2022/09/25

John Shelby Spong - Wikipedia

John Shelby Spong - Wikipedia

John Shelby Spong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

John Shelby Spong
Bishop Emeritus of Newark
Bishop John Shelby Spong portrait 2006.png
Spong in 2006
ChurchEpiscopal Church
ProvinceProvince 2
DioceseNewark
In office1979–2000
PredecessorGeorge Rath
SuccessorJohn P. Croneberger
Orders
OrdinationDecember 1955
by Edwin A. Penick
ConsecrationJune 12, 1976
by John Allin
Personal details
BornJune 16, 1931
DiedSeptember 12, 2021 (aged 90)
Richmond, Virginia, US
NationalityAmerican
DenominationAnglican
ParentsJohn Shelby Spong, Doolie Boyce Griffith
SpouseJoan Lydia Ketner (m. 1952, d. 1988)
Christine Mary Bridger (m. 1990)
Children5
Previous post(s)Coadjutor Bishop of Newark (1976–1979)
Alma materUniversity of North Carolina
Virginia Theological Seminary
Websitejohnshelbyspong.com

John Shelby "JackSpong (June 16, 1931 – September 12, 2021) was an American bishop of the Episcopal Church. From 1979 to 2000, he was the Bishop of Newark, New Jersey. A liberal Christian theologian, religion commentator, and author, he called for a fundamental rethinking of Christian belief away from theism and traditional doctrines.[1]

Early life and career[edit]

Spong was born in Charlotte, North Carolina, and educated in public schools there. He attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he was elected to the Phi Beta Kappa honor society and graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1952. He received his Master of Divinity degree from the Virginia Theological Seminary in 1955. He has had honorary Doctor of Divinity degrees conferred on him by Virginia Theological Seminary and Saint Paul's College, Virginia, as well as an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters conferred by Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania.

In 2005, he wrote: "[I have] immerse[d] myself in contemporary Biblical scholarship at such places as Union Theological Seminary in New York City, Yale Divinity SchoolHarvard Divinity School and the storied universities in EdinburghOxford and Cambridge."[2]

Spong served as rector of St. Joseph's Church in Durham, North Carolina, from 1955 to 1957; rector of Calvary Parish, Tarboro, North Carolina, from 1957 to 1965; rector of St. John's Church in Lynchburg, Virginia, from 1965 to 1969; and rector of St. Paul's Church in Richmond, Virginia, from 1969 to 1976. He held visiting positions and gave lectures at major American theological institutions, most prominently at Harvard Divinity School. He retired in 2000. As a retired bishop, he was a member of the Episcopal Church's House of Bishops.[3]

Spong was one of the first American bishops to ordain a woman into the clergy, in 1977, and he was the first to ordain an openly gay man, Robert Williams, in 1989. Later the church followed his lead. An Episcopal court ruled that homosexuality was not counter to its principles in 1996, and the church recognized same-sex marriages in 2015.[4]

Spong described his own life as a journey from the literalism and conservative theology of his childhood to an expansive view of Christianity. In a 2013 interview, Spong credited the Anglican bishop John Robinson as his mentor in this journey and said reading Robinson's writings in the 1960s led to a friendship and mentoring relationship with him over many years.[5] Spong also honors Robinson as a mentor in the opening pages of his 2002 book A New Christianity for a New World.

Recipient of many awards, including 1999 Humanist of the Year,[6] Spong was a contributor to the Living the Questions DVD program and was a guest on numerous national television broadcasts (including The Today ShowPolitically Incorrect with Bill Maher, Dateline60 Minutes, and Larry King Live). Spong's calendar had him lecturing around the world.[7] Spong was the cousin of the United States Senator from Virginia William B. Spong Jr.

According to The Episcopal Diocese of Newark, Bishop Spong suffered a stroke before a speaking engagement in Marquette, Michigan, on Saturday, September 10, 2016.[8]

Writings[edit]

Spong's writings rely on Biblical and non-Biblical sources and were influenced by modern critical analysis of these sources (see especially Spong, 1991). He is representative of a stream of thought with roots in the medieval universalism of Peter Abelard and the existentialism of Paul Tillich, whom he called his favorite theologian.[9]

A prominent theme in Spong's writing was that the popular and literal interpretations of Christian scripture are not sustainable and do not speak honestly to the situation of modern Christian communities. He believed in a more nuanced approach to scripture, informed by scholarship and compassion, which can be consistent with both Christian tradition and contemporary understandings of the universe. He believed that theism had lost credibility as a valid conception of God's nature. He stated that he was a Christian because he believes that Jesus Christ fully expressed the presence of a God of compassion and selfless love and that this is the meaning of the early Christian proclamation, "Jesus is Lord" (Spong, 1994 and Spong, 1991). Elaborating on this last idea, he affirmed that Jesus was adopted by God as his son (Born of a Woman 1992), and he says that this would be the way God was fully incarnated in Jesus Christ.[1] He rejects the historical truth claims of some Christian doctrines, such as the virgin birth (Spong, 1992) and the bodily resurrection of Jesus (Spong, 1994). In 2000, Spong was a critic of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Roman Catholic Church's declaration Dominus Iesus, because it reaffirmed the Catholic doctrine that the Roman Catholic Church is the one true Church and that Jesus Christ is the one and only savior for humanity.[10]

Spong was a strong proponent of the church reflecting the changes in society at large.[11] Towards these ends, he called for a new Reformation, in which many of Christianity's basic doctrines should be reformulated.[1]

Bishop John Shelby Spong portrait 2006.png
John Shelby SpongTwitter
@JohnShelbySpong

God is not a noun, that demands to be defined, God is a verb that invites us to live, to love and to be.

Apr 20, 2015[12]

His views on the future of Christianity were "that we have to start where we are. As I look at the history of religion, I observe that new religious insights always and only emerge from the old traditions as they begin to die. It is not by pitching the old insights out but by journeying deeply through them into new visions that we are able to change religion's direction. The creeds were 3rd- and 4th-century love songs that people composed to sing to their understanding of God. We do not have to literalize their words to perceive their meaning or their intention to join in the singing of their creedal song. I think religion in general and Christianity in particular must always be evolving. Forcing the evolution is the dialog between yesterday's words and today's knowledge. The sin of Christianity is that any of us ever claimed that we had somehow captured eternal truth in the forms we had created."[13]

Spong debated Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig on the resurrection of Jesus.[when?][citation needed]

In 1991's Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism: A Bishop Rethinks the Meaning of Scripture, Spong argued that St. Paul was homosexual, a theme that was satirized in Gore Vidal's novel Live from Golgotha.

"Points for Reform" of Christianity[edit]

Spong during CrossWalk America, 2006

Spong's "Twelve Points for Reform" were originally published in The Voice, the newsletter of the Diocese of Newark, in 1998.[14] Spong elaborated on them in his book A New Christianity for a New World:

  1. Theism, as a way of defining God, is dead. So most theological God-talk is today meaningless. A new way to speak of God must be found.
  2. Since God can no longer be conceived in theistic terms, it becomes nonsensical to seek to understand Jesus as the incarnation of the theistic deity. So the Christology of the ages is bankrupt.
  3. The Biblical story of the perfect and finished creation from which human beings fell into sin is pre-Darwinian mythology and post-Darwinian nonsense.
  4. The virgin birth, understood as literal biology, makes Christ's divinity, as traditionally understood, impossible.
  5. The miracle stories of the New Testament can no longer be interpreted in a post-Newtonian world as supernatural events performed by an incarnate deity.
  6. The view of the cross as the sacrifice for the sins of the world is a barbarian idea based on primitive concepts of God and must be dismissed.
  7. Resurrection is an action of God. Jesus was raised into the meaning of God. It therefore cannot be a physical resuscitation occurring inside human history.
  8. The story of the Ascension assumed a three-tiered universe and is therefore not capable of being translated into the concepts of a post-Copernican space age.
  9. There is no external, objective, revealed standard written in scripture or on tablets of stone that will govern our ethical behavior for all time.
  10. Prayer cannot be a request made to a theistic deity to act in human history in a particular way.
  11. The hope for life after death must be separated forever from the behavior control mentality of reward and punishment. The Church must abandon, therefore, its reliance on guilt as a motivator of behavior.
  12. All human beings bear God's image and must be respected for what each person is. Therefore, no external description of one's being, whether based on raceethnicitygender or sexual orientation, can properly be used as the basis for either rejection or discrimination.

Criticism[edit]

Spong claimed that his writings evoked both great support and great condemnation from differing segments of the Christian church.[15]

New Testament Catholic scholar Raymond E. Brown was critical of Spong's scholarship, referring to his studies as "amateur night".[16] Spong frequently praised Brown's scholarship, though the affection was not returned, with Brown having commented that "Spong is complimentary in what he writes of me as a NT scholar; ... I hope I am not ungracious if in return I remark that I do not think that a single NT author would recognize Spong's Jesus as the figure being proclaimed or written about."[17]

Spong's ideas have been criticized by some other theologians, notably in 1998 by Rowan Williams, the Bishop of Monmouth, who later became the Archbishop of Canterbury. Williams described Spong's Twelve Points for Reform as embodying "confusion and misinterpretation".[18]

During a speaking tour in Australia in 2001, Spong was banned by Peter Hollingworth, the Archbishop of Brisbane, from speaking at churches in the diocese. The tour coincided with Hollingworth leaving the diocese to become the Governor-General of Australia. Hollingworth said that it was not an appropriate moment for Spong to "engage congregations in matters that could prove theologically controversial".[19][20] After Spong's book Jesus for the Non-Religious was published in 2007, Peter Jensen, the Archbishop of Sydney, banned Spong from preaching at any churches in his diocese. By contrast, Phillip Aspinall, the Primate of Australia, invited Spong in 2007 to deliver two sermons at St John's CathedralBrisbane.[21]

Mark Tooley, a Methodist who is president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, a think tank noted for its critique of liberal religious groups, criticized Spong in 2010 as "brandishing the stale theologies and ideologies of a half-century ago".[22] Following Spong's death, Tooley told The Washington Times that "he [Spong] claimed that he was making religion relevant for a new generation who could not believe in the supernatural, often citing his daughters. But the irony was that as he was making his case, modernity was ending and postmodernity starting, and his rationalist perspective became passé. There was new openness to the supernatural."[23]

Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, described Spong's teaching as constituting the historic definition of heresy, having "denied virtually every major Christian doctrine."[24]

Death[edit]

Spong died in sleep at his home in Richmond, Virginia, on September 12, 2021, at the age of 90.[25] The notice was announced by the St. Paul's Episcopal Church in Richmond, Virginia, where Spong had once been a pastor.[26][27]

Publications[edit]

  • 1973 – Honest PrayerISBN 1-878282-18-2
  • 1974 – This Hebrew LordISBN 0-06-067520-9
  • 1975 – ChristpowerISBN 1-878282-11-5
  • 1975 – Dialogue: In Search of Jewish-Christian Understanding (co-authored with Rabbi Jack Daniel Spiro), ISBN 1-878282-16-6
  • 1976 – Life Approaches Death: A Dialogue on Ethics in Medicine
  • 1977 – The Living CommandmentsISBN 1-878282-17-4
  • 1980 – The Easter MomentISBN 1-878282-15-8
  • 1983 – Into the Whirlwind: The Future of the ChurchISBN 1-878282-13-1
  • 1986 – Beyond Moralism: A Contemporary View of the Ten Commandments (co-authored with Denise G. Haines, Archdeacon), ISBN 1-878282-14-X
  • 1987 – Consciousness and Survival: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry into the Possibility of Life Beyond Biological Death (edited by John S. Spong, introduction by Claiborne Pell), ISBN 0-943951-00-3
  • 1988 – Living in Sin? A Bishop Rethinks Human SexualityISBN 0-06-067507-1
  • 1991 – Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism: A Bishop Rethinks the Meaning of ScriptureISBN 0-06-067518-7
  • 1992 – Born of a Woman: A Bishop Rethinks the Birth of JesusISBN 0-06-067523-3
  • 1994 – Resurrection: Myth or Reality? A Bishop's Search for the Origins of ChristianityISBN 0-06-067546-2
  • 1996 – Liberating the Gospels: Reading the Bible with Jewish EyesISBN 0-06-067557-8
  • 1999 – Why Christianity Must Change or Die: A Bishop Speaks to Believers In ExileISBN 0-06-067536-5
  • 2001 – Here I Stand: My Struggle for a Christianity of Integrity, Love and EqualityISBN 0-06-067539-X
  • 2002 – God in Us: A Case for Christian Humanism (with Anthony Freeman), ISBN 978-0907845171
  • 2002 – A New Christianity for a New World: Why Traditional Faith Is Dying and How a New Faith Is Being BornISBN 0-06-067063-0
  • 2005 – The Sins of Scripture: Exposing the Bible's Texts of Hate to Reveal the God of LoveISBN 0-06-076205-5
  • 2007 – Jesus for the Non-ReligiousISBN 0-06-076207-1
  • 2009 – Eternal Life: A New Vision: Beyond Religion, Beyond Theism, Beyond Heaven and HellISBN 0-06-076206-3
  • 2011 – Re-claiming the Bible for a Non-Religious WorldISBN 978-0-06-201128-2
  • 2013 – The Fourth Gospel: Tales of a Jewish MysticISBN 978-0-06-201130-5
  • 2016 – Biblical Literalism: A Gentile HeresyISBN 978-0-06-236230-8
  • 2018 – Unbelievable: Why Neither Ancient Creeds Nor the Reformation Can Produce a Living Faith TodayISBN 0-06-264129-8

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c Interview. ABC Radio Australia, June 17, 2001
  2. ^ John Shelby Spong, The Sins of Scripture, HarperCollins 2005, page xi
  3. ^ The General Convention of the Episcopal Church: House of Bishops Archived 2014-10-10 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Risen, Clay (19 September 2021). "John Shelby Spong, 90, Dies; Sought to Open Up the Episcopal Church"The New York Times. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  5. ^ "The retired Bishop John Shelby Spong interview", Read the Spirit website, 23 June 2013.
  6. ^ "The Humanist Foundation". Churchofhumanism.org. Retrieved 2011-05-23.
  7. ^ Speaking calendar
  8. ^ "Former Newark Episcopal bishop Spong suffers stroke"NJ.com. 13 September 2016.
  9. ^ "Challenging the 'Sins of Scripture'". Interview with Bill O'Reilly. April 14, 2005.
  10. ^ Shelby, John (2010-11-05). "Dominus Iesus: The Voice of Rigor Mortis". Beliefnet.com. Retrieved 2011-05-23.
  11. ^ Liberal Bible-ThumpingThe New York Times, May 15, 2005
  12. ^ John Shelby Spong [@JohnShelbySpong] (Apr 20, 2015). "God is not a noun, that demands to be defined, God is a verb that invites us to live, to love and to be" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  13. ^ Q & A for 2-14-2013 – electronic newsletter, A New Christianity For a New World, https://progressingspirit.com/
  14. ^ A Call for a New Reformation
  15. ^ Spong, John Shelby (2000) Here I Stand: My Struggle for a Christianity of Integrity, Love and Equality (Harper Collins), pp. 1–2.
  16. ^ Brown, Raymond E. (1997). An Introduction to the New Testament. Doubleday.
  17. ^ Brown, Raymond E. (1992). The Birth of the Messiah: a commentary on the infancy narratives in Matthew and Luke. Doubleday.
  18. ^ Williams, Rowan (1998-07-17). "No life, here – no joy, terror or tears"Church Times. Anglican Ecumenical Society. Archived from the original on 2010.
  19. ^ "Anglican Church snubs Bishop". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 25 Jun 2001. Retrieved 5 Jan 2016.
  20. ^ "Fear of ideas: The decline and fall of Anglicanism"The Guardian. 7 Jul 2001. Retrieved 5 Jan 2016.
  21. ^ "Sydney Archbishop Jensen bans John Shelby Spong"The Australian. 14 Aug 2007. Retrieved 5 Jan 2016.
  22. ^ Tooley, Mark (March 25, 2010). "My Evening with Bishop John Shelby Spong"www.catholicity.com. InsideCatholic.com. Retrieved 23 Aug 2014.
  23. ^ Kellner, Mark A (September 12, 2021). "John Shelby Spong, liberal Episcopal bishop, dies at age 90"The Washington Times. Retrieved 2022-01-09.
  24. ^ Heresy in the Cathedral
  25. ^ Risen, Clay (September 19, 2021). "John Shelby Spong, 90, Dies; Sought to Open Up the Episcopal Church"The New York Times. Retrieved September 19, 2021.
  26. ^ Mark A. Kellner (September 12, 2021). "John Shelby Spong, liberal Episcopal bishop, dies at age 90"The Washington Times. Retrieved September 12, 2021.
  27. ^ Bob Smietana (September 12, 2021). "Bishop John Shelby Spong, firebrand who championed LGBTQ inclusion, has died"Religion News Service. Retrieved September 12, 2021.

External links[edit]

2022/09/24

[김조년] 현대문명생활과 에너지 문제 (1) < 칼럼 < 금강일보

[김조년의 맑고 낮은 목소리] 현대문명생활과 에너지 문제 (1) < 칼럼 < 오피니언 < 기사본문 - 금강일보


[김조년의 맑고 낮은 목소리] 현대문명생활과 에너지 문제 (1)
입력 2022.09.20

한남대 명예교수

인류역사에서 불(에너지)을 발견하여 사용하게 된 것은 누가 보아도 인간의 삶을 완전히 바꾸어 놓은 거대한 사건이다. 불 사용을 경험한 인류는 끊임없이 불, 곧 에너지개발과 진화에 어마어마한 힘을 쏟았다.

에너지의 원료가 되는 것들이 끊임없이 발굴되었고 개발되었다. 그 중 인류문명 전환에 커다란 획을 그은 것들이 나무들과 풀들을 말려서 사용하던 것을 넘어 화석연료들, 즉 석탄과 석유자원을 활용한 일이다. 그 다음에 나타난 것이 천연가스다. 그것들의 끝없는 활용범위가 넓어지고 커지면서 인류의 물질충족효과가 커졌다.

안락한 삶을 보장하는 생산성의 확장은 두 가지 큰 문제에 봉착하게 되었다. 하나는 그것들을 사용하면서 나타나는 오염문제요 다른 하나는 자원의 고갈문제다. 모든 인류의 생활분야에서 에너지활용량이 항상 그리고 계속하여 급격히 증가하면서 오염증가와 자원고갈문제 역시 함께 커지기 시작하였다.

거기에 따른 비용이 계속하여 상승하였다. 그래서 깨끗하고 비용이 적게 드는 에너지원을 찾는 것이 중요하게 되었다. 그것이 핵에너지다. 핵발전소가 상당히 빠른 속도로 건설되어 전기에너지를 공급하는 것이 아주 놀랍게 확보되었다. 깨끗한 에너지라고 선전되고 알려졌다.

그러나 이산화탄소배출은 없지만, 방사능오염과 위험을 극복할 길은 거의 없다고 판명되기 시작하였다. 특히 핵발전을 한 다음에 남는 핵재를 안전하게 처리하거나 보관할 능력을 확보한 기술은 지금까지 개발되지 않았다. 땅속이나 바닷속에 임시 저장하는 정도에 지나지 않는다.

그 저장소들도 곧 한계에 부딪힌다고 한다. 장구한 세월 동안 방사능오염은 축적될 것이란 것이 일반상식이 되었다. 그래서 끊임없이 논의되고 찾아진 것이 신재생에너지다.

오늘날 기후위기의 차원에서 볼 때, 세계 어디에서나 화석연료의 사용은 곧 중단되어야 한다는 것은 다 알려진 사실이다. 그래서 모든 생산품에서 화석연료를 사용하지 않는다는 증명, 즉 이산화탄소를 배출하지 않는 깨끗한 에너지를 사용하였다는 확실한 증명이 없으면 수출입이 불가능하게 되었다.

산업구조 자체가 달라져야 한다는 뜻이다. 이것은 인류문명의 딜레마다. 그것을 극복하기 위하여 끊임없이 개발되고 논의되는 것이 다시 말하지만 이른바 신재생에너지다. 바람과 물과 태양과 수소와 생물(바이오)에너지다.

물론 이 중 바람과 물을 이용한 에너지 생산은 매우 오래된 것들이다. 다만 사용이 불편하고 에너지 생산이 대량으로 지속하여 나오지 않는다는 단점을 가지고 있었다. 그래서 나온 것이 화석연료와 핵을 사용한 에너지생산이었지만, 지금 그것들은 상상을 초월하는 위험을 걱정하게 만들었다.

정부에 따라서 에너지 정책이 왔다갔다 한 것이 많다. 그 중 특히 크게 쟁점이 되는 것이 핵에너지와 신재생에너지다. 우선 핵에너지에 대한 논쟁은 끝없는 줄다리기 게임으로 이어진다. 에너지생산과 자본의 카르텔은 끝없는 문제로 등장한다.


그것을 넘어 위험의 문제는 깊게 생각할 일이다. 지진과 화산폭발과 전쟁과 끝없는 태풍이 다가와 핵발전소를 뒤집을 가능성은 항상 있다는 점이다.

그래서 이런 논의는 널리 알려진 결론이다. ‘1. 상상 가능한 사고는 반드시 일어난다는 것, 2. 사고가 일어날 때는 안전장치가 작동하지 않는다는 것, 3. 사고는 예상치 못한 때 예상치 못한 원인으로 예상치 못한 결과를 낳는다는 것이다.’ 체르노빌과 후쿠시마 핵발전소 폭발 사고는 바로 이 점을 그대로 증명해 주고 있다.

그래서 정권의 변화와 상관없이 상당히 빠르고 안전하게 그리고 지속하여 탈핵으로 가는 길을 찾는 것이 옳다고 나는 본다. 그 옳은 것을 실천하기 위하여는 신재생에너지 정책이 치밀하고 안전하게 이루어져야 한다고 나는 생각한다. 이것은 평화의 문제와 함께 정권을 넘는 광범위하고 솔직한 논의를 거친 결과로 나와야 할 것이다.

그런 의미로 본다면 최근에 대통령도 개탄스럽다고 말하고 정부에서도 문제로 삼으면서 감사원이 철저히 감사하겠다는 태양광발전시설확장과 관련된 부정을 캐내는 문제는 심각하게 중요하다.

물론 잘못된 것을 밝히고 책임을 묻는 것은 철저하게 해야 한다. 그러나 그것 때문에 신재생에너지개발의 필요성과 공급에 대한 흐름을 끊는 방향으로 가는 것은 안 된다. 우선 잘못을 잘 파악하고 그것을 극복할 수 있는 길을 찾는 것이 중요할 것이다. 그 대신 태양광발전의 공급을 끝없이 확대하는 것이 중요하다고 본다.

산림이나 농지를 훼손하는 것은 안 된다. 그 대신 활용가능한 곳을 최대한으로 찾을 필요가 있다. 내가 보기엔 고속도로나 고속도로 주변의 경사면, 노천주차장, 그리고 모든 건축물의 옥상과 벽들을 활용할 수 있을 것이다. 이미 만들어진 건물들에 새롭게 시설하는 것은 비용도 별도로 들고 미관상 아름답게 보이지 않을 수도 있다.

그러나 새로 건축할 건축물들에 대하여는 태양광발전시설을 강력하게 추진할 필요가 있다고 본다. 그렇게 하려면 기술이 탁월하게 개발되어 아름답고 작고 효율이 높은 다양한 형태의 태양광전기 패널이 개발되어야 할 것이다. 다양한 색깔과 모양으로 아름다운 지붕을 조성할 수도 있을 것이다.

이러한 것들은 어느 시기까지 하겠다는 조급함을 버리고, 정권의 바뀜과 상관없이 지속되는 안전한 에너지확보정책으로 나가야 할 것이다. 깨끗하고 안전하면서 지역중심의 에너지정책은 필수조건이라고 본다.