempt to interpret Nature in subjective ways.
Approach matters of morality, ethics and value with a focus on how the world works, with a deep concern for fairness and the welfare of all humans regardless of their station in life.
Seek to integrate these interpretative, spiritual and ethical responses in a manner that respects diverse religious and philosophical perspectives, while still subjecting them and itself to rigorous scrutiny.
The focus on scientific standards of evidence imbues RN with the humility inherent in scientific inquiry and its limited, albeit ever deepening, ability to describe reality (see Epistemology).
A strong environmental ethic for the welfare of the planet Earth and humanity.
Belief in the sacredness of life and the evolutionary process

The concept of emergence has grown in popularity with many Religious Naturalists. It helps explain how a complex Universe and life by self-organization have risen out of a multiplicity of relatively simple elements and their interactions. The entire story of emergence is related in the Epic of Evolution – the mythic scientific narrative used to tell the verifiable chronicle of the evolutionary process that is the Universe. Most religious naturalist consider the Epic of Evolution a true story about the historic achievement of Nature.[46][47][48] "The Epic of Evolution is the 14 billion year narrative of cosmic, planetary, life, and cultural evolution—told in sacred ways. Not only does it bridge mainstream science and a diversity of religious traditions; if skillfully told, it makes the science story memorable and deeply meaningful, while enriching one's religious faith or secular outlook."[49]

A number of naturalistic writers have used this theme as a topic for their books using such synonyms as: Cosmic Evolution, Everybody's Story, Evolutionary Epic, Evolutionary Universe, Great Story, New Story, Universal Story. 'Epic of evolution' is a term that, within the past three years(1998), has become the theme and title of a number of gatherings. It seems to have been first used by Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson in 1978. 'The evolutionary epic,' Wilson wrote in his book On Human Nature, 'is probably the best myth we will ever have.' Myth as falsehood was not the usage intended by Wilson in this statement. Rather, myth as a grand narrative that provides a people with a placement in time—a meaningful placement that celebrates extraordinary moments of a shared heritage. The epic of evolution is science translated into meaningful story."[50]

Evolutionary evangelist minister Michael Dowd uses the term to help present his position that science and religious faith are not mutually exclusive (a premise of religious naturalism). He preaches that the epic of cosmic, biological, and human evolution, revealed by science, is a basis for an inspiring and meaningful view of our place in the universe. Evolution is viewed as a spiritual process that it is not meaningless blind chance.[51] He is joined by a number of other theologians in this position.[52][53][54]

Notable proponents and critics[edit]
Proponents[edit]

Support for religious naturalism can be seen from two perspectives. One is individuals, in recent times, who have discussed and supported religious naturalism, per se. Another is individuals from earlier times who may not have used or been familiar with the term, "religious naturalism", but who had views that are compatible and whose thoughts have contributed to development of religious naturalism.

People who have been supportive of and who discussed religious naturalism by name include:

Chet Raymo
Loyal Rue
Donald A. Crosby
Jerome A. Stone
Michael Dowd
Ursula Goodenough
Terrence Deacon
Loren Eiseley
Philip Hefner
Ralph Wendell Burhoe
Mordecai Kaplan
Henry Nelson Wieman
George Santayana
Gordon D. Kaufman
Stuart Kauffman
Stanley A. Klein
C. Robert Mesle
Karl E. Peters
Varadaraja V. Raman
Ian Barbour
Robert S. Corrington

People from earlier times, who did not use the term, religious naturalism, but who had compatible views, include:
Lao-Tzu
Albert Einstein
W.E.B. Du Bois
Aldo Leopold

Critics[edit]

Religious naturalism has been criticized from two perspectives. One is that of traditional Western religion, which disagrees with naturalist disbelief in a personal God. Another is that of naturalists who do not agree that a religious sense can or should be associated with naturalist views. Critics in the first group include supporters of traditional Jewish, Christian, and Islamic religion. Critics in the second group include:
Richard Dawkins[55]
John Haught[56]

Prominent communities and leaders[edit]

Religious naturalists sometimes use the social practices of traditional religions, including communal gatherings and rituals, to foster a sense of community, and to serve as reinforcement of its participants' efforts to expand the scope of their understandings. Some other groups mainly communicate online. Some known examples of religious naturalists groupings and congregation leaders are:[57]
Religious Naturalist Association[58]
Spiritual Naturalist Society[59]
Unitarian Universalist Religious Naturalists[60]
Religious Naturalism Facebook Group[61]
World Pantheist Movement – largely web-based but with some local groups.[62]
Universal Pantheist Society founded 1975 – Pantheism is an intercepting concept with religious naturalism[63]
Congregation Beth Or, a Jewish congregation near Chicago led by Rabbi David Oler[64]
Congregation of Beth Adam in Loveland Ohio led by Rabbi Robert Barr[65]
Pastor Ian Lawton, minister at the Christ Community Church in Spring Lake, West Michigan and Center for Progressive Christianity[66][67]


Religious Naturalism is the focus of classes and conferences at some colleges and theology schools.[68][69] Articles about religious naturalism have appeared frequently in journals, including Zygon, American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, and the International Journal for Philosophy and Religion.[70]

References[edit]

^ Jerome Stone, Religious Naturalism Today, SUNY Press 2008, page 1
^ Michael S. Hogue, The Promise of Religious Naturalism, Rowman & Littlefield 2010, pages xix-xx
^ Varadaraja V. Raman, Book-jacket review of Loyal Rue's "Nature is Enough", SUNY Press 2012
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, SUNY Press 2012, page 114
^ Michael Cavanaugh, "What is Religious Naturalism?", Zygon 2000, page 242
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, SUNY Press 2012, page 91
^ Wesley Wildman. Religious Naturalism: What It Can Be, and What It Need Not Be. Page 36
^ Jump up to:a b Ursula Goodenough, NPR 13.7 Blog, November 23, 2014: What is religious naturalism?
^ Michael S. Hogue. Religion Without God: An Essay on Religious Naturalism. The Fourth R 27:3 (Spring 2014)
^ Oxford English Dictionary Online naturalism
^ Alhazen (Ibn Al-Haytham) Critique of Ptolemy, translated by S. Pines, Actes X Congrès internationale d'histoire des sciences, Vol I Ithaca 1962, as referenced in Sambursky 1974, p. 139
^ (Sabra 2003)
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, State University of New York Press, 2011. Page 91
^ Varadaraja V. Raman. Back-cover review of Loyal Rue's "Nature is Enough"
^ Ursula Goodenough. Religious Naturalism and naturalizing morality. Zygon 38 2003: 101-109.
^ Donald Crosby. Living with Ambiguity: Religious Naturalism and the Menace of Evil, SUNY Press, 2008, page ix-x
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, State University of New York Press, 2011. Pages 93-96
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, State University of New York Press, 2011. Page 110
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, State University of New York Press, 2011. Pages 110-111
^ Sharon M. Kaye; Paul Thomson (2006). Philosophy for Teens: Questioning Life's Big Ideas,. Prufrock Press Inc. p. 72. ISBN 9781593632021.
^ Wildman, Wesley. Religious Naturalism: What It Can Be, and What It Need Not Be. Philosophy, Theology, and the Sciences. 1(1). 2014. Pages 49-51.
^ George Hooker Colton; James Davenport Whelpley (1846). The American Review: A Whig Journal, Devoted to Politics and Literature. p. 282.
^ Athanasia. American Unitarian Association. 1870. p. 6.
^ Ludwig Feuerbach; George Eliot (1881). The Essence of Christianity. Religion. Trübner. p. 103.
^ Alex J. Goldman - The greatest rabbis hall of fame, SP Books, 1987, page 342, ISBN 0933503148
^ Rabbi Emanuel S. Goldsmith - Reconstructionism Today Spring 2001, Volume 8, Number 3,Jewish Reconstructionist Federation retrieved 4-1-09
^ Perrigo Conger, George (1940). The Ideologies of Religion. p. 212. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
^ Brightman, Edgar S (1940). God as the Tendency of Nature to Support or Produce Values (Religious Naturalism). A Philosophy of Religion. p. 148.
^ Stone, Jerome A (1991). The Minimalist Vision of Transcendence. p. 9. ISBN 9780791411599.
^ Jump up to:a b Ignatowski, Mike (June 25, 2006). Religious Naturalism. Kingston. Retrieved 2009-03-07.
^ Goodenough, Ursula (2000). The Sacred Depths of Nature. Oxford University Press. p. 171. ISBN 0195136292.
^ "Video Interview - Speaking of Faith". Krista's Journal. April 7, 2005. Archived from the original on October 11, 2008.
^ Crosby, Donald A (2008). Living with Ambiguity. SUNY Press. p. 1. ISBN 0791475190.
^ Loyal Rue. Nature is Enough: Religious Naturalism and the Meaning of Life. SUNY Press. 2011.
^ Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative
^ When God is Gone Everything is Holy – The Making of a Religious Naturalist, Chet Raymo, 2008, p 136
^ Chet Raymo - When God is Gone Everything is Holy, Soren Books, 2008, page 114, ISBN 1-933495-13-8
^ Gillette, P. Roger. "Theology Of, By, & For Religious Naturalism". Archived from the original on 2009-11-14. Retrieved 2009-03-09.
^ Loyal D. Rue - RELIGION is not about god, Rutgers University Press, 2005, page 367, ISBN 0813535115
^ Robinson, Rev. Edmund. "2029 Presentation of Skinner Award-Winning Social Justice Sermon". archive.uua.org. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
^ Crosby, Donald A. A Religion of Nature. amazon.com. ISBN 0791454541.
^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5tGpMcFF7U
^ The Promise of Religious Naturalism – Michael Hogue, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Sept.16, 2010, ISBN 0742562611
^ Rev. Dr. Jerome Stone's Presentation. "3062 Religious Naturalism: A New Theological Option". Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
^ "Introduction, page xviii" (PDF). Taylor's Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature.
^ How Grand a Narrative– Ursula Goodenough
^ " Epic, Story, Narrative – Bill Bruehl
^ How Grand a Narrative – Philip Hefner
^ "The Epic of Evolution". Taylor's Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. 2004.
^ Connie Barlow - The Epic of Evolution: Religious and cultural interpretations of modern scientific cosmology. Science & Spirit Archived 2006-05-23 at the Wayback Machine
^ "Thank God for Evolution". thankgodforevolution.com.
^ Eugenie Carol Scott, Niles Eldredge, Contributor Niles Eldredge, - Evolution Vs. Creationism: An Introduction, University of California Press, 2005, page 235, ISBN 0520246500 - [1]
^ John Haught - God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution, Westview Press, 2008ISBN 0813343704
^ Quotes of Berry and Hefner
^ Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, Houghton Mifflin 2006, pages 14,15,19
^ Loyal Rue, Nature is Enough, SUNY Press 2011, pages 116-122
^ Jerome A. Stone – Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative, State U. of New York Press (Dec 2008), pages 10, 11, 141,ISBN 0791475379
^ "Religious Naturalist Association". Retrieved September 17, 2015.
^ "Spiritual Naturalist Society". Retrieved February 22, 2018. Serving Religious and Spiritual Naturalists.
^ "Unitarian Universalist Religious Naturalists". Retrieved September 17, 2015.
^ "Religious Naturalism Facebook Group". Retrieved September 17, 2015.
^ "World Pantheism: The online community for naturalistic Pantheists". Retrieved June 24,2010.
^ Jerome A. Stone – Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative, State U. of New York Press, page 10 (Dec 2008)
^ Jerome A. Stone – Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative, State U. of New York Press, page 221 (Dec 2008)
^ A Jewish Perspective Archived 2009-01-17 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 2/15/2010
^ "Ian Lawton". Center for Progressive Christianity. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
^ "Ian Lawton's Page".
^ "Religious Naturalism Resources". Retrieved September 17, 2015.
^ "International Congress on Religious Naturalism". Retrieved September 17, 2015.
^ Template:Cite web name=web search "journal article religious naturalism"


Further reading[edit]
2015 – Donald A. Crosby – More Than Discourse: Symbolic Expressions of Naturalistic Faith, State University of New York Press, ISBN 1438453744
2015 – Nathan Martinez – Rise Like Lions: Language and The False Gods of Civilization, ISBN 1507509901
2008 – Donald A. Crosby – The Thou of Nature: Religious Naturalism and Reverence for Sentient Life, State University of New York Press, ISBN 1438446691
2011 – Loyal Rue – Nature Is Enough, State University of New York Press, ISBN 1438437994
2010 – Michael Hogue – The Promise of Religious Naturalism, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Sept.16, 2010, ISBN 0742562611
2009 – Michael Ruse & Joseph Travis – Evolution: The First Four Billion Years, Belknap Press, 2009, ISBN 067403175X
2008 – Donald A. Crosby – Living with Ambiguity: Religious Naturalism and the Menace of Evil, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0791475190
2008 – Michael Dowd – Thank God for Evolution:, Viking (June 2008), ISBN 0670020451
2008 – Chet Raymo – When God Is Gone, Everything Is Holy: The Making of a Religious Naturalist, Sorin Books, ISBN 1933495138
2008 – Kenneth R. Miller – Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul, Viking Adult, 2008, ISBN 067001883X
2008 – Eugenie C. Scott – Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction, Greenwood Press, ISBN 978-0313344275
2007 – Eric Chaisson – Epic of Evolution, Columbia University Press (March 2, 2007), ISBN 0231135610
2006 – John Haught – Is Nature Enough?, Cambridge University Press (May 31, 2006), ISBN 0521609933
2006 – Loyal Rue – Religion Is Not About God, Rutgers University Press, July 24, 2006, ISBN 0813539552
2004 – Gordon Kaufman – In the Beginning... Creativity, Augsburg Fortress Pub., 2004, ISBN 0800660935
2003 – James B. Miller – The Epic of Evolution: Science and Religion in Dialogue, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2003, ISBN 013093318X
2002 – Donald A. Crosby – A Religion of Nature – State University of New York Press, ISBN 0791454541
2000 – Ursula Goodenough – Sacred Depths of Nature, Oxford University Press, USA; 1 edition (June 15, 2000), ISBN 0195136292
2000 – John Stewart – Evolution's Arrow: The Direction of Evolution and the Future of Humanity, Chapman Press, 2000, ISBN 0646394975
1997 – Connie Barlow – Green Space Green Time: The Way of Science, Springer (September 1997), ISBN 0387947949
1992 – Brian Swimme – The Universe Story: From the Primordial Flaring Forth to the Ecozoic Era, HarperCollins, 1992, ISBN 0062508350

Reading lists – Evolution Reading Resources[permanent dead link], Books of the Epic of Evolution, Cosmic Evolution


External links[edit]
Look up religious naturalism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Religious naturalism

Religious Naturalist Association
Religious Naturalism
Religious Naturalism Resources Boston University
The Great Story leading RN educational website
Naturalism.org
The New Cosmology
SacredRiver.org
The Spiritual Naturalist Society

Quaker and Naturalist Too by Os Cresson, 2014 Book Review

Quaker and Naturalist too.doc

Book Review
Quaker and Naturalist Too
By Os Cresson 


For more than twenty years Os Cresson has been a leading light among nontheist Friends, his quiet, unassuming influence extending to Friends’ communities in the United States, Britain and beyond.

Os is a 100% Quaker, – and a one-hundred-per-cent naturalist without a trace of supernaturalism or mystical transcendentalism in his make-up. Not half-Quaker and half-atheist, not in two minds, nor standing with feet planted in two opposing camps, but “a person whose philosophies of science and religion and everything else, are bound to what we observe and what we infer from that”. 


Clear as he is about his own position (he quotes the Oxford English Dictionary definition of naturalism: “A view of the world, and of man’s relation to it, in which only the operation of natural [as opposed to supernatural or spiritual] laws and forces is admitted or assumed”) he is equally clear that this is only one position among many to be found in the modern, liberal, creedless Society of Friends. Os delights in this diversity and would have it no other way. Dogmatism is religion’s most relentless enemy within, and readers will find no trace of it in this book. 

Os has never thrust himself into the limelight. He has written for Friends Journal1
and contributed two classic essays to Godless for God’s Sake, the book which might be said to have given nontheist Quakerism lift-off when it was published in 2006. But many of his most valuable and insightful contributions have appeared in the transient medium of the internet, on the email forum  


nontheistfriends@googlegroups.com2
and the website 


www.nontheistfriends.org3
 




One reason for welcoming this book is that it snatches some of these gems from cyberspace and gives them new life on the printed page. 



The result is not only a powerful personal exposition of religious commitment free of outdated supernaturalism but also something of a handbook for nontheist Friends of all descriptions – naturalist, humanist, atheist, devout skeptic – and an eye-opener for Friends who have found it hard to reconcile godlessness with traditional Quaker metaphysics. Os starts with a short section on Quaker Unity, but I would recommend coming back to that after first taking in a truly wonderful
essay, Quakers from the Viewpoint of a Naturalist, which opens his second section. This is probably the best short statement of what it means to be a nontheist Friend that I have read anywhere. 


In a third section, Os digs deep into Quaker history to reveal a developing strand of Quaker dissent, or open-mindedness, which he characterises as the roots which eventually flowered into Quaker nontheism. Here he builds on one of his Godless for God’s Sake essays, starting with Gerrard  Winstanley and Jacob Bauthumley in the 17th century, moving on to 18th century “Quaker Skeptics” like John Bartram, the “proto-Hicksites” Job Scott, Abraham Shackleton, Hannah Barnard and Mary Newhall, and the Free Quakers of Philadelphia.



 In the 19th century he rediscovers David Duncan and the Manchester Free Friends, the Progressive and Congregational Friends of Longwood and New York, and the redoubtable Lucretia Mott (“I confess to great scepticism as to any account or story which conflicts with the unvarying natural laws of God and his creation”). Among several 20th century radicals he includes Henry Joel Cadbury,
historian, Biblical scholar, social activist (“I can describe myself as no ardent theist or atheist... My own religion is mainly neither emotional nor rational but expresses itself habitually, or occasionally in action”). 


This section concludes with an essay on Religious Naturalism in the Time of Fox. Os does not claim these giants for fully-developed naturalism or humanism, but offers them as examples of a freethinking movement at the heart of the Quaker tradition which paved the way to an inclusive Quakerism where today’s nontheist Friends can find themselves at home. Here he has made a most
valuable contribution to Quaker historiography, the more so since each entry is backed by source notes including an extensive bibliography.

No less valuable is the list of more than fifty recent books, pamphlets, articles and essays by Quaker nontheists which brings the book to a close.

This combination of exposition and resource manual makes Quaker and Naturalist a must-read both for Friends already committed to a nontheist viewpoint and others willing to explore adventurously what it might mean to be both religious and godless, Quaker and atheist. I cannot recommend it too highly. 


David Boulton 
---

Quaker and Naturalist Too – by Os Cresson, 2014 

published by Morning Walk Press, Iowa City, Iowa,
USA. ISBN 978-0-9914344-0-4 


----------

 1 Friends Journal is an American publication. 

2 An open forum set up by James Riemermann of the US 

3 A US web site set up by James Riemermann.